101
|
Shin J, Lee S, Hwang JA, Lee JE, Chung YE, Choi JY, Park MS. MRI-diagnosis of category LR-M observations in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:3319-3326. [PMID: 35031839 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08382-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We performed a meta-analysis to determine the probability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC malignancies in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) observations and the frequency of defined LR-M imaging features on MRI using LI-RADS v2018. METHODS We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify studies published from 1 January 2018 to 16 March 2021 reporting the probability of category LR-M in HCC and non-HCC malignancies on MRI. The pooled percentages of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in the LR-M observations were evaluated. Meta-regression analysis was performed to identify factors for study heterogeneity. The frequencies of defined LR-M imaging features were also calculated. Risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. RESULTS We identified 18 studies reporting the diagnostic performance of the LR-M category (3,812 observations in 3,615 patients), with nine studies reporting the frequencies of LR-M imaging features. The pooled percentages of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in the LR-M observations were 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21-38%) and 67% (95%CI, 57-77%), respectively. The study type and inclusion of benign lesions were significant factors for study heterogeneity. Of the 10 LR-M imaging features, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) showed the highest frequency in non-HCC malignancies (68%; 95%CI, 61-75%). CONCLUSIONS The LR-M category was commonly used to characterize non-HCC malignancies, but also included 29% of HCC. The frequencies of the different LR-M imaging features were variable, with rim APHE showing the highest frequency in non-HCC malignancies. KEY POINTS • In the LR-M category using LI-RADS v2018 for MRI, the pooled percentage of malignancies in general was 96%, with 29% HCC and 67% non-HCC malignancies, while the remaining 4% was benign entity. • The study type and inclusion of benign lesions were significant factors contributing to substantial heterogeneity among included studies. • The frequencies of the different LR-M imaging features were variable, with rim APHE showing the highest frequency in non-HCC malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeseung Shin
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jeong Ah Hwang
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Eun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Young Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Suk Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Terzi E, Giamperoli A, Iavarone M, Leoni S, De Bonis L, Granito A, Forgione A, Tovoli F, Piscaglia F. Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020336. [PMID: 35053498 PMCID: PMC8773738 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The American College of Radiology (ACR) released the Liver Imaging Report and Data System (LI-RADS) scheme, which categorizes hepatic nodules in risk classes from LR-1 to LR-5 (according to the degree of risk to be HCC) and LR-M (probable malignancy not specific for HCC). The aim of this study was to test whether HCC with different LR patterns on CEUS have different overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). We retrospectively enrolled 167 patients with the first definitive diagnosis of single HCC (by using CT/MRI or histological techniques if CT/MRI were inconclusive) for whom CEUS examination was available. The median size of HCC lesions was 2.2 cm (range 1.0-7.2 cm). According to CEUS LI-RADS classification, 28 patients were in LR-3, 48 in LR-4, 83 in LR-5, and 8 in LR-M. Patient liver function and nodule characteristics were not statistically different between CEUS LI-RADS classes. Using univariate analysis, CEUS LI-RADS class was not found to be a predictor of survival (p = 0.347). In conclusion, HCC showing the CEUS LI-RADS classes LR-3 and LR-4 have no better clinical outcome than typical HCC. Such data support the EASL policy, aimed at conclusive diagnostic investigations of indeterminate nodules up to obtaining histological proof to avoid leaving aggressive HCC not timely treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Terzi
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.T.); (S.L.); (A.G.); (F.T.)
| | - Alice Giamperoli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (L.D.B.); (A.F.)
| | - Massimo Iavarone
- A.M. & A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Grande Maggiore Hospital, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Simona Leoni
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.T.); (S.L.); (A.G.); (F.T.)
| | - Ludovico De Bonis
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (L.D.B.); (A.F.)
| | - Alessandro Granito
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.T.); (S.L.); (A.G.); (F.T.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (L.D.B.); (A.F.)
| | - Antonella Forgione
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (L.D.B.); (A.F.)
| | - Francesco Tovoli
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.T.); (S.L.); (A.G.); (F.T.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (L.D.B.); (A.F.)
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.T.); (S.L.); (A.G.); (F.T.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (A.G.); (L.D.B.); (A.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-051-214-2568 (ext. 2542); Fax: +39-051-636-2725
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Centonze L, De Carlis R, Vella I, Carbonaro L, Incarbone N, Palmieri L, Sgrazzutti C, Ficarelli A, Valsecchi MG, Dello Iacono U, Lauterio A, Bernasconi D, Vanzulli A, De Carlis L. From LI-RADS Classification to HCC Pathology: A Retrospective Single-Institution Analysis of Clinico-Pathological Features Affecting Oncological Outcomes after Curative Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:160. [PMID: 35054327 PMCID: PMC8775107 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The latest Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification by the American College of Radiology has been recently endorsed in the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) guidelines for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management. Although the LI-RADS protocol has been developed as a diagnostic algorithm, there is some evidence concerning a possible correlation between different LI-RADS classes and specific pathological features of HCC. We aimed to investigate such radiological/pathological correlation and the possible prognostic implication of LI-RADS on a retrospective cohort of HCC patients undergoing surgical resection. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the pathological characteristics of resected HCC, exploring their distribution among different LI-RADS classes and analyzing the risk factors for recurrence-free, overall and cancer-specific survival Results: LI-RADS-5 (LR-5) nodules showed a higher prevalence of microvascular invasion (MVI), satellitosis and capsule infiltration, as well as higher median values of alpha-fetoprotein (αFP) compared to LI-RADS-3/4 (LR-3/4) nodules. MVI, αFP, satellitosis and margin-positive (R1) resection resulted as independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival, while LI-RADS class did not exert any significant impact. Focusing on overall survival, we identified patient age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, αFP, MVI, satellitosis and R1 resection as independent risk factors for survival, without any impact of LI-RADS classification. Last, MELD score, log10αFP, satellitosis and R1 resection resulted as independent risk factors for cancer-specific survival, while LI-RADS class did not exert any significant impact. Conclusions: Our results suggest an association of LR-5 class with unfavorable pathological characteristics of resected HCC; tumor histology and underlying patient characteristics such as age, ECOG-PS and liver disease severity exert a significant impact on postoperative oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Centonze
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Riccardo De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Ivan Vella
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Luca Carbonaro
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.C.); (C.S.); (U.D.I.); (A.V.)
| | - Niccolò Incarbone
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Livia Palmieri
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Cristiano Sgrazzutti
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.C.); (C.S.); (U.D.I.); (A.V.)
| | - Alberto Ficarelli
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Maria Grazia Valsecchi
- Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre—B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.G.V.); (D.B.)
| | - Umberto Dello Iacono
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.C.); (C.S.); (U.D.I.); (A.V.)
| | - Andrea Lauterio
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Davide Bernasconi
- Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre—B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.G.V.); (D.B.)
| | - Angelo Vanzulli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.C.); (C.S.); (U.D.I.); (A.V.)
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Singal AG, Lok AS, Feng Z, Kanwal F, Parikh ND. Conceptual Model for the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Continuum: Current Status and Research Agenda. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:9-18. [PMID: 32961340 PMCID: PMC8287785 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to have a dismal prognosis, with 5-year survival below 20%. This poor prognosis can be in part attributed to failures along the cancer screening process continuum such as underuse of screening in at risk patients and appropriate treatments for patients with HCC. Better understanding these process failures, and how they compare to those seen in other cancer types, can help inform potential intervention targets and strategies to reduce HCC-related mortality. Herein, we outline a conceptual model with several discrete steps in the HCC screening process continuum including risk assessment, screening initiation, follow-up of screening results, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment evaluation. The conceptual model illustrates how each step in the screening process is prone to delays or failure, resulting in worse outcomes such as late stage diagnosis or poor survival, and how factors at the patient, provider, and health care system levels can contribute to these failures. We compare cancer screening processes for HCC with those employed in breast and colorectal cancer screening to identify opportunities for improvement. The Translational Liver Cancer consortium was recently established by the National Cancer Institute with the goal of improving early detection of HCC. Studies designed to address failures in the HCC screening process continuum will help accomplish this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| | - Anna S Lok
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ziding Feng
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Fasiha Kanwal
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Neehar D Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Ahn Y, Choi SH, Jang JK, Kim SY, Shim JH, Lee SS, Byun JH. Impact of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on Research Studies of Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using MRI. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:529-538. [PMID: 35289147 PMCID: PMC9081689 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Since its introduction in 2011, the CT/MRI diagnostic Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) has been updated in 2014, 2017, and 2018. We evaluated the impact of CT/MRI diagnostic LI-RADS on liver MRI research methodology for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for original articles reporting the diagnostic performance of liver MRI for HCC between 2011 and 2019. The MRI techniques, image analysis methods, and diagnostic criteria for HCC used in each study were investigated. The studies were classified into three groups according to the year of publication (2011–2013, 2014–2016, and 2017–2019). We compared the percentage of studies adopting MRI techniques recommended by LI-RADS, image analysis methods in accordance with the lexicon defined in LI-RADS, and diagnostic criteria endorsed by LI-RADS. We compared the pooled sensitivity and specificity between studies that used the LI-RADS and those that did not. Results This systematic review included 179 studies. The percentages of studies using imaging techniques recommended by LI-RADS were 77.8% for 2011–2013, 85.7% for 2014–2016, and 84.2% for 2017–2019, with no significant difference (p = 0.951). After the introduction of LI-RADS, the percentages of studies following the LI-RADS lexicon were 0.0%, 18.4%, and 56.6% in the respective periods (p < 0.001), while the percentages of studies using the LI-RADS diagnostic imaging criteria were 0.0%, 22.9%, and 60.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Studies that did not use the LI-RADS and those that used the LI-RADS version 2018 showed no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity (86.3% vs. 77.7%, p = 0.102 and 91.4% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.770, respectively), with some difference in heterogeneity (I2 = 94.3% vs. 86.7% in sensitivity and I2 = 86.6% vs. 53.2% in specificity). Conclusion LI-RADS imparted significant changes in the image analysis methods and diagnostic criteria used in liver MRI research for the diagnosis of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yura Ahn
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Keon Jang
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Hyun Shim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Soo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Ho Byun
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Mettikanont P, Kalluri A, Bittermann T, Phillips N, Loza BL, Rosen M, Siegelman E, Furth E, Abt P, Olthoff K, Shaked A, Hoteit M, Reddy KR. The Course of LIRADS 3 and 4 Hepatic Abnormalities as Correlated With Explant Pathology: A Single Center Experience. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2022; 12:1048-1056. [PMID: 35814502 PMCID: PMC9257948 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The Liver Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is the standard classification of imaging findings of hepatic abnormalities for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. We aimed to study the course of LI-RADS 3 and 4 (LR-3 and LR-4) abnormalities through correlations with explant pathology. METHODS A single center retrospective study of liver transplant recipients between January 2016 and September 2019 with HCC on explant pathology was conducted. Eligible patients were divided into three subgroups based on their LI-RADS classification: LR-3/4, LR-5 only, and combination of LR-3/4/5. RESULTS There were 116 eligible patients with 99 LR-3/4 observations (60 LR-3 and 39 LR-4); the rest had LR-5 lesions. LR-4 more often than LR-3 observations progressed to LR-5 (36% vs 12%) and with shorter duration during follow-up (median 175 days and 196 days). Mean size growth of LR-3 and LR-4 abnormalities were 2.6 and 3.8 mm; median growth rates were 0.2 and 0.4 mm/month, respectively. Numbers of HCC lesions per explant, largest HCC lesion size, and cumulative size were higher in LR-3/4/5 subgroup than LR-5 subgroup (P = 0.007, 0.007 and 0.006, respectively); 68% of LR-3 and 82% of LR-4 abnormalities were confirmed HCC on explant (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION Compared to LR-3, more LR-4 abnormalities progressed to LR-5 (12% and 36%, respectively) in a shorter time and with faster growth rate. A high proportion of LR-3 and LR-4 lesions (68% and 82%, respectively) were confirmed HCC on explant, raising the question of whether excluding HCC based on radiologic criteria alone is adequate in those with LR-3/4 abnormalities.
Collapse
Key Words
- AFP, alpha-fetoprotein
- BMI, body mass index
- CT, computed tomography
- HBV, hepatitis b virus
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HCV, hepatitis c virus
- LI-RADS, liver reporting and data system
- LIRADS classification
- LR-3, LI-RADS 3
- LR-4, LI-RADS4
- LR-5, LI-RADS 5
- LT, liver transplantation
- MELD-Na, model for end stage liver disease sodium
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- explant pathology
- hepatocellular carcinoma
- liver transplant
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - K. Rajender Reddy
- Address for correspondence: K. Rajender Reddy, Professor of Medicine, Director of Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, 2 Dulles, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Catania R, Chupetlovska K, Borhani AA, Maheshwari E, Furlan A. Tumor in vein (LR-TIV) and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: diagnostic features, pitfalls, prognostic and management implications. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:5723-5734. [PMID: 34519877 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03270-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Vascular invasion by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), also known as tumor in vein (TIV), indicates highly invasive tumor behavior and is also associated with poor outcome. Because a diagnosis of TIV precludes liver transplantation, knowledge of the imaging findings to differentiate between TIV and bland thrombus is key for proper patient management. Prior versions of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) included presence of TIV as part of LR-5 criteria. However, even if HCC is the most common liver malignancy associated with TIV, other tumors can have vascular invasion and may occur in cirrhotic patients. For these reasons, in LI-RADS v2017 LR-TIV has been introduced as a new different diagnostic category. The aim of this article is to discuss the diagnostic criteria of LR-TIV according to LI-RADS v2018 and analyze potential pitfalls encountered on daily clinical practice. Indeterminate cases and how to manage them will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Catania
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, UPMC Presbyterian Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Kalina Chupetlovska
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, University Hospital Saint Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, UPMC Presbyterian Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Amir A Borhani
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, UPMC Presbyterian Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Ekta Maheshwari
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, UPMC Presbyterian Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Alessandro Furlan
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, UPMC Presbyterian Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Min JH, Kim JM, Kim YK, Kim H, Cha DI, Kang TW, Choi GS, Choi SY, Ahn S. EASL versus LI-RADS: Intra-individual comparison of MRI with extracellular contrast and gadoxetic acid for diagnosis of small HCC. Liver Int 2021; 41:2986-2996. [PMID: 34242468 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and European Association for the Study (EASL) criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis have been updated in 2018. We aimed to compare the HCC diagnostic performance of LI-RADS and EASL criteria with extracellular contrast agents-MRI (ECA-MRI) and hepatobiliary agents-MRI (HBA-MRI). METHODS We prospectively evaluated 179 participants with cirrhosis (n = 105) or non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) (n = 74) who underwent both ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI before surgery for de novo nodule(s) measuring 10-30 mm. We compared the HCC diagnostic performance of EASL and LR-5 in both MRIs. RESULTS In an analysis of 215 observations (175 HCCs, 17 non-HCC malignancies and 23 benign lesions) identified from cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic CHB participants, LR-5 with ECA-MRI provided the highest sensitivity (80.7%), followed by EASL with ECA-MRI (76.2%), LR-5 with HBA-MRI (67.3%) and EASL with HBA-MRI (63.0%, all P < .05). The specificities were comparable (89.4%-91.5%). When the analysis is limited to participants with pathological cirrhosis (123 observations), the sensitivity of LR-5 with ECA-MRI was similar to that of EASL with ECA-MRI (82.7% vs 80.2%, P = .156), but higher than LR-5 with HBA-MRI (65.1%) or EASL with HBA-MRI (62.8%, both P < .001), with comparable specificities (87.5%-91.7%). CONCLUSIONS The LR-5 with ECA-MRI yielded the highest sensitivity with a similar specificity for HCC diagnosis in cirrhosis and non-cirrhotic CHB participants, while the sensitivities of LR-5 and EASL with ECA-MRI are similar for cirrhosis participants. This indicates non-invasive diagnosis criteria can differ by contrast agents and presence of cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hye Min
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Kon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Honsoul Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Ik Cha
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Wook Kang
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyu Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seo-Youn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Soohyun Ahn
- Department of Mathematics, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using LI-RADS and Ancillary Features: A Single Tertiary Centre Experience. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122232. [PMID: 34943474 PMCID: PMC8700695 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical utility of ancillary features (AFs) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS®) is yet to be established. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic yield of CEUS LI-RADS and AFs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively included patients with risk factors for HCC and newly diagnosed focal liver lesions (FLL). All lesions have been categorized according to the CEUS LI-RADS v2017 by an experienced sonographer blinded to clinical data and to the final diagnosis. From a total of 143 patients with 191 FLL, AFs favoring HCC were observed in 19.8% cases as hypoechoic rim and in 16.7% cases as nodule-in nodule architecture. From the total of 141 HCC cases, 83.6% were correctly classified: 57.4%- LR-5 and 26.2%- LR-4. In 9.21% cases, CEUS indicated LR-M; 2.12% cases- LR-3. The LR-5 category was 96.2% predictive (PPV) of HCC. LR-5 had 60.4% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity. PPV for primitive malignancy (LR-4 + LR-5) was 95.7%, with 88% sensitivity, 89.3% specificity and 88.4% accuracy for HCC. LR-4 category had 94.8% PPV and 26.2% sensitivity. CEUS LR4 + LR5 had 81,8% sensitivity for HCCs over 2 cm and 78.57% sensitivity for smaller HCCs. CEUS LR-5 remains an excellent diagnostic tool for HCC, despite the size of the lesion. The use of AFs might improve the overarching goal of LR-5 + LR-4 diagnosis of high specificity for HCC and exclusion of non-HCC malignancy.
Collapse
|
110
|
Jeong WK. [Radiologic Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 78:261-267. [PMID: 34824184 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2021.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
There are various causes of hepatocellular carcinoma, including viral hepatitis, and treatment strategies are often established based on the radiology diagnosis, unlike other carcinomas. The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a diagnostic system developed by the American College of Radiologists for clear communication and standardized reports of the liver imaging findings. It was recently included in the clinical guidance of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. In addition, the radiologic findings of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) enable a prediction of the prognosis after treatment and a diagnosis of diseases because the use of gadoxetic acid MRI has become more common. Thus, the role of radiology for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC is expected to be developed further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Kyoung Jeong
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
What proportion of LI-RADS 5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LI-RADS 5 criteria? Eur Radiol 2021; 32:3327-3333. [PMID: 34807269 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08389-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) category 5 (definite hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]) is assigned based on combinations of major imaging features (MFs): size, arterial-phase hyperenhancement (APHE), washout (WO), enhancing capsule, and threshold growth. The criteria were simplified in v2018 compared to v2017. The goal of this study is to assess the proportion of LR-5 observations reported in clinical practice with LI-RADS v2017 or v2018 that did not meet LR-5 criteria based on reported MFs. METHODS All MR and CT reports using a standardized LI-RADS template between April 2017 and September 2020 were identified retrospectively. For each reported LR-5 observation, size, MFs, and LI-RADS version (v2017 or v2018) were extracted. Reported MFs were used to determine whether LR-5 criteria were met using the applied version of LI-RADS. The data was summarized descriptively. RESULTS Three hundred eight observations in 234 patients (67.6% male, mean age 66.2 years) were reported as LR-5, including 136 (44.2%) with v2017 and 172 (55.8%) with v2018. 8/136 (6%) v2017 LR-5 observations and 6/172 (3%) v2018 LR-5 observations did not meet LR-5 criteria. Of 8 incorrectly categorized v2017 observations, 3 (43%) lacked APHE, 1 (14%) was a 16-mm new observation with APHE only, and 4 (43%) were 10-19 mm with APHE and WO. Of the 6 incorrectly categorized v2018 observations, 5 (83%) lacked APHE and 1 (17%) was < 10 mm. CONCLUSIONS Depending on the LI-RADS version, 3-6% of LR-5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LR-5 criteria based on reported MFs. Key Points • Depending on the LI-RADS version, 3-6% of LR-5 observations in clinical practice do not meet LR-5 criteria based on reported major imaging features. • Assigning LR-5 category to observations without nonrim arterial-phase hyperenhancement was the most common error.
Collapse
|
112
|
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging: Differences Between Radiologic and Pathologic Systems and Relevance to Patient Selection and Outcomes in Liver Transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 218:77-86. [PMID: 34406054 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.26436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Liver transplant is indicated with curative intent for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The radiologic T category is used to determine candidacy and priority of patients on the waiting list. After transplant, the explant liver pathologic TNM stage is used as a predictor of postoperative outcomes and overall prognosis. Although the comparison of radiologic and pathologic T categories for concordance is often considered to be straightforward, the staging conventions significantly differ. Not accounting for these differences is in part the reason for the high rates of radiologic-pathologic discordance reported in the literature, with inconsistent terminology being an additional source of confusion when evaluating concordance. These factors may affect the understanding of important radiopathologic phenotypes of disease and the adequate investigation of their prognostic capabilities. The aims of this article are to provide an overview of the pathologic and radiologic TNM staging systems for HCC while describing staging procedures, emphasize the differences between these staging systems to highlight the limitations of radiologic-pathologic stage correlation, present a review of the literature on the prognostic value of individual features used for HCC staging; and signal significant aspects of preoperative risk stratification that could be improved to positively impact posttransplant outcomes.
Collapse
|
113
|
Editorial Comment: LI-RADS-2 and -3 Observations-Benign or Not Benign? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 218:471. [PMID: 34730386 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.27014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
114
|
Moctezuma-Velázquez C, Lewis S, Lee K, Amodeo S, Llovet JM, Schwartz M, Abraldes JG, Villanueva A. Non-invasive imaging criteria for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis B. JHEP Rep 2021; 3:100364. [PMID: 34712933 PMCID: PMC8531662 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Criteria defined by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) enable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis based on imaging in cirrhosis. Non-cirrhotic patients require biopsy given the lower pre-test probability of HCC. The objective of our study was to assess the performance of EASL and LI-RADS criteria for the diagnosis of HCC in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic HBV infection. Methods This was a cross-sectional study performed at a referral center. We included all patients with HBV without cirrhosis with focal liver lesions who underwent contrast-enhanced CT or MRI at our clinic between 2005-2018. Studies were reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to the diagnosis. Results We included 280 patients, median age was 56.8 (IQR 48.2-65.45) years and 223 (80%) were male. In 191 (79%) cases the lesion was found as a result of screening. Cirrhosis was excluded based on pathology in 252 (90%) cases. We assessed 338 nodules: 257 (76%) HCC, 40 (12%) non-HCC malignant lesions, and 41 (12%) benign lesions. EASL criteria and LR-5/LR-tumor-in-vein (TIV) categories had a 100% agreement in categorizing lesions as HCC, and 226 nodules (67%) were classified as HCCs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 82.1 (76.9-86.6), 81.5 (71.3-89.2), 93.4 (89.3-96.2), and 58.9 (49.2-68.1), respectively. When the pre-test probability of HCC is >70%, estimated as a PAGE-B score above 9, and EASL or LR-5/LR-TIV criteria are met, post-test probability would be >90%. Conclusions EASL criteria and LR-5/LR-TIV categories show a positive predictive value in patients with HBV without cirrhosis that is comparable to that seen in patients with cirrhosis. These criteria can be used when the pre-test probability of HCC is >70%. Lay summary Current guidelines recommend performing a biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of presumed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients without cirrhosis. We showed that specific imaging criteria had a 100% agreement for categorizing lesions as HCC, with a positive predictive value of 93.4%. These imaging criteria could be used to diagnose HCC in HBV patients without cirrhosis with a pre-test probability of HCC of ≥70%, avoiding the need for a liver biopsy. Imaging criteria defined by the EASL and LI-RADS enable the diagnosis of HCC without biopsy in patients with cirrhosis. A biopsy is recommended in all patients without cirrhosis. Imaging criteria had a good performance in patients with HBV infection without cirrhosis when pre-test probability was >70%. HCC may be diagnosed based solely on imaging criteria in patients with HBV subject to HCC screening (i.e. PAGE-B score >9).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Moctezuma-Velázquez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
- Liver Cancer Translational Research Group, Liver Unit, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sara Lewis
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen Lee
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Salvatore Amodeo
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Josep M. Llovet
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
- Liver Cancer Translational Research Group, Liver Unit, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Myron Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Juan G. Abraldes
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Augusto Villanueva
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
- Corresponding author. Address: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, Box 1123, Room 11-70E, New York, NY 10029, USA; Tel.: +1-212-659-9392.
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Hwang SH, Hong SB, Han K, Seo N, Choi JY, Lee JH, Park S, Lim YS, Kim DY, Kim SY, Park MS. A New Reporting System for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B With Clinical and Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI Features. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 55:1877-1886. [PMID: 34668595 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current major guidelines for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on imaging findings are different from each other and do not include clinical risk factors as a diagnostic criteria. PURPOSE To developed and validated a new diagnostic score system using MRI and clinical features as applied in chronic hepatitis B patients. STUDY TYPE Retrospective observational study. SUBJECT A total of 418 treatment-naïve patients (out of 902 patients) with chronic hepatitis B having 556 lesions suspected for HCC which were eligible for curative treatment. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE T1W GRE in- and opposed-phase, T2W FSE, DWI, and T1W 3D-GRE dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences at 1.5 T and 3 T. ASSESSMENT Six radiologists with 7-22 years of experience independently evaluated MR images based on Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018. STATISTICAL TESTS Based on logistic regression analysis of MRI features and clinical factors, a risk score system was devised in derivation cohorts (268 patients, 352 lesions) and externally validated (150 patients, 204 lesions). The performance of the new score system was assessed by Harell's c-index. Using cutoff value of 12, maintaining positive predictive value ≥95%, the diagnostic performances of the score system were compared with those of LR-5. RESULTS The 15-point diagnostic scoring system used MRI features (lesion size, nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement, portal venous phase hypointensity, hepatobiliary phase hypointensity, and diffusion restriction) and clinical factors (alpha-fetoprotein and platelet). It showed good discrimination in the derivation (c-index, 0.946) and validation cohorts (c-index, 0.907). Using a risk score of 12 as a cut-off, this system yielded higher sensitivity than LR-5 (derivation cohort, 76.8% vs. 52.1%; validation cohort, 73.4% vs. 49.5%) without significant decrease in specificity (derivation cohort, 93.1% vs. 97.2%, P = 0.074; validation cohort, 91.7% vs. 96.1%, P = 0.299). DATA CONCLUSION A new score system showed improved sensitivity in chronic hepatitis B patients compared to LI-RADS without significant compromise in specificity. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Hye Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Seung Baek Hong
- Department of Radiology, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, and Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan, South Korea.,Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyunghwa Han
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nieun Seo
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin-Young Choi
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jei Hee Lee
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Sumi Park
- Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Young-Suk Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mi-Suk Park
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Progression Rates of LR-2 and LR-3 Observations on MRI to Higher LI-RADS Categories in Patients at High Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 218:462-470. [PMID: 34643108 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.26376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: Reported rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for LR-2 and LR-3 observations are generally greater than what may be expected based on clinical experience, possibly reflecting some studies' requirement for pathologic reference. Objective: To determine progression rates to higher LI-RADS categories of LR-2 and LR-3 observations in patients at high risk for HCC. Methods: This retrospective study included 91 patients (mean age 62 years; 64 men, 27 women) at high risk for HCC with clinically reported LR-2 (n=55) or LR-3 (n=36) observations on MRI and who also underwent follow-up CT or MRI after at least 12 months. A study coordinator annotated the location of a single LR-2 or LR-3 observation per patient, based on the clinical reports. Using LI-RADS v2018 criteria, two radiologists independently assigned LI-RADS categories on the follow-up examinations. Progression rates from LR-2 or LR-3 to higher categories were determined. A post hoc consensus review was performed of observations that progressed to LR-4 or LR-5. Subgroup analyses were performed with respect to presence or prior HCC (n=34) or a separate baseline LR-5 observation (n=12). Results: For LR-2 observations, progression to LR-4 was 0.0% (95% CI 0.0%-6.7%) and LR-5 was 3.6% (95% CI 0.4%-13.1%) for both readers. For LR-3 observations, progression to LR-4 was 22.2% (95% CI 9.6%-43.8%) and LR-5 was 11.1% (95% CI 3.0%-28.4%) for both readers. Fourteen observations progressed to LR-4 or LR-5 for both readers (post hoc analysis: no LR-2 to LR-4; two LR-2 to LR-5; eight LR-3 to LR-4; four LR-3 to LR-5). Progression rate from LR-3 to LR-5 was higher (p<.001) among patients with versus without a separate baseline LR-5 observation (100.0% vs 3.0%, respectively) for both readers; progression rate from LR-2 to LR-5 was not associated with a separate baseline LR-5 observation for either reader (p=.30). Progression rates were not different (p>.99) between patients with versus without prior HCC. Conclusion: Based on progression to LR-4 or LR-5, LR-2 and LR-3 observations showed lower progression rates than reported in studies incorporating pathology in determining progression. Clinical Impact: The findings refine understanding of the clinical significance of LR-2 and LR-3 observations.
Collapse
|
117
|
Nadarevic T, Giljaca V, Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Miletic D, Štimac D. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 10:CD013362. [PMID: 34611889 PMCID: PMC8493329 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013362.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, computed tomography (CT) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-foetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma is, therefore, missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of CT in people with chronic liver disease, who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma. OBJECTIVES Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector, multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, either in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Trials Register, Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Diagnostic-Test-Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science until 4 May 2021. We applied no language or document-type restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses. MAIN RESULTS We included 21 studies, with a total of 3101 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time-interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability in the patient selection domain, we judged 14% (3/21) of studies to be at low concern and 86% (18/21) of studies to be at high concern owing to characteristics of the participants who were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation. CT for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 77.5% (95% CI 70.9% to 82.9%) and specificity 91.3% (95% CI 86.5% to 94.5%) (21 studies, 3101 participants; low-certainty evidence). CT for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 71.4% (95% CI 60.3% to 80.4%) and specificity 92.0% (95% CI 86.3% to 95.5%) (10 studies, 1854 participants; low-certainty evidence). In the three studies at low concern for applicability (861 participants), we found sensitivity 76.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 91.5%) and specificity 89.2% (95% CI 57.0% to 98.1%). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In the clinical pathway for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, CT has roles as a confirmatory test for hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, and for staging assessment. We found that using CT in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 22.5% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 8.7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 28.6% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 8% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tin Nadarevic
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Vanja Giljaca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Agostino Colli
- Department of Transfusion Medicine and Haematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Mirella Fraquelli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Casazza
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche "L. Sacco", Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Damir Miletic
- Department of Radiology , Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Davor Štimac
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Fowler KJ, Burgoyne A, Fraum TJ, Hosseini M, Ichikawa S, Kim S, Kitao A, Lee JM, Paradis V, Taouli B, Theise ND, Vilgrain V, Wang J, Sirlin CB, Chernyak V. Pathologic, Molecular, and Prognostic Radiologic Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiographics 2021; 41:1611-1631. [PMID: 34597222 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignancy with variable biologic aggressiveness based on the tumor grade, presence or absence of vascular invasion, and pathologic and molecular classification. Knowledge and understanding of the prognostic implications of different pathologic and molecular phenotypes of HCC are emerging, with therapeutics that promise to provide improved outcomes in what otherwise remains a lethal cancer. Imaging has a central role in diagnosis of HCC. However, to date, the imaging algorithms do not incorporate prognostic features or subclassification of HCC according to its biologic aggressiveness. Emerging data suggest that some imaging features and further radiologic, pathologic, or radiologic-molecular phenotypes may allow prediction of the prognosis of patients with HCC. An invited commentary by Bashir is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn J Fowler
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Adam Burgoyne
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Mojgan Hosseini
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Shintaro Ichikawa
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Sooah Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Azusa Kitao
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Valérie Paradis
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Bachir Taouli
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Neil D Theise
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Jin Wang
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.J.F., C.B.S.), Medicine (A.B.), and Pathology (M.H.), University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, #8756, San Diego, CA 92103; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan (S.I.); Departments of Radiology (S.K.) and Pathology (N.D.T.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan (A.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Université de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon APHP, Clichy, France (V.P.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation," Paris, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP Nord, Clichy, France (V.V.); Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); and Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Bashir MR. Invited Commentary: Key Role of Imaging in Management and Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiographics 2021; 41:E171-E172. [PMID: 34597240 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Departments of Radiology and Medicine and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, 200 Trent Dr, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Harding-Theobald E, Louissaint J, Maraj B, Cuaresma E, Townsend W, Mendiratta-Lala M, Singal AG, Su GL, Lok AS, Parikh ND. Systematic review: radiomics for the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021; 54:890-901. [PMID: 34390014 PMCID: PMC8435007 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in imaging technology have the potential to transform the early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through quantitative image analysis. Computational "radiomic" techniques extract biomarker information from images which can be used to improve diagnosis and predict tumour biology. AIMS To perform a systematic review on radiomic features in HCC diagnosis and prognosis, with a focus on reporting metrics and methodologic standardisation. METHODS We performed a systematic review of all full-text articles published from inception through December 1, 2019. Standardised data extraction and quality assessment metrics were applied to all studies. RESULTS A total of 54 studies were included for analysis. Radiomic features demonstrated good discriminatory performance to differentiate HCC from other solid lesions (c-statistics 0.66-0.95), and to predict microvascular invasion (c-statistic 0.76-0.92), early recurrence after hepatectomy (c-statistics 0.71-0.86), and prognosis after locoregional or systemic therapies (c-statistics 0.74-0.81). Common stratifying features for diagnostic and prognostic radiomic tools included analyses of imaging skewness, analysis of the peritumoural region, and feature extraction from the arterial imaging phase. The overall quality of the included studies was low, with common deficiencies in both internal and external validation, standardised imaging segmentation, and lack of comparison to a gold standard. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative image analysis demonstrates promise as a non-invasive biomarker to improve HCC diagnosis and management. However, standardisation of protocols and outcome measurement, sharing of algorithms and analytic methods, and external validation are necessary prior to widespread application of radiomics to HCC diagnosis and prognosis in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Harding-Theobald
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeremy Louissaint
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bharat Maraj
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Edward Cuaresma
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Whitney Townsend
- Division of Library Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Grace L Su
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Anna S Lok
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Neehar D Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Bae JS, Lee JM, Jeon SK, Yoo J, Park SJ, Yoon JH, Joo I, Lee KB, Kim H. LI-RADS Tumor in Vein at CT and Hepatobiliary MRI. Radiology 2021; 302:107-115. [PMID: 34581625 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021210215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Diagnostic performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System tumor in vein (LR-TIV) category at CT and/or MRI has not yet been evaluated, to the knowledge of the authors. Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of the LR-TIV category in detecting macroscopic tumors in veins (TIVs) at CT and hepatobiliary contrast agent-enhanced (HBA) MRI, with pathologic results used as the reference standard. Materials and Methods Between January 2010 and December 2019, consecutive patients with or without macroscopic TIV who underwent both CT and HBA MRI before hepatic resection or liver transplant were retrospectively included. Three radiologists independently assessed the LR-TIV features of enhancing soft tissue in vein and features suggestive of TIV (FSTIV) and reached a consensus. Macroscopic TIV at pathologic examination was the reference standard. Sensitivities and specificities of the LR-TIV category without and with FSTIV were calculated, and the added value of FSTIV was evaluated by using the McNemar test. Results In the 1322 patients with (n = 101) or without (n = 1221) macroscopic TIV (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 58-70 years]; 1053 men), without consideration of FSTIV, the sensitivity and specificity of enhancing soft tissue in vein for detecting macroscopic TIV at pathologic examination were 64.4% (65 of 101) and 99.8% (1218 of 1221) with CT and 62.4% (63 of 101) and 99.8% (1218 of 1221) with HBA MRI, respectively. With consideration of FSTIV, the sensitivity and specificity of the LR-TIV category became 67.3% (68 of 101 patients) and 99.7% (1217 of 1221 patients) at both CT and HBA MRI. No difference was found between measurements without and with FSTIV (sensitivity, 62% vs 67% for CT [P = .45] and 64% vs 67% for HBA MRI [P = .18]; specificity, 99% for both CT and HBA MRI [P > .99 for both]). Conclusion The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System tumor in vein category showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity in the detection of macroscopic tumors in veins at both CT and hepatobiliary contrast agent-enhanced MRI, with pathologic examination used as the reference standard. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Morrell in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Seok Bae
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.) and Pathology (K.B.L., H.K.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.)
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.) and Pathology (K.B.L., H.K.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.)
| | - Sun Kyung Jeon
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.) and Pathology (K.B.L., H.K.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.)
| | - Jeongin Yoo
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.) and Pathology (K.B.L., H.K.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.)
| | - Sae-Jin Park
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.) and Pathology (K.B.L., H.K.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.)
| | - Jeong Hee Yoon
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.) and Pathology (K.B.L., H.K.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.)
| | - Ijin Joo
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.) and Pathology (K.B.L., H.K.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.)
| | - Kyoung-Bun Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.) and Pathology (K.B.L., H.K.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.)
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.) and Pathology (K.B.L., H.K.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.S.B., J.M.L., S.K.J., J.Y., S.J.P., J.H.Y., I.J.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Cannella R, Vernuccio F, Antonucci M, Gagliano DS, Matteini F, Midiri M, Brancatelli G. LI-RADS ancillary features favoring benignity: is there a role in LR-5 observations? Eur Radiol 2021; 32:1804-1812. [PMID: 34545444 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08267-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System algorithm allows category downgrade in the presence of ancillary features (AFs) favoring benignity, even in observations categorized as LR-5. This study aims to assess the role of AFs favoring benignity in LR-5 observations and their impact on category downgrade. METHODS This study included high-risk patients with at least one LR-5 observation imaged with gadoxetate disodium MRI. Three readers with different experience levels independently evaluated the presence of AFs favoring malignancy (not hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in particular and HCC in particular) and AFs favoring benignity. Category downgrade was considered possible in the presence of ≥ 1 AF favoring benignity and no AF favoring malignancy. Correlation between observations size and number of AFs was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Cohen's kappa (k) test was used to assess inter-reader agreement. RESULTS The final study cohort included 162 LR-5 (mean size: 23 ± 16 mm) in 119 patients. AFs favoring benignity were reported in 9 (5.6%), 20 (12.3%), and 10 (6.2%) LR-5 observations by reader 1, reader 2, and reader 3, respectively. Hepatobiliary phase isointensity was observed in 6 (3.7%), 2 (1.2%), and 7 (4.3%) observations, respectively. Category downgrade was considered possible in only one (0.6%) observation by reader 1 and reader 3. There was a significant correlation between observation size and number of AFs favoring malignancy (p < 0.001), not HCC in particular (p ≤ 0.010), and favoring HCC in particular (p < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement of AFs favoring benignity was poor to moderate (k range: - 0.01, 0.43). CONCLUSIONS AFs favoring benignity are not uncommon in LR-5 observations, but category downgrade is exceptional. KEY POINTS • Ancillary features favoring benignity are encountered in 5.6-12.3% of observations categorized as LR-5. • Category downgrade of LR-5 observations is very rare (0.6% of observations) in the presence of AFs favoring benignity due to the high prevalence (98-99%) of ancillary features favoring malignancy in LR-5 observations. • The inter-reader agreement of ancillary features favoring benignity is poor to moderate (k range: - 0.01, 0.43) in readers with different levels of experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cannella
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Michela Antonucci
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Domenico Salvatore Gagliano
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Matteini
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Midiri
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Brancatelli
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Adeniji N, Dhanasekaran R. Current and Emerging Tools for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance. Hepatol Commun 2021; 5:1972-1986. [PMID: 34533885 PMCID: PMC8631096 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer‐related mortality worldwide. Early detection of HCC enables patients to avail curative therapies that can improve patient survival. Current international guidelines advocate for the enrollment of patients at high risk for HCC, like those with cirrhosis, in surveillance programs that perform ultrasound every 6 months. In recent years, many studies have further characterized the utility of established screening strategies and have introduced new promising tools for HCC surveillance. In this review, we provide an overview of the most promising new imaging modalities and biomarkers for the detection of HCC. We discuss the role of imaging tools like ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the early detection of HCC, and describe recent innovations which can potentially enhance their applicability, including contrast enhanced ultrasound, low‐dose CT scans, and abbreviated MRI. Next, we outline the data supporting the use of three circulating biomarkers (i.e., alpha‐fetoprotein [AFP], AFP lens culinaris agglutinin‐reactive fraction, and des‐gamma‐carboxy prothrombin) in HCC surveillance, and expand on multiple emerging liquid biopsy biomarkers, including methylated cell‐free DNA (cfDNA), cfDNA mutations, extracellular vesicles, and circulating tumor cells. These promising new imaging modalities and biomarkers have the potential to improve early detection, and thus improve survival, in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nia Adeniji
- Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
124
|
Singal AG, Patibandla S, Obi J, Fullington H, Parikh ND, Yopp AC, Marrero JA. Benefits and Harms of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in a Prospective Cohort of Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1925-1932.e1. [PMID: 32920214 PMCID: PMC7943645 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The value of a cancer screening programs is defined by its balance of benefits and harms; however, there are few data evaluating both attributes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. We aimed to characterize benefits and harms of HCC surveillance in a large prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a clinical trial evaluating HCC surveillance among patients with cirrhosis at a safety-net health system enrolled between December 2014 and July 2015. We quantified surveillance-related benefits, defined as early HCC detection and curative treatment receipt, and physical harms, defined as diagnostic procedures for false positive or indeterminate results, over an 18-month period. RESULTS Of 614 cirrhosis patients with ≥1 surveillance exam, abnormal results were observed in 118 (19.2%) patients. Twenty-six patients developed HCC during follow-up, of whom 16 (61.5%) were detected by surveillance. The proportion of HCC detected at BCLC stage 0/A (62.5% vs 50%, p = .69) and who underwent curative treatment (43.8% vs. 40.0%, p = 1.0) did not significantly differ between surveillance-detected patients and those diagnosed incidentally/symptomatically. Physical harms were observed in 54 (8.8%) patients who underwent surveillance - most of mild severity with only 1 diagnostic CT or MRI and none undergoing invasive testing such as biopsy. Incidental findings on follow-up imaging were found in 40 (6.5%) patients -23 of low clinical importance and 17 medium clinical importance. CONCLUSIONS In our cohort of patients with cirrhosis, HCC surveillance was associated with high early tumor detection and minimal physical harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G. Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, TX,Department of Population Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX,Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Sruthi Patibandla
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, TX
| | - Joseph Obi
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, TX
| | - Hannah Fullington
- Department of Population Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Neehar D. Parikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI
| | - Adam C. Yopp
- Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX,Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jorge A. Marrero
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, TX,Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Cannella R, Vernuccio F, Celsa C, Cabibbo G, Calvaruso V, Greco S, Battaglia S, Choudhury KR, Tang A, Midiri M, Di Marco V, Cammà C, Brancatelli G. Long-term evolution of LI-RADS observations in HCV-related cirrhosis treated with direct-acting antivirals. Liver Int 2021; 41:2179-2188. [PMID: 33908147 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The risk of progression of indeterminate observations to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after direct-acting antivirals (DAA) is still undetermined. To assess whether DAA therapy changes the risk of progression of observations with low (LR-2), intermediate (LR-3) and high (LR-4) probability for HCC in cirrhotic patients and to identify predictors of progression. METHODS This retrospective study included cirrhotic patients treated with DAA who achieved sustained virological response between 2015 and 2019. A total of 68 patients had pre-DAA indeterminate observations and at least six months CT/MRI follow-up before and after DAA. Two radiologists reviewed CT/MRI studies to categorize observations according to the LI-RADSv2018 and assess the evolution on subsequent follow-ups. Predictors of evolutions were evaluated by using the Cox proportional hazard model, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 109 untreated observations were evaluated, including 31 (28.4%) LR-2, 67 (61.5%) LR-3 and 11 (10.1%) LR-4. During a median follow-up of 41 months, 17.4% and 13.3% of observations evolved to LR-5 or LR-M and LR-5, before and after DAA respectively (P = .428). There was no difference in rate of progression of neither LR-2 (P = 1.000), LR-3 (P = .833) or LR-4 (P = .505). At multivariate analysis, only initial LI-RADS category was an independent predictor of progression to LR-5 or LR-M for all observations (hazard ratio 6.75, P < .001), and of progression to LR-5 after DAA (hazard ratio 4.34, P = .047). CONCLUSIONS DAA therapy does not increase progression of indeterminate observations to malignant categories. The initial LI-RADS category is an independent predictor of observations upgrade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cannella
- Section of Radiology - BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.,Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- Section of Radiology - BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| | - Ciro Celsa
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.,Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences (Di.Chir.On.S.), University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cabibbo
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenza Calvaruso
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Silvia Greco
- Section of Radiology - BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Battaglia
- Department of Economics, Business and Statistics (SEAS), University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Kingshuk Roy Choudhury
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Massimo Midiri
- Section of Radiology - BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| | - Vito Di Marco
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Calogero Cammà
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Brancatelli
- Section of Radiology - BiND, University Hospital "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Centonze L, Di Sandro S, Lauterio A, De Carlis R, Sgrazzutti C, Ciulli C, Vella I, Vicentin I, Incarbone N, Bagnardi V, Vanzulli A, De Carlis L. A retrospective single-centre analysis of the oncological impact of LI-RADS classification applied to Metroticket 2.0 calculator in liver transplantation: every nodule matters. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1712-1721. [PMID: 34448275 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Although the diagnostic value of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) protocol is well recognized in clinical practice, its role in liver transplant (LT) setting is under-explored. We sought to evaluate the oncological impact of LI-RADS classification applied to Metroticket 2.0 calculator in a single-centre retrospective cohort of transplanted hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, exploring which LI-RADS subclasses need to be considered in order to grant the best Metroticket 2.0 performance. The most recent pre-LT imaging of 245 patients undergoing LT for HCC between 2005 and 2015 was retrospectively and blindly reviewed, classifying all nodules according to LI-RADS protocol. Metroticket 2.0 accuracy was subsequently tested incorporating all vital nodules identified during multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meetings attended before LI-RADS reclassification of the latest pre-LT imaging, LR-5 and LR-treatment-viable (LR-TR-V), LR-4/5 and LR-TR-V, and LR-3/4/5 and LR-TR-V nodules respectively. Considering their extremely low probability for harbouring HCC, LR-1 and LR-2 nodules were not considered in this analysis. Incorporation of all HCCs identified during MDT meetings attended before LI-RADS reclassification of the latest pre-LT imaging resulted in a Metroticket 2.0 c-index of 0.72, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.80]. Metroticket 2.0 c-index dropped to 0.60 [95% CI: 0.48-0.72] when LI-RADS-5 and LI-RADS-TR-V (P = 0.0089) or LI-RADS-5, LI-RADS-4 and LI-RADS-TR-V (P = 0.0068) nodules were entered in the calculator. Conversely, addition of LI-RADS-3 HCCs raised the Metroticket 2.0 c-index to 0.65 [95% CI: 0.54-0.86], resulting in a not statistically significant diversion from the original performance (0.72 vs. 0.65; P = 0.08). Exclusion of LR-3 and LR-4 nodules from Metroticket 2.0 calculator resulted in a significant drop in its accuracy. Every nodule with an intermediate-to-high probability of harbouring HCC according to LI-RADS protocol seems to contribute to tumour burden and should be entered in the Metroticket 2.0 calculator in order to grant appropriate performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Centonze
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Lauterio
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Ciulli
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.,School of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Ivan Vella
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Vicentin
- Advanced Technologies Department, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Niccolò Incarbone
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.,School of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Vanzulli
- Advanced Technologies Department, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.,School of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Lee Y, Wang JJ, Zhu Y, Agopian VG, Tseng H, Yang JD. Diagnostic Criteria and LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2021; 17:409-413. [PMID: 34386205 PMCID: PMC8340355 DOI: 10.1002/cld.1075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yi‐Te Lee
- Department of Molecular and Medical PharmacologyCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteCrump Institute for Molecular ImagingUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA
| | - Jasmine J. Wang
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer InstituteCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCA
| | - Yazhen Zhu
- Department of Molecular and Medical PharmacologyCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteCrump Institute for Molecular ImagingUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA
| | - Vatche G. Agopian
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA,Department of SurgeryDavid Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA
| | - Hsian‐Rong Tseng
- Department of Molecular and Medical PharmacologyCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteCrump Institute for Molecular ImagingUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA
| | - Ju Dong Yang
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer InstituteCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCA,Division of Digestive and Liver DiseasesDepartment of MedicineCedars Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCA,Comprehensive Transplant CenterCedars Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCA
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Min JH, Kim JM, Kim YK, Kim H, Choi GS, Kang TW, Cha D, Hwang JA, Ko SE, Ahn S. A modified LI-RADS: targetoid tumors with enhancing capsule can be diagnosed as HCC instead of LR-M lesions. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:912-922. [PMID: 34345947 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08124-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To elucidate whether the presence of enhancing capsule can be applied to establish a modified Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC malignancies in extracellular contrast agent (ECA)-enhanced and hepatobiliary agent (HBA)-enhanced MRI. METHODS We enrolled 198 participants (161 men; mean age, 56.3 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI before surgery for de novo hepatic nodule(s). Two reviewers assigned LI-RADS categories (v2018). We defined a "modified LR-5 category, which emphasizes enhancing capsule (mLR-5C)" over targetoid features and classifies tumors with both targetoid appearance and enhancing capsule as HCC instead of LR-M. We compared the diagnostic performance of conventional LI-RADS and modified LI-RADS criteria for both MRIs. RESULTS A total of 258 hepatic nodules (194 HCCs, 43 benign lesions, and 21 non-HCC malignancies; median size, 19 mm) were analyzed. By conventional LI-RADS, 47 (18.2%) nodules (31 HCCs and 16 non-HCC malignancies) were categorized as LR-M. The mLR-5C criterion showed superior sensitivity (ECA-MRI, 76.6% vs. 67.0%; HBA-MRI, 60.4% vs. 56.3%; both p < 0.05) while maintaining high specificity (ECA-MRI, 93.8% vs. 98.4%; HBA-MRI, 95.3% vs. 98.4%; both p > 0.05) compared with the LR-5 criterion. Using the mLR-5C criterion, ECA-MRI exhibited higher sensitivity than HBA-MRI (76.6% vs. 60.4%, p < 0.001) and similar specificity (93.8% vs. 95.3%, p > 0.99). CONCLUSION Our modified LI-RADS achieved superior sensitivity for diagnosing HCC, without compromising specificity compared with LR-5. ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC than HBA-MRI by applying the mLR-5C for LR-M lesions. KEY POINTS • By conventional LI-RADS, 31 (16.0%) of 194 HCCs were categorized as LR-M. • Among 31 HCCs categorized as LR-M, 19 HCCs or 8 HCCs were recategorized as HCC on ECA-MRI or HBA-MRI, respectively, after applying the modified LR-5 category, which allocates targetoid lesions with enhancing capsule as mLR-5C instead of LR-M. • The mLR-5C showed superior sensitivity compared with the LR-5 in both MRIs (ECA-MRI, 76.6% vs. 67.0%; HBA-MRI, 60.4% vs. 56.3%, both p < 0.05), while maintaining high specificity (ECA-MRI, 93.8% vs. 98.4%; HBA-MRI, 95.3% vs. 98.4%; both p > 0.05).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hye Min
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Kon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Honsoul Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyu Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Wook Kang
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Dongik Cha
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Ah Hwang
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Eun Ko
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Soohyun Ahn
- Department of Mathematics, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Comprehensive Guide: MR Imaging Edition. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2021; 29:375-387. [PMID: 34243924 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the lexicon, technique, interpretation, reporting, and data collection of liver imaging. Developed specifically for assessment of liver observations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), LI-RADS classifies hepatic observations on the basis of the probability of their being HCC, from LR-1 (definitely benign) to LR-5 (definitely HCC). This article discusses the technical requirements, major features, and ancillary features of and a systematic approach for using the LI-RADS diagnostic algorithm, with special emphasis on MR imaging.
Collapse
|
130
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Nonhepatocellular Malignancies in Chronic Liver Disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2021; 29:404-418. [PMID: 34243926 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy associated with chronic liver disease. Nonhepatocellular malignancies may also arise in the setting of chronic liver disease. The imaging diagnosis of non-HCC malignancies may be challenging. Non-HCC malignancies in patients with chronic liver disease most commonly include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and less commonly hepatic lymphomas and metastases. On MR imaging, non-HCC malignancies often demonstrate a targetoid appearance, manifesting as rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, peripheral washout, central delayed enhancement, and peripheral restricted diffusion. When applying the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System algorithm, observations with targetoid appearance are categorized as LR-M.
Collapse
|
131
|
HCC: role of pre- and post-treatment tumor biology in driving adverse outcomes and rare responses to therapy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3686-3697. [PMID: 34195886 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03192-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Liver cancer is the fastest-growing cause of cancer deaths in the United States and is a complex disease. The response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to treatment can be variable. Predicting response to determine the most effective therapy is an active area of research. Our understanding of underlying factors which drive response to therapy is continually increasing. As more therapies for the treatment of this disease evolve, it is crucial to identify and match the ideal therapy for a particular tumor and patient. The potential predicative imaging features of tumor behavior, while of research interest, have not been validated for clinical use and do not currently inform treatment planning. If further validated though, prognostic features may be used in the future to personalize treatment plans according to individual patients and tumors. Unexpected post-treatment responses such as potential tumor biology changes and abscopal effect which are important to be aware of. This review is intended for radiologists who routinely interpret post treatment HCC imaging and is designed to increase their cognizance about how HCC tumor biology drives response to therapy and explore rare responses to therapy.
Collapse
|
132
|
Choi DT, Davila JA, Sansgiry S, David E, Singh H, El-Serag HB, Sada YHF. Factors Associated With Delay of Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1679-1687. [PMID: 32693047 PMCID: PMC7855025 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We examined the frequency of and factors associated with delays in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a cohort of patients with cirrhosis in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS In a retrospective study, we collected and analyzed data from the Veterans Health Administration's electronic health records. We used a multivariate logistic regression model to identify factors associated with a delay in diagnosis of HCC of more than 60 days following a red flag (defined as the earliest date at which a diagnosis of HCC could have been made, based on American Association for the Study of Liver Disease 2005 guidelines). We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the effects of delayed diagnosis on survival, adjusting for patient and provider characteristics. RESULTS Among 655 patients with cirrhosis and a diagnosis of HCC from 2006 through 2011, 46.9% had a delay in diagnosis of more than 60 days following a red flag for HCC. Delays in diagnosis for more than 60 days were significantly associated with lack of provider adherence to the guidelines (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.82; 95% CI, 3.12-7.45), a diagnostic imaging evaluation instead of only measurement of alfa fetoprotein (adjusted OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.09-6.24), and diagnosis as an incidental finding during examination for an unrelated medical problem (compared with an HCC-related assessment) (adjusted OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.09-4.67). Diagnostic delays of 60 days or more were associated with lower mortality compared to patients without a delay in diagnosis (unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.68 and adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50-0.78). CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of veterans with cirrhosis have delays in diagnosis of HCC of 60 days or more after a red flag, defined by guidelines. Interventions are needed to improve timely follow-up of red flags for HCC and adherence to guidelines, to increase early detection of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra T. Choi
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Jessica A. Davila
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Shubhada Sansgiry
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Veterans Affairs South Central Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Eric David
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hardeep Singh
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Hashem B. El-Serag
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Yvonne Hsiao-Fan Sada
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX,Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
M Cunha G, Fowler KJ, Roudenko A, Taouli B, Fung AW, Elsayes KM, Marks RM, Cruite I, Horvat N, Chernyak V, Sirlin CB, Tang A. How to Use LI-RADS to Report Liver CT and MRI Observations. Radiographics 2021; 41:1352-1367. [PMID: 34297631 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Primary liver cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comprising the vast majority of primary liver malignancies. Imaging plays a central role in HCC diagnosis and management. As a result, the content and structure of radiology reports are of utmost importance in guiding clinical management. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) provides guidance for standardized reporting of liver observations in patients who are at risk for HCC. LI-RADS standardized reporting intends to inform patient treatment and facilitate multidisciplinary communication and decisions, taking into consideration individual clinical factors. Depending on the context, observations may be reported individually, in aggregate, or as a combination of both. LI-RADS provides two templates for reporting liver observations: in a single continuous paragraph or in a structured format with keywords and imaging findings. The authors clarify terminology that is pertinent to reporting, highlight the benefits of structured reports, discuss the applicability of LI-RADS for liver CT and MRI, review the elements of a standardized LI-RADS report, provide guidance on the description of LI-RADS observations exemplified with two case-based reporting templates, illustrate relevant imaging findings and components to be included when reporting specific clinical scenarios, and discuss future directions. An invited commentary by Yano is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme M Cunha
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Alexandra Roudenko
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Bachir Taouli
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Alice W Fung
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Robert M Marks
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Irene Cruite
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Natally Horvat
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| | - An Tang
- From the Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, Liver Imaging Group, La Jolla, Calif (G.M.C., K.J.F., C.B.S.). The complete list of author affiliations is at the end of this article
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Liu D, Wang X, Shi E, Wang L, Nie M, Li L, Jiang Q, Kong P, Shi S, Wang C, Yan S, Qin Z, Zhao S. Comprehensive Analysis of the Value of SMYD Family Members in the Prognosis and Immune Infiltration of Malignant Digestive System Tumors. Front Genet 2021; 12:699910. [PMID: 34335697 PMCID: PMC8322783 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.699910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The SET and MYND domain-containing (SMYD) gene family comprises a set of genes encoding lysine methyltransferases. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the expression levels of SMYD family members and the prognosis and immune infiltration of malignant tumors of the digestive system. Methods The Oncomine, Ualcan, Kaplan–Meier Plotter, cBioPortal, Metascape, and TIMER databases and tools were used to analyze the correlation of SMYD family mRNA expression, clinical stage, TP53 mutation status, prognostic value, gene mutation, and immune infiltration in patients with esophageal carcinoma (ESCA), liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), and stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD). Results In ESCA, the mRNA expression of SMYD2/3/4/5 was significantly correlated with the incidence rate, that of SMYD2/3 with the clinical stage, that of SMYD2/3/4/5 with TP53 mutation status, that of SMYD2/4/5 with overall survival (OS), and that of SMYD1/2/3/4 with relapse-free survival (RFS). In LIHC, the mRNA expression of SMYD1/2/3/4/5 was significantly correlated with the incidence rate, that of SMYD2/4/5 with the clinical stage, that of SMYD3/5 with TP53 mutation status, that of SMYD2/3/4/5 with OS, and that of SMYD3/5 with RFS. In STAD, the mRNA expression of SMYD2/3/4/5 was significantly correlated with the incidence rate, that of SMYD1/4 with the clinical stage, that of SMYD1/2/3/5 with TP53 mutation status, that of SMYD1/3/4 with OS, and that of SMYD1/3 with RFS. Furthermore, the function of SMYD family mutation-related genes in ESCA, LIHC, and STAD patients was mainly related to pathways, such as mitochondrial gene expression, mitochondrial matrix, and mitochondrial translation. The expression of SMYD family genes was significantly correlated with the infiltration of six immune cell types and eight types of immune check sites. Conclusion SMYD family genes are differentially expressed and frequently mutated in malignant tumors of the digestive system (ESCA, LIHC, and gastric cancer). They are potential markers for prognostic prediction and have important significance in immunity and targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donghui Liu
- Department of Oncology, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Xuyao Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Harbin Second Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Enhong Shi
- Department of Oncology, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Liru Wang
- Department of Oncology, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Minghao Nie
- Department of Pathology, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Long Li
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Qingxin Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Harbin 242 Hospital of AVIC, Harbin, China
| | - Pengyu Kong
- Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Shuai Shi
- Department of Cardiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Sen Yan
- Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Zhihui Qin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Shuang Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the outcomes of ultrasound (US) LI-RADS category US-3 observations detected at US performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening and surveillance on the basis of subsequently performed multi-phase MRI or CT or histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective analysis, 267 patients at high risk for HCC (161 men and 106 women; mean [± SD] age, 58.6 ± 12.2 years) underwent screening liver US between January 2017 and June 2019 and were assigned US-3 observations on a prospective clinical basis using the US LI-RADS algorithm. The results of follow-up imaging studies and/or histopathology were analyzed. RESULTS. Visualization scores assigned at US were A (40.8% [109/267]), B (52.8% [141/267]), and C (6.4% [17/267]). Reasons for US-3 observations included a measurable mass of 1 cm or larger (88.8% [237/267]; mean size, 1.8 ± 1.0 cm; range, 1.0-6.9 cm), an area of parenchymal distortion of 1 cm or greater (7.9% [21/267]; mean size, 1.8 ± 0.9 cm; range, 1.0-4.0 cm), or a new venous thrombus (3.4% [9/267]). Confirmatory testing with multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI or CT or with histopathology was available for 81.6% (218/267) of patients. Causes of US-3 observations included no abnormality at MRI or CT (41.3% [90/218]), a benign lesion (32.6% [71/218]), a LI-RADS category 3 (LR-3) observation at MRI or CT (5.5% [12/218]), a LI-RADS category 4 or 5 (LR-4 or LR-5) observation at MRI or CT or identification of HCC at histopathology (18.8% [41/218]), and an LR-M (denoting probably or definitely malignant but without specific features for HCC) observation at MRI or CT or other malignancy at histopathology (1.8% [4/218]). The PPV of a US-3 observation for probable or definite HCC was 18.8%, and for any malignancy it was 20.6%. CONCLUSION. In the HCC screening population, approximately one in five US-3 observations represents probable or definite HCC at multiphase MRI or CT or HCC at histopathology. These findings support current US LI-RADS guidelines to pursue further evaluation with multiphase cross-sectional imaging for US-3 observations.
Collapse
|
136
|
Chernyak V. Editorial for "Diagnostic Performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2017 Versus Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies". J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54:1920-1921. [PMID: 34155706 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Wan Y, Zheng Z, Liu R, Zhu Z, Zhou H, Zhang X, Boumaraf S. A Multi-Scale and Multi-Level Fusion Approach for Deep Learning-Based Liver Lesion Diagnosis in Magnetic Resonance Images with Visual Explanation. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11060582. [PMID: 34207262 PMCID: PMC8234101 DOI: 10.3390/life11060582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Many computer-aided diagnosis methods, especially ones with deep learning strategies, of liver cancers based on medical images have been proposed. However, most of such methods analyze the images under only one scale, and the deep learning models are always unexplainable. In this paper, we propose a deep learning-based multi-scale and multi-level fusing approach of CNNs for liver lesion diagnosis on magnetic resonance images, termed as MMF-CNN. We introduce a multi-scale representation strategy to encode both the local and semi-local complementary information of the images. To take advantage of the complementary information of multi-scale representations, we propose a multi-level fusion method to combine the information of both the feature level and the decision level hierarchically and generate a robust diagnostic classifier based on deep learning. We further explore the explanation of the diagnosis decision of the deep neural network through visualizing the areas of interest of the network. A new scoring method is designed to evaluate whether the attention maps can highlight the relevant radiological features. The explanation and visualization make the decision-making process of the deep neural network transparent for the clinicians. We apply our proposed approach to various state-of-the-art deep learning architectures. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchai Wan
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Big Data Technology for Food Safety, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China; (H.Z.); (X.Z.)
- Correspondence: (Y.W.); (Z.Z.)
| | - Zhongshu Zheng
- Beijing Lab of Intelligent Information Technology, School of Computer Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
| | - Ran Liu
- China South-to-North Water Diversion Corporation Limited, Beijing 100038, China;
| | - Zheng Zhu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17, Panjiayuan NanLi, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
- Correspondence: (Y.W.); (Z.Z.)
| | - Hongen Zhou
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Big Data Technology for Food Safety, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China; (H.Z.); (X.Z.)
| | - Xun Zhang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Big Data Technology for Food Safety, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China; (H.Z.); (X.Z.)
| | - Said Boumaraf
- Centre d’Exploitation des Systèmes de Télécommunications Spatiales (CESTS), Agence Spatiale Algérienne, Algiers, Algeria;
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Jeon SK, Joo I, Bae JS, Park SJ, Lee JM. LI-RADS v2018: how to appropriately use ancillary features in category adjustment from intermediate probability of malignancy (LR-3) to probably HCC (LR-4) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:46-55. [PMID: 34132875 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08116-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the appropriate use of ancillary features (AFs) in upgrading LI-RADS category 3 (LR-3) to category 4 (LR-4) for hepatic nodules on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed MRI features of solid hepatic nodules (≤ 30 mm) categorized as LR-3/4 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. In LI-RADS diagnostic table-based-LR-3 observations, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify AFs suggestive of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) rather than non-malignant nodules. Using McNemar's test, the sensitivities and specificities of the final-LR-4 category for HCC diagnosis were compared according to the principles of AF application in category adjustment. RESULTS A total of 336 hepatic nodules (191 HCCs; 145 non-malignant) in 252 patients were evaluated. Based on major HCC features, 248 nodules (123 HCCs) were assigned as table-based-LR-3 and 88 nodules (68 HCCs) as table-based-LR-4. In table-based-LR-3 observations, mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity was identified as an independent predictor of HCC as opposed to non-malignant nodules (odds ratio = 3.01, p = 0.002). For HCC diagnosis, different criteria of final-LR-4: only table-based-LR-4, allowing category upgrade using only T2 hyperintensity, or using any AFs favoring malignancy resulted in sensitivities of 35.6% (68/191), 53.9% (103/191), and 88.5% (169/191), and specificities of 86.2% (125/145), 75.9% (110/145), and 21.4% (31/145), respectively, which differed from each other (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS While the application of MRI AF in LI-RADS category adjustment increases the sensitivity of LR-4 category for HCC diagnosis, it is accompanied by a significant decrease in specificity. Mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, a significant AF indicative of HCC, may be more appropriate for upgrading LR-3 to LR-4. KEY POINTS • When upgrading from LR-3 to LR-4 using any MRI ancillary features favoring malignancy, LR-4 sensitivity increases but specificity decreased for HCC diagnosis. • By upgrading LR-3 to LR-4 based on MRI ancillary features found to suggest HCC rather than non-malignant nodules in multivariate analysis (i.e., mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity), LR-4 demonstrated a more balanced sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis (53.9% and 75.9%, respectively).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Kyung Jeon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Ijin Joo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea. .,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
| | - Jae Seok Bae
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Sae-Jin Park
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Alabousi M, Wilson E, Al-Ghetaa RK, Patlas MN. General Review on the Current Management of Incidental Findings on Cross-Sectional Imaging: What Guidelines to Use, How to Follow Them, and Management and Medical-Legal Considerations. Radiol Clin North Am 2021; 59:501-509. [PMID: 34053601 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
"Incidentalomas" are a common part of daily practice for radiologists, and knowledge of appropriate management guidelines is important in ensuring that no potentially clinically relevant findings are missed or are lost to follow-up in asymptomatic patients. Incidental findings of the brain, spine, thyroid, lungs, breasts, liver, adrenals, spleen, pancreas, kidneys, bowel, and ovaries are discussed, including where to find guidelines for management recommendations, how to follow them, and medical-legal considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Alabousi
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
| | - Evan Wilson
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Rayeh Kashef Al-Ghetaa
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Michael N Patlas
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St E, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Sartoris R, Gregory J, Dioguardi Burgio M, Ronot M, Vilgrain V. HCC advances in diagnosis and prognosis: Digital and Imaging. Liver Int 2021; 41 Suppl 1:73-77. [PMID: 34155790 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Understanding of the pathogenesis of HCC has significantly improved in the past few years due to advances in genetics, molecular biology and pathology. Several subtypes have been identified with different backgrounds and outcomes, leading to possible changes in disease management and challenging the role of imaging. Indeed, despite its pivotal role in the diagnostic workup, prognosis, and the decision-making process in patients with HCC, these recent developments are progressively redefining the role of imaging. First and most important, liver imaging is shifting from a purely qualitative to a quantitative paradigm, integrating quantitative imaging and radiomics in a digital era. Second, to improve patient management, imaging has gradually moved beyond tumor-centered assessment to include a broader evaluation of the liver and its function. This review describes and discusses these advances in the imaging for the diagnosis and prognosis of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Sartoris
- Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'inflammation", CRI, Paris, France.,Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP.Nord, Clichy, France
| | - Jules Gregory
- Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'inflammation", CRI, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, INSERM, UMR1153, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center (CRESS), METHODS Team, Paris, France
| | - Marco Dioguardi Burgio
- Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'inflammation", CRI, Paris, France.,Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP.Nord, Clichy, France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'inflammation", CRI, Paris, France.,Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP.Nord, Clichy, France
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- Université de Paris, INSERM U1149 "Centre de Recherche sur l'inflammation", CRI, Paris, France.,Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon APHP.Nord, Clichy, France
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Jiang H, Song B, Qin Y, Chen J, Xiao D, Ha HI, Liu X, Oloruntoba-Sanders O, Erkanli A, Muir AJ, Bashir MR. Diagnosis of LI-RADS M lesions on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: identifying cholangiocarcinoma-containing tumor with serum markers and imaging features. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:3638-3648. [PMID: 33245494 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07488-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The LI-RADS M (LR-M) category describes hepatic lesions probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients. Differentiation among LR-M entities, particularly detecting cholangiocarcinoma-containing tumors (M-CCs), is essential for treatment and prognosis. Thus, we aimed to develop diagnostic models on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI comprising serum tumor markers and LI-RADS imaging features for M-CC. METHODS Consecutive at-risk patients with LR-M lesions exclusively (no co-existing LR-4 and/or LR-5 lesions) were retrieved retrospectively from a prospectively collected database spanning 3 years. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (c-HCC-CCA) were classified together as M-CC. LI-RADS features determined by three independent radiologists and clinically relevant serum tumor markers were used to generate M-CC diagnostic models through logistic regression analysis against histology. Per-patient performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS Forty-five patients were included, 42.2% (19/45) with hepatocellular carcinoma, 33.3% (15/45) with ICC, 13.3% (6/45) with c-HCC-CCA, and 11.1% (5/45) with other hepatic lesions. Carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 > 38 U/mL, α-fetoprotein (AFP) > 4.8 ng/mL, and absence of the LI-RADS feature "blood products in mass" were significant predictors of M-CC. Combining three predictors demonstrated AUC of 0.862, sensitivity of 76%, and specificity of 88%. The risk of M-CC with all three criteria fulfilled was 98% (AUC, 0.690; sensitivity, 38%; specificity, 100%). CONCLUSIONS In at-risk patients with LR-M lesions, integrating CA19-9, AFP, and the LI-RADS feature "blood products in mass" achieved high diagnostic performance for M-CC. When all three criteria were fulfilled, the specificity for M-CC was 100%. KEY POINTS • In at-risk patients who had LR-M lesions exclusively (no concomitant LR-4/5 lesions), a model with carbohydrate antigen > 38 U/mL, α-fetoprotein > 4.8 ng/mL, and absence of the LI-RADS feature "blood products in mass" achieved high accuracy for diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma-containing tumors. • In patients of whom all three criteria were fulfilled, the specificity for M-CC was 100%, which might reduce or eliminate the need for biopsy confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanyu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yun Qin
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Dong Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Hong Ii Ha
- Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Xijiao Liu
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | | | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Andrew J Muir
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Renne SL, Sarcognato S, Sacchi D, Guido M, Roncalli M, Terracciano L, Di Tommaso L. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical and pathological overview. Pathologica 2021; 113:203-217. [PMID: 34294938 PMCID: PMC8299323 DOI: 10.32074/1591-951x-295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
HCC incidence rates have been rising in the past 3 decades and by 2025 > 1 million individuals will be affected annually. High-throughput sequencing technologies led to the identification of several molecular HCC subclasses that can be broadly grouped into 2 major subgroups, each characterized by specific morphological and phenotypical features. It is likely that this increasing knowledge and a more appropriate characterization of HCC at the pathological level will impact HCC patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Lorenzo Renne
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Sarcognato
- Department of Pathology, Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy.,Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Diana Sacchi
- Department of Pathology, Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Maria Guido
- Department of Pathology, Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy.,Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Massimo Roncalli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Terracciano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Di Tommaso
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Moura Cunha G, Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Sirlin CB. Up-to-Date Role of CT/MRI LI-RADS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2021; 8:513-527. [PMID: 34104640 PMCID: PMC8180267 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s268288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and a major healthcare burden in most societies. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play a pivotal role in the medical care of patients with or at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). When stringent imaging criteria are fulfilled, CT and MRI allow for diagnosis, staging, and assessment of response to treatment, without the need for invasive workup, and can inform clinical decision making. Owing to the central role of these imaging modalities in HCC management, standardization is essential to facilitate proper imaging technique, accurate interpretation, and clear communication among all stakeholders in both the clinical practice and research settings. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system that provides standardization across the continuum of HCC imaging, including ordinal probabilistic approach for reporting that directs individualized management. This review discusses the up-to-date role of CT and MRI in HCC imaging from the LI-RADS perspective. It also provides a glimpse into the future by discussing how advances in knowledge and technology are likely to enrich the LI-RADS approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Moura Cunha
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Shin J, Lee S, Kim YY, Chung YE, Choi JY, Park MS. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasonography 2021; 41:74-82. [PMID: 34289649 PMCID: PMC8696144 DOI: 10.14366/usg.21011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the proportion of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M (LR-M) in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and non-HCC malignancies and to investigate the frequency of individual CEUS LR-M imaging features. METHODS The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to July 23, 2020 for studies reporting the proportion of CEUS LR-M in HCC and non-HCC malignancies. The meta-analytic pooled proportions of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in the CEUS LR-M category were calculated. The meta-analytic frequencies of CEUS LR-M imaging features in non-HCC malignancies were also determined. Risk of bias and applicability were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. RESULTS Twelve studies reporting the diagnostic performance of the CEUS LR-M category were identified, as well as seven studies reporting the frequencies of individual CEUS LR-M imaging features. The pooled proportions of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in the CEUS LR-M category were 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44% to 65%) and 40% (95% CI, 28% to 53%), respectively. The pooled frequencies of individual CEUS LR-M imaging features in non-HCC malignancies were 30% (95% CI, 17% to 45%) for rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, 79% (95% CI, 66% to 90%) for early (<60 s) washout, and 42% (95% CI, 21% to 64%) for marked washout. CONCLUSION In total, 94% of CEUS LR-M lesions were malignancies, with HCCs representing 54% and non-HCC malignancies representing 40%. The frequencies of individual CEUS LR-M imaging features varied; early washout showed the highest frequency for non-HCC malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeseung Shin
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeun-Yoon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Suk Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Reig M, Forner A, Ávila MA, Ayuso C, Mínguez B, Varela M, Bilbao I, Bilbao JI, Burrel M, Bustamante J, Ferrer J, Gómez MÁ, Llovet JM, De la Mata M, Matilla A, Pardo F, Pastrana MA, Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Tabernero J, Urbano J, Vera R, Sangro B, Bruix J. Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Update of the consensus document of the AEEH, AEC, SEOM, SERAM, SERVEI, and SETH. Med Clin (Barc) 2021; 156:463.e1-463.e30. [PMID: 33461840 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver neoplasm and one of the most common causes of death in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. In parallel, with recognition of the clinical relevance of this cancer, major new developments have recently appeared in its diagnosis, prognostic assessment and in particular, in its treatment. Therefore, the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) has driven the need to update the clinical practice guidelines, once again inviting all the societies involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease to participate in the drafting and approval of the document: Spanish Society for Liver Transplantation (SETH), Spanish Society of Diagnostic Radiology (SERAM), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI), Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) and Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). The clinical practice guidelines published in 2016 and accepted as National Health System Clinical Practice Guidelines were taken as the reference documents, incorporating the most important recent advances. The scientific evidence and the strength of the recommendation is based on the GRADE system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Reig
- Unidad de Oncología Hepática (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer), Servicio de Hepatología, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España
| | - Alejandro Forner
- Unidad de Oncología Hepática (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer), Servicio de Hepatología, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España
| | - Matías A Ávila
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España; Programa de Hepatología, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA, Pamplona, España
| | - Carmen Ayuso
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España; Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - Beatriz Mínguez
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España; Servicio de Hepatología, Hospital Universitario Vall d́Hebron, Grupo de Investigación en Enfermedades Hepáticas (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Barcelona, España
| | - María Varela
- Sección de Hepatología, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias. Oviedo, España
| | - Itxarone Bilbao
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España; Servicio de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática y Trasplantes Digestivos, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Barcelona, España
| | - José Ignacio Bilbao
- Unidad de Radiología Vascular e Intervencionista, Departamento de Radiodiagnóstico, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - Marta Burrel
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - Javier Bustamante
- Servicio de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Sección de Hepatología y Trasplante, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Baracaldo, España
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Unidad de Oncología Hepática (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer), Servicio de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - Miguel Ángel Gómez
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática y Trasplantes, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | - Josep María Llovet
- Grupo de Investigación Traslacional en Oncología Hepática, Servicio de Hepatología, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - Manuel De la Mata
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España; Unidad Clínica de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, España
| | - Ana Matilla
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España; Sección de Hepatología, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España
| | - Fernando Pardo
- Servicio de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática y Trasplante, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
| | - Miguel A Pastrana
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Manuel Rodríguez-Perálvarez
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España; Unidad Clínica de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, España
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - José Urbano
- Unidad de Radiología Vascular e Intervencionista, Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, España
| | - Ruth Vera
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Complejo hospitalario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed-IDISNA, Pamplona, España
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España; Unidad de Hepatología y Área de Oncología HBP, Clínica Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA, Pamplona, España.
| | - Jordi Bruix
- Unidad de Oncología Hepática (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer), Servicio de Hepatología, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España.
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Lin Y, Zhu J, Pan L, Zhang J, Tan Z, Olivares J, Singal AG, Parikh ND, Lubman DM. A Panel of Glycopeptides as Candidate Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of NASH Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Stepped HCD Method and PRM Evaluation. J Proteome Res 2021; 20:3278-3289. [PMID: 33929864 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Changes in N-glycosylation on specific peptide sites of serum proteins have been investigated as potential markers for diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related HCC. To accomplish this work, a novel workflow involving broad-scale marker discovery in serum followed by targeted marker evaluation of these glycopeptides were combined. The workflow involved an LC-Stepped HCD-DDA-MS/MS method coupled with offline peptide fractionation for large-scale identification of N-glycopeptides directly from pooled serum samples (each n = 10) as well as differential determination of N-glycosylation changes between disease states. We then evaluated several potentially diagnostic N-glycopeptides among 78 individual patient samples (40 cirrhosis, 28 early stage NASH HCC, and 10 late-stage NASH HCC) by LC-Stepped HCD-PRM-MS/MS to quantitatively analyze 65 targeted glycopeptides from 7 glycoproteins. Of these targets, we found site-specific N-glycopeptides n169GSLFAFR_HexNAc(4)Hex(5)NeuAc(2) and n242ISDGFDGIPDNVDAALALPAHSYSGR_HexNAc(5)Hex(6)Fuc(1)NeuAc(3) from VTNC were significantly increased comparing samples from patients with NASH cirrhosis and NASH HCC (p < 0.05). When combining results of these 2 glycopeptides with AFP, the ROC curve analysis demonstrated the AUC value increased to 0.834 (95% CI, 0.748-0.921) and 0.847 (95% CI, 0.766-0.932), respectively, as compared to that of AFP alone (AUC = 0.791, 95% CI, 0.690-0.892). These 2 glycopeptides may serve as potential biomarkers for early HCC diagnosis in patients with NASH related cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Lin
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Jianhui Zhu
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Lingyun Pan
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Zhijing Tan
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Jocelyn Olivares
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
| | - Neehar D Parikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - David M Lubman
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Shin J, Lee S, Kim SS, Chung YE, Choi JY, Park MS, Kim MJ. Characteristics and Early Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Categorized as LR-M: Comparison with Those Categorized as LR-4 or 5. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54:1446-1454. [PMID: 33891790 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), the LI-RADS category M (LR-M), which are probably or definitely malignant but are not specific for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), does not exclude HCCs. A gap in knowledge remains, including their characteristics and recurrence of HCCs categorized as LR-M. PURPOSE To compare the characteristics of HCCs categorized as LR-M with HCCs categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 (LR-4/5) using the LI-RADS version 2018 and evaluate the relationship of these categories with the risk of early recurrence after curative resections of single HCCs. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. SUBJECTS Two hundred and eighty-one patients (mean age, 57 years; 191 men and 90 women) who underwent curative resections for single HCCs and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI between 2015 and 2017. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3T Dual gradient-echo T1 WI with in- and opposed-phase, turbo spin-echo T2 WI, diffusion-weighted echo-planar images, and three-dimensional gradient-echo T1 WI before and after administration of contrast agent. ASSESSMENT MRI features according to the LI-RADS version 2018 were evaluated and LI-RADS category were assigned for each observation. Clinical, imaging, and histopathological features were compared based on LI-RADS categorization. Early recurrence rates (<2 years) and associated factors were also evaluated. STATISTICAL TESTS Fisher's exact test, two-sample t test after satisfying assumption of normality through Shapiro-Wilk test, Fleiss κ coefficient, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test. RESULTS Forty-one HCCs (14.6%) were categorized as LR-M and 240 HCCs (85.4%) were categorized as LR-4/5. LR-M HCCs showed poorer differentiation than LR-4/5 HCCs. In the multivariate analysis, the LR-M category was an independent predictor for early recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.904; 95% confidence interval, 1.024-3.542; P < 0.05). Early recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with LR-M HCCs than in patients with LR-4/5 HCCs (32.0% vs. 18.4%, respectively, P < 0 05). DATA CONCLUSION Compared to LR-4/5 HCCs, LR-M HCCs were associated with poorer tumor differentiation and higher early recurrence rates after curative resections of single HCCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeseung Shin
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Seob Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Young Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Suk Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myeong-Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Hajjo R, Sabbah DA, Bardaweel SK, Tropsha A. Identification of Tumor-Specific MRI Biomarkers Using Machine Learning (ML). Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:742. [PMID: 33919342 PMCID: PMC8143297 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The identification of reliable and non-invasive oncology biomarkers remains a main priority in healthcare. There are only a few biomarkers that have been approved as diagnostic for cancer. The most frequently used cancer biomarkers are derived from either biological materials or imaging data. Most cancer biomarkers suffer from a lack of high specificity. However, the latest advancements in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the identification of highly predictive, disease-specific biomarkers. Such biomarkers can be used to diagnose cancer patients, to predict cancer prognosis, or even to predict treatment efficacy. Herein, we provide a summary of the current status of developing and applying Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers in cancer care. We focus on all aspects of MRI biomarkers, starting from MRI data collection, preprocessing and machine learning methods, and ending with summarizing the types of existing biomarkers and their clinical applications in different cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rima Hajjo
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, P.O. Box 130, Amman 11733, Jordan;
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carlina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
- National Center for Epidemics and Communicable Disease Control, Amman 11118, Jordan
| | - Dima A. Sabbah
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, P.O. Box 130, Amman 11733, Jordan;
| | - Sanaa K. Bardaweel
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan;
| | - Alexander Tropsha
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carlina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Wei H, Jiang H, Zheng T, Zhang Z, Yang C, Ye Z, Duan T, Song B. LI-RADS category 5 hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for early recurrence risk stratification after curative resection. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:2289-2302. [PMID: 33001306 PMCID: PMC7979599 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07303-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the role of preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in stratifying the risk of early recurrence in patients with LR-5 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by LI-RADS v2018 after curative resection. METHODS Between July 2015 and August 2018, this study evaluated consecutive treatment-naïve at-risk LR-5 HCC patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI examination within 2 weeks before curative resection. The Cox regression analysis was performed to identify potential predictors of early recurrence. Disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed and compared by using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. RESULTS Fifty-three of 103 (51.5%) patients experienced early recurrence. Three MRI findings were significantly associated with early recurrence: corona enhancement (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.116; p = 0.013), peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) (HR: 2.262; p = 0.007), and satellite nodule (HR: 2.777; p = 0.005). An additional risk factor was AFP level > 400 ng/mL (HR: 1.975; p = 0.016). Based on the number of MRI predictors, LR-5 HCC patients were stratified into three subgroups: LR-5a (60/103; no predictor), LR-5b (26/103; one predictor), and LR-5c (17/103; two or three predictors), with low, medium, and high risk of early recurrence, respectively. The 2-year DFS rate of LR-5a, LR-5b, and LR-5c patients was 65.0%, 38.5%, and 5.9%, respectively, while the corresponding median DFS was undefined, 17.1 months, and 5.1 months, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In at-risk LR-5 HCC patients, corona enhancement, peritumoral hypointensity on HBP, and satellite nodule could be used to preoperatively stratify the risk of early recurrence after hepatectomy. KEY POINTS • Corona enhancement, peritumoral hypointensity on HBP, satellite nodule, and serum AFP level > 400 ng/mL were significant predictors of early recurrence in patients with LR-5 HCC after hepatectomy. • Based on the number of predictive MRI findings, LR-5 HCC patients could be preoperatively stratified into three subgroups: LR-5a, LR-5b, and LR-5c, with significantly different risk of early recurrence and disease-free survival. • Preoperative risk stratification is essential for the identification of patients at increased risk of postoperative early recurrence, which may contribute to risk-based personalized management for LR-5 HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Hanyu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Tianying Zheng
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Caiwei Yang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Zheng Ye
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Ting Duan
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:6856-6867. [PMID: 33713172 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07815-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To establish inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and explore factors that affect it. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from January 2014 to March 2020 to identify original articles reporting the inter-reader reliability of CT LI-RADS. The imaging analysis methodology of each study was identified, and pooled intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) or kappa values (κ) were calculated for lesion size, major features (arterial-phase hyperenhancement [APHE], nonperipheral washout [WO], and enhancing capsule [EC]), and LI-RADS categorization (LR) using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses of pooled κ were performed for the number of readers, average reader experience, differences in reader experience, and LI-RADS version. RESULTS In the 12 included studies, the pooled ICC or κ of lesion size, APHE, WO, EC, and LR were 0.99 (0.96-1.00), 0.69 (0.58-0.81), 0.67 (0.53-0.82), 0.65 (0.54-0.76), and 0.70 (0.59-0.82), respectively. The experience and number of readers varied: studies using readers with ≥ 10 years of experience showed significantly higher κ for LR (0.82 vs. 0.45, p = 0.01) than those with < 10 years of reader experience. Studies with multiple readers including inexperienced readers showed significantly lower κ for APHE (0.55 vs. 0.76, p = 0.04) and LR (0.45 vs. 0.79, p = 0.02) than those with all experienced readers. CONCLUSIONS CT LI-RADS showed substantial inter-reader reliability for major features and LR. Inter-reader reliability differed significantly according to average reader experience and differences in reader experience. Reported results for inter-reader reliability of CT LI-RADS should be understood with consideration of the imaging analysis methodology. KEY POINTS • The CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) provides substantial inter-reader reliability for three major features and category assignment. • The imaging analysis methodology varied across studies. • The inter-reader reliability of CT LI-RADS differed significantly according to the average reader experience and the difference in reader experience.
Collapse
|