Breakthrough pneumococcal bacteremia in patients being treated with azithromycin and clarithromycin

Management of community-acquired pneumonia: a focus on conversion from hospital to the ambulatory setting

Patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are treated in hospital or in the ambulatory care setting depending on the severity of illness. Despite numerous guidelines proposed, there is no agreement on specific criteria for hospitalization other than the clinicians' experience. The purpose of this review is to discuss the importance of the appropriate choice and timely administration of antibacterial agents, either in the hospital or in the outpatient setting. Since a high proportion of CAP patients will not have an etiologic agent identified at the time of initiation of treatment, the choice of antibacterial therapy is usually empiric. Antibacterial agents with activity against pneumococci and atypical pathogens causing pneumonia are the preferred choices. Macrolides, doxycycline, or respiratory fluoroquinolones have been recommended by various guidelines committees in North America for the treatment of pneumonia in patients with or without underlying comorbidities. Because of the increasing resistance to beta-lactams as well other antibacterial agents such as macrolides, doxycycline, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (cotrimoxazole), it is important that clinicians are aware of local statistics on resistance to Streptococcus pneumoniae, as infection with this bacterium is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. More recently, fluoroquinolone resistance has been reported, but the percentage of pneumococcal strains resistant to this agent is relatively low compared with the other antibacterial agents. Switch (intravenous to oral) therapy is recommended for hospitalized patients with CAP to facilitate early discharge, which has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and reduce hospital costs. Early conversion to oral therapy has not been shown to be associated with increased complications or higher mortality. Following prompt intravenous therapy and stabilization, patients with CAP should be treated with oral therapy in the ambulatory setting.

Optimizing antibacterial therapy for community-acquired respiratory tract infections in children in an era of bacterial resistance

The spread of antibacterial resistance in bacteria that commonly cause childhood community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs), such as acute otitis media, community-acquired pneumonia, and acute pharyngitis, is a major healthcare problem. One of the foremost concerns is the rapid increase in penicillin, macrolide, and multidrug resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. There is also a rising prevalence of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in pockets of the United States, and beta-lactamase production in Haemophilus influenzae is widespread. Although data are limited, some evidence suggests that resistance to antibacterials can impair bacteriologic and clinical outcomes in childhood RTIs. Optimizing antibacterial use is important both in the care of individual patients and within strategies to address the wider problem of antibacterial resistance. This involves encouraging judicious antibacterial use (i.e., reducing overuse for viral infection and prophylaxis), and preventing misuse through the wrong choice, dosage, and duration of therapy. Given that initial therapy is usually empiric, antibacterials used to treat community-acquired RTIs in children should ideally have the following properties: an optimal targeted spectrum of activity; high clinical and bacteriologic efficacy against respiratory pathogens, including resistant strains; simple, short-course therapy; and good tolerability and palatability. New antibacterials will continue to have a role in the treatment of RTIs in children, especially where resistance compromises existing therapies.

What is the clinical impact of macrolide resistance?

Respiratory tract infections are treated empirically. Treatment is based on the likely pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility. The most common respiratory tract pathogen is Streptococcus pneumoniae. In the United States, approximately 25% to 30% of S. pneumoniae are resistant to erythromycin and other macrolides. There are two mechanisms of resistance: ribosomal methylation that causes high-level resistance, and an efflux pump that causes low-level resistance. Macrolides are ineffective in animal models that use pneumococcal isolates with the methylase- or efflux-mediated resistance mechanisms. There are many case reports that describe clinical failure and isolation of a macrolide-resistant pneumococcus while a patient receives macrolide treatment. Two recent studies that included macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant pneumococci showed that breakthrough bacteremia in patients receiving macrolide treatment occurred only with macrolide-resistant isolates. Study of bacteremic disease ensures the pathogenic role of the pneumococcus; however, it underestimates the true clinical impact of macrolide resistance.

Clinical and bacteriological efficacy of the ketolide telithromycin against isolates of key respiratory pathogens: a pooled analysis of phase III studies

A pooled analysis of data from 13 phase III studies of telithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, acute sinusitis or group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis was undertaken. Causative key respiratory tract pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes) were isolated at entry to the studies from cultures of relevant respiratory samples and tested for their susceptibility to telithromycin, penicillin and macrolides (erythromycin A). The combined clinical and bacteriological efficacy of telithromycin at the post-therapy, test-of-cure visit (days 17-24) was assessed in patients from whom a microbiologically evaluable pathogen was isolated at entry. More than 98% of key respiratory pathogens isolated, including penicillin G- and macrolide (erythromycin A)-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae, demonstrated full or intermediate susceptibility to telithromycin in vitro at the breakpoints of < or = 1.0 mg/L (susceptible) and 2.0 mg/L (intermediate) used for the purpose of evaluating the susceptibility of isolates recovered during the clinical trials. Treatment with telithromycin 800 mg once-daily for 5, 7 or 7-10 days resulted in high rates of clinical cure (88.5%) and a satisfactory bacteriological outcome (88.9%), similar to the figures seen with comparator antibacterial agents. Clinical cure and eradication rates were good for all key respiratory pathogens, including penicillin G- and macrolide (erythromycin A)-resistant S. pneumoniae. The results suggest that telithromycin will provide effective empirical therapy for community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections.

Community-acquired pneumonia

This seminar reviews important features and management issues of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) that are especially relevant to immunocompetent adults in light of new information about cause, clinical course, diagnostic testing, treatment, and prevention. Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most important pathogen; however, emerging resistance of this organism to antimicrobial agents has affected empirical treatment of CAP. Atypical pathogens have been quite commonly identified in several prospective studies. The clinical significance of these pathogens (with the exception of Legionella spp) is not clear, partly because of the lack of rapid, standardised tests. Diagnostic evaluation of CAP is important for appropriate assessment of severity of illness and for establishment of the causative agent in the disease. Until better rapid diagnostic methods are developed, most patients will be treated empirically. Antimicrobials continue to be the mainstay of treatment, and decisions about specific agents are guided by several considerations that include spectrum of activity, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles. Several factors have been shown to be associated with a beneficial clinical outcome in patients with CAP. These factors include administration of antimicrobials in a timely manner, choice of antibiotic therapy, and the use of a critical pneumonia pathway. The appropriate use of vaccines against pneumococcal disease and influenza should be encouraged. Several guidelines for management of CAP have recently been published, the recommendations of which are reviewed.

The clinical significance of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: it's all relative

Macrolides are currently recommended as first-line agents for the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Heavy use of these agents for a variety of indications has resulted in an increasing incidence of macrolide resistance among pneumococcal isolates. Although several case reports and small case series have suggested that in vitro macrolide resistance is associated with treatment failure in cases of pneumococcal pneumonia, other observational data suggest that drug susceptibility testing may not correlate with treatment failure. In this article, we review current information on the mechanisms of macrolide resistance and the pharmacodynamics of macrolide therapy, together with efficacy data from animal models and clinical observations, to begin to gauge the clinical significance of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Areas for further investigation are highlighted.

Macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections in Portugal: results of a 3-year (1999-2001) multicenter surveillance study

A nationwide multicenter study (including 31 laboratories) of the antimicrobial susceptibility of 1210 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) was carried out over 3 years (1999-2001) in Portugal. Testing of all isolates was undertaken in a central laboratory. Overall macrolide resistance was 13.1%. Decreased susceptibility to penicillin was 24.5% (15.5% low-level and 9.0% high-level resistance). Taken into consideration, the resistance rates reported in a previous surveillance study of 1989-1993, a six-fold increase of erythromycin resistance in the last decade was documented. Resistance to erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin was higher in pediatric patients than in adults. The overwhelming majority (82.3%) of macrolide-resistant isolates were multidrug resistant, although 44.9% were fully susceptible to penicillin. Most macrolide-resistant isolates (80.4%) showed the MLSB phenotype (76.6% MLSB-constitutive resistance, and 3.8% MLSB-inducible resistance) and were also resistant to clindamycin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole. The M phenotype was seen in 19.6% isolates and these had MIC90 values of 8 mg/L for erythromycin and clarithromycin, and of 12 mg/L for azithromycin. The clinical significance of macrolide resistance in the management of LRTI is discussed. Because of the specific situation concerning macrolide resistance described in S. pneumoniae, careful use of macrolide antibiotics in therapy and cautious monitoring of macrolide resistance should be continued in Portugal.

Antimicrobial Resistance among Isolates of Respiratory Tract Infection Pathogens from the Southern United States: Data from the PROTEKT US Surveillance Program 2000/2001

BACKGROUND

PROTEKT US (Prospective Resistant Organism Tracking and Epidemiology for the Ketolide Telithromycin in the United States) was established in 2000 to monitor antimicrobial resistance among respiratory tract pathogens across the United States.

METHODS

During 2000 to 2001, 75 southern US centers collected 3,867 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 1,455 Streptococccus pyogenes and 1,042 Haemophilus influenzae.

RESULTS

Overall, 46.1% of S. pneumoniae isolates were nonsusceptible to penicillin, 35.8% were resistant to erythromycin, and 0.5% were resistant to fluoroquinolones. Against S. pneumoniae the most active agents were telithromycin (99.7% susceptible), linezolid (99.8%) and the fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin 99.4%, gatifloxacin 99.5%). The prevalence of erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes isolates was 4.5%. Telithromycin, at concentration of < or = 1 mg/L, inhibited 99.9% of S. pyogenes. The prevalence of beta-lactamase positive H. influenzae was 26.2%. Telithromycin was active (MIC90 4 mg/L) against H. influenzae, irrespective of beta-lactamase production.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of penicillin and macrolide resistance among respiratory tract pathogens from the southern United States is high. Fluoroquinolone resistance is low. Telithromycin is highly active against respiratory tract pathogens with reduced susceptibility to beta-lactams, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones.

The epidemiology of antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and the clinical relevance of resistance to cephalosporins, macrolides and quinolones

Invasive non-meningeal pneumococcal infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The factors affecting the epidemiology and mortality of pneumococcal infections are discussed. The increase and spread of resistance to antimicrobial agents among pneumococci is a cause of concern to the clinician. There are links between the usage of antibacterial agents and the development of resistance. Resistance to penicillin and other beta-lactams has become widespread but this does not appear to have decreased the efficacy of some of these agents against non-meningeal infections. There is evidence that the good pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features of the third generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime and ceftriaxone) contribute to their efficacy in vivo. New breakpoints for cefotaxime and ceftriaxone against non-meningeal pneumococcal isolates were proposed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard (NCCLS, US), based on the clinical evidence of the efficacy of these drugs. In contrast there is increasing evidence that resistance to macrolides can lead to a poor clinical response. Fluoroquinolones have been widely used to treat respiratory tract infections among others, and pneumococcal resistance to these agents in vitro, although currently low, is increasing. There are reports that resistance to fluoroquinolones can develop during treatment and may be reflected in a lack of clinical response. Several clinical and epidemiological variables (e.g. prior antibiotic use) can be useful to identify patients at risk from infections with antibiotic-resistant pneumococci. These patients would be those who would benefit the most from a pneumococcal vaccination programme.

Activity of daptomycin against recent North American isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Daptomycin MICs at which 50% of isolates were inhibited (MIC(50)s) and MIC(90)s determined by the NCCLS broth microdilution method were both 0.25 microg/ml (range, 0.06 to 2 microg/ml) for 350 pneumococcal isolates. MICs determined by E test strips on commercially prepared Mueller-Hinton sheep blood agars with different calcium contents were 2 to 3 dilutions higher than those determined by strips that contained daptomycin plus calcium. Daptomycin zone diameters varied little on the same media.

Macrolide resistance: an increasing concern for treatment failure in children

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial treatment of pediatric respiratory tract infections has evolved during the past 30 years as a result of antimicrobial resistance. The focus of antimicrobial therapy in these conditions has shifted from penicillins to other agents because of the dramatic increase in antimicrobial resistance among common respiratory pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. It is important for clinicians to understand how resistance develops so that they can help prevent this phenomenon from occurring with other antimicrobials.

METHODS

This article reviews the published literature on resistance to macrolide antimicrobials among common pediatric respiratory tract pathogens and clinical and bacteriologic outcomes of infections with these pathogens.

RESULTS

Resistance among common pediatric respiratory tract pathogens to macrolides occurs through two main mechanisms, alteration of the target site and active efflux. Although resistance patterns vary by geographic region, the widespread use of macrolides has contributed to the emergence of both types of macrolide-resistant organisms. Conditions that favor the selection and proliferation of resistant strains include children with repeated, close contact who frequently receive antimicrobial treatment or prophylaxis, such as children who attend day care. Recent US surveillance data show that 20 to 30% of S. pneumoniae are resistant to macrolides, with approximately two-thirds of macrolide-resistant strains associated with an efflux mechanism and the remainder associated with a ribosomal methylase. Additionally, although less well-known, virtually all strains of H. influenzae have an intrinsic macrolide efflux pump. As resistance to macrolides has increased, clinical failures have resulted, and these agents are no longer considered appropriate for empiric first line antimicrobial therapy of acute otitis media and sinusitis unless patients are truly penicillin-allergic. Therefore, other antimicrobials are recommended for the empiric treatment of children with respiratory tract infections, including higher doses of amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate (90 mg/kg/day amoxicillin), cefuroxime axetil and intramuscular ceftriaxone.

CONCLUSIONS

As resistance to macrolides increases and clinical failures in children become more common with this class of antimicrobials, judicious use of antimicrobials is needed. This includes limiting antimicrobial use for viral infections and using the most effective agents when antimicrobials are clinically indicated, such as higher doses of amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate. Application of these principles may prevent proliferation and further development of resistance.

Steady-state plasma and bronchopulmonary concentrations of intravenous levofloxacin and azithromycin in healthy adults

The purpose of this study was to compare the concentrations of levofloxacin and azithromycin in steady-state plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) after intravenous administration. Thirty-six healthy, nonsmoking adult subjects were randomized to either intravenous levofloxacin (500 or 750 mg) or azithromycin (500 mg) once daily for five doses. Venipuncture and bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage were performed in each subject at either 4, 12, or 24 h after the start of the last antibiotic infusion. The mean concentrations of levofloxacin and azithromycin in plasma were similar to those previously published. The dosing regimens of levofloxacin achieved significantly (P < 0.05) higher concentrations in steady-state plasma than azithromycin during the 24 h after drug administration. The respective mean (+/- standard deviation) concentrations at 4, 12, and 24 h in ELF for 500 mg of levofloxacin were 11.01 +/- 4.52, 2.50 +/- 0.97, and 1.24 +/- 0.55 micro g/ml; those for 750 mg of levofloxacin were 12.94 +/- 1.21, 6.04 +/- 0.39, and 1.73 +/- 0.78 micro g/ml; and those for azithromycin were 1.70 +/- 0.74, 1.27 +/- 0.47, and 2.86 +/- 1.75 micro g/ml. The differences in concentrations in ELF among the two levofloxacin groups and azithromycin were significantly (P < 0.05) higher at the 4- and 12-h sampling times. The respective concentrations in AM for 500 mg of levofloxacin were 83.9 +/- 53.2, 18.3 +/- 6.7, and 5.6 +/- 3.2 micro g/ml; those for 750 mg of levofloxacin were 81.7 +/- 37.0, 78.2 +/- 55.4, and 13.3 +/- 6.5 micro g/ml; and those for azithromycin were 650 +/- 259, 669 +/- 311, and 734 +/- 770 micro g/ml. Azithromycin achieved significantly (P < 0.05) higher concentrations in AM than levofloxacin at all sampling times. The concentrations in ELF and AM following intravenous administration of levofloxacin and azithromycin were higher than concentrations in plasma. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of such high intrapulmonary concentrations in patients with respiratory tract infections.

Activity of telithromycin against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates recovered from French children with invasive and noninvasive infections

We compared the activities of telithromycin, erythromycin, azithromycin, josamycin, penicillin G, amoxicillin, cefpodoxime, and ceftriaxone against invasive and noninvasive non-penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates recovered from children. Of the 186 isolates tested, 89% were positive for erm(B) by PCR. Telithromycin had the lowest MICs, with MICs at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited of 0.032 and 0.25 micro g/ml for erythromycin-sensitive and -resistant isolates, respectively.

Telithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a pooled analysis

The efficacy of telithromycin has been assessed in six Phase III studies involving adults with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with a degree of severity compatible with oral therapy. Patients received telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 7-10 days in three open-label studies (n=870) and three randomized, double-blind, comparator-controlled studies (n=503). Comparator antibacterials were amoxicillin 1000 mg three-times daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily and trovafloxacin 200 mg once daily. Clinical and bacteriological outcomes were assessed 7-14 days post-therapy. Among telithromycin-treated patients, per-protocol clinical cure rates were 93.1 and 91.0% for the open-label and comparative studies, respectively. Telithromycin treatment was as effective as the comparator agents. High eradication and clinical cure rates were observed for infections caused by key pathogens: Streptococcus pneumoniae including isolates resistant to penicillin G and/or erythromycin A (95.4%), Haemophilus influenzae (89.5%) and Moraxella catarrhalis (90%). Telithromycin was also highly effective in patients with infections caused by atypical and/or intracellular pathogens and those at increased risk of morbidity. Telithromycin was generally well tolerated. Telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 7-10 days offers a convenient and well-tolerated first-line oral therapy for the empirical treatment of mild to moderate CAP.

Impact of initial antibiotic choice on clinical outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of a hospital claims-made database

BACKGROUND

Much controversy exists regarding the initial choice of antibiotics and selected outcomes for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

The investigators analyzed a hospital claims-made database to assess the impact of initial antibiotic choice on 30-day mortality, total hospital costs, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Fine risk groups allowed for stratification for variations in the severity of illness. Patients were divided into five monotherapy groups (ie, ceftriaxone, "other" cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, or penicillins) and four groups that received dual therapy (ie, the agents listed above, except macrolides) plus macrolides. Patients also were stratified by age (ie, > 65 years of age and < 65 years of age). Severely ill patients were excluded.

RESULTS

Overall, 44,814 persons met the criteria for inclusion. Among monotherapy patients, those who received macrolides had the least mortality but were the least ill. Patients who received dual therapy generally had shorter LOSs, lower total hospital charges, and decreased mortality compared with those who received monotherapy. Differences among dual-therapy regimens regarding outcomes studies were noted. Patients who were < 65 years of age had lower mortality rates, shorter LOSs, and lower hospital charges than did the more elderly patients. Within this group, those who received dual therapy had better outcomes than those who received monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the value of dual therapy employing macrolides as a second agent in decreasing mortality from CAP, and we provided similar data regarding shorter LOSs and lower hospital charges. This appears to hold for a younger population. Differences among dual-therapy regimens (all employing macrolides) appear to exist and may be clinically relevant.

International guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: the role of macrolides

The significance of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has led to the publication of guidelines from numerous international organisations. Because the macrolide class of antimicrobials is active against most of the key pathogens associated with CAP, agents from this class are commonly included in recommendations from these guidelines. However, there are differences among the various guidelines concerning the positioning of the macrolides for empirical therapy. An important factor concerning the use of macrolides for CAP is the emergence of resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae over the past decade. The rate of S. pneumoniae resistance to macrolides ranges from 4 to 70% of strains in worldwide surveillance studies. The most common mechanisms of resistance include methylation of a ribosomal target encoded by the erm gene and efflux of the macrolides by a cell membrane protein transporter, encoded by the mef gene. S. pneumoniae strains with the mef gene are resistant at a lower level (with minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] values generally 1-16 microg/ml) than erm resistant strains; and it is possible that such strains may be inhibited if sufficiently high levels of macrolide can be obtained at the infected site. Currently mef-associated resistance predominates in North America, whereas erm predominates in Europe. Until recently, reports of failure of treatment of CAP with macrolides has been rare, particularly for patients with low-risk for drug-resistant strains. However, since 2000, several patients treated with an oral macrolide who have subsequently required admission to the hospital for macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae (MRSP) bacteraemia have been reported in the literature. Major issues, which are fundamental to the use of the macrolides as recommended in the various guidelines, include the importance of providing therapy for 'atypical' pathogens and the clinical significance of MRSP. Presently, the macrolides are more prominently recommended in the North American guidelines than in other parts of the world. The difference in the emphasis placed on the importance of the atypical pathogens as well as the expression of MRSP in North America compared with Europe partly explains this variance.

Why do we need to eradicate pathogens in respiratory tract infections?

Evidence from studies in otitis media, acute bacterial sinusitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis indicate that clinical efficacy is dependent on bacterial eradication. Failure to eradicate bacterial pathogens increases the potential for clinical failure, incurring further costs, and may also select and maintain bacteria that are resistant to a wide range of antimicrobials. Bacteriologically confirmed clinical failures have been reported in pneumococcal pneumonia with both macrolides and older fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin). These failures were due to the involvement of resistant pathogens (macrolides) or suboptimal pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) (quinolones). However, persistent positive blood cultures have not been reported during therapy with adequate doses of benzylpenicillins or aminopenicillins. Treatment failure, driven by the failure to eradicate pathogens, leads to both economic and environmental costs, hospitalization being the major cost driver. Failure to achieve bacterial eradication may also lead to the development and spread of resistance. Different types of antimicrobials appear to be driving resistance to different extents, and this may be due to suboptimal PK/PD. In conclusion, factors to consider when prescribing include an accurate diagnosis, knowledge of local epidemiology, the role of PK/PD principles in antimicrobial choice, clinical outcomes in relation to bacteriologic efficacy, and resistance and its bacteriologic and clinical impact. The vicious cycle of infection, inappropriate therapy, bacteriologic failure, selection/spread of resistance and further infection needs to be broken by the use of appropriate treatments to achieve bacterial eradication.

Lower respiratory tract infection in hospitalized children

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the aetiology and antibiotic-resistance patterns of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in 1999 and compare it with data from 1995 and 1988.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective observational study of LRTI in hospitalized children at KK Women's & Children's Hospital, Singapore, was undertaken.

RESULTS

A positive isolate was found in 58% of patients (671/1158), comprising viruses (n = 477, 41.2%), non-type B Haemophilus influenzae (n = 101, 8.7%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 66, 5.7%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (n = 92, 8%), Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 19, 1.6%) and other bacteria (n = 19, 1.6%). Mixed virus-bacteria (n = 104, 9%) infections were comprised mostly of virus-H. influenzae combinations. In 1999, S. pneumoniae resistance rates were penicillin 44.6% (17%, 1995), amoxycillin 3% (18%, 1995; MIC 0.5-2 microg/mL reclassified as susceptible in 1999), erythromycin 55% (30%, 1995), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) 60% (23%, 1995). H. influenzaeresistance rates were amoxycillin 26.7% (38%, 1995), erythromycin 99% (37%, 1995), TMP/SMX 98% (37%, 1995). There were 15 cases of empyema of which seven were proven S. pneumoniae and there was one pneumococcal death (0.08%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumococcal pneumonia needs to be treated aggressively due to its high morbidity. Amoxycillin still remains useful for treating pneumococcus despite an increasing resistance to penicillin, erythromycin and TMP/SMX. Judicious use of antibiotics is needed to curb the increasing rate of antibiotic-resistance.

Using hospital antibiogram data to assess regional pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics

Antimicrobial resistance to penicillin and macrolides in Streptococcus pneumoniae has increased in the United States over the past decade. Considerable geographic variation in susceptibility necessitates regional resistance tracking. Traditional active surveillance is labor intensive and costly. We collected antibiogram reports from North Carolina hospitals and assessed pneumococcal susceptibility to multiple agents from 1996 through 2000. Susceptibility in North Carolina was consistently lower than the national average. Aggregating antibiogram data is a feasible and timely method of monitoring regional susceptibility patterns and may also prove beneficial in measuring the effects of interventions to decrease antimicrobial resistance.

Macrolide-resistant pneumococcal endocarditis and epidural abscess that develop during erythromycin therapy

Suppurative complications of Streptococcus pneumoniae infections have become uncommon in the antibiotic era. We report a case of pneumococcal bacteremia and pneumonia complicated with epidural abscess and endocarditis in which macrolide resistance (the MLS(B) phenotype) emerged during erythromycin therapy. Genetic determinants known to mediate the most common mechanisms of macrolide resistance (methylation of the 23S rRNA and antibiotic efflux) were not detected by polymerase chain reaction or DNA hybridization. Sequence analysis of the DNA encoding the 23S rRNA of the macrolide-resistant isolate from the patient demonstrated the replacement of adenine by thymine at position 2058 (A2058T) in 2 of 4 alleles. Clinicians should be alert to the possibility of the emergence of resistance during macrolide therapy for community-acquired pneumonia, particularly if suppurative complications of pneumococcal infection are suspected.

A critical assessment of published guidelines and other decision-support systems for the antibiotic treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections

Guidelines are an important means by which professional associations and governments have sought to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of disease management for infectious diseases. Prescribing of initial antibiotic therapy for community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs) is primarily empiric and physicians may often have a limited appreciation of bacterial resistance. Recent guidelines for managing RTIs have adopted a more evidence-based approach. This process has highlighted important gaps in the existing knowledge base, e.g. concerning the impact of resistance on the effectiveness of oral antibiotics for outpatient community-acquired pneumonia and the level of resistance that should prompt a change in empiric prescribing. In upper RTIs, the challenge is to identify patients in whom antibiotic therapy is warranted. Concentrated, sustained efforts are needed to secure physicians' use of guidelines. The information should be distilled into a simple format available at the point of prescribing and supported by other behavioral change techniques (e.g. educational outreach visits). Advances in information technology offer the promise of more dynamic, computer-assisted forms of guidance. Thus, RTI prescribing guidelines and other prescribing support systems should help control bacterial resistance in the community. However, their effect on resistance patterns is largely unknown and there is an urgent need for collaborative research in this area. Rapid, cost-effective diagnostic techniques are also required and new antibiotics will continue to have a role in disease management.

Outcomes in lower respiratory tract infections and the impact of antimicrobial drug resistance

Numerous published studies have documented the rapid rise in antimicrobial drug resistance among common respiratory pathogens, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae. Yet, surprisingly few studies have evaluated the impact of these in vitro findings on clinical outcomes. Outcomes research is the measurement of the impact of illness and the effect of treatment on clinically relevant end-points. Studies of patients with community-acquired pneumonia have established certain expected rates of outcomes, including mortality, clinical complications, and time to resolution of symptoms. Recent studies have identified specific processes of care and treatment choices that have an impact upon these outcomes. However, there are no well-controlled studies that provide definitive estimates of the magnitude of the impact of antimicrobial therapy on these outcomes for patients with community-acquired pneumonia or other respiratory tract infections, such as acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Most studies of the impact of drug resistance on outcomes for patients with respiratory tract infections have focused on the impact of beta-lactam drug resistance on outcomes for patients with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. In general, these studies have demonstrated that outcomes are not affected by current levels of drug resistance, but most studies are hampered by small sample size, inability to control adequately for severity of illness and concordance of therapy, and inclusion of few subjects with high-level drug resistance. Additional studies are urgently needed to assess better whether the current empiric treatment guidelines are adequate or will need to be adjusted as patterns of resistance continue to evolve.

Efficacy of amoxicillin-sulbactam, given twice-a-day, for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a clinical trial based on a pharmacodynamic model

The present multicenter study reports the results of a clinical trial, designed on the basis of a pharmacodynamic study published previously (Bantar et al., J. Chemother 2000; 12: 223-227) to assess the efficacy of amoxicillin/sulbactam (875 mg/125 mg), given orally twice-a-day for 7 days in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Eighty-four evaluable subjects older than 19 years with clinical symptoms and features suggestive of CAP, consulting from June 2000 to March 2002 and meeting the PORT risk class I through III, were enrolled in the study. Mean age (y +/- standard deviation) was 46.7 +/- 16.3 and 62% of the patients had some co-morbidity predisposing for CAP. Several individuals (77.4%) fell into a low-risk class (i.e. PORT I or II) and 22.6% of patients belonged to a moderate-risk class at the start of treatment. Six patients (6.45%) had pneumococcal bacteremia. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the organism most frequently isolated (61.9% of all the patients in whom an etiologic diagnosis was made), followed by Haemophilus influenzae. Clinical success was observed in 97.6% of the patients (confidence interval 95%, 94.3%-100%). Almost all the individuals with clinical success became afebrile within the first 3 days of therapy. Ten patients (11.8%) reported mild or moderate adverse events (especially diarrhea) possibly related to the antimicrobial therapy, but this did not lead to withdrawal from the trial. The results of this study suggest that amoxicillin/sulbactam (875 mg/125 mg) is an efficacious and well tolerated option for treating patients with CAP belonging to a low-moderate risk class and support the use of a short, oral (7-day) b.i.d. regimen.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia

Although several pneumonia severity criteria have been firmly established, the exact definition of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains elusive. Mortality from CAP remains high, reaching 50% in some series. The particular role of and spp. in severe CAP has been defined more clearly. Microbial diagnosis in the individual patient remains a difficult task. Despite promising new diagnostic tools, concerns about possible mixed origins preclude a change from the currently advocated broad-spectrum approach of antimicrobial treatment. Although there is some evidence that guidelines may optimize outcomes, their role in limiting the spread of resistance has only recently received attention. Finally, although there are promising data on the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation to treat pneumonia in patients without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, its place in the management of acute respiratory failure remains to be defined in randomized studies.

The battle against emerging antibiotic resistance: should fluoroquinolones be used to treat children?

Inappropriate use of antibiotic drugs in humans and animals has led to widespread resistance among microbial pathogens. Resistance is the phenotypic expression corresponding to genetic changes caused by either mutation or acquisition of new genetic information. In some cases, multidrug resistance occurs. Streptococcus pneumoniae is one of the most important respiratory pathogens, playing a major role in both upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Pneumococcal resistance to antimicrobials may be acquired by means of horizontal transfer followed by homologous recombination of genetic material from the normal flora of the human oral cavity or by means of mutation. Resistance to penicillins and macrolides has been increasing for some time, but, recently, fluoroquinolone resistance has become an issue as well. We are concerned that, if fluoroquinolones are approved for use in children, their widespread use will result in rapid emergence of pneumococcal resistance, because children are more often colonized in the nasopharynx with high-density populations of pneumococci than are adults.

Failure of macrolide antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia due to erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The rate of macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae is increasing, but some investigators have questioned its clinical relevance. We conducted a matched case-control study of patients with bacteremic pneumococcal infection at 4 hospitals to determine whether development of breakthrough bacteremia during macrolide treatment was related to macrolide susceptibility of the pneumococcal isolate. Case patients (n=86) were patients who had pneumococcal bacteremia and an isolate that was either resistant or intermediately resistant to erythromycin. Controls (n=141) were patients matched for age, sex, location, and year that bacteremia developed who had an erythromycin-susceptible pneumococcus isolated. Excluding patients with meningitis, 18 (24%) of 76 case patients and none of 136 matched controls were taking a macrolide when blood was obtained for culture (P=.00000012). Moreover, 5 (24%) of 21 case patients with the low-level-resistant M phenotype and none of 40 controls were taking a macrolide (P=.00157). These data show that development of breakthrough bacteremia during macrolide or azalide therapy is more likely to occur among patients infected with an erythromycin-resistant pneumococcus, and they also indicate that in vitro macrolide resistance resulting from both the efflux and methylase mechanisms is clinically relevant.

The efficacy and safety of oral pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxycillin–clavulanate 2000/125 mg, twice daily, versus oral amoxycillin–clavulanate 1000/125 mg, three times daily, for the treatment of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in adults

This double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study was designed to show that a pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation of oral amoxycillin-clavulanate (16:1, 2000/125 mg), twice daily, is at least as effective clinically and microbiologically as oral amoxycillin-clavulanate 1000/125 mg, three times daily, in the 10 day treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults. The pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation is designed to provide higher serum concentrations of amoxycillin for a longer period than standard dosing to achieve coverage of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with amoxycillin-clavulanic acid minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) up to and including 4 mg/l. A total of 344 patients with CAP from 77 centres received amoxycillin-clavulanate 2000/125 mg twice daily for 10 days (169 patients) or amoxycillin-clavulanate 1000/125 mg three times daily for 10 days (175 patients). The most common pathogen isolated was S. pneumoniae (52.3% of patients, amoxycillin-clavulanate 2000/125 mg group; 46.8% of patients, amoxycillin-clavulanate 1000/125 mg group). In the clinical per-protocol (PP) population at test of cure (days 18-39), the clinical success rate in the amoxycillin-clavulanate 2000/125 mg group was at least as good as in the amoxycillin-clavulanate 1000/125 mg group (91.5 and 93.0%, respectively; 95% CI, -8.3, 5.4). The radiological and bacteriological success rates at test of cure for the PP populations were 92.4 and 90.6% in the amoxycillin-clavulanate 2000/125 mg group and 93.9 and 84.4% in the amoxycillin-clavulanate 1000/125 mg group, respectively. The clinical, bacteriological and radiological success rates at the end of therapy (days 11-17) for the PP populations were all over 85%. Both regimens were well tolerated, with no differences in adverse events between the groups. Amoxycillin-clavulanate 2000/125 mg, twice daily, is well tolerated and at least as effective clinically as amoxycillin-clavulanate 1000/125 mg, three times daily, in patients with CAP and may also be appropriate for the treatment of infections due to S. pneumoniae strains with high-level penicillin resistance.

Treatment of drug-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia

The increasing prevalence of resistance to penicillin and other drugs among pneumococci has considerably complicated the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Penicillin resistance has become widespread and is a worldwide occurrence. Resistance to other classes of antibiotics traditionally used as alternatives in the treatment of pneumococcal infections has also increased markedly during recent years. In some areas of the USA, Europe, and east Asia a prevalence of macrolide resistance as high as 35% or more has been reported recently. From the clinical standpoint, a growing number of failures following the use of these agents has been described. Resistance to fluoroquinolones remains low but several failures have been reported in different parts of the world. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters have become essential at the time of making a rational choice and calculation of dosage. Penicillin G remains the mainstay of therapy for the treatment of penicillin-susceptible pneumococcal pneumonia. Penicillin-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia (minimum inhibitory concentration <4 microg/mL) can be safely treated with adequate betalactams at the right dosage. The new fluoroquinolones are very active and effective in pneumococcal pneumonia. Caution should be exercised in the widespread prescription of these drugs if we are to limit the rate of resistance to these agents.

Resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae: Implications for drug selection

Streptococcus pneumoniae is an important pathogen in many community-acquired respiratory infections in the United States and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Unfortunately, S. pneumoniae is becoming increasingly resistant to a variety of antibiotics. Results of recent surveillance studies in the United States show that the prevalence of penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae ranges from 25% to >50%, and rates of macrolide resistance among pneumococci are reported to be as high as 31%. A high prevalence of resistance to other antimicrobial classes is found among penicillin-resistant strains. Newer quinolones (e.g., gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin) that have better antipneumococcal activity in vitro are the most active agents and therefore are attractive options for treatment of adults with community-acquired respiratory infections. Efforts should be made to prevent pneumococcal infections in high-risk patients through vaccination.

Azithromycin treatment failure in community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to macrolides by a 23S rRNA mutation

In this report, we describe an azithromycin treatment failure in community-acquired pneumonia. During the first three days of azithromycin, the patient's symptoms worsened, and she was subsequently admitted to the hospital. Blood cultures were positive for a penicillin-susceptible, macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. DNA sequencing revealed an A2059G mutation in domain V of the 23S rRNA. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical report of an azithromycin failure in the treatment of S. pneumoniae resistant to macrolides by this mechanism.

Ceftriaxone activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens isolated in US clinical microbiology laboratories from 1996 to 2000: results from The Surveillance Network (TSN) Database-USA

Ceftriaxone was introduced into clinical practice in the USA in 1985 and was the first extended-spectrum (third-generation) cephalosporin approved for once-daily treatment of patients with Gram-positive or Gram-negative infections. Review of ceftriaxone activity is important given its continued use since the mid-1980s and reports of emerging resistance among all antimicrobial agent classes. We reviewed the activity of ceftriaxone and relevant comparative agents against five Gram-positive and 11 Gram-negative species for a 5-year period, 1996-2000, using data from The Surveillance Network (TSN) Database-USA. All MIC results were interpreted using NCCLS breakpoint criteria. Ceftriaxone resistance among isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=17219) remained essentially unchanged over the 5 years studied and in fact was lower from 1998 to 2000 (5.0-5.1%) than in 1996 (6.3%) and 1997 (6.6%). Ceftriaxone resistance (range, 5.1-6.9%) among viridans group streptococci (n=6621) varied by <2% from 1997 to 2000. Beta-lactam-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes (n=935) and group B beta-haemolytic streptococci (n=2267) were not identified in any year. Among methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (n=39 284) ceftriaxone resistance was 0.1-0.3% per year from 1996 to 2000. Ceftriaxone resistance among Escherichia coli (n=472407; range, 0.2-0.4%), Klebsiella oxytoca (n=16231; range, 3.5-4.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=117754; range, 1.9-2.6%), Proteus mirabilis (n=67692; range, 0.2-0.3%), Morganella morganii (n=11251; range, 0.3-2.1%) and Serratia marcescens (n=26519; range, 1.6-3.8%) was low and consistent from 1996 to 2000. Resistance to ceftriaxone among Enterobacter cloacae (n=48114; range, 21.7-23.9%) was relatively high, compared with other Enterobacteriaceae, but unchanged from 1996 to 2000. Rates of resistance to ceftriaxone among Acinetobacter spp. (n=20813) increased from 24.8% in 1996 to 45.1% in 2000. All Haemophilus influenzae (n=7911) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (n=218) were susceptible to ceftriaxone, as were 99.7% of Moraxella catarrhalis (n=312) tested in 1996 and 1997. In summary, ceftriaxone has retained its potent activity against the most commonly encountered Gram-positive and Gram-negative human pathogens despite widespread and ongoing clinical use for more than 15 years.

The clinical impact of macrolide resistance in pneumococcal respiratory infections

By the 1960s, several reports of bacteria with reduced susceptibility to antibiotics were published. In recent years, the problem of antibiotic resistance has magnified. In the treatment of respiratory tract infections, the development of resistance is of particular concern; 67% of antibiotic use in adults and 87% in children is for the treatment of such infections. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia and is a frequently isolated bacterial species in patients with other respiratory tract infections. Increasing levels of resistance may have important implications in the clinical setting. Physicians need to consider local susceptibility data, in addition to the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features of compounds, when selecting appropriate antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial infections.

Update on community-acquired pneumonia: impact of antibiotic resistance on clinical outcomes

In contrast to the rapid expansion in the number of published studies reporting the increasing rate of antimicrobial drug resistance among common respiratory pathogens, there remain few controlled studies examining the impact of these trends on clinical outcomes. Those studies that are published are hampered by small sample sizes, biases inherent in observational designs, and the relative infrequency of isolates showing high-level resistance, particularly high-level beta-lactam resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. This update summarizes recent published studies addressing the impact of drug resistance on outcomes for lower respiratory tract infections. The majority of these studies are retrospective cohort studies, focusing on the impact of beta-lactam-resistant pneumococcal infections in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. These studies support the conclusion that current levels of pneumococcal drug resistance do not result in clinical treatment failures for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. However, as patterns of drug resistance evolve, future studies will be needed to address the continued appropriateness of current empirical treatment guidelines for these patients.

The role of antibacterial therapy of acute otitis media in promoting drug resistance

Treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) is the leading cause of antibacterial use in children in most developed countries. Rates of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains resistant to many classes of antibacterial agents have risen dramatically in many countries over the past 20 years. While more restricted use of antibacterial agents for AOM would almost certainly slow the rise in resistance, AOM is a potentially painful disease and may have suppurative complications such as mastoiditis. In this review, we discuss the prudent use of antibacterial agents for AOM and provide an overview of the epidemiology of S. pneumoniae resistance worldwide. Data from 10 placebo-controlled studies in patients with AOM show that antibacterial treatment is generally associated with a significantly higher cure rate than placebo. Of the three studies which analysed children <2 years of age, cure rates were 28 to 48% for placebo and 41 to 74% with antibacterial agents. Of the studies purporting to show no difference in cure rates between placebo and antibacterial therapy, the diagnostic criteria defining entry into the study were poor; therefore, the studies may have included many children without bacterial disease. Accurate diagnosis of AOM is the key element in reducing unnecessary antibacterial usage. Either pneumatic otoscopy or tympanometry can provide evidence of an effusion and the presence of an opaque, yellow or creamy white bulging eardrum will confirm AOM. Finally, the selection of appropriate antibacterial agents will reduce the rise in resistance. Low dosages of antibacterial agents used for prophylaxis select for resistance, and certain classes of drugs such as the sulfonamides and macrolides appear to do the same even at therapeutic doses. Amoxicillin at high dosages should remain the first-line antibacterial agent. In the future, use of vaccination strategies against pneumococci, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus and non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae will also decrease antibacterial use.

Clinical relevance of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for community-acquired pneumonia

Macrolides are often the first choice for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. However, macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae has escalated at alarming rates in North America and worldwide. Macrolide resistance among pneumococci is primarily due to genetic mutations affecting the ribosomal target site (ermAM) or active drug efflux (mefE). Prior antibiotic exposure is the major risk factor for amplification and perpetuation of resistance. Clonal spread facilitates dissemination of drug-resistant strains. Data assessing the impact of macrolide resistance on clinical outcomes are spare. Many experts believe that the clinical impact is limited. Ribosomal mutations confer high-grade resistance, whereas efflux mutations can likely be overridden in vivo. Favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, high concentrations at sites of infections, and additional properties of macrolides may enhance their efficacy. In this article, we discuss the prevalence of macrolide resistance among S. pneumoniae, risk factors and mechanisms responsible for resistance, therapeutic strategies, and implications for the future.

Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications

Resistance to macrolides and lincosamides is increasingly reported in clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria. The multiplicity of mechanisms of resistance, which include ribosomal modification, efflux of the antibiotic, and drug inactivation, results in a variety of phenotypes of resistance. There is controversy concerning the clinical relevance of in vitro macrolide resistance. Recent data, however, have shown that eradication of bacteria correlates with clinical outcome of acute otitis media in children and that macrolide therapy results in delayed eradication of macrolide-resistant pneumococci. These results support the need for in vitro detection of macrolide resistance and correct interpretation of susceptibility tests to guide therapy.

Cost-effective approaches to the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the era of resistance

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) infects upwards of four million people in the US each year, of which 20% require subsequent hospitalisation. Consequently, it is a large contributor to excessive healthcare resource consumption and cost. Since the aetiology of CAP is not identified in a majority of patients, treatment is often empiric, aimed at the most common causes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and the atypical pathogens (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila). A variety of pharmaceutical agents exist for the treatment of CAP, most notably the cephalosporin and penicillin derivatives, the macrolide/azalide antibacterials, the newer tetracyclines, and most recently the respiratory fluoroquinolones. Choosing an agent is usually related to issues such as patient compliance, adverse event profiles, and the presence of resistance. Of these, resistance seems to be the main factor today. S. pneumoniae, the most common cause of CAP, is steadily acquiring resistance to a majority of the currently available antibacterials, thus further increasing costs due to prolonged hospitalisation, treatment of relapses and the use of more expensive antibacterials. Understanding and maximising the pharmacodynamic properties of the available antibacterials will not only prevent the emergence of resistance, thus prolonging their clinical utility, but also reduce the costs associated with treating the infection through rapid symptom improvement and earlier patient discharge. Numerous methods for reducing costs in patients with bacterial infections are documented in the literature and can be applied to CAP. Choosing monotherapy instead of combination therapy can reduce costs associated with the administration of the antibacterial. Agents with longer half-lives allow for once-daily administration, which in turn, leads to improved compliance, successful outcomes, and decreased costs. Administering antibacterials to maximise their pharmacodynamics, such as with continuous infusion of beta-lactams, reduces the amount of drug needed in addition to savings associated with administration and supplies. Finally, transitioning patients to oral therapy as soon as they are clinically stable can significantly reduce the length of hospital stay, which is the major contributing factor of healthcare costs. The use of a clinical pathway in an institution is the most effective way to apply these cost-saving approaches in the treatment of CAP. These pathways should be specific to each institution, thus considering the resistance rates in the area and encouraging the use of the most active, cost-effective agents to produce rapid, positive clinical outcomes.

In vitro activity of ABT-773, telithromycin and eight other antimicrobials against erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae respiratory isolates of children

The activity of the ketolide ABT-773 against 180 erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae obtained from children was compared with telithromycin, azithromycin, clarithromyin, roxithromycin, clindamycin, penicillin, levofloxacin and gatifloxacin. Ketolide MICs were all < or =1 mg/l, with ABT-773 being the most potent of all drugs tested. MIC(90)s for macrolides and azithromycin in mefE+ isolates were 16-32 compared with >128 mg/l for ermB+ isolates. ABT-773 and telithromycin MIC(90)s for mefE+ isolates were 0.125 and 0.5, compared with 0.032 and 0.016 mg/l for ermB+ isolates and 0.5 and 1 mg/l, respectively, for isolates containing both genes. Clindamycin was active against mefE+ but not ermB+ isolates. 155 isolates were resistant to penicillin. All fluoroquinolone MICs were < 1 mg/l. Further studies of ketolides for treatment of paediatric S. pneumoniae infections are warranted.

Pharmacodynamics of antiinfective therapy: taking what we know to the patient's bedside

Applied pharmacokinetics has long been a lifeline of clinical pharmacy services. National surveys during the past decade documented clinical pharmacy services and demonstrated that a substantial rate of growth occurred in clinical pharmacokinetic consultations and management of drug therapy protocols. Pharmacodynamic principles of antiinfective agents are rapidly becoming a new paradigm of clinical pharmacy services. beta-Lactams, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones represent the three classes of antiinfective agents that have made the most progress toward the clinical applications of pharmacodynamics. Pharmacodynamic parameters are being used to select and compare agents within an antiinfective class (e.g., fluoroquinolones), make modifications in the dosage (e.g., extended-interval dosing of aminoglycosides) and/or mode of administration (e.g., continuous infusion of beta-lactams), develop in vivo breakpoint determinations, and assess the development of bacterial resistance. In addition, pharmacodynamic parameters have influenced the clinical drug development of new (e.g., linezolid) and older (amoxicillin-clavulanate, fluoroquinolones) antiinfective agents. Further investigations are needed to explore the clinician's use of validated prediction methods and patient-specific pharmacodynamic parameters at the bedside. By linking pharmacokinetic services with pharmacodynamic principles, the opportunity for continued progress toward our assessment and decisions for successful clinical outcomes is possible with old and new antiinfective agents.