Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as primary medical therapy in women with breast cancer: an anglo-celtic cooperative oncology group study

[Treatment of breast cancer: from hormones to antibodies]

Breast cancer, as one of the most frequent tumor entities, is the object of intensive research activity. Clinical research over the last few years has resulted in an increasing differentiation in treatment strategies in the adjuvant setting as well as in metastatic breast cancer. Treatment decision is guided by different risk groups, and relevant changes in clinical practice have arisen in hormonal treatment as well as in chemotherapy. Furthermore, new agents have shown clinical activity, in particular trastuzumab has emerged as standard treatment in HER2 positive breast cancer. It was even licensed in 2006 for adjuvant treatment.

A nonreplicating adenoviral vector that contains the wild-type p53 transgene combined with chemotherapy for primary breast cancer: safety, efficacy, and biologic activity of a novel gene-therapy approach

BACKGROUND

: Primary systemic therapy (PST) is the standard approach to the management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The authors hypothesized that the intratumoral administration of a nonreplicating adenoviral vector (Ad5) that contains the human wild-type p53, AdCMV-p53, combined with chemotherapy, could increase the efficacy of PST as measured by pathologic complete response.

METHODS

: In a prospective, open-label, Phase II trial, 13 patients with LABC were treated with 6 3-week cycles of PST, which consisted of intratumoral injections of Ad5CMV-p53 for 2 consecutive days plus docetaxel and doxorubicin followed by surgery. p53 status was determined at baseline and was assessed immediately after the first injection (up to 48 hours). Clinical response was assessed by clinical and radiologic methods.

RESULTS

: The trial was terminated early, because none of the patients achieved a pathologic complete response. The median age was 56 years (range, 39-71 years), and the median tumor size was 8 cm (range, 5-11 cm). Eight patients (73%) had a p53 mutation. Serial biopsies showed an increase in p53 messenger RNA (mRNA) and p21(WAF1/Cip1) mRNA. All 12 evaluable patients achieved an objective clinical response. The surgical specimens revealed scattered tumor cells with extensive tumor-infiltrate leukocytes (predominantly T-lymphocytes). At a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 30-41 months), 4 patients (30%) developed systemic recurrence, and 2 patients died. The estimate breast cancer-specific survival rate at 3 years was 84% (95% confidence interval, 65.7-100%). There was no increase in systemic toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

: Ad5CMV-p53 combined with PST is safe, active, and associated with local immunomodulatory effects. The promising clinical activity of this combination deserves further investigation in randomized studies.

Neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: opportunities to assess tumour response

Primary, preoperative, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was introduced in the early 1970s as part of an integrated therapeutic approach to treat inoperable locally advanced breast cancer. The approach resulted in high responses, and sufficient downstaging to allow mastectomy in some patients. In addition, a small number of pathological complete responders were reported. Gradually, the idea of preoperative chemotherapy was extended to include patients with large but operable early-stage breast cancer, with the possibility in some cases of downstaging the primary tumour to avoid mastectomy, and to allow breast-conserving surgery to be done. This approach allows the tumour to be used as a measure of treatment response in vivo. More recently, the possibility has opened up for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to provide information on the use of clinical, pathological, and molecular endpoints, which can be used as surrogate markers to predict long-term outcome in the adjuvant setting. In addition, the anatomical accessibility of the breast provides the potential for serial biopsies to investigate molecular changes during treatment.

Doxorubicin and Docetaxel (AT/AD) for Breast Cancer

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy heightens the requirement that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column will review various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy. It will also serve as a review of various agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

Pathological response to preoperative concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for breast cancer: results of a phase II study

This study evaluated, in terms of pathological complete response (pCR) and acute toxicity, preoperative concurrent (5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-vinorelbine) chemoradiotherapy for large breast cancers. A total of 60 women were included in the study. Chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of 5-FU, 500 mg/m2/d, continuous infusion (d1-d5) and vinorelbine, 25 mg/m2 (d1; d6). Starting with the second cycle, radiotherapy delivered 50 Gy to the breast and 46 Gy to the internal mammary and supra/infra-clavicular lymph nodes. Breast surgery and axillary lymph node dissection were then performed. Four patients did not complete their chemotherapy. Breast conservation was possible in 69% of patients. The rate of pCR was 27%. Three factors were associated with pCR: histological grade 3, absence of hormonal receptors and high mitotic index. Grade 4 haematological toxicity occurred in 22% of patients. In conclusion, chemoradiotherapy demonstrated good efficacy, both in terms of pCR and in allowing breast conservation with acceptable tolerance.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: an overview and review of recent clinical trials

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is long established as part of the multi-modality management of locally advanced breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer, leading to significantly improved outcome. Numerous recent studies have compared the use of anthracycline-based NAC with adjuvant chemotherapy in earlier-stage disease, and have shown equivalent disease-free and overall survival rates with increased breast conservation rates. These studies have also shown that a pathological complete response after NAC is associated with improved long-term outcome. More recently, the taxanes have been introduced into clinical trials of NAC with increased overall and pCR rates. However, there is no evidence that the addition of taxanes to neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improves long-term disease free survival or overall survival. This paper reviews these trials, as well as trials of dose-dense and trastuzumab-containing NAC regimens. The review discusses the potential for NAC to replace prolonged adjuvant trials in the assessment of new therapeutic agents (using pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term outcome), to be used as an in vivo chemosensitivity assay to guide further treatment, and to identify molecular markers that correlate with tumour sensitivity or resistance to chemotherapeutic agents so that the treatment of patients can be individualised.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus doxorubicin (KBCS-01) in stage II, III breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the response and safety of a combination of docetaxel plus doxorubicin as neoadjuvant therapy for stage II, III breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with stage II or III breast cancer underwent three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks followed by curative surgery. Prophylactic GCSF was not used.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were enrolled in the study and 86 were evaluable for efficacy. The median age was 43 years (range, 30-69). The mean relative dose intensity was 0.98 for docetaxel and 0.98 for doxorubicin. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 12 (13.7%) patients. The clinical overall response rate was 86% and pathologic complete response was 10.5%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 26% of total 258 cycles and febrile neutropenia was observed in 15.8%. Pneumonia was observed in one patient and grade 3 mucositis was observed in three patients.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel and doxorubicin was an effective and well-tolerated neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III breast cancer. Clinical benefit of this treatment will be confirmed by survival data with long term follow up.

Primary Systemic Therapy of Breast Cancer

Primary systemic therapy (PST) or neoadjuvant therapy is used in nonmetastatic breast cancer to treat systemic disease earlier, decrease tumor bulk ideally to a complete pathological response (pCR), and reduce the extent of surgery. The multitude of clinical trials using PST in breast cancer patients has not proven the fundamental hypotheses of improved overall survival and disease-free survival that drove the investigation of PST. The other potential advantages of PST, which include increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery and predicting outcome to a particular chemotherapy regimen, are also not conclusively established. We examined the published literature on PST for breast cancer and predominantly focused our review on data from large, randomized clinical trials comparing primary systemic chemotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy, different primary systemic chemotherapy regimens, primary systemic chemotherapy with hormonal therapy, and different preoperative hormonal therapies. Although the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen has not been established, a combination of four cycles of an anthracycline followed by four cycles of a taxane appears to produce the highest pCR rate (22%-31%). In patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer, concurrent use of neoadjuvant trastuzumab with an anthracycline-taxane combination has produced provocative results that require further confirmatory studies. Preoperative hormonal therapy is associated with low pCR rates and should be reserved for patients who are poor candidates for systemic chemotherapy. The optimal management of patients with residual disease after the administration of maximum neoadjuvant therapy remains to be defined. The surgical approach, including the role of sentinel node biopsy and delivery of radiation therapy after PST in breast cancer patients, is evolving. Ongoing clinical trials will help identify the subset of patients who would most benefit from the use of PST, establish the most effective PST regimen, and determine the optimal multidisciplinary approach in the management of breast cancer.

Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update

Neoadjuvant (primary systemic) treatment is the standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer and a standard option for primary operable disease. Because of new treatments and new understandings of breast cancer, however, recommendations published in 2003 regarding neoadjuvant treatment for operable disease required updating. Therefore, a second international panel of representatives of a number of breast cancer clinical research groups was convened in September 2004 to update these recommendations. As part of this effort, data published to date were reviewed critically and indications for neoadjuvant treatment were newly defined.

Tratamiento neoadyuvante del cáncer de mama operable

Preoperative or neoadjuvant systemic treatment refers to either the first postdiagnosis systemic treatment that a patient receives or indicates that additional subsequent therapy is intended. Randomized controlled clinical trials have shown that preoperative systemic treatment offers the same disease free survival and overall survival benefits as does adjuvant systemic treatment. Neoadjuvant therapy has been found to increase the breast-conserving surgery rate. This therapy also allows to evaluate the primary tumor response to chemotherapy. Additionally, on the basis of the biologic characteristics of a tumor and differences in the response to systemic treatment, primary systemic treatment should be regarded as a tool that can be used to individualize systemic treatment for patients with breast cancer. However, some issues remain to be resolved, such as the markers that should be assessed before this therapy, as well as the optimal surgical and radiotherapy treatment.

Can we approach zero relapse in breast cancer?

Adjuvant hormonal therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy have contributed significantly to the falling rates of breast cancer mortality. The introduction of taxanes and aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting represents recent important improvements. More recently, the demonstration of significant benefit in the adjuvant setting with novel molecular targeted therapies (such as trastuzumab [Herceptin; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, http://www.gene.com]) is already beginning to have a substantial impact on the adjuvant treatment of patients with certain tumor characteristics (i.e., HER-2 positivity). Neoadjuvant treatment represents an approach that offers an intermediate end point (i.e., pathologic complete response) that can be used as a marker of therapeutic activity. Furthermore, the use of genomic profiling is starting to replace the traditional prognostic and predictive factors currently used to estimate risks for recurrence and response to particular adjuvant therapies. These recent developments have demonstrated that the notion of approaching zero relapse in breast cancer patients is now within our reach.

Primary chemotherapy with gemcitabine as prolonged infusion, non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel in patients with early breast cancer: final results of a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Combinations of anthracyclines, taxanes and gemcitabine have shown high activity in breast cancer. This trial was designed to evaluate a modified combination regimen as primary chemotherapy. Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) was used instead of conventional doxorubicin to improve cardiac safety. Gemcitabine was given 72 h after NPLD and docetaxel as a prolonged infusion over 4 h in order to optimize synergistic effects and accumulation of active metabolites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with histologically confirmed stage II or III breast cancer were treated with NPLD (60 mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and gemcitabine as 4-h infusion (350 mg/m(2)) on day 4. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. All patients received prophylactically recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Patients with axillary lymph node involvement after primary chemotherapy received adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil.

RESULTS

The clinical response rate was 80%, and complete remissions of the primary tumor occurred in 10 patients (25%). Breast conservation surgery was performed in 19 out of 20 patients (95%) with an initial tumor size of less than 3 cm and in 14 patients (70%) with a tumor size <or=3 cm. Seven patients had histologically confirmed complete responses accounting for a pCR rate of 17.5%. Expression of Ki--67 was the most important predictive parameter for response with high 38.9% breast pCR rate in patients with elevated Ki--67 expression. Although the predominant toxicity was myelosuppression with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 61% of patients few neutropenic complications resulted. Non-hematological toxicity was generally moderate with grade 3 or 4 toxicity in 10.0% of cycles. Most common non-hematologic toxicities were nausea, vomiting, alopecia, mucositis, asthenia and elevation of liver enzymes.

CONCLUSION

The evaluated schedule provides a safe and highly effective combination treatment for patients with early breast cancer, which is suitable for phase III studies.