Immunosuppressive TOR kinase inhibitor everolimus (RAD) suppresses growth of cells derived from posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder at allograft-protecting doses

Efficacy of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii for rat tracheal allografts

BACKGROUND

A new immunosuppressant must be developed because graft rejection remains the leading cause of death after lung transplantation. We evaluated the efficacy of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii as a new immunosuppressant using a heterotopic rat tracheal allotransplantation model.

METHODS

We performed short- and long-term experiments using a short-course of treatment with Multiglycosidorum tripterygii. To assess the immunosuppessive power of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii, we compared its efficacy (at 90, or 150 mg/kg/day) with that of tacrolimus (at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg/kg/day) at 4 weeks after transplantation. We then evaluated the effect of 150 mg/kg/day of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii treatment at 12 weeks after transplantation.

RESULTS

The efficacy of 150 mg/kg/day Multiglycosidorum tripterygii was superior to that of 90 mg/kg/day of the same drug and was comparable to that of 1.0 mg/kg/day tacrolimus, as demonstrated by morphologic assessment of the graft. Treatment with 150 mg/kg/day Multiglycosidorum tripterygii maintained graft morphology for 4 weeks but could not maintain graft viability for 12 weeks. Animals tolerated this dosage of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii for 12 weeks after administration.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the efficacy of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii is acceptable for rat tracheal allografts. Further studies are necessary to investigate Multiglycosidorum tripterygii treatment for clinical use in humans.

mTOR-targeted therapy of cancer with rapamycin derivatives

Rapamycin and its derivatives (CCI-779, RAD001 and AP23576) are immunosuppressor macrolides that block mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) functions and yield antiproliferative activity in a variety of malignancies. Molecular characterization of upstream and downstream mTOR signaling pathways is thought to allow a better selection of rapamycin-sensitive tumours. For instance, a loss of PTEN functions results in Akt phosphorylation, cell growth and proliferation; circumstances that can be blocked using rapamycin derivatives. From recent studies, rapamycin derivatives appear to display a safe toxicity profile with skin rashes and mucositis being prominent and dose-limiting. Sporadic activity with no evidence of dose-effect relationship has been reported. Evidence suggests that rapamycin derivatives could induce G1-S cell cycle delay and eventually apoptosis depending on inner cellular characteristics of tumour cells. Surrogate molecular markers that could be used to monitor biological effects of rapamycin derivatives and narrow down biologically active doses in patients, such as the phosphorylation of P70S6K or expression of cyclin D1 and caspase 3, are currently evaluated. Since apoptosis induced by rapamycin is blocked by BCL-2, strategies aimed at detecting human tumours that express BCL-2 and other anti-apoptotic proteins might allow identification of rapamycin-resistant tumours. Finally, we discuss current and future placements of rapamycin derivatives and related translational research into novel therapeutic strategies against cancer.

Sirolimus for GVHD prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Sirolimus is a novel macrolide immunosuppressant widely used in solid organ transplantation. We have conducted three clinical trials using this compound as prophylaxis against GVHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Our studies have demonstrated excellent GVHD control even when mismatched and unrelated donors were used. The morbidity and mortality associated with transplantation were reduced due to the omission or reduction in methotrexate dose. Furthermore, CMV reactivation and fungal infection rates were low. However, we have noted that sirolimus may be associated with increased rates of thrombotic microangiopathy after transplantation. Sirolimus has other uses, such as the treatment of established acute and chronic GVHD, and may be useful for treatment of post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and perhaps as an antineoplastic agent against a wide variety of hematologic and solid neoplasms.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Sirolimus in Renal Transplantation

Sirolimus (rapamycin) is a macrocyclic lactone isolated from a strain of Streptomyces hygroscopicus that inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated signal-transduction pathways, resulting in the arrest of cell cycle of various cell types, including T- and B-lymphocytes. Sirolimus has been demonstrated to prolong graft survival in various animal models of transplantation, ranging from rodents to primates for both heterotopic, as well as orthotopic organ grafting, bone marrow transplantation and islet cell grafting. In human clinical renal transplantation, sirolimus in combination with ciclosporin (cyclosporine) efficiently reduces the incidence of acute allograft rejection. Because of the synergistic effect of sirolimus on ciclosporin-induced nephrotoxicity, a prolonged combination of the two drugs inevitably leads to progressive irreversible renal allograft damage. Early elimination of calcineurin inhibitor therapy or complete avoidance of the latter by using sirolimus therapy is the optimal strategy for this drug. Prospective randomised phase II and III clinical studies have confirmed this approach, at least for recipients with a low to moderate immunological risk. For patients with a high immunological risk or recipients exposed to delayed graft function, sirolimus might not constitute the best therapeutic choice--despite its ability to enable calcineurin inhibitor sparing in the latter situation--because of its anti-proliferative effects on recovering renal tubular cells. Whether lower doses of sirolimus or a combination with a reduced dose of tacrolimus would be advantageous in these high risk situations remains to be determined. Clinically relevant adverse effects of sirolimus that require a specific therapeutic response or can potentially influence short- and long-term patient morbidity and mortality as well as graft survival include hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, infectious and non-infectious pneumonia, anaemia, lymphocele formation and impaired wound healing. These drug-related adverse effects are important determinants in the choice of a tailor-made immunosuppressive drug regimen that complies with the individual patient risk profile. Equally important in the latter decision is the lack of severe intrinsic nephrotoxicity associated with sirolimus and its advantageous effects on arterial hypertension, post-transplantation diabetes mellitus and esthetic changes induced by calcineurin inhibitors. Mild and transient thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal adverse effects and mucosal ulcerations are all minor complications of sirolimus therapy that have less impact on the decision for choosing this drug as the basis for tailor-made immunosuppressive therapy. It is clear that sirolimus has gained a proper place in the present-day immunosuppressive armament used in renal transplantation and will contribute to the development of a tailor-made immunosuppressive therapy aimed at fulfilling the requirements outlined by the individual patient profile.

Pro- and anti-cancer effects of immunosuppressive agents used in organ transplantation

Development of cancer is a feared, and increasingly apparent, complication of long-term immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients. In addition to the need to reduce cancer occurrence in these patients, therapeutic protocols are lacking to simultaneously attack the malignancy and protect the allograft when neoplasms do occur. In this overview, we present the current literature regarding the pro- and anti-neoplastic effects of immunosuppressive agents on cancer growth and development. Recent experimental findings are paving the way for new therapeutic strategies aimed at both protecting an allograft from immunologic rejection and addressing the problem of cancer in this high-risk population.

Antitumor efficacy of intermittent treatment schedules with the rapamycin derivative RAD001 correlates with prolonged inactivation of ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

The orally bioavailable rapamycin derivative RAD001 (everolimus) targets the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway and possesses potent immunosuppressive and anticancer activities. Here, the antitumor activity of RAD001 was evaluated in the CA20948 syngeneic rat pancreatic tumor model. RAD001 demonstrated dose-dependent antitumor activity with daily and weekly administration schedules; statistically significant antitumor effects were observed with 2.5 and 0.5 mg/kg RAD001 administered daily [treated tumor versus control tumor size (T/C), 23% and 23-30%, respectively], with 3-5 mg/kg RAD001 administered once weekly (T/C, 14-36%), or with 5 mg/kg RAD001 administered twice weekly (T/C, 36%). These schedules were well tolerated and exhibited antitumor potency similar to that of the cytotoxic agent 5-fluorouracil (T/C, 23%). Moreover, the efficacy of intermittent treatment schedules suggests a therapeutic window allowing differentiation of antitumor activity from the immunosuppressive properties of this agent. Detailed biochemical profiling of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling in tumors, skin, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), after a single administration of 5 mg/kg RAD001, indicated that RAD001 treatment blocked phosphorylation of the translational repressor eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 and inactivated the translational activator ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1). The efficacy of intermittent treatment schedules was associated with prolonged inactivation of S6K1 in tumors and surrogate tissues (> or =72 h). Furthermore, detailed analysis of the dose dependency of weekly treatment schedules demonstrated a correlation between antitumor efficacy and prolonged effects (> or =7 days) on PBMC-derived S6K1 activity. Analysis of human PBMCs revealed that S6K1 also underwent a concentration-dependent inactivation after RAD001 treatment ex vivo (>95% inactivation with 20 nM RAD001). In contrast, human PBMC-derived eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 was present predominantly in the hypophosphorylated form and was unaffected by RAD001 treatment. Taken together, these results demonstrate a correlation between the antitumor efficacy of intermittent RAD001 treatment schedules and prolonged S6K1 inactivation in PBMCs and suggest that long-term monitoring of PBMC-derived S6K1 activity levels could be used for assessing RAD001 treatment schedules in cancer patients.

Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition as therapy for hematologic malignancies

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a downstream effector of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt (protein kinase B) signaling pathway, which mediates cell survival and proliferation. mTOR regulates essential signal-transduction pathways, is involved in the coupling of growth stimuli with cell cycle progression, and initiates mRNA translation in response to favorable nutrient environments. mTOR is involved in regulating many aspects of cell growth, including membrane traffic, protein degradation, protein kinase C signaling, ribosome biogenesis, and transcription. Because mTOR activates both the 40S ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70s6k) and the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1, its inhibitors cause G1-phase cell cycle arrest. Inhibitors of mTOR also prevent cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) activation, inhibit retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation, and accelerate the turnover of cyclin D1, leading to a deficiency of active CDK4/cyclin D1 complexes, all of which may help cause G1-phase arrest. It is known that the phosphatase and tensin homologue tumor suppressor gene (PTEN) plays a major role in embryonic development, cell migration, and apoptosis. Malignancies with PTEN mutations, which are associated with constitutive activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway, are relatively resistant to apoptosis and may be particularly sensitive to mTOR inhibitors. Rapamycin analogs with relatively favorable pharmaceutical properties, including CCI-779, RAD001, and AP23573, are under investigation in patients with hematologic malignancies.

The evolving experience using everolimus in clinical transplantation

Everolimus is a derivative of sirolimus, a macrocyclic lactone, originally isolated from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. Both everolimus and sirolimus have a similar mechanism of action, exerting potent inhibition of growth factor-induced proliferation of lymphocytes, as well as other hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells of mesenchymal origin. Each agent complexes with the FK506 binding protein 12 to inhibit cyclin dependent kinase(s), collectively termed the target of rapamycin (TOR), causing G1-S phase cell cycle arrest. Safety and efficacy have been documented in large-scale, blinded, randomized, international clinical renal and cardiac transplant trials. Everolimus is more hydrophilic, exhibits a shorter elimination half-life (approximately 30 hours), and demonstrates greater relative bioavailability compared to sirolimus. However, similar to the calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus, everolimus is biotransformed by the cytochrome P450, 3A4 isozyme. Also similar to sirolimus, clinical experiences identified biologically relevant side effects including hyperlipidemia and exacerbation of cyclosporine (CsA)-associated nephrotoxicity. However, also similar to sirolimus, accumulating evidence suggests that the hyperlipidemia can be controlled and the CsA-associated renal effects appear reduced with a low incidence of acute rejection when everolimus is administered in combination with reduced CsA doses. The experience using everolimus in cardiac transplantation has also provided potentially important insights into the consequences of antiproliferative effects on vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts where reduction in intimal expansion was identified by intravascular coronary ultrasound examination among those patients receiving everolimus. Therefore, available results suggest that the introduction of everolimus as the newest TOR inhibitor should enhance therapeutic options for immunosuppression after organ transplantation.