Citrate anticoagulation abolishes degranulation of polymorphonuclear cells and platelets and reduces oxidative stress during haemodialysis

Citrate anticoagulation for postdilutional online hemodiafiltration with calcium-containing dialysate and infusate: significant clotting in the venous bubble trap

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective clinical study was to assess safety and antithrombotic efficacy of a regional citrate anticoagulation protocol for postdilutional online hemodiafiltration (HDF) with calcium-containing dialysate and infusate.

METHODS

Nineteen postdilutional online HDF procedures with citrate anticoagulation were performed in 9 end-stage renal disease patients. Calcium-containing (1.25 mmol/L dialysate/infusate, 15% (0.51 mol/L) trisodium citrate and 1 mol/L calcium chloride (when necessary) were used; the blood flow was 300 ml/min. Antithrombotic effect was assessed visually after HDF at 3 points: the dialyzer, arterial bubble trap, and venous bubble trap, using a score of 5 (excellent anticoagulation) to 1 (total clotting). The study was terminated prematurely due to frequent clotting in the venous bubble trap.

RESULTS

The mean duration of HDF was 4.3 +/- 0.9 hours; infusion volume was 13 +/- 2 L. Almost half of the HDF procedures (9/19, 47%) were completed with some difficulty: in 1 case (1/19, 5%) there was total system clotting; in the other 8 cases, system clotting was threatening and dialysis was terminated prematurely, but in only 4/19 cases (21%) prior to 4-hour duration. The main point of clot formation was the venous bubble trap (score 2.6 +/- 1.0), while anticoagulation was very good at the dialyzer (4.0 +/- 1.2) and excellent at the arterial bubble trap (4.8 +/- 0.9). No side effects were noted, and metabolic consequences were moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional citrate anticoagulation using calcium-containing dialysate/infusate during postdilutional online hemodiafiltration results in a high incidence of venous bubble trap clotting.

Renal replacement therapies: physiological review

INTRODUCTION

A physiological review on renal replacement therapies (RRT) is a challenging task: there is nothing "physiologic" about RRT, since the most accurate, safe and perfectly delivered extracorporeal therapy would still be far from "physiologically" replacing the function of the native kidney.

METHODS

This review will address the issues of physiology of fluid and solute removal, acid base control and impact on mortality during intermittent and continuous therapies: different RRT modalities and relative prescriptions will provide different "physiological clinical effects" to critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), with the aim of restoring lost "renal homeostasis". On the other side, however, the "pathophysiology" of RRT, consists with unwanted clinical effects caused by the same treatments, generally under-recognized by current literature but often encountered in clinical practice. Physiology and pathophysiology of different RRT modalities have been reviewed.

CONCLUSION

Physiology and pathophysiology of RRT often coexist during dialysis sessions. Improvement in renal recovery and survival from AKI will be achieved from optimization of therapy and increased awareness of potential benefits and dangers deriving from different RRT modalities.

Effect of Collection Tube Type and Preanalytical Handling on Myeloperoxidase Concentrations

Background: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) has shown potential as a marker for cardiovascular disease. Limited studies have been published with a variety of sample types, resulting in a wide range of MPO values. Little is known or understood about the impact of collection tube type and preanalytical handling of specimens for MPO determination.

Method: MPO concentration was determined by use of the ARCHITECT® MPO research use assay, which is currently under development. Samples were collected into multiple anticoagulant collection tubes from donors and patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms of acute coronary syndromes. Whole blood was stored on ice or at room temperature for predetermined time periods. We also evaluated serum and plasma after centrifugation followed by storage at room temperature, 2–8 °C, and below −10 °C.

Results: Baseline sample concentrations were dependent on collection tube type as well as handling conditions. MPO concentrations were consistently higher in samples collected in serum and heparin plasma tubes than in samples in EDTA or citrate tubes. Spike recovery was acceptable in all sera and plasma tested, indicating that the increased MPO concentrations were not due directly to an anticoagulant interference.

Conclusions: The collection tube type and preanalytical handling are critical for accurate and consistent MPO measurement. The preferred anticoagulant and tubes are the EDTA or EDTA plasma preparation tube. MPO concentrations in samples collected in these tubes are stable before centrifugation as whole blood as well as plasma after processing.

Clinical review: Patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy

Premature circuit clotting is a major problem in daily practice of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), increasing blood loss, workload, and costs. Early clotting is related to bioincompatibility, critical illness, vascular access, CRRT circuit, and modality. This review discusses non-anticoagulant and anticoagulant measures to prevent circuit failure. These measures include optimization of the catheter (inner diameter, pattern of flow, and position), the settings of CRRT (partial predilution and individualized control of filtration fraction), and the training of nurses. In addition, anticoagulation is generally required. Systemic anticoagulation interferes with plasmatic coagulation, platelet activation, or both and should be kept at a low dose to mitigate bleeding complications. Regional anticoagulation with citrate emerges as the most promising method.

Platelet activation in clinical haemodialysis: LMWH as a major contributor to bio-incompatibility?

BACKGROUND

The sum of undesirable side effects, occurring during haemodialysis (HD), is called bio-incompatibility. Concerning platelets, both an increase in the expression of the cell surface marker P-selectin (CD62p) and release of the intracellular granule product platelet factor 4 (PF4) have been described. However, as PF4 is also abundantly present on endothelium-bound proteoglycans, it is questionable whether the HD-induced increase is exclusively attributable to release from platelets. With respect to the cause of HD-induced bio-incompatibility, interest has been focused mainly on the extracorporeal circuit (ECC), especially the dialyser, whereas only little attention has been paid to other parts of the ECC and the mode of anticoagulation applied. To address the cause and origin of platelet activation and PF4 release during clinical HD, two complementary clinical studies were performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In study I, the relative influence of the various parts of the ECC was evaluated by measuring the expression of CD62p, platelet aggregation and levels of PF4 and serotonin at various sampling points. In study II, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was administered 10 min before the actual start of HD, in order to separate the effects from LMWH and the ECC on platelet activation.

RESULTS

In study I, CD62p expression increased across the entire length of the ECC, including the roller pump and dialyser (median at t(5) from 26% to 43%, P = 0.008; median at t(30) from 28% to 48%, P = 0.007). Increments in PF4 and aggregation of platelets were relatively modest. Platelet serotonin content, which was below reference values in healthy controls, and plasma serotonin concentration, which was above reference values, did not change. In study II, PF4 levels increased markedly after the injection of LMWH (from 12 IU/ml at t(-10) to 75 IU/ml at t(0), P = 0.018), whereas CD62p expression remained stable until the start of HD.

CONCLUSIONS

Platelet activation, as measured by the up-regulation of CD62p, is an early process, occurring not only within the dialyser, but across the entire length of the ECC. As CD62p remained unaltered after the administration of LMWH 10 min before the actual start of HD, this kind of activation is independent of LMWH. Considering PF4 however, a sharp increment was observed after the administration of LMWH and before the start of HD. This finding suggests that the PF4 release observed early in clinical HD is largely independent from the ECC, and is probably the result of LMWH-induced detachment from the endothelium. As the platelet serotonin content was relatively reduced and the plasma serotonin levels were elevated, platelets from chronic HD patients might be depleted due to chronic repetitive activation. Based on these data, it appears first, that PF4 is an inferior marker of platelet activation in clinical HD and second, that LMWH is a major contributor to HD-induced bio-incompatibility.

Platelet Activation during Haemodialysis: Comparison of Cuprammonium Rayon and Polysulfone Membranes

BACKGROUND/AIM

Haemodialysis-treated patients are at a high risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Part of this risk may be attributable to the type of the dialysis membrane used. We evaluated whether different dialysis membranes differ with respect to platelet activation.

METHODS

In a randomized crossover trial, the platelet activation was measured in 14 patients treated with two different dialyzers (cuprammonium rayon membrane and polysulfone membrane). We compared the platelet activation over the dialyzer and between dialyzers after several weeks of dialysis.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the two dialyzers in platelet activation over the dialyzer. After 2 weeks, however, the expression of CD62P, CD63, and PAC-1 was statistically significantly lower after cuprammonium membrane treatment than after polysulfone membrane treatment (mean fluorescence intensity in arbitrary units 8.0 vs. 11.1, 2.64 vs. 4.01, and 5.61 vs. 9.74, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Dialysis with a polysulfone membrane seems to lead to more platelet activation than dialysis with a cuprammonium membrane.

Influence of preparative procedures on assay of platelet function and apparent effects of antiplatelet agents

Previous studies have shown that anticoagulants alter platelet reactivity and the apparent effects of antiplatelet agents. This study was conducted to identify the impact of methods of preparation of blood samples on an assay of platelet function and the effects of antiplatelet agents. The activation of platelets was identified with the use of flow cytometry in response to thrombin (1 and 10 nmol/L), adenosine diphosphate (0.2 and 1 micromol/L), platelet activating factor (1 nmol/L), and convulxin (1 and 10 ng/ml). Antiplatelet effects were assessed after the addition in vitro of tirofiban (50 ng/ml) and cangrelor (10 nmol/L). Results were compared in whole blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) anticoagulated with corn trypsin inhibitor (32 microg/ml, a specific inhibitor of factor XIIa). The fraction of young platelets was quantified with thiazole orange, which identifies ribonucleic acid. The activation of platelets was consistently less in PRP compared with whole blood. Activation in PRP was 23 +/- 15% that in whole blood for thrombin, 65 +/- 26% for adenosine diphosphate, 40 +/- 20% for platelet activating factor, and 49 +/- 25% for convulxin (p <0.01 for each comparison). The fraction of young platelets in PRP was 39 +/- 11% that in whole blood (p <0.001). The effects of antiplatelet agents varied with agonist and antiplatelet agent but were generally greater in PRP compared with whole blood (p <0.05). In conclusion, platelet reactivity is lower and the effects of antiplatelet agents are greater and potentially misleading in PRP compared with whole blood. The accuracy of platelet function testing may be improved by performance in whole blood.

Acute effect of standard heparin versus low molecular weight heparin on oxidative stress and inflammation in hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases caused by traditional and non-traditional risk factors are the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Recently, much interest has been focused on non-traditional factors, such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Hemodialysis patients are not only exposed to oxidative stress but also to inflammation. Although anticoagulants are the most frequently used drugs in hemodialysis patients, their effect upon oxidative stress and inflammation in dialysis patients are still unknown.

METHODS

Thirty-three hemodialysis patients were randomized into three groups. Group 1 received standard heparin while group 2 received low molecular weight heparin during the dialysis therapy. Group 3 (control group) did not receive any anticoagulant agent. Investigators were blinded to the therapy. Serum concentrations of oxidative stress and inflammation markers, including C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor alpha, superoxide dismutase, and malondialdehyde, were measured before and after dialysis session.

RESULTS

The oxidative stress and inflammation markers were significantly increased in groups 1 and 3 (p < 0.05 for each) compared to their baseline values. In contrast, baseline and end-treatment values of the oxidative stress and inflammation markers were comparable in the group 2 (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that the type of anticoagulants may take a role in the acute effect of hemodialysis upon oxidative stress and inflammation markers. A comparison of the groups revealed that low molecular weight heparin decreased the oxidative stress and inflammation, whereas standard heparin increased the oxidative stress and inflammation. Low molecular weight heparin appears to have an additive benefit for hemodialysis patients.

Reduction in platelet activation by citrate anticoagulation does not prevent intradialytic hemodynamic instability

BACKGROUND

The etiology of intradialytic hemodynamic instability is multifactorial. Of the various factors involved, a rise in core temperature seems to be crucial. In this respect, the bioincompatibility of hemodialysis (HD) treatment might play an important role. The application of cool dialysate reduces the number of periods of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) considerably. In rats, roller pump perfusion caused hypotension by shear stress induced platelet aggregation and subsequent serotonin release. During clinical HD, citrate anticoagulation abolished platelet activation almost completely. Hence, citrate anticoagulation might reduce IDH, whereas the beneficial effect of cool dialysate might be partly explained by reduced platelet activation.

METHODS

In the present study, blood pressure, IDH episodes, platelet activation, platelet aggregation, and serotonin release were studied crossover in 10 patients during HD with dalteparin anticoagulation at normal and low dialysate temperatures and during HD with citrate.

RESULTS

Citrate strongly reduced platelet activation, but did not improve IDH. The blood pressure was best preserved during cool-temperature HD, despite manifest platelet activation. Platelet activation was not accompanied by a rise in the plasma serotonin concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Three major conclusions can be drawn: (1) it is unlikely that platelet activation and subsequent serotonin release underlie IDH in the clinical situation; (2) the protective effects of cool dialysate on IDH appear to be independent of HD-induced platelet activation, and (3) extrapolating results from rat experiments to the human situation requires uppermost prudence.

Patient characteristics rather than the type of dialyser predict the variability of endothelial derived surface molecules in chronic haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a frequent complication in chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients. Endothelial dysfunction, as measured by soluble cellular adhesion molecules (sCAM) and von Willebrand factor (vWf) in plasma, is an early manifestation of CVD. Today, it is unknown if, and to what extent, their levels are influenced by the type of dialyser.

METHODS

Four dialysers, low-flux cuprammonium (CU); high-flux and low-flux polysulfone and super-flux polyethersulfone, were compared in 15 chronic HD patients in a randomized cross-over fashion. sCAM and vWf were measured at baseline as well as after 4 weeks, and both intra-dialytical and after 24 h (t24 h). Twenty healthy subjects served as controls.

RESULTS

Baseline levels were considerably higher in chronic HD patients than in controls (soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1: sICAM-1 732+/-216 vs 572+/-259 ng/ml, P = 0.06; soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1: sVCAM-1 1917+/-492 vs 1126+/-338 ng/ml, P<0.001; vWF: 205+/-55% vs 98+/-52%, P<0.001). After 4 weeks, no changes were observed. During and after HD, sCAM did not change, except in the case of CU (sICAM-1: 719+/-259 to 772+/-261 ng/ml, P = 0.04). CU induced a rise in vWF directly after HD (t4 h; from 188+/-48% to 255+/-92%, P<0.01), whereas all modalities induced a significant increase at t24 h (mean 228+/-54%, P = 0.02). The levels of sCAM and vWf appeared to be dependent on the individual patients rather than on the type of dialyser (explained variance by different patients: 66%-91%, P<0.001; by type of dialyser 0.4-1.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline levels of sCAM and vWf were markedly higher in chronic HD patients than in controls and did not change after 4 weeks with any dialyser. All membranes induced a marked rise in vWf at t24 h, whereas sICAM-1 increased only in the case of CU at t4 h. As sCAM showed no marked changes during HD with any other modality, our study suggests activation of blood cells rather than endothelial cells. As pre-dialysis levels of sCAM and vWf varied noticeably between individual patients, endothelial dysfunction seems to be far more dependent on patient-related factors than on the HD treatment itself.