Cocaine-related aortic dissection in perspective

Cocaine mediated apoptosis of vascular cells as a mechanism for carotid artery dissection leading to ischemic stroke

In arterial dissection, blood may enter the arterial wall through an intimal tear, splitting the arterial wall and activating the coagulation cascade at the site of endothelial damage. Dissection of extracranial and intracranial vessels may lead to ischemic stroke through thromboembolic or hemodynamic mechanisms. Major blunt trauma or rapid acceleration-deceleration may cause dissection, but in patients with inherent arterial wall weakness, dissection can occur spontaneously or as a result of minor neck movement. Cocaine use has been associated with dissection of the aortic arch and coronary and renal arteries through cocaine-mediated hypertension. Recent preclinical studies have suggested, however, that cocaine may cause apoptosis of cells in the vascular wall. In this article, we postulate that cocaine may cause apoptosis of vascular endothelial and/or smooth muscle cells, thus weakening the vascular wall and resulting in a dissection-prone state. We review the literature and propose a biological basis for vasculopathy, vascular dissection, and ischemic stroke in the setting of cocaine use. Further research studies on vascular cells, as well as focused analysis of human pathological material, will be important in providing evidence for or against our hypotheses.

Causes and histopathology of ascending aortic disease in children and young adults

BACKGROUND

Ascending aortic diseases (aneurysms, dissections, and stenosis) and associated aortic valve disease are rare but important causes of morbidity and mortality in children and young adults. Certain genetic causes, such as Marfan syndrome and congenital bicuspid aortic valve disease, are well known. However, other rarer genetic and nongenetic causes of aortic disease exist.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature search to identify known causes of ascending aortic pathology in children and young adults. We catalogued both aortic pathologies and other defining systemic features of these diseases.

RESULTS

We describe 17 predominantly genetic entities that have been associated with thoracic aortic disease in this age group.

CONCLUSIONS

While extensive literature on the common causes of ascending aortic disease exists, there is a need for better histologic documentation of aortic pathology in rarer diseases.

A regional quality improvement effort to increase beta blocker administration before vascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a regional quality improvement effort can increase beta-blocker utilization prior to vascular surgery and decrease the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction (POMI).

METHODS

A quality improvement effort to increase perioperative beta blocker utilization was implemented in 2003 at centers participating in the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE). A 90% target was set and feedback given at biannual meetings. Beta blocker utilization (<1 month preoperative versus chronic) and POMI rates were prospectively collected for patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (n = 926) and lower extremity bypass (LEB; n = 2,123) from 2003 through 2008. Predictors of POMI were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Rates of beta blocker administration and POMI were analyzed over time, and across strata of patient risk based on a multivariate model.

RESULTS

Perioperative beta blocker treatment increased from 68% of patients in the first 3 months of 2005 to 88% by the last 3 months of 2008 (P < .001). In 2003, 44% of patients not on chronic beta blockers were treated with preoperative beta blockers; by 2008, 78% of patients not on chronic beta blockers were started perioperatively on these medications (P < .001). Beta blocker utilization increased across all centers and surgeons participating during the study period, and increased in patients of low, medium, and high cardiac risk. However, the rate of POMI did not change over time (5.2% in 2003, 5.5% in 2008; P = .876), although a trend towards lower POMI rate was seen in patients on preoperative beta blockers (4.4% in 2003-2005, 2.6% in 2006-2008; P = .43). In multivariable modeling we found that age >70 (odds ratio [OR], 2.1), positive stress test (OR, 2.2), congestive heart failure (CHF; OR, 1.7), chronic beta blocker administration (OR, 1.7), resting heart rate <70 (OR, 1.8), and diabetes (OR, 1.6) were associated with POMI. Resting heart rate was similar for patients on chronic (67), preoperative (70), and no beta blockers (70; P = .521).

CONCLUSIONS

Our regional quality improvement effort successfully increased perioperative beta blocker utilization. However, this was not associated with reduced rates of POMI or resting heart rate. While this demonstrates the effectiveness of regional quality improvement efforts in changing practice patterns, further work is necessary to more precisely identify those patients who will benefit from beta blockade at the time of vascular surgery.

Utility of B-type natriuretic Peptide for predicting perioperative cardiovascular events in patients without history of cardiovascular disease undergoing major non-cardiac surgery

Background and Objectives

Patients without previous history of cardiac disease can be regarded as low-risk when undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to examine whether preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level predicted postoperative cardiac events in these patients.

Subjects and Methods

Preoperative BNP level was measured in 163 patients whose risk was considered low according to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. Postoperative cardiac events, including death during hospitalization, myocardial injury, arrhythmia, cerebrovascular accidents and congestive heart failure were assessed.

Results

Postoperative cardiac events occurred in 8 patients (4.9%). Preoperative BNP levels were significantly higher among patients who experienced postoperative cardiac events, compared to those who did not (130.6±148.8 vs. 57.9±70.8 pg/mL, p=0.009).

Conclusion

Preoperative BNP level may provide prognostic information in low-risk patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery.

Anesthesiologists' preferences for preoperative cardiac evaluation before vascular surgery: results of a mail survey

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether anesthesiologists' decisions to request preoperative cardiac evaluation (cardiologist consultation, echocardiography, and cardiac stress testing) before vascular surgery were influenced by patient comorbidity and magnitude of surgery; and to explore whether factors unrelated to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines influence these decisions.

DESIGN

Survey instrument.

SETTING

University medical center.

SUBJECTS

2,000 U.S. anesthesiologists who were mailed a survey.

MEASUREMENTS

Six factors in a hypothetical patient presenting for vascular surgery [gender, race (white vs. black), age (65 yrs vs. 85 yrs), comorbidities (sick vs. healthy), functional status, and magnitude of surgical stress] were evaluated. Respondents were asked about their demographics, practice patterns, and how they would manage the hypothetical patient.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 2,000 mailed surveys, 439 U.S. anesthesiologists responded (22%). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis showed that anesthesiologists were more likely to recommend preoperative cardiology consultation for patients with more comorbidities [odds ratio = 5.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.76, 8.15], for those with poorer functional status (odds ratio = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.02, 2.07), for those undergoing a more significant surgery (odds ratio = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.13, 2.30), as the clinicians' estimated risk of perioperative myocardial infarction increased (P < 0.001), or if they only infrequently anesthetized patients such as the one described in the scenario (P = 0.05). They also would request a preoperative echocardiogram for patients with more comorbidities (odds ratio = 2.58; 95% CI = 1.80, 3.68) and for those undergoing a more significant surgery (odds ratio = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.12, 2.25). A preoperative stress test was recommended for patients with more comorbidities (odds ratio = 3.01; 95% CI = 2.06, 4.38) and for those with a more significant surgery (odds ratio = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.15, 2.63). Other factors associated with request for a preoperative stress test were female gender of the anesthesiologist (odds ratio = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.11, 2.87), those with less experience with such patients (P = 0.05), and those from New England (odds ratio = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.01, 4.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Anesthesiologists' preferences for preoperative cardiac evaluation are generally consistent with evidence-based and expert-based AHA/ACC guidelines. However, other physician factors (ie, gender, years in practice, and familiarity with the surgical procedure) also influenced these decisions.

Risk of adverse events after coronary artery bypass graft and subsequent noncardiac surgery

Aims: Coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) are increasingly performed in elderly patients. Risk factors and outcomes are poorly described for those undergoing noncardiac surgery within 1 year after CABG. Our objectives were to assess the risk and predictors of major adverse events associated with noncardiac surgery within 1 year after CABG. Methods: In a retrospective review of medical records at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA), over a period of 5 years, we identified patients who underwent noncardiac procedures within 1 year post-CABG. All events that occurred within 30 days after noncardiac surgery and deaths within 1 year after noncardiac surgery were considered to be related to CABG. Results: We identified 211 patients; of these, 21 patients had 24 adverse events. Within 1 year, 11 died, and within the first 30 days, three myocardial infarctions, six acute congestive heart failure episodes, three cerebrovascular accidents and one deep vein thrombosis episode had occurred. Predictors of an adverse event included emergency operation (odds ratio: 6.8), ejection fraction less than 45% (p < 0.001) and elevated right ventricular systolic pressure by 40 mmHg or more (p = 0.03). After the noncardiac procedure, patients requiring dialysis (p = 0.02), ventilatory support (p = 0.03) and longer hospital stay (p = 0.03) had greater rates of adverse outcomes. Conclusion: Post-CABG, preoperative ejection fraction less than 45%, right ventricular systolic pressure of 40 mmHg or more, as well as emergent noncardiac surgery, were predictors of adverse outcomes after the noncardiac procedure. Longer postoperative hospital stay, dialysis, as well as ventilatory support, were predictors of adverse outcomes after CABG.

Preliminary report on a sonographic method to determine the location of the intimal breach in Stanford type B aortic dissection

Using a defined angle T, which can be measured noninvasively using Doppler ultrasound, we aim to determine the location of the intimal breach in Stanford type B aortic dissection (AD) and estimate the risk of AD using that measurement. Our subjects included 86 healthy volunteers, 60 hypertensive patients, and 42 patients with Stanford type B AD. We used dual functional color Doppler ultrasound to locate the central point of the high-speed flow zone within the descending aorta, and then calculated the angle T, using the law of cosines. In addition, we measured the degree of distortion within the descending aorta using Line BD, defined as the distance from the lateral edge of the left subclavian artery (LSA) to the center of the breach in the intima in AD. The value of T was approximately 24° ± 3° and was constant across all 3 groups. In addition, the increase in BD distance corresponded to increased distortion in the descending aorta between the LSA and the region of aortic artery ligament (RAALE). We found that when the preoperative BD was less than 2.6 cm, the aortic arch could be straightened, using a stent-graft, to approximate the normal aorta. When the preoperative BD is less than 2.6 cm, the aortic arch can be corrected using a stent. In addition, since the T angle is constant, we speculate that it can be used to predict the risk of intimal breach and estimate its location using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to guide surgery.

The diagnosis and management of aortic dissection

Aortic dissection represents the most common aortic emergency, affecting 3 to 4 per 100,000 people per year and is still associated with a high mortality. Twenty percent of the patients with aortic dissection die before reaching hospital and 30% die during hospital admission. Aortic dissections may be classified in 3 ways: according to their anatomical extent (the Stanford or DeBakey systems), according to the time from onset (acute or chronic), and according to the underlying pathology (the European Society of Cardiologists' system). Advances in endovascular technology have provided new treatment options. Hybrid endovascular and conventional open surgical repair represent the mainstay of treatment for acute type A dissection. Medical management remains the gold standard for acute and uncomplicated chronic type B dissection, though endovascular surgery offers exciting potential in the management of complicated type B dissection through sealing of the intimal entry tear.

Evaluation of coronary CTA Appropriateness Criteria in an academic medical center

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate published appropriateness criteria for CT angiography (CTA) at the authors' academic medical center.

METHODS

Two observers independently reviewed the medical records of 251 patients who had undergone dual-source coronary CTA from June 1 to December 31, 2007. Patients were assigned to indications from 1 of 7 tables from the American College of Cardiology Foundation and ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Agreement between the two observers was assessed using kappa statistics. Disagreements were resolved by consensus panel. The final numbers of appropriate, uncertain, inappropriate, and not classifiable indications were recorded.

RESULTS

Indications for testing were classified as appropriate in 69 patients (27%), inappropriate in 42 patients (17%), and uncertain in 25 patients (10%). One hundred fifteen indications for coronary CTA (46%) were not classifiable. Analysis of interobserver variability for overall appropriateness yielded a kappa value of 0.31, which was considered to indicate fair agreement.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that a significant proportion (46%) of the coronary CTA studies performed at the authors' institution are for indications that are not covered by the published appropriateness criteria. Modifications to these criteria could help decrease the number of studies that are not classifiable. Physician education could decrease the number of inappropriate studies.

[Perioperative beta-receptor blockade. For and against]

Results from recent studies have questioned the application of beta-receptor blockers for reduction of morbidity and mortality during the perioperative period. This holds true especially for patients with no or only low cardiac risk. Although beta-receptor blockade was a form of standard therapy at the end of the 1990s, data today show no clear evidence for such a therapy not even in patients at risk for cardiac events. At least in patients with low risk the initiation of beta-receptor blockade during the perioperative period might lead to side-effects, thereby increasing morbidity and mortality.

To continue or discontinue aspirin in the perioperative period: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) are a common cause of death after non-cardiac surgery. Despite evidence for the benefit of aspirin for secondary prevention, it is often discontinued in the perioperative period due to the risk of bleeding.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in order to compare the effect of low-dose aspirin with that of placebo on myocardial damage, cardiovascular, and bleeding complications in high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Aspirin (75 mg) or placebo was given 7 days before surgery and continued until the third postoperative day. Patients were followed up for 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients were enrolled, 109 patients received aspirin and 111 received placebo. Four patients (3.7%) in the aspirin group and 10 patients (9.0%) in the placebo group had elevated troponin T levels in the postoperative period (P=0.10). Twelve patients (5.4%) had an MACE during the first 30 postoperative days. Two of these patients (1.8%) were in the aspirin group and 10 patients (9.0%) were in the placebo group (P=0.02). Treatment with aspirin resulted in a 7.2% absolute risk reduction [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-13%] for postoperative MACE. The relative risk reduction was 80% (95% CI, 9.2-95%). Numbers needed to treat were 14 (95% CI, 7.6-78). No significant differences in bleeding complications were seen between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, perioperative aspirin reduced the risk of MACE without increasing bleeding complications. However, the study was not powered to evaluate bleeding complications.

Cocaine and aortic dissection

Aortic dissection is a rare, potentially catastrophic vascular emergency. Early recognition of the clinical manifestations, rapid confirmation using imaging modalities, urgent administration of appropriate medication and expedient selection of definitive long-term therapy are key to preserving life and reducing morbidity. In recent years it has become increasingly clear that there is a relation between cocaine and aortic dissection. Cocaine serves as both a predisposing factor to aortic dissection due to its effect on aortic connective tissue and as a precipitating factor due to its propensity to produce abrupt and severe hypertension. While similarities exist in the clinical features and diagnostic methods between cocaine-related aortic dissection and aortic dissection unrelated to cocaine use, there are important differences in management between these two syndromes which are rooted in the pharmacology and physiology of cocaine. An understanding of these differences is key to effective early and long-term management of cocaine-related aortic dissection.

Perioperative beta-blockers for vascular surgery patients

Perioperative beta-blocker therapy has been a heavily investigated and controversial topic during the past decade. Prior national consensus statements that recommended the routine use of these medications in patients undergoing high-risk surgical procedures have been called into question because of the results of recent clinical trials that involved heterogeneous groups of surgical patients. This article reviews the evidence for perioperative beta-blocker usage as it pertains to patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures. The weight of evidence suggests that beta-blockers lower the perioperative risk of myocardial ischemia or infarction and cardiovascular death among patients with clinical risk factors undergoing major vascular surgery. However, there appears to be a concurrent risk of adverse events associated with these medications if patients are not monitored properly during the perioperative period. Perioperative beta-blockers should continue to occupy a prominent role in the therapeutic armamentarium for improving outcomes among high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery.

Is there an effect of perioperative blood pressure on intraoperative complications during phacoemulsification surgery under local anaesthesia?

PURPOSE

The practice of deferring phacoemulsification procedure on recording raised blood pressure (BP) in the immediate perioperative period is based on the perception of increased intraoperative risk. The significance of perioperative BP recordings on the surgical complications during phacoemulsification procedure was evaluated.

SETTING

Hairmyres Hospitals, Lanarkshire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were classified as hypertensive on the basis of the British Hypertension Society Guidelines. BP recordings during preoperative assessment, admission, and 1-hour postoperatively were recorded in 734 hypertensives and 740 normotensives undergoing phacoemulsification procedure. In addition, BP recordings in the holding area before giving local anaesthesia were noted in the 734 hypertensives. Patient's peri- and intraoperative complications during the procedure were noted.

RESULTS

The mean age was 72+/-10.5 years and 74+/-11.6 years among the hypertensives and normotensives. There was a significant increase in the number of hypertensives who developed isolated systolic hypertension in the holding area (95% confidence interval=2.82, P<0.001) where the mean BP was 171.38/78.31 mm Hg (+/-30.55/16.29). A total of 21 hypertensives and 18 normotensives developed intraoperative complications during the phacoemulsification procedure. There was no significant difference (P=0.41) in the intraoperative complications between the hypertensives and normotensives.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative increase in BP noted in the holding area among hypertensives did not increase the risk of surgical complications during phacoemulsification procedure when compared with normotensives. We recommend that BP should not be routinely measured in the holding area before phacoemulsification surgery under local anaesthesia.

Perioperative management of patients with renal disease

The patient who has renal disease is susceptible to many potential complications during the perioperative period. The prevention of postoperative acute renal failure (ARF), especially in patients who have existing chronic kidney disease, and management of patients who have end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are undergoing surgery are challenging. Elimination of risk factors for ARF and early diagnosis of ARF should improve patient outcomes. For patients who have ESRD, a thorough and comprehensive evaluation is necessary to decrease morbidity and mortality associated with the end-organ damage. This article reviews the prevention of postoperative ARF and the perioperative management of patients who have ESRD who are undergoing surgery.

Erectile dysfunction after prostatectomy: an evaluation of the risk factors

OBJECTIVE

The occurrence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients who have undergone prostatectomy has been assessed in the previous studies; however, its rate and risk factors vary in different studies. This study was conducted to assess the possible risk factors for ED after prostatectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 246 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who were candidates for either open prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were admitted in this study during a period of 3 years between December 2000 and December 2003. Cardiac risk index was assessed before the operation using American Heart Association guidelines and erectile function was assessed both preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. Patients with moderate to severe ED according to the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function were considered as ED afflicted. In this study, the prevalence of preoperative ED, the incidence of postoperative ED, and those conditions that could lead to an increase in the incidence of postoperative ED in either procedure were determined.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 63.7+/-9.7 years. The prevalence rates of preoperative ED were 24.6% and 25.9% in TURP and open prostatectomy groups, respectively. Among patients with no or mild ED preoperatively, 12.5% showed moderate to severe ED postoperatively (13.4% in TURP group vs 11.25% in open prostatectomy group).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of postoperative ED after prostatectomy was 12.5%. Risk factors for its appearance included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, higher transfusion rates, higher cardiac risk index and an older age.

Image-guided radiofrequency ablation of lung neoplasm in 100 consecutive patients by a thoracic surgical service

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer or selected patients with pulmonary metastases. However, for high-risk patients radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may offer an alternative option. The objective of this study was to evaluate computed tomography-guided RFA for high-risk patients and report our initial experience in 100 consecutive patients by a thoracic surgical service.

METHODS

Medically inoperable patients were offered RFA. Thoracic surgeons evaluated and performed RFA under computed tomography guidance. Patients were followed in the thoracic surgery clinic. The primary end point evaluated was overall survival.

RESULTS

One hundred patients underwent image-guided RFA for lung neoplasm (40 men, 60 women; median age, 73.5 years; range, 26 to 95 years). Forty-six patients (46%) with primary lung neoplasm, 25 patients (25%) with recurrent cancer, and 29 patients (29%) with pulmonary metastases underwent RFA. The mean follow-up for alive patients was 17 months. The median overall survival for the entire group of patients was 23 months. The probabilities of 2-year overall survival for the entire group, primary lung cancer patients, recurrent cancer patients, and metastatic cancer patients were 49% (95% confidence interval, 37 to 60), 50% (95% confidence interval, 33 to 65), 55% (95% confidence interval, 25 to 77), and 41% (95% confidence interval, 19 to 62), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience indicates that image-guided RFA done by the thoracic surgeons is feasible and safe in high-risk patients with lung neoplasm with reasonable results in patients who are not fit for surgery. Thoracic surgeons can perform RFA safely, and should continue to investigate this new image-guided modality that may offer an alternative option in medically inoperable patients.

Strategies for managing perioperative hypertension

Acute perioperative hypertension is associated with a higher risk of perioperative myocardial ischemia, bleeding, stroke, and renal failure. The immediate concern of short-term antihypertensive therapy is to prevent excessive surgical bleeding from arterial anastomoses, myocardial ischemia, and neurologic complications while causing minimal adverse effects until oral therapy can be resumed. This article reviews perioperative hypertension emergencies/urgencies and various approaches for management.

Endovascular treatment of external iliac artery stenoses for claudication with systematic stenting

The results of the endovascular treatment of external iliac artery lesions in patients with claudication are not well known. In the literature, very often, the studied populations are not homogenous (people with claudication and with acute ischemia) and the external iliac artery is not differentiated from the primary iliac artery. Moreover, systematic stenting is still debated. Our goal was to study the results of systematic stenting for atheromatous lesions of the external iliac artery in a consecutive and homogenous population of patients with claudication. From June 2000 to December 2006, 90 external iliac arteries were treated with systematic stenting for atheromatous lesions in 81 consecutive patients with claudication (74 men and 7 women, aged 62+/-12 years). Lesions were classified according to the Trans-Atlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC). Endovascular treatment was systematically chosen for TASC A (n=40) and B (n=30) patients and patients at high surgical risk for TASC C (n=18) and D (n=2). One hundred and seven stents were placed; they were 37+/-21 mm long with a 7+/-0.6mm diameter. Clinical examination and duplex follow-up were carried out at a minimum of 3 months and at the end of the follow-up. There was a 2.2% complication rate, without any deaths (retroperitoneal hematoma). Mean follow-up was 23 months (with a 13-month median). Primary patency rate was 97% (standard error [SE] 2%) at 1 year, 90% (SE 4.6%) at 2 years, and 84% (SE 6.6%) at 3 years. Secondary patency rate was 98% (SE 1.5%) at 1 year, 93% (SE 3.9%) at 2 years, and 93% (SE 4.5%) at 3 years. Ten restenoses were detected and treated by endovascular techniques (n=6), bypass (n=2), or medication (n=2). At the end of the follow-up, the patients were asymptomatic (n=62) or presented with a moderate (n=17) or severe (n=8) claudication. A patient with hemodialysis was amputated at the metatarsal level. No significant predictive restenosis factor was discovered. However, the C or D TASC classification seemed to favor an earlier restenosis (p=0.06). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that, in a larger population than in the literature, systematic stenting on the external iliac artery gives satisfying results in patients with claudication.

Cardiac complications and mortality rates in diabetic patients following non-cardiac surgery in an Australian teaching hospital

This retrospective study of diabetic patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery has identified that a greater number of patients are at risk of cardiac complications and death in the perioperative period than had previously been suggested. As well as insulin-dependent diabetic patients and patients with elevated creatinine (> 178 micromol/l) as previously found, our study suggests that non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients and patients with creatinine > 120 micromol/l are also at increased risk of cardiac complications and death following non-cardiac surgery. This increases by a factor of six those diabetic patients at risk of perioperative complications from non-cardiac surgery and also increases the number of patients with renal failure similarly at risk. The study confirms similar risks of cardiac complications and death to other recently published data and suggests ongoing comparisons will contribute to quality assurance activities in anaesthesia and surgery.

Effect of chronic beta-blocker use on stroke after noncardiac surgery

The incidence of postoperative stroke ranges from 0.08% to 0.7% in noncardiac surgery. Recently, the PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation (POISE) study reported an incidence of postoperative stroke of 1% in patients scheduled for noncardiac surgery when beta blockers were initiated immediately before surgery. To assess the association between chronic beta-blocker use and postoperative stroke in noncardiac surgery, we undertook a case-control study among 186,779 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery from 2000 to 2008 at the Erasmus Medical Centre. Patients who were undergoing intracerebral surgery or carotid surgery or who had head and/or carotid trauma were excluded. The case subjects were 34 patients (0.02%) who had experienced a stroke within 30 days after surgery. Of the remaining patients, 2 controls were selected for each case and were stratified according to calendar year, type of surgery, and age. For cases and controls, information was obtained regarding beta-blocker use before surgery, the presence of cardiac risk factors, and the use of other cardiovascular medication. The use of beta blockers was as common in the cases as in the controls (29% vs 29%; p = 1.0). The adjusted odds ratio for postoperative stroke among beta-blocker users compared with nonusers was 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.1 to 1.5). Similar results were obtained in the subgroups of patients stratified according to the use of cardiovascular therapy and the presence of cardiac risk factors. In conclusion, the present case-control study has shown no increased risk of postoperative stroke in patients taking chronic beta-blocker therapy.

Plasma N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide as a marker for postoperative cardiac events in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

This study considered if N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is associated with increased risk for postoperative cardiac events in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. In addition, this report describes how levels of NT-proBNP are affected by noncardiac surgery. The study design was a prospective cohort study that enrolled 83 patients age > or =50 years with > or =1 risk factor for coronary artery disease having intermediate or high-risk noncardiac surgery. NT-proBNP levels were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 3. During the month following surgery, 25 patients (33%) had a combined 37 postoperative cardiac events including 15 episodes of heart failure (20%), 12 episodes of new dysrhythmia (16%), 7 myocardial infarctions (9%), and 3 cardiac arrests (4%). Preoperative NT-proBNP level > or =457 pg/ml was significantly associated with occurrence of a postoperative cardiac event (odds ratio 10.5, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 56.6, p = 0.006). After surgery, 64 of 72 patients (89%) had an increase in NT-proBNP from their preoperative level. In conclusion, this study determined there was a significant association between elevated preoperative NT-proBNP and occurrence of a postoperative cardiac event. In addition, increased NT-proBNP after noncardiac surgery is not uncommon even in the absence of clinically identifiable heart failure.

Acute aortic syndromes and thoracic aortic aneurysm

Acute and chronic aortic diseases have been diagnosed and studied by physicians for centuries. Both the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases have been steadily improving over time, largely because of increased physician awareness and improvements in diagnostic modalities. This comprehensive review discusses the pathophysiology and risk factors, classification schemes, epidemiology, clinical presentations, diagnostic modalities, management options, and outcomes of various aortic conditions, including acute aortic dissection (and its variants intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcers) and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Literature searches of the PubMed database were conducted using the following keywords: aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, aortic ulcer, and thoracic aortic aneurysm. Retrospective and prospective studies performed within the past 20 years were included in the review; however, most data are from the past 15 years.

Long-term outcome of prophylactic coronary revascularization in cardiac high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery (from the randomized DECREASE-V Pilot Study)

Prophylactic coronary revascularization in vascular surgery patients with extensive coronary artery disease was not associated with an improved immediate postoperative outcome. However, the potential long-term benefit was unknown. This study was performed to assess the long-term benefit of prophylactic coronary revascularization in these patients. Of 1,880 patients scheduled for major vascular surgery, 430 had > or =3 risk factors (age >70 years, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, diabetes mellitus, and renal failure). All underwent cardiac testing using dobutamine echocardiography or nuclear stress imaging. Patients with extensive stress-induced ischemia (> or =5 segments or > or =3 walls) were randomly assigned to additional revascularization. In total, 101 patients showed extensive ischemia and were assigned to revascularization (n = 49) or no revascularization (n = 52). After 2.8 years, the overall survival rate was 64% for patients randomly assigned to no preoperative coronary revascularization versus 61% for patients assigned to preoperative coronary revascularization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 2.19, p = 0.61). Rates for survival free of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization were similar in both groups at 49% and 42% for patients allocated to medical treatment or coronary revascularization, respectively (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.57, p = 0.13). Only 2 patients assigned to medical treatment required coronary revascularization during follow-up. Also, in patients who survived the first 30 days after surgery, there was no apparent benefit of revascularization on cardiac events (HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.52, p = 0.36). In conclusion, preoperative coronary revascularization in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery was not associated with improved postoperative or long-term outcome compared with the best medical treatment.

[Perioperative fluid management: an analysis of the present situation]

Optimal perioperative fluid management is still controversial. Besides well known perioperative hypovolaemia, hypervolaemia has an influence on perioperative morbidity and mortality, particularly with regard to the patient's medical history, a reduced cardiac and pulmonal function and the operation itself. The concepts of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative fluid administration are neither adequately validated, nor sufficiently integrated into a perioperative concept. At the present, moderate fluid administration to improve preoperative and postoperative outcome is safe in minor or medium surgical procedures. High-risk surgical patients benefit from a time-oriented or/and goal-oriented monitored fluid therapy. In the past only little attention has been concentrated on postoperative fluid management, but may be stimulated by the new concepts of fast track surgery.

Successful use of endothelial progenitor cell capture stent for treatment of left main coronary artery disease before non-cardiac surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm

We report on the novel use of endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capture stent for the treatment of left main coronary artery disease (CAD) for a patient who required a high risk non-cardiac surgery for his rapidly expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Instead of using bare metal stent, we decided to use the EPC capture stent to treat his left main disease as it had a unique "pro-healing" properties. We were able to reduce his peri-operative risk and he underwent the AAA surgery successfully with no adverse events. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the successful use of EPC capture stent for the treatment of left main CAD before a high risk non-cardiac surgery for AAA.

Acute aortic dissection: perspectives from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)

Acute aortic dissection is a rare but deadly disease first described over 200 years ago by the physician to the late King George II on necropsy. Over the ensuing 2 centuries, the understanding of the pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up has matured. In an effort to understand the contemporary treatment of this disease, the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) has enrolled over 2000 patients over the past 12 years. In this article we summarize the key lessons learned from this multi-national registry of patients presenting with acute aortic dissection.

A case of aortic dissection in a cocaine abuser: a case report and review of literature

Background

Prompt diagnosis and management of aortic dissection are key to reduce patient morbidity and mortality; hence the need to a have a high index of suspicion for this condition. We believe it's important to report this case because it underscores the relationship between cocaine abuse and aortic dissection. In addition it strongly emphasizes basic principles in medicine: patients should not be profiled, and chronic complaints may need reassessment.

Case Presentation

We are presenting a case of Stanford type A aortic dissection in a 46 year old patient with history of cocaine abuse. The aortic dissection presented as worsening of chronic upper abdominal pains he has had for years. He presented to us hours after using crack cocaine.

Conclusion

Aortic dissection associated with cocaine abuse develops at a younger age. Therefore it's crucial to have high index of suspicion for aortic dissection in this subset of patients. Furthermore as this case illustrates, serious diseases can masquerade in old complaints. Patients should never be profiled, and chronic complaints should always be revisited.

The unresolved issues with risk stratification and management of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing major vascular surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article, with a specific focus on patients undergoing vascular surgery, is to review controversial issues related to mechanisms of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery disease detection, and strategies to reduce perioperative complications. We propose explanations for the many conflicting results that have recently emerged in the literature.Source documents: We searched MEDLINE and reviewed all relevant manuscripts and scientific statements regarding management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Identification and prevention of ischemia in patients undergoing vascular surgery remains controversial. While the identification of preoperative ischemia is a marker of a higher perioperative risk, the value of identifying such ischemia has been questioned. We believe this may be, at least in part, due to our limited understanding of perioperative MI. Appropriate management of patients, based on the results of such testing, is likely the key to improving outcomes, and deserves further investigation. Efforts aimed at reducing the ischemic consequences of severe coronary plaques (by revascularization or beta-blocker therapy) have yielded conflicting results. The use of high doses of preoperative beta-blocker therapy may be harmful. Some studies suggest a promising role for statin therapy. Benefits of acetylsalicylic acid must be weighted against the risk of bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Many questions remain unanswered about the impact of detecting inducible ischemia, and the role of revascularization or beta-blockers in patients undergoing vascular surgery. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of perioperative MI is critical, in order to identify the best approach to improve cardiac outcomes in these patients.

A Dutch guideline for the treatment of scoliosis in neuromuscular disorders

Background

Children with neuromuscular disorders with a progressive muscle weakness such as Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Spinal Muscular Atrophy frequently develop a progressive scoliosis. A severe scoliosis compromises respiratory function and makes sitting more difficult. Spinal surgery is considered the primary treatment option for correcting severe scoliosis in neuromuscular disorders. Surgery in this population requires a multidisciplinary approach, careful planning, dedicated surgical procedures, and specialized after care.

Methods

The guideline is based on scientific evidence and expert opinions. A multidisciplinary working group representing experts from all relevant specialties performed the research. A literature search was conducted to collect scientific evidence in answer to specific questions posed by the working group. Literature was classified according to the level of evidence.

Results

For most aspects of the treatment scientific evidence is scarce and only low level cohort studies were found. Nevertheless, a high degree of consensus was reached about the management of patients with scoliosis in neuromuscular disorders. This was translated into a set of recommendations, which are now officially accepted as a general guideline in the Netherlands.

Conclusion

In order to optimize the treatment for scoliosis in neuromuscular disorders a Dutch guideline has been composed. This evidence-based, multidisciplinary guideline addresses conservative treatment, the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care of scoliosis in neuromuscular disorders.

Cardiovascular complications of cocaine: imaging findings

Cocaine is the second most commonly abused illicit drug in the US and the most common one involved in emergency department visits, the majority of which are related to the cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular complications related with cocaine abuse include myocardial ischemia and infarction, myocarditis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, aortic dissection, thrombosis, stroke and cerebral hemorrhage, and different forms of visceral ischemia, among others. In an era where cocaine use has reached epidemic proportions, it is necessary for the radiologist to understand the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and imaging characteristics of its cardiovascular complications.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist healthcare professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

Epidural anaesthesia and survival after intermediate-to-high risk non-cardiac surgery: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although epidural anaesthesia and analgesia have numerous benefits, their effects on postoperative survival are unclear. We therefore undertook a population-based cohort study to determine whether perioperative epidural anaesthesia or analgesia is associated with improved 30-day survival.

METHODS

We used population-based linked administrative databases to do a retrospective cohort study of 259 037 patients, aged 40 years or older, who underwent selected elective intermediate-to-high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures between April 1, 1994, and March 31, 2004, in Ontario, Canada. Propensity-score methods were used to construct a matched-pairs cohort that reduced important baseline differences between patients who received epidural anaesthesia or analgesia as opposed to those that did not. We then determined the association of epidural anaesthesia with 30-day mortality within these matched-pairs.

FINDINGS

Of the 259 037 patients, 56 556 (22%) received epidural anaesthesia. Within the matched-pairs cohort (n=88 188), epidural anaesthesia was associated with a small reduction in 30-day mortality (1.7%vs 2.0%; relative risk 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98, p=0.02).

INTERPRETATION

Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia were associated with a small improvement in 30-day survival, but this effect should be interpreted cautiously. The estimate had borderline significance, despite a large sample size. Its absolute magnitude was also small, corresponding to a number needed to treat of 477. Our study, therefore, does not provide compelling evidence that epidural anaesthesia improves postoperative survival. Nonetheless, our results support the safety of perioperative epidural anaesthesia when used for indications other than improving survival (eg, improving postoperative pain relief, preventing postoperative pulmonary complications).

Acute aortic dissection

We summarise advances in the epidemiology, presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of acute aortic dissection. Improved understanding of this problem has been assisted not only by establishment of an international registry but also by progress in molecular biology and genetics of connective-tissue diseases. Advances in endovascular products and techniques have provided new treatment options. Open surgical repair remains the main treatment for dissection in the ascending aorta, whereas endovascular treatment is increasingly being used in dissection that is limited to other parts of the aorta.