Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial

Minimal access colonic surgery: is it truly minimally invasive?

Laparoscopic colonic surgery has an established role in the management of both benign and malignant conditions. Proposed benefits from laparoscopic surgery include decreased pain, decreased metabolic disturbance to the patient and faster recovery. It is now generally accepted that pro-inflammatory mediators, including cytokines, are to a great extent responsible for the metabolic changes associated with injury and surgery, and that these metabolic changes are related to postoperative recovery. Cytokine levels in the serum are decreased after major laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared with open surgery. However, the cytokine concentration in abdominal drain fluid is the same independent of the size of the incision and these concentrations are far higher than those found in the serum suggesting that the peritoneal would from the surgery itself is more important to metabolic events than the skin wound used to access the abdominal cavity to perform the operation. When looked at critically in programmes where patients are optimally managed perioperatively, there appears to be minimal metabolic benefit from performing a major colonic resection using minimal access surgery. Thus, it appears that the wound is critical when the operation involves only minor peritoneal disruption, such as in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but when large peritoneal defects are created, such as in major colorectal surgery, then the skin wound becomes irrelevant to metabolism and hence recovery. Thus, minimal access does not necessarily equate to minimal invasion and the terms should not be used interchangeably in the context of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations. Open cholecystectomy has been the gold standard for over 100 years. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced in the 1980s.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the beneficial and harmful effects of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched TheCochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (April 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (1980 to January 2004), Web of Science (1988 to January 2004), and CINAHL (1982 to January 2004) for randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All published and unpublished randomised trials in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis comparing any kind of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus any kind of open cholecystectomy. No language limitations were applied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed selection of trials and data extraction. The methodological quality of the generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, and follow-up was evaluated to assess bias risk. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. Authors were requested additional information in case of missing data. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed when appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-eight trials randomised 2338 patients. Most of the trials had high bias risk. There was no significant difference regarding mortality (risk difference 0,00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.01 to 0.01). Meta-analysis of all trials suggests less overall complications in the laparoscopic group, but the high-quality trials show no significant difference ('allocation concealment' high-quality trials risk difference, random effects -0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.02). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients have a shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD), random effects -3 days, 95% CI -3.9 to -2.3) and convalescence (WMD, random effects -22.5 days, 95% CI -36.9 to -8.1) compared to open cholecystectomy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were observed in mortality, complications and operative time between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and a quicker convalescence compared with the classical open cholecystectomy. These results confirm the existing preference for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy over open cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations. Open cholecystectomy has been the gold standard for over 100 years. Small-incision cholecystectomy is a less frequently used alternative. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced in the 1980s.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the beneficial and harmful effects of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched TheCochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (6 April 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (1980 to January 2004), Web of Science (1988 to January 2004), and CINAHL (1982 to January 2004) for randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All published and unpublished randomised trials in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis comparing any kind of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus small-incision or other kind of minimal incision open cholecystectomy. No language limitations were applied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed selection of trials and data extraction. The methodological quality of the generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, and follow-up was evaluated to assess bias risk. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. Authors were requested additional information in case of missing data. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed if appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen trials randomised 2337 patients. Methodological quality was relatively high considering the four quality criteria. Total complications of laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy are high: 26.6% versus 22.9%. Total complications (risk difference, random-effects -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.07 to 0.05), hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD), random-effects -0.72 days, 95% CI -1.48 to 0.04), and convalescence were not significantly different. High-quality trials show a quicker operative time for small-incision cholecystectomy (WMD, high-quality trials 'blinding', random-effects 16.4 minutes, 95% CI 8.9 to 23.8) while low-quality trials show no significant difference.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy seem to be equivalent. No differences could be observed in mortality, complications, and postoperative recovery. Small-incision cholecystectomy has a significantly shorter operative time. Complications in elective cholecystectomy are prevalent.

Small-incision versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations. Open cholecystectomy has been the gold standard for over 100 years. Small-incision cholecystectomy is a less frequently used alternative.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the beneficial and harmful effects of small-incision versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched TheCochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (6 April 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (1980 to January 2004), Web of Science (1988 to January 2004), and CINAHL (1982 to January 2004) for randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All published and unpublished randomised trials in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis comparing any kind of small-incision or other kind of minimal incision cholecystectomy versus any kind of open cholecystectomy. No language limitations were applied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed selection of trials and data extraction. The methodological quality of the generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, and follow-up was evaluated to assess bias risk. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. Authors were requested additional information in case of missing data. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed if appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials randomised 571 patients. Bias risk was high in the included trials. No mortality was reported. The total complication proportions are respectively 9.9% and 9.3% in the small-incision and open group, which is not significantly different (risk difference all trials, random-effects 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.06 to 0.07). There are also no significant differences considering severe complications and bile duct injuries. However, small-incision cholecystectomy has a shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference, random-effects -2.8 days (95% CI -4.9 to -0.6)) compared to open cholecystectomy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Small-incision and open cholecystectomy seem to be equivalent regarding risks of complications, but the latter method is associated with a significantly longer hospital stay. The quicker recovery of small-incision cholecystectomy compared with open cholecystectomy confirms the existing preference of this technique over open cholecystectomy.

Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for selected patients?

BACKGROUND

The authors report their 7-year experience with day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to determine its applicability, safety, and cost effectiveness.

METHODS

Of 920 consecutive patients who underwent elective LC over a 7-year period, 567 (62%) were scheduled for day-case surgery. The median age of the patients was 48 years (range, 16-74 years), and the male/female ratio was 148/419. The selection criteria required an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade of 1 or 2, absence of morbid obesity, low risk of common bile duct stones, adult company at home, and residence within 100 km of the hospital. The LC procedure was performed using a standard four-cannula technique. Propofol-opiate-rocuron-sevoflurane anesthesia, prophylactic antiemetics, and preemptive analgesia were administered in all cases.

RESULTS

The mean length of the operation was 56 +/- 18 min. There was no hospital mortality, and 7 (1.2%) of 567 patients required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Approximately 356 (63%) of the 567 patients were discharged home on the same day as the operation, whereas 211 patients (37%) were admitted overnight after the operation because of social reasons (13.7%), surgeon preference (15.2%), nausea and/or pain (15.2%), operation late in the afternoon (14.2%), or patient preference (41.7%). There were no serious complications. A total of 22 patients visited the emergency unit, and 7 patients required readmission, giving a readmission rate of 2%. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 6% (n = 22), with morbidities including retained stones (n = 2), bile leakage (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 1). The mean procedural cost to the hospital was 1,836 euros for day-case LC, as compared with 2,712 euros for an inpatient operation.

CONCLUSIONS

For selected patients, day-case LC is feasible and safe, providing a substantial reduction in hospital costs.

Improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life after cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the accepted treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis but has been criticized as an overused procedure. This study assesses the effectiveness of LC on reduction in gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and the impact on quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

A prospective cohort of subjects evaluated for gallstone disease between August 2001 and July 2004 completed preoperative and postoperative GI gallbladder symptom surveys (GISS) and SF36 QOL surveys. The GISS was developed to quantify the magnitude, severity, and distressfulness of 16 GI symptoms. Surveys were scored and evaluated using paired t tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-five subjects were included in the final analysis. The GISS revealed significant improvement in biliary type symptoms but not reflux or irritable bowel symptoms after LC (P > .05). Significant improvement was seen in QOL (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the utility of LC by showing not only a significant reduction of GI symptoms but also marked improvement in patients' general QOL.

Assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal resection for the treatment of esophageal cancer is usually associated with high morbido-mortality risks, that can be reduced using laparoscopy. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) has the potential to improve these results but, to-date, only a few limited series of cases have been reported. This report summarizes our experience in 24 cases.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes following LTE.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1998 and 2005, LTE was performed in 24 patients; 18 men and 6 women with an overall mean age of 63 years (range: 36-85). Indication for surgery was lower third esophageal cancer; 11 squamous cell carcinoma and 13 adenocarcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were used in 18 patients (75%). A laparoscopic transhiatal approach was used to perform an esophagectomy with curative intent. A cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was created.

RESULTS

No reversion to conventional open surgery was required. Mean anesthesia time was 293.8 min (range: 255-360). Major complications occurred in 7 patients (29.2%). Two patients (8.3%) had leakage from the cervical anastomosis. Surgical mortality was 8.3%. The median stay in Intensive Care Unit was 5 days (range: 1-29). Median hospital stay was 11.5 days (range: 7-54). At a mean follow-up of 24.9 months, 8 patients (36.4%) had disease recurrence (36.4%), global survival rate was 62.5%, and diseasefree survival rate was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for lower third esophageal cancer is a potentially safe and effective method when performed by surgeons with expertise in the field. Benefits from this approach need to be confirmed by further randomized studies.

Increased cholecystectomy rate in the laparoscopic era: a study of the potential causative factors

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that an increased cholecystectomy rate in the laparoscopic era may be due to a reduced threshold for surgery or diagnostic confusion with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This study aims to determine the validity of these suggestions.

METHODS

Questionnaires were sent to patients who had undergone cholecystectomy between 1988-1990 (open) and 1998-2000 (laparoscopic). Patients were asked about abdominal pain, fatty food intolerance, jaundice, and indigestion pre- and postoperatively. Questionnaires included Rome II criteria for the diagnosis of IBS and SF-36 quality-of-life data. Histological severity of gallbladder disease was assessed using a standard scoring system.

RESULTS

A total of 124 of 196 patients in the open group and 264 of 400 patients in the laparoscopic group replied. There was no difference between the groups in gender, age at surgery, IBS incidence, or quality-of-life scores. The laparoscopic group reported a lower incidence of preoperative fat intolerance (45.8 vs 58.1%, p < 0.05) and a higher incidence of persistent postoperative abdominal pain (27.3 vs 17.7%, p < 0.05). Mean histopathology severity scores were higher in the open group (4.42 vs 3.95, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased cholecystectomy rate in the laparoscopic era cannot be attributed to diagnostic confusion with IBS. However, a reduction in the threshold for surgery may have contributed to the increased rate of cholecystectomy.

Open cholecystectomy for all patients in the era of laparoscopic surgery - a prospective cohort study

Background

Open cholecystectomy through a small incision is an alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

From 1 January 2002 through 31 December 2003, all operations upon the gallbladder in a district hospital with emergency admission and responsibility for surgical training were done as intended small-incision open cholecystectomy.

Results

182 women and 90 men with a median age of 56 (interquartile range 45 to 68 years) underwent cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder disease, 170 as elective and 102 as emergency cases. Trainee surgeons assisted by consultants or registrars having passed an examination for open cholecystectomy performed surgery in 194 cases (71%). The common bile duct was explored in 52 patients. Total postoperative morbidity was six percent. Median postoperative stay was one day and mean total (pre- and postoperative) hospital stay 3.1 days. 32 operations (12%) were done as day surgery procedures. Nationally in Sweden in 2002, mean total hospital stay was 4.4 days, and 13% of all cholecystectomies were performed on an outpatient basis.

Conclusion

Open, small-incision cholecystectomy for all patients is compatible with short hospital stay, evidence-based gall-bladder surgery, and training of surgical residents.

5F sphincterotomes and 4F sphincterotomes are equivalent for the selective cannulation of the common bile duct

BACKGROUND

Cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) is the first step in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Cannulation difficulty is a known risk factor for post-ERCP complications and may be minimized by the use of a smaller caliber sphincterotome.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of CBD cannulation with a 4 F versus a 5 F sphincterotome.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial, with concealed allocation and double-blinding.

PATIENTS

Adult patients undergoing their first ERCP at a tertiary referral center.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to undergo CBD cannulation with either a 4 F or 5 F sphincterotome.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Successful deep cannulation in <15 attempts was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included number of attempts/time to cannulation, incidence of complications within 24 hours, and overall cannulation success (including patients before and after crossover). Analysis was intention to treat and included standard descriptive and inferential methods.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were randomized: 51 (4 F) versus 56 (5 F). The majority were female (71%) and white (92%). Baseline demographics, presenting symptoms, and laboratory values were similar between groups. Similar success in initial cannulation was observed: 84.3% (4 F) and 83.9% (5 F). No differences were noted in time to cannulation (5.12 min [SD, 4.8] for 4 F vs 4.46 min [SD, 4.13] for 5 F; p = NS), number of attempts to cannulation (6.2 [SD, 5.2] for 4 F vs 5.7 [SD, 4.9] for 5 F; p = NS), or complications. The overall cannulation success was 92.2% (4 F) and 92.9% (5 F).

LIMITATIONS

Premature termination of the trial resulted in decreased power.

CONCLUSIONS

There exists no significant difference in efficacy between 4 F and 5 F sphincterotomes. The choice of initial sphincterotome should be dictated by physician preference.

The value of virtual reality–simulator training in the development of laparoscopic surgical skills

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) training in improving the surgical skills of medical students and gynecologic trainees.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study to assess the changes observed in objectively measured surgical performance after VR training.

SETTING AND POPULATION

University teaching hospital and the laboratories of the University of Western Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen 5th-year medical students, six junior-doctor trainees (years 1-3), and eight senior trainees (years 4-6).

INTERVENTIONS

Standard gynecologic procedures before and after VR training were undertaken on sheep. The procedures were video-recorded and edited to blind the scorer as to identity and seniority of the operator. The procedures were scored using a combination of operative time and penalties for surgical errors. The surgical scores were correlated with the VR scores.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Operative skills were assessed using a combination score compiled from scores obtained while undertaking salpingectomy, salpingotomy, and tubal clipping. Virtual reality scores were also a combination score derived from summation of various computer-calculated measures of time and accuracy in undertaking two standardized exercises.

RESULTS

The baseline VR scores were significantly related to the overall pre-training scores (salpingectomy p = .032). A better initial VR score was also predictive of better surgical performance. The initial VR score was also predictive of improvement observed between baseline and post-training (p = .004).

CONCLUSION

Virtual reality training is of value in improving surgical skills in the clinical environment. It appears to be of most value in the earliest stages of training. These data suggest that serious consideration should be given to incorporating VR training into the training program of obstetricians and gynecologists at an early stage.

Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly used for postoperative evaluation of an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). Although a normal IOC is very suggestive of a disease-free common bile duct (CBD), abnormal studies are associated with high false-positive rates. This study aimed to identify a subset of patients with abnormal IOC who would benefit from a postoperative ERCP.

METHODS

This prospective study investigated 51 patients with abnormal IOC at laparoscopic cholecystectomy who underwent postoperative ERCP at two tertiary referral centers over a 3-year period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of CBD stones at postoperative ERCP.

RESULTS

For all 51 patients, ERCP was successful. The ERCP showed CBD stones in 33 cases (64.7%), and normal results in 18 cases (35.2%). On univariate analysis, abnormal liver function tests (p < 0.0001) as well as IOC findings of a large CBD stone (p = 0.03), multiple stones (p = 0.01), and a dilated CBD (p = 0.07) predicted the presence of retained stones at postoperative ERCP. However, on multivariable analysis, only abnormal liver function tests correlated with the presence of CBD stones (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of patients with an abnormal IOC have a normal postoperative ERCP. Elevated liver function tests can help to identify patients who merit further evaluation by ERCP. The use of less invasive methods such as endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography should be considered for patients with normal liver function tests to minimize unnecessary ERCPs.

[Laparoscopic versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy]

OBJECTIVES

To describe differences in operating time, pain scores, analgesic consumption, complications, length of hospital stay, and quality of life in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) vs mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy (MLC).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between 1991 and July 1999, we performed a study of 1041 patients with gallstones who underwent LC (group A, n = 421 patients) or MLC (group B, n = 620 patients). Age, sex, ASA score, pain scores (visual analog scale), analgesic and antiemetic consumption, operating time, complications and length of hospital stay were recorded. Nottingham Health Profile questionnaires were completed by a subgroup of 200 patients, and respiratory response was evaluated using a Fokuda spirometer before surgery and at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction and quality of life were evaluated. The results were interpreted using the SPSS program and descriptive statistics were performed with p = 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean age was 48.9 +/- 14.2 years; 80.5% of the patients were women; 87.88% of the patients were ASA I. Elective surgery was performed in 89.78%. The mean operating time was 94 +/- 45 minutes in LC and was 108 +/- 48 minutes in MLC (p < 0.001). LC was associated with lower postoperative pain (0 = 68.88%), lower analgesic-antiemetic requirements (0 = 9.03%) and shorter length of hospital stay. Complications were significantly more frequent in group B (p = 0.05); two patients in group B died within 30 days of surgery (0.32%).

CONCLUSIONS

LC appears to be associated with lower pain scores and analgesic-antiemetic requirements and shorter recovery times than MLC. The results in terms of quality of life in LC were excellent.

Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic and minilaparotomic myomectomy.

DESIGN

Randomized study (Canadian Task Force classification I).

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred forty-eight women requiring surgical myomectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Myomectomy by minilaparotomy or laparoscopy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Operation time was significantly lower in the minilaparotomy group (p < .001). When compared with minilaparotomy, laparoscopy was associated with a lower decline of hemoglobin concentration (p <.001), a reduced length of postoperative ileus (p < .001), and a shorter time to discharge (p <.001). Pain intensity at 6 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the laparoscopy group (p <.001); also, patients who underwent laparoscopy requested analgesics less frequently in the first 48 hours after the operation (p < .001). Patients included in the laparoscopy group were fully recuperated on postoperative day 15 more frequently than those included in the minilaparotomy group (p = .012). No complications were observed in the minilaparotomy group. There were two complications in the laparoscopy group (one laparoconversion caused by difficulties of hemostasis and one acute diffuse peritonitis caused by ileal perforation). Laparoscopic and minilaparotomic myomectomy cost, respectively, 2250 euros and 1975 euros.

CONCLUSION

When compared with minilaparotomic myomectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy may offer the benefits of lower postoperative analgesic use and faster postoperative recovery.

Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study with special reference to obesity

BACKGROUND

Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) has recently challenged the role of the laparoscopic approach (LC) for cholecystectomies. However, the situation is far from clear when operating times and recovery are evaluated.

METHODS

Altogether 157 patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones were randomized into MC (n = 85) and LC (n = 72) groups. Both groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical fitness classification, and operating surgeon.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 55 +/- 19.5 min in the MC group and 79 +/- 27.0 min in the LC group (p < 0.0001). The postoperative hospital stay and length of sick leave did not differ between the two groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, or postoperative pulmonary function between the groups. The body mass index did not influence operating time or patient recovery in either group. No major complications occurred in either groups.

CONCLUSION

The MC procedure seems to be a faster technique than the LC approach for noncomplicated gallstone disease, with no difference in recovery times. The MC procedure also seems to be suitable for the obese patient.

Ethical issues in innovative colorectal surgery

When physicians and surgeons investigate new drugs or devices, they must adhere to stringent regulatory standards governing human experimentation. Although these standards and regulations are not perfect, they serve to protect the interests of patients and research subjects. By contrast, few standards or regulations exist for innovative procedures, including new surgical techniques. Surgeons apply the term "innovative surgery" to describe practices ranging from minor technical modifications in standard procedures to non-validated investigational approaches indistinguishable from human research. By focusing on recent innovations in surgery, including colorectal surgery, this article proposes an ethical model of surgical innovation that protects patients while maintaining professional self-regulation of surgical advances.

Minimally invasive surgery

In 1987 Mouret performed the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy, starting a revolution in surgery. For paediatricians it is difficult to appreciate the magnitude of what has occurred in this short period. The development of minimal access techniques represents the most significant change in surgical practice since the introduction of aseptic technique or safe anaesthesia. As with many innovations, rapid change, technical language, and the evangelism of pioneers has left confusion in its wake.

Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy

Surgical trauma causes significant alterations in host immune function. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery is associated with reduced postoperative pain and more rapid return to normal activity. Experimental data have also shown more aggressive tumor establishment and growth rates following open surgery and laparoscopic surgery. Surgery-related immunosuppression may be partly responsible for the differences in cancer growth and outcome noted. It is clear that the choice of abdominal surgical approach has immunologic consequences. Further studies are needed to better the time course and extent of surgery-related alterations in the immune system and their clinical importance. A better understanding of the impact of surgery on the immune system may provide opportunities for pharmacologic manipulation of postoperative immune function to improve clinical results.

Current status of laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard operation for gallstone disease. The aim of this review was to scrutinize the advantages and benefits of this minimal invasive technique compared to the conventional operation according to the available literature. Regarding the evidence-based medicine criteria, the current status of laparoscopy in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis, cholecystitis and common bile duct stones has been worked out.

METHODS

A Medline, PubMed, Cochrane search.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are available comparing laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. The superiority of LC in less postoperative pain, shorter recovery and hospital stay is stated. Operation time was longer in the first years of LC. 3 RCTs deal with acute cholecystitis: one paper could not find any significant advantage of LC over conventional cholecystectomy, the other two found benefits in recovery, hospital stay and postoperative pain. The range of conversion is between 5 and 7% in elective cases and increases up to 27% for acute cholecystitis. With a rate of more than 90% in Europe, the standard procedure for common bile duct stones is 'therapeutic splitting' with endoscopy and retrograde cholangiopancreatography preoperatively followed by LC. Laparoscopic bile duct clearance is effective and safe in experienced hands, however, the only proven benefit is a slightly shorter hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach is preferred in elective cholecystectomy and acute cholecystitis. The minimal invasive technique has proven to be effective, gentle and safe. The main benefits are evident within the first postoperative days.

Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty

To assess the potential recovery rate of a minimally invasive total hip replacement technique with minimal soft tissue disruption, an accelerated rehabilitation protocol was implemented with weightbearing as tolerated on the day of surgery. One hundred consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Ninety-seven patients (97%) met all the inpatient physical therapy goals required for discharge to home on the day of surgery; 100% of patients achieved these goals within 23 hours of surgery. Outpatient therapy was initiated in 9% of patients immediately, 62% of patients by 1 week, and all patients by 2 weeks. The mean time to discontinued use of crutches, discontinued use of narcotic pain medications, and resumed driving was 6 days postoperatively. The mean time to return to work was 8 days, discontinued use of any assistive device was 9 days, and resumption of all activities of daily living was 10 days. The mean time to walk (1/2) mile was 16 days. Furthermore, there were no readmissions, no dislocations, and no reoperations. Therefore, a rapid rehabilitation protocol is safe and fulfills the potential benefits of a rapid recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on hospital utilization

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and associated endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP) on hospital utilization.

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has resulted in marked reductions in average length of hospital stay; but population-based studies of hospital utilization have generally not taken into account increased cholecystectomy rates or associated increases in pre and postoperative admissions.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study of all residents of Western Australia who underwent cholecystectomy in the period 1980-2000. Record linkage was used to identify pre and postoperative admissions, and to estimate aggregate length of stay per case based on all relevant admissions. We estimated trends in cholecystectomy rates, proportions of cases with related pre and postoperative hospital admissions, average aggregate length of stay per case and total bed utilization per unit of population.

RESULTS

The introduction of LC was associated with a sustained increase in rates of cholecystectomy of 25%. Similar increases occurred in the percentage of cases with related preoperative and postoperative admissions. Average length of stay for index admissions declined by nearly 60% compared with 50% for all related admissions. Per capita hospital utilization for index admissions decreased by 45% compared with 38% for index and associated admissions combined, and 32% for all admissions for biliary disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced hospital utilization associated with LC was partly offset by increases in pre and postoperative admissions and a sustained increase in cholecystectomy rates. Record linkage is required to assess the true impact of new technologies on hospital utilization.

Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients 80 years and older

Advanced age is associated with an increase in postoperative complications. This study assesses the indications and outcome for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients aged 80 years or older. Consecutive, unselected patients aged 80 years or over undergoing LC between 1991 and 2000 were included. A retrospective case review enabled analysis of clinical and operative factors together with in-hospital morbidity, 30-day mortality, and duration of hospital stay. A series of 117 patients, 79 women and 38 men with a median age of 83 years (range 80-93 years), underwent LC. Indications for LC were chronic cholecystitis in 62 (53%) patients, acute cholecystitis in 28 (24%), gallstone pancreatitis in 12 (10%), and other conditions in 15 (13%). Six (5%) patients required conversion to an open procedure. Overall, 26 (22%) patients developed a postoperative complication. There were no bile leaks or bile duct injuries. One patient, with gangrenous cholecystitis, died after LC. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range 1-31 days). LC can be performed safely with low morbidity in patients over age 80 years.

Abdominal pain and patient overall and cosmetic satisfaction one year after cholecystectomy: outcome of a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Previous studies with long-term follow-up after cholecystectomy have shown that residual abdominal symptoms are common. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) can both give a smoother, early postoperative course than conventional open cholecystectomy (OC). The present study concerns abdominal pain and patient overall and cosmetic satisfaction one year after LC and MC.

METHODS

In a prospective, single-blind study, 724 patients were randomly allocated to LC or MC. Patients completed questionnaires including items concerning abdominal pain before and one year after surgery and overall and cosmetic satisfaction one year after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no difference in reduction of abdominal pain between LC and MC patients. For four different aspects of abdominal pain, 31%, 24%, 30% and 16% of patients operated with LC reported residual abdominal pain one year after surgery. The corresponding figures for MC were 28%, 20%, 27% and 18% (P values 0.55, 0.32, 0.55 and 0.63, respectively). According to questionnaire answers, there was no significant difference in the cosmetic result and overall patient satisfaction between LC and MC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no differences between laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy in long-term outcome regarding abdominal pain and patient overall and cosmetic satisfaction. A large proportion of patients have abdominal pain one year after cholecystectomy. Future studies should include preoperative assessment and indications for cholecystectomy.

The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy today is the standard operation for all gall stone disease. Nevertheless, a number of questions are still being discussed: What are the optimal steps? Or, more important, is the laparoscopic technique really superior to the open procedure according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine? How should we proceed in case of an occult choledocholithiasis? Is intraoperative cholangiography mandatory, and does the concept for the treatment of silent gall stones need to be revised in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

METHOD

Literature review.

RESULTS

Eleven randomised studies show the superiority of the laparoscopic technique. Only one study shows no advantage provided the length of the incision in the open procedure is less than 8 cm. According to our own experience, up to 98% of all gall bladders can be removed laparoscopically when following the described standard technique, with a conversion rate of less than 1%. In the case of an occult choledocholithiasis the concept of "therapeutic splitting" has proved successful; the risk of a residual stone is below 1%. Routine intraoperative cholangiography is not cost effective. The risk of complications for a silent gall stone in the long term is higher than for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in young patients with incidental gall stones.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic technique has given new impulses to the surgery of the gall bladder and has proven to be an effective, patient-friendly alternative to open surgery.

Small-incision (mini-laparotomy) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study in a university hospital

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy into general practice in 1990, it has rapidly become the dominant procedure for gallbladder surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the laparoscopic, open and mini-laparotomy approaches to cholecystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study covers a period of 6 years. A total of 1,276 patients underwent cholecystectomy for calculous biliary disease. The laparoscopic procedure was applied to 952 (74.6%) patients, while 210 (16.5%) underwent the traditional open cholecystectomy and the remaining 114 (8.9%) patients underwent mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (3.9%) from the laparoscopic group required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Morbidity was similar in the open and laparoscopic groups (3.8%), while it was significantly lower in the mini-laparotomy group (0.8%). No major bile duct injuries occurred after the open or mini-laparotomy approaches. The median operation time was significantly shorter in the mini-laparotomy group than in the laparoscopic group (46 min vs 61 min). Hospital stay was significantly longer for the open cholecystectomy group (mean value 5.1 days) compared with the laparoscopic and mini-laparotomy groups (mean values 2.5 days and 2.7 days, respectively). Hospital expenses showed a saving of 786 Euro for each patient who underwent the open procedure and 980 Euro for each patient who underwent the mini-laparotomy approach compared with the laparoscopic one.

CONCLUSION

We believe that commissioners of healthcare should question whether the benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy justify the additional cost after the introduction of the mini-laparotomy approach.

Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Measuring health-related quality of life (QoL) after surgery is essential for decision making by patients, surgeons, and payers. The aim of this consensus conference was twofold. First, it was to determine for which diseases endoscopic surgery results in better postoperative QoL than open surgery. Second, it was to recommend QoL instruments for clinical research.

METHODS

An expert panel selected 12 conditions in which QoL and endoscopic surgery are important. For each condition, studies comparing endoscopic and open surgery in terms of QoL were identified. The expert panel reached consensus on the relative benefits of endoscopic surgery and recommended generic and disease-specific QoL instruments for use in clinical research.

RESULTS

Randomized trials indicate that QoL improves earlier after endoscopic than open surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), cholecystolithiasis, colorectal cancer, inguinal hernia, obesity (gastric bypass), and uterine disorders that require hysterectomy. For spleen, prostate, malignant kidney, benign colorectal, and benign non-GERD esophageal diseases, evidence from nonrandomized trials supports the use of laparoscopic surgery. However, many studies failed to collect long-term results, used nonvalidated questionnaires, or measured QoL components only incompletely. The following QoL instruments can be recommended: for benign esophageal and gallbladder disease, the GIQLI or the QOLRAD together with SF-36 or the PGWB; for obesity surgery, the IWQOL-Lite with the SF-36; for colorectal cancer, the FACT-C or the EORTC QLQ-C30/CR38; for inguinal and renal surgery, the VAS for pain with the SF-36 (or the EORTC QLQ-C30 in case of malignancy); and after hysterectomy, the SF-36 together with an evaluation of urinary and sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery provides better postoperative QoL in many clinical situations. Researchers would improve the quality of future studies by using validated QoL instruments such as those recommended here.

Impact of laparoscopy on frequency of surgery for treatment of gallstones

Although the indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy are generally the same as those for open cholecystectomy, there has been a suspicion that indications for cholecystectomy have broadened and the spectrum of patients undergoing this procedure has changed. This study was designed to determine whether surgeons and patients have lowered the threshold for proceeding to cholecystectomy with use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Discharge data were collected for all patients who underwent an elective operation in general surgery clinics in Ankara Numune Teaching and Research Hospital between 1990 to 2001. The rate of total cholecystectomy to all elective operations and rate of laparoscopic technique to all cholecystectomies were analyzed. Total number of operations and rate of cholecystectomy were relatively stable over 6 years prior to laparoscopy. With the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although total number of elective operations seems stable, the proportion of cholecystectomy to all operations showed an increase. Our study could not explain the increase of total number of cholecystectomies since the widespread introduction of laparoscopy. First, it may be due to changing selection criteria for surgical treatment of gallstones. Second, surgery may have been done for asymptomatic gallstones. And third, patients with moderate symptoms who refused the (open) operation in the past may now be more willing to undergo a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer: the gold standard? A comparison of laparoscopic vs open nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the complication rate and clinical follow-up of patients treated for T1 renal cancer by open or laparoscopic nephrectomy at the same institution, as this approach appears to be attractive for treating small renal cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2002, 39 patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic and 26 transperitoneal open radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer (TNM 1997). Variables before during and after surgery, e.g. cancer recurrence, were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the laparoscopic and open groups in age, sex ratio, weight, height, fitness score, operative duration (134 vs 133 min), minor or major complications, tumour diameter, Fuhrman grade or length of follow-up. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had less blood loss (133 vs 357 mL, P < 0.001), less need for transfusion (none vs 150 mL, P = 0.04), a lower consumption of analgesia drugs, and shorter hospitalization (5.5 vs 8.8 days, P < 0.001). With a mean follow-up of 20.4 months there was no recurrence or tumour progression.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with T1 renal cancer is a safe, reliable procedure that decreases hospitalization time and bleeding, and ensures the same cancer control as open nephrectomy.

Trials in surgery

Background

Trials in surgery pose some special problems. This paper examines these with reference to 10 years of methodological research sponsored by the UK National Health Service Research and Development programme.

Methods

Solutions to common problems encountered in surgical studies were considered, such as issues of blinding, dependence of results on technical skill and continued evolution of technology.

Results

Numerous methodological developments are described, including the tracker trial concept in which trial design can be adapted to take account of technical developments and interim results. The governance of trials, solutions to ethical conundra and the rising importance of databases are also discussed.

Conclusion

Like surgery itself, the methodological toolkit for evaluation of surgical procedures continues to evolve. The rules of statistical and scientific probity provide plenty of scope for imaginative design solutions for surgical trials.

Surgical complications of selected gastrointestinal emergencies: pitfalls in management of the acute abdomen

Complaints referable to the abdomen are common emergency department presentations. Many of these conditions prove to be benign and self-limited, whereas others are potentially catastrophic. Because serious and benign intra-abdominal conditions share many relatively nonspecific symptoms, it is often difficult to identify patients who have life-threatening problems early in the course of their disease. Apart from relieving the patient's symptoms, the emergency physician's primary role is to detect and stabilize life-threatening conditions in a rapid and cost-effective manner.

Right hemihepatectomy for bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the treatment of choice for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. But with the introduction of this technique, the incidence of bile duct injuries has increased. We report the case of a 33-year-old man who was transferred from an affiliated hospital to our department for the treatment of a bile duct injury 2 weeks after LC. Prior to transfer, a laparotomy had been performed, with insertion of a T-tube and a Robinson drain on day 5 after LC. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) on admission day revealed an extensive defect of the right biliary system, which could not be treated endoscopically. An emergency laparotomy had to be performed at night for acute bleeding from the portal vein. Due to massive inflammation in the porta hepatis and intraparenchymal destruction of the right bile duct, liver resection was performed 2 days later, after the patient had stabilized in the intensive care unit (ICU). The patient had a prolonged postoperative course, but he finally recovered well from these operations. In conclusion, the management of bile duct injuries should include ultrasound to detect and drain fluid collections and ERC to classify the injury. Emergency laparotomy should never be performed without these examinations, since the majority of bile duct injuries can be treated endoscopically. Surgery for this serious complication should always be performed at specialized centers for hepatobiliary surgery.

The recent decline in gallbladder cancer mortality in Europe

Mortality from gallbladder cancer has been traditionally high in Eastern Europe, and lower in northern countries. Trends in 18 European countries, including the European Union (EU) and selected Eastern European countries, have been updated using official death certification data abstracted from the WHO database over the period 1980-1999. In the EU, age-standardized rates declined by about 30% between the late 1980s and 1999 to reach 1.8/100 000 for women, and by about 10% to reach 1.4/100 000 for men. In the Czech Republic and Hungary, rates for women were over 6/100 000 until the early 1990s, and declined by about 25% thereafter. For males, gallbladder cancer mortality showed no consistent trend, with rates over 3/100 000. Thus, a high mortality area from gallbladder cancer is still evident for both sexes in Central and Eastern Europe. The trends in mortality from gallbladder cancer are probably influenced by changes in risk factor exposure, such as diet, nutrition or tobacco, but essentially reflect more widespread and earlier adoption of cholecystectomy in the EU, since gallstones are the major risk factor for gallbladder cancer. The data also indicate the scope for further improvement of the management of gallbladder disease in Eastern Europe.

Mini-cholecystectomy: a personal series in acute and chronic cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive techniques in the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease include laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and mini-cholecystectomy (MC). Reports of LC in acute or chronic inflammation of the gallbladder are common, but those of MC are much more limited, particularly in complicated cases.

METHODS

Thirty-six consecutive patients with gallstone disease who underwent mini-cholecystectomy (MC) were included in this study. Twenty-four were female, median age 62 years (range 23-82) and median body mass index (BMI) was 23.4 (range 17.0-28.4). Seventeen of 36 patients had an acutely inflamed gallbladder, one with septicaemia, and six had gangrenous cholecystitis. Three patients presented with acute pancreatitis. MC was performed by a standardised technique. Operative time, frequency of postoperative analgesic injections, time to start oral diet after operation and length of postoperative hospital stay were compared between patients with chronic and acute cholecystitis.

RESULTS

The median operative time was 92.5 minutes (range 35-130). There was no difference in operative time between patients with chronic and acute cholecystitis: 80 minutes (range 35-120) vs 95 minutes (range 60-130). The frequency of postoperative analgesic injections was also similar in the two groups. Oral diet could be started within 24 h of operation in all except one patient with chronic cholecystitis but in only 8 of 17 with acute cholecystitis. Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in patients with chronic cholecystitis: 2 days (range 2-5) vs 4 days (range 2-14), p =0.0009.

CONCLUSIONS

MC is an effective surgical procedure for an inflamed gallbladder regardless of the degree and type of inflammation. Patients with chronic cholecystitis recover more quickly and have a shorter hospital stay.

Biliary tract injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a single unit

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into Australia in early 1990. Its rapid increase in acceptance was, however, tempered by reports of an increased incidence of bile duct injury. The aim of this study was to report on the incidence of biliary tract injuries in a single unit, comment on the way they were managed and look at strategies to prevent them.

METHODS

A retrospective audit was conducted on laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between January 1992 and March 2001. The data was collated from patient medical record files and yielded a total of 1216 procedures.

RESULTS

There were 899 women (74%) and 317 men (26%), with an age range of 13-92 years. Most of the procedures were performed on an elective (94%) rather than emergent basis (6%). There was one bile duct injury (0.09%) and seven bile leaks (0.63%). The single injury involved common bile duct obstruction by a misplaced clip and was successfully managed by chol-angio-enteric bypass. Of the seven bile leaks, three were from the cystic duct stump, two from the gallbladder bed, and two were unidentified, settling conservatively. Of the five patients actively treated, two underwent therapeutic laparoscopy, two proceeded to laparotomy, and one was managed successfully by endoscopic stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-centre studies such as this are important in ensuring that standards of surgery are maintained in a community setting.

Randomized study of the effectiveness of closing laparoscopic trocar wounds with octylcyanoacrylate, adhesive papertape or poliglecaprone

BACKGROUND

Several methods for skin closure are used, i.e. sutures, adhesive papertape and tissue adhesives. Little is known about the efficacy of these techniques in laparoscopic surgery. This study was performed to analyse the efficacy of octylcyanoacrylate, a new tissue adhesive, adhesive papertape and poliglecaprone for wound closure in laparoscopy.

METHODS

From May 2000 to September 2001, 140 patients were included in a prospective randomized trial. Wounds were closed with octylcyanoacrylate (n = 48), adhesive papertape (n = 42) or poliglecaprone (n = 50). Closing time, wound infection, cosmetic results and costs were evaluated. A time-motion analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

The patients in the three groups were well matched for age, gender and body mass index. Closing times per wound were 26, 33 and 65 s respectively for adhesive papertape, octylcyanoacrylate and poliglecaprone (P < 0.001). Cosmetic results, as scored by the patients, were no different. The number of actions required to close each wound was 5.7, 8.3 and 21.0 for octylcyanoacrylate, adhesive papertape (P = 0.05 versus octylcyanoacrylate) and poliglecaprone (P < 0.01 versus octylcyanoacrylate and adhesive papertape) respectively. Octylcyanoacrylate was significantly more expensive than poliglecaprone and adhesive papertape.

CONCLUSION

Closure with adhesive papertape was the fastest method. The smallest number of actions required to close a wound was with octylcyanoacrylate. Adhesive papertape was the most cost-effective.

Recovery after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the duration of convalescence is 2 to 3 weeks with an unclear pathogenesis. This study was undertaken to analyze postoperative recovery after uncomplicated elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive unselected employed patients were followed up prospectively from 1 week before to 1 week after outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Daily computerized monitoring of physical motor activity and sleep duration and night sleep fragmentation (actigraphy), subjective sleep quality, pulmonary function, pain, and fatigue were registered. Treadmill exercise performance (preoperatively and at postoperative days 2 and 8) and nocturnal pulse oximetry at the patients' homes (preoperatively and postoperative nights 1-3) were completed.

RESULTS

Median age was 41 years (range, 21-56). Compared with preoperatively, levels of physical motor activity, fatigue, and pain scores were normalized 2 days after operation. Subjective sleep quality was significantly worsened on the first postoperative night, and sleep duration was significantly increased on the first 2 postoperative nights. There were no significant perioperative changes in actigraphy night sleep fragmentation, incidence of self-reported awakenings or nightmares/distressing dreams, exercise performance, or nocturnal oxygenation. Pulmonary peak flow measurements were normalized the day after operation.

CONCLUSION

After uncomplicated outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there is no pathophysiologic basis for recommending a postoperative convalescence of more than 2 to 3 days in otherwise healthy younger patients.