Comparative Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs for Rehospitalization in Schizophrenia-A Nationwide Study With 20-Year Follow-up

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: Updated recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

These updated guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology replace the original version published in 2011. They address the scope and targets of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. A consensus meeting was held in 2017, involving experts in schizophrenia and its treatment. They were asked to review key areas and consider the strength of the evidence on the risk-benefit balance of pharmacological interventions and the clinical implications, with an emphasis on meta-analyses, systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials where available, plus updates on current clinical practice. The guidelines cover the pharmacological management and treatment of schizophrenia across the various stages of the illness, including first-episode, relapse prevention, and illness that has proved refractory to standard treatment. It is hoped that the practice recommendations presented will support clinical decision making for practitioners, serve as a source of information for patients and carers, and inform quality improvement.

Patient characteristics, burden and pharmacotherapy of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: results from a survey of 204 US psychiatrists

BACKGROUND

Minimal/non-response to antipsychotic treatment, and persistent positive symptoms despite treatment, are common among patients with schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to characterize a US treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) population in terms of patient demographics, burden of symptoms, treatment history, and factors influencing therapeutic choice.

METHODS

In an online survey, 204 psychiatrists self-selected and completed three patient records: two TRS and one schizophrenia ('non-TRS').

RESULTS

Respondents reported that 29.5% of their schizophrenia caseload had TRS. Selected TRS (n = 408) vs non-TRS (n = 204) patients were more likely to be unemployed (74.5% vs 45.1%, p < 0.001), hospitalized at least once (93.4% vs 74.0%, p < 0.001), and to have physical/psychiatric comorbidities including obesity (40.2% vs 23.5%, p < 0.001) and depression (38.7% vs 25.0%, p = 0.001). Psychiatric symptoms were more frequent and severe in TRS, and interfered more with social and functioning domains. Of positive symptoms, eliminating delusions and hallucinations was considered most important to improve a patient's long-term prognosis. In TRS, clozapine monotherapy was the most common treatment (15.9%), though ranked fifth of ten options to treat TRS. Psychiatrists typically increased the antipsychotic dose or added a second antipsychotic before initiating clozapine or switching antipsychotics. Antipsychotic switches were most commonly due to lack of efficacy (TRS = 71.4% vs non-TRS = 54.3%, p < 0.001) and intolerability (34.4% vs 38.4%, p = 0.22) with the prior antipsychotic. Persistent hallucinatory behavior was the top symptom leading to treatment switches in TRS (63.9% vs 37.1%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

According to psychiatrists, symptoms have a greater clinical burden on patients with TRS than non-TRS. TRS is commonly managed by antipsychotic dose increases/combinations, with clozapine the fifth preference despite being the only approved TRS medication. New treatments are needed for patients who do not respond to available antipsychotics.

Impact of age and CYP2D6 genetics on exposure of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole in patients using long-acting injectable versus oral formulation: relevance of poor and intermediate metabolizer status

PURPOSE

Tailoring medication dosing for the individual patient is complex, and many factors can influence drug exposure. We investigated the effect of age and CYP2D6 genotype on aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole exposure in patients using long-acting injectable (LAI) or oral aripiprazole.

METHODS

Matched data on serum concentration of aripiprazole and CYP2D6 genotype of patients using oral or LAI aripiprazole were included retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring service. The patients were divided into the following CYP2D6 genotype-defined categories: poor metabolizers (PMs), intermediate metabolizers (IMs), normal metabolizers (NMs), and ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs). Linear mixed model analyses were used to evaluate the impact of CYP2D6 genotype on dose-adjusted serum concentrations of the active moiety of aripiprazole+dehydroaripiprazole in relation to age and formulation.

RESULTS

We identified 635 patients (mean age = 40.1 years, 9.4% ≥ 65 years, 53.7% females) using LAI (n = 166) or oral formulation (n = 469). The genotype-predicted CYP2D6 phenotype subgroups were 2.4% UMs, 82.0% NMs, 8.0% IMs, and 7.2% PMs. Age did not significantly affect exposure of the active moiety of aripiprazole+dehydroaripiprazole in the LAI (p = 0.071) or oral (p = 0.14) subgroups. Compared with CYP2D6 NMs, PMs and IMs had significantly increased exposure of the active moiety of aripiprazole+dehydroaripiprazole in the LAI (1.7-fold higher, p < 0.001, and 1.5-fold higher, p < 0.001) and oral (1.7-fold higher, p < 0.001, and 1.6-fold higher, p < 0.001) subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, doses should be adjusted according to CYP2D6 genotype when initiating treatment with aripiprazole LAI or tablets, while advanced age do not affect the exposure of the active moiety of aripiprazole treatment regardless of formulation.

[Long-acting antipsychotics: The QAAPAPLE algorithm review]

BACKGROUND

Eight years ago, a committee of experts from 4 Quebec university psychiatry departments has provided the QAAPAPLE algorithm in order to guide clinicians in their use of long-acting antipsychotics (LAAP) for patients with psychotic disorders.

OBJECTIVE

Update the QAAPAPLE algorithm.

METHODS

Using a qualitative and selective literature review, the experts have focused on several aspects related to the use of LAAP and the relevance of modifying the algorithm: 1) new data on LAAP (including polypharmacy and co-prescription with clozapine, dose frequency/interval); 2) perception and attitude regarding algorithms and evidence; 3) difficulties in implementing algorithms; 4) polypharmacy involving LAAP and co-prescriptions with clozapine; 5) partner patients perspective on the algorithm.

RESULTS

Thirteen meta-analysis were published and completed observational studies (including those on national registries), confirming the LAAP benefits. Literature adds specifications about using some drug associations as well as dose frequency and interval. Therefore, scientific advances have been considered to modify the algorithm.

CONCLUSION

Interacting with Quebec psychiatrists, we have examined changes in prescription and literature to better understand the use of algorithm. The committee has updated the QAAPAPLE algorithm to guide clinicians in using LAAP along the path of patients with psychosis as early as the first episode and through different clinical settings (including treatment resistance) in order to have a more flexible and user-friendly treatment.

Continuation of schizophrenia treatment with three long-acting injectable antipsychotics in South Korea: A nationwide population-based study

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have been developed to prevent symptom relapse in patients with schizophrenia; relapse has a detrimental clinical impact and high social burden. However, data on treatment continuation rates of LAI antipsychotics are inconsistent, primarily because of study design; limited data exist for patients taking oral psychotropic medications taken along with LAI antipsychotics, and factors related to LAI antipsychotics treatment discontinuation. Patients with schizophrenia in the South Korea Health Insurance Review Agency database from 2007 to 2016 who had received LAI haloperidol, LAI paliperidone, or LAI risperidone were included. Treatment continuation rates and proportions of patients using concurrent oral psychotropic medications were calculated. Cox proportional hazard ratios were used for analysis related to discontinuation. There was a significant difference in treatment continuation rates at 6 months after initiation (36.8% LAI haloperidol, 57.5% LAI paliperidone, and 34.5% LAI risperidone). A substantial proportion of patients in all three groups were prescribed oral antipsychotics during LAI antipsychotics treatment. In the LAI paliperidone group, type of hospital was significantly associated with a higher risk of treatment discontinuation, with a hazard ratio of 1.195-1.598. Early discontinuation of LAI antipsychotic treatment occurs in a large number of patients with schizophrenia. Intervention strategies for improving the LAI antipsychotics treatment adherence are needed.

Time to Rehospitalization in Patients With Schizophrenia Receiving Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics or Oral Antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate and compare time to rehospitalization in patients with schizophrenia receiving long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) after discharge with those receiving oral antipsychotics. Additionally, the trend of LAIs prescription rates was investigated.

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia (n = 13 087), who were discharged from the study hospital from 2006 to 2017, were followed-up under naturalistic conditions in the year after discharge. The primary outcome was time to rehospitalization. Survival analysis was used in the comparisons between LAIs and oral antipsychotics and between FGA-LAIs and SGA-LAIs. Simple linear regression and Cochrane-Armitage trend test were used to test whether a time trend existed for LAIs prescription rates.

RESULTS

In the 1 year following discharge, patients in the LAIs group had a significantly lower rehospitalization rate and a significantly lengthened time to rehospitalization than those in the oral antipsychotics group. Rehospitalization rate and time to rehospitalization were not significantly different in patients receiving FGA-LAIs or SGA-LAIs. A significantly higher percentage of patients treated with FGA-LAIs received anticholinergic agents than those treated with SGA-LAIs. The LAIs prescription rate grew significantly from 2006 to 2017 by an average of 0.5% per year.

CONCLUSIONS

LAIs were significantly superior to oral antipsychotics in reducing rehospitalization risk, whereas SGA-LAIs were comparable with FGA-LAIs in reducing rehospitalization risk. However, use of concomitant anticholinergic agents was less frequent in the SGA-LAIs group than in the FGA-LAIs group. Increase in LAIs prescription rate may be due to growing experiences and success among clinicians in treating patients with LAIs.

Comparative effectiveness of second generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics based on nationwide database research in Hungary

Background

Schizophrenia is a severe condition that affects approximately 1% of the population. Certain elements of antipsychotic treatment can only be examined in large population, thus the need for population-based real-world analyses has been increasing.

Patients and methods

Hungarian National Health Fund database includes all healthcare data of the population of Hungary. All patients diagnosed with schizophrenia between 01.01.2006 and 31.12.2015 were included in the study. We analyzed all patients with newly initiated second-generation antipsychotic during the inclusion period (01.01.2012–31.12.2013). Patients were followed for 2 years. All-cause treatment discontinuation served as the primary outcome of the study. Patients with newly initiated long-acting injectable treatments were further investigated in stratified analyses based on their previous treatment.

Results

106,624 patients had schizophrenia diagnosis during the study period. 12,232 patients met the inclusion criteria for newly initiating second-generation antipsychotic during the inclusion period. The proportion of patients still on treatment after 1 year for oral treatments varied between 17% (oral risperidone) and 31% (oral olanzapine) while the analogous data for long acting injectables were between 32% (risperidone long acting) and 64% (paliperidone long acting one monthly). The 2-year data were similarly in favor of long-actings. Median time to discontinuation in the oral group varied between 57 days (clozapine) and 121 days (olanzapine). The median time to discontinuation for long-actings was significantly longer: between 176 and 287 days; in case of paliperidone long acting, median was not reached during the observation period. Patients receiving long-acting treatment switched from another long-acting remained on the newly initiated treatment significantly longer than those switched from orals.

Conclusion

Our results indicate the superiority of second generation long-acting antipsychotics with regard to rates of treatment discontinuation and periods of persistence to the assigned medication.

The impact of the ambiguous definition of "month" on pharmacotherapy

AIM

The Gregorian calendar divides a common year into 12 months of irregular length. As a result, whenever time is measured in months, an unavoidable degree of inaccuracy exists. We hypothesize that the use of this unprecise measure of time has profound implications for the field of pharmacotherapy from practical and drug safety issues, to variations in drug budgets, and pharmacoepidemiological, industrial and drug regulatory considerations, such as price-fixing policies. In this paper, we have tried to gather evidence in favor of our hypothesis, focusing on the particular case of antipsychotics.

METHODS

First, we examined all monthly prescriptions of long acting injectable aripiprazole or paliperidone in the Basque Country from January 1st to December 31st, 2017. Second, we investigated how the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics defines the defined daily dose (DDD) for these drugs. Third, we analyzed the pack size of oral solid formulations of antipsychotics on the market in Spain. Finally, we explored how evidence from clinical trials is transferred to clinical practice and how it may affect drug fixing-policies.

RESULTS

We found that "monthly" and "every 4 week" injections were prescribed for approximately half of patients. We estimated that an extra cost of almost half a million euros (€495,420) would have been incurred if all prescriptions had been every 4 weeks. We also found that 21 additional adverse site reactions per year could be expected for aripiprazole. Besides, the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics calculates the defined daily dose using a 30-day interval for these drugs. In addition, we found that pack sizes for currently available solid oral antipsychotic formulations are inconsistent, with 53% being sold as 28-day multiples and 46% as 30-day multiples. Finally, we found out that although the vast majority of clinical trials are performed in weeks, drug regulatory agencies frequently use the term "month" or "monthly" in the summary of product characteristics of marketed antipsychotics.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the inconsistent definition of month has deep implications on various aspects of pharmacotherapy. Considering all the data given above, we urge drug regulatory agencies to specifically avoid the term "month" in the summary of product characteristics and adopt 4-week intervals instead. We also suggest that the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics establishes a new 28-day based DDD for "monthly" antipsychotics. Finally, healthcare providers worldwide should abstain from using "monthly" frequencies in drug prescription software tools.

Maintenance treatment for patients with a first psychotic episode

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update of recent studies relevant for maintenance treatment with antipsychotic medication after a first psychotic episode (FEP).

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite controversy derived from a follow-up analysis from an earlier study showing that attempted early discontinuation after remission was associated with improved long-term functioning, most other studies support better long-term outcome with continuous maintenance treatment after the first episode. However, the main question is not whether, but for how long maintenance treatment after FEP should be offered. Consistent evidence shows that withdrawal from antipsychotics increases the risk for a relapse or re-hospitalization. On the other hand, maintenance treatment is associated with the risk to develop burdensome antipsychotic-induced side-effects and one should keep in mind that around 20% of FEP will not have a second episode. In this regard, the decision for maintenance treatment for periods above some months must be the result of a comprehensive risk-benefit evaluation during a shared decision-making process.

SUMMARY

There is no replicated evidence that prognosis can be improved by discontinuing antipsychotic medication after a FEP. There is a clear need for additional studies to develop single-subject outcome predictors and to identify long-term efficacy of maintenance treatment beyond relapse (e.g. recovery).

Psychiatrists' attitude towards the use of clozapine in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia: A nationwide survey

OBJECTIVES

Clozapine is the most effective treatment for refractory schizophrenia, yet it remains underused in clinical practice. The current study examined the awareness, familiarity and attitude of a nationwide sample of Israeli psychiatrists regarding the use of clozapine.

METHODS

Data were collected using questionnaires, completed by 295 psychiatrists. Participants were asked to score questions regarding clozapine procedures; familiarity with guidelines, drug properties, prescription and attitude towards specialized clozapine resources.

RESULTS

About half (53.3%) of the psychiatrists reported initiating treatment with clozapine according to the guidelines, whereas 33% reported that they administered clozapine only after three or more unsuccessful antipsychotic treatments. Surprisingly, availability of specialized resources for clozapine treatment (such as clozapine clinics) was associated with delayed initiation of clozapine treatment, and a lower rate of clozapine administration. Barriers to clozapine use included concerns about patient adherence, side effects and partial compliance with the required blood monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying or avoiding clozapine treatment to potentially eligible patients, despite familiarity with the drug efficacy and treatment guidelines, is a major mental health concern. However, executive allocation of resources to support the use of clozapine may be ineffective in promoting clozapine use.

Association of Antipsychotic Polypharmacy vs Monotherapy With Psychiatric Rehospitalization Among Adults With Schizophrenia

IMPORTANCE

The effectiveness of antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia relapse prevention is controversial, and use of multiple agents is generally believed to impair physical well-being.

OBJECTIVE

To study the association of specific antipsychotic combinations with psychiatric rehospitalization.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this nationwide cohort study, the risk of psychiatric rehospitalization was used as a marker for relapse among 62 250 patients with schizophrenia during the use of 29 different antipsychotic monotherapy and polypharmacy types between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2015, in a comprehensive, nationwide cohort in Finland. We conducted analysis of the data from April 24 to June 15, 2018. Rehospitalization risks were investigated by using within-individual analyses to minimize selection bias.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hazard ratio (HR) for psychiatric rehospitalization during use of polypharmacy vs during monotherapy within the same individual.

RESULTS

In the total cohort, including 62 250 patients, 31 257 individuals (50.2%) were men, and the median age was 45.6 (interquartile range, 34.6-57.9) years. The clozapine plus aripiprazole combination was associated with the lowest risk of psychiatric rehospitalization in the total cohort, being superior to clozapine, the monotherapy associated with the best outcomes, with a difference of 14% (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94) in the analysis including all polypharmacy periods, and 18% in the conservatively defined polypharmacy analysis excluding periods shorter than 90 days (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.89; P < .001). Among patients with their first episode of schizophrenia, these differences between clozapine plus aripiprazole vs clozapine monotherapy were greater (difference, 22%; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96 in the analysis including all polypharmacy periods, and difference, 23%; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95 in the conservatively defined polypharmacy analysis). At the aggregate level, any antipsychotic polypharmacy was associated with a 7% to 13% lower risk of psychiatric rehospitalization compared with any monotherapy (ranging from HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.88, to HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.95; P < .001). Clozapine was the only monotherapy among the 10 best treatments. Results on all-cause and somatic hospitalization, mortality, and other sensitivity analyses were in line with the primary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Combining aripiprazole with clozapine was associated with the lowest risk of rehospitalization, indicating that certain types of polypharmacy may be feasible in the treatment of schizophrenia. Because add-on treatments are started when monotherapy is no longer sufficient to control for worsening of symptoms, it is likely that the effect sizes for polypharmacy are underestimates. Although the results do not indicate that all types of polypharmacy are beneficial, the current treatment guidelines should modify their categorical recommendations discouraging all antipsychotic polypharmacy in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia.

Effects of long-acting injectable antipsychotics versus oral antipsychotics on autonomic nervous system activity in schizophrenic patients

OBJECTIVE

Long-acting injections (LAIs) of antipsychotics show distinct pharmacokinetic profiles from oral antipsychotics (OAPs). Although there may be differences in adverse event frequency, any differences in their effects on autonomic nervous system (ANS) remain unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 270 schizophrenic patients were recruited in this study: 241 received OAPs (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or aripiprazole) and 29 received LAIs (risperidone LAI, aripiprazole LAI, or paliperidone palmitate) as monotherapy. Heart rate variability was measured as an index of ANS activity, and the low-frequency (0.03-0.15 Hz) component, high-frequency (0.15-0.40 Hz) component, and total power (0.03-0.40 Hz) were calculated. Components were compared between the groups using t-tests.

RESULTS

A significant difference was detected in the low-frequency component between the OAP and LAI groups (P=0.046). No significant difference was found in total power or the high-frequency component between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with OAPs, LAIs have fewer adverse effects on ANS activity, particularly the low-frequency component, as determined using a spectral analysis of heart rate variability.