Therapeutic drug monitoring of the newer antiepileptic drugs

Efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine oral loading in patients with epilepsy

The rapid achievement of effective levels of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is required in patients with epilepsy who have a higher risk of seizures, and oral loading of AEDs may be an important consideration in these patients. We performed the present study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of oral loading of oxcarbazepine in patients with recurrent seizures, or after temporary discontinuation of AEDs for diagnostic or presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Forty adult patients were studied and oxcarbazepine was administered orally at a single loading dosage of 30 mg/kg. The plasma levels of oxcarbazepine and its active metabolite, 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbazepine (monohydroxy derivative, MHD), were measured, and clinical assessment of adverse events was performed at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, and 24 h after oral loading of oxcarbazepine. Approximately two-thirds of patients reached effective levels of MHD 2 h after receiving the oral loading, and all patients reached effective levels 4 h after oxcarbazepine administration. Most patients maintained therapeutic MHD levels for at least 16 h. Almost half of the patients experienced adverse events, but all were mild to moderate in severity and resolved spontaneously within 24 h. Our study shows that oral loading of oxcarbazepine is an effective and well-tolerated method for rapidly achieving therapeutic levels of MHD in patients with epilepsy, and is a useful option in selected patients with recurrent seizures, or after temporary discontinuation of AEDs.

Simultaneous quantification of levetiracetam and gabapentin in plasma by ultra-pressure liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry detection

INTRODUCTION

Gabapentin (Neurontin) and levetiracetam (Keppra) are anticonvulsants with novel structures and suggested therapeutic ranges of 2-10 mg/L and 6-20 mg/L, respectively. Gabapentin is also used extensively to manage neuropathic pain, and for this indication, wherein higher doses are prescribed, plasma concentrations of 15-30 mg/L are typical.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we describe a simple rapid assay to support therapeutic drug monitoring of gabapentin and levetiracetam in plasma by ultra-pressure liquid chromatography couples to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) detection.

METHODS

After the addition of internal standard and protein precipitation of patient plasma with methanol:acetonitrile in a 50:50 ratio, 1 μL of supernatant sample is injected onto an Acquity UPLC HSS T3, 1.8 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm (Waters) column. Elution occurs using a linear gradient of acetonitrile and water, each having 0.1% formic acid added. The column is eluted into a Waters Acquity UPLC TQD, operating in a positive mode to detect gabapentin at transition 172.18 > 154.11, levetiracetam at 171.11 > 126, and internal standard (3-amino-2-naphthoic acid) at 188.06 > 170. Secondary transitions for each analyte are also monitored for gabapentin at 172.18 > 137.06, levetiracetam at 171.11 > 154, and internal standard at 188.06 > 115. Runtime is 1.5 minutes per injection with baseline resolved chromatographic separation.

RESULTS

The analytical measurement ranges were 1-150 mg/L for gabapentin and for levetiracetam. Intra-assay imprecision by the coefficient of variance (CV) was less than 8% and interassay CV was less than 5% for both analytes, at 4 different concentrations. Results obtained from patient samples were compared with results generated by established high-performance liquid chromatography-UV methods with the following regression statistics: y = 1.12x - 0.77, r = 0.996, Sy, x = 0.89, and n = 29 for gabapentin and y = 0.991x + 0.70, r = 0.997, Sy, x = 2.24, and n = 30 for levetiracetam. No analytical interferences were identified.

CONCLUSION

: In summary, a simple reliable UPLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for routine clinical monitoring of gabapentin and levetiracetam.

Modulation of abnormal synaptic transmission in hippocampal CA3 neurons of spontaneously epileptic rats (SERs) by levetiracetam

Levetiracetam (LEV) inhibits partial refractory epilepsy in human, and both convulsive and absence-like seizures in the spontaneously epileptic rat (SER). Two-thirds of hippocampal CA3 neurons in SER show a long-lasting depolarization shift, with accompanying repetitive firing upon mossy fiber stimulation. This abnormal excitability is probably attributable to abnormalities in the L-type Ca(2+) channels. We performed electrophysiological studies to elucidate the mechanism underlying the antiepileptic effects of LEV via intracellular recording from the hippocampal CA3 neurons in slice preparations of SER and non-epileptic Wistar rats. LEV (100 μM) inhibited the depolarization shift with repetitive firing by mossy fiber stimulation (MFS), without affecting the first spike in SER CA3 neurons. At a higher dose (1mM), LEV suppressed the first spike in all SER neurons (including the CA3 neurons which showed only a single action potential by MFS), while the single action potential of Wistar rat CA3 neurons remained unaffected. SER CA3 neurons with MFS-induced abnormal firing exhibited a higher number of repetitive spikes when a depolarization pulse was applied in the SER CA3 neurons. LEV (100 μM, 1mM) reduced the repetitive firing induced by a depolarization pulse applied without affecting Ca(2+) spike in SER neurons. LEV is known not to bind glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. These findings suggest that the therapeutic concentration of LEV inhibits abnormal firing of the CA3 neurons by modulating abnormal synaptic transmission and abnormal Na(+) channels in SER.

Pharmacotherapeutics of epilepsy: use of lamotrigine and expectations for lamotrigine extended release

The goal in managing patients with epilepsy is complete seizure freedom. Pharmacotherapeutic management of epilepsy is complicated by multiple syndromes, inter-individual differences in drug sensitivities, inter-individual differences in drug disposition, and drug interactions. Most anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) have a therapeutic window with only a 2- to 3-fold concentration range. Extended release formulations offer advantages over their immediate release counter parts with less fluctuation in the serum concentration vs time curve and improved compliance. However, missed doses are more likely to result in prolonged “sub-therapeutic serum concentrations”. Best clinical outcome may sometimes require twice daily dosing of extended release formulations even though approved for once daily dosing, as this optimally balances pharmacokinetics against compliance. Lamotrigine (LTG) is a broad spectrum AED with efficacy in partial and generalized epilepsy syndromes and good tolerability. Its metabolism is affected by co-medications which may be inducing, neutral or inhibiting of hepatic glucuronidation. Furthermore, though the average half-life in monotherapy is about 24 hours, there is a large inter-individual variation that may, including the extremes, approach a range of 10-fold. LTG-XR is expected to decrease fluctuation of serum concentration in the presence of hepatic inducing or neutral drugs. However, optimal clinical benefit in some patients may require twice daily dosing when metabolism is rapid.

Effects of antiepileptic drugs on GABA release from rat and human neocortical synaptosomes

In epilepsy, allegedly, a neurotransmitter imbalance between the inhibitory GABA and the excitatory glutamate prevails. Therefore, some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are thought to increase GABA release. Because little is known about corresponding presynaptic effects of AEDs in the human brain, this study investigated the effects of carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenytoin, gabapentin, pregabalin, levetiracetam, and valproate on (3)H-GABA release from human neocortical synaptosomes preincubated with (3)H-GABA. To obtain information on possible species differences, rat neocortical synaptosomes were investigated concomitantly. Release was evoked by either veratridine (1, 3.2, or 10 μM), which prevents activated voltage-dependent Na(+) channels from closing, or elevation of extracellular [K(+)] from 3 to 15 mM. The exocytosis inhibitor tetanus toxin (TeT) or withdrawal of buffer Ca(2+) (Ca (e) (2+) ) reduced K(+)-evoked release in both species, while blockade of Na(+) channels with tetrodotoxin had no effect. K(+)-evoked release was characterized as predominant, Ca(2+)-dependent and Na(+)-independent, exocytosis. Carbamazepine and phenytoin in the rat and carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, and valproate in human tissue reduced K(+)-evoked (3)H-GABA release. With respect to veratridine-evoked release, Ca (e) (2+) withdrawal did not reduce release in the rat; it even increased the release in human tissue. TeT was slightly inhibitory in the rat. Blockade of GABA transport diminished veratridine-evoked (3)H-GABA release in either species. This release was characterized as mediated mainly by transporter reversal. Carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and phenytoin in rat tissue and carbamazepine and phenytoin in human decreased veratridine-induced (3)H-GABA release. Interestingly, no AED increased (3)H-GABA release. The reduction by AEDs of veratridine-evoked release was more intense than that of K(+)-evoked release. In conclusion, reduction of GABA release by AEDs may be the actual objective in a pathologically altered neuronal network where GABA acts in a depolarizing fashion.

Modern methods for analysis of antiepileptic drugs in the biological fluids for pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence and therapeutic drug monitoring

Epilepsy is a chronic disease occurring in approximately 1.0% of the world's population. About 30% of the epileptic patients treated with availably antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) continue to have seizures and are considered therapy-resistant or refractory patients. The ultimate goal for the use of AEDs is complete cessation of seizures without side effects. Because of a narrow therapeutic index of AEDs, a complete understanding of its clinical pharmacokinetics is essential for understanding of the pharmacodynamics of these drugs. These drug concentrations in biological fluids serve as surrogate markers and can be used to guide or target drug dosing. Because early studies demonstrated clinical and/or electroencephalographic correlations with serum concentrations of several AEDs, It has been almost 50 years since clinicians started using plasma concentrations of AEDs to optimize pharmacotherapy in patients with epilepsy. Therefore, validated analytical method for concentrations of AEDs in biological fluids is a necessity in order to explore pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence and TDM in various clinical situations. There are hundreds of published articles on the analysis of specific AEDs by a wide variety of analytical methods in biological samples have appears over the past decade. This review intends to provide an updated, concise overview on the modern method development for monitoring AEDs for pharmacokinetic studies, bioequivalence and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Quantitative dynamic nuclear polarization-NMR on blood plasma for assays of drug metabolism

Analytical platforms for the fast detection, identification and quantification of circulating drugs with a narrow therapeutic range are vital in clinical pharmacology. As a result of low drug concentrations, analytical tools need to provide high sensitivity and specificity. Dynamic nuclear polarization-NMR (DNP-NMR) in the form of the hyperpolarization-dissolution method should afford the sensitivity and spectral resolution for the direct detection and quantification of numerous isotopically labeled circulating drugs and their metabolites in single liquid-state NMR transients. This study explores the capability of quantitative in vitro DNP-NMR to assay drug metabolites in blood plasma. The lower limit of detection for the anti-epileptic drug (13)C-carbamazepine and its pharmacologically active metabolite (13)C-carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide is 0.08 µg/mL in rabbit blood plasma analyzed by single-scan (13)C DNP-NMR. An internal standard is used for the accurate quantification of drug and metabolite. Comparison of quantitative DNP-NMR data with an established analytical method (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) yields a Pearson correlation coefficient r of 0.99. Notably, all DNP-NMR determinations were performed without analyte derivatization or sample purification other than plasma protein precipitation. Quantitative DNP-NMR is an emerging methodology which requires little sample preparation and yields quantitative data with high sensitivity for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Pregabalin modulation of neurotransmitter release is mediated by change in intrinsic activation/inactivation properties of ca(v)2.1 calcium channels

In this work, we studied the effects of the anticonvulsant and analgesic drug pregabalin (PGB) on excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) at principal neurons of the mouse medial nucleus of the trapezoid body and on presynaptic calcium currents at the calyx of Held. We found that the acute application of PGB reduced the amplitude of EPSCs in a dose-dependent manner with a maximal blocking effect of approximately 30%. A clinical high-concentration dose of PGB (e.g., 500 μM) blocked Ca(v)2.1 channel-mediated currents and decreased their facilitation during a 100-Hz train, without changing their voltage-dependent activation. Furthermore, PGB also removed the inactivation of Ca(v)2.1 channels at a clinically relevant low concentration of 100 μM. These results suggest novel modulatory mechanisms mediated by the acute administration of PGB on fast excitatory synaptic transmission and might contribute to better understanding PGB anticonvulsant/analgesic clinical effects.

Region-specific changes in gene expression in rat brain after chronic treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin

PURPOSE

It is commonly assumed that antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) act similarly in the various parts of the brain as long as their molecular targets are present. A few experimental studies on metabolic effects of vigabatrin, levetiracetam, valproate, and lamotrigine have shown that these drugs may act differently in different brain regions. We examined effects of chronic treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin on mRNA levels to detect regional drug effects in a broad, nonbiased manner.

METHODS

mRNA levels were monitored in three brain regions with oligonucleotide-based microarrays.

RESULTS

Levetiracetam (150 mg/kg for 90 days) changed the expression of 65 genes in pons/medulla oblongata, two in hippocampus, and one in frontal cortex. Phenytoin (75 mg/kg), in contrast, changed the expression of only three genes in pons/medulla oblongata, but 64 genes in hippocampus, and 327 genes in frontal cortex. Very little overlap between regions or drug treatments was observed with respect to effects on gene expression.

DISCUSSION

We conclude that chronic treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin causes region-specific and highly differential effects on gene expression in the brain. Regional effects on gene expression could reflect regional differences in molecular targets of AEDs, and they could influence the clinical profiles of AEDs.

A rapid and simple assay for lamotrigine in serum/plasma by HPLC, and comparison with an immunoassay

Monitoring serum/plasma concentrations of lamotrigine may be useful under certain circumstances. An HPLC column packed with strong cation-exchange (SCX)-modified microparticulate silica together with a 100% methanol eluent containing an ionic modifier permits direct injection of sample extracts. An HPLC-UV method developed using this principle for the measurement of serum/plasma lamotrigine is simple, sensitive and selective. The analysis time is less than 5 min. Intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy meet acceptance criteria, and sample stability, and potential interferences from other compounds have been evaluated. There was good agreement with consensus mean results from external quality assessment samples (n = 32). Analysis of patient samples (n = 115) using the HPLC method and the Seradyn QMS® Lamotrigine immunoassay showed that the immunoassay over-estimated lamotrigine by 21% on average.

Effect of carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine on wild-type and mutant neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors linked to nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy

Carbamazepine (5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide) and oxcarbazepine (10,11-dihydro-10-oxo-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide) are widely used for the treatment of partial epilepsy. Recent work indicates that these drugs, in addition to targeting voltage-gated Na(+) channels, can modulate ligand-gated channels. These compounds appear to be particularly effective for treatment of nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy, which can be caused by mutant neuronal nicotinic receptors. We compared the effects of carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine on heteromeric nicotinic receptors to better understand the underlying mechanism of the effect of these drugs in epileptic patients. Receptors were expressed in cell lines and studied by patch-clamp methods at -60 mV. For alpha2beta4 receptors activated with 100 microM nicotine, IC(50) for carbamazepine was 49 microM. Receptors in which alpha2 was substituted with alpha2-I279 N, linked to autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy, had an IC(50) of 21 microM. For oxcarbazepine, the IC(50) was larger than 500 microM for wild-type receptors and approximately 100 microM for mutant receptors. A similar inhibition was observed in the presence of 10 microM nicotine, indicating a non-competitive mechanism. The monohydroxy derivative (MHD) of oxcarbazepine, clinically the most relevant compound, was tested on both alpha2beta4 and alpha4beta2 receptors, to obtain a broader view of its possible physiological effects. At the typical concentration present in blood (100 microM), MHD produced an approximate 40% channel block on alpha4beta2, but no significant effect on alpha2beta4 receptors. Oxcarbazepine and MHD retarded the channel deactivation, suggesting that these compounds produce open channel block. These results may explain the particular efficacy of these drugs in nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Newer Anti-Epilepsy Medications

In the past twenty years, 14 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States and/or Europe. These drugs are eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. In general, the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established in clinical trials for these new anticonvulsants, and clear guidelines for drug monitoring have yet to be defined. The antiepileptic drugs with the strongest justifications for drug monitoring are lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, stiripentol, and zonisamide. Stiripentol and tiagabine are strongly protein bound and are candidates for free drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring has lower utility for gabapentin, pregabalin, and vigabatrin. Measurement of salivary drug concentrations has potential utility for therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs will be discussed in managing patients with epilepsy.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Newer Anti-Epilepsy Medications

In the past twenty years, 14 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States and/or Europe. These drugs are eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. In general, the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established in clinical trials for these new anticonvulsants, and clear guidelines for drug monitoring have yet to be defined. The antiepileptic drugs with the strongest justifications for drug monitoring are lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, stiripentol, and zonisamide. Stiripentol and tiagabine are strongly protein bound and are candidates for free drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring has lower utility for gabapentin, pregabalin, and vigabatrin. Measurement of salivary drug concentrations has potential utility for therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs will be discussed in managing patients with epilepsy.

Generic products of antiepileptic drugs: a perspective on bioequivalence and interchangeability

Most antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are currently available as generic products, yet neurologists and patients are reluctant to switch to generics. Generic AEDs are regarded as bioequivalent to brand AEDs after meeting the average bioequivalence criteria; consequently, they are considered to be interchangeable with their respective brands without loss of efficacy and safety. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the present bioequivalence requirements are already so rigorous and constrained that there is little possibility that generics that meet regulatory bioequivalence criteria could lead to therapeutic problems. So is there a scientific rationale for the concerns about switching patients with epilepsy to bioequivalent generics? Herein we discuss the assessment of bioequivalence and propose a scaled-average bioequivalence approach where scaling of bioequivalence is carried out based on brand lot-to-lot variance as an alternative to the conventional bioequivalence test as a means to determine whether switching patients to generic formulations, or vice versa, is a safe and effective therapeutic option. Meeting the proposed scaled-average bioequivalence requirements will ensure that when an individual patient is switched, he or she has fluctuations in plasma levels similar to those from lot-to-lot of the brand reference levels and thus should make these generic products safely switchable without change in efficacy and safety outcomes.

Gabapentin toxicity in patients with chronic kidney disease: a preventable cause of morbidity

BACKGROUND

Gabapentin is frequently used as an analgesic in patients with chronic kidney disease. Although gabapentin is well known for its favorable pharmacokinetics, it is exclusively eliminated renally, and patients with chronic kidney disease are at risk for toxicity. Existing literature on such risk is lacking.

METHODS

We examined the Mayo Clinic Rochester database from 1998 to 2007 in patients with serum gabapentin measurements and known medical outcomes. A total of 729 patients were stratified according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate: group I, 126 individuals with estimated glomerular filtration greater than 90 mL/min/1.72 mm(2) [corrected] ; group II, 594 individuals with estimated glomerular filtration less than 90 mL/min/1.72 mm(2) [corrected] without dialysis; group III, 9 individuals with chronic dialysis.

RESULTS

Patients in groups II and III had higher serum gabapentin levels (8.39+/-0.32 microL/mL and 58.8+/-10.22 microL/mL, respectively) than in group I (5.52+/-0.32 microL/mL, P<.01). Toxicity occurred exclusively in groups II (5.56%) and III (77.8%); toxic manifestations were more severe in group III than in group II. Elderly individuals with multiple comorbidities were overrepresented in those with toxic manifestations. Gabapentin toxicity was suspected initially in only 41.5% of symptomatic cases.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentin toxicity in patients with chronic kidney disease is underrecognized. Patients with chronic kidney disease often receive inappropriately high gabapentin dosage for their kidney function, occasioning overt toxicity; advanced age and comorbidity predispose these patients for toxicity. Heightened awareness of such preventable risk, amid the chronic kidney disease epidemic, would be cost-effective and improve healthcare quality.

Anticonvulsants in bipolar disorders: current research and practice and future directions

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effectiveness of drugs with anticonvulsant properties for interventions in persons with bipolar disorder and to place these findings in the context of clinicians' practices and their implications for future research to more effectively manage bipolar disorders.

METHODS

Major electronic databases were searched up to February 2009 for clinical trial data, both original studies and reviews, on drugs with anticonvulsant properties studied for bipolar disorders.

RESULTS

Valproate, principally as divalproex, has strong evidence for effectiveness in mania, moderately strong evidence for benefits in prophylaxis of recovered states, and recent proof-of-concept evidence for benefits in bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has strong evidence for evidence for effectiveness in maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder, principally for benefits in depressive states. Lamotrigine has been established as ineffective in mania and has lacked efficacy in acute bipolar depression in most randomized trials. Carbamazepine has strong evidence for effectiveness in mania, but lacks adequate studies in other aspects of bipolar disorder treatment. Its adverse effect profile and pharmacokinetic interference with a wide range of drugs, including many employed in bipolar disorder, warrants limitation of use to patients who have responded inadequately to other regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Three drugs, valproate, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine, have strong evidence-based support for use in clinical states of bipolar disorder. Other anticonvulsant drugs investigated in bipolar disorder either have evidence of lack of benefits in bipolar disorder or have been inadequately studied to determine possible effectiveness.

Pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam XR 500mg tablets

PURPOSE

To compare the relative bioavailability of levetiracetam extended-release tablets (XR) with immediate release tablets (IR) following single and multiple dosing; to assess the food effect and the dose-proportionality of XR from 1000 to 3000mg.

METHODS

Two panels of 24 healthy subjects were enrolled. Study N01160 was a three-way crossover between IR fasted (single and repeated 500mg b.i.d.), XR fasted (single and repeated 1000mg o.d.) and XR with food (1000mg single dose). Study N01260 was a three-way crossover single dose-proportionality between XR 1000, 2000 and 3000mg.

RESULTS

After single dose, levetiracetam XR and IR were bioequivalent with respect to AUC((0-t)), AUC(infinity) and C(max). The median t(max) was delayed from 0.9 to 4h. For the fed/fasted comparison, the confidence intervals around the C(max) and AUC ratios were within the 80-125% limits. At steady-state, the AUC(24h) were also bioequivalent. In the dose-proportionality trial, the AUC and C(max) increased linearly with the dose. Levetiracetam XR was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam XR 1000mg o.d. is bioequivalent to levetiracetam IR 500mg b.i.d. There is no food effect, and the absorption of XR is dose-proportional from 1000 to 3000mg.

A probable case of gabapentin-related reversible hearing loss in a patient with acute renal failure

BACKGROUND

As described in the literature, gabapentin toxicity in patients with impaired renal function can manifest as coma, myoclonus, tremulousness, or altered mental status. Gabapentin is an antiepileptic agent indicated for use as an adjunct therapy in partial seizures and postherpetic neuralgia but is also prescribed for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 46-year-old white woman (height, 167 cm; weight, 177 kg; body mass index, 62.8 kg/m2) with a 6-year history of diabetes mellitus and previously normal renal function, presented to the emergency department of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center with anuria (a serum creatinine level of 7.4 mg/dL), hearing loss, myoclonus, and confusion with hallucinations lasting for 3 days. Her blood pressure was 110/74 mm Hg. The patient's preadmit medication list included: lisinopril (40 mg QD), hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg QD), and furosemide (80 mg QD) for hypertension; atorvastatin (10 mg QD) for hyperlipidemia; omeprazole (20 mg QD) for gastroesophageal reflux disease; salmeterol/fluticasone inhaler (100/50 microg; 1 puff BID) and albuterol metered-dose inhaler (90 microg as needed) for asthma; metformin (500 mg BID) and insulin lispro per sliding scale for type 2 diabetes mellitus; oxycodone controlled release (60 mg TID) for chronic osteoarthritis and low back pain; alprazolam (0.5 mg every 8 hours as needed) for generalized anxiety disorder; venlafaxine (150 mg BID) for depression; and gabapentin (300 mg TID) for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The patient's symptoms (hearing loss, myoclonus, and confusion) improved after 1 session of hemodialysis (approximately 10 hours following admission) and had resolved at the time of discharge (4 days later). On admission, the gabapentin concentration was 17.6 microg/mL, and following hemodialysis, the gabapentin concentration was undetectable (by discharge/day 4). The timing of the patient's last dose of gabapentin is unknown. Normal doses for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy range from 900 to 3600 mg/d divided 3 times daily.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a patient with acute renal failure who developed hearing loss, myoclonus, and confusion with hallucinations in the presence of elevated gabapentin concentrations. Due to rapid improvement after hemodialysis and discontinuation of gabapentin, we believe that these symptoms were probably due to gabapentin toxicity.

Population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine with data from therapeutic drug monitoring in German and Spanish patients with epilepsy

This study develops a population pharmacokinetic model for lamotrigine (LTG) in Spanish and German patients diagnosed with epilepsy. LTG steady-state plasma concentration data from therapeutic drug monitoring were collected retrospectively from 600 patients, with a total of 1699 plasma drug concentrations. The data were analyzed according to a one-compartment model using the nonlinear mixed effect modelling program. The influences of origin (Germany or Spain), sex, age, total body weight, and comedication with valproic acid (VPA), levetiracetam, and enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (phenobarbital [PB], phenytoin [PHT], primidone [PRM], and carbamazepine [CBZ]) were investigated using step-wise generalized additive modelling. The final regression model for LTG clearance (CL) was as follows: CL(L/h) = 0.028*total body weight*e(-0.713*VPA)*e0.663*PHT*e0.588*(PB or PRM)*e0.467*CBZ*e0.864*IND, where IND refers to two or more inducers added to LTG treatment; this factor as well as VPA, PHT, PB, PRM, and CBZ take a value of zero or one according to their absence or presence, respectively. The administration of inducers led to a significant increase in mean LTG CL (values of 0.045-0.070 L/h/kg vs. 0.028 L/h/kg being reached in monotherapy), whereas VPA led to a significant decrease in CL (0.014 L/h/kg). Thus, comedication with these analyzed drugs can partly explain the interindividual variability in population LTG CL, which decreased from the basic model by more than 40%. The proposed model may be very useful for clinicians in establishing initial LTG dosage guidelines. However, the interindividual variability remaining in the final model (clearance coefficient of variation close to 30%) make these a priori dosage predictions imprecise and justifies the need for LTG plasma level monitoring to optimize dosage regimens. Thus, this final model allows easy implementation in clinical pharmacokinetic software and its application in dosage individualization using the Bayesian approach.

Pediatric Case Report of Topiramate Toxicity

BACKGROUND

Topiramate is an FDA-approved second generation antiepileptic drug with actions on voltage-dependent sodium and calcium channels and GABA and excitatory amino acid receptors. There has only been one prior pediatric case report of topiramate toxicity. We report a 33-month-old girl with persisting neurologic symptoms after acute ingestion of topiramate.

CASE REPORT

A 33-month-old girl was found at her sitter'shouse with a bottle of topiramate (100-mg tablets). She presented to the emergency department 3 days post-ingestion. The child appeared confused and was only able to crawl. At one point, she looked directly at mother and asked, "Where is my mommy?" She had visual hallucinations and screamed while pointing to objects on the wall. Neurologic exam was notable for the slurred speech and severe ataxia. All laboratory testing, urine chemical dependency screen, CSF, chest X-ray, head CT, and EEG showed no abnormalities. Topiramate level on the third day post-ingestion was 9.4 mcg/mL, and 4.2 mcg/mL on the fourth day. Patient became oriented to family and regained normal gait on the fourth day. Her slurred speech persisted until the sixth day after ingestion.

CONCLUSION

Topiramate is an anti-epileptic drug with multifactorial mechanisms of action not entirely understood. We report here a 33-month-old girl with prolonged neurologic symptoms including hallucination, slurred speech, and severe ataxia after acute topiramate ingestion. This is the first pediatric case report of hallucination and prolonged neurologic symptoms with acute topiramate ingestion.

Development of tolerance to levetiracetam in rats with chronic epilepsy

PURPOSE

Pharmacoresistance is a major problem in the treatment of epilepsy. We showed previously that pharmacoresistance, at least partially, is due to an up-regulation of the multidrug transporter (MDT) P-glycoprotein (P-gp): inhibition of P-gp improves seizure control in phenytoin-treated epileptic rats (poststatus epilepticus rat model for temporal lobe epilepsy). Since it has been suggested that levetiracetam (LEV) is no substrate for MDTs, we hypothesized that LEV would more adequately control seizures in this rat model.

METHODS

Chronic epileptic rats were treated repeatedly with LEV (2-week interval; different dosages) via continuous infusion using osmotic minipumps, 5-6 months after electrically induced status epilepticus. The anticonvulsive effects were determined by video-EEG monitoring and the concentration of LEV was measured in plasma and brain homogenates using gas chromatography.

RESULTS

LEV adequately entered the epileptic brain and dose-dependently suppressed spontaneous seizures in chronic epileptic rats for 3-4 days. Hereafter, seizure frequency increased, while LEV plasma levels did not change. Seizure behavior was less severe throughout the whole treatment. LEV did not affect seizure duration. After a withdrawal period of 2 weeks all rats initially responded again to LEV.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial seizure control by LEV supports the observation that LEV is not impeded by MDTs. However, the failure to control seizures for a longer period of time indicates the development of tolerance to this drug. This poses another problem in the treatment of this kind of epilepsy. Whether tolerance may be prevented by intermittent administration of LEV should be further investigated.

Antiepileptic drugs--best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Although no randomized studies have demonstrated a positive impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on clinical outcome in epilepsy, evidence from nonrandomized studies and everyday clinical experience does indicate that measuring serum concentrations of old and new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can have a valuable role in guiding patient management provided that concentrations are measured with a clear indication and are interpreted critically, taking into account the whole clinical context. Situations in which AED measurements are most likely to be of benefit include (1) when a person has attained the desired clinical outcome, to establish an individual therapeutic concentration which can be used at subsequent times to assess potential causes for a change in drug response; (2) as an aid in the diagnosis of clinical toxicity; (3) to assess compliance, particularly in patients with uncontrolled seizures or breakthrough seizures; (4) to guide dosage adjustment in situations associated with increased pharmacokinetic variability (e.g., children, the elderly, patients with associated diseases, drug formulation changes); (5) when a potentially important pharmacokinetic change is anticipated (e.g., in pregnancy, or when an interacting drug is added or removed); (6) to guide dose adjustments for AEDs with dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, particularly phenytoin.