Blood-pressure control in the hypertensive population

Treated hypertensives with good medication compliance are still in a state of uncontrolled blood pressure in the Japanese elderly

OBJECTIVES

Blood pressure (BP) is poorly controlled in many countries. Poor compliance was suggested as the main cause for poor BP control. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between compliance and the control of both casual blood pressure (BP) and 24-hr ambulatory BP in a Japanese elderly population.

METHODS

The study was a cross-sectional survey. Casual BP and 24-hr ambulatory BP were measured at home. Hypertension was defined as casual systolic BP (SBP)≧140 and/or diastolic BP (DBP)≧90 mmHg, or as treated hypertension. A compliance rate of greater than 80% by the pill count method was defined as good compliance.

RESULTS

Of the 178 treated hypertensives, 82.6% showed good compliance. Between the treated hypertensives with good compliance and those with poor compliance, no significant difference was found in either casual BP or ambulatory BP. Of the treated hypertensives with good compliance, the prevalence of achieved target ambulatory BP, i.e., daytime BP<135/85 mmHg, nighttime BP<120/75 mmHg, and 24-hr BP<125/80 mmHg, was, respectively, 35.4%, 43.5%, and 20.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Casual BP and 24-hr ambulatory BP were poorly controlled in the community-living elderly although many of the treated hypertensives showed good compliance. It is unlikely that this inadequate control of hypertension is due to poor compliance on the part of the subjects.

High remaining risk in poorly treated hypertension: the 'rule of halves' still exists

OBJECTIVES

To estimate risk factors for stroke, to examine how different categories of patients with increased blood pressure are associated with risk for first-ever stroke event, and to estimate the proportions of these categories in a geographically defined population in northern Sweden.

SETTING

The study was nested within the Västerbotten Intervention Program and the Northern Sweden MONICA cohorts.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

A population-based cross-sectional study and an incident case-control study were carried out. The incident case-control study comprised 129 cases of first-ever stroke diagnosed during 1985-96, with two randomly selected controls per case, chosen from the same geographically defined population. The cross-sectional study was based on 59,735 participants. Blood pressure status was categorized as: normotensive [systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mmHg]; treated and adequately controlled hypertension (SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg); treated but poorly controlled hypertension (SBP > or = 140 mmHg or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or both); untreated hypertension (SBP > or = 140 mmHg or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or both); newly detected increased blood pressure (SBP > or = 140 mmHg or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or both).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Risk for first-ever stroke.

RESULTS

In the cross-sectional study, 68% of individuals were normotensive, 3% had treated and adequately controlled hypertension, 6% had treated but poorly controlled hypertension, 7% had untreated hypertension, and 16% had newly detected increased blood pressure. In univariate analysis of the case-control study, history of diabetes, daily smoking, obesity, increased blood pressure and the hypertension categories 'treated but poorly controlled' and 'untreated' were associated with an increased stroke risk. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only diabetes and the hypertension categories treated but poorly controlled and untreated remained significant, with odds ratios 6.1 (95% confidence interval 2.4 to 15.3) and 4.3 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 10.5), respectively. Only one of the 129 individuals who suffered stroke had treated and adequately controlled hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

The study illustrates the importance of adequate blood pressure control and, at the same time, that the vast majority in the population with increased blood pressure did not receive optimal care. Thus the 'rule of halves' still exists, and the high remaining risk in poorly treated hypertensive individuals in Sweden is remarkable and requires attention from the medical profession.

Simple, shared guidelines raise the quality of antihypertensive treatment in routine care

AIMS

To assess the impact of simple, collectively produced, evidence-based guidelines on optimizing the choice of antihypertensive drugs in routine care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-eight physicians agreed to produce and test these guidelines for 1 year in their daily practice on a random sample of 1049 treated hypertensive patients (intervention group). A control group of 42 general practitioners recruited and followed up for 1 year a parallel nonintervention cohort of 722 treated hypertensive patients. After 1 year of follow-up, the patients in the nonintervention group had no changes in any of the predefined end points. In the intervention group, the use of diuretics and beta-blockers--drugs with documented preventive efficacy--increased, respectively, from 48.3% to 57.6% and from 22.0% to 29.7%; and the proportion of hypertensive patients receiving indicated drugs (with no contraindications) rose from 66.1% to 73.0%. The prescription of poorly tolerated drugs decreased from 12.4% to 7.2%, and noncompliance with the antihypertensive therapy decreased from 5.2% to 3.8%. In the intervention group, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure control improved (systolic pressure <140 mm Hg, from 23.3% to 39.5%; diastolic pressure <90 mm Hg, from 65.4% to 87.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

An intervention strategy based on the collaborative production of simple evidence-based guidelines appears to be effective in raising the quality of antihypertensive therapy in routine care.

A retrospective, population-based analysis of persistence with antihypertensive drug therapy in primary care practice in Italy

BACKGROUND

Many hypertensive patients discontinue drug therapy despite the increased cardiovascular risk associated with inadequately controlled hypertension. However, most experiments do not address this premature discontinuation of therapy, making it difficult to project the appropriateness of antihypertensive drugs in real-world use.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess patients' persistence with antihypertensive drug therapy in a nonexperimental setting.

METHODS

An administrative database kept by the Local Health Unit of Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy, listing patient baseline characteristics, drug prescriptions, and hospital admissions was used to perform a population-based, retrospective study. The study included all patients who met the following criteria from January I through December 31, 1997: new user of antihypertensive drugs; > or = 20 years of age; receiving a first prescription for a diuretic, beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker, angiotensin II-receptor antagonist (AIIA), or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. All prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs filled during the 12-month follow-up period were used to define patients as continuers, switchers, or discontinuers on the basis of their persistence with therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 16,783 patients were included in the study analyses: 7,409 men (44.1%) and 9,374 women (55.9%), with an average age of 56.1 +/- 18.3 years (range, 20-105 years). Of this study population, 64.9% (n = 10,894) discontinued treatment over the course of follow-up, 26.9% (n = 4508) continued treatment with the initially prescribed medication (with 5.1% [n = 862] adding another medication for combination therapy), and 8.2% (n = 1381) switched medications. Patients initially prescribed AIIAs were more likely to continue treatment than those initiated on other types of antihypertensives (P < 0.001). Discontinuation was associated with younger age, lower prevalence of concurrent chronic pharmacotherapies, and lower prevalence of previous hospitalizations for cardiovascular disease (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Health care claims data are a powerful tool for measuring continuation of therapy, providing detailed, populationwide epidemiologic and economic information for analyzing antihypertensive drug treatment. Further studies are required to relate pharmacotherapy to outcomes.

Long-term persistence with antihypertensive drugs in new patients

The objective of this study was to investigate stay-on-therapy patterns over 3 years among patients prescribed different classes of antihypertensive drugs for the first time. A retrospective analysis of information recorded in the drugs database of the Local Health Unit of Ravenna (Italy) was carried out on 7312 subjects receiving a first prescription for diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II antagonists between 1 January and 31 December 1997. Patients were followed up for 3 years. All prescriptions of antihypertensive drugs filled during the follow-up periods were considered. The patients continuing or discontinuing the initial treatment, the duration of treatment, and the doses taken were all calculated, as well as main factors influencing the persistence rate. The drugs prescribed were predominantly ACE-inhibitors, followed by calcium channel blockers, diuretics, beta-blockers and angiotensin II antagonists. A total of 57.9% of patients continued their initial treatment during the 3-year follow-up period, 34.5% discontinued the treatment, whilst 7.6% were restarted on a treatment in the third year. Persistence with treatment was influenced by: age of patient (persistence rate increasing proportionately with advancing years), type of drug first prescribed (persistence rate higher with angiotensin II antagonists, progressively lower with ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers and diuretics), gender of patient (persistence was better in males), age of general practitioner (GP) (the younger the GP, the better the persistence rate) and gender of GP (better stay-on-therapy rate with male GP prescribing). In the case of patients treated continuously, mean daily dose increased progressively over the 3 years. With adequate markers, helpful data can be collected from prescription claims databases for the purpose of monitoring the persistence of patients in continuing their medication, and the quality of antihypertensive treatment in a general practice setting.

Hypertension control and medication increase in primary care

Over half of treated patients with hypertension are not well controlled. However, little is known about physicians' prescribing behaviour for these patients. Our objective was to clarify whether physicians increase antihypertensive medication in patients with poorly controlled hypertension and what characteristics are predictors of medication increase. This was a retrospective cohort study by surveying medical records in primary care clinics in Tochigi, Japan. Twenty-nine of 79 randomly selected physicians agreed to select 20 consecutive hypertensive patients. This resulted in 547 patients (women 60%; mean (s.d.) age, 68 (12) years) who had blood pressure measurements taken in 1998 and prescription of antihypertensive medication in 1998 and 1999. Mean (s.d.) systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 142 (12)/81 (9) mm Hg and the percentage of patients in good control (<140/90 mm Hg), fair (140-159/90-94) and poor (> or =160/95) were 42%, 47%, and 11%, respectively. Physicians increased medication in 28% of poorly controlled patients (95% confidence interval (CI), 17-41%), which was more than those in fair (12%, 95%CI 8-16%) or good control (7%, 95%CI 4-12%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that systolic and diastolic blood pressures were positively, and the number of kinds of antihypertensive medications and the age of the physician were negatively, associated with an increase in medication. In conclusion, primary care physicians did not increase antihypertensive medication adequately for patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Attempts to understand and to change physicians' prescription behaviour could reduce the burden of uncontrolled hypertension among treated hypertensive patients.

Insufficient duration of action of antihypertensive drugs mediates high blood pressure in the morning in hypertensive population: the Ohasama study

Blood pressure (BP) usually peaks in the morning. The circadian variation of the onset of cardiovascular disease mimics this circadian BP variation. To examine the determinants of the BP difference between the self-recorded BP in the morning (home BP) and daytime average ambulatory BP a cross sectional study was done in the general population of Ohasama, Japan. 1207 subjects > or = 20 years measured both home (more than 14 times) and ambulatory BPs (326 treated for hypertension and 881 untreated subjects), The prevalence of subjects with the systolic BP difference (home BP in the morning - daytime ambulatory BP) of > or = 10 mmHg (high morning BP) was 5.6% in untreated normotensives, 2.9% in untreated hypertensives, and 25.8% in treated hypertensives. This trend was also observed for diastolic pressure. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that age, male sex, and use of antihypertensive drugs were positively associated and day-night difference of BP was negatively associated with the high morning BP, respectively. These results suggest an insufficient duration of antihypertensive action of widely used antihypertensive drugs in Japan from the 1980s to 1990s. The amplitude of the day-night difference of ambulatory BP in subjects with a high morning BP was lower (non-dipping) than that without high morning BP. The high morning BP is not necessarily accompanied by hypertension but might be mediated, at least in part, by an insufficient duration of action of antihypertensive drugs. The high morning BP accompanies so-called non-dipper pattern of circadian BP variation. An insufficient duration of action of drugs may partly mediate non-dipping in subjects with antihypertensive medication.

Risk of cardiovascular disease in relation to achieved office and ambulatory blood pressure control in treated hypertensive subjects

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the prognostic impact of 24-h blood pressure control in treated hypertensive subjects.

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that ambulatory blood pressure improves risk stratification in untreated subjects with essential hypertension. Surprisingly, little is known on the prognostic value of this procedure in treated subjects.

METHODS

Diagnostic procedures including 24-h noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were undertaken in 790 subjects with essential hypertension (mean age 48 years) before therapy and after an average follow-up of 3.7 years (2,891 patient-years).

RESULTS

At the follow-up visit, 26.6% of subjects achieved adequate office blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg), and 37.3% of subjects achieved adequate ambulatory blood pressure control (daytime blood pressure <135/85 mm Hg). Months or years after the follow-up visit, 58 patients suffered a first cardiovascular event. Event rate was lower (0.71 events/100 person-years) among the subjects with adequate ambulatory blood pressure control than among those with higher blood pressure levels (1.87 events/100 person-years) (p = 0.0026). Ambulatory blood pressure control predicted a lesser risk for subsequent cardiovascular disease independently of other individual risk factors (RR 0.36; 95% confidence intervals: 0.18 to 0.70; p = 0.003), including age, diabetes and left ventricular hypertrophy. Office blood pressure control was associated with a nonsignificant lesser risk of subsequent events (RR 0.63; 95% confidence intervals: 0.31 to 1.31; p = NS). In-treatment ambulatory blood pressure was more potent than pre-treatment blood pressure for prediction of subsequent cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory blood pressure control is superior to office blood pressure control for prediction of individual cardiovascular risk in treated hypertensive subjects.

Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients without and with blood pressure control: data from the PAMELA population. Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni

Previous studies have shown that in the population, only a minority of treated hypertensive patients achieve blood pressure (BP) control. Whether and to what extent this inadequate control has reflection on hypertension-related organ damage has never been systematically examined. In 2051 subjects belonging to the PAMELA (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni) Study population, we measured office, home, and 24-hour ambulatory BP values, together with echocardiographic left ventricular mass and wall thickness. Based on the fraction on antihypertensive treatment and on measurements of increased or normal office, home, or 24-hour ambulatory BP values, subjects were classified as normotensives, untreated hypertensives, treated hypertensives with inadequate BP control, and treated hypertensives with effective BP control. Compared with values in the normotensive group, left ventricular mass index, left ventricular wall thickness, and prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy were markedly increased not only in untreated hypertensive patients but also in treated hypertensives with inadequate BP control. Echocardiographic abnormalities were less in treated hypertensives with BP control than in patients with inadequate BP control, but values were still clearly greater than in normotensive subjects. This was the case regardless whether BP control was assessed by office, home, and/or ambulatory values. Our data provide evidence that in the hypertensive fraction of the population, cardiac structural alterations can be frequently found in both the presence and absence of antihypertensive treatment. They also imply that even effective treatment of hypertension does not allow complete reversal of the cardiac organ damage characterizing high BP states.

Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure in the International Nifedipine GITS Study Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)

OBJECTIVES

The International Nifedipine GITS Study Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) showed, by means of office blood pressure measurements, that long-term treatment with nifedipine GITS is as effective as diuretics in preventing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications. However, since office blood pressure measurements reflect to a limited extent blood pressure outside the office, a side-arm INSIGHT study in which patients underwent both office measurement and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was also performed.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The study had a randomized, double-blind, parallel group design. After 4 weeks of placebo, mild-to-moderate essential hypertensive patients were randomized to nifedipine GITS 30 mg or amiloride 2.5 + hydrochlorothiazide 5 mg for 3.1 years. Dose titration was performed by dose doubling and addition of atenolol 25-50 mg or enalapril 5-10 mg, or other drugs when needed. Analysis was carried out by intention-to-treat and included computation of 24 h, day and night ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate values. Additional analyses included computation of the trough-to-peak ratio and the smoothness index (the ratio between the average of the 24-hourly blood pressure reductions after treatment and its standard deviation).

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were recruited and 149 were valid for analysis: 78 patients had 24 h ambulatory recordings both at baseline and during treatment and 134 during treatment. Office, 24 h and day and night blood pressures were all significantly and similarly reduced by both treatments. Office and ambulatory heart rate was left unchanged by diuretics, while it was slightly reduced by nifedipine. Median trough-to-peak ratios were always > 0.5 and superimposable between the two treatment groups. Similarly, smoothness indices of systolic and diastolic blood pressures were comparably high for nifedipine and diuretics, thus demonstrating a similar well-balanced antihypertensive response to both drugs. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups in the number of cardiovascular events (17 in the nifedipine-based and 26 in the diuretics-based treatment group).

CONCLUSIONS

In the INSIGHT study, the long-term antihypertensive effect on 24 h blood pressure and the cardiovascular protection of nifedipine was similar to that of diuretics.

Blood pressure variability and organ damage in a general population: results from the PAMELA study (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni)

In hypertensive patients, 24-hour blood pressure (BP) variability (V) shows a positive relationship with organ damage, organ damage progression, and cardiovascular morbidity. The clinical relevance of BPV in the population has never been investigated. In a sample of 3200 individuals, randomly selected from the general population of Monza (Milan, Italy), we evaluated BP by an automatic oscillometric device every 20 minutes for 24 hours and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) by echocardiography. In each subject, individual systolic and diastolic BP readings were averaged to obtain a 24-hour mean. Systolic BPV was obtained by calculating (1) the standard deviation of the 24-hour mean, which was taken as the overall BPV, (2) the cyclic components (Fourier spectral analysis) that in the population as a whole explained >95% of the overall BPV, and (3) the fraction of the overall BPV that in each subject was not accounted for by the 2 cyclic components, termed individual residual BPV. A similar procedure was used for diastolic BP and heart rate. Participation rate was 64.1%. Patients receiving antihypertensive therapy (n=403) were excluded from the analysis, which was therefore limited to 1648 participants. In the population as a whole, LVMI significantly related to 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP mean (beta=0.40 and beta=0.37, respectively, P<0.001 for both) but not to the 2 cyclic components that accounted for most of the BPV. On the other hand, the individual residual BPV (which accounts on average for about 50% of overall BPV) showed a significant positive relationship with LVMI (beta =0.38 and beta=0.88 for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, P<0.05 and P<0.01). No relationship was found between LVMI and heart rate values. These findings provide evidence that there is a relationship between LVMI and 24-hour average BP values in the population. They also provide the first demonstration that in the population there is also a positive independent association between LVMI and BPV. This association, however, can be exclusively seen with the BPV component that has an erratic rather than a cyclic nature.

Assessment of antihypertensive drug use in primary care in Ravenna, Italy, based on data collected in the PANDORA project

BACKGROUND

In the clinical-practice setting, only a small percentage of patients treated with antihypertensive drugs become normotensive. Furthermore, the diversity of drug classes used makes comparison of treatments difficult.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to characterize the types and efficacy of antihypertensive treatments used in primary care in the area of Ravenna, Italy. The study was conducted in the context of the PANDORA Project, an open-ended global outcome study.

METHODS

Data were gathered from general practitioners (GPs) and were stored by the GPs or through links with national health service databases. The population of interest was patients with essential hypertension taking antihypertensive medication, each of whom was observed for 365 days. Blood pressure was measured in the morning or afternoon using an automated device, in accordance with normal clinical practice. At each office visit, the GP reviewed and made any necessary adjustments to the patient's antihypertensive treatment. Antihypertensive drug use was assessed by calculating the mean daily dose (MDD) of the prescribed drug and the duration of treatment (DT). A DT > or = 273 days constituted continuous therapy, and a DT <273 days constituted discontinuous therapy. Adverse events were not collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-one GPs took part in the study. The study population included 969 patients (443 men, 526 women), all of them white, whose ages ranged from 23 to 88 years. At enrollment, 327 patients were normotensive (blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg) and 642 were hypertensive despite drug treatment. More than 25 treatment regimens were identified. Over the course of follow-up, 49 patients had discontinuous therapy and 920 had continuous therapy. Among those who had continuous therapy, 117 (12.7%) took an MDD of <0.5 tablet/d; 297 (32.3%) took > or = 0.5 and <1 tablet/d; 364 (39.6%) took > or = 1 and <2 tablets/d; and 142 (15.4%) took > or = 2 tablets/d. At the end of the observation period, the proportion of normotensive patients had increased by 5.7% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this study, improper use of antihypertensive drug therapy appears to be one of the reasons for the relatively small proportion of patients who attain blood pressure control with treatment.

The 24-hour blood pressure pattern: does it have implications for morbidity and mortality?

The onset of adverse cardiovascular events demonstrates a circadian pattern that reaches a peak in the morning shortly after awakening and arising. A parallel, 24-hour cyclical pattern has also been observed in the activities of various physiologic measurements, including blood pressure, heart rate, sympathetic nervous system activity, and platelet adhesiveness. Although a direct link has not yet been established, it can be postulated that the early morning surge in blood pressure may be a factor in precipitating acute cardiovascular episodes. Similar to the early morning blood pressure surge, blood pressure variability throughout the day appears to be a further independent risk factor for hypertensive target organ damage. Thus, it is reasonable to select an antihypertensive agent that offers smooth and well-sustained blood pressure control for the full 24-hour dosing interval, including the vulnerable early morning period. The results of clinical trials using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring have shown that telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, possesses such properties. Whether or not these attributes of telmisartan might translate into improvements in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality will be explored in the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET). This study will compare the effects of telmisartan 80-mg monotherapy, ramipril 10-mg monotherapy, or a combination of telmisartan 80 mg plus ramipril 10 mg, on cardiovascular endpoints in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events, several of whom are likely to be hypertensive at baseline. Inclusion of the telmisartan plus ramipril treatment arm will allow investigation of the potential advantages presented by combining an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor with an angiotensin II receptor antagonist.

Monotherapy versus combination therapy as first line treatment of uncomplicated arterial hypertension

Mild to moderate hypertension still remains poorly controlled. This relates to multiple factors including low antihypertensive efficacy of single drug therapies reluctance of primary care physicians to modify/titrate initially chosen therapy to obtain target blood pressure, and poor compliance with medication. Several guidelines for the treatment of high blood pressure now include combination therapy with low doses of 2 drugs as one of the strategies for the initial management of mild/moderate arterial hypertension. Evidence discussed in this article points to superior control of blood pressure by combinations of low doses of 2 drugs as compared with monotherapy in regular doses. This superior effectiveness of combined therapy relates to a better antihypertensive efficacy and higher response rates in the low range of doses as the result of complementary mechanisms of antihypertensive effects, better tolerance as a result of a lower rate of adverse effects in the low dose range, improved compliance from better tolerance and simple drug regimen, and lower cost. Whether increased use of fixed low dose combination therapies would translate to better control of arterial hypertension in the population and thereby further reduction of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality caused by hypertension remains to be assessed.

Blood pressure control assessed by home, ambulatory and conventional blood pressure measurements in the Japanese general population: the Ohasama study

To assess blood pressure control in the Japanese population, we analyzed previously obtained measurements of conventional, home and ambulatory blood pressures in 1,174 subjects aged > or =40 in a Japanese community. On the basis of conventional blood pressure values and the use of antihypertensive medication, participants were classified as normotensive, untreated hypertensive and treated hypertensive subjects. When 140/90, 135/85 and 135/85 mmHg were used as the hypertension criteria for conventional, home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements, respectively, all three blood pressure values were higher in untreated and treated hypertensive subjects than in normotensive subjects. Among the treated hypertensive subjects, approximately half were classified as hypertensive not only by conventional blood pressure, but also by home or ambulatory measurements. Approximately 10% of the subjects defined as normotensive by conventional blood pressure measurement were classified as hypertensive by home or ambulatory measurements, whereas 60% of the untreated hypertensive subjects as defined by conventional blood pressure measurement had normal home or ambulatory blood pressure values. Therefore, we concluded that 1) the poor blood pressure control in treated hypertensive subjects was attributable not only to the white coat effect but also to inadequate control of blood pressure; and 2) a certain percentage of subjects were misclassified as hypertensive or normotensive by conventional blood pressure measurement.

Blood pressure levels, risk factors and antihypertensive treatments: lessons from the SHEAF study

OBJECTIVES

The SHEAF study (Self measurement of blood pressure at Home in the Elderly: Assessment and Follow-up) is a 3-year prospective cohort study of French elderly (> or =60 years) hypertensive patients designed to assess whether home blood pressure (HBP) measurement provides additional prognostic information over office blood pressure (OBP) in terms of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The objective of the present work is to describe the baseline data of the population enrolled in the SHEAF study with special emphasis on blood pressure control in treated hypertensives.

METHODS

During the 2-week initial inclusion phase, baseline demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, antihypertensive treatments as well as office and home blood pressure were recorded. Baseline OBP was assessed using a mercury sphygmomanometer (three consecutive measurements during two visits performed 2 weeks apart). HBP was performed over a 4-day period (three consecutive measurements in the morning and in the evening).

RESULTS

A total of 4939 (95%) of the 5211 patients included in the SHEAF study were treated with at least one antihypertensive drug. Their ages ranged from 60 to 99 years (mean age 70 +/- 7 years); 49% were men, 12% had a previous history of coronary artery disease, 14% diabetes and 43% a treated dyslipidaemia. A total of 45% of the treated patients received a single antihypertensive drug, 34% two drugs, 21% three drugs or more. Overall 23% of treated hypertensives were normalised at the doctor's office (systolic BP <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP <90 mm Hg) and 27% at home (home systolic BP <135 mm Hg and home diastolic BP <85 mm Hg). Poor blood pressure control was associated with age, an increasing presence of diabetes and prescription of several antihypertensives. The proportion of subjects with controlled blood pressure decrease with age from 26% (60-69 years) to 21% (> or =80 years). Blood pressure control of diabetic patients was particularly poor as only 19% had an OBP <140/90 mm Hg and 6% a blood pressure <130/85 mm Hg. The percentage of patients with controlled OBP decreased from 26% when receiving a single antihypertensive drug to 11% when receiving four antihypertensives or more.

CONCLUSION

In the SHEAF study, less than one-third of the patients had an OBP adequately controlled thus confirming previous studies performed in younger populations. Presence of associated cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes did not give rise to a better blood pressure control. When blood pressure control was assessed using HBP measurement similar results were found. As the beneficial effect of antihypertensive treatment has been particularly well established in the elderly, the data of this study underlines the need for a closer and more rigorous management of elderly hypertensives.

Nitrendipine and enalapril combination therapy in mild to moderate hypertension: assessment of dose-response relationship by a clinical trial of factorial design

Hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor and the goal of its pharmacologic treatment is to reduce morbidity and mortality. Treatment is usually initiated with a low dose of a single agent and titrated to a higher dose as required. As many as 50% of patients require the addition of a second agent to achieve satisfactory blood pressure control. The aim of this study was to assess the dose-response relationship of nitrendipine and enalapril alone or in fixed combination in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. A total of 496 patients were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, factorial-design, parallel-group clinical trial comparing placebo, nitrendipine (5, 10, and 20 mg) and enalapril (5, 10, and 20 mg) alone or in combination. After a single-blind, 2-week placebo run-in period, 414 patients whose diastolic blood pressure ranged between 90-109 mm Hg were randomly assigned to a treatment group. The combination of nitrendipine and enalapril, particularly regimens including nitrendipine 20 mg and enalapril 5 or 10 mg, were significantly superior to both monotherapies; mean diastolic blood pressure reductions from baseline to last visit were -12.5 and -14.3 mm Hg, respectively. Response surface analysis provided further evidence that these combinations were optimal in terms of anti-hypertensive efficacy. All treatments were well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. In summary, the anti-hypertensive efficacy of the combination was found to be superior to both monotherapies at any doses. The dose combination achieving the greatest blood pressure reduction was nitrendipine 20 mg and enalapril 10 mg.

Caffeine and stress: implications for risk, assessment, and management of hypertension

Caffeine use is widespread, and its consumption increases during periods of stress. Caffeine raises blood pressure by elevating vascular resistance, and this effect is larger and more prolonged in hypertensive patients than in normotensive. The pressor response to caffeine occurs equally in persons at rest and under stress. The elevated baseline pressures of the hypertensive patient are therefore increased by both caffeine and stress, potentially leading to undesirably high pressures. Such combined effects on blood pressure may potentially confound the evaluation of hypertension, and possibly reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy. These effects are not abolished by pharmacologic tolerance to caffeine, as tolerance may not be complete with daily intake. The contribution of caffeine's effects to the development of hypertension warrants continued study, and caffeine use by patients merits consideration in terms of assessment and management of this disorder.

Hypertension guidelines and their limitations--the impact of physicians' compliance as evaluated by guideline awareness

OBJECTIVE

The initial step of an optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with arterial hypertension is the recognition and acceptance of new recommendations by the physicians themselves. This guideline awareness of the physicians has never been evaluated in detail.

DESIGN

The awareness of content of current recommendations in hypertension diagnosis, treatment and treatment control was therefore assessed in primary care physicians using a questionnaire. The guidelines of the German Hypertension Society were used as the reference standard.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 24 899 German physicians, including all internists, all cardiologists and 22% of general practitioners were contacted in a nationwide survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of answers in agreement with the guideline was used as a measure of guideline awareness. Adequate awareness of content of guideline recommendations was defined as the correct answer to five out of eight questions; the correct answers had to include the appropriate definition of hypertension.

RESULTS

The analysis was based on 11 547 returned questionnaires (47.1%). An adequate guideline awareness was found in 23.7% of the total study population, especially in 37.1% of cardiologists, in 25.6% of internists and in 18.8% of general practitioners. While the guideline awareness was significantly influenced by the duration of private practice, regional and municipal factors had only minor influence on the results.

CONCLUSION

The impact of hypertension guidelines on actual medical knowledge is modest. Thus, the information strategies about current treatment guidelines must be improved and tailored to the needs of physicians in clinical practice to ultimately improve patient care.

High prevalence of cardiac and extracardiac target organ damage in refractory hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Target organ damage (TOD) in chronically treated hypertensives is related to effective blood pressure (BP) control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of cardiac and extracardiac TOD in patients with refractory hypertension (RH) compared with well-controlled treated hypertensives (C).

METHODS

Fifty-four consecutive patients with RH (57 +/- 10 years), selected according to WHO/ISH guidelines definition, and 51 essential hypertensives (55 +/- 10 years) with satisfactory BP control obtained by association therapy, underwent the following procedures: (1) clinic BP measurement; (2) blood sampling for routine chemistry examinations; (3) 24 h urine collection for microalbuminuria; (4) non-mydriatic retinography; (5) echocardiogram; (6) carotid ultrasonogram. In order to exclude 'office resistance' (defined as clinic BP > 140/90 mmHg and average 24 h BP </= 125/79 mmHg), all patients with RH were subjected to 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar for age, gender, body surface area, smoking habit and duration of hypertension, glucose, creatinine and lipid levels. By definition, clinic BP was significantly higher in RH than C (161 +/- 19/96 +/- 9 versus 127 +/- 6/80 +/- 5 mmHg, respectively, P < 0.01). The increased prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and carotid intima-media (IM) thickening (40 versus 12%, P < 0.01, according to a non-gender-specific partition value of 125 g/m2; and 36 versus 14%, P < 0.01, according to IM thickness > or =1.0 mm, respectively); a higher prevalence of carotid plaques (65 versus 32%, P < 0.05), a more advanced retinal involvement (grade II and III, 73 and 5% versus 38 and 0%, P < 0.01) and a greater albumin urinary excretion (22 +/- 32 mg/24 h versus 11 +/- 13 mg/24 h, P < 0.01) were found in RH compared to C.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that RH is a clinical condition associated with a high prevalence of TOD at cardiac, macro- and microvascular level and consequently with high absolute cardiovascular risk, which needs a particularly intensive therapeutic approach aimed to normalize BP levels and to induce TOD regression.

Prevalence and therapeutic control of hypertension in 30,000 subjects in the workplace

-To assess blood pressure (BP) control in a French working population through the use of a careful assessment of BP based on 2 different visits in 1 month, 17 359 men and 12 267 women were evaluated from January 1997 to April 1998. The initial phase was a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study designed to assess the incidence of arterial hypertension in a French working population. Information was collected by the work-site physician during the annual examination. BP was measured with a validated automatic device. Among subjects with BP >/= mm Hg, patients not treated with antihypertensive drugs were invited to have an additional BP measurement taken 1 month later. The prevalence of hypertension (BP >/= mm Hg) based on 2 visits was 16.2% in men and 9.4% in women. When the diagnosis of hypertension was based on 2 visits, its prevalence was 41% lower in men and 36% lower in women compared with that of a diagnosis based on a single visit. Accordingly, the awareness of hypertension was 49% higher in men and 40% higher in women. Overall, 12.5% of hypertensive men and 33.2% of hypertensive women taking antihypertensive medication had their BP levels lowered to < mm Hg by treatment. Although the percentage of hypertensive men and women under current treatment who were aware of their hypertension increased with age, BP control among treated subjects decreased with age. Ineffective BP control with treatment accounted for 33% of BP levels >/= mm Hg in men and 40% of those observed in women. In this large French working population, estimates of hypertension therapeutic control depend heavily on the number of BP measurements. Despite these methodological precautions, insufficient awareness of BP and insufficient BP control through treatment remain 2 major public health problems.

Autonomic dysregulation in essential hypertension: insight from heart rate and arterial pressure variability

Essential hypertension is the most prevalent cardiovascular disorder, affecting more than 50 million people in the USA. Hypertension-related mortality and morbidity figures have been greatly improved over the last three decades by major advances in prevention. Detection and operative suggestions for practicing physicians are available from several guideline treatments derived from grouped data obtained in numerous well-conducted studies on large numbers of patients. However, the disappointing results of some forms of antihypertensive therapies, particularly in preventing coronary artery disease, has shed some doubts on traditional approaches to managing hypertensive patients. At present, in spite of extensive investigations, the exact causal mechanism(s) are far from being fully understood, and consequently, essential hypertension is still managed using a heuristic approach. Persistent elevations in arterial pressure imply some disturbances in the complex and multifactorial cardiovascular control mechanisms. In this context, neurohumoral disturbances might play a special role, in view of the demonstration that an elevated sympathetic drive seems essential in hypertensive patients. In this review, we follow the hypothesis that other allied methods capable of quantitatively assessing some aspects of the regulatory system might support and integrate the usual dichotomous diagnostic procedure based on arterial pressure determinations. In prior studies, we reported that parameters obtained by spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) might furnish useful information on autonomic normal and abnormal nervous system regulation. In the foregoing, we summarize our experience using this approach in the clinical management of hypertensive patients. It is our tenet that spectral analysis of mono or multivariate cardiovascular beat-by-beat variabilities provides potentially important information on alterations in neural control of the circulation accompanying essential hypertension. In spite of an ongoing debate on the interpretation of specific aspects of HRV spectral components, overall, it appears that the available evidence supports the hypothesis that in essential hypertension, there is an increased sympathetic and reduced vagal cardiac drive coupled with an enhancement of vasomotor sympathetic modulation. Prospective studies on large populations, rendered more easy to perform, thanks to improvements in technology and telemedicine applications, might provide an answer to the still open question of how to apply spectral analysis of HRV to a better mechanistic understanding of essential hypertension, and to more satisfactory individually tailored antihypertensive treatments.

Current concepts in the management of hypertensive crisis: emergencies and urgencies

Hypertensive emergencies and hypertensive urgencies represent a large percentage of major medical emergencies and have the potential of producing serious organ damage or death if not treated promptly and selectively. Several classifications of antihypertensive agents are discussed, with emphasis on selecting agents appropriate for patients' hypertension manifestations and comorbid situations. Epidemiology and evaluation of hypertension, as well as common pharmacokinetics of several common and new oral and parenteral antihypertensive agents, are described. Special nursing considerations of medication administration and gerontology concepts are included.

Cardiovascular risk and therapeutic intervention for the early morning surge in blood pressure and heart rate

The incidence of most adverse cardiovascular events appears to follow a circadian pattern, reaching a peak in the morning shortly after wakening and arising. The activities of many physiologic parameters, including hemodynamic, hematologic and humoral factors, also fluctuate in a cyclical manner over the 24h. It has been suggested that, during the post-awakening hours, the phases of these cycles synchronize to create an environment that predisposes to atherosclerotic plaque rupture and thrombosis in susceptible individuals, thereby accounting for the heightened cardiovascular risk at this time of day. Blood pressure and heart rate are part of this physiologic process, following a clear circadian rhythm characterized by a fall during sleep and a sharp rise upon awakening. This so-called 'morning surge' in blood pressure may act as a trigger for cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and stroke. The clinical implication of these observations is that antihypertensive therapy should provide blood pressure control over the entire interval between doses. For agents taken once daily in the morning, the time of trough plasma drug level (and lowest pharmacodynamic effect) will often coincide with the early morning surge in blood pressure and heart rate. For these reasons, chronotherapeutic formulations of drugs and intrinsically long-acting antihypertensive agents provide the most logical approach to the treatment of hypertensive patients since they provide 24 h blood pressure control from a single daily dose as well as attenuating the early morning rise in blood pressure (and in some instances heart rate).

[Comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy of and tolerance to 2 imidazoline receptor agonists: moxonidine and rilmenidine in monotherapy]

Two hundreds mild to moderate hypertensive patients (mean age 54 +/- 10, 115 males, 85 females) were randomised in a multicentre, double blind, two parallel groups trial in order to compare the efficacy of moxonidine (0.2 mg od) and rilmenidine (1 mg od), two selective I1 receptor agonists. The dosage had to be shifted after a four-week treatment period (moxonidine 0.4 mg od or rilmenidine 2 mg bid) if DBP > 90 mmHg. More than half of the patients had to be shifted to a double dose. The blood pressure was normalised (DBP < or = 90 mmHg) for 47% of the moxonidine patient's and 50% of the rilmenidine patients. The DBP decrease reached 7.3 mmHg in the moxonidine group and 8.0 mmHg in the rilmenidine group (P = 0.28). The SBP decrease was the same in the two groups (7.6 mmHg). Both drugs were well tolerated. The great affinity of moxonidine and rilmenidine for the I1 receptors and the weak affinity for the alpha 2 receptors were probably responsible of the small number of adverse events which are generally linked to the centrally acting antihypertensive drugs (asthenia, somnolence, oedema). Because moxonidine and rilmenidine are often to be prescribed at double dose and are often associated with other antihypertensives, moxonidine whose dosage could be shifted without having to increase the number of daily intakes could enhance the patient's comfort and make the compliance easier.

Comparative effects of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS during treatment and after missing two doses

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) measured by office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) during treatment and, after patients have missed two doses.

METHOD

After a single blind run-in 4-week placebo period, 58 patients were randomly allocated to amlodipine (5mg/daily, n=30) or nifedipine GITS (30mg/daily; n=28) in a double-blind, double dummy fashion. Patients received active medication for 4 weeks. Then, to simulate failure of compliance, patients received two single blinded doses of placebo. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was carried out at the end of run-in placebo phase, the first day, the last day of active treatment and up to 72h after the last active dose.

RESULTS

Diastolic blood pressure was controlled in 61.9% patients on amlodipine and 52.9% on nifedipine GITS. Reductions in blood pressure were similar in both groups. ABPM showed significant reduction in blood pressure from the first day in the nifedipine GITS group, while amlodipine group had marginal effect. Peak reduction in systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 26/15mmHg at 5-6h after ingestion of amlodipine tablets. The trough reduction was 22/13mmHg; with a trough-to-peak ratio of 84.61% for systolic and 86.67% for diastolic blood pressure. Peak reduction in systolic/diastolic blood pressure with nifedipine GITS was 19/15mmHg and the trough reduction was 21/17mmHg, giving a trough-to-peak ratio of 100% for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. When patients received placebo after 4 weeks of active treatment, simulating a compliance failure, amlodipine maintained reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure for at least up to 72h after the last active dose, maintaining 57.71% of the effect for systolic blood pressure and 60.00% for diastolic blood pressure. In contrast, nifedipine GITS effect was rapidly lost during this study phase, with a reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure of only 14-16%, 72h after the last active dose.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that amlodipine and nifedipine GITS reduce blood pressure to about the same extent during chronic treatment. In the case of compliance failure, such as missing one or two doses, amlodipine maintained significant and important antihypertensive effect with the trough-to-peak ratio still over 50% 72h after the last active dose. On the other hand, the coverage of nifedipine GITS was limited to about 36h after the last active dose.

Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure in a population of elderly men

OBJECTIVES

The principal aim was to study ambulatory and office blood pressure in a population of elderly men. We also wanted to describe the prevalence of hypertension and investigate the blood pressure control in treated elderly hypertensives.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of a population of elderly men, conducted between 1991 and 1995.

SUBJECTS

Seventy-year-old men (n = 1060), participants of a cohort study that began in 1970.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Office and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure.

RESULTS

Average 24 h blood pressure in the population was 133 +/- 16/75 +/- 8 mmHg, and daytime blood pressure 140 +/- 16/80 +/- 9 mmHg. Corresponding values in untreated subjects (n = 685) were 131 +/- 16/74 +/- 7 and 139 +/- 16/79 +/- 8, respectively. An office recording of 140/90 mmHg corresponded to an ambulatory pressure of 130/78 (24 h) and 137/83 mmHg (daytime) in untreated subjects. In subjects identified as normotensives according to office blood pressure (n = 270), the 95th percentiles of average 24 h and daytime blood pressures were 142/80 and 153/85 mmHg, respectively. The prevalence of hypertension, defined as office blood pressure greater than or = 140/90 mmHg, was 66%. Despite treatment, treated hypertensives (n = 285) showed higher office (157/89 vs. 127/76 mmHg) and 24 h ambulatory (138/78 vs. 122/71 mmHg) pressures than normotensives (P < 0.05). Fourteen per cent of the treated hypertensives had an office blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide a basis for 24 h ambulatory blood pressure reference values in elderly men. The study confirms previous findings of a high prevalence of hypertension at older age. It also indicates that blood pressure is inadequately controlled in elderly treated hypertensives.

Risks of coronary heart disease in women: current understanding and evolving concepts

The population of older individuals in the United States is growing rapidly. Because women generally live longer than men and make up the majority of this aging population, the elucidation of health issues related to older women is important. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and disability for women and claims the lives of more women than the next 14 causes combined. The majority of these deaths are due to atherosclerotic coronary heart disease, with nearly 250,000 women dying of myocardial infarction each year. There is evidence that women with suspected or established cardiovascular disease have not benefited fully from recent advances in the detection and management of coronary heart disease. Regardless of the mechanism and extent of the effect that sex differences have on approaches to cardiovascular disease, women appear to benefit from proven efficacious therapies, and the longer-term outcomes associated with these treatments are positive. The data regarding women and coronary heart disease are rapidly evolving and sometimes conflicting. The intent of this article is to summarize the most current understanding of coronary heart disease risks in women, highlighting the impact of prevention, and to discuss the latest novel findings that may become important in our armamentarium for prevention of coronary heart disease.

Effect of pharmacist intervention and initiation of home blood pressure monitoring in patients with uncontrolled hypertension

This prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluated the impact of pharmacist-initiated home blood pressure monitoring and intervention on blood pressure control, therapy compliance, and quality of life (QOL). Subjects were 36 patients with uncontrolled stage 1 or 2 hypertension. Eighteen subjects received home blood pressure monitors, a diary, and instructions to measure blood pressure twice every morning. Home measurements were evaluated by a clinical pharmacist by telephone, and the patient's family physician was contacted with recommendations if mean monthly values were 140/90 mm Hg or higher. Eighteen control patients did not receive home monitors or pharmacist intervention. Office blood pressure measurements and QOL surveys (SF-36) were obtained at baseline and after 6 months. Mean absolute reductions in systolic and diastolic pressures were significantly reduced from baseline in intervention subjects (17.0 and 10.5 mm Hg, both p < 0.0001) but not in controls (7.0 and 3.8 mm Hg, p = 0.12 and p = 0.09). More intervention subjects (8) had blood pressure values below 140/90 at 6 months compared with controls (4). During the study 83.3% (15) of intervention subjects had drug therapy changes versus 33% (6) of controls (p < 0.01). Compliance and QOL were not significantly affected. Our data suggest that the combination of pharmacist intervention with home monitoring can improve blood pressure control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This may be related to increased modifications of drug regimens.

Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) is usually measured by conventional sphygmomanometry. Although apparently simple, this procedure is fraught with many potential sources of error. This review focuses on two alternative techniques of BP measurement: ambulatory monitoring and self measurement.

REVIEW

BP values obtained by ambulatory monitoring or self measurement are characterised by high reproducibility, are not subject to digit preference or observer bias, and minimise the transient rise of the blood pressure in response to the surroundings of the clinic or the presence of the observer, the so called white coat effect. For ambulatory monitoring, the upper limits of systolic/diastolic normotension in adults include 130/80 mm Hg for the 24 hour BP and 135/85 and 120/70 mm Hg for the daytime BP and night time BP, respectively. For the the self measured BP these thresholds include 135/85 mm Hg. Automated BP measurement is most useful to identify patients with white coat hypertension. Whether or not white coat hypertension predisposes to sustained hypertension remains debated. However, outcome is better correlated with the ambulatory BP than with the conventional BP. In patients with white coat hypertension, antihypertensive drugs lower the BP in the clinic, but not the ambulatory BP, and also do not improve prognosis. Ambulatory BP monitoring is also better than conventional BP measurement in assessing the effects of treatment. Ambulatory BP monitoring is necessary to diagnose nocturnal hypertension and is especially indicated in patients with borderline hypertension, elderly patients, pregnant women, patients with treatment resistant hypertension, and also in patients with symptoms suggestive of hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

The newer techniques of BP measurement are now well established in clinical research, for diagnosis in clinical practice, and will increasingly make their appearance in occupational and environmental medicine.

Results of antihypertensive treatment by primary and secondary care physicians as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

BACKGROUND

We present data from a cross-sectional study on consecutive non-randomized drug-treated mild-to-moderate essential hypertensives, whose blood pressure was ambulatorily monitored for 24 h to evaluate the presence of adequate control.

DESIGN

Primary and secondary care physicians were invited to send to our clinic drug-treated patients with essential hypertension (JNC VI stages 1-2) to undergo 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) while continuing their prescribed medications.

METHODS

The 436 enrolled patients (255 males, 181 females, age 61+/-11 years) were left on their therapeutic regime: monotherapy in 208 patients (47. 7%) and combination therapy in 228 patients (52.3%). All the patients were divided into two care groups: primary care, 238 patients (54.6%) and secondary care, 198 patients (45.4%). A mean daytime blood pressure < or =135/85 mmHg was chosen as a definition of adequate blood pressure control.

RESULTS

Adequate blood pressure control was found in 196/436 total patients (45%); 112/238 patients in primary care (47%) and 84/198 patients in secondary care (42.4%) (P=NS); 94/208 patients (45.2%) in monotherapy and 102/228 patients (44.7%) in combination therapy (P=NS); 125/255 male patients (49%) and 71/181 female patients (39.2%) (P=0.0428). In the logistic regression model, female sex was associated with a higher risk of inadequate blood pressure control of about 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate blood pressure control, as assessed by ABPM, is not different in the two settings of family doctor's office and specialist's clinic and is predicted by male gender. The figures of adequate blood pressure control remind us of the rule of halves, regardless of treatment regimes and medications.

Ethnic differences in nocturnal blood pressure decline in treated hypertensives

Lack of a nocturnal decline in blood pressure (BP) has been associated with more severe end organ damage in hypertensives, and blacks appear less likely than whites to have a > 10% drop in nighttime BP ("dipping"). Little information is available about the relationship between treatment regimens, ethnic group classification, and dipping in treated hypertensive patient populations. We obtained 24-h ambulatory BP readings in 438 adult white (n = 103), black (n = 200) and Hispanic (n = 135) treated hypertensives. Tycos monitors were connected in patients' homes before their usual morning medication dose time. Research assistants administered a quality-of-life questionnaire, recorded patients' drug regimen, and observed the patients take their morning dose. Monitors were programmed to record BP every 30 min. Dippers were defined as persons who had a drop of > or = 10% decline in average daytime (08:00 to 22:00) compared to nighttime (00:00 to 04:00) BP. Logistic regression modeling was used to assess the relationship between demographic and treatment variables and probability of dipping. Twenty-four-hour average BP was similar in all three ethnic groups. However, the absence of a systolic dip was significantly more common in black and Hispanic men than in white men (OR black v white = 11.54, 95% CI = 3.92 to 34.01; OR Hispanic v white = 7.32, 95% CI = 2.47 to 21.68). There were no ethnic group differences in probability of systolic dipping among women. Absence of a diastolic dip was approximately twice as common in blacks and Hispanics than in whites, with no marked gender-by-ethnic-group interaction in the magnitude of the association. Of the 10 most commonly prescribed antihypertensives, no single drug was positively associated with nocturnal BP decline. Later versus earlier morning dose time, but not once-a-day dosing, was associated with absence of dipping. Treated black and Hispanic hypertensives are less likely to "dip" than non-Hispanic whites. No particular drug was positively associated with dipping.

Hypertensive emergencies

A hypertensive emergency is a situation in which uncontrolled hypertension is associated with acute end-organ damage. Most patients presenting with hypertensive emergency have chronic hypertension, although the disorder can present in previously normotensive individuals, particularly when associated with pre-eclampsia or acute glomerulonephritis. The pathophysiological mechanisms causing acute hypertensive endothelial failure are complex and incompletely understood but probably involve disturbances of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, loss of endogenous vasodilator mechanisms, upregulation of proinflammatory mediators including vascular cell adhesion molecules, and release of local vasoconstrictors such as endothelin 1. Magnetic resonance imaging has demonstrated a characteristic hypertensive posterior leucoencephalopathy syndrome predominantly causing oedema of the white matter of the parietal and occipital lobes; this syndrome is potentially reversible with appropriate prompt treatment. Generally, the therapeutic approach is dictated by the particular presentation and end-organ complications. Parenteral therapy is generally preferred, and strategies include use of sodium nitroprusside, beta-blockers, labetelol, or calcium-channel antagonists, magnesium for pre-eclampsia and eclampsia; and short-term parenteral anticonvulsants for seizures associated with encephalopathy. Novel therapies include the peripheral dopamine-receptor agonist, fenoldapam, and may include endothelin-1 antagonists.

Prevalence of target organ damage in treated hypertensive patients: different impact of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure control

OBJECTIVES

First, to evaluate the prevalence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, LV concentric remodelling and microalbuminuria in a selected sample of treated hypertensive patients with effective and prolonged clinic blood pressure (BP) control (BP < 140/90 mmHg). Second, to compare the prevalence of these markers of organ damage in patients with and without ambulatory BP (ABP) control, defined as average daytime BP < 132/85 mmHg).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive hypertensive patients who attended our hypertension outpatient clinic over a period of 3 months and were regularly followed up by the same medical team were included in the study. Obesity, diabetes mellitus, history or signs of cardiovascular or renal complications and major noncardiovascular diseases were the exclusion criteria from the study. Each patient underwent 24 h ABP monitoring, echocardiography and 24 h urine collection for albumin measurement.

RESULTS

The prevalence of LV hypertrophy (LV mass index > 125 g/m2 in both sexes), LV concentric remodelling (relative wall thickness > 0.45) and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion < 300 mg/ 24 h) in this selected group of patients (32 men, 26 women; mean age 53 +/- 9 years; mean clinic BP 122 +/- 9/ 78 +/- 6 mmHg) was markedly low (6.9, 8.6 and 5.1%, respectively). The 26 patients with effective ABP control (group I) were similar to the 32 patients without effective ABP control (group II) in age, gender, body surface area, clinic BP, smoking habit, glucose, cholesterol and creatinine plasma levels. Prevalence of LV hypertrophy, LV concentric remodelling and microalbuminuria was lower in group I than in group II (0 versus 12.9% P< 0.01, 7.7 versus 9.4% NS, 3.8 versus 6.2% NS, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that nonobese, nondiabetic hypertensive patients with an effective clinic BP control have a very low prevalence of target organ damage and that LVH is present only in individuals with insufficient ABP control.

Comparison of angiotensin II receptor blockers: impact of missed doses of candesartan cilexetil and losartan in systemic hypertension

Blood pressure remains poorly controlled in the hypertensive population due in large part to low or unsatisfactory patient compliance. Clinical studies that incorporate an intentionally missed dose have been designed to evaluate the impact of poor patient compliance on the effectiveness of antihypertensive medications. In these studies, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is continued throughout the dosing interval and beyond in order to determine when systolic and diastolic blood pressure increase into the hypertensive range. In an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, the antihypertensive effects of candesartan cilexetil 16 mg were maintained after a missed dose, whereas systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased toward baseline levels after a missed dose of losartan 100 mg. Candesartan cilexetil provided a significantly greater reduction in sitting systolic (p = 0.004) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.008) than losartan when measured 48 hours after the last dose. Moreover, the homogeneity of antihypertensive effects was greater after candesartan cilexetil than losartan based on calculation of the smoothness index from ambulatory systolic and diastolic measurements during the first 24-hour period after dosing and during the 12-hour period after the missed dose. These results demonstrate that missing or delaying a dose of candesartan cilexetil has less impact on antihypertensive efficacy than missing or delaying a dose of losartan.

Undertreatment of hypertension in community-dwelling older adults: a drug-utilization study in Dicomano, Italy

OBJECTIVE

To define: (1) the prevalence of and (2) factors associated with undertreatment of hypertension in older persons; and (3) the prevalence of specific drug regimens and reasons for their selection.

PARTICIPANTS

Cross-sectional survey of persons aged > or =65 years living in Dicomano, Italy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of untreated and uncontrolled hypertension, both defined on the basis of two blood pressure (BP) cut-off points (> or =140/90 and > or =160/90 mm Hg) and of the presence of pharmacological treatment Predictors of undertreatment were analysed for the higher BP cut-off only.

RESULTS

Five hundred of 692 (72.3%) and 380/692 (54.9%) participants met the 140/90 and the 160/90 mm Hg BP criterion, respectively. Of the latter, 162 (42.6%) were untreated, 119 (31.3%) had uncontrolled and 99 (26.1%) controlled hypertension. Women [odds ratio (OR), 0.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.2-0.7], participants with coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.6), stroke (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7), and preserved cognitive status (Mini Mental State Examination score >21: 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7) were more frequently treated. Uncontrolled hypertension was less likely in women (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-1.0) and CAD patients (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7). Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors (55%), calcium (Ca)-antagonists (31%) and diuretics (20%) were the drugs most commonly prescribed. ACE-inhibitors were preferred, and diuretics rarely used, in diabetic subjects. Ca-antagonists were used mostly in CAD participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension is undertreated in the majority of noninstitutionalized older adults, especially in men with impaired cognition and no vascular disease. Drug regimens are mostly based on ACE-inhibitors and Ca-antagonists, as a result of associated clinical conditions, requiring individualized treatment.

Antihypertensive therapy in renal patients - benefits and difficulties

High blood pressure values, diastolic and systolic, are associated with decreased renal function. This is particularly true when the diastolic blood pressure is higher than 90 mm Hg. Several studies showed that lowering of the blood pressure within the range of normotension according to the WHO causes a reduction in the rate of progression to terminal renal failure. These studies have led to recommendations to aim at a target blood pressure of approximately 125/75 mm Hg in the treatment of patients with glomerular diseases and particularly diabetic nephropathy with proteinuria >1 g/day. In contrast to these results, blood pressure values corresponding to the recommendation (</=125/75 mm Hg) of the JNC VI (see text) were achieved in 15% of the patients only. It has also been shown that at any given level of an average 24-hour blood pressure, patients with an insufficient decrease of the blood pressure during nighttime have a higher risk to progress to terminal renal failure. Thus it is very important to lower the nighttime blood pressure and to detect nighttime blood pressure increases using ambulatory blood pressure measurements.