Anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I, antiprothrombin antibodies, and the risk of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome

Obstetric and vascular APS: Same autoantibodies but different diseases?

Beta2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI)-dependent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are the main pathogenic autoantibody population and at the same time the laboratory diagnostic tool for the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

These antibodies are responsible for both the vascular and the obstetric manifestations of the syndrome but the pathogenic mechanisms behind these manifestations are not the same. For example, thrombotic events do not appear to play a major role in APS miscarriages and a direct reactivity of β2GPI-dependent aPLs on decidual and trophoblast cells was reported. A local expression of β2GPI on these tissues was reported both in physiological conditions and in APS women, thus explaining the local tropism of the autoantibodies.

The two hit hypothesis was suggested to explain why the vascular manifestations of APS may occur only occasionally in spite of the persistent presence of aPLs. This is not apparently the case for the obstetric variant of the syndrome, making the difference even more striking. A different pathogenesis may also provide the rationale for the well-known fact that the vascular and the obstetric manifestations may occur independently although in a minority of cases.

Laboratory testing in pediatric rheumatology

In children, laboratory evaluations can assist in the screening of patients for inflammatory disorders, confirm diagnoses, allow for monitoring of disease activity and response to therapy, and suggest prognoses and risk of morbidities associated with rheumatic diseases. This review provides an overview of the usefulness and interpretation of both the commonly ordered tests ordered by the general pediatrician as well as those frequently used in the pediatric rheumatology clinic for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Studies discussed include the complete blood count, acute phase reactants, autoantibodies, serum complement, urinalysis, streptococcal antibody tests, and commonly used genetic studies.

Comparative incidence of a first thrombotic event in purely obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome with pregnancy loss: the NOH-APS observational study

The incidence of thrombosis in the purely obstetric form of antiphospholipid syndrome is uncertain. We performed a 10-year observational study of 1592 nonthrombotic women who had experienced 3 consecutive spontaneous abortions before the 10th week of gestation or 1 fetal death at or beyond the 10th week of gestation. We compared the frequencies of thrombotic events among women positive for antiphospholipid Abs (n = 517), women carrying the F5 6025 or F2 rs1799963 polymorphism (n = 279), and women with negative thrombophilia screening results (n = 796). The annual rates of deep vein thrombosis (1.46%; range, 1.15%-1.82%), pulmonary embolism (0.43%; range, 0.26%-0.66%), superficial vein thrombosis (0.44%; range, 0.28%-0.68%), and cerebrovascular events (0.32%; range, 0.18%-0.53%) were significantly higher in aPLAbs women than in the other groups despite low-dose aspirin primary prophylaxis. Women carrying 1 of the 2 polymorphisms did not experience more thrombotic events than women who screened negative for thrombophilia. Lupus anticoagulant was a risk factor for unprovoked proximal and distal deep and superficial vein thrombosis and women in the upper quartile of lupus anticoagulant activity had the highest risk. Despite data suggesting that aPLAbs may induce pregnancy loss through nonthrombotic mechanisms, women with purely obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome are at risk for thrombotic complications.

Recent developments in our understanding of the antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disease that manifests clinically as recurrent thrombotic complications or foetal losses and serologically with elevated levels of antiphospholipid antibodies in the plasmas of these patients. The term 'antiphospholipid syndrome' is confusing, because the auto-antibodies are not directed against phospholipids but towards a plasma protein, β(2) -glycoprotein I. For many years, the reason why auto-antibodies against β(2) -glycoprotein I were pro-thrombotic was unclear, because β(2) -glycoprotein I seems to be an obsolete protein in our circulation. Human and mice deficient in this protein do not express a clear phenotype. Recent studies on the structure and function of β(2) -glycoprotein I have provided novel insights into the importance of this protein in physiology and its role in the pathology of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) as potential markers of antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid antibodies present in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are directed at a number of phospholipid-binding proteins: β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI), prothrombin, and so on. Antibodies directed at β2GPI are accepted as a classification criterion for APS, while the presence of antiprothrombin antibodies is not. In the present article, we investigated the possible role of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) as marker of APS on a cohort of 295 individuals with APS (95 primary APS and 45 secondary APS) and APS-related diseases. We found aPS/PT to be highly associated with venous thrombosis (immunoglobulin G [IgG] aPS/PT odds ratio [OR], 7.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.97-13.92 and IgM aPS/PT OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.35-4.77) and obstetric abnormalities (IgG aPS/PT OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.04-5.43), but not with arterial thrombosis. A very high degree of concordance between the concentration of aPS/PT and lupus anticoagulant activity was demonstrated. Therefore, we support the inclusion of aPS/PT determination as second-level assay to confirm APS classification.

Reevaluation of predictive value of ACL and anti-β2GP1 antibody for thrombosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: from a perspective of a practical world

Detection of ACL (anticardiolipin, ACL) and anti-β2GP1 (beta2 glycoprotein1, β2GP1) antibody has been widely used, and the criteria of APS (Antiphospholipid syndrome, APS) have been used for the prediction of thrombosis in patients with SLE. What is the exact predictive value of these two antibodies? Is it really necessary to apply the criteria of APS to each patient just for the purpose of prediction of thrombosis? The aim of this retrospective study is to reevaluate the predictive value of different combination of ACL and anti-β2GP1 antibody for thrombosis formation in Chinese patients with SLE. Patients fulfilling the 1997 ACR classification criteria for SLE were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed. Thrombosis was confirmed by ultrasound, cerebral MRI, computed tomography pulmonary angiogram and angiography. Both IgG and IgM isotype of ACL and anti-β2GP1 antibody were detected with ELISA kit. ROC curves and other parameters of diagnostic test for different combination of ACL and anti-β2GP1 were analyzed and compared. 175 patients were recruited and thrombosis was diagnosed in 49 patients. In patients with thrombosis, 95.9% had been treated with glucocorticoids before detection of the two antibodies, 44.9% had hypertension and 53.1% had hyperlipidemia. ACL was positive in 28 patients (16%), and anti-β2GP1 antibody was positive in 21 patients (12%). The presence of a low or higher titer of either ACL (>12 RU/ml) or anti-β2GP1 antibody (>20 RU/ml) once has the highest predictive accuracy. The sensitivity, the specificity, the Youden's index and the area under ROC curve are 61.11%, 81.11%, 0.4222 and 0.711 respectively. A transient low or higher titer of ACL or anti-β2GP1 antibody had a good predictive value for thrombosis in patients with SLE, especially in those with other traditional risk factors for thrombosis and those treated with glucocorticoids.

Uso de la heparina de bajo peso molecular y aspirina en una paciente con síndrome antifosfolípido y pérdida gestacional recurrente

Introducción: La pérdida gestacional recurrente (PGR) es una patología frecuente, que causa gran impacto en las parejas conllevando frustración, ansiedad, depresión, gastos excesivos y hasta rupturas de la relación de pareja. Su etiología es multicausal  y frecuentemente no se logra determinar. Se presenta el caso de una paciente con PGR quien luego de seis pérdidas gestacionales, en el séptimo embarazo se detectaron anticuerpos antifosfolípidos altos, recibiendo tratamiento de tromboprofilaxis doble hasta la semana 32, obteniéndose un producto pretérmino vivo y sano  que  evolucionó  satisfactoriamente.  Se  discuten dificultades para la precisión diagnóstica y las modalidades de tratamiento descritos. 

Evidence-based recommendations for the prevention and long-term management of thrombosis in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients: report of a task force at the 13th International Congress on antiphospholipid antibodies

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by the presence of thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in combination with the persistent presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies: lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies in medium to high titers. The management of thrombosis in patients with APS is a subject of controversy. This set of recommendations is the result of an effort to produce guidelines for therapy within a group of specialist physicians in Cardiology, Neurology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, with a clinical and research focus on APS.

'Non-criteria' aPL tests: report of a task force and preconference workshop at the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies, Galveston, TX, USA, April 2010

Abstract: Current classification criteria for definite APS recommend the use of one or more of three positive standardized laboratory assays, including anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), lupus anticoagulant (LA), and antibodies directed to β(2)glycoprotein I (anti-β(2)GPI) to detect antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in the presence of at least one of the two major clinical manifestations (i.e., thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) of the syndrome. Several other autoantibodies shown to be directed to phospholipids and/or their complexes with phospholipids and/or to proteins of the coagulation cascade, as well as a mechanistic test for resistance to annexin A5 anticoagulant activity, have been proposed to be relevant to APS. A task force of worldwide scientists in the field discussed and analyzed critical questions related to 'non-criteria' aPL tests in an evidence-based manner during the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (APLA 2010, 13-16 April 2010, Galveston, Texas, USA). This report summarizes the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of this task force.

New Insights into the Molecular Basis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) that promote thrombosis, pregnancy complications and cardiovascular diseases. Alterations in the function of vascular cells induced by aPL underlie these outcomes. This review will discuss recent findings that indicate a novel mechanism by which aPL antagonize endothelial cell production of nitric oxide and thereby promote thrombosis.

Modified phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin [corrected] ELISA enables identification of patients negative for other antiphospholipid antibodies and also detects low avidity antibodies

BACKGROUND

Two approaches for detecting anti-prothrombin antibodies have been described. The first detects antibodies against prothrombin alone and the second, phos-phatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies. The latter more often correlate with clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome and with lupus anticoagulant activity.

METHODS

In order to increase the capacity of antibody binding, we modified the previously described phosphatidylser-ine-dependent antiprothrombin ELISA and determined their avidity. We examined 203 patients with systemic autoimmune diseases and 222 blood donors.

RESULTS

Our modification resulted in a greater intensity of antibody binding to prothrombin on phosphatidylserine-coated plate surfaces compared to the previously described method. By changing ELISA conditions, we were able to detect with one assay the two, presumably different, populations of antiprothrombin antibodies. Diagnostic specificities of both ELISAs for antiphospholipid syndrome were similar (92.5% vs. 93.1%), while the sensitivity of the modified phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin ELISA was significantly higher than the anti-prothrombin alone ELISA (59% vs. 25%). Low avidity antiprothrombin antibodies were only detected in the modified phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin ELISA. Four percent of patients with positive phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies, showing clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome, were negative for all other antiphospholipid antibodies. The risk for antiphospholipid syndrome increased with the number of antiphospholipid antibody positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that antibodies detected with a modified phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin ELISA could improve the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome by offering additional information on the risk for thrombosis, especially in patients negative for other antiphospholipid antibodies.

Thrombophilia in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers-a study on patients with or without post-thrombotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Chronic venous leg ulcers (CVU) cause considerable burden of disease for the patients as well as enormous costs for health care systems. The pathophysiology of CVU is complex and not entirely understood. So far reliable pathogenic and/or prognostic parameters have not been identified.

OBJECTIVES

We studied the role of thrombophilia in patients referred to a University dermatology department for treatment of CVU.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 310 patients with active chronic venous leg ulcers (CEAP 6) was stratified into two comparably large groups according to the presence or absence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS+; PTS-) as determined using duplex scan and/or phlebography. In addition, several thrombophilia parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of protein S deficiency and factor V Leiden mutation was significantly higher in PTS+ patients compared with the PTS- group. However, patients in both subgroups revealed high prevalences of thrombophilia (antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, activated protein C resistance, factor V mutation or elevated homocysteine).

CONCLUSION

Based on these data, it is conceivable that thrombophilia contributes to the pathogenesis of CVU, possibly through induction of microcirculatory dysregulations.

Correlation of livedo racemosa, cutaneous inflammatory plaques, and antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa

We examined the prevalence of various cutaneous symptoms including livedo racemosa and inflammatory plaques, lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies (Abs), and anti-phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex (anti-PS/PT) Abs in patients with cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) to determine if any of them correlate with the clinical and/or serologic features. If such correlations exist, the clinical and serologic features of the cutaneous manifestations could aid in the early diagnosis and/or treatment of cutaneous PAN. We retrospectively investigated the clinical and serologic features, direct immunofluorescence findings, and treatment methods used in 50 patients with cutaneous PAN seen at our Department of Dermatology between 2003 and 2009. Subcutaneous nodules were observed in all 50 patients, 44 (88.0%) had livedo racemosa, 30 (60.0%) had skin ulcers, and 14 (28.0%) had inflammatory plaques. Levels of serum IgM anti-PS/PT Abs were significantly higher in patients with livedo racemosa than in patients without livedo racemosa. Serum IgG anti-PS/PT Ab levels differed significantly between patients with inflammatory plaques (12.86 ± 13.16 U/mL) and those without inflammatory plaques (6.53 ± 5.92 U/mL). Similar trends were seen with respect to IgG aCL Ab levels. In contrast, levels of IgM anti-PS/PT Abs were significantly lower in patients with inflammatory plaques compared to patients without them. Inflammatory plaques were significantly more prevalent in patients with skin ulcers. Warfarin and prednisolone were selected as the primary therapy at a significantly higher rate in patients with inflammatory plaques and skin ulcers than in patients without them. We suggest that a variety of antiphospholipid Abs could influence the cutaneous patterns of cutaneous PAN. In particular, IgG anti-PS/PT Abs and/or IgG aCL Abs could indicate the presence of inflammatory plaques as a specific cutaneous manifestation of cutaneous PAN.

The annexin A2 system and vascular homeostasis

Optimal fibrin balance requires precisely controlled plasmin generation on the surface of endothelial cells, which line the blood vessel wall. As a co-receptor for plasminogen and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), which are key factors in plasmin generation, the annexin A2 (A2) complex promotes vascular fibrinolysis. The intracellular A2 complex is a heterotetramer of two A2 monomers and two copies of the associated protein, p11. In response to endothelial cell activation, A2 is phosphorylated by src-kinase, and translocated to the cell surface in a highly regulated manner. Over-expression of A2 is seen in acute promyelocytic leukemia during the early hemorrhagic phase, while high titer antibodies to A2, as in antiphospholipid syndrome or cerebral venous thrombosis, are associated with thrombosis. In experimental hyperhomocysteinemia, moreover, derivatization of A2 by homocysteine leads to intravascular fibrin accumulation and dysangiogenesis, features that phenocopy the Anxa2(-/-) mouse. Exogenous A2 may also offer a novel therapeutic approach to ischemic thrombotic stroke, as administration of A2 in conjunction with conventional tPA-based thrombolytic therapy improved outcome in an animal model. Here, we discuss the role of the A2 system in vascular homeostasis, the molecular interactions that regulate its profibrinolytic activity, and its potential role in the pathogenesis and treatment of vascular disease.

High frequency of inadequate test requests for antiphospholipid antibodies in daily clinical practice

BACKGROUND

We have empirically noted that many physicians routinely request anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) without a correct clinical indication. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively whether aPL testing at our Thrombosis Centre was justified.

METHODS

Medical records from 520 subjects for aPL screening tests for various clinical conditions were reviewed. The aPL screening tests were: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β(2) glycoptotein I (aβ(2) GPI). Requests for aPL screening were divided into justified, potentially justified or not adequately justified.

RESULTS

aPL testing requests were considered justified in 358 (69%) patients, potentially justified in 66 (12.6%) and not adequately justified in 96 (18.4%). LA was positive in 65 (18%) of justified requests and in only one (1%) of the 96 potentially justified requests. None of the 66 not adequately justified for aPL testing was positive for LA. aβ(2) GPI was positive in 63 (17.6%) of the 358 justified, in four (6%) of the 66 potentially justified and in five (5.2%) of the 96 not adequately justified requests; aCL IgG were positive in 59 (16.4%) of the 358 justified and in five (7.5%) and six (6.2%) of the potentially justified and not adequately justified requests, respectively. The presence of the triple aPL positivity was found exclusively in the justified requests.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that requests for aPL tests should be addressed more adequately. This work could be an example of how to focus attention on requests for laboratory tests especially on the basis of valid clinical criteria before the analyte is measured.

Laboratory testing for the antiphospholipid syndrome: making sense of antiphospholipid antibody assays

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition characterised by a wide range of clinical features (primarily thrombosis and/or obstetric related), associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) as detected by a diverse range of laboratory tests. APS remains a significant diagnostic challenge for clinicians across a wide range of specialities, largely due to issues related to laboratory testing as well as the expanding range of reported clinical manifestations of APS. The laboratory issues include limitations in detailed knowledge by both clinical and laboratory personnel regarding the 'complete' range of available aPL tests, as well as ongoing problems with assay reproducibility and standardisation. aPL are identified using diverse laboratory procedures based on one of two distinct test processes, namely solid phase and liquid phase assays. The former includes anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ(2)GPI). The latter are centred on clot-based tests that are used to identify the so-called lupus anticoagulant (LA). This article will discuss: (i) issues related to laboratory testing for APS in terms of the currently available solid-phase and liquid-phase assays, and identifiable biases resulting from these tests usually being performed in different laboratories; (ii) current problems with calibration, standardisation and reproducibility of these assays; (iii) pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical considerations and ongoing initiatives for improvement; (iv) issues related to potential combinations/panels of available aPL tests; and (v) the entities of seropositive APS, seronegative APS and non-APS aPL-positivity. In doing so, this review will hopefully help bridge the two disciplines of haematology and immunology ('representing' liquid-phase and solid-phase aPL testing, respectively), by improving the understanding of those working in each of these disciplines of the merits and limitations of the assays performed in the other discipline, and encouraging inter-discipline cooperation in the reporting of aPL test results.

β₂-Glycoprotein-1 autoantibodies from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome are sufficient to potentiate arterial thrombus formation in a mouse model

Antiphospholipid syndrome is characterized by thrombosis, recurrent fetal loss, and the presence of the lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, or anti-β(2)-glycoprotein-1 (anti-β(2)-GP1) antibodies. Although anti-β(2)-GP1 antibodies have been documented as a biomarker for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome, their direct role in the pathogenesis of thrombosis is unknown. We have demonstrated using intravital microscopy that anti-β(2)-GP1 autoantibodies purified from the sera of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome complicated by thrombosis greatly amplify thrombus size after laser-induced vessel wall injury in live mice. Anti-β(2)-GP1 autoantibodies from 3 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome were affinity-purified using human β(2)-GP1 bound to agarose. The effects of purified anti-β(2)-GP1 IgG autoantibodies, of anti-β(2)-GP1-depleted IgG, and of IgG from normal human sera on thrombus formation were measured in mice after arterial injury in the cremaster muscle. Before injury, purified anti-β(2)-GP1 IgG autoantibodies, anti-β(2)-GP1 antibody-depleted IgG, or IgG from normal human sera were infused. Increasing amounts of purified anti-β(2)-GP1 autoantibodies increased thrombus size in a dose-dependent manner, whereas neither anti-β(2)-GP1 antibody-depleted IgG nor IgG from normal serum affected thrombus size. These results indicate that anti-β(2)-GP1 IgG autoantibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome patient sera are not only a marker of antiphospholipid syndrome but are directly involved in the pathogenesis of thrombosis.

An international multicentre-laboratory evaluation of a new assay to detect specifically lupus anticoagulants dependent on the presence of anti-beta2-glycoprotein autoantibodies

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed by the simultaneous presence of vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity and detection of antiphospholipid antibodies in plasma.

OBJECTIVES

We have shown that prolongation of clotting time by anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) antibodies correlates better with thrombosis than a positive classic lupus anticoagulant (LAC) assay in a single center study. To confirm or falsify this finding we have conducted a multicenter study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 325 LAC-positive samples, we found that the beta2GPI-dependent LAC correlated 2.0 times better with thrombosis than the classic LAC assay. Although significant, this was a minimal improvement compared with the 'classic' LAC. It was published that calcium influences the behavior of anti-beta2GPI antibodies in coagulation assays. To investigate whether calcium plays a role in the present study, we divided the patient population into two groups: (i) blood was collected in 0.109 m sodium citrate and (ii) blood was drawn in 0.129 m sodium citrate as anticoagulant. We found that a positive result with the beta2GPI-dependent LAC assay correlated better with thrombosis [odds ratio (OR): 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-5.8] when 0.109 m sodium citrate was used compared with 0.129 m sodium citrate (OR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.1).

CONCLUSION

We were able to confirm in an international multicenter study that a positive result in a beta2GPI-dependent LAC assay correlates better with thrombosis than the classic LAC assay, but that the assay needs further study as it is sensitive to external factors such as the sodium citrate concentration used as anticoagulant in the test sample.

Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This guideline provides an overview of the evidence on established and emerging risk factors for stroke to provide evidence-based recommendations for the reduction of risk of a first stroke.

METHODS

Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA Manuscript Oversight Committee. The writing group used systematic literature reviews (covering the time since the last review was published in 2006 up to April 2009), reference to previously published guidelines, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulate recommendations using standard AHA criteria (Tables 1 and 2). All members of the writing group had the opportunity to comment on the recommendations and approved the final version of this document. The guideline underwent extensive peer review by the Stroke Council leadership and the AHA scientific statements oversight committees before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.

RESULTS

Schemes for assessing a person's risk of a first stroke were evaluated. Risk factors or risk markers for a first stroke were classified according to potential for modification (nonmodifiable, modifiable, or potentially modifiable) and strength of evidence (well documented or less well documented). Nonmodifiable risk factors include age, sex, low birth weight, race/ethnicity, and genetic predisposition. Well-documented and modifiable risk factors include hypertension, exposure to cigarette smoke, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and certain other cardiac conditions, dyslipidemia, carotid artery stenosis, sickle cell disease, postmenopausal hormone therapy, poor diet, physical inactivity, and obesity and body fat distribution. Less well-documented or potentially modifiable risk factors include the metabolic syndrome, excessive alcohol consumption, drug abuse, use of oral contraceptives, sleep-disordered breathing, migraine, hyperhomocysteinemia, elevated lipoprotein(a), hypercoagulability, inflammation, and infection. Data on the use of aspirin for primary stroke prevention are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive evidence identifies a variety of specific factors that increase the risk of a first stroke and that provide strategies for reducing that risk.

Antiphospholipid antibodies promote leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion and thrombosis in mice by antagonizing eNOS via β2GPI and apoER2

In antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) binding to β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI) induce endothelial cell-leukocyte adhesion and thrombus formation via unknown mechanisms. Here we show that in mice both of these processes are caused by the inhibition of eNOS. In studies of cultured human, bovine, and mouse endothelial cells, the promotion of monocyte adhesion by aPL entailed decreased bioavailable NO, and aPL fully antagonized eNOS activation by diverse agonists. Similarly, NO-dependent, acetylcholine-induced increases in carotid vascular conductance were impaired in aPL-treated mice. The inhibition of eNOS was caused by antibody recognition of domain I of β2GPI and β2GPI dimerization, and it was due to attenuated eNOS S1179 phosphorylation mediated by protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). Furthermore, LDL receptor family member antagonism with receptor-associated protein (RAP) prevented aPL inhibition of eNOS in cell culture, and ApoER2-/- mice were protected from aPL inhibition of eNOS in vivo. Moreover, both aPL-induced increases in leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion and thrombus formation were absent in eNOS-/- and in ApoER2-/- mice. Thus, aPL-induced leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion and thrombosis are caused by eNOS antagonism, which is due to impaired S1179 phosphorylation mediated by β2GPI, apoER2, and PP2A. Our results suggest that novel therapies for APS can now be developed targeting these mechanisms.

Thrombophilias and stillbirth

It is often postulated that both inherited and acquired thrombophilias increase the risk of stillbirth. In an attempt to reduce this theoretical risk, pregnant patients with prior fetal losses and thrombophilias are anticoagulated. However, there is no definitive proof that thrombophilias are causally linked to stillbirth. Prospective studies have failed to establish a definitive link between inherited thrombophilias and stillbirth. The extant literature suggests that only high concentrations of antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with stillbirth. Moreover, when pregnant women with prior fetal losses even in these cases are placed on anticoagulation, it is unclear that their recurrence risk of stillbirth decreases.

Diagnostic algorithm for thrombophilia screening

Thrombophilia screening is aimed at detecting the most frequent and well-defined causes of venous thrombosis, such as activated protein C resistance/factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin G20210A gene mutation, deficiencies of natural anticoagulants, such as antithrombin, protein C and protein S, the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, hyperhomocysteinemia and increased factor VIII activity. At this time, thrombophilia screening is not recommended for those possible congenital or acquired risk factors, whose association with increased risk of thrombosis has not been proven sufficiently. Laboratory investigations should include a step-wise approach to the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders with respect to the assays and methods of analysis that are used. The assays recommended for the first diagnostic step of screening should establish, whether the subject has one of the common causes of thrombophilia. If one or more abnormal results are obtained, the second diagnostic step includes the assays recommended for confirmation and/or characterization of the defect. When performing the investigation of thrombophilia, it is important to consider all pre-analytical and other variables that may affect the results of thrombophilia testing, including time of testing, age, gender, liver function, hormonal status, pregnancy or the acute phase response to inflammatory diseases. This is necessary, in order to avoid, any misinterpretation of the results. This review summarizes the current knowledge concerning thrombophilia investigations, with special focus on the diagnostic algorithm regarding patient selection, the assays and methods of analysis used and all the variables that should be considered when employing tests for the diagnosis of thrombophilia.

Antiphospholipid syndrome; its implication in cardiovascular diseases: a review

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) is a rare syndrome mainly characterized by several hyper-coagulable complications and therefore, implicated in the operated cardiac surgery patient. APLS comprises clinical features such as arterial or venous thromboses, valve disease, coronary artery disease, intracardiac thrombus formation, pulmonary hypertension and dilated cardiomyopathy. The most commonly affected valve is the mitral, followed by the aortic and tricuspid valve. For APLS diagnosis essential is the detection of so-called antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) as anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) or lupus anticoagulant (LA). Minor alterations in the anticoagulation, infection, and surgical stress may trigger widespread thrombosis. The incidence of thrombosis is highest during the following perioperative periods: preoperatively during the withdrawal of warfarin, postoperatively during the period of hypercoagulability despite warfarin or heparin therapy, or postoperatively before adequate anticoagulation achievement. Cardiac valvular pathology includes irregular thickening of the valve leaflets due to deposition of immune complexes that may lead to vegetations and valve dysfunction; a significant risk factor for stroke. Patients with APLS are at increased risk for thrombosis and adequate anticoagulation is of vital importance during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A successful outcome requires multidisciplinary management in order to prevent thrombotic or bleeding complications and to manage perioperative anticoagulation. More work and reporting on anticoagulation management and adjuvant therapy in patients with APLS during extracorporeal circulation are necessary.

Antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome causes venous, arterial, and small-vessel thrombosis; pregnancy loss; and preterm delivery for patients with severe pre-eclampsia or placental insufficiency. Other clinical manifestations are cardiac valvular disease, renal thrombotic microangiopathy, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, and cognitive impairment. Antiphospholipid antibodies promote activation of endothelial cells, monocytes, and platelets; and overproduction of tissue factor and thromboxane A2. Complement activation might have a central pathogenetic role. Of the different antiphospholipid antibodies, lupus anticoagulant is the strongest predictor of features related to antiphospholipid syndrome. Therapy of thrombosis is based on long-term oral anticoagulation and patients with arterial events should be treated aggressively. Primary thromboprophylaxis is recommended in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and probably in purely obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. Obstetric care is based on combined medical-obstetric high-risk management and treatment with aspirin and heparin. Hydroxychloroquine is a potential additional treatment for this syndrome. Possible future therapies for non-pregnant patients with antiphospholipid syndrome are statins, rituximab, and new anticoagulant drugs.

Antiphospholipid-associated thrombocytopenia or autoimmune hemolytic anemia in patients with or without definite primary antiphospholipid syndrome according to the Sapporo revised classification criteria: a 6-year follow-up study

The updated Sapporo classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) only include thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity as clinical criteria. To test this notion, we studied 55 patients (80% women) with hematologic manifestations. All fulfilled the laboratory criteria for primary APS. Thirty-five patients (64%) had thrombocytopenia, 14 (25%) had autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and 6 (11%) had both. Twenty-five patients (22 women, 88%) also fulfilled one clinical criterion for APS after a median follow-up of 13.2 years (range, 1.45-37 years), whereas the remaining 30 patients (22 women, 73%) have not had any thrombotic event nor pregnancy morbidity after a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 0.12-24 years). No patient developed systemic lupus erythematosus during follow-up. The hematologic manifestation was asynchronous with the APS onset in 84% of patients. The response to treatment was similar regardless of the APS status. Patients with definite APS were more frequently positive for the lupus anticoagulant (63%) than lupus anticoagulant-positive patients without APS (30%; odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-11.4; P < .02). Anticardiolipin or anti–β2-glycoprotein-I antibodies were highly prevalent among the study groups. Our study suggests that, depending upon their antiphospholipid profile, patients with hemocytopenias appear to comprise a peculiar subset of patients with APS; some develop thrombotic and/or obstetric APS whereas others continue with hematologic APS.

The antiphospholipid syndrome: a large elephant with many parts or an elusive chameleon disguised by many colours?

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by a range of clinical features (primarily thrombosis and/or obstetric-related), together with the presence of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) as detected by a diverse range of laboratory tests. APS remains a significant diagnostic and management challenge for clinicians across a wide range of specialties, some 30 years after APS was first described as a discrete clinical entity. This is due to ongoing issues regarding nomenclature, the diagnosis of APS in individual patients, the expanding range of recognized clinical manifestations and of APS-related laboratory tests, and management issues in particular APS patient subgroups (including obstetric and catastrophic APS). In addition to the presence of appropriate clinical features, the diagnosis of APS fundamentally requires the finding of positive aPL test result(s), which is hampered by ongoing problems with assay reproducibility and standardization. This review focuses on ongoing dilemmas and issues related to clinical and laboratory aspects of APS including: (1) diagnostic challenges posed by the protean clinical manifestations of APS; (2) current nomenclature and recent proposals for revision of the 2006 international classification criteria; (3) an overview of some key issues related to aPL testing; (4) potential pitfalls of applying the APS classification criteria as diagnostic criteria; and (5) the controversial subgroups of seronegative APS and non-APS aPL positivity.

Antiprothrombin antibody: why do we need more assays?

Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I (beta(2)GPI) antibodies and lupus anticoagulant (LA) are the only laboratory tests considered within the revised criteria for the classification of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Recently, the significance to assay the antibodies against phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex (aPS/PT) has been discussed, and these antibodies, rather than antibodies against prothrombin alone, are closely associated with APS and LA. The sensitivity and specificity of aPS/PT for the diagnosis of APS were assessed in a population of patients with a variety of autoimmune disorders. The aCL and aPS/PT have similar diagnostic value for APS, and most of APS patients with aPS/PT had positive LA. Therefore, aPS/PT should be further explored, not only for research purposes, but also as a candidate for one of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based confirmatory test for APS associated LA.

Antiphospholipid antibodies and the protein C pathway

Haemostasis is a delicate balance between procoagulant and anticoagulant processes. In the human body usually anticoagulant mechanisms prevail over procoagulant mechanisms, thereby preventing a prothrombotic state. The antiphospholipid syndrome is an example in which this balance is shifted to a more prothrombotic state due to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. One of the most extensively proposed pathogenic mechanisms within the antiphospholipid syndrome is the inhibition of protein C by antiphospholipid antibodies. Antiphospholipid antibodies have been described to have different actions on the protein C pathway, for example decreasing protein C and/or S plasma levels, inducing increased resistance against activated protein C and lowering thrombin levels (resulting in an impaired protein C activation). This review briefly discusses the actions of protein C in human body but mainly focuses on the effects of antiphospholipid antibodies on the protein C pathway that have been described in literature.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: critical analysis of the diagnostic path

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed in the presence of vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity occurring in patients with circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LA] and/or IgG/IgM anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or IgG/IgM anti-beta2glycoprotein I [abeta2GPI] antibodies). Each test may identify different autoantibodies; a single test makes the diagnosis possible when positive on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. However, single test positivity may be unrelated to pathogenic antibodies, which are now considered to be a subclass of abeta2GPI antibodies directed against the domain I of this protein. Conversely, all three positive tests identify a single class of abeta2GPI antibodies, thus identifying high-risk patients with APS.

The use of laboratory methods in differential diagnosis and treatment of SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome

The detection of autoantibodies has become an important component in the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome. Their importance lies in the fact that they are not only markers of the disease and used as part of a diagnostic panel, but many of them also show correlation with disease activity. All antibody testing should be interpreted in the context of the clinical features. The antinuclear antibodies test is an effective screening assay in patients with clinical features of SLE. The combination of antinuclear antibodies test, dsDNA and ENA (Ro, La, Sm, RNP) antibodies help to establish the diagnosis of most patients with SLE. New antibodies, such as antinucleosomes and anti-C1q, appear to be useful for SLE diagnosis, monitoring disease activity and predicting renal flares, particularly in dsDNA-negative patients. Anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant are the tests most commonly used in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome. However, the use of anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I as a routine diagnostic test remains controversial.

Prevalence and significance of anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies in patients with Lupus Anticoagulant (LA)

OBJECTIVE

Anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies have been found in Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) positive patients. Their prevalence and relative contribution to thromboembolic risk in LA-positive patients is not well defined. The aim of this study was to determine their presence and association with thromboembolic events in a large series of patients with confirmed LA.

METHODS

Plasma from LA-positive patients was collected at Thrombosis Centers and sent to a reference central laboratory for confirmation. Positive plasma was tested using home-made ELISA for the presence of aPT and anti-beta(2)GPI antibodies.

RESULTS

LA was confirmed in 231 patients. Sixty-one of 231 (26%, 95%CI 22-33) LA positive subjects were positive for IgG aPT and 62 (27%, 95% CI 21-33) were positive for IgM aPT antibodies. Clinical features of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) were not associated with the presence of IgG aPT [43 APS in 61 (70%) positive and 109 APS in 170 (64%) negative IgG aPT subjects, p=ns] or IgM aPT. Rate of positivity of IgG and IgM a beta(2)GPI was significantly higher than that of IgG and IgM aPT. Clinical events accounting for APS occurred in 97 of 130 (75%) IgG a beta(2)GPI positive and in 55 of 101 (54%) IgG a beta(2)GPI negative patients (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.3, p=0.002). No significant association with clinical events in patients positive for both IgG aPT and IgG a beta(2)GPI as compared to those positive for one or another test was found. When patients negative for both IgG aPT and IgG a beta(2)GPI (LA positive only) were compared with remaining patients, a significantly lower association with clinical events was found (OR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.7, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared to IgG a beta(2)GPI, the prevalence of IgG aPT in patients with LA is significantly lower and not associated with the clinical features of APS.

Pathogenetic potential of antiphospholipid antibodies

Antiphospholipid antibodies are autoantibodies that recognize phospholipid-binding proteins such as beta2 glycoprotein (beta2GP)-I, prothrombin or annexins. These antibodies have been associated with arterial or venous thrombotic events and pregnancy morbidity. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the pathogenetic potential of these antibodies include: resistance to activated protein C, acquired Factor XII deficiency resulting in suppression of intrinsic fibrinolytic activity, activation of endothelial cells through the nuclear factor kappaB pathway leading to tissue factor upregulation, adhesion molecule and cytokine expression and activation of platelets. Opposite effects, such as the potentiation of the inhibitory action of beta2GPI on the activation of Factor XI, make the dynamics of the interaction of these antibodies with the coagulation system rather complex. Many of the above functions can be mediated by signaling through molecules of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family, such as CD40, which is recognized by purified anti-beta2GPI antibodies.

Management of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by recurrent venous or arterial thromboses, fetal losses and thrombocytopenia in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, namely lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies or antibodies directed to various proteins, mainly β2 glycoprotein I, or all three. There is consensus in treating patients with APS and first venous thrombosis with oral anticoagulation to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.0. A recent systematic review recommended a target INR of >3.0 in those patients with APS and arterial thrombosis. The approach in women with obstetric manifestations of APS is based on the use of aspirin plus heparin. The best treatment for patients with the catastrophic variant of the APS is a combination of anticoagulation, corticosteroids, and plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulins.

Cardiovascular events in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: strategies of prevention

Antiphospholipid antibodies are a heterogeneous group of auto-antibodies against phospholipids-binding proteins. The antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the clinical association of antiphospholipid antibodies with a condition of hypercoagulability that can affect any blood vessel. Involvement of larger vessels, such as arteries or veins, manifests in the form of thrombosis or thromboembolism, whereas involvement of small vessels manifests as thrombotic micro-angiopathy. The antiphospholipid syndrome is also characterized by the presence of recurrent fetal loss. Patients who are persistently positive for antiphospholipid tests, and who have an arterial thrombosis or venous thrombosis history, are at increased risk of recurrence. Oral anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay of treatment for the thrombotic manifestations of the syndrome. Therapy with anticoagulant drugs should be long-term. On the other hand, although the thromboembolic potential of antiphospholipid antibodies has been well documented, there is still no general consensus on the prophylactic treatment of antiphospholipid antibodies carriers who have never developed vascular/obstetric manifestations. The effect of primary prophylaxis in antiphospholipid antibodies positive individuals is not well known and no evidence-based recommendations exist for thrombosis prevention in these individuals. However, the presence of risk factors for thrombosis increases the risk of first event of antiphospholipid antibodies positive patients. In conclusion, there is still much to learn on primary prophylaxis of asymptomatic antiphospholipid antibodies carriers. Hopefully, evidence-based guidelines will be available in the future.

Observational study of pregnant women with a previous spontaneous abortion before the 10th gestation week with and without antiphospholipid antibodies

BACKGROUND

A clinical subtype of purely obstetrical antiphospholipid antibody (aPL-Ab) syndrome (APS) requires three or more unexplained consecutive embryonic losses before the 10th week of gestation associated with persistently positive lupus anticoagulant (LAC), and/or anticardiolipin IgG or IgM, and/or anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (abeta2GpI) IgG or IgM. Although this diagnostic classification of APS appeared to be the most sensitive, the APS-associated serological criteria are still debated.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We prospectively observed the second pregnancy of 284 women with a previous embryonic loss, both with and without aPL-Ab.

RESULTS

aPL-Ab-positive women were more prone to pregnancy loss, embryonic loss, pre-eclampsia, placental abruption and intrauterine fetal growth restriction. Type IIa aPL-Ab positivity (LAC present alone) was associated with the highest risk of recurrent embryonic loss and intrauterine growth restriction. Type I aPL-Ab positivity (combinations of aPL-Ab type positivity) was associated with the strongest risks of late complications, pre-eclampsia and placental abruption. Finally, abeta2GpI-M positivities were not clinically relevant in these women.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a first unexplained pregnancy loss before the 10th week of gestation who are also positive for aPL-Abs have a higher risk of various complications in their second pregnancy. In this study, measurement of abeta2GpI-M had a questionable prognostic value.