Eradication of neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII in canine hemophilia A after liver gene therapy

Animal models of hemophilia and related bleeding disorders

Animal models of hemophilia and related diseases are important for the development of novel treatments and to understand the pathophysiology of bleeding disorders in humans. Testing in animals with the equivalent human disorder provides informed estimates of doses and measures of efficacy, which aids in design of human trials. Many models of hemophilia A, hemophilia B, and von Willebrand disease (VWD) have been developed from animals with spontaneous mutations (hemophilia A dogs, rats, sheep; hemophilia B dogs; and VWD pigs and dogs), or by targeted gene disruption in mice to create hemophilia A, B, or VWD models. Animal models have been used to generate new insights into the pathophysiology of each bleeding disorder and also to perform preclinical assessments of standard protein replacement therapies, as well as novel gene transfer technology. The differences both between species and in underlying causative mutations must be considered in choosing the best animal for a specific scientific study.

Development of Gene Transfer for Induction of Antigen-specific Tolerance

Gene replacement therapies, like organ and cell transplantation are likely to introduce neo-antigens that elicit rejection via humoral and/or effector T cell immune responses. Nonetheless, thanks to an ever growing body of pre-clinical studies it is now well accepted that gene transfer protocols can be specifically designed and optimized for induction of antigen-specific immune tolerance. One approach is to specifically express a gene in a tissue with a tolerogenic microenvironment such as the liver or thymus. Another strategy is to transfer a particular gene into hematopoietic stem cells or immunological precursor cells thus educating the immune system to recognize the therapeutic protein as "self". In addition, expression of the therapeutic protein in pro-tolerogenic antigen presenting cells such as immature dendritic cells and B cells has proven to be promising. All three approaches have successfully prevented unwanted immune responses in pre-clinical studies aimed at the treatment of inherited protein deficiencies, e.g. lysosomal storage disorders and hemophilia, and of type I diabetes and multiple sclerosis. In this review we focus on current gene transfer protocols that induce tolerance, including gene delivery vehicles and target tissues, and discuss successes and obstacles in different disease models.

Gene therapy for hemophilia: advancing beyond the first clinical success

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Consistently measurable and persistent expression of circulating clotting factor activity, associated with decreased clinical bleeding, has been achieved for the first time in a hemophilia gene therapy trial. This review examines the successes and limitations of this clinical trial for hemophilia B and approaches to advance beyond this milestone.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although a self-complementary serotype 8 adeno-associated virus (scAAV8) vector approach directed factor IX expression of up to 6% in a human trial, the apparent need to suppress vector dose-dependent immune-mediated liver inflammation in some patients at the highest dose highlighted the next steps to optimize the risk-benefit of hemophilia gene therapy. The approaches being pursued include manufacturing modifications to eliminate contaminating empty vector capsids, the utilization of factor IX and factor VIII modified transgenes to improve secretion or function of the transgene product, and adjunctive pharmacologic and molecular approaches to overcome limitations imposed by naturally occurring antibodies against vectors and by the large size of the factor VIII gene.

SUMMARY

Preclinical data suggest strategies in development may build upon the first gene therapy success and achieve factor IX correction sufficient to prevent bleeding without toxicity and translate success to hemophilia A gene therapy.

Effective gene therapy for haemophilic mice with pathogenic factor IX antibodies

Formation of pathogenic antibodies is a major problem in replacement therapies for inherited protein deficiencies. For example, antibodies to coagulation factors (‘inhibitors’) seriously complicate treatment of haemophilia. While immune tolerance induction (ITI) protocols have been developed, inhibitors against factor IX (FIX) are difficult to eradicate due to anaphylactic reactions and nephrotic syndrome and thus substantially elevate risks for morbidity and mortality. However, hepatic gene transfer with an adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 8 vector expressing FIX (at levels of ≥4% of normal) rapidly reversed pre-existing high-titre inhibitors in haemophilia B mice, eliminated antibody production by B cells, desensitized from anaphylaxis (even if protein therapy was resumed) and provided long-term correction. High levels of FIX protein suppressed memory B cells and increased Treg induction, indicating direct and indirect mechanisms of suppression of inhibitor formation. Persistent presence of Treg was required to prevent relapse of antibodies. Together, these data suggest that hepatic gene transfer-based ITI provides a safe and effective alternative to eradicate inhibitors. This strategy may be broadly applicable to reversal of antibodies in different genetic diseases.

Liver gene therapy by lentiviral vectors reverses anti-factor IX pre-existing immunity in haemophilic mice

A major complication of factor replacement therapy for haemophilia is the development of anti-factor neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors). Here we show that liver gene therapy by lentiviral vectors (LVs) expressing factor IX (FIX) strongly reduces pre-existing anti-FIX antibodies and eradicates FIX inhibitors in haemophilia B mice. Concomitantly, plasma FIX levels and clotting activity rose to 50–100% of normal. The treatment was effective in 75% of treated mice. FIX-specific plasma cells (PCs) and memory B cells were reduced, likely because of memory B-cell depletion in response to constant exposure to high doses of FIX. Regulatory T cells displaying FIX-specific suppressive capacity were induced in gene therapy treated mice and controlled FIX-specific T helper cells. Gene therapy proved safer than a regimen mimicking immune tolerance induction (ITI) by repeated high-dose FIX protein administration, which induced severe anaphylactoid reactions in inhibitors-positive haemophilia B mice. Liver gene therapy can thus reverse pre-existing immunity, induce active tolerance to FIX and establish sustained FIX activity at therapeutic levels. These data position gene therapy as an attractive treatment option for inhibitors-positive haemophilic patients.

Gene therapy for hemophilia

Hemophilia A and B are X-linked monogenic disorders resulting from deficiencies of factor VIII and FIX, respectively. Purified clotting factor concentrates are currently intravenously administered to treat hemophilia, but this treatment is non-curative. Therefore, gene-based therapies for hemophilia have been developed to achieve sustained high levels of clotting factor expression to correct the clinical phenotype. Over the past two decades, different types of viral and non-viral gene delivery systems have been explored for hemophilia gene therapy research with a variety of target cells, particularly hepatocytes, hematopoietic stem cells, skeletal muscle cells, and endothelial cells. Lentiviral and adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based vectors are among the most promising vectors for hemophilia gene therapy. In preclinical hemophilia A and B animal models, the bleeding phenotype was corrected with these vectors. Some of these promising preclinical results prompted clinical translation to patients suffering from a severe hemophilic phenotype. These patients receiving gene therapy with AAV vectors showed long-term expression of therapeutic FIX levels, which is a major step forwards in this field. Nevertheless, the levels were insufficient to prevent trauma or injury-induced bleeding episodes. Another challenge that remains is the possible immune destruction of gene-modified cells by effector T cells, which are directed against the AAV vector antigens. It is therefore important to continuously improve the current gene therapy approaches to ultimately establish a real cure for hemophilia.

Immune responses to AAV vectors: overcoming barriers to successful gene therapy

Gene therapy products for the treatment of genetic diseases are currently in clinical trials, and one of these, an adeno-associated viral (AAV) product, has recently been licensed. AAV vectors have achieved positive results in a number of clinical and preclinical settings, including hematologic disorders such as the hemophilias, Gaucher disease, hemochromatosis, and the porphyrias. Because AAV vectors are administered directly to the patient, the likelihood of a host immune response is high, as shown by human studies. Preexisting and/or recall responses to the wild-type virus from which the vector is engineered, or to the transgene product itself, can interfere with therapeutic efficacy if not identified and managed optimally. Small-scale clinical studies have enabled investigators to dissect the immune responses to the AAV vector capsid and to the transgene product, and to develop strategies to manage these responses to achieve long-term expression of the therapeutic gene. However, a comprehensive understanding of the determinants of immunogenicity of AAV vectors, and of potential associated toxicities, is still lacking. Careful immunosurveillance conducted as part of ongoing clinical studies will provide the basis for understanding the intricacies of the immune response in AAV-mediated gene transfer, facilitating safe and effective therapies for genetic diseases.

New developments in the treatment of pediatric hemophilia and bleeding disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Disorders of hemostasis such as hemophilia, von Willebrand disease (VWD), and other clotting protein deficiencies lead to significant morbidity in the pediatric population. Because of the limitations of current treatment options, novel therapies are being developed, many of which are reviewed here.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several new observations about the nature of clotting protein physiology have been made recently, creating novel perspectives on the treatment options. This review will mostly focus on the current therapy as well as new progress in hemophilia care (particularly strategies to prolong half-life of clotting factor replacements, the management of inhibitors, gene therapy, and novel therapeutic approaches), and briefly mention some progress in VWD and fibrinogen deficiency therapies.

SUMMARY

New therapeutic developments have the potential to dramatically decrease morbidity and improve the quality of life of children with bleeding disorders.

Inhibitors in childhood hemophilia A: genetic and treatment-related risk factors for development and eradication

The development of neutralizing antibodies remains a serious complication of hemophilia replacement therapy. Factor VIII inhibiting antibodies (inhibitors) occur commonly following replacement therapy in hemophilia A, creating a significant burden of clinical disease. This article will review our current understanding of risk factors and their known impact on inhibitor development in previously untreated or minimally treated children with severe and mild hemophilia A. It will also explore how the most recently elucidated immunology of inhibitor development might hold important clues to more effective inhibitor eradication and prevention in this heavily impacted patient population.

Liver-Directed Adeno-Associated Viral Gene Therapy for Hemophilia

Hemophilia A and B are monogenic bleeding disorders resulting from loss of functional coagulation factors VIII or IX, respectively. Prophylactic treatment requires frequent intravenous injections of exogenous factor VIII (F.VIII) or factor IX (F.IX), due to the short half-life of both factors. Hemophilia patients are at risk of developing neutralizing antibodies to F.VIII (~25-30%) or F.IX (~2-4%), which require the use of expensive bypass agents and immune tolerance induction protocols. Viral vector mediated liver gene transfer of F.VIII or F.IX offers an alternative treatment for hemophilia with easily defined clinical endpoints and no need for strict regulation of coagulation factor expression, as both proteins circulate as inactive zymogens. Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors are derived from a non-pathogenic human virus that efficiently transduce non-dividing cells, such as hepatocytes, and provide stable transgene expression. In vivo liver gene transfer of AAV-F.VIII and -F.IX vectors has restored hemostasis in murine and canine hemophilia models long-term, and has also been shown to induce immune tolerance. Consequently, two Phase I/II clinical trials have been conducted, based on hepatic AAV-FIX gene transfer to patients with severe hemophilia B. The first trial, utilizing serotype 2, demonstrated transient correction, which was limited by a cellular immune response against the viral capsid. However, sustained therapeutic expression has been achieved in a second trial, using AAV8 for expression of a codon-optimized F.IX transgene. Translation of F.VIII gene transfer studies into the clinic may require additional optimization of gene transfer and vector to effectively express the larger cDNA of F.VIII.

Porcine model of hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is a common X chromosome-linked genetic bleeding disorder caused by abnormalities in the coagulation factor VIII gene (F8). Hemophilia A patients suffer from a bleeding diathesis, such as life-threatening bleeding in the brain and harmful bleeding in joints and muscles. Because it could potentially be cured by gene therapy, subhuman animal models have been sought. Current mouse hemophilia A models generated by gene targeting of the F8 have difficulties to extrapolate human disease due to differences in the coagulation and immune systems between mice and humans. Here, we generated a porcine model of hemophilia A by nuclear transfer cloning from F8-targeted fibroblasts. The hemophilia A pigs showed a severe bleeding tendency upon birth, similar to human severe hemophiliacs, but in contrast to hemophilia A mice which rarely bleed under standard breed conditions. Infusion of human factor VIII was effective in stopping bleeding and reducing the bleeding frequency of a hemophilia A piglet but was blocked by the inhibitor against human factor VIII. These data suggest that the hemophilia A pig is a severe hemophilia A animal model for studying not only hemophilia A gene therapy but also the next generation recombinant coagulation factors, such as recombinant factor VIII variants with a slower clearance rate.

Development of resistance to biologic therapies with reference to IFN-β

All biotherapeutics have the potential to generate anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in patients. The main factors leading to an immune response are thought to be product, treatment and patient related. In this review, reasons for the formation of ADAs, and particularly neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), are considered, with a focus on IFN-β as a well-studied example. The time course for the production of NAbs, the measurement of NAbs, the defining of IFN-β responders and non-responders, the implications for disease progression in patients, and future methods for avoiding the production of ADAs and of tolerizing patients are considered.

AAV-based neonatal gene therapy for hemophilia A: long-term correction and avoidance of immune responses in mice

Hemophilia A gene therapy has been hampered by immune responses to vector-associated antigens and by neutralizing antibodies or inhibitors to the factor VIII (FVIII) protein; these ‘inhibitors’ more commonly effect hemophilia A patients than those with hemophilia B. A gene replacement strategy beginning in the neonatal period may avoid the development of these immune responses and lead to prolonged expression with correction of phenotype thereby avoiding long-term consequences. Serotype rh10 AAV was developed splitting the FVIII coding sequence into heavy and light chains with the chicken β-actin promoter/CMV enhancer for dual recombinant AAV vector delivery. Coinjection of virions of each FVIII chain intravenously to mice on the second day of life was performed. Mice express sustained FVIII antigen levels of ≥5% to 22 months of life without the development of antibodies to FVIII. Phenotypic correction was manifest in all AAV-FVIII-treated mice as demonstrated by functional assay and reduction in bleeding time. This study demonstrates the use of AAV in a gene replacement strategy in neonatal mice that establishes both long-term phenotypic correction of hemophilia A and lack of antibody development to FVIII in this disease model where AAV is administered shortly after birth. These studies support consideration of gene replacement therapy for diseases that are diagnosed in utero or in the early neonatal period.

Engineering Factor Viii for Hemophilia Gene Therapy

Current treatment of hemophilia A by intravenous infusion of factor VIII (fVIII) concentrates is very costly and has a potential adverse effect of developing inhibitors. Gene therapy, on the other hand, can potentially overcome these limitations associated with fVIII replacement therapy. Although hemophilia B gene therapy has achieved promising outcomes in human clinical trials, hemophilia A gene therapy lags far behind. Compared to factor IX, fVIII is a large protein which is difficult to express at sustaining therapeutic levels when delivered by either viral or non-viral vectors. To improve fVIII gene delivery, numerous strategies have been exploited to engineer the fVIII molecule and overcome the hurdles preventing long term and high level expression. Here we reviewed these strategies, and discussed their pros and cons in human gene therapy of hemophilia A.

Animal models of hemophilia

The X-linked bleeding disorder hemophilia is caused by mutations in coagulation factor VIII (hemophilia A) or factor IX (hemophilia B). Unless prophylactic treatment is provided, patients with severe disease (less than 1% clotting activity) typically experience frequent spontaneous bleeds. Current treatment is largely based on intravenous infusion of recombinant or plasma-derived coagulation factor concentrate. More effective factor products are being developed. Moreover, gene therapies for sustained correction of hemophilia are showing much promise in preclinical studies and in clinical trials. These advances in molecular medicine heavily depend on availability of well-characterized small and large animal models of hemophilia, primarily hemophilia mice and dogs. Experiments in these animals represent important early and intermediate steps of translational research aimed at development of better and safer treatments for hemophilia, such a protein and gene therapies or immune tolerance protocols. While murine models are excellent for studies of large groups of animals using genetically defined strains, canine models are important for testing scale-up and for long-term follow-up as well as for studies that require larger blood volumes.

Advances in Overcoming Immune Responses following Hemophilia Gene Therapy

Both Clinical trials and pre-clinical experiments for hemophilia gene therapy showed that it is important to overcome potential immune responses against gene transfer vectors and/or transgene products to ensure the success of gene therapy. Recently various approaches have been investigated to prevent or modulate such responses. Gene transfer vectors have been specifically engineered and immunosuppressive regimens have been administered to avoid or manipulate the immune responses against the vectors. In order to prevent cytotoxic lymphocyte or antibody formation induced by transgene expression, novel approaches have been developed, including methods to manipulate antigen presentation, development of variant genes encoding less immunogenic proteins or gene transfer protocols to evade immune responses, as well as immunosuppressive strategies to target either T and/or B cell responses. Most of these successful protocols involve the induction of activated regulatory T cells to create a regulatory immune environment during tolerance induction. Recent development of these strategies to evade vector-specific immune responses and induce long-term immune tolerance specific to the transgene product will be discussed.

Gene therapy for haemophilia: prospects and challenges to prevent or reverse inhibitor formation

Monogenic hereditary diseases, such as haemophilia A and B, are ideal targets for gene therapeutic approaches. While these diseases can be treated with protein therapeutics, such as factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX), the notion that permanent transfer of the genes encoding these factors can cure haemophilia is very attractive. An underlying problem with a gene therapy approach, however, is the patient's immune response to the therapeutic protein (as well as to the transmission vector), leading to the formation of inhibitory antibodies. Even more daunting is reversing an existing immune response in patients with pre-existing inhibitors. In this review, we will describe the laboratory and clinical progress, and the challenges met thus far, in achieving the goal of gene therapy efficacy, with a focus on the goal of tolerance induction.

Immune tolerance induction in haemophilia: evidence and the way forward

Given the inhibitor-associated morbidity resulting from limited effective treatment options, antibody eradication is the ultimate goal of inhibitor management. The only clinically proven strategy for achieving antigen-specific tolerance to factor VIII is immune tolerance induction (ITI). First reported over 30 years ago, much of our current knowledge about ITI in haemophilia A and B was derived from small cohort studies and retrospective national and international ITI registries. More recently, prospective randomised ITI trials have been designed and initiated to answer outstanding questions related to the optimisation of current therapeutic strategy in haemophilia A. However, due to the low incidence of inhibitor development in haemophilia B compared to haemophilia A, there are few comparable data from which to develop a useful evidence-based approach to the prevention and eradication of FIX inhibitors. The lack of an effective strategy is particularly problematic given the even greater morbidity associated with the almost unique occurrence of allergic and anaphylactic reactions that often herald FIX antibody development, and further complicates attempts to eradicate FIX inhibitors. Ultimately, successful inhibitor prevention and eradication strategies for both diseases will emerge from the clinical translation of our evolving knowledge of immune stimulation and tolerance. This paper will discuss our current understanding of immune tolerance outcome and outcome predictors for haemophilia A and B; it will also review the current consensus recommendations for ITI, as well as the emerging scientific body of immunological knowledge that may significantly impact the therapeutic and preventative strategies of the future.

Gene therapy for haemophilia: a long and winding road

BACKGROUND

Cure, or improvement of disease phenotype, has been a long-term goal in the treatment of haemophilia. An obvious strategy for achieving this goal is the use of gene therapy.

OBJECTIVES

This paper summarises prior and current clinical trials of gene therapy for haemophilia A and B, and briefly describes additional strategies in pre-clinical development.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 50 human subjects with severe haemophilia A or B have been enrolled in seven different trials of gene therapy. These have used plasmids, retroviral, adenoviral, and AAV vectors, directed to autologous fibroblasts, skeletal muscle, liver, and other target cell types accessed by intravenous injection of vector. Four separate trials have used AAV vectors, three of these targeting liver. Data from animal models suggest that several different gene replacement strategies may eventually yield long-term expression of factor at therapeutic levels, and that in situ correction of gene defects in hepatocytes may eventually be a therapeutic option.

Pharmacokinetics and ex vivo whole blood clot formation of a new recombinant FVIII (N8) in haemophilia A dogs

N8, a new recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) compound developed for the treatment of haemophilia A, is produced in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and formulated without human- or animal-derived materials. The aim of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and the procoagulant effect, measured by ex vivo whole blood clot formation, of N8 and a commercial rFVIII in a cross-over study in haemophilia A dogs. N8 and Advate® (100 IU kg⁻¹) were administered intravenously to three haemophilia A dogs. Blood was sampled between 0 and 120 h postdose and FVIII:C analysed. PK parameters maximum plasma concentration, area under the curve, half-life (t(½)), clearance, mean residence time (MRT) and volume of distribution and incremental recovery were calculated. Whole blood clotting time (WBCT) and thromboelastography (TEG®) were used to determine the haemostatic potential. No adverse reactions were observed with N8 or Advate ®. N8 and Advate® exhibited similar PK parameters, with t(½) 7.7-11 h and MRT 11-14 h. Both rFVIII compounds corrected the prolonged WBCT (> 48 min) to the range of normal dogs (8-12 min), i.e. N8 to 7.5-10.5 min and Advate® to 7.5-11.5 min. N8 and Advate® also normalized the whole blood clot formation according to TEG®. The native whole blood clotting assays (WBCT, TEG®) appeared to be more sensitive to low concentrations of FVIII than assays in citrated plasma samples. In conclusion, comparison of N8 and Advate ® in haemophilia A dogs revealed similar safety, similar PK and similar effects in whole blood clot formation assays.

Successful immune tolerance induction by FVIII in hemophilia A patients with inhibitor may occur without deletion of FVIII-specific T cells

BACKGROUND

 The development of an inhibitor is the major complication facing patients with hemophilia A treated by administration of factor (F) VIII concentrates. Restoration of tolerance to FVIII can be achieved by prolonged administration of FVIII (immune tolerance induction, ITI). Although ITI has been used for more than 30years in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitor, its mechanism of action is still poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

 As administration of high doses of antigen can induce the apoptosis of the T cells recognizing the antigen, a potential mechanism of action of ITI may be the deletion of FVIII-specific T cells.

PATIENTS/METHODS

 We studied the CD4+ T-cell response to FVIII in five (one mild, one moderate and three severe) patients successfully desensitized by administration of FVIII and in control subjects.

RESULTS

 Following repeated stimulation with autologous dendritic cells loaded with FVIII, FVIII-specific T oligoclonal cell lines were expanded from the blood of one of the successfully desensitized patients. The FVIII-specific T cells produced IL-5, IL-13 and IL-2. By contrast, FVIII-specific T-cell lines could not be derived from three patients with mild hemophilia A without inhibitor or from four normal control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

 These data represent the first analysis of the cellular mechanisms regulating the induction of tolerance to FVIII. They demonstrate that successful tolerance induction may occur without deletion of FVIII-specific T cells.

[Immune mechanisms involved in the development and eradication of anti-factor VIII alloantibodies in hemophilia]

Hemophilia A is an X-linked hereditary bleeding disorder caused by a congenital deficiency in blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Therapy to prevent or treat bleeding is replacement of FVIII. The most significant complication of treatment in patients with hemophilia A is the development of alloantibodies that inhibit FVIII activity, termed inhibitors. In the presence of inhibitors, replacement of the missing clotting factor with FVIII preparations becomes less effective. Once replacement therapy is ineffective, morbidity increases. It remains unsolved to prevent inhibitor formation. The only strategy is long-term administration of a large quantity of FVIII in an attempt to eradicate the inhibitors through immune tolerance. However, little is known about the mechanisms involved in the induction of tolerance. This review will focus on the current understanding of why inhibitors develop and can be eradicated. The development of inhibitors by intravenous infusions of FVIII without adjuvant poses an intriguing challenge to immunologists.

Efficacy and safety of long-term prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A dogs following liver gene therapy using AAV vectors

Developing adeno-associated viral (AAV)-mediated gene therapy for hemophilia A (HA) has been challenging due to the large size of the factor VIII (FVIII) complementary DNA and the concern for the development of inhibitory antibodies to FVIII in HA patients. Here, we perform a systematic study in HA dogs by delivering a canine FVIII (cFVIII) transgene either as a single chain or two chains in an AAV vector. An optimized cFVIII single chain delivered using AAV serotype 8 (AAV8) by peripheral vein injection resulted in a dose-response with sustained expression of FVIII up to 7% (n = 4). Five HA dogs administered two-chain delivery using either AAV8 or AAV9 via the portal vein expressed long-term, vector dose-dependent levels of FVIII activity (up to 10%). In the two-chain approach, circulating cFVIII antigen levels were more than fivefold higher than activity. Notably, no long-term immune response to FVIII was observed in any of the dogs (1/9 dogs had a transient inhibitor). Long-term follow-up of the dogs showed a remarkable reduction (>90%) of bleeding episodes in a combined total of 24 years of observation. These data demonstrate that both approaches are safe and achieve dose-dependent therapeutic levels of FVIII expression, which supports translational studies of AAV-mediated delivery for HA.