Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in a Portuguese pulmonary hypertension expert center

INTRODUCTION

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an alternative therapy in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or residual/recurrent pulmonary hypertension (PH) after surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term efficacy and safety of a BPA program.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study included all BPA sessions performed in CTEPH patients between 2017 and 2019. Clinical assessment including WHO functional class, plasma biomarkers, 6-min walk test (6MWT) and right heart catheterization was performed at baseline and six months after the last BPA session.

RESULTS

A total of 57 BPA sessions were performed in 11 CTEPH patients (64% with inoperable disease, 82% under pulmonar vasodilator therapy). Nine patients completed both the BPA program and a minimum six-month follow-up period. There were significant improvements in WHO functional class (p=0.004) and 6MWT (mean increase of 42 m; p=0.050) and a trend for significant hemodynamic improvement: 25% decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (p=0.082) and 42% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (p=0.056). In the group of patients with severely impaired hemodynamics (three patients with mPAP >40 mmHg), the reduction was significant: 51% in mPAP (p=0.013) and 67% in PVR (p=0.050). Prostacyclin analogs and long-term oxygen therapy were withdrawn in all patients. Minor complications were recorded in 25% of patients. There were no major complications or deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

A BPA strategy on top of pulmonary vasodilator therapy further improves symptoms, exercise capacity and hemodynamics with an acceptable risk-benefit ratio in patients with inoperable CTEPH or residual/recurrent PH after surgery.

A model for estimating the health economic impact of earlier diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Background

Diagnostic delay of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) exceeds 1 year, contributing to higher mortality. Health economic consequences of late CTEPH diagnosis are unknown. We aimed to develop a model for quantifying the impact of diagnosing CTEPH earlier on survival, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and healthcare costs.

Material and methods

A Markov model was developed to estimate lifelong outcomes, depending on the degree of delay. Data on survival and quality of life were obtained from published literature. Hospital costs were assessed from patient records (n=498) at the Amsterdam UMC – VUmc, which is a Dutch CTEPH referral center. Medication costs were based on a mix of standard medication regimens.

Results

For 63-year-old CTEPH patients with a 14-month diagnostic delay of CTEPH (median age and delay of patients in the European CTEPH Registry), lifelong healthcare costs were estimated at EUR 117 100 for a mix of treatment options. In a hypothetical scenario of maximal reduction of current delay, improved survival was estimated at a gain of 3.01 life-years and 2.04 QALYs. The associated cost increase was EUR 44 654, of which 87% was due to prolonged medication use. This accounts for an incremental cost–utility ratio of EUR 21 900/QALY.

Conclusion

Our constructed model based on the Dutch healthcare setting demonstrates a substantial health gain when CTEPH is diagnosed earlier. According to Dutch health economic standards, additional costs remain below the deemed acceptable limit of EUR 50 000/QALY for the particular disease burden. This model can be used for evaluating cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies aimed at reducing the diagnostic delay.

This constructed model based on the Dutch healthcare setting can be used for evaluating cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies aimed at reducing the diagnostic delay of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertensionhttps://bit.ly/35yXPM3

Interventional Management of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is a distinct form of pulmonary hypertension characterized by the nonresolution of thrombotic material in the pulmonary tree; whenever feasible and safe, first-line treatment should be pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. In patients who are not operative candidates, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as an effective treatment modality that results in improvements in functional class, symptoms, hemodynamics, 6-minute walk distance, and right ventricular and pulmonary artery mechanics. Careful attention to procedural technique and rapid identification and treatment of complications are critical for a successful BPA program.

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Patients With Inoperable or Recurrent/Residual Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Single-Centre Initial Experience

BACKGROUND

Patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are often treated with pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific drugs. However, most of these patients remain symptomatic, despite medical treatment. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an emerging therapeutic intervention for patients with inoperable CTEPH. This study aimed to report the initial experience of BPA in a tertiary referral centre for CTEPH.

METHODS

A total of 26 consecutive patients, who underwent 91 BPA sessions, were included in the study. All patients underwent a detailed examination, including 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and right heart catheterisation at baseline and 3 months after the last BPA session.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 51±17 years. Fifteen (15) patients had inoperable CTEPH and 11 patients had residual or recurrent CTEPH post pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Functional class improved in 17 of 26 (65%) patients. The 6MWD increased from a mean 315±129 to 411±140 m (p<0.001), and NT pro-BNP reduced from a median 456 to 189 pg/mL (p=0.001). The number of patients who required supplemental oxygen decreased from 11 (42.3%) to five (19%) (p=0.031) after BPA treatment. The mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased from a mean 47.5±13.4 to 38±10.9 mmHg (p<0.001), the pulmonary vascular resistance decreased from a mean 9.3±4.7 to 5.8±2.8 Wood units (p<0.001), and the cardiac index increased from a mean 2.4±0.7 to 2.9±0.6 L/min/m² (p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty improved haemodynamics, 6MWD, and functional class, and reduced the requirement for supplemental oxygen, with an acceptable risk-benefit ratio in patients with inoperable CTEPH and with residual/recurrent CTEPH.

Increased Pulmonary Arterial Compliance after Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty Predicts Exercise Tolerance Improvement in Inoperable CTEPH Patients with Lower Pulmonary Arterial Pressure

BACKGROUND

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) improved pulmonary arterial compliance (C_PA) and exercise tolerance in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether C_PA is a useful index to indicate exercise tolerance improvement by BPA in CTEPH patients.

METHODS

The correlation between changes in C_PA and improvements in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) by BPA was retrospectively analyzed in 70 patients (Analysis 1), and it was sequentially analyzed in 46 symptomatic patients who achieved mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)<30mmHg (Analysis 2).

RESULTS

We enrolled 70 patients (female/male:57/13, mean age:59 years) who underwent a total of 352 BPA sessions which significantly increased C_PA (1.5±0.8 vs. 3.0±1.0 mL/mmHg) and decreased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (8.0 ± 3.9 vs. 3.6 ± 1.7 wood units). The correlation coefficient between improvement in 6MWD and changes in PVR and C_PA were r=0.21 (p=0.09) and r=0.14 (p=0.26) (Analysis 1). In Analysis 2, those were r=0.32 (p=0.06) and r=0.38 (p=0.02), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

C_PA can be a useful index to indicate the improvement in exercise tolerance by BPA in symptomatic patients with lower mPAP.

Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a time-trend analysis from the Japanese nationwide registry

BACKGROUND

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), a novel technique initially introduced as a treatment for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, is now increasingly being performed in a broader spectrum of patients. Here, we performed a time-trend analysis of the characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients who underwent BPA in Japan, using data extracted from nationwide procedure-based registration system.

METHODS

The Japanese Structural Heart Disease (J-SHD) registry was established and sponsored by the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics and aims to provide basic statistics on the performance of structural interventions in Japan. J-SHD registers cases from approximately 200 institutions, representing more than 90% of SHD intervention-performing hospitals in the nation. We analysed the registered BPA data elements from January 2015 to December 2018. Successful BPA was defined as a session in which a physician successfully treated all targeted lesions.

RESULTS

There were a total of 2512 BPA sessions; the number of institutions and registered sessions increased from 30 to 50 sites and from 479 to 852 sessions during the study period, respectively. The average age of the patients was 66±13 years, and 72.1% were women. In-hospital death was observed in 0.2%, and the total complications rate was 5.3%. The preoperative and postoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure were 32±11 mm Hg and 30±10 mm Hg, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The number of BPA sessions increased during the study period, with an acceptable in-hospital complication rate.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty protocol in a Portuguese pulmonary hypertension expert center

INTRODUCTION

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who are not eligible for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PEA) or who have recurrent or persistent pulmonary hypertension after surgery. There is no standardized technique for BPA and, its complexity and high risk of severe complications, requires skills and appropriate training and should be reserved for expert CTEPH centers, as a complementary intervention to medical and surgical therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this document is to describe the BPA protocol used at a high-volume center nationwide, validated by its results.

METHODS

The present protocol includes technical details, definition of outcomes and complications, as well as patient full diagnostic work-up and treatment algorithm, before and after BPA.

RESULTS

The technical, hemodynamic, and clinical results of the application of this protocol will be subject of a later publication where they will be described in detail. In conclusion, we present a percutaneous intervention protocol in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in the context of chronic pulmonary thromboembolism, validated by its clinical, hemodynamic, and technical results.

Evaluation and management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension - consensus statement from the ISHLT

ISHLT members have recognized the importance of a consensus statement on the evaluation and management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The creation of this document required multiple steps, including the engagement of the ISHLT councils, approval by the Standards and Guidelines Committee, identification and selection of experts in the field, and the development of 6 working groups. Each working group provided a separate section based on an extensive literature search. These sections were then coalesced into a single document that was circulated to all members of the working groups. Key points were summarized at the end of each section. Due to the limited number of comparative trials in this field, the document was written as a literature review with expert opinion rather than based on level of evidence.

Current strategies for managing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results of the worldwide prospective CTEPH Registry

Background

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are currently accepted therapies for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This international CTEPH Registry identifies clinical characteristics of patients, diagnostic algorithms and treatment decisions in a global context.

Methods

1010 newly diagnosed consecutive patients were included in the registry between February 2015 and September 2016. Diagnosis was confirmed by right heart catheterisation, ventilation–perfusion lung scan, computerised pulmonary angiography and/or invasive pulmonary angiography after at least 3 months on anticoagulation.

Results

Overall, 649 patients (64.3%) were considered for PEA, 193 (19.1%) for BPA, 20 (2.0%) for both PEA and BPA, and 148 (14.7%) for PAH therapy only. Reasons for PEA inoperability were technical inaccessibility (n=235), comorbidities (n=63) and patient refusal (n=44). In Europe and America and other countries (AAO), 72% of patients were deemed suitable for PEA, whereas in Japan, 70% of patients were offered BPA as first choice. Sex was evenly balanced, except in Japan where 75% of patients were female. A history of acute pulmonary embolism was reported for 65.6% of patients. At least one PAH therapy was initiated in 35.8% of patients (26.2% of PEA candidates, 54.5% of BPA candidates and 54.1% of those not eligible for either PEA or BPA). At the time of analysis, 39 patients (3.9%) had died of pulmonary hypertension-related causes (3.5% after PEA and 1.8% after BPA).

Conclusions

The registry revealed noticeable differences in patient characteristics (rates of pulmonary embolism and sex) and therapeutic approaches in Japan compared with Europe and AAO.

There are distinct regional differences in the management of CTEPH patients but globally, the proportion of patients managed by PEA remains stable, independently of the new established treatment options of PAH therapies and BPAhttps://bit.ly/3zEXxkv

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty protocol in a Portuguese pulmonary hypertension expert center

INTRODUCTION

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who are not eligible for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PEA) or who have recurrent or persistent pulmonary hypertension after surgery. There is no standardized technique for BPA and, its complexity and high risk of severe complications, requires skills and appropriate training and should be reserved for expert CTEPH centers, as a complementary intervention to medical and surgical therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this document is to describe the BPA protocol used at a high-volume center nationwide, validated by its results.

METHODS

The present protocol includes technical details, definition of outcomes and complications, as well as patient full diagnostic work-up and treatment algorithm, before and after BPA.

RESULTS

The technical, hemodynamic, and clinical results of the application of this protocol will be subject of a later publication where they will be described in detail. In conclusion, we present a percutaneous intervention protocol in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in the context of chronic pulmonary thromboembolism, validated by its clinical, hemodynamic, and technical results.

Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Pulmonary Artery Subtotal Occlusion and Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

[Figure: see text].

A pilot cohort study assessing the feasibility of complete revascularization with balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty improves prognosis by alleviating pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, even with incomplete revascularization. However, hypoxia or the requirement for pulmonary vasodilators often remain even after pulmonary hypertension relief. With this cohort study, we aimed to examine whether complete revascularization by additional balloon pulmonary angioplasty on residual lesions, even after pulmonary hypertension relief, could resolve hypoxia or the requirement for pulmonary vasodilators. During complete revascularization with balloon pulmonary angioplasty in 42 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, we investigated therapeutic effects at baseline (T1), pulmonary hypertension relief phase (T2), and at 6 months post-final balloon pulmonary angioplasty (T3). The pulmonary hypertension relief phase was defined as the first time that a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≤ 25 mmHg or pulmonary vascular resistance ≤ 240 dyn-s/cm⁵ was reached in right heart catheterization before balloon pulmonary angioplasty. The partial pressure of oxygen increased progressively over T1, T2, and T3 (59.2±8.5, 69.0±9.7, and 80.0±9.5 mmHg, respectively; P<0.001 T2 vs. T3). Minimum oxygen saturation levels during the 6-minute walk distance test were 87% (81‒89%), 88% (84‒92%), and 91% (89‒93.3%), respectively (P<0.001 T2 vs. T3), with gradual increase in the 6-minute walk distance (346±125 m, 404±90 m, 454±101 m, respectively; P<0.001 T2 vs. T3). The percentages of patients using pulmonary vasodilators (54.8%, 45.2%, 4.8%, respectively; P<0.001 T2 vs. T3) and requiring oxygen therapy (26%, 26%, 7%, respectively; P = 0.008 T2 vs. T3) decreased significantly without hemodynamic exacerbation or major complications. Despite the discontinuation of pulmonary vasodilators, mean pulmonary artery pressure improved (36.0 [31.0‒41.3], 21.4±4.2, 18.5±3.6 mmHg, respectively; P<0.001 T2 vs. T3). Complete revascularization with balloon pulmonary angioplasty beyond pulmonary hypertension relief benefits patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; it may improve oxygenation and exercise capacity, and reduce the need for pulmonary vasodilators and oxygen therapy.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: advances in patient and lesion selection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has been performed worldwide for patients who are ineligible for pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). However, the technical details of BPA have not been standardized, and no international consensus regarding patient and lesion selection for BPA has been reached. Evidence for the combination of BPA with PEA or medical therapy is also lacking. This review highlights recent progress in BPA in terms of patient and lesion selection and the current procedural approach for BPA, including combination treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The indications for BPA have expanded with recent reports describing the improved safety and efficacy of BPA. Because lesions are generally present in all segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arteries, it is recommended to treat all the lesions to achieve desirable hemodynamic improvement. Selective pulmonary angiography is the gold standard for lesion selection in modern BPA aimed at total revascularization. Despite the lack of randomized controlled studies, combination treatment with BPA may be well tolerated and effective.

SUMMARY

BPA, alone or in combination with PEA or medical therapy, may be a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for monotreatment of PEA. However, further investigation is required to standardize patient and lesion selection for BPA.

Raising the bar to ultradisciplinary collaborations in management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is an underdiagnosed and potentially fatal subgroup of pulmonary hypertension, if left untreated. Clinical signs include exertional dyspnea and non-specific symptoms. Diagnosis requires multimodality imaging and heart catheterization. Pulmonary endarterectomy, an open heart surgery, is the gold standard treatment of choice in selected patients in specialized centers. Targeted medical therapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty can be effective in high-risk patients with significant comorbidities, distal pulmonary vascular obstructions, or recurrent/persistent pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy. Currently, there is a limited number of data regarding novel coronavirus-2019 infection in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and the changing spectrum of the disease during the pandemic. Challenging times during this outbreak due to healthcare crisis and relatively higher case-fatality rates require convergence; that is an ultradisciplinary collaboration, which crosses disciplinary and sectorial boundaries to develop integrated knowledge and new paradigms. Management strategies for the "new normal" such as virtual care, preparedness for further threats, redesigned standards and working conditions, reevaluation of specific recommendations, and online collaborations for optimal decisions for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients may change the poor outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in a Portuguese pulmonary hypertension expert center

INTRODUCTION

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an alternative therapy in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or residual/recurrent pulmonary hypertension (PH) after surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term efficacy and safety of a BPA program.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study included all BPA sessions performed in CTEPH patients between 2017 and 2019. Clinical assessment including WHO functional class, plasma biomarkers, 6-min walk test (6MWT) and right heart catheterization was performed at baseline and six months after the last BPA session.

RESULTS

A total of 57 BPA sessions were performed in 11 CTEPH patients (64% with inoperable disease, 82% under pulmonary vasodilator therapy). Nine patients completed both the BPA program and a minimum six-month follow-up period. There were significant improvements in WHO functional class (p=0.004) and 6MWT (mean increase of 42 m; p=0.050) and a trend for significant hemodynamic improvement: 25% decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (p=0.082) and 42% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (p=0.056). In the group of patients with severely impaired hemodynamics (three patients with mPAP >40mmHg), the reduction was significant: 51% in mPAP (p=0.013) and 67% in PVR (p=0.050). Prostacyclin analogs and long-term oxygen therapy were withdrawn in all patients. Minor complications were recorded in 25% of patients. There were no major complications or deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

A BPA strategy on top of pulmonary vasodilator therapy further improves symptoms, exercise capacity and hemodynamics with an acceptable risk-benefit ratio in patients with inoperable CTEPH or residual/recurrent PH after surgery.

ERS statement on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare complication of acute pulmonary embolism, either symptomatic or not. The occlusion of proximal pulmonary arteries by fibrotic intravascular material, in combination with a secondary microvasculopathy of vessels <500 µm, leads to increased pulmonary vascular resistance and progressive right heart failure. The mechanism responsible for the transformation of red clots into fibrotic material remnants has not yet been elucidated. In patients with pulmonary hypertension, the diagnosis is suspected when a ventilation/perfusion lung scan shows mismatched perfusion defects, and confirmed by right heart catheterisation and vascular imaging. Today, in addition to lifelong anticoagulation, treatment modalities include surgery, angioplasty and medical treatment according to the localisation and characteristics of the lesions.This statement outlines a review of the literature and current practice concerning diagnosis and management of CTEPH. It covers the definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism, pathophysiology, treatment by pulmonary endarterectomy, balloon pulmonary angioplasty, drugs and their combination, rehabilitation and new lines of research in CTEPH.It represents the first collaboration of the European Respiratory Society, the International CTEPH Association and the European Reference Network-Lung in the pulmonary hypertension domain. The statement summarises current knowledge, but does not make formal recommendations for clinical practice.

Advances in balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an emerging treatment option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who have inoperable, segmental/subsegmental disease, or residual disease after pulmonary endarterectomy. In the past decade, advances in the techniques for BPA have led to better clinical outcomes with improvements in hemodynamics, pulmonary perfusion, exercise tolerance, functional capacity, and quality of life. We present the experience with BPA at our university, the largest CTEPH center in the world, followed by reviewing the published data regarding the efficacy and safety of BPA in patients with CTEPH. There is increasing evidence to support that the initial hemodynamic improvement is sustained for ≥3 years after the procedure. Although infrequent, complications observed with BPA are associated with pulmonary vascular injury or rarely reperfusion pulmonary edema. As the technique for percutaneous pulmonary artery revascularization has improved, the procedural risk and complications have continued to decrease. This promising technique continues to develop, and future research is required to demonstrate the long-term benefits of BPA, standardize the technique, and define a uniform institutional infrastructure for providing BPA as a part of the treatment of CTEPH.

Association Between Anticoagulation Outcomes and Venous Thromboembolism History in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Background: The association between anticoagulation outcomes and prior history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) has not been established. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation treatment in CTEPH patients with and without prior history of VTE.

Methods: A total of 333 CTEPH patients prescribed anticoagulants were retrospectively included from May 2013 to April 2019. The clinical characteristics were collected at their first admission. Incidental recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding were recorded during follow-up. The Cox proportional regression models were used to identify potential factors associated with recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding.

Results: Seventy patients (21%) without a prior history of VTE did not experience recurrent VTE during anticoagulation. Compared to CTEPH patients without a prior history of VTE, those with a prior history of VTE had an increased risk of recurrent VTE [2.27/100 person-year vs. 0/100 person-year; hazard ratio (HR), 8.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18–1142.00; P = 0.029] but a similar risk of clinically relevant bleeding (3.90/100 person-year vs. 4.59/100 person-year; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.38–1.78; P = 0.623). Multivariate Cox analyses suggested that a prior history of VTE and interruption of anticoagulation treatments were significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE, while anemia and glucocorticoid use were significantly associated with a higher risk of clinically relevant bleeding.

Conclusions: This study is the first to reveal that a prior history of VTE significantly increases the risk of recurrent VTE in CTEPH patients during anticoagulation treatment. This finding should be further evaluated in prospective studies.

Mid-term follow-up of balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: An experience in Latin America

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics of patients who undergo balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and report the mid-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND

BPA has been recently introduced in Latin America. Mid-term results have not been published.

METHODS

Prospective Chilean Registry of inoperable CTEPH patients who underwent BPA. Clinical variables were analyzed at baseline, after each procedure and at follow-up. Hemodynamic variables were recorded before and after the last BPA.

RESULTS

Between August 2016 and September 2019, 22 patients (17 women), 59 ± 12.7 years, underwent 81 BPA and were followed for as long as 33.1 months (mean 17.3 ± 7.5). Mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased by 17.4% (51.1 ± 12 vs. 42.2 ± 13 mmHg, p = .001), pulmonary vascular resistance by 23.9% (766.7 ± 351 vs. 583 ± 346 dynes/s/cm^-5 , p = .001), cardiac index increased by 8% (2.3 ± 0.54 vs. 2.5 ± 0.54 L/min/m² , p = .012), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide decreased by 73.8% (1,685 ± 1,045 vs. 441.8 ± 276 pg/dl, p = .006), and 6-min walk distance improved by 135 m (316.7 ± 94 vs. 451.1 ± 113 m, p = .001). One patient (4.5%) developed lung reperfusion injury and four patients (18.2%) had minor bleeding (hemoptysis), after the procedure. There was no mortality associated with BPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that BPA for inoperable CTEPH is a relatively safe procedure that improves clinical and hemodynamic parameters in the mid-term. This therapy should be considered as an alternative, mainly in places where access to PAH therapy or surgery is restricted.

Depression, anxiety and psychological distress in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a mixed-methods study

Introduction

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a chronic and progressive disease. While prognoses have improved, PH patients still experience side effects and activity restrictions. Accordingly, the key questions asked by this study are ‘How many PH patients have depression/anxiety symptoms?’ and ‘Is there a difference in the symptoms and distress factors between pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) patients, and how are they experiencing distress?’

Methods

A mixed-methods study was conducted to collect and analyse quantitative and qualitative data. We administered questionnaires (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7) and then conducted interviews with participants who reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥10).

Results

Seventy-four participants were enrolled in the study, 25 with idiopathic PAH and 49 with CTEPH. Their average age was 55.2 years (PAH 42.7 years, CTEPH 61.5 years). Overall, 44.6% of participants had mild or more severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥5) and 17.6% had moderate or more severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥10). PAH patients had particularly high depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥5: PAH 64.0%, CTEPH 34.7%; PHQ-9 ≥10: PAH 24%, CTEPH 14.3%). We extracted four common themes from the qualitative interview data on participants’ experience of psychological distress: ‘Loss of myself,’ ‘Isolation from my surroundings,’ ‘Hassle associated with oxygen therapy,’ and ‘Fear of illness progression/deterioration.’ One theme— ‘Suffering from side effects’—was extracted only for PAH patients, while another—‘Rumination on illness due to breathlessness’—was extracted only for CTEPH patients.

Discussion and conclusion

The study found that PH patients are prone to depression. The identification of factors and themes that influence the psychological distress of PH patients is important information that can be used to improve the support for the physical and mental health of these patients. Interventions for these distress may contribute to improving the mental status of PH patients.

Pulmonary hypertension in majority countries: opportunities amidst challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary hypertension is a deadly disease, the causes of which vary between geographical regions. Eighty four percentage of the world's population lives in majority countries (also called low-income and middle-income countries), yet data on pulmonary hypertension in these settings are proportionally scarce. This article provides a review of pulmonary hypertension in majority countries, focusing in detail on the most common causes in these regions, and highlights contextual challenges faced.

RECENT FINDINGS

Epidemiological data confirms a complex and overlapping array of causes, with pulmonary hypertension because of conditions such as rheumatic heart disease, HIV, schistosomiasis, chronic lung disease and sickle cell disease. Delayed pulmonary hypertension diagnosis remains a concern and is ascribed to a lack of resources and lack of pulmonary hypertension awareness by health professionals. Pulmonary hypertension diagnosis is frequently considered once signs of right heart failure emerge, while echocardiography and right heart catheterization are unavailable in many settings. Accurate data on the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in many of these regions are needed and could be achieved by establishing and frequent review of national databases where the incident and prevalent pulmonary hypertension cases are captured.

SUMMARY

There is urgent need for pulmonary hypertension advocacy among clinicians in the primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare sectors of majority countries, and validated noninvasive diagnostic algorithms are needed. Increased awareness and early diagnosis are likely to improve outcomes of pulmonary hypertension patients in these regions, and potentially stimulate locally relevant research.

Oxygen Pathway Limitations in Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Exertional intolerance is a limiting and often crippling symptom in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Traditionally the pathogenesis has been attributed to central factors, including ventilation/perfusion mismatch, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, and right heart dysfunction and uncoupling. Pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty provide substantial improvement of functional status and hemodynamics. However, despite normalization of pulmonary hemodynamics, exercise capacity often does not return to age-predicted levels. By systematically evaluating the oxygen pathway, we aimed to elucidate the causes of functional limitations in patients with CTEPH before and after pulmonary vascular intervention.

METHODS

Using exercise cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with simultaneous invasive hemodynamic monitoring, we sought to quantify the steps of the O₂ transport cascade from the mouth to the mitochondria in patients with CTEPH (n=20) as compared with healthy participants (n=10). Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of pulmonary vascular intervention (pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon angioplasty) on the individual components of the cascade (n=10).

RESULTS

Peak Vo₂ (oxygen uptake) was significantly reduced in patients with CTEPH relative to controls (56±17 versus 112±20% of predicted; P<0.0001). The difference was attributable to impairments in multiple steps of the O₂ cascade, including O₂ delivery (product of cardiac output and arterial O₂ content), skeletal muscle diffusion capacity, and pulmonary diffusion. The total O₂ extracted in the periphery (ie, ΔAVo₂ [arteriovenous O₂ content difference]) was not different. After pulmonary vascular intervention, peak Vo₂ increased significantly (from 12.5±4.0 to 17.8±7.5 mL/[kg·min]; P=0.036) but remained below age-predicted levels (70±11%). The O₂ delivery was improved owing to an increase in peak cardiac output and lung diffusion capacity. However, peak exercise ΔAVo₂ was unchanged, as was skeletal muscle diffusion capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that patients with CTEPH have significant impairment of all steps in the O₂ use cascade, resulting in markedly impaired exercise capacity. Pulmonary vascular intervention increased peak Vo₂ by partly correcting O₂ delivery but had no effect on abnormalities in peripheral O₂ extraction. This suggests that current interventions only partially address patients' limitations and that additional therapies may improve functional capacity.

Efficacy and safety of balloon pulmonary angioplasty for residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the standard treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), although some patients may experience residual pulmonary hypertension (PH). It is unclear whether balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is effective for residual PH after PEA. This study aimed to compare the BPA outcomes between patients with residual PH after PEA and those with inoperable CTEPH.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared BPA for residual PH after PEA (25 patients, 101 BPA sessions) and BPA alone for inoperable CTEPH (21 patients, 89 BPA sessions). All patients underwent right heart catheterisation and functional and laboratory tests before PEA or before and after BPA.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the number of BPA sessions per patient (4.0 ± 1.9 vs. 4.2 ± 1.9, p = 0.671). No significant differences were observed with respect to the mean pulmonary artery pressure (23.6 ± 9.1 vs. 21.9 ± 5.7 mmHg, p = 0.44), pulmonary vascular resistance (3.7 ± 0.5 vs. 2.8 ± 1.2 Wood units, p = 0.14), 6-min walking distance (392.1 ± 117.7 vs. 452.4 ± 90.1 m, p = 0.096), and World Health Organization functional class (I/II/III/IV: 14/11/0/0 vs. 9/12/0/0, p = 0.375). Severe haemoptysis requiring embolisation was more common in the PH after PEA group (16.0% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.018). However, no patients required mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and there were no procedural deaths.

CONCLUSION

Although BPA might be effective for residual PH after PEA, it was associated with a high rate of haemoptysis.

Revisiting a Distinct Entity in Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a specific type of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and the major component of Group 4 pulmonary hypertension (PH). It is caused by pulmonary vasculature obstruction that leads to a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and, ultimately, to failure of the right ventricle. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PEA) is the only definitive therapy, so a timely diagnosis and early referral to a specialized PEA center to determine candidacy is prudent for a favorable outcome. Percutaneous balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has a potential role in patients unsuitable for PEA. Medical therapy with riociguat is the only PH-specific medical therapy currently approved for the treatment of inoperable or persistent CTEPH. This review article aims to revisit CTEPH succinctly with a review of prevailing literature.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in the era of modern therapeutic approaches: data from the Polish multicenter registry (BNP-PL)

Background:

Significant achievements in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) have provided effective therapeutic options for most patients. However, the true impact of the changed landscape of CTEPH therapies on patients’ management and outcomes is poorly known. We aimed to characterize the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of CTEPH patients in the modern era of CTEPH therapies.

Methods:

We analyzed the data of CTEPH adults enrolled in the prospective multicenter registry.

Results:

We enrolled 516 patients aged 63.8 ± 15.4 years. The incidence rate of CTEPH was 3.96 per million adults per year. The group was burdened with several comorbidities. New oral anticoagulants (n = 301; 58.3%) were preferred over vitamin K antagonists (n = 159; 30.8%). Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) was performed in 120 (23.3%) patients and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in 258 (50%) patients. PEA was pretreated with targeted pharmacotherapy in 19 (15.8%) patients, and BPA in 124 (48.1%) patients. Persistent CTEPH was present in 46% of PEA patients and in 65% of patients after completion of BPA. Persistent CTEPH after PEA was treated with targeted pharmacotherapy in 72% and with BPA in 27.7% of patients. At a mean time period of 14.3 ± 5.8 months, 26 patients had died. The use of PEA or BPA was associated with better survival than the use of solely medical treatment.

Conclusions:

The modern population of CTEPH patients comprises mostly elderly people significantly burdened with comorbid conditions. This calls for treatment decisions that are tailored individually for every patient. The combination of two or three methods is currently a frequent approach in the treatment of CTEPH.

Clinical Trial Registration:

clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03959748

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension risk score evaluation and validation (CTEPH Solution): proposal of a study protocol aimed to realize a validated risk score for early diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH) is the most serious long-term complication of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) though it is the only potentially reversible form of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH). Its incidence is mainly limited to the first 2 years following the embolic event, however it is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed.

METHODS

This is a multicenter observational cross-sectional and prospective study. Patients with a prior diagnosis of PE will be enrolled and undergo baseline evaluation for prevalent PH detection through a clinical examination and an echocardiogram as first screening exam. All cases of intermediate-high echocardiographic probability of PH will be confirmed by right heart catheterization and then identified as CTEPH through appropriate imaging and functional examinations in order to exclude other causes of PH. A CTEPH Risk Score will be created using retrospective data from this prevalent cohort of patients and will be then validated on an incident cohort of patients with acute PE.

RESULTS

1000 retrospective and 218 prospective patients are expected to be enrolled and the study is expected to be completed by the end of 2021. Up to now 841 patients (620 retrospective and 221 prospective) have been enrolled.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first large prospective study for the prediction of CTEPH development in patients with PE. It aims to create a comprehensive scoring tool that includes echocardiographic data which may allow early detection of CTEPH and the application of targeted follow up screening programs in patients with PE.

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty: State of the Art

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is a novel technique for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. While cardiologists need no introduction to the concept of balloon angioplasty, BPA has its own particular challenges. This article aims to provide the reader with an overview of BPA, starting with an introduction to chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED), the standard management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), technical challenges faced when performing BPA and the evidence base supporting its use. The second part of the article will focus on the future of BPA, in particular the areas where research is required to establish an evidence base to justify the role of BPA in CTEPH and CTED treatment.

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Technically Operable and Technically Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Background: In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in patients with technically inoperable distal-type chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (d-CTEPH) and technically operable proximal-type disease (p-CTEPH) by analyzing the results of BPA treatment in two collaborating CTEPH referral centers. Methods and results: We assessed hemodynamic results, functional efficacy, complication and survival rate after BPA treatment in 70 CTEPH patients (median age 64 years; (interquartile range (IQR): 52–73 years)), of whom 16 (median age 73 years; (QR 62–82 years)) were in the p-CTEPH subgroup. Altogether, 377 BPA procedures were performed, resulting in significant (p < 0.001) improvement in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP 48.6 ± 10 vs. 31.3 ± 8.6 mmHg), pulmonary vascular resistance (694 ± 296 vs. 333 ± 162 dynes*s*cm⁻⁵), six-minute walk test (365 ± 142 vs. 433 ± 120 metres) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (1307 (510–3294) vs. 206 (83–531) pg/mL). The rate of improvement did not differ between the sub-groups. Lung injury episodes and severe hemoptysis were similarly infrequent in d-CTEPH and p-CTEPH (6.4% vs. 5%; p = 0.55 and 1.0% vs. 2.5; p = 0.24, respectively). There was no significant difference between the sub-groups regarding survival (p = 0.53 by log-rank test). Conclusion: BPA may be beneficial in patients with p-CTEPH who cannot undergo pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Larger long-term studies are needed to better define the efficacy, safety, and optimal BPA procedural standards in this population.

In-Depth Analysis of a Case of Persistent Severe Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a disease characterized by an increase in the pulmonary vascular resistance that typically progresses to right heart failure and death. It is classified into five groups. Management depends on the group classification. Group four PH, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is thought to be a result of acute pulmonary emboli that cause fibrosis and scarring of the pulmonary arteries with consequent obstruction. The diagnosis of CTEPH is made by identifying perfusion abnormalities on ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan. Other studies required for the diagnostic evaluation include transthoracic echocardiogram, right heart catheterization, NT pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and thrombophilia evaluation. Several other tests needed to exclude other causes of pulmonary hypertension include high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), connective tissue disease evaluation, thyroid function testing, human immunodeficiency virus testing, and liver ultrasonography to exclude portal hypertension. The treatment for CTEPH is surgical pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). In patients who are not candidates or decline PEA, pulmonary balloon angioplasty may be useful, however, further studies are required. Several pulmonary artery hypertension medications have been studied in the management of inoperable CTEPH or persistent PH following PEA including bosentan (improves hemodynamics but not exercise capacity), macitentan (improves both hemodynamics and clinical parameters), and riociguat (improves both hemodynamics and exercise capacity). However, only riociguat is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this indication.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: JACC Focus Seminar

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is the result of pulmonary arterial obstruction by organized thrombotic material stemming from incompletely resolved acute pulmonary embolism. The exact incidence of CTEPH is unknown but appears to approximate 2.3% among survivors of acute pulmonary embolism. Although ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy has been supplanted by computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in the diagnostic approach to acute pulmonary embolism, it has a major role in the evaluation of patients with suspected CTEPH, the presence of mismatched segmental defects being consistent with the diagnosis. Diagnostic confirmation of CTEPH is provided by digital subtraction pulmonary angiography, preferably performed at a center familiar with the procedure and its interpretation. Operability assessment is then undertaken to determine if the patient is a candidate for potentially curative pulmonary endarterectomy surgery. When pulmonary endarterectomy is not an option, pulmonary arterial hypertension-targeted pharmacotherapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty represent potential therapeutic alternatives.

Evolution of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated by balloon pulmonary angioplasty, according to their anticoagulant regimens

Patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) need anticoagulant therapy for life. Conventionally, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been used and data about direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in CTEPH patients are lacking. Recently, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as a treatment option for CTEPH. However, there are no reports examining the effects of DOACs and VKAs on the hemodynamics of patients after BPA. The aim of this study was to compare DOACs and VKAs regarding the hemodynamic changes in patients with CTEPH treated by BPA. Patients who were treated by BPA and underwent follow-up right heart catheterization 6 ± 1 months after the final BPA procedure were included in this study. The subjects were divided into two groups based on the anticoagulant administered, and hemodynamic changes (mean pulmonary artery pressure, mPAP; pulmonary vascular resistance, PVR; cardiac index, CI) were assessed. Of the 65 consecutive patients, 29 met the inclusion criteria (DOAC-group n = 14, VKA-group n = 15). Compared to pre-BPA, post-BPA hemodynamic parameters were improved in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding pre-BPA, post-BPA, 6Mo-f/u and Δhemodynamic parameters (difference between 6Mo-f/u and post-BPA, ΔmPAP, - 0.7 ± 3.3 vs. - 2.7 ± 5.4 mmHg, p = 0.24; ΔPVR, - 41.9 ± 80.9 vs. - 16.4 ± 74.1 dyne s/cm⁵, p = 0.38; ΔCI, - 0.06 ± 0.35 vs. - 0.10 ± 0.35 L/min/m², p = 0.80; DOAC-group vs. VKA-group, respectively). Hemodynamic improvement by BPA was maintained over 6 months of follow-up irrespective of the type of anticoagulant administered in CTEPH patients.

Treatment effect prediction using CT after balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the change in computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) metrics after balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) can predict treatment effect in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients.

METHODS

This study included 82 CTEPH patients who underwent both CTPA and right heart catheterization (RHC) before and at the scheduled time of 6 months after BPA. The diameters of the main pulmonary artery (dPA), ascending aorta (dAA), right atrium (dRA), right ventricular free wall thickness (dRVW), and right and left ventricles (dRV, dLV) were measured on CTPA. The correlation of the New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA FC), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, and calculated CT metrics with a decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (ΔmPAP) using RHC (used as the reference for BPA effect) was investigated. Using multiple regression analysis, independent variables were also identified.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, clinical indicators (NYHA FC, 6MWD, and BNP level) improved significantly after BPA and were significantly correlated with ΔmPAP (p < 0.01). In the univariate analysis of CTPA parameters, dPA, dRA, dPA/dAA ratio, dRVW, and dRV/dLV ratio decreased significantly and were significantly correlated with ΔmPAP (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that decreased dPA (p = 0.001) and decreased dRA (p = 0.039) on CTPA were independent predictive factors of ΔmPAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased dPA and dRA on CTPA could predict a decrease in mPAP after BPA, thus potentially eliminating unnecessary invasive catheterization.

KEY POINTS

• The reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure after balloon pulmonary angioplasty in CTEPH patients was significantly correlated with the clinical indices improvement and CTPA parameter decrease. • The decreased diameter of the main pulmonary artery and the decreased diameter of the right atrium on CTPA were independent predictors of mean pulmonary artery pressure reduction.

Interventional and pharmacological management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is caused by obstruction of the pulmonary vasculature, leading to increased pulmonary vascular resistance and ultimately right ventricular failure, the leading cause of death in non-operated patients. This article reviews the current management of CTEPH. The standard of care in CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). However, up to 40% of patients with CTEPH are ineligible for PEA, and up to 51% develop persistent/recurrent PH after PEA. Riociguat is currently the only medical therapy licensed for treatment of inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH after PEA based on the results of the Phase III CHEST-1 study. Studies of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) have shown benefits in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH after PEA; however, data are lacking from large, prospective, controlled studies. Studies of macitentan in patients with inoperable CTEPH and treprostinil in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH showed positive results. Combination therapy is under evaluation in CTEPH, and long-term data are not available. In the future, CTEPH may be managed by PEA, medical therapy or BPA - alone or in combination, according to individual patient needs. Patients should be referred to experienced centers capable of assessing and delivering all options.

Pulmonary angioplasty: A step further in the continuously changing landscape of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension management

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a potentially fatal and frequently undiagnosed form of pulmonary hypertension (PH), classified within group 4 by the World Health Organization (WHO). It is a type of precapillary PH, which uncommonly develops as a peculiar sequel of acute pulmonary embolism due to the partial resolution of the mechanically obstructing thrombus with a coexisting inflammatory response from pulmonary vessels. CTEPH is one of the potentially treatable forms of PH whose current standard of care is surgical pulmonary endarterectomy. Medical therapy with few drugs in non-operable disease is approved and has shown improvement in patients' hemodynamic condition and functional ability. Recently, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has shown promising results as a treatment option for technically inoperable patients, those with unacceptable risk-to-benefit ratio and in a case of residual PH after endarterectomy. Lack of meticulous CTEPH screening programs in post-pulmonary embolism patients leading to underdiagnosis of this condition, complex operability assessment, and diversity in BPA techniques among different institutions are still the issues that need to be addressed. In this paper, we review the recent achievements in the management of non-operable CTEPH, their outcome and safety, based on available data.

Chronic Thromboembolic Disease and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary vascular disease (CTED) are rare manifestations of venous thromboembolism. Presumably, CTEPH and CTED are variants of the same pathophysiological mechanism. CTEPH and CTED can be near-cured by pulmonary endarterectomy, balloon pulmonary angioplasty, and medical treatment with Riociguat or subcutaneous treprostinil, which are the approved drugs.

Imaging of pulmonary hypertension in adults: a position paper from the Fleischner Society

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mmHg and classified into five different groups sharing similar pathophysiologic mechanisms, haemodynamic characteristics, and therapeutic management. Radiologists play a key role in the multidisciplinary assessment and management of PH. A working group was formed from within the Fleischner Society based on expertise in the imaging and/or management of patients with PH, as well as experience with methodologies of systematic reviews. The working group identified key questions focusing on the utility of CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine in the evaluation of PH: a) Is noninvasive imaging capable of identifying PH? b) What is the role of imaging in establishing the cause of PH? c) How does imaging determine the severity and complications of PH? d) How should imaging be used to assess chronic thromboembolic PH before treatment? e) Should imaging be performed after treatment of PH? This systematic review and position paper highlights the key role of imaging in the recognition, work-up, treatment planning, and follow-up of PH.

Imaging of Pulmonary Hypertension in Adults: A Position Paper from the Fleischner Society

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mm Hg and classified into five different groups sharing similar pathophysiologic mechanisms, hemodynamic characteristics, and therapeutic management. Radiologists play a key role in the multidisciplinary assessment and management of PH. A working group was formed from within the Fleischner Society based on expertise in the imaging and/or management of patients with PH, as well as experience with methodologies of systematic reviews. The working group identified key questions focusing on the utility of CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine in the evaluation of PH: (a) Is noninvasive imaging capable of identifying PH? (b) What is the role of imaging in establishing the cause of PH? (c) How does imaging determine the severity and complications of PH? (d) How should imaging be used to assess chronic thromboembolic PH before treatment? (e) Should imaging be performed after treatment of PH? This systematic review and position paper highlights the key role of imaging in the recognition, work-up, treatment planning, and follow-up of PH. This article is a simultaneous joint publication in Radiology and European Respiratory Journal. The articles are identical except for stylistic changes in keeping with each journal's style. Either version may be used in citing this article. © 2021 RSNA and the European Respiratory Society. Online supplemental material is available for this article.