Concurrent Nab-paclitaxel and Radiotherapy: Novel Radiosensitization for Borderline Resectable or Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the toxicity and tumor response with concurrent nab-paclitaxel chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with standard (5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine) CRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2014 to 2017 were divided into 2 groups: concurrent nab-paclitaxel (100 to 125 mg/m2 weekly) CRT (median: 2.1 Gy fraction size and 52.5 Gy total) or standard CRT (median: 1.8 Gy fraction size, 54.5 Gy total). The primary endpoint was toxicity, and secondary endpoints were local failure and conversion to resectability. Comparisons were made using rank-sum or Fisher exact test and multivariable competing risk regression for the cumulative incidence of local failure.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients in the nab-paclitaxel CRT group and 22 in the standard CRT group; 88% had the unresectable disease. The median follow-up was 18 months. The median duration of chemotherapy before concurrent CRT was 1.9 and 2.3 months in the nab-paclitaxel and standard CRT groups (P=0.337), and radiotherapy dose was 52.5 Gy (range, 52.5 to 59.4 Gy) and 54.5 Gy (range, 45.0 to 59.4 Gy), respectively. There were no statistically significant grade ≥2 toxicities. The nab-paclitaxel CRT group experienced a nonstatistically significant lower incidence of local failure (hazard ratio=0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-3.03, P=0.536). More patients in the nab-paclitaxel CRT group proceeded to surgery (9/28 compared with 3/22 in the standard CRT, P=0.186); of which 6 (25%) in the nab-paclitaxel CRT and 2 (10%) in the standard CRT groups were initially unresectable.

CONCLUSIONS

Nab-paclitaxel CRT had similar toxicity compared with standard CRT in the treatment of borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer. Its use was associated with an arithmetically lower cumulative incidence of local failure and an arithmetically higher conversion to resectability, both of which were not statistically significant.

Evaluation of Epigenetic and Radiomodifying Effects during Radiotherapy Treatments in Zebrafish

Radiotherapy is still a long way from personalizing cancer treatment plans, and its effectiveness depends on the radiosensitivity of tumor cells. Indeed, therapies that are efficient and successful for some patients may be relatively ineffective for others. Based on this, radiobiological research is focusing on the ability of some reagents to make cancer cells more responsive to ionizing radiation, as well as to protect the surrounding healthy tissues from possible side effects. In this scenario, zebrafish emerged as an effective model system to test for radiation modifiers that can potentially be used for radiotherapeutic purposes in humans. The adoption of this experimental organism is fully justified and supported by the high similarity between fish and humans in both their genome sequences and the effects provoked in them by ionizing radiation. This review aims to provide the literature state of the art of zebrafish in vivo model for radiobiological studies, particularly focusing on the epigenetic and radiomodifying effects produced during fish embryos’ and larvae’s exposure to radiotherapy treatments.

Hearing Loss Risk in Pediatric Patients Treated with Cranial Irradiation and Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Cranial radiation therapy (RT) and cisplatin-based chemotherapy are essential to treating many pediatric cancers but cause significant ototoxicity. The objective of this study is to determine the relationship between the RT dose and the risk of subsequent hearing loss in pediatric patients treated with cisplatin.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study of cisplatin-treated pediatric patients examined ototoxicity from cranial RT. Ototoxicity was graded for each ear according to the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) consensus ototoxicity scale. The RT dose to the cochlea was calculated using the mean, median, maximum, and minimum dose received to determine the most predictive parameter for hearing loss. Multivariable logistic regression models then examined risk factors for hearing loss.

RESULTS

In 96 children (161 ears) treated with RT + cisplatin, the minimum cochlear RT dose was most predictive of hearing loss. A higher cochlear RT dose was associated with increased hearing loss (odds ratio per 10 Gy dose increase = 1.64; P = .043), with an added risk in those receiving an autologous bone marrow transplantation (hazard ratio = 10.47; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This research supports further testing of the minimum cochlear RT dose as a more predictive dose parameter for risk of ototoxicity. The cochlear RT dose was additive to the risk of hearing loss from underlying cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Exposure to autologous bone marrow transplantation was the strongest predictor of developing hearing loss, placing these children at particularly high risk for hearing loss across all cochlear doses. Future prospective studies are crucial to further inform RT dose thresholds and minimize the risk of hearing loss in childhood cancer survivors.

Localized Delivery of Cisplatin to Cervical Cancer Improves Its Therapeutic Efficacy and Minimizes Its Side Effect Profile

PURPOSE

Cervical cancer represents the fourth most frequent malignancy in the world among women, and mortality has remained stable for the past 4 decades. Intravenous cisplatin with concurrent radiation therapy is the standard-of-care for patients with local and regional cervical cancer. However, cisplatin induces serious dose-limiting systemic toxicities and recurrence frequently occurs. In this study, we aimed to develop an intracervical drug delivery system that allows cisplatin release directly into the tumor and minimize systemic side effects.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty patient biopsies and 5 cell lines treated with cisplatin were analyzed for platinum content using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Polymeric implants loaded with cisplatin were developed and evaluated for degradation and drug release. The effect of local or systemic cisplatin delivery on drug biodistribution as well as tumor burden were evaluated in vivo, in combination with radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Platinum levels in patient biopsies were 6-fold lower than the levels needed for efficacy and radiosensitization in vitro. Cisplatin local delivery implant remarkably improved drug specificity to the tumor and significantly decreased accumulation in the blood, kidney, and other distant normal organs, compared with traditional systemic delivery. The localized treatment further resulted in complete inhibition of tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

The current standard-of-care systemic administration of cisplatin provides a subtherapeutic dose. We developed a polymeric drug delivery system that delivered high doses of cisplatin directly into the cervical tumor, while lowering drug accumulation and consequent side effects in normal tissues. Moving forward, these data will be used as the basis of a future first-in-human clinical trial to test the efficacy of localized cisplatin as adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in local and regional cervical cancer.

Erlotinib Versus Etoposide/Cisplatin With Radiation Therapy in Unresectable Stage III Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare erlotinib (E) and etoposide/cisplatin (EP) with concurrent radiation therapy (RT) for patients with stage IIIA/B unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm+).

METHODS AND PATIENTS

This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted across 19 institutions in China (December 2012 to January 2016). Enrolled patients were randomized (1:1) to E + RT (oral erlotinib 150 mg/d for 2 years or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity and RT 200 cGy/d, 5 d/wk for 6 weeks from the first day of erlotinib) or EP + RT (etoposide 50 mg/m² intravenously on days 1-5 and 29-33; cisplatin 50 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 8, 29 and 36; and RT as for E + RT). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate and safety.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-two patients were screened, and 20 patients with EGFRm+ in each group received the allocated E + RT or EP + RT treatment. Patient characteristics were well balanced between groups. Compared with EP + RT, median PFS with E + RT was significantly longer (24.5 vs 9.0 months [hazard ratio, 0.104; 95% confidence interval, 0.028-0.389; P < .001]). Objective response rate in the E + RT and EP + RT groups was 70% and 61.9%, respectively (P = .744). The incidence of adverse events (any grade) was similar between E + RT and EP + RT groups (88.9% and 84.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint of PFS was met, and the data showed that E + RT might provide PFS improvement compared with EP + RT, with similar tolerability. However, definitive statements regarding the efficacy of concurrent E + RT in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer with activating EGFRm+ cannot be made, and slow patient accrual will likely make it infeasible to conduct a phase 3 study.

Low-Dose Hsp90 Inhibitor Selectively Radiosensitizes HNSCC and Pancreatic Xenografts

PURPOSE

Treatment approaches using Hsp90 inhibitors at their maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) have not produced selective tumor toxicity. Inhibition of Hsp90 activity causes degradation of client proteins including those involved in recognizing and repairing DNA lesions. We hypothesized that if DNA repair proteins were degraded by concentrations of an Hsp90 inhibitor below those required to cause nonspecific cytotoxicity, significant tumor-selective radiosensitization might be achieved.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tandem mass tagged-mass spectrometry was performed to determine the effect of a subcytotoxic concentration of the Hsp90 inhibitor, AT13387 (onalespib), on global protein abundance. The effect of AT13387 on in vitro radiosensitization was assessed using a clonogenic assay. Pharmacokinetics profiling was performed in mice bearing xenografts. Finally, the effect of low-dose AT13387 on the radiosensitization of three tumor models was assessed.

RESULTS

A subcytotoxic concentration of AT13387 reduced levels of DNA repair proteins, without affecting the majority of Hsp90 clients. The pharmacokinetics study using one-third of the MTD showed 40-fold higher levels of AT13387 in tumors compared with plasma. This low dose enhanced Hsp70 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), which is a biomarker of Hsp90 inhibition. Low dose monotherapy was ineffective, but when combined with radiotherapy, produced significant tumor growth inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a significant therapeutic ratio can be achieved by a low dose of Hsp90 inhibitor in combination with radiotherapy. Hsp90 inhibition, even at a low dose, can be monitored by measuring Hsp70 expression in PBMCs in human studies.

Decrease in treatment intensity predicts worse outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radiochemotherapy

Purpose

Radiochemotherapy (RCT) is an effective standard therapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Nonetheless, toxicity is common, with patients often requiring dose modifications.

Methods

To investigate associations of RCT toxicities according to CTCAE version 5.0 and subsequent therapy modifications with short- and long-term treatment outcomes, we studied all 193 patients with HNSCC who received RCT (70 Gy + platinum agent) at an academic center between 03/2010 and 04/2018.

Results

During RCT, 77 (41%, 95% CI 34–49) patients developed at least one ≥ grade 3 toxicity, including seven grade 4 and 3 fatal grade 5 toxicities. The most frequent any-grade toxicities were xerostomia (n = 187), stomatitis (n = 181), dermatitis (n = 174), and leucopenia (n = 98). Eleven patients (6%) had their radiotherapy schedule modified (mean radiotherapy dose reduction = 12 Gy), and 120 patients (64%) had chemotherapy modifications (permanent discontinuation: n = 67, pause: n = 34, dose reduction: n = 7, change to other chemotherapy: n = 10). Objective response rates to RCT were 55% and 88% in patients with and without radiotherapy modifications (p = 0.003), and 84% and 88% in patients with and without chemotherapy modifications (p = 0.468), respectively. Five-year progression-free survival estimates were 20% and 50% in patients with and without radiotherapy modifications (p = < 0.001), and 53% and 40% in patients with and without chemotherapy modifications (p = 0.88), respectively.

Conclusions

Reductions of radiotherapy dose were associated with impaired long-term outcomes, whereas reductions in chemotherapy intensity were not. This suggests that toxicities during RCT should be primarily managed by modifying chemotherapy rather than radiotherapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12094-020-02447-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Romidepsin Spares Normal Tissues While Acting as an Effective Radiosensitizer in Bladder Tumors in Vivo

PURPOSE

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer has a 40% to 60% 5-year survival rate with radical treatment by surgical removal of the bladder or radiation therapy-based bladder preservation techniques, including concurrent chemoradiation. Elderly patients cannot tolerate current chemoradiation therapy regimens and often receive only radiation therapy, which is less effective. We urgently need effective chemotherapy agents for use with radiation therapy combinations that are nontoxic to normal tissues and tolerated by elderly patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We have identified histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors as promising agents to study. Pan-HDAC inhibition, using panobinostat, is a good strategy for radiosensitization, but more selective agents may be more useful radiosensitizers in a clinical setting, resulting in fewer systemic side effects. Herein, we study the HDAC class I-selective agent romidepsin, which we predict to have fewer off-target effects than panobinostat while maintaining an effective level of tumor radiosensitization.

RESULTS

In vitro effects of romidepsin were assessed by clonogenic assay and showed that romidepsin was effective in the nanomolar range in different bladder cancer cells and radiosensitized these cells. The radiosensitizing effect of romidepsin was confirmed in vivo using superficial xenografts. The drug/irradiation combination treatment resulted in significant tumor growth delay but did not increase the severity of acute (3.75 days) intestinal normal tissue toxicity or late toxicity at 29 weeks. Moreover, we showed that romidepsin treatment impaired both homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining DNA repair pathways, suggesting that the disruption of DNA repair pathways caused by romidepsin is a key mechanism for its radiosensitizing effect in bladder cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that romidepsin is an effective radiosensitizer in vitro and in vivo and does not increase the acute and late toxicity after ionizing radiation. Romidepsin is already in clinical use for the cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, but a phase 1 clinical trial of romidepsin as a radiosensitizer could be considered in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Cisplatin Every 3 Weeks Versus Weekly With Definitive Concurrent Radiotherapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is an established component of the nonoperative management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the standard dose of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks is associated with clinically significant toxicity. Interest in a more tolerable regimen has led to the widespread use of weekly lower dose cisplatin, but few randomized trials have compared these approaches.

METHODS

We examined outcomes of patients with stage III-IVb HNSCC treated with definitive intent chemoradiotherapy using either high-dose cisplatin (HDC) or low-dose cisplatin (LDC), using population-based Veterans Affairs data. In an intent-to-treat analysis, patients were assigned to the HDC vs LDC group according to the dose of their first cycle. Variables potentially influencing treatment decisions including cancer site, stage, smoking/alcohol use, and comorbidities were used to generate propensity scores (PS) for the use of HDC. We compared overall survival (OS) by treatment group using Cox regression, adjusting for PS. We then determined the risk of toxicities using PS-adjusted logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2901 patients were included in the analysis; 2200 received HDC (mean initial dose 100 mg/m2). The mean initial dose of LDC was 40 mg/m2. After PS adjustment, HDC was not associated with improved OS over LDC (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.80 to 1.04). Adjusting for PS, HDC was associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury, neutropenia, dehydration/electrolyte disturbance, and hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

In this large, population-based study of US military veterans, LDC was associated with similar survival to HDC in the nonoperative definitive management of locally advanced HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and hypopharynx/larynx. HDC was associated with statistically significantly more toxicity than LDC. Adoption of LDC may reduce toxicity burden while maintaining OS.

Olaparib nanoparticles potentiated radiosensitization effects on lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is a key enzyme in the repair process of DNA strand breaks (DSBs). Olaparib (Ola) is a PARP inhibitor that is involved in arresting PARP release from radiotherapy (RT)-induced damaged DNA to potentiate the effect of RT. Although the underlying mechanisms for the radiosensitization effects of Ola are well understood in vitro, the radiosensitization effects in vivo are still unclear. Moreover, poor water solubility and severe toxicity are two major impediments for the clinical success of Ola.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here, we developed olaparib nanoparticles (Ola-NPs) and investigated their radiosensitization mechanisms and toxicity using human non-small-cell lung cancer xenograft models in mice.

RESULTS

The prepared Ola-NPs showed a mean size of 31.96±1.54 nm and a lower polydispersity index of about 0.126±0.014. In addition, the sensitization enhancement ratio of Ola-NPs (3.81) was much higher than that of free Ola (1.66). The combination of Ola-NPs and RT (Ola-NPs + RT) significantly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in mice. The mechanism of enhanced antitumor efficacy might be related to the inhibition of DSB repair and the promotion of cell apoptosis in vivo. No additional toxicity caused by Ola-NPs was observed.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the principle of using Ola-NPs as a potent radiosensitizer to improve the therapeutic effect of RT relative to free Ola (P<0.05 in all cases).

Accelerated Bifractionated Radiation with Concurrent Cisplatin Administration in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Feasibility Study

Aims and Background

To test the feasibility of accelerated interrupted twice-daily radiation and concurrent cisplatin administration in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Patients and Methods

Nineteen patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were treated with accelerated bifractionated radiation with concurrent administration of cisplatin. There were 18 men and 1 female with a median age of 60 years (range, 17–71) and median performance status of 90 (-range, 80–100). Sixteen patients (85%) presented with stage IV disease. Primary site included the nasopharynx (n = 7), oropharynx (n = 5), hypopharynx (n = 1) and larynx (n = 6). Radiation consisted of two fractions of 1.6 Gy each daily, five times weekly to a total dose of 64 Gy. Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on days 2 and 28 of the treatment period.

Results

Nine patients achieved a complete response (47%; 95% CI, 25%–70%) and 5 a partial response (26%; 95% CI, 7%–46%). Grade III–IV toxicity included leukopenia (16%), mucositis (26%), dry mouth (5%), weight loss (16%) and infection (5%). After a median follow-up of 27.11 months (range, 1–33+), 9 patients have died. Median time to progression was 11 months (range, 1–32+) and median survival 25 months (range, 1–32+).

Conclusions

Accelerated twice-daily radiation with concurrent cisplatin is effective in locally advanced head and neck cancer and can be safely given with manageable toxicity.

Gemcitabine-induced Radiation Recall Dermatitis: Case Report

A 65-year-old male with lung adenocarcinoma received radiotherapy to the mediastinum and right upper lobe, followed by chemotherapy with gemcitabine. Radiation recall dermatitis developed in the area corresponding to the radiotherapy portal. This is one of just a few cases reported recently concerning radiation recall dermatitis stemming from gemcitabine.

Tolerability and efficacy of afatinib at a low starting dosage in 10 elderly or low performance status patients with advanced refractory non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Whether a full dosage of afatinib is tolerable and effective for elderly or low performance status (PS) patients with advanced refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of afatinib in 10 patients (the majority elderly) with a low PS score (2 or 3), who had advanced refractory adenocarcinoma and were carrying active epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Afatinib was administered at a starting dosage of 20 or 30mg/day, followed by 10mg increases in dose up to a maximum dosage of 40mg/day.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 76 years and 50% of the patients had a PS of 3. The patients had previously been treated with gefitinib and/or erlotinib, with a median number of three chemotherapy regimens. All the patients received at least 30mg/day of afatinib. Eight patients did not receive the 40mg/day dosage because of patient refusal due to grade 2 diarrhea (n=6) or the judgment of the doctor (n=2). One patient discontinued the treatment because of drug-induced interstitial lung disease. The most frequent adverse event was grade 2 diarrhea. The objective response rate was 11% and the PS score of five cases improved after afatinib therapy. The median progression-free survival and overall survival periods were 3.6 months and 5.8 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A low starting dosage of afatinib might enable elderly or low PS patients with advanced refractory NSCLC to receive this drug as salvage therapy.

Weekly cisplatin (30-40 mg/m2) as radiosensitizer: Is it high or moderate emetic agent?

PURPOSE

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline recommends a high antiemetic prophylaxis for any dose of cisplatin. This hypothesis was tested by us in this analysis of solid tumor patients who received weekly cisplatin as a radiosensitizer in a dose range of 30-40 mg/m2.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 181 solid tumor patients who received weekly cisplatin (in the dose range of 30-40 mg/m2) as a radiosensitizer between July 2015 and August 2015. The antiemetic prophylaxis schedule provided was classified as optimal (if a high antiemetic prophylaxis was provided) or suboptimal (if a nonhigh antiemetic prophylaxis was provided). The incidence of acute, delayed and breakthrough vomiting after chemotherapy was noted. SPSS version 20 was used for analysis. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the association between antiemetic schedule (suboptimal vs. optimal) and postchemotherapy emesis.

RESULTS

In the present study, of 181 patients, only 25 patients (13.8%) received optimal antiemetic prophylaxis while the remaining 156 (86.2%) received suboptimal prophylaxis. In the cohort of patients with suboptimal prophylaxis, dexamethasone was omitted in all patients (100%) while NK receptor antagonist was omitted in 76 patients (48.7%). The rate of vomiting was lower in patients receiving optimal prophylaxis as compared to that in patients receiving suboptimal prophylaxis (12% vs. 39.75%; P - 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Omission of dexamethasone followed by aprepitant was the main reason for suboptimal prophylaxis. High antiemetic prophylaxis in accordance with ASCO guidelines overall decreased the risk of emesis in patients receiving CTRT with weekly cisplatin in the dose range of 30-40 mg/m2.

Radiochemotherapy with Gemcitabine in Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Long-term Results of a Phase II Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of patients affected by unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with radiotherapy (ERT) and concurrent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with or without intraluminal brachytherapy (BT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients underwent weekly gemcitabine (100 mg/m(2)) as a 24-h infusion during the course of three-dimensional radiotherapy (50.4 Gy to the tumor and 39.6 Gy to the nodes). Among them, certain patients received a boost of intraluminal high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with 192 Ir. The outcome of patients was evaluated in terms of response to therapy, local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 27 patients with the diagnosis of unresectable, non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic biliary ducts, treated with radiochemotherapy with gemcitabine. After a dose of 50 Gy, a boost of HDR intraluminal brachytherapy was administered in 6 patients (22%): 4 patients received 15 Gy and 2 patients 20 Gy. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range=3-52 months), for the entire group, 2-year LC was 29% (median=12 months), 2-year MFS was 36% (median 16 months). Two-year and three-year OS were 27% and 7% respectively, with a median of 14 months. Toxicities were acceptable. Median OS in patients treated with brachytherapy boost was 21 months versus 14 months for the group treated with gemcitabine-based radiochemotherapy only; 2-year LC was 53% versus 25%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine appears to be a potent radiation sensitizer, and when combined with radiation therapy, it shows encouraging tumor response. Moreover, patients treated with a boost of brachytherapy after radiochemotherapy seem to have a better local control with an acceptable toxicity. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these data and define the optimal combined treatments.

Capecitabine as a Radiosensitizer in Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Study

AIM

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest cancer diagnoses and is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the U.S. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for the 20% for whom the tumor is resectable, however, controversy exists over the appropriate adjuvant therapy where local recurrence rates remain strikingly high (50-85%). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding capecitabine (a known radiosensitizer by direct and abscopal effects) to concurrent radiation in the adjuvant setting after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 63 patients diagnosed from 2004-2013 with histopathologically-confirmed stage I/II pancreatic cancer treated with a surgical resection followed by adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation to at least 45 Gy using 3D planning and capecitabine at 1,600 mg/m(2)/day (Monday-Friday) for 6 weeks. This was combined with either 4 months of gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks or capecitabine at 2,000 mg/m(2) for 14 days every 3 weeks for a total of 4 months.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were over 65 years old (71%), male (60%), had negative surgical margins (79%), had pancreatic head or neck involvement (71%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1 (71%), and a cancer antigen 19-9 in the range of 11-100 U/ml at the time of diagnosis (51%). Of the 63 patients reviewed, 61 patients (97%) completed concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Treatment was halted in one patient due to gastritis and a second for gastrointestinal bleeding. Otherwise, adverse reactions during concurrent chemoradiotherapy were well-tolerated and the majority were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades 1 and 2. Grade 3 toxicity was anorexia (n=2) and hand and foot syndrome (n=2) and GI bleeding (n=1). The only grade 4 toxicities were anorexia (n=1) and fatigue (n=1). The median follow-up of patients at the time of analysis was 36 months. The median survival of the entire cohort was 23.5 (range=8.5-42) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 80%, 35% and 25%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiation using capecitabine as a radiosensitizer in the adjuvant setting for pancreatic cancer was completed by the vast majority of patients in this series. Treatment was relatively well-tolerated, and its efficacy seems comparable to that for historical controls. This study probably represents the largest yet reported using capecitabine in this setting. Future studies including an increased sample size are required.

Study of the radiotherapy sensitizea-tion of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in patients by sodium glycididazole

To observe the radiotherapy sensitization effect of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in patients by sodium glycididazole in recent clinical efficacy and toxicity. A total of 42 patients admitted with metastasis and recurrence of retroperitoneal lymph node from September 2006 to December 2009 were classified with the method of case-control. After three dimensional conformal radiation therapy with or without sodium glycididazole (800 mg/m²) for sensitization, the results of recent clinical efficacy, relief of pain, and Karnofsky score were obtained. Tumor remission rate of patients in sensitization group (with sodium glycididazole) at post-radiotherapy 3 months was significant higher than that in control group (without sodium glycididazole) (52% vs. 24%; P<0.05). Oral dose of morphine daily, and Karnofsky score in anterior-posterior radiotherapy of patients in the sensitization group were significant different with those in the control group (93 ± 12 and 42 ± 6 mg vs. 94 ± 12 and 20 ± 5 mg and (65 ± 4) and (90 ± 9) vs. (64 ± 5) and (80 ± 10), respectively; P<0.01). Sodium glycididazole has positive radiotherapy sensitization to the metastasis or recurrence of retroperitoneal lymph node for digestive tract cancer, which could obviously improve the life quality or release the pain for patients.

Radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitor therapy-mechanism and frequency of toxicity in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that ionizing radiation may be associated with unexpected side-effects in melanoma patients treated with concomitant BRAF inhibitors. A large multicenter analysis was carried out to generate reliable safety data and elucidate the mechanism.

METHODS

A total of 161 melanoma patients from 11 European skin cancer centers were evaluated for acute and late toxicity, of whom 70 consecutive patients received 86 series of radiotherapy with concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy. To further characterize and quantify a possible radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitors, blood samples of 35 melanoma patients were used for individual radiosensitivity testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization of chromosomal breaks after ex vivo irradiation.

RESULTS

With radiotherapy and concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy the rate of acute radiodermatitis ≥2° was 36% and follicular cystic proliferation was seen in 13% of all radiotherapies. Non-skin toxicities included hearing disorders (4%) and dysphagia (2%). Following whole-brain radiotherapy, rates of radiodermatitis ≥2° were 44% and 8% (P < 0.001) for patients with and without BRAF inhibitor therapy, respectively. Concomitant treatment with vemurafenib induced acute radiodermatitis ≥2° more frequently than treatment with dabrafenib (40% versus 26%, P = 0.07). In line with these findings, analysis of chromosomal breaks ex vivo indicated significantly increased radiosensitivity for patients under vemurafenib (P = 0.004) and for patients switched from vemurafenib to dabrafenib (P = 0.002), but not for patients on dabrafenib only. No toxicities were reported after stereotactic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy with concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy is feasible with an acceptable increase in toxicity. Vemurafenib is a more potent radiosensitizer than dabrafenib.

Repeated sub-optimal photodynamic treatments with pheophorbide a induce an epithelial mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer cells via nitric oxide

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved treatment that causes a selective cytotoxic effect in cancer cells. In addition to the production of singlet oxygen and reactive oxygen species, PDT can induce the release of nitric oxide (NO) by up-regulating nitric oxide synthases (NOS). Since non-optimal PDT often causes tumor recurrence, understanding the molecular pathways involved in the photoprocess is a challenging task for scientists. The present study has examined the response of the PC3 human metastatic prostate cancer cell line following repeated low-dose pheophorbide a treatments, mimicking non-optimal PDT treatment. The analysis was focused on the NF-kB/YY1/RKIP circuitry as it is (i) dysregulated in cancer cells, (ii) modulated by NO and (iii) correlated with the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). We hypothesized that a repeated treatment of non-optimal PDT induces low levels of NO that lead to cell growth and EMT via the regulation of the above circuitry. The expressions of gene products involved in the circuitry and in EMT were analyzed by western blot. The findings demonstrate the cytoprotective role of NO following non-optimal PDT treatments that was corroborated by the use of L-NAME, an inhibitor of NOS.

Drug radiotherapy combinations: review of previous failures and reasons for future optimism

Combining chemotherapy with radiotherapy has resulted in significant clinical improvements in many different tumour types. However, the non-specific mechanisms by which these drugs exert their effects mean that this is often at the expense of increased side effects. Previous attempts at using targeted drugs to induce more tumour specific radiosensitisation have been generally disappointing. Although cetuximab, an EGFR monoclonal antibody, resulted in improved overall survival in HNSCC when combined with radiotherapy, it has failed to show benefit when added to chemo-radiotherapy. In addition, our inability to successfully use drug treatments to reverse tumour hypoxia is underlined by the fact that no such treatment is currently in widespread clinical use. The reasons for these failures include the lack of robust biomarkers, and the previous use of drugs with unacceptable side-effect profiles. Despite these disappointments, there is reason for optimism. Our improved understanding of key signal transduction pathways and of tumour specific DNA repair deficiencies has produced new opportunities to specifically radiosensitise tumours. Novel strategies to reduce tumour hypoxia include the use of drugs that cause vascular normalisation and drugs that reduce tumour oxygen consumption. These new strategies, combined with better compounds at our disposal, and an ability to learn from our previous mistakes, mean that there is great promise for future drug-radiotherapy combinations to result in significant clinical benefits.

Combined chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced inoperable transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder and/or in patients ineligible for surgery: a phase I trial

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase I trial of gemcitabine (gem) with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC) ineligible for surgery or cisplatin or refusing organ loss.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with urothelial cancer, cT2-T4, cN0-1, M0, ineligible for surgery due to local tumor extension, PS, age or co-morbidities or who refused surgery were included. After maximal transurethral resection, the treatment schedule included: twice-weekly i.v. infusion of gem [dose levels (DL) 1-6: 20, 27, 30, 33, 50 and 40 mg/m(2), respectively] for 30 min and concurrent radiotherapy (RT) to the bladder with 55.5 Gy. The primary end point was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose recommended (RD) for further studies of this gem schedule. The secondary end point was late toxicity. The MTD was defined by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in 2 or more of 6 patients, discontinuation of RT and/or gem for >1 week in 2 or more of 6 patients due to grade (G) 3/4 acute and/or late toxicity in more than 2 of 18 patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-five of 44 patients were assessable for toxicity and thus the primary end point. DLTs occurred in two of five patients at dose level 5: one G3 alanine aminotransferase elevation and one G3 fatigue. The MTD, therefore, was 50 mg/m(2) gem twice weekly. At DL 6 with 40 mg/m(2), the RD was established: only one of six patients developed G3 fatigue and diarrhea. Late toxicity was rare and of low grade (only G1-2). The 2-year locoregional failure rate was 32% (9/28); 10 of 28 patients (38%) were alive with an intact bladder and no evidence of recurrent disease, 9 patients developed distant metastases and 6 died of their disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine in combination with RT is well tolerated in BC patients ineligible for surgery and/or cisplatin. The RD of gemcitabine for subsequent trials is 40 mg/m(2) twice weekly with concurrent radiation.

Compliance and toxicity of the hypoxic radiosensitizer nimorazole in the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the compliance and toxicity of the hypoxic radiosensitizer nimorazole in head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), treated in Denmark between 1990 and 2013. All patients treated with radical radiotherapy (± chemotherapy) [66-70 Gy; 33-35 fractions; 2 Gy/fraction; 5-6 fractions/week] concomitant with the hypoxic radiosensitizer nimorazole. Nimorazole was administered as oral tablets in doses of approximately 1.2 g/m(2) body surface area in connection with the first of each daily radiation treatment. A second daily dose of 1 g was given in connection with the second radiotherapy fraction in the accelerated fractionation regimen. The compliance was estimated as the percentage of the initially prescribed dose, which was received by each patient. The main side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 1049 patients were investigated. The tolerance to nimorazole was fair: 58% of patients received the full prescribed total dose. Nausea and vomiting were the major complaints: among the 260 patients with dose reductions due to known side effects, (87%) were due to nausea/vomiting. All side effects ceased when treatment was interrupted, and neither severe nor long lasting side effects were observed. Female patients were significantly more likely to have dose reduction (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.50-2.70), and nausea/vomiting. Patients aged more than 70 years were significantly more likely to have dose reduction. Patients who received less than 1100 mg/m(2) were significantly less likely to have dose reduction (OR 0.58; CI 0.44-0.78), and nausea/vomiting, compared to those who received 1100-1300 mg/m(2). The tolerance was also less in the group of patients received accelerated chemoradiotherapy (OR 1.70; CI 1.20-2.50) with more association with nausea/vomiting (OR 2.09; CI 1.40-3.10).

CONCLUSION

The compliance to nimorazole is fair, with tolerable acute, but neither persistent nor late, toxicity. It can be administered with chemotherapy and different radiotherapy fractionation schedules.

Afatinib: first global approval

Afatinib, an irreversible inhibitor of the ErbB family of tyrosine kinases, is under development with Boehringer Ingelheim for the once-daily, oral treatment of cancer. Afatinib downregulates ErbB signalling by covalently binding to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 and HER4, irreversibly inhibiting tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation. It also inhibits transphosphorylation of HER3. Oral afatinib (Gilotrif™) has been approved in the US for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have tumours with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations as detected by a US FDA-approved test. Afatinib has also been approved in Taiwan for the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. In addition, the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use has recommended the approval of afatinib (Giotrif®) for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations who are EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor naïve. Afatinib is also under regulatory review in Canada, Japan and other Asian countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of afatinib, leading to this first approval in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Bevacizumab as secondline treatment of glioblastoma - worth the effort?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of bevacizumab and irinotecan as secondline treatment of glioblastoma in patients with progression after radiotherapy and temozolomide.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 16 subjects was performed with overall survival and toxicity evaluation as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed serious toxicity of this highly expensive regimen without proving an improvement in overall survival of patients in comparison to a control group.

CONCLUSION

Unless there are robust data from phase III clinical trials, including quality of life assessments or evaluation of predictive bio-markers to guide therapy, bevacizumab and irinotecan regimen should be spared for cautiously selected patients, especially in countries with limited budget for oncological treatment.

Efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Chemoradiation using cisplatin-based regimens has become the standard care in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancers. The impact of taxanes as radiosensitizing agents with concurrent chemoradiation regimens is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of weekly cisplatin + docetaxel combination with chemoradiation in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers (59.5% stage IV, 23.3% stage III, and 16.7% stage II) were assessed retrospectively. Total radiation dose to the planning target volume of gross disease (primary and/or node) was 70 Gy/35 fractions, 5 fractions per week. Minimum doses of 60 Gy and 50 Gy were administered to planning target volume of elective high-risk and low-risk disease, respectively. Chemotherapy consisted of weekly cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)) + docetaxel (20 mg/m(2)) concurrently with radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 46.5 years (range, 17-79). Objective response rate was 86%. The 4-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 65.4% and 91.3%, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were mucositis (48%), nausea (22%), neutropenia (12%), dermatitis (5%), fatigue (5%) and weight loss (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly cisplatin and docetaxel concurrent with radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers was found tolerable with a high efficacy.

Efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Chemoradiation using cisplatin-based regimens has become the standard care in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancers. The impact of taxanes as radiosensitizing agents with concurrent chemoradiation regimens is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of weekly cisplatin + docetaxel combination with chemoradiation in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers (59.5% stage IV, 23.3% stage III, and 16.7% stage II) were assessed retrospectively. Total radiation dose to the planning target volume of gross disease (primary and/or node) was 70 Gy/35 fractions, 5 fractions per week. Minimum doses of 60 Gy and 50 Gy were administered to planning target volume of elective high-risk and low-risk disease, respectively. Chemotherapy consisted of weekly cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)) + docetaxel (20 mg/m(2)) concurrently with radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 46.5 years (range, 17-79). Objective response rate was 86%. The 4-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 65.4% and 91.3%, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were mucositis (48%), nausea (22%), neutropenia (12%), dermatitis (5%), fatigue (5%) and weight loss (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly cisplatin and docetaxel concurrent with radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers was found tolerable with a high efficacy.

Feasibility trial for daily oral administration of the hypoxic sensitizer AK-2123 (Sanazole) in radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To examine the feasibility of daily oral administration of the hypoxic tumor radiation sensitizer, sanazole (AK-2123).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the toxicity associated with 44 treatments of 42 patients, who received daily oral administration of 1 g/day sanazole (level A, 1-9g, 12 treatments; Level B, 10 g, 33 treatments) 2 h before radiotherapy. Eligibility criteria were as follows: Patients who were unable to receive standard treatment because of older age and/or fragile status and/or refractory disease. Five patients with advanced tumors treated with pre- or postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy were also included.

RESULTS

Toxicity was assessed during 44 treatment sessions. Eight patients (18%) showed sanazole-related paresthesia in the extremities, similar to the rate (15%) reported in a preceding multi-institutional international phase III study, which used intravenous administration. No sanazole-related toxicity rated grade 3 or higher was observed. Forty out of the 44 treatment sessions (91%) were completed.

CONCLUSION

This study validates the feasibility of daily oral administration of sanazole. Further studies to establish suitable applications are warranted.

Distribution and radiosensitizing effect of cholesterol-coupled Dbait molecule in rat model of glioblastoma

Background

Glioma is the most aggressive tumor of the brain and the most efficient treatments are based on radiotherapy. However, tumors are often resistant to radiotherapy due to an enhanced DNA repair activity. Short and stabilized DNA molecules (Dbait) have recently been proposed as an efficient strategy to inhibit DNA repair in tumor.

Methodology/Principal Findings

The distribution of three formulations of Dbait, (i) Dbait alone, (ii) Dbait associated with polyethylenimine, and (iii) Dbait linked with cholesterol (coDbait), was evaluated one day after intratumoral delivery in an RG2 rat glioma model. Dbait molecule distribution was assessed in the whole organ with 2D-FRI and in brain sections. CoDbait was chosen for further studies given its good retention in the brain, cellular localization, and efficacy in inducing the activation of DNA repair effectors. The radiosensitizing effect of coDbait was studied in four groups of rats bearing RG2-glioma: no treatment, radiotherapy only, coDbait alone, and CoDbait with radiotherapy. Treatment started 7 days after tumor inoculation and consisted of two series of treatment in two weeks: coDbait injection followed by a selective 6-Gy irradiation of the head. We evaluated the radiosensitizing effect using animal survival, tumor volume, cell proliferation, and vasculature characteristics with multiparametric MRI. CoDbait with radiotherapy improved the survival of rats bearing RG2-glioma by reducing tumor growth and cell proliferation without altering tumor vasculature.

Conclusion/Significance

coDbait is therefore a promising molecular therapy to sensitize glioma to radiotherapy.

Pharmacological protection from radiation ± cisplatin-induced oral mucositis

PURPOSE

To evaluate if two pharmacological agents, Tempol and D-methionine (D-met), are able to prevent oral mucositis in mice after exposure to ionizing radiation ± cisplatin.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Female C3H mice, ∼8 weeks old, were irradiated with five fractionated doses ± cisplatin to induce oral mucositis (lingual ulcers). Just before irradiation and chemotherapy, mice were treated, either alone or in combination, with different doses of Tempol (by intraperitoneal [ip] injection or topically, as an oral gel) and D-met (by gavage). Thereafter, mice were sacrificed and tongues were harvested and stained with a solution of Toluidine Blue. Ulcer size and tongue epithelial thickness were measured.

RESULTS

Significant lingual ulcers resulted from 5 × 8 Gy radiation fractions, which were enhanced with cisplatin treatment. D-met provided stereospecific partial protection from lingual ulceration after radiation. Tempol, via both routes of administration, provided nearly complete protection from lingual ulceration. D-met plus a suboptimal ip dose of Tempol also provided complete protection.

CONCLUSIONS

Two fairly simple pharmacological treatments were able to markedly reduce chemoradiation-induced oral mucositis in mice. This proof of concept study suggests that Tempol, alone or in combination with D-met, may be a useful and convenient way to prevent the severe oral mucositis that results from head-and-neck cancer therapy.

Metronidazole-induced Encephalopathy: Case Report and Review Literature

PURPOSE

Neurotoxicities resulting from various medications are under diagnosed; Metronidazole-induced encephalopathy is one of them. Here we present two patients with a history of metronidazole use and discuss neuroimaging findings.

CASE REPORT

We report two patients suffering from acute neurological symptoms associated with metronidazole use. A 70-year-old female who received a cumulative dose of 41.25g of metronidazole within one month, developed seizure. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed T2 hyperintensity over bilateral dentate nuclei and dorsal midbrain. A 56-year-old female suffering from acute onset of central vertigo with metronidazole use, took a total dose of 24g. The brain MRI showed T2 hyperintensity over dorsal midbrain and dorsal medulla, which disappeared in the following neuroimaging 50 days later. Metronidazole-induced encephalopathy (MIE) was suspected in both patients.

CONCLUSION

Metronidazole-induced encephalopathy is an uncommon but potentially reversible disease in patients with acute neurological deficits from the use of metronidazole. Nonalcoholic Wernicke's encephalopathy may share a similar metabolic pathway with MIE, resulting in difficulties in diagnosis.

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genetic polymorphisms and toxicity to 5-FU-based chemoradiation in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is a large degree of variation in tumour response and host toxicities associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer patients. We performed a complimentary pharmacogenetic study to investigate germline polymorphisms of genes involved in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and irinotecan pathways and their potential association with clinical outcomes and toxicities from neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer treated in a prospective genotype-directed study.

METHODS

The germline DNA of 131 patients was genotyped for 10 variants in TYMS, MTHFR, DPYD, UGT1A1, ABCC1 and SLCO1B1 genes. Ninety-six patients were treated with 5-FU/radiotherapy (RT) and 35 received 5-FU/RT/irinotecan. Relationships between genetic variants and adverse events, tumour response, overall and disease-free survivals were assessed.

RESULTS

MTHFR 1298A>C and MTHFR diplotypes (for 677C>T and 1298A>C) were associated with chemoradiation-related toxicity when 5-FU was used alone. MTHFR haplotypes (677C-1298C) and diplotypes (CA-TA and TA-TA) showed, respectively, a protective and a negative effect on the incidence of severe diarrhoea or mucositis. No association was observed between genetic markers and drug response.

CONCLUSION

MTHFR polymorphisms can potentially predict toxicity in patients treated with 5-FU as a single chemotherapeutic drug.

Phase I study of conformal radiotherapy and concurrent full-dose gemcitabine with erlotinib for unresected pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the recommended dose of radiotherapy when combined with full-dose gemcitabine and erlotinib for unresected pancreas cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with unresected pancreatic cancer (Zubrod performance status 0-2) were eligible for the present study. Gemcitabine was given weekly for 7 weeks (1,000 mg/m(2)) with erlotinib daily for 8 weeks (100 mg). A final toxicity assessment was performed in Week 9. Radiotherapy (starting at 30 Gy in 2-Gy fractions, 5 d/wk) was given to the gross tumor plus a 1-cm margin starting with the first dose of gemcitabine. A standard 3 plus 3 dose escalation (an additional 4 Gy within 2 days for each dose level) was used, except for the starting dose level, which was scheduled to contain 6 patients. In general, Grade 3 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity was considered a dose-limiting toxicity, except for Grade 3 anorexia or Grade 3 fatigue alone.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were treated (10 men and 10 women). Nausea, vomiting, and infection were significantly associated with the radiation dose (p = .01, p = .03, and p = .03, respectively). Of the 20 patients, 5 did not complete treatment and were not evaluable for dose-escalation purposes (3 who developed progressive disease during treatment and 2 who electively discontinued it). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in none of 6 patients at 30 Gy, 2 of 6 at 34 Gy, and 1 of 3 patients at 38 Gy.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study have indicated that the recommended Phase II dose is 30 Gy in 15 fractions.

[Effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer in conjunction with local hyperthermia and metronidazole]

Our study included 36 patients with hard fixed rectal tumors (T3, T4) who had received combined treatment at the Center's Clinics. On irrigoscopic evidence, lesions were more than 10 cm long. Radiotherapy was conducted thrice a week, STD of 4 Gy--TTD of 40 Gy; capecitabine, per os, 650 mg/m2 twice a day, days 1-22; oxaliplatin, 50 mg/m2, intravenously, days 3, 10 and 17; metronidazole in polymer composition, intrarectally, 10 mg/m2, twice, days 12 and 17 of radiotherapy; local hyperthermia (the <<Yakhta-4>> installation), 460 mHz, 41-45 deg. C, 60 min, days 8, 12, 15 and 17. Diarrhea (stage III) was reported in 3 (8.3%); no toxicity (grade IV). Radical surgery was carried out in 35 (97.2%); sphincter-saving operation--20 (55.5%). Therapy-related pathomorphism (grade III-IV) was detected in 15 (42.8%). Combined neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus polyradiomodification featured low toxicity and good tolerability and immediate effect.

Daidzein effect on hormone refractory prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo compared to genistein and soy extract: potentiation of radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Genistein, the major bioactive isoflavone of soybeans, acts as a radiosensitizer for prostate cancer (PCa) both in vitro and in vivo. However, pure genistein promoted increased metastasis to lymph nodes. A mixture of soy isoflavones (genistein, daidzein, glycitein) did not cause increased metastasis, but potentiated radiotherapy. We tested whether daidzein could negate genistein-induced metastasis.

METHODS

Mice bearing PC-3 prostate tumors were treated with daidzein, genistein or both, and with tumor irradiation. Primary tumors and metastases were evaluated. The effects of each isoflavone and soy were compared in vitro using PC-3 (AR-) and C4-2B (AR+) androgen-independent PCa cell lines.

RESULTS

Daidzein did not increase metastasis to lymph nodes and acted as a radiosensitizer for prostate tumors. Daidzein inhibited cell growth and enhanced radiation in vitro but at doses higher than genistein or soy. Daidzein caused milder effects on inhibition of expression and/or activities of APE1/Ref-1, HIF-1alpha and NF-kappaB in PC-3 and C4-2B cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Daidzein could be the component of soy that protects against genistein-induced metastasis. Daidzein inhibited cell growth and synergized with radiation, affecting APE1/Ref-1, NF-kappaB and HIF-1alpha, but at lower levels than genistein and soy, in AR+ and AR- PCa cells, suggesting it is an AR-independent mechanism.

Efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel and epirubicin in locally advanced invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel plus epirubicin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in locally advanced breast cancer patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the records of 39 patients with locally advanced breast cancer. All of them received neoadjuvant epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks with G-CSF support. Responding patients were subjected to breast-conserving or modified radical mastectomy.

RESULTS

Four (10.3%) patients achieved clinical complete response (cCR) and 25 (64.1%) clinical partial response (cPR). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was observed in 4 patients with cCR. Ten (25.6%) patients achieved stable disease (SD), while no patient had progressive disease (PD). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 6 (15.3%) and 4 cases (10.3%), respectively. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 2 (5.1%) cases and anemia in 7 (17.9%) cases. Grade 1/2 mucositis was observed in 12 (30.7%) patients and grade 1/2 peripheral neuropathy in 7 (17.9%) patients. Dose reduction was necessary in 4 patients with grade 4 neutropenia. The median disease-free survival was 60 months (95% CI: 41-79 months). Median overall survival was not reached. Five-year overall survival was 64.2%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of docetaxel plus epirubicin was active and tolerable in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced breast cancer.

Recent advances in combined modality therapy

Combined modality therapy emerged from preclinical data showing that carefully chosen drugs could enhance the sensitivity of tumor cells to radiation while having nonoverlapping toxicities. Recent advances in molecular biology involving the identification of cellular receptors, enzymes, and pathways involved in tumor growth and immortality have resulted in the development of biologically targeted drugs. This review highlights the recent clinical data in support of newer generation cytotoxic chemotherapies and systemic targeted agents in combination with radiation therapy.

Late toxicities in concurrent chemoradiotherapy using high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy plus weekly cisplatin for locally advanced cervical cancer: a historical cohort comparison against two previous different treatment schemes

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), using high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRICB) compared to radiation (RT) alone in patients with advanced cervical cancer using a control-cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 332 cases of Stage IIB-III disease were included in this comparative study. Seventy-three patients were treated with a 3-insertion schedule and labeled group A, whereas the other 146 patients with a 4-insertion schedule became group B. One hundred and thirteen patients treated by a 4-insertion protocol with concurrent weekly cisplatin were labeled group C.

RESULTS

The cumulative rate of grade 2 or above rectal complication was 13.7% for group A, 9.6% for the group B and 15.9% for group C (p = 0.76), whereas the grade 3 to 4 non-rectal radiation-induced intestinal injury was 6.8% for group A, 6.2% for group B and 9.7% for group C (p = 0.20). Grade 2 to 4 late bladder toxicity was higher in group C, with the cumulative rate being 5.5% for group A, 4.8% for group B and 15.0% for group C (p = 0.004). The independent factor for a rectal complication was the occurrence of a bladder complication (p = 0.01, hazard ratio 3.06). The independent factors for bladder complications were the use of CCRT (p = 0.01, hazard ratio 2.08), and the occurrence of rectal complications (p = 0.02, hazard ratio 2.77).

CONCLUSIONS

When treating advanced cervical cancer, HDRICB consisting of four 6 Gy insertions and weekly cisplatin shows a trend of increasing late bladder complications. The interval between drug administration and HDRICB should be kept long enough to avoid any synergistic effect of both regimens.

Myelopathy After Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy with Capecitabine and Gemcitabine

This article describes a woman with metastatic upper gastrointestinal cancer who developed thoracic myelopathy unexpectedly after standard dosage and fractionation radiotherapy. She also was receiving capecitabine and gemcitabine concomitantly. There are few reported cases of chemotherapy potentiation of spinal cord radiation toxicity. These agents are known radiosensitizers, making it likely that they contributed to this adverse outcome. As these agents are increasingly incorporated into clinical trials of combined therapy, caution will be necessary in both trial design and clinical management.

Comparison of hyper-fractionated accelerated and standard fractionated radiotherapy with concomitant low-dose gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine improves median survival for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Recently, hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) has been used to treat these patients; however, the safety and efficacy are not well defined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The standard-fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) group (n=17) received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions of 1.8 Gy/day. The HART group (n=18) received 50 Gy in 40 fractions of 1.25 Gy twice/day. Concurrent gemcitabine was administered to both groups.

RESULTS

Median survival times were 11.3 months (SFRT) and 12.9 months (HART). One- and two-year survival rates were 37.5% and 18.8% (SFRT) and 47.1% and 17.6% (HART), respectively. The response rates did not differ significantly. The HART regimen required significantly fewer treatment days (35.5) than did the SFRT regimen (41.3). The toxicity profiles were similar.

CONCLUSION

The HART/gemcitabine regimen has equivalent efficacy and a shorter treatment time as compared with the SFRT/gemcitabine regimen for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Toxicity profile and pharmacokinetic study of a phase I low-dose schedule-dependent radiosensitizing paclitaxel chemoradiation regimen for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We report the toxicity profile and pharmacokinetic data of a schedule-dependent chemoradiation regimen using pulsed low-dose paclitaxel for radiosensitization in a Phase I study for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Paclitaxel at escalating doses of 15 mg/m(2), 20 mg/m(2), and 25 mg/m(2) were infused on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday with daily chest radiation in cohorts of 6 patients. Daily radiation was delayed for maximal G2/M arrest and apoptotic effect, an observation from preclinical investigations. Plasma paclitaxel concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicities included 3 of 18 patients with Grade 3 pneumonitis and 3 of 18 patients with Grade 3 esophagitis. There was no Grade 4 or 5 pneumonitis or esophagitis. There was also no Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia or neuropathy. For Dose Levels I (15 mg/m(2)), II (20 mg/m(2)), and III (25 mg/m(2)), the mean peak plasma level was 0.23 +/- 0.06 micromol/l, 0.32 +/- 0.05 micromol/l, and 0.52 +/- 0.14 micromol/l, respectively; AUC was 0.44 +/- 0.09 micromol/l, 0.61 +/- 0.1 micromol/l, and 0.96 +/- 0.23 micromol/l, respectively; and duration of drug concentration >0.05 micromol/l (t > 0.05 micromol/l) was 1.6 +/- 0.3 h, 1.9 +/- 0.2 h, and 3.0 +/- 0.9 h, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pulsed low-dose paclitaxel chemoradiation is associated with low toxicity. Pharmacokinetic data showed that plasma paclitaxel concentration >0.05 micromol/l for a minimum of 1.6 h was sufficient for effective radiosensitization.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine can be administered using limited-field radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To examine the feasibility of concurrent use of full-dose gemcitabine (GEM) and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENT AND METHODS

22 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were subjected to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly, three times during 4 weeks). They received limited-field irradiation by three-dimensional radiotherapy planning.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients, 16 (72%) completed the treatment (50 Gy irradiation and at least three times concurrent administration of 1 g/m(2) GEM). One patient with unresectable tail cancer showed peritonitis carcinomatosa and both chemotherapy and radiotherapy had to be stopped. Dose reduction or omission of GEM was necessary in another four patients. In addition, radiotherapy was discontinued in one patient for fatigue. Grade 3 hematologic toxicity was detected in eight patients (36%), and grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (anorexia) in one patient (5%). In total, the response rate amounted to 32% (seven partial responses), and the median survival time (MST) was 16 months. Among the twelve patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy, nine underwent surgery and showed a survival rate of 78% at 1 year. Another 13 patients without surgery showed 14 months of MST. No regional lymph node failure has appeared so far.

CONCLUSION

Limited-field radiotherapy enables the safe concurrent administration of 1,000 mg/m(2) GEM.

Severe Reversible Toxic Encephalopathy Induced by Cisplatin in a Patient with Cervical Carcinoma Receiving Combined Radiochemotherapy

CASE REPORT

A 45-year-old patient with cervix carcinoma received combined radiochemotherapy including cisplatin. After a cumulative dose of 240 mg/m(2) the patient suddenly became somnolent and developed a severe tetraparesis and generalized seizures. After ruling out intracranial bleeding, cerebral metastases as well as infectious and metabolic causes of this condition, a severe toxic encephalopathy was diagnosed based on the clinical findings and MRI scans. After symptomatic treatment on the intensive care unit all symptoms were completely reversible.

CONCLUSION

Toxic encephalopathy is a rare but dramatic complication of various cytostatic drugs. With the widespread use of cisplatin this rare disorder should be kept in mind.

Quality of life and treatment related toxicity in 335 patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated by two chemoradiation regimens

PURPOSE

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CT/RT) is the gold standard for advanced cervical carcinoma, but with frequent debates over treatment schedules and toxicity. This study compared 2 concomitant CT/RT regimens in terms of quality of life (QoL) and acute toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2003 and March 2005, 335 patients with stage IIB-IIIB cervical carcinoma were evaluated in a randomized single-center phase III trial at the Oncology Institute Cluj-Napoca. Patients received concurrent CT/RT with cisplatin 20 mg/m(2), days 1-5, every 21 days (arm A, n=171) or 40 mg/m(2)/weekly (arm B, n=164). QoL was estimated using the EORTC QLQ-30, v.3.0 questionnaire and acute toxicity using the common toxicity criteria (CTC) v.2.0.

RESULTS

Significant improvement of global health status (p <0.01) and a decrease in pain (p <0.01) was observed in arm A. In arm B fatigue increased (p=0.01) and role functioning diminished (p=0.05). In both arms depression, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea increased (p <0.05). Gastrointestinal toxicity was similar in both arms (76% vs. 77.5%). Hemoglobin drop was higher in arm B: 75% vs. 63% (p=0.02), while no differences were seen in leukocyte and platelet toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant CT/RT with cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) x 5 days every 21 days has better impact on patients' QoL and lower toxicity compared with the weekly chemotherapy regimen.

Extended-Field Irradiation and Intracavitary Brachytherapy Combined With Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer With Positive Para-Aortic or High Common Iliac Lymph Nodes: Results of ARM 1 of RTOG 0116

PURPOSE

The Radiation Therapy Oncolology Group (RTOG) 0116 trial was designed to test the ability of Amifostine to reduce the toxicity of combined chemotherapy with extended-field radiotherapy and brachytherapy (Part 2), after first determining the toxicity rate for the regimen without Amifostine (Part 1). This manuscript reports the results of Part 1.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligibility included patients with cervical carcinoma and high common iliac or para-aortic metastasis. Patients received extended-field radiotherapy to 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) with intracavitary irradiation. The final point A dose was 85 Gy LDR equivalent. Use of HDR was allowed. The positive para-aortic and high common iliac nodes were boosted to 54 to 59.4 Gy. Cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) was delivered weekly during external beam and once with brachytherapy. The primary endpoint of Part 1 was acute Grade 3/4 toxicity, excluding Grade 3 leukopenia.

RESULTS

A total of 26 eligible patients were entered between August 1, 2000, and December 3, 2003. Of these, 21 had para-aortic metastasis (15 also had high common iliac involvement), and 5 had high common iliac involvement only. The median follow-up was 17.1 months (range, 1.8-38.6 months) for all patients and 21.7 months (range, 11.4-38.6 months) for alive patients. The acute Grade 3/4 toxicity rate, excluding Grade 3 leukopenia was 81%. Late Grade 3/4 toxicity was 40%. Eight patients underwent surgery for complications. Sixteen (62%) patients had a complete response for both local and nodal disease. The complete local response was 92%, the complete overall nodal response rate was 62% and the regional and para-aortic nodal response rates were 60% and 71% respectively. Estimated disease-free and overall survival at 18 months are 46% and 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended field and intracavitary irradiation with cisplatin for para-aortic or high common iliac metastasis from cervical cancer is associated with significant acute and late toxicity.

Results of the phase I dose-escalating study of motexafin gadolinium with standard radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE

Motexafin gadolinium (MGd) is a putative radiation enhancer initially evaluated in patients with brain metastases. This Phase I trial studied the safety and tolerability of a 2-6-week course (10-22 doses) of MGd with radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 33 glioblastoma multiforme patients received one of seven MGd regimens starting at 10 doses of 4 mg/kg/d MGd and escalating to 22 doses of 5.3 mg/kg/d MGd (5 or 10 daily doses then three times per week). The National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program toxicity and stopping rules were applied.

RESULTS

The maximal tolerated dose was 5.0 mg/kg/d MGd (5 d/wk for 2 weeks, then three times per week) for 22 doses. The dose-limiting toxicity was reversible transaminase elevation. Adverse reactions included rash/pruritus (45%), chills/fever (30%), and self-limiting vesiculobullous rash of the thumb and fingers (42%). The median survival of 17.6 months prompted a case-matched analysis. In the case-matched analysis, the MGd patients had a median survival of 16.1 months (n = 31) compared with the matched Radiation Therapy Oncology Group database patients with a median survival of 11.8 months (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.94).

CONCLUSION

The maximal tolerated dose of MGd with radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme in this study was 5 mg/kg/d for 22 doses (daily for 2 weeks, then three times weekly). The baseline survival calculations suggest progression to Phase II trials is appropriate, with the addition of MGd to radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide.

Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

This study is designed to assess the toxicity and therapeutic effectiveness of concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Concurrent gemcitabine (400 mg/m2/wk) in six weekly cycles starting on d 1 of radiotherapy (50.4 Gy; 1.8 Gy/fraction/d; 5 d/wk) was prescribed on 22 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients were analyzed with regard to radiological response on computerized tomography, overall survival, and toxicity. Twelve (55%) patients completed the prescription of six gemcitabine cycles and 50.4 Gy radiotherapy; while 10 (45%) received one to five cycles of gemcitabine owing to neutropenia. All patients experienced abdominal discomfort during treatment and three patients required medical intervention. Other toxicities reported were nausea in 13 patients (60%), grade 3 vomiting in 3 (14%). Radiological response evaluations were as follows: complete, 2 (9%); partial, 9 (41%); stable, 7 (32 %); and progressive, 4 (18 %). Median survival was 8.7 mo. Combination of weekly gemcitabine (400 mg/m2) and radiotherapy provided response in 50% of the patients but was associated with severe toxicity resulting in incomplete delivery of the planned chemotherapy.

Early Clinical Outcome With Concurrent Chemotherapy and Extended-Field, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the early clinical outcomes with concurrent cisplatin and extended-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (EF-IMRT) for carcinoma of the cervix.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-six patients with Stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer treated with EF-IMRT were evaluated. The pelvic lymph nodes were involved in 19 patients, and of these 19 patients, 10 also had para-aortic nodal disease. The treatment volume included the cervix, uterus, parametria, presacral space, upper vagina, and pelvic, common iliac, and para-aortic nodes to the superior border of L1. Patients were assessed for acute toxicities according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. All late toxicities were scored with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxicity score.

RESULTS

All patients completed the prescribed course of EF-IMRT. All but 2 patients received brachytherapy. Median length of treatment was 53 days. The median follow-up was 18 months. Acute Grade > or = 3 gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and myelotoxicity were seen in 1, 1, and 10 patients, respectively. Thirty-four patients had complete response to treatment. Of these 34 patients, 11 developed recurrences. The first site of recurrence was in-field in 2 patients (pelvis in 1, pelvis and para-aortic in 1) and distant in 9 patients. The 2-year actuarial locoregional control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and Grade > or = 3 toxicity rates for the entire cohort were 80%, 51%, 65%, and 10%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Extended-field IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy was tolerated well, with acceptable acute and early late toxicities. The locoregional control rate was good, with distant metastases being the predominant mode of failure. We are continuing to accrue a larger number of patients and longer follow-up data to further extend our initial observations with this approach.