Environmental tobacco smoke, genetic susceptibility, and risk of lung cancer in never-smoking women

Genetics and the common cancers

Rare highly penetrant genes cannot account for much of the familial risk for most common cancers, and there is increasing evidence that a high proportion of cancers arise in a susceptible minority who carry low-penetrance genes or gene combinations. The evidence for the existence of such genes and the prospects for identifying them are reviewed.

Genetic polymorphisms and chromosome damage

Genetic polymorphisms that affect xenobiotic metabolism or cellular response to DNA damage can modulate individual sensitivity to genotoxins. Information on the effects of such polymorphisms on the level of chromosome damage may facilitate the identification of risk groups and increase the sensitivity of cytogenetic endpoints as biomarkers of genotoxic exposure and effect. Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) is an important detoxification enzyme which, due to a homozygous gene deletion (null genotype), is lacking from about 50% of Caucasians. A higher level of DNA adducts and chromosome damage has been detected in lymphocytes of tobacco smokers and bus drivers who lack the GSTM1 gene. Other polymorphic glutathione S-transferases include GSTM3, GSTP1, and GSTT1. The GSTT1 null genotype (10-20% of Caucasians) has been associated with an increased "baseline" level of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in lymphocytes. N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2), metabolizing xenobiotics with primary aromatic amine and hydrazine structures, is another important polymorphic phase II enzyme. Subjects having the NAT2 slow acetylator genotype appear to show an increased baseline frequency of lymphocyte CAs in the absence of identified environmental exposure. Besides human biomonitoring studies, genetic polymorphisms may be important in explaining individual variation in genotoxic response observed in genetic toxicology tests with human cells. Several studies have suggested that blood cultures from GSTT1 null and GSTM1 null individuals have increased in vitro sensitivity to various genotoxins. The best-known example is probably the diepoxybutane sensitivity of GSTT1 null donors. Recently discovered polymorphisms affecting DNA repair may be expected to be of special importance in modulating genotoxic effects; the first available studies have suggested that the exon 10 Arg399Gln polymorphism of XRCC1 gene (X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1) could affect individual genotoxic response. In conclusion, the genetic polymorphism of GSTM1 influences the frequency of chromosome damage in exposed humans, while that of GSTT1 and NAT2 affect the "baseline" level of such damage. Both GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes may shape the in vitro genotoxic response of human lymphocytes. The significance of DNA repair polymorphisms is presently unclear.

Validation of smoking status in clinical research into inflammatory periodontal disease

BACKGROUND

Tobacco smoking is an accepted risk factor for periodontal disease. Most studies in the periodontal literature rely on reported smoking habits which can be unreliable. This review specifically addresses this problem.

METHODS

Methods of assessing tobacco smoke exposure, variation in individual smoking habits, classification of former/ex-smokers, and validation of abstinence in smoking cessation studies receive attention.

DISCUSSION

Additionally, clinical studies that have examined periodontal health in subjects with validated smoking status are discussed.

Women and lung cancer: does oestrogen play a role?

Smoking-related disease remains a major public-health problem. Large numbers of women continue to smoke, and new smokers are almost as likely to be female as male. Lung cancer is still a largely incurable disease; annual lung-cancer mortality in women exceeds that of breast cancer, and lung cancer now accounts for 12% of all new female cancer cases. The results of several studies suggest that women are more susceptible than men to lung cancer and to conditions that predispose to this cancer, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There is still much controversy about whether there is an increased lung-cancer risk in women across all populations. Many epidemiological studies have been negative or equivocal when comparing male and female lung-cancer risk. This article is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all epidemiological studies, or of all possible lung-cancer risk factors. Lung-cancer incidence and risk in women are discussed, and evidence for possible mechanisms of increased female risk are presented, including the role of oestrogen in the development of lung cancer.

A review of residential radon case-control epidemiologic studies performed in the United States

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States for both men and women. Although most lung cancer deaths are attributable to tobacco usage, even secondary causes of lung cancer are important because of the magnitude of lung cancer incidence and its poor survival rate. This review summarizes the basic features and major findings from the published U.S. large-scale residential radon case-control studies performed in New Jersey, Iowa, and Missouri (two studies). The methodology from an unpublished study covering Connecticut, Utah, and Southern Idaho is also presented. Overall, the higher categorical risk estimates for these published studies produced a positive association between prolonged radon exposure and lung cancer. Two studies (Missouri-II and Iowa) that incorporated enhanced dose estimates produced the most compelling evidence suggesting an association between prolonged residential radon exposure and lung cancer. The prevailing evidence suggests that the statistically significant findings may be related to improved retrospective radon exposure estimates. The general findings from the U.S. studies, along with extrapolations from radon-exposed underground miners, support the conclusion that after cigarette smoking, prolonged residential radon exposure is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the general population.

The role of gene-environment interaction in the aetiology of human cancer: examples from cancers of the large bowel, lung and breast

It has become increasingly clear that cancer can be considered neither purely genetic nor purely environmental. A relatively new area of cancer research has focused on the interaction between genes and environment in the same causal mechanism. Primary candidates for gene-environment interaction studies have been genes that encode enzymes involved in the metabolism of established cancer risk factors. There are common variant forms of these genes (polymorphisms), which may alter metabolism and increase or decrease exposure to carcinogens, thus impacting the risk of cancer. We present an overview of enzymes involved in carcinogen metabolism, present epidemiological tools to evaluate gene-environment interactions, and provide examples from cancers of the breast, lung and large bowel.

The epidemiology of lung cancer

Lung cancer continues to be the leader in cancer deaths in the United States. The incidence of lung cancer in men has slowly decreased since the late 1980s, but has just now begun to plateau in women at the end of this decade. Despite modest advances in chemotherapy for treating lung cancer, it remains a deadly disease with overall 5-yr survival rates having not increased significantly over the last 25 years, remaining at approximately 14%. Tobacco smoking causes approximately 85-90% of bronchogenic carcinoma. Environmental tobacco exposure or a second-hand smoke also may cause lung cancer in life-long non-smokers. Certain occupational agents such as arsenic, asbestos, chromium, nickel and vinyl chloride increase the relative risk for lung cancer. Smoking has an additive or multiplicative effect with some of these agents. Familial predisposition for lung cancer is an area with advancing research. Developments in molecular biology have led to growing interest in investigation of biological markers, which may increase predisposition to smoking-related carcinogenesis. Hopefully, in the future we will be able to screen for lung cancer by using specific biomarkers. Finally, dietary factors have also been proposed as potential risk modulators, with vitamins A, C and E proposed as having a protective effect. Despite the slow decline of smoking in the United States, lung cancer will likely continue its devastation for years to come.

Cancer epidemiology in the last century and the next decade

By the early 1980s, epidemiologists had identified many important causes of cancer. They had also proposed the 'multi-stage' model of cancer, although none of the hypothesized events in human carcinogenesis had then been identified. The remarkable advances in cell and molecular biology over the past two decades have transformed the scope and methods of cancer epidemiology. There have been a few new discoveries based purely on traditional methods, and many long-suspected minor risks have been estimated more precisely. But modern epidemiological studies often depend on genetic, biochemical or viral assays that had not been developed 20 years ago.

Metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen in nonsmoking women exposed to environmental tobacco smoke

BACKGROUND

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is associated with lung cancer in nonsmokers. Most epidemiologic studies find a higher risk for lung cancer in nonsmoking women married to smokers than in those married to nonsmokers. We measured metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen in urine from healthy, nonsmoking women exposed to ETS.

METHODS

We recruited women and their partners through advertisements. Couples completed questionnaires on smoking history and demographics, and both partners provided 100 mL of urine; 23 women had male partners who smoked in the home (i.e., exposed women), and 22 women had male partners who did not smoke (i.e., unexposed women). Urine samples were analyzed for nicotine, for cotinine, for 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and its glucuronide (NNAL-Gluc), as well as for creatinine. NNAL and NNAL-Gluc are metabolites of the tobacco-specific lung carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK). Unpaired Student's t tests were conducted on log-transformed values. All statistical tests are two-sided.

RESULTS

Urinary levels of nicotine, cotinine, NNAL, and NNAL-Gluc were statistically significantly higher in exposed women than in unexposed women. Geometric means for these compounds in exposed versus unexposed women, respectively, were as follows: nicotine, 0.050 nmol/mg of creatinine (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.033 to 0.076) versus 0.008 nmol/mg of creatinine (95% CI = 0.004 to 0.014); cotinine, 0.037 nmol/mg of creatinine (95% CI = 0.022 to 0.061) versus 0.007 nmol/mg of creatinine (95% CI = 0.004 to 0.011); NNAL, 0.013 pmol/mg of creatinine (95% CI = 0.007 to 0.024) versus 0.004 pmol/mg of creatinine (95% CI = 0.002 to 0.007); and NNAL-Gluc, 0.027 pmol/mg of creatinine (95% CI = 0.016 to 0.045) versus 0.004 pmol/mg of creatinine (95% CI = 0.003 to 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsmoking women exposed to ETS take up and metabolize the tobacco-specific lung carcinogen NNK, which could increase their risk of lung cancer. Within couples, the NNAL plus NNAL-Gluc level in exposed women compared with that of their smoking partners averaged 5.6%. Notably, epidemiologic studies have estimated the excess risk for lung cancer in nonsmoking women exposed to ETS as 1%-2% of that in smokers.

Lung cancer in lifetime nonsmoking men - results of a case-control study in Germany

Epidemiological studies of lung cancer among nonsmoking men are few. This case-control study was conducted among lifetime nonsmoking men between 1990 and 1996 in Germany to examine lung cancer risk in relation to occupation, environmental tobacco smoke, residential radon, family history of cancer and previous lung disease. A total of 58 male cases with confirmed primary lung cancer and 803 male population controls who had never smoked more than 400 cigarettes in their lifetime were personally interviewed by a standardized questionnaire. In addition, 1-year radon measurements in the living and bedroom of the subjects' last dwelling were carried out. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Having ever worked in a job with known lung carcinogens was associated with a two-fold significantly increased lung cancer risk (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.0-5.0), adjusted for age and region. The linear trend test for lung-cancer risk associated with radon exposure was close to statistical significance, demonstrating an excess relative risk for an increase in exposure of 100 Bq m(-3)of 0.43 (P = 0.052). Nonsignificantly elevated effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in public transportation and in social settings were observed. No associations with a family history of cancer or previous lung diseases were found. Our results indicate that occupational carcinogens and indoor radon may play a role in some lung cancers in nonsmoking men.

Gender differences in genetic susceptibility for lung cancer

In contrast to men, the incidence of lung cancer among women has increased over the past decade. The basis for this increase among female smokers remains unknown. Surgical patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer and control subjects without a history of malignancy completed a smoking questionnaire and donated a blood sample. DNA was extracted from peripheral mononuclear cells and genotyped for polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) (exon 7) and glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) (null). No gender differences in either age at diagnosis or histological subtype were observed among lung cancer patients. In both patients (n = 180) and controls (n = 163), females smoked significantly less than males. The pack-year history associated with adenocarcinoma was smaller than that for squamous cell carcinoma. No significant association was observed between the GSTM1 null genotype and cancer risk. However, women had a larger cancer risk than men (odds ratio 4.98 vs. 1.37) if they possessed the mutant CYP1A1 genotype. Female cancer patients were significantly more likely than female controls to have both the CYP1A1 mutation and GSTM1 null genotype. The combined variant genotypes conferred an odds ratio of 6.54 for lung cancer in women versus 2.36 for men, independent of age or smoking history. These data suggest that polymorphisms in CYP1A1 and GSTM1 contribute to the increased risk of females for lung cancer.

Epidemiologic basis for an occupational and environmental policy on environmental tobacco smoke

ETS contains numerous toxins. Robust epidemiologic evidence implicates ETS as a cause of lung cancer and as a primary cause and source of exacerbation of excess respiratory disease. There is also increasing evidence that ETS may be associated with other outcomes, including heart disease. There is currently little doubt that ETS is an important and avoidable health hazard. Unfortunately, ETS is frequently encountered in the workplace--where it is no safer than in other environments and where it presents hazards to exposed workers and to others. A unique aspect of workplace ETS is that exposure is rarely an outcome of essential manufacturing, extraction, or service delivery processes. Moreover, ETS exposure, with its growing list of known hazards, is preventable by engineering or policy means. Implementation of policies to prevent workplace ETS can be highly effective while entailing low costs and yielding primary and secondary benefits to employers and employees. ACOEM strongly supports an increase in the scope and effectiveness of policies and efforts that protect against exposure to ETS in the workplace and elsewhere. To that end, ACOEM supports voluntary, regulatory, and legislative initiatives to eliminate ETS from the workplace, including public spaces such as bars, casinos, restaurants, schools, day-care centers, and public transportation. ACOEM also encourages employers to provide employee training concerning the health hazards of ETS and voluntary personal smoking-cessation programs.

The effect of the genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1,CYP2D6, GSTM1 and GSTP1 on aromatic DNA adduct levels in the population of healthy women

Aromatic DNA adduct levels and polymorphisms of two phase I enzymes - CYP1A1 and CYP2D6 and two phase II enzymes - GSTM1 and GSTP1 were analyzed in a group of 133 nonsmoking healthy women 35-45 years old and holding jobs not connected with the exposure to the combustion products of organic matter. They were office workers from the south and north-eastern parts of Poland. Blood samples were collected in winter and in summer. Aromatic DNA adduct levels were measured in all winter and summer samples. The frequencies of CYP1A1, CYP2D6, GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms in samples from the studied women did not show any differences when compared with other Caucasian populations and the Polish male population studied previously. The differences in the levels of DNA adducts among the carriers of different genotypes were statistically non-significant. Analysis of combined genotypes selected the groups of volunteers with the highest and the lowest DNA adduct levels. The highest levels of DNA adducts were observed in the carriers of GSTM1(null)/CYP1A1Ile/Val (8.00+/-13.00 adducts/10(8) nucleotides in summer samples) and GSTP1-AA/CYP1A1Ile/Val genotypes (7.00+/-4.32 in winter and 7.30+/-7. 27/10(8) nucleotides in summer). The lowest levels of DNA adducts (3. 00+/-2.30 in winter and 2.00+/-3.16/10(8) nucleotides in summer) were found in the carriers of the genotype GSTP1-AG+GG/CYP1A1Ile/Val. The levels of DNA adducts in these groups were determined by the polymorphisms of GSTM1 and GSTP1 phase II detoxifying enzymes.

Cancer risk and low-penetrance susceptibility genes in gene-environment interactions

PURPOSE

To provide a concise review for human cancer risk related to low-penetrance genes and their effects on environmental carcinogen exposure.

METHODS

Citation of relevant and recent references for molecular epidemiology, focusing on lung cancer, ethical issues, and some clinical implications of recent molecular epidemiology studies.

RESULTS

Low-penetrance genes contribute to cancer risk by augmenting the effects of carcinogen exposures. These exposures can be measured in the body through molecular dosimetry (ie, the amount of DNA damage), which reflects a biologically effective dose. The examination of tumors and the mutations within tumor suppressor genes, such as p53, can provide etiologic clues for both exposure and susceptibility. Although many studies have focused on carcinogen metabolism and cancer risk, more recent studies are considering DNA repair. Also, we are learning that behavior, such as tobacco addiction, also may be genetically controlled.

CONCLUSION

Sporadic cancers are caused by gene(n)-environment(n) interactions rather than a dominant effect by a specific gene, environmental exposure, or gene-environment interaction. New paradigms, where we categorize genes as caretaker or gatekeeper genes, will allow for new hypotheses to be tested and will require advanced methods of analysis. The goal of molecular epidemiology is to develop risk assessment models for individuals, but currently the most achievable goal will be population risk assessment and a better understanding of carcinogenesis.