Deficient mismatch repair system in patients with sporadic advanced colorectal cancer

Pathological complete response to pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic ascending colon cancer with microsatellite instability

Pembrolizumab is a novel immune-checkpoint inhibitor used for treatment of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer. Several studies have reported clinical complete response (CR) after treatment with pembrolizumab, but none has confirmed pathological CR. Here we provide the first description of pathological CR with R0 resection after immune-checkpoint therapy. A 45-year-old man presented at our hospital with abdominal distention and highly elevated tumor markers. Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT showed a 110 × 75 mm bulky mass with markedly swollen lymph nodes and an isolated peritoneal metastasis in the pelvic space. Biopsy revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. We diagnosed ascending colon cancer cT4aN2bM1c Stage IVc. A biopsy specimen obtained during systemic chemotherapy (FOLFOXIRI) was confirmed pathologically as MSI-H, after which the treatment was changed to pembrolizumab. The tumor markers rapidly decreased to within normal ranges after three courses of treatment. After twenty courses, CT revealed shrinkage of the main tumor, lymph node metastases, and the peritoneal metastasis, and we performed extended right hemi-colectomy with dissection of the peritoneal metastasis. No residual tumor cells were found histologically. The patient achieved pathological CR and the postoperative course was uneventful. An accurate diagnosis and appropriate follow up are crucial for obtaining sufficient therapeutic effect of pembrolizumab.

Precision Medicine for Colorectal Cancer with Liquid Biopsy and Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

There are some challenges to improve the clinical outcome of colorectal cancers (CRCs) by implementing new technologies, such as early detection of recurrence/relapse and selection of appropriate drugs based on the genomic profiles of tumors. For example, the genomic characteristics of tumors can be analyzed by blood-based tests, namely ‘liquid biopsies’, which are minimally-invasive and can be performed repeatedly during the treatment course. Hence, liquid biopsies are considered to hold great promise to fill these gaps in clinical routines. In this review, we addressed clinical usefulness of liquid biopsies in the clinical management of CRC patients, including cancer screening, detection of minimal residual disease, selection of appropriate molecular-targeted drugs, monitoring of the treatment responsiveness, and very early detection of recurrence/relapse of the disease. Furthermore, we discussed the possibility of adoptive T cell therapies and a future personalized immunotherapy based on tumor genome information.

Abstract

In the field of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, diagnostic modalities and chemotherapy regimens have progressed remarkably in the last two decades. However, it is still difficult to identify minimal residual disease (MRD) necessary for early detection of recurrence/relapse of tumors and to select and provide appropriate drugs timely before a tumor becomes multi-drug-resistant and more aggressive. We consider the leveraging of in-depth genomic profiles of tumors as a significant breakthrough to further improve the overall prognosis of CRC patients. With the recent technological advances in methodologies and bioinformatics, the genomic profiles can be analyzed profoundly without delay by blood-based tests—‘liquid biopsies’. From a clinical point of view, a minimally-invasive liquid biopsy is thought to be a promising method and can be implemented in routine clinical settings in order to meet unmet clinical needs. In this review, we highlighted clinical usefulness of liquid biopsies in the clinical management of CRC patients, including cancer screening, detection of MRD, selection of appropriate molecular-targeted drugs, monitoring of the treatment responsiveness, and very early detection of recurrence/relapse of the disease. In addition, we addressed a possibility of adoptive T cell therapies and a future personalized immunotherapy based on tumor genome information.

An open-label, phase II multicohort study of an oral hypomethylating agent CC-486 and durvalumab in advanced solid tumors

Purpose

To evaluate whether administration of the oral DNA hypomethylating agent CC-486 enhances the poor response rate of immunologically ‘cold’ solid tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab.

Experimental design

PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitor naïve patients with advanced microsatellite stable colorectal cancer; platinum resistant ovarian cancer; and estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer were enrolled in this single-institution, investigator-initiated trial. Two 28 day regimens, regimen A (CC-486 300 mg QD Days 1–14 (cycles 1–3 only) in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous day 15) and regimen B (CC-486 100 mg QD days 1–21 (cycle 1 and beyond), vitamin C 500 mg once a day continuously and durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous day 15) were investigated. Patients underwent paired tumor biopsies and serial peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collection for immune-profiling, transcriptomic and epigenomic analyzes.

Results

A total of 28 patients were enrolled, 19 patients treated on regimen A and 9 on regimen B. The combination of CC-486 and durvalumab was tolerable. Regimen B, with a lower dose of CC-486 extended over a longer treatment course, showed less grade 3/4 adverse effects. Global LINE-1 methylation assessment of serial PBMCs and genome-wide DNA methylation profile in paired tumor biopsies demonstrated minimal changes in global methylation in both regimens. The lack of robust tumor DNA demethylation was accompanied by an absence of the expected ‘viral mimicry’ inflammatory response, and consequently, no clinical responses were observed. The disease control rate was 7.1%. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.5 to 2.3) and median overall survival was 5 months (95% CI 4.5 to 10).

Conclusions

The evaluated treatment schedules of CC-486 in combination with durvalumab did not demonstrate robust pharmacodynamic or clinical activity in selected immunologically cold solid tumors. Lessons learned from this biomarker-rich study should inform continued drug development efforts using these agents.

Trial registration number

NCT02811497.

Complete Pathological Response After Neoadjuvant Short-Course Immunotherapy with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Locally Advanced MSI-H/dMMR Rectal Cancer

Background

Patients with colorectal carcinoma and high‐grade microsatellite instability (MSI‐H) or deficiency in mismatch repair (dMMR) exceptionally respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs are more active in treatment‐naïve patients than in patients with refractory MSI‐H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer and even more active in patients with locally advanced tumors.

Material and Methods

A 33‐year‐old male patient with Lynch syndrome was diagnosed with a locally advanced rectal cancer and refused standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation because of the potential harm of sexual dysfunction. MMR and microsatellite instability status were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and fragment length polymerase chain reaction followed by capillary electrophoresis.

Results

After MSI‐H/dMMR was confirmed, the patient was treated with ICIs (1 mg/kg ipilimumab at day 1 and 3 mg/kg nivolumab at day 1 and 15). A complete clinical response was documented at day 21 after start of treatment. The patient underwent a total mesorectal excision at day 30. In the extirpated tissue, a complete pathological response was confirmed.

Conclusion

In MSI‐H/dMMR locally advanced rectal cancer short‐course ICI treatment is highly effective and may be discussed in patients with dMMR locally advanced rectal cancer.

Key Points

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are more active in treatment‐naïve patients than in patients with refractory high‐grade microsatellite instability (MSI‐H)/deficiency in mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer.

Standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation is less effective in MSI‐H/dMMR rectal cancer patients than in patients with proficient mismatch repair.

A young patient with Lynch syndrome and MSI‐H/dMMR locally advanced rectal cancer refused chemoradiation in order to preserve his fertility.

After neoadjuvant treatment with one dose of ipilimumab and two doses of nivolumab a complete clinical and pathological response was documented.

Clinical trials are needed to first establish neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with locally advanced MSI‐H/dMMR rectal cancer and thereafter to evaluate organ‐preservation strategies.

This report describes the case of a 33‐year‐old male patient with Lynch syndrome who was diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer. Instead of chemoradiation, neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors was given.

Cutaneous metastasis of cecum cancer with MSI-high and BRAFV600E mutation: a case report

Background

Cutaneous metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC) are rare, occurring in 0.7% to 5% of cancer patients. Furthermore, the molecular subtypes of cutaneous metastasis of CRC are unclear. Here, we present a rare case of cutaneous metastasis of high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-high)/BRAFV600E-mutant cecum cancer.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old woman presented at the outpatient clinic with a subcutaneous mass on her left back. An excisional biopsy was performed and metastatic cutaneous adenocarcinoma was diagnosed. A computed tomography scan of the thorax and abdomen showed thickening of the cecum wall, the presence of pericolic lymph nodes, multiple masses in the liver, and a single nodule in the right lung. Right colectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and functional end-to-end anastomosis was performed because of the almost-complete intestinal obstruction. The expression of KRAS wild type, BRAFV600E mutation, and MSI-high was detected in the cecum cancer using molecular pathological examination. She received chemotherapy with XELOX + BEV regimen (capecitabine + oxaliplatin + bevacizumab). After four administrations, a computed tomography scan showed reduction of distant metastases, which suggested partial response.

Conclusions

We encountered a rare case of cutaneous metastasis of MSI-high and BRAFV600E-mutant cecum cancer. In the future, it will be necessary to accumulate more cases to identify clinical features and more effective treatments for CRCs with cutaneous metastasis.

Advances in immune therapies for the treatment of microsatellite instability‑high/deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer (Review)

Microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer (MSI-H/dMMR CRC) is a molecular subtype characterized by high-frequency mutations within DNA mismatch repair genes. Defects in the DNA mismatch repair machinery lead to subsequent frame-shift mutations, resulting in the generation of frame-shift peptides that serve as neoantigens. This has translated into exquisite sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and a significant clinical benefit from immune therapies in this patient population. The present article provides a comprehensive review of the advances in the field of immune therapies for MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC, with a focus on the major randomized clinical trials that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of specific ICIs for this population, a detailed review of the molecular background responsible for tumor response, as well as the mechanisms of resistance to ICI therapy. Finally, ongoing investigations of other immunotherapeutic strategies to address and overcome the challenges that currently limit response and long-term response to ICIs were presented.

ILT4 in Colorectal Cancer Cells Induces Suppressive T Cell Contexture and Disease Progression

Purpose

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy shows little or no clinical benefit in most colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, due to the immunosuppressive T cell contexture in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Immunoglobulin-like transcript (ILT) 4 is an immunosuppressive molecule in myeloid cells. ILT4 is enriched in solid tumor cells, facilitating their proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. However, the regulatory role of ILT4 in T cell immunity of CRC is still undetermined. Here, we aimed to explore how tumor cell-derived ILT4 orchestrates T cell infiltration, subset distribution, and function in CRC.

Methods

A total of 145 paraffin-embedded cancer tissues and the corresponding clinicopathological information were collected from CRC patients. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and public database analyses determined the correlation of ILT4 expression with different T cell subset densities, IFN-γ levels, and patient outcomes. Paired Ig-like receptor B (PIR-B, ILT4 mouse ortholog)-overexpressing/-downregulated MC38 cells were subcutaneously injected into C57BL/6 mice as a CRC transplantation model. The frequencies, subsets, and IFN-γ levels of T cells in mouse blood and spleens were determined using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, respectively.

Results

High ILT4 expression in CRC cells was associated with decreased T cell infiltration, disease progression, and poor patient survival. T cell subset analyses indicated that ILT4-high patients showed reduced CD8⁺ T cell but elevated FOXP3⁺ regulatory T (Treg) cell frequencies in the TME. High ILT4 levels predicted lower IFN-γ production by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), especially by CD8⁺T cells in human CRC tissues. Moreover, PIR-B overexpression accelerated MC38 growth in mice, decreased CD3⁺/CD8⁺/IFN-γ⁺ T cell densities, and elevated Treg infiltration in the TME, blood, and spleens. PIR-B knockdown had the opposite effects.

Conclusion

ILT4 in CRC cells induced immunosuppressive T cell subset infiltration and impaired IFN-γ production in TILs, suggesting that ILT4 might be a potential immunotherapeutic target and prognostic biomarker.

Molecular Determinants and Other Factors to Guide Selection of Patients for Hepatic Resection of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed significantly over the last few decades as cytotoxic and targeted chemotherapies have evolved and resection of (technically feasible) colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has become standard of care for eligible patients. Overall, survival for metastatic CRC has considerably improved, but recurrences are common. Numerous clinical risk scores have been suggested to guide patient selection for CRLM resection, but none perfectly predict outcomes; therefore, a personalized approach to metastatic CRC treatment using genetic profiles for risk stratification and prognostication is a critically important advancement. All patients with suspected metastatic CRC should undergo genetic testing for common oncogene mutations (e.g., KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS) in addition to a triphasic CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis; if hepatectomy may be entertained and there is concern about the future liver remnant (FLR), liver volumetrics should also be performed. MRI and PET are useful adjuncts for cases in which diagnosis or extent of disease is unclear. The decision to operate should be individualized and based on each patient's condition, tumor biology, and technical resectability. Genetic profiles should be used to inform multidisciplinary meetings surrounding topics of chemotherapy and surgical resection, as well as patient discussions concerning the risks and benefits of surgery. In the end, most patients with technically resectable colorectal cancers and adequate cardiopulmonary fitness benefit from surgical resection, as it remains the only chance of long-term survival.

Loss of Optineurin Drives Cancer Immune Evasion via Palmitoylation-Dependent IFNGR1 Lysosomal Sorting and Degradation

Mutations in IFN and MHC signaling genes endow immunotherapy resistance. Patients with colorectal cancer infrequently exhibit IFN and MHC signaling gene mutations and are generally resistant to immunotherapy. In exploring the integrity of IFN and MHC signaling in colorectal cancer, we found that optineurin was a shared node between the two pathways and predicted colorectal cancer patient outcome. Loss of optineurin occurs in early-stage human colorectal cancer. Immunologically, optineurin deficiency was shown to attenuate IFNGR1 and MHC-I expression, impair T-cell immunity, and diminish immunotherapy efficacy in murine cancer models and patients with cancer. Mechanistically, we observed that IFNGR1 was S-palmitoylated on Cys122, and AP3D1 bound with and sorted palmitoylated IFNGR1 to lysosome for degradation. Unexpectedly, optineurin interacted with AP3D1 to prevent palmitoylated IFNGR1 lysosomal sorting and degradation, thereby maintaining IFNγ and MHC-I signaling integrity. Furthermore, pharmacologically targeting IFNGR1 palmitoylation stabilized IFNGR1, augmented tumor immunity, and sensitized checkpoint therapy. Thus, loss of optineurin drives immune evasion and intrinsic immunotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: Loss of optineurin impairs the integrity of both IFNγ and MHC-I signaling pathways via palmitoylation-dependent IFNGR1 lysosomal sorting and degradation, thereby driving immune evasion and intrinsic immunotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer. Our work suggests that pharmacologically targeting IFNGR1 palmitoylation can stabilize IFNGR1, enhance T-cell immunity, and sensitize checkpoint therapy in colorectal cancer.See related commentary by Salvagno and Cubillos-Ruiz, p. 1623.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1601.

Analyzing the Opportunities to Target DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair and Replicative Stress Responses to Improve Therapeutic Index of Colorectal Cancer

Despite the ample improvements of CRC molecular landscape, the therapeutic options still rely on conventional chemotherapy-based regimens for early disease, and few targeted agents are recommended for clinical use in the metastatic setting. Moreover, the impact of cytotoxic, targeted agents, and immunotherapy combinations in the metastatic scenario is not fully satisfactory, especially the outcomes for patients who develop resistance to these treatments need to be improved. Here, we examine the opportunity to consider therapeutic agents targeting DNA repair and DNA replication stress response as strategies to exploit genetic or functional defects in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathways through synthetic lethal mechanisms, still not explored in CRC. These include the multiple actors involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through homologous recombination (HR), classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ), inhibitors of the base excision repair (BER) protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), as well as inhibitors of the DNA damage kinases ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR), CHK1, WEE1, and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM). We also review the biomarkers that guide the use of these agents, and current clinical trials with targeted DDR therapies.

Subcutaneous envafolimab monotherapy in patients with advanced defective mismatch repair/microsatellite instability high solid tumors

Background

Monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) signaling currently approved for defective mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) tumors must be delivered by intravenous infusion. Envafolimab, a humanized single-domain anti-PD-L1 antibody fused to an Fc fragment, represents a potential advance because it can be conveniently administered subcutaneously.

Methods

This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of envafolimab in patients with previously treated advanced dMMR/MSI-H tumors from 25 clinical sites across China. Adults with histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic malignant dMMR/MSI-H solid tumors received weekly 150 mg subcutaneous envafolimab injections in a 28-day treatment cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate (assessed by a blinded independent review committee). Secondary efficacy outcomes were disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

Results

One hundred and three patients (65 with colorectal cancer, 18 with gastric cancer, and 20 with other solid tumors) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 11.5 months. The objective response rate was 42.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 33.0–52.8), and the disease control rate was 66.0% (95% CI 56.0–75.1). Median duration of response was not reached; the duration of response rate at 12 months was 92.2% (95% CI 77.5–97.4). Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% CI 5.5 to not evaluable). Overall survival at 12 months was 74.6% (95% CI 64.7–82.1). Sixteen patients (16%) had at least one grade 3 or 4 related treatment-emergent adverse event. No grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events related to envafolimab were reported. Injection site reactions, all grade 1–2, were reported in nine patients (9%), but there were no infusion reactions. Eight patients (8%) had grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events.

Conclusions

This is the first pivotal phase 2 study to examine the efficacy and safety of a single-domain immune checkpoint antibody in the treatment of cancer. Envafolimab was effective and had acceptable safety in the treatment of previously treated advanced dMMR/MSI-H solid tumors. As the first single-domain PD-L1-targeting antibody administered by rapid subcutaneous injection, envafolimab has the potential to be a significant advance in the treatment of cancer.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03667170. Registered 10 September 2018—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03667170.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13045-021-01095-1.

ATMIN Suppresses Metastasis by Altering the WNT-Signaling Pathway via PARP1 in MSI-High Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Constant DNA damage occurs in cells, and the cells are programmed to respond constitutively. This study explored the roles of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated interactor (ATMIN), one of the impaired pathways involving the DNA damage response (DDR) in mismatch repair-deficient [microsatellite instability (MSI)-high] colorectal carcinoma (CRC).

METHODS

Expression of ATMIN messenger RNA (mRNA) was detected in CRC specimens with microsatellite instability (MSI) characteristics. The effects of ectopic ATMIN expression and ATMIN knockdown on invasion abilities were evaluated in MSI-high cell lines, and liver metastasis ability was investigated in vivo. Protein-protein interactions were assessed by coimmunoprecipitation analyses in vitro.

RESULTS

Decreased ATMIN expression was positively correlated with advanced stage of disease (P < 0.05), lymph node metastases (P < 0.05), and deeper invasion (P < 0.05) in MSI-high tumors. Transient or stable ATMIN knockdown significantly increased cell motility. Moreover, in the high-throughput microarray and gene set enrichment analysis, ATMIN was shown to act on the Wnt-signaling pathway via PARP1. This cascade influences β-catenin/transcription factor 4 (TCF4) binding affinity in MSI-high tumors, and PARP1 inhibition significantly decreased the number of metastases from ATMIN knockdown cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The results not only indicated the critical role of ATMIN, but also shed new light on PARP1 inhibitors, providing a basis for further clinical trials of MSI-high CRC.

Irinotecan or Oxaliplatin: Which is the First Move for the Mate?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present review is to discuss the potential link between RAS, BRAF and microsatellite instability (MSI) mutational patterns and chemotherapeutic agent efficacy [Irinotecan (IRI) vs. Oxaliplatin (OXA)], and how this can potentially influence the choice of the chemotherapy backbone.

METHODS

Following a review of the research literature, all pertinent articles published in the core journals were selected for the study. The inclusion criteria regarded relevant clinical and pre-clinical studies on the topic of interest (Relationship of OXA and IRI to KRAS/BRAF mutations and MSI).

RESULTS

Excision repair cross complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression is inhibited by KRAS mutation, making tumor cells more sensitive to OXA. Results from OPUS, COIN and PRIME trials support that no conclusive data are available for BRAF mutant population because of the small number of patients. Enhanced IRI cytotoxicity to MSI cell lines is due to the participation of some of the mismatch repair (MMR) components in various DNA repair processes and their role in the maintenance of the pro-apoptotic effect of IRI and G2/M cell arrest.

CONCLUSION

OXA and IRI are indispensable drugs for mCRC treatment and their selection must be as careful as that of targeted agents. We suggest taking into consideration the interaction between known genomic alterations and OXA and IRI activity to personalize chemotherapy in mCRC patients.

Immunology of Lynch Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with Lynch syndrome have a high probability of developing colorectal and other carcinomas. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the immunologic aspects of Lynch syndrome pathogenesis and provides an overview of potential immune interventions for patients with Lynch syndrome polyps and Lynch syndrome-associated carcinomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Immunogenic properties of the majority of Lynch syndrome polyps and associated cancers include microsatellite instability leading to a high mutational burden and the development of novel frameshift peptides, i.e., neoantigens. In addition, patients with Lynch syndrome develop T cell responses in the periphery and in the tumor microenvironment (TME) to tumor-associated antigens, and a proinflammatory cytokine TME has also been identified. However, Lynch syndrome lesions also possess immunosuppressive entities such as alterations in MHC class I antigen presentation, TGFβ receptor mutations, regulatory T cells, and upregulation of PD-L1 on tumor-associated lymphocytes. The rich immune microenvironment of Lynch syndrome polyps and associated carcinomas provides an opportunity to employ the spectrum of immune-mediating agents now available to induce and enhance host immune responses and/or to also reduce immunosuppressive entities. These agents can be employed in the so-called prevention trials for the treatment of patients with Lynch syndrome polyps and for trials in patients with Lynch syndrome-associated cancers.

Perspectives on Immunotherapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer, especially liver metastasis, is still a challenge worldwide. Traditional treatment such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been difficult to be further advanced. We need to develop new treatment methods to further improve the poor prognosis of these patients. The emergence of immunotherapy has brought light to mCRC patients, especially those with dMMR. Based on several large trials, some drugs (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) have been approved by US Food and Drug Administration to treat the patients diagnosed with dMMR tumors. However, immunotherapy has reached a bottleneck for other MSS tumors, with low response rate and poor PFS and OS. Therefore, more clinical trials are underway toward mCRC patients, especially those with MSS. This review is intended to summarize the existing clinical trials to illustrate the development of immunotherapy in mCRC patients, and to provide a new thinking for the direction and experimental design of immunotherapy in the future.

Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer

The immune tumor microenvironment (TME) of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a crucial contributor to disease biology, making it an important target for therapeutic intervention. The diversity of immune cell populations within various subsets of CRC has led to the discovery that immune characterization of the TME has both prognostic and predictive value for patients. The convergence of improved molecular and cellular characterization of CRC along with the widespread use of immunotherapy in solid tumors has led to a revolution in the approach to clinical care. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) which target key immune checkpoints, such as programmed death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), have demonstrated remarkable clinical activity in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) CRCs and are now used in routine practice. The observation that MSI-H cancers are highly infiltrated with immune cells and carry a high neoantigen load led to the successful targeting of these cancers with immunotherapy. More recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a PD-1 inhibitor for microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers with high tumor mutation burden. However, the anti-tumor activity of immunotherapy is rare in the majority of CRC. While immune cell characterization does provide prognostic value in these patients, these observations have not yet led to therapeutic interventions. By delineating factors that predict efficacy, resistance, and therapeutic targets, ongoing research will inform the development of effective combination strategies for the vast majority of MSS CRC and immunotherapy-resistant MSI-H cancers.

Comparative Analysis and in vitro Experiments of Signatures and Prognostic Value of Immune Checkpoint Genes in Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

Immune checkpoints, as pivotal regulators of immune escape in cancer, can motivate the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The aim of this study is to identify the expression of the immune checkpoint genes (ICGs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and to relate their individual as well as combined expression to prognosis and therapeutic effectiveness in CRC.

Methods

RNA expression of 47 ICGs and clinical information of CRC patients were collected from two public databases to elucidate the expression levels and prognostic values of these ICGs in CRC. Then, the Shapiro–Wilk normality test was used to determine the normality of variables. Overall survival (OS) rates of each subset were found by Kaplan–Meier method, and the statistical significance was determined by the Log rank test (p < 0.05).

Results

The expression of 13 and 9 ICGs was significantly associated with CRC prognosis in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohorts. A series of ICGs was found to be significantly associated with TMB, neoantigens and MMR in CRC indicating that the combination of immunotherapy treatment biomarkers and ICGs may achieve accurate prognostic stratification of CRC, and potentially identify CRC cases that might respond to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). The subsets of high or low PD1/PD-L1/IDO1 expression stratified by CD48 were accurately associated with prognosis in CRC. In addition, in vitro experiments confirmed that VTCN1(B7-H4)-KD increases anti-PD-L1-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity on CRC tumor cells.

Conclusion

Although the expression of a single immune-checkpoint molecule does not predict the efficacy of immunotherapy in CRC, our findings infer that subsets defined by ICGs are associated with prognosis and imply the possibility that VTCN1 and CD48 serve as new immunotherapeutic targets.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Limited therapy options exist for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal or anal cancers, prompting investigation into alternative therapies. Immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint blockade is one such emerging treatment that has demonstrated promising results in other tumour streams.x This review aims to assess the current use of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with lower gastrointestinal tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for included studies. Clinical trials published in English and utilising immune checkpoint blockade for primary tumours situated in the lower gastrointestinal tract were included. Databases were searched for studies reporting on at least one of overall survival, progression-free survival or response to therapy.

RESULTS

In total, 972 abstracts were screened, with 10 studies included in the final review. Eight trials (833 patients) assessed immune checkpoint blockade in the setting of colorectal cancers. These included pembrolizumab, nivolumab, durvalumab, atezolizumab, tremelimumab and ipilimumab. A total of 20 patients across all studies achieved a complete response, and 111 patients achieved a partial response to treatment. Two trials (62 patients) assessed immune checkpoint blockade in anal cancer, utilising nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Two patients across both studies achieved a complete response, and 11 patients achieved a partial response.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of patients with advanced lower gastrointestinal tumours achieved a complete response to treatment for what would otherwise be considered palliative disease. Presented data have highlighted that particular patients may benefit from first-line or combination immunotherapy, and thus, further investigation is warranted to individualise treatment.

Mechanisms of Immune Escape and Resistance to Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies in Mismatch Repair Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancers

Simple Summary

A subset of colorectal cancers (CRCs) is characterized by a mismatch repair deficiency that is frequently associated with microsatellite instability (MSI). The compromised DNA repair machinery leads to the accumulation of tumor neoantigens affecting the sensitivity of MSI metastatic CRC to immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), both upfront and in later lines of treatment. However, up to 30% of MSI CRCs exhibit primary resistance to frontline immune based therapy, and an additional subset develops acquired resistance. Here, we first discuss the clinical and molecular features of MSI CRCs and then we review how the loss of antigenicity, immunogenicity, and a hostile tumor microenvironment could influence primary and acquired resistance to CPIs. Finally, we describe strategies to improve the outcome of MSI CRC patients upon CPI treatment.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) represent an effective therapeutic strategy for several different types of solid tumors and are remarkably effective in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The prevalent view is that the elevated and dynamic neoantigen burden associated with the mutator phenotype of MMRd fosters enhanced immune surveillance of these cancers. In addition, recent findings suggest that MMRd tumors have increased cytosolic DNA, which triggers the cGAS STING pathway, leading to interferon-mediated immune response. Unfortunately, approximately 30% of MMRd CRC exhibit primary resistance to CPIs, while a substantial fraction of tumors acquires resistance after an initial benefit. Profiling of clinical samples and preclinical studies suggests that alterations in the Wnt and the JAK-STAT signaling pathways are associated with refractoriness to CPIs. Intriguingly, mutations in the antigen presentation machinery, such as loss of MHC or Beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), are implicated in initial immune evasion but do not impair response to CPIs. In this review, we outline how understanding the mechanistic basis of immune evasion and CPI resistance in MMRd CRC provides the rationale for innovative strategies to increase the subset of patients benefiting from CPIs.

High Concordance of Genomic Profiles between Primary and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The comparison of the genetic profiles between primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is needed to enable the discovery of useful therapeutic targets against metastatic CRCs. We performed the targeted next generation sequencing assay of 170 cancer-associated genes for 142 metastatic CRCs, including 95 pairs of primary and metastatic CRCs, to reveal their genomic characteristics and to assess the genetic heterogeneity. The most frequently mutated gene in primary and metastatic CRCs was APC (71% vs. 65%), TP53 (54% vs. 57%), KRAS (45% vs. 44%), PIK3CA (16% vs. 19%), SMAD4 (15% vs. 14%) and FBXW7 (11% vs. 11%). The concordance in the top six frequently mutated genes was 85%, on average. The overall mutation frequencies were consistent with two sets of public data (TCGA and MSKCC). To the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to compare the genetic profiles of our cohort with that of the metastatic CRCs from MSKCC. Comparative sequencing analysis between primary and metastatic CRCs revealed a high degree of genetic concordance in the current clinically actionable genes. Therefore, the genetic investigation of archived primary tumor samples with the challenges of obtaining an adequate sample from metastatic sites appears to be sufficient for the application of cancer precision medicine in the metastatic setting.

PTCH1 mutation promotes antitumor immunity and the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer patients

Immunotherapy has emerged as an effective therapeutic strategy for various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC), but only a subset of MSI-H patients can benefit from such therapy. Patched1 (PTCH1) is a frequently altered gene in CRCs and its mutations contribute to unregulated Hedgehog (Hh) signaling. In the study, we evaluated the association of PTCH1 mutations with CRC immunity based on our single-center cohort and multiple cancer genomic datasets. Among 21 enrolled patients, six (28.6%) harbored a PTCH1 mutation based on WES analyses. In CRC patients, the PTCH1 mutation subgroup experienced a higher durable clinical benefit rate than the PTCH1 wild-type subgroup (100% vs. 40%, P = 0.017). In addition, patients with the PTCH1 mutation experienced greater progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.037; HR, 0.208) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.045; HR, 0.185). A validation cohort from the MSKCC also confirmed the correlation between PTCH1 mutation and better prognosis (P = 0.022; HR, 0.290). Mechanically, diverse antitumor immune signatures were more highly enriched in PTCH1-mutated tumors than in PTCH1 wild-type tumors. Furthermore, PTCH1-mutated tumors had higher proportions of CD8 + T cells, activated NK cells, and M1 type macrophage infiltration, as well as elevated gene signatures of several steps in the cancer-immunity cycle. Notably, the PTCH1 mutation was correlated with tumor mutational burden (TMB), loss of heterozygosity score, and copy number variation burden. Our results show that the mutation of PTCH1 is a potential biomarker for predicting the response of CRC patients to immunotherapy.

Importance of lymph node immune responses in MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer

Patients with colorectal cancers (CRCs) generally exhibit improved survival through intensive lymph node (LN) dissection. However, recent progress in cancer immunotherapy revisits the potential importance of regional LNs, where T cells are primed to attack tumor cells. To elucidate the role of regional LN, we investigated the immunological status of nonmetastatic regional LN lymphocytes (LNLs) in comparison with those of the tumor microenvironment (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TILs) using flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing. LNLs comprised an intermediate level of the effector T cell population between peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and TILs. Significant overlap of the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire was observed in microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair–deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) CRCs with high tumor mutation burden (TMB), although limited TCRs were shared between nonmetastatic LNs and primary tumors in microsatellite stable/MMR proficient (MSS/pMMR) CRC patients with low TMB. In line with the overlap of the TCR repertoire, an excessive LN dissection did not provide a positive impact on long-term prognosis in our MSI-H/dMMR CRC cohort (n = 130). We propose that regional LNs play an important role in antitumor immunity, particularly in MSI-H/dMMR CRCs with high TMB, requiring care to be taken regarding excessive nonmetastatic LN dissection in MSI-H/dMMR CRC patients.

Personalized and targeted therapies

Biomarker is defined as indicator of normal or pathogenic biological process or response to an intervention or exposure. There are several categories of biomarkers but predictive biomarkers play the most important role in the treatment of neoplasms. In some cancers there may be more than one potential biomarker, and their identification determines the treatment of the patient. Identification of predictive biomarkers allows the development of novel targeted therapies resulting in tailored treatment. In this chapter we discuss most important predictive biomarkers used in contemporary oncology for which there is approved therapies.

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers with therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer: A 2021 update on current development, evidence, and recommendation

Although therapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across many cancer types, only a handful of them show evidence of clinical utility and are recommended for routine clinical practice in the management of cancers of colon and rectum (CRC). This 2021 update aims to provide a succinct summary on the use of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers (expanded RAS, BRAF, microsatellite-high [MSI-H] or deficient mismatch repair [dMMR], neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [NTRK] fusion genes, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type II [HER2] gene amplification) associated with CRC. Therapeutic implications of each relevant predictive or prognostic biomarker for patients with CRC are described, along with discussion on new developments on (1) biomarker-driven therapies such as testing of BRAF, MLH1 promoter methylation and MMR germline genes in differentiating sporadic CRC or hereditary conditions such as Lynch syndrome; (2) first-line use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic CRC; (3) risk stratification and therapy selection based on primary tumor location (left-sided vs. right-sided colon cancer); (3) atypical BRAF mutations; (4) use of EGFR directed therapy in the perioperative oligometastatic disease setting; (5) re-challenge of EGFR directed therapy and (6) personalizing therapy of fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan based on new evidence in pharmacogenomic testing. Data are collected and analyzed from available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatments with known therapeutic targets in CRC, which may be associated with predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers. Discussions are presented in an application-based format, with goal to empower pharmacists or other clinicians to gain awareness and understanding in biomarker-driven cancer therapy issues.

Prognostic significance of MUC2, CDX2 and SOX2 in stage II colorectal cancer patients

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a serious health concern worldwide. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, about 15 to 30% of stage II CRC patients subjected to tumor resection with curative intent, develop disease relapse. Moreover, the therapeutic strategy adopted after surgery is not consensual for these patients. This supports the imperative need to find new prognostic and predictive biomarkers for stage II CRC.

Methods

For this purpose, we used a one-hospital series of 227 stage II CRC patient samples to assess the biomarker potential of the immunohistochemical expression of MUC2 mucin and CDX2 and SOX2 transcription factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate disease-free survival curves that were compared using the log-rank test, in order to determine prognosis of cases with different expression of these proteins, different mismatch repair (MMR) status and administration or not of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

In this stage II CRC series, none of the studied biomarkers showed prognostic value for patient outcome. However low expression of MUC2, in cases with high expression of CDX2, absence of SOX2 or MMR-proficiency, conferred a significantly worst prognosis. Moreover, cases with low expression of MUC2 showed a significantly clear benefit from treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we observe that patients with stage II CRC with low expression of MUC2 in the tumor respond better when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This observation supports that MUC2 is involved in resistance to fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and might be a promising future predictive biomarker in stage II CRC patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08070-6.

Assessment of the Circulating Tumor Cells and Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Prognostic and Diagnostic Value

Background

Microsatellite instability (MSI) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) play important roles in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Methods

CTCs and MSI were assessed in the blood and representative tumor tissues of 100 CRC patients by flow cytometry (FCM) and PCR amplification. The data were correlated to relevant clinicopathological features of the patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.

Results

MSI-high was detected in 44 (44.0%) patients, MSI-low in 37 (37%), and microsatellite stable (MSS) in 19 (19.0%) patients (P=0.007). The baseline CTCs count (<4 cells/7mL blood) was reported in 39% of the patients, and CTCs ≥4 cells/7mL blood in 61% of the patients (P=0.028). Improved PFS and OS rates were associated significantly with MSI-high (P<0.001), decreased CTC levels during the course of treatment (P<0.001) and post-treatment CTCs (P=0.008). There was no significant association between MSI-high and PFS or OS in early-stage patients (P=0.187 and P=0.187; respectively); however, it was associated significantly with better PFS and OS in late-stage patients (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that only a change in serial CTC levels is considered an independent prognostic factor for OS (P<0.012). Post-treatment CTCs level, serial CTCs level changes during the course of treatment, lymph nodes and distant metastasis were independent prognostic factors for PFS (P<0.001, P= 0.047, P=0.001 and P<0.001; respectively).

Conclusion

MSI and CTCs could be used as accurate, reliable and sensitive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for CRC patients’ survival rates and outcomes.

Immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has transformed the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with mismatch-repair deficiency (dMMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI-H), though this constitutes on average less than 5% of mCRC, and ICI is ineffective in preserved MMR/microsatellite stable disease (pMMR/MSS). Here we review the efficacy of ICI in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, poor response to ICI in pMMR/MSS mCRC, role for ICI in locally advanced disease, biomarkers of response, novel immunotherapies, and future directions in targeting resistance mechanisms.

Colon Cancer, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer focuses on systemic therapy options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because important updates have recently been made to this section. These updates include recommendations for first-line use of checkpoint inhibitors for mCRC, that is deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high, recommendations related to the use of biosimilars, and expanded recommendations for biomarker testing. The systemic therapy recommendations now include targeted therapy options for patients with mCRC that is HER2-amplified, or BRAF V600E mutation-positive. Treatment and management of nonmetastatic or resectable/ablatable metastatic disease are discussed in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer available at NCCN.org. Additional topics covered in the complete version include risk assessment, staging, pathology, posttreatment surveillance, and survivorship.

A review of the sensitivity of metastatic colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair to standard-of-care chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies, with recommendations for future research

In 5% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, tumours display a deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) system. Immunotherapy is beneficial in dMMR mCRC patients and has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients with unresectable or metastatic dMMR CRC. Although dMMR and proficient MMR (pMMR) CRC tumours are biologically distinct, they are commonly treated with the same chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies. This includes dMMR mCRC patients who did not respond to immunotherapy (20-30%). However, it is unclear if these treatments are equally beneficial in dMMR mCRC. Of note, dMMR mCRC patients have a worse prognosis compared to pMMR, which may in part be caused by a lower response to treatment. To avoid unnecessary exposure to ineffective treatments and their associated toxicity, it is important to identify which systemic treatments are most beneficial in dMMR mCRC patients, thus improving their outcome. Indeed, future treatment strategies are likely to involve combinations of immunotherapy, chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies. In this evidence-based review, we summarize clinical trials reporting treatment efficacy of different types of chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies in dMMR mCRC patients. We also review the biological rationale behind a potential differential benefit of chemotherapy with or without monoclonal antibodies in dMMR mCRC patients. A barrier in the interpretation of preclinical results is the choice of model systems. They largely comprise traditional models, including cell lines and xenografts, rather than more representative models, such as patient-derived organoids. We provide concrete recommendations for clinical investigators and fundamental researchers to accelerate research regarding which systemic therapy is most effective in dMMR mCRC patients.

Avelumab versus standard second line treatment chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability: The SAMCO-PRODIGE 54 randomised phase II trial

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have failed in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients except those with dMMR/MSI tumors. However, until very recently we had only non-comparative promising data in this population with anti-programmed cell death 1/ programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1) antibodies alone or combined with anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) antibodies. This comparative phase II trial (NCT03186326), conducted in more than 100 centers in France, will include dMMR/MSI mCRC patients with progression after a first-line treatment with chemotherapy ± targeted therapies, to evaluate efficacy and safety of the anti-PDL1 Avelumab versus a standard second-line treatment. Main inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 to 75 years, ECOG performance status ≤2, dMMR/MSI mCRC and failure of a standard first-line regimen. Patient will be randomised to receive Avelumab 10 mg/kg versus standard second-line doublet chemotherapy plus a targeted agent according to tumor RAS status. Patients will be followed for 4 years. A gain of 5 months in median PFS is expected in favour of the Avelumab arm (12 vs 7 months; HR=0.58). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. In addition, circulating tumour DNA and microbiota will be explored to test their potential prognostic and predictive values. The study was opened in March 2018.

Understanding relevant immune mechanisms in gastrointestinal oncology

Rapid and successful drug development has resulted in multiple treatment options for gastrointestinal cancer, requiring careful decision making for individual patients. The general theme in modern immunology is that the field is moving beyond establishing the fundamental principles of immune response mechanisms to applying these propositions to understand human diseases and develop new therapies. Immunotherapy has contributed enormously to cancer treatments with a virtual explosion in novel therapeutics including checkpoint inhibitors and other recently developed immunomodulators and the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Although the majority of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are generally considered poorly immunogenic, clinical trials have revealed that some of the patients with various gastrointestinal cancers are highly responsive to immune checkpoint inhibition-based therapies. We paid special attention to the clinical relevance of immunology and emphasized how newly developed therapies work, including what their strengths and pitfalls are. This review aims to enhance the interest of practitioners in the many specialties and subspecialties that the discipline influences and to assist them in understanding this increasing complexity.

A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Microsatellite‐stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) tends to be poorly immunogenic, with limited treatment options. In MSS CRC xenograft models, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus programed death 1 inhibitors resulted in synergistic antitumor activity and increased tumor immunogenicity. This phase 2 study evaluated FTD/TPI plus nivolumab in patients with MSS metastatic CRC.

Methods

This single‐arm, safety lead‐in study used a Simon's two‐stage design (enrolling 6 patients in the safety lead‐in, proceeding to stage 2 if ≥2 of the first 15 patients achieved a partial or complete response per immune‐related response criteria [irRC] within 6 months). Patients with histologically proven MSS mCRC, and disease progression after ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens received FTD/TPI (35 mg/m² twice daily; days 1–5 and 8–12 every 28 days) plus nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks).

Results

Between August 2016 and January 2017, 18 patients (50% men; median age 56.5 years) were enrolled; 72% had colon cancer and 56% had KRAS mutations. All patients received treatment (median, 2.5 cycles [range, 1–8]). No dose‐limiting toxicities were observed in the study. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) of any cause and grade were nausea (67%), diarrhea (61%), and neutropenia (50%); 13 patients (72%) experienced grade ≥3 AEs. No patients discontinued treatment because of AEs. No patient achieved a tumor response (either per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] or irRC), and the study did not progress to the second stage. Stable disease was achieved in 8 patients per irRC and in 10 patients per RECIST. Median progression‐free survival was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8–6.0 months) per irRC and 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.8–5.1 months) per RECIST.

Conclusion

Patients with refractory MSS metastatic CRC failed to experience clinical benefit with FTD/TPI plus nivolumab, although safety data in this population indicated tolerability and feasibility of this combination.

Trial registration number

NCT02860546.

Canadian Consensus for Biomarker Testing and Treatment of TRK Fusion Cancer in Adults

The tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib were recently approved in Canada for the treatment of solid tumours harbouring neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions. These NTRK gene fusions are oncogenic drivers found in most tumour types at a low frequency (<5%), and at a higher frequency (>80%) in a small number of rare tumours (e.g., secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland and of the breast). They are generally mutually exclusive of other common oncogenic drivers. Larotrectinib and entrectinib have demonstrated impressive overall response rates and tolerability in Phase I/II trials in patients with TRK fusion cancer with no other effective treatment options. Given the low frequency of TRK fusion cancer and the heterogeneous molecular testing landscape in Canada, identifying and optimally managing such patients represents a new challenge. We provide a Canadian consensus on when and how to test for NTRK gene fusions and when to consider treatment with a TRK inhibitor. We focus on five tumour types: thyroid carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and salivary gland carcinoma. Based on the probability of the tumour harbouring an NTRK gene fusion, we also suggest a tumour-agnostic consensus for NTRK gene fusion testing and treatment. We recommend considering a TRK inhibitor in all patients with TRK fusion cancer with no other effective treatment options.

Prognostic and Predictive Values of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Universal MMR/MSI testing is standard of care for all patients with newly diagnosed CRC based on multi-society guidelines in the United States. Such testing is intended to identify patients with Lynch Syndrome due to a germline mutation in an MMR gene, but also detects those with sporadic dMMR/MSI-high CRCs. The prognostic utility of MMR/MSI status in non-metastatic colorectal cancer has been studied extensively, yet more limited data are available for its predictive utility. Results have not been entirely consistent due to potential stage-related differences and limited numbers of dMMR/MSI-H patients included in the studies. In this review, we summarize the current evidence for the prognostic and predictive value of dMMR/MSI-H in non-metastatic CRC, and discuss the use of this biomarker for patient management and treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Comparison of long-term outcomes between Lynch sydrome and sporadic colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome. Comparison of prognosis between LS and sporadic CRC (SCRC) were rare, with conflicting results. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes between patients with LS and SCRC.

Methods

Between June 2008 and September 2018, a total of 47 patients were diagnosed with LS by genetic testing at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to obtain homogeneous cohorts from SCRC group. Thereafter, 94 SCRC patients were enrolled as control group. All of enrolled patients received curative surgeries and standardized postoperative monitoring. The long-term survival rates between the two groups were compared, and the prognostic factors were also analyzed.

Results

The 5-year overall survival rate of LS group was 97.6%, which was significantly higher than of 82.6% for SCRC group (χ² = 4.745, p = 0.029). The 5-year recurrence free survival rate showed no significant differences between the two groups (78.0% for LS group vs. 70.6% for SCRC patients; χ² = 1.260, p = 0.262). The 5-year tumor free survival rates in LS group was 62.1% for LS patients, which were significantly lower than of 70.6% for SCRC group (χ² = 4.258, p = 0.039). Subgroup analysis of recurrent patients show that the LS group had longer overall survival than the SCRC group after combined chemotherapy. By multivariate analysis, we found that tumor recurrence of primary CRC [Risk ratio (95% (confidence interval): 48.917(9.866–242.539); p < 0.001] and late TNM staging [Risk ratio (95% (confidence interval): 2.968(1.478–5.964); p = 0.002] were independent risk factors for OS.

Conclusion

LS patients have better long-term survival prognosis than SCRC patients, even though the two groups have statistically comparable recurrence free survival. Combined chemotherapy is an effective treatment for LS patients who developed primary CRC recurrence. Standardized postoperative monitoring for LS patients may enable detection of metachronous tumors at earlier stages, which was a guarantee of a favorable prognosis despite lower tumor free survival.

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in colon cancer and its interaction with budding and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as tumor-host antagonists

PURPOSE

To analyze the role of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemisty in the context of tumor microenvironment in colon cancer (CC) with focus on the interaction between tumor budding and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and to elucidate its potential value for immunooncologic treatment decisions.

METHODS

Three hundred forty seven patients with CC, stages I to IV, were enrolled. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was performed using two different antibodies (clone 22C3 pharmDx, Agilent and clone QR1, Quartett). Tumor proportion score (TPS) as well as immune cell score (IC) was assessed. Budding and TILs were assessed according to the criteria of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) and International TILs Working Group (ITWG). Correlation analyses as well as survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

PD-L1 positivity significantly correlated with TILs > 5% and MMR deficiency, and PD-L1-positive cases (overall and IC) showed significantly longer overall survival (OS) with both antibodies.The parameters "high grade," "right-sidedness," and "TILS > 5% regardless of MMR status" evolved as potential parameters for additional immunological treatment decisions. Additionally, TPS positivity correlated with low budding. More PD-L1-positive cases were seen in both high TIL groups. The low budding/high TIL group showed longer disease-free survival and longer OS in PD-L1-positive cases.

CONCLUSION

Overall, PD-L1 positivity correlated with markers of good prognosis. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was able to identify parameters as additional potential candidates for immune therapy. Furthermore, it was able to stratify patients within the low budding/high TIL group with significant prognostic impact.

Potential Mechanism of Immune Evasion Associated with the Master Regulator ASCL2 in Microsatellite Stability in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has two major subtypes, microsatellite instability (MSI) and microsatellite stability (MSS) based on the genomic instability. In this study, using computational programs, we identified 9 master transcription factors (TFs) based on epigenomic profiling in MSS CRC samples. Notably, unbiased gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that several master TFs were strongly associated with immune-related functions in TCGA MSS CRC tissues, such as interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and interferon alpha (IFN-α) responses. Focusing to the top candidate, ASCL2, we found that CD8⁺ T cell infiltration was low in ASCL2 overexpressed MSS CRC samples. Compared with other gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (gastric cancer, MSI CRC, and esophageal cancer), ASCL2 is specifically upregulated in MSS CRC. Moreover, we identified 28 candidate genes in IFN-γ and IFN-α response pathways which were negatively correlated with ASCL2. Together, these results link transcriptional dysregulation with the immune evasion in MSS CRC, which may advance the understanding of immune resistance and contribute to developing novel treatments of MSS CRC.

Rare BRCA2 Mutation and MSI-H in Male Patient with Aggressive Stage III Colorectal Cancer, Case Report and Literature Review

Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy worldwide. We report the case of a 66-year-old man diagnosed with stage III B colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and subsequently developed hepatic metastases. Two months following metastasectomy, PET-CT scan revealed liver metastases with metabolic activity. The patient was started on FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimen in combination with cetuximab, and achieved stable partial remission 7 weeks after starting the treatment. NGS and IHC testing of the surgically removed tumor revealed MSI-H/dMMR, and NRAS/KRAS wild type status, moderate positive (30%) expression of PD-L1 protein, along with BRCA2 mutation.

Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Advanced Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade has clinical benefit in microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors after previous therapy. The efficacy of PD-1 blockade as compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for MSI-H-dMMR advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer is unknown.

METHODS

In this phase 3, open-label trial, 307 patients with metastatic MSI-H-dMMR colorectal cancer who had not previously received treatment were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive pembrolizumab at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks or chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil-based therapy with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab) every 2 weeks. Patients receiving chemotherapy could cross over to pembrolizumab therapy after disease progression. The two primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

At the second interim analysis, after a median follow-up (from randomization to data cutoff) of 32.4 months (range, 24.0 to 48.3), pembrolizumab was superior to chemotherapy with respect to progression-free survival (median, 16.5 vs. 8.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.80; P = 0.0002). The estimated restricted mean survival after 24 months of follow-up was 13.7 months (range, 12.0 to 15.4) as compared with 10.8 months (range, 9.4 to 12.2). As of the data cutoff date, 56 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 69 in the chemotherapy group had died. Data on overall survival were still evolving (66% of required events had occurred) and remain blinded until the final analysis. An overall response (complete or partial response), as evaluated with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, was observed in 43.8% of the patients in the pembrolizumab group and 33.1% in the chemotherapy group. Among patients with an overall response, 83% in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 35% of patients in the chemotherapy group, had ongoing responses at 24 months. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 22% of the patients in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 66% (including one patient who died) in the chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pembrolizumab led to significantly longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy when received as first-line therapy for MSI-H-dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer, with fewer treatment-related adverse events. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme and by Stand Up to Cancer; KEYNOTE-177 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02563002.).

Metastatic Colorectal Cancers with Mismatch Repair Deficiency Result in Worse Survival Regardless of Peritoneal Metastases

BACKGROUND

Mismatch-repair deficiency (dMMR) predicts worse chemoresponsiveness but better survival in early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma. This study examined metastatic colorectal and appendix cancers with and without peritoneal metastasis (PM) in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), hypothesizing that dMMR tumors show better survival.

METHODS

Stage 4 colon, rectum, and appendix cancers (2010-2016) were identified in the NCDB (including goblet cell carcinoids, excluding neuroendocrine tumors). Stage 4 disease without liver, bone, brain, lung, or distant nodal metastases defined PM. Fisher's exact tests were used to compare proportions, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival.

RESULTS

Of 130,125 stage 4 colon, rectum, and appendix cancers, 27,848 (21.4%) had PM. Appendix primary tumors had PM more commonly than colon or rectum cancer (83.6% vs. 20.6% and 12.1% of stage 4 cases; p < 0.0001). More PM patients had MMR testing than patients with other metastasis (OM) (21.4% vs. 16.1%), and testing increased from 9.6% in 2010 to 26.3% in 2016 (both p < 0.0001). Among the PM patients, MMR testing was least common for appendix cancers (9.0%). When tested, PM patients more often had dMMR (22.9% [1122/4900] vs. 15.4% [2532/16,495] of OM patients; p < 0.0001). Colon primary tumor had dMMR most frequently (25.0% vs. 14.6% and 14.5% for rectal and appendix tumor; p < 0.0001). Most PM patients received chemotherapy (66.2%). Immunotherapy use increased over time (1.1% of PM diagnoses in 2010 vs. 20.8% in 2016). For MMR-tested stage 4 patients, dMMR correlated with worse survival (median OM, 19.7 vs. 23.9 months, p < 0.0001; median PM, 19.9 vs. 24.6 months, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The NCDB showed dMMR predicting worse survival for stage 4 colorectal cancers with and without PM and dMMR existing in 14.5-25% of tested patients, suggesting that increased attention to MMR testing in stage 4 colorectal and appendix cancers can identify many patients who could potentially benefit from immunotherapy.

The clinical utility of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) became the spotlight after the US FDA' s approval of MSI as an indication of immunotherapy for cancer patients. Immunohistochemical detection of loss of MMR proteins and PCR amplification of specific microsatellite repeats are widely used in clinical practice. Next-generation sequencing is a promising tool for identifying MSI patients. Circulating tumour DNA provides a convenient alternative when tumour tissue is unavailable. MSI detection is an effective tool to screen for Lynch syndrome. Early-stage CRC patients with MSI generally have a better prognosis and a reduced response to chemotherapy; instead, they are more likely to respond to immunotherapy. In this review, we aimed to assess the clinical utility of MSI as a biomarker in CRC. We will provide an overview of the available methods for evaluation of the analytical validity of MSI detection and elaborate the evidence on the clinical validity of MSI in the management of CRC patients.

Tumor-derived mutations in postoperative plasma of colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability

The mutation in postoperative plasma (molecular residues) was an independently prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC). The status of postoperative plasma mutation of microsatellite instability (MSI) CRC has not been systematically examined. In this study, we enrolled 30 MSI and 46 microsatellite stability (MSS) CRCs, and performed next generation sequencing on surgical tissues, postoperative plasma, and plasma during follow-up. Compared with MSS, MSI tumors had dissimilar genomic profiles, higher tumor mutation burden (TMB), and more frameshift mutations. In the postoperative plasma, more MSI CRCs were detected with tumor-derived mutations (77% in MSI vs 33% in MSS, p < 0.001). The numbers of postoperative mutations were proportional to MSI tissues (Spearman r = 0.47, p = 0.023), while not for MSS. More proportion of postoperative plasma samples of MSI CRCs harbored frameshift mutations than MSS (p = 0.007). For the follow-up plasma, 93% (14 out of 15) MSI CRCs harbored tumor-derived mutations; 33% (4/12) MSS were mutation-positive, lower than MSI (p = 0.003). Thus, considering that MSI CRC had extremely distinct mutational characteristics in tumor and postoperative plasma compared with MSS CRC, we propose that the prognostic value of molecular residue identification in postoperative plasma needs to be independently evaluated in MSI and MSS CRCs.

Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker in Solid Tumors

Tumor mutational burden (TMB), defined as the number of somatic mutations per megabase of interrogated genomic sequence, varies across malignancies. Panel sequencing-based estimates of TMB have largely replaced whole-exome sequencing-derived TMB in the clinic. Retrospective evidence suggests that TMB can predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and data from KEYNOTE-158 led to the recent FDA approval of pembrolizumab for the TMB-high tumor subgroup. Unmet needs include prospective validation of TMB cutoffs in relationship to tumor type and patient outcomes. Furthermore, standardization and harmonization of TMB measurement across test platforms are important to the successful implementation of TMB in clinical practice. SIGNIFICANCE: Evaluation of TMB as a predictive biomarker creates the need to harmonize panel-based TMB estimation and standardize its reporting. TMB can improve the predictive accuracy for immunotherapy outcomes, and has the potential to expand the candidate pool of patients for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Automated Quantitation of CD8-positive T Cells Predicts Prognosis in Colonic Adenocarcinoma With Mucinous, Signet Ring Cell, or Medullary Differentiation Independent of Mismatch Repair Protein Status

Despite their association with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency, colonic adenocarcinomas with mucinous, signet ring cell, or medullary differentiation have not been associated with improved survival compared with conventional adenocarcinomas in most studies. Recent studies indicate that increased T-cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment has a favorable prognostic effect in colonic adenocarcinoma. However, the prognostic effect of tumor-associated T cells has not been evaluated in histologic subtypes of colonic adenocarcinoma. We evaluated CD8-positive T-cell density in 259 patients with colonic adenocarcinoma, including 113 patients with tumors demonstrating mucinous, signet ring cell, or medullary differentiation, using a validated automated quantitative digital image analysis platform and correlated CD8-positive T-cell density with histopathologic variables, MMR status, molecular alterations, and survival. CD8-positive T-cell densities were significantly higher for MMR protein-deficient tumors (P<0.001), BRAF V600E mutant tumors (P=0.004), and tumors with medullary differentiation (P<0.001) but did not correlate with mucinous or signet ring cell histology (P>0.05 for both). In the multivariable model of factors predicting disease-free survival, increased CD8-positive T-cell density was associated with improved survival both in the entire cohort (hazard ratio=0.34, 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.75, P=0.008) and in an analysis of patients with tumors with mucinous, signet ring cell, or medullary differentiation (hazard ratio=0.06, 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.54, P=0.01). The prognostic effect of CD8-positive T-cell density was independent of tumor stage, MMR status, KRAS mutation, and BRAF mutation. Venous invasion was the only other variable independently associated with survival in both the entire cohort and in patients with tumors with mucinous, signet ring cell, or medullary differentiation. In summary, our results indicate that the prognostic value of MMR protein deficiency is most likely attributed to increased tumor-associated CD8-positive T cells and that automated quantitative CD8 T-cell analysis is a better biomarker of patient survival, particularly in patients with tumors demonstrating mucinous, signet ring cell, or medullary differentiation.

Mismatch repair status between primary colorectal tumor and metastatic tumor, a retrospective consistent study

Objectives Mismatch repair (MMR) and Microsatellite instability (MSI) are critical when considering immunotherapy and chemotherapeutic drugs an option for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the consistence of MMR status as well as MSI between primary CRC and metastatic tumor to see if the expression of four MMR proteins and the status of MSI are congruent in primary tumor and metastatic tumor. With the results of the study and future more relevant studies, the sites of MMR testing may be more precise for individualized treatment.

Study design Patients with clear diagnosis of sporadic CRC and distal organ metastasis were identified from a prospectively established database. The status of MMR and MSI was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) respectively of synchronously obtained tissue samples.

Results Forty patients with complete clinical date were enrolled. For primary tumor, 36/40 samples were tested as MMR-proficient (pMMR) and 4 were MMR-deficient (dMMR). For metastatic samples, 30 samples were tested as pMMR while 10 samples were dMMR. Six out of forty patients were tested as inconsistent status of MMR and MSI. After statistical analysis, the expression status of MMR was not statistically significant between primary and metastatic tumors (P=0.1405, larger than 0.05).

Conclusion Based on our samples, the status of MMR between primary CRC and metastatic tumor was consistent, thus test of MMR status can be performed at both sites. However, due to the limited samples enrolled in our study, the results should be interpreted carefully.

Survival of patients with deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer in the pre-immunotherapy era

Background

Metastatic colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR mCRC) benefit from immunotherapy. Interpretation of the single-arm immunotherapy trials is complicated by insignificant survival data during systemic non-immunotherapy. We present survival data on a large, comprehensive cohort of dMMR mCRC patients, treated with or without systemic non-immunotherapy.

Methods

Two hundred and eighty-one dMMR mCRC patients (n = 54 from three prospective Phase 3 CAIRO trials; n = 227 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry). Overall survival was analysed from diagnosis of mCRC (OS), from initiation of first-line (OS1) and second-line (OS2) systemic treatment. Cox regression analysis examined prognostic factors. As comparison for OS 2746 MMR proficient mCRC patients were identified.

Results

Of 281 dMMR patients, 62% received first-line and 26% second-line treatment. Median OS was 16.0 months (13.8–19.6) with antitumour therapy and 2.5 months (1.8–3.5) in untreated patients. OS1 was 12.8 months (10.7–15.2) and OS2 6.2 months (5.4–8.9) in treated dMMR patients. Treated dMMR patients had a 7.6-month shorter median OS than pMMR patients.

Conclusion

Available data from immunotherapy trials lack a control arm with standard systemic treatment. Given the poor outcome compared to the immunotherapy results, our data strongly suggest a survival benefit of immunotherapy in dMMR mCRC patients.