Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults using the 2012 Beers criteria

Trends in Prevalence and Determinants of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in the United States: 2007 to 2012

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence and determinants of the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older U.S. adults using the 2012 Beers criteria.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study in a random national sample of Medicare beneficiaries.

SETTING

Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries from 2007 to 2012.

PARTICIPANTS

U.S. population aged 65 and older with Parts A, B, and D enrollment in at least 1 month during a calendar year (N = 38,250 individuals; 1,308,116 observations).

MEASUREMENTS

The 2012 Beers criteria were used to estimate the prevalence of the use of PIMs in each calendar month and over a 12-month period using data on diagnoses or conditions present in the previous 12 months. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for the dependence of multiple monthly observations of a single person when estimating 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and logistic regression was used to identify independent determinants of PIM use.

RESULTS

The point prevalence of the use of PIMs decreased from 37.6% (95% CI = 37.0-38.1) in 2007 to 34.2% (95% CI = 33.6-34.7) in 2012, with a statistically significant 2% (95% CI = 1-3%) decline per year assuming a linear trend. The 1-year period prevalence declined from 64.9% in 2007 to 56.6% in 2012. The strongest predictor of PIM use was the number of drugs dispensed. Individuals aged 70 and older and those seen by a geriatrician were less likely to receive a PIM.

CONCLUSION

From 2007 to 2012, the prevalence of PIM use in older U.S. adults decreased according to the 2012 Beers criteria, although it remains high, still affecting one-third each month and more than half over 12 months. The number of dispensed prescriptions could be used to target future interventions.

Sex differences in the risk of receiving potentially inappropriate prescriptions among older adults

Objectives: to measure sex differences in the risk of receiving potentially inappropriate prescription drugs and to examine what are the factors that contribute to these differences.

Design: a retrospective cohort study.

Setting: community setting of British Columbia, Canada.

Participants: residents of British Columbia aged 65 and older (n = 660,679).

Measurements: we measured 2013 period prevalence of prescription dispensations satisfying the American Geriatrics Society's 2012 version of the Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. We used logistic regressions to test for associations between this outcome and a number of clinical and socioeconomic factors.

Results: a larger share of women (31%) than of men (26%) filled one or more potentially inappropriate prescription in the community. The odds of receiving potentially inappropriate prescriptions are associated with several clinical and socioeconomic factors. After controlling for those factors, community-dwelling women were at 16% higher odds of receiving a potentially inappropriate prescription than men (adjusted odds ratio = 1.16, 95% confidence interval = 1.12–1.21). Much of this sex difference stemmed from women's increased odds of receiving potentially inappropriate prescriptions for benzodiazepines and other hypnotics, for tertiary tricyclic antidepressants and for non-selective NSAIDs.

Conclusion: there are significant sex differences in older adults' risk of receiving a potentially inappropriate prescription as a result of complex intersections between gender and other social constructs. Appropriate responses will therefore require changes in the information, norms and expectations of both prescribers and patients.

Inappropriate prescribing of antithrombotic therapy in Ethiopian elderly population using updated 2015 STOPP/START criteria: a cross-sectional study

Background

Inappropriate use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants among elderly patients increases the risk of adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing of antithrombotic therapy in hospitalized elderly patients.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional, single-center study was conducted at the Gondar University Hospital. A total of 156 hospitalized elderly patients fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the study. The Screening Tool for Older Person’s Prescription/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment criteria version 2 were applied to patients’ data to identify the total number of inappropriate prescribing (IPs) including potentially inappropriate medications and potential prescribing omissions.

Results

A total of 70 IPs were identified in 156 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 36 (51.4%) were identified as potentially inappropriate medications by the Screening Tool for Older Person’s Prescription criteria. The prevalence of IP per patient indicated that 58 of the 156 (37.2%) patients were exposed to at least one IP. Of these, 32 (55.2%) had at least one potentially inappropriate medication and 33 (56.9%) had at least one potential prescribing omission. Patients hospitalized due to venous thromboembolism (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] =29.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–708.6), stroke (AOR =7.74, 95% CI, 1.27–47.29), or acute coronary syndrome (AOR =13.48, 95% CI, 1.4–129.1) were less likely to be exposed to an IP. An increase in Charlson comorbidity index score was associated with increased IP exposure (AOR =0.60, 95% CI, 0.39–0.945). IPs were about six times more likely to absent in patients prescribed with antiplatelet only therapy (AOR =6.23, 95% CI, 1.90–20.37) than those receiving any other groups of antithrombotics.

Conclusion

IPs are less common in elderly patients primarily admitted due to venous thromboembolism, stroke, and acute coronary syndrome, and those elderly patients prescribed with only antiplatelet. Patients with higher Charlson comorbidity index were, however, associated with increased IPs exposure. Our study may guide further research to reduce high-risk prescription of antithrombotics in the elderly.

Polytherapy and the risk of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) among elderly and very elderly patients in three different settings (hospital, community, long-term care facilities) of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region, Italy: are the very elderly at higher risk of PIPs?

PURPOSE

The aim of this point-prevalence study was to assess the occurrence of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy and the risk of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) among elderly and very elderly patients in different health-care settings of the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region in the North-East of Italy.

METHODS

Prescription pattern of elderly (65-79 years) and very elderly (>79 years) patients in three different health-care settings [hospitals, general practitioners, and long-term care facilities (LTCFs)] was assessed in March 2014, and PIPs were assessed according to the Beers criteria. Other situations at potentially high risk were checked.

RESULTS

A total of 1582 patients (hospital, n = 528; outpatients, n = 527; nursing homes, n = 527) were included. Very elderly were more represented in hospitals (60.4%) and LTCFs (77.1%) than among general practitioners (37.6%). Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy rates ranged 57.7-73.7% and 9.7-15.6%, respectively. The most frequently prescribed drugs were the proton pump inhibitors, whereas the most common PIPs resulted the benzodiazepines. Multinomial regression analysis showed that female sex, age > 79 years, hyperpolypharmacy, and chronic kidney disease were associated with the risk of having ≥2 PIPs. Two situations at high risk of PIPs not contemplated by the Beers criteria were recurrent in the study population and concerned the statins and metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy among elderly and very elderly are strictly associated with the risk of multiple PIPs. The findings offer the opportunity to remark that improvement of the knowledge of safe drug use is generally needed in aging societies and may become of utmost relevance among health-care workers operating in LTCFs. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Safer Prescribing--A Trial of Education, Informatics, and Financial Incentives

BACKGROUND

High-risk prescribing and preventable drug-related complications are common in primary care. We evaluated whether the rates of high-risk prescribing by primary care clinicians and the related clinical outcomes would be reduced by a complex intervention.

METHODS

In this cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge trial conducted in Tayside, Scotland, we randomly assigned participating primary care practices to various start dates for a 48-week intervention comprising professional education, informatics to facilitate review, and financial incentives for practices to review patients' charts to assess appropriateness. The primary outcome was patient-level exposure to any of nine measures of high-risk prescribing of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or selected antiplatelet agents (e.g., NSAID prescription in a patient with chronic kidney disease or coprescription of an NSAID and an oral anticoagulant without gastroprotection). Prespecified secondary outcomes included the incidence of related hospital admissions. Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle, with the use of mixed-effect models to account for clustering in the data.

RESULTS

A total of 34 practices underwent randomization, 33 of which completed the study. Data were analyzed for 33,334 patients at risk at one or more points in the preintervention period and for 33,060 at risk at one or more points in the intervention period. Targeted high-risk prescribing was significantly reduced, from a rate of 3.7% (1102 of 29,537 patients at risk) immediately before the intervention to 2.2% (674 of 30,187) at the end of the intervention (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.68; P<0.001). The rate of hospital admissions for gastrointestinal ulcer or bleeding was significantly reduced from the preintervention period to the intervention period (from 55.7 to 37.0 admissions per 10,000 person-years; rate ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.86; P=0.002), as was the rate of admissions for heart failure (from 707.7 to 513.5 admissions per 10,000 person-years; rate ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.95; P=0.02), but admissions for acute kidney injury were not (101.9 and 86.0 admissions per 10,000 person-years, respectively; rate ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.09; P=0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

A complex intervention combining professional education, informatics, and financial incentives reduced the rate of high-risk prescribing of antiplatelet medications and NSAIDs and may have improved clinical outcomes. (Funded by the Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01425502.).

Burden of Potentially Harmful Medications and the Association With Quality of Life and Mortality Among Institutionalized Older People

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the overlap among 3 different definitions of potentially harmful medication (PHM) use and the corresponding associations with resident quality of life and mortality.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with 3-year follow-up for mortality.

SETTING

Assisted living facilities and nursing homes in Helsinki and Kouvola, Finland.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 326 residents.

MEASUREMENTS

PHM use was defined as (1) use of medications with anticholinergic properties, (2) use of Beers Criteria medications, and (3) concomitant use 3 or more psychotropic medications. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the 15D and psychological well-being (PWB) scale. Residents self-rated their own health using a 4-point scale. Mortality data were obtained from central registers.

RESULTS

There were 38.0%, 28.2%, and 12.6% of residents who used PHMs according to 1 (G1), 2 (G2), and 3 definitions (G3), respectively. Overall, 21.2% of residents did not use PHMs according to any of the 3 definitions (G0). There were no significant differences in comorbidity, cognition, or functioning among groups. In adjusted analyses, there was a stepwise association between use of multiple PHMs and poorer self-rated health, poorer PWB, and poorer HRQoL. There was no association in adjusted analyses between PHM use and 3-year mortality (47.8%-63.8%).

CONCLUSION

PHM use is highly prevalent in institutional settings, regardless of the definition of inappropriateness. Residents who used multiple categories of PHMs were at greatest risk of poor HRQoL, poor PWB, and poor self-rated health. However, there was no apparent association with increased mortality. Given the importance of quality of life as an outcome to older people, further efforts are needed to minimize PHM use in this setting.

How to Use the American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria-A Guide for Patients, Clinicians, Health Systems, and Payors

The Beers Criteria are a valuable tool for clinical care and quality improvement but may be misinterpreted and implemented in ways that cause unintended harms. This article describes the intended role of the 2015 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria and provides guidance on how patients, clinicians, health systems, and payors should use them. A key theme underlying these recommendations is to use common sense and clinical judgment in applying the 2015 AGS Beers Criteria and to remain mindful of nuances in the criteria. The criteria serve as a "warning light" to identify medications that have an unfavorable balance of benefits and harms in many older adults, particularly when compared with pharmacological and nonpharmacological alternatives. However, there are situations in which use of medications included in the criteria can be appropriate. As such, the 2015 AGS Beers Criteria work best not only when they identify potentially inappropriate medications, but also when they educate clinicians and patients about the reasons those medications are included and the situations in which their use may be more or less problematic. The criteria are designed to support, rather than supplant, good clinical judgment.

Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the Elderly in Korean Long-Term Care Facilities

Background

Elderly residents of long-term care facilities are more vulnerable to being prescribed inappropriate medications because of the high incidence of co-medication in this population resulting from the presence of multiple chronic diseases and also age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Objective

We evaluated the frequency of potentially inappropriate medications and factors influencing their frequency.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 20 long-term care facilities located in the northwest regions of South Korea for 824 patients aged 65 years and older who were assessed between January and February of 2012. Potentially inappropriate medications were identified using the 2012 American Geriatric Society’s Beers Criteria. We assessed the relationship between the frequency of potentially inappropriate medications prescribed and patient age, sex, co-medications, comorbidity, activities of daily living, length of stay, grade of long-term care insurance for seniors, and the bed size and business type of the long-term care facility.

Results

Of the 529 participants who satisfied our inclusion criteria, 308 (58.2 %) had received at least one inappropriate medication according to the 2012 Beers Criteria. The most frequently prescribed classes of inappropriate medications were central nervous system drugs (58.7 %), anti-cholinergics (21.2 %), and cardiovascular medications (10.8 %). The most commonly used drugs were quetiapine (28.4 %), chlorpheniramine (15.8 %), risperidone (6.5 %), and zolpidem (5.8 %). Inappropriate medication use was associated with the number of co-medications and long-term care insurance grade 3, which means less dependence and a requirement of low-level care.

Conclusions

Central nervous system drugs (58.7 %) were the most prescribed class of inappropriate medications. Quetiapine was the drug most often given inappropriately (28.4 %). There was a relationship between inappropriate medication use and the number of co-medications. The frequency of inappropriate medication prescriptions was higher among patients whose long-term care insurance for seniors was grade 3, which means less dependence and a requirement of low-level care.

American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults

The 2015 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria are presented. Like the 2012 AGS Beers Criteria, they include lists of potentially inappropriate medications to be avoided in older adults. New to the criteria are lists of select drugs that should be avoided or have their dose adjusted based on the individual's kidney function and select drug-drug interactions documented to be associated with harms in older adults. The specific aim was to have a 13-member interdisciplinary panel of experts in geriatric care and pharmacotherapy update the 2012 AGS Beers Criteria using a modified Delphi method to systematically review and grade the evidence and reach a consensus on each existing and new criterion. The process followed an evidence-based approach using Institute of Medicine standards. The 2015 AGS Beers Criteria are applicable to all older adults with the exclusion of those in palliative and hospice care. Careful application of the criteria by health professionals, consumers, payors, and health systems should lead to closer monitoring of drug use in older adults.