Lutetium texaphyrin (PCI-0123): a near-infrared, water-soluble photosensitizer

In vivo optical properties of normal canine prostate at 732 nm using motexafin lutetium-mediated photodynamic therapy

The optical properties (absorption [mu(a)], transport scattering [mu('s)] and effective attenuation [mu(eff)] coefficients) of normal canine prostate were measured in vivo using interstitial isotropic detectors. Measurements were made at 732 nm before, during and after motexafin lutetium (MLu)-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT). They were derived by applying the diffusion theory to the in vivo peak fluence rates measured at several distances (3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 mm) from the central axis of a 2.5 cm cylindrical diffusing fiber (CDF). Mu(a) and mu('s) varied between 0.03-0.58 and 1.0-20 cm(-1), respectively. Mu(a) was proportional to the concentration of MLu.Mu(eff) varied between 0.33 and 4.9 cm(-1) (mean 1.3 +/- 1.1 cm(-1)), corresponding to an optical penetration depth (8 = 1/(mu(eff)) of 0.5-3 cm (mean 1.3 +/- 0.8 cm). The mean light fluence rate at 0.5 cm from the CDF was 126 +/- 48 mW/cm2 (N = 22) when the total power from the fiber was 375 mW (150 mW/cm). This study showed significant inter- and intraprostatic differences in the optical properties, suggesting that a real-time dosimetry measurement and feedback system for monitoring light fluences during treatment should be advocated for future PDT studies. However, no significant changes were observed before, during and after PDT within a single treatment site.

Quantitation of motexafin lutetium in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) methods were developed and validated for the evaluation of motexafin lutetium (MLu, lutetium texaphyrin, PCI-0123) pharmacokinetics in human plasma. The LC-MS/MS method was specific for MLu, whereas the ICP-AES method measured total elemental lutetium. Both methods were fast, simple, precise, and accurate. For the LC-MS/MS method, a closely related analogue (PCI-0353) was used as the internal standard (IS). MLu and the IS were extracted from plasma by protein precipitation and injected into an LC-MS/MS system configured with a C18 column and an electrospray interface. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.05 microg MLu mL(-1), with a signal-to-noise ratio of 15:1. The response was linear from 0.05 to 5.0 microg MLu mL(-1). For the ICP-AES method, indium was used as the IS. The sample was digested with nitric acid, diluted, filtered, and then injected into the ICP-AES system. Two standard curve ranges were validated to meet the expected range of sample concentrations: 0.5 to 50, and 0.1 to 10 microg Lu mL(-1). The LC-MS/MS and ICP-AES methods were validated to establish accuracy, precision, analyte stability, and assay robustness. Interday precision and accuracy of quality control samples were < or =6.3% coefficient of variation (CV) and within 2.2% relative error (RE) for the LC-MS/MS method, and < or =8.7% CV and within 4.9% RE for the ICP-AES method. Plasma samples from a subset of patients in a clinical study were analyzed using both methods. For a representative patient, over 90% of the elemental lutetium in plasma could be ascribed to intact MLu at early time points. This percentage decreased to 59% at 48 hours after dosing, suggesting that some degradation and/or metabolism of the drug may have occurred.

Photodynamic parameters in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) bioassay for photosensitizers administered intraperitoneally (IP) into the chick embryo

The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay was used to determine the photodynamic response (PDR) of blood vessels to Photofrin, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD-MA) and lutetium texaphyrin (Lutex). The photosensitizers were administered systemically via intraperitoneal injection into the chick embryo. Forward stepwise regression analysis of the PDR results enabled the individual contributions of seven experimental variables to be ranked: drug dose, light dose, fluence rate, drug uptake time, vessel type (whether arterioles or venules), vessel diameter, and embryo age. The order of importance of the variables, the PDR profile, was determined for each photosensitizer. Relative contributions of the experimental variables from this study to the CAM PDR were compared with those from our previous study on PDR of CAM blood vessels following topical application of the same photosensitizers. PDR profiles were interpreted in terms of biophysical and biochemical characteristics of the individual photosensitizers and the variation in their interactions with the delivery/distribution environment.

Photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization: a review

PURPOSE

To review the biophysical basis and current state of therapy for photodynamic closure of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in the eye.

METHODS

A review of the literature is included, which encompasses the chemical structure, biophysical mechanism of action, range of available agents, status of clinical trials, clinical indications, results of treatments, complications, and future directions.

RESULTS

Photodynamic therapy has been shown to be effective in closing both experimental choroidal neovascularization in animal models as well as subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in humans. The therapy results in temporary closure of choroidal new vessels for a period of approximately 1 to 4 weeks. By 12 weeks, most patients have reperfusion or reproliferation of choroidal new vessels resulting in the need for retreatment to achieve continued closure and visual stabilization. Differences exist in the quantum yield, clinical efficiency, and light and sensitizer dose requirements between different classes of agents. Further clinical trials will be required to determine the optimal form of therapy, with verteporfin (Visudyne) as the only currently approved agent. Other agents, including tin etiopurpurin (Purlytin) and motexafin lutetium (Optrin), are currently undergoing phase III, and phase II trials, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy is a promising treatment modality shown to be effective in achieving closure and stabilization of vision loss compared with placebo control in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization.

New technology for deep light distribution in tissue for phototherapy

Photodynamic therapy is one of several techniques developed for phototherapy for solid cancers and hematologic malignancies. Photodynamic therapy is a treatment that utilizes a molecular energy exchange between visible light and a photosensitive drug, which results in the production of 1O2, a highly reactive cytocidal oxygen species. The effect is limited to the region where light and drug are combined so that malignant tissue is destroyed and the usual side effects associated with standard cancer therapies are avoided. The light component of photodynamic therapy is customarily generated via dye-pumped or diode lasers. The cost and the complexity of lasers have seriously limited the clinical use of photodynamic therapy for malignancies. A new device technology, based on light-emitting diodes, has been developed (Light Sciences Corporation, Issaquah, WA) that allows light production inside the target tissue. This new technology will expand the current range of indications that are treatable with photodynamic therapy to include moderate- and large-volume refractorytumors. Conventional photodynamic therapy utilizes the delivery of intense light for seconds or minutes. The new approach differs from conventional photodynamic therapy in that it combines a novel interstitial light delivery system with prolonged photoactivation of photosensitive drugs. Prolonging photoactivation time in order to deliver a higher light dose results in an amplification effect, whereby the repeated activation of each photosensitive drug molecule leads to the generation of many thousands of 1O2 molecules. The production of overwhelming numbers of these powerful oxidants in individual cells and the vascular supply of tumors leads to irreversible damage and death of the targeted lesions. Results of preclinical studies have indicated a significant correlation between increased duration of photoactivation and increased volume and depth of photodynamic therapy-induced necrosis. The new developments will enable photodynamic therapy to be used effectively against refractory bulky disease as frontline therapy or in combination with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or biologics. Perhaps most promising, many patients with advanced refractory disease may now be relieved of symptoms or may return to the treatable population.

The history of photodetection and photodynamic therapy

Light has been employed in the treatment of disease since antiquity. Many ancient civilizations utilized phototherapy, but it was not until early last century that this form of therapy reappeared. Following the scientific discoveries by early pioneers such as Finsen, Raab and Von Tappeiner, the combination of light and drug administration led to the emergence of photochemotherapy as a therapeutic tool. The isolation of porphyrins and the subsequent discovery of their tumor-localizing properties and phototoxic effects on tumor tissue led to the development of modern photodetection (PD) and photodynamic therapy (PDT). This review traces the origins and development of PD and PDT from antiquity to the present day.

Photosensitizer delivery for photodynamic therapy of choroidal neovascularization

The present review examines the importance of improving photosensitizer delivery for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in light of the clinical impact of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for CNV. An overview of the classes of available photosensitizers is provided and the properties governing photosensitizer uptake and circulation in serum are discussed. Current delivery systems, for example liposomal formulations as well as the use of the promising strategy of antibody targeted delivery as a strategy to improve PDT selectivity and efficiency for CNV treatment are described. A summary of the work using Verteporfin, tin ethyl purpurin and Lu-Tex--photosensitizers currently in clinical trials for CNV--is given.

Photodynamic therapy for mesothelioma

Multiple trials of traditional cancer therapies for malignant pleural mesothelioma (including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) have not convincingly demonstrated that any one treatment is superior to supportive care alone. Although there have been reports of long-term survivors who were treated with aggressive surgery combined with radiation and aggressive multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimens, these patient populations are highly selected and results cannot be generalized to a larger population. Despite attempts to use aggressive multimodality therapies, disease recurs in most patients. Local failure in particular is a large part of the natural history of mesothelioma, especially after surgery alone. Therefore, one of the major considerations in the development of new treatments is the inclusion of aggressive local therapies. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a local treatment modality, is being evaluated as an adjuvant therapy to surgical resection. Clinical use of PDT requires the use of a photosensitizing agent and light of a wavelength specific to the absorption characteristics of the sensitizer in the presence of oxygen. The treatment effect of PDT is superficial, mostly because of the limited depth of light absorption in tissues. Therefore, it is theoretically an ideal treatment for tissue surfaces and body cavities after surgical debulking procedures. One theoretical advantage of PDT is that it can be used to treat the lung surface after a pleurectomy; therefore, patients may be treated with a pleurectomy rather than with an extrapleural pneumonectomy. Several studies have evaluated the efficacy of PDT in the treatment of mesothelioma. Clinical studies have not proven convincingly that the use of PDT is superior to the use of other adjuvant therapies or to surgery alone. The advent of newer photosensitizers and improved laser technology has led to a renewed interest in evaluating PDT. Additional studies are necessary to determine the role of PDT in the treatment of mesothelioma.

Photodynamic therapy with motexafin lutetium (Lu-Tex) reduces experimental graft coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Motexafin lutetium (Lu-Tex) is a photodynamic therapy (PDT) agent that localizes in atheromatous plaque in which it can be activated by far-red light. Lu-Tex biolocalization was examined in graft coronary artery disease (GCAD) with a rodent allograft model. After photoactivation, the effect on intimal proliferation was assessed.

METHODS

A PVG to ACI rat heterotopic heart transplantation model was used. Lu-Tex (10 mg/kg) was intravenously administered 90 days after transplantation. Photoactivation was performed 24 hr after Lu-Tex administration. A light-emitting diode, central wavelength of 742 nm, was used to illuminate the intraperitoneally placed allografts via a laparotomy (light fluence of 75 J/cm2 at a power density of 75 mW/cm2). Animals were divided into four groups according to postoperative treatments: PDT with Lu-Tex injection and light illumination (n=21), Lu-Tex injection and laparotomy (n=14), laparotomy with light only (n=14), and laparotomy only (n=16). GCAD was quantitatively assessed 14 days after treatments.

RESULTS

Lu-Tex localized in atherosclerotic plaque in vessels with GCAD. PDT significantly reduced both the percent of affected vessels and intimal proliferation compared to all other control study groups. alpha-Smooth muscle cell actin and anti-rat macrophage antibody-positive areas were significantly reduced within the neointima in allografts treated with PDT compared to all other study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT significantly reduced atherosclerotic lesions of GCAD. Lu-Tex-mediated PDT may, therefore, be a potential method for treating accelerated atherosclerosis associated with transplantation.

Photodynamic Therapy With Motexafin Lutetium Induces Redox-Sensitive Apoptosis of Vascular Cells

Abstract —Motexafin lutetium is a photosensitizer that accumulates in atherosclerotic plaque and, after activation by far-red light, produces cytotoxic singlet oxygen. The combination of photosensitizer and illumination, known as photodynamic therapy (PDT), has been shown to reduce atheroma formation in animal models and is under clinical investigation. However, the effects of PDT with motexafin lutetium on isolated vascular cells are unknown. This study was designed to characterize the effects of PDT on vascular cell viability and to define the cell-death pathway for this agent. Fluorescence microscopy of RAW macrophages and human vascular smooth muscle cells revealed time-dependent uptake of motexafin lutetium. Illumination of motexafin lutetium–loaded cells with 732-nm light (2 J/cm 2 ) impaired cellular viability and growth (IC 50 5 to 20 μmol/L). Depletion of intracellular glutathione potentiated ( P =0.035) and the addition of antioxidant N -acetylcysteine attenuated ( P =0.002) cell death, suggesting that the intracellular redox state influences motexafin lutetium action. PDT was associated with the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial release of cytochrome c , and caspase activation. PDT promoted phosphatidylserine externalization and induced apoptotic DNA fragmentation, with the number of apoptotic cells increasing from 7±2% to 34±3% of total cells. Reducing plaque cellularity by the induction of apoptosis may be one mechanism by which PDT reduces plaque burden, possibly modulates plaque vulnerability, and inhibits restenosis in vivo.

Interaction between photodynamic therapy and BCG immunotherapy responsible for the reduced recurrence of treated mouse tumors

Subcutaneous mouse EMT6 tumors were treated by individual or combined regimens of a single Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine administration and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Six clinically relevant photosensitizers characterized by different action mechanisms were used: Photofrin, benzoporphyrin derivative, tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (foscan), mono-L-aspartylchlorin e6, lutetium texaphyrin or zinc phthalocyanine. Irrespective of the type of photosensitizer used, the optimized BCG protocols improved the cure rate of PDT-treated tumors. This indicates that the interaction does not take place during the early phase of tumor ablation but at later events involved in preventing tumor recurrence. Beneficial effects on tumor cure were observed even when the BCG injection was delayed to 7 days after PDT. The accumulation of activated myeloid cells that markedly increases in tumors treated by Photofrin-based PDT was not additionally affected by BCG treatment. However, the incidence of immune memory T cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes that almost doubled at 6 days after Photofrin-PDT further increased close to three-fold with adjuvant BCG. This suggests that BCG immunotherapy amplifies the T-lymphocyte-mediated immune response against PDT-treated tumors. Since both these modalities are established for the treatment of superficial bladder carcinomas, use of their combination for this condition should be clinically tested.

Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for motexafin gadolinium and motexafin lutetium in human plasma

We present new HPLC methods for the quantitation in human plasma of two investigative metallotexaphyrin agents, motexafin gadolinium (Gd-Tex) and motexafin lutetium (Lu-Tex). Each assay uses: the other texaphyrin analogue as an internal standard; protein precipitation with acetonitrile:methanol (50:50, v/v); an ODS reversed-phase column; an isocratic mobile phase of 100 mM ammonium acetate, pH 4.3:acetonitrile:methanol (59:21:20, v/v/v); and absorbance detection at 470 nm. The Gd-Tex assay has a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 0.01 microM and is linear between 0.01 and 30 microM. The Lu-Tex assay has an LLOQ of 0.1 microM and is linear between 0.1 and 30 microM. The assays are suited for in vivo preclinical studies and clinical trials because they require minimal amounts of plasma, are sensitive, and involve a 30-mm run time. These assays are important tools for evaluating the potential of Gd-Tex and Lu-Tex as a radiation enhancer and photosensitizer, respectively.

Photoangioplasty for human peripheral atherosclerosis: results of a phase I trial of photodynamic therapy with motexafin lutetium (Antrin)

BACKGROUND

In photoangioplasty, light activation of a photosensitive drug offers the potential for treatment of long segments of vascular disease. This is a brief description of a study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a new photosensitizer, Antrin (motexafin lutetium), in the endovascular treatment of atherosclerosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An open-label, single-dose, escalating drug- and light-dose study was performed in patients with atherosclerotic peripheral arterial insufficiency. Clinical evaluation, serial quantitative angiography, and intravascular ultrasonography were performed. Therapy was well tolerated, and only minor side effects were observed. Treatment produced no deleterious vascular effects. Although this study was not designed to examine clinical efficacy, several secondary end points suggested a favorable therapeutic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase I study demonstrates that photoangioplasty with motexafin lutetium is well tolerated and safe. Preliminary efficacy data suggest a future role for the treatment of flow-limiting atherosclerosis.

Mechanisms of action of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration, especially the neovascular form of the disease, is the leading cause of blindness in elderly people in developed countries. Thermal photocoagulation is still the preferred treatment for choroidal neovascularization that does not involve the fovea, but it is suitable for only a small number of patients and it can lead to immediate loss of visual acuity. Photodynamic therapy with use of photochemical light activation of verteporfin as a photosensitizer (verteporfin therapy) has been shown to be effective in treating vascularized tumors, and its potential to treat other conditions involving neovascularization has also been suggested. Preclinical and clinical studies have indicated that verteporfin therapy can be used to treat choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration effectively and safely. Selective occlusion of choroidal neovasculature by this therapy causes minimal damage to the neurosensory retina and, therefore, does not induce loss of visual acuity. This benefit allows verteporfin therapy to be used in the large proportion of patients who are not eligible for treatment by laser photocoagulation. The mechanistic aspects of the mode of action of light-activated verteporfin are described in this review.

Photoangioplasty: An emerging clinical cardiovascular role for photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been studied and applied to various disease processes. The potential of PDT for selective destruction of target tissues is especially appealing in cardiovascular disease, in which other existing interventional tools are somewhat nonselective and carry substantial risk of damage to the normal arterial wall. Enthusiasm for photoangioplasty (PDT of vascular de novo atherosclerotic and, potentially, restenotic lesions) is fueled by more effective second-generation photosensitizers and technological advances in endovascular light delivery. This excitement revolves around at least 4 significant attributes of light-activated therapy: the putative selectivity and safety of photoangioplasty, the potential for atraumatic and effective debulking of atheromatous plaque through a biological mechanism, the postulated capability to reduce or inhibit restenosis, and the potential to treat long segments of abnormal vessel by simply using fibers with longer light-emitting regions. The available nonclinical data, coupled with the observations of a new phase I trial in human peripheral atherosclerosis, suggest a promising future for photoangioplasty in the treatment of primary atherosclerosis and prevention of restenosis.

Photodynamic activity of lutetium-texaphyrin in a mouse tumor system

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

New photosensitizers proposed for photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment of tumors need to be evaluated in animal models to determine the parameters needed for treatment. They also need to be compared with existing photosensitizers for efficacy. We examined the PDT response to lutetium-texaphyrin (PCI-0123) in a mouse mammary adenocarcinoma model and compared it with the PDT response seen when using Photofrin.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

DBA/2 mice with SMT-F tumors were used to explore PCI-0123 toxicity, laser light dose, and drug dose effects on PDT response and to determine the most effective time for light application. The PDT response of PCI-0123-treated tumors was compared with that of Photofrin-treated tumors.

RESULTS

Treatment of tumors with 150 J/cm2 of 740 nm laser light 5-6 hr after PCI-0123 administration (40 mg/kg) resulted in a 100% response rate and a 55% cure rate. Tumors treated with 150 J/cm2 of 630 nm laser light 24 hr after Photofrin administration (10 mg/kg) resulted in a 67% response rate and a 16% cure rate.

CONCLUSION

PCI-0123 was found to be a more effective photosensitizer than Photofrin.

Texaphyrins: new drugs with diverse clinical applications in radiation and photodynamic therapy

The texaphyrins are quintessential metal-coordinating expanded porphyrins. They constitute a new series of synthetic porphyrin analogues that show promise as drugs for use in a range of medical therapies. Currently, two different water-solubilized lanthanide(III) texaphyrin complexes, namely the gadolinium(III) and lutetium(III) derivatives 1 and 2 (Gd-Tex and Lu-Tex, respectively), are being tested clinically. The first of these, XCYTRIN, is in a pivotal Phase III clinical trial as a potential enhancer of radiation therapy for patients with metastatic cancers to the brain receiving whole brain radiation therapy. The second, in various formulations, is being tested as a photosensitizer for use in: (i) the photodynamic treatment of recurrent breast cancer (LUTRIN; Phase II clinical trials complete), (ii) photoangioplastic reduction of atherosclerosis involving peripheral arteries (ANTRIN; now in Phase II testing), and (iii) light-based treatment of age-related macular degeneration (OPTRIN; currently in Phase I clinical trials), a vision-threatening disease of the retina. Taken in concert, these two metallotexaphyrins provide a powerful new class of experimental drugs whose diverse potential utility is abetted by a combination of well-optimized physical features, favorable tissue biolocalization characteristics, and novel mechanisms of action. Interestingly, these mechanisms may alter conventional wisdom regarding mechanisms of radiation therapy and the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis.

Photodynamic therapy in dermatology

The combination of light and chemicals to treat skin diseases is widely practiced in dermatology. Within this broad use of light and drugs, in recent years the concept of photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged. PDT is a promising modality for the management of various tumors and nonmalignant diseases, based on the combination of a photosensitizer that is selectively localized in the target tissue and illumination of the lesion with visible light, resulting in photodamage and subsequent cell death. Moreover, the fluorescence of photosensitizing compounds is also utilized as a helpful diagnostic tool for the detection of neoplastic tissue. Intensive basic and clinical research culminated in the worldwide approval of PDT for bladder, esophageal, and lung cancer. The expanding use of this relatively new therapeutic modality in dermatology at many centers around the world has revealed its efficacy for the treatment of cutaneous precancer and cancer, as well as selected benign skin disorders. The following article summarizes the main principles of PDT considering the most recent developments and provides a comprehensive synopsis of the present status of the use of PDT in dermatology. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:389-413.)

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should be able to describe the basic concepts of PDT, including fundamental knowledge of the most relevant photosensitizers, the light sources, the mechanisms involved in PDT-mediated cell destruction, as well as the indications and limitations of photodynamic treatment of skin diseases.

Lutetium texaphyrin (Lu-Tex): a potential new agent for ocular fundus angiography and photodynamic therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the suitability of lutetium texaphyrin (lu-tex) as a fluorescence imaging agent in the delineation of retinal vascular and choroidal vascular diseases. The utilization of an efficient fluorescent molecule that is also a photosensitizer represents a unique opportunity to couple diagnosis and therapy.

METHODS

Fundus fluorescence angiography comparing lu-tex (motexafin lutetium, Optrin, Pharmacyclics Inc, Sunnyvale, California) with the conventional angiographic dyes, sodium fluorescein, and indocynanine green (ICG), was performed on the eyes of normal and laser-injured New Zealand white rabbits. Plasma pharmacokinetic data and plasma protein binding were assessed in addition to light microscopy of the retina in both imaged and laser-injured eyes.

RESULTS

Normal retinal and choroidal vasculature was well delineated by lu-tex angiography. Experimentally induced choroidal and retinal vascular lesions were enhanced by lu-tex and demonstrated different staining patterns than fluorescein or ICG, particularly at the margins of the lesions. Lu-tex cleared rapidly from the plasma, with 39.7% bound to the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) fraction while 15.8% was bound to the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) fraction. No evidence of retinal toxicity after dye administration was observed by either ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography or by light microscopy.

CONCLUSION

Lu-tex angiography is a potentially valuable method for retinal vascular and choroidal vascular evaluation, and it has advantages over fluorescein and ICG angiography. The same agent could conceivably be used for both the identification of abnormal vasculature and subsequent photodynamic treatment.

Fluorescence pharmacokinetics of Lutetium Texaphyrin (PCI-0123, Lu-Tex) in the skin and in healthy and tumoral hamster cheek-pouch mucosa

We have investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Lutetium Texaphyrin (Lu-Tex), a second-generation photosensitizer, in the Syrian hamster cheek pouch early cancer model. Ten male hamsters, five with chemically induced early squamous cell cancer of the left cheek pouch, received an intracardiac injection of a 10 mg/ml Lu-Tex solution, resulting in a dose of 12 mg Lu-Tex per kg of bodyweight. The PK of the dye have been measured during the 24 h following the injection with an optical-fiber-based spectrofluorometer on the ventral skin, the healthy and the tumoral cheek-pouch mucosa. The Lu-Tex fluorescence is excited at 460 nm and detected around 740 nm. All the measurements yield very similar pharmacokinetic curves. The fluorescence intensity reaches a maximum between two and three hours after the injection and, at its maximum, it is consistently higher (up to 1.5 times) on the tumor than on the healthy mucosa. It remains smaller on the skin than on cheek-pouch mucosa. After 24 h, the Lu-Tex fluorescence is no longer detectable either on the skin, on the lesion or on the healthy mucosa. Moreover, Lu-Tex clearly displays a significant fluorescence selectivity between early carcinoma and healthy mucosa in this model. Furthermore, the inter-animal fluctuations of the fluorescence signal are small (+/-16% on the tumor-bearing mucosa). Eight-minute-long skin-irradiation tests have been performed 24 h after the injection of the Lu-Tex on the ventral skin of 16 additional animals with a solar simulator. No reaction is observed, either macroscopically or microscopically, which further demonstrates, as suggested by the fluorescence measurements, that this photosensitizer is significantly cleared from the skin after 24 h.

In vivo animal studies with gadolinium (III) texaphyrin as a radiation enhancer

PURPOSE

Gadolinium texaphyrin (Gd-Tex, PCI-0120) is an expanded porphyrin that has demonstrated radiation enhancement. In this study, we evaluated the radiation enhancement and biolocalization of Gd-Tex in three animal tumor models.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

EMT6, SMT-F, and MCa tumors were established intramuscularly or subcutaneously. Gd-Tex and other metallotexaphyrins were administered prior to single or multiple fractions of radiation. 14C-labeled Gd-Tex was used for biolocalization studies.

RESULTS

Gd-Tex, in combination with radiation, produced significant tumor growth delay compared to irradiated control groups in both single and multifraction radiation studies. Gd-Tex radiation enhancement was observed only when the drug was given before, but not after irradiation. Several metallotexaphyrins, identical except for the metal ion, were studied in the EMT6 tumor model including gadolinium (Gd), lutetium (Lu), europium (Eu), yttrium (Y), and cadmium (Cd) texaphyrin complexes. Only Gd-Tex produced radiation enhancement. Biodistribution studies using 14C-labeled Gd-Tex demonstrated drug selectivity and retention in tumors growing intramuscularly compared to uninvolved muscle and plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Gd-Tex produces reproducible radiation enhancement in a variety of in vivo tumor models. This drug's unique radiochemistry, tumor selectivity, and in vivo activity suggests possible mechanisms of action not addressed by in vitro assay methods.

Photodynamic parameters in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) bioassay for topically applied photosensitizers

The relative efficacy of Photofrin-based photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been compared with that of the second-generation photosensitizers 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), sulfonated chloro-aluminum phthalocyanine (AlPcSn), benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD-MA), and lutetium texaphyrin (Lutex). PDT-induced vascular damage in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) is measured following topical application of the photosensitizers. In order to make meaningful comparisons, care is taken to keep treatment variables the same. These include light dose (5 and 10 J/cm2), power density (33 and 100 mW/cm2), and drug uptake time (30 and 90 min). The drug dose ranges from 0.1 microgram/cm2 for BPD to 5000 micrograms/cm2 for ALA. Results are also analyzed statistically according to CAM vessel type (arterioles versus venules), vessel diameter, and vessel development (embryonic age). For each photosensitizer, the order of importance for the various PDT parameters is found to be unique. The differences between the sensitizers are most likely due to variation in biophysical and biochemical characteristics, biodistribution, and uptake kinetics.

Photodynamic therapy of B16F10 murine melanoma with lutetium texaphyrin

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) of pigmented melanoma has generally been unsuccessful because of insufficient light penetration in such tissues. In this study, the responsiveness of the heavily pigmented B16F10 murine melanoma to lutetium texaphyrin (PCI-0123), a water-soluble sensitizer with strong absorbance in the near infrared (700-760 nm), was examined. These studies were carried out in both normal and ApoE deficient C57BL/6 mice. The latter strain exhibits a lipoprotein profile more like humans (low density lipoprotein > high density lipoprotein) than rodents (high density lipoprotein >> low density lipoprotein). Under optimal conditions of drug dose, light dose, and interval between drug administration and irradiation--the median survival time of C57BL/6 tumor bearing mice was approximately doubled (29 d) compared with tumor bearing control animals (13 d). The life-span of the ApoE knockout mice was greater (33 d) than the C57BL/6 animals (23 d) when irradiation occurred 3 h after administration of a 10 micromol per kg drug dose. The greater efficacy of PDT in the ApoE deficient mice was associated with more rapid clearance of drug from the blood, greater accumulation of sensitizer in tumor tissue, and substantially greater drug binding to the very low density lipoprotein/low density lipoprotein plasma fraction. Confocal laser scanning microscopy showed that the predominant subcellular site of photosensitizer binding was to melanosomes; costaining was performed with Mel-5. Melanosomes are susceptible to oxidative stress. Photo-oxidation, mediated by PCI-0123 PDT, could potentially overload an already highly oxidized stressed state leading to cell death. The good tissue penetration depth achieved by PCI-0213 mediated PDT and the activation of melanosomes makes PDT of pigmented melanoma, for the first time, clinically relevant.

In vivo photodynamic therapy with the new near-IR absorbing water soluble photosensitizer lutetium texaphyrin and a high intensity pulsed light delivery system

An in vivo fluorescence monitoring and photodynamic therapy (PDT) study was performed using the new photosensitizer lutetium texaphyrin (Lu-Tex). This photosensitizer is water soluble and has the additional advantage of strong absorption near 730 nm. C26 colon carcinoma was transplanted in the foot of BALB/c mice. In vivo fluorescence spectroscopy was applied to study Lu-Tex tissue distribution kinetics. For this purpose, fluorescence intensity both in the foot with the tumor and in the normal foot was measured in vivo by the laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) system. For PDT, both feet of the mice were irradiated simultaneously with the use of a new high intensity pulsed light delivery system, the Photodyne. The results of the LIF measurements showed that the maximal fluorescence intensity ratio between the normal and tumor bearing foot (FIR) was observed 24-48 h after the agent injection. Photoirradiation with doses from 90 to 240 J cm-2 (0.6 J cm-2 per 2 ms pulse, 1 Hz) 24 h after injection of Lu-Tex at a dose of 10 mg kg-1 caused significant tumor necrosis and delay in the tumor growth rate. The antitumor effect was enhanced with increasing light doses. Normal tissue response to PDT with Lu-Tex was determined as the damage index of the normal foot, which was irradiated simultaneously with the tumor bearing foot. The normal tissue response after PDT with Lu-Tex was compared with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) induced protoporphyrin IX (PP), chlorin e6 (Chl) and Photofrin (PII) at the same values of antitumor effect. The results showed that at 50, 80 and 100% inhibition of tumor growth the orders of the values of normal foot damage indexes were as follows: ALA > Lu-Tex > or = PII > Chl, PII > ALA > Lu-Tex > Chl and PII > Lu-Tex > ALA > Chl respectively.

Preclinical assessment of hypocrellin B and hypocrellin B derivatives as sensitizers for photodynamic therapy of cancer: progress update

Hypocrellins are perylenequinone pigments with substantial absorption in the red spectral region and high singlet oxygen yield. They are available in pure monomeric form and may be derivatized to optimize properties of red light absorption, tissue biodistribution and toxicity. In vitro screening of synthetic derivatives of the naturally occurring compound, hypocrellin B (HB), for optimal properties of cyto-(dark) toxicity and phototoxicity resulted in selection of three compounds for preclinical evaluation: HBEA-R1 (ethanolaminated HB), HBBA-R2 (butylaminated HB) and HBDP-R1 [2-(N,N-dimethylamino)-propylamine-HB]. Extinction coefficients at 630 nm (epsilon 630) are 6230, 6190 and 4800, respectively; and 1O2 quantum yields, phi, 0.60, 0.32 and 0.42. Intracellular uptake is essentially complete within 2 h (HBEA-R1, HBBA-R2) and 20 h (HBDP-R1). Greatest uptake is associated with lysosomes and Golgi. The HBEA-R1 and HBBA-R2 elicit phototoxicity in vitro primarily via the type II mechanism, with some type I activity under stringently hypoxic conditions. Transcutaneous phototherapy with HBEA-R1 permanently ablates EMT6/Ed tumors growing in the flanks of Balb/c mice, with minimal cutaneous effects. The HBBA-R2 does not elicit mutagenic activity in strains TA98 and TA100 of Salmonella typhimurium. Further development of selected hypocrellin derivatives as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy is warranted.

A novel aspect of photodynamic action: induction of recurrent spikes in cytosolic calcium concentration

Effects of photodynamic action of gadolinium porphyrin-like macrocycle B (PLMGdB) on cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, [Ca2+]c, was investigated in isolated rat pancreatic acini. The PLMGdB alone or light alone (2 min) had no effect on [Ca2+]c. Cell-bound PLMGdB upon brief (0.5-2.0 min) light activation triggered recurrent spikes in [Ca2+]c. At lower PLMGdB concentration (100 nM) the spikes continued during the whole period of monitoring [Ca2+]c. At a higher concentration of 500 nM, the spikes continued for the first 40 min, followed by a gradual increase in basal [Ca2+]c upon which smaller spikes were superimposed. At 1 microM, the spikes continued for the first 20 min, after that spiking gradually degenerated into a plateau phase. In many aspects, photodynamically triggered spikes resembled spikes generated by physiological concentrations of cholecystokinin. The spikes triggered by photodynamic action were likely to be the result of the ignition of a physiological "chain reaction", because functional inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptors were required for spiking to occur. Two-aminoethoxydiphenylborate, an inhibitory modulator of IP3-triggered Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, effectively inhibited photodynamically generated spikes. Therefore photodynamic action appears to be able to permanently transfix a physiological process, leading to long-lasting pharmacological or therapeutic effects.

Phototherapy of cancer and atheromatous plaque with texaphyrins

Cancer and cardiovascular disease are the leading causes of death in the western world. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has demonstrated activity in the treatment of superficial cancerous lesions and as an intraoperative adjunct during surgical debulking. Texaphyrins are pure, synthetic water-soluble macrocycles that localize in both cancerous lesions and atheromatous plaque. Lutetium texaphyrin (PCI-0123) is activated by tissue-penetrating far red light (720-760 nm). Patient diagnosis and treatment planning is possible via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the paramagnetic gadolinium texaphyrin (PCI-0120) or via fluorescence imaging using the diamagnetic PCI-0123. In this study it is shown that texaphyrins localize selectively in cancer and atheromatous plaque. PDT with PCI-0123 is found to cause selective photodamage to the diseased tissue. Specifically, PCI-0123 acts to eradicate the SMT-F murine mammary tumors and diet-induced atheromatous plaque in rabbits.