Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial

Bevacizumab/PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitor or bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). Methods: We retrospectively collected data for patients with advanced nsNSCLC who underwent first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitor or bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (IC and BC groups). Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted to balance covariates. Results: 278 patients were enrolled, after PSM (n = 104/group), the objective response rate was 45.1% and 24.0% in the IC and BC groups (p = 0.001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.5 and 8.2 months (p = 0.007), and duration of response was 14.8 versus 8.1 months (p = 0.007), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the PFS for those patients with PD-L1≥1% (16.2 vs 6.8 months, p = 0.000) was significantly longer in the IC group than that in BC group, but not in the PD-L1<1% subgroup (8.9 vs12.7 months, p = 0.719). Conclusion: PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy was superior to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced nsNSCLC, which is debatable for patients with PD-L1<1%.

Personalized Treatment for Patients With Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the most common cause of death among all types of cancer in Germany, with an annual death rate of 45 000 patients. Over the past 15 years, innovations in diagnosis and treatment have prolonged the survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in all tumor stages.

METHODS

This review of the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer is based on current national and international guidelines, and on prospective trials with the highest possible level of evidence that were retrieved by a selective search of the literature.

RESULTS

Improved outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (85% of new diagnoses) were achieved with the aid of precise diagnostic techniques, including functional imaging and endobronchial procedures for localized disease stage. Contemporary surgical and radio-oncological technologies reduce the morbidity and expand the boundaries of local therapy. Molecular pathology, including the assessment of predictive biomarkers, is an integral part of the diagnostic evaluation of non-small-cell lung cancer in all tumor stages; it enables stratified cytotoxic/molecularly targeted treatments and immunotherapies and improves patient-reported outcomes. The percentage of long-term survivors in the metastatic stage has doubled by the introduction of immunotherapy. In contrast, there has been no major improvement in the survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer (15% of new diagnoses).

CONCLUSION

In addition to the implementation of lung cancer screening in high-risk populations, the further development and consistent implementation of personalized diagnosis and treatment in certified lung cancer centers can be expected to prolong survival and improve the patients' quality of life.

Regulation of VEGFR2 and AKT Signaling by Musashi-2 in Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer type and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents most of the diagnoses of lung cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) is a member of the VEGF family of receptor tyrosine kinase proteins, which are expressed on both endothelial and tumor cells, are one of the key proteins contributing to cancer development, and are involved in drug resistance. We previously showed that Musashi-2 (MSI2) RNA-binding protein is associated with NSCLC progression by regulating several signaling pathways relevant to NSCLC. In this study, we performed Reverse Protein Phase Array (RPPA) analysis of murine lung cancer, which suggests that VEGFR2 protein is strongly positively regulated by MSI2. Next, we validated VEGFR2 protein regulation by MSI2 in several human lung adenocarcinoma cell line models. Additionally, we found that MSI2 affected AKT signaling via negative PTEN mRNA translation regulation. In silico prediction analysis suggested that both VEGFR2 and PTEN mRNAs have predicted binding sites for MSI2. We next performed RNA immunoprecipitation coupled with quantitative PCR, which confirmed that MSI2 directly binds to VEGFR2 and PTEN mRNAs, suggesting a direct regulation mechanism. Finally, MSI2 expression positively correlated with VEGFR2 and VEGF-A protein levels in human lung adenocarcinoma samples. We conclude that the MSI2/VEGFR2 axis contributes to lung adenocarcinoma progression and is worth further investigations and therapeutic targeting.

Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel monotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor administration for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter Phase 2 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Whether immunotherapy improves the efficacy or worsens adverse events of subsequent chemotherapy remains unclear. We performed a Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as a treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment with programmed cell death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitor failure.

METHODS

Nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m² ) was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle to patients with advanced NSCLC within 12 weeks after the failure of PD-(L)1 inhibitor treatment. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in all patients; the secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty cases were registered, and 29 cases were included in the analysis. The ORR was 55.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.1%-79.6%) and the DCR was 86.2% (95% CI: 65.9%-97.0%). The median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4-6.7 months), and PFS rates at 1- and 2-year timepoints were 34.5% and 13.3%, respectively. The median OS was 11.9 months (95% CI: 0.8-23.0 months). Good performance status and responder of previous PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy were independent predictors of PFS. Grade 3 or higher toxicities included leukopenia (27.6%), neutropenia (31.0%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (6.9%), increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels (3.4%), and interstitial lung disease (3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nab-paclitaxel therapy improved ORR after PD-(L)1 inhibitor treatment failure with a durable response of 13% and acceptable toxicities in patients with advanced NSCLC.

αVEGFR2-MICA fusion antibodies enhance immunotherapy effect and synergize with PD-1 blockade

Antiangiogenic therapy has shown significant clinical benefits in gastric cancer (GC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, their effectiveness is limited by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. The MHC class I chain-related molecules A and B (MICA/B) are expressed in many human cancers, enabling elimination of cancer cells by cytotoxic lymphocytes through natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) receptor activation. To improve antiangiogenic therapy and prolong its efficacy, we generated a bi-specific fusion protein (mAb04-MICA). This was comprised of an antibody targeting VEGFR2 fused to a MICA α1-α2 ectodomain. mAb04-MICA inhibited proliferation of GC and NSCLC cells through specific binding to VEGFR2 and had superior anti-tumor efficacy in both GC and NSCLC-bearing mouse models compared with ramucirumab. Further investigation revealed that the mAb04-MICA promoted NKG2D⁺ NK cell activation and induced the tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) polarization from M2 type to M1 type both in vitro and in vivo. The polarization of TAMs upon NKG2D and MICA mediated activation has not yet been reported. Moreover, given the up-regulation of PD-L1 in tumors during anti-angiogenesis therapy, anti-PD-1 antibody enhanced the anti-tumoral activity of mAb04-MICA through stimulating infiltration and activation of NKs and CD8⁺T cells in responding tumors. Our findings demonstrate that dual targeting of angiogenesis and NKG2D, or in combination with the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, is a promising anti-tumor therapeutic strategy. This is accomplished through maintaining or reinstating tumor immunosurveillance during treatment, which expands the repertoire of anti-angiogenesis-based cancer immunotherapies.

Effect and outcomes analysis of anlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients with liver metastasis: results from the ALTER 0303 phase 3 randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

Liver metastasis (LM) is common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and always predicted worse outcomes with no effective therapy. We aimed to evaluate the effects and prognosis in LM patients treated with anlotinib.

METHODS

The present study is a post hoc analysis based on a multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 randomized clinical trial which designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC. A total of 437 patients were enrolled in present study, and 78 patients with LM.

RESULTS

Patients with LM showed a worse outcome compared to those without LM (PFS median, 2.6 vs 4.2 months), and OS (median, 5.6 vs 9.4 months, both P < 0.0001). The anlotinib was associated with longer PFS (median, 3.0 months) compared with placebo (median, 0.9 months), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.23 (95%CI, 0.12-0.42; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, OS was marginally significantly better in anlotinib group (median 6.6 months), compared with placebo (median 4.0 months), HR 0.61 (95%CI, 0.36-1.02; P = 0.055). Multivariate analysis confirmed normal peripheral blood LDH/TBiL level predicted better PFS and OS, lower ECOG score acted as independently prognostic factor for superior OS. Anlotinib was more associated with hand-foot syndrome (7.7% vs 0) and serum TSH level rise (7.7% vs 3.8%) and well tolerated, all AEs were no more than grade 3.

CONCLUSION

Patients with LM had a dismal prognosis, anlotinib could lead to a better PFS in pretreated NSCLC patients, which suggested anlotinib is a potential third-line or further therapy in these patients.

First-in-human, phase I study of AK109, an anti-VEGFR2 antibody in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) plays a key role in antiangiogenesis which has been an essential strategy for cancer treatment. We report the first-in-human study of AK109, a novel anti-VEGFR2 monoclonal antibody, to characterize the safety profile and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) properties, and explore the preliminary antitumor efficacy in patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, phase I study, including dose escalation and dose expansion (NCT04547205). Patients with advanced cancers were treated 2 and 3 weekly with escalating doses of AK109. A 3 + 3 design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Blood was sampled for PK/PD analysis. The primary endpoint was safety and recommended phase II dose (RP2D).

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. However, 38 patients reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 10 patients. The most common TRAEs were proteinuria (n = 24, 60%), hypertension (n = 13, 32.5%), increased aspartate transaminase (n = 11, 27.5%), thrombopenia (n = 10, 25%), and anemia (n = 10, 25%). A total of 28 patients (70%) reported adverse events of special interest (AESIs). The most common AESIs were proteinuria (60%), hypertension (32.5%), and hemorrhage (32.5%), mainly including gum bleeding and urethrorrhagia. AK109 exhibited an approximately linear PK exposure with dose escalation at 2-12 mg/kg. PD analyses showed rapid target engagement. Among the 40 patients, 4 achieved partial response and 21 achieved stable disease with an objective response rate of 10% and a disease control rate of 62.5%. Based on the safety profile, the PK/PD profile, and preliminary antitumor activities, 12 mg/kg Q2W and 15 mg/kg Q3W were selected as RP2D.

CONCLUSIONS

AK109 showed manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity, supporting further clinical development in a large population.

Sequencing strategies with ramucirumab and docetaxel following prior treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Ramucirumab (RAM) and docetaxel (DOC) are commonly used after first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, we aimed to elucidate sequencing strategies of RAM and DOC following prior treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), cytotoxic agent (CTx) alone, bevacizumab (BEV), and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

METHODS

We recruited patients with NSCLC who received RAM and DOC and compared the groups with and without prior ICI, CTx alone, BEV, and TKI, respectively. By tumor response to such treatments, the patients were further classified into "complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)," "stable disease," and "progressive disease" groups, respectively. We compared RAM and DOC efficacy among these groups.

RESULTS

In total, 237 patients were registered. In the group with prior ICI, the objective response rate and disease control rate were significantly higher than those without prior ICI (p = 0.012 and 0.028, respectively), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was also significantly longer (p = 0.027). There were no significant differences in PFS between the groups with and without CTx alone, BEV, and TKI. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior ICI was an independent factor associated with better PFS. Furthermore, the prior ICI group with CR + PR significantly prolonged PFS compared to the group without prior ICI (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

RAM and DOC may be preferably administered after ICI, rather than after CTx alone, BEV, or TKI, and, furthermore, enhanced if the prior ICI has a favorable tumor response.

Regulation of VEGFR2 and AKT signaling by Musashi-2 in lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer type and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents most of the lung cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) is a member of the VEGF family of receptor tyrosine kinase proteins, expressed on both endothelial and tumor cells which is one of the key proteins contributing to cancer development and involved in drug resistance. We previously showed that Musashi-2 (MSI2) RNA-binding protein is associated with NSCLC progression by regulating several signaling pathways relevant to NSCLC. In this study, we performed Reverse Protein Phase Array (RPPA) analysis of murine lung cancer which nominated VEGFR2 protein as strongly positively regulated by MSI2. Next, we validated VEGFR2 protein regulation by MSI2 in several human NSCLC cell line models. Additionally, we found that MSI2 affected AKT signaling via negative PTEN mRNA translation regulation. In silico prediction analysis suggested that both VEGFR2 and PTEN mRNAs have predicted binding sites for MSI2. We next performed RNA immunoprecipitation coupled with quantitative PCR which confirmed that MSI2 directly binds to VEGFR2 and PTEN mRNAs, suggesting direct regulation mechanism. Finally, MSI2 expression positively correlated with VEGFR2 and VEGF-A protein levels in human NSCLC samples. We conclude that MSI2/VEGFR2 axis contributes to NSCLC progression and is worth further investigations and therapeutic targeting.

Anti-angiogenic agents for NSCLC following first-line immunotherapy: Rationale, recent updates, and future perspectives

The implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with or without chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for patients who do not have actionable mutations has proved to be a major paradigm shift in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the transition of ICIs, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, to a first-line setting has left an unmet need for effective second-line treatment options, which is an area of intense research. In 2020, we reviewed the biological and mechanistic rationale for anti-angiogenic agents in combination with, or following, immunotherapy with the aim of eliciting a so called 'angio-immunogenic' switch in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the latest clinical evidence of the benefits of incorporating anti-angiogenic agents into treatment regimens. While there is a paucity of prospective data, several recent observational studies indicate that the marketed anti-angiogenic drugs, nintedanib or ramucirumab, are effective in combination with docetaxel following immuno-chemotherapy. Addition of anti-angiogenics, like bevacizumab, have also demonstrated clinical benefit when combined with first-line immuno-chemotherapy regimens. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing these agents in combination with ICIs, with encouraging early results (e.g., ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab in LUNG-MAP S1800A). Also, several emerging anti-angiogenic agents combined with ICIs are currently being assessed in phase III trials following immunotherapy, including lenvatinib (LEAP-008), and sitravatinib (SAPPHIRE) It is hoped that these trials will help expand second-line treatment options in patients with NSCLC. Areas of focus in the future will include further molecular dissection of the mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy and the various response-progression profiles to immunotherapy observed in the clinic and the monitoring of the dynamics of immunomodulation over the course of treatment. Improved understanding of these phenomena may help identify clinical biomarkers and inform the optimal use of anti-angiogenics in the treatment of individual patients.

Impact of ramucirumab pharmacokinetics in combination with docetaxel on the efficacy and survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody, has been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its pharmacokinetic properties in clinical practice are unknown. We aimed to measure ramucirumab concentrations and conduct a retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis using real-world data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III-IV and recurrent NSCLC who received ramucirumab plus docetaxel were evaluated in this study. After the first administration, the ramucirumab trough concentration (C_trough) was measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Patient characteristics, adverse events, tumor response, and survival time were retrospectively extracted from medical records from August 2, 2016 to July 16, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were examined to assess serum ramucirumab concentrations. C_trough ranged from below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ) to 48.8 µg/mL (BLQ ≤ 1st quartile (Q1) ≤ 7.34, 7.34 < 2nd quartile (Q2) ≤ 14.7, 14.7 < 3rd quartile (Q3) ≤ 21.9 and 21.9 < 4th quartile (Q4) ≤ 48.8 µg/mL). The overall response rate was significantly higher in Q2-4 than that in Q1 (p = 0.011). The median progression-free survival was marginally longer, and overall survival was significantly longer in Q2-4 (p = 0.009). The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in Q1 was significantly higher than in Q2-4 (p = 0.034) and associated with C_trough (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with higher ramucirumab exposure had a high ORR and prolonged survival time, whereas patients with lower ramucirumab exposure were characterized by a high GPS and poor prognosis. Cachexia may reduce the exposure level of ramucirumab in certain patients, reducing the clinical benefits of ramucirumab treatment.

Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer with KRASG12C mutation: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Sotorasib is a specific, irreversible inhibitor of the GTPase protein, KRASG12C. We compared the efficacy and safety of sotorasib with a standard-of-care treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the KRASG12C mutation who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial at 148 centres in 22 countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, who progressed after previous platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Key exclusion criteria included new or progressing untreated brain lesions or symptomatic brain lesions, previously identified oncogenic driver mutation other than KRASG12C for which an approved therapy is available (eg EGFR or ALK), previous treatment with docetaxel (neoadjuvant or adjuvant docetaxel was allowed if the tumour did not progress within 6 months after the therapy was terminated), previous treatment with a direct KRASG12C inhibitor, systemic anticancer therapy within 28 days of study day 1, and therapeutic or palliative radiation therapy within 2 weeks of treatment initiation. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to oral sotorasib (960 mg once daily) or intravenous docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) in an open-label manner using interactive response technology. Randomisation was stratified by number of previous lines of therapy in advanced disease (1 vs 2 vs >2), ethnicity (Asian vs non-Asian), and history of CNS metastases (present or absent). Treatment continued until an independent central confirmation of disease progression, intolerance, initiation of another anticancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, or death, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was assessed by a blinded, independent central review in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04303780, and is active but no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between June 4, 2020, and April 26, 2021, 345 patients were randomly assigned to receive sotorasib (n=171 [50%]) or docetaxel (n=174 [50%]). 169 (99%) patients in the sotorasib group and 151 (87%) in the docetaxel group received at least one dose. After a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 16·4-20·1), the study met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant increase in the progression-free survival for sotorasib, compared with docetaxel (median progression-free survival 5·6 months [95% CI 4·3-7·8] vs 4·5 months [3·0-5·7]; hazard ratio 0·66 [0·51-0·86]; p=0·0017). Sotorasib was well tolerated, with fewer grade 3 or worse (n=56 [33%] vs n=61 [40%]) and serious treatment-related adverse events compared with docetaxel (n=18 [11%] vs n=34 [23%]). For sotorasib, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were diarrhoea (n= 20 [12%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (n=13 [8%]), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (n=9 [5%]). For docetaxel, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (n=13 [9%]), fatigue (n=9 [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (n=8 [5%]).

INTERPRETATION

Sotorasib significantly increased progression-free survival and had a more favourable safety profile, compared with docetaxel, in patients with advanced NSCLC with the KRASG12C mutation and who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs.

FUNDING

Amgen.

Immunotherapy-based combinations in metastatic NSCLC

Immuno-oncology has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) since the approval of immunotherapy by the U.S. FDA in 2015. Despite the advancements, outcomes for patients have room for further improvement. Combination therapies have shown promise in overcoming resistance and improving outcomes. This review focuses on current immunotherapy-based combination approaches, reported and ongoing trials, as well as novel combination strategies, challenges, and future directions for mNSCLC treatment. We summarize approaches in combination with chemotherapy, novel immune checkpoints, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other strategies including vaccines, and radiation therapy. The promise of biomarker-driven studies to understand resistance and design multi-arm platform trials that evaluate novel therapies is becoming of increasing relevance with the ultimate goal of administering precision immunotherapy by identifying the right dose of the right combination for the right patient at the right time.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A review of risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most frequent subtype of lung cancer. Surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or molecularly targeted therapy is used to treat NSCLC. Nevertheless, many patients who accept surgery likely develop distant metastases or local recurrence. In recent years, targeted treatments and immunotherapy have achieved improvement at a breakneck pace. Therapy must be customized for each patient based on the specific medical condition, as well as other variables. It is critical to have an accurate NSCLC sub-classification for tailored treatment, according to the latest World Health Organization standards.

Lung cancer immunotherapy: progress, pitfalls, and promises

Lung cancer is the primary cause of mortality in the United States and around the globe. Therapeutic options for lung cancer treatment include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted drug therapy. Medical management is often associated with the development of treatment resistance leading to relapse. Immunotherapy is profoundly altering the approach to cancer treatment owing to its tolerable safety profile, sustained therapeutic response due to immunological memory generation, and effectiveness across a broad patient population. Different tumor-specific vaccination strategies are gaining ground in the treatment of lung cancer. Recent advances in adoptive cell therapy (CAR T, TCR, TIL), the associated clinical trials on lung cancer, and associated hurdles are discussed in this review. Recent trials on lung cancer patients (without a targetable oncogenic driver alteration) reveal significant and sustained responses when treated with programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint blockade immunotherapies. Accumulating evidence indicates that a loss of effective anti-tumor immunity is associated with lung tumor evolution. Therapeutic cancer vaccines combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can achieve better therapeutic effects. To this end, the present article encompasses a detailed overview of the recent developments in the immunotherapeutic landscape in targeting small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Additionally, the review also explores the implication of nanomedicine in lung cancer immunotherapy as well as the combinatorial application of traditional therapy along with immunotherapy regimens. Finally, ongoing clinical trials, significant obstacles, and the future outlook of this treatment strategy are also highlighted to boost further research in the field.

Angiogenic inhibitor pre-administration improves the therapeutic effects of immunotherapy

In lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are often inadequate for tumor growth inhibition. Angiogenic inhibitors (AIs) are required to normalize tumor vasculature for improved immune cell infiltration. However, in clinical practice, ICIs and cytotoxic antineoplastic agents are simultaneously administered with an AI when tumor vessels are abnormal. Therefore, we examined the effects of pre-administering an AI for lung cancer immunotherapy in a mouse lung cancer model. Using DC101, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) monoclonal antibody, a murine subcutaneous Lewis lung cancer (LLC) model was used to determine the timing of vascular normalization. Microvessel density (MVD), pericyte coverage, tissue hypoxia, and CD8-positive cell infiltration were analyzed. The effects of an ICI and paclitaxel after DC101 pre-administration were investigated. On Day 3, increased pericyte coverage and alleviated tumor hypoxia represented the highest vascular normalization. CD8+ T-cell infiltration was also highest on Day 3. When combined with an ICI, DC101 pre-administration significantly reduced PD-L1 expression. When combined with an ICI and paclitaxel, only DC101 pre-administration significantly inhibited tumor growth, but simultaneous administration did not. AI pre-administration, and not simultaneous administration, may increase the therapeutic effects of ICIs due to improved immune cell infiltration.

Multicentre real-world data of ramucirumab plus docetaxel after combined platinum-based chemotherapy with programmed death-1 blockade in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: NEJ051 (REACTIVE study)

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) is a promising treatment for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its clinical significance after platinum-based chemotherapy plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade remains unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the clinical significance of RD as a second-line treatment after the failure of chemo-immunotherapy in NSCLC?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this multicentre retrospective study, 288 patients with advanced NSCLC who received RDas second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade, at 62 Japanese institutions from January 2017 to August 2020, were included. Prognostic analyses were performed using the log-rank test. Prognostic factor analyses were performed using a Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 288 patients were enrolled: 222 were men (77.1%), 262 were aged <75 years (91.0%), 237 (82.3%) had smoking history and 269 (93.4%) had a performance status (PS) of 0-1. One hundred ninety-nine patients (69.1%) were classified as adenocarcinoma (AC) and 89 (30.9%) as non-AC. The types of PD-1 blockade used in the first-line treatment were anti-PD-1 antibody and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody in 236 (81.9%) and 52 (18.1%) patients, respectively. The objective response rate for RD was 28.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.7-34.4). The disease control rate was 69.8% (95% CI, 64.1-75.0).The median progression free survival and overall survival were 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-4.6) and 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.9), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, non-AC and PS 2-3 were independent prognostic factors for worse progression free survival , while bone metastasis on diagnosis, PS 2-3 and non-AC were identified as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival.

INTERPRETATION

RD is a feasible second-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC who had received combined chemo-immunotherapy with PD-1 blockade.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000042333.

Dose reduction of docetaxel avoids the usage of pegfilgrastim in docetaxel plus ramucirumab therapy for recurrent nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pegfilgrastim is recommended in docetaxel plus ramucirumab (DTX + RAM) therapy for recurrent nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) because of the associated frequency of febrile neutropenia (FN). However, the FN occurs less frequently when the dose of DTX is reduced because of other adverse events, such as appetite loss and oral mucositis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with recurrent NSCLC who received DTX + RAM therapy at the Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital. The cut-off value which is the most unlikely to cause FN without the combined use of pegfilgrastim was set using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. This was created according to the dose of DTX and the presence or absence of the onset of FN. We compared the incidence of FN when a DTX dose above and below the cut-off value was used. The ROC curve showed that 48 mg/m² was the best cut-off value that predicted whether FN was likely to occur when pegfilgrastim was not used concurrently. The incidence of FN was 26.1% for DTX ≥48 mg/m² and 5.1% for DTX <48 mg/m² .

CONCLUSIONS

Pegfilgrastim can be discontinued when the dose of DTX is reduced to <48 mg/m² due to nonhematological toxicities.

The budget impact of introducing mobocertinib for the postplatinum treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion mutations

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and death in the United States. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% of lung cancer cases, and oncogenic mutations in the gene encoding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are among its most common genetic causes. Although NSCLC tumors harboring more common oncogenic EGFR mutations can be effectively treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), those harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations respond poorly to treatment with therapies approved for advanced NSCLC, including TKIs. Mobocertinib, a first-in-class potent, oral, irreversible TKI, is effective in this population. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact, for a US health plan with 10 million members, of introducing mobocertinib for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations who have been previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to compare 2 scenarios: a reference scenario in which 50% of patients received amivantamab and 50% received physician's choice/usual care therapy and an alternative scenario in which mobocertinib replaced the physician's choice/usual care option. The model had a 5-year time horizon in the base case. The model included epidemiologic inputs to estimate the size of the treatment-eligible population; clinical inputs to estimate treatment duration and efficacy, as well as adverse event frequency; and cost inputs for treatment acquisition and administration, management of adverse events, monitoring, and terminal care. The duration and cost of subsequent therapies were also considered. Budget impact was reported as a total cost, as per-member per-year costs, and as per-member per-month (PMPM) costs. To assess the robustness of model estimates and identify cost drivers, one-way sensitivity analyses and a range of scenario analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The model estimated an eligible treatment population of 55 patients (11 per year) over a 5-year time horizon. In the base case, the estimated budget impact of introducing mobocertinib was $5,615,808, or $0.01 PMPM. Model findings were robust to one-way sensitivity analyses and a range of sensitivity analyses; none of these analyses led to a PMPM budget impact of more than $0.06. Cost drivers included the percentage of eligible patients, the median duration of physician's choice/usual care therapy, patient weight, and the percentage of patients who undergo molecular testing. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated budget impact of mobocertinib is low, primarily because NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations is rare. DISCLOSURES: Dr Hernandez is an employee of Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. Dr Young was an employee of Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., at the time this study was conducted. This study and the editorial assistance were funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.

A network meta-analysis of immunotherapy-based treatments for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: In the absence of head-to-head trials comparing immunotherapies for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NsqNSCLC), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the relative efficacy of these treatments. Materials & methods: A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials evaluating first-line-to-progression and second-line treatments for advanced NsqNSCLC informed Bayesian NMAs for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) end points. Results: Among first-line-to-progression treatments, pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum showed the greatest OS benefit versus other regimens and a PFS benefit versus all but three regimens. Among second-line treatments, an OS benefit was seen for atezolizumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab versus docetaxel. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum showed the maximum OS benefit in the first-line setting. In the second-line setting, anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 monotherapies were better than docetaxel.

Bevacizumab versus Ramucirumab in EGFR-Mutated Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Real-World Observational Study

The combination of bevacizumab or ramucirumab with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations could have survival benefits. However, no study, to date, has been conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of these two antiangiogenic therapies (AATs). Stage IIIB to IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs between January 2014 and May 2022 were enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups: those receiving bevacizumab and those receiving ramucirumab as a combination therapy in any line of treatment. Ninety-six patients were enrolled in this study's final analysis. The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who received front-line AATs combined with EGFR-TKI therapy was longer than that of patients receiving later-line AATs combined with other therapies (19.6 vs. 10.0 months, p < 0.001). No difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between front-line and later-line therapy (non-reach vs. 44.0 months, p = 0.261). Patients who received these two different AATs did not differ in PFS (24.1 vs. 15.7 months, p = 0.454) and OS (48.6 vs. 43.0 months, p = 0.924). In addition, these two AATs showed similar frequencies of the T790M mutation (43.6% vs. 38.2%; p = 0.645). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated several AAT cycles as an independent good prognostic factor in OS. The incidence of some adverse events such as bleeding and hepatitis was higher for bevacizumab than for ramucirumab but it was not significant. Front-line AAT and EGFR-TKI combination therapy improved the PFS of stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. The effectiveness and safety of the two AATs were similar.

Selpercatinib in Patients With RET Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Safety and Efficacy From the Registrational LIBRETTO-001 Phase I/II Trial

PURPOSE

Selpercatinib, a first-in-class, highly selective, and potent CNS-active RET kinase inhibitor, is currently approved for the treatment of patients with RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We provide a registrational data set update in more than double (n = 316) of the original reported population (n = 144) and better characterization of long-term efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled to LIBRETTO-001, a phase I/II, single-arm, open-label study of selpercatinib in patients with RET-altered cancers. An analysis of patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC, including 69 treatment-naive and 247 with prior platinum-based chemotherapy, was performed. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1, independent review committee). Secondary end points included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

In treatment-naive patients, the ORR was 84% (95% CI, 73 to 92); 6% achieved complete responses (CRs). The median DoR was 20.2 months (95% CI, 13.0 to could not be evaluated); 40% of responses were ongoing at the data cutoff (median follow-up of 20.3 months). The median PFS was 22.0 months; 35% of patients were alive and progression-free at the data cutoff (median follow-up of 21.9 months). In platinum-based chemotherapy pretreated patients, the ORR was 61% (95% CI, 55 to 67); 7% achieved CRs. The median DoR was 28.6 months (95% CI, 20.4 to could not be evaluated); 49% of responses were ongoing (median follow-up of 21.2 months). The median PFS was 24.9 months; 38% of patients were alive and progression-free (median follow-up of 24.7 months). Of 26 patients with measurable baseline CNS metastasis by the independent review committee, the intracranial ORR was 85% (95% CI, 65 to 96); 27% were CRs. In the full safety population (n = 796), the median treatment duration was 36.1 months. The safety profile of selpercatinib was consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort with extended follow-up, selpercatinib continued to demonstrate durable and robust responses, including intracranial activity, in previously treated and treatment-naive patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.

Molecular Mechanisms and Future Implications of VEGF/VEGFR in Cancer Therapy

Angiogenesis, the sprouting of new blood vessels from existing vessels, is one of six known mechanisms employed by solid tumors to recruit blood vessels necessary for their initiation, growth, and metastatic spread. The vascular network within the tumor facilitates the transport of nutrients, oxygen, and immune cells and is regulated by pro- and anti-angiogenic factors. Nearly four decades ago, VEGF was identified as a critical factor promoting vascular permeability and angiogenesis, followed by identification of VEGF family ligands and their receptors (VEGFR). Since then, over a dozen drugs targeting the VEGF/VEGFR pathway have been approved for approximately 20 solid tumor types, usually in combination with other therapies. Initially designed to starve tumors, these agents transiently "normalize" tumor vessels in preclinical and clinical studies, and in the clinic, increased tumor blood perfusion or oxygenation in response to these agents is associated with improved outcomes. Nevertheless, the survival benefit has been modest in most tumor types, and there are currently no biomarkers in routine clinical use for identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from treatment. However, the ability of these agents to reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment into an immunostimulatory milieu has rekindled interest and has led to the FDA approval of seven different combinations of VEGF/VEGFR pathway inhibitors with immune checkpoint blockers for many solid tumors in the past 3 years. In this review, we discuss our understanding of the mechanisms of response and resistance to blocking VEGF/VEGFR, and potential strategies to develop more effective therapeutic approaches.

Efficacy and outcomes of ramucirumab and docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after disease progression on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Results of a monocentric, retrospective analysis

Current first-line standard therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer without driver mutations involves chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination. Prior to the advent of immune checkpoint inhibition, REVEL, a randomized phase III trial demonstrated improved progression-free and overall survival with ramucirumab and docetaxel (ram+doc) in patients who failed platinum-based first-line therapy. Long-term outcomes related to second-line ramucirumab and docetaxel after first-line immunotherapy exposure remain unknown. We analyzed outcomes for 35 patients from our center whom received ramucirumab and docetaxel following disease progression on chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination. Median progression-free survival among patients who received ram+doc after exposure to immunotherapy was 6.6 months (95% CI = 5.5 to 14.9 months; p<0.0001), and median overall survival was 20.9 months (95% CI = 13.4 months to infinity; p<0.0001). These outcomes suggest that there may a synergistic benefit to combining chemotherapy with anti-angiogenic therapy after immunotherapy exposure. Future analyses should be evaluated prospectively and among a larger patient subset.

Characterization and management of adverse events observed with mobocertinib (TAK-788) treatment for EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Mobocertinib has demonstrated durable clinical benefit in platinum-pretreated patients (PPP) with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Pooled safety analysis of two studies included patients with NSCLC (N = 257) treated with the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mobocertinib (160 mg once daily). We report overall safety (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) in the RP2D population; characterization of GI and skin-related events in 114 PPP from a phase 1/2 study (NCT02716116); and clinical activity in PPP with and without dose reductions due to TEAEs.

RESULTS

In the RP2D population (N = 257), the most common TEAEs were diarrhea (93%), nausea (47%), rash (38%), and vomiting (37%). In PPP (N = 114), median times to diarrhea onset and resolution were 5 and 2 days, respectively. Median times to onset and resolution of skin-related events were 9 and 78 days, respectively. Among PPP with (n = 29) or without (n = 85) dose reductions due to TEAEs, overall response rates were 21% and 31% and median durations of response were 5.7 and 17.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GI and skin-related events are common with mobocertinib; minimizing dose reductions with proactive management may improve clinical outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02716116; NCT03807778.

Recent Advances in Lung Cancer Therapy Based on Nanomaterials: A Review

Lung cancer is one of the commonest cancers with a significant mortality rate for both genders, particularly in men. Lung cancer is recognized as one of the leading causes of death worldwide, which threatens the lives of over 1.6 million people every day. Although cancer is the leading cause of death in industrialized countries, conventional anticancer medications are unlikely to increase patients' life expectancy and quality of life significantly. In recent years, there are significant advances in the development and applications of nanotechnology in cancer treatment. The superiority of nanostructured approaches is that they act more selectively than traditional agents. This progress led to the development of a novel field of cancer treatment known as nanomedicine. Various formulations based on nanocarriers, including lipids, polymers, liposomes, nanoparticles and dendrimers have opened new horizons in lung cancer therapy. The application and expansion of nano-agents lead to an exciting and challenging research era in pharmaceutical science, especially for the delivery of emerging anti-cancer agents. The objective of this review is to discuss the recent advances in three types of nanoparticle formulations for lung cancer treatments modalities, including liposomes, polymeric micelles, and dendrimers for efficient drug delivery. Afterward, we have summarized the promising clinical data on nanomaterials based therapeutic approaches in ongoing clinical studies.

Discrepancies Between the Cost of Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment and How Much Is Reimbursed by the Brazilian Public Healthcare System

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and most patients are diagnosed of advanced disease. Molecular-targeted therapy and immunotherapy increase survival among these patients. In this study, we compared the cost of the best treatments available with the amount reimbursed by the Brazilian public healthcare system (Sistema Único de Saúde [SUS]) to treat advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

The authors divided lung cancer into 10 subtypes according to histology and molecular profile. A panel of experts defined the best treatment sequencing for each subtype. The authors considered only drug costs retrieved from the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency official data. The progression-free survival of each regimen was considered as treatment duration. The cost estimate included all postprogression therapies weighted by each subtype proportional frequency. The amount reimbursed by SUS was the sum of the monthly budget accumulated during the estimated treatment duration and then for the proportional frequency of each subtype.

RESULTS

The budget reimbursed by SUS for treating each advanced lung cancer case in Brazil is R$8000.00 in average whereas the cost estimate for the best treatment available is R$729 454.00 per case, which represents a difference of 9118%. The budget impact to ensure the reimbursement needed to acquire the best treatments available was estimated in near R$13 billion annually.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost estimate of the best treatment available for advanced lung cancer in Brazil is much higher than the amount reimbursed by SUS. This budgetary gap leads to a major access barrier that may compromise the survival outcomes of SUS users.

CodeBreaK 200: Sotorasib (AMG510) Has Broken the KRAS G12C+ NSCLC Enigma Code

Per the US FDA sotorasib approval summary, KRAS G12C mutation is found in approximately 14% of adenocarcinoma of the lung, primarily in patients with a history of smoking. Until recently, targeted therapies against KRAS G12C have been largely unsuccessful due to the small protein size of KRAS and thus lack of binding pockets in KRAS and rapid hydrolysis of GTP to GDP by KRAS enzymes from abundance of GTP in the cytoplasm. Sotorasib, a first-in-class covalent KRAS G12C inhibitor that binds to the switch pocket II in the KRAS G12C-GDP "off" state, received US FDA accelerated approval on May 21, 2021 in the US, based on a Phase II dose expansion cohort of CodeBreaK 100 trial. Sotorasib at 960 mg once daily achieved an ORR of 36% (95% CI: 28%, 45%), with a median response duration of 10 months (range 1.3+, 11.1) in 124 KRAS G12C+ NSCLC. At the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2022 annual meeting, sotorasib achieved a statistically significant improved PFS over docetaxel (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0. 51-0.86; P = 0.002). The modest magnitude of PFS improvement of 1.1 months (from 4.5 months to 5.6 months) and the ORR of 28% led to a vigorous debate on whether sotorasib was indeed a true breakthrough. In this pros and cons debate, we argue thatsotorasib has achieved a true breakthrough.

Sotorasib in KRASG12C mutated lung cancer: Can we rule out cracking KRAS led to worse overall survival?

The KRAS oncogene is present in up to 25% of solid tumors and for decades had been undruggable. Sotorasib was the first-in-class KRAS inhibitor to reach the US and European market, and its pharmacological inhibition is restricted to the KRAS p.G12C mutation. Sotorasib showed activity (tumor shrinkage) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring this specific mutation, and efficacy was tested in the CodeBreaK 200, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT04303780). The results were presented in the ESMO 2022 meeting. CodeBreaK 200 found an improvement in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS), but overall survival, a key secondary endpoint, was not improved. However, critical questions about the trial's design may limit inferences regarding the reported results. The control arm treatment was inferior to the best standard of care. A late protocol modification (which lowered the sample size and allowed a problematic crossover) prohibited the trial from making a determination regarding overall survival. Imbalance in censoring rates, with potential informative censoring, makes PFS estimates unreliable. Quality-of-life data were also limited. Ultimately, CodeBreaK 200 does not clarify how this therapy should be used in practice, and while we maintain cautious enthusiasm for this and other Ras inhibitors, we await more informative trials.

Expression of KAI1 and AGR2 in lung adenocarcinoma and their clinicopathological significance

OBJECTIVE

Anticancer 1 (KAI1, tumor metastasis suppressor gene) and Anterior gradient-2 (AGR2, considered a valuable prognostic factor for some cancers) are associated with metastasis and prognosis of various types of human cancers. Nevertheless, the relationship between KAI1 and AGR2 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains unclear. In this research, we analyzed the correlations between KAI1 and AGR2 in LUAD, and explored their correlations with clinicopathological parameters and overall survival time (OS) in patients with LUAD.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining was used to detect KAI1 and AGR2 expression in 132 cases of LUAD samples. At the same time, all clinicopathological parameters and postoperative survival information were collected.

RESULTS

AGR2 positive rate was significantly increased and KAI1 positive rate was significantly decreased in LUAD and control tissues. KAI1 positive rates were negatively correlated with tumor stage, LNM stage and TNM stage, and KAI1 subgroup positive expression of OS was significantly higher than negative KAI1 subgroup. The positive rate of AGR2 was positively correlated with tumor grade, LNM stage and TNM stage, and negatively correlated with patients OS. Active expression of AGR2 and KAI1, tumor stage, and LNM stage in multivariate analyses may be independent prognostic factors for OS in LUAD patients.

CONCLUSION

KAI1 and AGR2 may be potential biomarkers for prognosis and metastasis, and they are also promising therapeutic targets for LUAD patients.

Ischemic stroke in a patient with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer after treatment with ramucirumab

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have been widely investigated in the last 10 years, with particular attention paid to their adverse effects because of their efficacy in improving cancer patient survival. Previous research primarily focused on the monoclonal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab and its adverse outcomes. Reports show a higher risk of ischemic stroke, one of the most concerning clinically relevant events, after treatment with bevacizumab. However, few studies have examined the relationship between anti-VEGF receptor 2 monoclonal antibody ramucirumab and its adverse events. This article presents the case of a non-small-cell lung cancer patient who experienced a new ischemic stroke after treatment with ramucirumab. The findings suggest that further studies may be necessary to investigate the relationship between ramucirumab and the risk of ischemic stroke.

Immunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC Without Driver Mutations: Available Therapeutic Alternatives After Progression and Future Treatment Options

The treatment paradigm of non-small-cell lung cancer without oncogenic drivers has varied dramatically in recent years and is constantly evolving. Immune- checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated unprecedented durable efficacy in a subset of these patients, so these drugs have become the standard of care in most cases. There are different ways to deliver these agents, such as monotherapy and combinations of immunotherapy or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. Treatment selection is complicated by an absence of head-to-head comparisons in randomized trials because these agents have gained approval by demonstrating superiority to platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone. Unfortunately, most patients will progress and die from their disease despite advances. Furthermore, after progression on these agents, there is a lack of randomized controlled data to support further management, constituting an unmet need. This review discusses the therapeutic alternatives after progression, summarizes mechanisms of resistance and progression patterns, and describes the main approaches under clinical investigation in the field.

Combi-TED: a new trial testing Tedopi® with docetaxel or nivolumab in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer progressing after first line

Despite the positive results obtained by first-line chemoimmunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only a few second-line options are available after disease progression. Combi-TED is a phase II international study that will assess the efficacy of Tedopi®, a cancer vaccine, combined with either docetaxel or nivolumab and compared with docetaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC after chemoimmunotherapy. The study, currently in the recruitment phase, will assess 1-year overall survival (primary end point), patient's progression-free survival and overall response rate, as well as the correlation of efficacy with several tumor or blood biomarkers. The results will hopefully provide more information on Tedopi combinational treatment compared with current standard of care in NSCLC patients who fail first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04884282 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lung: Russian clinical guidelines

удалить

Safety and Efficacy of Treatment with/without Ramucirumab in Advanced or Metastatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 11 Global, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials

Ramucirumab, as a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, was first approved in 2014 for treated advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. This study deeply analyzed the efficacy and safety of advanced or metastatic cancer treated with ramucirumab, which included 11 global, double-blind, phase 3 randomized controlled trials with a total of 7410 patients. Subgroup analysis based on different cancer types showed that standard regimens plus ramucirumab significantly increased progression-free survival and overall survival compared with placebo groups in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Although a higher proportion of patients achieved overall response and disease control than those treated with placebo, the overall response was not statistically significant between the two groups in advanced NSCLC. Grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that occurred in at least 5% of patients were neutropenia (30.5% in the ramucirumab group vs. 23.5% in the placebo group), leucopenia (14.8% vs. 9.2%), weight decreased (14.2% vs. 8.0%), myalgia (11.7% vs. 7.7%), fatigue (10.9% vs. 7.7%), hypertension (9.2% vs. 2.3%), and anaemia (6.2% vs. 7.7%). In the TEAEs of special interest, the ramucirumab group had a significantly higher incidence of bleeding (mainly grade 1-2 epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding), hypertension, proteinuria, liver injury/failure (grade 1-2), venous thromboembolism (grade 1-2), and gastrointestinal perforation (grade ≧3) than the control group.

Biomarkers in the management of lung cancer: changing the practice of thoracic oncology

Lung cancer currently represents a leading cause of cancer death. Substantial progress achieved in the medical therapy of lung cancer during the last decade has been associated with the advent of targeted therapy, including immunotherapy. The targeted therapy has gradually shifted from drugs suppressing general mechanisms of tumor growth and progression to agents aiming at transforming mechanisms like driver mutations in a particular tumor. Knowledge of the molecular characteristics of a tumor has become an essential component of the more targeted therapeutic approach. There are specific challenges for biomarker determination in lung cancer, in particular a commonly limited size of tumor sample. Liquid biopsy is therefore of particular importance in the management of lung cancer. Laboratory medicine is an indispensable part of multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) has played and will continue playing a major role in updating and spreading the knowledge in the field.

Sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomized controlled phase 3 trial (ORIENT-3)

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy are limited. This study (ORIENT-3) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC.

METHODS

ORIENT-3 was an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled phase 3 trial that recruited patients with stage IIIB/IIIC/IV sqNSCLC after failure with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 200 mg of sintilimab or 75 mg/m² of docetaxel intravenously every 3 weeks, stratified by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the full analysis set (FAS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety.

RESULTS

Between August 25, 2017, and November 7, 2018, 290 patients were randomized. For FAS, 10 patients from the docetaxel arm were excluded. The median OS was 11.79 (n = 145; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.28-15.57) months with sintilimab versus 8.25 (n = 135; 95% CI, 6.47-9.82) months with docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.025). Sintilimab treatment significantly prolonged PFS (median 4.30 vs. 2.79 months; HR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.68; P < 0.001) and showed higher ORR (25.50% vs. 2.20%, P < 0.001) and DCR (65.50% vs. 37.80%, P < 0.001) than the docetaxel arm. The median DoR was 12.45 (95% CI, 4.86-25.33) months in the sintilimab arm and 4.14 (95% CI, 1.41-7.23) months in the docetaxel arm (P = 0.045). Treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 26 (18.1%) patients in the sintilimab arm and 47 (36.2%) patients in the docetaxel arm. Exploratory biomarker analysis showed potential predictive values of expression levels of two transcription factors, including OVOL2 (HR: 0.35; P < 0.001) and CTCF (HR: 3.50; P < 0.001)，for sintilimab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with docetaxel, sintilimab significantly improved the OS, PFS, and ORR of Chinese patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer complicated by interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is limited because of the risk of its acute exacerbation (AE). Furthermore, the efficacy and safety of second-line chemotherapy for these patients is unclear.

METHODS

To investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC patients with ILD, we retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated at our institute between April 2010 and December 2018.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients received two or more regimens. Thirty-four patients were male and the median age at the initiation of second-line chemotherapy was 70 years. Almost all patients had a smoking history. Fourteen patients had adenocarcinoma and 15 had squamous cell carcinoma histology. Stages III and IV were observed in 20 and 11 patients, respectively. With respect to the type of ILD, 12 patients had usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 11.4 and 68.6%, respectively. The median progression-free and median overall survival were 4.1 and 6.4 months, respectively. The AE of ILD was observed in eight patients, five of whom died. UIP and low percentage vital capacity were detected as significant risk factors for the AE of ILD.

CONCLUSION

Second-line chemotherapy among patients with NSCLC complicated by ILD showed a certain effectiveness, but some patients experienced the AE of ILD, which may lead to death. The risk of the AE of ILD must be considered especially for patients with UIP and low percentage VC.

Ramucirumab plus atezolizumab in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

The treatment options for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop tumor progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. The combination of ICI with inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth receptor (VEGFR) signaling has shown promising results in previously untreated patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single institution phase II study, patients with advanced stage NSCLC previously treated with at least one line including ICI received ramucirumab 10 mg/kg and atezolizumab 1,200 mg intravenously every 21 days until tumor progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by the RECIST 1.1 criteria according to the investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerability.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled between June 2019 and April 2021. The median age was 67 (range 42-82), 17 (81 %) were female, and 15 (71 %) had non-squamous histology. The median number of prior systemic treatment lines and prior ICI lines were 3 (range 2-8) and 1 (range 1-3), respectively. One patient achieved a complete response for an ORR of 4.8 % while 16 (76.2 %) had stable disease with a CBR of 80.9 %. The median PFS was 3.4 months, and the median OS was 16.5 months. The most common adverse events included hypertension (86 %), proteinuria (67 %), and nausea (52 %). Grade 3 or 4 events were seen in 9 (43 %) of patients, with hypertension being the most common (33 %) of the grade 3 or 4 events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary endpoint of ORR was not met, the combination of ramucirumab plus atezolizumab was associated with a high CBR and the OS was better than expected in heavily pretreated patients. Therefore, further investigation with ICI plus VEGF inhibition is warranted.

What's the latest with investigational drugs for soft tissue sarcoma?

INTRODUCTION

Despite extensive research undertaken in the past 20-30 years, the treatment for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has remained largely the same, with anthracycline-based chemotherapy remaining the first choice for treating advanced or metastatic STS.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on newly approved drugs for STS and current research directions, including recent results of late-phase trials in patients with STS. We cover several different histological subtypes, and we discuss the role of adoptive cell transfer (ACT) therapies for the treatment of synovial and myxoid/round cell (high-grade myxoid) liposarcoma, one of the most promising areas of treatment development to date. We searched clinicaltrials.gov and pubmed.ncbi.nih.gov, as well as recent year proceedings from the annual conferences of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), and Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS).

EXPERT OPINION

Immune-oncology drugs (IOs) show promise in certain subtypes of STS, but it is recognized that PD-1/PD-L1 axis inhibition is not enough on its own. Better trial stratifications based on the molecular categorization of different subtypes of STS are needed, and more evidence suggests that 'one size fits all' treatment is no longer sustainable in this heterogeneous and aggressive group of tumors.

A Phase 2 Study of Docetaxel, Ramucirumab, and Pembrolizumab for Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) who Progressed on Platinum-Doublet and PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade

BACKGROUND

There is an urgent and unmet need for more effective treatment options for patients with metastatic and recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progressed on platinum-based therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and targeted therapies. Currently, the combination of docetaxel (D) and ramucirumab (R) is the next best salvage therapy with a modest historical progression free survival (PFS) of 4.5 months and 6-month PFS rate of 37% predating the era of ICI use. Anecdotal reports in patients who progressed on ICI suggest a higher response rate to docetaxel compared to historical experience. Furthermore, tumor related angiogenesis promotes tumor growth and may contribute to immune escape in patients treated with ICI. Therapeutic combination with anti-angiogenic, ICI, and chemotherapy have independently demonstrated clinical efficacy without additive toxicities in NSCLC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, single arm, open label, phase 2 study will evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of the combination of docetaxel 75 mg/m2, ramucirumab 10 mg/kg, and pembrolizumab 200 mg in up to 41 patients with metastatic or recurrent NSCLC after progression on concomitant or sequential platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI. This treatment will be given intravenously on the same day every 3 weeks until disease progression, occurrence of severe side effects, or no clinical benefit. The primary endpoint is 6-month PFS rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICI combined with docetaxel and ramucirumab. The findings could provide valuable information for developing new treatment strategies for NSCLC patients.

Disrupting cancer angiogenesis and immune checkpoint networks for improved tumor immunity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have advanced the field of cancer immunotherapy in patients by sustaining effector immune cell activity within the tumor microenvironment. However, the approach in general is still faced with issues related to ICI response duration/resistance, treatment eligibility, and safety, which indicates a need for further refinements. As immune checkpoint upregulation is inextricably linked to cancer-induced angiogenesis, newer clinical efforts have demonstrated the feasibility of disrupting both tumor-promoting networks to mediate enhanced immune-driven protection. This review focuses on such key evidence stipulating the necessity of co-applying ICI and anti-angiogenic strategies in cancer patients, with particular interest in highlighting newer engineered antibody approaches that may provide theoretically superior multi-pronged and safe therapeutic combinations.

Case Report: Anlotinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor and sequential GA regimen or FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy in treatment of KRAS G12V mutated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with liver metastasis: A case and literature review

There is a high mortality rate associated with pancreatic cancer, and the incidence has been rising globally in recent decades. When patients are diagnosed, there is little chance that surgery will be beneficial. Systemic chemotherapy is the currently accepted treatment option for patients with metastatic advanced pancreatic cancer. However, a very limited survival improvement is possible with chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer, and chemotherapy resistance plays a significant role in poor prognosis. Despite the fact that targeting growth factor receptor inhibitors such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR) antibodies significantly improves survival in pancreatic cancer, only a very small number of patients benefit from the treatment. As emerging drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant therapeutic effects in several tumor types, but monotherapy is not effective in pancreatic cancer. In the first-line treatment of solid tumors, combination therapy may result in remarkable outcomes. Here in, we have reported a younger patient with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with liver metastasis (PDACLM) who had a long-term partial response and good tolerance to the combination of anlotinib and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and chemotherapy. Gene analysis suggested only one mutation in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) G12V gene. Consequently, there is some hope for patients with pancreatic cancer, especially for KRAS G12V gene mutated patients. Upon reviewing the literature, this patient’s combination therapy is the first to have been reported.

Counter Regulation of Tumor Angiogenesis by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Thrombospondin-1

Considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the process of angiogenesis in the context of normal and tumor tissue over the last fifty years. Angiogenesis, like most physiological processes, is carefully controlled by dynamic and opposing effects of positive factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and negative factors, such as thrombospondin-1. In most cases, the progression of a small mass of cancerous cells to a life-threatening tumor depends upon the initiation of angiogenesis and involves the dysregulation of the angiogenic balance. Whereas our newfound appreciation for the role of angiogenesis in cancer has opened up new avenues for treatment, the success of these treatments, which have focused almost exclusively on antagonizing the VEGF pathway, has been limited to date. It is anticipated that this situation will improve as more therapeutics that target other pathways are developed, more strategies for combination therapies are advanced, more detailed stratification of patient populations occurs, and a better understanding of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy is gained.

Elevated TSH Level, TgAb, and Prior Use of Ramucirumab or TKIs as Risk Factors for Thyroid Dysfunction in PD-L1 Blockade

BACKGROUND

Thyroid dysfunction is frequently caused by treatment with antiprogrammed cell death-1 ligand 1 antibodies (PD-L1-Abs) and anticancer drugs, including ramucirumab (RAM) and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (multi-TKIs), which are often used prior to PD-L1-Ab treatment in cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 148 patients treated with PD-L1-Abs were evaluated for antithyroid antibodies at baseline and for thyroid function every 6 weeks for 24 weeks after treatment initiation and then were observed until the visits stopped.

RESULTS

Of the 148 patients, 15 (10.1%) developed thyroid dysfunction after PD-L1-Ab treatment (destructive thyroiditis in 8 and hypothyroidism without preceding thyrotoxicosis in 7). The prevalence of an elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level at baseline (3/15 [20.0%] vs 4/133 [3.0%], P < .05), positive antithyroglobulin antibodies (TgAbs) at baseline (4/15 [26.7%] vs 5/133 [3.8%], P < .05) and prior treatment with RAM or multi-TKIs (3/15 [20.0%] vs 5/133 [3.8%], P < .05) were significantly higher in patients with vs without thyroid dysfunction. In a multivariate analysis, elevated TSH level at baseline, TgAb positivity at baseline, and prior treatment with RAM or multi-TKIs were significantly associated with the development of thyroid dysfunction, with ORs of 7.098 (95% CI 1.154-43.638), 11.927 (95% CI 2.526-56.316), and 8.476 (95% CI 1.592-45.115), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this real-world study suggest that the risk of thyroid dysfunction induced by PD-L1-Abs can be predicted by the TSH level at baseline, TgAb positivity at baseline, and prior treatment with RAM or multi-TKIs.

Prognostic Awareness and Discussions of Incurability in Patients with Pretreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Caregivers: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Although patients with advanced cancer often have poor prognostic awareness, the most effective communication approach for improving prognostic awareness is unclear. In addition, the association between prognostic awareness and preferences for future medical treatment remains unexplored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of consecutive patients with advanced or post-operative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer whose disease had progressed after first-line chemotherapy, and their caregivers. We evaluated patterns of clinical discussions about incurability, prognostic awareness, and preference for future medical treatment at baseline and 3 months later.

RESULTS

We obtained 200 valid responses to the questionnaires at baseline and 147 valid responses 3 months later. In addition, 180 caregivers returned valid responses. A total of 54% of patients and 51% of caregivers had accurate awareness at baseline, and 52% of patients had accurate awareness 3 months later. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that patients who were informed about incurability in recent and past discussions were significantly more likely to have accurate awareness 3 months later, compared with those who were only informed recently (adjusted odds ratio 5.08; 95% CI, 1.31-19.78; P = .019). Accurate awareness at 3 months was significantly negatively associated with preference for life-prolonging treatment at 3 months after adjusting for covariates (adjusted odds ratio 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.90; P = .028).

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced cancer who had both recent and past discussions about incurability with their oncologists have more accurate prognostic awareness. Improving prognostic awareness could reduce the preference for life-prolonging treatment.