FtsY, the bacterial signal-recognition particle receptor, interacts functionally and physically with the SecYEG translocon

Membrane binding of the bacterial signal recognition particle receptor involves two distinct binding sites

Cotranslational protein targeting in bacteria is mediated by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and FtsY, the bacterial SRP receptor (SR). FtsY is homologous to the SRα subunit of eukaryotes, which is tethered to the membrane via its interaction with the membrane-integral SRβ subunit. Despite the lack of a membrane-anchoring subunit, 30% of FtsY in Escherichia coli are found stably associated with the cytoplasmic membrane. However, the mechanisms that are involved in this membrane association are only poorly understood. Our data indicate that membrane association of FtsY involves two distinct binding sites and that binding to both sites is stabilized by blocking its GTPase activity. Binding to the first site requires only the NG-domain of FtsY and confers protease protection to FtsY. Importantly, the SecY translocon provides the second binding site, to which FtsY binds to form a carbonate-resistant 400-kD FtsY–SecY translocon complex. This interaction is stabilized by the N-terminal A-domain of FtsY, which probably serves as a transient lipid anchor.

Proteomic dissection of potential signal recognition particle dependence in protein secretion by Bacillus subtilis

The bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent pathway is believed to be a major targeting route for membrane proteins, as well as for subsets of secretory proteins. The present studies were aimed at an assessment of the role of two key components of SRP, namely Ffh and FtsY, in protein secretion by the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Our results show that both components are important for the extracellular accumulation of proteins containing known signal peptides. Remarkably, extracellular accumulation of individual proteins was affected to different extents by depletion of Ffh or FtsY, at least under the conditions tested. Moreover, the observed Ffh or FtsY dependence of certain secretory proteins did not seem to correlate with signal peptide length or hydrophobicity. Although it is presently difficult to distinguish between direct and indirect effects, these findings suggest that other, yet unidentified, determinants in secretory proteins are also important for their SRP dependence. High-level production of homologous and heterologous secretory proteins was shown to result in elevated cellular Ffh and FtsY levels. This phenomenon is, most likely, due to post-transcriptional regulation. In conclusion, the present proteomic dissection of SRP-dependent extracellular protein accumulation provides exciting leads to identify novel determinants for interactions between secretory proteins and SRP.

Protein secretion in the Archaea: multiple paths towards a unique cell surface

Archaea are similar to other prokaryotes in most aspects of cell structure but are unique with respect to the lipid composition of the cytoplasmic membrane and the structure of the cell surface. Membranes of archaea are composed of glycerol-ether lipids instead of glycerol-ester lipids and are based on isoprenoid side chains, whereas the cell walls are formed by surface-layer proteins. The unique cell surface of archaea requires distinct solutions to the problem of how proteins cross this barrier to be either secreted into the medium or assembled as appendages at the cell surface.

Signal recognition particle receptor exposes the ribosomal translocon binding site

Signal sequences of secretory and membrane proteins are recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) as they emerge from the ribosome. This results in their targeting to the membrane by docking with the SRP receptor, which facilitates transfer of the ribosome to the translocon. Here, we present the 8 angstrom cryo-electron microscopy structure of a "docking complex" consisting of a SRP-bound 80S ribosome and the SRP receptor. Interaction of the SRP receptor with both SRP and the ribosome rearranged the S domain of SRP such that a ribosomal binding site for the translocon, the L23e/L35 site, became exposed, whereas Alu domain-mediated elongation arrest persisted.

Subunit a of cytochrome o oxidase requires both YidC and SecYEG for membrane insertion

The Escherichia coli YidC protein belongs to the Oxa1 family of membrane proteins that facilitate the insertion of membrane proteins. Depletion of YidC in E. coli leads to a specific defect in the functional assembly of major energy transducing complexes such as the F1F0 ATPase and cytochrome bo3 oxidase. Here we report on the in vitro reconstitution of the membrane insertion of the CyoA subunit of cytochrome bo3 oxidase. Efficient insertion of in vitro synthesized pre-CyoA into proteoliposomes requires YidC, SecYEG, and SecA and occurs independently of the proton motive force. These data demonstrate that pre-CyoA is a substrate of a novel pathway that involves both SecYEG and YidC.

Distinct requirements for translocation of the N-tail and C-tail of the Escherichia coli inner membrane protein CyoA

Inner membrane proteins (IMPs) of Escherichia coli use different pathways for membrane targeting and integration. YidC plays an essential but poorly defined role in the integration and folding of IMPs both in conjunction with the Sec translocon and as a Sec-independent insertase. Depletion of YidC only marginally affects the insertion of Sec-dependent IMPs, whereas it blocks the insertion of a subset of Sec-independent IMPs. Substrates of this latter "YidC-only" pathway include the relatively small IMPs M13 procoat, Pf3 coat protein, and subunit c of the F(1)F(0) ATPase. Recently, it has been shown that the steady state level of the larger and more complex CyoA subunit of the cytochrome o oxidase is also severely affected upon depletion of YidC. In the present study we have analyzed the biogenesis of the integral lipoprotein CyoA. Collectively, our data suggest that the first transmembrane segment of CyoA rather than the signal sequence recruits the signal recognition particle for membrane targeting. Membrane integration and assembly appear to occur in two distinct sequential steps. YidC is sufficient to catalyze insertion of the N-terminal domain consisting of the signal sequence, transmembrane segment 1, and the small periplasmic domain in between. Translocation of the large C-terminal periplasmic domain requires the Sec translocon and SecA, suggesting that for this particular IMP the Sec translocon might operate downstream of YidC.

Multi-step Assembly Pathway of the cbb3-type Cytochrome c Oxidase Complex

The cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidases as members of the heme-copper oxidase superfamily are involved in microaerobic respiration in both pathogenic and non-pathogenic proteobacteria. The biogenesis of these multisubunit enzymes, encoded by the ccoNOQP operon, depends on the ccoGHIS gene products, which are proposed to be specifically required for co-factor insertion and maturation of cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidases. Here, the assembly of the cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase from the facultative photosynthetic model organism Rhodobacter capsulatus was investigated using blue-native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. This process involves the formation of a stable but inactive 210 kDa sub-complex consisting of the subunits CcoNOQ and the assembly proteins CcoH and CcoS. By recruiting monomeric CcoP, this sub-complex is converted into an active 230 kDa CcoNOQP complex. Formation of these complexes and the stability of the monomeric CcoP are impaired drastically upon deletion of ccoGHIS. In a ccoI deletion strain, the 230 kDa complex was absent, although monomeric CcoP was still detectable. In contrast, neither of the complexes nor the monomeric CcoP was found in a ccoH deletion strain. In the absence of CcoS, the 230 kDa complex was assembled. However, it exhibited no enzymatic activity, suggesting that CcoS might be involved in a late step of biogenesis. Based on these data, we propose that CcoN, CcoO and CcoQ assemble first into an inactive 210 kDa sub-complex, which is stabilized via its interactions with CcoH and CcoS. Binding of CcoP, and probably subsequent dissociation of CcoH and CcoS, then generates the active 230 kDa complex. The insertion of the heme cofactors into the c-type cytochromes CcoP and CcoO precedes sub-complex formation, while the cofactor insertion into CcoN could occur either before or after the 210 kDa sub-complex formation during the assembly of the cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase.

Biogenesis of inner membrane proteins in Escherichia coli

Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli are surrounded by two membranes, the inner membrane and the outer membrane. The biogenesis of most inner membrane proteins (IMPs), typical alpha-helical proteins, appears to follow a partly conserved cotranslational pathway. Targeting involves a relatively simple signal recognition particle (SRP) and SRP-receptor. Insertion of most IMPs into the membrane occurs via the Sec-translocon, which is also used for the vectorial transport of secretory proteins. Similar to eukaryotic systems, little is known about the later stages of biogenesis of IMPs, the folding and assembly in the lipid bilayer. Recently, YidC has been identified as a factor that assists in the integration, folding, and assembly of IMPs both in association with the Sec-translocon and separately. This review deals mainly with recent structural and biochemical data from various experimental systems that offer new insight into the different stages of biogenesis of E. coli IMPs.

The Streptomyces lividans Cytoplasmic Signal Recognition Particle Receptor FtsY Is Involved in Protein Secretion

The bacterial version of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor alpha-subunit (FtsY) is well conserved and essential to all known bacteria. In gram-negative bacteria, the SRP pathway mediates a co-translational targeting of most inner membrane proteins. Additionally, in Streptomyces lividans, a gram-positive bacterium, SRP also targets secretory proteins to the translocon. The role of S. lividans FtsY has been assessed in this work. Co-immunoprecipitation studies confirmed that FtsY is associated with the S. lividans SRP in the cytoplasm and that this complex also co-immunoprecipitated with pre-agarase, suggesting that the SRP receptor is involved in SRP-mediated targeting of secretory proteins in S. lividans. Furthermore, the SRP remains attached for the most part to the cellular membrane when the cleavage of pre-secretory proteins is severely reduced in a strain lacking the gene coding for the major type-I signal peptidase.

A dual function for SecA in the assembly of single spanning membrane proteins in Escherichia coli

The assembly of bacterial membrane proteins with large periplasmic loops is an intrinsically complex process because the SecY translocon has to coordinate the signal recognition particle-dependent targeting and integration of transmembrane domains with the SecA-dependent translocation of the periplasmic loop. The current model suggests that the ATP hydrolysis by SecA is required only if periplasmic loops larger than 30 amino acids have to be translocated. In agreement with this model, our data demonstrate that the signal recognition particle- and SecA-dependent multiple spanning membrane protein YidC becomes SecA-independent if the large periplasmic loop connecting transmembrane domains 1 and 2 is reduced to less than 30 amino acids. Strikingly, however, we were unable to render single spanning membrane proteins SecA-independent by reducing the length of their periplasmic loops. For these proteins, the complete assembly was always SecA-dependent even if the periplasmic loop was reduced to 13 amino acids. If, however, the 13-amino acid-long periplasmic loop was fused to a downstream transmembrane domain, SecA was no longer required for complete translocation. Although these data support the current model on the SecA dependence of multiple spanning membrane proteins, they indicate a novel function of SecA for the assembly of single spanning membrane proteins. This could suggest that single and multiple spanning membrane proteins are processed differently by the bacterial SecY translocon.