Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer

Bladder-sparing approaches to invasive disease

Although immediate radical cystectomy remains the standard of care for invasive bladder cancer, a large body of international experience from single institutions and cooperative groups has accumulated, suggesting favorable results with bladder-sparing approaches in appropriately selected patients. Modern selective bladder preservation with trimodality therapy, consisting of transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, radiation, and chemotherapy, can achieve complete response rates of 60-80%, 5-year survival rates of 50-60%, and survival rates with an intact bladder of 40-45%. Although no randomized comparisons between cystectomy and trimodality therapy exist, long-term data confirm that the 10-year overall and disease-specific survival rates for patients in bladder-sparing protocols are comparable to outcomes reported in contemporary cystectomy series. In addition, quality of life studies have demonstrated that the retained native bladder functions well. Thus, trimodality therapy with careful cystoscopic surveillance and with prompt cystectomy for invasive recurrences has emerged as a legitimate alternative to extirpative surgery. Future work will continue to optimize the bladder-sparing regimen while limiting toxicity.

Sequential gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by docetaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of the sequential administration of gemcitabine (GMB) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) followed by docetaxel (Taxotere) as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients [aged </=70 years and performance status (PS) (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) 0-2] with previously untreated locally advanced/recurrent or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were eligible. Study treatment consisted of GMB (1000 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8) and CDDP (70 mg/m(2), day 1) (GP regimen), every 21 days for a total of four cycles followed by docetaxel (D; 100 mg/m(2), day 1) every 21 days for four cycles.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years were enrolled; 67% of them had PS 0 and 87% stage IV disease. Patients received a median of four GP and four D cycles per patient. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 27% and 63% patients with GP and D, respectively. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11% of patients, only with the GP regimen. Other toxic effects were mild. There was no toxic death. The objective response rate was 55.2% [95% CI: 39.45%-71.07%]. Five patients had complete response (13.15%) and 16 patients had partial response (42.1%), while nine patients had disease stabilization (23.7%) (intention-to-treat analysis). After a median follow-up period of 13 months (range 1.5-40.5 months), the median time to progression was 6.8 months (range 1-40.5 months), the median overall survival 13 months (range 1.5-40.5 months), and the 1-year survival rate 55.3%.

CONCLUSION

The sequential administration of GP followed by D is active and well tolerated as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma and merits to be further evaluated.

State-of-the-art management of metastatic disease at initial presentation or recurrence

Carcinoma of the bladder is the second most prevalent genitourinay malignancy and the fifth most common solid tumor in the USA. On the basis of favorable response rates and survival data, cisplatin-based regimens can be considered the standard treatment for fit patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Since cisplatin-containing regimens are contraindicated for patients with impaired renal function, gemcitabine plus either paclitaxel or docetaxel may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for these patients. Randomized trials are needed to determine the future role of these combinations in the management of advanced transitional cell carcinoma. The optimal regimens for the medically unfit patients and second-line chemotherapy remain undefined. Postchemotherapy surgical resection of residual cancer may result in a disease-free survival in highly selected patients who would otherwise die of the disease. Progresses in the understanding of the molecular biology of bladder cancer and identification of new targeted therapies will undoubtedly provide new opportunities but whether or not this approach to therapy will lead to better results must still be determined.

Systemic chemotherapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a common malignancy. Advanced urothelial cancer is a chemosenstive neoplasm. Whereas the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was long-considered the standard of care for patients with advanced disease, the evaluation of newer agents with retained activity and improved tolerability has been the focus of much investigation over the past decade. Combinations such as cisplatin-gemcitabine (GC) and intensified, G-CSF supported MVAC have shown more favourable toxicity profile and equal or even improved efficacy. Specific groups of patients (elderly, patients with renal dysfunction or poor performance status or co-morbidities) who cannot tolerate cisplatin-based therapy, should receive carboplatin, gemcitabine or taxane-based treatment. Continuing improvements in our understanding of the molecular phenotype of individual patient tumors may lead to the appropriate therapies that target molecular aberrations unique to this malignancy. This review will summarize recent developments in the management of locally advanced (T4b, N 2-3) and/or metastatic (M1) bladder cancer.

Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite the general acceptance of gemcitabine/cisplatin in metastatic bladder cancer, its role and tolerability in the adjuvant setting, in which renal insufficiency is common, is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 39 patients with locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (T2-T4, N0-N2) were treated with 4 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin/amifostine after radical cystectomy. All toxicities were evaluated by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Tumor samples were immunohistochemically stained for pRB, p53, and p16.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (90%) completed 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Eleven patients (28%) experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity, and 14 patients (36%) experienced grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. The median increase in creatinine was 0.3 mg/dL. With a median follow-up of 22.8 months (range, 7-70 months), 13 patients (33%) had recurrent disease, 1 patient at 6 years after completion of therapy. Twelve patients (31%) died, including 11 (28%) with recurrent disease. Thirty-three tumor blocks were evaluated for pRB, p53, and p16 alterations. In an exploratory analysis, altered expression of p53, p16, and pRB was found in 15 (45%), 22 (67%), and 30 patients (91%), respectively. No association between altered p53 and disease-free or overall survival was detected, but altered p16 and pRB expression was associated with better outcome (P < or = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine/cisplatin with amifostine is tolerated in the adjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. The favorable prognostic value of altered p16 and pRB raises the hypothesis of a relative beneficial effect of chemotherapy in this population but needs verification in other studies.

Role of gemcitabine in cancer therapy

Gemcitabine, a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite, is one of the most promising new cytotoxic agents. The drug has shown activity in a variety of solid tumors, and has been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic, bladder, and breast cancer. Recent data showed that gemcitabine is also active against ovarian cancer. Gemcitabine has a good toxicity profile, with myelosuppression being the most common side effect, while non-hematological events are relatively uncommon. The low toxicity profile makes the drug a valid option for unfit and elderly patients. Due to the synergistic activity with other chemotherapeutic compounds, mainly cisplatinum, several trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine in combination with other cytotoxic agents. Current clinical trials are evaluating the role of gemcitabine in combination with new targeted therapies.

Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium

M-VAC (cisplatin, methotrexate, adriamycin, vinblastine) combination chemotherapy has been for long time the standard of care in fit patient with advanced urothelial tumors. Gemcitabine/cisplatin with similar results and an improved toxicity profile has proved to be a new standard alternative. Whether or not we can improve survival with newer triplet regimens will depend upon the results of ongoing phase III trials. In addition to the new active drug combinations and targeted therapies, new approaches are emerging for treatment. Chemotherapy optimization using molecular markers predicting chemosensitivity are being applied. There is an obvious need to incorporate in clinical trials a systematic translational approach to explain both our successes and our failures.

Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine/cisplatin and methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer

PURPOSE

To compare long-term survival in patients with locally advanced and metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) or methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Efficacy data from a large randomized phase III study of GC versus MVAC were updated. Time-to-event analyses were performed on the observed distributions of overall survival time and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Four hundred and five patients were randomized, 203 to the GC arm and 202 to the MVAC arm. At the time of this analysis, 347 patients have died (GC 176, MVAC 171). Overall survival was similar in both arms (HR 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.34, P = 0.66) with a median survival of 14.0 months (95% CI 12.3-15.5 months) in the GC, and 15.2 months (95% CI 13.2-17.3 months) in the MVAC arm. The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months with GC (95% CI 6.8-8.8) and 8.3 months with MVAC (95% CI 7.3-9.7) with a HR of 1.09 (95% CI 0.89-1.34). Significant prognostic factors favoring overall survival included performance status (>70), TNM staging (M0 vs. M1), low/normal alkaline phosphatase expression, number of sites of disease <3, and the absence of visceral metastasis. By adjusting for these prognostic factors, the HR was 0.99 for overall survival and 1.01 for progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term overall and progression-free survival following treatment with GC or MVAC are similar. These results strengthen the role of GC as a standard of care in patients with locally advanced and metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC).

Systemic chemotherapy in inoperable or metastatic bladder cancer

Urothelial cancer is a common malignancy. The management of patients with recurrent disease after cystectomy or initially metastatic or unresectable disease represents a therapeutic challenge. Systemic chemotherapy prolongs survival but long-term survival remains infrequent. During recent years there has been improvement due to the use of novel chemotherapeutic agents, mainly gemcitabine and the taxanes. The long-considered-standard MVAC has been challenged by combinations showing more favourable toxicity profiles and equal (gemcitabine-cisplatin) or even improved (dose-dense, G-CSF-supported MVAC) efficacy. Specific interest has also been generated in specific groups of patients (elderly patients, patients with renal function impairment or comorbidities), who are not fit for the standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy but can derive significant benefit from carboplatin- or taxane-based treatment. Retrospective analyses have enabled the identification of groups of patients with different prognoses, who possibly require different therapeutic approaches. Modern chemotherapy offers a chance of long-term survival in patients without visceral metastases, possibly in combination with definitive local treatment. Finally, the progress of targeted therapies in other neoplasms seems to be reflected in advanced bladder cancer by recent studies indicating that biological agents can be combined with modern chemotherapy. The true role of such therapies is currently being evaluated.

Efficacy of combined gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer

PURPOSE

We wanted to determine and report on the outcome of combined gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy for patients suffering with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 1999 and December 2004, 43 selected patients were enrolled in this study. Group 1 (the adjuvant chemotherapy group) had undergone radical surgery with removal of evident tumor from the following primary sites: bladder (n=8), renal pelvis (n=7) and ureter (n=3). Group 2 (the salvage chemotherapy group) had undergone palliative surgery with a remnant tumor at the following primary sites; bladder (n=23) and renal pelvis (n=2). All the patients were given gemcitabine/ciplatin and they evaluated for the therapeutic effect and toxicity. The patients were initially treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) intravenously for 30 minutes on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on day 1 using prehydration measures.

RESULTS

Group 1: The median follow-up period was 16.5 months. The mean age was 63 years (males: 15 cases, females: 3 cases), and eleven patients (61%) remained alive. The estimated median relapse-free survival period and 2-year survival rate were 24 months and 63%, respectively. Group 2: the median follow-up period was 20 months, the mean patient age was 63.8 years (males: 22 cases, females: 3 cases), and nine patients (36%) remained alive. The overall response and 2-year survival rates were 36% and 43%, respectively. Toxicities: Grade 3 toxicities developed in 14 cycles during the total 232 cycles. Grade 4 toxicity did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm that adjuvant and salvage chemotherapy with using gemcitabine and cisplatin is tolerable and safe.

Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of a 3-Week Regimen

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer among men and the seventh among women. At diagnosis, at least 25% of bladder cancer tumors are locally or systemically advanced. Systemic chemotherapy is the only current modality for advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Recently, a phase III randomized study has demonstrated that the regimen with gemcitabine (GMC) and cisplatin (CDDP) had a survival advantage similar to the standard M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin), with a better safety profile.

AIM

It was the aim of this study to evaluate the tumor response rate, the median time to progression, the median survival and toxicity in a 21-day schedule with GMC and CDDP in patients with advanced/metastatic bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 1998 to December 2000, 27 patients with advanced/metastatic transitional cell carcinoma were enrolled. All patients received 1,200 mg/m(2) GMC administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8, and 75 mg/m(2) CDDP as a 1-hour infusion on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. The patients had a median age of 59.8 years (range 39-75) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were valuable for toxic effects, length of survival and tumor response. The statistical analysis was performed in May 2004. Mean and median follow-up were 20.23 and 13.2 months (range 2-68), respectively. The overall remission rate (complete response + partial response) was 48% (95% CI 28.4-67.6%). The median time to progression was 9 months (range 2-56). The median duration of survival for all patients was 13.2 months (range 2-68+), with 1-year and 23-month survival rates of 60 and 20%, respectively. There was no grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related death. Grade 3 anemia was observed in 4 patients (16%) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 patients (24%). No grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting or neutropenia was observed.

CONCLUSION

GMC and CDDP is an active schedule with a good safety profile in a 21-day regimen. It may be a valid alternative to the standard 28-day regimen due to its high tumor response and survival with a low incidence of toxicity, especially in pretreated and metastatic patients.

Phase I and pharmacological study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra, R115777) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

This phase I trial was designed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tipifarnib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of each of these agents was evaluated. Patients were treated with tipifarnib b.i.d. on days 1-7 of each 21-day cycle. In addition, gemcitabine was given as a 30-min i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin as a 3-h i.v. infusion on day 1. An interpatient dose-escalation scheme was used. Pharmacokinetics was determined in plasma and white blood cells. In total, 31 patients were included at five dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) consisted of thrombocytopenia grade 4, neutropenia grade 4, febrile neutropenia grade 4, electrolyte imbalance grade 3, fatigue grade 3 and decreased hearing grade 2. The MTD was tipifarnib 200 mg b.i.d., gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2). Eight patients had a confirmed partial response and 12 patients stable disease. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Tipifarnib can be administered safely at 200 mg b.i.d. in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2). This combination showed evidence of antitumour activity and warrants further evaluation in a phase II setting.

Chemotherapy for Metastatic Bladder Cancer

This paper reviews the current status of systemic chemotherapy in the management of advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. The activity of a number of single agents and combination drug regimens is discussed, and the small number of randomised-controlled studies available is also considered. Prognostic factors for response and survival, particularly long-term survival after systemic chemotherapy, are also reviewed. Special consideration is given to the role of systemic chemotherapy as a precursor to surgery (or radiotherapy) in locally advanced disease that is initially considered incurable. Therapeutic options for patients unable to tolerate cisplatin owing to renal impairment or other comorbidities are explored. Future directions are explored, including the role of molecular phenotyping in providing prognostic information, indicators of the likely success of conventional therapeutic measures and the development of specific targeted therapies.

Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer

PURPOSE

To compare long-term survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) or methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Efficacy data from a large randomized phase III study of GC versus MVAC were updated. Time-to-event analyses were performed on the observed distributions of overall and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 405 patients were randomly assigned: 203 to the GC arm and 202 to the MVAC arm. At the time of analysis, 347 patients had died (GC arm, 176 patients; MVAC arm, 171 patients). Overall survival was similar in both arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.34; P = .66) with a median survival of 14.0 months for GC and 15.2 months for MVAC. The 5-year overall survival rates were 13.0% and 15.3%, respectively (P = .53). The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months for GC and 8.3 months for MVAC, with an HR of 1.09. The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 9.8% and 11.3%, respectively (P = .63). Significant prognostic factors favoring overall survival included performance score (> 70), TNM staging (M0 v M1), low/normal alkaline phosphatase level, number of disease sites (<or= three), and the absence of visceral metastases. By adjusting for these prognostic factors, the HR was 0.99 for overall survival and 1.01 for progression-free survival. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients with and without visceral metastases were 6.8% and 20.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Long-term overall and progression-free survival after treatment with GC or MVAC are similar. These results strengthen the role of GC as a standard of care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TCC.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study

The purpose of the study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced/recurrent or metastatic urothelial carcinoma stage-IV disease were eligible. Patients with Performance status: PS ECOG >3 or age >75 years or creatinine clearance <50 ml min(-1) were excluded. Study treatment consisted of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) (day 8) and gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) (days 1+8), every 21 days for a total of six to nine cycles. A total of 31 patients with urothelial bladder cancer, 25 men and six women, aged 42-74 (median 64) years were enrolled. The majority of patients had a good PS (51.6%; PS 0). In all, 15 (48.3%) patients had locally advanced or recurrent disease only and 16 (54.8%) presented with distant metastatic spread, with multiple site involvement in 22.5%. Toxicity was primarily haematologic, and the most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were anaemia 11 (6.7%) thrombocytopenia eight (4.9%), and neutropenia 45 (27.6%), with 10 (6.1%) episodes of febrile neutropenia. No toxic deaths occurred. A number of patients had some cardiovascular morbidity (38.7%). Nonhaematological toxicities except alopecia (29 patients) were mild. Overall response rate was 51.6%, including four complete responses (12.9%) and 12 partial responses (38.7%), while a further five patients had disease stabilisation (s.d. 16.1%). The median time to progression was 8 months (95% CI 5.1-9.2 months) and the median overall survival was 15 months (95% CI 11.2-18.5 months), with 1-year survival rate of 60%. In conclusion, this schedule of gemcitabine and docetaxel is very active and well tolerated as a first-line treatment for advanced/relapsing or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Although its relative efficacy and tolerance as compared to classic MVAC should be assessed in a phase III setting, the favourable toxicity profile of this regimen may offer an interesting alternative, particularly in patients with compromised renal function or cardiovascular disease.

Combined-modality therapy with gemcitabine and radiotherapy as a bladder preservation strategy: results of a phase I trial

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I trial of gemcitabine given twice weekly with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients underwent maximal transurethral resection of their bladder tumors followed by twice-weekly infusion of gemcitabine with 2 Gy/d concurrent radiotherapy to the bladder, for a total of 60 Gy over 6 weeks. The starting dose of gemcitabine was 10 mg/m(2) with subsequent dose levels of 20, 27, 30, and 33 mg/m(2). The primary end point was the determination of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of twice weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy. Secondary end points included assessment of toxicity associated with combined-modality therapy and initial assessment of the rate of bladder preservation.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled and 23 were assessable for toxicity and response. No significant toxicity was demonstrated at the 10 or 20 mg/m(2) twice-weekly doses. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in two of three patients treated at 33 mg/m(2). Intermediate dose levels of 27 and 30 mg/m(2) were then evaluated. The MTD of gemcitabine was 27 mg/m(2). The DLT was systemic, manifested as an elevation in liver function tests, malaise, and edema. Fifteen of 23 patients (65%) are alive with bladders intact and no evidence of recurrent disease at a median follow-up of 43 months.

CONCLUSION

Twice-weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy at 2 Gy/d to a total dose of 60 Gy is well-tolerated. The MTD of gemcitabine is 27 mg/m(2). There is a high rate of bladder preservation in this selected group of patients.

A multi-institutional phase II trial of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer

The purpose of the study was to evaluate response and survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer treated with combination gemcitabine and paclitaxel administered on a biweekly schedule at doses of 3000 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2, respectively. Patients with adequate organ function and performance status were accrued through 7 institutions, stratified by prior therapy status, and treated as noted. Response was evaluated by 1979 bi-dimensional World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Of 55 eligible patients, 17 had a partial and 5 had a complete response rate for an overall response rate of 40% (27-54%). One complete response and one partial response were observed in the 6 previously treated patients. Overall median survival was 11.8 months (11.9 months in the chemonaive cohort). Grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression occurred in 56%, but only 4 serious infections were observed. We conclude that because of a lower than expected complete response rate, even when corrected for prognostic groupings, this regimen is not recommended for routine use in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Insufficient patients with poor renal function or prior therapy were accrued to reach conclusions regarding its utility in these subgroups.

Chemotherapy and cystectomy for invasive transitional cell carcinoma of bladder

Invasive transitional cell bladder cancer is associated with occult metastasis. Approximately 50% of patients with clinically localized, invasive bladder cancer ultimately die of their disease. Systemic chemotherapy has been combined with radical cystectomy in an attempt to improve survival. Phase I and II trials have achieved tumor down-staging. Initial randomized trials did not show a statistically significant survival benefit from systemic single agent chemotherapy. More recently, two multi-center randomized trials have shown a significant survival benefit from neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy trials, to date, have failed to show statistically improved survival, although most published studies have been methodologically flawed. For invasive, clinically nonmetastatic bladder cancer, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is one of the new standards of care. The role of postsurgical systemic chemotherapy appears promising, but has not been proven in a randomized trial. Molecular prognostication is now being incorporated into the design of clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Systemic chemotherapy for patients with bladder cancer – current controversies and future directions

Many localised, superficial bladder cancers can be effectively controlled. However, disease which has spread to nodes outside the pelvis or to distant organs is generally incurable and systemic therapies, rather than surgery, are appropriate. Combination chemotherapy based around established cytotoxic drugs such as cisplatin has proven benefit in palliating symptoms and prolonging survival in responsive patients with advanced disease. Combination chemotherapies which include newer cytotoxic drugs such as gemcitabine provide the potential for equivalent efficacy with less toxicity than established regimens. Between the extremes of superficial and advanced disease, muscle-invasive bladder cancers have traditionally been treated, with curative intent, by radical surgery or radiotherapy. However, newly published data suggest, for the first time, genuine survival benefits from peri-operative chemotherapy. This article reviews the evidence for cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced disease, assesses the potential benefits of newer cytotoxic drugs, discusses the latest evidence pertaining to peri-operative chemotherapy in muscle-invasive disease, and looks forward to potential new biological agents in the systemic therapy of bladder cancer.

Phase I study of gemcitabine and radiotherapy plus cisplatin after transurethral resection as conservative treatment for infiltrating bladder cancer

PURPOSE

Although the use of radical transurethral resection followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy leads to a similar survival rate to that achieved after cystectomy, the number of long-term survivors is low in both cases. An improvement may be obtained by adding a new drug, such as gemcitabine, which is active in bladder cancer and acts as a radiosensitizer. However, because gemcitabine may be very toxic when associated with radiotherapy, we designed this dose-finding study in an attempt to find the dose that can be safely added to radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients treated with transurethral resection for infiltrating bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After undergoing macroscopically complete transurethral resections for transitional carcinoma of the bladder, patients staged pT2 or higher and without distant metastases concurrently received 54 Gy of fractionated radiotherapy over 6 weeks with cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) q.3 w), starting on Day 1 of radiotherapy. Concomitant gemcitabine was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 q.3 w for 2 cycles at a dose of 200 mg/m(2), escalated to 500 mg/m(2), with a 100 mg/m(2) increase at each dose level. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the dose of gemcitabine associated with dose-limiting toxic effects (febrile neutropenia, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Grade 3 or 4 enteric toxicity, or Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity) in 33% of the patients treated at that dose level. Six to 8 weeks after completing the therapy, the patients underwent cystoscopic reevaluation with multiple biopsies of the initial tumor site.

RESULTS

Of our consecutive series of 16 patients, 5 received a gemcitabine dose of 200 mg/m(2)/week, 3 a dose of 300 mg/m(2)/week, 3 a dose of 400 mg/m(2)/week, and 5 a dose of 500 mg/m(2)/week for 6 weeks. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed at doses of up to 400 mg/m(2)/week. At the dose 500 mg/m(2)/week, 1 patient experienced an intestinal perforation that recovered after surgery, and another suddenly died after developing Grade 3 untreated diarrhea in the last treatment week. All of the 15 evaluable patients were microscopically disease free at the cystoscopic reevaluation; furthermore, the posttreatment computed tomography scans did not reveal any distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

After transurethral resection for the conservative treatment of infiltrating bladder cancer, gemcitabine doses of up to 400 mg/m(2)/week seem to be safe in combination with cisplatin and radiotherapy in organ-sparing management. On the basis of the promising results of this Phase I study, we are currently conducting a Phase II trial to verify the possible improvement in local control resulting from the addition of gemcitabine.

A phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in patients with unresectable (Stage T4 or >/= N1) metastatic or locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract.

METHODS

A total of 27 patients were enrolled in the current multisite study, which was performed within the University of California-Los Angeles Community Oncology Research Network. The first 10 patients in the study received 800 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day treatment cycle. In addition, on Day 1, the first 10 patients received 80 mg/m(2) of docetaxel intravenously after completion of the gemcitabine infusion. Because of dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia), the initial dose of docetaxel was reduced to 60 mg/m(2) for the remaining patients who entered the study (n = 17 patients).

RESULTS

Neutropenia was the most common adverse event that occurred in patients at the Grade 3 level (in 10 of 27 patients; 37.0%) and the Grade 4 level (in 6 of 27 patients; 22.2%). There were no other adverse events at the Grade 4 toxicity level. Twenty-five of 27 patients (92.6%) completed more than 1 cycle of combination therapy and were evaluated for antitumor responses. The frequency of objective clinical responses was 33.3% (9 of 27 patients). Complete responses to therapy were observed in 2 of 27 patients (7.4%), and partial responses were observed in 7 of 27 patients (25.9%). The median duration of response was 20 weeks (range, 12+ weeks to 152 weeks). The median survival duration was 52 weeks (range, 12 weeks to 160+ weeks). Four of 27 patients (14.8%) remained alive at the time of the current data analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study suggested that combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel was an effective treatment for patients with unresectable (Stage T4 or >/= N1) metastatic or locally advanced TCC of the urothelial tract. Gemcitabine plus docetaxel appeared to be tolerated well, and treatment-related toxicities were limited to hematologic toxicities. Because cisplatin-containing regimens are contraindicated for patients with impaired renal function, the gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination may prove to be an effective and well tolerated treatment option for these patients.

Follow-up strategies and management of recurrence in urologic oncology bladder cancer:

A surveillance program following cystectomy should consider a patient's individual risk for the development of local and distant recurrences and any specific needs related to the urinary tract reconstruction performed (Table 1). Well-documented recurrence patterns following cystectomy are available from many large surgical series and provide the background information needed for tailoring follow-up based on pathologic criteria. Economic issues also must be considered, given that the health care-related expenses of treating and following patients with bladder cancer is twice as much as that expended for the treatment of prostate cancer. Because of the ever-increasing fiscal constraints placed on clinicians, risk-adjusted follow-up strategies are reasonable, but will require prospective evaluation to validate their appropriateness.

Collecting Duct Carcinoma of the Kidney: A Clinicopathological Study Of 9 Cases

PURPOSE

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) of the kidney is a rare variant that is associated with an extremely poor prognosis. We report our experience with this variety of cancer in the last 9 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1993 to 2002, 9 patients with CDC were treated at our institution. The diagnosis of CDC was made by a nephrectomy specimen in 8 cases and by renal biopsy in 1. Tumor characteristics, and patient treatment and outcome are reported.

RESULTS

At presentation 1 T1N0M0, 1 T3N0M0, 3 T3N+M0 and 4 T3N+M+ tumors were seen. Mean followup was 13.6 months. Five patients received no complementary treatment. The patient with the T1N0M0 tumor remained free of disease 13 months after nephrectomy and the one with T3N0M0 tumor remained free of disease at 17 months. A patient with a T3N+M+ tumor experienced progression at 1 month, local recurrence at 17 months and was then lost to followup. The 2 other patients with T3N+M0 and T3N+M+ disease, respectively, progressed rapidly and were lost to followup after 5 months. One patient with a T3N+M0 neoplasm received immunotherapy and died after 24 months, while the other with T3N+M0 disease was treated with oral prednisolone and died after 5 months. Finally, 2 patients with T3N+M+ disease received chemotherapy, consisting of 1,250 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, and 70 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1. Each patient achieved an objective response after 3 chemotherapy cycles and remained disease-free 27 and 9 months after nephrectomy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CDC is an aggressive variety of kidney neoplasm that is often associated with nodal and visceral metastases at presentation. Our data suggest that combined gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy may be the best therapeutic option for patients with this tumor.

Treatment of refractory urothelial carcinoma with alternating paclitaxel, methotrexate, cisplatin (TMP) and 5-fluorouracil, α-interferon, cisplatin (FAP)

We assessed the activity and safety of a biochemotherapy regimen in which courses of paclitaxel, methotrexate, and cisplatin were alternated with courses of 5-fluorouracil, alpha-interferon, and cisplatin in the treatment of refractory urothelial carcinoma. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. In the phase I portion, 15 patients were treated according to an escalating dosage regimen designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose. A total of 30 patients received treatment according to the maximum tolerated dose regimen: methotrexate (30 mg/m(2)) given iv on days 1 and 22; paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) given iv over 3 h on day 1; cisplatin (70 and 25 mg/m(2)) administered iv on days 1 and 22, respectively; 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) given iv by continuous infusion daily for 5 days beginning on day 22; and alpha-interferon (4 mIU/m(2)) given SC daily for 5 days simultaneously with the 5-fluorouracil infusions. The regimen was repeated at 42-day intervals. The 40 treated patients had an overall response rate of 43%, a complete response rate of 18%, and a median survival time of 44 weeks. Most of the toxic effects were hematologic: Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 30% of patients (12 patients) and Grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 20% (8 patients). Even though this alternating biochemotherapy regimen was active for patients with refractory urothelial carcinoma, its activity was not better than that of certain single cytotoxic agents. Furthermore, the complicated dosing schedule and toxic effects of the regimen precluded its routine use in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

The systemic treatment of advanced and metastatic bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is the second most common genitourinary tumour and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy have failed to show a survival advantage, although these studies generally had suboptimum design and an insufficient number of patients. Despite the introduction of newer agents, the median survival for metastatic disease is about 1 year; however, improvements in quality of life have been achieved. Platinum drugs should be included in studies of combination chemotherapy regimens wherever possible. There have been various studies exploring the role of taxanes, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, and platinum in double and triple combinations in different schedules to maximise dose intensity and improve effectiveness but large phase III trials are needed. The current tumour, node, and metastasis staging system is insufficient to predict outcome in patients with bladder cancer irrespective of the treatment they received. Evaluation of molecular prognostic markers should be incorporated into phase II and III trials to define their roles in clinical outcome. Future studies should stratify patients according to the number of risk factors they have to avoid imbalance in treatment groups and patients should be carefully selected.

Is there standard chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer? Quality of life and medical resources utilization based on largest to date randomized trial

A large multinational phase III trial performed during the late 1990s compared two systemic chemotherapy regimens gemcitabine plus cisplatin and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (M-VAC) in more than 400 patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. This trial has been discussed to landmark the beginning of a new era following M-VAC polychemotherapy which has dominated treatment of advanced urothelial cancer throughout the previous decade. Despite the fact that gemcitabine/cisplatin combination therapy did not surpass M-VAC therapy in regard to patient survival as initially intended, this combination demonstrated a more favourable toxicity profile with improved tolerability and superior cost effectiveness, rendering this combination an attractive alternative to M-VAC. This review on the largest to date phase III trial for advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer will focus on issues of quality of life including indicators such as performance status and changes in body weight. Furthermore, data on medical resources utilization as accounted during systemic polychemotherapy and related toxic events will be reconsidered, particularly under the impression of decreasing health care resources worldwide.

New drugs and new approaches in metastatic bladder cancer

The median survival of patients with metastatic cancer of the urothelium who receive best supportive care only in 4-6 months. With the introduction of combination chemotherapy regimens including cisplatin and methotrexate for the management of metastatic urothelial cancer, median overall survival has doubled. Nevertheless, death due to cancer ultimately occurs in more than 80% of these patients, thus more effective therapy is required. The new available treatment modalities range from new combinations of conventional chemotherapeutic agents to combinations incorporating novel drugs like gemcitabine and the taxanes. These new combinations incorporate the new active agents in two, three or multiple drug combinations, administered either in one regimen or sequentially in various combinations and schedules intended to improve the outcome of bladder cancer patients. Ongoing phase III studies will help to define the role of these new combinations in the treatment of advanced bladder cancer. The improved understanding of the molecular biology of urothelial malignancies is helping to define the role of new prognostic indices that can direct the most appropriate choice of treatment for advanced disease. In addition, advances in the molecular biology of urothelial malignancies may allow identification of specific genetic lesions and biochemical pathways upon which future therapeutic approaches can be focused. The integration of newer biologic agents, probably to supplement rather than to supplant chemotherapeutic drugs, should be a primary direction of research with the objective to interfere with multiple aspects of bladder cancer progression.

Gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract: an alternative therapy

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based combinations are considered to be the standard treatment for advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. Many of the patients are elderly with concomitant diseases or impaired renal function. We studied the tolerance and activity of the gemcitabine/carboplatin combination as a therapeutic alternative.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic TCC of the urothelium were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 5 on Day 1 every 21 days. Patients with creatinine clearance of 30 mL/min or above and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores 60 or above were enrolled.

RESULTS

A total of 227 cycles were administered to 41 patients, with an average of 5.5 cycles per patient (range, 1-8 cycles). Creatinine clearance was below 60 mL/min in 54% of patients, KPS was 70 or below in 37% of patients, and 37% of patients were 70 years old or older. Hematologic toxicity was mainly Grade 3/4 neutropenia in 63%, Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 32%, and Grade 3/4 anemia in 54% of patients. There were only three episodes of febrile neutropenia and one death from neutropenic sepsis. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild, with asthenia as the most frequently reported event. We obtained 6 complete and 17 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 56.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.6-71.6%). Progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.7-8.5) and median survival was 10.1 months (95% CI, 8.8-12.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin achieves a similar result to doublets using cisplatin. It has an acceptable toxicity profile and enables patients with impaired renal function and/or poor performance status and elderly patients to be treated.

Overview of bladder cancer trials in the European Organization for Research and Treatment

In the 1990s, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary (EORTC GU) Group focused on dose-intensity concepts of the methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) regimen for patents with bladder cancer. In a randomized trial in patients with advanced urothelial cell cancer, standard MVAC was compared with 2-weekly intensified MVAC plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Although the dose-intensified therapy resulted in a higher overall and complete response rates, it did not result in a better median survival. In parallel, the Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group (SOGUG), in collaboration with the EORTC GU Group, conducted Phase I and II trials to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the incorporation of two new active agents, gemcitabine and paclitaxel, into two-drug or three-drug cisplatin-based or carboplatin-based regimens. The EORTC GU Group currently is conducting randomized studies of combined paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine compared with combined gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with good performance status and good renal function and studies of combined gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with combined carboplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine in patients who are unsuited for cisplatin. In the 1990s, the EORTC coordinated a large Intergroup study of neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy before definitive treatment. That study included 976 patients and was based on a design to detect at least a 10% absolute improvement in survival. The final results showed a 5.5% survival difference at 3 years in the chemotherapy arm. The EORTC GU Group currently is coordinating an Intergroup study that was designed to detect an improvement of 7% in absolute survival in the adjuvant setting. Cancer 2003;97(8 Suppl):2120-6.

Overview of bladder cancer trials in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

In the United States, radical cystectomy is viewed as the gold standard and, with few exceptions, is the only treatment recommended for patients with invasive bladder cancer. In many areas of cancer treatment, however, the trend in the 1990s has been toward organ conservation using combined chemotherapy and radiation with or without conservative local surgery. For patients with breast, esophageal, anal, and laryngeal cancers as well as limb sarcomas, conservative therapy often is recommended. However, invasive bladder cancer has not been viewed generally as a condition that allows for conservative management. In the past 15 years, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has completed six prospective protocols of combined-modality therapy for patients with muscle-invasive cancer who were candidates for cystectomy. Bladder preservation with intravesical surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were combined as initial treatment, with radical cystectomy recommended for incomplete responders. Five of the RTOG protocols were Phase I-II trials of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and one protocol was a Phase III trial that tested the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine. A total of 415 patients were entered on these trials. The 5-year overall survival rate was approximately 50%, with three-quarters of those patients achieving a cure for their bladder cancer while maintaining a functioning bladder. The current RTOG protocol and its successor are directed toward better tolerated and potentially more effective chemotherapy regimens that may result in a high protocol compliance rate and, possibly, a higher overall survival rate. The trimodality therapeutic approach used in all of these RTOG protocols was more effective compared with the radiation monotherapy offered in the 1970s and with protocols that used only chemotherapy. Trimodality therapy with selective bladder preservation is not designed to take the place of radical cystectomy; however, it may be offered as a reasonable alternative to patients with invasive bladder cancer who are not willing to undergo radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. A bladder-sparing strategy may be offered appropriately to highly selected patients with the understanding that radical cystectomy is an available option in those who fail combined radiation and chemotherapy with no diminution in survival related to the delay in cystectomy.

Progress in the chemotherapy of metastatic cancer of the urinary tract

Cytotoxic chemotherapy has an evolving role in the management of metastatic cancer of the bladder and urinary tract. The most responsive of these tumors are transitional cell carcinomas. Standard single agents (e.g., methotrexate, doxorubicin, mitomycin, ifosfamide, vinblastine, and cisplatin) have produced objective response rates of 15-25% and combination chemotherapy has resulted in objective regression in 40-75% of cases. The taxanes and gemcitabine are now being incorporated into combination regimens because they have activity against this disease, both in previously treated and untreated patients. In previously untreated patients, regimens incorporating gemcitabine and paclitaxel and a platinum complex, with or without ifosfamide or doxorubicin, produce median survival periods of 15-20 months. Contemporary experience with the methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin regimen yields a median survival period of 18 months. Traditional cytotoxic regimens have been ineffective in the management of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder. However, regimens predicated on the taxanes and gemcitabine yield response rates of 30-40%, which may translate into improved survival. Nevertheless, stage migration may produce the semblance of improved survival, which may reflect reduced tumor burden (via reclassification) and case selection. Because historically controlled comparisons may introduce errors from case selection bias, stage migration, differences in duration of follow-up, and the evolution of supportive care, it is essential to validate the role of new agents in well structured, randomized clinical trials.

[Gemcitabine/cisplatin vs. MVAC. 5 year survival outcome of the phase III study of chemotherapy of advanced urothelial carcinoma in Germany]

Of 405 patients with stage IV transitional cell carcinoma from an international multicenter phase III trial, 70 were randomized in Germany to receive either gemcitabine/cisplatin or standard MVAC systemic chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. Overall survival as the primary endpoint of the study was similar in both arms (median survival GC 15.4 months vs MVAC 16.1 months), as were tumor-specific survival and time to progressive disease. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the 5-year overall survival rate was 10% for patients randomized to GC and 18% randomized to MVAC. Tumor overall response rates (GC 54%, MVAC 53%) were similar. The toxic death rate was 0% in the GC arm and 3% (one patient) in the MVAC arm. Significantly more GC than MVAC patients experienced grade 3/4 anemia (GC 52%, MVAC 20%) with significantly more red blood cell transfusions in the GC arm.Significantly more GC than MVAC patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (GC 54%, MVAC 17%) without grade 3/4 hemorrhage or hematuria in either arm. More MVAC patients experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia (GC 56%, MVAC 61%, p=1.000), neutropenic or leukopenic fever (GC 0%, MVAC 10%, p=0.237), mucositis (GC 0%, MVAC 7%, p=0.495), and alopecia (GC 6%, MVAC 36%, p=0.004). GC represents a reasonable alternative for the palliative treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic transitional cell carcinoma. Sustained long-term survival was only found for patients with locally advanced cancer, lymphatic metastases, or solitary distant metastasis but not for visceral metastatic disease.

DNA repair mechanisms involved in gemcitabine cytotoxicity and in the interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin

The influence of DNA repair mechanisms on the interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin was studied using a panel of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines deficient in one of the following repair pathways: base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). NER and HR are known to be involved in platinum-DNA adduct repair. Single agent experiments demonstrated that each of the repair deficient cell lines had a similar sensitivity towards gemcitabine as the parental cell lines, whereas the NER- and HR-deficient lines showed increased sensitivity towards cisplatin. Furthermore, in the parental cell lines, the administration sequence cisplatin followed by gemcitabine was synergistic, whereas the reversed schedule showed additivity and simultaneous administration revealed antagonistic cytotoxicity. In the repair deficient cell lines, using this synergistic schedule of cisplatin followed by gemcitabine, loss of synergy was observed in the NER- and HR-deficient cell lines. However, the magnitude of the effect in the NER-deficient cells was small. The sensitivity to the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine shown by the BER- and NHEJ-deficient cell lines did not differ significantly from that of the parental cell line. Cellular accumulation of platinum as well as the formation of GG- and AG-intrastrand adducts in the parental line and in the HR-deficient line were not affected by gemcitabine. In conclusion, our results indicate that BER, NER, HR, and NHEJ are most likely incapable of modulating the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, and that HR is involved in the synergistic interaction between cisplatin and gemcitabine in our cell system.

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Patients with localised but muscle-invasive transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder are at high risk of relapse and death from metastatic disease after local treatment by cystectomy, radiation, or both. Despite improvements in treatment, patients with metastatic TCC have a median survival of about a year. TCC is quite sensitive to chemotherapy, and patients are able to tolerate newer regimens such as gemcitabine plus cisplatin better than older regimens such as methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. However, the role of chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced muscle-invasive TCC remains uncertain. Most trials of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy have shown no significant improvement in survival, but many of these studies had suboptimum design, evaluated chemotherapy that was less effective than regimens in current use, and had sample sizes that were too small for important changes in survival to be detected or ruled out. Recent trials show trends in the direction of improved survival when optimum chemotherapy is used. Large trials that recruit more than 1000 patients are required to assess the effectiveness of adjunctive chemotherapy, and a large intergroup trial is in progress. Other trials should address the role of molecular markers in selecting patients for chemotherapy. Whenever possible, chemotherapy for locally advanced muscle-invasive TCC should be given in the context of a well-designed clinical trial.

Piritrexim in advanced, refractory carcinoma of the urothelium (E3896): a phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

This was a single-agent phase II clinical trial of the antifol piritrexim in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

METHODS

Patients with previously-treated, advanced urothelial carcinoma were treated with oral piritrexim at a dose of 25 mg three times daily for 5 consecutive days each week for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week rest period. Courses were repeated every 28 days.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled in the study, with 28 patients evaluable for survival and toxicity and 27 evaluable for response.

TOXICITY

Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity, with WHO grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 4 patients, granulocytopenia in 1 patient, and anemia in 3 patients. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity consisted of neuropathy in 5 patients, hepatotoxicity in 2, nausea in 2, and 1 each with pulmonary toxicity and rash.

EFFICACY

Of the 27 patients evaluable for response, 2 (7%) achieved an objective response, lasting 112 and 142 days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Piritrexim has minimal activity in patients with previously treated transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, regardless of prior exposure to methotrexate, and further evaluation of this compound in this clinical setting is not warranted.

Gemcitabine plus epirubicin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who are not eligible for platinum-based regimens

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus epirubicin in previously untreated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were not eligible for cisplatin-based regimens.

METHODS

Patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and at least one of the following characteristics were eligible: impaired renal function (creatinine clearance < 60 mL per minute), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) >or= 2, and age >or= 75 years. The treatment included epirubicin 70 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients entered the study, and a total of 152 cycles were administered, with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range, 1-6 cycles per patient). The following Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities were reported (percent of cycles): neutropenia, 22.4%; anemia, 11.2%; and thrombocytopenia, 6.5%. No cardiac, renal, or hepatic toxicities were observed. Dose intensities of epirubicin and gemcitabine were 19.6 mg/m(2) per week (84%) and 532.2 mg/m(2) per week (80%), respectively. There were 2 complete responses (5.3%), 13 partial responses (34.2%), 11 patients with stable disease (28.9%), and 12 patients with progressive disease (31.6%), for an overall response rate of 39.5% (95% confidence interval, 25.1-55.1). The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 4.8 months and 8.0 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 38%, and the median PFS and OS were 6.4 months and 16.4 months, respectively, in patients with PS 0-1. Thirty patients were symptomatic: Seventeen patients (56.7%) achieved a complete response, and 5 patients (16.7%) achieved a partial symptomatic response.

CONCLUSIONS

At the doses given in this study, gemcitabine and epirubicin had a good tolerability profile with interesting activity in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were not fit for cisplatin-based regimens.

High-risk metastatic urothelial cancer: chances for cure?

The median survival of patients with metastatic bladder cancer treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin chemotherapy is approximately 1 year and long-term survival occurs in a small proportion of patients. Recent efforts to improve the outcome of patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma have focused on the identification of new drugs with single agent activity and on their incorporation into platinum-based combination regimens. Paclitaxel, docetaxel, ifosfamide and gemcitabine are among the most active new agents. A large number of phase I/II trials have evaluated these agents in two- and three-drug combination regimens. The response proportion observed with these combinations varies considerably and median survival times range from 8 to 20 months. Because it is known that pretreatment prognostic features have an impact on individual patient outcome, the variation in reported survival in patients treated with chemotherapy may be a consequence of pretreatment patient characteristics. The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer is still controversial. After a significant response to chemotherapy, resection of residual resistant disease may be performed with intent to cure in highly selected patients. As obtainment of complete remission is a prerequisite for long-term survival, new therapeutic strategies, such as molecular targeted small molecule therapy and monoclonal antibodies, and new molecular markers predictive of response have the potential to be incorporated into the current treatment strategies, increasing the rate of cure.

Pretreatment prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced urothelial tumors treated in a phase I/II trial with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine

BACKGROUND

New chemotherapeutic agents, including paclitaxel and gemcitabine, are active in advanced bladder carcinoma, and combination regimens with these agents have shown promising results. Unlike conventional chemotherapy regimens, such as methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin, there are no data available on key predictive factors for response and survival with these novel agents. Since this information is needed for selection of patients for these new combinations and for stratification purposes in ongoing randomized trials, the authors aimed to study the predictive factors for response and survival to the current regimen containing cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine.

METHODS

The authors studied 56 patients with advanced urothelial tumors treated on a Phase I/II trial of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine (TCG) to identify pretreatment characteristics that were prognostic for survival using this novel combination. The pretreatment characteristics analyzed were age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histopathology (pure transitional versus other), visceral (liver, lung, or bone) metastasis, number of sites of disease, lactate dehydrogenase, and hemoglobin.

RESULTS

The factors that were associated with a worse survival in univariate analysis were performance status > 0, presence of visceral metastasis, and more than one site of malignant disease. In a multivariate model, performance status (P = 0.044) and visceral disease (P = 0.008) showed independent statistical significance for decreased survival. Patients were then grouped based on these two independent prognostic factors. Median survival times in the groups of patients with zero, one, or two of these risk factors were 32.8 months, 17 months, and 9.6 months, respectively (P = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

A pretreatment performance status > 0 and the presence of visceral metastasis have a profound impact on survival when using the TCG regimen. These two variables will be used to stratify patients in the upcoming Phase III randomized trial comparing this TGC regimen with a gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen in advanced urothelial tumors.

Long-term survival in phase II trials of gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced transitional cell cancer

PURPOSE

To assess long-term survival and prognostic indicators of survival in patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Survival data from three previously published phase II trials of gemcitabine/cisplatin were updated. Baseline hemoglobin, performance status, and presence of visceral metastases, which are known prognostic factors with other regimens, were examined. Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method and significance assessed using the log-rank statistic. Cox's Proportional Hazards Model was used to construct univariate and multivariate survival models.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Overall median survival of 121 included patients was 13.2 (11.0 to 14.9) months and estimated 4 year survival was 13 +/- 6%. In a univariate analysis, the presence of visceral metastases and a hemoglobin < 12.5 mg/dl had significant adverse prognostic implications (P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). Performance status was not a significant predictor of survival, perhaps due to the fact that only 14% of patients had a performance status of 2. In a multivariate analysis, only the absence of visceral metastases retained its prognostic importance with an estimated 24% 4-year survival in such patients. These results lend further evidence for the clinical benefit of this regimen in advanced transitional cell cancer.

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide as weekly therapy: a feasibility and phase II study of salvage treatment for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

We investigated the feasibility, safety, and antitumor activity of weekly gemcitabine given in combination with low doses of cisplatin and ifosfamide in previously treated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable, metastatic or unresectable TCC who had received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. On a 28-day course, doses of cisplatin 30 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2), and ifosfamide 1 g/m(2) were given on day 1 and then repeated on day 8 and day 15 unless there was dose-limiting hematologic toxicity.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were registered; 10 patients participated in a pilot study, after which 41 patients were registered onto the phase II protocol. Forty-eight patients (94.1%) had dose-limiting hematologic toxicity on day 8 or day 15. Nonhematologic toxicity of grade 3 or greater consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting (seven patients, 13.7%) and infection (seven patients, 13.7%). Responses could be assessed in 49 of 51 eligible patients; two complete responses (4.1%) and 18 partial responses (36.7%) were observed for an overall response rate of 40.8% (exact 95% confidence interval, 27% to 56%).

CONCLUSION

This regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide is not feasible for weekly administration because of hematologic toxicity. Nevertheless, there was promising activity with only two doses per 28-day cycle. On the basis of these results, we have initiated a phase II trial of this combination given as a single dose every 14 days in patients with untreated, metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Selective bladder preservation by combined modality protocol treatment: long-term outcomes of 190 patients with invasive bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of patients with muscle-invasive Stage T2-4a bladder carcinoma managed by transurethral surgery and concurrent chemoradiation.

METHODS

A total of 190 patients were treated on institutional prospective protocols using concurrent cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and radiotherapy after rigorous transurethral resection of the bladder tumor. Patients were re-evaluated by repeated biopsy and urine cytologic analysis after 40 Gy, with the initial tumor response guiding subsequent therapy. One hundred twenty-one patients with a complete response by cytologic and histologic examination and those medically unfit for cystectomy received boost chemoradiation to 64 to 65 Gy. Those patients without a complete response were advised to undergo radical cystectomy. A total of 66 patients (35%) ultimately underwent radical cystectomy; 41 for less than a complete response and an additional 25 for recurrent invasive tumors. The median follow-up was 6.7 years for all surviving patients.

RESULTS

The 5 and 10-year actuarial overall survival rate was 54% and 36%, respectively (Stage T2, 62% and 41%; Stage T3-T4a, 47% and 31%, respectively). The 5 and 10-year disease-specific survival rate was 63% and 59% (Stage T2, 74% and 66%; Stage T3-T4a, 53% and 52%), respectively. The 5 and 10-year disease-specific survival rate for patients with an intact bladder was 46% and 45% (Stage T2, 57% and 50%; Stage T3-T4a, 35% and 34%), respectively. The pelvic failure rate was 8.4%. No patient required cystectomy because of bladder morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-year overall survival and disease-specific survival rates are comparable with the results reported for contemporary radical cystectomy for patients of similar clinical and pathologic stage. One third of patients treated on protocol with the goal of bladder sparing ultimately required a cystectomy. A trimodality approach with bladder preservation based on the initial tumor response is, therefore, safe, with most long-term survivors retaining functional bladders.

Surgery and adjunctive chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer

Invasive bladder cancer has a predilection for early, occult metastasis. Despite effective local control from radiotherapy or cystectomy, approximately 50% of the patients with clinically localized, invasive bladder cancer ultimately die of their disease. Over the past 25 years, systemic chemotherapy has been combined with definitive local treatment in an attempt to improve cure rates. Non-randomized phase I-II trials have shown promising results, with significant tumor down-staging. However, many randomized trials have failed to show a statistically significant survival benefit from adjunctive systemic chemotherapy. Recently, two intergroup randomized trials have shown a survival benefit from neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy, although the differences between the arms have not been dramatic. Adjuvant chemotherapy trials to date have failed to show statistically improved survival, although most published studies have been methodologically flawed. This review analyzes the results of published data and constructs a practical paradigm for patient management.

The present and future of combination chemotherapy in bladder cancer

The combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) has dominated the landscape of chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer for over 15 years. Randomized studies have shown its superiority over cisplatin alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. However, it exhibits a significant toxicity profile and achieves only a slight impact on overall survival. Gemcitabine is among the new cytotoxic drugs in development for treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin represents a new standard alternative of treatment in the disease based on similar efficacy to and lower toxicity than the classic MVAC regimen. Future drug development will focus on the clinical usefulness of three-drug regimens (including gemcitabine, paclitaxel or docetaxel, and a platinum salt), and nonplatinum-based combinations, as well as showing the impact of adjuvant postcystectomy chemotherapy on survival.

Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell'Italia Meridionale

BACKGROUND

A prospective, randomized Phase III trial was performed to determine whether, compared with gemcitabine (GEM) alone, the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to GEM was able to improve the time to disease progression and the clinical benefit rate in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate, overall survival rate, and toxicity patterns of patients in the two treatment arms were evaluated as secondary end points.

METHODS

Patients with measurable, locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive GEM (Arm A) or a combination of GEM and CDDP (Arm B). In Arm A, a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) GEM per week was administered for 7 consecutive weeks, and, after a 2-week rest, treatment was resumed on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for 2 cycles. In Arm B, CDDP was given at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) per week 1 hour before GEM at the same dose that was used in Arm A. On Day 22, only GEM was administered. Patients were restaged after the first 7 weeks of therapy and then again after the other 2 cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients entered the trial: Fifty-four patients were randomized to Arm A, and 53 patients were randomized to Arm B. The median time to disease progression was 8 weeks in Arm A and 20 weeks in Arm B; this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.048). In Arm A, one complete response and four partial responses were recorded on the basis of an intent-to-treat analysis, with an overall response rate of 9.2% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3-20%). In Arm B, there were no complete responses, whereas 14 partial responses were achieved, with an overall response rate of 26.4% (95%CI, 15-40%). This difference in the overall response rates was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The tumor growth control rate (i.e., total number of patients who achieved complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease) was 42.6% (95%CI, 29-57%) in Arm A and 56.6% (95%CI, 42-70%) in Arm B. A clinical benefit was observed in 21 of 43 patients (49%) in Arm A and in 20 of 38 patients (52.6%) in Arm B without any significant difference. The median overall survival was 20 weeks for patients in Arm A and 30 weeks for patients in Arm B (P = 0.43). Toxicity was mild in both treatment arms, with no significant differences between the two groups except for the statistically higher incidence of Grade 1-2 asthenia in Arm B (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of CDDP to GEM significantly improved the median time to disease progression and the overall response rate compared with GEM alone. The clinical benefit rate was similar in both arms, whereas the median overall survival rate was more favorable for Arm B, although the difference did not attain statistical significance. The authors conclude that the combination of CDDP and GEM currently may be considered as an optimal treatment for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Gemcitabine doublets in advanced urothelial cancer

Gemcitabine was identified as an active agent in the treatment of urothelial cancer early in its clinical development. A gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen has been shown to lead to comparable survival in a phase III comparison to methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin in the metastatic setting with less toxicity. Nonetheless, cisplatin-related toxicity is not inconsequential. Renal insufficiency limits wide applicability and long-term survival remains poor. A number of additional doublet combinations have thus been investigated. Substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin is feasible but leads to an apparent lower complete response rate. Likewise, combinations of gemcitabine and a taxane are feasible, but with somewhat discouraging response rates. A combination of doxorubicin and gemcitabine has been reported to lead to a 36% complete response rate, but this has not been confirmed. Combinations with targeted therapeutic agents such as the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and trastuzumab have great potential, but the clinical studies have not yet been completed.

Current and future perspectives in advanced bladder cancer: is there a new standard?

The methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC) regimen has been the standard treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer for the past 15 years. The minimal or moderate survival benefit-depending on prognostic features-and the severe toxicity associated with the MVAC regimen have made the search for new drugs and drug combinations of utmost importance to increase efficacy and/or decrease toxicity. In this respect, the taxanes and gemcitabine are promising new drugs. Paclitaxel and docetaxel as single agents have yielded overall response rates of 7% to 56%, depending on whether the patients have received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin has been explored in three studies with a total of 104 evaluable patients, a pooled overall response (OR) rate of 61%, and a complete response (CR) rate of 20%. There are two studies of docetaxel and cisplatin with a total of 91 evaluable patients, an OR rate of 54%, and a CR rate of 16%. The OR rate for paclitaxel and carboplatin in six studies was 43%, with a CR rate of 13%; however, the reported median survival was only 8.5 to 9.5 months. The OR rate for single-agent gemcitabine based on five studies was 26%, with a CR rate of 9%, which was apparently independent of whether the patients had received prior chemotherapy. The OR rate for gemcitabine and cisplatin in four phase II studies ranged from 41% to 57%, with a CR rate of 15% to 22% and a median survival of 12.5 to 14.3 months. Based on the encouraging results for the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC), a randomized phase III trial comparing GC and MVAC was begun in late 1996. This study of 405 randomized patients showed that the two regimens were associated with similar response rates, time to progression, and overall survival, whereas GC was associated with less toxicity than MVAC. On the basis of this superior risk-benefit ratio, the GC regimen should be favored as a new standard treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. Other promising combinations include gemcitabine and paclitaxel, with or without cisplatin, and the combination of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin. The triple combination of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and cisplatin has yielded an OR rate of 78%, a CR rate of 28%, and a median survival of 24 months. An international phase III trial comparing this triple combination with GC in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer has now been initiated.

Novel gemcitabine-containing triplets in the management of urothelial cancer

Chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. For a decade, the combination regimen of methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin has been considered the standard for these patients. The need for improved efficacy and reduced toxicity of a predominantly palliative therapy has propelled efforts for new drug development. Of the newly identified agents with documented activity, both gemcitabine and paclitaxel have been evaluated with a platinum and have been incorporated into multiagent chemotherapy combinations. Phase II data from two gemcitabine-based triplets are currently available. Combination gemcitabine/paclitaxel/cisplatin and gemcitabine/paclitaxel/carboplatin have high levels of activity with overall and complete response rates of 76% and 26%, respectively, for the former and 68% and 32%, respectively, for the latter combination. The role of gemcitabine-based multiagent combinations compared with standard therapy awaits evaluation in prospectively randomized trials.