High-dose combination alkylating agents with bone marrow support as initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer

Monotherapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Review of Newer Agents

Purpose. New agents for the palliative treatment of metastatic breast cancer have emerged in the 1990s. This review summarizes the response rates of these agents with an emphasis on recent findings, such as presentations from the 1998 Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Methods. The English medical literature was reviewed to identify clinical trials involving monotherapy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Three agents—paclitaxel, vinorelbine, and docetaxel—are emphasized because their databases are extensive enough to allow interesting comparisons. Liposomal-encapsulated anthracyclines, losoxantrone, gemcitabine, oral surrogates of continuous-infusion fluorouracil, raltitrexed, LY 231514, edatrexate, topoisomerase I inhibitors, and trastuzumab are reviewed briefly.

Results. Many of the new agents produce response rates approaching or even surpassing those achievable with doxorubicin monotherapy. Compared with older agents, some new agents have improved or at least different safety profiles, and some are easier to administer.

Discussion and conclusions. The new agents offer useful therapeutic options that make them suitable for combining with each other and with older agents, which could result in more effective regimens for metastatic disease, and, ultimately, primary disease in the adjuvant setting. The chemotherapeutic paradigms governing the management of breast cancer for the past three decades are likely to change as we move into the 21st century.

Sequential treatment including high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support in patients with high-risk stage II-III breast cancer: outpatient administration in community cancer centers

The authors determined outcomes for patients with localized high-risk breast cancer undergoing sequential outpatient treatment with conventional-dose adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy, and growth factor mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with PBSC support in community cancer centers. Ninety-six patients with stage II-IIIB noninflammatory breast cancer with 10 or more positive lymph nodes and a median age of 46 years (range, 22-60 years) were treated with: 1) doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM), four courses at 2-week intervals; 2) cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and etoposide (600 mg/m2) (CE), followed by filgrastim (6 microg/kg per day) and PBSC harvest; and 3) cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2), and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) (CTCb), followed by PBSC infusion. All 96 patients received AFM, 95 (99%) received CE, and 95 (99%) received CTCb with a median hospital stay of 12 days (5-34 days) for all phases of treatment. Sixty-nine patients (72%) are alive, 55 (57%) without relapse at a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 37-77 months). One patient (1%) died of acute myeloid leukemia and all other deaths were associated with recurrent breast cancer. The probabilities of event-free survival (EFS) at 4 years for patients with or without locally advanced disease were 0.37 and 0.69, respectively (p = 0.004), and 0.71 and 0.48 for patients who were estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positive or ER/PR negative, respectively (p = 0.016). In multivariate analyses, locally advanced disease (relative risk, 2.3; p = 0.021) and ER/PR-negative hormone receptor status (relative risk, 2.2; p = 0.014) were the only adverse risk factors for EFS identified. Patients with zero, one, or two of these adverse risk factors had 4-year EFS of 0.80, 0.56, and 0.33, respectively. The sequential administration of AFM, CE, and CTCb followed by PBSC in an outpatient community setting was well tolerated in patients with high-risk stage II-III breast cancer. More intensive or more novel treatment strategies will be required to decrease relapses in patients who have ER/PR-negative tumors and/or have locally advanced disease.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation as treatment for high-risk breast cancer

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation has emerged as a common treatment for patients with breast cancer who have a poor prognosis. The success of this approach appears to depend on the tumor burden and the sensitivity of the disease to chemotherapy because treatment techniques have been refined and treatment-related mortality has declined. Phase II studies in patients with stage II and III disease are encouraging and suggest that treatment with high-dose chemotherapy before the development of metastatic disease may provide an advantage in terms of relapse-free and overall survival. However, tumor cells may contaminate stem cell collections and contribute to relapse after transplantation. Therefore it may be important to separate and select purified CD34+ cells which are not contaminated. It has been suggested that selection bias contributes to the favorable preliminary results observed in phase II studies of high-risk patients. Such issues, together with patient and physician bias regarding the benefits of this strategy, emphasize the need to complete the prospective randomized trials now underway.

Use of tumor lines with selectable markers in assessing the effect on experimental metastases of combination chemotherapy with alkylating agents

High-dose chemotherapy with a 3-day regimen of cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine was used to treat mice bearing experimental lung metastases of mammary tumor cell lines with selectable markers (lines 66cl4 and 4TO7). Cloning of lung cells at various times after treatment revealed a rapid 3 to 4 log loss of clonogenic tumor cells, down to undetectable levels. However, after several weeks, clonogenic tumor cells reappeared in the lungs; few cures were obtained even when mice had a relatively low tumor burden when treated with chemotherapy. Splenocyte numbers and response to Concanavalin A indicated a transient immunosuppression. In one experiment, mice were treated with a second round of chemotherapy 3 weeks after the first. The number of clonogenic cells per lung again dropped, but regrowth of cells was rapid, and no cures were obtained. Inoculation of tumor-bearing mice s.c. after chemotherapy with lethally irradiated cells of the highly immunogenic tumor cell line 4TO7-IL-2 had little effect on the rate of reappearance of line 4TO7 in lungs, but subsequent growth of tumor cells in lungs was slowed. This model system can be used to test the efficacy of additional immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens on minimal residual metastatic disease after high-dose chemotherapy, when remaining metastatic cells are apparently dormant.

Dose-Intensified Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Present and Future Prospects

With the trend to maximize chemotherapy in breast cancer, the use of peripheral blood stem cells in addition to hematopoietic growth factors to alleviate myelosuppression caused by dose-intensified chemotherapy has been shown to be beneficial. In treatment of metastatic breast cancer, response rates and complete response rates as high as 100%and nearly 80%, respectively, have been reported. Such treatments have shown even greater promise in an adjuvant setting for high-risk breast cancer. High-dose chemotherapy studies, however, involve highly-selected patient populations who are generally compared with unselected patients, and controversy still surrounds the question of whether it is substantially superior to conventional-dose chemotherapy. There are now more than sufficient data to justify ongoing randomized trials, and the most important overall recommedation is to encourage patients to participate in these clinical trials.

Clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic breast cancer with complete remission following systemic treatment

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have variable clinical courses. The purpose was to describe the clinical characteristics of MBC patients with complete remissions (CR) following systemic treatment.

METHODS

We analyzed 315 consecutive MBC patients treated with several types of systemic treatments at the National Cancer Center Hospital between January 1988 and December 1993.

RESULTS

The median survival time (MST) and median progression-free survival were 28.0 and 17.1 months, respectively. Forty patients were defined as 'first-CR' following initial or second-line systemic treatment and the majority of them had a good performance status, low number of metastatic sites and low incidence of liver involvement. Nine of 40 patients with first-CR continued progression-free 5 years after beginning systemic treatments. The major sites of metastasis were the lung and bone and there were no cases with liver metastasis. Five patients received standard doxorubicin-containing combination chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen. Two of these nine patients remain progression free in first-CR. Three of them remained in first-CR after 5 years and died of progressive breast cancer and two others died of unrelated causes. Two patients relapsed after obtaining a first-CR for at least 5 years and remain alive with active metastatic disease. The MST and median progression-free survival of nine patients were 10.6 and 9.0 years, respectively. These nine patients represented 22.5% of all first-CR patients and 3.2% of the total patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MBC is commonly recognized to be an incurable disease, a small percentage of patients clearly are alive and progression free for prolonged periods after initiation of systemic treatments.

High-dose therapy with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support using an innovative mobilization regimen in patients with high-risk primary or chemoresponsive metastatic breast cancers

High-dose therapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support was performed in 29 patients with primary high-risk (Group I) or chemoresponsive metastatic (Group II) breast cancer patients. Group I patients had received PBSC mobilization within 4 weeks of modified radical mastectomy. Group II patients had to achieve minimal residual disease (MRD) by induction chemotherapy before being considered eligible for PBSC mobilization and high-dose therapy. An innovative FE120C regimen (5-FU 600 mg/m2, i.v., day 1; epirubicin 120 mg/m2, i.v., day 1; cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, i.v., day 1) plus G-CSF (300 microg/day, subcutaneous injection for 9 days, from day 4 post-FE120C) was used to mobilize PBSCs. After high-dose CTCb (cyclophosphamide 6,000 mg/m2, thiothepa 500 mg/m2, carboplatin 800 mg/m2, in 4 days), patients received PBSC infusion and daily C-CSF 300 microg subcutaneous injection. There were 19 and 16 patients enrolled into Group I and Group II, respectively. Ten of the Group II patients had achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction chemotherapy. The median numbers of mobilized total CD34 + cells for Group I and Group II patients were 27.3 (9.2 to 114.1) x 10(6)/kg and 17.1 (5.9 to 69.1) x 10(6)/kg respectively. The median time to neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 500/microL) was 8 and 9 days in Group I and II, respectively. The median time to platelet recovery (> or = 50,000/microL) was 10 and 15 days in Group I and II, respectively. No major treatment-related toxicities were noted. In Group I, 13 out of 19 patients (68.4%; 43-87%, 95% C.I.) remained recurrence-free with a median follow-up of 31 months (6 + to 55 + months). In Group II, 3 out of 10 patients (30%; 7-65%, 95% C.I.) remained progression-free at 33 +, 35 +, 39 + months from induction therapy. We suggest that the FE120C plus G-CSF is an effective and innovative regimen for PBSC mobilization in breast cancer patients, and high-dose CTCb therapy with PBSC support is a safe and well-tolerated treatment modality.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell reconstitution for solid tumors

High-dose chemotherapy--in conjunction with the transplantation of either mononuclear cells harvested from the marrow or CD 34+ cells harvested from the peripheral blood--has proved effective in curing certain patients with leukemia, lymphoma, and, to a lesser extent, multiple myeloma. Though the CD 34+ therapy is a relatively new treatment and the mononuclear cell therapy is more standard, both have been successfully used to reconstitute lethally damaged hematopoietic stem cells. Allogeneic transplants have been more effective than autologous transplants against tumors, but they also pose a greater hazard of death from complications, graft-versus-host disease, and infections. More currently, this approach has been used in patients with certain solid tumors, either in a metastatic or recurrent disease setting or as an adjuvant to surgery and/or standard doses of chemotherapy in patients with a known high risk of recurrence. Unfortunately, the majority of the studies about the impact of this therapy have been small and nonrandomized against standard therapy, and they have encompassed diverse populations of patients. This makes comparisons with contemporary standard--dose approaches--already problematic from a statistical point of view--even more dangerous because of the dissimilarity of the groups being compared. Particularly in the high-risk adjuvant setting, data suggest that those patients that meet the eligibility criteria for high-dose therapy and transplantation exhibit the prognostic factors for a positive outcome. When one compares these results with those of a more heterogeneous group of patients treated with conventional therapy, the conclusion might be drawn that high-dose therapy is superior to standard therapy, when a longer follow-up of the patients in the study will show this to be untrue. Thus there is a plea from clinicians and physicians conducting trials for prospective, randomized trials that would allow a fair comparison between high-dose therapy in combination with transplant procedures and a more conventional, standard chemotherapy, which is often less toxic and definitely less expensive. This article reviews the data for transplantation in four tumors: breast cancer, ovarian cancer, small-cell lung cancer, and germ cell testis cancer. There is such a small number of randomized trials that an attempt must be made to compare these small high-dose therapy studies with similar, though not identical, large studies of conventional therapy. This article attempts to make those comparisons, and several conclusions are drawn, which are detailed below. First, few data support the use of high-dose chemotherapy in any patient with recurrent and drug-resistant breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Similarly, few data support the use of high-dose approaches for patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer. For patients with metastatic breast cancer that has responded completely to conventional chemotherapy, no data suggest a survival advantage for the immediate consolidation of that response with high-dose chemotherapy. The only trial addressing this issue found that immediate transplantation led to a better disease-free survival rate, but overall survival, as compared with that of patients who received transplants at relapse, was not affected, and the study did not address the issue of the relative merits of conventional chemotherapy in either case. The only study of high-dose versus conventional chemotherapy was statistically underpowered, and it showed poorer-than-anticipated outcomes in the patients who received conventional therapy. Ongoing or recently completed trials will, it is hoped, address the many unanswered questions in this area. For patients with high-risk, non-metastatic breast cancer, no completed and analyzed phase III randomized studies address the relative merits of conventional versus high-dose therapy. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Clinical course of breast cancer patients with metastases confined to the lungs treated with chemotherapy. The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience and review of the literature

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical course of patients with a metastatic breast cancer (MBC) confined to the lungs and treated with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (DC-CT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1973 and 1985, 1581 patients with MBC were treated with DC-CT at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Data for 88 patients (5.6%) with metastases confined to the lungs were reviewed to correlate various clinical characteristics with response to treatment and survival.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 76% with 33% achieving complete response (CR). The median overall survival time was 22 months (range 1-210). The 10-year survival rate was 9%. The overall response and CR rates were higher for the patients with metastases confined to the lungs (76% and 33%. respectively) than for the remainder of MBC patients (64% and 14%; P < 0.01). The 10-year survival rate was also higher (9% versus 3%, P < 0.01), but there were no differences in median overall survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis demonstrated that patients with metastases confined to the lungs treated with DC-CT had a high objective response rate, especially high CR rates, and a median survival comparable to that of our entire population of MBC patients. A small but clinically significant percentage of patients had prolonged survival. Therefore, not all visceral sites are indicators of poor prognosis.

Hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in breast cancer: current status and future directions

Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death despite numerous advances in medical science. In vitro, preclinical, and clinical trials have shown that chemotherapy dose intensity is an important component of therapy. Many clinical trials addressing the use of high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic cellular rescue have been conducted over the past decade. Early trials undertaken in heavily pretreated patients who had metastatic disease were associated with high treatment-related mortality rates; good response rates were noted but overall survivals were short. Subsequent technological advances, including the use of recombinant hematopoietic growth factors and peripheral blood progenitor cells as the source of cellular rescue, have dramatically lowered the morbidity and mortality of the procedure, as well as shortened hospital stay and markedly reduced cost. As a result, the high-dose chemotherapy approach has been used earlier in the disease course, both in patients with metastatic disease who were responding and in the adjuvant setting in patients at high risk for relapse. Results of many of these phase II trials are extremely encouraging, and phase III prospective, randomized trials comparing autotransplant to conventional approaches are currently under way. This review discusses past, current, and future initiatives of this modality. Included is a discussion of new preparative regimens, the addition of agents such as biochemical modifiers to enhance antitumor activity, and issues regarding timing of autotransplant, stem cell technology, use of allogeneic stem cells, and posttransplantation therapies.

Much ado about not...enough data: high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue for breast cancer

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or stem cell rescue (HDC/ASCR) has been proposed as a promising treatment strategy for breast cancer. Despite the frequency with which this procedure is performed, the role of HDC/ASCR in the treatment of breast cancer remains undefined. The purpose of this review is to examine the rationale for the procedure, the research progress to date, and the limitations of available data. A literature search of Medline from January 1966 through May 1997, CancerLit from January 1983 through May 1997, and Current Contents through May 1997 identified more than 600 English language papers or abstracts on this topic. Our review focuses on the preclinical and clinical data that explore the concept of chemotherapy dose intensity and the role of dose intensity in treating breast cancer. HDC/ASCR is based on the hypothesis that high-dose chemotherapy will overcome drug resistance, eradicate metastatic disease, and increase the proportion of women with breast cancer who are "cured." To date, results from only one phase 3 trial of HDC/ASCR compared with more conventional therapy have been published. Phase 2 and some phase 3 data on HDC/ASCR in the treatment of high-risk primary breast cancer and metastatic breast cancer are discussed. However, the results are inconclusive. The completion of national and international randomized trials is urgently needed to establish definitively the role of HDC/ASCR in the treatment of breast cancer.

Delayed pulmonary toxicity syndrome following high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer

We have intensely followed 45 consecutive women who underwent high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide/cisplatin/BCNU) and autologous bone marrow transplant (HDC/ABMT) for primary breast cancer with pulmonary function testing and computed tomography at regular intervals up to 126 wk (median follow-up, 72 wk). Our results show a high incidence of interstitial pneumonitis requiring steroids (64%), but no deaths due to pulmonary toxicity. The DL(CO) reaches a nadir of 58.2 +/- SEM 3.4 (expressed as a percent of baseline value) 15-18 wk following HDC/ABMT, and marginally improves with time. To a much lesser extent, vital capacity is reduced with a parallel drop in FEV1, suggesting mild restrictive changes without significant obstruction. Patients who develop pulmonary symptoms of cough or dyspnea have a corresponding significantly greater and earlier decline in DL(CO). Chest computed tomography was neither sensitive nor specific for diagnosing pulmonary toxicity. For patients who received steroids for pulmonary toxicity, there was a subsequent improvement in DL(CO) of 17.1% (p = 0.0001). Because our patients do not fit with the recent definition of idiopathic pulmonary syndrome (IPS), we propose the term delayed pulmonary toxicity syndrome (DPTS) to better describe the milder form of lung toxicity seen in our patient population. We were unable to correlate the severity of DPTS with age, tobacco use, baseline pulmonary function, or systemic exposure to BCNU, cyclophosphamide, or cisplatin. These data suggest that factor(s) other than, or in addition to, chemotherapy systemic exposure can contribute to DPTS. Furthermore, early identification and institution of systemic corticosteroids may improve lung function.

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Buffy Coat Versus CD34-Selected Autologous Bone Marrow Support in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Receiving High-Dose Chemotherapy

High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic progenitor cell support is administered increasingly to selected categories of patients with high-risk malignancies. Bone marrow and/or peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are commonly cryopreserved with the cryoprotectant dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which can cause a variety of systemic side effects when the graft is thawed and infused. The progenitor cells thought to be responsible for hematopoietic recovery express the CD34 antigen and constitute 1% to 3% of the marrow cells and 0.5% of the PBPC fraction. Transplantation of a CD34+ graft would markedly reduce the volume and thus the amount of DMSO required, thereby decreasing the infusion-related toxicities. In this study, 89 high-risk breast cancer patients received high-dose therapy and were randomized to receive an autologous CD34+ marrow graft (Arm A) versus a standard buffy coat fraction (Arm B). After marrow infusion, significant increases in diastolic and systolic blood pressure, as well as significant decreases in heart rate, were documented in Arm B compared to Arm A patients (P < .001). None of the patients in Arm A experienced any clinically serious adverse events associated with the marrow infusion compared to 6% of the Arm B patients. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 13 days for Arm A and 11 days for Arm B patients (P = .218). The median time to platelet engraftment was 27 days for Arm A and 20 days for Arm B patients (0.051). There were no other significant differences between the two arms of the study with respect to thrombocytopenia-related complications or immune function reconstitution. Additionally, patients on Arm A who received ≥1.2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg had no delay in platelet recovery (22 days), compared to patients on Arm B, who also received greater than 1.2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (20 days) (P = .604). In conclusion, this prospective randomized study demonstrates that breast cancer patients who receive high-dose therapy with autologous CD34+ marrow support have reduced marrow infusion-related toxicity, comparable time to neutrophil engraftment and immune function recovery posttransplant, and for those who receive <1.2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, comparable time to platelet engraftment compared to women who receive buffy coat fractions of marrow.

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Buffy Coat Versus CD34-Selected Autologous Bone Marrow Support in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Receiving High-Dose Chemotherapy

High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic progenitor cell support is administered increasingly to selected categories of patients with high-risk malignancies. Bone marrow and/or peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are commonly cryopreserved with the cryoprotectant dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which can cause a variety of systemic side effects when the graft is thawed and infused. The progenitor cells thought to be responsible for hematopoietic recovery express the CD34 antigen and constitute 1% to 3% of the marrow cells and 0.5% of the PBPC fraction. Transplantation of a CD34+ graft would markedly reduce the volume and thus the amount of DMSO required, thereby decreasing the infusion-related toxicities. In this study, 89 high-risk breast cancer patients received high-dose therapy and were randomized to receive an autologous CD34+ marrow graft (Arm A) versus a standard buffy coat fraction (Arm B). After marrow infusion, significant increases in diastolic and systolic blood pressure, as well as significant decreases in heart rate, were documented in Arm B compared to Arm A patients (P < .001). None of the patients in Arm A experienced any clinically serious adverse events associated with the marrow infusion compared to 6% of the Arm B patients. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 13 days for Arm A and 11 days for Arm B patients (P = .218). The median time to platelet engraftment was 27 days for Arm A and 20 days for Arm B patients (0.051). There were no other significant differences between the two arms of the study with respect to thrombocytopenia-related complications or immune function reconstitution. Additionally, patients on Arm A who received ≥1.2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg had no delay in platelet recovery (22 days), compared to patients on Arm B, who also received greater than 1.2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (20 days) (P = .604). In conclusion, this prospective randomized study demonstrates that breast cancer patients who receive high-dose therapy with autologous CD34+ marrow support have reduced marrow infusion-related toxicity, comparable time to neutrophil engraftment and immune function recovery posttransplant, and for those who receive <1.2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, comparable time to platelet engraftment compared to women who receive buffy coat fractions of marrow.

Optimising treatment outcomes: a review of current management strategies in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer remains an essentially incurable disease and chemotherapy, despite producing frequent and clinically useful responses, has had a disappointing impact on survival. Several highly promising lines of clinical research with new agents, combinations and dosages may yet produce an improved outcome. Of the new drugs that have been studied, the taxoids, docetaxel and paclitaxel appear to be the most active agents yet discovered in this setting; navelbine is also active. Investigations of high-dose chemotherapy have produced the highest rates of complete response achieved in patients with this condition. The results of recent randomised trials confirm the high activity of this modality and also suggest a survival advantage compared with more traditionally dosed treatment. Active research into biological therapy is also under way and vaccines, antibodies and inhibitors of growth factors are all being evaluated.

Effect of CD34+ Selection and Various Schedules of Stem Cell Reinfusion and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Priming on Hematopoietic Recovery After High-Dose Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

We evaluated the effects of various schedules of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) reinfusion, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF ) priming, and CD34+ enrichment on hematopoietic recovery in 88 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin 250 mg/m2, etoposide 60 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/kg. PBSC (≥7.5 × 108 nucleated cells/kg) were collected following priming with G-CSF and were either immediately cryopreserved (48 patients; cohorts A and B) or were first processed for CD34+ enrichment (40 patients; cohorts C and D). Patients in cohorts A and C received PBSC on day 0; patients in cohorts B and D received 25% of their nucleated cells on day −2 and 75% on day 0 (split reinfusion). Patients in cohorts A, B, and C were primed with G-CSF 10 μg/kg, subcutaneously (SC), once a day; patients in cohort D were primed with 5 μg/kg G-CSF, SC, twice daily (bid). Bid administration of G-CSF yielded 2.3 to 4.7 × higher numbers of CD34+ cells in the PBSC product than the same total dose given once a day (P = .002). Reinfusion of 25% of unselected PBSC on day −2 (median, 2.26 × 108/kg nucleated cells [range, 1.7 to 3.3 × 108/kg]) with the remaining cells reinfused on day 0 resulted in earlier granulocyte recovery to ≥500/μL when compared with reinfusion of all stem cells on day 0 (group B, median of 8 days [range, 7 to 11] v group A, 10 days [range, 8 to 11], P = .0003); no schedule-dependent difference was noted in reaching platelet independence (group B, 11.5 days [range, 5 to 21]; group A, 12 days [range, 8 to 24], P = not significant). Split schedule reinfusion of CD34+-selected PBSC did not accelerate granulocyte recovery. In groups D and C, the median number of days to granulocyte recovery was 12 (range, 8 to 22) and 11.5 (range, 9 to 13); patients became platelet independent by day 15 (range, 6 to 22) and 14 (range, 12 to 23), respectively. CD34+-selected PBSC rescue decreased the incidence of postreinfusion nausea, emesis, and oxygen desaturation in comparison to unselected PBSC reinfusion (P ≤ .005 for each). Hematopoietic recovery may be accelerated by earlier reinfusion of ≈ 2.26 × 108/kg unselected nucleated cells. Earlier recovery may be triggered by components other than the progenitors included in the CD34+ cell population. Sustained hematopoietic recovery can also be achieved with CD34+-selected PBSC alone. Dosing of G-CSF on a bid schedule generates higher CD34+ cell yield in the leukapheresis product. Whether even earlier “sacrificial” reinfusion of approximately 2 × 108/kg unselected nucleated cells concomitant with the administration of high-dose chemotherapy would reduce the duration of absolute granulocytopenia further while initiating sustained long-term hematopoietic recovery will require further investigation.

Effect of CD34+ Selection and Various Schedules of Stem Cell Reinfusion and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Priming on Hematopoietic Recovery After High-Dose Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

We evaluated the effects of various schedules of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) reinfusion, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF ) priming, and CD34+ enrichment on hematopoietic recovery in 88 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin 250 mg/m2, etoposide 60 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/kg. PBSC (≥7.5 × 108 nucleated cells/kg) were collected following priming with G-CSF and were either immediately cryopreserved (48 patients; cohorts A and B) or were first processed for CD34+ enrichment (40 patients; cohorts C and D). Patients in cohorts A and C received PBSC on day 0; patients in cohorts B and D received 25% of their nucleated cells on day −2 and 75% on day 0 (split reinfusion). Patients in cohorts A, B, and C were primed with G-CSF 10 μg/kg, subcutaneously (SC), once a day; patients in cohort D were primed with 5 μg/kg G-CSF, SC, twice daily (bid). Bid administration of G-CSF yielded 2.3 to 4.7 × higher numbers of CD34+ cells in the PBSC product than the same total dose given once a day (P = .002). Reinfusion of 25% of unselected PBSC on day −2 (median, 2.26 × 108/kg nucleated cells [range, 1.7 to 3.3 × 108/kg]) with the remaining cells reinfused on day 0 resulted in earlier granulocyte recovery to ≥500/μL when compared with reinfusion of all stem cells on day 0 (group B, median of 8 days [range, 7 to 11] v group A, 10 days [range, 8 to 11], P = .0003); no schedule-dependent difference was noted in reaching platelet independence (group B, 11.5 days [range, 5 to 21]; group A, 12 days [range, 8 to 24], P = not significant). Split schedule reinfusion of CD34+-selected PBSC did not accelerate granulocyte recovery. In groups D and C, the median number of days to granulocyte recovery was 12 (range, 8 to 22) and 11.5 (range, 9 to 13); patients became platelet independent by day 15 (range, 6 to 22) and 14 (range, 12 to 23), respectively. CD34+-selected PBSC rescue decreased the incidence of postreinfusion nausea, emesis, and oxygen desaturation in comparison to unselected PBSC reinfusion (P ≤ .005 for each). Hematopoietic recovery may be accelerated by earlier reinfusion of ≈ 2.26 × 108/kg unselected nucleated cells. Earlier recovery may be triggered by components other than the progenitors included in the CD34+ cell population. Sustained hematopoietic recovery can also be achieved with CD34+-selected PBSC alone. Dosing of G-CSF on a bid schedule generates higher CD34+ cell yield in the leukapheresis product. Whether even earlier “sacrificial” reinfusion of approximately 2 × 108/kg unselected nucleated cells concomitant with the administration of high-dose chemotherapy would reduce the duration of absolute granulocytopenia further while initiating sustained long-term hematopoietic recovery will require further investigation.

Systemic adjuvant therapy of breast cancer

Systematic adjuvant therapy has improved the outcome for women with operable breast cancer. As a result, a substantial proportion of patients with this disease are candidates for adjuvant treatment. In providing a woman with recommendations for therapy, her risk of developing recurrent breast cancer needs to be assessed in relationship to the degree of benefit she will obtain from treatment. With the range of presently available treatments, an individualized approach is necessary to provide the patient with options appropriate for her own situation. For women with a high risk of recurrence despite current standard adjuvant therapies, innovative approaches with high dose chemotherapy followed by infusion of autologous hematopoietic stem cells and growth factors are being evaluated. Ongoing clinical trials will demonstrate whether or not these newer therapies result in a better outcome.

Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancer. The Epirubicin High Dose (HEPI 010) Study Group

PURPOSE

A phase III study was performed in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to evaluate the effect on response rate and survival of a doubling of the epirubicin dose intensity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred fifty-six patients were randomised to receive either epirubicin 100 mg/m2 or 50 mg/m2 in combination with 5-FU (500 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) (FEC 100 vs. FEC 50) i.v., every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles (eight in case of CR).

RESULTS

Of 456 patients, 390 were evaluable for efficacy. Objective response (CR + PR) was seen in 57% (FEC 100) vs. 41% (FEC 50) of the evaluable patients (P = 0.003). The CR rate was higher in the FEC 100 arm (12% vs. 7%, P = 0.07). FEC 100 produced significantly higher response rates in patients with visceral localisation (50% vs. 34%, P = 0.011) and in patients with more than two metastatic organ sites (64% vs. 37%, P = 0.001). Median time to progression (7.6 vs. 7 months) and overall survival (18 months vs. 17 months) were similar. Myelosuppression was the principal toxic effect, with grade IV neutropenia observed in 57% of the patients treated with FEC 100 vs. 9% of those on FEC 50. Grade IV infection or febrile neutropenia were observed in 8% (FEC 100) vs. 0.4% (FEC 50), but the incidence of septic death was the same in the two arms (two patients each). Cardiac toxicity was similar in the two treatment groups, with 5% vs. 3% of the patients taken off study due to cardiac events, primarily due to a decline in LVEF. Only three patients (two in FEC 100) experienced congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSION

This trial shows that FEC with epirubicin at 100 mg/m2 can be administered for repeated cycles without bone marrow support with increased, though acceptable, toxicity and with a significant increase of antitumor effect (especially in visceral and/or high-burden disease), but no increased survival.

Advanced breast cancer: investigational role of gemcitabine

There have been many recent advances in the treatment of advanced breast cancer including the introduction of novel drugs and the development of high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). These innovations may offer significant hope for improvement in the treatment of breast cancer in the near future. Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analogue with significant antitumour activity in many human solid tumours. Conflicting results have been observed from studies evaluating gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer. Efficacy data for single-agent gemcitabine range from 25 to 46% depending on starting dose and whether patients have previously received chemotherapy for metastatic disease (as well as adjuvant use). Gemcitabine is extremely well tolerated, even in heavily pre-treated patients, and is easy to administer on an outpatient basis to both chemo-naive and previously treated patients. The most common toxicity is mild myelosuppression. Gemcitabine causes minimal nausea and vomiting, and significant hair loss is extremely uncommon. Combination chemotherapy studies with anthracyclines are underway and significant activity has been observed in combination with both doxorubicin and epirubicin. In view of its modest toxicity profile, and its novel mechanism of action, gemcitabine warrants further evaluation in breast cancer patients, both as a single agent and in combination chemotherapy schedules.

Collection of circulating progenitor cells after epirubicin, paclitaxel and filgrastim in patients with metastatic breast cancer

The efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and circulating progenitor cell (CPC) transplantation in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) relies mainly on giving this treatment after a response to conventional induction chemotherapy has been achieved. For this reason an optimal mobilization regimen should be therapeutically effective while minimizing the number of leucaphereses required to support the myeloablative therapy. The combination of an anthracycline and paclitaxel in chemotherapy-untreated MBC has produced impressive response rates. We evaluated the CPC-mobilizing capacity of the combination epirubicin (90 mg m(-2)) and paclitaxel (135 mg m(-2)) followed by filgrastim (5 microg kg(-1) day(-1)) starting 48 h after chemotherapy administration in ten patients with MBC who were eligible for an HDC and CPC transplantation programme. Leucaphereses were performed by processing at least two blood volumes per procedure at recovery from neutrophil nadir when CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood exceeded 20 microl(-1). In most patients (six out of 10) more than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1), a threshold considered to be sufficient for haematopoietic reconstitution, were collected with a single apheresis. In the remaining four patients an additional procedure, performed the following day, was enough to reach the required number of progenitors. These data suggest that the epirubicin-paclitaxel combination, besides being a very active regimen in MBC, is effective in releasing large amounts of progenitor cells into circulation.

The case for high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: (II) clinical experience

Recent Phase II studies on the use of myelo-ablative chemotherapy in breast cancer have confirmed that this approach is associated with low mortality and apparent efficacy. In a preceding article the theoretical arguments were presented for testing this approach in the high-risk adjuvant setting; in the current article the clinical data justifying the present approaches for this type of treatment are reviewed. The evidence suggests that peripheral blood stem cell supported myelo-ablative chemotherapy should be tested against conventional regimens in order to determine whether or not the increased expense and toxicity of such an approach is associated with improved survival for women whose axillary node status places them at high risk of disease relapse and subsequent death.

High-dose chemotherapy supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells in poor prognosis metastatic breast cancer--phase I/II study. Edinburgh Breast Group

Current treatments for metastatic breast cancer are not associated with significant survival benefits despite response rates of over 50%. High-dose therapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) has been investigated, particularly in North America, and prolonged survival in up to 25% of women has been reported, but with a significant treatment-related mortality. However, in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing autologous transplantation, haematopoietic reconstruction is significantly quicker and mortality lower than with ABMT, when peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are used. In 32 women with metastatic breast cancer, we investigated the feasibility of PBPC mobilisation with high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after 12 weeks' infusional induction chemotherapy and the subsequent efficacy of the haematopoietic reconstitution after conditioning with melphalan and either etoposide or thiotepa. PBPC mobilisation was successful in 28/32 (88%) patients, and there was a rapid post-transplantation haematopoietic recovery: median time to neutrophils > 0.5 x 10(9) l-1 was 14 days and to platelets > 20 x 10(9) l-1 was 10 days. There was no procedure-related mortality, and the major morbidity was mucositis (WHO grade 3-4) in 18/32 patients (56%). In a patient group of which the majority had very poor prognostic features, the median survival from start of induction chemotherapy was 15 months. Thus, PBPC mobilisation and support of high-dose chemotherapy is feasible after infusional induction chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer, although the optimum drug combination has not yet been determined.

Selective transgene expression for detection and elimination of contaminating carcinoma cells in hematopoietic stem cell sources

Tumor contamination of bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) may affect the outcome of patients receiving high dose chemotherapy with autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem cell products. In this report, we demonstrate that replication defective adenoviral vectors containing the cytomegalovirus (CMV) or DF3/MUC1 carcinoma-selective promoter can be used to selectively transduce contaminating carcinoma cells. Adenoviral-mediated reporter gene expression in breast cancer cells was five orders of magnitude higher than that found in BM, PB, and CD34+ cells. Our results demonstrate that CD34+ cells have low to undetectable levels of integrins responsible for adenoviral internalization. We show that adenoviral-mediated transduction of a reporter gene can detect one breast cancer cell in 5 x 10(5) BM or PB cells with a vector containing the DF3/MUC1 promoter. We also show that transduction of the HSV-tk gene for selective killing by ganciclovir can be exploited for purging cancer cells from hematopoietic stem cell populations. The selective expression of TK followed by ganciclovir treatment resulted in the elimination of 6-logs of contaminating cancer cells. By contrast, there was little effect on CFU-GM and BFU-E formulation or on long term culture initiating cells. These results indicate that adenoviral vectors with a tumor-selective promoter provide a highly efficient and effective approach for the detection and purging of carcinoma cells in hematopoietic stem cell preparations.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Because metastatic breast cancer is a lethal disease despite some responsiveness to systemic chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue is being utilized with increasing frequency. This analysis was undertaken to determine the outcome for such patients treated with intensive chemotherapy between 1989-1994, at the Hoag Cancer Center in Newport Beach, CA.

METHODS

During 1989, only patients with metastatic disease who had failed more than two standard breast cancer chemotherapy regimens were considered eligible for such treatment. They received high-dose BCNU/cyclophosphamide/cisplatinum chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow rescue. After January 1990, patients with metastatic disease were eligible only if they had received limited prior chemotherapy and demonstrated responsiveness to induction chemotherapy. Beginning June 1990, patients with metastatic disease were to receive mitoxantrone and thiotepa (MiTepa) followed by peripheral blood stem cell rescue, then ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell rescue. High-risk adjuvant patients were to receive one course of ICE followed by rescue.

RESULTS

Between 1/89-12/94, 48 breast cancer patients underwent 65 intensive chemotherapy treatments followed by autologous stem cell rescue. During 1989, three of the eight patients with metastatic disease died within 60 days because of therapy-related complications. The longest failure-free survival (FFS) of these eight was 12.2 months, and the longest overall survival (OS) 20.5 months. Since 1/90, one physician has treated 24 patients with metastatic breast cancer, 17 of whom actually underwent two successive transplants with MiTepa/ICE. For the latter group, median FFS is 23.2 months; median OS is 39.7 months. There were no acute deaths, but two patients died > 60 days after initial transplant from therapy-related complications, veno-occlusive disease (5.2 months) and myelodysplastic syndrome (30.5 months), while five died of progressive disease at 22.5, 32.8, 39.4, 46.3, and 51.3 months. For the 24 metastatic patients treated 1990-1994, 1-, 2-, and 3-year FFS rates are 86%, 40%, and 17%, respectively, while OS rates are 91%, 80%, and 65%. Of 11 patients treated in the adjuvant setting, only one has relapsed (9.8 months) with follow-up from 3-61 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifications made in the program, including selection of patients responsive to induction chemotherapy, transfusion of peripheral blood stem cells, implementation of hematopoietic colony stimulating factors, and use of tandem intensive treatments has been associated with a low rate of acute morbidity and encouraging survival rates.

Autologous transplantation with tumor-free graft: a model for multiple myeloma patients

The importance of obtaining a tumor-free graft for autologous transplantation in cancer patients has been debated extensively in the last decade and is still unresolved largely because it is believed that relapse is more likely to originate from the host and not from the graft. This is in spite of recent indications that the main source of relapse is the graft. In this review article we bring forward evidence that the currently used grafts, whether from peripheral blood or bone marrow, harbour significant number of tumor cells before and even after purging with currently available purging protocols. We believe that the use of a tumor-free graft is the only way to obtain a valid assessment of the efficacy of high dose radio-chemotherapy, and is the only methodology to increase the probability to achieve long term survival following AT. Accordingly, we describe in detail a procedure to obtain a tumor-free graft, designed for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients based on flow-sorting of CD34+ stem cells.

Phase II study of intensive chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients in complete remission of disseminated breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This trial studied the disease-free survival after high-dose chemotherapy in patients in complete remission of metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty women, mean age 42.2 years (range 33-55) with metastatic breast cancer, received high-dose chemotherapy in a phase II study. Patients were eligible if they were < or = 55 years of age, had achieved complete remission within 6 months of the initiation of chemotherapy, and had a WHO performance scale of 0 or 1. The high-dose regimen consisted of melphalan 180 mg/m2 and mitoxantrone 60 mg/m2 both divided over 3 days. On day 7 bone marrow and/or peripheral stem cells were infused. After bone marrow recovery, external beam radiation was administered to sites of previous metastatic disease in 15 patients.

RESULTS

Apart from leuko- and thrombocytopenia, mucositis was the major side effect. One patient died during the bone marrow transplant period due to an aspergillus infection. The median follow-up since high-dose chemotherapy is 25 months (range 13 to 56 months). The median disease-free survival since high-dose chemotherapy is 27 months and the disease free survival is still 43% with an overall survival of 53% at 3 years. In two patients tumor relapse occurred only in the brain; in one patient the only relapse sign was a meningeal carcinosis. At the moment 17 patients are disease-free (13(+)-56+) months after high-dose chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Until now this high-dose regimen in selected patients with complete remission after induction chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer has a promising disease free survival.

Health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation

The functional capacity and the health-related quality of life were investigated in nine women (ages 23-58 years) undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Data were obtained by using two questionnaires: the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and the Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWED-QUAL). The patients answered the questionnaires on three occasions: on admission to the transplant unit, at discharge from the unit, and 7-15 weeks after ASCT. It was found that the women were affected by the treatment in various dimensions of daily life. The transplantation primarily affected their self-rated physical health and functions. Their physical-health status was poorest at the time of discharge. The women's emotional status was found to be poor during the whole study period. The results of the present study indicate that professional nursing is essential for breast cancer patients undergoing ASCT.

Evaluation of symptom distress in a bone marrow transplant outpatient environment

OBJECTIVE

To measure patient perceptions of autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT)-associated symptoms in the outpatient setting, assess the efficacy of the established antiemetic protocol, evaluate patient satisfaction, and report patient medication compliance.

DESIGN

A prospective, descriptive study of patients with breast cancer who were enrolled in an outpatient ABMT program.

SETTING

Duke University Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation Program.

METHODS

Patient perceptions of 12 symptoms were measured by the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) on the day of admission to the hospital, the day of discharge to the outpatient clinic, after bone marrow reinfusion, and before patient release from the clinic. The number of retching and vomiting episodes was recorded by each patient daily. Patient satisfaction was determined by a standardized personal interview conducted prior to discharge. Patient compliance was assessed by a review of patient medication documentation.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled over 5 months. The median SDS scores for each symptom evaluated revealed that anorexia, nausea, fatigue, insomnia, and bowel problems were the most distressing symptoms patients experienced in the outpatient ABMT program. Scores for pain, negative outlook, cough, diminished concentration, and change in appearance indicated only mild distress associated with these variables. The total number of vomiting episodes ranged from 1 to 33 total episodes per patient per outpatient stay. The percentage of patients experiencing a complete antiemetic response ranged from 24% to 48% over the 4 days after chemotherapy but steadily improved thereafter to a peak of 90% 1 week later. Patient satisfaction results showed that patients preferred being out of the hospital and reported their anxiety controlled although most had some problems with the outpatient clinic or medications required.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of appetite, fatigue, and insomnia have been identified as symptoms that are frequently present during the course of the outpatient ABMT program. Mild, intermittent nausea persists in the outpatient setting for up to 9 days after bone marrow transplant despite continuous combination antiemetic therapy. Patient interviews confirmed the belief that patients enjoy being out of the hospital. Medication compliance is more than 90% in this structured outpatient setting.

Renal function in high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell support treatment for breast cancer

Autologous and allogeneic bone marrow grafting both require cytoreductive therapy but only the allogeneic procedure requires immunosuppressive agents. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation has been reported to be associated with a high incidence of both renal failure and veno-occlusive disease (VOD) of the liver, the combination of which is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. There is less known about the frequency and severity of these complications in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation. In the present study renal, hepatic and other complications were examined in 232 patients with Stages II/III and IV breast cancer who were treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell support with either marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cells. The post-treatment severity of the renal dysfunction was classified as follows: Grade 0, normal renal function [< 25% decrement in glomerular filtration rate (GFR)]; Grade 1. mild renal dysfunction (> 25% decrement in GFR but < a twofold increase in serum creatinine); Grade 2, > twofold rise in serum creatinine but no need for dialysis; Grade 3 > than twofold rise in serum creatinine and need for dialysis. There were 102 patients (44%) who were classified as Grade 0 and 81 patients (35%) who were classified as Grade 1 renal dysfunction. Severe renal dysfunction (Grades 2 and 3) was observed in 49 of the 232 patients (21%). This severe renal dysfunction of 21% compares with a previously reported 53% incidence of severe renal dysfunction for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Similarly, the frequency of hepatic VOD was less (4.7% or 11 of 232 patients) in this autologous bone marrow transplant study as compared to a reported incidence of hepatic VOD ranging from 22 to 53% in large series of allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients. The severe renal dysfunction (Grades 2 and 3) in the present autologous hematopoietic cell support study correlated most significantly with sepsis, liver and pulmonary dysfunction. The major fall in GFR occurred during chemotherapy but before hematopoietic cell support, thus primarily incriminating the cytoreductive therapy rather than the hematopoietic cell support. The only significant effect of different chemotherapy protocols was, at four weeks, the Taxol-treated group had a significantly lower creatinine clearance as compared to the BCNU treated group.

High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for hormone-refractory advanced carcinoma of the prostate: experience of two cases

Two patients with hormone-refractory advanced prostate cancer were treated with high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation. A satisfactory number of stem cells were collected by appropriately timed leukapheresis in these patients. The stem-cell samples collected from the first patient were positive for prostate-specific antigen messenger ribonucleic acid expression; such expression was not detected in the samples from the second patient. The first patient has remained in complete remission as of December 1995. The second patient died of the disease.

The significance of microbial cultures of the hematopoietic support for patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy

The use of hematopoietic support for patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy has increased over the past 10 years. Various quality controls are performed on the hematopoietic cells, including microbiologic cultures. There is considerable expense associated with the serial cultures performed at different times during the collection, processing, and use of the cells. We reviewed all the microbiologic cultures performed on bone marrow harvests and leukaphereses over a 17 month period. Of the 227 bone marrow harvests, 16 cultures were positive, but only 3 (1.3%) were repeat positives with the same organism after processing or at the time of reinfusion. Of the 560 leukaphereses, 4 (0.7%) were cultured positive at the time of collection and reinfusion. Two patients were bacteremic with gram-negative bacilli at the time of leukaphereses despite being asymptomatic, and these were the only two products that had to be collected again. No patient suffered an adverse clinical result after receiving culture-positive cells. Bone marrow and peripheral blood progenitor cells can be safely collected, and a culture after processing is adequate to ensure the safety of the product.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in breast cancer

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support is an investigational treatment for patients with breast cancer who have a high risk of recurrence or who have metastatic disease. In the adjuvant setting, there is a lack of survival data from randomized studies comparing high-dose to conventional-dose therapy. High-dose adjuvant chemotherapy was found to result in as high as 71% 5-year event-free survival in patients with more than nine metastatic axillary lymph nodes in one nonrandomized study, which appears to be superior to those achieved with conventional-dose therapy. In metastatic breast cancer the great majority of patients die of cancer despite high-dose therapy with the current regimens, and it is unclear whether survival of these patients is improved with high-dose therapy as compared to conventional-dose therapy. However, a few patients with breast cancer with distant metastases have enjoyed a disease-free interval lasting for several years after high-dose therapy, which is rarely seen with conventional-dose therapy, and one small randomized trial showed improved survival in the high-dose arm of the study. The more extensive patient selection for high-dose chemotherapy needs to be taken into account when comparing the results achieved with different dose levels, and therefore a high priority should be given for randomized studies where high-dose therapy is compared with conventional-dose therapy.

High-dose cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and etoposide with autologous stem cell rescue in patients with breast cancer

This study was designed to establish the toxicity and response rates o observed with a combination of high-dose cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and etoposide with stem cell rescue in patients with breast carcinoma. Eligibility criteria included metastatic or locally advanced breast carcinoma ; aged < or equal to 60 years; performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1; and creatinine clearance > or equal to 65 ml/min. Chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg i.v. X 4 days, etoposide 400 mg/m(2) i.v. X 4 days, and carboplatin 375 mg/m(2) X 4 days. Bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells were reinfused 48 h after completion of chemotherapy. Seventeen patients were treated in this study. The major toxicity was gastrointestinal (grades I and II). Fevers associated with neutropenia were observed in all the patients, but no episodes of bacteremia were documented. Hematopoietic toxicities were acceptable. No toxic deaths were observed. Six patients had chemotherapy-sensitive disease at time of transplant, nine had refractory disease, and two were untested. A response rate of 62% with 18% complete response (CR) was achieved. Two patients are free of disease at +7 and +9 months after transplantation. The combination of high-dose cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and etoposide is well tolerated with a response rate comparable to previously reported high-dose chemotherapy regimens. However, in a poor prognostic risk group, namely patients with chemoinsensitive disease, this therapeutic approach seems to be of no advantage over standard chemotherapy.

Immunocytochemical detection of breast cancer cells in marrow and peripheral blood of patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support

Detection of small numbers of breast cancer cells is important in staging the disease and can be helpful in assessing the efficacy of purging regimens prior to autologous stem cell infusion. Immunohistochemical methods are potentially useful and broadly applicable for this purpose since they are simple to perform, sensitive, and may be quite specific. We have used a combination of four monoclonal antibodies [260F9, 520C9, 317G5 (Baxter Corp); BrE-3 (Dr. R. Ceriani)] against tumor cell surface glycoproteins in a sensitive immunocytochemical assay to identify breast tumor cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Immunostained cytospin preparations were fixed prior to staining to preserve cytological details of immunopositive cells. After immunostaining, slides were counterstained with hematoxylin to confirm the identify of labeled cells. In cytocentrifuge experiments in which small numbers of CAMA human breast tumor cells were added to bone marrow mononuclear cells, a linear relationship between the number of tumor cells added and the number of tumor cells detected was obtained over a broad range of tumor cell concentrations. The probability of detecting tumor cells was dependent on the number of cytocentrifuge slides examined. When ten slides (5 million cells) were examined, the probability of detecting tumor at a concentration of 4 tumor cells per million bone marrow mononuclear cells was 98%. In clinical specimens, tumor cells were detected in marrow aspirates from 73 of 240 (30%) patients undergoing autologous transplantation, including 70 (37%) of 190 patients with clinical stage IV disease, 0 of 7 patients with clinical stage III disease, and 3 of 43 (7%) patients with clinical stage II disease. Seventy-three of 657 peripheral blood specimens from 26 of 155 patients (17%) contained breast cancer cells with counts ranging from 1 to 97 tumor cells per million leukocytes. Tumor cells were most frequently found in the blood of patients with stage IV disease [21 of 107 (20%)] but were also found in a substantial number [5 of 44 (11%)] of patients with stage II disease. Positive selection of CD34-positive hematopoietic progenitor cells as well as negative purging methods such as incubation with 4-hydroxyperoxy-cyclophosphamide (4-HC) were evaluated with respect to tumor cell depletion. Selection of CD34-positive progenitor cells from bone marrow or peripheral blood resulted in log reduction of 1 to > 4 tumor cells reinfused at autologous transplantation. A lesser log reduction (up to 1) was demonstrated following 4-HC purging. We conclude that properly performed and controlled immunocytochemical staining of bone marrow and peripheral blood cytospins is a sensitive and simple way to detect and quantitate breast cancer cells in hematopoietic specimens harvested for autotransplantation and that CD34-positive progenitor cell selection results in significant reduction in the number of breast cancer cells reinfused with marrow or peripheral blood stem cells.

High-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer

What can we conclude and hope to see in the next few years? Laboratory studies and imperfect retrospective analysis of conventional chemotherapy have created a climate of active interest to experiment with dose-intensive chemotherapy. There seems to be a consensus in favour of combination alkylating agents to maximise anticancer and rescuable antimarrow stem cell effects, whilst producing sublethal second-organ toxicity. PBPC has replaced ABMT as the routine rescue technique, on grounds of cost and recovery time. The mature results of this changed technology for support have yet to be seen in terms of the risks of late, poor engraftment and the potential benefits in terms of acute complications (faster engraftment) and tumour kill (reduced tumour contamination?). Whilst experiments continue to examine the impact of tumour contamination of blood harvests or BM harvests, inadequate attention has been paid in metastatic disease to patient selection. There seems to be a continuing growth of interest in multiple high-dose therapy regimens using stem cells collected earlier in the therapy to rescue sequential myeloablative treatments. This possibility has been realised by the stem cell technology and is being pursued with enthusiasm and with promising early results. Media-driven public interest in this increasingly political disease is pushing us to 'do more'. In future years, our worst nightmares may be realised if this means aping the experience of Halsted's disciples, "don't test, just believe"--the economic and human costs of high-dose treatment cannot justify our avoiding the rigorous examination of controlled trials.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of cancer

High-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell rescue has proven to be an effective treatment in relapsed lymphoma and neuroblastoma. This treatment approach should be considered also in selected patients with leukaemia, multiple myeloma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer and testicular cancer. Relative contraindications include progression of the disease on appropriate conventional treatment, poor performance status, active infection as well as serious renal, pulmonary, liver and cardiac dysfunction. Increasing age should also be taken into consideration when autologous stem cell transplantation is planned. Every effort should be made to eliminate malignant cells that can be present in the stem cell containing population, which will be infused to the patient following myeloablative treatment.

Intermediate doses of cyclophosphamide alone or following adriamycin in advanced breast cancer. A pilot study

Cyclophosphamide (CTX) is an active drug in breast cancer and presents a well-established dose-response relationship. To explore further this relationship, the present pilot study investigated the therapeutic efficacy of cyclophosphamide at intermediate dose in two groups of untreated patients with advanced breast cancer. Nine women received the drug alone at 3-4 g/m2 i.v. every 2 weeks for a total of three doses. The same dose schedule was also given to 11 women following the administration of four cycles of Adriamycin, at 75 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks. We documented one partial remission in untreated women and four partial responses in Adriamycin-treated patients. The major toxicity was represented by leukopenia and neutropenia. Myelosuppression was relevant but of short duration, and the use of G-CSF appeared useful in controlling this side effect. In spite of the high dose intensity of the present cyclophosphamide dose schedule (9 g/m2 in 4 weeks), i.e., almost three times superior to that conventionally employed, present results do not suggest its superiority over the current chemotherapeutic regimens utilized in advanced disease.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue for breast cancer: yesterday, today and tomorrow

Metastatic breast cancer remains incurable by conventional means and is the second leading cause of all cancer deaths in women in the United States. Laboratory and clinical studies have shown chemotherapy dose intensity may be important in breast cancer therapy, and therefore clinical trials have been investigating high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR) for the past decade. Initial Phase I trials in heavily pretreated patients demonstrated good response rates but short survival times. The next generation of trials used HDC as initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer and showed improved results. Most recently, patients receive HDC after "induction" chemotherapy to minimize tumor burden prior to HDC. Results from these most recent trials are encouraging, with complete remissions (CR) achievable in at least half of patients and long-term survivors noted. An ongoing randomized trial of HDC versus conventional chemotherapy should answer whether HDC is superior to conventional chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Based on encouraging data from a preliminary trial, two ongoing randomized trials are comparing HDC versus conventional chemotherapy in high-risk primary breast cancer. Technological improvements, better supportive care and experience have all contributed to decrease the morbidity and mortality of this procedure. Additionally, hospitalizations have become shorter and costs may be decreasing. This review will discuss the issues pertinent to this modality in the past and present, including chemotherapy regimens, stem cell technology and related issues, outcomes, ongoing trials and future directions for consideration.

Randomized, double-blind comparison of a prochlorperazine-based versus a metoclopramide-based antiemetic regimen in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND

Highly emetogenic combination alkylator therapy is routinely used in autologous bone marrow transplantation for treatment of eligible patients with solid tumors. Antiemetic therapy remains less than optimal in this setting.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six patients with cancer receiving high dose cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and carmustine with autologous bone marrow support were randomized to receive one of four double-blinded antiemetic regimens: 4-day continuous infusion prochlorperazine (6 mg/m2 intravenous [i.v.] loading dose followed by 1.5 mg/m2/hour) or metoclopramide (80 mg/m2 iv loading dose followed by 20 mg/m2/hr) each with either dronabinol 5 mg/m2 or placebo capsules for two doses before carmustine on the last day of chemotherapy. All subjects received scheduled lorazepam and diphenhydramine throughout the 4-day study period. Efficacy was measured by the Emetic Process Rating Scale and the Rhodes Index of Nausea and Vomiting (INV) Form 2.

RESULTS

One hundred six patients completed the study and were fully evaluable. The median number of emetic episodes on the metoclopramide study arm were: 1 (0-7, day -6), 1 (0-6, day -5), 2 (0-9, day -4), and 2 (0-10, with dronabinol day -3) or 2 (0-7, no dronabinol day -3) and on the prochlorperazine study arm were: 4 (0-12, day -6), 0 (0-8, day -5), 0 (0-12, day -4) and 2.5 (0-9, with dronabinol day -3) or 2 (0-12, no dronabinol day -3). Metoclopramide was significantly better on the first day of therapy (day -6, P < .002) and prochlorperazine was significantly better on the third day of therapy (day -4, P < 0.002). There was no significant difference among any of the four arms on the last day of chemotherapy (day -3), or when the median number of emetic episodes over the total study period were compared. The patients' assessment of nausea, vomiting, and retching on the INV Form 2 was consistent with the observer ratings. Toxicities requiring dose reduction or discontinuation of antiemetic drugs included diarrhea, cardiac arrhythmias, sedation, anxiety, and akathisia.

CONCLUSIONS

Both metoclopramide and prochlorperazine in combination with lorazepam and diphenhydramine offer good control of nausea and vomiting although the sedation and low risk for cardiac toxicity limit the regimen to an inpatient setting with close monitoring. No regimen was clearly superior during the entire treatment period but prochlorperazine offered more consistent control after the first day.