101
|
Akbari H, Rathore S, Bakas S, Nasrallah MP, Shukla G, Mamourian E, Rozycki M, Bagley SJ, Rudie JD, Flanders AE, Dicker AP, Desai AS, O'Rourke DM, Brem S, Lustig R, Mohan S, Wolf RL, Bilello M, Martinez-Lage M, Davatzikos C. Histopathology-validated machine learning radiographic biomarker for noninvasive discrimination between true progression and pseudo-progression in glioblastoma. Cancer 2020; 126:2625-2636. [PMID: 32129893 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imaging of glioblastoma patients after maximal safe resection and chemoradiation commonly demonstrates new enhancements that raise concerns about tumor progression. However, in 30% to 50% of patients, these enhancements primarily represent the effects of treatment, or pseudo-progression (PsP). We hypothesize that quantitative machine learning analysis of clinically acquired multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can identify subvisual imaging characteristics to provide robust, noninvasive imaging signatures that can distinguish true progression (TP) from PsP. METHODS We evaluated independent discovery (n = 40) and replication (n = 23) cohorts of glioblastoma patients who underwent second resection due to progressive radiographic changes suspicious for recurrence. Deep learning and conventional feature extraction methods were used to extract quantitative characteristics from the mpMRI scans. Multivariate analysis of these features revealed radiophenotypic signatures distinguishing among TP, PsP, and mixed response that compared with similar categories blindly defined by board-certified neuropathologists. Additionally, interinstitutional validation was performed on 20 new patients. RESULTS Patients who demonstrate TP on neuropathology are significantly different (P < .0001) from those with PsP, showing imaging features reflecting higher angiogenesis, higher cellularity, and lower water concentration. The accuracy of the proposed signature in leave-one-out cross-validation was 87% for predicting PsP (area under the curve [AUC], 0.92) and 84% for predicting TP (AUC, 0.83), whereas in the discovery/replication cohort, the accuracy was 87% for predicting PsP (AUC, 0.84) and 78% for TP (AUC, 0.80). The accuracy in the interinstitutional cohort was 75% (AUC, 0.80). CONCLUSION Quantitative mpMRI analysis via machine learning reveals distinctive noninvasive signatures of TP versus PsP after treatment of glioblastoma. Integration of the proposed method into clinical studies can be performed using the freely available Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, ChristianaCare, Newark, Delaware
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Martin Rozycki
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam E Flanders
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Arati S Desai
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ronald L Wolf
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michel Bilello
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Maria Martinez-Lage
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Moradmand H, Aghamiri SMR, Ghaderi R. Impact of image preprocessing methods on reproducibility of radiomic features in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 21:179-190. [PMID: 31880401 PMCID: PMC6964771 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Revised: 11/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the effect of image preprocessing, in respect to intensity inhomogeneity correction and noise filtering, on the robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features extracted from the Glioblastoma (GBM) tumor in multimodal MR images (mMRI). In this study, for each patient 1461 radiomics features were extracted from GBM subregions (i.e., edema, necrosis, enhancement, and tumor) of mMRI (i.e., FLAIR, T1, T1C, and T2) volumes for five preprocessing combinations (in total 116 880 radiomics features). The robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features were assessed under four comparisons: (a) Baseline versus modified bias field; (b) Baseline versus modified bias field followed by noise filtering; (c) Baseline versus modified noise, and (d) Baseline versus modified noise followed bias field correction. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), dynamic range (DR), and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used as metrics. Shape features and subsequently, local binary pattern (LBP) filtered images were highly stable and reproducible against bias field correction and noise filtering in all measurements. In all MRI modalities, necrosis regions (NC: n ® ~449/1461, 30%) had the highest number of highly robust features, with CCC and DR >= 0.9, in comparison with edema (ED: n ® ~296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n ® ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor regions (TM: n ® ~254/1461, 17%). The necrosis regions (NC: n¯ ~ 449/1461, 30%) had a higher number of highly robust features (CCC and DR >= 0.9) than edema (ED: n¯ ~ 296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n¯ ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor (TM: n¯ ~ 254/1461, 17%) regions across all modalities. Furthermore, our results identified that the percentage of high reproducible features with ICC >= 0.9 after bias field correction (23.2%), and bias field correction followed by noise filtering (22.4%) were higher in contrast with noise smoothing and also noise smoothing follow by bias correction. These preliminary findings imply that preprocessing sequences can also have a significant impact on the robustness and reproducibility of mMRI‐based radiomics features and identification of generalizable and consistent preprocessing algorithms is a pivotal step before imposing radiomics biomarkers into the clinic for GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajar Moradmand
- Medical Radiation Enginearing, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Reza Ghaderi
- Medical Radiation Enginearing, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.,Eletrical Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Rudie JD, Weiss DA, Saluja R, Rauschecker AM, Wang J, Sugrue L, Bakas S, Colby JB. Multi-Disease Segmentation of Gliomas and White Matter Hyperintensities in the BraTS Data Using a 3D Convolutional Neural Network. Front Comput Neurosci 2019; 13:84. [PMID: 31920609 PMCID: PMC6933520 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
An important challenge in segmenting real-world biomedical imaging data is the presence of multiple disease processes within individual subjects. Most adults above age 60 exhibit a variable degree of small vessel ischemic disease, as well as chronic infarcts, which will manifest as white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on brain MRIs. Subjects diagnosed with gliomas will also typically exhibit some degree of abnormal T2 signal due to WMH, rather than just due to tumor. We sought to develop a fully automated algorithm to distinguish and quantify these distinct disease processes within individual subjects’ brain MRIs. To address this multi-disease problem, we trained a 3D U-Net to distinguish between abnormal signal arising from tumors vs. WMH in the 3D multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI, i.e., native T1-weighted, T1-post-contrast, T2, T2-FLAIR) scans of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) 2018 dataset (ntraining = 285, nvalidation = 66). Our trained neuroradiologist manually annotated WMH on the BraTS training subjects, finding that 69% of subjects had WMH. Our 3D U-Net model had a 4-channel 3D input patch (80 × 80 × 80) from mpMRI, four encoding and decoding layers, and an output of either four [background, active tumor (AT), necrotic core (NCR), peritumoral edematous/infiltrated tissue (ED)] or five classes (adding WMH as the fifth class). For both the four- and five-class output models, the median Dice for whole tumor (WT) extent (i.e., union of AT, ED, NCR) was 0.92 in both training and validation sets. Notably, the five-class model achieved significantly (p = 0.002) lower/better Hausdorff distances for WT extent in the training subjects. There was strong positive correlation between manually segmented and predicted volumes for WT (r = 0.96) and WMH (r = 0.89). Larger lesion volumes were positively correlated with higher/better Dice scores for WT (r = 0.33), WMH (r = 0.34), and across all lesions (r = 0.89) on a log(10) transformed scale. While the median Dice for WMH was 0.42 across training subjects with WMH, the median Dice was 0.62 for those with at least 5 cm3 of WMH. We anticipate the development of computational algorithms that are able to model multiple diseases within a single subject will be a critical step toward translating and integrating artificial intelligence systems into the heterogeneous real-world clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - David A Weiss
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Rachit Saluja
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Andreas M Rauschecker
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jiancong Wang
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Leo Sugrue
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - John B Colby
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Rathore S, Akbari H, Bakas S, Pisapia JM, Shukla G, Rudie JD, Da X, Davuluri RV, Dahmane N, O'Rourke DM, Davatzikos C. Multivariate Analysis of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Transcriptomic Classification of de novo Glioblastoma Patients. Front Comput Neurosci 2019; 13:81. [PMID: 31920606 PMCID: PMC6923885 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma, the most frequent primary malignant brain neoplasm, is genetically diverse and classified into four transcriptomic subtypes, i. e., classical, mesenchymal, proneural, and neural. Currently, detection of transcriptomic subtype is based on ex vivo analysis of tissue that does not capture the spatial tumor heterogeneity. In view of accumulative evidence of in vivo imaging signatures summarizing molecular features of cancer, this study seeks robust non-invasive radiographic markers of transcriptomic classification of glioblastoma, based solely on routine clinically-acquired imaging sequences. A pre-operative retrospective cohort of 112 pathology-proven de novo glioblastoma patients, having multi-parametric MRI (T1, T1-Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR), collected from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania were included. Following tumor segmentation into distinct radiographic sub-regions, diverse imaging features were extracted and support vector machines were employed to multivariately integrate these features and derive an imaging signature of transcriptomic subtype. Extracted features included intensity distributions, volume, morphology, statistics, tumors' anatomical location, and texture descriptors for each tumor sub-region. The derived signature was evaluated against the transcriptomic subtype of surgically-resected tissue specimens, using a 5-fold cross-validation method and a receiver-operating-characteristics analysis. The proposed model was 71% accurate in distinguishing among the four transcriptomic subtypes. The accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) for distinguishing each subtype (classical, mesenchymal, proneural, neural) from the rest was equal to 88.4% (71.4/92.3), 75.9% (83.9/72.8), 82.1% (73.1/84.9), and 75.9% (79.4/74.4), respectively. The findings were also replicated in The Cancer Genomic Atlas glioblastoma dataset. The obtained imaging signature for the classical subtype was dominated by associations with features related to edge sharpness, whereas for the mesenchymal subtype had more pronounced presence of higher T2 and T2-FLAIR signal in edema, and higher volume of enhancing tumor and edema. The proneural and neural subtypes were characterized by the lower T1-Gd signal in enhancing tumor and higher T2-FLAIR signal in edema, respectively. Our results indicate that quantitative multivariate analysis of features extracted from clinically-acquired MRI may provide a radiographic biomarker of the transcriptomic profile of glioblastoma. Importantly our findings can be influential in surgical decision-making, treatment planning, and assessment of inoperable tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jared M Pisapia
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Division of Neurosurgery, Children Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Christiana Care Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Xiao Da
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ramana V Davuluri
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Nadia Dahmane
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Chitalia RD, Rowland J, McDonald ES, Pantalone L, Cohen EA, Gastounioti A, Feldman M, Schnall M, Conant E, Kontos D. Imaging Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Heterogeneity in Preoperative Breast Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) Scans Predict 10-Year Recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 26:862-869. [PMID: 31732521 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-4067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Identifying imaging phenotypes and understanding their relationship with prognostic markers and patient outcomes can allow for a noninvasive assessment of cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify and validate intrinsic imaging phenotypes of breast cancer heterogeneity in preoperative breast dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) scans and evaluate their prognostic performance in predicting 10 years recurrence. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Pretreatment DCE-MRI scans of 95 women with primary invasive breast cancer with at least 10 years of follow-up from a clinical trial at our institution (2002-2006) were retrospectively analyzed. For each woman, a signal enhancement ratio (SER) map was generated for the entire segmented primary lesion volume from which 60 radiomic features of texture and morphology were extracted. Intrinsic phenotypes of tumor heterogeneity were identified via unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the extracted features. An independent sample of 163 women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer (2002-2006), publicly available via The Cancer Imaging Archive, was used to validate phenotype reproducibility. RESULTS Three significant phenotypes of low, medium, and high heterogeneity were identified in the discovery cohort and reproduced in the validation cohort (P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier curves showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in recurrence-free survival (RFS) across phenotypes. Radiomic phenotypes demonstrated added prognostic value (c = 0.73) predicting RFS. CONCLUSIONS Intrinsic imaging phenotypes of breast cancer tumor heterogeneity at primary diagnosis can predict 10-year recurrence. The independent and additional prognostic value of imaging heterogeneity phenotypes suggests that radiomic phenotypes can provide a noninvasive characterization of tumor heterogeneity to augment personalized prognosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhea D Chitalia
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer Rowland
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lauren Pantalone
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric A Cohen
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Aimilia Gastounioti
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Feldman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mitchell Schnall
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Emily Conant
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Despina Kontos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine & Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Pertuz S, Sassi A, Holli-Helenius K, Kämäräinen J, Rinta-Kiikka I, Lääperi AL, Arponen O. Clinical evaluation of a fully-automated parenchymal analysis software for breast cancer risk assessment: A pilot study in a Finnish sample. Eur J Radiol 2019; 121:108710. [PMID: 31689665 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the association between breast cancer risk and mammographic parenchymal measures obtained using a fully-automated, publicly available software, OpenBreast. METHODS This retrospective case-control study involved screening mammograms of asymptomatic women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2016 and 2017. The 114 cases were matched with corresponding healthy controls by birth and screening years and the mammographic system used. Parenchymal analysis was performed using OpenBreast, a software implementing a computerized parenchymal analysis algorithm. Breast percent density was measured with an interactive thresholding method. The parenchymal measures were Box-Cox transformed and adjusted for age and percent density. Changes in the odds ratio per standard deviation (OPERA) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for parenchymal measures and percent densities were used to evaluate the discrimination between cases and controls. Differences in AUCs were assessed using DeLong's test. RESULTS The adjusted OPERA value of parenchymal measures was 2.49 (95% CI: 1.79-3.47). Parenchymal measures using OpenBreast were more accurate (AUC = 0.779) than percent density (AUC = 0.609) in discriminating between cases and controls (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Parenchymal measures obtained with the evaluated software were positively associated with breast cancer risk and were more accurate than percent density in the prediction of risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Said Pertuz
- Connectivity and Signal Processing group, Universidad Industrial de Santander, 680002 Bucaramanga, Colombia; Computing Sciences, Tampere University, 33710 Tampere, Finland.
| | - Antti Sassi
- Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, 33521 Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Joni Kämäräinen
- Computing Sciences, Tampere University, 33710 Tampere, Finland
| | - Irina Rinta-Kiikka
- Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, 33521 Tampere, Finland
| | - Anna-Leena Lääperi
- Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, 33521 Tampere, Finland
| | - Otso Arponen
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, 33521 Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Thakur SP, Doshi J, Pati S, Ha SM, Sako C, Talbar S, Kulkarni U, Davatzikos C, Erus G, Bakas S. Skull-Stripping of Glioblastoma MRI Scans Using 3D Deep Learning. BRAINLESION : GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES. BRAINLES (WORKSHOP) 2019; 11992:57-68. [PMID: 32577629 PMCID: PMC7311100 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46640-4_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Skull-stripping is an essential pre-processing step in computational neuro-imaging directly impacting subsequent analyses. Existing skull-stripping methods have primarily targeted non-pathologicallyaffected brains. Accordingly, they may perform suboptimally when applied on brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans that have clearly discernible pathologies, such as brain tumors. Furthermore, existing methods focus on using only T1-weighted MRI scans, even though multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) scans are routinely acquired for patients with suspected brain tumors. Here we present a performance evaluation of publicly available implementations of established 3D Deep Learning architectures for semantic segmentation (namely DeepMedic, 3D U-Net, FCN), with a particular focus on identifying a skull-stripping approach that performs well on brain tumor scans, and also has a low computational footprint. We have identified a retrospective dataset of 1,796 mpMRI brain tumor scans, with corresponding manually-inspected and verified gold-standard brain tissue segmentations, acquired during standard clinical practice under varying acquisition protocols at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Our quantitative evaluation identified DeepMedic as the best performing method (Dice = 97.9, Hausdorf f 95 = 2.68). We release this pre-trained model through the Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (CaPTk) platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhesh P Thakur
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology (SGGS), Nanded, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jimit Doshi
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sung Min Ha
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sanjay Talbar
- Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology (SGGS), Nanded, Maharashtra, India
| | - Uday Kulkarni
- Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology (SGGS), Nanded, Maharashtra, India
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Guray Erus
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Image-based Classification of Tumor Type and Growth Rate using Machine Learning: a preclinical study. Sci Rep 2019; 9:12529. [PMID: 31467303 PMCID: PMC6715812 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48738-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Medical images such as magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provide valuable information for cancer detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. In addition to the anatomical information these images provide, machine learning can identify texture features from these images to further personalize treatment. This study aims to evaluate the use of texture features derived from T1-weighted post contrast scans to classify different types of brain tumors and predict tumor growth rate in a preclinical mouse model. To optimize prediction models this study uses varying gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) sizes, tumor region selection and different machine learning models. Using a random forest classification model with a GLCM of size 512 resulted in 92%, 91%, and 92% specificity, and 89%, 85%, and 73% sensitivity for GL261 (mouse glioma), U87 (human glioma) and Daoy (human medulloblastoma), respectively. A tenfold cross-validation of the classifier resulted in 84% accuracy when using the entire tumor volume for feature extraction and 74% accuracy for the central tumor region. A two-layer feedforward neural network using the same features is able to predict tumor growth with 16% mean squared error. Broadly applicable, these predictive models can use standard medical images to classify tumor type and predict tumor growth, with model performance, varying as a function of GLCM size, tumor region, and tumor type.
Collapse
|
109
|
Fathi Kazerooni A, Bakas S, Saligheh Rad H, Davatzikos C. Imaging signatures of glioblastoma molecular characteristics: A radiogenomics review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 52:54-69. [PMID: 31456318 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past few decades, the advent and development of genomic assessment methods and computational approaches have raised the hopes for identifying therapeutic targets that may aid in the treatment of glioblastoma. However, the targeted therapies have barely been successful in their effort to cure glioblastoma patients, leaving them with a grim prognosis. Glioblastoma exhibits high heterogeneity, both spatially and temporally. The existence of different genetic subpopulations in glioblastoma allows this tumor to adapt itself to environmental forces. Therefore, patients with glioblastoma respond poorly to the prescribed therapies, as treatments are directed towards the whole tumor and not to the specific genetic subregions. Genomic alterations within the tumor develop distinct radiographic phenotypes. In this regard, MRI plays a key role in characterizing molecular signatures of glioblastoma, based on regional variations and phenotypic presentation of the tumor. Radiogenomics has emerged as a (relatively) new field of research to explore the connections between genetic alterations and imaging features. Radiogenomics offers numerous advantages, including noninvasive and global assessment of the tumor and its response to therapies. In this review, we summarize the potential role of radiogenomic techniques to stratify patients according to their specific tumor characteristics with the goal of designing patient-specific therapies. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:54-69.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
- Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group (QMISG), Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Zwanenburg A. Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:2638-2655. [PMID: 31240330 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04391-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Radiomics in nuclear medicine is rapidly expanding. Reproducibility of radiomics studies in multicentre settings is an important criterion for clinical translation. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to investigate reproducibility of radiomics biomarkers in PET imaging and to obtain quantitative information regarding their sensitivity to variations in various imaging and radiomics-related factors as well as their inherent sensitivity. Additionally, we identify and describe data analysis pitfalls that affect the reproducibility and generalizability of radiomics studies. After a systematic literature search, 42 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and data from 21 were used for the quantitative meta-analysis. Data concerning measurement agreement and reliability were collected for 21 of 38 different factors associated with image acquisition, reconstruction, segmentation and radiomics-specific processing steps. Variations in voxel size, segmentation and several reconstruction parameters strongly affected reproducibility, but the level of evidence remained weak. Based on the meta-analysis, we also assessed inherent sensitivity to variations of 110 PET image biomarkers. SUVmean and SUVmax were found to be reliable, whereas image biomarkers based on the neighbourhood grey tone difference matrix and most biomarkers based on the size zone matrix were found to be highly sensitive to variations, and should be used with care in multicentre settings. Lastly, we identify 11 data analysis pitfalls. These pitfalls concern model validation and information leakage during model development, but also relate to reporting and the software used for data analysis. Avoiding such pitfalls is essential for minimizing bias in the results and to enable reproduction and validation of radiomics studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Zwanenburg
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Nabavizadeh SA, Akbari H, Ware JB, Nasrallah M, Guiry S, Bagley SJ, Desai A, Levy S, Sarchiapone W, Prior T, Detre J, Wolf RL, O'Rourke DM, Brem S, Davatzikos C. Arterial Spin Labeling and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for evaluation of arteriovenous shunting and tumor hypoxia in glioblastoma. Sci Rep 2019; 9:8747. [PMID: 31217496 PMCID: PMC6584644 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45312-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults and carries a dismal prognosis. Significant challenges in the care of patients with GBM include marked vascular heterogeneity and arteriovenous (AV) shunting, which results in tumor hypoxia and inadequate delivery of systemic treatments to reach tumor cells. In this study, we investigated the utility of different MR perfusion techniques to detect and quantify arteriovenous (AV) shunting and tumor hypoxia in patients with GBM. Macrovascular shunting was present in 33% of subjects, with the degree of shunting ranging from (37-60%) using arterial spin labeling perfusion. Among the dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion curve features, there were a strong negative correlation between hypoxia score, DSC perfusion curve recovery slope (r = -0.72, P = 0.018) and angle (r = -0.73, P = 0.015). The results of this study support the possibility of using arterial spin labeling and pattern analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for evaluation of arteriovenous shunting and tumor hypoxia in glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ali Nabavizadeh
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Ware
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - MacLean Nasrallah
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Samantha Guiry
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Arati Desai
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Scott Levy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Whitney Sarchiapone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timothy Prior
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John Detre
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ronald L Wolf
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Apicella C, Ruano CSM, Méhats C, Miralles F, Vaiman D. The Role of Epigenetics in Placental Development and the Etiology of Preeclampsia. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20112837. [PMID: 31212604 PMCID: PMC6600551 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20112837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, we comprehensively present the function of epigenetic regulations in normal placental development as well as in a prominent disease of placental origin, preeclampsia (PE). We describe current progress concerning the impact of DNA methylation, non-coding RNA (with a special emphasis on long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) and microRNA (miRNA)) and more marginally histone post-translational modifications, in the processes leading to normal and abnormal placental function. We also explore the potential use of epigenetic marks circulating in the maternal blood flow as putative biomarkers able to prognosticate the onset of PE, as well as classifying it according to its severity. The correlation between epigenetic marks and impacts on gene expression is systematically evaluated for the different epigenetic marks analyzed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Apicella
- Institut Cochin, U1016 INSERM, UMR8104 CNRS, Université Paris Descartes, 24 rue du faubourg St Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - Camino S M Ruano
- Institut Cochin, U1016 INSERM, UMR8104 CNRS, Université Paris Descartes, 24 rue du faubourg St Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - Céline Méhats
- Institut Cochin, U1016 INSERM, UMR8104 CNRS, Université Paris Descartes, 24 rue du faubourg St Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - Francisco Miralles
- Institut Cochin, U1016 INSERM, UMR8104 CNRS, Université Paris Descartes, 24 rue du faubourg St Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - Daniel Vaiman
- Institut Cochin, U1016 INSERM, UMR8104 CNRS, Université Paris Descartes, 24 rue du faubourg St Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Pfaehler E, Zwanenburg A, de Jong JR, Boellaard R. RaCaT: An open source and easy to use radiomics calculator tool. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212223. [PMID: 30785937 PMCID: PMC6382170 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The widely known field ‘Radiomics’ aims to provide an extensive image based phenotyping of e.g. tumors using a wide variety of feature values extracted from medical images. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that feature values calculated by different institutes follow the same feature definitions. For this purpose, the imaging biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI) provides detailed mathematical feature descriptions, as well as (mathematical) test phantoms and corresponding reference feature values. We present here an easy to use radiomic feature calculator, RaCaT, which provides the calculation of a large number of radiomic features for all kind of medical images which are in compliance with the standard. Methods The calculator is implemented in C++ and comes as a standalone executable. Therefore, it can be easily integrated in any programming language, but can also be called from the command line. No programming skills are required to use the calculator. The software architecture is highly modularized so that it is easily extendible. The user can also download the source code, adapt it if needed and build the calculator from source. The calculated feature values are compliant with the ones provided by the IBSI standard. Source code, example files for the software configuration, and documentation can be found online on GitHub (https://github.com/ellipfaehlerUMCG/RaCat). Results The comparison with the standard values shows that all calculated features as well as image preprocessing steps, comply with the IBSI standard. The performance is also demonstrated on clinical examples. Conclusions The authors successfully implemented an easy to use Radiomics calculator that can be called from any programming language or from the command line. Image preprocessing and feature settings and calculations can be adjusted by the user.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Pfaehler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Alex Zwanenburg
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johan R. de Jong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Elsheikh SSM, Bakas S, Mulder NJ, Chimusa ER, Davatzikos C, Crimi A. Multi-stage Association Analysis of Glioblastoma Gene Expressions with Texture and Spatial Patterns. BRAINLESION : GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES. BRAINLES (WORKSHOP) 2019; 11383:239-250. [PMID: 31482151 PMCID: PMC6719702 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11723-8_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most aggressive malignant primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis. Glioblastoma heterogeneous neuroimaging, pathologic, and molecular features provide opportunities for subclassification, prognostication, and the development of targeted therapies. Magnetic resonance imaging has the capability of quantifying specific phenotypic imaging features of these tumors. Additional insight into disease mechanism can be gained by exploring genetics foundations. Here, we use the gene expressions to evaluate the associations with various quantitative imaging phenomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging. We highlight a novel correlation by carrying out multi-stage genomewide association tests at the gene-level through a non-parametric correlation framework that allows testing multiple hypotheses about the integrated relationship of imaging phenotype-genotype more efficiently and less expensive computationally. Our result showed several novel genes previously associated with glioblastoma and other types of cancers, as the LRRC46 (chromosome 17), EPGN (chromosome 4) and TUBA1C (chromosome 12), all associated with our radiographic tumor features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samar S M Elsheikh
- Computational Biology Group, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nicola J Mulder
- Computational Biology Group, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Emile R Chimusa
- Division of Human Genetics, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Crimi
- University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Biriwa, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Rudie JD, Rauschecker AM, Bryan RN, Davatzikos C, Mohan S. Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology. Radiology 2019; 290:607-618. [PMID: 30667332 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Due to the exponential growth of computational algorithms, artificial intelligence (AI) methods are poised to improve the precision of diagnostic and therapeutic methods in medicine. The field of radiomics in neuro-oncology has been and will likely continue to be at the forefront of this revolution. A variety of AI methods applied to conventional and advanced neuro-oncology MRI data can already delineate infiltrating margins of diffuse gliomas, differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression, and predict recurrence and survival better than methods used in daily clinical practice. Radiogenomics will also advance our understanding of cancer biology, allowing noninvasive sampling of the molecular environment with high spatial resolution and providing a systems-level understanding of underlying heterogeneous cellular and molecular processes. By providing in vivo markers of spatial and molecular heterogeneity, these AI-based radiomic and radiogenomic tools have the potential to stratify patients into more precise initial diagnostic and therapeutic pathways and enable better dynamic treatment monitoring in this era of personalized medicine. Although substantial challenges remain, radiologic practice is set to change considerably as AI technology is further developed and validated for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D Rudie
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| | - Andreas M Rauschecker
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| | - R Nick Bryan
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| | - Suyash Mohan
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (J.D.R., C.D., S.M.); Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (A.M.R.); and Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Tex (R.N.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Li H, Galperin-Aizenberg M, Pryma D, Simone CB, Fan Y. Unsupervised machine learning of radiomic features for predicting treatment response and overall survival of early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:218-226. [PMID: 30473058 PMCID: PMC6261331 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To predict treatment response and survival of NSCLC patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), we develop an unsupervised machine learning method for stratifying patients and extracting meta-features simultaneously based on imaging data. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was performed based on an 18F-FDG-PET dataset of 100 consecutive patients who were treated with SBRT for early stage NSCLC. Each patient's tumor was characterized by 722 radiomic features. An unsupervised two-way clustering method was used to identify groups of patients and radiomic features simultaneously. The groups of patients were compared in terms of survival and freedom from nodal failure. Meta-features were computed for building survival models to predict survival and free of nodal failure. RESULTS Differences were found between 2 groups of patients when the patients were clustered into 3 groups in terms of both survival (p = 0.003) and freedom from nodal failure (p = 0.038). Average concordance measures for predicting survival and nodal failure were 0.640±0.029 and 0.664±0.063 respectively, better than those obtained by prediction models built upon clinical variables (p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The evaluation results demonstrate that our method allows us to stratify patients and predict survival and freedom from nodal failure with better performance than current alternative methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongming Li
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, United States
| | - Maya Galperin-Aizenberg
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, United States
| | - Daniel Pryma
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, United States
| | - Charles B Simone
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, United States
| | - Yong Fan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Binder ZA, Thorne AH, Bakas S, Wileyto EP, Bilello M, Akbari H, Rathore S, Ha SM, Zhang L, Ferguson CJ, Dahiya S, Bi WL, Reardon DA, Idbaih A, Felsberg J, Hentschel B, Weller M, Bagley SJ, Morrissette JJD, Nasrallah MP, Ma J, Zanca C, Scott AM, Orellana L, Davatzikos C, Furnari FB, O'Rourke DM. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Extracellular Domain Mutations in Glioblastoma Present Opportunities for Clinical Imaging and Therapeutic Development. Cancer Cell 2018; 34:163-177.e7. [PMID: 29990498 PMCID: PMC6424337 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2017] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
We explored the clinical and pathological impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) extracellular domain missense mutations. Retrospective assessment of 260 de novo glioblastoma patients revealed a significant reduction in overall survival of patients having tumors with EGFR mutations at alanine 289 (EGFRA289D/T/V). Quantitative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging analyses indicated increased tumor invasion for EGFRA289D/T/V mutants, corroborated in mice bearing intracranial tumors expressing EGFRA289V and dependent on ERK-mediated expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1. EGFRA289V tumor growth was attenuated with an antibody against a cryptic epitope, based on in silico simulation. The findings of this study indicate a highly invasive phenotype associated with the EGFRA289V mutation in glioblastoma, postulating EGFRA289V as a molecular marker for responsiveness to therapy with EGFR-targeting antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zev A Binder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - E Paul Wileyto
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sung Min Ha
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Logan Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Cole J Ferguson
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Sonika Dahiya
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Harvard Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris 75013, France
| | - Joerg Felsberg
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Moorenstrasse 5, Duesseldorf 40225, Germany
| | - Bettina Hentschel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Medical Faculty, Härtelstrasse 16, Leipzig 04107, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jennifer J D Morrissette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jianhui Ma
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, San Diego 92093, USA
| | - Ciro Zanca
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, San Diego 92093, USA
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Laura Orellana
- Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Frank B Furnari
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, San Diego 92093, USA.
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Akbari H, Bakas S, Pisapia JM, Nasrallah MP, Rozycki M, Martinez-Lage M, Morrissette JJD, Dahmane N, O’Rourke DM, Davatzikos C. In vivo evaluation of EGFRvIII mutation in primary glioblastoma patients via complex multiparametric MRI signature. Neuro Oncol 2018; 20:1068-1079. [PMID: 29617843 PMCID: PMC6280148 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) is a driver mutation and potential therapeutic target in glioblastoma. Non-invasive in vivo EGFRvIII determination, using clinically acquired multiparametric MRI sequences, could assist in assessing spatial heterogeneity related to EGFRvIII, currently not captured via single-specimen analyses. We hypothesize that integration of subtle, yet distinctive, quantitative imaging/radiomic patterns using machine learning may lead to non-invasively determining molecular characteristics, and particularly the EGFRvIII mutation. Methods We integrated diverse imaging features, including the tumor's spatial distribution pattern, via support vector machines, to construct an imaging signature of EGFRvIII. This signature was evaluated in independent discovery (n = 75) and replication (n = 54) cohorts of de novo glioblastoma, and compared with the EGFRvIII status obtained through an assay based on next-generation sequencing. Results The cross-validated accuracy of the EGFRvIII signature in classifying the mutation status in individual patients of the independent discovery and replication cohorts was 85.3% (specificity = 86.3%, sensitivity = 83.3%, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.85) and 87% (specificity = 90%, sensitivity = 78.6%, AUC = 0.86), respectively. The signature was consistent with EGFRvIII+ tumors having increased neovascularization and cell density, as well as a distinctive spatial pattern involving relatively more frontal and parietal regions compared with EGFRvIII- tumors. Conclusions An imaging signature of EGFRvIII was found, revealing a complex, yet distinct macroscopic glioblastoma phenotype. By non-invasively capturing the tumor in its entirety, the proposed methodology can assist in evaluating the tumor's spatial heterogeneity, hence overcoming common spatial sampling limitations of tissue-based analyses. This signature can preoperatively stratify patients for EGFRvIII-targeted therapies, and potentially monitor dynamic mutational changes during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jared M Pisapia
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Martin Rozycki
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Maria Martinez-Lage
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer J D Morrissette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nadia Dahmane
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Donald M O’Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Rathore S, Akbari H, Doshi J, Shukla G, Rozycki M, Bilello M, Lustig R, Davatzikos C. Radiomic signature of infiltration in peritumoral edema predicts subsequent recurrence in glioblastoma: implications for personalized radiotherapy planning. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2018. [PMID: 29531967 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.5.2.021219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Standard surgical resection of glioblastoma, mainly guided by the enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), disregards infiltrating tumor within the peritumoral edema region (ED). Subsequent radiotherapy typically delivers uniform radiation to peritumoral FLAIR-hyperintense regions, without attempting to target areas likely to be infiltrated more heavily. Noninvasive in vivo delineation of the areas of tumor infiltration and prediction of early recurrence in peritumoral ED could assist in targeted intensification of local therapies, thereby potentially delaying recurrence and prolonging survival. This paper presents a method for estimating peritumoral edema infiltration using radiomic signatures determined via machine learning methods, and tests it on 90 patients with de novo glioblastoma. The generalizability of the proposed predictive model was evaluated via cross-validation in a discovery cohort ([Formula: see text]) and was subsequently evaluated in a replication cohort ([Formula: see text]). Spatial maps representing the likelihood of tumor infiltration and future early recurrence were compared with regions of recurrence on postresection follow-up studies with pathology confirmation. The cross-validated accuracy of our predictive infiltration model on the discovery and replication cohorts was 87.51% (odds ratio = 10.22, sensitivity = 80.65, and specificity = 87.63) and 89.54% (odds ratio = 13.66, sensitivity = 97.06, and specificity = 76.73), respectively. The radiomic signature of the recurrent tumor region revealed higher vascularity and cellularity when compared with the nonrecurrent region. The proposed model shows evidence that multiparametric pattern analysis from clinical MRI sequences can assist in in vivo estimation of the spatial extent and pattern of tumor recurrence in peritumoral edema, which may guide supratotal resection and/or intensification of postoperative radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saima Rathore
- University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Hamed Akbari
- University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Jimit Doshi
- University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Martin Rozycki
- University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Michel Bilello
- University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Robert Lustig
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- University of Pennsylvania, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|