Early start of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve treatment outcome for premenopausal breast cancer patients with tumors not expressing estrogen receptors. The International Breast Cancer Study Group

Identification of cancer care and protocol characteristics associated with recruitment in breast cancer clinical trials

PURPOSE

It is estimated that only 5% of patients with cancer participate in a clinical trial. Barriers to participation may relate to available protocols, physicians, and patients, but few data exist on barriers related to cancer care environments and protocol characteristics.

METHODS

The primary objective was to identify characteristics of cancer care environments and clinical trial protocols associated with a low recruitment into breast cancer clinical trials. Secondary objectives were to determine yearly recruitment fraction onto clinical trials from 1997 to 2002 in Ontario, Canada, and to compare recruitment fraction among years. Questionnaires were sent to hospitals requesting characteristics of cancer care environments and to cooperative groups/pharmaceutical companies for information on protocols and the number of patients recruited per hospital/year. Poisson regression was used to estimate the recruitment fraction.

RESULTS

Questionnaire completion rate varied between 69% and 100%. Recruitment fraction varied between 5.4% and 8.5% according to year. More than 30% of patients were diagnosed in hospitals with no available trials. In multivariate analysis, the following characteristics were associated with recruitment: use of placebo versus not (relative risk [RR] = 0.80; P = .05), nonmetastatic versus metastatic trial (RR = 2.80; P < .01), and for nonmetastatic trials, protocol allowing an interval of 12 weeks or longer versus less than 12 weeks (from diagnosis, surgery, or end of therapy) before enrollment (RR = 1.36; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Allowable interval of 12 weeks or longer to randomly assign patients in clinical trials could help recruitment. In our study, absence of an available clinical trial represented the largest barrier to recruitment.

New Therapeutic Options for Breast Cancer during Pregnancy

National and international guidelines for pregnant breast cancer patients recommend to treat pregnant patients as closely as possible to the standards for non-pregnant patients. Therefore, new treatment options like sentinel lymph node biopsy or taxane-based chemotherapy have to be carefully checked for their possible implementation even for pregnant patients. These patients need to be treated in a breast cancer center where a multidisciplinary team is ready to support the patient and her family and to serve her with the best up-to-date treatment for mother and child.

Variability in chemotherapy delivery for elderly women with advanced stage ovarian cancer and its impact on survival

Given the survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer (OC), we examined the associations of survival with the time interval from debulking surgery to initiation of chemotherapy and with the duration of chemotherapy. Among patients > or =65 years with stages III/IV OC diagnosed between 1991 and 2002 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we developed regression models of predictors of the time interval from surgery to initiation of chemotherapy and of the total duration of chemotherapy. Survival was examined with Cox proportional hazards models. Among 2558 patients, 1712 (67%) initiated chemotherapy within 6 weeks of debulking surgery, while 846 (33%) began treatment >6 weeks. Older age, black race, being unmarried, and increased comorbidities were associated with delayed initiation of chemotherapy. Delay of chemotherapy was associated with an increase in mortality (hazard ratio (HR)=1.11; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2). Among 1932 patients in the duration of treatment analysis, the 1218 (63%) treated for 3-7 months had better survival than the 714 (37%) treated for < or =3 months (HR=0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94). This analysis represents one of the few studies describing treatment delivery and outcome in women with advanced OC. Delayed initiation and early discontinuation of chemotherapy were common and associated with increased mortality.

Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27

PURPOSE

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-18 was designed to determine whether four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) administered preoperatively improved breast cancer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with AC administered postoperatively. Protocol B-27 was designed to determine the effect of adding docetaxel (T) to preoperative AC on tumor response rates, DFS, and OS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analyses were limited to eligible patients. In B-18, 751 patients were assigned to receive preoperative AC, and 742 patients were assigned to receive postoperative AC. In B-27, 784 patients were assigned to receive preoperative AC followed by surgery, 783 patients were assigned to AC followed by T and surgery, and 777 patients were assigned to AC followed by surgery and then T.

RESULTS

Results from B-18 show no statistically significant differences in DFS and OS between the two groups. However, there were trends in favor of preoperative chemotherapy for DFS and OS in women less than 50 years old (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85, P = .09 for DFS; HR = 0.81, P = .06 for OS). DFS conditional on being event free for 5 years also demonstrated a strong trend in favor of the preoperative group (HR = 0.81, P = .053). Protocol B-27 results demonstrated that the addition of T to AC did not significantly impact DFS or OS. Preoperative T added to AC significantly increased the proportion of patients having pathologic complete responses (pCRs) compared with preoperative AC alone (26% v 13%, respectively; P < .0001). In both studies, patients who achieved a pCR continue to have significantly superior DFS and OS outcomes compared with patients who did not.

CONCLUSION

B-18 and B-27 demonstrate that preoperative therapy is equivalent to adjuvant therapy. B-27 also showed that the addition of preoperative taxanes to AC improves response.

Effects of a treatment gap during adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer: results of International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trials 13-93 and 14-93

BACKGROUND

The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) conducted two complementary randomized trials to assess whether a treatment-free gap during adjuvant chemotherapy influenced outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1993 to 1999, IBCSG Trials 13-93 and 14-93 enrolled 2215 premenopausal and postmenopausal women with axillary node-positive, operable breast cancer. All patients received cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, C) plus either doxorubicin (Adriamycin, A) or epirubicin (E) for four courses followed immediately (No Gap) or after a 16-week delay (Gap) by classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) for three courses. The median follow-up was 7.7 years.

RESULTS

The Gap and No-Gap groups had similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). No identified subgroup showed a statistically significant difference, but exploratory subgroup analysis noted a trend towards decreased DFS for Gap compared with No Gap for women with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors not receiving tamoxifen, especially evident during the first 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A 16-week gap between adjuvant AC/EC and CMF provided no benefit and may have increased early recurrence rates in patients with ER-negative tumors.

Evidence based radiation oncology: Breast cancer

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy is, similar to surgery, a local treatment. In the case of breast cancer, it is generally given after conservative or after more extensive, tumour and patient adapted, surgery. The target volumes can be the breast and/or the thoracic wall and/or the regional lymph node areas. The integration and the extent of radiotherapy as part of the comprehensive treatment of the breast cancer patient, including the amount of surgery and the sequencing with the systemic treatments, has to be well discussed with all medical specialists involved in treating breast cancer on a multidisciplinary basis. Guidelines for the appropriate prescription and execution of radiotherapy are of utmost importance. However, individualisation based on the individual patients' and tumours' characteristics should always be envisaged.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a review of the literature the level of evidence that is available for the indications for radiotherapy is summarised, as well as the main clinical questions that are unanswered today. An overview of the recent and ongoing clinical trails in breast cancer will highlight some of the current ongoing debates.

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of breast cancer, radiotherapy, given after as well conservative as extensive risk-adapted surgery, significantly reduces the risk of local and regional recurrences. Especially for patients with an intermediate to high absolute risk for local recurrences, a positive influence on overall survival has been shown, notably when appropriate radiotherapy techniques are used. Most important is that the best results that we can offer to our breast cancer patients for all clinical endpoints (local and regional control; quality of life; cosmetic results; survival) can be obtained by a multidisciplinary and patient-oriented approach, involving all those involved in the treatment of breast cancer patients.

Adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy during late-trimester pregnancy: not quite a standard of care

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of breast cancer during pregnancy was formerly considered an indication for abortion. The pendulum has since swung to the other extreme, with most reviews now rejecting termination while endorsing immediate anthracycline-based therapy for any pregnant patient beyond the first trimester. To assess the evidence for this radical change in thinking, a review of relevant studies in the fields of breast cancer chemotherapy, pregnancy, and drug safety was conducted.

DISCUSSION

Accumulating evidence for the short-term safety of anthracycline-based chemotherapy during late-trimester pregnancy represents a clear advance over the traditional norm of therapeutic abortion. Nonetheless, the emerging orthodoxy favoring routine chemotherapy during gestation should continue to be questioned on several grounds: (1) the assumed difference in maternal survival accruing from chemotherapy administered earlier--i.e., during pregnancy, rather than after delivery--has not been quantified; (2) the added survival benefit of adjuvant cytotoxic therapy prescribed within the hormone-rich milieu of pregnancy remains presumptive, particularly for ER-positive disease; (3) the maternal survival benefit associated with modified adjuvant regimens (e.g., weekly schedules, omission of taxanes, etc.) has not been proven equivalent to standard (e.g., post-delivery) regimens; and (4) the long-term transplacental and transgenerational hazards of late-trimester chemotherapy are unknown.

SUMMARY

Although an incrementally increased risk of cancer-specific mortality is impossible to exclude, mothers who place a high priority on the lifelong well-being of their progeny may be informed that deferring optimal chemotherapy until after delivery is still an option to consider, especially in ER-positive, node-negative and/or last-trimester disease.

Comparison of elapsed times from breast cancer detection to first adjuvant therapy in Nova Scotia in 1999/2000 and 2003/04

BACKGROUND

Waiting times for cancer care continue to be an important issue for Canadians. We evaluated 2 cohorts of breast cancer patients to compare changes in elapsed times to care, to determine the proportion of patients who received their postoperative oncology consultation within the recommended time and to examine elapsed times between date of surgery and start of first adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all women with surgically treated breast cancer who were referred to a provincial cancer centre for adjuvant therapy. The first cohort comprised women referred between Sept. 1, 1999, and Sept. 1, 2000 (n = 342), and the second cohort comprised women referred between Sept. 1, 2003, and Sept. 1, 2004 (n = 295). A general linear model with a stepwise selection was used to identify dominant factors that influenced elapsed times; covariates included cohort period, age at diagnosis, place of residence, disease stage, type of surgery, type of adjuvant therapy, distance to cancer centre, median household income and mean education level.

RESULTS

The overall median time from disease detection to the start of first adjuvant therapy for the combined cohorts was 96 days (quartiles 76, 122); this interval was longer for patients in the second cohort (90 v. 102 days, p < 0.001). For the combined cohorts, significantly more patients saw a radiation oncologist within the recommended time from date of surgery than did patients referred to a medical oncologist (82.7% v. 51.7%; p < 0.001). Patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy as their first adjuvant treatment waited longer from the date of definitive surgery to the start of treatment than did patients who received chemotherapy or hormonal treatment (77 v. 48 or 42 days; p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

The median elapsed time from the detection of breast cancer to the start of first adjuvant therapy was longer in the second cohort (referred in 2003/04) than in the first cohort (referred in 1999/2000). The proportion of patients whose first oncology consultation was within the recommended timeframe varied significantly according to type of oncology specialist, favouring radiation oncology. Despite this difference in access, patients whose first adjuvant therapy was systemic therapy experienced significantly shorter elapsed times from surgery to the start of adjuvant therapy than did patients whose first adjuvant therapy was radiation therapy.

Treatment of Premenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer

Breast cancer occurring in women before the age of menopause continues to be a major medical and psychological challenge. Endocrine therapy has emerged as the mainstay of adjuvant treatment for women with estrogen receptor-positive tumours. Although the suppression of ovarian function (by oophorectomy, irradiation of the ovaries or gonadotropin releasing factor analogues) is effective as adjuvant therapy if used alone, its value has not been proven after chemotherapy. This is presumably because of the frequent occurrence of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea. Tamoxifen reduces the risk of recurrence by approximately 40%, irrespective of age and the ovarian production of estrogens. The worth of ovarian function suppression in combination with tamoxifen is unproven and is being investigated in an intergroup randomised clinical trial (SOFT [Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial]). Aromatase inhibitors are more effective than tamoxifen in postmenopausal women but are only being investigated in younger patients. The use of chemotherapies is identical in younger and older patients; however, at present the efficacy of chemotherapy in addition to ovarian function suppression plus tamoxifen is unknown in premenopausal patients with endocrine responsive disease. 'Targeted' therapies such as monoclonal antibodies to human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, HER1 and vascular endothelial growth factor, 'small molecule' inhibitors of tyrosine kinases and breast cancer vaccines are rapidly emerging. Their use depends on the function of the targeted pathways and is presently limited to clinical trials. Premenopausal patients are best treated in the framework of a clinical trial.

A randomized phase II trial comparing preoperative plus perioperative chemotherapy with preoperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate in a randomized trial the activity of perioperative chemotherapy in patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer and to compare it with the preoperative chemotherapy alone. Patients with cT2-3 N0-2 M0 histologically proven breast cancer, with estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors in less than 20% of cells, or with absence of progesterone receptors, received epirubicin 25 mg/m days 1 and 2, cisplatin 60 mg/m day 1, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m daily as continuous infusion. Responding patients were randomized to continue fluorouracil until 2 weeks after surgery (perioperative chemotherapy) or to stop fluorouracil 1 week before surgery. Fifty-eight patients completed six courses of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil, and were randomized to perioperative chemotherapy (29 patients) or to control (29 patients). The median Ki-67 index remained stable (32-27.5%) in the perioperative chemotherapy arm (P=0.3) and decreased from 55 to 22.5% in the control arm (P=0.01). The rate of pathological complete remission was 41% in both arms (P=1.0). No significant difference in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival was observed between the two arms. Perioperative chemotherapy failed to show an increase in the pathological complete remission rate. A biological effect on Ki-67 expression was demonstrated.

Influence of Timing of Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Over Survival in Breast Cancer: A Negative Outcome Study by the Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)

PURPOSE

This retrospective trial evaluates whether the timing of initiation of the adjuvant chemotherapy has any influence over survival in early-stage breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 2782 patients from El Alamo project (from 1990 to 1997; n = 15,400) were selected with stages I-III, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Data were gathered about prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, vessel permeation (vascular or lymphatic), histological grade, and number of involved nodes, hormonal receptor status and administration of hormone therapy. The time interval between surgery and initiation of chemotherapy, and dates of relapse, second primary breast tumor and death were recorded. Patients were assigned in four groups according to the surgery-chemotherapy interval: <3 weeks (group A), 3-6 weeks (group B), 6-9 weeks (group C) and >9 weeks (group D).

RESULTS

There were no differences in disease-free survival (DFS), nor in 5-year overall survival (OS), according to the timing of initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust analysis for known prognostic factors but the effect of surgery-chemotherapy interval remained non-significant. The variable timing of initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy has also been assessed as a continuous variable and no differences have been detected.

CONCLUSION

The optimum time of initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in early stages of breast cancer is unknown. The delay in the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy has no influence over survival in the analyzed time intervals. Retrospective analysis like this one with enough statistical power would be necessary to detect differences among groups.

The interval from surgery to chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To study the effect of the interval between surgery and the start of chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We stratified patients according to the start of platinum-based chemotherapy in group 1 (within 4 weeks from surgery), group 2 (between 4 and 8 weeks) and group 3 (between 8 and 12 weeks).

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninty-four stage III ovarian cancer patients were analysed. In the multivariate analysis there were no differences in survival according to the interval between surgery and chemotherapy among the three groups. The independent prognostic variables were type of procedure (p = 0.014), performance status (p = 0.040) and post-chemotherapy CA-125 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The interval between surgery and chemotherapy does not affect outcome.

Delay of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation following breast cancer surgery among elderly women

BACKGROUND

Delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer is associated with worse stage distribution at diagnosis and decreased survival. However, the occurrence of delay in the delivery of adjuvant therapy and its impact on prognosis is not well understood.

METHODS

To investigate the timeliness of initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery for breast cancer, we used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Among women > or = 65 years diagnosed between 1992 and 1999 with stages I-II breast cancer, we used linear regression and Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the time intervals between surgery and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, factors associated with delay, and the effect of delay on survival.

RESULTS

Our sample consisted of 5003 women who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Of these, 47% initiated chemotherapy within 1 month, 37% between 1 and 2 months, 6% between 2 and 3 months and 10% >3 months (delay) following surgery. Delay was associated with increasing age, residing in a rural location, being unmarried, earlier tumor stage, hormone receptor positivity, mastectomy, and non-receipt of radiation therapy. Survival did not differ among patients who initiated chemotherapy within 1, 2, or 3 months after surgery. Delay beyond 3 months was, however, associated with increased disease-specific mortality (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.31-2.19) and overall mortality (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.21-1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older patients, moderate delays in the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy occur frequently, but long delays (>3 months) are uncommon. While early initiation of therapy is no benefit, significant delays are associated with increased mortality. Whether this reflects the medical impact of the delay of chemotherapy or factors associated with delay is unclear, but until this is clarified, patients should be encouraged to initiate treatment without significant delay.

High-throughput techniques in breast cancer: A clinical perspective

High-throughput technologies such as DNA-microarrays, RT-PCR and proteomics can improve the prognostic and predictive information acquired from classical parameters. Unlike information gathered by classical methods, high-throughput technologies can accurately inform clinicians on patient response to adjuvant therapy or those who will resist the effect of that therapy. Studies performed in breast cancer with high-throughput techniques have focused on tumour biology, prognosis, prediction of response to a few agents and, more recently, early diagnosis. However, further refinement is needed before these techniques become part of clinical routine. In the meantime, they will be used in clinical investigation, particularly in the areas of hormonal therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, where modest improvements in the capacity of prediction can benefit many women. Close cooperation among clinicians, pathologists and basic investigators is essential to take high-throughput techniques to daily practice. New diagnostic tools will be complex but they will provide valuable patient information.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in 2005: Standards and beyond

The 2003 St. Gallen consensus panel divided the many available adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) regimens into those with "standard efficacy" (ACx4, CMFx6) and those with "superior efficacy" (FA(E)Cx6, CA(E)Fx6, A(E)-->CMF, TACx6, ACx4--> paclitaxel (P)x4 or docetaxel (D)x4) but also greater complexity, toxicity and cost. This paper will summarize the latest information on long-term side effects of the "superior" regimens and 5-year benefits reported in taxane trials, including those of a "new" sequential regimen, FECx3--> docetaxelx3. Rapidly expanding evidence of marked heterogeneity in the magnitude of CT benefits according to the tumour oestrogen receptor (ER) status, a claim made for many years by IBCSG investigators, will be reviewed; it will lead to the conclusion that a revolution needs to take place in the way oncologists think about the CT added value and design adjuvant clinical trials. The conclusions proposed to the 2005 St. Gallen consensus panel are that: adequately dosed anthracycline-based CT regimens remain an acceptable standard for many women; a lower threshold for using taxanes in sequence or combination with anthracyclines (A) is justified in the presence of an ER-negative or low-ER tumour status, other aggressive biologic features (such as HER-2 overexpression), fear about A-induced cardiotoxicity; no recommendation can yet be made as far as the optimal taxane-A regimen, the best taxane or the best taxane schedule.

Does timing of adjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis after early breast cancer? Results of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG)

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect on survival of delaying the start of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer for up to 3 months after surgery. In the nation-wide clinical trials of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, 7501 breast cancer patients received chemotherapy within 3 months of surgery between 1977 and 1999: 352 with classical cyclofosfamide, metotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF); 6065 with CMF i.v. and 1084 with cyclofosfamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil. For the analysis, the time between surgery and the start of chemotherapy was divided into four strata (1–3, 4, 5 and 6–13 weeks). The results show that within the three groups of chemotherapy, there was an even distribution of known prognostic factors across the four strata of initiation of chemotherapy. There was no pattern indicating a benefit from early start of chemotherapy. No significant interactions were found for subgroups of patients with a poorer prognosis (many involved lymph nodes, high-grade malignancies or hormone receptor negative disease). In conclusion, we have found no evidence for a survival benefit due to early initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy within the first 2–3 months after surgery.

Meeting Highlights: International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2005

The ninth St Gallen (Switzerland) expert consensus meeting in January 2005 made a fundamental change in the algorithm for selection of adjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer. Rather than the earlier approach commencing with risk assessment, the Panel affirmed that the first consideration was endocrine responsiveness. Three categories were acknowledged: endocrine responsive, endocrine non-responsive and tumors of uncertain endocrine responsiveness. The three categories were further divided according to menopausal status. Only then did the Panel divide patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories. It agreed that axillary lymph node involvement did not automatically define high risk. Intermediate risk included both node-negative disease (if some features of the primary tumor indicated elevated risk) and patients with one to three involved lymph nodes without additional high-risk features such as HER 2/neu gene overexpression. The Panel recommended that patients be offered chemotherapy for endocrine non-responsive disease; endocrine therapy as the primary therapy for endocrine responsive disease, adding chemotherapy for some intermediate- and all high-risk groups in this category; and both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for all patients in the uncertain endocrine response category except those in the low-risk group.

Predicting response to systemic treatments: learning from the past to plan for the future

Therapeutic effects of adjuvant therapies for breast cancer have been assessed "across the board" and implemented using the principle that if a treatment is effective "on average" then it is effective "for all patients." Exploration and improved understanding of the biological basis for predicting response to available adjuvant therapies is essential to enhance patient care. As illustration, we consider the effects of chemotherapy and tamoxifen in two International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trials for postmenopausal women. The level of estrogen receptor (ER) expression in the primary tumor is a powerful predictor of response to adjuvant therapy. Absence of ER identifies a chemosensitive cohort for which concurrent tamoxifen significantly blunts the large chemotherapy effect. High levels of ER expression are associated with good results using tamoxifen alone; adding chemotherapy provides little additional benefit. By contrast, adding chemotherapy to tamoxifen provides additional benefit for patients with node-positive disease and tumors expressing intermediate levels of ER. Identification of chemosensitive targets, e.g., absence of PgR, in tumors with intermediate ER expression is required to further tailor, adding chemotherapy within this otherwise endocrine-responsive cohort. Age is not a therapeutic target. Thus, the biological bases for treatment responsiveness must be defined. All findings from clinical trials and meta-analyses should be presented primarily according to steroid hormone receptor status and future studies should be designed as tailored treatment investigations.

Oncological aspects of breast reconstruction

Breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular over the past 20 years. There is concern that it may mask locoregional recurrence or that immediate reconstruction may compromise adjuvant treatments. We review available evidence regarding its oncological safety. The literature consists almost entirely of single institution, small retrospective reviews with variable follow-up and varying conclusions. Most reviews suggest that breast reconstruction does not adversely affect disease-free or overall survival and that there is no significant delay in presentation with recurrent disease. Three retrospective series compared chemotherapy delivery after immediate breast reconstruction with controls having mastectomy alone. No delay in chemotherapy delivery or effect on dose intensity was demonstrated. Irradiation of a prosthetic implant has been shown to increase the rate of capsular contracture; irradiation of autogenous tissue reconstruction is usually well tolerated.

Breast cancer

Breast cancer remains a public-health issue on a global scale. We report new information about the disease from the past 5 years. Early age at first birth, increasing parity, and tamoxifen use are related to long-term lifetime reduction in breast-cancer risk. Ductal carcinomas in situ has been suggested to be renamed ductal intraepithelial neoplasia to emphasise its non-life-threatening nature. An alternative approach, the progenitor/stem cell theory, predicts that only some tumour cells cause cancer progression and that these should be targeted by treatment. Mammography and ultrasonography are still the most effective for women with non-dense and dense breast tissues, respectively. Additionally, MRI, lymphatic mapping, the nipple-sparing mastectomy, partial breast irradiation, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and adjuvant treatments are promising for subgroups of breast-cancer patients. Although tamoxifen can be offered for endocrine-responsive disease, aromatase inhibitors are increasingly used. Assessment of potential molecular targets is now important in primary diagnosis. Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and other drugs with anti-angiogenesis properties are currently undergoing preclinical investigations.

Oestrogen receptor status, pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer

The aim of this study was to ascertain if oestrogen receptor (ER) status predicts for pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer, and the effects of pCR on survival. Using a single-institution database, 435 patients were identified, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer and were eligible for the analysis. Patients whose tumours were ER negative were more likely to achieve a pCR than patients who were ER positive (21.6 vs 8.1%, P<0.001). Owing to a strong correlation between ER status and grade, these variables were not shown to be independent predictors of pCR. Overall survival (OS) was better in those patients who achieved a pCR compared to those who did not (5-year OS 91 vs 73%; P=0.02). This was still the case when only patients with ER-negative tumours were examined (5-year OS 90 vs 52%, P=0.005), but not in the subset of patients with ER-positive tumours (5-year OS 93 vs 79%; P=0.3). Therefore, patients with ER-negative tumours were found to be more likely to achieve a pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than those with ER-positive tumours, and pathological response did not have prognostic significance in patients with ER-positive tumours.

The choice of systemic adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive early breast cancer

Patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer represent a distinct population for which tailored adjuvant treatments are needed. Endocrine therapy is mandatory for this population. For premenopausal patients, ovarian ablation or tamoxifen can be recommended; the combination of both, as well as the combination of ovarian ablation and aromatase inhibitors is under investigation. For postmenopausal patients, tamoxifen for 5 years is the 'standard of care'. Anastrozole can be recommended for patients with a contraindication to tamoxifen. The addition of 5 years of letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen has yielded benefits in terms of disease-free survival. The sequential use of tamoxifen and exemestane was superior to tamoxifen for 5 years. However, in both studies, long-term toxicity is still not fully evaluated. The addition of chemotherapy to endocrine treatment can be recommended for patients at high risk of relapse and in young patients. Chemotherapy should consist of 3-6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil or of an anthracycline-containing regimen. The addition of taxanes cannot be routinely recommended in this population. Endocrine treatment should start after completion of chemotherapy.

Relationship Between Time Interval From Primary Surgery to the Start of Taxane- Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Clinical Outcome of Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Italian Study

Purpose

To assess whether the interval from primary surgery to the start of taxane- plus platinum-based chemotherapy has any impact on the clinical outcome of advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

The study was conducted on 313 patients who underwent surgery followed by taxane- plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up of survivors was 30.7 months (range, 6 to 109 months).

Results

The 25%, 50%, and 75% quantiles of intervals from surgery to the start of chemotherapy were 11, 21, and 31 days, respectively. After the sixth cycle, 102 patients achieved a pathologic complete response at second-look surgery and 98 obtained a clinical complete response but were not submitted to second-look surgery. Taking into consideration the best assessed response, a complete (either clinical or pathologic) response was found in 200 patients. Residual disease (≤ 1 v > 1 cm; P < .0001) and ascites (absent v present; P = .003) were independent predictive factors for achieving a complete response, whereas residual disease (P = .001) and stage (IIc to III v IV; P = .04) were independent prognostic variables for survival. Conversely, statistical analyses failed to detect significant differences in complete response rates and survival among patients with an interval from surgery to chemotherapy shorter than 11 days, 12 to 21 days, 22 to 31 days, and longer than 31 days.

Conclusion

The interval from surgery to the start of taxane- plus platinum-based chemotherapy seems to have neither a predictive value for response to treatment nor a prognostic relevance for survival of advanced ovarian cancer patients.

The effect of immediate breast reconstruction on adjuvant chemotherapy

Immediate breast reconstruction is being increasingly offered to patients requiring mastectomy for breast cancer. An audit was carried out to determine whether it affected time to initiation of chemotherapy, delays during chemotherapy, percentage intended dose and need for support with antibiotics or granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. A total of 44 patients undergoing a variety of reconstructive procedures followed by chemotherapy were identified and patient records were reviewed. These were compared with a control group of 49 patients undergoing mastectomy alone and chemotherapy in the same 4-year period and institution. Patients undergoing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction experienced an average of 5 more days delay to chemotherapy initiation than controls with the commonest reason being poor wound healing. Percentage intended dose, delays during chemotherapy and need for support with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor or antibiotics were comparable in all groups.

Axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast carcinoma appears to be a safe procedure to ensure locoregional control. During a median follow-up of 35 months the false-negative rate was 1% in our study population of 185 patients.

BACKGROUND

The objective of this prospective study is to provide data on follow-up of patients with primary operable breast carcinoma staged with SLNB without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were tumour-negative.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-five patients were enrolled. Preoperative dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy were performed; both a vital blue dye and a gamma detection probe were used intraoperatively. Patients with tumour-positive SLNs received completion ALND or if no SLNs could be identified. All patients were monitored according to regional follow-up protocols.

RESULTS

The SLNs were identified in 179 out of the 185 patients. In 73 patients the SLNs were tumour-positive and in 106 patients tumour-negative. The median follow-up was 35 months (range 17-59). In one SLN-negative patient an axillary recurrence occurred 26 months after the SLNB (false-negative rate: 1%).

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB without ALND appears to be a safe procedure to ensure locoregional control in SLN-negative breast carcinoma, if carried out by an experienced team.

Safety of sentinel node biopsy in pregnant patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymphoscintigraphy (LS) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have typically been contraindicated for pregnant patients diagnosed with breast cancer because they are considered unsafe.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six premenopausal non-pregnant patients who were candidates for LS underwent peritumoral injection of approximately 12 MBq of 99mTc-HSA nanocolloids. Static [15 min and 16 h post-injection (p.i.)] and whole-body (16 h p.i.) scintigraphic images were acquired. Activity concentration in the urine (0-2, 2-4, 4-8, 8-16 h p.i.) was evaluated by a gamma-counter. Activity in the bloodstream was measured at 4 and 16 h p.i. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were placed, before tracer injection, on the injection site, between injection site and epigastrium (two points), and on the epigastrium, umbilicus and hypogastrium, and were removed before surgery.

RESULTS

Scintigraphic images showed no radiotracer concentration except in the injection site and in the sentinel node. In all patients, the total activity excreted within the first 16 h was <2% of the injected activity. Activity in the blood pool was, at each time point, <1% of the injected activity. In 23 of 26 patients, all absorbed dose measurements were lower than the sensitivity of the TLD (<10 microGy); in the remaining three patients, the absorbed doses at the level of epigastrium, umbilicus and hypogastrium were in the following ranges: 40-320, 120-250 and 30-140 microGy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our standard technique (12 MBq of 99mTc-HAS), LS and SLNB can be performed safely during pregnancy, since the very low prenatal doses from this diagnostic procedure, when properly performed, do not significantly increase the risk of prenatal death, malformation or mental impairment.

Tissue microarrays: a practical guide

Tissue microarrays are a recent innovation in the field of pathology. They were originally designed as a high-throughput approach for researchers to assess the expression of interesting candidate disease-related genes or gene products simultaneously on hundreds of tissue samples. However, their use is becoming more widespread in routine pathology, for example for quality assurance and for the optimisation of diagnostic reagents such as monoclonal antibodies and gene probes. Several molecular and conventional pathological techniques can be performed on a single tissue array, thereby enabling morphology, DNA, RNA and protein targets to be analysed on sequential sections through multiple tissue samples. Moreover, compared with full-face tissue sections, tissue microarrays are a cost- and time-efficient, effective approach to analysing biomarker expression on a large number of samples. Whilst tissue microarrays are available from commercial sources, many pathology laboratories prefer to make in-house arrays from their often extensive pathology archive to facilitate the correlation of their findings with clinical parameters. The technical skills necessary to produce tissue arrays are well within the capacity of most laboratories. However, several pitfalls to successful array production exist. The present article describes the applications of this technique and details practical points for optimal tissue array production.

Comments on the St. Gallen Consensus 2003 on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer

This final paper of the proceedings of the recent Eighth St. Gallen Conference 2003 on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer comments on the Consensus Paper put forth by the international expert panel and emphasizes new information, that has emerged during the 2 years since the seventh such meeting in 2001. More than 3200 breast cancer specialists from various medical fields-coming from 75 countries and all six continents-have attended the meeting and the process of scientific consensus development. Recommendations for patient care are so critically dependent on assessment of endocrine responsiveness that the importance of high-quality steroid hormone receptor determination and standardized quantitative reporting cannot be overemphasized. The Panel modified and simplified the risk categories so that only endocrine receptor-absent status was sufficient to reclassify an otherwise low-risk, node-negative disease into the category of average risk. Absence of steroid hormone receptors was also recognized as indicating endocrine non-responsiveness. Some important areas highlighted especially in the 2003 consensus include: recognition of the separate nature of endocrine non-responsive breast cancer, both invasive cancers and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); improved understanding of the mechanisms of acquired endocrine resistance, offering exciting prospects for extending the impact of successful sequential endocrine therapies; presentation of high-quality evidence indicating that chemotherapy and tamoxifen should be used sequentially rather than concurrently; availability of a potential alternative to tamoxifen for treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine responsive disease; promise of newly defined prognostic and predictive markers.

Séquence des traitements adjuvants après chirurgie du cancer du sein

The majority of patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer require adjuvant treatment after surgery with radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal treatment. This article reviews the important topic of treatment sequencing in breast cancer to optimally integrate all the adjuvant treatments.

Tailoring adjuvant treatments for the individual breast cancer patient

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy, tamoxifen and ovarian function suppression have all demonstrated their effectiveness for treating women with early breast cancer. Treatment selection for individual patients, however, requires estimates on the magnitude of treatment effects to be achieved from the application of each modality. Unfortunately, information currently available is insufficient to properly tailor adjuvant treatments.

METHODS

We consider predictive factors to improve our understanding about selection of adjuvant therapies, reassessment of data from previous clinical trials and design of future studies.

RESULTS

Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) are the primary measures available today to tailor adjuvant therapies. Patient age/menopausal status (ability to obtain treatment effects via ovarian function suppression), measures of the metastatic potential of the tumor (such as number of positive axillary lymph nodes), and concurrent use of chemotherapy and tamoxifen are other factors that modify the magnitude of relative effect associated with chemotherapy and endocrine therapies. The Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plots (STEPP) method displays the patterns of treatment effects within randomized clinical trials or datasets from meta-analyses to identify features that predict responsiveness to the treatments under study without relying on retrospective subset analysis. Confirmation of hypotheses using independent clinical trial databases is recommended.

DISCUSSION

All findings from clinical trials and meta-analyses should be presented primarily according to steroid hormone receptor status and patient age. Future studies should be designed as tailored treatment investigations, with endocrine therapies evaluated within populations of patients with endocrine responsive tumors, and chemotherapy questions focused within populations of patients with endocrine nonresponsive disease.

Does Timing of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer Influence Survival?

Purpose: Theoretically, patients with early breast cancer might benefit from starting adjuvant chemotherapy soon after surgery, and this would have important clinical implications. We have addressed this question from a large, single-center database in which the majority of patients received anthracyclines.

Patients and Methods: A total of 1,161 patients from a prospectively maintained database treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer at the Royal Marsden Hospital (London, United Kingdom), including 686 (59%) receiving anthracyclines, were retrospectively analyzed. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of the 368 patients starting chemotherapy within 21 days of surgery (group A) were compared with those of the 793 patients commencing chemotherapy ≥ 21 days after surgery (group B). Median follow-up time was 39 months (range, 12 to 147 months).

Results: No significant difference in 5-year DFS was found between the two groups overall (70% for group A v 72% for group B; P = .4) or in any subgroup. Likewise, there was no difference in 5-year OS (82% for group A v 84% for group B; P = .2) or when the interval to the start of chemotherapy was considered as a continuous variable (P = .4).

Conclusion: We have been unable to identify any significant survival benefit from starting adjuvant chemotherapy early after surgery, either overall or in any subset of patients.

Meeting highlights: updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer

This account of the highlights of the eighth St Gallen (Switzerland) meeting in 2003 emphasizes new information that has emerged during the 2 years since the seventh meeting in 2001. This article should be read in conjunction with the report of that earlier meeting. Recommendations for patient care are so critically dependent on assessment of endocrine responsiveness that the importance of high-quality steroid hormone receptor determination and standardized quantitative reporting cannot be overemphasized. The International Consensus Panel modified the risk categories so that only endocrine receptor-absent status was sufficient to reclassify an otherwise low-risk, node-negative disease into the category of average risk. Absence of steroid hormone receptors also was recognized as indicating endocrine nonresponsiveness. Some important areas highlighted at the recent meeting include: (1) recognition of the separate nature of endocrine-nonresponsive breast cancer-both invasive cancers and ductal carcinoma-in-situ; (2) improved understanding of the mechanisms of acquired endocrine resistance, which offer exciting prospects for extending the impact of successful sequential endocrine therapies; (3) presentation of high-quality evidence indicating that chemotherapy and tamoxifen should be used sequentially rather than concurrently; (4) availability of a potential alternative to tamoxifen for treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive disease; and (5) the promise of newly defined prognostic and predictive markers.

Integration of systemic therapy and radiation therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with conservative surgery

There is no consensus on the optimal combination of systemic therapy and radiation therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with conservative surgery. This article reviews prospective and retrospective studies that shed light on this topic. Patients with positive, close, or unknown microscopic margins appear to benefit from relatively early initiation of radiation therapy, whereas those with wider tumor-free margin widths do not. For patients at high risk of distant failure (such as those with = 4 positive axillary nodes), chemotherapy may be more effective when it begins before radiation therapy rather than after. Regimens of concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy tend to have higher acute and subacute complication rates than sequential regimens, but the actual rates vary substantially with the exact details of the overall treatment program. There are no data on the impact of the timing of tamoxifen administration on the effectiveness of radiation therapy. Tamoxifen does not appear to increase complication rates relative to the use of radiation therapy alone. Thus, the best way of giving combined-modality therapy is uncertain. Further retrospective and prospective studies to investigate the issues discussed herein should be performed.

Acute toxicity of concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CMF or AC) in breast cancer patients. a prospective, comparative, non-randomised study

The concurrent administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer treatment might lead to an increased incidence of side-effects. In this prospective, non-randomised, comparative study, the acute toxicity of radiotherapy alone (RT) and radiotherapy concurrent with doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC/RT) and radiotherapy concurrent with cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF/RT) was compared. We used the common toxicity criteria (CTC) to score the level of acute toxicity before, during and 6 months after the completion of the period of irradiation. The number of hospital admissions, as well as the compliance of chemotherapy, were noted. We observed that patients treated with AC/RT and CMF/RT had significant higher incidences of (high-grade) skin-toxicity, oesophagitis, dyspnoea, malaise, anorexia, nausea and hospital admission compared with those treated with RT only. The target-volume of radiotherapy was the main predictor of (high-grade) acute skin toxicity and oesophagitis. AC/RT was associated with significant more (high-grade) skin toxicity than CMF/RT. The dose of chemotherapy was reduced to less than 85% of the planned dose in 11% of patients, 17% of patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy needed admission to hospital. From the results of our study, we conclude that the concurrent administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy leads to an unacceptably high level of acute toxicity.

Controversies in the adjuvant systemic therapy of endocrine-non-responsive breast cancer

Treatment of breast cancer requires a fully integrated multidisciplinary management as well as an ongoing dialogue with laboratory scientists. The growing amount of data generated by randomized clinical trials need to be interpreted by the clinicians and discussed with patients, so that treatment decisions might be better individualized. In early breast cancer, three consensus panels have been developed to help with this task: the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group or Oxford Overview, the NIH Consensus Conference on Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer and the St. Gallen International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Nevertheless, even these panels leave us with a good deal of uncertainty about the optimal adjuvant systemic treatment of the disease, especially when it is classified as "endocrine non-responsive". The two most problematic issues regarding the management of endocrine non-responsive breast cancer are: (1) which fit woman should not be treated, with two major "to treat or not to treat" dilemmas, (a) women above 70 years of age, where available evidence is scant and co-morbid conditions more often come into the equation of benefit/risk, and (b) women who have very small invasive tumours (<1 cm); and (2) what is the optimal chemotherapy regimen (type, doses, schedule, timing and duration). The aim of this review is to examine these controversial issues. Two difficult clinical cases, which are representative of those frequently encountered in daily practice, will also be presented and discussed, with the help of a panel of 48 breast cancer experts from different regions of the world.

Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-18 was initiated in 1988 to determine whether four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide given preoperatively improve survival and disease-free survival (DFS) when compared with the same chemotherapy given postoperatively. Secondary aims included the evaluation of preoperative chemotherapy in downstaging the primary breast tumor and involved axillary lymph nodes, the comparison of lumpectomy rates and rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in the two treatment groups, and the assessment of the correlation between primary tumor response and outcome. Initially published findings were based on a follow-up of 5 years; this report updates results through 9 years of follow-up. There continue to be no statistically significant overall differences in survival or DFS between the two treatment groups. Survival at 9 years is 70% in the postoperative group and 69% in the preoperative group (P =.80). DFS is 53% in postoperative patients and 55% in preoperative patients (P =.50). A statistically significant correlation persists between primary tumor response and outcome, and this correlation has become statistically stronger with longer follow-up. Patients assigned to preoperative chemotherapy received notably more lumpectomies than postoperative patients, especially among patients with tumors greater than 5 cm at study entry. Although the rate of IBTR was slightly higher in the preoperative group (10.7% versus 7.6%), this difference was not statistically significant. Marginally statistically significant treatment-by-age interactions appear to be emerging for survival and DFS, suggesting that younger patients may benefit from preoperative therapy, whereas the reverse may be true for older patients.

Influence of delay to diagnosis on prognostic indicators of screen-detected breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although delay to diagnosis after a breast screening abnormality causes anxiety, its effect on prognosis is unknown.

METHODS

Using pooled data from five Canadian organized breast cancer screening programs, the authors used unconditional logistic regression to evaluate the effect of delay to diagnosis on prognostic indicators among 4465 women with invasive breast carcinoma diagnosed in the ipsilateral breast within 3 years of an abnormal screen performed during 1990-1996.

RESULTS

Women with high-suspicion screens (n = 1569) compared with those without (n = 2896) were more promptly investigated (median days from screen to diagnosis, 31 vs. 47; P < or = 0.0001), had larger tumors (79.4% vs. 55.9% > 10 mm; P < or = 0.0001), and were more likely to be lymph node positive (33.9% vs. 17.3%; P < or = 0.0001). For delays beyond > 12 to < or = 20 weeks, a linear trend of increased tumor size and lymph node positivity began to emerge. Controlling for suspicion, the authors found that odds ratios for tumor size greater than 10 mm were 0.9 (95% CI, 0.66-1.17), 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.56), 1.5 (95% CI, 1.05-2.16), and 2.1 (95% CI, 1.15-3.86) for delays of > 12 to < or = 20, > 20 to < or = 52, > 52 to < or = 104, and > 104 < or = 156 weeks, respectively (p(trend) < or = 0.0001), compared with delays of > 4 to < or = 12 weeks. Similarly, odds ratios for lymph node metastasis were 1.0 (95% CI, 0.67-1.42), 1.2 (95% CI, 0.84-1.69), 2.2 (95% CI, 1.48-3.15), and 3.2 (95% CI, 1.84-5.55) for the same time intervals (p(trend) = 0.0033).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' findings suggest that delays to diagnosis of asymptomatic breast carcinoma of 6 to 12 months are associated with progression of breast carcinoma as measured by increasing risk of lymph node metastases and larger tumor size. A policy of early recall rather than biopsy for low suspicion mammographic abnormalities may introduce delays of this magnitude. The tendency to more expediently investigate women with high-suspicion, worse prognosis screens (suspicion bias) obscures whether delays shorter than 20 weeks also worsen prognostic indicators. Suspicion bias should be considered when interpreting the effect of delay on prognosis.

Influence of endocrine-related factors on response to perioperative chemotherapy for patients with node-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated tumor- and patient-related features that might influence the response to perioperative chemotherapy (PeCT) compared with no adjuvant therapy for patients with node-negative breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1,275 patients were randomized to either no adjuvant treatment (427 patients) or PeCT (848 patients). The following variables thought to have prognostic significance were evaluated: grade, tumor size, estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) content (absent; low, 1 to 9 fmol/mg cytosol protein; or positive, > or = 10 fmol/mg cytosol protein), c-erbB-2 overexpression, menopausal status, and age. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the relative influence of these factors to predict the effect of PeCT on disease-free survival (DFS). Median follow-up was 13.5 years.

RESULTS

The 10-year DFS percentage for 692 premenopausal patients did not significantly differ between the PeCT and no-adjuvant-treatment groups: 61% and 59%, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.20; P = .70). No predictive factors were identified. For 583 postmenopausal patients, 10-year DFS percentages for the groups were 63% and 58%, respectively (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93; P = .03). The absence of expression of ER, PgR, or both ER and PgR was the most important factor predicting improved outcome with PeCT among postmenopausal patients. The 10-year DFS percentages were 85% and 53% for the steroid hormone receptor-absent cohort of treated and untreated patients, respectively (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.49; P = .0009).

CONCLUSION

The role of PeCT should be explored for patients whose primary tumors do not express steroid hormone receptors, because it is likely that early initiation of treatment is exclusively relevant for such patients.

Adjuvant therapy of primary breast cancer: a review of key findings from the 7th international conference, St. Gallen, February 2001

Breast cancer research has developed at a rapid pace over the last decades. Recent discoveries promise to provide individualized treatment options, increased long-term survival for women with breast cancer, and the possibility of moving toward curative intent in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Age, race, tumor size, histological tumor type, axillary nodal status, standardized pathological grade, and hormone-receptor status are accepted as established prognostic and/or predictive factors for selection of systemic adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The role of other promising new factors, such as p53 mutations, HER-2 status, plasminogen activator system, histological evidence of vascular invasion, and quantitative parameters of angiogenesis will be determined in ongoing prospective studies. Currently, 5 years' treatment with adjuvant tamoxifen in women with hormone-positive receptor status, is regarded as the optimal duration of treatment. Long-term follow-up on the randomized trials will determine the added benefit of treatment beyond 5 years. Ovarian ablation has shown a reduction in recurrence and death, and the exact role and extent of adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive tumors is under discussion. Combination hormonal and chemo-hormonal therapies are also being evaluated. There are no convincing data on the survival impact of tamoxifen as a preventative therapy for breast cancer: longer-term follow-up is required, and the planned meta-analyses in 2005 should help shed light on this issue. Statistically significant benefits have been observed with adjuvant chemotherapy (particularly with anthracycline-containing regimens in premenopausal women) versus no adjuvant chemotherapy. The optimal length of adjuvant anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (AC) regimens needs further evaluation as do randomized comparisons of AC to cyclophosphamide/ doxorubicin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/5-FU. Although taxanes promise to provide an additive benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9344 and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-28 studies evaluating paclitaxel in the adjuvant setting have not yet demonstrated statistically significant benefits on disease-free survival and overall survival. In the year 2000, all adjuvant therapy studies conducted by the Co-operative Groups in both node-negative and node-positive disease involve a taxane. High-dose chemotherapy evaluations are still ongoing. The numerous prospective adjuvant therapy trials (hormonal; selective estrogen-receptor modulators; aromatase inhibitors; chemotherapy, involving anthracyclines/taxanes/platinum/trastuzumab; biological factors; elderly women (>70 years); high-risk patients; radiotherapy in 1-3 positive lymph nodes), and neoadjuvant studies might further define the chances to enhance cure rates in the treatment of primary breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: can we define its role?

It remains unclear whether neoadjuvant therapy increases disease-free survival when compared with an approach in which chemotherapy is delayed until after surgery. However, the current rationale for neoadjuvant therapy is based on its usefulness in quickly evaluating the likely benefit of new approaches to treatment and tailoring therapy to the biological characteristics of the individual tumor. In the primary therapy of breast cancer, the Aberdeen study shows that patients unresponsive to an anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimen may achieve a response when switched to docetaxel. Further, patients with an initial clinical response to CVAP were more likely to show a pathological complete response (pCR) at final assessment when four cycles of CVAP were followed by four of docetaxel than when CVAP was maintained for eight cycles (pCR rate 34% versus 16%). Early data suggest that this difference translates into significantly lengthened progression-free survival. As in other disease settings, it may be possible to devise nonanthracycline-containing neoadjuvant regimens which are at least as effective as those in current use.

Timely topic: The application of tissue microarrays to cancer research

Tissue microarrays are paraffin blocks containing multiple cyclindrical tissue biopsy cores taken from individual donor paraffin-embedded tissue blocks and placed into a recipient block with defined array coordinates. Tissue microarray technology facilitates rapid assessment of the clinical relevance of molecular markers by enabling the simultaneous analysis of hundreds of tissue specimens. One of the applications of this technology is to significantly accelerate advances in cancer research through more efficient assessment of novel markers of outcome and response and, as a result, a more rapid application of this knowledge to clinical practice.