Long-term treatment with metoprolol after myocardial infarction: effect on 3 year mortality and morbidity

Effect of metoprolol on diet-induced atherosclerosis in rabbits

The effect of metoprolol, a beta 1-blocker, on atherogenesis was evaluated in rabbits fed a diet supplemented with 0.25% cholesterol and 3% coconut oil for 21 weeks. After 7 weeks on the diet, the rabbits were randomly divided into treated (n = 22) and untreated (n = 22) groups. Treated animals received metoprolol subcutaneously by an osmotic pump for 14 weeks, resulting in a plasma level of 774 +/- 69 nM during the investigation. Plasma concentrations of cholesterol, triglycerides, and phospholipids did not differ between the two groups. Nor were there any significant differences between the two groups in plasma concentrations of apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein C-III, and apolipoprotein E measured by electroimmunoassay. At the end of the study, the aortas were cut into three portions and the extent of atherosclerosis was determined by morphometry. The group that had received metoprolol had significantly (p less than 0.015) less atherosclerosis in the aorta (ascending plus arch 37.8 +/- 6.8%, thoracic 32.9 +/- 6.1%, abdominal 19.8 +/- 6.1% of total intimal area; mean +/- SEM) than the controls (ascending plus arch 54.9 +/- 7.1%, thoracic 48.0 +/- 6.2%, abdominal 25.9 +/- 5.5%).

Differential effects of timolol and metoprolol on platelet function at rest and during exercise

Ten male patients suffering from stable angina pectoris were studied at rest and immediately after exercise during treatment either with timolol (a non-selective beta-blocker) or with metoprolol (a beta 1-selective blocker). Timolol induced a significant increase in platelet aggregation and a reduction in platelet cyclic AMP, and it also raised the plasma adrenaline at rest and during exercise as compared to the pre-treatment level. Metoprolol had none of these effects. Prior to medication and during metoprolol treatment, exercise led to an increase in the peripheral platelet count, whereas timolol was associated with a reduction of platelets during physical effort. Neither drug affected platelet thromboxane B2 at rest. During exercise, its level was not affected in the pre-treatment period or during metoprolol treatment but it was sharply increased by timolol therapy.

Effect of controlled-release metoprolol on blood pressure and exercise heart rate in hypertension: a comparison with conventional tablets

In a double-blind study with parallel groups a new controlled-release (CR) formulation of metoprolol, 100 mg once daily, was compared with conventional metoprolol tablets, 100 mg once daily, in 27 patients with primary hypertension. Exercise tests on a bicycle ergometer were undertaken 24 h after intake of the last dose of the drug following a four-week placebo run-in period and after four weeks of active treatment. Heart rate, measured in the supine position and during exercise at the highest comparable workload, was reduced significantly more by metoprolol CR (p less than 0.05), thus indicating a higher degree of beta 1-blockade at the end of the dose interval with metoprolol CR. There was a greater reduction in supine systolic pressure (p less than 0.05) but not in supine diastolic pressure after metoprolol CR than after conventional tablets at 24 h. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to reduction in systolic blood pressure during exercise. The 24-h plasma concentrations of metoprolol CR and conventional tablets correlated with the effects on heart rate, but not with blood pressure. The tolerability of metoprolol CR was comparable with that of metoprolol administered as conventional tablets. In conclusion, there was significantly greater beta 1-blockade 24 h after the intake of drug after metoprolol CR compared with conventional tablets.

Myocardial infarct expansion, infarct extension, and reinfarction: pathophysiologic concepts

Infarct expansion and infarct extension are events early in the course of myocardial infarction with serious short- and long-term consequences. Infarct expansion, disproportionate thinning, and dilatation of the infarct segment probably begin within hours of acute infarction and usually reach peak extent within seven to 14 days. Clinical data suggest that infarct expansion occurs in approximately 35% to 45% of anterior transmural myocardial infarctions and to a lesser extent in infarctions at other sites. Although expansion usually develops in large infarcts, the extent of transmural necrosis rather than absolute infarct size predicts its occurrence. Expansion has an adverse effect on infarct structure and function for several reasons. Functional infarct size is increased because of infarct segment lengthening, and expansion results in over-all ventricular dilatation. Thus, patients with expansion of an infarct have poorer exercise tolerance, more congestive heart failure symptoms, and greater early and late mortality than those without expansion. Infarct rupture and late aneurysm formation are two additional structural consequences of infarct expansion. Experimental and clinical data suggest that the incidence and severity of expansion can be modified by interventions. Increased ventricular loading conditions and steroidal and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents make expansion more severe. Reperfusion of the infarct segment and pharmacologic interventions that decrease ventricular afterload lessen the severity of expansion. Previous myocardial infarction and preexisting ventricular hypertrophy may also limit the development of infarct expansion. Infarct extension is defined clinically as early in-hospital reinfarction after a myocardial infarction. The pathologic finding of infarct extension is necrotic and healing myocardium of several different recent ages within the same vascular territory. Although this pathologic criterion usually cannot be verified, studies employing invasive and noninvasive assessment of patients with early reinfarction provide evidence that the new myocardial injury is usually in the same vascular risk region as the original infarction. A variety of different criteria have been applied in the clinical diagnosis of infarct extension, and this has resulted in a large range of estimated frequencies from under 10% to as high as 86%. High estimates are found in studies using one or two nonspecific criteria such as ST segment shift or reelevation of total CK. The lowest rates have been found when combinations of criteria are used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Prognosis of ventricular arrhythmias in relation to sudden cardiac death: therapeutic implications

The hypothesis that ventricular arrhythmias represent an independent predictor of sudden cardiac death was examined by analyzing the published data. The frequency and complexity of ventricular arrhythmias increase progressively both with age and severity of heart disease, but no age- or disease-related norms have been established for clinical guidance. Simple and complex arrhythmias, including short runs of ventricular tachycardia, do not increase risk of sudden cardiac death in subjects without heart disease or with heart disease and normal myocardial function. Progression of nonsustained into sustained ventricular tachycardia in such individuals is rare. Simple and complex ventricular arrhythmias are not strong independent predictors of sudden death in survivors of myocardial infarction. In these, the overall incidence of sudden cardiac death averages 3.5 to 5% during the first year, but is about 15 to 20% per year in patients with severely impaired ventricular function. The results of this survey suggest that in patients with well preserved ventricular function, prophylactic use of antiarrhythmic drugs is not indicated, and that treatment of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias is not likely to reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death.

Metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction reduces ventricular arrhythmias both in the early stage and after the acute event

Fifty three of the 5778 patients included in the MIAMI (Metoprolol in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial were investigated with long-term ECG recordings in order to evaluate the effect of acute beta-blockade on premature ventricular complexes in and after acute myocardial infarction. Twenty five patients were given placebo and 28 metoprolol in a double-blind randomized fashion for 15 days. After this period the patients were put on open beta-blockade without breaking individual study codes. The mean number of premature ventricular complexes during the inclusion day (day 0) was the same in the two groups. The median numbers were also similar in the two groups: 190 and 154 in the placebo and metoprolol groups, respectively. Metoprolol significantly reduced the median number of premature ventricular complexes in the randomized period. The median numbers on days 1, 2 and 15 were 146, 101, 84 in the placebo group and 73, 59 and 10 in the metoprolol group, respectively (P less than 0.05). Also during the further follow-up, when investigated 1, 3 and 6 months after the infarction, the median number of premature ventricular complexes was lower in the metoprolol group (74, 257, 142 in the placebo group and 7, 5 and 11 in the metoprolol group, P less than 0.05). This indicates that metoprolol treatment in the acute phase of myocardial infarction reduces ventricular arrhythmias both in the early stage and also after the acute event.

Economic consequences of postinfarction prophylaxis with beta blockers: cost effectiveness of metoprolol

Treatment with certain beta adrenoceptor blocking agents after myocardial infarction reduces mortality and the incidence of reinfarction. Data from a randomised placebo controlled study of the beta 1 selective blocker metoprolol given as secondary prophylaxis were therefore analysed for the possible cost effectiveness of extending this treatment to the general population of patients with myocardial infarction. Metoprolol 100 mg twice daily and matching placebo were given to 154 and 147 patients, respectively, for three years. During this period drug costs for the beta blocker, digitalis, and diuretics were analysed as well as costs of readmission for cardiac problems and indirect costs arising from sick leave or early retirement. Active treatment with metoprolol significantly reduced costs of readmission as well as indirect costs. The net effect per patient over the three years was a reduction of roughly kr 19,000 (1930 pounds). These results suggest that beta blocker treatment given as secondary prophylaxis after myocardial infarction is highly cost effective.

Autonomic control of ventricular tachycardia: direct effects of beta-adrenergic blockade in 24 hour old canine myocardial infarction

The purpose of this study was to determine whether alpha- or beta-adrenergic influences directly modulate the rate of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia occurring 24 hours after left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion. Chloralose-anesthetized, open chest dogs (n = 41) with ventricular tachycardia were studied. The left anterior descending artery was cannulated distally. Neither intracoronary saline solution nor phenylephrine (0.3 to 12 micrograms) changed the rate of ventricular tachycardia; however, isoproterenol (0.01 to 10 micrograms) produced dose-dependent increases in the rate. In six dogs, metoprolol, 5 mg given intravenously, slowed ventricular tachycardia from 174 +/- 10 (mean +/- SE) to 140 +/- 17 beats/min (p less than 0.05). This was accompanied by decreases in mean arterial pressure from 106 +/- 7 to 95 +/- 8 mm Hg, cardiac output from 2.6 +/- 0.3 to 1.6 +/- 0.3 liters/min and prolongation of atrioventricular conduction from 134 +/- 10 to 189 +/- 29 ms (all p less than 0.05) during atrial pacing at a cycle length of 300 ms. In 10 dogs, metoprolol (0.5 mg) given intracoronary, a dose that shifted the isoproterenol dose-response curve to the right, slowed ventricular tachycardia from 174 +/- 7.2 to 140 +/- 9.7 beats/min (p less than 0.05) without hemodynamic changes. Additional metoprolol (4.5 mg) given intravenously produced hemodynamic alterations, but ventricular tachycardia did not slow further. Therefore, beta- but not alpha-adrenergic influences control the rate of ventricular tachycardia occurring 24 hours after left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion. Furthermore, beta-adrenergic blockade slows ventricular tachycardia solely by a direct electrophysiologic effect on the tachycardia foci and not indirectly as a result of hemodynamic effects.

Effects of chronic metoprolol treatment on glucose tolerance after myocardial infarction

Chronic treatment with metoprolol of postmyocardial infarction patients did not influence the response to an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Treatment with metoprolol of patients with a previously abnormal intravenous glucose tolerance test was not associated with a negative influence on the long-term prognosis.

Long term efficacy of a controlled-release formulation of isosorbide 5-mononitrate (Imdur) in angina patients receiving beta-blockers

In a multicentre double-blind crossover study the clinical efficacy and tolerability of a controlled-release formulation, Durules, of isosorbide 5-mononitrate (Imdur) 60mg once daily was compared with placebo over 2 weeks in 70 patients with stable exercise-induced angina pectoris who were receiving concomitant long term beta-blockade. Isosorbide 5-mononitrate significantly improved exercise capacity and signs of myocardial ischaemia, while reducing the number of anginal attacks and consumption of short-acting glyceryl trinitrate tablets compared with beta-blocker therapy alone. During an open follow-up period of 1 year, there was no attenuation of the antianginal efficacy of isosorbide 5-mononitrate. The drug was well tolerated during both phases of the study, and the only significant adverse effect was headache, which rapidly disappeared during continued treatment.

Serum lipids and lipoproteins in ischaemic heart disease following withdrawal of long-term metoprolol treatment

In 39 patients who had been treated with metoprolol 100-200 mg daily or placebo for three years after acute myocardial infarction, serum lipids and lipoproteins were studied while the patients were on treatment as well as after its withdrawal. Withdrawal was performed over 1 week. Treatment had to be reinstituted in 6 patients (1 ex placebo and 5 ex metoprolol) because of aggravated symptoms. During the entire study period total cholesterol was significantly higher in the metoprolol withdrawal group and LDL cholesterol tended to be higher. HDL cholesterol in both groups increased significantly during the initial 28-day period following withdrawal of treatment. In both groups VLDL triglycerides tended to decrease during the first 28 days without treatment. Other lipoprotein fractions in both groups were unchanged. Overall, in patients who tolerated the ending of 3 years of treatment with metoprolol after myocardial infarction, there was no significant effect on lipoprotein fractions as compared to a placebo group.

Beta-adrenergic blockade after stroke. A preliminary closed cohort study

To collect background data for a prospective clinical trial of beta-blocking agents in the prevention of deaths after stroke, the long-term prognosis in 60 patients discharged from a stroke unit on beta-blocker therapy was compared with the outcome in 60 matched patients with stroke but without beta-blockers. Matching included sex, age, type of stroke, and presence or absence of hypertension and cardiac failure. Thirteen patients (22%) in the beta-blocker group died during a median followup of 41 months. Of the 60 patients not on beta-blockade at discharge, 21 (35%) died during a median followup of 36 months. By life-table technique and log-rank test, the relative risk for death was 0.60:1.00 (p = 0.14). During followup, 12 recurrent strokes were observed in patients on beta-blockers and 19 in patients without beta-blockers (relative risk 0.57:1.00; p = 0.12). It appeared that the reduction in mortality could only marginally be ascribed to fewer deaths from myocardial infarction; other causes of death were also less frequent in beta-blocker-treated patients. The results emphasize that supplementary information on the effect of beta-blocking agents on mortality after stroke is needed before a larger trial of beta-blocker therapy in patients with manifest cerebrovascular disease can be initiated.

Prognostic significance of the treadmill exercise test performance 6 months after myocardial infarction

A submaximal treadmill exercise test performed before hospital discharge after an uncomplicated myocardial infarction is often utilized to estimate prognosis and guide management, but there is little experience with a maximal exercise test performed 6 months after infarction to identify prognosis later in the convalescent period. The performance characteristics during an exercise test 6 months after myocardial infarction were related to the development of death, recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass surgery in the subsequent 12 months (that is, 6 to 18 months after infarction) in 473 patients. Mortality was significantly greater in patients who exhibited any of the following: inability to perform the exercise test because of cardiac limitations, the development of ST segment elevation of 1 mm or greater during the exercise test, an inadequate blood pressure response during exercise, the development of any ventricular premature depolarizations during exercise or the recovery period and inability to exercise beyond stage I of the modified Bruce protocol. By utilizing a combination of four high risk prognostic features from the exercise test, it was possible to stratify patients in terms of risk of mortality, from 1% if none of these features were present to 17% if three or four were present. Recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction was predicted by an inability to perform the exercise test because of cardiac limitations, but not by any characteristics of exercise test performance. Coronary artery bypass surgery was associated with the development of ST segment depression of 1 mm or greater during the exercise test. Although clinical evidence of angina and heart failure 6 months after infarction was predictive of subsequent mortality among all survivors, among the low risk group without severely limiting cardiac disease, the exercise test provided unique prognostic information not available from clinical assessment alone. Therefore, a maximal exercise test performed 6 months after myocardial infarction is a valuable, noninvasive tool to evaluate prognosis. It provides information that is independent of and additive to clinical evaluation performed at the same time.

Quality of life after myocardial infarction: effect of long term metoprolol on mortality and morbidity

A double blind randomised study of 154 patients with myocardial infarction assigned to metoprolol (100 mg twice daily) and 147 assigned to placebo compared the effects of treatment in relation to health state over three years. Health state was evaluated by a new method based on the average number of days spent in each of seven mutually exclusive categories of health. The scale took into account death, history of serious complications, functional state, and side effects of treatment. Of the maximum attainable 1095 days alive during the three years patients given metoprolol attained 992 days and those given placebo 964 days. During the period alive the metoprolol treated group spent an average of 278 days in an optimal functional state as compared with 176 days for the placebo treated group. This included 221 and 156 days respectively in a completely asymptomatic state (that is, without either cardiac symptoms or side effects of treatment). The time spent with a serious non-fatal complication was shortened by 56 days in the metoprolol group. The overall differences between the groups were statistically significant (p = 0.03). Aside from bringing an improved quality of life after myocardial infarction, metoprolol may add up to one month to life expectancy for three years of treatment.

Metoprolol. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and related cardiovascular disorders

During the intervening years since metoprolol was first reviewed in the Journal (1977), it has become widely used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and angina pectoris. Although much data have accumulated, its precise mechanisms of action in these diseases remain largely uncertain. Optimum treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris with metoprolol is achieved through dose titration within the therapeutic range. It has been clearly demonstrated that metoprolol is at least as effective as other beta-blockers, diuretics and certain calcium antagonists in the majority of patients. Although a twice daily dosage regimen is normally used, satisfactory control can be maintained in many patients with single daily doses of conventional or, more frequently, slow release formulations. Addition of a diuretic may improve the overall response rate in hypertension. Several controlled trials have studied the effects of metoprolol administered during the acute phase and after myocardial infarction. In early intervention trials a reduction in total mortality was achieved in one moderately large trial of prolonged treatment, but in another, which excluded patients already being treated with beta-blockers or certain calcium antagonists and where treatment was only short term, mortality was significantly reduced only in 'high risk' patients. Overall results with metoprolol have not demonstrated that early intervention treatment in all patients produces clinically important improvement in short term mortality. Thus, the use of metoprolol during the early stages of myocardial infarction is controversial, largely because of the requirement to treat all patients to save a small number at 'high risk'. This blanket coverage approach to treatment may be more justified during the post-infarction follow-up phase since it has been shown that metoprolol slightly, but significantly, reduces the mortality rate for periods of up to 3 years. Metoprolol is generally well tolerated and its beta 1-selectivity may facilitate its administration to certain patients (e.g. asthmatics and diabetics) in whom non-selective beta-blockers are contraindicated. Temporary fatigue, dizziness and headache are among the most frequently reported side effects. After a decade of use, metoprolol is well established as a first choice drug in mild to moderate hypertension and stable angina, and is beneficial in post-infarction patients. Further study is needed in less well established areas of treatment such as cardiac arrhythmias, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertensive cardiomegaly.

Initial therapy for mild hypertension

The treatment of mild hypertension has been a subject of controversy because its benefits versus risks are not as well established as they are for moderate to severe hypertension. Results of several studies, however, now show that treatment reduces the frequency of stroke in those with milder blood pressure elevations. New guidelines published by the Joint National Committee recommend that treatment of mild hypertension begin with either a diuretic or a beta blocker. The effect on the most common complication of mild hypertension, that is, coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death), has, however, not been encouraging in studies in which diuretics have been used as first-line treatment. Two large-scale primary preventive studies compared the efficacy of diuretics and beta blockers in reducing coronary heart disease in hypertensive patients; results were in favor of beta blocker regimens in men. So far there is some evidence, but no hard scientific proof, that certain beta blockers offer advantages over diuretics in preventing myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in hypertensive patients. A major concern with the use of diuretics is the risk of hypokalemia; this can be reduced when they are combined with beta blockers.