Effects of Co-occurring Genomic Alterations on Outcomes in Patients with KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Dual NGS Comparative Analysis of Liquid Biopsy (LB) and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Samples of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC)

Lung cancer ranks second worldwide after breast cancer and third in Europe after breast and colorectal cancers when both sexes and all ages are considered. In this context, the aim of this study was to emphasize the power of dual analysis of the molecular profile both in tumor tissue and plasma by NGS assay as a liquid biopsy approach with impact on prognosis and therapy modulation in NSCLC patients. NGS analysis was performed both from tissue biopsies and from cfNAs isolated from peripheral blood samples. Out of all 29 different mutations detectable by both NGS panels (plasma and tumor tissue), seven different variants (24.13%; EGFR L858R in two patients, KRAS G13D and Q61H and TP53 G244D, V197M, R213P, and R273H) were detected only in plasma and not in the tumor itself. These mutations were detected in seven different patients, two of them having known distant organ metastasis. Our data show that NGS analysis of cfDNA could identify actionable mutations in advanced NSCLC and, therefore, this analysis could be used to monitor the disease progression and the treatment response and even to modulate the therapy in real time.

Comprehensive pan-cancer genomic landscape of KRAS altered cancers and real-world outcomes in solid tumors

Recent clinical development of KRAS inhibitors has heightened interest in the genomic landscape of KRAS-altered cancers. We performed a pan-cancer analysis of KRAS-altered samples from 426,706 adult patients with solid or hematologic malignancies using comprehensive genomic profiling; additional analyses included 62,369 liquid biopsy and 7241 pediatric samples. 23% of adult pan-cancer samples had KRAS alterations; 88% were mutations, most commonly G12D/G12V/G12C/G13D/G12R, and prevalence was similar in liquid biopsies. Co-alteration landscapes were largely similar across KRAS mutations but distinct from KRAS wild-type, though differences were observed in some tumor types for tumor mutational burden, PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability, and other mutational signatures. Prognosis of KRAS-mutant versus other genomic cohorts of lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer were assessed using a real-world clinicogenomic database. As specific KRAS inhibitors and combination therapeutic strategies are being developed, genomic profiling to understand co-alterations and other biomarkers that may modulate response to targeted or immunotherapies will be imperative.

Co-occurring KEAP1 and TP53 mutations in lung squamous cell carcinoma induced primary resistance to thoracic radiotherapy: A case report

In lung squamous cell carcinoma, KEAP1 mutations frequently coexist with TP53 mutations. A preclinical model showed that mutations leading to the activation of the KEAP1-NRF2 pathway contribute to clinical radioresistance. However, there have been few clinical reports on the association between the presence of KEAP1 and TP53 mutations in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma. Here, we report the case of a 62-year-old patient with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma with KEAP1 and TP53 mutations who experienced primary resistance to thoracic radiotherapy. She was administered pembrolizumab in combination with cytotoxic agents as the first-line treatment and the best response was a partial response. However, the mediastinal lymph node metastases regrew 11 months after the chemotherapy. Thus, she received thoracic radiation therapy for localized lesions. However, the lesions within the radiation field had apparently progressed. Although she received subsequent chemotherapy, the lesion rapidly progressed. Treatment strategies including radiotherapy based on genetic stratification, such as KEAP1 and TP53 mutation status, should be implemented for lung squamous cell carcinoma.

A single center analysis of first-line treatment in advanced KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer: real-world practice

Purpose

For the first-line treatment of KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, immunotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy are the main treatment method. Here, we investigated the clinical efficacy and prognosis those two regimens as first-line treatment in real-world practice.

Methods

KRAS mutant NSCLC patients received chemotherapy or immunotherapy as first-line treatment from September 2014 to March 2022 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, treatment scheme, clinical curative effect and follow-up data of enrolled patients were collected for analysis.

Results

Fifty patients received immunotherapy and 115 patients received chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients who received immunotherapy (HR = 0.350, 95%CI 0.156–0.781, P = 0.010), or pemetrexed-based regimen (HR = 0.486, 95%CI 0.255–0.928, P = 0.029), or antiangiogenic therapy (HR = 0.355, 95%CI 0.159–0.790, P = 0.011) were at a low risk of disease progression. And patients received antiangiogenic therapy had lower risk of death than those not (HR = 0.333, 95%CI 0.120–0.926, P = 0.035). Subgroup analysis revealed the immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone had lower risk of disease progression (HR = 0.377, 95%CI 0.166–0.856, P = 0.020) in PD-L1 expression ≥1% subgroup. And in non-G12C KRAS subgroup, but not in G12C KRAS subgroup, patients who received antiangiogenic therapy had lower risk of disease progression (HR = 0.254, 95%CI 0.098–0.656, P = 0.005) and death than those not (HR = 0.197, 95%CI 0.056–0.692, P = 0.011). In terms of different chemotherapy regimen, platinum-paclitaxel combined with antiangiogenic therapy achieved the highest ORR and DCR (P < 0.05), while the platinum-pemetrexed combined with antiangiogenic therapy had the longest PFS and OS (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

For the first-line treatment of KRAS mutant NSCLC patients, immunotherapy, antiangiogenic therapy, and pemetrexed-based regimen could obtain more benefits. Subgroup analysis revealed the benefits of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy were applicable in PD-L1 expression≥1% subgroup, and antiangiogenic therapy could benefit non-G12C KRAS subgroup, but not G12C KRAS subgroup. In terms of different chemotherapy regimen, platinum-pemetrexed combined with antiangiogenic therapy may be the preferred chemotherapy regimen.

KRAS G12 isoforms exert influence over up-front treatments: A retrospective, multicenter, Italian analysis of the impact of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in an NSCLC real-life population

BACKGROUND

KRAS is commonly mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the prognostic and predictive impact of each G12 substitution has not been fully elucidated. The approval of specific G12C inhibitors has modified the idea of KRAS "undruggability", and although the first-line standard consists of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy, as suggested at ASCO 2022, the outcome in KRAS-mutated population is still controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively described the clinical and pathological characteristics of a homogeneous G12 mutated cohort of 219 patients treated in four Italian oncologic units. We evaluated the outcome (PFS at 18 months and OS at 30 months) of those who underwent standard first-line treatment according to PD-L1 status, focusing on differences across single mutations.

RESULTS

In the study population, 47.9% of patients harbor the KRAS G12C mutation; 20.5%, G12V; 17.4%, G12D; and 8.2%, G12A. Smoking was a common behavior of patients harboring transversions and transition mutations. PD-L1 expression does not show particular distribution in the case series, although we recorded a prevalence of PD-L1 <1% in G12V (51.4%) compared to G12A (26.7%). ICIs alone was the clinician's choice in 32.7% of patients, and the chemo-immune combination in 17.3% of patients. We described the independent prognostic role of young age (p = 0.007), female gender (p = 0.016), and an ICI-based regimen (p = 0.034) regardless of mutations. Overall, our data confirm the worst prognostic value of G12V mutation apart from treatment choice unlike the other major mutations (C, D, and A) that showed a favorable trend in PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS G12 mutations are confirmed to have different characteristics, and the outcome is influenced by ICI first-line regimen. This study provides valuable information for further analysis in the future.

CoMutDB: the landscape of somatic mutation co-occurrence in cancers

MOTIVATION

Somatic mutation co-occurrence has been proven to have a profound effect on tumorigenesis. While some studies have been conducted on co-mutations, a centralized resource dedicated to co-mutations in cancer is still lacking.

RESULTS

Using multi-omics data from over 30 000 subjects and 1747 cancer cell lines, we present the Cancer co-mutation database (CoMutDB), the most comprehensive resource devoted to describing cancer co-mutations and their characteristics.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

The data underlying this article are available in the online database CoMutDB: http://www.innovebioinfo.com/Database/CoMutDB/Home.php.

KRAS in NSCLC: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

In NSCLC, KRAS mutations occur in up to 30% of all cases, most frequently at codon 12 and 13. KRAS mutations have been linked to adenocarcinoma histology, positive smoking history, and Caucasian ethnicity, although differences have been described across KRAS mutational variants subtypes. KRAS mutations often concur with other molecular alterations, notably TP53, STK11, and KEAP1, which could play an important role in treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. For many years, KRAS mutations have been considered undruggable mainly due to a high toxicity profile and low specificity of compounds. Sotorasib and adagrasib are novel KRAS inhibitors that recently gained FDA approval for pre-treated KRAS mutant NSCLC patients, and other molecules such as GDC-6036 are currently being investigated with promising results. Despite their approval, the efficacy of these drugs is lower than expected and progression among responders has been reported. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to anti-KRAS molecules typically involves either on target secondary mutations (e.g., G12, G13, Q61H, R68S, H95, Y96C, V8L) or off-target alterations. Ongoing trials are currently evaluating strategies for implementing efficacy and overcoming acquired resistance to these compounds. Finally, the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors still needs to be completely assessed and responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents may strongly depend on concomitant mutations.

Genomic Landscapes and Hallmarks of Mutant RAS in Human Cancers

The RAS family of small GTPases represents the most commonly activated oncogenes in human cancers. To better understand the prevalence of somatic RAS mutations and the compendium of genes that are coaltered in RAS-mutant tumors, we analyzed targeted next-generation sequencing data of 607,863 mutations from 66,372 tumors in 51 cancer types in the AACR Project GENIE Registry. Bayesian hierarchical models were implemented to estimate the cancer-specific prevalence of RAS and non-RAS somatic mutations, to evaluate co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity, and to model the effects of tumor mutation burden and mutational signatures on comutation patterns. These analyses revealed differential RAS prevalence and comutations with non-RAS genes in a cancer lineage-dependent and context-dependent manner, with differences across age, sex, and ethnic groups. Allele-specific RAS co-mutational patterns included an enrichment in NTRK3 and chromatin-regulating gene mutations in KRAS G12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Integrated multiomic analyses of 10,217 tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed distinct genotype-driven gene expression programs pointing to differential recruitment of cancer hallmarks as well as phenotypic differences and immune surveillance states in the tumor microenvironment of RAS-mutant tumors. The distinct genomic tracks discovered in RAS-mutant tumors reflected differential clinical outcomes in TCGA cohort and in an independent cohort of patients with KRAS G12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer that received immunotherapy-containing regimens. The RAS genetic architecture points to cancer lineage-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities that can be leveraged for rationally combining RAS-mutant allele-directed therapies with targeted therapies and immunotherapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

The complex genomic landscape of RAS-mutant tumors is reflective of selection processes in a cancer lineage-specific and context-dependent manner, highlighting differential therapeutic vulnerabilities that can be clinically translated.

Therapeutic Outcomes and Clinical Features of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Carrying KRAS Mutations: A Multicenter Real-life Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Targeting Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) has been deemed impossible for long time, but new drugs have recently demonstrated promising results. Evidence on the outcome of KRAS-mutant advanced-NSCLC treated with new standard regimens are still scarce. Thus, we aimed at assessing the incidence and clinical impact of KRAS mutations in a real-life population of advanced-NSCLC, exploring the prognostic significance of distinct alterations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present multicenter retrospective study, conducted by 5 Italian Centers from January 2018 to February 2020, involved 297 advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC. Complete clinico-pathological data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Out of 297 patients, 130 carried KRAS_G12C mutation, while 167 presented with mutations other than G12C. Within KRAS_non-G12C group, 73%, 16.8% and 8.9% harboured G12X, codon 13 and Q61H alterations, respectively. No significant differences in survival outcome and treatment response were documented according to KRAS_G12C versus non-G12C, nor KRAS_G12C versus G12X versus other mutations. On univariate analysis ECOG PS, number and sites of metastatic lesions and PD-L1 status significantly impacted on survival. A clear trend towards worse prognosis was apparent in chemotherapy-treated patients, while immunotherapy-based regimens were associated to prolonged survival. Investigating the outcome of PD-L1 ≥ 50% population, we did not detect any significant difference between KRAS_G12C and non-G12C subsets.

CONCLUSION

Here, we report on real-life data from a large retrospective cohort of advanced NSCLC harbouring KRAS alterations, with particular attention to G12C mutation. Our study offers useful clues on survival outcome, therapeutic response and clinico-pathological correlations in KRAS-mutant setting, especially in the upcoming era of KRAS G12C targeting therapy.

Drugging KRAS: current perspectives and state-of-art review

After decades of efforts, we have recently made progress into targeting KRAS mutations in several malignancies. Known as the ‘holy grail’ of targeted cancer therapies, KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human malignancies. Under normal conditions, KRAS shuttles between the GDP-bound ‘off’ state and the GTP-bound ‘on’ state. Mutant KRAS is constitutively activated and leads to persistent downstream signaling and oncogenesis. In 2013, improved understanding of KRAS biology and newer drug designing technologies led to the crucial discovery of a cysteine drug-binding pocket in GDP-bound mutant KRAS G12C protein. Covalent inhibitors that block mutant KRAS G12C were successfully developed and sotorasib was the first KRAS G12C inhibitor to be approved, with several more in the pipeline. Simultaneously, effects of KRAS mutations on tumour microenvironment were also discovered, partly owing to the universal use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we discuss the discovery, biology, and function of KRAS in human malignancies. We also discuss the relationship between KRAS mutations and the tumour microenvironment, and therapeutic strategies to target KRAS. Finally, we review the current clinical evidence and ongoing clinical trials of novel agents targeting KRAS and shine light on resistance pathways known so far.

Clinical and Molecular Features of KRAS-Mutated Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Background: The molecular and clinical features of KRAS-mutated lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy have yet to be characterized, which could guide the development of therapeutics targeting KRAS with potential immuno-oncology treatment combinations. Research Question: Do KRAS-mutated patients with different subtypes and comutations have different clinical responses and overall survival (OS) to checkpoint inhibitors? Study Design and Methods: 87 patients with NSCLC at the City of Hope who received immune checkpoint inhibitors were identified and analyzed retrospectively. Tumor genomic alterations were extracted from the clinical data with next-generation sequencing using various platforms. Demographic, clinical, molecular, and pathological information was collected with the approval of the institutional review board of the City of Hope. OS was calculated if it was available at the study time point, and responses were determined according to the RECIST v1.1. Results: Among 87 patients, 32 had a KRAS G12C mutation (36.8%), 19 had G12V (21.9%), 18 had G12D (20.7%), 6 had G12A (6.9%), 3 had G12R (3.45%), and 10 had amplification (11.49%) and other uncommon mutations. G12D had a statistically significant Odds Ratio (OR) between patients who had responses and progression of the disease (OR (95% CI) = 0.31 (0.09−0.95), p < 0.05), with 5 G12D-mutated patients having responses and 11 G12D-mutated patients having progression of the disease. In the univariate analysis with OS, there was a trend of better OS in the G12D-mutated patients, with no statistically significant difference in terms of OS between the patients who had G12D mutation and the patients who had other KRAS mutations (HR (95% CI) = 0.53 (0.21−1.36), p = 0.185). The median OS was significantly worse with KRAS comutation CDKN2A/B loss (4.2 vs. 16.9 months, HR = 3.07 (1.09−8.69), p < 0.05) and MET (3.4 vs. 17 months, HR = 3.80 (1.44−10.05), p < 0.01), which were included for the multivariate analysis. The OS with other KRAS comutations was not statistically significant, including STK11 and KEAP1. Conclusion: KRAS mutation subtypes such as G12D and comutations such as CDKN2/A and MET may modulate the immunotherapy responses and outcomes in lung cancer.

Dissecting the clinicopathologic, genomic, and immunophenotypic correlates of KRASG12D-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Allele-specific KRAS inhibitors are an emerging class of cancer therapies. KRAS-mutant (KRASMUT) non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) exhibit heterogeneous outcomes, driven by differences in underlying biology shaped by co-mutations. In contrast to KRASG12C NSCLC, KRASG12D NSCLC is associated with low/never-smoking status and is largely uncharacterized.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic and genomic information were collected from patients with NSCLCs harboring a KRAS mutation at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Imperial College of London. Multiplexed immunofluorescence for CK7, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), Foxp3, and CD8 was carried out on a subset of samples with available tissue at the DFCI. Clinical outcomes to PD-(L)1 inhibition ± chemotherapy were analyzed according to KRAS mutation subtype.

RESULTS

Of 2327 patients with KRAS-mutated (KRASMUT) NSCLC, 15% (n = 354) harbored KRASG12D. Compared to KRASnon-G12D NSCLC, KRASG12D NSCLC had a lower pack-year (py) smoking history (median 22.5 py versus 30.0 py, P < 0.0001) and was enriched in never smokers (22% versus 5%, P < 0.0001). KRASG12D had lower PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) (median 1% versus 5%, P < 0.01) and lower tumor mutation burden (TMB) compared to KRASnon-G12D (median 8.4 versus 9.9 mt/Mb, P < 0.0001). Of the samples which underwent multiplexed immunofluorescence, KRASG12D had lower intratumoral and total CD8+PD1+ T cells (P < 0.05). Among 850 patients with advanced KRASMUT NSCLC who received PD-(L)1-based therapies, KRASG12D was associated with a worse objective response rate (ORR) (15.8% versus 28.4%, P = 0.03), progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-2.00, P = 0.003], and overall survival (OS; HR 1.45, 1.05-1.99, P = 0.02) to PD-(L)1 inhibition alone but not to chemo-immunotherapy combinations [ORR 30.6% versus 35.7%, P = 0.51; PFS HR 1.28 (95%CI 0.92-1.77), P = 0.13; OS HR 1.36 (95%CI 0.95-1.96), P = 0.09] compared to KRASnon-G12D.

CONCLUSIONS

KRASG12D lung cancers harbor distinct clinical, genomic, and immunologic features compared to other KRAS-mutated lung cancers and worse outcomes to PD-(L)1 blockade. Drug development for KRASG12D lung cancers will have to take these differences into account.

Molecular Characteristics and the Effect of KRAS Mutation on the Prognosis of Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Xinjiang, China

Purpose

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a malignant tumor with high mortality. The Kirsten rat sarcoma vial oncogene (KRAS) gene can affect patient prognosis. In this study, we aim to explore the impact of KRAS mutation status on the clinical prognosis of NSCLC immunotherapy.

Patients and Methods

Collected tumor samples from the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University and 220 patients with stage III–IV NSCLC were included the study. All patients are on first- or second-line therapy and not on targeted therapy. Based on the molecular profiles and clinical features, we analysis of the effect of KRAS mutation on the treatment outcome of NSCLC.

Results

In this study, the main mutant subtypes of KRAS were G12C, G12D, and G12V. In the KRAS mutation group, the highest mutation frequency other than KRAS was TP53, followed by STK11 and KMT2C. We found that among patients received immunotherapy, KRAS-mutant patients were more sensitive to immunotherapy, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 65% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 80%. Survival analysis found that patients with KRAS mutation had better prognosis with immunotherapy than the non-KRAS mutation patients by comparing the overall survival (OS) (median OS: 18.1 months vs 12.2 months, p=0.0032) and progression-free survival (PFS) (media PFS: 7.9 months vs 3.6 months, p=0.01). We found that the patients with KRAS mutation had better prognosis with immunotherapy than with chemotherapy (median OS: 18.1 months vs 12.3 months, p=0.039, PFS 7.9 months vs 4.1 months, p=0.001). Patients with the KRAS G12C mutation had better results with immunotherapy than chemotherapy, but there was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups (OS: p=0.26 PFS: p=0.055). KRAS and TP53 co-mutation and KRAS and KMT2C co-mutation may improve response to immunotherapy.

Conclusion

Our results suggested that the gene mutation profile of NSCLC in KRAS mutation group and non-KRAS mutation group were different. The patients with KRAS mutation will have better prognosis with immunotherapy.

The KEAP1-NRF2 System and Esophageal Cancer

NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of many cytoprotective genes. NRF2 activation is mainly regulated by KEAP1 (kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1) through ubiquitination and proteasome degradation. Esophageal cancer is classified histologically into two major types: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). ESCC harbors more genetic alterations in the KEAP-NRF2 system than EAC does, which results in NRF2 activation in these cancers. NRF2-addicted ESCC exhibits increased malignancy and acquisition of resistance to chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, it has been recognized that the development of drugs targeting the KEAP1-NRF2 system based on the molecular dissection of NRF2 function is important and urgent for the treatment of ESCC, along with efficient clinical screening for NRF2-addicted ESCC patients. Recently, the fate of NRF2-activated cells in esophageal tissues, which was under the influence of strong cell competition, and its relationship to the pathogenesis of ESCC, was clarified. In this review, we will summarize the current knowledge of the KEAP1-NRF2 system and the treatment of ESCC. We propose three main strategies for the treatment of NRF2-addicted cancer: (1) NRF2 inhibitors, (2) synthetic lethal drugs for NRF2-addicted cancers, and (3) NRF2 inducers of the host defense system.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Outcomes for Patients With KRAS G12D-Mutant NSCLC

Introduction

Co-occurring mutations in KRAS-mutant NSCLC are associated with discrete biological properties and modulate therapeutic susceptibilities. As G12D-specific inhibitors are expected to enter the clinic, we sought to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC.

Methods

This was a retrospective single-institution study. Patients with NSCLC and KRAS G12D mutations detected by the Massachusetts General Hospital SNaPshot next-generation sequencing assay were identified. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were collected by chart review.

Results

A total of 107 patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC were identified. Most patients were former smokers (80, 74.8%) and had tumors with adenocarcinoma pathologic subtype (93, 86.9%). Among 56 patients evaluated for programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor proportion score was less than 50% in 43 (76.8%). Concomitant mutations were identified in STK11 (17 of 107, 15.9%), KEAP1 (10 of 58, 17.2%), TP53 (36 of 107, 33.6%), and SMARCA4 (11 of 107, 10.3%). Among 57 patients treated with first-line therapy, patients with STK11 co-mutations had shorter progression-free survival (1.2 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6–2.9 versus 4.1 mo, 95% CI: 2.5–6.0, p = 0.0235) and overall survival (4.3 mo, 95% CI: 1.2–10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 8.6–31.1, p = 0.0018) compared with wild type. Patients with KEAP1 co-mutations had shorter overall survival (4.6 mo, 95% CI: 1.2–10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 7.1–30.1, p = 0.0125) than those without. TP53 co-mutations exerted no influence on survival.

Conclusions

Co-occurring mutations were common in patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC. STK11 and KEAP1 co-mutations were associated with worse clinical outcomes, whereas co-occurring TP53 did not affect survival.

The current state of the art and future trends in RAS-targeted cancer therapies

Despite being the most frequently altered oncogenic protein in solid tumours, KRAS has historically been considered ‘undruggable’ owing to a lack of pharmacologically targetable pockets within the mutant isoforms. However, improvements in drug design have culminated in the development of inhibitors that are selective for mutant KRAS in its active or inactive state. Some of these inhibitors have proven efficacy in patients with KRAS^G12C-mutant cancers and have become practice changing. The excitement associated with these advances has been tempered by drug resistance, which limits the depth and/or duration of responses to these agents. Improvements in our understanding of RAS signalling in cancer cells and in the tumour microenvironment suggest the potential for several novel combination therapies, which are now being explored in clinical trials. Herein, we provide an overview of the RAS pathway and review the development and current status of therapeutic strategies for targeting oncogenic RAS, as well as their potential to improve outcomes in patients with RAS-mutant malignancies. We then discuss challenges presented by resistance mechanisms and strategies by which they could potentially be overcome.

The RAS oncogenes are among the most common drivers of tumour development and progression but have historically been considered undruggable. The development of direct KRAS inhibitors has changed this paradigm, although currently clinical use of these novel therapeutics is limited to a select subset of patients, and intrinsic or acquired resistance presents an inevitable challenge to cure. Herein, the authors provide an overview of the RAS pathway in cancer and review the ongoing efforts to develop effective therapeutic strategies for RAS-mutant cancers. They also discuss the current understanding of mechanisms of resistance to direct KRAS inhibitors and strategies by which they might be overcome.

Owing to intrinsic and extrinsic factors, KRAS and other RAS isoforms have until recently been impervious to targeting with small-molecule inhibitors.

Inhibitors of the KRAS^G12C variant constitute a potential breakthrough in the treatment of many cancer types, particularly non-small-cell lung cancer, for which such an agent has been approved by the FDA.

Several forms of resistance to KRAS inhibitors have been defined, including primary, adaptive and acquired resistance; these resistance mechanisms are being targeted in studies that combine KRAS inhibitors with inhibitors of horizontal or vertical signalling pathways.

Mutant KRAS has important effects on the tumour microenvironment, including the immunological milieu; these effects must be considered to fully understand resistance to KRAS inhibitors and when designing novel treatment strategies.

Molecular Biology and Therapeutic Perspectives for K-Ras Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the most common alterations are identified in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene, accounting for approximately 30% of cases in Caucasian patients. The majority of mutations are located in exon 2, with the c.34G > T (p.G12C) change being the most prevalent. The clinical relevance of KRAS mutations in NSCLC was not recognized until a few years ago. What is now emerging is a dual key role played by KRAS mutations in the management of NSCLC patients. First, recent data report that KRAS-mutant lung AC patients generally have poorer overall survival (OS). Second, a KRAS inhibitor specifically targeting the c.34G > T (p.G12C) variant, Sotorasib, has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the European Medicines Agency. Another KRAS inhibitor targeting c.34G > T (p.G12C), Adagrasib, is currently being reviewed by the FDA for accelerated approval. From the description of the biology of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, the present review will focus on the clinical aspects of KRAS mutations in NSCLC, in particular on the emerging efficacy data of Sotorasib and other KRAS inhibitors, including mechanisms of resistance. Finally, the interaction between KRAS mutations and immune checkpoint inhibitors will be discussed.

KRAS-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Past Efforts to Future Challenges

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene identified in human cancers. Despite the numerous efforts to develop effective specific inhibitors against KRAS, this molecule has remained "undruggable" for decades. The development of direct KRAS inhibitors, such as sotorasib, the first FDA-approved drug targeting KRAS G12C, or adagrasib, was made possible with the discovery of a small pocket in the binding switch II region of KRAS G12C. However, a new challenge is represented by the necessity to overcome resistance mechanisms to KRAS inhibitors. Another area to be explored is the potential role of co-mutations in the selection of the treatment strategy, particularly in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of this review was to analyze the state-of-the-art of KRAS mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer by describing the biological structure of KRAS and exploring the clinical relevance of KRAS as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. We reviewed the different treatment approaches, focusing on the novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of KRAS-mutant lung cancers.

Association of High Tumor Mutation Burden in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers With Increased Immune Infiltration and Improved Clinical Outcomes of PD-L1 Blockade Across PD-L1 Expression Levels

Importance

Although tumor mutation burden (TMB) has been explored as a potential biomarker of immunotherapy efficacy in solid tumors, there still is a lack of consensus about the optimal TMB threshold that best discriminates improved outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Objectives

To determine the association between increasing TMB levels and immunotherapy efficacy across clinically relevant programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) levels in patients with NSCLC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter cohort study included patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immunotherapy who received programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or PD-L1 inhibition in the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), and in the Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C)/Mark Foundation data sets. Clinicopathological and genomic data were collected from patients between September 2013 and September 2020. Data analysis was performed from November 2021 to February 2022.

Exposures

Treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition without chemotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Association of TMB levels with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

In the entire cohort of 1552 patients with advanced NSCLC who received PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, the median (range) age was 66 (22-92) years, 830 (53.5%) were women, and 1347 (86.8%) had cancer with nonsquamous histologic profile. A regression tree modeling ORR as a function of TMB identified 2 TMB groupings in the discovery cohort (MSKCC), defined as low TMB (≤19.0 mutations per megabase) and high TMB (>19.0 mutations per megabase), which were associated with increasing improvements in ORR, PFS, and OS in the discovery cohort and in 2 independent cohorts (DFCI and SU2C/Mark Foundation). These TMB levels also were associated with significant improvements in outcomes of immunotherapy in each PD-L1 tumor proportion score subgroup of less than 1%, 1% to 49%, and 50% or higher. The ORR to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition was as high as 57% in patients with high TMB and PD-L1 expression 50% or higher and as low as 8.7% in patients with low TMB and PD-L1 expression less than 1%. Multiplexed immunofluorescence and transcriptomic profiling revealed that high TMB levels were associated with increased CD8-positive, PD-L1-positive T-cell infiltration, increased PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells, and upregulation of innate and adaptive immune response signatures.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that increasing TMB levels are associated with immune cell infiltration and an inflammatory T-cell-mediated response, resulting in increased sensitivity to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in NSCLC across PD-L1 expression subgroups.

Targeting KRAS: Crossroads of Signaling and Immune Inhibition

Mutations of RAS are commonly seen in human cancers, especially in lung, colorectal, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite huge effort for decades, targeting RAS mutations has been “undruggable” because of the molecular instability of RAS protein inhibition. However, the recent discovery of the KRAS G12C inhibitor paved the way to expand therapeutic options for patients with cancer harboring the KRAS G12C mutation. At the same time, the successful development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) drastically changed the paradigm of cancer treatment and resulted in a better understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment in patients with KRAS-mutant cancer. This review describes the following: the clinical characteristics of cancer with KRAS mutation; successful development of the KRAS G12C inhibitor and its impact on the tumor immune microenvironment; and potential new avenues such as the combination strategy using KRAS inhibitor and ICI, with preclinical and clinical rationales for overcoming resistance to inhibition of KRAS to improve therapeutic efficacy for patients with cancer harboring KRAS mutations.

Genetic, Metabolic and Immunological Features of Cancers with NRF2 Addiction

Nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2 (NRF2) is a master transcription factor that coordinately regulates the expression of many cytoprotective genes and plays a central role in defense mechanisms against oxidative and electrophilic insults. Although increased NRF2 activity is principally beneficial for our health, NRF2 activation in cancer cells is detrimental. Many human cancers exhibit persistent NRF2 activation and such cancer cells rely on NRF2 for most of their malignant characteristics, such as therapeutic resistance and aggressive tumorigenesis, and thus fall into NRF2 addiction. The persistent activation of NRF2 confers great advantages on cancer cells, whereas it is not tolerated by normal cells, suggesting that certain requirements are necessary for a cell to exploit NRF2 and evolve into malignant a cancer cell. In this review, recent reports and data on the genetic, metabolic and immunological features of NRF2-activated cancer cells are summarized, and prerequisites for NRF2 addiction in cancer cells and their therapeutic applications are discussed.

Impact of KRAS Mutation Subtypes and Co-Occurring Mutations on Response and Outcome in Advanced NSCLC Patients following First-Line Treatment

(1) Background: The purpose was to systematically assess the impact of KRAS subtypes and co-mutations on responses of first-line treatment and outcomes by genetic classification in advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC. (2) Methods: Molecular pathology was confirmed with NGS; Kaplan−Meier analysis and Cox multivariate model were used to analyze the efficacy of first-line treatment and prognosis in KRAS subgroups. (3) Results: Advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC was confirmed among 183 patients, who received first-line therapy. The most common KRAS subtype and co-mutation were G12C (29.5%) and TP53 (59.6%). ICIs/CHE group prolonged PFS to 16.9 m, vs. (CHE)4.6 m vs. (CHE/BEV)7.0 m (p < 0.0001); mOS (ICIs/CHE)37.1 m vs. (CHE)19.8 m vs. [CHE/BEV] 20.7 m (p = 0.024). PFS benefited to different degrees after first-line ICI-based treatment in each genetic classification. KRAS G12D even benefited from OS (p = 0.045). CHE/BEV prolonged mPFS of KRAS/STK11 co-mutation (p = 0.043), but decreased mPFS in G12A subtype (p = 0.026). Multivariate analysis indicated that heavy smoking history (≥20 pack-years) (HR = 0.45, p = 0.039) predicts optimistic prognosis; PS score 1 (HR = 3.604, p = 0.002) and KRAS/SMAD4 co-mutation (HR = 4.293, p = 0.027) remained as independent predictors of shorter OS. (4) Conclusions: First-line treatment with ICI benefited KRAS-mutant-NSCLC patients and resulted in non-negative predictive value for any genetic classification. Bevacizumab should be cautiously chosen for patients with KRAS G12A subtype but is recommended for KRAS/STK11 patients. KRAS/SMAD4 is a new co-mutation genotype that displayed independent risk prognostic factors in patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC.

KRAS-G12D mutation drives immune suppression and the primary resistance of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 have demonstrated potency towards treating patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), the potential association between Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) oncogene substitutions and the efficacy of ICIs remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to find point mutations in the KRAS gene resistant to ICIs and elucidate resistance mechanism.

METHODS

The association between KRAS variant status and the efficacy of ICIs was explored with a clinical cohort (n = 74), and confirmed with a mouse model. In addition, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, such as CD8⁺ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD-L1 level, was investigated. Cell lines expressing classic KRAS substitutions were used to explore signaling pathway activation involved in the formation of TIME. Furthermore, interventions that improved TIME were developed to increase responsiveness to ICIs.

RESULTS

We observed the inferior efficacy of ICIs in KRAS-G12D-mutant NSCLC. Based upon transcriptome data and immunostaining results from KRAS-mutant NSCLC, KRAS-G12D point mutation negatively correlated with PD-L1 level and secretion of chemokines CXCL10/CXCL11 that led to a decrease in CD8⁺ TILs, which in turn yielded an immunosuppressive TIME. The analysis of cell lines overexpressing classic KRAS substitutions further revealed that KRAS-G12D mutation suppressed PD-L1 level via the P70S6K/PI3K/AKT axis and reduced CXCL10/CXCL11 levels by down-regulating high mobility group protein A2 (HMGA2) level. Notably, paclitaxel, a chemotherapeutic agent, upregulated HMGA2 level, and in turn, stimulated the secretion of CXCL10/CXCL11. Moreover, PD-L1 blockade combined with paclitaxel significantly suppressed tumor growth compared with PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy in a mouse model with KRAS-G12D-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Further analyses revealed that the combined treatment significantly enhanced the recruitment of CD8⁺ TILs via the up-regulation of CXCL10/CXCL11 levels. Results of clinical study also revealed the superior efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy in patients with KRAS-G12D-mutant NSCLC compared with ICI monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study elucidated the molecular mechanism by which KRAS-G12D mutation drives immunosuppression and enhances resistance of ICIs in NSCLC. Importantly, our findings demonstrate that ICIs in combination with chemotherapy may be more effective in patients with KRAS-G12D-mutant NSCLC.

The KRAS-G12C inhibitor: activity and resistance

Although it has long been deemed "undruggable", with the development of drugs specifically binding the KRAS-G12C mutant protein, clinical trials that directly inhibit oncogenic RAS have recently made promising improvements. In particular, the covalent KRAS-G12C inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib are used to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying KRAS-G12C mutations. Unfortunately, the vast majority of patients do not respond to KRAS-G12C inhibitor therapy, mainly due to intrinsic or acquired resistance caused by cellular, molecular, and genetic mechanisms. Improving the understanding of drug response in the tumor microenvironment may continue to promote the design, testing, and clinical application of KRAS-G12C inhibitors.

Mechanisms used by cancer cells to tolerate drug-induced replication stress

Activation of oncogenes in cancer cells forces cell proliferation, leading to DNA replication stress (RS). As a consequence, cancer cells heavily rely on the intra S-phase checkpoint for survival. This fundamental principle formed the basis for the development of inhibitors against key players of the intra S-phase checkpoint, ATR and CHK1. These drugs are often combined with chemotherapeutic drugs that interfere with DNA replication to exacerbate RS and exhaust the intra S-phase checkpoint in cancer cells. However, drug resistance impedes efficient clinical use, suggesting that some cancer cells tolerate severe RS. In this review, we describe how an increased nucleotide pool, boosted stabilization and repair of stalled forks and firing of dormant origins fortify the RS response in cancer cells. Notably, the vast majority of the genes that confer RS tolerance are regulated by the E2F and NRF2 transcription factors. These transcriptional programs are frequently activated in cancer cells, allowing simultaneous activation of multiple tolerance avenues. We propose that the E2F and NRF2 transcriptional programs can be used as biomarker to select patients for treatment with RS-inducing drugs and as novel targets to kill RS-tolerant cancer cells. Together, this review aims to provide a framework to maximally exploit RS as an Achilles' heel of cancer cells.

The treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring KRAS mutation: a new class of drugs for an old target-a narrative review

Background and Objective

The genetic nature of cancer provides the rationale to support the need for molecular diagnosis and patient selection for individualised antineoplastic treatments that are the best in both tolerability and efficacy for each cancer patient, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations represent the prevalent oncogenic driver in NSCLC, being detected in roughly one-third of cases and KRAS G12C is the most frequent mutation found in approximately 13% of patients.

Methods

This paper gives an overview of the numerous scientific efforts in recent decades aimed at KRAS inhibition.

Key Content and Findings

Sotorasib is the first approved KRAS G12C inhibitor that has been shown to provide a durable clinical benefit in patients with pre-treated NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation. Together with the development of new targeted drugs, the development of strategies to control resistance mechanisms is one of the major drivers of research that is exploring the use of KRAS inhibitors not only alone, but also in combination with other targeted therapies, chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Conclusions

This review will describe the major therapeutic developments in KRAS mutation-dependent NSCLC and will analyse future perspectives to maximise benefits for this group of patients.

Emerging Blood-Based Biomarkers for Predicting Immunotherapy Response in NSCLC

Simple Summary

Treatment with immunotherapy has been established as a standard treatment for lung cancer in recent years. Unfortunately, still, only a small proportion of patients benefit from the treatment, being the first leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Therefore, there is an urgent need for predictive biomarkers to help clinicians to discern whose patients are more likely to respond to immunotherapy. Since liquid biopsy opens the door to select patients and monitor the response during the treatment in a non-invasive way, in this review, we focus on the most relevant and recent results based on blood soluble biomarkers.

Abstract

Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has demonstrated a profitable performance for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) cancer treatment in some patients; however, there is still a percentage of patients in whom immunotherapy does not provide the desired results regarding beneficial outcomes. Therefore, obtaining predictive biomarkers for ICI response will improve the treatment management in clinical practice. In this sense, liquid biopsy appears as a promising method to obtain samples in a minimally invasive and non-biased way. In spite of its evident potential, the use of these circulating biomarkers is still very limited in the real clinical practice, mainly due to the huge heterogeneity among the techniques, the lack of consensus, and the limited number of patients included in these previous studies. In this work, we review the pros and cons of the different proposed biomarkers, such as soluble PD-L1, circulating non-coding RNA, circulating immune cells, peripheral blood cytokines, and ctDNA, obtained from liquid biopsy to predict response to ICI treatment at baseline and to monitor changes in tumor and tumor microenvironment during the course of the treatment in NSCLC patients.

Mutational Activation of the NRF2 Pathway Upregulates Kynureninase Resulting in Tumor Immunosuppression and Poor Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Activation of the NRF2 pathway through gain-of-function mutations or loss-of-function of its suppressor KEAP1 is a frequent finding in lung cancer. NRF2 activation has been reported to alter the tumor microenvironment. Here, we demonstrated that NRF2 alters tryptophan metabolism through the kynurenine pathway that is associated with a tumor-promoting, immune suppressed microenvironment. Specifically, proteomic profiles of 47 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cell lines (11 KEAP1 mutant and 36 KEAP1 wild-type) revealed the tryptophan-kynurenine enzyme kynureninase (KYNU) as a top overexpressed protein associated with activated NRF2. The siRNA-mediated knockdown of NFE2L2, the gene encoding for NRF2, or activation of the NRF2 pathway through siRNA-mediated knockdown of KEAP1 or via chemical induction with the NRF2-activator CDDO-Me confirmed that NRF2 is a regulator of KYNU expression in LUAD. Metabolomic analyses confirmed KYNU to be enzymatically functional. Analysis of multiple independent gene expression datasets of LUAD, as well as a LUAD tumor microarray demonstrated that elevated KYNU was associated with immunosuppression, including potent induction of T-regulatory cells, increased levels of PD1 and PD-L1, and resulted in poorer survival. Our findings indicate a novel mechanism of NRF2 tumoral immunosuppression through upregulation of KYNU.

Use of the Biocartis Idylla™ Platform for the Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, BRAF and KRAS Proto-Oncogene Mutations in Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens from Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

The study aimed to demonstrate rapid and effective molecular testing on liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples for EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations using the Biocartis Idylla™. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) LBC samples for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were tested for EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations based on the relevance to tumour subtype. The quantification values (Cq values) and mutation detection status were compared between LBC samples and routine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) clot samples. ROSE LBC samples (n = 54) showed a higher yield of well-preserved tumour and wild type (WT) DNA, demonstrated by lower quantification cycles, no false positives or false negatives, and a higher sensitivity for low allele frequency mutations when compared with FFPE clot samples. The Biocartis Idylla™ provides highly sensitive, reliable and rapid testing for LBC samples for the detection of EFGR and KRAS mutations. BRAF mutations were not detected in the participant cohort; however, all LBC WT BRAF results correlated with the results from the FFPE clot samples. Access to rapid molecular testing using LBC samples can detect the most frequent driver mutations closer to the time of diagnosis, enabling the selection of the most effective first-line targeted therapy sooner, reducing delays or side effects from suboptimal treatments, patient anxiety and costs to healthcare systems, whilst improving patient outcomes.

More to the RAS Story: KRASG12C Inhibition, Resistance Mechanisms, and Moving Beyond KRASG12C

Despite the discovery of RAS oncogenes in human tumor DNA 40 years ago, the development of effective targeted therapies directed against RAS has lagged behind those more successful advancements in the field of therapeutic tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting other oncogenes such as EGFR, ALK, and ROS1. The discoveries that (1) malignant RAS oncogenes differ from their wild-type counterparts by only a single amino acid change and (2) covalent inhibition of the cysteine residue at codon 12 of KRAS^G12C in its inactive GDP-bound state resulted in effective inhibition of oncogenic RAS signaling and have catalyzed a dramatic shift in mindset toward KRAS-driven cancers. Although the development of allele-selective KRAS^G12C inhibitors has changed a treatment paradigm, the clinical activity of these agents is more modest than tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting other oncogene-driven cancers. Heterogeneous resistance mechanisms generally result in the restoration of RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway signaling. Many approaches are being evaluated to overcome this resistance, with many combinatorial clinical trials ongoing. Furthermore, because KRAS^G12D and KRAS^G12V are more prevalent than KRAS^G12C, there remains an unmet need for additional therapeutic strategies for these patients. Thus, our current translational standing could be described as "the end of the beginning," with additional discovery and research innovation needed to address the enormous disease burden imposed by RAS-mutant cancers. Here, we describe the development of KRAS^G12C inhibitors, the challenges of resistance to these inhibitors, strategies to mitigate that resistance, and new approaches being taken to address other RAS-mutant cancers.

Genomic landscape of chemical-induced lung tumors under Nrf2 different expression levels

The transcription factor Nrf2 plays a crucial role in the anti-oxidative stress response, protection of DNA from injury, and DNA repair mechanisms. Nrf2 activity reduces cancer initiation, but how Nrf2 affects whole-genome alterations upon carcinogenic stimulus remains unexplored. Although recent genome-wide analysis using next-generation sequencing revealed landscapes of nucleotide mutations and copy number alterations in various human cancers, genomic changes in murine cancer models have not been thoroughly examined. We elucidated the relationship between Nrf2 expression levels and whole exon mutation patterns using an ethyl-carbamate (urethane)-induced lung carcinogenesis model employing Nrf2-deficient and Keap1-kd mice, the latter of which express high levels of Nrf2. Exome analysis demonstrated that single nucleotide and trinucleotide mutation patterns and the Kras mutational signature differed significantly and were dependent on the expression level of Nrf2. The Nrf2-deficient tumors exhibited fewer copy number alterations relative to the Nrf2-wt and Keap1-kd tumors. The observed trend in genomic alterations likely prevented the Nrf2-deficient tumors from progressing into malignancy. For the first time, we present whole-exome sequencing results for chemically-induced lung tumors in the Nrf2 gain or loss of function mouse models. Our results demonstrate that different Nrf2 expression levels lead to distinct gene mutation patterns that underly different oncogenic mechanisms in each tumor genotype.

New horizons for uncommon mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: BRAF, KRAS, RET, MET, NTRK, HER2

The 2004 discovery of EGFR mutations, followed by ALK rearrangements, ushered in a targeted therapy era for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting gene alterations have substantially improved survival and quality of life for patients with NSCLC. In the last decade, rearrangements of the ROS1 oncogene have been incorporated into healthcare practice that are applicable to another small subgroup of patients who benefit from similar targeted strategies. Recent genome studies of lung adenocarcinoma have identified other possible therapeutic targets, including RET, NTRK fusions, c-MET alterations, and activating mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and HER2, all with frequencies greater than 1%. Lung cancers harbouring these genome changes can potentially be treated with agents approved for other indications or under clinical development. This review updates the therapeutic arsenal that especially targets those genes.

A targetable CoQ-FSP1 axis drives ferroptosis- and radiation-resistance in KEAP1 inactive lung cancers

Targeting ferroptosis, a unique cell death modality triggered by unrestricted lipid peroxidation, in cancer therapy is hindered by our incomplete understanding of ferroptosis mechanisms under specific cancer genetic contexts. KEAP1 (kelch-like ECH associated protein 1) is frequently mutated or inactivated in lung cancers, and KEAP1 mutant lung cancers are refractory to most therapies, including radiotherapy. In this study, we identify ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1, also known as AIFM2) as a transcriptional target of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) and reveal that the ubiquinone (CoQ)-FSP1 axis mediates ferroptosis- and radiation- resistance in KEAP1 deficient lung cancer cells. We further show that pharmacological inhibition of the CoQ-FSP1 axis sensitizes KEAP1 deficient lung cancer cells or patient-derived xenograft tumors to radiation through inducing ferroptosis. Together, our study identifies CoQ-FSP1 as a key downstream effector of KEAP1-NRF2 pathway and as a potential therapeutic target for treating KEAP1 mutant lung cancers.

Limited role of KRAS mutation in guiding immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The success of sotorasib (AMG-510) and adagrasib (MRTX-849) has resolved the problem of non-availability of drugs for patients with KRAS_G12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. However, more research is required before these drugs can be introduced as a first-line treatment for those patients, and there are no available drugs for other non-G12C-mutated patients so far; therefore, immunotherapy remains the optimal first-line treatment in this situation. The role of KRAS in affecting the response to immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this review was to summarize the impact of KRAS mutations, a highly heterogeneous group, on immunotherapy to provide clinicians and researchers with relevant information that can help guide decision-making.

The prevalence and real-world therapeutic analysis of Chinese patients with KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell lung cancer

Objective

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is an important driver gene of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite a rapid progress achieved in the targeted therapy, chemotherapy remains the standard treatment option for patients with KRAS‐mutant NSCLC. This study aimed to assess real‐world data of Chinese patients with KRAS‐mutant NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy.

Methods

KRAS mutational status was analyzed using next‐generation sequencing of 150,327 NSCLC patients from the Lung Cancer Big Data Precise Treatment Collaboration Group (LANDSCAPE) project (Cohort I). Treatment data were collected and analyzed retrospectively from 4348 NSCLC patients who were admitted to the Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute between January 2009 and October 2020 (Cohort II).

Results

In Cohort I, 18,224 patients were detected with KRAS mutations (12.1%) of whom G12C (29.6%) was the most frequent subtype, followed by G12D (18.1%) and G12V (17.5%). In case of concomitant mutations, TP53 had the highest incidence of 33.6%, followed by EGFR (11.6%), STK11 (10.4%), KEAP1(6.2%), and CDKN2A (6.0%). Cohort II included 497 patients (11.4%) with KRAS mutations. In the first‐line chemotherapeutic analysis of Cohort II, patients benefited more from the pemetrexed/platinum (PP) regimen than the gemcitabine/platinum (GP) or taxanes/platinum (TP) regimen (median progression‐free survival [PFS], 6.4 vs. 4.9 vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48–0.88, p = 0.033 and HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.47–1.00, p = 0.05, respectively), with no significant difference when combined with bevacizumab. Regarding patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the objective response rate was 26% for a median PFS of 9.6 months (95% CI 6.16–13.03). Patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy had a significantly longer survival than monotherapy (median PFS, 13.9 vs. 5.2 months, HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.35–0.99, p = 0.049).

Conclusion

KRAS is an important driver gene in NSCLC, compromising 12.1% in this study, and G12C was noted as the most common subtype. Patients with KRAS‐mutant NSCLC could benefit from pemetrexed‐based chemotherapy and ICIs.

Cancer mutation profiles predict ICIs efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have produced remarkable responses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, receivers still have a relatively low response rate. Initial response assessment by conventional imaging and evaluation criteria is often unable to identify whether patients can achieve durable clinical benefit from ICIs. Overall, there are sparse effective biomarkers identified to screen NSCLC patients responding to this therapy. A lot of studies have reported that patients with specific gene mutations may benefit from or resist to immunotherapy. However, the single gene mutation may be not effective enough to predict the benefit from immunotherapy for patients. With the advancement in sequencing technology, further studies indicate that many mutations often co-occur and suggest a drastic transformation of tumour microenvironment phenotype. Moreover, co-mutation events have been reported to synergise to activate or suppress signalling pathways of anti-tumour immune response, which also indicates a potential target for combining intervention. Thus, the different mutation profile (especially co-mutation) of patients may be an important concern for predicting or promoting the efficacy of ICIs. However, there is a lack of comprehensive knowledge of this field until now. Therefore, in this study, we reviewed and elaborated the value of cancer mutation profile in predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy and analysed the underlying mechanisms, to provide an alternative way for screening dominant groups, and thereby, optimising individualised therapy for NSCLC patients.

Overcoming KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancer

More than 50 years after the discovery of RAS family proteins, which harbor the most common activating mutations in cancer, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first direct allele-specific inhibitor of mutant KRAS in lung cancer. We highlight the history of discovering RAS and decades of studies targeting KRAS-driven lung cancer. A landmark article by Shokat and colleagues in 2013 elucidated allosteric inhibition of this undruggable target and paved the way for the first-in-class direct KRAS^G12C inhibitor. Although these drugs have impressive 36%-45% objective response rates with a median duration of response of 10 months, many tumors do not respond, and diverse mechanisms of resistance have already been observed; this includes new KRAS alterations, activation of alternate RTK pathway proteins, bypass pathways, and transcriptional remodeling. These resistance mechanisms can be profiled using tissue-based and plasma-based testing and help to inform clinical trial options for patients. We conclude with a discussion of research informing ongoing clinical trials to rationally test promising treatments to thwart or overcome resistance to KRAS^G12C inhibitors and target other KRAS-altered lung cancers.

Daily Practice Assessment of KRAS Status in NSCLC Patients: A New Challenge for the Thoracic Pathologist Is Right around the Corner

Simple Summary

RAS mutation is the most frequent oncogenic alteration in human cancers and KRAS is the most frequently mutated, notably in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Various attempts to inhibit KRAS in the past were unsuccessful in these latter tumors. However, recently, several small molecules (AMG510, MRTX849, JNJ-74699157, and LY3499446) have been developed to specifically target KRAS G12C-mutated tumors, which seems promising for patient treatment and should soon be administered in daily practice for non-squamous (NS)-NSCLC. In this context, it will be mandatory to systematically assess the KRAS status in routine clinical practice, at least in advanced NS-NSCLC, leading to new challenges for thoracic oncologists.

Abstract

KRAS mutations are among the most frequent genomic alterations identified in non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinomas (NS-NSCLC), notably in lung adenocarcinomas. In most cases, these mutations are mutually exclusive, with different genomic alterations currently known to be sensitive to therapies targeting EGFR, ALK, BRAF, ROS1, and NTRK. Recently, several promising clinical trials targeting KRAS mutations, particularly for KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC, have established new hope for better treatment of patients. In parallel, other studies have shown that NSCLC harboring co-mutations in KRAS and STK11 or KEAP1 have demonstrated primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, the assessment of the KRAS status in advanced-stage NS-NSCLC has become essential to setting up an optimal therapeutic strategy in these patients. This stimulated the development of new algorithms for the management of NSCLC samples in pathology laboratories and conditioned reorganization of optimal health care of lung cancer patients by the thoracic pathologists. This review addresses the recent data concerning the detection of KRAS mutations in NSCLC and focuses on the new challenges facing pathologists in daily practice for KRAS status assessment.

Correlation of KRAS G12C Mutation and High PD-L1 Expression with Clinical Outcome in NSCLC Patients Treated with Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 improved the survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% and without alterations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET. However, markers able to predict the efficacy of ICIs, in combination with PD-L1 expression are still lacking. Our aim in this hypothesis-generating pilot study was to evaluate whether the KRAS G12C variant may predict the efficacy of ICIs in advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%.

METHODS

Genomic DNA or tissue sections of 44 advanced ICI-treated NSCLC cases with PD-L1 ≥ 50% without EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET alterations were tested using Next Generation Sequencing, Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Statistical analyses were carried out fitting univariate and multivariate time to event models.

RESULTS

KRAS G12C mutant patients (N = 11/44) showed a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) at univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.03). The Kaplan-Meier plot of the PFS time-to-event supports that G12C positive patients have a longer time to progress. PFS improvement was not observed when any KRAS mutations were compared to wild-type cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitations due to the small sample size and exploratory nature of this study, we tentatively conclude the KRAS G12C mutation should be considered in future trials as a predictive marker of prolonged response to first-line ICIs in NSCLC patients overexpressing PD-L1. This finding could be relevant as anti-KRAS G12C therapies enter the therapeutic landscape of NSCLC.

Updated Prognostic Factors in Localized NSCLC

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 80% of lung cancer subtypes. Patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer may be considered for upfront surgical treatment. However, the overall 5-year survival rate is 59%. To improve survival, adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was largely explored and showed an overall benefit of survival at 5 years < 7%. The evaluation of recurrence risk and subsequent need for ACT is only based on tumor stage (TNM classification); however, more than 25% of patients with stage IA/B tumors will relapse. Recently, adjuvant targeted therapy has been approved for EGFR-mutated resected NSCLC and trials are evaluating other targeted therapies and immunotherapies in adjuvant settings. Costs, treatment duration, emergence of resistant clones and side effects stress the need for a better selection of patients. The identification and validation of prognostic and theranostic markers to better stratify patients who could benefit from adjuvant therapies are needed. In this review, we report current validated clinical, pathological and molecular prognosis biomarkers that influence outcome in resected NSCLC, and we also describe molecular biomarkers under evaluation that could be available in daily practice to drive ACT in resected NSCLC.

Targeting KRAS Mutant in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Novel Insights Into Therapeutic Strategies

Although KRAS-activating mutations represent the most common oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), various attempts to inhibit KRAS failed in the past decade. KRAS mutations are associated with a poor prognosis and a poor response to standard therapeutic regimen. The recent development of new therapeutic agents (i.e., adagrasib, sotorasib) that target specifically KRAS G12C in its GDP-bound state has evidenced an unprecedented success in the treatment of this subgroup of patients. Despite providing pre-clinical and clinical efficacy, several mechanisms of acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors have been reported. In this setting, combined therapeutic strategies including inhibition of either SHP2, SOS1 or downstream effectors of KRAS G12C seem particularly interesting to overcome acquired resistance. In this review, we will discuss the novel therapeutic strategies targeting KRAS G12C and promising approaches of combined therapy to overcome acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors.

Direct Targeting KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on Resistance

Simple Summary

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), with a frequency around 30%, and among them KRAS G12C mutation occurs in 11% of cases. KRAS mutations were for a long time considered to be non-targetable alterations or “undruggable”. Direct inhibition is actually developped with switch-II mutant selective covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors with small molecules such as sotorasib or adagrasib preventing conversion of the mutant protein to GTP-bound active state. Little is known about primary or acquired resistance. Acquired resistance does occur and could be related to genetic alterations in the nucleotide exchange function or adaptive mechanisms either in down-stream pathways or in newly expressed KRAS G12C mutation. Mechanisms of resistance could be classified as “on-target” mechanisms, involving KRAS G12C alterations, or “off-target” mechanisms, involving other gene alterations and/or phenotypic changes.

Abstract

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), with a frequency of around 30%, and encoding a GTPAse that cycles between active form (GTP-bound) to inactive form (GDP-bound). The KRAS mutations favor the active form with inhibition of GTPAse activity. KRAS mutations are often with poor response of EGFR targeted therapies. KRAS mutations are good predictive factor for immunotherapy. The lack of success with direct targeting of KRAS proteins, downstream inhibition of KRAS effector pathways, and other strategies contributed to a focus on developing mutation-specific KRAS inhibitors. KRAS p.G12C mutation is one of the most frequent KRAS mutation in NSCLC, especially in current and former smokers (over 40%), which occurs among approximately 12–14% of NSCLC tumors. The mutated cysteine resides next to a pocket (P2) of the switch II region, and P2 is present only in the inactive GDP-bound KRAS. Small molecules such as sotorasib are now the first targeted drugs for KRAS G12C mutation, preventing conversion of the mutant protein to GTP-bound active state. Little is known about primary or acquired resistance. Acquired resistance does occur and may be due to genetic alterations in the nucleotide exchange function or adaptative mechanisms in either downstream pathways or in newly expressed KRAS G12C mutation.

Diminished Efficacy of Programmed Death-(Ligand)1 Inhibition in STK11- and KEAP1-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Is Affected by KRAS Mutation Status

INTRODUCTION

STK11 and KEAP1 mutations (STK11 mutant [STK11MUT] and KEAP1MUT) are among the most often mutated genes in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Although STK11MUT has been associated with resistance to programmed death-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) inhibition in KRASMUT LUAD, its impact on immunotherapy efficacy in KRAS wild-type (KRASWT) LUAD is currently unknown. Whether KEAP1MUT differentially affects outcomes to PD-(L)1 inhibition in KRASMUT and KRASWT LUAD is also unknown.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected from September 2013 to September 2020 from patients with advanced LUAD at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital cohort and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/MD Anderson Cancer Center cohort. Clinical outcomes to PD-(L)1 inhibition were analyzed according to KRAS, STK11, and KEAP1 mutation status in two independent cohorts. The Cancer Genome Atlas transcriptomic data were interrogated to identify differences in tumor gene expression and tumor immune cell subsets, respectively, according to KRAS/STK11 and KRAS/KEAP1 comutation status.

RESULTS

In the combined cohort (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital + Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/MD Anderson Cancer Center) of 1261 patients (median age = 61 y [range: 22-92], 708 women [56.1%], 1065 smokers [84.4%]), KRAS mutations were detected in 536 cases (42.5%), and deleterious STK11 and KEAP1 mutations were found in 20.6% (260 of 1261) and 19.2% (231 of 1202) of assessable cases, respectively. In each independent cohort and in the combined cohort, STK11 and KEAP1 mutations were associated with significantly worse progression-free (STK11 hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04, p < 0.0001; KEAP1 HR = 2.05, p < 0.0001) and overall (STK11 HR = 2.09, p < 0.0001; KEAP1 HR = 2.24, p < 0.0001) survival to immunotherapy uniquely among KRASMUT but not KRASWT LUADs. Gene expression ontology and immune cell enrichment analyses revealed that the presence of STK11 or KEAP1 mutations results in distinct immunophenotypes in KRASMUT, but not in KRASWT, lung cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

STK11 and KEAP1 mutations confer worse outcomes to immunotherapy among patients with KRASMUT but not among KRASWT LUAD. Tumors harboring concurrent KRAS/STK11 and KRAS/KEAP1 mutations display distinct immune profiles in terms of gene expression and immune cell infiltration.

Clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 comutations: subgroup results from the phase III IMpower150 trial

Background

The efficacy of atezolizumab (A) and/or bevacizumab (B) with carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) chemotherapy was explored in the phase III, randomized IMpower150 study in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to KRAS mutations (mKRAS) and co-occurring STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 mutations.

Methods

Mutation status was determined by circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed in a mutation-evaluable intention-to-treat population (MEP; n=920) and SP263 (programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)) biomarker-evaluable population (n=774).

Results

Within the mKRAS population (24.5% of MEP), ABCP showed numerical improvements vs BCP in median OS (19.8 vs 9.9 months; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.72) and PFS (8.1 vs 5.8 months; HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.61)—greater than with ACP (OS: 11.7 vs 9.9 months; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91; PFS: 4.8 vs 5.8 months; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.13) vs BCP. Across PD-L1 subgroups in mKRAS patients, OS and PFS were longer with ABCP vs BCP, but OS with ACP was similar to BCP in PD-L1-low and PD-L1-negative subgroups. Conversely, in KRAS-WT patients, OS was longer with ACP than with ABCP or BCP across PD-L1 subgroups. KRAS was frequently comutated with STK11, KEAP1, and TP53; these subgroups conferred different prognostic outcomes. Within the mKRAS population, STK11 and/or KEAP1 mutations were associated with inferior OS and PFS across treatments compared with STK11-WT and/or KEAP1-WT. In mKRAS patients with co-occurring mSTK11 and/or mKEAP1 (44.9%) or mTP53 (49.3%), survival was longer with ABCP than with ACP or BCP.

Conclusions

These analyses support previous findings of mutation of STK11 and/or KEAP1 as poor prognostic indicators. While clinical efficacy favored ABCP and ACP vs BCP in these mutational subgroups, survival benefits were greater in the mKRAS and KEAP1-WT and STK11-WT population vs mKRAS and mKEAP1 and mSTK11 population, suggesting both prognostic and predictive effects. Overall, these results suggest that atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab and chemotherapy is an efficacious first-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC subgroups with mKRAS and co-occurring STK11 and/or KEAP1 or TP53 mutations and/or high PD-L1 expression.

Genomic characteristics of invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung with multiple pulmonary sites of involvement

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) of the lung frequently presents with diffuse pneumonic-type features or multifocal lesions, which are regarded as a pattern of intrapulmonary metastases. However, the genomics of multifocal IMAs have not been well studied. We performed whole exome sequencing on samples taken from 2 to 5 regions in seven patients with synchronous multifocal IMAs of the lung (24 regions total). Early initiating driver events, such as KRAS, NKX2-1, TP53, or ARID1A mutations, are clonal mutations and were present in all multifocal IMAs in each patient. The tumor mutational burden of multifocal IMAs was low (mean: 1.13/mega base), but further analyses suggested intra-tumor heterogeneity. The mutational signature analysis found that IMAs were predominantly associated with endogenous mutational process (signature 1), APOBEC activity (signatures 2 and 13), and defective DNA mismatch repair (signature 6), but not related to smoking signature. IMAs synchronously located in the bilateral lower lobes of two patients with background usual interstitial pneumonia had different mutation types, suggesting that they were double primaries. In conclusion, genomic evidence found in this study indicated the clonal intrapulmonary spread of diffuse pneumonic-type or multifocal IMAs, although they can occur in multicentric origins in the background of usual interstitial pneumonia. IMAs exhibited a heterogeneous genomic landscape despite the low somatic mutation burden. Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical significance of the genomic characteristics of IMAs in expanded cohorts.

NRF2: KEAPing Tumors Protected

The Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1)/nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) pathway plays a physiologic protective role against xenobiotics and reactive oxygen species. However, activation of NRF2 provides a powerful selective advantage for tumors by rewiring metabolism to enhance proliferation, suppress various forms of stress, and promote immune evasion. Genetic, epigenetic, and posttranslational alterations that activate the KEAP1/NRF2 pathway are found in multiple solid tumors. Emerging clinical data highlight that alterations in this pathway result in resistance to multiple therapies. Here, we provide an overview of how dysregulation of the KEAP1/NRF2 pathway in cancer contributes to several hallmarks of cancer that promote tumorigenesis and lead to treatment resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: Alterations in the KEAP1/NRF2 pathway are found in multiple cancer types. Activation of NRF2 leads to metabolic rewiring of tumors that promote tumor initiation and progression. Here we present the known alterations that lead to NRF2 activation in cancer, the mechanisms in which NRF2 activation promotes tumors, and the therapeutic implications of NRF2 activation.

Targeting KRAS in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Kirsten Rat Sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is the most frequently altered oncogene in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). KRAS mutant tumors constitute a heterogeneous group of diseases, different from other oncogene-derived tumors in terms of biology and response to treatment, which hinders the development of effective drugs against KRAS. Therefore, for decades, despite enormous efforts invested in the development of drugs aimed at inhibiting KRAS or its signaling pathways, KRAS was considered to be undruggable. Recently, the discovery of a new pocket under the effector binding switch II region of KRAS G12C has allowed the development of direct KRAS inhibitors such as sotorasib, the first FDA-approved drug targeting KRAS G12C, or adagrasib, initiating a new exciting era. However, treatment with targeted KRAS G12C inhibitors also leads to resistance, and understanding the possible mechanisms of resistance and which drugs could be useful to overcome it is key. Among others, KRAS G12C (ON) tricomplex inhibitors and different combination therapy strategies are being analyzed in clinical trials. Another area of interest is the potential role of co-mutations in treatment selection, particularly immunotherapy. The best first-line strategy remains to be determined and, due to the heterogeneity of KRAS, is likely to be based on combination therapies.

Present and Emerging Biomarkers in Immunotherapy for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review

Targeting the immune system, especially the PDL-1/PD-1 axis, has significantly improved the outcomes of metastatic lung cancer patients. However, only a portion of patients will benefit significantly from PD(L)1 therapeutics alone or in combination with either chemotherapy or anti-CTLA4 antibody. It is therefore important to study predictive biomarkers to help select the patients who will experience the most benefit from immunotherapy. In this paper, the current status of PDL-1 expression on tumour cells, the smoking status of patients, tumour mutational burden, gut microbiome and STK11 and KEAP1 mutations in the tumour as predictive biomarkers for PD(L)-1-based immunotherapy are summarized.