Weaning of immunosuppression in long-term liver transplant recipients

Hepatic allograft-derived Kupffer cells regulate T cell response in rats

In liver transplantation, the development of tolerance is associated with an increased rate of apoptosis of T lymphocytes in the portal inflammatory infiltrate and the presence of an intragraft Th2-like T cell population. Underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Kupffer cells (KC), which reside in the hepatic sinosoids, can directly interact with circulating T lymphocytes and thus are uniquely positioned to play a role in immunomodulation. In this study, the immunoregulatory effects of KC were investigated. We show that KC can significantly suppress T cell proliferation in mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR). Furthermore, KC express functional Fas ligand (FasL) and can induce apoptosis of Fas+ cells. This process can be blocked by addition of neutralizing anti-FasL antibody. Moreover, using an allogeneic liver transplant model we have determined that 1. KC recovered from chronically accepted hepatic allografts have increased FasL messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression and a greater ability to induce apoptosis of alloreactive T cells compared with KC recovered from an acute rejection model; 2. KC not only induce apoptosis of T cells, but also regulate cytokine production and Th2/Th3-like cytokine (interleukin [IL]-10 / transforming growth factor [TGF]-beta) mRNA expression in allogeneic MLR in vitro; and 3. administration of KC derived from chronically accepted liver allografts significantly prolongs the survival of hepatic allografts in an acute rejection model in an alloantigen-specific manner. In conclusion, these data implicate the possible role of KC-mediated regulation of T cell response in the induction of immune tolerance in liver allografts.

Real-time monitoring of acute liver-allograft rejection using the Banff schema

BACKGROUND

The Banff schema is the internationally accepted standard for grading acute liver-allograft rejection, but it has not been prospectively tested.

METHODS

Complete Banff grading was prospectively applied to 2,038 liver-allograft biopsies from 901 adult tacrolimus-treated primary hepatic allograft recipients between August 1995 and September 2001. Histopathologic data was melded with demographic, clinical, and laboratory data into a database on an ongoing basis using locally developed software.

RESULTS

Acute rejection developed in 575 of 901 (64%) patients and the worst grade was mild in 422 of 575 (73%). At least one episode of moderate or severe acute rejection developed in 153 of 901 (17%) patients and most episodes, irrespective of severity, occurred within the first year after transplantation. Patients with moderate or severe acute rejection showed higher alanine aminotransferase (P =0.007) and aspartate aminotransferase ( P=0.07) levels and were more likely to develop perivenular fibrosis on follow-up biopsies (P =0.001) and graft failure from acute or chronic rejection ( P=0.004) than those with mild rejection. Regardless of severity, 80% of patients with acute rejection did not develop significant fibrosis in follow-up biopsies, and graft failure from acute or chronic rejection occurred in only 11 of 901 (1%) allografts.

CONCLUSIONS

Most acute-rejection episodes are mild and do not lead to clinically significant architectural sequelae. When tested prospectively under real-life and -time conditions, the Banff schema can be used to identify those few patients who are potentially at risk for more significant problems. Creation, capture, and integration of non-free text, or "digital," pathology data can be used to prospectively conduct outcomes-based research in transplantation.

Skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management

In the United States more than 100,000 people are living with solid organ transplants. The intense immunosuppressive regimens necessary for prolonged survival of allografts significantly increase the rates of both internal and cutaneous malignancies in recipients of solid organ transplants. Skin cancer is the most common cancer in patients after transplantation. Because of the early onset and high tumor burden in transplant recipients, dermatologists have significant challenges in managing the treatment of these patients. This article describes the epidemiology and clinical presentation of skin cancer during posttransplantation immunosuppression, discusses pathogenic cofactors, and reviews the optimal management for mild and severe skin cancer in transplant recipients.

Pancreas and islet cell transplantation

Currently, for the patient with type 1 diabetes, a definitive treatment without resorting to the use of exogenous insulin can be achieved only with pancreas or islet cell transplantation. These means of restoring beta-cell mass can completely maintain essentially normal long-term glucose homeostasis, although the need for powerful immunosuppressive regimens limits their application to only a subgroup of adult patients. Apart from the shortage of donors that has limited all kinds of transplantation, however, the widespread use of beta-cell replacement has been precluded until recently by the drawbacks associated with both organ and islet cell transplantation. Although the study of recurrence of diabetes has generated attention, the fundamental obstacle to pancreas and islet transplantation has been, and remains, the alloimmune response. With a better elucidation of the mechanisms of alloengraftment achieved during the last 3 years, the stage has been set for further advances.

Spontaneous acceptance of liver transplants in rodents: evidence that liver leucocytes induce recipient T-cell death by neglect

In many animal models transplanted livers are not rejected, even when there is a complete MHC mismatch between the donor and recipient and the recipient is not immunosuppressed. This distinguishes liver transplants from other organs, such as kidneys and hearts, which are rapidly rejected in mismatched individuals. Acceptance of transplanted livers in a rat model is not due to the absence of an immune response to the liver and there is a rapid, abortive response that is ultimately exhausted. Donor leucocytes transferred with the liver appear to be responsible for both liver acceptance and the abortive activation of the recipient's T cells. The immune mechanism of liver transplant acceptance appears to be due to 'death by neglect' in which T cells are activated to express IL-2 and IFN-gamma mRNA in the recipient lymphoid tissues, but not at adequate levels within the graft. Subsequently the activated T cells die leading to specific clonal deletion of liver donor-reactive T cells. These findings have important implications for liver transplant patients as immunosuppressive drugs that are given to prevent rejection can also interfere with this form of tolerance. In addition, it might be possible to modify the immunosuppressive drug treatment of transplant patients to promote the process of death by neglect of recipient alloreactive T cells.

New approaches to immunosuppression in liver transplantation

With the continued improvements in outcome following liver transplantation, the drawbacks associated with conventional immunosuppression regimens become increasingly apparent. Although up to 70% of patients develop a histological infiltrate of the graft (acute rejection), many of these will resolve spontaneously, and chronic rejection is rare. If a robust form of allograft acceptance or tolerance can be established, then immunosuppression can be withdrawn along with all the accompanying risks. The liver is already known to be associated with downregulated immune responses; the mechanism for this is unclear, but may be related to a number of mechanisms known to be involved in peripheral tolerance. There are many strategies being studied for achieving allograft tolerance, including the use of modern immunosuppressants, antibodies that target key molecules in the immune response, and recruitment of leukocytes to allografts. In the interim, it is necessary to look for safe protocols that allow trials of tolerance strategies without putting patients at increased risk.

Transplantation tolerance from a historical perspective

Although transplantation immunology as a distinctive field began with the development of experimental models that showed the feasibility of bone marrow transplantation, organ engraftment was accomplished first in humans, and was thought for many years to occur by drastically different mechanisms. Here, we present our view of the concepts of allograft acceptance and acquired tolerance from a historical perspective, and attempt to amalgamate them into simple and unifying rules that might guide improvements in clinical therapy.

Posttransplantation care: role of the primary care physician versus transplant center

1. Forty percent of transplant centers expect the primary care physician to be the primary physician; 40% have both a primary care physician and a hepatologist manage the patient. 2. Transplant centers expect primary care physicians to provide general preventive medicine, physical examinations, vaccinations, and, rarely, management of hypertension, renal dysfunction, and diabetes. 3. A high percentage of primary care physicians feel comfortable caring and managing the overall health care of a long-term liver transplant patient. 4. Primary care physicians feel at most ease managing preventive care, annual physical examinations, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, bone disease, and vaccinations. 5. Primary care physicians should be aware of the common medical conditions of the liver transplant patient of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, hyperlipidemia, and recurrent disease. 6. Common medical conditions for both the transplant centers and primary care physicians are hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, bone disease, pregnancy, vaccination, infectious prophylaxis, and headaches.

Weaning of immunosuppression in living donor liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Some reported studies have indicated the possibility of immunosuppression withdrawal in cadaveric liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility and feasibility of weaning living donor liver transplant recipients from immunosuppression.

METHODS

From June of 1990 to October of 1999, 63 patients were considered to be weaned from immunosuppression. They consisted of 26 electively weaned patients and 37 either forcibly or incidentally weaned patients (nonelective weaning) due to various causes but mainly due to infection. Regarding elective weaning, we gradually reduced the frequency of tacrolimus administration for patients who survived more than 2 years after transplantation, maintained a good graft function, and had no rejection episodes in the preceding 12 months. The frequency of administration was reduced from the conventional b.i.d. until the start of weaning to q.d., 4 times a week, 3 times a week, twice a week, once a week, twice a month, once a month, and finally, the patients were completely weaned off with each weaning period lasting from 3 to 6 months. The reduction method of nonelective weaning depended on the clinical course of each individual case. When the patients were clinically diagnosed to develop rejection during weaning, then such patients were treated by a reintroduction of tacrolimus or an additional steroid bolus when indicated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (38.1%) achieved a complete withdrawal of tacrolimus with a median drug-free period of 23.5 months (range, 3-69 months). Twenty-three patients (36.5%) are still being weaned at various stages. Sixteen patients (25.4%) encountered rejection while weaning at median period of 9.5 months (range, 1-63 months) from the start of weaning. All 16 were easily treated with the reintroduction of tacrolimus or additional steroid bolus therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to achieve a complete withdrawal of immunosuppression in some selected patients. Although the mechanism of graft acceptance in these patients has yet to be elucidated, we believe that a majority of long-term patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation may, thus, be potential candidates to be successfully weaned from immunosuppression.

A short course of methylprednisolone immunosuppression inhibits both rejection and spontaneous acceptance of rat liver allografts

BACKGROUND

The effects of immunosuppressive drugs on transplant tolerance have not been extensively studied, although their effect on rejection is well established.

METHODS

We examined the effects of a short course of treatment with the immunosuppressive drug methylprednisolone (MP) on the survival of PVG liver allografts in Dark Agouti (DA) recipients that accepted the livers and in Lewis recipients that rejected the livers. Infiltration of liver allografts was examined by immunohistochemical staining of liver sections, and apoptosis was measured by terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling.

RESULTS

A 5-day course of MP (days 0 to 4) led to rejection of four of six livers (mean survival time [MST] 99 days) in DA recipients compared with long-term survival (MST >100 days) in untreated animals. Delayed administration of MP (days 3 to 7) exacerbated rejection in DA recipients, and all eight animals rejected the graft (MST 68.5 days). Treatment of Lewis recipients with MP did not significantly prolong survival when administered from days 0 to 4 (MST 13 days), although delay of administration improved the outcome. Treatment from days 3 to 7 resulted in an MST of 21 days, whereas treatment from days 7 to 11 resulted in an MST of 41.5 days. MP treatment from day 3 to day 7 reduced T cells and interleukin 2 receptor-expressing cells but increased the numbers of apoptotic cells infiltrating both DA and Lewis strain allografts.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that immunosuppression with MP inhibits both spontaneous tolerance and rejection of liver allografts in a rat model and question the efficacy of administering MP to all liver allograft recipients from the time of transplantation.

Persistence of stable intragraft cell chimerism in rat liver allografts after drug-induced tolerance

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced tolerance of rat liver allografts is well documented. We analyzed cellular events during immunosuppressive therapy on day (d) 10 and in the late phase (d 100) after transplantation to assess for characteristics in the intrahepatic leukocyte (IHL) population in the phase of tolerance.

METHODS

Lewis rats served as recipients of Dark Agouti rat livers. Temporary immunosuppression with either cyclosporine (CsA) monotherapy (3 mg/kg/d) or triple therapy that consisted of a subtherapeutic CsA dosage (0.25 mg/kg/d) and monoclonal antibodies directed against the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R, CD25) and the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1, CD54) was administered from postoperative d 0 to d 13. Cell migration and cell activation within liver grafts was assessed by standard histology and flow cytometry. IHL apoptosis was detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-digoxigenin nick end labeling (TUNEL).

RESULTS

Both CsA monotherapy and triple therapy prolonged liver allograft survival to more than 100 d and led to the induction of donor-specific tolerance. Untreated recipients rejected their allografts within 14 d. In both groups, donor-specific IHLs initially dropped to 18% to 25% on d 10, but they rebounded to as much as 40% on d 100 as a common characteristic of both groups. Within this population, donor-specific T cells were dominant. In both groups, increased numbers of activated (IL-2R+) CD8+ T lymphocytes were present on d 100. No accumulation of apoptotic IHL was observed on d 100. Their proportion was unchanged in the triple therapy group and slightly decreased in the CsA group compared to the syngeneic controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study reveals that tolerant liver allografts are repopulated by donor-specific T lymphocytes. This phenomenon is independent of the type of applied immunosuppression. The persistence of activated CD8+ T cells in the phase of proven donor-specific tolerance on d 100 indicates that liver tolerance is associated with the state of a permanent intragraft immune activation. It seems that the coexistence of donor cells with infiltrating recipient cells within liver grafts, termed intrahepatic cell chimerism, is characteristic for tolerated liver allografts.

Rapid decreases in donor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor frequencies and graft outcome after liver and lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

A decrease in donor-specific T cell precursor frequencies as seen late, one or more years, after transplantation is assumed to reflect transplantation tolerance, a condition important for long term acceptance of the allograft. However, such late decreases also occur in recipients that developed chronic transplant dysfunction questioning its relevance in transplantation tolerance. We investigated whether early, i.e., the first 6 months, decreases in donor-specific T cell precursor frequencies reflect transplantation tolerance and predict graft outcome after liver and lung transplantation.

METHODS

Donor and third party specific cytotoxic (CTLp) and helper T lymphocyte precursor (HTLp) frequencies were analyzed in pretransplant and 1 (or 2) and 6-month blood samples taken from liver and lung recipients and were correlated with graft outcome.

RESULTS

In liver allograft recipients with good graft function (n=7), mean donor-specific CTLp frequencies decreased as early as 1 month after transplantation and remained low thereafter. In contrast, mean CTLp frequencies did not decrease in liver allograft recipients with chronic transplant dysfunction (n=6). In lung allograft recipients, donor-specific CTLp frequencies remained relatively high and frequencies were not different between recipients without (n=6) or with (n=6) chronic transplant dysfunction. Donor-specific HTLp frequencies did not change significantly after liver or lung transplantation and did not differ between recipients without or with chronic transplant dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

An early decrease in donor-specific CTLp correlates with good graft outcome after liver transplantation. Such rapid decreases in alloreactivity do not occur after lung transplantation illustrating the unique capacity of liver allografts to induce transplantation tolerance.

Immune activation is required for the induction of liver allograft tolerance: implications for immunosuppressive therapy

Liver transplants in many animal models are unusual because often they are not rejected even when transplanted across complete major histocompatibility complex barriers without immunosuppression. Their paradoxical behavior is even more obvious when the immune mechanism of acceptance is examined. Instead of acceptance resulting from a lack of immune response to the graft, the opposite occurs, and there is an unusual extensive increase in immune activation in acceptance compared with rejection. This abnormal extensive immune activation is driven by donor leukocytes transferred with the liver and results in death of the recipient cells that would normally reject the transplant. Some forms of immunosuppression inhibit this activation-associated liver transplant tolerance. The significance of these findings and possible means to design future treatment protocols for clinical transplantation that optimize management of liver transplant recipients are discussed.

Co-transplantation of donor-derived hepatocytes induces long-term tolerance to cardiac allografts in a rat model

BACKGROUND

Liver allografts transplanted between MHC-disparate mice, rats, and swine are spontaneously accepted in most strain combinations without requirement for immunosuppression. The underlying mechanism has, however, remained elusive. Here, we demonstrate that co-transplantation of donor-derived hepatocytes protect Lewis (RT1.A1) cardiac allografts from acute and chronic rejection in DA (RT1.Aa) recipients indefinitely.

METHODS

Livers of donor Lewis rats were harvested and the hepatocytes separated from hepatic leukocytes by collagenase digestion and gradient separation. DA recipient animals were transplanted Lewis cardiac allografts and simultaneously intraportally infused either Lewis-derived hepatocytes or hepatic leukocytes. Recipient animals were either not further treated or received a single dose of 15 mg/kg cyclosporine.

RESULTS

Donor hepatocytes alone significantly protected syngeneic cardiac allografts from rejection, whereas hepatic leukocytes failed to influence graft survival. In combination with cyclosporine, recipient cardiac allografts were indefinitely protected from rejection. Graft-infiltrating cells in tolerant animals presented as clusters of CD4+ T cells and stained mostly positive for interleukin-4, whereas graft-infiltrating cells in rejected allografts were predominantly positive for interferon-gamma. Adoptive transfer of splenocytes derived from tolerant animals protected Lewis cardiac allografts from rejection in DA recipients without immunosuppression. In contrast, hepatic leukocytes protected only 50% of the allografts from rejection.

CONCLUSION

We propose that donor hepatocytes induce permanent engraftment of syngeneic allografts by establishing a Th2 type alloresponse that is transferable to new graft recipients. The results of this study demonstrate that liver parenchymal cells significantly mediate spontaneously liver-induced tolerance.

Organ donor or graft pretreatment to prolong allograft survival: lessons learned in the murine model

Permanent donor-specific tolerance to allografts is the goal of transplantation research. Currently, morbid immunosuppressive therapy is used to mitigate rejection initiated in part by Ia-bearing interstitial graft dendritic or antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that are thought to migrate into the host after transplantation. We hypothesized that donor or organ immune modulation directed against graft APCs might influence graft immunogenicity and promote prolonged graft acceptance in histoincompatible hosts in the absence of immunosuppressive therapy. Haplotype-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb), mAb specific to graft APC, adhesion or costimulatory molecules and anti-LFA-1-Ricin and anti-Iak-Ricin immunoconjugates (IC) were prepared and administered in varying doses and time intervals to donor C3H/HeJ (H-2k) mice. Thereafter, their spleens and hearts were removed at varying time intervals and used either as stimulator cells in one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction or transplanted into naive Balb/c (H-2d) recipients, respectively. Explanted C3H hearts were pretreated with anti-Iak mAb on the Langendorf apparatus. Hearts were also used from major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I, MHC class II, and MHC class I- and II-deficient "knockout" mice. Splenocytes exposed to at least 500 microg of anti-Iak mAb in vivo for more than 4 hr were able to inhibit the mixed lymphocyte reaction to almost background levels, but only after incubation with rabbit complement in vitro. Similarly pretreated cardiac allografts (both in vivo or explanted and pretreated on the Langendorf apparatus) did not experience prolonged survival in nonimmunosuppressed Balb/C recipients when compared with control solutions, regardless of the concomitant use of complement. Splenocytes from immunoconjugate pretreated donors inhibited the mixed lymphocyte reaction completely without the use of complement; however, hearts from these donors also did not experience prolonged survival nor donor hearts exposed to mAb specific for graft APC, adhesion or costimulatory molecules. Only hearts from MHC class I and class II "knockout" mice survived significantly longer than controls. We conclude that donor or graft pretreatment with haplotype-specific anti-Ia mAb, haplotype-specific immunoconjugates, or mAb directed against graft APC, adhesion or costimulation molecules have little efficacy in promoting acceptance of cardiac allografts in nonimmunosuppressed recipients. The enhanced survival of hearts from MHC class I- and class II-deficient donors suggest that novel methods to effect the immunogenicity of the graft will be required if long-term allograft acceptance is to be achieved in the absence of host immunosuppression.

Tolerance of rat liver allografts induced by short-term selective immunosuppression combining monoclonal antibodies directed against CD25 and CD54 with subtherapeutic cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to develop and evaluate protocols for selective immunosuppression after liver transplantation using the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) NDS-61, directed against the interleukin-2 receptor (CD25), and 1A29, directed against the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD54), in combination with subtherapeutic cyclosporine (CsA).

METHODS

Orthotopic rat liver transplantation (ORLT) was performed in a DA-to-LEW strain combination. Immunosuppression was administered from day 0 to +13. Functional parameters such as survival time, body weight, and serum bilirubin levels were measured and the liver grafts were evaluated histologically.

RESULTS

A stepwise tapering of CsA from 3 to 0.25 mg/kg/day reduced the long-term survival rate. All animals died at a CsA dosage of 0.25 mg/kg/day, which was therefore defined as subtherapeutic. Monotherapy with the anti-CD25 mAb was performed at dosages of 600 and 1800 microg/kg/day. The lower mAb dosage resulted in a long-term survival rate of 12% and was defined as subtherapeutic. The combination therapy of CsA (0.25 mg/kg/day) and anti-CD25 mAb (600 microg/kg/day) produced a synergistic effect and led to a long-term survival rate of 84%. This survival rate was significantly higher than those after either CsA (P<0.005) or anti-CD25 mAb (P<0.001) monotherapy. Both dosages (10 and 30 microg/kg/day) of anti-CD54 mAb monotherapy as well as anti-CD54 mAb combined with a subtherapeutic dosage of CsA were ineffective in preventing acute allograft rejection. The addition of anti-CD54 mAb (30 microg/kg/day) to combined CsA plus anti-CD25 mAb therapy (triple therapy), however, increased the long-term survival rate to 100%. In the triple therapy group there was no rejection process in the liver allografts at any time, and donor-specific tolerance could be shown by donor-specific and third-party heterotopic heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The synergistic action of subtherapeutic CsA plus anti-CD25 mAb NDS-60 could be demonstrated, whereas anti-CD54 mAb only had a positive effect in a triple therapy group. Triple therapy prevented both acute and chronic rejection and induced donor-specific tolerance.

Severe late acute allograft rejection in a child after living-related auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency

Auxiliary liver transplantation (ALT) is known to correct liver-based metabolic disorders. However, it remains unclear whether the presence of a native liver influences the long-term prognosis of ALT for metabolic diseases. We reported on a 4-yr-old girl who had undergone living-related auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency and experienced severe late acute rejection 18 months after liver transplantation, during weaning of immunosuppressive agents. Results of histological analysis of the graft indicated very severe acute rejection (rejection activity index, 9/9), and computed tomography revealed graft liver atrophy. These observations suggest the possibility that severe rejection might occur in APOLT, especially during weaning of immunosuppression.

Pediatric transplantation

Advances in organ preservation, surgical technique, and postoperative care have permitted the rapid development of liver transplantation in children. Consequently, the applicability of this procedure has gone beyond the treatment of life-threatening complications of chronic liver disease and now includes disabling morbidities and quality-of-life issues. The use of hepatic segments for transplantation with reduced or split cadaveric grafts and living-related donors has decreased the mortality of children awaiting liver transplantation. We are presently armed with a new potent immunosuppressive drug, tacrolimus, and an understanding that the migration and grafting of passenger leukocytes of bone marrow origin is the seminal explanation for allograft acceptance. The next forefront will involve manipulation of the process not only for the transplantation of already successful whole organs--such as the liver, kidney, pancreas, and heart--but also in the development of the intestinal transplantation program. Thus, augmentation of leukocyte traffic in unconditioned recipients of cadaver allografts with concomitant intravenous infusion of donor bone marrow cells under the same immunosuppressive management of tacrolimus-prednisone treatment will be the path into the future.

Outcome of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation is not rare, but there is little information about its time of onset, risk factors, response to treatment and prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of recurrence and outcome of autoimmune hepatitis after transplantation.

METHODS

The records of patients transplanted in eight centers in our country between 1984 and 1996 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-three of the 2331 (1.8%) recipients fulfilled diagnostic criteria of autoimmune hepatitis at the time of transplantation. Sixteen patients were excluded from evaluation. Nine (33%) of the 27 patients evaluated fulfilled criteria for recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis, with a mean time of recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation of 2.6+/-1.5 years. Patients with recurrence had a longer follow-up time after transplantation (5.1 vs. 2.5 years, P=0.0012) and were receiving less immunosuppressive treatment. The estimated risk of recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis in the graft increased over time: 8% over the first year and 68% 5 years after transplantation. None of the seven patients with liver-kidney microsomal-positive antibodies recurred (P=0.059). Fifty percent of the patients failed to respond or responded only partially to therapy, although none of the patients have deteriorated clinically after 2.4+/-1.06 years of follow-up after recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis in the graft is a common event with an incidence that increases over time as immunosuppression is reduced. Although response to treatment is poor, patient and graft survival do not appear to be decreased.

Withdrawal of immunosuppression: implications for composite tissue allograft transplantation

Complete or partial withdrawal of immunosuppression is a desirable goal for physicians managing solid organ transplant recipients and has particular appeal for the management of composite tissue allograft recipients. Experience to date with steroid withdrawal or cyclosporine withdrawal in organ transplant recipients suggests that the risks of acute rejection are minimized with slow tapering of the drugs and when drug withdrawal is attempted many months or years after transplantation. Unfortunately, the full benefits of withdrawing any component of a multidrug immunosuppression regimen can probably be achieved only when the drug is withdrawn relatively early after transplantation. Thus, there is a need for improved immunologic monitoring to facilitate withdrawal of immunosuppression in any setting. Because steroid withdrawal might be particularly advantageous to the recipient of a composite tissue allograft, further experience is needed to determine the safety of steroid withdrawal with newer immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and sirolimus.

Donor-specific hyporeactivity after liver transplantation: prominent decreases in donor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor frequencies independent of changes in helper T lymphocyte precursor frequencies or suppressor cell activity

BACKGROUND

The development of immunological donor-specific hyporeactivity may account for the low incidence of chronic rejection after clinical liver transplantation. We investigated whether hyporeactivity commonly develops after liver transplantation by analyzing precursor frequencies of donor-reactive cytotoxic (CTLp) and helper (HTLp) T lymphocytes and mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) reactivity in liver allograft recipients. We further studied whether CTLp hyporeactivity correlated with changes in donor-specific HTLp frequencies or suppressor cell activity.

METHODS

CTLp and HTLp frequencies and MLC reactivity against donor and third-party spleen cells were determined in pre- and posttransplantation peripheral blood samples from 18 recipients with good graft function 2 years after transplantation. By mixing posttransplantation samples (with "putative" suppressor cell activity) with pretransplantation samples (in which normal CTL activity with no suppressor cell activity is expected), the presence of suppressor cell activity in peripheral blood was analyzed.

RESULTS

Two years after transplantation, all but one (94%) of the recipients had developed CTLp hyporeactivity as evidenced by reduced donor-specific CTLp frequencies. The development of hyporeactivity was not specific for any particular underlying disease. The occurrence of HTL hyporeactivity, however, was less frequent: 38% and 20% of recipients were HTLp and MLC hyporeactive, respectively. Decreases in CTLp frequencies did not correlate with decreased donor-specific HTL function or suppressor cell activity in peripheral blood samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-specific CTLp hyporeactivity can develop in the majority of liver allograft recipients, irrespective of underlying disease. Donor-specific HTL hyporeactivity, however, occurs infrequently. A reduction in donor-specific CTLp frequencies was found to be independent of changes in donor-specific HTLp or suppressor cell activity, suggesting that other mechanisms (e.g., clonal deletion) are operative in the reduction of donor-specific CTLp after liver transplantation.

Tolerance and latent cellular rejection in long-term liver transplant recipients

Tolerance develops in a proportion of long-term liver transplant recipients but currently cannot be identified before an attempt at withdrawal from immunosuppression therapy. In the present study, we have examined the immunophenotypic characteristics of the cellular infiltrate in portal tracts and lobules as observed in liver biopsy specimens in relation to the outcome of subsequent withdrawal from immunosuppression therapy. Cryostat biopsy specimens from 27 long-term recipients before drug withdrawal, and from 10 patients with recent transplants who were having acute rejection, were analyzed. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for CD3+ (pan T cell), CD8+ (cytotoxic), CD4+ (helper), CD45RO+ (memory), CD45RA+ (naive), CD56+ (natural killer), CD68+ (macrophage), and CD8+ perforin+ cells. Fewer CD8+ and CD3+ cells were present in the lobular areas of biopsy specimens from patients who were successfully withdrawn from immunosuppression therapy (n = 6) compared with biopsy specimens from patients with nontolerant grafts (n = 9; 15 vs. 23 cells/high-power field [hpf] [P < .01] and 16 vs. 26 cells/hpf [P < .03], respectively) or biopsy specimens obtained during acute rejection (15 vs. 31 cells/hpf [P < .01] and 16 vs. 32 cells/hpf [P < .01]). Cell frequencies in the biopsy specimens of nontolerant long-term patients were similar to those found with acute rejection. Immunophenotyping the lobular inflammation within long-term liver allografts assists in identifying those patients in whom drug withdrawal is likely to be unsuccessful and in whom it is postulated a form of inactive, latent cellular rejection exists.

Early cyclosporine monotherapy in liver transplantation: a 5-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial

Maintenance of adequate immunosuppression and avoidance of side-effects are the goals of long-term management of all organ-transplanted patients. We here report the final results of a prospective, randomized trial comparing early cyclosporine monotherapy versus double-drug therapy (cyclosporine and steroids) in adult liver transplantation patients. One hundred four patients were randomized 3 months after transplantation either to continue (Group I = 50 patients) or to stop steroids (Group II = 54 patients). Patients on a double-drug regimen were maintained long term on methylprednisolone at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg/d. Target cyclosporine trough levels were between 150 and 250 ng/mL in both groups. Our main points of interest were the prevalence of acute and chronic rejections and steroid-related side-effects in the two groups of patients. Mean follow-up was 41 +/- 16 months (range, 4-68 months). Patient actuarial survival 2 and 5 years after randomization was similar in the two groups (82% vs. 83% and 82% vs. 77%). The prevalence of acute rejections after randomization was, respectively, 8% and 4%. A single episode of chronic rejection was observed only in a patient on long-term steroid therapy. Side-effects of steroid therapy were less frequent in patients weaned off steroids, and when considering hypertension and diabetes, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant. Early cyclosporine monotherapy is a safe undertaking in liver transplantation because it allows a significant reduction of steroid-related side-effects without increasing the risk of acute and chronic rejection. After 5 years, patient survival was similar in patients with or without steroids.

Allograft rejection after liver transplantation for autoimmune liver diseases

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) may progress to liver failure, requiring liver transplantation as definitive therapy, and these immune-mediated disorders may predispose the patient to more frequent graft rejection. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of preexisting AILD on the incidence of allograft rejection after liver transplantation. Sixty-three patients who underwent liver transplantation between March 1988 and December 1994 for AILDs that included autoimmune hepatitis (AIH; n = 33) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC; n = 30) were retrospectively compared with 47 patients who underwent liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis during the same time period. There was a lower incidence of acute allograft rejection in patients with AILD who received tacrolimus-based compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (50% v 85.5%; P = .02). However, patients with AILDs overall had a higher incidence of acute rejection than patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (81% v 46.8%; P < .001), regardless of the type of immunosuppression. In addition, steroid-resistant rejection occurred more frequently in patients with AILDs than in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (38.1% v 12.8%; P = .003). There was also a trend toward a higher incidence of chronic rejection in patients with AILDs compared with patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (11.1% v 2.1%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Patient and graft survivals at 1 and 3 years were similar between patients with AILDs and alcoholic liver disease. Compared with alcoholic cirrhosis, preexisting AILDs are associated with a higher incidence of acute allograft rejection and a trend toward more frequent chronic rejection.

Defining the outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation

Successful immunosuppression withdrawal should benefit the natural history of organ transplantation patients. To identify the clinical hazards of removing drug treatment and possible characteristics that predict a favorable outcome in long-term liver recipients, immunosuppression was withdrawn completely and the clinicopathological outcome documented in 18 liver recipients. Indication for transplantation, HLA matching, early rejection history, and presence of microchimerism were examined as predictors of outcome. Chimerism was determined by polymerase chain reaction-based examination for donor-specific HLA-DRB1 alleles and Y-gene-specific nucleotide sequences. At 3 years, 5 patients (28%) remained completely off immunosuppression; 12 patients (67%) experienced histological graft changes: acute rejection in 4, portal tract inflammation/hepatitis in 7, and necrosis in 1. Hepatitis B or C viral infections did not account for the nonrejection patterns. Unmasking of systemic disorders occurred. Chimerism, demonstrated in 7 patients (39%), with skin the optimal tissue, was not associated with tolerance. Parameters associated with successful drug withdrawal were transplantation for non-immune-mediated liver disorders, fewer donor-recipient HLA A, B, and DR mismatches, and a low incidence of early rejection. Immunosuppression withdrawal is a feasible option in a proportion of selected liver recipients, but identification of tolerant patients remains imprecise.

Chronic liver allograft rejection: a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases interinstitutional study analyzing the reliability of current criteria and proposal of an expanded definition. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database

A study was conducted to assess the inter and intrarater agreement for the histopathologic features and diagnosis of chronic rejection (CR) and several other important causes of late liver allograft dysfunction. On two occasions, five pathologists, experienced with liver transplantation, reviewed a set of 49 slides representing a range of diagnoses, without knowledge of the clinical history or liver injury test results. The readings were correlated with the original histopathologic diagnosis, liver injury tests, and clinicopathologic follow-up. Assessment of biopsy adequacy (kappa = 0.69) and portal tract counts (kappa = 0.79) showed good to excellent intrarater agreement, whereas interrater agreement for these variables was moderate to good, respectively (kappa = 0.44 and 0.65). Likewise, the intrarater agreement for the diagnosis of CR (kappa = 0.68), hepatitis (kappa = 0.77), and obstructive cholangiopathy (kappa = 0.55) showed good to excellent agreement, whereas the interrater agreement for these same diagnoses ranged from fair to good (kappa = 0.58, 0.46, and 0.25, respectively). In 18 specimens, there was a near unanimous diagnosis of CR across both readings. These biopsies were obtained at a median of 7.1 months (range, 42 days to 4.9 years) after transplantation, and the average number of portal tracts was 8.4 (range, 4-15). Interestingly, only 13 of these 18 specimens showed bile duct loss in >50% of the portal triads; the remaining cases showed atrophy/pyknosis of the biliary epithelium in a majority of small bile ducts. Clinicopathologic correlation showed that these 18 biopsies were obtained from 16 grafts from 15 patients, 14 of whom ultimately required retransplantation or died of or with CR, whereas two of the grafts/patients recovered. A high rate of sensitivity (92%) and a somewhat lower, but acceptable, rate of specificity (71% to 80%) was found for the diagnosis of CR. Chronic rejection and other causes of late liver allograft dysfunction can be diagnosed reliably by a group of pathologists experienced with liver transplantation, and the diagnosis of CR correlates with clinical course and liver function abnormalities. Expanded criteria for the diagnosis of CR are presented, and potential problem areas for practicing pathologists are discussed.

Prolonged allogeneic and xenogeneic microchimerism in unmatched primates without immunosuppression by intrathymic implantation of CD34+ donor marrow cells

Engraftment of stem cell-enriched donor marrow implanted in the thymus of a foreign host might facilitate acceptance of donor-specific organ or tissue grafts. To test this hypothesis, allogeneic and xenogeneic CD34+ marrow cells from unrelated adult male baboons and humans were injected intrathymically in eight infant female baboons, both with and without standard cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. In allogeneic experiments, male (donor) cells, of both T- and B-cell lineages, were detected by PCR in the peripheral blood of all six recipients and persisted for at least 15 months in 2/4 recipients studied longtutudinally. Donor-derived skin grafts survived twice as long as third party grafts in unimmunosuppressed recipients. In xenogeneic protocols, human male (donor) cells were demonstrable for 7 and 15 months, respectively, in two baboon recipients with evidence that implanted human CD34+ cells had produced lymphoid progeny. Survival of donor-specific skin xenografts was prolonged in one of two recipients. These experiments demonstrate that the intrathymic injection of CD34+ marrow cells can result in long-lasting lymphohematopoietic microchimerism in unrelated primates even without immunosuppression and can alter donor-specific skin graft survival.

Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation for acute liver failure

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation holds potential advantages over conventional orthotopic liver transplantation, but experience with the technique in acute liver failure is limited.

METHODS

We describe our initial experience in seven patients (4 men, 3 women; mean age 28, range 14-35 years) with acute liver failure (paracetamol 3, non A-E 2, autoimmune 1, Ecstasy 1) who fulfilled criteria for emergency transplantation. Preoperatively, the median international normalised ratio was seven (range 3.4-15), with a creatinine of 123 microM (51-389 microM) and bilirubin 320 microM (61-572 microM). The reasons for performing an auxiliary transplant were the patients' young age and stable preoperative condition (n = 5), or a significant psychiatric history precluding conventional transplantation (n = 2).

RESULTS

All patients received blood group-matched left (n = 2) or right (n = 5) auxiliary grafts. Median duration of surgery was 8.5 h (7.3-10 h), with blood loss of 8.3 litres (4.6-14.6 litres). Post-transplant, the international normalised ratio and aspartate aminotransferase fell progressively in all patients, with median values at day 7 of 1.4 (1.0-2.4) and 108 IU/1 (78-910 IU/1). Three patients died from sepsis within the first postoperative month. At 2 weeks, four of six patients had partial regeneration of the native liver, which became complete in two of the survivors by 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patient selection remains poorly defined, auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation in acute liver failure is technically feasible and, in some patients, allows native liver regeneration and eventual immunosuppression withdrawal.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus. The role of immunosuppression

Immunosuppressive agents increase the risk of death due to coronary disease or stroke by their ability to cause 3 different adverse effects: dyslipidaemia, hypertension and hyperglycaemia. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus has emerged as a major adverse effect of immunosuppressants. As recipients of organ transplants survive longer, the secondary complications of diabetes mellitus have assumed greater importance. There is a need for a precise definition of post-transplant diabetes mellitus to facilitate inter-centre comparison and to study the natural history of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. We recommend broad criteria to define hyperglycaemia, as a fasting blood glucose level of > 400 mg/dl at any point or > 200 mg/dl for 2 weeks, or a need for insulin treatment for at least 2 weeks. We also recommend serial measurements of HbA1c. Cyclosporin and tacrolimus cause post-transplant diabetes mellitus by a number of mechanisms, including decreased insulin secretion, increased insulin resistance or a direct toxic effect on the beta cell. For corticosteroids, the induction of insulin resistance seems to be the predominant factor. However, few studies have examined the mechanism of diabetogenicity at the molecular level. This may hold the key for pharmacological manipulation of current immunosuppressive regimens which may result in decreased metabolic complications. Corticosteroid sparing regimens have been shown to reduce the metabolic complications of immunosuppressants including post-transplant diabetes mellitus. However, their use should be balanced against the increased incidence of transplant rejections. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus may be organ-specific irrespective of the immunosuppressant used. Tacrolimus causes a high incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in recipients of kidney transplants (upto 20% in some reports); the diabetogenicity of cyclosporin-based regimens is comparable with that of tacrolimus-based regimens in recipients of liver transplants. A few clinical studies in which attempts were made to discontinue cyclosporin resulted in an unacceptable loss of the transplant. In the case of tacrolimus, complete withdrawal of immunosuppression may be possible in selected patients with liver transplants. However, post-transplant recipients who may benefit from this approach are difficult to identify. In some early series, patients received doses of tacrolimus that were approximately 2 to 3 times higher than those currently used, which may have resulted in a higher incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. More recently, it has been shown that tacrolimus was successful in salvaging whole pancreatic grafts which were maintained on cyclosporin. Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression as primary therapy was also used with remarkable success in solitary whole pancreas transplants. Strategies to reduce the metabolic complications of immunosuppressants should be pursued aggressively as this will directly lead to a decrease in long term cardiovascular adverse effects.