Cardiocerebral Resuscitation

Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide successful predicts cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the field: a prospective observational study

Introduction

Prognosis in patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is poor. Higher survival rates have been observed only in patients with ventricular fibrillation who were fortunate enough to have basic and advanced life support initiated soon after cardiac arrest. An ability to predict cardiac arrest outcomes would be useful for resuscitation. Changes in expired end-tidal carbon dioxide levels during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be a useful, noninvasive predictor of successful resuscitation and survival from cardiac arrest, and could help in determining when to cease CPR efforts.

Methods

This is a prospective, observational study of 737 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The patients were intubated and measurements of end-tidal carbon dioxide taken. Data according to the Utstein criteria, demographic information, medical data, and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO₂) values were collected for each patient in cardiac arrest by the emergency physician. We hypothesized that an end-tidal carbon dioxide level of 1.9 kPa (14.3 mmHg) or more after 20 minutes of standard advanced cardiac life support would predict restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Results

PetCO₂ after 20 minutes of advanced life support averaged 0.92 ± 0.29 kPa (6.9 ± 2.2 mmHg) in patients who did not have ROSC and 4.36 ± 1.11 kPa (32.8 ± 9.1 mmHg) in those who did (P < 0.001). End-tidal carbon dioxide values of 1.9 kPa (14.3 mmHg) or less discriminated between the 402 patients with ROSC and 335 patients without. When a 20-minute end-tidal carbon dioxide value of 1.9 kPa (14.3 mmHg) or less was used as a screening test to predict ROSC, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were all 100%.

Conclusions

End-tidal carbon dioxide levels of more than 1.9 kPa (14.3 mmHg) after 20 minutes may be used to predict ROSC with accuracy. End-tidal carbon dioxide levels should be monitored during CPR and considered a useful prognostic value for determining the outcome of resuscitative efforts and when to cease CPR in the field.

Monitoring the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Numerous recent reports have described limitations in the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Thus, there has been increasing interest in the techniques available to monitor quality. This review focuses on the major publications since the review published by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation in 2005. Some key articles published prior to this time period have also been included.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of devices can monitor various components of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. End-tidal CO2 measurement assists in confirming placement of endotracheal tubes, correlates with cardiac output and detects the return of spontaneous circulation. Turbine flow-meters monitor respiratory rate and tidal volume. Transthoracic impedance monitoring measures respiratory rate, and may assist in confirmation of endotracheal tube placement. A new mechanical device (CPREzy) and a new defibrillator/monitor allow estimation of depth (and rate) of compressions. Ventricular-fibrillation waveform analysis may facilitate better timing of defibrillation. Echocardiography detects conditions that may impair the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

SUMMARY

Many options are available to monitor the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Some have significant limitations, and others are only readily available in hospital. The use of the information from this more intensive monitoring promises to improve outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Immediate post-shock chest compressions improve outcome from prolonged ventricular fibrillation

AIM

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that immediate post-shock chest compressions improve outcome from prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) compared with typical "hands off" period (i.e., delayed post-shock compressions) associated with AED use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After 7.5 min of untreated VF, 36 domestic swine (26+/-1 kg) were treated with 200 J biphasic shocks and randomly assigned to: (1) 1 min of immediate post-shock chest compressions or (2) simulated pre-hospital automated external defibrillator (AED) care with delays in post-shock chest compressions. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) occurred in 7/18 immediate chest compressions animals within 2 min of the first shock versus 0/18 AED animals (P<0.01). Ten of 18 immediate chest compressions animals attained ROSC compared with 3/18 AED animals (P<0.05). Nine of 18 immediate chest compressions swine were alive at 24 and 48 h compared with 3/18 AED swine (P<0.05). All 48-h survivors had good neurologic outcomes. Among the 21 animals that defibrillated with the first shock, ROSC was attained in 7/10 immediate chest compressions animals within 2 min of the first shock compared with 0/11 AED animals (P=0.001), and 48-h survival was attained in 8/10 versus 3/11, respectively (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate post-shock chest compressions can substantially improve outcome from prolonged VF compared with simulated pre-hospital AED care.

Safety, feasibility, and hemodynamic and blood flow effects of active compression-decompression of thorax and abdomen in patients with cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

During closed chest compression for cardiac arrest, any increase in coronary perfusion pressure accounts for a proportional increase in myocardial blood flow and therefore the resuscitability of the patient. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and hemodynamic effects of phased chest and abdominal compression-decompression and to compare it with mechanical chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

DESIGN

In this prospective, single-center, phase II study, we compared patients treated with the Datascope Lifestick Resuscitator with patients who had been treated with mechanical precordial compression.

SETTING

Emergency department of a tertiary care university hospital.

PATIENTS

We included 31 patients with cardiac arrest who had received cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department.

INTERVENTIONS

The Lifestick device was used in 20 patients. In 11 patients, mechanical chest compression with the Thumper device was used as a control intervention.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We evaluated the safety, feasibility, and hemodynamic effects of both interventions and observed, with the help of echocardiography, the mechanisms through which blood flow was generated. We found no significant difference between the use of the Lifestick device and standard chest compression with the Thumper device in resuscitations. Most operators regarded the Lifestick as a feasible alternative to the Thumper. We could observe a mean increase in coronary perfusion pressure of 9.33 mm Hg (interquartile range, 1.96-14.36; p = .08) and an increase of end-tidal CO2 of 10 mm Hg (interquartile range, 5-16; p = .003) (1333Pa [interquartile range, 665-2133]) during resuscitation with the Lifestick compared with using the Thumper.

CONCLUSION

In this preliminary study, resuscitation with the Lifestick was found to be safe and feasible. The design of the study and small number of patients included in it limit the conclusions about the hemodynamic effects of the Lifestick.

Basic life support

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases the chances of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Existing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates are poor. There are several strategies for increasing the frequency and effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. These include simplifying the technique for basic life support, emphasizing the importance of compressions over ventilation, reducing the length of training by using video-based self-instruction and widening the range of those trained to include school children.

RECENT FINDINGS

A change in compression-ventilation ratio from 15: 2 to 30: 2 increases the number of compressions delivered. There is some evidence that compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation may increase survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Video-based self-instruction enables laypeople to be trained in basic life support in a fraction of the time of traditional courses. School children can be taught basic life support and can be used to help disseminate the skill.

SUMMARY

The optimal basic life support technique that will generate the highest survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has not been determined, but there is increasing evidence that the existing technique needs to be simplified. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival but it needs to be undertaken more frequently if overall survival rates are to be improved significantly.

Effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Previous animal and clinical studies suggest that bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation may be superior to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Our hypothesis was that both cardiac-only bystander resuscitation and conventional bystander CPR would improve outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of < or = 15 minutes' duration, whereas the addition of rescue breathing would improve outcomes for cardiac arrests lasting > 15 minutes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We carried out a prospective, population-based, observational study involving consecutive patients with emergency responder resuscitation attempts from May 1, 1998, through April 30, 2003. The primary outcome measure was 1-year survival with favorable neurological outcome. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between type of CPR and outcomes. Among the 4902 witnessed cardiac arrests, 783 received conventional CPR, and 544 received cardiac-only resuscitation. Excluding very-long-duration cardiac arrests (> 15 minutes), the cardiac-only resuscitation yielded a higher rate of 1-year survival with favorable neurological outcome than no bystander CPR (4.3% versus 2.5%; odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.95), and conventional CPR showed similar effectiveness (4.1%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.60). For the very-long-duration arrests, neurologically favorable 1-year survival was greater in the conventional CPR group, but there were few survivors regardless of the type of bystander CPR (0.3% [2 of 624], 0% [0 of 92], and 2.2% [3 of 139] in the no bystander CPR, cardiac-only CPR, and conventional CPR groups, respectively; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation and conventional CPR are similarly effective for most adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. For very prolonged cardiac arrests, the addition of rescue breathing may be of some help.

The Save Hearts in Arizona Registry and Education (SHARE) program: Who is performing CPR and where are they doing it?

BACKGROUND

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decreases mortality from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest significantly. Accordingly, layperson CPR is an integral component in the chain of survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. The near statewide incidence and location of layperson CPR is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine true incidence and location of layperson CPR in the State of Arizona.

METHODS

The Save Hearts in Arizona Registry and Education (SHARE) program reviewed EMS first care reports submitted voluntarily by 30 municipal fire departments responsible for approximately 67% of Arizona's population. In addition to standard Utstein style data, information regarding the performance of bystander CPR, the vocation and medical training of the bystander and the location of the arrest were documented.

RESULTS

The total number of out-of-hospital adult arrests of presumed cardiac etiology reported statewide was 1097. Cardiac arrests occurred in private residences in 67%, extended care or medical facilities in 18%, and public locations in 15%. Bystander CPR was performed in 37% of all arrests, 24% of residential arrests, 76% of extended care or medical facility arrests, and 52% of public arrests. Bystander CPR provided an odds ratio of 2.2 for survival [95% CI 1.2-4.1]. Excluding cardiac arrests which occurred in the presence of bystanders with formal CPR training as part of their job description, layperson CPR was performed in 218 of 857 (25%) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The near statewide incidence of layperson CPR is extremely low. This low rate of bystander CPR is likely to contribute to the low overall survival rates from cardiac arrest. Public health officials should re-evaluate current models of public education on CPR.

Continuous passive oxygen insufflation results in a similar outcome to positive pressure ventilation in a swine model of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The deleterious effects of positive pressure ventilation may be prevented by substituting passive oxygen insufflation during advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

METHODS

We compared 24-h neurologically normal survival among three different ventilation scenarios for ACLS in a realistic swine model of out-of-hospital prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest. No bystander CPR was provided during the first 8 min of untreated VF before the simulated arrival of an emergency medical system (EMS). Thirty-six swine were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups. Group I (standard ventilation) was mechanically ventilated at 10 respirations per minute (RPM) at a tidal volume (TV) of 10 ml/kg with 100% oxygen. Group II (hyperventilation) was ventilated at 35 RPM at a TV of 20 ml/kg with 100% oxygen. In Group III (insufflation) animals, a nasal cannula was placed in the oropharynx to administer oxygen continuously at 10 l/min.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the 24h neurologically normal survival among groups (standard: 2/12, hyperventilation: 2/12, insufflation: 4/12; p=.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Passive insufflation may be an acceptable alternative to the currently recommended positive pressure ventilation during resuscitation efforts for out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest. Potential advantages of this technique include: (1) easier to teach, (2) easier to administer, (3) prevention of the adverse effects of positive pressure ventilation and (4) allows EMS personnel to concentrate upon other critically important duties.

Ability of citizens in a senior living community to perform lifesaving cardiac skills and appropriately utilize AEDs

The objective of this study was to assess the ability of citizens in a senior living community (SLC) to perform adequate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and appropriately utilize an automated external defibrillator (AED) in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario (SCAS). This study was a prospective, observational study; a convenience sample of SLC residents aged > 54 years was enrolled. Subjects were presented with a SCAS (adult mannequin, bystander available to assist, AED visible). Subjects' skills were rated in standardized fashion. For statistical analysis, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as appropriate. There were 51 subjects; 69% were female; mean age was 64 years; 86% were without disabilities. Pre-retirement professions included: medical (13.7%), office/sales (41.2%), and engineer/science (15.7%). Subjects had previous American Heart Association first-responder training (CPR and AED use) as follows: none (22%), within 0 to 6 months (47%), 7-12 months (4%), > 12 months (27%). During the SCAS, subjects performed inconsistently on the various links in the chain of survival. Although most subjects (94%; 95% CI 84-99%) checked for unresponsiveness, only 62.8% (95% CI 48-76%) also specified "call 911 and bring me the AED." Most subjects (88%; 95% CI 76-96%) started chest compressions, however, only a minority provided high quality chest compressions (29%; 95% CI 17-44%). With respect to AED skill performance, we noted the following: 94% (95% CI 84-99%) of subjects removed the patient's clothing, 90% (95% CI 79-97%) turned the device on, 94% delivered a shock as directed, and 82% continued CPR if "no shock indicated" by AED (95% CI 69-92%). Performance was less satisfactory for the following: only 39.2% (95% CI 26-54%) continued chest compressions after AED arrival, 60.8% (95% CI 46-74%) of subjects correctly attached electrodes, and 6% (95% CI 1-16%) verbalized "clear" in advance of shock. Although many members of our sample SLC had prior training, they frequently failed to adequately perform some key steps in the SCAS. Recent efforts to place AEDs in SLCs should be augmented by a plan to adequately train residents and other available individuals (e.g., staff) in CPR/AED use.

Compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bystanders and first responders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current resuscitation guidelines consider ventilation and chest compression essential components of resuscitation and therefore only one methodology, standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, is explicitly recommended for the treatment of both respiratory and cardiac arrests. Pathophysiological and experimental observations argue that this generalization results in suboptimal treatment for victims of cardiac arrest.

RECENT FINDINGS

For more than a decade animal studies have demonstrated that assisted ventilation is not essential during the initial treatment of a fibrillatory arrest; but only in the last year have these results been confirmed in humans. These new observations come from a handful of systems utilizing cardiocerebral resuscitation in their prehospital resuscitation of adult victims of presumed cardiac arrest. They have all demonstrated a dramatic increase in survival. Recent data also indicate that survival is significantly increased when laypersons perform chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

SUMMARY

The current resuscitation guidelines regarding the prehospital treatment of victims of adult cardiac arrest should be modified to explicitly permit the use of continuous-chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

The new American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines: should children and adults have to share?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The latest American Heart Association guidelines for pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were published in December 2005. Changes from the 2000 guidelines were directed toward simplifying CPR. Infants, children, and adults now share the same recommendation for the initial compression:ventilation ratio. This is a significant change for pediatricians trained in the importance of a respiratory etiology of pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest. The present review will focus on the rationale behind these guideline changes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The new guidelines for single rescuer CPR include a compression:ventilation ratio of 30: 2 for both adult and pediatric victims. The impetus for this recommendation is based on recent appreciation for the deleterious effects of hyperventilation as well as an attempt to increase bystander delivery of CPR. The physiologic results of hyperventilation are discussed. The new pediatric basic life support guideline changes are underscored. Research representing the spectrum of opinions on the optimal compression:ventilation ratio, including compression-only CPR, is presented.

SUMMARY

Although based primarily on adult, animal, and computational models, the new compression:ventilation ratio, recommended for both initial pediatric and adult CPR, is a reasonable recommendation. The simplified CPR guidelines released in 2005 will hopefully contribute to improved bystander delivery of CPR and improved outcome.

Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation

OBJECTIVES

Continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCC-CPR) has been advocated as an alternative to standard CPR (STD-CPR). Studies have shown that CCC-CPR delivers substantially more chest compressions per minute and is easier to remember and perform than STD-CPR. One concern regarding CCC-CPR is that the rescuer may fatigue and be unable to maintain adequate compression rate or depth throughout an average emergency medical services response time. The specific aim of this study was to compare the effects of fatigue on the performance of CCC-CPR and STD-CPR on a manikin model.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized crossover study involving 53 medical students performing CCC-CPR and STD-CPR on a manikin model. Students were randomized to their initial CPR group and then performed the other type of CPR after a period of at least two days. Students were evaluated on their performance of 9 minutes of CPR for each method. The primary endpoint was the number of adequate chest compressions (at least 38 mm of compression depth) delivered per minute during each of the 9 minutes. The secondary endpoints were total compressions, compression rate, and the number of breaks taken for rest. The students' performance was evaluated on the basis of Skillreporter Resusci Anne (Laerdal, Wappingers Falls, NY) recordings. Primary and secondary endpoints were analyzed by using the generalized linear mixed model for counting data.

RESULTS

In the first 2 minutes, participants delivered significantly more adequate compressions per minute with CCC-CPR than STD-CPR, (47 vs. 32, p = 0.004 in the 1st minute and 39 vs. 29, p = 0.04 in the 2nd minute). For minutes 3 through 9, the differences in number of adequate compressions between groups were not significant. Evaluating the 9 minutes of CPR as a whole, there were significantly more adequate compressions in CCC-CPR vs. STD-CPR (p = 0.0003). Although the number of adequate compressions per minute declined over time in both groups, the rate of decline was significantly greater in CCC-CPR compared with STD-CPR (p = 0.0003). The mean number of total compressions delivered in the first minute was significantly greater with CCC-CPR than STD-CPR (105 per minute vs. 58 per minute, p < 0.001) and did not change over 9 minutes in either group. There were no differences in compression rates or number of breaks between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CCC-CPR resulted in more adequate compressions per minute than STD-CPR for the first 2 minutes of CPR. However, the difference diminished after 3 minutes, presumably as a result of greater rescuer fatigue with CCC-CPR. Overall, CCC-CPR resulted in more total compressions per minute than STD-CPR during the entire 9 minutes of resuscitation.

Three-phase model of cardiac arrest: time-dependent benefit of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Evidence has suggested that the pathophysiology of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest may consist of 3 time-sensitive phases: electrical, circulatory, and metabolic. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults in a metropolitan county who had had witnessed ventricular fibrillation arrest before emergency medical services were undertaken to investigate this 3-phase model with regard to bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We hypothesized that the survival benefit from bystander CPR depends on the collapse-to-shock interval, with the highest benefit occurring during the circulatory phase. The collapse-to-shock interval was a priori grouped into 4 categories: 1 to 5, 6 to 7, 8 to 10, and > or = 11 minutes. We used logistic regression analysis to assess whether the association between CPR and survival to hospital discharge depended on the collapse-to-shock interval category. Of the 2,193 events meeting the inclusion criteria, 67.0% had received bystander CPR. The average collapse-to-shock interval was 8.2 +/- 2.8 minutes. The survival rate was 33.4%. A higher likelihood of survival was associated with bystander CPR (odds ratio [OR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 to 1.73) and a shorter collapse-to-shock interval (OR -1.84, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.10, for each additional SD of 2.8 minutes less) after adjustment. The beneficial association of CPR increased as the collapse-to-shock interval increased (p = 0.05 for interaction). The bystander CPR was associated with an OR of survival of 0.96 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.46) for a 1- to 5-minute collapse-to shock interval, OR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.58) for a 6- to 7-minute interval, OR of 1.62 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.11) for an 8- to 10-minute interval, and OR of 2.11 (95% CI 1.32 to 3.37) for an > or = 11-minute interval. The results of this investigation support a phased model of ventricular fibrillation arrest. The findings suggest that the transition from the electrical to circulatory phase may occur at about 5 minutes, and the circulatory phase may extend to 15 minutes.

Cardiocerebral resuscitation improves survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

PURPOSE

The guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have been in place for decades; but despite their international scope and periodic updates, there has been little improvement in survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for patients who did not receive early defibrillation. The Emergency Medical Service directors in 2 rural Wisconsin counties initiated a new protocol for the pre-hospital management of adult cardiac arrest victims in an attempt to improve survival rates. The results observed after implementation of this protocol are presented and compared with those observed during a three-year period that preceded initiation of the project.

METHODS

The protocol, based upon the principles of cardiocerebral resuscitation, was significantly different from the standard CPR protocol. A major objective was to minimize interruptions of chest compressions. Each defibrillation, including the first, was preceded by 200 uninterrupted chest compressions. Single shocks, rather than stacked shocks, were utilized. Post shock rhythm and pulse checks were eliminated, and chest compressions were resumed immediately after a shock was delivered. Initial airway management was limited to an oral pharyngeal device and supplemental oxygen. If the arrest was witnessed, assisted ventilations and intubation were delayed until either a return of spontaneous circulation or until three series of "compressions + analysis +/- shock" were completed.

RESULTS

In the 3 years preceding the change in protocol, where standard CPR was utilized, there were 92 witnessed out-of-hospital adult cardiac arrests with an initially shockable rhythm. Eighteen patients survived, and 14 of 92 (15%) were neurologically intact. After implementing the new protocol in early 2004, there were 33 witnessed out-of-hospital adult cardiac arrests with an initially shockable rhythm. Nineteen survived, and 16 of 33 (48%) were neurologically normal. Differences in both total and neurologically normal survival are significant (chi-squared = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Instituting the new cardiocerebral resuscitation protocol for managing prehospital cardiac arrest improved survival of adult patients with witnessed cardiac arrest and an initially shockable rhythm.

Cardiocerebral resuscitation for cardiac arrest

Survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest continue to be low despite periodic updates in the Guidelines for Emergency Medical Services and periodic improvements such as the addition of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs). The low incidence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), substantial time without chest compressions throughout the resuscitation effort, and a lack of response to initial defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation contribute to these unacceptably poor results. Resuscitation guidelines are only revised every 5 to 7 years and can be difficult to change because of the lack of randomized controlled trials in humans. Such trials are rare because of a number of logistical difficulties, including the problem of obtaining informed consent. An alternative approach to advancing resuscitation science is for evidence-based demonstration projects in areas that have adequate records, so that one may determine whether the new approach improves survival. This is reasonable because the current guidelines make provisions for deviations under certain local circumstances or as directed by the emergency medical services medical director. A wealth of experimental evidence indicates that interruption of chest compressions for any reason in patients with cardiac arrest is deleterious. Accordingly, a new approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest called cardiocerebral resuscitation (CCR) was developed that places more emphasis on chest compressions for witnessed cardiac arrest in adults and de-emphasizes ventilation. There is also emphasis on chest compressions before defibrillation in circulatory phase of cardiac arrest. CCR was initiated in Tucson, Arizona, in November 2003, and in two rural Wisconsin counties in early 2004.