Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Use of electrophysiologic testing in the prediction of long-term outcome

Long-term follow up of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and mild, moderate, or severe impairment of left ventricular function

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients with life threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, impaired left ventricular function, and severe heart failure will benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment.

DESIGN

410 patients were followed up after ICD implant. Left ventricular function was assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class of heart failure: 50 patients (12%) were in NYHA I-II, 151 (37%) in NYHA II, 117 (29%) in NYHA II-III, and 92 (22%) in NYHA III. Epicardial ICD implantation was performed in 209 patients (51%) and 201 patients (49%) received non-thoracotomy ICDs.

RESULTS

Perioperatively, 12 patients (3%) died, more often after epicardial ICD implant (11/209 patients, 5%) than after transvenous implant (1/201 patients, < 1%) (P < 0.05). During a mean (SD) follow up of 28 (24) months (range < 1 to 114 months), 90 patients (23%) died: nine (2%) died from sudden arrhythmia; five (1%) also died suddenly but probably not from arrhythmic causes; 55 (14%) died from cardiac causes (congestive heart failure, myocardial reinfarction); 21 (5%) died from non-cardiac causes. The three year, five year, and seven year survival was 92-96% for arrhythmic mortality in NYHA class I, II and III, compared to a three year survival of 94% and a five year and seven year survival of 84% for patients in NYHA class II-III. 338 patients (82%) received ICD shocks (21 (SD 43) shocks per patient); patients in NYHA class II (83%), class II-III (84%), and class III (90%) received ICD discharges more often than those in class I-II (64%) (P < 0.05). The mean (SD) time interval between ICD implant and the first ICD shock was shorter in NYHA class II (16 (17) months), class II-III (19 (27) months), and class III (16 (19) months) than in class 0-I (22 (24) months) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mild, moderate, and severe left ventricular dysfunction benefit from ICD treatment and these patients survive for a considerable time after the first shock. Survival is influenced by the degree of left ventricular dysfunction; aggressive treatment of heart failure is necessary as well as ICD therapy.

Can catheter ablation in cardiac arrest survivors prevent ventricular fibrillation recurrence?

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias are the most common cause for sudden cardiac death. The success of catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardias led to the supposition that ablation could also be used in the treatment of ventricular tachycardias. Despite the promising results in bundle branch reentry and some forms of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, the success rate in patients with coronary artery disease is still low. There is hope that new approaches to reliably localize the critical region of the tachycardia and new ablation techniques to create larger areas of injury may lead to a wider application of ablation therapy in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. Survivors of cardiac arrest typically have more rapid and unstable arrhythmias than patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, and these rapid arrhythmias frequently degenerate into ventricular fibrillation. The instability of the arrhythmia makes it impossible to localize the arrhythmia origin with current mapping techniques. Experimental and clinical data, however, suggest that these arrhythmias also frequently start from a localized area of electrical activation. With developments in mapping techniques and energy delivery, catheter ablation may soon become a feasible therapeutic approach in some patients with unstable arrhythmias. The article discusses the prerequisites for this approach and suggests the patients who may be appropriate candidates for this technique.

Cardiac disease in chronic uremia: management

Heart disease is a common cause of morbidity in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The management of heart disease in these patients requires a multidimensional approach to the management of heart failure, coronary disease, and arrhythmias, and to risk factors such as hypertension, anemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and electrolyte/acid-base disturbances. Coronary artery disease management includes use of antianginal drugs and revascularization of coronary arteries with angioplasty +/- stent placement or coronary artery bypass grafting. The long-term outcomes of these procedures need to be assessed and improved. Hypertension occupies a major role in the pathogenesis of heart disease in ESRD, and early and adequate control of hypertension is likely to have a major impact on the progression of cardiac disease. This entails the achievement of optimal volume status, combined with the appropriate use of antihypertensive agents such as calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, vasodilators, alpha-blockers, and central sympatholytic drugs. In ESRD patients, specific dialysis-related complications such as intradialytic hypotension and pericardial effusion may have additional effects on cardiac function and require attention. The choice of dialysate composition and membrane may influence clinical outcomes with specific effects on cardiac performance.

Predictors of long-term survival in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias

The study consisted of 369 patients (age 62 +/- 13 years) who presented to our institution from April 1984 to April 1994 for malignant ventricular arrhythmias presenting as sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 57% of patients, ventricular fibrillation in 25% of patients, and syncope due to VT in 17% of patients. Coronary artery disease was present in 74% of patients, cardiomyopathy in 19% of patients, and no evident heart disease in 7% of patients. Two hundred twenty-one patients were given drug, therapy, 47 patients underwent arrhythmia surgery, and 75 patients had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). During a mean follow-up of 30 months (range 1 to 101), 66 patients (18%) died from a cardiac death of which 26 (39%) were sudden. Cox regression analysis was conducted utilizing a total of 19 variables (clinical and therapeutic) in the entire population and separately in patients with coronary artery disease and cardiomyopathy. The most significant variables (multivariate analysis) of survival from cardiac mortality in the entire population were: congestive heart failure (CHF) class (p = 0.0003), ejection fraction (p = 0.02), and the use of drug therapy (p = 0.03); in patients with coronary artery disease, CHF class (p = 0.0001) and ejection fraction (p = 0.0006); and in patients with cardiomyopathy, CHF class (p = 0.009) and sustained VT on Holter monitoring (p = 0.007). Kaplan-Meier survival rates from cardiac death were: significantly lower (p = 0.005) in patients with CHF class III and IV compared with CHF class I and II (25% vs 58%, p = 0.005) with drug therapy; marginally significant (47% vs 88%, p = 0.06) from 20 to 40 months in patients with an ICD; and nonsignificant in patients who underwent arrhythmia surgery (63% vs 71%). Patients with an ICD had a better expected survival (82%) than patients who had arrhythmia surgery (69%) and drug therapy (65%). Thus, in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias, CHF class was the most significant independent predictor of survival from cardiac mortality over all disease substrates, and therapy influenced survival depending on the CHF class. Patients in CHF class III and IV who underwent arrhythmia surgery or had an ICD had a better expected survival than those taking drug therapy, and the negative impact of antiarrhythmic therapy was most prominent in patients with CHF class III and IV.

Propafenone during acute myocardial ischemia in patients: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

The proarrhythmic risk of class I antiarrhythmic agents in combination with myocardial ischemia is mainly the result of their effects on ventricular repolarization. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of class Ic antiarrhythmic agents on QT dispersion during myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND

QT interval dispersion on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) has been suggested as a noninvasive marker of inhomogeneous ventricular repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind study, 98 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were pretreated with propafenone or placebo. QT dispersion was defined as a maximal minus minimal QT interval on the 12-lead ECG before and after PTCA. The power of the study to detect clinically meaningful differences in QT dispersion was 0.75, and a twofold increase in QT dispersion in the propafenone group compared with the placebo group was considered clinically relevant.

RESULTS

The QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals increased significantly during occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (9% and 11%, respectively, p < 0.05), whereas occlusion of the circumflex and right coronary arteries had no effect. QTc dispersion increased significantly in the propafenone group during ischemia (+52%, p = 0.002, vs. +23%, p = 0.15). The most considerable effect on QT dispersion was observed during LAD occlusion and ischemia of the anterior wall (+74%, p = 0.025). Corrected JT dispersion (+57%, p = 0.017, vs. +24%, p = 0.23) and the QT dispersion ratio (+1.6%, p = 0.031, vs. 0.9%, p = 0.34) showed similar effects. Plasma levels of propafenone (522 +/- 165 micrograms/liter) did not influence the results.

CONCLUSIONS

During myocardial ischemia, particularly during LAD occlusion, propafenone results in a significant increase in QT dispersion. The results indicate that QT interval prolongation and enhanced QT dispersion reflect inhomogeneous ventricular repolarization generated by the ischemic anterior wall of the myocardium. These observations may demonstrate a clinically important interaction between myocardial ischemia, repolarization variables and propafenone.

Evaluation and Management of Sudden Death Survivors

Only 20% of patients survive a cardiac arrest. Up to 80% of patients have a cardiac arrest secondary to a ventricular tachyarrhythmia. In the adult population, over 70% of the above patients have obstructive coronary artery disease; thus, coronary arteriography should be performed in all survivors of cardiac arrest. Once reversible causes have been treated, antiarrhythmic therapy is usually guided by Holter monitoring, electrophysiologic testing or both. Due to high recurrence rates on antiarrhythmic drugs, many patients are now treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Although these devices appear to improve sudden death survival, long-term overall survival may not be superior to “best drug therapy.” This hypothesis is currently being tested in two prospective randomized, multicenter trials.

Malignant sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in women: characteristics and outcome of treatment with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Clinical rhythm, heart disease, ejection fraction, defibrillation threshold, recurrent arrhythmias, and mortality were compared in 268 consecutive recipients (213 men and 55 women) of their first implantable cardioverter defibrillator for life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Women were younger than men, less likely to have structural heart disease, and more likely to have clinical ventricular fibrillation, a higher ejection fraction, and a lower defibrillation threshold. Complications of defibrillator placement were similar in both sexes. Unadjusted survival tended to be higher in women than in men (97% vs 90%, respectively, at 2 years, P = 0.08), largely due to fewer deaths from noncardiac causes or cardiac causes other than arrhythmia (P = 0.04). Women also tended to be at lower, albeit still substantial, risk for recurrent arrhythmias during follow-up (37% vs 52% in men at 2 years, P = 0.11). After adjustment for baseline differences, overall survival, arrhythmia death-free survival, nonarrhythmia death-free survival, and frequency of recurrent arrhythmias were not found to be gender related. Despite their apparent "lower risk" status on initial presentation, women remained at substantial risk for recurrent arrhythmias. This underscores the need to avoid being unduly biased by the "appearance" of health in managing women with malignant arrhythmias. That survival and other clinical endpoints were all ultimately independent of gender emphasizes the importance of other clinical variables in assessing risk from ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Increased Monday incidence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Experience with a third-generation implantable defibrillator

BACKGROUND

Examination of the timing of cardiac events provides important pathophysiological information. Previous studies have shown that the onset of acute myocardial infarction occurs most frequently on Monday. The septadian (day of the week) pattern of occurrence of sudden cardiac death and lethal ventricular arrhythmias has not been examined previously.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined the septadian distribution of life-threatening (cycle length < 280 ms) ventricular arrhythmias in 683 consecutive patients receiving a Ventak PRx, a third-generation implantable defibrillator with an event recorder. There was a prominent Monday peak, with a midweek decline and a secondary peak later in the week. A marked trough is apparent on both weekend days. The observed pattern was independent of age, sex, ejection fraction, NYHA functional class, type of heart disease, and the use of antiarrhythmic drugs but was not observed in patients receiving beta-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

Potentially lethal arrhythmias are not random events but occur in a daily pattern suggesting a relationship to the beginning and end of the work week. The absence of a Monday peak in patients receiving beta-blockers suggests that the pattern may be influenced by beta-blockers. This information may be useful in devising strategies to prevent sudden cardiac death.

Drugs or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with poor left ventricular function?

Poor left ventricular function is a predictor of sudden death. Both antiarrhythmic drugs and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) promise to reduce the sudden death rate in these patients and consequently improve survival. In patients without spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias, only beta-blocking agents and amiodarone have been shown to reduce sudden death and improve survival in some studies, whereas class I antiarrhythmic drugs increased mortality. For patients with documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias, protection against sudden death by serially tested class I antiarrhythmic drugs is at best moderate. There is some evidence suggesting that therapy with class III antiarrhythmic drugs, either amiodarone or dl-sotalol, may reduce sudden death rates and improve overall mortality in comparison to therapy with class I antiarrhythmic drugs. ICDs have been shown to prevent sudden death reliably. In published patient cohorts in which only patients who were not inducible off antiarrhythmic drugs or still inducible on antiarrhythmic drugs received an ICD, the ICD seemed to improve overall survival in comparison to class I antiarrhythmic drugs. A small prospective randomized study that compared a conventional therapy strategy to primary ICD implantations showed an improved outcome with ICDs as therapy of first choice. However, these studies included many patients treated with class I antiarrhythmic drugs considered to be less effective. In matched control studies comparing the ICD to amiodarone or dl-sotalol, less sudden deaths and an improved overall survival could be shown for the ICD in general without stratification for left ventricular function. Thus, in patients with hemodynamically nontolerated ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the ICD seems to improve survival in comparison to class I antiarrhythmic drugs, dl-sotalol, or amiodarone. However, in patients with poor left ventricular function, therapy with ICDs seems to be less cost-effective than in patients with preserved left ventricular function. In patients with very poor left ventricular function who are evaluated for cardiac transplantation, the ICD seems to change only the mode of death from sudden to a nonsudden cardiac death if transplantation cannot be performed soon.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications in 1996: have they changed?

The recent progress in the technology of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and the excellent clinical results achieved with ICD treatment in the prevention of sudden death have facilitated the wide-spread acceptance and diffusion of this therapeutic modality. However, ICD implantation is a costly therapy and its use is still associated with some important unresolved issues. In particular, owing to the absence of randomized controlled clinical trials, it is not yet known whether ICD really reduces overall mortality. Thus, at the present time, it appears logical to exercise restraint in expanding the use of ICDs as first-choice therapy in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. ICD treatment should be restricted to those well-defined categories of high-risk patients who are most likely to benefit from device implantation in terms of life prolongation. Basically, this means patients with hemodynamically poorly tolerated ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation that are not inducible at electrophysiologic study and those who do not respond to, or do not tolerate, drug therapy with amiodarone, sotalol, or beta blockers. Patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation also seem to be suitable candidates for ICD implantation. Other indications for ICD therapy are, as yet, more controversial and should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

What to do in patients with no structural heart disease and sudden arrhythmic death?

The term "idiopathic" ventricular fibrillation is used to describe those episodes of unexpected sudden arrhythmic death due to ventricular fibrillation in patients with no demonstrable structural heart disease. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation has been reported to account for 5-100% of all sudden arrhythmic deaths. Post mortem analysis have shown that about 80% of patients might have some kind of structural anomalies, mainly atherosclerosis, myocarditis, or right ventricular dysplasia. Follow-up of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation has shown a high incidence of recurrent episodes of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The absence of structural heart disease generally implies an excellent long-term prognosis if ventricular fibrillation can be avoided. Patients with an implantable defibrillator should have a mortality rate similar to the general population. New subsets of patients are being recognized as belonging with those previously classified as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. More than 60 patients have been identified in different centers around the world with the so-called "right bundle branch block, ST segment elevation, and sudden death syndrome." Recurrence rate of malignant ventricular arrhythmias is very high in these patients, despite antiarrhythmic therapy. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator seems the treatment of choice. Asymptomatic forms of the syndrome have been described. Follow-up in these asymptomatic patients has shown that some of them might become symptomatic during follow-up. Also, intermittent forms of the syndrome have been described, with transient normalization of the electrocardiogram. Administration of class I drugs in these patients unmasks the typical electrocardiographic pattern. In some of the patients previously classified as having idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, ajmaline or procainamide administration unmasks the electrocardiographic pattern of the syndrome, suggesting that its incidence may be higher than previously suspected.

Impact of the implantable defibrillator on mortality: the axiom of overall implantable cardioverter-defibrillator survival

As soon as it was established that the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) effectively prevents sudden death, it became axiomatic that whether the ICD will prolong overall survival depends entirely on the population of patients to which it is applied. This axiom of overall ICD survival immediately reveals the only vital question that remains regarding usage of the ICD; namely, How does one select those patients in whom prevention of sudden death by the ICD will also prolong life? This axiom also reveals the essential futility of randomized trials now being conducted for the purpose of discerning the true efficacy of the ICD. Claims to the scientific high ground notwithstanding, if a study asks the wrong question from the beginning, then the design of that study (including whether the study is randomized or nonrandomized), is completely irrelevant. Ideally, funds now being spent on these randomized trials should be diverted to the design and initiation of more appropriate trials, trials that will teach us to select patients for the ICD more effectively. At the very least, however, we should recognize the problems inherent in the ongoing trials, so that when their results are finally published (and are loudly touted by whichever faction feels vindicated by them), we will not be carried away into inappropriate clinical behavior.

Sustained ventricular tachycardias associated with myotonic dystrophy

Patients with myotonic dystrophy are reported to have a higher frequency of sudden death than the general population. Although causes of sudden death in myotonic dystrophy are suggested to be due to conduction of defects progressing, the HV interval cannot predict whether conduction system disease would develop or progress. We report two cases of myotonic dystrophy complicated with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (VT), which can cause sudden death. In Case No. 1, although the patient was treated successfully for sustained VT with verapamil in electrophysiologic studies, another sustained VT was confirmed 2 years later. In Case No. 2, the patient showed decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and late potentials, and induced sustained VT that was identical to clinically documented VT. Although VT is believed to be rare in patients with myotonic dystrophy, these cases suggest that VT is a possible cause of sudden death.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy for ventricular arrhythmias: current perspectives

Pharmacologic therapy for ventricular arrhythmias has undergone a remarkable change recently. Recognition of the importance of underlying structural heart disease on prognostic implications of ventricular arrhythmias has resulted in the refinement of the clinical classification of these arrhythmias. With refinement of techniques of risk stratification, it is now possible to identify patients ventricular arrhythmias at high risk for sudden death. Retrospective analyses of prior antiarrhythmic drug trials and new data from prospective randomized trials are now available and can more directly define the risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapy. Prevention of sudden death, reduction in total mortality, or improvement in symptoms remain the only benefits of antiarrhythmic drugs. With inclusion of total mortality as the major endpoint for assessment of pharmacologic interventions in high-risk patients, the potential for excess mortality due to antiarrhythmic agents is now recognized. The pharmacologic diversity of newly released antiarrhythmic agents and others under development has resulted in a re-evaluation of the traditional classification of these drugs. Multiple ongoing clinical trials will define the risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapy and other nonpharmacologic interventions in patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Survival of 1476 patients initially resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVES

To determine the short and long term outcome of patients admitted to hospital after initially successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest out of hospital.

DESIGN

Review of ambulance and hospital records. Follow up of mortality by "flagging" with the registrar general. Cox proportional hazards analysis of predictors of mortality in patients discharged alive from hospital.

SETTING

Scottish Ambulance Service and acute hospitals throughout Scotland.

SUBJECTS

1476 patients admitted to a hospital ward, of whom 680 (46%) were discharged alive.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Survival to hospital discharge, neurological status at discharge, time to death, and cause of death after discharge.

RESULTS

The median duration of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range 8-15) in patients discharged alive and 1 (1-4) day in those dying in hospital. Neurological status at discharge in survivors was normal or mildly impaired in 605 (89%), moderately impaired in 58 (8.5%), and severely impaired in 13 (2%); one patient was comatose. Direct discharge to home occurred in 622 (91%) cases. The 680 discharged survivors were followed up for a median of 25 (range 0-68) months. There were 176 deaths, of which 81 were sudden cardiac deaths, 55 were non-sudden cardiac deaths, and 40 were due to other causes. The product limit estimate of 4 year survival after discharge was 68%. The independent predictors of mortality on follow up were increased age, treatment for heart failure, and cardiac arrest not due to definite myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

About 40% of initial survivors of resuscitation out of hospital are discharged home without major neurological disability. Patients at high risk of subsequent cardiac death can be identified and may benefit from further cardiological evaluation.

Clinical trials of arrhythmia management: methods or madness

Some randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) involving antiarrhythmic agents have recently reported unexpected findings. Cardiologists have tried to explain these unforeseen results by pointing to possible inadequacies of trial design. Details of the design and the conduct of RCTs are essential for the proper interpretation of the data that emerge from the trial. Unless an RCT is carefully designed and meticulously conducted, the results may be difficult to interpret. Some trials of antiarrhythmic drugs and management strategies have had design faults that have complicated the interpretation of the trial data. Clinical trial results are only one component of the body of knowledge that clinicians must use when they plan patient management and prescribe therapies. Data from the basic sciences, other branches of medicine, personal experience, and clinical trials must all be available in order to reach the best decision. It is inappropriate to rely exclusively on the results of clinical trials because individual patients and their problems rarely, if ever, fully match the characteristics of patients enrolled into clinical trials. However, data from good RCTs should form an important base for clinical decision making.

Management of patients with life-threatening sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias--the role of guided antiarrhythmic drug therapy

Two recent studies have evaluated the utility of electrophysiologic (EP) testing in the treatment of patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias. The first study compared electrophysiologically guided antiarrhythmic drug therapy with nonguided beta-blocker therapy. Patients without inducible arrhythmias were assigned to oral metoprolol; patients with inducible arrhythmias were randomly assigned to receive either oral metoprolol or EP-guided drug therapy with propafenone, flecainide, disopyramide, sotalol, or amiodarone. Antiarrhythmic drugs were tested in a random order, but amiodarone was always tested last. A total of 170 patients were evaluated; 115 patients had inducible arrhythmias, and 61 patients were randomly assigned to serial drug testing, 54 to metoprolol without invasive testing, and the remainder who were noninducible to empiric metoprolol. The best outcome was observed in patients without inducible arrhythmias, all of whom received metoprolol. There was no difference in outcome between the two groups with inducible arrhythmias, either treated with metoprolol or with EP-guided serial antiarrhythmic drug testing. The second study evaluated survivors of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) without new myocardial infarction. Patients received assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction, Holter monitoring (HM), and EP testing. Only patients with inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias or with sufficient ambulatory ventricular ectopy were included in the study. Therapy was randomized either to empiric amiodarone or conventional drug therapy guided by EP testing and/or HM. A total of 228 patients were treated, 113 with amiodarone and 115 with conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The composite primary end points were total mortality, documented out-of-hospital resuscitation from recurrent VF, or syncopal implantable cardioverter/defibrillator shock followed by return of consciousness. Patients treated with empiric amiodarone had a better outcome than did patients treated with guided conventional drug therapy. In those patients in whom an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator was used, patients treated with amiodarone had fewer total shocks and fewer syncopal shocks than did patients treated with conventional therapy. Patients with a history of out-of-hospital VF or sustained ventricular tachycardia without inducible ventricular arrhythmias at EP study have the best outcome. Empiric metoprolol is equivalent to conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy guided by EP testing. Empiric amiodarone is superior to conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy guided by HM and/or EP testing.

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with an ejection fraction of twenty percent or less

Over a 7-year period, 5.8% (n = 210) of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution had severely impaired global left ventricular function with an ejection fraction of 20% or less. Mean age at operation was 66 years (+/- 0.7; standard error), and 76% of patients were male. Primary indications for operation were unstable angina (73 patients, 35%), return of symptoms with previous bypass grafting (41 patients, 20%), congestive heart failure with reversible ischemia (55 patients, 26%), and recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (41 patients, 20%). Overall, actuarial survival (n = 210) was 82%, 79%, and 73% at 1, 2, and 5 years. Risk of death was highest early after the operation, and then declined rapidly to a constant level. Patients who did not receive retrograde coronary sinus cardioplegia (p = 0.05), older patients (p = 0.004), and those with preoperative ventricular arrhythmias (p = 0.003) or renal failure (p < 0.0001) had an increased risk of death early after operation. Patients with congestive symptoms and those requiring extensive or redo bypass grafting (p = 0.02) were found to be at an increased risk of death throughout the follow-up period. When the number of distal anastomoses performed increased, survival was found to decrease (p < 0.003), and to a greater extent in women than in men (p = 0.02). Of the four primary indications for operation, unstable angina yielded the highest risk-adjusted survival. Successful results after surgical revascularization in patients with severe impairment of ventricular function can be achieved by careful patient selection and management.

Management of ventricular fibrillation with transvenous defibrillators without baseline electrophysiologic testing or antiarrhythmic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Baseline electrophysiologic study (EPS) is routinely performed in patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation (VF) to risk stratify and select patients for chronic antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The role of EP testing prior to insertion of a multiprogrammable implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), however, is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study was a retrospective review of outcome in 66 survivors of an initial episode of out-of-hospital VF not associated with a Q wave myocardial infarction or reversible causes, treated with transvenous ICDs as first-line therapy. Patients were excluded from the study if they had a previous history of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), a clinical history suggestive of supraventricular tachycardia, or had undergone preoperative EP testing. Fifty-two of the patients (79%) were male with an average age of 58 +/- 11 years. Coronary artery disease was present in 43 patients (66%), cardiomyopathy in 15 patients (23%), and valvular heart disease in 1 patient (1.5%). Seven patients (11%) had no detectable structural heart disease. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.40 +/- 0.16. With an average follow-up of 25 +/- 12 months, survival free of death from any cause was 100%. Twenty-three patients (35%) experienced 48 episodes of recurrent rapid VT or VF (average cycle length: 236 +/- 47 msec) treated by their device. The mean time to first therapy was 223 +/- 200 days. Only one of these patients also received antitachycardia pacing for two episodes of VT. One patient (1.5%) temporarily received amiodarone after removal of an infected device that was subsequently replaced. No other patient received antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

CONCLUSION

After a cardiac arrest due to primary VF, select patients treated with multiprogrammable ICDs can be managed successfully without baseline EPS or antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

Influence of Holter monitor and electrophysiologic study methods and efficacy criteria on the outcome of patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in the ESVEM trial

Because not all laboratories use the monitoring and stimulation protocols used in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, we reanalyzed the ESVEM patients' data using alternative, commonly used Holter monitor (HM) and programmed stimulation efficacy criteria to determine if different criteria would have changed the trial's conclusions. Also, because beta-blocker use and coronary artery disease frequency were not equally distributed between the two limbs in ESVEM, we reanalyzed the ESVEM data adjusting for the possible effect of these variables. In the HM limb, drug efficacy in the original ESVEM analysis was declared by reduction of total premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) by 70%, pairs by 80%, runs of 3 to 15 beats by 90%, and all ventricular tachycardia (VT) more than 15 beats by 100%. In this analysis, we examine outcome in subjects meeting two more stringent sets of criteria, (1) reduction of total PVCs by 70%, of pairs by 80%, and of all VT by 100% (new criteria set 1) and (2) reduction of total PVCs by 80%, of pairs by 90%, and of all VT by 100% (new criteria set 2). In electrophysiology (EPS) limb patients, we compared arrhythmia recurrence when efficacy was declared with triple extrastimuli as compared with maximally testing with double extrastimuli, and arrhythmia recurrence was compared in patients tested with identical versus any more aggressive protocol on drug than was used before drug. We also compared the predictive accuracy of zero versus 3 to 15, and 0 to 5, 6 to 10, and more than 10 induced beats on drug. Additionally, we compared predictive accuracy of the HM- and EP-guided limbs excluding patients on beta blockers and those with noncoronary disease. Lastly, to determine whether concordant results on HM and EPS testing would provide more accurate efficacy predictions than EP testing alone, HM recordings obtained in EPS-limb patients but not processed or used during the course of the EVSEM study were analyzed. The original ESVEM HM criteria, new set 1, and new set 2 yielded predicted drug efficacy rates of 77%, 68%, and 58%, respectively; however, arrhythmia recurrence rates were unchanged. Similarly, arrhythmia recurrence rates for patients tested with triple versus less than triple extrastimuli (p=.238), more aggressive versus identical protocols (p=.955), and 0 to 5 v 6 to 10 v more than 10 induced beats (p=.263) or 0 v 3 to 15 induced beats (p=.106) were unchanged. in the 215 (of 286) patients with coronary disease and not receiving beta blockers, there was still no difference in arrhythmia recurrence or mortality between the noninvasive and invasive limbs in ESVEM. Lastly, in patients with drug efficacy predictions by EPS testing, there was no difference in outcome in patients who had concordant versus discordant efficacy prediction by simultaneously obtained HMs. The use of more stringent testing methods and efficacy criteria would not have significantly improved the predictive accuracy of drug assessment by HM or EPS in the ESVEM trial. Additionally, excess noncoronary disease in EP-guided patients and excess beta-blocker used in HM-guided patients did not influence the results in the ESVEM trial.

Incidence and clinical significance of multiple consecutive, appropriate, high-energy discharges in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND

Some patients with an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) suffer multiple appropriate, consecutive, high-energy discharges (MCDs) during follow-up. Such events might represent resistant ventricular arrhythmias and might have prognostic significance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty consecutive patients with an ICD were followed up for up to 82 months (mean, 21 +/- 19 months). Thirty-eight patients had survived an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and 42 had recurrent ventricular tachycardia. During follow-up, 16 patients had MCD (group A), 26 patients had episodes of single appropriate discharges (group B), and 38 patients had no appropriate discharges (group C). Group A patients had worse functional status (P = .001), lower left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) (P = .001), and lower survival rates (log rank, P = .003) than the remaining two groups of patients. Cox analysis showed LVEF (P = .001) to be an independent predictor of MCD. Independent predictors of death or heart transplant were MCD (P = .001), female sex (P = .001), age (P = .001), history of cardiac arrest (P = .003), and functional status (P = .003). The only independent predictor of total mortality was female sex (P = .002). Independent predictors of cardiac death were MCD (P = .007) and female sex (P = .018). Independent predictors of arrhythmic death were age (P = .001), female sex (P = .02), and MCD (P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with an ICD, the development of MCD is an independent predictor of cardiac and arrhythmic mortality. If this finding is confirmed in larger studies, it may help to identify patients in whom other therapeutic alternatives, ie, heart transplantation, should be considered during follow-up after ICD implantation.

Cost-effectiveness of implantable defibrillator as first-choice therapy versus electrophysiologically guided, tiered strategy in postinfarct sudden death survivors. A randomized study

BACKGROUND

Rising costs of health care, partly as a result of costly therapeutic innovations, are of concern to both the medical profession and healthcare authorities. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is still not remunerated by Dutch healthcare insurers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early implantation of the ICD in postinfarct sudden death survivors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty consecutive postinfarct survivors of cardiac arrest caused by ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation were randomly assigned either ICD as first choice (n = 29) or a tiered therapy starting with antiarrhythmic drugs and guided by electrophysiological (EP) testing (n = 31). Median follow-up was 729 days (range, 3 to 1675 days). Fifteen patients died, 4 in the early ICD group and 11 in the EP-guided strategy group (P = .07). For quantitative assessment, the cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated for both groups and expressed as median total costs per patient per day alive. Because effectiveness aspects other than mortality are not incorporated in this ratio, other factors related to quality of life were used as qualitative measures of cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness ratios were $63 and $94 for the early ICD and EP-guided strategy groups, respectively, per patient per day alive. This amounts to a net cost-effectiveness of $11,315 per patient per year alive saved by early ICD implantation. Costs in the early ICD group were higher only during the first 3 months of follow-up, but as a result of the high proportion of therapy changes, including arrhythmia surgery and late ICD implantation, costs in the EP-guided strategy group became higher after that. Patients discharged with antiarrhythmic drugs as sole therapy had the lowest total costs. This subset, however, showed extremely high mortality, resulting in a poor cost-effectiveness ratio ($196 per day). Invasive therapies and hospitalization were the major contributors to costs. If quality-of-life measures are taken into account, the cost-effectiveness of early ICD implantation was even more favorable. Recurrent cardiac arrest and cardiac transplantation occurred in the EP-guided strategy group only, whereas exercise tolerance, total hospitalization duration, number of invasive procedures, and antiarrhythmic therapy changes were significantly in favor of early ICD implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of cost-effectiveness, early ICD implantation is superior to the EP-guided therapeutic strategy in postinfarct sudden death survivors.

Data-driven Decisions: The Importance of Clinical Trials in Arrhythmia Management

As a result of clinical trials, the measurement of arrhythmias has evolved over the past three decades. In the late 1960s, customary teaching was that ventricular premature depolarizations were dangerous and antiarrhythmic therapy, in hopes of reducing fatal consequences, became common place; however, following clinical trials such as CAST, IMPACT, and SWORD, we learned that, at least in postinfarct patients, arrhythmia suppression may lead to increased rather than reduced mortality. Such trials have led to a marked reduction in therapy of indiscriminate ventricular ectopy and have led to ongoing testing of specific subgroups identified as having particularly higher adverse prognostic risk. With the advent of cardiac monitoring and the confirmation that ventricular tachyarrhythmias are the most common cause for sudden death, their therapy, too, has evolved and matured, again aided by clinical trials. The ESVEM study prospectively examined the role of monitor-guided versus electrophysiologically guided drug therapy of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and confirmed that both approaches may have a role in reducing arrhythmic deaths-though the specific benefits of each technique remain somewhat unsettled. Both the ESVEM and CASCADE studies suggested that the most effective drugs for ventricular tachyarrhythmias are the class II/III drugs, sotalol and amiodarone, both appearing more effective than our older class I agents. These should now be viewed as the first-line drugs for these arrhythmias. The relative benefits of these two agents with respect to each other and to implantable cardioverter defibrillators, however, remains to be determined by further clinical trials, such as AVID and CIDS. The therapy of atrial tachyarrhythmias has similarly evolved with the aid of clinical observations. While rate control is required in all patients with atrial fibrillation, we have come to realize that the applications of antiarrhythmic drugs for the purpose of maintaining sinus rhythm must be used only selectively rather than uniformly. Both a meta-analysis by Coplen and colleagues and a report by the SPAF investigators suggested that with atrial arrhythmias, too, antiarrhythmic drug therapy may result in enhanced rather than reduced mortality in some circumstances. Additional clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the role of antiarrhythmic therapy of atrial fibrillation.

Evaluation of end points of serial drug testing in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia after healing of acute myocardial infarction

Serial electrophysiologic drug testing was used to guide antiarrhythmic therapy in a consecutive series of 150 patients with clinical sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or cardiac arrest and inducible monomorphic VT. All patients had coronary artery disease and a history of myocardial infarction. For patients with clinical sustained VT, drug responders and partial drug responders (VT slowed by drug to rate < 150 beats/min, with systolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg) had similar total mortality rates (2-year actuarial survival 100% and 94%, p = NS), which were statistically different from that of patients with drug inefficacy (2-year survival 67%). Partial drug responders had high arrhythmia recurrence rates, similar to those of patients with drug inefficacy. For cardiac arrest survivors, the results of electrophysiologically guided drug testing did not predict prognosis. Patients with a change in mode of VT induction during antiarrhythmic therapy had a favorable prognosis (no deaths during follow-up).

Influence of the implantable cardioverter/defibrillator on sudden death and total mortality in patients evaluated for cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) may reduce sudden tachyarrhythmic death in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. It is uncertain whether this improves survival, particularly in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The effect of treatment for spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias (ICD [n = 59], antiarrhythmic drugs [n = 53], or no antiarrhythmic treatment [n = 179]) on total mortality and mode of cardiac death was analyzed in 291 consecutive patients evaluated for cardiac transplantation between January 1986 and January 1995. There were 109 deaths (37.4%) (63 [21.6%] sudden, 40 [13.7%] nonsudden, and 6 [2.1%] noncardiac) during mean follow-up of 15 months (range, 1 to 118 months). Baseline clinical variables, medical therapies for heart failure, and actuarial rates of transplantation were similar between treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier sudden death rates were lowest in the ICD group, intermediate in the no antiarrhythmic treatment group, and highest in the drug treatment group throughout follow-up (12-month sudden death rates, 9.2%, 16.0%, and 34.7%, respectively; P = .004). Total mortality and nonsudden death rates did not differ. Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that antiarrhythmic drug treatment was associated with sudden death (relative risk, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.39; P = .04) and ICD was associated with nonsudden death (relative risk, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.62; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Sudden death rates were lowest in patients treated with ICDs compared with drug treatment or no antiarrhythmic treatment. However, although ICDs reduced sudden death in selected high-risk patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, the effect on long-term survival was limited, principally by high nonsudden death rates.

Increased propensity of women to develop torsades de pointes during complete heart block

INTRODUCTION

To determine whether an increased female gender susceptibility to torsades de pointes (TdP) may exist in a clinical model of bradycardia-induced long QT syndrome, we investigated reported cases of TdP associated with acquired complete heart block.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-two cases reported in the medical literature dating from 1941 through 1993 were identified, all describing TdP or "transient ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation" (to include those cases reported prior to the use of TdP terminology) in the setting of acquired complete heart block unassociated with QT prolonging drugs. Expected female prevalence in complete heart block was estimated at 52%, based on projections derived from 206,016 hospital discharges in the National Inpatient Profile (Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, Ann Arbor, MI), over the years 1985 through 1992. During complete heart block, mean heart rate was 37 beats/min in both sexes (combined n = 43), and absolute QT interval ranged from 0.52 to 0.88 seconds, with a mean of 0.68 seconds (n = 25). Female prevalence among patients with TdP during complete heart block was greater than expected: 72% for all studied cases (P < 0.001); 70% (P < 0.04) and 74% (P < 0.02) among those reported prior to (n = 35) and during or after (n = 37) 1980, respectively; 73% (P < 0.03) among those with documented normokalemia (n = 26); and 68% (P = 0.2) among those with a prolonged QT interval and known polymorphic VT (i.e., unequivocal TdP; n = 25).

CONCLUSION

Despite inherent limitations of this retrospective study, the data are consistent in suggesting a greater than expected female prevalence among patients with TdP related to complete heart block. This finding lends support to a broadening concept of increased susceptibility of women to the development of TdP in various settings of QT prolongation.

Efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in patients presenting with cardiac arrest

The efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) incorporated into implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) was assessed in 29 consecutive survivors of cardiac arrest, not attributable to acute myocardial infarction, ischemia, or drug and electrolyte effects. The cohort included 25 men and 4 women with a mean age of 65 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 29%. Seventeen patients had coronary artery disease, 11 had nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, and 1 had long QT syndrome. Programmed stimulation yielded monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 17 patients, polymorphic VT in 6, and no inducible VT in 6. During a mean follow-up of 22 months, a total of 91 episodes of monomorphic VT occurred, 73 of which were successfully pace terminated (83%). Monomorphic VT amenable to pace termination recurred only in the group that had this arrhythmia inducible. The recurrent arrhythmias in the 12 patients having either no inducible VT or polymorphic VT were all rapid VTs, having a cycle length < 220 ms; and therefore, not amenable to pace termination. These results suggest that ATP incorporated into ICDs is useful in survivors of cardiac arrest and may significantly reduce the number of shocks that these patients would otherwise receive. Programmed stimulation may also help to define those patients who would receive the maximum benefit from ATP.

Favourable outcome in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation with treatment aimed at prevention of high sympathetic tone and suppression of inducible arrhythmias

OBJECTIVE

In the absence of an obvious cause for cardiac arrest, patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation are difficult to manage. A subset of patients has inducible arrhythmias. In others sympathetic excitation plays a role in the onset of the cardiac arrest. This study evaluates a prospective stepped care approach in the management of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, with therapy first directed at induced arrhythmias and secondly at adrenergic trigger events.

SETTING

University Hospital.

PATIENTS

10 consecutive patients successfully resuscitated from idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.

INTERVENTIONS

Programmed electrical stimulation to determine inducibility, followed by serial drug treatment. Assessment of pre-arrest physical activity and mental stress status by interview, followed by beta blockade. Cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in non-inducible patients not showing significant arrest related sympathetic excitation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Recurrent cardiac arrest or ventricular tachycardia.

RESULTS

Five patients were managed with serial drug treatment and four with beta blockade. In one patient a defibrillator was implanted. During a median follow up of 2.8 years (range 6 to 112 months) no patient died or experienced defibrillator shocks. One patient had a recurrence of a well tolerated ventricular tachycardia on disopyramide.

CONCLUSIONS

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation may be related to enhanced sympathetic activation. Prognosis may be favourable irrespective of the method of treatment. Whether the present approach enhances prognosis of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation remains to be determined. However, it may help to avoid potentially hazardous antiarrhythmic drugs or obviate the need for implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators.

Drugs versus devices: contemporary practice in light of contemporary trials

In years past, the secondary prevention of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias was limited to empiric drug therapy. In close temporal proximity to the birth of electrophysiologic study-guided treatment strategies to manage these arrhythmias, devices to convert arrhythmias were envisioned and designed. Now, advanced generation implantable defibrillators provide synchronized, low-energy cardioversion, antitachycardia pacing, and pacing support for bradycardia. Over the past decade and half, this technology that was once applied as a therapy of last resort has evolved and emerged as a therapy of first choice. Recently, however, enthusiasm for drug treatment strategies has also increased, especially the use of amiodarone. Most experts now agree that drug therapy chosen by electrophysiologic study guidance provides superior survival compared to the empiric use of Class I drugs, as long as a drug that suppresses arrhythmia inducibility is found. The empiric use of amiodarone and beta blockers may also improve outcome. This review examines some of the recent clinical trials utilizing pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods. The importance of ongoing and future clinical trials is emphasized.

The role of coronary revascularization in recipients of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

The impact of adjuvant coronary revascularization was studied in a group of 138 recipients of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, all of whom had ischemic heart disease as the cause of their arrhythmias. Patients chosen for revascularization had more severe anatomic, symptomatic, or physiologic evidence of active ischemia. There were no operative deaths among 23 patients who actually underwent coronary artery bypass combined with cardioverter-defibrillator implantation; however, operative mortality by the intention-to-treat principle was 8% (2/25). Total cardiac survival was better for patients who underwent revascularization than for those patients who had "high-risk" characteristics and did not undergo revascularization. Stratified subgroup analysis demonstrated significant survival advantages favoring revascularization in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, class III or IV angina, and an ejection fraction greater than 25%. Multivariate analysis revealed that low ejection fraction and left main coronary artery disease were independent predictors of decreased survival.

Implantable defibrillators for high-risk patients with heart failure who are awaiting cardiac transplantation

The objective of this study was to assess the operative risk and efficacy of implantable defibrillators for preventing sudden death in patients with heart failure awaiting transplantation. The average waiting time for elective cardiac transplantation is 6 months to 1 year. Sudden cardiac death is the major source of mortality in outpatients in stable condition awaiting cardiac transplantation. The efficacy of implantable defibrillator therapy in this population is not established. We analyzed the operative risk, time to appropriate shock, and sudden death in 15 patients determined to be at high risk of sudden death who were accepted onto the outpatient cardiac transplant waiting list. Nonfatal postoperative complications occurred in two (13%) subjects with epicardial defibrillating lead systems and in none with transvenous lead systems. Defibrillation energies were 16 +/- 2 J versus 24 +/- 2 J with epicardial and transvenous lead systems, respectively. Sudden death free survival until transplantation was 93%. Most of the patients (60%) had an appropriate shock during a mean follow-up of 11 +/- 12 months. The mean time to an appropriate shock was 3 +/- 3 months. Hospital readmission was required in three (20%) subjects to await transplantation on an urgent basis. However, two of these subjects had received appropriate shocks before readmission. In selected patients at high risk for sudden death while on the outpatient cardiac transplant waiting list, the operative risk is low and adequate defibrillation energies can be obtained to allow implantable defibrillator placement. Most subjects will have an appropriate shock as outpatients before transplantation, and sudden death free survival is excellent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Evaluating and improving the cost-effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is an expensive, widely used device for severe ventricular arrhythmias. Marginal cost-effectiveness analysis is a technique to examine the incremental cost of treatment strategy in relation to its effectiveness. In this study, we used this technique to analyze the cost-effectiveness of the ICD compared with that of electrophysiology (EP)-guided drug therapy and examined ways in which it may be improved. We analyzed Michigan Medicare discharge abstracts (1989 to 1992) and local physician visit, test, and ICD charges. Effectiveness was from 218 previously described patients with ICDs in whom the time of first event (first appropriate shock or death) was determined and presumed to represent "control" (EP-guided drug therapy) mortality. We assumed a 4-year life cycle for the ICD generator and 3.4% operative mortality and used a 5% discount to prevent value. Data were analyzed in a 1-month cycle Markov decision model over a 6-year horizon, and results were updated to 1993 dollars. ICD effectiveness was an increase in discounted mean life expectancy of 1.72 years. Cost-effectiveness was $31,100/year of life saved (YLS). Results were minimally or modestly sensitive to variations in preoperative mortality; resource use; consideration only of patients with ICDs who were receiving any antiarrhythmic drug or specifically amiodarone; and to a decrease in the percentage of first shocks that would equal death without the ICD until the assumed percentage decreased to < 38%. At ejection fraction of < 0.25 and > or = 0.25, cost-effectiveness was $44,000/YLS and $27,200/YLS, respectively, and without preimplant EP study was $18,100/ YLS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Predictors of mortality in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardias or ventricular fibrillation and depressed left ventricular function: importance of beta-blockade

To study prognostic factors in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardias (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) complicated by left ventricular dysfunction, we evaluated the predictive value of demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic parameters for cardiac mortality and sudden cardiac death in 85 patients with VT or VF and left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.45 (mean 0.27 +/- 0.10). Patients underwent serial drug testing and received appropriate antiarrhythmic treatment, with amiodarone given as last-resort therapy. During a follow-up of 24 +/- 13 months, 23 patients died of cardiac causes, and 18 of them died suddenly. Left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.27 and amiodarone treatment were related to greater cardiac mortality and increased risk of sudden cardiac death, whereas beta-blockade was associated with improved survival. In the multivariate model cardiac mortality was best predicted by a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.27, and absence of beta-blockade and severe left ventricular dysfunction were the strongest predictors of sudden cardiac death. We conclude that severe left ventricular dysfunction predicts increased cardiac mortality and high risk of sudden cardiac death. Moreover, beta-blocking treatment is associated with lower cardiac mortality and a reduced risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with sustained VT or VF and depressed left ventricular function. beta-Blocking agents may therefore be an important addition to conventional antiarrhythmic treatment in patients with VT or VF and left ventricular dysfunction.

Spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Trial

OBJECTIVES

We compared the QRS waveforms of the initial and subsequent complexes of spontaneous sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and the rhythm induced at electrophysiologic study to test the theory that premature ventricular complexes "trigger" spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and that a stable substrate exists such that the spontaneous arrhythmia can be reproduced at electrophysiologic study.

BACKGROUND

Failure rates have been high in several recent studies in which prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias was guided by suppression of premature ventricular complexes or induced ventricular tachycardias.

METHODS

Digital waveform analysis was used to distinguish events of ventricular tachycardia initiated by configurationally distinct, possibly triggering, complexes (type 1) from events in which the initial QRS waveforms were identical to subsequent complexes, suggesting no requirement for premature ventricular beats (type 2).

RESULTS

Of 1,102 episodes of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia, 73 (6.6%) were type 1; 1,012 were type 2 (91.8%); and 17 (1.5%) were uncertain. Of 59 patients only 14 (24%) had only type 1 episodes (group 1), whereas 37 patients (63%) had predominantly type 2 events (group 2) (p < 0.0001). Sustained ventricular tachycardia was inducible in all group 1 patients, and in most (57%) the induced rhythm was similar to the spontaneous rhythm. Ventricular tachycardia could not be induced in 7 patients from group 2 (19%), and in 18 patients (49%) the induced and spontaneous rhythms were dissimilar. Recurrence of arrhythmia rates differed according to the guidance method in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between observed and predicted modes of initiation of ventricular tachycardia and between spontaneous and induced rhythms could result in inappropriate guidance and subsequent failure of antiarrhythmic treatment.

Ventricular arrhythmias detected after transvenous defibrillator implantation in patients with a clinical history of only ventricular fibrillation. Implications for use of implantable defibrillator

BACKGROUND

Patients with a history of ventricular fibrillation (VF) have been shown to have a clinical profile, response to electrophysiological testing (EPS), and response to antiarrhythmic therapy that distinguishes them from patients with a history of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT). Despite these differences, it is not clear whether VF in these patients is triggered by MVT or occurs de novo. The incidence of MVT and VF in such patients after their index VF event has important implications for therapeutic decisions regarding implantable defibrillator selection and programming.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The records of 111 consecutive patients who had undergone transvenous cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) implantation for malignant ventricular arrhythmias were reviewed retrospectively. For each patient, all device tachyarrhythmia detections were examined and classified as VF, MVT, rapid polymorphic VT, or other. The number of events, time to first arrhythmia detection, and cycle length of MVTs were recorded. There were 55 patients with a history of only VF and 56 with a history that included an episode of MVT. Over 14 months of follow-up, with all patients initially off of antiarrhythmic medications, MVT was detected by only 18% of patients with a history of only VF compared with 54% of those with a history that included MVT (P = .002). Among patients who did detect MVT, those with a history of only VF had fewer episodes (7 +/- 7 versus 20 +/- 31, P = .001) and a shorter mean MVT cycle length (279 versus 314 ms, P = .03) than those with a clinical history of MVT. Abrupt onset of VF not preceded by MVT was detected in 11% of patients with VF only. In addition to a history of MVT, male sex, age < 60 years, and MVT inducible on EPS were all significantly associated with an increased likelihood of MVT detection. On multivariate analysis, the inducibility of MVT was the primary independent predictor of MVT detection but was of minimal incremental predictive value in the subgroup of patients with a history of only VF. When EPS results were not considered, arrhythmia history was the primary independent predictor of MVT detection.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a history of only VF infrequently have MVT detected by their defibrillators. When these patients do detect MVT, it is faster than that detected in patients with a clinical history of MVT before ICD surgery. A significant percentage of VF survivors detected the abrupt onset of VF not preceded by MVT, suggesting that the deterioration of rapid MVT to VF is not the only clinically important mechanism of VF induction. These findings may have important implications for the understanding of the mechanism of VF induction and for use of an implantable defibrillator.

Cost-effectiveness analysis in heart disease, Part III: Ischemia, congestive heart failure, and arrhythmias

Cost-effectiveness analyses were reviewed in the following diagnostic and treatment categories: acute myocardial infarction (MI) and diagnostic strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), congestive heart failure (CHF), and arrhythmias. In the case of acute MI, coronary care units, as presently used, are rather expensive but could be made much more efficient with more effective triage and resource utilization; reperfusion via thrombolysis is cost-effective, as are beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors post-MI in appropriate patients. Cost-effectiveness of CAD screening tests depends strongly on the prevalence of disease in the population studied. Cost-effectiveness of CABG surgery depends on targeting; eg, it is highly effective for such conditions as left-main and three-vessel disease but not for lesser disease. PTCA appears to be cost-effective in situations where there is clinical consensus for its use, eg, severe ischemia and one-vessel disease, but requires further analysis based on randomized data; coronary stents also appear to be cost-effective. In preliminary analysis, ACE inhibition for CHF dominates, ie, saves both money and lives. Cardiac transplant appears to be cost-effective but requires further study. For arrhythmias, implantable cardioverter defibrillators are cost-effective, especially the transvenous device, in life-threatening situations; radiofrequency ablation is also cost-effective in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome apart from asymptomatic individuals; and pacemakers have not been analyzed except in the case of biofascicular block, where results were variable depending on the situation and preceding tests.

Ventricular tachycardias with left bundle branch block morphology

The differential diagnosis of VTs with LBBB morphology includes several well-defined syndromes. Although the majority of cases are attributable to acquired structural heart disease, including ischemia, prior infarction, or dilated cardiomyopathy, consideration of specific right ventricular processes is essential to proper evaluation and treatment. The approach to older patients or those with evidence for heart disease should begin with an evaluation for coronary artery disease and an assessment of biventricular function. Careful evaluation for bundle branch reentry should be performed during electrophysiological study, especially when there is underlying conduction system disease. Younger patients, those without overt heart disease, or those with isolated right ventricular disease, should receive a complete noninvasive evaluation of right and left ventricular size and function. An abnormal SAECG or identification of intracardiac late potentials suggest right ventricular dysplasia or cardiomyopathy, whereas responsiveness to adenosine and absence of detectable heart disease support the diagnosis of idiopathic right VT. Newer techniques, including MRI, show promise in identifying subtle right ventricular disease not otherwise detectable even in the setting of presumed idiopathic right VT. Following surgical repair of selected congenital heart defects, particularly tetralogy of Fallot, symptoms of recurrent palpitations, near syncope, syncope, or aborted sudden death may be attributable to recurrent VT, and diagnostic electrophysiological study should be considered for these patients. Finally, SVTs with LBBB morphology, particularly cases associated with right-sided or septal accessory pathways, should always be considered in this differential diagnosis.

Radiological appearances of implantable defibrillator systems

Implantable defibrillator systems have been used in over 20,000 patients worldwide. Such systems use a variety of different electrodes and the identification of these and the recognition of associated problems with them presents a challenge to the radiologist. The appearance of currently available implantable defibrillation systems and the use of radiological examination in patient follow-up and system troubleshooting is discussed based on our experience with a large population of patients receiving these devices. Radiological examination is excellent for demonstrating displacement of distortion of defibrillation electrodes, but in our experience is ineffective for the identification of lead conductor fractures.

Results and efficiency of programmed ventricular stimulation with four extrastimuli compared with one, two, and three extrastimuli

BACKGROUND

Conventional programmed ventricular stimulation protocols are inefficient compared with more recently proposed protocols. The purpose of the present study was to determine if additional efficiency could be derived from a 6-step programmed ventricular stimulation protocol that exclusively uses four extrastimuli.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The subjects were 209 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease and documented sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, aborted sudden death, or syncope. These patients underwent 159 electrophysiological tests in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and 105 electrophysiological tests in the presence of antiarrhythmic therapy. Programmed stimulation was performed with two protocols in random order in each patient. Both protocols used an eight-beat drive train, 4-s intertrain pause, and basic drive cycle lengths of 350, 400, and 600 ms. The 6-step protocol started with coupling intervals of 290, 280, 270, and 260 ms, which were shortened simultaneously in 10-ms steps until S2 was refractory. The 18-step protocol used one, two and three extrastimuli in conventional sequential fashion. The end points were 30 s of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, two episodes of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia requiring cardioversion, or completion of the protocol at two right ventricular sites. There was no significant difference in the yield of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia using the two protocols, regardless of the clinical presentation or treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia occurred with the 18-step protocol twice as frequently as with the 6-step protocol (6% versus 3%, P < .001). The duration of the 18-step protocol was significantly longer than that of the 6-step protocol in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia (5.5 +/- 7 versus 2.3 +/- 2 minutes, P < .001), as well as in patients without inducible ventricular tachycardia (25.4 +/- 7 versus 6.9 +/- 2 minutes, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

A stimulation protocol that exclusively uses four extrastimuli improves the specificity and efficiency of programmed ventricular stimulation without compromising the yield of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease.

Three-year outcome of a nonthoracotomy approach to cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in 189 consecutive patients

To date, no long-term clinical data have been published in patients undergoing a nonthoracotomy approach to cardioverter-defibrillator system implantation. In the present report, 189 consecutive patients prospectively underwent a standardized approach to cardioverter-defibrillator system implantation in which the nonthoracotomy configurations were tested first. If satisfactory defibrillation thresholds were not obtained, thoracotomy was performed during the same intraoperative session. A nonthoracotomy system was successfully implanted in 149 of 189 patients (79%), with a higher success rate (90%) observed in patients who had more recent implantations. The overall rate of complications associated with these systems was low (11%). Over a mean follow-up of 12.5 +/- 9.3 months, 17 patients (9%) died. Three-year total, cardiac, and sudden death-free actuarial survival for all patients was 83 +/- 11%, 88 +/- 7%, and 94 +/- 2%, respectively. Three-year sudden death-free actuarial survival was higher in the nonthoracotomy than in the thoracotomy patients (97 +/- 2% vs 87 +/- 6%, p = 0.047), although total survival was similar (77 +/- 11% vs 83 +/- 7%, p = 0.77). These data suggest that a majority of patients (> 80%) requiring a cardioverter-defibrillator system can undergo implantation using a nonthoracotomy approach. Patients receiving nonthoracotomy systems have 3-year outcomes comparable to those implanted via thoracotomy. If these results are maintained, a nonthoracotomy approach will supplant thoracotomy-implanted systems as the preferred method because of the simpler implant procedure and lower overall cost involved.

An AVID dissent

Despite declarations to the contrary, AVID appears to be a study that is seriously flawed. It is unfairly biased against the ICD; it entails unresolved ethical questions; and it poses a basic question that is inappropriate and subject to broad misinterpretation. Whatever the outcome of the study, harm is likely to follow unless the results are viewed very circumspectly. Rather than conducting such a study, we instead should be directing research funds toward identifying subsets of patients who might best benefit from the ICD. To optimize the use of the ICD, we need to do more patient selection, not less. We need to define subsets of patients in whom the prevention of sudden death by the ICD yields a prolonged overall survival, as well as subsets of patients in whom the device offers little or no benefit. AVID not only fails to do this, but it also threatens to inappropriately curtail (or less likely, to inappropriately expand) the proper use this efficacious tool, the ICD.

Operation for ventricular tachyarrhythmias: refining current treatment strategies

For many patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the optimal choice of palliative or curative therapies is not yet well established. To refine optimal current treatment strategies, baseline patient characteristics were studied in relation to likelihood of successful outcome in 240 consecutive patients undergoing operation for treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 1981 to 1991. Indications for operation were sudden cardiac death or inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias refractory to medical therapy (or both). Treatment was directed endocardial procedures in 77 patients (32%), other cardiac procedures in 57 patients (24%) (coronary artery bypass grafting in 94% and valve procedure in 14%, either with [35%] or without [65%] concomitant implantable cardioverter-defibrillator), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator alone in 106 patients (44%). Overall 30-day operative mortality was 5% (70% confidence interval, 4%-7%) and 2-year survival was 74% (70% confidence interval, 71%-77%). Overall 2-year freedom from sudden cardiac death was 97% (70% confidence interval, 96%-98%) and was similar (p = not significant) for all treatment modalities. For each treatment modality, multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for operative mortality and 2-year tachyarrhythmia recurrence, advanced angina and congestive heart failure New York Heart Association classes, and overall mortality. To characterize better the use and benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting, risk factors related to outcome also were identified for patients stratified according to absence (44 patients) or presence (119 patients) of coronary artery disease excluding patients treated by directed endocardial procedures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sudden cardiac death in heart failure. The role of abnormal repolarization

Congestive heart failure is a common, highly lethal cardiovascular disorder claiming over 200,000 lives a year in the United States alone. Some 50% of the deaths in heart failure patients are sudden, and most of these are probably the result of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Methods designed to identify patients at risk have been remarkably unrewarding, as have attempts to intervene and prevent sudden death in these patients. The failure to impact favorably on the incidence of sudden death in heart failure patients stems largely from a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis. This article explores the role of abnormalities of ventricular repolarization in heart failure patients. We will examine evidence for the hypothesis that alteration of repolarizing K+ channel expression in failing myocardium predisposes to abnormalities in repolarization that are arrhythmogenic. The possible utility of novel electrophysiological and ECG measures of altered ventricular repolarization will be explored. Understanding the mechanism of sudden death in heart failure may lead to effective therapy and more accurate identification of patients at greatest risk.

Clinical experience with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator has played an increasingly greater role in the management of episodes of sudden cardiac-related death related to ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. This study reviews the cases of 142 patients who underwent insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, 104 who received a device alone (group I) and 38 who underwent insertion of the device in combination with other cardiac surgical procedures (group II). The overall operative mortality was 3.5% and this did not differ between the two groups. The complication rate was higher for group II than for group I patients, and consisted primarily of an increased incidence of atrial arrhythmias (53% versus 13%; p < 0.001). Late complications included three device infections requiring removal of the defibrillator. The late mortality did not differ between the two groups and was primarily related to congestive heart failure. Sudden cardiac-related death was an uncommon late event, with an actuarial freedom from sudden cardiac-related death of 98%, 97%, and 87% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. The morbidity and mortality rate are low in association with the insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, even when this is combined with other cardiac surgical procedures. Its insertion is also associated with a low subsequent rate of sudden cardiac-related death.

The value of electrophysiologic testing in patients resuscitated from documented ventricular fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Electrophysiologic testing is performed in patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation (VF) on the assumption that sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be a precursor to VF, with the former amenable to assessment by serial drug testing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed the usefulness of this strategy by analyzing clinical and electrophysiologic data of 42 survivors (29 men and 13 women; mean age 54 +/- 14 years) of VF without a reversible cause. All patients had VF documented on ECG and required defibrillation. Underlying heart diseases included coronary disease in 28, dilated cardiomyopathy in 3, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia in 1, and no apparent structural heart disease in 10 patients. Only 2 (4.7%) patients had a prior history of documented VT. The electrophysiologic study was performed 7 to 30 days after VF. Programmed stimulation at the right ventricular apex using at least two drive cycle lengths and up to three extrastimuli induced sustained monomorphic VT in 4 (9.5%), sustained polymorphic VT in 3 (7.1%), nonsustained monomorphic VT in 1 (2.3%), nonsustained polymorphic VT in 5 (11.9%), and VF in 13 (30.9%) patients. Two patients with documented prior VT and coronary disease had sustained VT induced during the electrophysiologic study. On the other hand, sustained monomorphic VT was induced in 53 of the 59 (90%) patients (45 men and 14 women; mean age 57 +/- 16 years) with clinically documented VT concurrently studied using the same stimulation protocol.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that reproducible induction of sustained monomorphic VT in survivors of documented VF is uncommon. It may be more cost effective to proceed directly to treatment with implantable cardioverter defibrillators in these patients.

Survival and incidence of appropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients who have no detectable structural heart disease. CEDARS Investigators

Prognosis of patients with episodes of hypotensive ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the absence of structural heart disease is poorly defined. To solve this problem, this study analyzed a subgroup of 25 such patients chosen from 468 consecutive patients who had an initial implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) inserted between May 1984 and May 1990 in 9 medical centers and were followed up for at least 1 year. The patient group consisted of 17 men and 8 women, aged 8 to 75 years. Cardiac arrest occurred in 20 patients, 3 patients had recurrent VT, and 2 patients had both. Left ventricular ejection fraction ranged from 50% to 70%. During electrophysiologic study, a specific response was seen in 13 patients, defined as monomorphic VT (5 patients), or VF in those who had a history of VF (8 patients). In 8 patients, only a nonspecific response was seen. No arrhythmia could be induced in 4 patients. Of the 13 patients with a specific response, antiarrhythmic drug was tested in 9; in 3 of them the arrhythmia was suppressed. Within the first year, 6 of the 25 patients (24%) received appropriate shock. In the remaining 436 patients who had organic heart disease, 155 (36%) received appropriate ICD shock (p = NS). Therefore, ICD implantation appears to be warranted in patients with a history of life-threatening arrhythmias, not only in the presence but also in the absence of demonstrable structural heart disease.