Higher surgical wound complication rates with sirolimus immunosuppression after kidney transplantation: a matched-pair pilot study

Sirolimus-Associated Hepatotoxicity in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus is an immunosuppressant that exerts anti-rejection activity by inhibiting T-cell activity and is used to treat chronic rejection and calcineurin-related nephrotoxicity. Unlike tacrolimus and cyclosporine, it has no effect on calcineurin activity in liver transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE

To report correlates of survival outcomes in a series of patients with putative sirolimus-related hepatotoxicity after liver transplant.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent a liver transplant for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) and who received sirolimus immunosuppressive therapy between November 2000 and November 2003. Extracted data included sirolimus serum concentrations, frequency of sirolimus-related adverse effects, drug-related clinical hepatitis, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten patients were found to have been treated with sirolimus for either renal insufficiency (n = 6) or chronic rejection (n = 4). Six patients had liver biopsies, while the remaining 4 patients were clinically diagnosed with rejection. Two of the 6 patients demonstrated changes consistent with sinusoidal congestion and one with eosinophilia, consistent with an allergic drug reaction. HCV viral load increased slightly, from 600 000 to 700 000 IU/mL. Mean baseline transaminase levels were 45 IU/L for aspartate aminotransferase and 50 IU/L for alanine aminotransferase, with peak levels of 210 and 180 IU/L, respectively. The time to transaminase increase was a mean of 21 days when sirolimus was added, with resolution within 27 days (mean) after its discontinuation. No changes were evident in antiviral therapy. Combination sirolimus and tacrolimus concentrations were maintained at >10 ng/mL; average monotherapy with sirolimus was 12 ng/mL, and average time on therapy was 25 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Sirolimus-related hepatotoxicity is an important complication after liver transplant. Immediate recognition is critical to avoid confusion with other causes of abnormal serum aminotransferases after liver transplant, and discontinuation of the drug may be required.

Clinicopathological study of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR)-associated pyelonephritis in renal transplantation

We retrospectively studied the occurrence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR)-associated pyelonephritis using renal biopsies obtained from the transplanted kidneys, and correlated the histological changes with clinical parameters. Out of a total of 131 renal biopsies performed between 1990 and 2001 on renal transplant patients at the department of Urology of Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 12 patients showed pyuria more than twice in a single year. Seven of these 12 patients were available for determining VUR by voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). Cystoureterography demonstrated VUR in three of seven studied patients with pyuria. A histopathological examination revealed dilatation of both proximal and distal tubules in renal biopsies of transplant patients with VUR, compared to renal biopsies of transplant patients without VUR, or non-transplanted patients with thin membrane disease. One of the patients with VUR showed advanced features of chronic pyelonephritis in four consecutive biopsies at different time points, suggesting a late stage of reflux nephropathy in the transplanted kidney. We conclude from our study that the occurrence of VUR-related pyelonephritis may be one of the important long-term complications in the survival of renal allografts.

Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: a prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus has been associated with an increased risk of wound-healing complications in several retrospective analyses. The authors compared the rates of wound-healing complications in renal allograft recipients in a prospective, randomized trial of sirolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-prednisone versus tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-prednisone.

METHODS

All patients received antithymocyte globulin induction. In the first phase of the study, patients (n = 77) were included regardless of body mass index (BMI). In the second phase (n = 46 patients), the authors excluded patients with a BMI greater than 32 kg/m2, and the target trough sirolimus level was lowered to 10 to 15 ng/mL (previously 15-20 ng/mL). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of wound complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients received tacrolimus and 64 received sirolimus and were included in subsequent analyses. The incidence of complications was 8% (5 of 59) in the tacrolimus group and 47% (30 of 64) in the sirolimus group (P < 0.0001). Rates of perigraft fluid collections, superficial wound infections, and incisional herniae were significantly higher in the sirolimus group. Multivariate logistic regression showed only sirolimus (P = 0.0001) and BMI (P = 0.0021) to independently correlate with complications. In the first phase of the study, the wound complication rate in the sirolimus group was 55% (21 of 38 patients). After excluding obese recipients and decreasing the target sirolimus level, the wound complication rate in the sirolimus group was 35% (9 of 26 patients; P = 0.1040).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens leads to a higher incidence of wound-healing complications and will require new approaches to patient selection and management to decrease their incidence.

Sirolimus-induced angioedema

Sirolimus (SRL) is a macrolide immunosuppressant that has gained widespread use in organ transplantation. Its full spectrum of side-effects is yet to be defined. We describe herein three cases of SRL-induced angioedema (AE) in African-American (AA) primary renal allograft recipients who received SRL in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. In two cases, AE manifested after SRL was restarted after a period of discontinuation. The third case presented upon initial exposure to the drug. None of the patients was receiving any drug that has been previously associated with AE. Complete resolution occurred only after SRL was withdrawn. AE has not recurred in any of the patients during a follow-up period of up to 21 months. We conclude that AE is a previously unrecognized adverse event associated with SRL use. Close monitoring for this side-effect, especially in AA patients, is warranted.