Emergency surgery for obstructing colorectal cancers: a comparison between right-sided and left-sided lesions

Surgery for obstructed colorectal malignancy in an Asian population: predictors of morbidity and comparison between left- and right-sided cancers

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment of obstructed colorectal cancers has been associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. This study was performed to review the spectrum of surgery and early outcome of patients with acutely obstructed colorectal cancers. The secondary aims were to compare right- and left-sided obstruction and to identify factors predicting morbidity and mortality in these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent operative intervention for acute obstruction from colorectal malignancy from February 2003 to April 2008 was performed. Patients were identified from the hospital's operating records based on postoperative diagnosis codes of colorectal malignancy. The diagnosis of acute obstruction was confirmed through clinical assessment, radiological investigations, and surgical findings. All the complications were graded according to the classification proposed by Clavien and group.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 1,268 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal malignancy, 134 (10.6%) patients with a median age of 71 years (range, 34-97 years) were operated for acute obstruction. Left-sided malignancy accounted for 79.9% of the obstruction, with sigmoid colon being the most common site in 54 (40.3%) patients. A significant proportion (77.6%) of our patients had associated perioperative morbidity, and the mortality rate was 11.9%. Worse complications (grades of complications III to V) were more frequent in patients who had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (3-4), are > or = 60 years old, and had preoperative renal impairment. Stoma was created more frequently in left-sided pathology.

CONCLUSION

In an Asian population, surgery in patients with acute colorectal malignant obstruction is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Though left-sided malignant obstruction occurs more frequently and is associated with a higher incidence of stoma creation, primary resection and anastomosis is a safe option in selected patients.

[Comparison of effects of preoperative stenting for obstructing colorectal cancers according to the location of the obstructing lesion]

BACKGROUND/AIMS

With the development of self-expanding metallic stents, colonic obstruction can be relieved without the need for surgery. The results of preoperative placement of stents for malignant colorectal obstruction might be different according to the obstructing lesion. The objective of this study was to compare clinical improvement rates and operative results after preoperative placement of stents for malignant colorectal obstruction according to the location of the obstructing lesion.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study including 57 patients who underwent self-expanding metallic stent insertion for obstructing resectable colorectal cancers. Patients were classified into three groups according to the location of the lesion as follows: proximal to the sigmoid colon (Group A), sigmoid colon (Group B), and rectum (Group C).

RESULTS

The number of patients in A, B, and C groups was 13, 22, and 22, respectively. No significant differences in age, gender, stent type, and accompanying diseases among the three groups were observed. There were no significant differences in stent-related complications, clinical improvement rates, and one-stage resection rates among the three groups. The postoperative complications, the requirement rate of ICU care, the period of ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital mortality did not significantly differ among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical improvement rates and operative results after successful placement of stents for obstructing resectable colorectal cancers are not different according to the location of the obstructing lesion, suggesting that preoperative stenting for one-stage curative resection is useful, irrespective of the location of lesion.

Right colonic perforation in an Asian population: predictors of morbidity and mortality

INTRODUCTION

Perforation of the colon is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pathologies arising from the right colon differ greatly between Asians and the Western population. The aims of our study were to evaluate the implications of perforated right colon in an Asian population and to identify factors that could predict the perioperative outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent operative intervention for peritonitis from right colonic perforation from July 2003 to April 2008 was performed. Patients were identified from the hospital's diagnostic index and operating records. The severity of abdominal sepsis for all patients was graded using the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI). All the complications were graded according to the classification proposed by Clavian and colleagues.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 22-93 years) formed the study group. Diverticulitis (47.1%) and malignancy (37.3%) accounted for the majority of the pathologies. Right hemicolectomy without diverting stoma (n = 34, 66.7%) was performed most commonly. Of our patients, 74.5% had perioperative morbidity with 19 (37.3%) patients having grade III or worse complications. In our series, five (9.8%) patients died. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >or=3, >or=2 premorbid conditions, raised MPI, raised creatinine, and stoma creation were related to more severe complications (grade III/IV). The following variables were correlated with in-hospital mortality: ASA score >or=3, raised MPI, hematocrit <33%, raised creatinine, malignant perforation, and stoma creation. On multivariate analysis, a higher ASA score >or=3 was predictive of significant morbidity, while both malignant perforation and stoma creation were associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Diverticulitis is the commonest cause of right colonic perforation in Asians. Patients with higher ASA score and malignant perforation are at risk of higher morbidity and mortality. Resection with primary anastomosis is safe and patients who require stomas are more likely to do worse.

Short term outcome after emergency and elective surgery for colon cancer

OBJECTIVE

Emergency presentation of colon cancer is common and associated with high mortality and morbidity following surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative mortality and complications in a consecutive and population based series.

METHOD

All patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon diagnosed between 1993 and 2007 were registered prospectively. Postoperative mortality and complication rates in elective and emergency patients were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In the study period 1129 patients were admitted, of whom 279 (25%) presented as an emergency. A total of 999 (89%) patients underwent surgical treatment; 924 patients (82%) had a major resection. The mortality rate was 3.5% after elective and 10% after emergency operation with resection (P < 0.01), and the complication rate was 24% and 38% (P < 0.01), respectively. In patients with left-sided obstruction, the mortality rate after Hartmann's procedure was 19% compared to 3% after resection with primary anastomosis (P < 0.01). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that emergency operation, increasing age, advanced tumour stage and ASA class IV were independent risk factors for postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSION

Emergency operation for colon cancer was associated with high rates of complications and mortality, indicating that immediate surgery should be avoided if possible. Decompression of left sided obstruction with a stent seems promising, whereas no conclusion can be made with regard to optimal procedure if stent placement fails; in this study Hartmann's procedure was associated with high mortality and morbidity.

Systematic review of intraoperative colonic irrigation vs. manual decompression in obstructed left-sided colorectal emergencies

AIMS

A systematic review was conducted to determine if manual decompression is a safe alternative to intraoperative colonic irrigation prior to primary anastomosis in obstructed left-sided colorectal emergencies.

METHODS

Search for relevant articles from 1980 to 2007 was conducted on Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register using the keywords "colonic lavage, irrigation, decompression, washout, obstructed and bowel preparation", either singularly or in combination. Trials in English publications with similar patient characteristics, inclusion criteria and outcome measures were selected for analysis. Thirty-day mortality, anastomotic leak rates and post-operative wound infection were studied as outcome variables. Analysis was performed with RevMan 4.2 software.

RESULTS

Seven trials were identified for systematic review, with a total of 449 patients. Data from the single randomised controlled trial and one prospective comparative trial were analysed separately. Results from the remaining five studies were pooled into two arms of a composite series, one with colonic irrigation and one without. Results showed no significant difference in the anastomotic leak rates and mortality rates between the colonic irrigation and manual decompression arms in the randomised and comparative trials. The composite series, however, showed significantly better results with manual decompression (RR 6.18, 95% CI 1.67-22.86). The post-operative infection rate was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Manual decompression was comparable to colonic irrigation for primary anastomosis in obstructed left-sided colorectal emergencies, with no significant increase in mortality, leak or infection rates.

Side-to-end anastomosis in a colostomy for acute malignant large-bowel obstruction: side-to-end anastomosis with a colostomy (STEC procedure)

This report describes the use of side-to-end anastomosis in a colostomy for an acute malignant large-bowel obstruction. A 59-year-old man presented with a colonic obstruction due to advanced descending colon cancer. The preoperative imaging studies revealed a complete obstruction of the descending colon at the site of the splenic flexure, a remarkably dilated transverse colon, and no other metastatic lesions. Side-to-end anastomosis was performed with the colostomy because of the high comorbidity associated with such cases. When the patient's general condition improved, a stoma closure was performed under local anesthesia. In conclusion, a side-to-end anastomosis with a colostomy (STEC procedure) was found to be a simple, useful, and cost-effective technique for an acute malignant large-bowel obstruction, particularly in a high-risk patient.

Use of modified multidetector CT colonography for the evaluation of acute and subacute colon obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of using CT colonography with a modified procedural protocol for diagnosis and cancer staging in patients with suspected acute or subacute colon obstruction caused by colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Following colonic cleansing with lukewarm water enemas, thin-collimation CT colonography was performed on 47 patients (15 women and 32 men, mean age, 68 years) in the precontrast prone position and in the supine position after the intravenous administration of a contrast agent. The surgical and pathologic findings served as a reference standard.

RESULTS

In 44 of 47 patients, colon distention was caused by obstruction, and pathologic examination confirmed colorectal cancer in 41 of these 44 patients. CT colonography correctly located all tumors and successfully identified noncancerous causes of colon distention in five patients. The overall accuracy of staging was 97.6 percent for the T category, 73.2 percent for N, and 100 percent for M. Two synchronous colorectal cancers were correctly identified.

CONCLUSIONS

When appropriate protocol modifications regarding colon cleansing and air insufflation are made to take the clinical situation into account, CT colonography is a technically feasible, accurate, and well-tolerated method for tumor evaluation and cancer staging in patients with acute and subacute colon obstruction.

Epidemiology and management options for colorectal cancer in children

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), although primarily a disease of adulthood, accounts for 2% of malignancies in adolescents and has been reported in children as young as 9 months of age. Our knowledge of CRC in pediatrics is based on a handful of case series and case reports. Apart from one small clinical trial, there has been a lack of prospective clinical studies in this age group. Based on these published reports, most CRC in children is sporadic, but it can also arise in the setting of predisposing conditions, such as gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes, nonpolyposis familial cancer syndromes, and inflammatory bowel disease. Despite some similarities to adult disease, CRC in childhood may be intrinsically different biologically, because it differs from adult-onset CRC in several respects. Childhood CRC tends to be diagnosed at an advanced stage, is largely of mucinous histology, and (probably because of these features) tends to have a poorer outcome. As a result of its rarity in children and the lack of prospective pediatric studies, recommendations for therapy are primarily extrapolated from adult clinical trials. A review of pediatric case series in the English literature emphasizes the prognostic significance of stage of disease, as well as extent of surgical resection. As in adults, early detection is critical in an effort to capture the disease at less advanced stages. Complete surgical resection with aggressive lymph node dissection is essential for cure, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be used in an effort to render unresectable lesions resectable. Active agents in adults with CRC include fluorouracil, folinic acid (leucovorin), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Furthermore, newer targeted therapeutic agents, such as bevacizumab and cetuximab, have added additional efficacy to the standard chemotherapy backbone. Collaborative multi-institutional pediatric clinical trials are needed to evaluate the prognosis, optimal treatment response, and the basic biology of childhood onset CRC.

Emergency management of malignant acute left-sided colonic obstruction

INTRODUCTION

The management of acute left-sided colonic obstruction still remains a challenging problem despite significant progress.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken using PubMed and the Cochrane Library regarding the options in emergency management of left-sided colonic obstruction focusing on outcomes such as mortality, morbidity, long-term prognosis and cost effectiveness.

DISCUSSION

Colonic stenting is the best option either for palliation or as a bridge to surgery. It reduces morbidity and mortality rate and the need for colostomy formation. Stenting is likely to be cost effective, but data are variable depending on the individual healthcare system. Nevertheless, surgical management remains relevant as colonic stenting has a small rate of failure, and it is not always available. There are various surgical options. One-stage primary resection and anastomosis is the preferred choice for low-risk patients. Intra-operative colonic irrigation has no proven benefit. Subtotal colectomy is useful in cases of proximal bowel damage or synchronous tumours. Hartmann's procedure should be reserved for high-risk patients. Simple colostomy has no role other than for use in very ill patients who are not fit for any other procedure.

Profile and Significance of Emergency Colonic Resections

The objectives of this study are to define the distinguishing features between elective and emergency colonic surgery. The records of adult patients who underwent elective and emergent colonic resection over a 4-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes for elective and emergency procedures and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the significant predictors of outcome. Three hundred and thirty-eight elective and 147 emergency colonic resections were performed. Diverticular disease was most common in the emergency group (43.5% vs 14.2%, P = 0.001) whereas malignancy predominated in the elective group (56.2% vs 5.4%, P = 0.001). The emergency group accounted for 54.7 per cent and 79.3 per cent of the total morbidity and mortality. Emergency colonic surgery has distinctive features and significance. Emergency surgery for colonic obstruction and total/subtotal resection are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Diverticular disease compares favorably to other pathologies in postoperative outcome.

Primary vs. delayed resection for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer: impact of surgery on patient outcome

PURPOSE

By comparing surgical outcomes between primary and delayed resection, we addressed whether and how surgical strategies impacted prognosis of patients with left-sided colorectal cancer underwent emergency curative resection.

METHODS

Between January 1980 and December 2002, a total of 143 patients were identified who presented with obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer and received emergency curative resection in Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Patients were stratified according to the timing of tumor resection into two groups: primary resection and delayed resection. Demographic data of the patients, characteristics of the tumors, and short-term and long-term outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The demographic data and tumor characteristics did not differ between the two groups except for more rectal cancers in the delayed resection group (P=0.021). Primary resection group had a higher anastomotic leakage rate (P=0.017) and a trend toward a higher mortality rate, which did not reach statistical significance (P=0.063). The median follow-up intervals were similar (60.4 vs. 58.3 months; P=0.79). The median survival tended to be longer in delayed resection group (66 vs. 105 months; P=0.088). Overall five-year and ten-year survival for primary resection were 43.7 and 31.9 percent, respectively, compared with 67.2 and 53.2 percent, respectively, for delayed resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed resection seems to be a safer procedure and provided a better oncologic outcome compared with primary resection in obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer under emergency situations.

Results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma with obstruction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Emergency surgery for obstructing colorectal carcinoma is thought to be associated with poor survival. The aim of the study is to assess the results of surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1987 to 2004, 80 patients underwent emergency surgery for completely obstructing colorectal carcinoma (COC), and 171 patients underwent elective surgery for non-obstructing cancer (NOC). Morbidity, mortality, and the late outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

The groups were comparable for age, gender, tumor distribution, histopathologic characteristics, stage, morbidity, concomitant operations, recurrence, and sites of recurrence. High ASA class, poor performance status, and high mortality rate were recorded in COC group (p < 0.05). Mortality was related to ASA class (p < 0.001), performance status (p < 0.001), and obstruction (p = 0.014). ASA class was the single independent factor of morbidity (p < 0.001). The groups were comparable for survival (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Obstructing colorectal carcinoma seems to be associated with high mortality rate, but long-term survival seems to be the same with non-obstructing carcinoma.

Stenting of the proximal colon in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction: techniques and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Self-expandable metal stents are used throughout the GI tract to relieve malignant obstructions.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the outcome after colonic stent placement into the proximal colon.

DESIGN

Medical records of patients from 3 institutions who underwent attempts at placement of self-expandable metal stents for malignant obstructions of the proximal colon were retrospectively reviewed. Extracted data included patient characteristics, obstruction location, and goal of procedure (palliation vs bridge to surgery).

SETTING

Academic medial centers.

PATIENTS

Those with right-sided malignant colonic obstruction.

INTERVENTIONS

Placement of colonic stent.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Initial technical success, relief of obstruction, and early and long-term complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (15 men, 6 women; mean age 67 years) were included. Tumor type was colonic adenocarcinoma in 19 patients. Obstruction was complete in 8 patients and subtotal in 13 patients. Stenting was attempted as a bridge to surgery in 8 patients and as palliation in 13 patients. Initial technical success was achieved in 20 of 21 patients (95%). Complete relief of obstruction was achieved in 17 of 20 patients who had technical success (85%), unachieved in 2 patients (No. 14 and 17), and unknown in 1 patient (No. 6). There were no procedure-related complications (bleeding, perforation, etc). The only long-term complication was stent reocclusion from tumor ingrowth.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective, single-arm analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-expandable metal stents appear to be safe and effective in the treatment of malignant obstruction of the proximal colon. Technical and clinical success rates are comparable to those seen with distal colonic stenting.

Trends in frequency and management of obstructing colorectal cancers in a well-defined population

BACKGROUND

Few population-based studies investigate obstructing colorectal cancers. This study was designed to describe trends in their frequency and management.

METHODS

Data were obtained for 13,331 colorectal cancers registered by the population-based cancer registry of Burgundy, France, between the years 1976 and 2000.

RESULTS

Obstructing cancers represented 8.3 percent of all colorectal cancers. This proportion was stable throughout the study. Resection for cure increased from 54.9 percent (1976-1980) to 71.4 percent (1996-2000; P = 0.011). Using multivariate analysis, site of cancer and period of diagnosis were the only factors significantly associated to a curative resection. Postoperative mortality for obstructing colorectal cancers decreased from 32.6 percent (1976-80) to 15.2 percent (1996-2000; P < 0.001). The presence of obstruction was significantly associated with a higher postoperative mortality, independent of age and tumor stage (odds ratio = 2.55; 95 percent confidence interval = 2.13-3.5).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of obstructing colorectal cancers has remained unchanged for 25 years. Operative mortality is still high, although some improvements have occurred. Efforts must be made to diagnose colorectal cancers before obstruction occurs. Mass screening represents a promising approach.

Outcomes of right- compared with left-side colectomy

Right colon resections are perceived as less morbid than left colon resections. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in outcomes between right-and left-side colon resections. We reviewed 420 consecutive open colectomies over 4 years. Patient demographics, surgical indications, intraoperative variables, and outcomes were collected. Two hundred twenty-three right colectomies (RCs) were compared with 197 left colectomies (LCs). RCs were more often required for cancer (111 vs 65, P < .001) and LCs for diverticular disease (10 vs 90, P < .001). LCs were more often performed emergently (36% vs 23%, P = .004) and required longer mean operative times (149 minutes vs 130 minutes, P = .004). Complications and mortality in the two groups were equal statistically. In the emergent colectomy subset, LCs were associated with greater intraoperative blood loss (315 vs 201 mL, P = .02) but fewer complications (11% vs 17%, P = .003).

Management of acute malignant large-bowel obstruction with self-expanding metal stent

BACKGROUND

Colorectal stents are being used for palliation and as a "bridge to surgery" in obstructing colorectal carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) as the initial interventional approach in the management of acute malignant large bowel obstruction.

METHODS

Between February 2002 and May 2006, 67 patients underwent the insertion of a SEMS for an obstructing malignant lesion of the left-sided colon or rectum.

RESULTS

In 55 patients, the stents were placed for palliation, whereas in 12 they were placed as a bridge to surgery. Stent placement was technically successful in 92.5% (n = 62), with a clinical success rate of 88% (n = 59). Two perforations that occurred during stent placement we retreated by an emergency Hartmann operation. In intention-to-treat by stent, the peri-interventional mortality was 6% (4/67). Stent migration was reported in 3 cases (5%), and stent obstruction occurred in 8 cases (13.5%). Of the nine patients with stents successfully placed as a bridge to surgery, all underwent elective single-stage operations with no death or anastomotic complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent insertion provided an effective outcome in patients with malignant colonic obstruction as a palliative and preoperative therapy.

La cirugía en el cáncer de colon complicado

Colorectal cancer continues to have a serious social impact. A large proportion of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. Approximately one-third of patients with colorectal cancer will undergo emergency surgery for a complicated tumor, with a high risk of mortality and poorer long-term prognosis. The most frequent complications are obstruction and perforation, while massive hemorrhage is rare. The curative potential of surgery, whether urgent or elective, depends on how radical the resection is, among other factors. In the literature on the management of urgent colorectal disease, there are few references to the oncological criteria for resection. Uncertainly about the optimal treatment has led to wide variability in the treatment of this entity. The present article aims to provide a critical appraisal of the controversies surrounding the role of surgery and its impact on complicated colorectal cancer.

Palliative stent implantation in the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction

BACKGROUND

Palliative surgical interventions for the management of colonic obstruction in cases of metastasized or locally irresectable colorectal carcinoma show remarkable morbidity and mortality rates for mostly older and multimorbid patients. For manifest obstruction, placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) is considered to be a suitable minimally invasive therapeutic option. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of stent-based treatment for malignant large bowel obstruction.

METHODS

From January 1999 to June 2005, consecutive patients who had undergone placement of a SEMS for malignant colorectal obstruction were enrolled and monitored. Manifest incontinence and rectum carcinoma within 5 cm above the anocutaneous line were contraindications for SEMS implantation. For all further locations of tumor-induced stenosis, a stent was implanted using endoscopy and fluoroscopy. This case series was characterized in terms of age, carcinoma localization, complications, morbidity and mortality, and the necessity for further interventions.

RESULTS

For 44 of 48 patients (92%), stents were placed successfully and obstruction was abolished. The four remaining patients experienced stent dislocation. The median of age of the patients was 77.7 years (range, 47-96 years). The distribution of malignant stenoses was as follows: rectum (n = 16, 33.3%), sigmoideal colon (n = 21, 43.8%), descending colon (n = 4, 8.3%), splenic flexure (n = 2, 4.2%), transversal colon (n = 3, 6.2%), hepatic flexure (n = 1, 2.1%), and ascending colon (n = 1, 2.1%). There was no peri-interventional morbidity or mortality. The median in situ time for the stents was 251 days (mean, 422 days), with 13 of 44 patients treated with palliative therapy showing complications (29.5%). Six patients were treated endoscopically, and three individuals underwent surgical intervention. For four patients, no further intervention was required. Overall, there was no treatment-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

For palliative treatment of malignancy-induced colorectal obstruction, SEMS is an efficient tool associated with low morbidity and minimal mortality. From a technical point of view, all tumor locations are accessible.

Delayed ischemic gangrene change of distal limb despite optimal decompressed colostomy constructed in obstructed sigmoid colon cancer: A case report

Creating blow-hole colostomy for decompression could provide a time-saving and efficient surgical procedure for a severely debilitated case with a completely obstructed colorectal cancer. Complications are reported as prolapse, retraction, and paracolostomal abscess. However, complication with an ischemic distal limb has not been reported. We report a case of critical intra-abdominal disease after decompressed colostomy for relieving malignant sigmoid colon obstruction; a potential fatal condition should be alerted. A 76-year-old male visited our emergency department for symptoms related to obstructed sigmoid colon tumor with foul-odor vomitus containing fecal-like materials. An emergent blow-hole colostomy proximal to an obstructed sigmoid lesion was created, and resolution of complete colon obstruction was pursued. Unfortunately, extensive abdominal painful distention with board-like abdomen and sudden onset of high fever with leukocytopenia developed subsequently. Such surgical abdomen rendered a secondary laparotomy with resection of the sigmoid tumor along with an ischemic colon segment located proximally up to the previously created colostomy. Eventually, the patient had an uneventful postoperative hospital stay. In the present article, we have described an emergent condition of sudden onset of distal limb ischemia after blow-hole colostomy and concluded that despite the decompressed colostomy would resolve acute malignant colon obstruction efficiently; impending ischemic bowel may progress with a possible irreversible peritonitis. Any patient, who undergoes a decompressed colostomy without resection of the obstructed lesion, should be monitored with leukocyte count and abdominal condition survey frequently.

Surgical Treatment of Colon Cancer

Over 100,000 Americans are diagnosed each year with colon cancer and approximately 90% are treated surgically. Most undergo a curative intent resection, but 30 to 50 percent will have a recurrence of their disease. While much of the variability in outcomes depends on the stage of the disease and other tumor variables, it is now clear that surgeon variables such as caseload and training affect both local recurrence and patient survival. Operative techniques including laparoscopic and other minimally invasive procedures and surgical decisions including choice of operative procedure, management of cancer arising in polyps and treatment of metastatic disease affect outcomes. The role of postoperative surveillance for recurrence remains controversial.

Free peritoneal graft for repair of severe seromuscular defect of bowel: from experiment to clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Severe seromuscular tear of the bowel with impending perforation following enterolysis or trauma is not uncommon in gastrointestinal surgery. It is sometimes complicated with enterocutaneous fistula, intra-abdominal abscess or free perforation, especially of the ileus. In addition, direct serosal repair is often impossible, or complicated by lumen compromise. Serosal patch repair also reportedly is also associated with complications such as dislodgement of the sutured bowel loop, fistula formation, adhesion ileus, or volvulus. Free peritoneal graft (FPG), as in split-thickness skin graft (STSG), can be taken by underlying healthy tissue within 24 to 48 h and used for repair of such defect.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, FPG was used as an alternative to serosal patch repair or resection to cover severe defects of the colon, rectum, duodenum, or small bowel in 30 consecutive patients. All defects were over 8 x 4 cm in size and involved 30 to 80% of the circumference of the bowel wall. Each defect was deep enough to expose the thin mucosal layer, with the intestinal content visible through it. These defects could have been successfully treated by resection or repair using a serosal or mucosal patch instead of FPG. After making sure that the mucosa associated with the defect was alive and not perforated, a patch of intact peritoneum with pre-peritoneal tissue from the lateral abdominal wall (slightly smaller than the defect) was superimposed, with the edges simply sewn to the margin of the defect.

RESULTS

All patients recovered uneventfully, with no untoward effects determined, even after long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We believe that FPG provides a feasible, simple, effective, economic, and safe alternative for repair of severe seromuscular defects; potentially making it widely applicable in clinical practice.

Colorectal cancer presenting as surgical emergencies

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Surgery is considered the first line therapy for CRC, and is generally encountered by many surgeons under elective conditions. Unfortunately, colorectal cancer may present acutely as a surgical emergency. These conditions include, but are not limited to perforation, hemorrhage, and obstruction. The presentation of a patient with these conditions can lead to higher morbidity and mortality. The choice of operation depends mainly on the site of the disease (left-sided versus right-sided), the patient's physical condition, nutritional status, and age. The treatment for right-sided lesions is a right hemicolectomy. However, treatment of left-sided lesions is still undecided. There are many therapeutic options such as primary or staged resections, Hartman's procedure, subtotal colectomy, or colostomy. Other therapies involve non-operative techniques such as laser therapy, colonic stenting, emergency endoscopy, and comfort measures.

Comparison of one-stage resection and anastomosis of acute complete obstruction of left and right colon

BACKGROUND

Although acute obstruction of the right colon is usually handled by primary anastomosis following resection, many surgeons are reluctant to offer one-stage resection and anastomosis to patients with obstructive lesions of the left colon. The aim of the study is to compare the immediate result of one-stage resection and anastomosis for patients with acute complete obstruction of the right colon versus left colon.

METHODS

From January 1986 to December 2003, 214 cases of acute colonic obstruction were managed with one-stage resection and anastomosis by a single surgeon. Eighty patients were operated on for obstructive lesions of the right colon, 71 of them for carcinoma of the colon. Operative mortality was 10% (8/80); all except 2 patients died of respiratory failure. There were 2 cases (2.5%) of anastomotic leakage. One hundred thirty-four patients were operated on for obstructive lesions of the left colon, 127 of them for carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Operative mortality was 1.5% (2/134); both patients died of metastasis from the colorectal cancer following surgery. There were 3 cases (2.3%) of anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSION

This experience suggests that an anastomosis can be performed as safely in patients with acute obstruction of the left colon as in those with acute obstruction of the right colon. Mortality following resection and anastomosis is actually lower in left than right colonic obstruction. Neither intraoperative irrigation nor routine subtotal colectomy was found to be necessary in patients with acute colonic obstruction. Intraoperative decompression should be considered in left and also right colonic obstruction prior to the anastomosis following colonic resection.

A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer

BACKGROUND

Although a significantly decreased long-term survival has been observed in patients undergoing surgery for complicated colorectal tumors compared with uncomplicated ones, the role of radical oncologic surgery on emergency colonic cancer is not defined clearly. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of a curative emergency surgery in terms of tumor recurrence and cancer-related survival compared with elective colonic surgery.

METHODS

Between January 1996 and December 1998, all patients with colonic cancer deemed to have undergone a curative resection were considered for inclusion in this prospective study. Patients were classified into 2 groups: group 1, after emergency surgery for complicated colonic cancer, and group 2, patients undergoing elective surgery. The main end points were cancer-related survival and the probability of being free from recurrence at 3 years.

RESULTS

Of the 266 patients included in the study, 59 patients (22.2%) were in group 1 and 207 patients (77.8%) were in group 2. Postoperative mortality was higher in group 1 (P=.0004). After patients were stratified by the tumor node metastasis system, differences between the groups with respect to overall survival of stage II tumors (P=.0728), the probability of being free from recurrence (P=.0827), and cancer-related survival (P=.1071) of stage III cancers did not reach statistical significance. Differences were observed for the overall survival in stage III tumors (P=.0007), and for the probability of being free from recurrence (P=.0011) and cancer-related survival (P=.0029) in stage II cancers. When patients with elective stage II tumors presenting 1 or more negative prognostic factor were compared with emergency patients affected by a stage II colonic cancer, no differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Curative surgeries for complicated colonic cancer are acceptable in emergency conditions. Cancer-related survival and recurrence in patients with complicated colonic cancers may approach that of elective surgery if a surgical treatment with radical oncologic criteria is performed.

Intraoperative colonic lavage in emergency surgical treatment of left-sided large bowel lesions

There has been a trend towards resection and primary anastomosis after on-table lavage in patients with left sided colonic emergencies. This study will analyse the outcome in our centre. Thirty-two patients underwent the operation for various lesions of the left colon and the rectum between December 1998 and December 2002. The mean age of the patients was 37.7+/-11.1 years. Mean extra time for the procedure was 37.4+/-5.2 min. The mean hospital stay was 11.2+/-2.9 days. Postoperative complications included four cases (12.5%) of wound infection, and one (3.1%) right sub-phrenic abscess. No clinical anastomotic leakage or mortality was recorded. This study shows that primary anastomosis with on-table colonic lavage can be a safe procedure in selected, low risk patients.

Resultados y factores pronósticos de mortalidad en la intervención de Hartmann

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of one-stage procedures in emergency colonic surgery many years ago has relegated the use of the Hartmann procedure to the most seriously-ill patients, which has led to the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with this surgical technique. The aim of our study was to investigate our results using Hartmanns procedure and to evaluate several prognostic factors of postoperative mortality in this group of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1995 to December 2000, 79 patients (34 men and 45 women) with a mean age of 71.5 years underwent Hartmanns operation. Almost all the series (91.1%) had comorbidities. In this group of patients, morbidity and mortality were analyzed retrospectively, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to study prognostic factors of postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

The indications for surgery were acute peritonitis (77.2%), intestinal obstruction (18.9%), and lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3.7%). The most frequent etiology was acute diverticulitis (36 patients), followed by complicated colorectal carcinoma (18 patients). In 70.9% of the patients (56 patients) one or more postoperative complications was observed. Reoperation was performed in 15 patients (18.9%) and overall postoperative mortality was 45.5%. Renal failure (creatinine > or = 120 micromol/l) and high surgical ASA score (III or IV) reached statistical significance as predictive factors of mortality in these patients (p=.001 and p=.005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The patients who underwent Hartmanns procedure with high surgical ASA score and/or renal failure were at significantly higher risk of mortality.

Evaluation of P-POSSUM in surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer and correlation of the predicted mortality with different surgical options

PURPOSE

This study examined the accuracy of Portsmouth Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity system (P-POSSUM) in predicting the mortality of patients who underwent operations for obstructing colorectal cancer. It also is attempted to analyze the actual mortality and the predicted P-POSSUM mortality of different surgical options for obstructing left-sided cancer.

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer during 1998 to 2002 were collected. Mortality predicted by P-POSSUM was compared to the actual mortality with the method of linear analysis. The accuracy of using P-POSSUM to predict mortality in this group of patients was assessed by Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit test and Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis. The predicted and actual mortality of patients who underwent different surgical options also were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were included in the study and 18 patients died postoperatively. The operative mortality was 11.3 percent. P-POSSUM predicted overall mortality of 15 percent. The observed and predicted mortality was found to have no significant lack of fit (chi-squared = 5.98; degree of freedom = 3; P = 0.11). The area under Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis was 0.75. For patients with left-sided tumors, P-POSSUM predicted mortality and actual mortality of patients who had resection without anastomosis were both significantly higher than patients with single-stage resection and primary anastomosis (P = 0.044 and 0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

P-POSSUM system is valid for prediction of overall mortality in patients with operations for obstructing colorectal cancer. Estimation of P-POSSUM predicted mortality during operation and its ability to correlate with choice of procedure is an area that is worth further study in emergency colorectal surgery.

Large bowel obstruction: predictive factors for postoperative mortality

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to assess the prognostic value for mortality of several factors in patients with colonic obstruction and to study the differences between proximal and distal obstruction.

METHODS

Two-hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgery for colonic obstruction were studied. Patients with an obstructive lesion distal to the splenic flexure were assessed as having a distal colonic obstruction. Resection and primary anastomosis was the operation of choice in selected patients. Alternative procedures were Hartmann's procedure in high-risk patients, subtotal colectomy in cases of associated proximal colonic damage, and colostomy or intestinal bypass in the presence of irresectable lesions. Obstruction was considered proximal when the tumor was situated at the splenic flexure or proximally and a right or extended right colectomy was performed. A range of factors were investigated to estimate the probability of death: gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, nature of obstruction (benign vs. malign), location of the lesion (proximal vs. distal), associated proximal colonic damage and/or peritonitis, preoperative transfusion, preoperative renal failure, and laboratory data (hematocrit < or = 30 percent, hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dl, and leukocyte count >15,000/mm3). Univariate and multivariate forward steptwise logistic regression analysis was used to study the prognostic value of each significant variable in terms of mortality.

RESULTS

One or more complications were detected in 109 patients (46.5 percent). Death occurred in 44 patients (18.8 percent). No differences were observed between proximal and distal obstruction. Age (>70 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists III-IV score, preoperative renal failure, and the presence of proximal colon damage with or without peritonitis were significantly associated with postoperative mortality in the univariate analysis. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of proximal colon damage, and preoperative renal failure were significant predictors of outcome in multivariate logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

Large bowel obstruction still has a high of mortality rate. An accurate preoperative evaluation of severity factors might allow stratification of patients in terms of their mortality risk and help in the decision-making process for treatment. Such an evaluation would also enable better comparison between studies performed by different authors. Principles and stratification similar to those of distal lesions should be considered in patients with proximal colonic obstruction.

Self-expanding metal stents for colonic obstruction: experiences from 104 procedures in a single center

PURPOSE

In the past, colonic obstruction caused by malignancy most often resulted in high-risk operations, usually involving two-step procedures or leaving the patient with a stoma in case of disseminated disease.

METHODS

Between May 1997 and January 2003, 104 procedures with self-expanding metal stents have been performed in 96 patients at our institution. The goals of the procedure were either postponement of emergency operation or definitive palliative treatment. Surgeons with combined endoscopic and fluoroscopic technique performed all procedures. In most cases no analgesia or only slight sedation was used. Seven types of stents were used, CHOO stents and Wallstents accounting for the majority.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included, 44 men and 52 women, with a mean age of 78 (range, 41-100) years. Technical success was achieved in 92 percent; clinical success, in 82 percent. Thirty-eight patients presented with an acute obstruction and were treated with self-expanding metal stents. Seventeen patients later underwent an elective resection, 9 patients were not decompressed, and 12 patients had disseminated disease and were not treated further. Eight patients had benign strictures. These eight patients accounted for several of the reinterventions, and only three patients truly gained benefit from stenting. In the remaining patients disseminated disease was diagnosed and the acute stenting served as the definitive palliative treatment. Procedure-related complications were few: perforation occurred in three patients during stenting and in one instance 6 to 7 hours after. Other technical problems could mainly be overcome by introducing an additional stent. Complications seen in the group treated with self-expanding metal stents and subsequent resection [mortality N = 3 (18 percent)], anastomotic leakage [N = 3 (18 percent)], do not differ from the number of complications we usually see in our patients who undergo elective colorectal resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of self-expanding metal stents in malignant colonic obstruction is a safe and effective procedure with a low mortality and morbidity. In our experience the stenting of benign strictures is ineffective and combined with a high rate of complications.

Laparoscopic Colectomy for Obstructing Sigmoid Cancer With Prior Insertion of an Expandable Metallic Stent

We report a patient with obstructing cancer of the sigmoid colon initially treated with a self-expanding metallic stent. The metallic stent successfully relieved the intestinal obstruction, and laparoscopic anterior resection was performed subsequently. The use of this approach in the management of patients with obstructing colorectal cancer is discussed.

Comparison of stenting with emergency surgery as palliative treatment for obstructing primary left-sided colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Self-expanding metallic stents provide an alternative to surgery as definitive palliation in patients with obstructing colorectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the outcome of patients with obstruction due to primary left-sided colorectal cancer treated by palliative stenting with outcome in patients who had undergone surgery.

METHODS

Patients with incurable obstructing primary colorectal cancer distal to the splenic flexure treated with emergency surgery (n = 31) or placement of a metallic stent (n = 30) from November 1997 to June 2002 were included. Data on the mortality, morbidity, necessity of intensive care and hospital stay for the two groups were compared. The subsequent outcomes, including the incidence of stoma creation and survival, were also analysed.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution and presence of co-morbidity. Insertion of metallic stents was successful in 29 of 30 patients. Hospital death occurred in four and eight patients in the study and control groups respectively (P = 0.335). Fewer patients with placement of a stent required intensive care (1 versus 11; P = 0.001) and the median hospital stay was shorter in patients with stenting (4 versus 8 days; P = 0.008). A stoma was subsequently created in four patients with stenting, whereas 15 patients who had emergency operation required a stoma (P = 0.005). The difference in median survival between the two groups was not statistically significant (107 versus 119 days; P = 0.088).

CONCLUSION

Self-expanding metallic stents are effective in the palliation of obstructing colorectal cancer. Placement of stents is associated with a shorter hospital stay, less likelihood of intensive care and a lower incidence of stoma creation, when compared with emergency surgery. Thus insertion of a metallic stent should be considered in patients with incurable obstructing colorectal cancer.

[Comparison between resection and primary anastomosis and staged resection in obstructing adenocarcinoma of the left colon]

BACKGROUND

The surgical option to deal with obstruction of the left side of the large bowel is still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To report the experience of our group in the treatment of malignant left-sided colonic obstruction focusing on the immediate results using either one-stage resection and primary anastomoses or staged resection.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Twenty-three patients (median age = 52 (39-84) years; 10 males and 13 females) with potentially resectable obstructed adenocarcinomas of the left colon entered the study. The patients were submitted to different surgical procedure: 14 (60,9%) underwent one stage colonic resection (intra-operative lavage of colon (n = 10) or subtotal colectomy (n = 4); resection and primary anastomoses group) and 9 patients (39,1%) underwent staged resection (Hartmann's operation (n = 4) or loop colostomy (n = 5); staged resection group).

RESULTS

Two patients (8,7%) died. All were from the staged resection group. Four patients (44,4%) of staged resection group did not complete the treatment with the closing of the colostomy. The incidence of complications was 28,6% in resection and primary anastomoses group (4/14) and 66,7% in staged resection group (6/9). Hospital stay was 15 (9-45) in staged resection patients and 8 (6-20) in resection and primary anastomoses group. There was one case (7,1%) of anastomotic dehiscence in resection and primary anastomoses group and two cases (22,2%) in staged resection group.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of obstruction of left colon in one stage is safe and may be indicated for the management of the majority of cases.