Antibiotic combinations: should they be tested?

Synergistic activities of gatifloxacin in combination with other antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related species

Drug combinations have been used to treat serious infections caused by Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, Stenotrophomonas, and Acinetobacter. In this study, the combined drug effects of gatifloxacin (GAT) and nonquinolones were determined by time-kill analysis at clinically achievable drug concentrations. Synergy (>or=2 log(10)-enhanced killing at 24 h) was observed with GAT plus amikacin or a beta-lactam against 50 to 75% of strains, including strains nonsusceptible to one or both drugs.

Fractional inhibitory concentration index of combinations of antibacterial agents against cariogenic organisms

OBJECTIVES

To examine the inhibitory effects between paired combinations of four antibacterial agents that have been investigated in dentistry against six bacteria associated with dentinal caries.

METHODS

The antibacterial agents tested were: chlorhexidine dihydrochloride, benzalkonium chloride, cetrimide and cetylpyridinium chloride. Two organisms each belonging to Streptococcus, Lactobacillus and Actinomyces species were evaluated against these agents. A checkerboard microtitration method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration and fractionary inhibitory concentration (FIC) and summation operator FIC index of the paired combinations of antibacterial agents against the six species of bacteria. Appropriate controls were included. The summation operator FIC index was then used to determine if synergy, antagonism, or indifference occurred as a result of interactions between the antibacterial agents and the test organisms.

RESULTS

The data from a total of 295 test results were evaluated. Using summation operator FIC values for synergy as < or = 0.5 and antagonism as > 4.0 as recommended by The American Society for Microbiology, no significant synergistic or antagonistic interactions were observed between the paired antibacterial agents when tested against selected organisms. However, a tendency for an additive antibacterial effect was observed with approximately a third of the test results. Nonetheless, no combination of antibacterial agents appeared to be superior to any other.

CONCLUSIONS

According to these in vitro results, there appears to be no beneficial effect of combining the antibacterial agents against the individual cariogenic micro-organisms selected. However, it may be beneficial to use combined antibacterial agents that have a broader range of activity against an ecosystem of bacteria than using individual agents.

Comparative in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of nosocomial isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and synergistic activities of nine antimicrobial combinations

The in vitro susceptibilities of 69 nosocomial Acinetobacter isolates were determined by the broth microdilution method. Fourteen (20%) isolates were resistant to at least two aminoglycosides and two extended-spectrum penicillins. Nine antimicrobial combinations were then tested for synergy against these 14 isolates by checkerboard titration: imipenem with ciprofloxacin, amikacin, and tobramycin and ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ticarcillin-clavulanate with amikacin and tobramycin. Synergy was detected with one or more antimicrobial combinations against 9 of 14 (64%) isolates, partial synergy was detected with one or more combinations against all 14 isolates, and an additive effect alone was observed with two different combinations against two isolates. No antagonism was detected with any combination. Imipenem plus either amikacin or tobramycin resulted in a synergistic or partial synergistic response against all 14 isolates. Specific combinations showing synergy against A. baumannii isolates were imipenem with tobramycin (four isolates), imipenem with amikacin (three isolates), ampicillin-sulbactam with tobramycin (six isolates), ampicillin-sulbactam with amikacin (three isolates), and ticarcillin-clavulanate with tobramycin (one isolate). Genotyping by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis showed that 9 of the 14 isolates were of one strain, 4 isolates were of a second strain, and the remaining isolate was of a different strain. Eight of 14 (57%) patients infected with resistant A. baumannii isolates died. Only 3 of 14 patients had received a therapeutic regimen which was tested for synergy. Clinical studies are needed to determine the significance of these findings.

Antibiotic selection in the treatment of endophthalmitis: the significance of drug combinations and synergy

Emerging resistance of organisms to standard antibiotic therapy has forced clinicians to continually evaluate the best intraocular antibiotics for the treatment of endophthalmitis. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment with intraocular antibiotics are important factors in the successful management of endophthalmitis. Although drug combinations are necessary to cover the full range of bacteria causing endophthalmitis, antimicrobial synergy is probably less important in endophthalmitis treatment because of the high intravitreal concentration of individual antibiotics achieved by intravitreal injection. In the treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis, the combination of intravitreal vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 cc) and ceftazidime (2.25 mg/ 0.1 cc) is a reasonable alternative to the combination vancomycin and amikacin (0.4 mg/ 0.1 cc).

Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto Infection Program

Combinations of beta-lactams plus aminoglycosides have been standard therapy for suspected infections in granulocytopenic cancer patients, especially those with profound long-lasting granulocytopenia. With the advent of new broad-spectrum bactericidal antibiotics such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins or carbapenems, the need to combine beta-lactams with aminoglycosides became more controversial. The objective of this prospective randomized multicenter study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of meropenem monotherapy with those of the combination of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empirical treatment of fever in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Of 1,034 randomized patients, 958 were assessable in the intent-to-treat analysis for response to antibacterial therapy, including 483 in the meropenem group and 475 in the ceftazidime-plus-amikacin group. The median durations of neutropenia were 16 and 17 days, respectively. A successful outcome was reported in 270 of 483 (56%) patients treated with monotherapy compared with 245 of 475 (52%) patients treated with the combination group (P = 0.20). The success rates in the monotherapy group and the combination group were similar by type of infection (single gram-negative bacteremia, single gram-positive bacteremia, clinically documented infection, and possible infection). The occurrence of further infections assessed in patients for whom the allocated regimen was not modified did not differ between the two groups (12% in both groups). Mortality due to the presenting infection or further infection was relatively low (8 patients treated with the monotherapy compared with 13 patients treated with the combination). A total of 1,027 patients were evaluable for adverse events; the proportion of those who developed adverse effects was similar between the two groups (29% in both groups), and only 19 (4%) patients in the monotherapy group and 31 (6%) in the combination group experienced an adverse event related or probably related to the study drug. Allergic reactions were the only reason for stopping the protocol antibiotic(s) (3 and 5 patients, respectively). This study confirms that monotherapy with meropenem is as effective as the combination of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empiric treatment of fever in persistently granulocytopenic cancer patients, and both regimens were well tolerated.

Clinical significance of bacterial resistance to tetracyclines in the treatment of periodontal diseases

Tetracyclines are frequently employed during the treatment of clinical infections in medicine and dentistry, however, emergence of resistant bacterial strains has decreased the utility of these drugs. Accordingly, there is concern that indiscriminant administration of tetracyclines during periodontal therapy will further contribute to the development of additional resistant microorganisms which can complicate infectious disease therapy. This review paper briefly discusses the utility of tetracyclines as an antimicrobial agent in the treatment of periodontal diseases. It then focuses on the clinical significance of bacterial resistance to tetracyclines. Patterns of resistance that may be associated with the following scenarios are addressed: short- and long-term antibiotic therapy, individuals with a history of prior tetracycline therapy, patients with refractory periodontitis, and following controlled local drug delivery. It appears that selection and development of bacterial resistant strains is an inevitable consequence of antibiotic therapy. Nevertheless, prudent administration of tetracyclines may help delay or prevent the emergence of resistant microorganisms.

Piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

Gram-positive bacteria have become the predominant infecting organisms in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Empiric antibiotic regimens used in febrile neutropenic patients often include an extended-spectrum cephalosporin, but the response to therapy in gram-positive coccal bacteremia has been unsatisfactory. Thus, new antibiotics with better activity against gram-positive bacteria should be tested. The objective of this prospective randomized controlled study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerance of piperacillintazobactam plus amikacin with that of ceftazidime plus amikacin, the standard regimen of the International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, in the empiric treatment of febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients. A total of 858 episodes were eligible for this study, and 706 episodes were assessable for efficacy. The antibiotic treatment was successful in 210 (61%) of 342 episodes in the piperacillin-tazobactam-amikacin group compared with 196 (54%) of 364 episodes treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin (P = 0.05). The time to defervescence was significantly shorter (P = 0.01) and the time to failure was significantly longer (P = 0.02) in the piperacillin-tazobactam-amikacin group. A significant difference in response to bacteremic infections between the two patient groups was found: piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin was successful in 40 of 80 episodes (50%), and ceftazidime plus amikacin was successful in 35 of 101 episodes (35%) (P = 0.05). A multivariate analysis showed that the probability of failure was significantly greater with ceftazidime plus amikacin than with piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin (P = 0.02). This trial suggests that piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin is more effective than ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empiric treatment of fever and bacteremia in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Although cutaneous reaction was more frequently associated with piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin than with ceftazidime-amikacin, this unwanted effect was relatively mild and its incidence was comparable to that of other penicillin compounds.

In vitro interactions of neomycin sulfate, bacitracin, and polymyxin B sulfate

BACKGROUND

Neomycin sulfate, bacitracin, and polymyxin B sulfate have been combined in topical preparations to provide a complementary antimicrobial spectrum for the prevention of minor wound infections. The advisability of the inclusion of neomycin sulfate has been questioned since it may cause contact sensitization.

METHODS

To assess the value of neomycin, microdilution checkerboard titrations were used to determine the in vitro interactions between two-antibiotic and three-antibiotic combinations against reference strains of bacteria commonly associated with wound infections. Using Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC) indices (< 0.5 indicates synergism with two-drug combinations), the combination of neomycin/bacitracin was synergistic for both S. aureus and Ps. aeruginosa; neomycin/polymyxin B was synergistic for E. faecalis, and the bacitracin/polymyxin B combination was synergistic against Ps. aeruginosa. A three-drug combination of neomycin/bacitracin/polymyxin B had FIC values of < 1 for all organisms, indicating synergy and substantiating the clinical role of neomycin sulfate in current topical formulations.

RESULTS

Neomycin has the lowest safety profile of the drugs in this combination. A replacement agent should ideally have similar or superior synergistic capabilities with the remaining drugs and contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of the preparation. Additionally, because of the strongly synergistic tendencies displayed by the three-drug combination, it may be possible to reduce the antibiotic concentrations present in current formulations.

CONCLUSION

By developing this concept, there is potential for the formulation of topical preparations to be based on a sound theoretical and clinical rationale.

Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem monotherapy with imipenem plus netilmicin for treatment of severe infections in nonneutropenic patients

Nosocomial pneumonia and sepsis, as well as severe diffuse peritonitis, must be treated early in order to prevent complications such as septic shock and organ dysfunctions. With the availability of new broad-spectrum and highly bactericidal antibiotics, the need of combining beta-lactams with aminoglycosides for the treatment of severe infections should be reassessed. A prospective randomized controlled study was performed to compare imipenem monotherapy with a combination of imipenem plus netilmicin in the empiric treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, nosocomial sepsis, and severe diffuse peritonitis. A total of 313 patients were enrolled, and 280 were assessable. The antibiotic treatment was successful in 113 of 142 patients (80%) given the monotherapy and in 119 of 138 patients (86%) given the combination (P = 0.19). The failure rates for the most important type of infection, i.e., pneumonia, were similar in the two groups, as well as the number of superinfections. While creatinine increase was associated with factors not related to antibiotic therapy for all eight patients of the monotherapy group, no factor other than the antibiotics could be found for 6 of the 14 cases of nephrotoxicity observed in the combination group (P = 0.014). Finally, the emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to imipenem occurred in 8 monotherapy patients and in 13 combination therapy patients. In conclusion, imipenem monotherapy appeared as effective as the combination of imipenem plus netilmicin for the treatment of severe infection. The addition of netilmicin increased nephrotoxicity, and it did not prevent the emergence of P. aeruginosa resistant to imipenem.

Reproducibility of the microdilution checkerboard method for antibiotic synergy

We assessed the reproducibility of the microdilution checkerboard method for measuring antibiotic synergy. Five strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested with four antibiotic combinations by using 10 replicates each. Twenty-five percent of replicate sets gave discordant classification results (i.e., a 7:3 or worse split in categorization). Determination of the individual MICs of each antibiotic alone was excellent; all 10 replicates were within 1 twofold dilution for 95% of the 80 sets of 10 replicates. The microdilution checkerboard method either should not be used or should be used with at least five replicates per determination, with > or = 80% agreement among the replicates required for classification.

Decimal assay for additivity of drugs permits delineation of synergy and antagonism

Although there are many in vitro tests for drug interactions, few possess a linear, predictable dose-dependent end point or have a precise definition for additivity. Therefore, a new test with both of these features, the decimal assay for additivity, was developed. This test is based on a disk diffusion assay and the strict linear relationship between drug mass and size of the inhibition zone. When the decimal assay for additivity was applied to combinations known on a mechanistic basis to be additive, synergistic, or antagonistic, results of the new test always reflected the expected drug interaction. For example, synergy between trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole was detected in tests with Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae, as was antagonism between cefoxitin and cefotaxime in tests with Enterobacter cloacae. Quinolones plus chloramphenicol appeared to be antagonistic. In addition to correctly identifying the drug interaction, the decimal assay for additivity identified the drug ratio producing the maximal drug interaction. These results suggest that the decimal assay for additivity should prove very useful in future studies of drug interactions.

Parameters characterizing the in vitro activity of cefixime, a new oral broad spectrum cephalosporin, against respiratory and urinary pathogens

The wide and potent in vitro activity of cefixime, a new oral broad spectrum cephalosporin, has been confirmed on a collection of respiratory and urinary pathogens recently isolated in Italy. The new cephem emerged as the most bactericidal of all the comparators tested against several fast as well as slowly-growing gram-negative species including Enterobacteria, Haemophilus and Moraxella, irrespective of their ability to synthetize beta-lactamases. Among the gram-positive species Streptococcus pyogenes and S. pneumoniae were effectively covered. Cefixime activity was not adversely influenced by several important variables such as pH (over the range from 5 to 8), inoculum size (from 10(5) to 10(8) CFU per ml) and the presence of 50% human serum or urine. Time-kill tests confirmed a pronounced bactericidal potency of the drug especially towards common respiratory pathogens (H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes). Killing of urinary strains was optimal at cefixime concentrations reached in urine since eradication, except for Proteus mirabilis, was enhanced with increasing levels of the drug. The absence of an untoward paradoxic effect on the rate of cefixime bactericidal action was confirmed by employing a dynamic bladder model simulating the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug after a single 200 mg daily dosage. Interactions of cefixime with several other drugs that may be employed in combination therapy were generally prone to provide indifference and synergism while antagonism was never observed. Favorable interactions were also registered when cefixime acted with other antibiotics on partially resistant species such as Staphylococci and Pseudomonas. The new cephem seems to provide excellent opportunities for expanding oral cephalosporin therapy to a wide range of infections produced by susceptible pathogens in the adult and pediatric populations.

Antimicrobial activity of isepamicin (SCH21420, 1-N-HAPA gentamicin B) combinations with cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, mezlocillin and piperacillin tested against gentamicin-resistant and susceptible gram-negative bacilli and enterococci

Isepamicin, formerly SCH21420 or 1-N-HAPA gentamicin B, is an aminoglycoside that was tested alone or in combination with one of seven broad spectrum drugs against 80 clinical isolates. Half of the strains were gentamicin-resistant but only one isolate (1.3%) was resistant to isepamicin. The broadest spectrum comparison drugs tested alone (ciprofloxacin at 3.8% resistance and imipenem at 5.0% resistance) were associated with the lowest synergy rates when combined with isepamicin. The rank order of synergy (complete or partial) was; cefotaxime = ceftazidime = ceftriaxone = mezlocillin = piperacillin (75% to 80%) greater than imipenem (66%) greater than ciprofloxacin (38%). Isepamicin/ampicillin combinations produced synergistic killing of those enterococci not having high-grade resistance to gentamicin or kanamycin. Enterococcus faecium strains were also refractory to isepamicin/ampicillin synergy. Isepamicin appears to be widely useable against gentamicin-resistant gram-negative bacilli either alone or combined with most commonly used broad spectrum beta-lactams.

Nosocomial pneumonia: comparative multicentre trial between monotherapy with cefotaxime and treatment with antibiotic combinations

In a multicentre clinical trial involving 32 hospitals, 588 adult patients diagnosed with nosocomial pneumonia and not receiving mechanical ventilation were treated randomly with monotherapy with cefotaxime or the antibiotic combination routinely used in each particular hospital. Both groups of patients were similar regarding demographic data, concurrent diseases, additional therapies and causative organism. Protocol violations were recorded in 40 patients, and these patients were excluded from the evaluation of treatment efficacy. The cure rate was 79% in the cefotaxime group and 71% in the group receiving antibiotic combinations; this difference is statistically significant (p = 0.03, Fisher's two-tailed test). In the patients receiving combinations of cephalosporins having activity predominantly against gram-positive organisms plus aminoglycosides, the cure rate obtained was very low. The frequency of serious adverse reactions was significantly higher in the group treated with antibiotic combinations. It is concluded that monotherapy with cefotaxime is the regimen that offers better results for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

Synergistic activity of aminoglycoside-beta-lactam combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with an unusual aminoglycoside antibiogram

The bactericidal activity of aminoglycosides alone and in combination with various beta-lactams was studied by the time-kill technique against ten Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with an unusual antibiogram (amikacin-resistant, gentamicin-resistant, tobramycin-susceptible [ArGrTs]). Previous studies have indicated that ArGrTs isolates are moderately resistant to all aminoglycosides and many are multiply resistant to beta-lactams. Aminoglycoside-beta-lactam combinations showed infrequent synergistic (16%) or enhanced killing (12%) against the ArGrTs isolates. Synergistic activity, when present, was more likely to occur with tobramycin and amikacin than with gentamicin, even though these differences were not statistically significant. Antibiotic resistance patterns were not predictive of synergy or enhanced killing. Systemic infections produced by ArGrTs isolates that are multiply resistant to the beta-lactams may not respond to combination therapy with an aminoglycoside and beta-lactam. Alternative treatment with polymyxin B or a quinolone may be required for these infections.

Synergism between ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin against gram-negative bacteria in vitro

A combination of ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin was evaluated for synergism employing time-kill experiments. A total of 59 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacteria was examined. All organisms were moderately sensitive or resistant to ciprofloxacin; 72.9% also showed moderate sensitivity or resistance to fosfomycin. After 24 h, synergism was seen in 22% of the strains, i.e. less than reported by other authors. There was no correlation between synergistic action and sensitivity to ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin, respectively.