Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study

Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The optimal technique for the resection of sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) is unknown, with established limitations and risks with conventional polypectomy. Although cold snare polypectomy is safe, the efficacy of piecemeal resection for large lesions is untested. In this study we evaluate the safety and efficacy of cold EMR for large SSPs.

METHODS

Patients presenting for elective colonoscopy at an academic endoscopy center with 1 or more SSPs ≥10 mm in size were enrolled, excluding those on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy other than aspirin. Lesions were resected with a cold EMR technique comprising submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin and dilute methylene blue before piecemeal cold snare resection of all visible polyp with a margin of normal tissue. Outcomes were the presence of residual serrated neoplasia in biopsy specimens from the defect margin and findings on surveillance colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Cold EMR was performed on 163 SSPs during 105 procedures in 99 patients (97% women; median age, 57 years). The mean size was 17.5 mm: 61 SSPs were ≥20 mm and 13 SSPs ≥30 mm, and 97.5% were in the proximal colon. Cytologic dysplasia was present in 2 (1.2%). Margin biopsy specimens were positive in 2 lesions (1.2%). Surveillance colonoscopy for 82% of lesions (median, 5 months) showed residual serrated tissue in 1, treated with cold snare, but no evidence of recurrence in the remainder. Minor adverse events were seen in 3 patients; no delayed bleeding was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Cold EMR is a safe and effective method for the removal of large SSPs.

Assessing colon polypectomy competency and its association with established quality metrics

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inadequate polypectomy leads to incomplete resection, interval colorectal cancer, and adverse events. However, polypectomy competency is rarely reported, and quality metrics are lacking. The primary aims of this study were to assess polypectomy competency among a cohort of gastroenterologists and to measure the correlation between polypectomy competency and established colonoscopy quality metrics (adenoma detection rate and withdrawal time).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study to assess polypectomy competency among 13 high-volume screening colonoscopists at an academic medical center. Over 6 weeks, we made video recordings of ≥28 colonoscopies per colonoscopist and randomly selected 10 polypectomies per colonoscopist for evaluation. Two raters graded the polypectomies by using the Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills, a polypectomy competency assessment tool, which assesses individual polypectomy skills and overall competency.

RESULTS

We evaluated 130 polypectomies. A total of 83 polypectomies (64%) were rated as competent, which was more likely for diminutive (70%) than small and/or large polyps (50%, P = .03). Overall Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills competency scores varied significantly among colonoscopists (P = .001), with overall polypectomy competency rates ranging between 30% and 90%. Individual skills scores, such as accurately directing the snare over the lesion (P = .02) and trapping an appropriate amount of tissue within the snare (P = .001) varied significantly between colonoscopists. Polypectomy competency rates did not significantly correlate with the adenoma detection rate (r = 0.4; P = .2) or withdrawal time (r = 0.2; P = .5).

CONCLUSIONS

Polypectomy competency varies significantly among colonoscopists and does not sufficiently correlate with established quality metrics. Given the clinical implications of suboptimal polypectomy, efforts to educate colonoscopists in polypectomy techniques and develop a metric of polypectomy quality are needed.

Polypectomy for complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Small colorectal polyps are encountered frequently and may be incompletely removed during colonoscopy. The optimal technique for removal of small colorectal polyps is uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the incomplete resection rate (IRR) by using EMR or cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for the removal of small adenomatous polyps.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized controlled study from a tertiary-care referral center. A total of 358 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria (polyp sized 6-9 mm) were randomized to the EMR (n =179) and CSP (n =179) groups, and their polyps were treated with conventional EMR or CSP, respectively. After polypectomy, an additional 5 forceps biopsies were performed at the base and margins of polypectomy sites to assess the presence of residual polyp tissue. The EMR and CSP samples were compared to assess the IRR.

RESULTS

Among a total of 525 polyps, 415 (79.0%) were adenomatous polyps, and 41 (16.4%) were advanced adenomas. The overall IRR for adenomatous polyps was significantly higher in the CSP group compared with the EMR group (18/212, 8.5% vs 3/203, 1.5%; P = .001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the CSP procedure was a stronger risk factor for the IRR (odds ratio [OR] 6.924; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.098-24.393; P = .003). In addition, piecemeal resection was the most important risk factor for the IRR (OR 28.696; 95% CI, 3.620-227.497; P = .001). The mean procedure time for polypectomy was not significantly different between the EMR and CSP groups (5.5 ± 2.7 vs 4.7 ± 3.4 minutes; P = .410). None of these patients presented with delayed bleeding. There were no severe adverse events related to the biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

EMR was significantly superior to CSP for achieving complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps. Patients with piecemeal resection of polyps had a higher risk for incomplete resection. (Clinical trial registration number: Hongwei-1102-12.).

High complete resection rate for pre-lift and cold biopsy of diminutive colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 The majority of polyps removed at colonoscopy are diminutive (≤ 5 mm) to small (< 10 mm) and there are few guidelines for the best way for these polyps to be removed. We aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of cold biopsy forceps polypectomy with pre-lift (CBPP) for polyps ≤ 7 mm. Our aims were to assess completeness of histological resection of this technique, to identify factors contributing to this and assess secondary considerations such as timing, retrieval and complication rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study on consecutive patients receiving a colonoscopy at Cheltenham General Hospital, as part of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (BCSP) in England. The study included only polyps that were judged as ≤ 7 mm by the colonoscopist. A small sub-mucosal pre-lift injection was administered prior to removal of the polyp using cold biopsy forceps. One or more biopsies were taken until the polyp was confidently assessed visually as being completely removed by the colonoscopist. The entire polypectomy site was then removed en bloc by endomucosal resection (EMR) with a margin of at least 1 to 2 mm around defect. This was sent for histopathological analysis to assess completeness of resection. Polypectomy timing, tissue retrieval, number of bites required for visual resection and complications were recorded at the time of the procedure.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were recruited and consented. Of them, 42 patients had a total of 60 polyps resected. Three patients had inflammatory polyps and were excluded from the study, leaving 57/60 polyps for final analysis. Seventeen were hyperplastic and 40 adenomatous polyps. Retrieval was complete for all 57 polyps and there were no complications both during or post- polypectomy. The complete resection rate (CRR) was 86 %. The technique was more effective in smaller polyps with 91.7 % of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) completely excised.

CONCLUSIONS

CBPP is a safe and highly effective technique for polyps < 5 mm with a high complete resection and retrieval rate. The time taken for the procedure is significantly greater than cold forceps alone, or cold snare as seen in other studies.

Association between the ulcer status and the risk of delayed bleeding after the endoscopic mucosal resection of colon

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Bleeding is the most common adverse event following colonoscopic endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of a colon EMR according to the post-EMR ulcer status and determine the risk factors of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) based on the post-EMR ulcer status.

METHODS

The medical records and endoscopic images of patients who underwent EMR of colon polyps with diameters of ≥ 5 mm were retrospectively reviewed by us. If any exposed vessels were observed on the post-EMR ulcer, the types of exposed vessels were classified into cut and uncut vessels. The coagulation injuries on the post-EMR ulcer were categorized as grades 1, 2, or 3.

RESULTS

In total, 505 patients with 728 polyps were examined. Exposed vessels were present in 416 post-EMR ulcers, including cut vessels in 11 (1.5%) and uncut vessels in 405 (55.6%). With regard to coagulation injury, 113 (15.5%), 443 (60.9%), and 172 (23.6%) post-EMR ulcers had grades 1, 2, and 3 injuries, respectively. DPPB was observed in 20 lesions (2.7%). Multivariate analysis indicated that a polyp size > 10 mm (odds ratio [OR], 3.354; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.229-9.154), cut vessels (OR, 18.913; 95% CI, 3.106-115.187), and grade 3 coagulation injury (OR, 16.796; 95% CI, 1.825-154.556) were associated with DPPB.

CONCLUSIONS

Cut vessels and severe coagulation injury on post-EMR ulcers, as well as larger polyp size, are risk factors for DPPB. Careful inspection of post-EMR ulcers and prophylactic hemostasis, if necessary, may improve the clinical outcomes of colonoscopic EMR.

A prospective comparison of cold snare polypectomy using traditional or dedicated cold snares for the resection of small sessile colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 The evidence for efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the completeness of resection and safety of cold snare polypectomy, using either traditional or dedicated cold snares.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 This was a prospective, non-randomized study performed at a single tertiary hospital. Adult patients with at least one colorectal polyp (size ≤ 10 mm) removed by cold snare were included. In the first phase, all patients had polyps removed by traditional snare without diathermy. In the second phase, all patients had polyps removed by dedicated cold snare. Complete endoscopic resection was determined from histological examination of quadrantic polypectomy margin biopsies. Immediate or delayed bleeding within 2 weeks was recorded.

RESULTS

 In total, 181 patients with 299 eligible polyps (n = 93 (173 polyps) traditional snare group, n = 88 (126 polyps) dedicated cold snare group) were included. Patient demographics and procedure indications were similar between groups. Mean polyp size was 6 mm in both groups ( P  = 0.25). Complete polyp resection was 165 /173 (95.4 %; 95 %CI 90.5 - 97.6 %) in the traditional snare group and 124/126 (98.4 %; 95 %CI 93.7 - 99.6 %) in the dedicated cold snare group ( P  = 0.16). Serrated polyps, compared with adenomatous polyps, had a higher rate of incomplete resection (7 % vs. 2 %, P  = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of immediate bleeding (3 % vs. 1 %, P  = 0.41) and there were no delayed hemorrhages or perforations.

CONCLUSIONS

 Cold snare polypectomy is effective and safe for the complete endoscopic resection of small (≤ 10 mm) colorectal polyps with either traditional or dedicated cold snares.

Endoscopic management of colorectal adenomas

Colorectal adenomas are well known precursors of invasive adenocarcinoma. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for adenoma detection. Colonoscopy is far more than a diagnostic tool, as it allows effective treatment of colorectal adenomas. Endoscopic resection of colorectal adenomas has been shown to reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Difficult resection techniques are available, such as endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection. This review aims to provide an overview of the different endoscopic resection techniques and their indications, and summarizes the current recommendations in the recently published guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Safety of cold polypectomy for small colorectal neoplastic lesions: a prospective cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Cold polypectomy has been widely accepted for removal of small colorectal polyps. However, no large-scale prospective study exists as for its safety in Japan. We investigated this issue in this single-center, prospective cohort study in a total of 1198 colorectal polyps resected with cold polypectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent cold polypectomy for colorectal neoplastic lesions less than 10-mm diameter between September 2014 and October 2016 were enrolled. Primary outcome was the incidence of delayed bleeding within 2 weeks after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the rate of immediate bleeding, perforation, endoscopic en bloc resection, and advanced histology.

RESULTS

Cold polypectomy was performed on 1198 polyps in the 474 patients. No delayed bleeding or colonic perforation was observed. Immediate bleeding during the procedure, requiring endoscopic hemostasis, occurred in 97 lesions (8.1%), and all of them were successfully managed endoscopically. The endoscopic en bloc resection rate was 97.2%. Twenty-eight lesions (2.3%) were histologically diagnosed as advanced neoplasia; among them, three lesions were well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, and in two of them, a negative margin was not histologically confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

Cold polypectomy for small colorectal polyps is a safe technique without significant complication, but careful endoscopic diagnosis at cold polypectomy is necessary to identify advanced neoplasia. The reliability of cold polypectomy in excision of polyps with high-grade neoplasia should be established before the procedure becomes standard in the excision of small colorectal polyps.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000014812.

Current standards and new developments of colorectal polyp management and resection techniques

Colonoscopy and endoscopic removal of precancerous polyps play an important role in colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. Improved endoscopes and quality standards have led to an increasing polyp and adenoma detection rate. Optimal polyp resection techniques and management strategies are key for an effective colonoscopy practice. Areas covered: Strategies for how to improve diminutive polyp (polyps up to 5 mm in size) management are discussed because of their high prevalence. Systematic removal of diminutive polyps leads to increasing costs of colonoscopy practice, while the effect on colorectal cancer prevention might be negligible. Furthermore, polypectomy recommendations for mid-size and large polyps are provided. For all larger polyps larger, complete and safe resection is mandatory to avoid post colonoscopy cancers. The focus for managing such larger polyps is to use new techniques (i.e. cold snares) and to attempt complete removal and to reduce post-polypectomy complications. Expert commentary: The resect-and-discard strategy is a promising management strategy for diminutive polyps. However, modification of this approach might be required in order to make widespread adoption feasible. Cold snare polypectomy is a promising new approach for small polyp resection. For resection of large polyps adequate treatment recommendations with regard to endoscopic mucosal resection and complication prevention are provided.

Comparative efficacy of cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although cold polypectomy techniques are preferred over polypectomy with electrocautery in the management of diminutive polyps, comprehensive comparisons among various cold polypectomy techniques have not yet been fully performed.

METHODS

We searched for all relevant randomized controlled trials published up until October 2016 examining the efficacy of cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive polyps. Cold polypectomy techniques were classified as cold forceps polypectomy (CFP), jumbo forceps polypectomy (JFP), traditional cold snare polypectomy (CSP), and dedicated CSP, according to the type of device. A network meta-analysis was performed to calculate the direct and indirect estimates of efficacy among the cold polypectomy techniques.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 703 patients and 968 polyps were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding comparative efficacy for complete histological eradication, there was no inconsistency in the network (Cochran's Q test, df = 4, P = 0.22; I ² = 30%). In terms of complete histological eradication, both dedicated and traditional CSP were superior to CFP (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval [CI]] 4.31 [1.92-9.66] and 2.45 [1.30-4.63], respectively); dedicated CSP was superior to traditional CSP (OR [95% CI] 1.76 [1.07-2.89]); and there was no difference between JFP versus CFP (OR [95% CI] 1.36 [0.40-4.61]). Regarding tissue retrieval rate, there was no difference between dedicated versus traditional CSP (OR [95% CI] 1.03 [0.44-2.38]). The procedure time for CSP was comparable to that of CFP.

CONCLUSIONS

Dedicated CSP was shown to be superior to other cold polypectomy techniques in terms of complete histological eradication. Cold polypectomy using a dedicated snare can be recommended for the removal of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Standardisation of polypectomy technique

There are several approaches to polypectomy for sessile polyps <20 mm and for pedunculated polyps. Recent evidence is leading towards standardisation of polypectomy technique. Key recent polypectomy developments include: 1. Use of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for sessile polyps <10 mm; 2. Use of hot snare polypectomy (HSP) following submucosal injection for sessile polyps sized 10-19 mm; 3. Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy (PCSP), with or without prior submucosal injection, for select sessile polyps sized 10-19 mm, where the potential risk for an adverse event is increased (e.g. polyps in the caecum or ascending colon, or patients with increased risk of post-polypectomy bleeding), and where the risk of submucosal invasion is low; 4. Avoidance of hot biopsy forceps (HBF); 5. Limiting the use of cold biopsy forceps (CBF) to the smallest of diminutive polyps, where CSP is not feasible; 6. Mechanical haemostasis prior to polypectomy for large pedunculated polyps with head ≥20 mm or stalk ≥10 mm.

A case of colonic stenosis caused by cold snare polypectomy for the removal of a colonic polyp

A 78-year-old woman with hypertension had a positive fecal immunochemical test and underwent colonoscopy, which revealed a 4 mm sessile polyp (Paris type; 0-Is) in the transverse colon. Based on low magnification colonoscopy with narrow band imaging, the polyp was Type 2 according to the NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic classification, diagnosed as an adenoma, and then resected via cold snare polypectomy (CSP). Five days after CSP, she complained of right-sided abdominal pain. Abdominal CT showed focal wall thickening of the transverse colon and focal infiltration of tissues surrounding the transverse colon. The inflammatory lesion was considered to coincide with the location of the polyp resected with CSP. However, no inflammatory findings were seen in other parts of the colon, and intraperitoneal free air and ascites were not identified. Moreover, no inflammatory findings and no infectious signs in other organs were present. She was administered intravenous antibiotics and, 19 days later, she was discharged from our hospital. Approximately 3 months later, colonoscopy revealed colonic stenosis associated with red mucosa and ulceration in the transverse colon where the polyp had been resected with CSP. Contrast-enhanced X-ray revealed an approximately 1 cm-long colonic stenosis in the transverse colon near the hepatic flexure.

Cold snare polypectomy reduced delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with conventional hot polypectomy: a propensity score-matching analysis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for small colorectal polyps has lower incidence of adverse events, especially delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB). However, few data are available on comparisons of the incidence of DPPB of CSP and hot polypectomy (HP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of DPPB after CSP and compare it with that of HP. A propensity score model was used as a secondary analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single municipal hospital. We identified 539 patients with colorectal polyps from 2 mm to 11 mm in size who underwent CSP (804 polyps in 330 patients) or HP (530 polyps in 209 patients) between July 2013 and June 2015.

RESULTS

 There were no cases of DPPB in the CSP group. Conversely, DPPB occurred in 4 patients (1.9 %) after HP, resulting in a significant difference between the CSP and HP groups (0.008 % vs 0 %, P  = 0.02). Propensity score-matching analysis created 402 matched pairs, yielding a significantly higher DPPB rate in the HP group than CSP group (0.02 % vs 0 %, P  = 0.04). However, significantly more patients in the CSP group had unclear horizontal margins that precluded assessment (83 vs 38 cases, P  < 0.001). The retrieval failure rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than in the HP group (3 % vs 0.7 %, P  = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

DPPB was less frequent with CSP than HP, as selected by the propensity score-matching model. Our findings indicate that CSP is recommended polypectomy in daily clinical setting. However, special care should be taken during polyp retrieval and horizontal margin assessment, and these issues could be taken into account in follow-up after CSP.

Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

 Removal of polyps during colonoscopy effectively prevents the development of colorectal cancer. So far, snare resection with high frequency current with or without prior submucosal saline injection is the method of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcome of cold snare resection during routine endoscopy.

METHODS

 In this prospective study, 522 patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were included. Cold snare resection for diminutive (< 6 mm), small (6 - 9 mm), and larger polyps (> 9 - 15 mm) was performed using a dedicated cold snare device (Exacto ^® ) without prior submucosal injection. Outcome parameters included bleeding rate, perforation rate, procedure time, histologic evaluation of polyp margins, and success rates. The data were compared to a group of patients undergoing hot snare resection.

RESULTS

 Overall, 1233 polyps were removed using cold snare resection with an overall success rate of 99.4 %. All failures of cold snare resection occurred in the cecum (8/82, failure rate 9.8 %). In the remaining colon, the success rate was 100 %. Immediate post-polypectomy bleeding occurred in 0.49 % of all patients and was most frequently seen in polyps larger than 9 mm. The procedure time was significantly shorter using cold snare resection compared with hot snare resection (27.6 min vs. 35.7 min, P  < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

 Cold snare resection can be performed safely in outpatients for removal of small polyps in screening colonoscopy. It does not require prior saline injection and reduces procedure time without an increased risk of bleeding.

Serrated lesions and serrated polyposis syndrome

The serrated pathway has been shown to be an alternative colorectal carcinogenetic route potentially accounting for up to one third of all CRCs. Serrated lesions, particularly SSPs, have been a focus of research during the past few years. They have well-established histological and molecular characteristics that account for their potential carcinogenetic risk through the accumulation BRAF, KRAS and methylator profile (CpG) mutations. Their endoscopic identification and resection represent a challenge because of their specific characteristics, and the need for an adequate specimen for histological diagnosis. Knowledge of these lesions is key, as is the adoption of established criteria for their endoscopic description and histological diagnosis. SPS is the maximum expression of involvement by serrated lesions, is associated with increased risk for CRC, and requires attentive endoscopic follow-up, as well as family screening. While the exact etiopathogenic mechanism remains unknown, current research will likely provide us with appropriate answers in the not too distant future.

Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90%); 2 cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90%); 3 adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25%); 4 appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80%); 5 complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.

Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot forceps biopsy (HFB) for diminutive colorectal polyps.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized single-center clinical trial included consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age with diminutive colorectal polyps 3-5 mm from December 2014 to October 2015. The primary outcome measures were en-bloc resection (endoscopic evaluation) and complete resection rates (pathological evaluation). The secondary outcome measures were the immediate bleeding or immediate perforation rate after polypectomy, delayed bleeding or delayed perforation rate after polypectomy, use of clipping for bleeding or perforation, and polyp retrieval rate. Prophylactic clipping after polyp removal wasn’t routinely performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred eight patients were randomized into the CSP (102), HFB (106) and 283 polyps were evaluated (CSP: 148, HFB: 135). The en-bloc resection rate was significantly higher with CSP than with HFB [99.3% (147/148) vs 80.0% (108/135), P < 0.0001]. The complete resection rate was significantly higher with CSP than with HFB [80.4% (119/148) vs 47.4% (64/135), P < 0.0001]. The immediate bleeding rate was similar between the groups [8.6% (13/148) vs 8.1% (11/135), P = 1.000], and endoscopic hemostasis with hemoclips was successful in all cases. No cases of perforation or delayed bleeding occurred. The rate of severe tissue injury to the pathological specimen was higher HFB than CSP [52.6% (71/135) vs 1.3% (2/148), P < 0.0001]. Polyp retrieval failure was encountered CSP (7), HFB (2).

CONCLUSION

CSP is more effective than HFB for resecting diminutive polyps. Further long-term follow-up study is required.

Histological outcomes between hot and cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND/AIM

To compare the complete resection rate of hot and cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 233 consecutive patients with 461 colorectal polyps up to 10 mm in diameter that were treated by hot or cold snare polypectomy between April 2014 and August 2016. Lesions treated by hot snare polypectomy (n = 137) and cold snare polypectomy (n = 324) were compared. The histological complete resection rates were evaluated between the two groups. We analyzed the relationship between factors for complete resection and clinical factors using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There was a significantly higher complete resection rate in hot snare polypectomy than in cold snare polypectomy (70.5% vs. 47.3%; P < 0.001). In the analysis of subgroups categorized according to polyp size, the complete resection rate for hot snare polypectomy was significantly higher than that for cold snare polypectomy among polyps ≥6 mm (69.0% vs. 43.5%; P < 0.001). Among polyps ≤5 mm, no significant difference regarding the complete resection rate was observed between the methods (81.3% vs. 53.4%; P = 0.057). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that using hot snare polypectomy (odds ratio 3.03; P < 0.001), small lesion size (odds ratio 1.57; P = 0.049), and lesion location in the left colon (odds ratio 1.73; P = 0.007) were independent factors for complete resection.

CONCLUSION

Hot snare polypectomy provides a higher complete resection rate than does cold snare polypectomy for larger (6-10 mm) subcentimeter colorectal polyps.

Paediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines

This guideline refers to infants, children, and adolescents ages 0 to 18 years. The areas covered include indications for diagnostic and therapeutic esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy; endoscopy for foreign body ingestion; corrosive ingestion and stricture/stenosis endoscopic management; upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; and endoscopic ultrasonography. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and endoscopy specific to inflammatory bowel disease has been dealt with in other guidelines and are therefore not mentioned in this guideline. Training and ongoing skill maintenance are to be dealt with in an imminent sister publication to this.

Endoscopic management of mucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract

With the increasing role of endoscopy in patient evaluation, more mucosal lesions, including gastric, duodenal and colonic polyps, are encountered during routine examinations. It is imperative for gastroenterologists to become familiar with the endoscopic management of these various gastrointestinal lesions. In this article, various resection techniques will be discussed, including hot/cold forceps polypectomy, hot/cold snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. The article will also discuss the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of these techniques and the future direction of endoscopic management of mucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.

The Impact on Endoscopic Resource Utilization After a Targeted Intervention for Cost-Minimization of EGD and Colonoscopy

OBJECTIVES

The need to define the cost of endoscopic procedures becomes increasingly important in an era of providing low-cost, high-quality care. We examined the impact of informing endoscopists of the cost of accessories and pathology specimens as a cost-minimization strategy.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of therapeutic outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. During the pre-intervention phase (phase 1), the endoscopists were not briefed on the cost of accessories or pathology specimens obtained during the procedure. During a 3-week intervention phase and the post-intervention phase (phase 2) endoscopists were informed of the dollar value of accessories and pathology specimens after the completion of all procedures. In all cases the institutional costs (not charges) were used. The endoscopists were blinded to their observation.

RESULTS

A total of 969 EGD, colonoscopy, and EGD+colonoscopy performed by 6 endoscopists were reviewed, 456 procedures in phase 1 and 513 procedures in phase 2. There was no significant difference between phases 1 and 2 in total device and pathology cost in dollars (188.8±151.4 vs. 188.9±151.8, P=0.99), total device cost (36.2±107.9 vs. 39.0±95.96, P=0.67) and total pathology cost (152.6±101.3 vs. 149.9±112.5, P=0.70). There was not a significant difference in total device and pathology cost when examined by specific procedures performed, or for any of the endoscopists between phases 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Making endoscopists more cost conscious by informing them of the costs of each procedure during EGD and colonoscopy does not result in lower procedural costs. Analysis of cost-minimization strategies involving procedures in other health-care settings and procedures using high-cost accessories are warranted.

The Influence of Snare Size on the Utility and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy for the Removal of Colonic Polyps in Japanese Patients

Background

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has been recently reported to be useful for the removal of small colonic polyps. However, the relationship between the histologically complete resection rate and snare size used during CSP has not been reported. Our aim was to assess the utility of CSP.

Methods

We analyzed the histologically complete resection rates and the frequency of complications for 175 colon polyps removed by CSP. Moreover, we examined the histologically complete resection rate associated with different snare sizes used during CSP.

Results

There was no significant difference in the histologically complete resection rate between endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (60.9%) and CSP (53.1%). There were also no significant differences in the frequency of complications including perforation and postoperative bleeding between EMR (perforation: none; postoperative bleeding: two patients) and CSP (perforation: none; postoperative bleeding: none). Histological examination revealed that the complete resection rate of CSP using a short snare (61.6%) was significantly higher than that of CSP using a long snare (44.9%; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the frequency of complications between CSP using the short snare and that using the long snare.

Conclusions

CSP is a safe, useful method for the removal of colonic polyps. CSP using the short snare improved the histologically complete resection rates compared to the long snare. Future studies to further assess the utility of CSP are required.

Resection of Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps: What Is the Optimal Technique?

Colorectal polyps are classified as neoplastic or non-neoplastic on the basis of malignant potential. All neoplastic polyps should be completely removed because both the incidence of colorectal cancer and the mortality of colorectal cancer patients have been found to be strongly correlated with incomplete polypectomy. The majority of colorectal polyps discovered on diagnostic colonoscopy are diminutive and small polyps; therefore, complete resection of these polyps is very important. However, there is no consensus on a method to remove diminutive and small polyps, and various techniques have been adopted based on physician preference. The aim of this article was to review the diverse techniques used to remove diminutive and small polyps and to suggest which technique will be the most effective.

Endoscopic Instruments and Electrosurgical Unit for Colonoscopic Polypectomy

Colorectal polypectomy is an effective method for prevention of colorectal cancer. Many endoscopic instruments have been used for colorectal polypectomy, such as snares, forceps, endoscopic clips, a Coagrasper, retrieval net, injector, and electrosurgery generator unit (ESU). Understanding the characteristics of endoscopic instruments and their proper use according to morphology and size of the colorectal polyp will enable endoscopists to perform effective polypectomy. I reviewed the characteristics of endoscopic instruments for colorectal polypectomy and their appropriate use, as well as the basic principles and settings of the ESU.

Efficacy and adverse events of cold vs hot polypectomy: A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare previously reported randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of cold and hot polypectomy, we systematically reviewed and clarify the utility of cold polypectomy over hot with respect to efficacy and adverse events.

METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predominance of cold and hot polypectomy for removing colon polyps. Published articles and abstracts from worldwide conferences were searched using the keywords “cold polypectomy”. RCTs that compared either or both the effects or adverse events of cold polypectomy with those of hot polypectomy were collected. The patients’ demographics, endoscopic procedures, No. of examined lesions, lesion size, macroscopic and histologic findings, rates of incomplete resection, bleeding amount, perforation, and length of procedure were extracted from each study. A forest plot analysis was used to verify the relative strength of the effects and adverse events of each procedure. A funnel plot was generated to assess the possibility of publication bias.

RESULTS: Ultimately, six RCTs were selected. No significant differences were noted in the average lesion size (less than 10 mm) between the cold and hot polypectomy groups in each study. Further, the rates of complete resection and adverse events, including delayed bleeding, did not differ markedly between cold and hot polypectomy. The average procedural time in the cold polypectomy group was significantly shorter than in the hot polypectomy group.

CONCLUSION: Cold polypectomy is a time-saving procedure for removing small polyps with markedly similar curability and safety to hot polypectomy.

Endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions: The narrowing divide between East and West

Colonic polypectomy is an effective way of reducing colon cancer mortality. Multiple techniques now exist for the resection of polyps, and the endoscopist must decide on the appropriate resection approach for individual patients and lesions. This decision should maximize efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness and provide optimal oncological outcomes while minimizing unnecessary surgical treatment. Advances in endoscopic imaging technology are improving the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis and allowing more precise risk assessment of colonic lesions. Resection technique can be tailored to the endoscopic findings. Diminutive (≤5 mm) and small polyps (≤9 mm) are best resected primarily by snare techniques. Cold snare polypectomy has proven safety, but efficacy and technique require further study. There is variation in techniques used for polyps 6-20 mm in size and incomplete resection rates for conventional polypectomy may be considerable. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is well established, safe and effective for lesions without submucosal invasion (SMI); however, recurrence is a key limitation. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is well established in the East; however, it is resource intensive and its role in lesions with a low risk of SMI is questionable. ESD in the West remains incompletely defined and is associated with high adverse event rates, but it is becoming increasingly available and successful as experience grows. Emerging full-thickness resection technologies are still in their infancy and remain experimental as a result of the absence of reliable closure devices and techniques. Patient-focused outcomes should guide technique selection.

Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size?

AIM: To identify whether the forceps estimation is more useful than visual estimation in the measurement of colon polyp size.

METHODS: We recorded colonoscopy video clips that included scenes visualizing the polyp and scenes using open biopsy forceps in association with the polyp, which were used for an exam. A total of 40 endoscopists from the Busan Ulsan Gyeongnam Intestinal Study Group Society (BIGS) participated in this study. Participants watched 40 pairs of video clips of the scenes for visual estimation and forceps estimation, and wrote down the estimated polyp size on the exam paper. When analyzing the results of the exam, we assessed inter-observer differences, diagnostic accuracy, and error range in the measurement of the polyp size.

RESULTS: The overall intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of inter-observer agreement for forceps estimation and visual estimation were 0.804 (95%CI: 0.731-0.873, P < 0.001) and 0.743 (95%CI: 0.656-0.828, P < 0.001), respectively. The ICCs of each group for forceps estimation were higher than those for visual estimation (Beginner group, 0.761 vs 0.693; Expert group, 0.887 vs 0.840, respectively). The overall diagnostic accuracy for visual estimation was 0.639 and for forceps estimation was 0.754 (P < 0.001). In the beginner group and the expert group, the diagnostic accuracy for the forceps estimation was significantly higher than that of the visual estimation (Beginner group, 0.734 vs 0.613, P < 0.001; Expert group, 0.784 vs 0.680, P < 0.001, respectively). The overall error range for visual estimation and forceps estimation were 1.48 ± 1.18 and 1.20 ± 1.10, respectively (P < 0.001). The error ranges of each group for forceps estimation were significantly smaller than those for visual estimation (Beginner group, 1.38 ± 1.08 vs 1.68 ± 1.30, P < 0.001; Expert group, 1.12 ± 1.11 vs 1.42 ± 1.11, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Application of the open biopsy forceps method when measuring colon polyp size could help reduce inter-observer differences and error rates.

The "golden retriever" study: improving polyp retrieval rates by providing education and competitive feedback

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps can be achieved at expert centers, accurate prediction of histopathological outcomes has not been achieved in all practice settings. It is therefore important that resected polyps are retrieved for histology. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of education and competitive feedback on the overall polyp retrieval rate and to determine which polyp-related and procedure-related factors are associated with retrieval.

METHODS

We prospectively included consecutive colonoscopies performed at a single center between April 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease or familial polyposis syndromes were excluded from analysis. Six months after the start of the study, all endoscopists were educated on the importance of polyp retrieval, and a competition was started by publicly providing feedback on the retrieval rate of all endoscopists and the monthly best 3 performers (or "golden retrievers") in particular. We compared overall retrieval rates in the 6 months before and after the start of the competition.

RESULTS

The overall polyp retrieval rate improved from 88% (525/594) to 93% (978/1047), comparing consecutive colonoscopies performed in the 6 months before and during the polyp retrieval competition (P < .01). The histopathological outcomes of retrieved polyps were not different before and during the competition. The retrieval rate of right-sided polyps increased from 85% to 95% during the competition (odds ratio [OR], 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-5.4), whereas the left-sided retrieval rate remained 92%. On multivariable analysis, polyp size greater than 5 mm (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.8-9.6) and in competition resection (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6) were significantly associated with polyp retrieval, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Providing education and competitive feedback to endoscopists will improve polyp retrieval rates, especially for clinically relevant, right-sided polyps.

Role of the cold biopsy technique in diminutive and small colonic polyp removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The most commonly detected polyps during screening colonoscopy are diminutive and small polyps, and therefore endoscopic treatment of those polyps is a daily routine for every colonoscopist. The primary aim of this study was to compare the complete eradication rate of diminutive and small colorectal polyps using cold biopsy versus other techniques, because randomized controlled trials have shown conflicting results.

METHODS

In March 2015 we searched for randomized controlled trials in Medline, EMBASE, and ISI the Web of Science, starting with their dates of inception, and abstracts of pertinent scientific meetings (eg, American College of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Week). The primary outcome was complete removal of diminutive and small polyps (≤7 mm) by histologic eradication rates. The secondary outcome was total procedure time. Using RevMan (Cochrane), we used the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model for binary endpoints and the inverse variance method for continuous outcomes. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to rate the quality of evidence for each outcome.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials included a total of 668 patients and 721 polyps. Removal techniques included cold biopsy, jumbo biopsy, and cold snare polypectomy. Based on histologic criteria, incomplete polyp removal was significantly lower with cold snare/jumbo forceps biopsy technique than with the cold biopsy technique (relative risk, .40; 95% CI, .26-.62), with no heterogeneity (I(2), 0%). Total procedure time was an average of 2.66 minutes shorter for the cold snare/jumbo forceps biopsy techniques compared with the cold biopsy technique (95% CI, -5.14 to -.18). The quality of evidence was rated moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate quality evidence that cold snare or jumbo biopsy techniques reduce the risk of incomplete diminutive polyp removal by 60% without increasing the total procedure time. Adequately powered randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A previous study reported that cold snare polypectomy (CSP) was superior to cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for the removal of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) (≤5 mm) when the techniques were assessed for completeness of resection. However, completeness is expected to be greater with CFP when strict investigation of the remnant polyp is performed. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of CFP with narrow-band imaging (NBI) evaluation of polypectomy sites for removal of DCPs, compared with CSP.

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial at a tertiary-care referral hospital. Of the 380 patients screened, 146 patients with 231 DCPs were enrolled. CFP was used to resect DCPs until no remnant polyp was visible by NBI endoscopy. The primary noninferiority endpoint was histologic eradication of polyps, with a noninferiority margin of -10%.

RESULTS

A size of >3 mm was seen in 129 polyps (55.8%). The overall rates of histologic eradication were 90.5% in the CFP group and 93.0% in the CSP group (difference, 2.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.67 to 4.62). However, when confined to the polyps >3 mm, the histologic eradication rate was 86.8% and 93.4% (95% CI, -17.2 to 3.6), respectively. Polyp size, histology, location, and time taken for polypectomy did not differ between the groups. The failure rate of tissue retrieval was higher in the CSP than in the CFP group (7.8% vs 0.0%, respectively; P =.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, >90% of all DCPs were completely resected by using CFP with NBI evaluation of polypectomy sites, showing noninferiority compared with CSP. However, in polyps measuring >3 mm, CFP failed to show noninferiority versus CSP. CFP appears to be the proper method for resection of DCPs 1 to 3 mm in size if no remnant polyp is visible by NBI endoscopy, but CFP is likely to be insufficient for larger polyps. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02201147.).

Improving the utility of colonoscopy: Recent advances in practice

Colonoscopy is a frequently performed diagnostic and therapeutic test and the primary screening tool in several nationalized bowel cancer screening programs. There has been a considerable focus on maximizing the utility of colonoscopy. This has occurred in four key areas: Optimizing patient selection to reduce unnecessary or low yield colonoscopy has offered cost-benefit improvements in population screening. Improving quality assurance, through the development of widely accepted quality metrics for use in individual practice and the research setting, has offered measurable improvements in colonoscopic yield. Significant improvements have been demonstrated in colonoscopic technique, from the administration of preparation to the techniques employed during withdrawal of the colonoscope. Improved techniques to avoid post-procedural complications have also been developed-further maximizing the utility of colonoscopy. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent evidence-based advances in colonoscopic practice that contribute to the optimal practice of colonoscopy.

The diminutive colon polyp: biopsy, snare, leave alone?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diminutive polyps, measuring between 1 and 5 mm, represent the vast majority of colorectal polyps encountered during screening colonoscopy. Although the chance of harboring advanced adenoma or neoplastic cells is low, ensuring a complete polyp resection with clear margins is crucial to reduce the risk of interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the different methods applied for polypectomy of diminutive polyps and clarify whether a diminutive polyp should be retrieved or left in place.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cold biopsy polypectomy is indicated for resection of polyps measuring 1-3 mm and removal of 4-5 mm polyps should be ensured by cold snare polypectomy. Over the last decade, hot biopsy polypectomy has been gradually abandoned because of an increased risk of diathermic injury. The resect and discard strategy and the diagnose and disregard strategy should be performed only by expert endoscopists, who should use validated scales and document the polyp features by storing several endoscopic images.

SUMMARY

Nowadays, complete resection of diminutive polyps, following the most appropriate technique, is recommended in clinical practice. The resect and discard strategy and the diagnose and disregard strategy should be reserved to expert endoscopists.

Feasibility of cold snare polypectomy in Japan: A pilot study

AIM: To investigate the feasibility of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in Japan.

METHODS: The outcomes of 234 non-pedunculated polyps smaller than 10 mm in 61 patients who underwent CSP in a Japanese referral center were retrospectively analyzed. The cold snare polypectomies were performed by nine endoscopists with no prior experience in CSP using an electrosurgical snare without electrocautery.

RESULTS: CSPs were completed for 232 of the 234 polyps. Two (0.9%) polyps could not be removed without electrocautery. Immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis occurred in eight lesions (3.4%; 95%CI: 1.1%-5.8%), but all were easily managed. The incidence of immediate bleeding after CSP for small polyps (6-9 mm) was significantly higher than that of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm; 15% vs 1%, respectively). Three (5%) patients complained of minor bleeding after the procedure but required no intervention. The incidence of delayed bleeding requiring endoscopic intervention was 0.0% (95%CI: 0.0%-1.7%). In total, 12% of the resected lesions could not be retrieved for pathological examination. Tumor involvement in the lateral margin could not be histologically assessed in 70 (40%) lesions.

CONCLUSION: CSP is feasible in Japan. However, immediate bleeding, retrieval failure and uncertain assessment of the lateral tumor margin should not be underestimated. Careful endoscopic diagnosis before and evaluation of the tumor residue after CSP are recommended when implementing CSP in Japan.

Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND

Both cold-only snare and hot polypectomy snare are used for the removal of small colorectal polyps.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome of cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps with a snare exclusively designed as a cold snare versus cold snare polypectomy by using a traditional polypectomy snare.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

Municipal hospital in Japan.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with colorectal polyps 10 mm or smaller in diameter were randomized to dedicated cold snare (dedicated cold snare group) or traditional cold snare (traditional cold snare group). The primary outcome measure was complete resection rates by cold snaring based on pathological examination. Secondary outcomes included bleeding within 2 weeks after polypectomy and identification of submucosal arteries and injured arteries in the resected specimens.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients having 210 eligible polyps were randomized: dedicated cold snare group, N = 37 (98 polyps) and traditional cold snare group, N = 39 (112 polyps). Patient demographic characteristics including the number, size, and shape of the polyps removed were similar in the 2 groups. The complete resection rate was significantly greater with the dedicated cold than with the traditional cold snare (91% [89/98] vs 79% [88/112], P = .015), with a marked difference with 8- to 10-mm polyps, both flat and pedunculated. Immediate bleeding and hematochezia rates were similar (19% vs 21%, P = .86; 5.4% vs 7.7%, P = .69). No delayed bleeding occurred. Histology demonstrated a similar prevalence of arteries and injured arteries in the submucosa (33% [32/96] vs 30% [31/104], P = .59; 3.1% [3/96] vs 6.7% [7/104], P = .24).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size, single-center study.

CONCLUSION

Polypectomy by using a dedicated cold snare resulted in complete polyp removal more often than did cold snaring with a traditional snare, especially polyps 8 to 10 mm in diameter, whether flat or pedunculated. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02036047.)

Cold snare piecemeal resection of colonic and duodenal polyps ≥1 cm

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic removal of duodenal and colorectal adenomas is currently considered to be the standard of care for prevention of adenocarcinoma. The use of cautery carries a risk of delayed bleeding, post-polypectomy syndrome, and perforation. We examined the safety and feasibility of removing colonic and duodenal polyps ≥ 1 cm using a piecemeal cold snare polypectomy technique.

PATIENTS

The study included 15 patients with duodenal polyps ≥ 1 cm and 15 patients with colonic polyps ≥ 1 cm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Bleeding, perforation, abdominal pain, or hospitalization occurring within 2 weeks of polypectomy.

RESULTS

Between 24 August 2011 and 29 April 2013, 15 patients had removal of duodenal polyps ≥ 1 cm. Mean patient age was 64 years and 9/15 patients were male. The mean polyp size was 24 mm (10 - 60 mm). All polyps were removed with a cold snare and some required cold biopsy forceps. One patient required hospitalization for gastrointestinal blood loss 7 days post-polypectomy; this patient was using Coumadin. Between 27 February 2012 and 30 May 2013, 15 patients underwent resection of a ≥ 1 cm colonic polyp. Mean patient age was 68 years and 9/15 were male. The mean polyp size was 20 mm (10 - 45 mm). All polyps were primarily removed with a cold snare. None of the patients required hemostatic clips for control of immediate bleeding. One patient presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain 1 day after initial endoscopy. CT scan showed no abnormalities and the patient was discharged.

CONCLUSIONS

Cold snare polypectomy for large duodenal and colonic polyps is technically feasible and may have a favorable safety profile compared to standard electrocautery-based endoscopic resection. Comparative trials are required to determine the relative safety and efficacy of cold snare techniques for complete and durable resection of large polyps compared to standard hot snare methods.

Characterization and significance of protrusions in the mucosal defect after cold snare polypectomy

BACKGROUND

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is widely practiced; however, the endoscopic features of the CSP mucosal defect have not been studied. In particular, protrusions within the cold snare defect (CSDPs) may create concern for residual polyp. The frequency and constituents of this phenomenon are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency, predictors, and histologic constituents of CSDPs.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care hospital endoscopy unit.

PATIENTS

Eighty-eight consecutive patients undergoing CSP for a polyp ≤ 10 mm in size.

INTERVENTION

Inspection of the cold snare mucosal defect with high-definition white light and biopsy sampling of CSDPs for separate histologic assessment, when present.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Frequency and constituents of CSDPs.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven consecutive polyps ≤ 10 mm in size were removed in 88 patients (50 men [57%], mean age 63 years). Polyps were predominately adenomatous (162, 63%), located in the proximal colon (159, 62%) and flat (200, 78%). Mean lesion size was 5.5 mm (range, 2-10 mm). High-grade dysplasia was present in a single polyp for which the defect was bland. CSDPs occurred in 36 polypectomies (14%). CSDPs were associated with polyp size ≥ 6 mm (odds ratio, 3.7; P < .001 multivariable analysis) but not age, sex, lesion, histopathology, morphology, or location. Histopathologic examination of CSDPs revealed submucosa in 34 (94%) and muscularis mucosa in 29 (80%). No residual adenomatous or serrated polyp tissue was detected.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study. Small number of polyps with high-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSION

Protrusions are common within the CSP mucosal defect and are associated with polyp size ≥ 6 mm. CSDPs do not represent vascular structures, do not contain residual polyp, and are not associated with adverse outcomes in short-term follow-up. However, CSDPs represent incomplete mucosal layer resection.

Cold snare polypectomy: does snare type influence outcomes?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cold snare techniques are widely used for the removal of small and diminutive polyps. The influence of snare type on the effectiveness of cold snare polypectomy is unknown.

METHODS

Cold snare polypectomy of 3-7-mm polyps was undertaken using either a thin wire mini-snare (0.30 mm) or a thick wire mini-snare (0.47 mm). Primary outcome was endoscopic completeness of excision. Consensus regarding endoscopic assessment of completeness of excision was standardized and aided by chromoendoscopy. Secondary outcomes included: completeness of histological excision, polyp 'fly away', polyp retrieval rate, early or delayed bleeding and perforation.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-seven polyps were removed ranging from 3 to 7 mm, 62% were situated in the left side of the colon and 89.4% were sessile. Endoscopic completeness of excision was significantly higher with the thin wire snare compared to the thick wire snare (90.2% vs 73.3%, P < 0.05). There was a numerical trend towards a higher complete histological excision rate with the thin wire snare, but this did not reach statistical significance (73.3% vs 65.2%, P = 0.4). There was a fair level of agreement (kappa = 0.36) between endoscopic and histological completeness of excision. Polyp 'fly away' occurred less often with the thin wire snare (14.6% vs 35.3%, P = 0.002), but there was no significant difference in polyp retrieval rate (84.3% vs 83.8%, P = 0.94). There were no complications with either snare.

CONCLUSION

Snare type appears to be an important determinant of completeness of excision when removing small polyps by the cold snare technique.

Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal technique for removal of diminutive or small colorectal polyps is debatable.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the complete resection rates of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for the removal of adenomatous polyps ≤7 mm.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled study.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 139 patients who were found to have ≥1 colorectal adenomatous polyps ≤7 mm.

INTERVENTIONS

Polyps were randomized to be treated with either CSP or CFP. After the initial polypectomy, additional EMR was performed at the polypectomy site to assess the presence of residual polyp tissue.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Absence of residual polyp tissue in the EMR specimen of the polypectomy site was defined as complete resection.

RESULTS

Among a total of 145 polyps, 128 (88.3%) were adenomatous polyps. The overall complete resection rate for adenomatous polyps was significantly higher in the CSP group compared with the CFP group (57/59, 96.6% vs 57/69, 82.6%; P = .011). Although the complete resection rates for adenomatous polyps ≤4 mm were not different (27/27, 100% vs 31/32, 96.9%; P = 1.000), the complete resection rates for adenomatous polyps sized 5 to 7 mm was significantly higher in the CSP group compared with the CFP group (30/32, 93.8% vs 26/37, 70.3%; P = .013).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study.

CONCLUSION

CSP is recommended for the complete resection of colorectal adenomatous polyps ≤7 mm. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01665898.).

Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)

BACKGROUND

The optimal method of diminutive polypectomy (< 6 mm) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rates of incomplete resection of diminutive polyps of the colon using three standard polyp resection techniques (hot snare, cold snare, and cold biopsy forceps).

DESIGN

Randomized, pilot study.

SETTINGS

Single-center endoscopy center.

PATIENTS

PATIENTS undergoing routine outpatient colonoscopies.

INTERVENTIONS

Polypectomy was performed using the method to which the patient was randomized. Following retrieval of the polyp, the polypectomy base was lifted by submucosal injection of normal saline and then excised using the cold snare device. If no tissue could be removed, then at least four cold biopsies using forceps of the remaining margin were obtained.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adequacy of resection of diminutive polyps, which was defined as no visible adenoma or hyperplastic tissue seen in the base tissue on histology.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were enrolled (57 % male), the mean age was 60 (range 33 - 82), and 62 polyps were randomized from 37 patients. The mean polyp size was 3.6 mm (range 2 - 5 mm) and 37 polyps (60 %) were adenomatous. Overall incomplete polyp resection rate was 9 % (95 %CI 3 - 19 %), 5 of 37 (14 %) for adenomas. By the study arm, the incomplete resection rates were 1 of 18 (6 %) for hot snare, 2 of 21 (10 %) for cold snare, and 2 of 18 (11 %) for cold biopsy forceps. The majority of polyp bases were removed with cold biopsy forceps since most of the endoscopists did not feel that the saline lift cold snare method was feasible or appropriate.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of the polyp base tissue was not routinely performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Recruiting patients to a pilot study that randomized polyps to one of three common methods of polypectomy for diminutive polyps was feasible, and approximately 1 in 10 diminutive polyps found on colonoscopy were incompletely resected by standard polypectomy methods.

Advances in the removal of diminutive colorectal polyps

Diminutive polyps (<5 mm in diameter) represent the majority of polyps found during colonoscopy; about a half of them are adenomatous, with low risk of advanced neoplasia. Recent studies have demonstrated that cold polypectomy should be considered the recommended approach for resecting diminutive polyps and that cold snaring may be superior to cold forceps biopsy, at least for polyps of 4-5 mm. Recently, electronic chromoendoscopy has been applied to characterization of diminutive polyps to discriminate adenomatous from nonadenomatous lesions. Optical diagnosis of polyp histology could potentially exert huge cost savings by the 'resect and discard' strategy for diminutive polyps and 'leaving-in' for diminutive hyperplastic polyps in the recto-sigmoid colon. These policies represent the mainstay for adopting endoscopy-directed post-polypectomy surveillance strategies, endorsed by both American and European Endoscopy Societies. Accuracy of both histology and surveillance intervals predictions from academic centers have been encouraging, although the same performance has not been replicated in community practices.

Sessile serrated adenoma: from identification to resection

Until the past two decades, almost all colorectal polyps were divided into two main groups: hyperplastic polyps and adenomas. Sessile serrated adenomas presented endoscopic, pathological and molecular profiles distinct from others polyps. Previously under-diagnosed, physicians now identified sessile serrated adenomas. The serrated neoplastic pathway is accounting for up to one-third of all sporadic colorectal cancers and sessile serrated adenomas have been identified as the main precursor lesions in serrated carcinogenesis. By analogy with the adenoma-adenocarcinoma sequence, the sessile serrated adenomas-adenocarcinoma sequence, has been identified. The development of endoscopic resection techniques permits the consideration of a non-surgical approach as the first option regardless of the size of the lesion. Sessile serrated adenoma warrants the watchfulness of physicians and requires an optimal quality of the colonoscopy procedure, a thorough evaluation of the lesion, an adequate endoscopic resection and follow-up colonoscopies in accordance with sessile serrated adenomas guidelines. We herein present a review on sessile serrated adenomas focusing on their pathological specificities, epidemiology, treatment modalities and follow-up.