Immunosuppression with belatacept-based, corticosteroid-avoiding regimens in de novo kidney transplant recipients

Belatacept-based, ATG-Fresenius-induction regimen for kidney transplant recipients: a proof-of-concept study

Belatacept provides effective immunosuppression while avoiding the nephrotoxicities associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). However, existing belatacept-based regimens still have high rates of acute rejection. We hypothesized that therapy with belatacept, mycophenolic acid (MMA), steroids and induction therapy with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin Fresenius (ATGF), rejection rate could be reduced. Prospective, single center, proof-of-concept study including males and females aged ≥18years, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seropositive recipients of a first, HLA non-identical, live or deceased donor kidney allograft. Only patients with a calculated panel reactive antibody score of 0% were included. Three donors were positive for Chagas disease. Six of twelve patients had at least one infection and five were readmitted to the hospital for treatment. One patient had a Trypanosoma cruzi infection via the graft treated successfully. Median cold ischemia time for the transplant patients with a deceased donor was 21.5h. Mean serum creatinine levels at 1, 3 and 6months were 1.76±0.59, 1.55±0.60 and 1.49±0.60mg/dl, respectively. Two of twelve patients experienced clinical, biopsy-proven rejection, successfully treated with methylprednisolone. No patient developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) or any other malignancy and no patient lost their graft or died during follow-up. The potential of this approach makes it worthy of further investigation.

Belatacept for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Most people who receive a kidney transplant die from either cardiovascular disease or cancer before their transplant fails. The most common reason for someone with a kidney transplant to lose the function of their transplanted kidney necessitating return to dialysis is chronic kidney transplant scarring. Immunosuppressant drugs have side effects that increase risks of cardiovascular disease, cancer and chronic kidney transplant scarring. Belatacept may provide sufficient immunosuppression while avoiding unwanted side effects of other immunosuppressant drugs. However, high rates of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) have been reported when belatacept is used in particular kidney transplant recipients at high dosage.

OBJECTIVES

1) Compare the relative efficacy of belatacept versus any other primary immunosuppression regimen for preventing acute rejection, maintaining kidney transplant function, and preventing death. 2) Compare the incidence of several adverse events: PTLD; other malignancies; chronic transplant kidney scarring (IF/TA); infections; change in blood pressure, lipid and blood sugar control. 3) Assess any variation in effects by study, intervention and recipient characteristics, including: differences in pre-transplant Epstein Barr virus serostatus; belatacept dosage; and donor-category (living, standard criteria deceased, or extended criteria deceased).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 1 September 2014 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared belatacept versus any other immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplant recipients were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data for study quality and transplant outcomes and synthesized results using random effects meta-analysis, expressed as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI).  Subgroup analyses and univariate meta-regression were used to investigate potential heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five studies that compared belatacept and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) that reported data from a total of 1535 kidney transplant recipients. Of the five studies, three (478 participants) compared belatacept and cyclosporin and two (43 recipients) compared belatacept and tacrolimus. Co-interventions included basiliximab (4 studies, 1434 recipients); anti-thymocyte globulin (1 study, 89 recipients); alemtuzumab (1 study, 12 recipients); mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 5 studies, 1509 recipients); sirolimus (1 study, 26 recipients) and prednisone (5 studies, 1535 recipients).Up to three years following transplant, belatacept and CNI-treated recipients were at similar risk of dying (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.44), losing their kidney transplant and returning to dialysis (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.38), and having an episode of acute rejection (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.86). Belatacept-treated kidney transplant recipients were 28% less likely to have chronic kidney scarring (3 studies, 1360 recipients: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.94) and also had better graft function (measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (3 studies 1083 recipients): 10.89 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI 4.01 to 17.77; estimated GFR (4 studies, 1083 recipients): MD 9.96 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI 3.28 to 16.64) than CNI-treated recipients. Blood pressure was lower (systolic (2 studies, 658 recipients): MD -7.51 mm Hg, 95% CI -10.57 to -4.46; diastolic (2 studies, 658 recipients): MD -3.07 mm Hg, 95% CI -4.83 to -1.31, lipid profile was better (non-HDL (3 studies 1101 recipients): MD -12.25 mg/dL, 95% CI -17.93 to -6.57; triglycerides (3 studies 1101 recipients): MD -24.09 mg/dL, 95% CI -44.55 to -3.64), and incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant was reduced by 39% (4 studies (1049 recipients): RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.93) among belatacept-treated versus CNI-treated recipients.Risk of PTLD was similar in belatacept and CNI-treated recipients (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 2.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 12.66) and was no different among recipients who received different belatacept dosages (high versus low dosage: ratio of risk ratios (RRR) 1.06, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.80, test of difference = 0.96) or among those who were Epstein Barr virus seronegative compared with those who were seropositive before their kidney transplant (seronegative versus seropositive; RRR 1.49, 95% CI 0.15 to 14.76, test for difference = 0.73).The belatacept dose used (high versus low), type of donor kidney the recipient received (extended versus standard criteria) and whether the kidney transplant recipient received tacrolimus or cyclosporin made no difference to kidney transplant survival, incidence of acute rejection or estimated GFR. Selective outcome reporting meant that data for some key subgroup comparisons were sparse and that estimates of the effect of treatment in these groups of recipients remain imprecise.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of any difference in the effectiveness of belatacept and CNI in preventing acute rejection, graft loss and death, but treatment with belatacept is associated with less chronic kidney scarring and better kidney transplant function. Treatment with belatacept is also associated with better blood pressure and lipid profile and a lower incidence of diabetes versus treatment with a CNI. Important side effects (particularly PTLD) remain poorly reported and so the relative benefits and harms of using belatacept remain unclear. Whether short-term advantages of treatment with belatacept are maintained over the medium- to long-term or translate into better cardiovascular outcomes or longer kidney transplant survival with function remains unclear. Longer-term, fully reported and published studies comparing belatacept versus tacrolimus are needed to help clinicians decide which patients might benefit most from using belatacept.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of belatacept in adult kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Belatacept is a first-in-class, selective co-stimulation blocker recently approved for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in adult kidney transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to report the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of belatacept.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (CD86 receptor occupancy), and immunogenicity of belatacept were studied in de novo adult kidney transplant recipients in phase II and III clinical studies.

RESULTS

Following multiple doses of 5 or 10 mg/kg, the geometric mean (percentage coefficient of variation) maximum serum concentration and area under the serum concentration-time curve over one dosing interval of belatacept were 136 (20%) and 238 (27%) μg/mL, and 13,587 (27%) and 21,241 (35%) μg·h/mL, respectively. The median belatacept elimination half-life was 8-9 days. Belatacept exhibited concentration-dependent binding to CD86 receptors. The pre-dose CD86 receptor occupancy by belatacept decreased from 94 to 65% between day 5 and 1 year post-transplant, with corresponding pre-dose trough serum concentrations of belatacept decreasing from ~35 to 4 μg/mL during this period. The cumulative incidence of developing anti-belatacept antibodies was 5.3% up to 3 years post-transplant and had no impact on belatacept exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Belatacept in adult kidney transplant demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics with low variability, concentration-dependent pharmacodynamics, and a low incidence of anti-drug antibodies.

A network meta-analysis of the efficacy of belatacept, cyclosporine and tacrolimus for immunosuppression therapy in adult renal transplant recipients

Belatacept is a first in-class co-stimulation blocker developed for primary maintenance immunosuppression following renal transplantation. The objective of this study was to estimate the efficacy of belatacept relative to tacrolimus and cyclosporine among adults receiving a single kidney transplant. A systematic review was conducted of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between January 1990 and December 2013 using EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and unpublished study reports from two belatacept RCTs. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) methods were used to compare the efficacy measures, mortality, graft loss, acute rejection and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Heterogeneity was quantified using statistical metrics and potential sources were evaluated using meta-regression and subgroup analysis. A total of 28 RCTs comparing tacrolimus with cyclosporine, and three comparing belatacept with cyclosporine, were identified. All three agents provided comparable graft and patient survival, despite a higher risk of acute rejection associated with belatacept and cyclosporine. Belatacept was associated with significant improvement in GFR versus cyclosporine. Compared with tacrolimus, this difference was clinically meaningful yet statistically non-significant. The probability of being the best treatment was highest for belatacept for graft survival (68%), patient survival (97%) and renal function (89%), and highest for tacrolimus for acute rejection (99%).Variability in donor, recipient, and trial characteristics was present in the included RCTs; however, minimal statistical heterogeneity was detected in the analysis of acute rejection, graft or patient survival, and none of the characteristics were found to be significantly associated with relative effect. Although the direction of effect of immunosuppressants on GFR was consistent across RCTs, precise estimation of its magnitude was limited by a small number of RCTs and heterogeneity in relative effect sizes. Clinicians often seek an alternative to CNIs due to their nephrotoxic effects. The results of this indirect comparison indicate that belatacept is an effective immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation among adults.

Co-stimulatory blockade with belatacept in kidney transplantation

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstone of immunosuppression after transplantation but can exert negative effects on chronic allograft function and metabolic profile. Belatacept, a selective co-stimulation blocker of T cells, is the first biologic agent approved for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Studies reveal better preservation of glomerular filtration rate and improved metabolic end points with belatacept when compared to CNIs. Increased incidence of acute rejection is noted with belatacept but overall graft survival looked similar at 5 years. Risk for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is higher in Epstein-Barr virus-seronegative recipients of belatacept. Belatacept seems to be a promising drug, and further experience with its use will define its future role.

Renal transplantation using belatacept without maintenance steroids or calcineurin inhibitors

Kidney transplantation remains limited by toxicities of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and steroids. Belatacept is a less toxic CNI alternative, but existing regimens rely on steroids and have higher rejection rates. Experimentally, donor bone marrow and sirolimus promote belatacept's efficacy. To investigate a belatacept-based regimen without CNIs or steroids, we transplanted recipients of live donor kidneys using alemtuzumab induction, monthly belatacept and daily sirolimus. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive unfractionated donor bone marrow. After 1 year, patients were allowed to wean from sirolimus. Patients were followed clinically and with surveillance biopsies. Twenty patients were transplanted, all successfully. Mean creatinine (estimated GFR) was 1.10 ± 0.07 mg/dL (89 ± 3.56 mL/min) and 1.13 ± 0.07 mg/dL (and 88 ± 3.48 mL/min) at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Excellent results were achieved irrespective of bone marrow infusion. Ten patients elected oral immunosuppressant weaning, seven of whom were maintained rejection-free on monotherapy belatacept. Those failing to wean were successfully maintained on belatacept-based regimens supplemented by oral immunosuppression. Seven patients declined immunosuppressant weaning and three patients were denied weaning for associated medical conditions; all remained rejection-free. Belatacept and sirolimus effectively prevent kidney allograft rejection without CNIs or steroids when used following alemtuzumab induction. Selected, immunologically low-risk patients can be maintained solely on once monthly intravenous belatacept.

Immunosuppression regimen and the risk of acute rejection in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment for end-stage renal disease in appropriate HIV-positive individuals. However, acute rejection (AR) rates are over twice those of HIV-negative recipients.

METHODS

To better understand optimal immunosuppression for HIV-positive KT recipients, we studied associations between immunosuppression regimen, AR at 1 year, and survival in 516 HIV-positive and 93,027 HIV-negative adult kidney-only recipients using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2003 to 2011.

RESULTS

Consistent with previous reports, HIV-positive patients had twofold higher risk of AR (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.2; P<0.001) than their HIV-negative counterparts as well as a higher risk of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.18-1.94; P=0.001), but these differences were not seen among patients receiving antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction (aRR for AR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.41-3.35, P=0.77; adjusted hazard ratio for graft loss, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.73-3.25; P=0.26). Furthermore, HIV-positive patients receiving ATG induction had a 2.6-fold lower risk of AR (aRR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.87; P=0.02) than those receiving no antibody induction. Conversely, HIV-positive patients receiving sirolimus-based therapy had a 2.2-fold higher risk of AR (aRR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.20-3.86; P=0.01) than those receiving calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens.

CONCLUSION

These findings support a role for ATG induction, and caution against the use of sirolimus-based maintenance therapy, in HIV-positive individuals undergoing KT.

Substantial proliferation of human renal tubular epithelial cell-reactive CD4+CD28null memory T cells, which is resistant to tacrolimus and everolimus

BACKGROUND

In spite of maintenance treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, tubulitis still occurs and can lead to structural kidney graft damage. We hypothesize that human renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs) trigger selective proliferation of recipient T-cell subsets with variable sensitivity to immunosuppressive drugs.

METHODS

Recipient peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cocultured with donor-derived TECs for 7 days. The proliferation of the total CD4 T-cell pool was assessed. Next, we analyzed which CD4 T-cell subset proliferated and how this response was affected by tacrolimus, everolimus, prednisolone, and mycophenolic acid (MPA) in clinically relevant concentrations.

RESULTS

CD4 T-cell proliferation upon TEC encounter was mainly executed by memory T cells. Interestingly, 38%±7% of the proliferating CD4 T-cell pool showed a CD28 phenotype. These proliferating CD4CD28 memory T cells produced high levels of interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, and the cytolitic protease granzyme B. TEC-reactive CD4 T-cell proliferation was significantly suppressed by tacrolimus, everolimus, prednisolone, and MPA (P<0.05). Surprisingly and in contrast to prednisolone and MPA, neither tacrolimus nor everolimus could inhibit the CD4CD28 T-cell proliferative response.

CONCLUSION

Our data show substantial proliferation of TEC-reactive CD4CD28 memory T cells, which are resistant to tacrolimus and everolimus. This phenomenon might play an important mechanistic role during cellular rejection under full immunosuppression.

Flow cytometry and solid organ transplantation: a perfect match

In the field of transplantation, flow cytometry serves a well-established role in pre-transplant crossmatching and monitoring immune reconstitution following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The capabilities of flow cytometers have continuously expanded and this combined with more detailed knowledge of the constituents of the immune system, their function and interaction and newly developed reagents to study these parameters have led to additional utility of flow cytometry-based analyses, particularly in the post-transplant setting. This review discusses the impact of flow cytometry on managing alloantigen reactions, monitoring opportunistic infections and graft rejection and gauging immunosuppression in the context of solid organ transplantation.

Obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation: prevention and treatment

The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in dialysis patients is high and further increases after transplantation due to weight gain and the detrimental metabolic effects of immunosuppressive drugs. Corticosteroids cause insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, abnormal glucose metabolism and arterial hypertension. The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus is diabetogenic by inhibiting insulin secretion, whereas cyclosporine causes hypertension and increases cholesterol levels. Mtor antagonists are responsible for hyperlipidemia and abnormal glucose metabolism by mechanisms that also implicate insulin resistance. The metabolic syndrome in transplant recipients has numerous detrimental effects such as increasing the risk of new onset diabetes, cardiovascular disease events and patient death. In addition, it has also been linked with accelerated loss of graft function, proteinuria and ultimately graft loss. Prevention and management of the metabolic syndrome are based on increasing physical activity, promotion of weight loss and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Bariatric surgery before or after renal transplantation in patients with body mass index >35 kg/m(2) is an option but its long term effects on graft and patient survival have not been investigated. Steroid withdrawal and replacement of tacrolimus with cyclosporine facilitate control of diabetes, whereas replacement of cyclosporine and mtor antagonists can improve hyperlipidemia. The new costimulation inhibitor belatacept has potent immunosuppressive properties without metabolic adverse effects and will be an important component of immunosuppressive regimens with better metabolic risk profile. Medical treatment of cardiovascular risk factors has to take potential drug interactions with immunosuppressive medication and drug accumulation due to renal insufficiency into account.

Novel immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplantation

Excellent outcomes have been achieved in the field of renal transplantation. A significant reduction in acute rejection has been attained at many renal transplant centers using contemporary immunosuppressive, consisting of an induction agent, a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent plus or minus a corticosteroid. Despite improvements with these regimens, chronic allograft injury and adverse events still persist. The perfect immunosuppressive regimen would limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid toxicity while providing enhanced allograft outcomes. Potential improvements to the calcineurin inhibitor class include a prolonged release tacrolimus formulation and voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog. Belatacept has shown promise as an agent to replace calcineurin inhibitors. A novel, fully-human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, ASKP1240, is currently enrolling patients in phase 2 trials with calcineurin minimization and avoidance regimens. Another future goal of transplant immunosuppression is effective and safe treatment of allograft rejection. Novel treatments for antibody mediated rejection include bortezomib and eculizumab. Several investigational agents are no longer being pursed in transplantation including the induction agents, efalizumab and alefacept, and maintenance agents, sotrastaurin and tofacitinib. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the published evidence of the effectiveness and safety of investigational immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients.

Risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder associated with use of belatacept

Purpose

Published evidence on a rare but serious malignancy associated with use of the first biological agent approved for long-term maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients is reviewed.

Summary

Belatacept (Nulojix, Bristol-Myers Squibb) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in combination therapy to prevent renal graft rejection in patients who are Epstein-Barr virus seropositive. Belatacept appears to offer some advantages over calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens (e.g., no need for therapeutic drug monitoring), but its use poses a risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), a rapidly progressing and often lethal malignancy. The efficacy and safety of more-intensive and less-intensive belatacept regimens were established in two Phase III clinical trials, which found that rates of patient and graft survival were comparable to those in cyclosporine users; belatacept was shown to be superior in preserving renal function. The occurrence of PTLD, particularly PTLD involving the central nervous system, in 0–4% of belatacept-treated patients in clinical trials prompted postmarketing initiatives: (1) implementation of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) program to help ensure the safe and proper use of belatacept, (2) longitudinal studies to better define the risks and outcomes of belatacept therapy, and (3) a manufacturer-created patient registry to track belatacept use and encourage voluntary reporting of associated adverse events.

Conclusion

Appropriate patient selection and adherence to REMS requirements, including patient counseling and facilitation of registry enrollment, are essential in mitigating the increased risk of PTLD associated with belatacept therapy.

T-cell co-stimulatory blockade in transplantation: two steps forward one step back!

INTRODUCTION

The concern about nephrotoxicity with calcineurin inhibitors led to the search of novel agents for immunosuppression. Based on the requirement of T-cell co-stimulatory signals to fully activated naïve T cells, it became clear that blocking these pathways could be an appealing therapeutic target. However, some unexpected findings were noticed in the recent clinical trials of belatacept, including a higher rate of rejection, which warranted further investigation with some interesting concepts emerging from the bench.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to review the literature of the B7:CD28 co-stimulatory blockade in transplantation, including the basic immunology behind its development, clinical application and potential limitations.

EXPERT OPINION

Targeting co-stimulatory pathways were found to be much more complex than initially anticipated due to the interplay between not only various co-stimulatory pathways but also various co-inhibitory ones. In addition, co-stimulatory signals have different roles in diverse immune cell types. Therefore, targeting CD28 ligands with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4)-Ig may have some deleterious effects, including the inhibition of regulatory T cells, blockade of co-inhibitory signals (CTLA4) and promotion of Th17 cells. Co-stimulatory independence of memory T cells was another unforeseen limitation. Learning how to better integrate co-stimulatory targeting with other immunosuppressive agents will be critical for the improvement of long-term graft survival.

Transient combination therapy targeting the immune synapse abrogates T cell responses and prolongs allograft survival in mice

T cells play a major role in allograft rejection, which occurs after T cell activation by the engagement of several functional molecules to form an immune synapse with alloantigen presenting cells. In this study, the immune synapse was targeted using mAbs directed to the TCR beta-chain (TCRβ) and lymphocyte function-associated antigen−1 (LFA1) to induce long-term allograft survival. Evaluation of antigen-specific T cell responses was performed by adoptively transferring CFSE labeled transgenic OT-II cells into wild-type mice and providing OVA peptide by intravenous injection. Graft survival studies were performed in mice by transplanting BALB/c ear skins onto the flanks of C57BL/6 recipients. The anti-TCRβ plus anti-LFA1 mAb combination (but not either mAb alone) abrogated antigen-specific T cell responses invitro and invivo. Transient combination therapy with these agents resulted in significantly prolonged skin allograft survival in mice (51±10 days; p<0.01) when compared to treatment with either anti-TCRβ mAb (24±5 days) or anti-LFA1 mAb (19±3 days) alone or no treatment (10±1 days). When lymphoid tissues from these mice were analyzed at different times post-transplant, only those receiving the combination of anti-TCRβ and anti-LFA1 mAbs demonstrated long-lasting reductions in total T cell numbers, cellular and humoral anti-donor responses, and expression of CD3 on the surface of T cells. These results demonstrate that transient anti-TCRβ and anti-LFA1 mAb combination therapy abrogates antigen-reactive T cell responses with long-lasting effects that significantly prolong allograft survival.

Corticosteroid and calcineurin inhibitor sparing regimens in kidney transplantation

Chronic kidney disease is a major public health problem that is associated with increased risks of kidney disease progression, cardiovascular disease and death. Kidney transplantation remains the renal replacement therapy of choice for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Despite impressive strides in short-term allograft survival, there has been little improvement in long-term kidney graft survival, and rates of death with a functioning allograft remain high. Long-term safety profiles of existing immunosuppressive regimens point to a need for continued search for alternative agents. This overview discusses emerging evidence on a few promising therapeutic approaches, juxtaposes conflicting findings and highlights remaining knowledge gaps.

Maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplantation

The need to maintain allograft recipients on immunosuppression is nearly universal. Immunosuppressive agents used in organ transplantation target one or more steps of the host alloimmune response, specifically processes related to CD4-positive T lymphocytes. Calcineurin-inhibitor based steroid-containing regimens have been the mainstay of maintenance immunosuppression over the last two decades. Newer agents have shown efficacy in this role in recent trials with comparable allograft and patient outcomes. These agents have permitted calcineurin-inhibitor minimization and steroid-sparing strategies in selected groups of patients.

Current trends in immunosuppressive therapies for renal transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Current trends in immunosuppressive therapies for renal transplant recipients are reviewed.

SUMMARY

The common premise for immunosuppressive therapies in renal transplantation is to use multiple agents to work on different immunologic targets. The use of a multidrug regimen allows for pharmacologic activity at several key steps in the T-cell replication process and lower dosages of each individual agent, thereby producing fewer drug-related toxicities. In general, there are three stages of clinical immunosuppression: induction therapy, maintenance therapy, and treatment of an established acute rejection episode. Only immunosuppressive therapies used for maintenance therapy are discussed in detail in this review. The most common maintenance immunosuppressive agents can be divided into five classes: (1) the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (cyclosporine and tacrolimus), (2) costimulation blockers (belatacept), (3) mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus), (4) antiproliferatives (azathioprine and mycophenolic acid derivatives), and (5) corticosteroids. Immunosuppressive regimens vary among transplantation centers but most often include a CNI and an adjuvant agent, with or without corticosteroids. Selection of appropriate immunosuppressive regimens should be patient specific, taking into account the medications' pharmacologic properties, adverse-event profile, and potential drug-drug interactions, as well as the patient's preexisting diseases, risk of rejection, and medication regimen.

CONCLUSION

Advancements in transplant immunosuppression have resulted in a significant reduction in acute cellular rejection and a modest increase in long-term patient and graft survival. Because the optimal immunosuppression regimen is still unknown, immunosuppressant use should be influenced by institutional preference and tailored to the immunologic risk of the patient and adverse-effect profile of the drug.

Belatacept: a novel immunosuppressive agent for kidney transplant recipients

Long-term graft and patient survival remain the most significant challenges in kidney transplantation, and new therapies are needed to improve long-term outcomes. Belatacept, a first-in-class selective costimulation blocker, has been approved for prophylaxis of organ rejection in kidney transplant recipients who are positive for EBV. In Phase III trials, belatacept demonstrated superior preservation of renal function and comparable patient/graft survival compared with cyclosporine, while avoiding the renal toxicities and other adverse events associated with the use of a calcineurin inhibitor. Patients treated with belatacept had higher rates of acute rejection than cyclosporine-treated patients. However, acute rejection episodes that occurred early and did not recur were generally not associated with donor-specific antibodies, and few belatacept patients had graft loss due to rejection. The improved renal benefit with belatacept may translate into improvements in long-term graft and patient outcomes. Targeting T-cell costimulation is an important new option for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients.

Mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors in solid organ transplantation: from benchside to clinical use

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Here, we review recent advances and new insights in mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) biology (signalling pathway, kidney biology and immune system), and recent clinical data on mTOR inhibitors related to solid organ transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The mTOR pathway is a major integrator of signals governing protein and lipid biosynthesis and growth factor-driven cell cycle progression. Recent findings have emphasized a critical role of mTOR in cellular homeostasis with a crucial role in podocyte function. Beyond CD8(+) and regulatory T-cell control, mTOR protein is involved in critical biological functions of T helper cells or dendritic cells. New specific inhibitors of mTORC1/C2 are available and shed new light on mTOR functions. Finally, clinical trials have better defined the use of mTOR inhibitors and emphasized their role in cancer prevention.

SUMMARY

The mTOR pathway is considered as a key integrator of multiple inputs that drives numerous biological processes in cell biology. mTOR inhibitors are potent immunosuppressive drugs for solid organ transplantation. Newly designed specific inhibitors of mTOR complex 1 and 2 offer promising therapeutic effects and a better understanding of the pathway. Many conditions may benefit from mTOR inhibition for a short period, but tolerance of treatment in a chronic setting remains a major concern.

Prospective randomized trial of maintenance immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of prednisone in adult kidney transplantation

Rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) has minimized steroid-related complications following kidney transplant (KT). This trial compares long-term (10-year) outcomes with three different maintenance immunosuppressive protocols following RDP in adult KT. Recipients (n=440; 73% living donor) from March 2001 to April 2006 were randomized into one of three arms: cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (CSA/MMF, n=151); high-level tacrolimus (TAC, 8-12 μg/L) and low-level sirolimus (SIR, 3-7 μg/L) (TACH/SIRL, n=149) or low-level TAC (3-7 μg/L) and high-level SIR (8-12 μg/L) (TACL/SIR(H) , n=140). Median follow-up was ∼7 years. There were no differences between arms in 10-year actuarial patient, graft and death-censored graft survival or in allograft function. There were no differences in the 10-year actuarial rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (30%, 26% and 20% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH) and chronic rejection (38%, 35% and 31% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH). Rates of new-onset diabetes mellitus were higher with TACH/SIRL (p=0.04), and rates of anemia were higher with TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH (p=0.04). No differences were found in the overall rates of 16 other post-KT complications. These data indicate that RDP-based protocol yield acceptable 10-year outcomes, but side effects differ based on the maintenance regimen used and should be considered when optimizing immunosuppression following RDP.

The role of Thymoglobulin induction in kidney transplantation: an update

The rabbit antithymocyte globulin Thymoglobulin first became available over 25 yr ago and is the most widely used lymphocyte-depleting preparation in solid organ transplantation. Thymoglobulin targets a wide range of T-cell surface antigens as well as natural killer-cell antigens, B-cell antigens, plasma cell antigens, adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors, resulting in profound, long-lasting T-cell depletion. Randomized studies have established the anti-rejection efficacy of Thymoglobulin in kidney transplantation. Experimental and clinical data suggest that Thymoglobulin administration may ameliorate ischemia reperfusion injury, thus reducing the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). Studies have demonstrated the benefit of using Thymoglobulin to facilitate immunosuppression minimization, both for corticosteroid and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal or avoidance, with potential improvement in cardiovascular and renal outcomes. The optimal cumulative dose for Thymoglobulin induction is 6-7.5 mg/kg, with vigilant short- and long-term monitoring of hematological status. Induction with Thymoglobulin is now indicated in immunologically high-risk patients, in those at increased risk of DGF and to maintain efficacy in low-risk transplant recipients receiving steroid or CNI minimization or avoidance regimens. We suggest that in future trials Thymoglobulin be tested with costimulation signal blockers and other immunosuppressants with the objective of establishing operational tolerance.

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies: A Focus on Belatacept

Objective

To review the elements and components of the risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) for the costimulation blocker belatacept and associated implications for health care providers working with transplant recipients.

Data Sources and Extraction

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (January 1990 to March 2012) were searched by using risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, REMS, belatacept, and organ transplant as search terms (individual organs were also searched). Retrieved articles were supplemented with analysis of information obtained from the Federal Register, the Food and Drug Administration, and the manufacturer of belatacept.

Data Synthesis

REMS are risk-management strategies implemented to ensure that a product's benefits outweigh its known safety risks. Although belatacept offers a novel strategy in maintenance immunosuppression and was associated with superior renal function compared with cyclosporine in phase 2 and 3 trials, belatacept is also associated with increased risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and central nervous system infections. The Food and Drug Administration required development of a REMS program as part of belatacept's approval process to ensure safe and appropriate use of the medication and optimization of its risk-benefit profile. Conclusion—Elements of the belatacept REMS include a medication guide that must be dispensed with each infusion and a communication plan. In the management of a complex population of patients, it is essential that those who care for transplant recipients, and patients, recognize the implications of potential and known risks of belatacept. The REMS program aims to facilitate careful selection and education of patients and vigilant monitoring.

Chitinase-like protein Brp-39/YKL-40 modulates the renal response to ischemic injury and predicts delayed allograft function

Kidney hypoperfusion during episodes of systemic hypotension or after surgical procurement for transplantation can lead to tubular cell death via necrosis and apoptosis, which trigger a series of responses that promote repair. The factors that contribute to the repair phase after kidney injury are not well understood. Using a urine proteomic screen in mice, we identified the macrophage-secreted chitinase-like protein Brp-39, the murine protein product of the chitinase 3-like 1 gene, as a critical component of this reparative response that serves to limit tubular cell apoptotic death via activation of Akt, improving animal survival after kidney ischemia/reperfusion. Examination of graded times of renal ischemia revealed a direct correlation between the degree of kidney injury and both Chi3l1/Brp-39 expression in the kidney and its levels in the urine. In samples collected from patients undergoing deceased-donor kidney transplantation, we found higher levels of the orthologous human protein, YKL-40, in urine and blood from allografts subjected to sufficient peri-transplant ischemia to cause delayed graft function than from allografts with slow or immediate graft function. Urinary levels of YKL-40 obtained within hours of transplant predicted the need for subsequent dialysis in these patients. In summary, these data suggest that Brp-39/YKL-40 is a sensor of the degree of injury, a critical mediator of the reparative response, and a possible biomarker to identify patients at greatest risk of sustained renal failure after transplantation.

Effects of immunosuppressive agents on Th17 cells involved in transplantation

The lymphocyte-derived helper T (Th) cells are critical regulators of the adaptive immune response and are associated with inflammatory disease. The most recently recognized Th-cell lineage, Th17, plays an important role in host defense against extracellular pathogens by secreting the proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin 17, and recruiting reactive oxygen species (ROS)-producing monocytes to the site of infection. However, accumulating evidence has implicated Th17-cell dysregulation as an underlying cause for some immune-related pathogenic conditions, including allograft rejection. Recent studies of human transplant patients have indicated that Th17 cells exhibit resistance to current immunosuppressive therapies that would otherwise prevent allograft rejection. In this review, we will discuss the most current research findings related to Th17-cell function in various kinds of allografts.

Belatacept utilization recommendations: an expert position

INTRODUCTION

There is a continuing need for an immunosuppressive therapy that offers a high benefit-risk profile for renal transplant recipients, supporting long-term patient and graft survival while minimizing cumulative nephrotoxicity and other side effects. Belatacept , the first biological agent developed for primary maintenance immunosuppression, was recently approved for use in Europe. Belatacept combined with corticosteroids and a mycophenolic acid is indicated for prophylaxis of graft rejection in adults receiving renal transplant. Its use is contraindicated in Epstein-Barr virus seronegative or serostatus unknown patients due to increased risk of developing posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides practical recommendations for the use of belatacept, based on safety and efficacy data from Phase II and Phase III clinical trials in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment with belatacept is associated with improved long-term graft function, making belatacept an important option for prevention of kidney allograft rejection. Furthermore, efficacy and safety data over several years of therapy suggest that belatacept is particularly suitable for long-term immunosuppression, and the selective targeting offered by belatacept may help avoid some of the non-specific chronic safety risks associated with calcineurin inhibitors and steroids. Future studies will clarify the optimal regimen for belatacept usage.

Introduction to the use of belatacept: a fusion protein for the prevention of posttransplant kidney rejection

The development of new immunosuppressive drugs for kidney transplantation resulted both in better short-term outcomes and in decreased metabolic, cardiovascular, and nephrotoxicity risk. Belatacept belongs to a new class of immunosuppressive drugs that selectively inhibits T-cell activation by preventing CD28 activation and by binding its ligands B7-1 and B7-2. The result is an inactivation of costimulatory pathways. A comparative analysis of the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT datasets showed belatacept regimens resulted in better cardiovascular and metabolic risk profiles than did cyclosporin A (CsA) regimens: belatacept likewise outperformed CsA in terms of lower blood pressure and serum lipids and less new onset diabetes after transplantation. About 20% of belatacept-treated patients developed adverse effects which included anemia, pyrexia, neutropenia, diarrhea, urinary tract infection, headache, and peripheral edema. At present, belatacept does not seem to predispose patients to a higher rate of infection than CsA maintenance immunosuppression. The risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative diseases was higher in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seronegative patients than in EBV-seropositive patients, but the risk may be reduced by use of a less intensive regimen and avoidance of EBV-negative patients and of patients whose pretransplant EBV serology is unknown. Belatacept provides a new option for immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation, but needs further evaluation in terms of the late effects that may derive from prolonged blockage of the costimulatory system and the induction of tolerance status.

An evaluation of sirolimus in renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Sirolimus is a powerful antiproliferative immunosuppressive drug approved for the prevention of kidney allograft rejection. By its unique mechanism of action, sirolimus provides a multitude of clinical potential and has been used effectively in different drug combinations. Extensive experience has been gained regarding the best timing of its application, side effect profile and potential benefits and limitations compared with other immunosuppressive drugs.

AREAS COVERED

The authors evaluate the recent experience with sirolimus in kidney transplantation. Pivotal randomized controlled trials were used to provide an overview with special attention to pharmacokinetic and dynamic aspects of sirolimus, its current clinical use as well as perspectives for its future role.

EXPERT OPINION

Sirolimus enriches the possibilities of immunosuppressive therapies after renal transplantation. Beneficial effects toward kidney function by allowing CNI sparing, lower incidence of malignancies and less viral infections have been suggested. Sirolimus should be used cautiously in de novo patients for reasons of wound healing. An early conversion to a sirolimus-based CNI-free regimen has shown promising results, whereas late conversion is more challenging. Finally, sirolimus-associated side effects are causing tolerability concerns and frequent discontinuations. Future research should aim to better define the therapeutic window and those patients most likely to benefit.

Current state of renal transplant immunosuppression: Present and future

For kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppression commonly consists of combination treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent and a corticosteroid. Many medical centers use a sequential immunosuppression regimen where an induction agent, either an anti-thymocyte globulin or interleukin-2 receptor antibody, is given at the time of transplantation to prevent early acute rejection which is then followed by a triple immunosuppressive maintenance regimen. Very low rejection rates have been achieved at many transplant centers using combinations of these agents in a variety of protocols. Yet, a large number of recipients suffer chronic allograft injury and adverse events associated with drug therapy. Regimens designed to limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid use are actively being pursued. An ideal immunosuppressive regimen limits toxicity and prolongs the functional life of the graft. This article contains a critical analysis of clinical data on currently available immunosuppressive strategies and an overview of therapeutic moieties in development.

Improvement in renal function in kidney transplant recipients switched from cyclosporine or tacrolimus to belatacept: 2-year results from the long-term extension of a phase II study

Kidney transplant recipients who switched from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept demonstrated higher calculated glomerular filtration rates (cGFRs) at 1 year in a Phase II study. This report addresses whether improvement was sustained at 2 years in the long-term extension (LTE). Patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus were randomized to switch to belatacept or continue CNI. Of 173 randomized patients, 162 completed the 12-month main study and entered the LTE. Two patients (n = 1 each group) had graft loss between Years 1-2. At Year 2, mean cGFR was 62.0 ml/min (belatacept) vs. 55.4 ml/min (CNI). The mean change in cGFR from baseline was +8.8 ml/min (belatacept) and +0.3 ml/min (CNI). Higher cGFR was observed in patients switched from either cyclosporine (+7.8 ml/min) or tacrolimus (+8.9 ml/min). The frequency of acute rejection in the LTE cohort was comparable between the belatacept and CNI groups by Year 2. All acute rejection episodes occurred during Year 1 in the belatacept patients and during Year 2 in the CNI group. There were more non-serious mucocutaneous fungal infections in the belatacept group. Switching to a belatacept-based regimen from a CNI-based regimen resulted in a continued trend toward improved renal function at 2 years after switching.

Belatacept : a new biological agent for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decades, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have become the cornerstone of transplant immunosuppression. CNIs can exert negative effects on chronic allograft function along with cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic adverse effects. Belatacept , a selective co-stimulation blocker of T cells, is the first US FDA (06/2011) and EMEA (06/2011) approved biologic agent for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

The authors critically reviewed the literature over the last few years comparing belatacept with current standard of maintenance immunosuppression including CNIs in kidney transplantation.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the increased incidence and severity of acute rejection with belatacept in Phase II and III studies, a better preservation of GFR and reduced incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy was observed as compared with CNIs. Patient and graft survivals were similar over 3- and 5-year follow-up post-transplantation. Incidence of adverse events were similar between the groups, but the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, predominantly involving CNS, was higher in Epstein-Barr virus seronegative recipients on belatacept, especially with a more intensive regimen. CV and metabolic end points were more favorable in belatacept versus CNI groups with similar incidences of diabetes after transplantation. Belatacept seems to be a promising drug for the future, but long-term outcomes are awaited.

CD28 family and chronic rejection: "to belatacept...And beyond!"

Kidneys are one of the most frequently transplanted human organs. Immunosuppressive agents may prevent or reverse most acute rejection episodes; however, the graft may still succumb to chronic rejection. The immunological response involved in the chronic rejection process depends on both innate and adaptive immune response. T lymphocytes have a pivotal role in chronic rejection in adaptive immune response. Meanwhile, we aim to present a general overview on the state-of-the-art knowledge of the strategies used for manipulating the lymphocyte activation mechanisms involved in allografts, with emphasis on T-lymphocyte costimulatory and coinhibitory molecules of the B7-CD28 superfamily. A deeper understanding of the structure and function of these molecules improves both the knowledge of the immune system itself and their potential action as rejection inducers or tolerance promoters. In this context, the central role played by CD28 family, especially the relationship between CD28 and CTLA-4, becomes an interesting target for the development of immune-based therapies aiming to increase the survival rate of allografts and to decrease autoimmune phenomena. Good results obtained by the recent development of abatacept and belatacept with potential clinical use aroused better expectations concerning the outcome of transplanted patients.

[Perspectives in pediatric renal transplantation]

New immunosuppressive drugs are administered in adults after renal transplantation to prevent toxicities (nephrotoxicity, cardiovascular complications…). Among these, Belatacept exhibited exciting results and its indication in pediatric patients will have to be validated, especially in EBVpositive recipients. Rituximab, bortezomide and eculizumab are also currently being evaluated in protocols of desensitization and in the treatment of humoral rejections. An individually tailored immunosuppressive regimen might be considered in the future, based on the study of certain polymorphisms or on immune status and alloreactivity determined by new biomarkers. Finally, the development of EBV and cmV vaccines would prevent these infections after transplantation.

Are calcineurin inhibitors-free regimens ready for prime time?

The goal of research in transplant therapeutics is to achieve safe and effective immunosuppression strategies that allow durable engraftment free of toxicities. The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) regimens, because of their inherent toxicities (including nephrotoxicity), have been unable to meet these promises. Over the past decade acute cellular rejection decreased dramatically with a concomitant robust increase in 1-year graft survival; however, long-term graft outcome showed only modest improvement. This is due in part to the toxicities of the immunosuppressive drugs. The quest for a toxicity-free-CNI-free regimen has been both intense and frustrating. A turning point in CNIs-free therapy may have occurred with the recent approval of belatacept, which represents a new paradigm in immunosuppression: biological therapy for chronic immunosuppression devoid of the usual toxicities associated with the CNIs. Belatacept, a fusion receptor protein, blocks costimulation signals necessary for the activation of T cells. Although costimulation blockade has not been shown to induce tolerance, it can provide safe and effective immunosuppression without renal or cardiovascular toxicities. The approval of belatacept in both the United States and Europe for use in renal transplantation will finally push CNI-free regimens into prime time. Novel biologics such as ASKP1240 (a human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody) and one small molecule, tofacitinib, may advance further the use of CNI-free regimens in organ transplantation.

Belatacept Post Kidney Transplantation

Objective:

To review the use of belatacept as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients.

Data Sources:

To provide an extensive overview of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of belatacept, a MEDLINE/PubMed search (1980–December 2011) was performed for all articles evaluating belatacept's properties and patient outcomes, as well as abstracts from recent meetings, using key words belatacept, pharmacology, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety.

Study Selection/Data Extraction:

Phase 2 and 3 studies in humans describing use, adverse reactions, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of belatacept were identified and reviewed. Other articles were identified through PubMed.

Data Synthesis:

Belatacept, a costimulation blocker, is a biologic recombinant fusion protein that has been shown to prevent acute cellular rejection in kidney transplant recipients and preserve renal function. It was recently approved by the FDA as an antirejection immunosuppressant agent for use in kidney transplant recipients. It is the first biologic agent used for maintenance immunosuppression. It acts as an antagonist to CD80 and CD86 receptors located on the surface of antigen presenting cells, thereby blocking CD28 T-cell activation and, thus, preventing acute rejection. In comparison with patients receiving other current therapies, patients on belatacept have demonstrated superior renal function with comparable outcomes in patient and graft survival.

Conclusions:

Belatacept has potential for use as an alternative to current maintenance immunosuppression regimens, with potentially fewer adverse effects.

Donor-specific HLA antibodies in a cohort comparing everolimus with cyclosporine after kidney transplantation

Donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) have a negative impact on kidney graft survival. Therefore, we analyzed the occurrence of DSA and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in patients from two prospective randomized trials in our center. At 3-4.5 months posttransplant 127 patients were randomized to continue cyclosporine or converted to everolimus therapy. The presence of DSA was prospectively assessed using Luminex assays. AMR was defined according to the Banff 2009 classification. Antibody screening was available in 126 patients with a median follow-up of 1059 days. Seven out of 65 (10.8%) patients on cyclosporine developed DSA after a median of 991 days. In comparison, 14/61 patients (23.0%) randomized to everolimus developed DSA after 551 days (log-rank: p = 0.048). Eight patients on everolimus compared to two patients on cyclosporine developed AMR (log-rank: p = 0.036). Four of 10 patients with AMR-all in the everolimus group-lost their graft. A multivariate regression model revealed everolimus, >3 mismatches and living donor as significant risk factors for DSA. Acute rejection within the first year, >3 mismatches, everolimus and living donor were independent risk factors for AMR. This single center analysis demonstrates for the first time that everolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk for the development of DSA and AMR.

Belatacept: a new biologic and its role in kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and role of belatacept in maintenance immunosuppression in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Knowledge (1990-November 2011), and Google were searched using the terms belatacept, kidney or renal, and transplant.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant articles (English language and human subjects) were reviewed. Selected studies included 3 Phase 2 and 2 Phase 3 trials. Data were compared with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) briefing documents and belatacept full prescribing information.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Belatacept, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4-immunoglobulin, is the first marketed intravenous maintenance immunosuppressant. It is approved for use in combination with basiliximab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids to prevent rejection in adult KTR. Belatacept exhibits linear pharmacokinetics and first-order elimination. The less intensive regimen used in Phase 3 trials is approved by the FDA. In low-moderate immunologic risk KTR, short-term patient and allograft survival appear comparable with that seen with cyclosporine, with improved renal function despite more frequent and severe early acute rejection. Preliminary data from Phase 2 corticosteroid-avoidance and conversion trials suggest that better renal function, acceptable rejection rates, and comparable patient and allograft survival may be achieved with belatacept compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Common adverse effects of belatacept include anemia, neutropenia, urinary tract infection, headache, and peripheral edema. While a more favorable cardiovascular and metabolic profile and lack of requirement for therapeutic drug monitoring are attractive, a higher frequency of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is concerning. Belatacept drug costs are significantly higher than those of standard CNI- or sirolimus-based regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Belatacept provides a new option for maintenance immunosuppression in adult KTR. Further research is needed to compare its efficacy and safety with standard tacrolimus-based regimens, to evaluate whether increased drug costs are offset by long-term improvements in patient and allograft survival, and to establish its role in the immunosuppression armamentarium.

Belatacept: from rational design to clinical application

Gradually improved immunosuppression has contributed significantly to the progress achieved in transplantation medicine so far. Nevertheless, current drug regimens are associated with late graft loss--in particular as a result of immunologic damage or drug toxicity--and substantial morbidity. Recently, the costimulation blocker belatacept (marketed under the name Nulojix®) has been approved for immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Belatacept (a mutated version of CTLA4Ig) is a fusion protein rationally designed to block CD28, a critical activating receptor on T cells, by binding and saturating its ligands B7-1 and B7-2. In phase II and III trials, belatacept was compared with cyclosporine (in combination with basiliximab, MMF, and steroids). Advantages observed with belatacept include superior graft function, preservation of renal structure and improved cardiovascular risk profile. Concerns associated with belatacept are a higher frequency of cellular rejection episodes and more post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases especially in EBV seronegative patients, who should be excluded from belatacept-based regimens. Thus, after almost three decades of calcineurin inhibitors as mainstay of immunosuppression, belatacept offers a potential alternative. In this article, we will provide an overview of belatacept's preclinical development and will discuss the available evidence from clinical trials.

Immunosuppressive protocols and immunological challenges related to hand transplantation

There are many immunological challenges related to hand transplantation. Curbing the immune system's ability to effectively mount an immune response against the graft is the goal. As the various components of the immune response are defined and their mechanisms of action delineated, more specific immunosuppressive agents and protocols have been developed. Complications related to immunosuppression in hand transplant recipients are similar to incidences among solid organ recipients. With longer follow-up, the increased cardiovascular risk factors or the development of a neoplasm will likely cause mortality. Standardizing immunosuppression in hand transplantation with the long-term goal of minimization is critically needed.

Do wound complications or lymphoceles occur more often in solid organ transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

mTOR inhibitors have been associated with wound complications and lymphoceles. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare these outcomes for solid organ transplant recipients. Relevant medical databases were searched to identify RCTs in solid organ transplantation comparing mTOR inhibitors with an alternative therapy reporting on wound complications and/or lymphoceles. Methodological quality of RCTs was assessed. Pooled analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Thirty-seven RCTs in kidney, heart, simultaneous pancreas-kidney and liver transplantation were included. Pooled analyses showed a higher incidence of wound complications (OR 1.77, CI 1.31-2.37) and lymphoceles (OR 2.07, CI 1.62-2.65) for kidney transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors together with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). There was also a higher incidence of wound complications (OR 3.00, CI 1.61-5.59) and lymphoceles (OR 2.13, CI 1.57-2.90) for kidney transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors together with antimetabolites. Heart transplant patients receiving mTOR inhibitors together with CNIs also reported more wound complications (OR 1.82, CI 1.15-2.87). We found a higher incidence of wound complications and lymphoceles after kidney transplantation and a higher incidence of wound complications after heart transplantation for immunosuppressive regimens that included mTOR inhibitors from the time of transplantation.

Targets of new immunosuppressants in renal transplantation

Although current immunosuppression is highly effective in avoiding acute rejection, it is associated with nephrotoxicity, cardiovascular morbidity, infection, and cancer. Thus, new drugs dealing with new mechanisms, as well as minimizing comorbidities, are warranted in renal transplantation. Few novel drugs are currently under investigation in Phase I, II, or III clinical trials. Belatacept is a humanized antibody that inhibits T-cell co-stimulation and has shown encouraging results in Phase II and III trials. Moreover, two new small molecules are under clinical development: AEB071 or sotrastaurin (a protein kinase C inhibitor) and CP-690550 or tasocitinib (a Janus kinase inhibitor). Refinement in selecting the best combinations for the new and current immunosuppressive agents is probably the main challenge for the next few years.

Costimulatory pathways in transplantation

Secondary, so-called costimulatory, signals are critically required for the process of T cell activation. Since landmark studies defined that T cells receiving a T cell receptor signal without a costimulatory signal, are tolerized in vitro, the investigation of T cell costimulation has attracted intense interest. Early studies demonstrated that interrupting T cell costimulation allows attenuation of the alloresponse, which is particularly difficult to modulate due to the clone size of alloreactive T cells. The understanding of costimulation has since evolved substantially and now encompasses not only positive signals involved in T cell activation but also negative signals inhibiting T cell activation and promoting T cell tolerance. Costimulation blockade has been used effectively for the induction of tolerance in rodent models of transplantation, but turned out to be less potent in large animals and humans. In this overview we will discuss the evolution of the concept of T cell costimulation, the potential of 'classical' and newly identified costimulation pathways as therapeutic targets for organ transplantation as well as progress towards clinical application of the first costimulation blocking compound.

Report of a joint ESOT and AST meeting: highlights in biologic agents and transplantation

A joint meeting organized by the European (ESOT) and American (AST) Societies of Transplantation occurred in Nice, France, October 1-3, 2010. Focused on emerging use of biologic agents in solid organ transplantation, it served as a venue for state-of-the-art updates in basic immunology and clinical science, with an emphasis on the interrelatedness of the two. This meeting summary is designed to highlight important insights communicated in Nice, offer an overview of novel therapeutics in development, and entice members of all societies to consider attending a second joint symposium, under consideration for 2012.