Oral beta-adrenergic blockade with metoprolol in chronic severe dilated cardiomyopathy

Vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the treatment of chronic heart failure: distinguishing hype from hope

During the past 10 years, more than 80 orally active vasodilator and inotropic agents have been tested in the clinical setting to evaluate their potential utility in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Although the initial reports of all of these drugs suggested that each represented a major therapeutic advance, only three agents--digoxin, captopril and enalapril--have produced consistent long-term hemodynamic and clinical benefits in these severely ill patients. Most of the other drugs that have been tested have not (to date) distinguished themselves from placebo therapy in large-scale, controlled trials, even though these agents produce hemodynamic effects that closely resemble those seen with digitalis and the converting-enzyme inhibitors. These observations suggest that the hemodynamic derangements that characteristically accompany the development of left ventricular dysfunction cannot be considered to be the most important pathophysiologic abnormality in chronic heart failure. Although cardiac contractility is usually depressed in this disease, positive inotropic agents do not consistently improve the clinical status of these patients. Similarly, although the systemic vessels are usually markedly constricted, drugs that ameliorate this vasoconstriction do not consistently relieve symptoms, enhance exercise capacity or prolong life. Hence, correction of the central hemodynamic abnormalities seen in heart failure may not necessarily provide a rational basis for drug development, and future advances in therapy are likely to evolve only by attempting to understand and modify the basic physiologic derangements in this disorder.

Longitudinal study of ventricular function after the Mustard operation for transposition of the great arteries: a long term follow up

An earlier study of 25 patients who were investigated by radionuclide angiography after a Mustard procedure showed that they had had evidence of right and left ventricular dysfunction at rest and with exercise. Twenty one (mean age 17.0 years (range 13.7-20.6) 11 female patients) of the original 25 patients were followed up a mean of 4.3 years later (mean 14.6 years (range 12.5-16.0) after the procedure). The group means for resting right and left ventricular ejection fraction and exercise response were not significantly different from those reported five years before. Individual changes in values were within the normal variation seen in serial studies. This long term longitudinal follow up of patients after the Mustard operation showed that although some patients still had right and left ventricular dysfunction, resting ventricular function and exercise response remained stable over a five year period. This preservation of cardiac function may contribute to the long term survival of patients after the Mustard procedure.

Effect of drug therapy on survival in chronic congestive heart failure

A review of the current evidence on the effects of various agents on survival among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) suggests that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors probably offer the greatest potential for benefit. Trials undertaken before the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS) revealed favorable trends among patients in New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV who received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Data from CONSENSUS clearly demonstrate that enalapril reduces mortality rates among patients in New York Heart Association class IV, but conclusions regarding effects in patients with mild or moderate CHF must await the results of future studies. In contrast, the large data base on alpha-adrenergic blockers suggests that these drugs are not likely to improve survival. Information on inotropic agents is sparse, but it is possible that these drugs may not improve survival and, in fact, may have a harmful effect. Mortality data on CHF patients treated with beta blockers and calcium channel blockers are likewise limited; conclusions concerning effects on survival must be postponed until further studies are conducted. Many of the investigations undertaken thus far to examine survival in patients with CHF have been small and of short duration, so any comparisons of the effects of various drugs must be interpreted with caution.

Drug effects on the sinus node. A clinical perspective

The direct and indirect effects of drugs on the sinoatrial (SA) node are described in relation to basic cellular mechanisms and clinical applications. The effects of the different classes of antiarrhythmic agents are considered in terms of their direct depressant and excitatory actions. Indirect actions, particularly autonomic effects, are also discussed. Clinical aspects of the pharmacologic management of disorders of sinus node function such as the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia, and the identification of sinus node dysfunction by drug effects are considered in detail.

Beta-blocker therapy in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the setting of left ventricular dysfunction

Although several studies suggest beta blockers (BB) are effective in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias, less is known about their role in the treatment of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with impaired left ventricular function. To assess the tolerance and efficacy of these agents, 32 patients presenting with either ventricular fibrillation (18) or sustained ventricular tachycardia (14) were studied during BB therapy. Left ventricular dysfunction (mean ejection fraction 29%) was present as a consequence of coronary artery disease (26) or cardiomyopathy (6). Baseline arrhythmia assessment revealed recurrent ventricular tachycardia in all patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy including BB was guided by programmed stimulation (10), exercise testing (8), ambulatory monitoring (12), or was given empirically (2). Beta blockers were well tolerated, as measured by exercise duration, which improved significantly, and by long-term maintenance, which continued in 23 of 32 (72%) patients. Over a mean follow-up of 668 days, patients treated with BB had a relatively low incidence of both sudden (3%) and nonsudden (9%) death. Thus, BB can be effective and well tolerated adjunct therapy in patients with a history of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the setting of impaired left ventricular function.

Dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis: natural history, etiology, clinical manifestations, and management

This monograph begins and ends with a statement of uncertainty regarding many aspects of dilated cardiomyopathy. Natural history studies identify patients with widely differing outcomes. A host of prognostic factors have emerged, yet it would appear that the major determinants of survival are as yet unrecognized. The diagnosis remains primarily one of exclusion, and management is largely nonspecific and supportive. The frequency of sudden cardiac death is well documented, but the ability to accurately identify patients at risk and the efficacy of antiarrhythmic therapy is unestablished. The emerging success of cardiac transplantation is a source of encouragement. The causes of dilated cardiomyopathy remain a source of intense investigation. Accumulating evidence (much of it circumstantial) does, however, implicate a viral etiology and perhaps altered function of the immunoregulatory system. However, the disparity between the severity of functional disturbance with the relative lack of histologic markers of cellular necrosis implies a disturbance at a cellular level. The etiology or etiologies remain elusive. Future investigation directed at fundamental aspects of cardiac cellular biology may provide the answers.

Metoprolol. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and related cardiovascular disorders

During the intervening years since metoprolol was first reviewed in the Journal (1977), it has become widely used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and angina pectoris. Although much data have accumulated, its precise mechanisms of action in these diseases remain largely uncertain. Optimum treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris with metoprolol is achieved through dose titration within the therapeutic range. It has been clearly demonstrated that metoprolol is at least as effective as other beta-blockers, diuretics and certain calcium antagonists in the majority of patients. Although a twice daily dosage regimen is normally used, satisfactory control can be maintained in many patients with single daily doses of conventional or, more frequently, slow release formulations. Addition of a diuretic may improve the overall response rate in hypertension. Several controlled trials have studied the effects of metoprolol administered during the acute phase and after myocardial infarction. In early intervention trials a reduction in total mortality was achieved in one moderately large trial of prolonged treatment, but in another, which excluded patients already being treated with beta-blockers or certain calcium antagonists and where treatment was only short term, mortality was significantly reduced only in 'high risk' patients. Overall results with metoprolol have not demonstrated that early intervention treatment in all patients produces clinically important improvement in short term mortality. Thus, the use of metoprolol during the early stages of myocardial infarction is controversial, largely because of the requirement to treat all patients to save a small number at 'high risk'. This blanket coverage approach to treatment may be more justified during the post-infarction follow-up phase since it has been shown that metoprolol slightly, but significantly, reduces the mortality rate for periods of up to 3 years. Metoprolol is generally well tolerated and its beta 1-selectivity may facilitate its administration to certain patients (e.g. asthmatics and diabetics) in whom non-selective beta-blockers are contraindicated. Temporary fatigue, dizziness and headache are among the most frequently reported side effects. After a decade of use, metoprolol is well established as a first choice drug in mild to moderate hypertension and stable angina, and is beneficial in post-infarction patients. Further study is needed in less well established areas of treatment such as cardiac arrhythmias, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertensive cardiomegaly.

Acute hemodynamic and metabolic effects of ICI 118,587 (Corwin), a selective partial beta 1 agonist, in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

The effects of acute intravenous administration of ICI 118,587 (Corwin), a partial beta 1 agonist, were studied in nine patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and symptomatic congestive heart failure. Hemodynamic and metabolic parameters were measured using Swan-Ganz, arterial, and coronary sinus catheters. Repeated doses of Corwin produced no significant change in left ventricular performance, while a trend towards decreased blood pressure and stroke work was seen. No change occurred in coronary sinus blood flow, transmyocardial lactate extraction, or catecholamine release. One patient had significant depression of left ventricular function with hypotension. Thus, acute infusion of Corwin produced no beneficial inotropic responses, but rather produced features suggestive of further myocardial depression.

Norepinephrine spillover to plasma in patients with congestive heart failure: evidence of increased overall and cardiorenal sympathetic nervous activity

The analysis of plasma kinetics of the sympathetic neurotransmitter norepinephrine can be used to estimate sympathetic nervous "activity" (integrated nerve firing rate) for the body as a whole and for individual organs. In 12 patients with cardiac failure (left ventricular ejection fraction 10% to 39%), the mean arterial plasma norepinephrine concentration was 557 +/- 68 pg/ml (mean +/- SE) compared with 211 +/- 21 pg/ml in 15 subjects without heart failure (p less than .002). The difference was due to both increased release of norepinephrine to plasma (indicating increased "total" sympathetic activity) and reduced clearance of norepinephrine from plasma. The increase in sympathetic activity did not involve all organs equally. Cardiac (32 +/- 9 vs 5 +/- 1 ng/min; p less than .002) and renal (202 +/- 45 vs 66 +/- 9 ng/min; p = .002) norepinephrine spillover were increased by 540% and 206%, respectively, but norepinephrine spillover from the lungs was normal. Adrenomedullary activity was also increased in the patients with heart failure, whose mean arterial plasma epinephrine concentration was 181 +/- 38 pg/ml compared with 71 +/- 12 pg/ml in control subjects (p less than .02). There is marked regional variation, inapparent from measurements of plasma norepinephrine concentration, in sympathetic nerve activity in patients with congestive heart failure. The finding of increased cardiorenal norepinephrine spillover has important pathophysiologic and therapeutic implications.

Beta-blockers in congestive cardiomyopathy. Conceptual advance or contraindication?

The precise role of adrenergic activity in congestive cardiomyopathy has not been established. A number of mechanisms through which increased catecholamine levels may be harmful, along with the clinical and experimental evidence supporting this concept, are summarized in this review. In this context, the suggestion that beta blockers may be beneficial for patients with severe heart failure, despite their well-known propensity to decrease cardiac contractility, can be better understood. Published reports on the use of beta blocker therapy for congestive cardiomyopathy now include approximately 200 patients, but have yielded inconsistent results. Non-randomized trials in Sweden have suggested increased survival, with most patients having improved functional status while receiving beta blockade, although improvement may take three to six months to become evident. The Swedish group also reported clinical deterioration after discontinuation of beta blockade. Two recent randomized trials in America yielded promising results, but the unexpectedly low mortality in the placebo groups emphasizes the critical importance of concurrent controls. Unfavorable reports have involved small groups with short-duration therapy. Even in these reports, overt aggravation of clinical heart failure has been quite infrequent but sometimes profound. As large scale trials are undertaken, an obvious goal is the development of methods to differentiate the patients with congestive cardiomyopathy who will benefit in response to beta blocker therapy from the few patients who will have a serious adverse response.

Improvement in symptoms and exercise tolerance by metoprolol in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

It has been suspected that the increased sympathetic activity seen in patients with chronic congestive heart failure from dilated cardiomyopathy may be harmful. We therefore tested the long-term effect of metoprolol on eight patients in a double-blind, randomized protocol and 12 patients in an unblinded, crossover protocol who were treated for 12 months (range 10 to 24), and compared them with 16 similar subjects who were treated with placebo for 10 months (range 6 to 12) in a double-blind, randomized protocol. Patients were followed by serial clinical assessment, treadmill testing, radionuclide ventriculography, and echocardiography. Metoprolol-treated patients had an improvement in mean exercise capacity by 3 mets (p less than .0001) while experiencing a significant improvement in functional classification (p less than .001) during both the double-blind and open-label crossover studies and had an improved ejection fraction during the double-blind study (p less than .02). These improvements were not seen in matched control subjects receiving placebo. Seven of 20 patients receiving long-term metoprolol therapy had resolution of nearly all symptoms of heart failure, doubled their exercise capacity, and had progressive improvement in resting radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction (12.6 +/- 3% to 26.9 +/- 6%) and echocardiographic left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (7.7 +/- 0.5 to 6.5 +/- 0.5 cm). Only one of 21 patients treated was intolerant of metoprolol. We conclude that metoprolol can be given safely to a select group of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in doses that substantially reduce both resting and exercise heart rates. Long-term beta-blockade improved functional class and exercise capacity in 14 of 20 patients while producing an exceptional clinical response in seven that was accompanied by improved resting parameters of left ventricular function.

Rationale for beta-adrenergic blocking drugs in cardiomyopathy

Activation of the sympathetic nervous system has traditionally been regarded as an important compensatory mechanism that helps to maintain myocardial contractility in severe heart failure. Recent findings suggest that increased catecholamine levels are linked to decreased beta-adrenergic receptor density and myocardial damage. Thus, rather than aiding the failing heart, increased myocardial exposure to catecholamines may actually contribute to further deterioration in myocardial function. Beta-adrenergic blocking drugs may ameliorate these harmful effects and paradoxically result in improved ventricular performance.

A randomized trial of low-dose beta-blockade therapy for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Beta-blockade therapy to improve survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) has been both advocated and criticized. However, randomized studies have not been performed. Thus, 50 patients with IDC were randomized in pairs to standard therapy (C) alone or with beta blockade (BB). Beta-blockade therapy with metoprolol was titrated from 12.5 to 50 mg twice daily as tolerated (final average dose, 61 mg/day). Groups were comparable in age (C, 50 +/- 15 years; BB, 51 +/- 13 years), gender (C, 76% male; BB, 56% male), entry functional class (C, 2.8 +/- 0.8; BB, 2.7 +/- 0.7), and left ventricular ejection fraction (C, 27 +/- 12%; BB, 29 +/- 10%). Follow-up averaged 19 months (range 1 to 38). One subject in each group was lost to follow-up. There were 3 early BB dropouts (within 2 days) due to low-output syndrome (2 patients) or fatigue (1 patient). Eleven patients died. By intention to treat, 5 BB and 6 C patients died (difference not significant). By actual treatment, 3 BB patients died, including 2 late dropouts (at 0.2, 10 and 17 months), and 8 C patients died (at 2, 9, 9, 15, 18, 24, 29 and 32 months, p = 0.12). In additional, functional evaluation on follow-up (functional class, San Diego questionnaire and exercise time) all tended to favor those receiving BB. Low-dose BB is tolerated in 80% of IDC patients on a long-term basis. Those continuing to take BB have a good prognosis. Mortality in C patients, however, is less than in some retrospective studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Neurohumoral mechanisms involved in congestive heart failure

Congestive heart failure (CHF) promotes an array of biologic changes that are largely designed to compensate for reduced flow. These include activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin system, as well as the release of arginine vasopressin. The ultimate expression of these compensatory mechanisms is heightened vascular tone, increased sodium and water retention and antidiuresis. The peripheral circulation is normally under the fine control of circulating and neuronally released moieties, which can directly or indirectly alter vascular tone. Angiotensin II appears to be a key element in this regard because of its multiple biologic activities. Direct arteriolar vasoconstriction, facilitation of norepinephrine release and stimulation of aldosterone are some of the activities that are likely to be of major importance in the syndrome of CHF. Therefore, it is not surprising that converting enzyme inhibitors have a growing role as treatment. Other pharmacologic agents that can reduce sympathetic tone by acting on presynaptic receptors are being developed. Selective dilation of certain vascular beds may be possible with agents designed to interact with vascular dopaminergic receptors. The mechanisms whereby circulating epinephrine and norepinephrine modulate norepinephrine release and vascular tone are beginning to be understood and likely involve presynaptic, postsynaptic and nonsynaptic vascular receptors. A better appreciation of the mechanisms involved in the fine control of the peripheral circulation should allow for more selective and more imaginative pharmacologic therapy for CHF.

Acute intravenous and sustained oral treatment with the beta1 agonist prenalterol in patients with chronic severe cardiac failure

Prenalterol, a beta1 agonist, was given in a single blind acute intravenous study to seven patients with cardiac failure (New York Heart Association class II and III). It was then given in a double blind crossover study of sustained oral prenalterol to six of them. As a result of dose titration studies the oral dose of prenalterol given was 100 mg twice a day in all patients. Erect bicycle sprint tests were performed to exercise tolerance before and after treatment had been started. Cardiac function was assessed at rest and during graded supine bicycle exercise by determining haemodynamic indices using a Swan-Ganz catheter and radionuclide left ventricular ejection fractions. In the intravenous study cardiac function was assessed at rest and during exercise after a control infusion of dextrose and after an infusion of 5 mg prenalterol. In the oral crossover study a placebo or prenalterol were given for two periods of two weeks; at the end of each period exercise tolerance was measured and cardiac function assessed at rest and during exercise. Throughout the study period there was no change in symptoms, medication, or exercise tolerance. Intravenous prenalterol significantly improved cardiac function; left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac index increased and left ventricular filling pressure fell both at rest and during exercise. Sustained oral treatment with prenalterol, however, did not improve resting left ventricular filling pressure or left ventricular ejection fraction at rest or during exercise but did increase heart rate at rest, and mean blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistance at rest and during exercise; in fact, during exercise left ventricular filling pressure was significantly increased while cardiac index and stroke volume index were decreased by prenalterol. Sustained oral treatment with prenalterol did not have the beneficial effects on cardiac function produced by intravenous treatment and in fact had deleterious effect on the measured indices of cardiac function during exercise.