Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival

Is It Good to Have a Stiff Aorta with Aging? Causes and Consequences

Aortic stiffness increases with advancing age, more than doubling during the human life span, and is a robust predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) clinical events independent of traditional risk factors. The aorta increases in diameter and length to accommodate growing body size and cardiac output in youth, but in middle and older age the aorta continues to remodel to a larger diameter, thinning the pool of permanent elastin fibers, increasing intramural wall stress and resulting in the transfer of load bearing onto stiffer collagen fibers. Whereas aortic stiffening in early middle age may be a compensatory mechanism to normalize intramural wall stress and therefore theoretically "good" early in the life span, the negative clinical consequences of accelerated aortic stiffening beyond middle age far outweigh any earlier physiological benefit. Indeed, aortic stiffness and the loss of the "windkessel effect" with advancing age result in elevated pulsatile pressure and flow in downstream microvasculature that is associated with subclinical damage to high-flow, low-resistance organs such as brain, kidney, retina, and heart. The mechanisms of aortic stiffness include alterations in extracellular matrix proteins (collagen deposition, elastin fragmentation), increased arterial tone (oxidative stress and inflammation-related reduced vasodilators and augmented vasoconstrictors; enhanced sympathetic activity), arterial calcification, vascular smooth muscle cell stiffness, and extracellular matrix glycosaminoglycans. Given the rapidly aging population of the United States, aortic stiffening will likely contribute to substantial CVD burden over the next 2-3 decades unless new therapeutic targets and interventions are identified to prevent the potential avalanche of clinical sequelae related to age-related aortic stiffness.

Evaluating the effect of multivalvular disease on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Aims: To determine the prognosis of multivalvular disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis. Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR for aortic stenosis with covariate-adjusted risk of mortality associated with concomitant valve disease (mitral regurgitation [MR], mitral stenosis [MS] or tricuspid regurgitation [TR]) were included. Results: Moderate-to-severe MR was associated with increased mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.11-2.30; p = 0.01) and 1 year (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.22-2.87; p = 0.004). The presence of all-grade MS did not impact 30-day or 1-year mortality (HR, 30 days: 1.60; 95% CI: 0.71-3.63; p = 0.26; and HR, 1 year: 1.90; 95% CI: 0.98-3.69; p = 0.06); however, an increased risk of 1-year mortality (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.03-2.70; p = 0.04) was observed with severe MS compared with no MS. Moderate-to-severe TR had a higher risk of all-cause mortality at 1 year (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.24-1.78; p < 0.001) compared with no or mild TR. Conclusion: Moderate-to-severe MR or TR, and severe MS, significantly increase mid-term mortality after TAVR.

Harnessing feature extraction capacities from a pre-trained convolutional neural network (VGG-16) for the unsupervised distinction of aortic outflow velocity profiles in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Aims

Hypothesizing that aortic outflow velocity profiles contain more valuable information about aortic valve obstruction and left ventricular contractility than can be captured by the human eye, features of the complex geometry of Doppler tracings from patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) were extracted by a convolutional neural network (CNN).

Methods and results

After pre-training a CNN (VGG-16) on a large data set (ImageNet data set; 14 million images belonging to 1000 classes), the convolutional part was employed to transform Doppler tracings to 1D arrays. Among 366 eligible patients [age: 79.8 ± 6.77 years; 146 (39.9%) women] with pre-procedural echocardiography and right heart catheterization prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), good quality Doppler tracings from 101 patients were analysed. The convolutional part of the pre-trained VGG-16 model in conjunction with principal component analysis and k-means clustering distinguished two shapes of aortic outflow velocity profiles. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that mortality in patients from Cluster 2 (n = 40, 39.6%) was significantly increased [hazard ratio (HR) for 2-year mortality: 3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1-8.9]. Apart from reduced cardiac output and mean aortic valve gradient, patients from Cluster 2 were also characterized by signs of pulmonary hypertension, impaired right ventricular function, and right atrial enlargement. After training an extreme gradient boosting algorithm on these 101 patients, validation on the remaining 265 patients confirmed that patients assigned to Cluster 2 show increased mortality (HR for 2-year mortality: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.4-5.1, P-value: 0.004).

Conclusion

Transfer learning enables sophisticated pattern recognition even in clinical data sets of limited size. Importantly, it is the left ventricular compensation capacity in the face of increased afterload, and not so much the actual obstruction of the aortic valve, that determines fate after TAVR.

Left Ventricle Biomechanics of Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Patient-Specific Computational Model

This study aimed to create an imaging-derived patient-specific computational model of low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) to obtain biomechanics data about the left ventricle. LFLG AS is now a commonly recognized sub-type of aortic stenosis. There remains much controversy over its management, and investigation into ventricular biomechanics may elucidate pathophysiology and better identify patients for valve replacement. ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography images from a patient with LFLG AS were obtained to provide patient-specific geometry for the computational model. Surfaces of the left atrium, left ventricle (LV), and outflow track were segmented. A previously validated multi-scale, multi-physics computational human heart model was adapted to the patient-specific geometry, yielding a model consisting of 91,000 solid elements. This model was coupled to a virtual circulatory system and calibrated to clinically measured parameters from echocardiography and cardiac catheterization data. The simulation replicated key physiologic parameters within 10% of their clinically measured values. Global LV systolic myocardial stress was 7.1 ± 1.8 kPa. Mean stress of the basal, middle, and apical segments were 7.7 ± 1.8 kPa, 9.1 ± 3.8 kPa, and 6.4 ± 0.4 kPa, respectively. This is the first patient-specific computational model of LFLG AS based on clinical imaging. Low myocardial stress correlated with low ejection fraction and eccentric LV remodeling. Further studies are needed to understand how alterations in LV biomechanics correlates with clinical outcomes of AS.

Prognosis of Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Severe, Non-critical Form, With Surgical Treatment Benefits

Objectives

To determine the risk of mortality and need for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods

A longitudinal multicentre study including consecutive patients with severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] < 1.0 cm²) and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients were classified as: high-gradient (HG, mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg), normal-flow low-gradient (NFLG, mean gradient < 40 mmHg, indexed systolic volume (SVi) > 35 ml/m²) and LFLG (mean gradient < 40 mmHg, SVi ≤ 35 ml/m²).

Results

Of 1,391 patients, 147 (10.5%) had LFLG, 752 (54.1%) HG, and 492 (35.4%) NFLG. Echocardiographic parameters of the LFLG group showed similar AVA to the HG group but with less severity in the dimensionless index, calcification, and hypertrophy. The HG group required AVR earlier than NFLG (p < 0.001) and LFLG (p < 0.001), with no differences between LFLG and NFLG groups (p = 0.358). Overall mortality was 27.7% (CI 95% 25.3–30.1) with no differences among groups (p = 0.319). The impact of AVR in terms of overall mortality reduction was observed the most in patients with HG (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.12–0.23; p < 0.001), followed by patients with LFLG (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.13–0.49; p < 0.001), and finally patients with NFLG (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.20–0.44; p < 0.001), with a risk reduction of 84, 75, and 71%, respectively.

Conclusions

Paradoxical LFLG AS affects 10.5% of severe AS, and has a lower need for AVR than the HG group and similar to the NFLG group, with no differences in mortality. AVR had a lower impact on LFLG AS compared with HG AS. Therefore, the findings of the present study showed LFLG AS to have an intermediate clinical risk profile between the HG and NFHG groups.

Evolution of the burden of aortic stenosis by sex in the province of Quebec between 2006 and 2018

Objectives

To evaluate the evolution of the burden of aortic stenosis (AS) by sex in the province of Quebec from 2006–2007 to 2018–2019 and compare the percentage of mortality between people who underwent aortic valve intervention and those who did not.

Methods

Persons aged ≥20 years were identified from the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System using International Classification of Diseases and intervention codes in the hospital files.

Results

In 2018, the crude prevalence and incidence of AS were 0.89% (99% CI 0.89 to 0.90) (n=59 025) and 1.39 per 1000 (1.35 to 1.43) (n=9105), respectively. Age-standardised prevalence and incidence of AS diagnosis increased between 2006 and 2018 from 0.67% (0.66 to 0.68) to 0.75% (0.74 to 0.76) and from 0.91 per 1000 (0.88 to 0.95) to 1.20 per 1000 (1.17 to 1.23), respectively. Among incident AS, the age-standardised percentage of valve interventions increased from 11.7% (10.9 to 12.6) to 14.5% (13.9 to 15.3). This increase was only observed in men. The 30-day mortality was stable among patients with incident AS treated conservatively, from 6.9% (6.5 to 7.4) to 7.3% (6.9 to 7.6), and decreased from 7.6% (6.1 to 9.3) to 3.8% (3.1 to 4.7) among operated patients with incident AS. This decrease was only observed in women. However, from 2010, the age-adjusted mortality among prevalent AS tended to be higher in women.

Conclusions

In the province of Quebec, age-standardised prevalence and incidence of AS diagnosis increased between 2006 and 2018. Among incident AS, there was an increase in valve intervention in men and a decrease in 30-day mortality in women who underwent valve intervention. Overall and age-standardised mortality remained higher in women.

Left Ventricular Mechanics Differ in Subtypes of Aortic Stenosis Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background

Left ventricular (LV) mechanics are impaired in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). We hypothesized that there would be differences in myocardial mechanics, measured by global longitudinal strain (GLS) recovery in patients with four subtypes of severe AS after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), stratified based upon flow and gradient.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 204 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR and were followed post-TAVR at our institution for clinical outcomes. Speckle-tracking transthoracic echocardiography was performed pre- and post-TAVR. Patients were classified as: (1) normal-flow and high-gradient, (2) normal-flow and high-gradient with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF), (3) classical low-flow and low-gradient, or (4) paradoxical low-flow and low-gradient.

Results

Both GLS (−13.9 ± 4.3 to −14.8 ± 4.3, P < 0.0001) and LVEF (55 ± 15 to 57 ± 14%, P = 0.0001) improved immediately post-TAVR. Patients with low-flow AS had similar improvements in LVEF (+2.6 ± 9%) and aortic valve mean gradient (−23.95 ± 8.34 mmHg) as patients with normal-flow AS. GLS was significantly improved in patients with normal-flow (−0.93 ± 3.10, P = 0.0004) compared to low-flow AS. Across all types of AS, improvement in GLS was associated with a survival benefit, with GLS recovery in alive patients (mean GLS improvement of −1.07 ± 3.10, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

LV mechanics are abnormal in all patients with subtypes of severe AS and improve immediately post-TAVR. Recovery of GLS was associated with a survival benefit. Patients with both types of low-flow AS showed significantly improved, but still impaired, GLS post-TAVR, suggesting underlying myopathy that does not correct post-TAVR.

Impact of Primary Hemostasis Disorders on Late Major Bleeding Events among Anticoagulated Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated by TAVR

BACKGROUND

Bleeding events are among the striking complications following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and bleeding prediction models are crucially warranted. Several studies have highlighted that primary hemostasis disorders secondary to persistent loss of high-molecular-weight (HMW) multimers of the von Willebrand factor (vWF) and assessed by adenosine diphosphate closure time (CT-ADP) may be a strong predictor of late major/life-threatening bleeding complications (MLBCs). Pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent comorbidity in TAVR patients and potentially associated with increased bleeding events after the procedure.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the impact of ongoing primary hemostasis disorders, as assessed by post-procedural CT-ADP > 180 s, on clinical events after TAVR among anticoagulated AF patients.

METHODS

An ongoing primary hemostasis disorder was defined by post-procedure CT-ADP > 180 s. Bleeding complications were assessed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of late MLBCs at one-year follow-up. The secondary endpoint was a composite of mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

In total, 384 TAVR patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 57 patients (14.8%) had a prolongated CT-ADP > 180 s. Increased MLBCs were observed in patients with CT-ADP > 180 s (35.1% versus 1.2%; p < 0.0001). Conversely, the occurrence of the composite endpoint did not differ between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified CT-ADP > 180 s (HR 28.93; 95% CI 9.74-85.95; p < 0.0001), bleeding history, paradoxical aortic stenosis (AS), and major vascular complications following TAVR as independent predictors of late MLBCs.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with anticoagulated AF, a post-procedural CT-ADP > 180 s was identified as a strong independent predictor of late MLBCs. These findings suggest that persistent primary hemostasis disorders contribute to a higher risk of late bleeding events and should be considered for a tailored, risk-adjusted antithrombotic therapy after TAVR.

Valvulo-Arterial Impedance and Dimensionless Index for Risk Stratifying Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

The hemodynamic effects of aortic stenosis (AS) consist of increased left ventricular (LV) afterload, reduced myocardial compliance, and increased myocardial workload. The LV in AS patients faces a double load: valvular and arterial loads. As such, the presence of symptoms and occurrence of adverse events in AS should better correlate with calculating the global burden faced by the LV in addition to the transvalvular gradient and aortic valve area (AVA). The valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) is a useful parameter providing an estimate of the global LV hemodynamic load that results from the summation of the valvular and vascular loads. In addition to calculating the global LV afterload, it is paramount to estimate the stenosis severity accurately. In clinical practice, the management of low-flow low-gradient (LF-LG) severe AS with preserved LV ejection fraction requires careful confirmation of stenosis severity. In addition to the Zva, the dimensionless index (DI) is a very useful parameter to express the size of the effective valvular area as a proportion of the cross-section area of the left ventricular outlet tract velocity-time integral (LVOT-VTI) to that of the aortic valve jet (dimensionless velocity ratio). The DI is calculated by a ratio of the sub-valvular velocity obtained by pulsed-wave Doppler (LVOT-VTI) divided by the maximum velocity obtained by continuous-wave Doppler across the aortic valve (AV-VTI). In contrast to AVA measurement, the DI does not require the calculation of LVOT cross-sectional area, a major cause of erroneous assessment and underestimation of AVA. Hence, among patients with LG severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction, calculation of DI in routine echocardiographic practice may be useful to identify a subgroup of patients at higher risk of mortality who may derive benefit from aortic valve replacement. This article aims to elucidate the Zva and DI in different clinical situations, correlate with the standard indexes of AS severity, LV geometry, and function, and thus prove to improve risk stratification and clinical decision making in patients with severe AS.

Antihypertensive treatment and risk factors for syncope in asymptomatic aortic stenosis patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND

Evidence for treating hypertension in patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis(AS) is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

Given the paucity of data on the relationship between syncope and antihypertensive treatment in aortic stenosis. This study sought to investigate this association in patients admitted to our hospital.

METHODS

A total of 158 patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis were analyzed. Follow-up was conducted by clinic visit, telephone contact, or review of electronic medical records. Outcomes were syncope.

RESULTS

Hypertension were documented in 90 of the 158 patients with moderate or severe AS, and 77 of them received antihypertensive medications. During an average 28 months follow-up period, the occurrence of syncope was observed in 13 patients. Among them, 8 were in antihypertensive group (n = 77) and 5 in normotensive group (n = 68). There was no significant difference in incidence of syncope between the two groups. Patients with treated hypertension and syncope had a lower stroke volume index (SVi), a higher valve arterial impedance (Z_VA), a smaller SAC than those without. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in syncope cumulative incidence between antihypertensive group and normotensive group (log rank P = .478). Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that both Z_VA (hazard ratio:19.006, 95% confidence interval: 4.664 to77.448;P = .002) and LVMI (hazard ratio:1.484, 95% confidence interval: 1.427 to 5.157;P = .016) were associated with development of syncope, whereas hypertension were not related independently to syncope (hazard ratio:0.935, 95% confidence interval: 0.786 to3.173; P = .869).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with moderate or severe AS, concomitant hypertension, and antihypertensive treatment didn't increase the occurrence of syncope, whereas higher Z_VA was independently associated with greater risk of syncope.

Severe aortic stenosis echocardiographic thresholds revisited

BACKGROUND

In view of inconsistencies in threshold values of severe aortic stenosis (AS) hemodynamic indices, it is unclear what is the relative contribution of each variable in a binary classification of AS based on aortic valve replacement (AVR) indication. We aimed to assess relative discriminative value and optimal threshold of each constituent hemodynamic parameter for this classification and confirm additional prognostic value.

METHODS

Echocardiography studies of 168 patients with ≥ moderate AS were included. AS types were dichotomized into Group-A, comprising moderate and Normal-Flow Low-Gradient (NFLG), and Group-B, comprising High-Gradient(HG), Low Ejection Fraction Low-Flow Low-Gradient(Low EF-LFLG), and Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient(PLFLG) AS. Aortic valve area (AVA), Doppler velocity index (DVI), peak aortic velocity, mean gradient, stroke volume index and transaortic flow rate(TFR) were assessed for A/B Group discrimination value and optimal thresholds were determined. Dichotomized values were assessed for predictive value for AVR or death.

RESULTS

C-statistic values for binary AS classification was .74-.9 for the tested variables. AVA and DVI featured the highest score, and SVI the lowest one. AVA≤.81 cm² and DVI≤.249 had 87.6% and 86% respective sensitivity for Group B patients, and a similar specificity of 80.9%. During a mean follow-up of 9.1±10.1 months, each of the tested dichotomized variables except for SVI predicted AVR or death on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

An AVA value ≤.81 cm² or a DVI ≤ .249 threshold carry the highest discriminative value for severe AS in patients with aortic stenosis, translating into an independent prognostic value, and can be helpful in making clinical decisions.

Comparison of Echocardiographic Variables in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction Grouped by Flow and Gradient

The pathophysiology of severe aortic stenosis (AS) is complex with vascular, valvular, and myocardial components. To better define this process, we compared echocardiographic and clinical variables in patients with severe AS and preserved EF according to flow and gradient. We retrospectively studied the clinical and echocardiographic data of 287 patients (mean age 76 ± 11 years, 57% men) from 2012 to 2017 with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm²/m²) and preserved ejection fraction (>50%). Patients were divided into 4 groups based on flow (stroke volume index < or ≥35 ml/m²) and mean aortic pressure gradient (< or ≥40 mm Hg): normal flow, high gradient (NFHG), normal flow, low gradient (NFLG), low flow, high gradient (LFHG) and low flow, low gradient (LFLG). Among patients with severe AS, 23% had NFHG, 44% had NFLG, 10% had LFHG, and 23% had LFLG. Only diabetes was marginally significantly different among the clinical variables. Aortic valve area index was largest in NFLG and smallest in LFHG (p < 0.001 for pairwise comparisons). Valvuloarterial impedance was highest in LFHG (p < 0.01 for pairwise comparisons). Systemic arterial compliance was lower and systemic vascular resistance was higher in low flow compared with normal flow groups. In conclusion, LFHG had the smallest valve area index along with markers of increased vascular resistance combined with high gradients, which suggests a unique pathophysiology in this group of severe AS patients with preserved EF.

Proposal criteria of paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis for predicting prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient (PLF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with poor prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study aimed to verify the conventional criteria of PLF-LG AS (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] > 50%, mean aortic valve pressure gradient [AVPG] < 40 mm Hg and stroke volume index [SVI] < 35 ml/m² by measuring Doppler method) compatible for predicting prognosis in patients undergoing TAVI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 128 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI for AS with LVEF > 50% were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the hospital readmission due to heart failure (HRHF) and the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality after hospital discharge. The patients were classified by both the conventional criteria of PLF-LG AS and the proposal criteria of PLF-LG AS if mean aortic valve pressure gradient (AVPG) < 40 mmHg and SVI by measuring Simpson's method < cut off value based on the ROC curve for predicting HRHF.

RESULTS

According to the conventional criteria, only 6 patients were diagnosed with PLF-LG AS. However, according to the proposal criteria, 16 patients were diagnosed with PLF-LG AS. Fourteen patients developed HRHF during the follow-up period after TAVI. Based on the ROC curves, SVI by measuring Simpson's method (cut off value = 25 ml/m²) had higher sensitivity and specificity for predicting HRHF (AUC = 0.74, p = 0.0013) than SVI by measuring Doppler method (AUC = 0.63, p = 0.045). The multivariate analysis revealed that PLF-LG AS defined by the proposal criteria (HR: 5.25; 95% CI: 1.60-17.16; p = 0.0073) but not by the conventional criteria was independently associated with HRHF. PLF-LG AS defined by the conventional criteria and the proposal criteria were not associated with all-cause mortality in the univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that new criteria of PLF-LG AS defined as SVI < 25 ml/m² measured by Simpson's method could predict HRHF in patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI.

Repeated echocardiographic imaging of aortic stenosis: Real-life lessons

BACKGROUND

Timing of aortic valve intervention is dependent on the accuracy and reproducibility of echocardiographic (ECHO) parameters. We aimed to assess haemodynamic subsets of aortic stenosis (AS), their change over time, and variability of ECHO parameters.

METHOD

This retrospective, longitudinal study compared sequential ECHO over 15 months to identify concordant or discordant aortic valve area (AVA) and mean pressure gradient (MPG) in order to determine the real world variability of echocardiographic indices.

RESULTS

We included 143 patients with a mean age of 76.0 years. The median length of time between studies was 112 days (IQR 38-208). Initially, participants were classified as 9 (6.4%) mild, 47 (33.6%) moderate, and 84 (60.0%%) severe AS. In 80 (55.9%) AVA and MPG were concordant; stroke volume index (SVi) was < 35 mL/m² in 53 (74.6%). AS severity was downgraded in 29 (20.7%) patients. MPG was most consistent and AVA was the least consistent between successive investigations (intraclass correlation coefficients R = .86 and R = .76, respectively). Even small variations in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) measurement of 1 standard deviation reclassified up to 67% of participants from severe to non-severe.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of patients with AS have valve area/gradient discordance. Variations in LVOT diameter measurement commensurate with clinical practice reclassified AS severity in up to two-third of cases. Change in AS severity should only be accepted following careful scrutiny of all available ECHO data.

Diagnostic Work-Up of the Aortic Patient: An Integrated Approach toward the Best Therapeutic Option

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease. In the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard of care for symptomatic patients at high surgical risk. Recently, indications to TAVI have also been extended to the low surgical risk and intermediate surgical risk populations. Consequently, in this setting, some aspects acquire greater relevance: surgical risk evaluation, clinical assessment, multimodality imaging of the valve, and management of coronary artery disease. Moreover, future issues such as coronary artery re-access and valve-in-valve interventions should be considered in the valve selection process. This review aims to summarize the principal aspects of a multidimensional (multidisciplinary) and comprehensive preprocedural work-up. The Heart Team is at the center of the decision-making process of the management of aortic valve disease and bears responsibility for offering each patient a tailored approach based on an individual evaluation of technical aspects together with the risks and benefits of each modality. Considering the progressive expansion in TAVI indication and technological progress, the role of a work-up and multidisciplinary Heart Team will be even more relevant.

Moderate gradient severe aortic stenosis: diagnosis, prognosis and therapy

Aortic stenosis (AS) is defined as severe in the presence of: mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, peak aortic velocity ≥4 m/s, and aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm² (or an indexed AVA ≤0.6 cm²/m²). However, up to 40% of patients have a discrepancy between gradient and AVA, i.e. AVA ≤1 cm² (indicating severe AS) and a moderate gradient: >20 and <40 mmHg (typical of moderate stenosis). This condition is called ‘low-gradient AS’ and includes very heterogeneous clinical entities, with different pathophysiological mechanisms. The diagnostic tools needed to discriminate the different low-gradient AS phenotypes include colour-Doppler echocardiography, dobutamine stress echocardiography, computed tomography scan for the definition of the calcium score, and recently magnetic resonance imaging. The prognostic impact of low-gradient AS is heterogeneous. Classical low-flow low-gradient AS [reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)] has the worst prognosis, followed by paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS (preserved LVEF). Conversely, normal-flow low-gradient AS is associated with a better prognosis. The indications of the guidelines recommend surgical or percutaneous treatment, depending on the risk and comorbidities of the individual patient, both for patients with classic low-flow low-gradient AS and for those with paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS.

Pseudo-discordance mimicking low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

While the combination of a small aortic valve area (AVA) and low mean gradient is frequently labeled 'low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS)', there are two potential causes for this finding: underestimation of mean gradient and underestimation of AVA.

METHODS

In order to investigate the prevalence and causes of discordant echocardiographic findings in symptomatic patients with AS and normal left ventricular (LV) function, we evaluated 72 symptomatic patients with AS and normal LV function by comparing Doppler, invasive, computed tomography (CT) LV outflow tract (LVOT) area, and calcium score (CaSc).

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients had discordant echocardiographic findings (mean gradient < 40 mmHg, AVA ≤ 1 cm²). Of those, 19 had discordant invasive measurements (true discordant [TD]) and 17 concordant (false discordant [FD]): In 12 of the FD the mean gradient was > 30 mmHg; technical pitfalls were found in 10 patients (no reliable right parasternal Doppler in 6). LVOT area by echocardiography or CT could not differentiate between concordants and discordants nor between TD and FD (p = NS). CaSc was similar in concordants and FD (p = 0.3), and it was higher in true concordants than in TD (p = 0.005). CaSc positive predictive value for the correct diagnosis of severe AS was 95% for concordants and 93% for discordants.

CONCLUSIONS

Discordant echocardiographic findings are commonly found in patients with symptomatic AS. Underestimation of the true mean gradient due to technical difficulties is an important cause of these discrepant findings. LVOT area by echocardiography or CT cannot differentiate between TD and FD. In the absence of a reliable and compete multi-window Doppler evaluation, patients should undergo CaSc assessment.

Size-adjusted aortic valve area: refining the definition of severe aortic stenosis

AIMS

Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) <1 cm2 or an AVA indexed to body surface area (BSA) <0.6 cm/m2, despite little evidence supporting the latter approach and important intrinsic limitations of BSA indexation. We hypothesized that AVA indexed to height (H) might be more applicable to a wide range of populations and body morphologies and might provide a better predictive accuracy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 1298 patients with degenerative AS and preserved ejection fraction from three different countries and continents (derivation cohort), we aimed to establish an AVA/H threshold that would be equivalent to 1.0 cm2 for defining severe AS. In a distinct prospective validation cohort of 395 patients, we compared the predictive accuracy of AVA/BSA and AVA/H. Correlations between AVA and AVA/BSA or AVA/H were excellent (all R2 > 0.79) but greater with AVA/H. Regressions lines were markedly different in obese and non-obese patients with AVA/BSA (P < 0.0001) but almost identical with AVA/H (P = 0.16). AVA/BSA values that corresponded to an AVA of 1.0 cm2 were markedly different in obese and non-obese patients (0.48 and 0.59 cm2/m2) but not with AVA/H (0.61 cm2/m for both). Agreement for the diagnosis of severe AS (AVA < 1 cm2) was significantly higher with AVA/H than with AVA/BSA (P < 0.05). Similar results were observed across the three countries. An AVA/H cut-off value of 0.6 cm2/m [HR = 8.2(5.6-12.1)] provided the best predictive value for the occurrence of AS-related events [absolute AVA of 1 cm2: HR = 7.3(5.0-10.7); AVA/BSA of 0.6 cm2/m2 HR = 6.7(4.4-10.0)].

CONCLUSION

In a large multinational/multiracial cohort, AVA/H was better correlated with AVA than AVA/BSA and a cut-off value of 0.6 cm2/m provided a better diagnostic and prognostic value than 0.6 cm2/m2. Our results suggest that severe AS should be defined as an AVA < 1 cm2 or an AVA/H < 0.6 cm2/m rather than a BSA-indexed value of 0.6 cm2/m2.

Doppler Mean Gradient Is Discordant to Aortic Valve Calcium Scores in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Doppler mean gradient (MG) may underestimate aortic stenosis (AS) severity when obtained during atrial fibrillation (AF) because of lower forward flow compared with sinus rhythm (SR). Whether AS is more advanced at the time of referral for aortic valve intervention in AF compared with SR is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine flow-independent computed tomographic aortic valve calcium scores (AVCS) and their concordance to MG in AF versus SR in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent TAVR from 2016 to 2020 for native valve severe AS with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% were identified from an institutional TAVR database. MGs during AF and SR in high-gradient AS (HGAS) and low-gradient AS (LGAS) were compared with AVCS (AVCS/MG ratio). AVCS were obtained within 90 days of pre-TAVR echocardiography.

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty-three patients were included; median age was 82 years (interquartile range [IQR], 76-86 years), and 46% were women. AF was present in 109 (17%) and SR in 524 (83%) patients during echocardiography. Aortic valve area index was slightly smaller in AF versus SR (0.43 cm²/m² [IQR, 0.39-0.47 cm²/m²] vs 0.46 cm²/m² [IQR, 0.41-0.51 cm²/m²], P = .0003). Stroke volume index, transaortic flow rate, and MG were lower in AF (P < .0001 for all). AVCS were higher in men with AF compared with SR (3,510 Agatston units [AU] [IQR, 2,803-4,030 AU] vs 2,722 AU [IQR, 2,180-3,467 AU], P < .0001) in HGAS but not in LGAS. AVCS were not different in women with AF versus SR. Overall AVCS/MG ratios were higher in AF versus SR in HGAS and LGAS (P < .03 for all), except in women with LGAS.

CONCLUSIONS

AVCS were higher than expected by MG in AF compared with SR. The very high AVCS in men with AF and HGAS at the time of TAVR suggests late diagnosis of severe AS because of underestimated AS severity during progressive AS and/or late referral to TAVR. Additional studies are needed to examine the extent to which echocardiography may be underestimating AS severity in AF.

Head-to-Head Comparison of Different Software Solutions for AVC Quantification Using Contrast-Enhanced MDCT

Aortic valve calcification (AVC) in aortic stenosis patients has diagnostic and prognostic implications. Little is known about the interchangeability of AVC obtained from different multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) software solutions. Contrast-enhanced MDCT data sets of 50 randomly selected aortic stenosis patients were analysed using three different software vendors (3Mensio, CVI42, Syngo.Via). A subset of 10 patients were analysed twice for the estimation of intra-observer variability. Intra- and inter-observer variability were determined using the ICC reliability method, Bland-Altman analysis and coefficients of variation. No differences were revealed between the software solutions in the AVC calculations (3Mensio 941 ± 623, Syngo.Via 948 mm³ ± 655, CVI42 941 ± 637; p = 0.455). The best inter-vendor agreement was found between the CVI42 and the Syngo.Via (ICC 0.997 (CI 0.995-0.998)), followed by the 3Mensio and the CVI42 (ICC 0.996 (CI 0.922-0.998)), and the 3Mensio and the Syngo.Via (ICC 0.992 (CI 0.986-0.995)). There was excellent intra- (3Mensio: ICC 0.999 (0.995-1.000); CVI42: ICC 1.000 (0.999-1.000); Syngo.Via: ICC 0.998 (0.993-1.000)) and inter-observer variability (3Mensio: ICC 1.000 (0.999-1.000); CVI42: ICC 1.000 (1.000-1.000); Syngo.Via: ICC 0.996 (0.985-0.999)) for all software types. Contrast-enhanced MDCT-derived AVC scores are interchangeable between and reproducible within different commercially available software solutions. This is important since sufficient reproducibility, interchangeability and valid results represent prerequisites for accurate TAVR planning and its widespread clinical use.

Role of Exercise Testing and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Paradoxical Severe Aortic Stenosis

Introduction The clinical behavior and prognosis of patients with asymptomatic paradoxical low-gradient aortic stenosis (PLGAS) still remain controversial. Some authors consider PLGAS as an echocardiographically poorly quantified moderate AS (MAS). We aimed to investigate the clinical behavior of PLGAS by comparing it with that of asymptomatic high-gradient aortic stenosis (HG-AS) and MAS using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with speckle tracking imaging (STI) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The hypothesis of our study is, unlike that described by other authors, to demonstrate the existence of clinical and echocardiographic differences between PLGAS and MAS. Methods A cohort of 113 patients was included and categorized into three groups according to AS type: MAS (n=63), HG-AS (n=29), and PLGAS (n=21). Patients' clinical data were obtained. Patients underwent 2D TTE with STI and CPET. Results There were no significant differences in the clinical variables between the three AS groups. In the multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis, with PLGAS being the reference category, the most powerful variable for establishing a difference with HG-AS was the left ventricular mass (LVM) indexed by body-surface area (odds ratio [OR]=1.04, confidence interval (CI)=1.01-1.06, p<0.05). The MAS group showed less abnormal CPET (OR=0.198, CI=0.06-0.69, p<0.05), and higher left ventricle global longitudinal strain rate (GLSR) (OR=0.003, CI=0.00-0.35, p<0.05) than the PLGAS group. Conclusions TTE with STI and CPET established the clear differences between patients with asymptomatic PLGAS and those with asymptomatic MAS, as well as the similarities between patients with PLGAS and those with HG-AS. Our data identify PLGAS as a completely different entity from MAS.

Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Valve Stenosis: The Role of Non-Invasive Imaging

Aortic stenosis is the most common heart valve disease necessitating surgical or percutaneous intervention. Imaging has a central role for the initial diagnostic work-up, the follow-up and the selection of the optimal timing and type of intervention. Referral for aortic valve replacement is currently driven by the severity and by the presence of aortic stenosis-related symptoms or signs of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. This review aims to provide an update of the imaging techniques and seeks to highlight a practical approach to help clinical decision making.

Myocardial Contraction Fraction for Risk Stratification in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) is a volumetric measure of myocardial shortening independent of left ventricular size and geometry. This multicenter study investigates the usefulness of MCF for risk stratification in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

METHODS

We included 643 consecutive patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction in whom MCF was computed at baseline and analyzed mortality during follow-up.

RESULTS

Throughout follow-up with medical and surgical management (34.9 [16.1-65.3] months), lower MCF tertiles had higher mortality than the highest tertile. Eighty-month survival was 56±4% for MCF>41%, 41±4% for MCF 30% to 41%, and 40±4% for MCF<30% (P<0.001). After comprehensive adjustment, mortality risk remained high for MCF 30% to 41% (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.53 [1.08-2.18]) and for MCF<30% (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.82 [1.24-2.66]) versus MCF>41%. The optimal MCF cutoff point for mortality prediction was 41%. Age, body mass index, Charlson index, peak aortic velocity, and ejection fraction were independently associated with mortality. MCF (χ² to improve 10.39; P=0.001), provided greater additional prognostic value over the baseline parameters than stroke volume (SV) index (χ² to improve 5.41; P=0.042), left ventricular mass index (χ² to improve 2.15; P=0.137), or global longitudinal strain (χ² to improve 3.67; P=0.061). MCF outperformed ejection fraction for mortality prediction. When patients were classified by SV index and MCF, mortality risk was low when SV index was ≥30 mL/m² and MCF>41%, higher for patients with SV index ≥30 mL/m² and MCF≤41% (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.47 [1.05-2.07]) and extremely high for patients with SV index <30 mL/m² (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.29 [1.45-3.62]).

CONCLUSIONS

MCF is a valuable marker of risk in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction and could improve decision-making, especially in normal-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

Echocardiography and EuroSCORE II for the stratification of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of echocardiography and the EuroSCORE II in stratifying patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LG SAS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) with or without aortic valve intervention (AVI). The study included 323 patients with LG SAS (aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm² and mean pressure gradient < 40 mmHg). Patients were divided into two groups: a high-risk group (EuroSCORE II ≥ 4%, n = 115) and a low-risk group (EuroSCORE II < 4%, n = 208). Echocardiographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed. All-cause mortality was used as a clinical outcome during mean follow-up of 2 ± 1.3 years. Two-year cumulative survival was significantly lower in the high-risk group than the low-risk patients (62.3% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.001). AVI tended to reduce mortality in the high-risk patients (70% vs. 59%; p = 0.065). It did not significantly reduce mortality in the low-risk patients (82.8% with AVI vs. 81.2%, p = 0.68). Multivariable analysis identified heart failure, renal dysfunction and stroke volume index (SVi) as independent predictors for mortality. The study suggested that individualization of AVI based on risk stratification could be considered in a patient with LG SAS and preserved LVEF.

Wild-Type Transthyretin Amyloidosis in Female Patients - Consideration of Sex Differences

Background: With recent advances in non-invasive diagnostic tools, some studies indicate that wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) may be more common in females than previously reported. However, the clinical characteristics of female ATTRwt patients have not been determined. Methods and Results: Of the 78 consecutive patients with ATTRwt in our cohort, 14 (17.9 %) were female. Compared with male patients, female ATTRwt patients had smaller left ventricular (LV) wall thicknesses (ventricular septum thickness 12.9 vs. 14.2 mm [P=0.081]; posterior wall thickness 12.7 vs. 13.6 mm [P=0.035]) and a higher LV ejection fraction (EF; mean [±SD] 58.4±8.9% vs. 48.9±11.8%; P=0.006). However, the severity of heart failure (HF), as assessed by HF stage, New York Heart Association functional class and B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations, did not differ between female and male patients. Moreover, LV mass index and relative wall thickness were increased and the stroke volume index was reduced in both female and male patients. In organ biopsies, female patients had a higher sensitivity to transthyretin deposition from abdominal fat than male patients (positive abdominal fat biopsy 80.0 % vs. 26.5%; P=0.016). Conclusions: This study suggests that a relatively large proportion of elderly females have ATTRwt. Female ATTRwt patients had HF symptoms even at the stage of mild LV hypertrophy and preserved EF. Abdominal fat biopsy may be useful to diagnose ATTRwt, especially in female patients with HF.

Estimating the Haemodynamic Streamline Vena Contracta as the Effective Orifice Area Measured from Reconstructed Multislice Phase-contrast MR Images for Patients with Moderately Accelerated Aortic Stenosis

PURPOSE

In aortic stenosis (AS), the discrepancy between moderately accelerated flow and effective orifice area (EOA) continues to pose a challenge. We developed a method of measuring the vena contracta area as hemodynamic EOA using cardiac MRI focusing on AS patients with a moderately accelerated flow to solve the problem that AS severity can currently be determined only by echocardiography.

METHODS

We investigated 40 patients with a peak transvalvular velocity > 3.0 m/s on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The patients were divided into highly accelerated and moderately accelerated AS groups according to whether or not the peak transvalvular velocity was ≥ 4.0 m/s. From the multislice 2D cine phase-contrast MRI data, the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta of the reconstructed streamline in the Valsalva sinus was defined as MRI-EOAs. Patient symptoms and echocardiography data, including EOA (defined as TTE-EOA), were derived from the continuity equation using TTE.

RESULTS

All participants in the highly accelerated AS group (n = 19) showed a peak velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s in MRI. Eleven patients in the moderately accelerated AS group (n = 21) had a TTE-EOA < 1.00 cm². In the moderately accelerated AS group, MRI-EOAs demonstrated a strong correlation with TTE-EOAs (r = 0.76, P < 0.01). Meanwhile, in the highly accelerated AS group, MRI-EOAs demonstrated positivity but a moderate correlation with TTE-EOAs (r = 0.63, P = 0.004). MRI-EOAs were overestimated compared to TTE-EOAs. In terms of the moderately accelerated AS group, the best cut-off value for MRI-EOAs was < 1.23 cm², compatible with TTE-EOAs < 1.00 cm², with an excellent prediction of the New York Heart Association classification ≥ III (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 76.9%).

CONCLUSION

MRI-EOAs may be an alternative to conventional echocardiography for patients with moderately accelerated AS, especially those with discordant echocardiographic parameters.

Management of aortic stenosis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations

Multiple guidelines exist for the management of aortic stenosis (AS). We systematically reviewed current guidelines and recommendations, developed by national or international medical organizations, on management of AS to aid clinical decision-making. Publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE between 1 June 2010 and 15 January 2021 were identified. Additionally, the International Guideline Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, and websites of relevant organizations were searched. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Two reviewers assessed rigour of guideline development and extracted the recommendations. Of the seven guidelines and recommendations retrieved, five showed considerable rigour of development. Those rigourously developed, agreed on the definition of severe AS and diverse haemodynamic phenotypes, indications and contraindications for intervention in symptomatic severe AS, surveillance intervals in asymptomatic severe AS, and the importance of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) and shared decision-making. Discrepancies exist in age and surgical risk cut-offs for recommending surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) vs. transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the use of biomarkers and complementary multimodality imaging for decision-making in asymptomatic patients and surveillance intervals for non-severe AS. Contemporary guidelines for AS management agree on the importance of MDT involvement and shared decision-making for individualized treatment and unanimously indicate valve replacement in severe, symptomatic AS. Discrepancies exist in thresholds for age and procedural risk used in choosing between SAVR and TAVI, role of biomarkers and complementary imaging modalities to define AS severity and risk of progression in asymptomatic patients.

Advanced cardiovascular multimodal imaging and aortic stenosis

Aortic valve stenosis has become the most common valvular heart disease on account of aging population and increasing life expectancy. Echocardiography is the primary diagnosis tool for this, but it still has many flaws. Therefore, advanced cardiovascular multimodal imaging techniques are continuously being developed in order to overcome these limitations. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) allows a comprehensive morphological and functional evaluation of the aortic valve and provides important data for the diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with aortic stenosis. CMR can functionally assess the aortic flow using two-dimensional and time-resolved three-dimensional velocity-encoded phase-contrast techniques. Furthermore, by late gadolinium enhancement and T1-mapping, CMR can reveal the presence of both irreversible replacement and diffuse interstitial myocardial fibrosis. Moreover, its role in guiding aortic valve replacement procedures is beginning to take shape. Recent studies have rendered the importance of active and passive biomechanics in risk stratification and prognosis prediction in patients with aortic stenosis, but more work is required is just in its infancy, but data are promising. In addition, cardiac computed tomography is particularly useful for the diagnosis of aortic valve stenosis, and in preprocedural evaluation of the aorta, while positron emission tomography can be also used to assess valvular inflammation and active calcification. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of current available data regarding advanced cardiovascular multimodal imaging in aortic stenosis.

Ageing, Hypertension and Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Conscious Uncoupling

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is no longer considered to be a disease of fixed left ventricular (LV) afterload (due to an obstructive valve), but rather, functions as a series circuit with important contributions from both the valve and ageing vasculature. Patients with AS are frequently elderly, with hypertension and a markedly remodelled aorta. The arterial component is sizable, and yet, the contribution of ventricular afterload has been difficult to determine. Arterial stiffening increases the speed of propagation of the blood pressure wave along the central arteries (estimated as the pulse wave velocity), which results in an earlier return of reflected waves. The effect is to augment blood pressure in the proximal aorta during systole, increasing the central pulse pressure and, in turn, placing even greater afterload on the heart. Elevated global LV afterload is known to have adverse consequences on LV remodelling, function and survival in patients with AS. Consequently, there is renewed focus on methods to estimate the relative contributions of local versus global changes in arterial mechanics and valvular haemodynamics in patients with AS. We present a review on existing and upcoming methods to quantify valvulo-arterial impedance and thereby global LV load in patients with AS.

Arterial biomarkers in the evaluation, management and prognosis of aortic stenosis

Degenerative aortic valve stenosis is the most common primary valve disease and a significant cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In an era when new techniques for the management of aortic stenosis are gaining ground, the understanding of this disease is more important than ever to optimize treatment. So far, the focus has been placed on the assessment of the valve itself. However, the role that the arterial system plays in the pathogenesis and natural history of the disease needs to be further elucidated. Arteriosclerosis, when it coexists with a stenotic valve, augments the load posed on the left ventricle contributing to greater impairment of cardiovascular function. Arterial stiffness, a well-established predictor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, could play a role in the prognosis and quality of life of this population. Several studies using a variety of indices to assess arterial stiffness have tried to address the potential utility of arterial function assessment in the case of aortic stenosis. Importantly, reliable data identify a prognostic role of arterial biomarkers in aortic stenosis and stress their possible use to optimize timing and method of treatment. This review aims at summarizing the existing knowledge on the interplay between the heart and the vessels in the presence of degenerative aortic stenosis, prior, upon and after interventional management. Further, it discusses the evidence supporting the potential clinical application of arterial biomarkers for the assessment of progression, severity, management and prognosis of aortic stenosis.

High Prevalence of Severe Aortic Stenosis in Low-Flow State Associated With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a low-flow state and may underestimate aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Single-high Doppler signals (HS) consistent with severe AS (peak velocity ≥4 m/s or mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg) are averaged down in current practice. The objective for the study was to determine the significance of HS in AF low-gradient AS (LGAS).

METHODS

One thousand five hundred forty-one patients with aortic valve area ≤1 cm² and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were identified and classified as high-gradient AS (HGAS) (≥40 mm Hg) and LGAS (<40 mm Hg), and AF versus sinus rhythm (SR). Available computed tomography aortic valve calcium scores (AVCS) were retrieved from the medical record. Outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 76±11 years, female 47%. Mean gradient was 51±12 in SR-HGAS, 48±10 in AF-HGAS, 31±5 in SR-LGAS, and 29±7 mm Hg in AF-LGAS, all P≤0.001 versus SR-HGAS; HS were present in 33% of AF-LGAS. AVCS were available in 34%. Compared with SR-HGAS (2409 arbitrary units; interquartile range, 1581-3462) AVCS were higher in AF-HGAS (2991 arbitrary units; IQR1978-4229, P=0.001), not different in AF-LGAS (2399 arbitrary units; IQR1817-2810, P=0.47), and lower in SR-LGAS (1593 arbitrary units; IQR945-1832, P<0.001); AVCS in AF-LGAS were higher when HS were present (P=0.048). Compared with SR-HGAS, the age-, sex-, comorbidity index-, and time-dependent aortic valve replacement-adjusted mortality risk was higher in AF-HGAS (hazard ratio=1.82 [1.40-2.36], P<0.001) and AF-LGAS with HS (hazard ratio=1.54 [1.04-2.26], P=0.03) but not different in AF-LGAS without HS or SR-LGAS (both P=not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe AS was common in AF-LGAS. AVCS in AF-LGAS were not different from SR-HGAS. AVCS were higher and mortality worse in AF-LGAS when HS were present.

All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis with aortic sclerosis and mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis: A cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic sclerosis, a precursor of AS, are associated with mortality in the general population; however, their association in patients undergoing hemodialysis with higher morbidity of AS is unknown. Thus, we investigated the mortality of aortic sclerosis and mild-to-moderate AS in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing hemodialysis at nine dialysis facilities who underwent screening echocardiography between January 2008 and December 2019. We investigated the mortality of patients with aortic sclerosis or mild-to-moderate AS using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Among 1,878 patients undergoing hemodialysis, those with normal aortic valves, aortic sclerosis, mild AS, moderate AS, severe AS, and prosthetic aortic valves were 844 (45%), 793 (42%), 161 (8.6%), 38 (2.0%), 11 (0.6%), and 31 (1.7%), respectively. After excluding patients with severe AS and prosthetic aortic valves, we performed comparative analysis on 1,836 patients (mean age, 67 years; 66% male). In a median follow-up of 3.6 years, crude death rates (per 100 person-years) were 5.2, 10.6, and 13.0 in patients with normal aortic valves, aortic sclerosis, and mild-to-moderate AS, respectively. Compared with normal aortic valves, both aortic sclerosis and mild-to-moderate AS were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular death: adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 1.36 (1.13-1.65) and 1.36 (1.02-1.80) for all-cause death; and 1.52 (1.06-2.17) and 1.74 (1.04-2.92) for cardiovascular death, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic sclerosis and mild-to-moderate AS were independent risk factors for all-cause and cardiovascular death in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Valvular Disease and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome of shortness of breath and/or exercise intolerance secondary to elevated left ventricular filling pressures at rest or with exertion either as a result of primary diastolic dysfunction (primary HFpEF) or secondary to specific underlying causes (secondary HFpEF). In secondary HFpEF, early intervention of underlying valvular heart disease generally improves symptoms and prolongs survival. In primary HFpEF, there is increasing awareness of the existence and prognostic implications of secondary atrioventricular valve regurgitation. Further studies will clarify their mechanisms and the effectiveness of valvular intervention in this intriguing HFpEF subgroup.

Diabetes Mellitus and Its Implications in Aortic Stenosis Patients

Aortic stenosis (AS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are both progressive diseases that if left untreated, result in significant morbidity and mortality. Several studies revealed that the prevalence of DM is substantially higher in patients with AS and, thus, the progression from mild to severe AS is greater in those patients with DM. DM and common comorbidities associated with both diseases, DM and AS, increase patient management complexity and make aortic valve replacement the only effective treatment. For that reason, a better understanding of the pathogenesis underlying both these diseases and the relationships between them is necessary to design more appropriate preventive and therapeutic approaches. In this review, we provided an overview of the main aspects of the relationship between AS and DM, including common comorbidities and risk factors. We also discuss the established treatments/therapies in patients with AS and DM.

Low Relative Valve Load is Associated With Paradoxical Low-Flow Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Adverse Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical low-flow (LF) severe aortic stenosis (AS) despite preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) has been shown to be distinct from normal-flow (NF) AS, with a poorer prognosis. Relative valve load (RVL) is a novel echocardiographic haemodynamic index based on the ratio of transaortic mean pressure gradient to the global valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) in order to estimate the contribution of the valvular afterload to the global LV load. We aimed to determine the usefulness of RVL in LF AS versus NF AS.

METHOD

A total of 450 consecutive patients with medically managed severe AS (aortic valve area <1.0 cm²) with preserved LVEF (>50%) were studied. Patients were divided into LF (stroke volume index <35 mL/m²) or NF, and high RVL or low RVL. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic profiles, as well as clinical outcomes, were compared.

RESULTS

There were 149 (33.1%) patients with LF. Despite higher global impedance in LF (Zva 6.3±2.4 vs 3.9±0.9 mmHg/mL/m²; p<0.001) compared with NF, the RVL in LF AS was significantly lower (5.4±2.7 vs 9.8±5.1 mL/m²; p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, low RVL (≤7.51) remained independently associated with poor clinical outcomes on Cox regression (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.68), with 53.2% sensitivity and 70.3% specificity. This was comparable to other prognostic indices in AS. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that low RVL was associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased systemic arterial afterload may be important in the pathophysiology of LF AS. Low RVL was an independent predictor of poor clinical outcomes in medically managed severe AS. There may be a greater role in the attenuation of systemic arterial afterload in AS to improve outcomes.

Prognosis of paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

AIMS

In paradoxical low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (PLFLG AS) patients, stroke volume index (SVI) is reduced despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Although reduced SVI is already known as a poor prognostic predictor, the outcomes of PLFLG AS patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have not been clearly defined. We retrospectively investigated the post-TAVR outcomes of PLFLG AS patients in comparison with normal-flow high-gradient aortic stenosis (NFHG AS) patients.

METHODS

The current observational study included 245 patients with NFHG AS (mean transaortic pressure gradient ≥40 mmHg and LVEF ≥ 50%) and 48 patients with PLFLG AS (mean transaortic pressure gradient <40 mmHg, LVEF ≥ 50% and SVI < 35 ml/m2). The endpoints were all-cause mortality, hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV.

RESULTS

PLFLG AS patients had a significantly higher proportion with a history of atrial fibrillation/flutter as compared with NFHG AS patients. All-cause mortality of PLFLG AS patients was worse than that of NFHG AS patients (P = 0.047). Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure was more frequent in PLFLG AS patients than in NFHG AS patients (P = 0.041). New York Heart Association functional class III-IV after TAVR was more frequently observed in PLFLG AS patients (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of PLFLG AS patients were worse than those of NFHG AS patients in this study. Preexisting atrial fibrillation/flutter was frequent in PLFLG AS patients, and may affect their post-TAVR outcomes. Therefore, closer post-TAVR follow-up should be considered for these patients.

Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement

Over the last half century, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has evolved to offer a durable and efficient valve haemodynamically, with low procedural complications that allows favourable remodelling of left ventricular (LV) structure and function. The latter has become more challenging among elderly patients, particularly following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Precise understanding of myocardial adaptation to pressure and volume overloading and its responses to valve surgery requires comprehensive assessments from aortic valve energy loss, valvular-vascular impedance to myocardial activation, force-velocity relationship, and myocardial strain. LV hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis remains as the structural and morphological focus in this endeavour. Early intervention in asymptomatic aortic stenosis or regurgitation along with individualised management of hypertension and atrial fibrillation is likely to improve patient outcome. Physiological pacing via the His-Purkinje system for conduction abnormalities, further reduction in para-valvular aortic regurgitation along with therapy of angiotensin receptor blockade will improve patient outcome by facilitating hypertrophy regression, LV coordinate contraction, and global vascular function. TAVI leaflet thromboses require anticoagulation while impaired access to coronary ostia risks future TAVI-in-TAVI or coronary interventions. Until comparable long-term durability and the resolution of TAVI related complications become available, SAVR remains the first choice for lower risk younger patients.

Left Ventricular Hypertrophic Change Indicating Poor Prognosis in Patients With Normal-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background: Risk stratification of normal-flow, low-gradient (NFLG) severe aortic stenosis (SAS) with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) remains unclear.

Methods and Results: Of 289 consecutive patients diagnosed with SAS by aortic valve area <1.0 cm², 66 with NFLG-SAS (stroke volume index >35 mL/m², mean pressure gradient <40 mmHg, LVEF ≥50%) were enrolled in this study; patients with bicuspid aortic valve, acute coronary syndrome, hemodialysis, or a history of aortic valve replacement (AVR) were excluded. Adverse events (AEs) were defined as cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, and deteriorating condition requiring AVR. Factors associated with AEs were investigated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Over a median of 675 days of follow-up, 25 AEs were recorded: 4 cardiovascular deaths, 12 hospitalizations for heart failure, and 9 patients requiring AVR. In addition, there were 14 events of progression to high-gradient SAS. Multivariable analysis showed significant associations between AEs and the presence of symptoms (hazard ratio [HR] 10.276; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.724–28.357; P<0.001), LV hypertrophy (LV mass index >115 and >95 mg/m² for males and females, respectively; HR 3.257; 95% CI 1.172–9.050; P=0.024), and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity (HR 2.761; 95% CI 1.246–6.118; P=0.012).

Conclusions: The presence of symptoms, LV hypertrophy, and high TR velocity could be reliable prognostic indicators and may require watchful waiting for timely AVR in patients with NFLG-SAS.

Normal Values of Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume According to Measurement Technique, Age, Sex, and Ethnicity: Results of the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Study

BACKGROUND

Assessment of cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) is essential to understand cardiac function and hemodynamics. These parameters can be examined using three echocardiographic techniques (pulsed-wave Doppler, two-dimensional [2D], and three-dimensional [3D]). Whether these methods can be used interchangeably is unclear. The influence of age, sex, and ethnicity on CO and SV has also not been examined in depth. In this report from the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Normal Values Study, the authors compare CO and SV in healthy adults according to age, sex, ethnicity, and measurement techniques.

METHODS

A total of 1,450 adult subjects (53% men) free of heart, lung, and kidney disease were prospectively enrolled in 15 countries, with even distributions among age groups and sex. Subjects were divided into three age groups (young, 18-40 years; middle aged, 41-65 years; and old, >65 years) and three main racial groups (whites, blacks, and Asians). CO and SV were indexed (cardiac index [CI] and SV index [SVI], respectively) to body surface area and height and measured using three echocardiographic methods: Doppler, 2D, and 3D. Images were analyzed at two core laboratories (one each for 2D and 3D).

RESULTS

CI and SVI were significantly lower by 2D compared with both Doppler and 3D methods in both sexes. SVI was significantly lower in women than men by all three methods, while CI differed only by 2D. SVI decreased with aging by all three techniques, whereas CI declined only with 2D and 3D. CO and SV were smallest in Asians and largest in whites, and the differences persisted after normalization for body surface area.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results provide normal reference values for CO and SV, which differ by age, sex, and race. Furthermore, CI and SVI measurements by the different echocardiographic techniques are not interchangeable. All these factors need to be taken into account when evaluating cardiac function and hemodynamics in individual patients.