Role of heparan sulfate as a tissue-specific regulator of FGF-4 and FGF receptor recognition

Distinctive Expression Patterns of Heparan Sulfate O-Sulfotransferases and Regional Differences in Heparan Sulfate Structure in Chick Limb Buds

The skeletal tissue development and patterning in chick limb buds are known to be under the spacio-temporal control of various heparin-binding cell growth factors such as fibroblast growth factors and bone morphogenetic proteins. Different structural regions on heparan sulfate (HS) chains of proteoglycans could be implicated in regional differences in the binding capacities of these cell growth factors, by which they could selectively interact with targeted cells and regulate their signaling in those processes. In this study we first demonstrated by cDNA cloning that one heparan sulfate 2-O-sulfotransferase (HS2ST) and two isoforms of heparan sulfate 6-O-sulfotransferase (HS6ST-1 and -2) occurred in chick embryos and had different substrate specificities each other. We next showed by whole mount in situ hybridization that the HS6ST-1 and HS6ST-2 transcripts were preferentially localized to the anterior proximal region and at the posterior proximal region of the limb bud, respectively, whereas the HS2ST transcript was distributed rather uniformly throughout the bud. Analyses of the structures of HS from different regions of the wing buds have shown variation in that 6-O-sulfated residues are more abundant in the proximal than distal region, whereas iduronosyl 6-O-sulfated residues are abundant in the anterior proximal region and glucuronosyl 6-O-sulfated residues in the posterior proximal region. These results suggest that HS with different sulfation patterns created with multiple sulfotransferase activities provides an appropriate extracellular environment for morphogenetic signal transduction.

Quantitative assessment of FGF regulation by cell surface heparan sulfates

Heparin/heparan sulfate-like glycosaminoglycans (HSGAGs) modulate the activity of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family of proteins. Through interactions with both FGFs and FGF receptors (FGFRs), HSGAGs mediate FGF-FGFR binding and oligomerization leading to FGFR phosphorylation and initiation of intracellular signaling cascades. We describe a methodology to examine the impact of heparan sulfate fine structure and source on FGF-mediated signaling. Mitogenic assays using BaF3 cells transfected with specific FGFR isoforms allow for the quantification of FGF1 and FGF2 induced responses independent of conflicting influences. As such, this system enables a systematic investigation into the role of cell surface HSGAGs on FGF signaling. We demonstrate this approach using cell surface-derived HSGAGs and find that distinct HSGAGs elicit differential FGF response patterns through FGFR1c and FGFR3c. We conclude that this assay system can be used to probe the ability of distinct HSGAG species to regulate the activity of specific FGF-FGFR pairs.

Immunolocalization of BMP-2/-4, FGF-4, and WNT10b in the developing mouse first lower molar

Intercellular signaling controls all steps of odontogenesis. The purpose of this work was to immunolocalize in the developing mouse molar four molecules that play major roles during odontogenesis: BMP-2, -4, FGF-4, and WNT10b. BMP-2 and BMP-4 were detected in the epithelium and mesenchyme at the bud stage. Staining for BMP-2 markedly increased at the cap stage. The relative amount of BMP-4 strongly increased from E14 to E15. At E15, BMP-4 was detected in the internal part of the enamel knot where apoptosis was intense. In contrast to TGFbeta1, BMP-2 and -4 did not show accumulation at the epithelial-mesenchymal junction where the odontoblast started differentiation. When odontoblasts became functional, BMP-2 and BMP-4 were detected at the apical and basal poles of preameloblasts. BMP-2, which induces ameloblast differentiation in vitro, may also be involved physiologically. The decrease in FGF-4 from E14 to E15 supports a possible role for the growth factor in the control of mesenchymal cell proliferation. The relative amount of FGF-4 was maximal at E17. The subsequent decrease at E19 showed correlation with the withdrawal of odontoblasts and ameloblasts from the cell cycle. WNT10b might also stimulate cell proliferation. At E14-15, WNT10b was present in the mesenchyme and epithelium except for the enamel knot, where the mitotic activity was very low. At E19 there was a decreasing gradient of staining from the cervical loop where cells divide to the tip of the cusp in the inner dental epithelium where cells become postmitotic. The target cells for FGF-4 and WNT10b appeared different.

Spatial and temporal expression of heparan sulfate in mouse development regulates FGF and FGF receptor assembly

Heparan sulfate (HS) interacts with diverse growth factors, including Wnt, Hh, BMP, VEGF, EGF, and FGF family members, and is a necessary component for their signaling. These proteins regulate multiple cellular processes that are critical during development. However, a major question is whether developmental changes occur in HS that regulate the activity of these factors. Using a ligand and carbohydrate engagement assay, and focusing on FGF1 and FGF8b interactions with FGF receptor (FR)2c and FR3c, this paper reveals global changes in HS expression in mouse embryos during development that regulate FGF and FR complex assembly. Furthermore, distinct HS requirements are identified for both complex formation and signaling for each FGF and FR pair. Overall, these results suggest that changes in HS act as critical temporal regulators of growth factor and morphogen signaling during embryogenesis.

Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans are required for lung growth and morphogenesis in vitro

Proteoglycans (PGs) have been shown to play a key role in the development of many tissues. We have investigated the role of sulfated PGs in early rat lung development by treating cultured tissues with 30 mM sodium chlorate, a global inhibitor of PG sulfation. Chlorate treatment disrupted growth and branching of embryonic day 13 lung explants. Isolated lung epithelium (LgE) migrated toward and invaded lung mesenchyme (LgM), and chlorate irreversibly suppressed this response. Chlorate also inhibited migration of LgE toward beads soaked in FGF10. Chlorate severely decreased branching morphogenesis in tissue recombinants consisting of LgM plus either LgE or tracheal epithelium (TrE) and decreased expression of surfactant protein C gene (SP-C). Chlorate also reduced bone morphogenetic protein-4 expression in cultured tips and recombinants but had no effect on the expression of clara cell 10-kDa protein (CC10), sonic hedgehog (Shh), FGF10, and FGF receptor 2IIIb. Chlorate reduced the growth of LgE in mesenchyme-free culture but did not affect SP-C expression. In contrast, chlorate inhibited both rudiment growth and the induction of SP-C in mesenchyme-free cultured TrE. Treatment of lung tips and tissue recombinants with chondroitinase ABC abolished branching morphogenesis. Chondroitinase also suppressed growth of TrE in mesenchyme-free culture. Chondroitinase treatment, however, had no effect on the induction of SP-C expression in any of these cultures. These results demonstrate the overall importance of sulfated PGs to normal lung development and demonstrate a dynamic role for chondroitin sulfate PGs in embryonic lung growth and morphogenesis.

Domain-specific modification of heparan sulfate by Qsulf1 modulates the binding of the bone morphogenetic protein antagonist Noggin

We have reported previously that Noggin is a heparin-binding protein and associates with the cell surface through heparan sulfate proteoglycans, where it remains functional for the binding of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). Here we report that the binding of Noggin to the cell surface is highly selective for heparan sulfate and that specific structural features are required for the interaction. Noggin binds most efficiently to heparin sequences composed of 10 or more monosaccharides; N-, 6-O-, and 2-O-sulfates contribute to this interaction. In addition, we have shown that the developmentally regulated endosulfatase Qsulf1 selectively removes sulfate groups from the 6-O position of sugars within the most highly sulfated S domains of heparan sulfate, whereas 6-O-sulfates in the NA/NS domains are not substrates for the enzyme. The activity of Qsulf1 in cells in culture results in the release of Noggin from the cell surface and a restoration of BMP responsiveness to the cells. This shows that Noggin binds to the S domains of heparan sulfate and provides evidence that, in addition to modulating Wnt signaling in vivo by the release of heparan sulfate bound Wnt, Qsulf1 also modulates BMP signaling by the release of surface-bound Noggin.

Major glycosaminoglycan species in the developing retina: synthesis, tissue distribution and effects upon cell death

Retinal explants maintained in culture medium retain their histotypic structure and develop similarly to the in vivo condition. Extracellular matrix components, particularly the glycosaminoglycans which are not routinely present in dissociated cell cultures are involved in various cellular events. In this work we characterized and determined the localization of sulfated glycosaminoglycans in the extracellular matrix of rat retinal explants at various stages of normal postnatal development and tested whether disruption of the tissue glycosaminoglycan composition may impose either trophic or toxic effects upon distinct retinal cell populations. Our data show that chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycan chains are synthesized in different proportions during postnatal retinal development. A peak of synthesis of chondroitin sulfates is evident at around P14. Immunohistochemistry showed chondroitin 6-sulfate in the plexiform layers during the earlier stages while later, intense immunoreactivity was found in the outer retina. Heparan sulfate was found in the neuroblastic layer (NBL) at P1, in both nuclear layers from P5 onwards and in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) at all stages. In contrast to chondroitin 6-sulfate, immunoreactivity to heparan sulfate was absent from the outer retina at both P14 and P21. Treatment with heparitinase modulated the rates of cell death in both the GCL and the NBL in P1 retinal explants. Taken together our data show that among the major sulfated glycosaminoglycans, the developing rat retina synthesizes only heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfates in a spatiotemporally regulated manner, with a peak of chondroitin sulfates at P14, possibly related to photoreceptor differentiation. In addition, our data suggest a role for heparan sulfate as a modulator of sensitivity to cell death in the retina.

Heparan sulfate-FGF10 interactions during lung morphogenesis

Signaling by fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) through FGFR2b is essential for lung development. Heparan sulfates (HS) are major modulators of growth factor binding and signaling present on cell surfaces and extracellular matrices of all tissues. Although recent studies provide evidence that HS are required for FGF-directed tracheal morphogenesis in Drosophila, little is known about the HS role in FGF10-mediated bud formation in the vertebrate lung. Here, we mapped HS expression in the early lung and we investigated how HS interactions with FGF10-FGFR2b influence lung morphogenesis. Our data show that a specific set of HS low in O-sulfates is dynamically expressed in the lung mesenchyme at the sites of prospective budding near Fgf10-expressing areas. In turn, highly sulfated HS are present in basement membranes of branching epithelial tubules. We show that disrupting endogenous gradients of HS or altering HS sulfation in embryonic lung culture systems prevents FGF10 from inducing local responses and markedly alters lung pattern formation and gene expression. Experiments with selectively sulfated heparins indicate that O-sulfated groups in HS are critical for FGF10 signaling activation in the epithelium during lung bud formation, and that the effect of FGF10 in pattern is in part determined by regional distribution of O-sulfated HS. Moreover, we describe expression of a HS 6-O-sulfotransferase preferentially at the tips of branching tubules. Our data suggest that the ability of FGF10 to induce local budding is critically influenced by developmentally regulated regional patterns of HS sulfation.

The involvement of heparan sulfate (HS) in FGF1/HS/FGFR1 signaling complex

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling begins with the formation of a ternary complex of FGF, FGF receptor (FGFR), and heparan sulfate (HS). Multiple models have been proposed for the ternary complex. However, major discrepancies exist among those models, and none of these models have evaluated the functional importance of the interacting regions on the HS chains. To resolve the discrepancies, we measured the size and molar ratio of HS in the complex and showed that both FGF1 and FGFR1 simultaneously interact with HS; therefore, a model of 2:2:2 FGF1.HS.FGFR1 was shown to fit the data. Using genetic and biochemical methods, we generated HSs that were defective in FGF1 and/or FGFR1 binding but could form the signaling ternary complex. Both genetically and chemically modified HSs were subsequently assessed in a BaF3 cell mitogenic activity assay. The ability of HS to support the ternary complex formation was found to be required for FGF1-stimulated cell proliferation. Our data also proved that specific critical groups and sites on HS support complex formation. Furthermore, the molar ratio of HS, FGF1, and FGFR1 in the ternary complex was found to be independent of the size of HS, which indicates that the selected model can take place on the cell surface proteoglycans. Finally, a mechanism for the FGF.FGFR signaling complex formation on cell membrane was proposed, where FGF and FGFR have their own binding sites on HS and a distinct ternary complex formation site is directly responsible for mitogenic activity.

Binding of interleukin-8 to heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate in lung tissue

Interleukin (IL)-8, a member of the CXC chemokine family, is a potent neutrophil chemotactic factor. Mechanisms that regulate the activity of chemokines in tissue are not clear. The goal of this study was to determine whether IL-8-glycosaminoglycan interactions are responsible for the binding of IL-8 in lung tissue. Experiments were performed with a quantitative tissue-binding assay to measure the amount of 125I-IL-8 binding and an in situ tissue-binding assay to characterize the location of IL-8 binding in lung tissue. Confocal microscopy demonstrated IL-8 binding to specific anatomic locations such as cell surfaces and extracellular matrix that were enriched with heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate. Removal of heparan sulfate or chondroitin sulfate from lung tissue significantly decreased the binding of 125I-IL-8. Two forms of IL-8 with single amino acid mutations in the glycosaminoglycan-binding domain showed decreased binding. In addition, studies with normal and monomeric IL-8 showed that dimerization increased the binding of 125I-IL-8 in lung tissue. These findings suggest that IL-8-glycosaminoglycan interactions determine the location where IL-8 binds in lung tissue and provides a site for the dimerization of IL-8, which increases the local concentration of IL-8 in the lungs.

Endothelial cell heterogeneity

OBJECTIVE

To review recent advances in the field of endothelial cell heterogeneity, and to apply this knowledge to an understanding of site-specific vasculopathy, including acute lung injury.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Published research and review articles in the English language related to endothelial cell biology and endothelial cell heterogeneity.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The results of published studies have been used to provide a perspective of endothelial cell phenotypes in health and disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The structure and function of endothelial cells are differentially regulated in space and time. Far from being a giant monopoly of homogeneous cells, the endothelium represents a consortium of smaller enterprises of cells located within blood vessels of different tissues. Although united in certain functions, each enterprise is uniquely adapted to meet the demands of the underlying tissue. The endothelium may also vary in its response to pathophysiologic stimuli and therefore contribute to the focal nature of vasculopathic disease states. In acute lung injury, the unique properties of the endothelium may conspire with systemic imbalances to localize pathology to the pulmonary vasculature.

Heparan sulfate on endothelial cells mediates the binding of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes via the DBL1alpha domain of PfEMP1

Plasmodium falciparum may cause severe forms of malaria when excessive sequestration of infected and uninfected erythrocytes occurs in vital organs. The capacity of wild-type isolates of P falciparum-infected erythrocytes (parasitized red blood cells [pRBCs]) to bind glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) such as heparin has been identified as a marker for severe disease. Here we report that pRBCs of the parasite FCR3S1.2 and wild-type clinical isolates from Uganda adhere to heparan sulfate (HS) on endothelial cells. Binding to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and to human lung endothelial cells (HLECs) was found to be inhibited by HS/heparin or enzymes that remove HS from cell surfaces. (35)S-labeled HS extracted from HUVECs bound directly to the pRBCs' membrane. Using recombinant proteins corresponding to the different domains of P falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1), we identified Duffy-binding-like domain-1alpha (DBL1alpha) as the ligand for HS. DBL1alpha bound in an HS-dependent way to endothelial cells and blocked the adherence of pRBCs in a dose-dependent manner. (35)S-labeled HS bound to DBL1alpha-columns and eluted as a distinct peak at 0.4 mM NaCl. (35)S-labeled chondroitin sulfate (CS) of HUVECs did not bind to PfEMP1 or to the pRBCs' membrane. Adhesion of pRBCs of FCR3S1.2 to platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1)/CD31, mediated by the cysteine-rich interdomain region 1alpha (CIDR1alpha), was found be operative with, but independent of, the binding to HS. HS and the previously identified HS-like GAG on uninfected erythrocytes may act as coreceptors in endothelial and erythrocyte binding of rosetting parasites, causing excessive sequestration of both pRBCs and RBCs.

PCOLCE2 encodes a functional procollagen C-proteinase enhancer (PCPE2) that is a collagen-binding protein differing in distribution of expression and post-translational modification from the previously described PCPE1

The procollagen COOH-terminal proteinase enhancer (PCPE) is a glycoprotein that binds the COOH-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and potentiates its cleavage by procollagen C-proteinases, such as bone morphogenetic protein-1 (BMP-1). Recently, sequencing of a human expressed sequence tag, which maps near the primary open angle glaucoma region on chromosome 3q21, showed it to encode a novel protein with only 43% identity with PCPE but with a similar domain structure. Here we show this novel protein to be a functional procollagen COOH-terminal proteinase enhancer with activity comparable with that of PCPE and thus propose the designations PCPE2 and PCPE1, respectively. PCPE2 is shown to have a much more limited distribution of expression than does PCPE1, with strong expression primarily in nonossified cartilage in developing tissues and at high levels in the adult heart. PCPE2 is shown to be a glycoprotein that differs markedly in the nature of its glycosylation from that of PCPE1. PCPE2 is also shown to have markedly stronger affinity for heparin than PCPE1, which may account for higher affinities for cell layers. Unexpectedly, both PCPE1 and PCPE2 were found to be collagen-binding proteins, capable of binding at multiple sites on the triple helical portions of fibrillar collagens and also capable of competing for such binding with procollagen C-proteinases. The latter observations may provide insights into the ways PCPEs affect the kinetics of the C-proteinase reaction and into the physical interactions that occur between procollagen C-proteinases and their substrates.

Order out of chaos: assembly of ligand binding sites in heparan sulfate

Virtually every cell type in metazoan organisms produces heparan sulfate. These complex polysaccharides provide docking sites for numerous protein ligands and receptors involved in diverse biological processes, including growth control, signal transduction, cell adhesion, hemostasis, and lipid metabolism. The binding sites consist of relatively small tracts of variably sulfated glucosamine and uronic acid residues in specific arrangements. Their formation occurs in a tissue-specific fashion, generated by the action of a large family of enzymes involved in nucleotide sugar metabolism, polymer formation (glycosyltransferases), and chain processing (sulfotransferases and an epimerase). New insights into the specificity and organization of the biosynthetic apparatus have emerged from genetic studies of cultured cells, nematodes, fruit flies, zebrafish, rodents, and humans. This review covers recent developments in the field and provides a resource for investigators interested in the incredible diversity and specificity of this process.

Variant heparan sulfates synthesized in developing mouse brain differentially regulate FGF signaling

Heparan sulfates (HSs) exert critical regulatory actions on many proteins, including growth factors, and are essential for normal development. Variations in their specific sulfation patterns are known to regulate binding and signaling of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) via tyrosine kinase receptors (FGFRs). We previously reported differences in sulfation patterns between HS species expressed by embryonic day 10 (E10) and E12 mouse neural precursor cells. We have examined the abilities of the different HS species to support signaling of the relevant FGF-FGFR combinations expressed early during brain development. For FGF8, which only functions early (E8-E11), E10 HS showed preferential activation. The most potent signaling for FGF8 was via FGFR3c, for which E10 HS was strongly active and E12 HS had no activity. For FGF2, which functions from E10 to E13, HS from both stages showed similar activity and were more potent at activating FGFR1c than the other receptors. Thus, we find a stage-specific correlation with activation. To explore the potential mechanisms for the generation of these stage-specific HS species, we investigated the expression of the HS sulfotransferase (HSST) isozymes responsible for creating diverse sulfation motifs in HS chains. We find that there are stage-specific combinations of HSST isozymes that could underlie the synthesis of different HS species at E10 and E12. Collectively, these data lead us to propose a model in which differential expression of HSSTs results in the synthesis of variant HS species that form functional signaling complexes with FGFs and FGFRs and orchestrate proliferation and differentiation in the developing brain.

Fibroblast growth factor receptors 1 and 2 interact differently with heparin/heparan sulfate. Implications for dynamic assembly of a ternary signaling complex

Heparan sulfate (HS) regulates the kinetics of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2)-stimulated intracellular signaling and differentially activates cell proliferation of cells expressing different FGF receptors (FGFRs). Evidence suggests that HS interacts with both FGFs and FGFRs to form active ternary signaling complexes. Here we compare the interactions of two FGFRs with HS. We show that the ectodomains of FGFR1 IIIc and FGFR2 IIIc exhibit specific interactions with different characteristics for both heparin and porcine mucosal HS. These glycans are both known to activate FGF signaling via these receptors. FGFR2 interacts with a higher apparent affinity than FGFR1 despite both involving 6-O-, 2-O-, and N-sulfates. FGFR1 and FGFR2 bind heparin with mean association rate constants of 1.9 x 10(5) and 2.1 x 10(6) m(-1)s(-1), respectively, and dissociation rate constants of 1.2 x 10(-2) and 2.7 x 10(-2) s(-1), respectively. These produced calculated affinities of 63 and 13 nm, respectively. Hence, FGFR1 and FGFR2 bind to heparin chains with markedly different kinetics and affinities. We propose a mechanistic model where the kinetic parameters of the HS/FGFR interaction are a key element regulating the formation of ternary complexes and the resulting FGF signaling outcomes.