Treatment Outcomes of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy on Extra-cranial Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Breast Cancer: Mature Results from a Single Institution Experience

AIMS

Evidence shows stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is used as a non-invasive ablative therapy in the treatment of multisite oligometastatic (OM) and oligoprogressive (OP) diseases originating from metastatic breast cancer. This study aims to report the treatment outcomes and to investigate what factors that are prognostic in terms of local control, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving SABR for extracranial OM and OP diseases originating from metastatic breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review on treatment records of patients with OM and OP from metastatic breast cancer who underwent SABR at a single was carried out. SABR was performed with daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using a dedicated robotic SABR machine. Local control, PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier statistics and the post-treatment toxicity data was scored following the CTCAE v4.0 protocol. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression tests were used in the subgroup analysis of prognostic factors on PFS and OS including patients' age, types of follow-up imaging (staging CT only vs whole-body MR/PET), metastases status (OM vs OP), primary breast cancer tumour grade, hormone receptors (ER/PR/HER2) status, change of systemic treatments at SABR, number of metastases, SABR treatment sites and doses.

RESULTS

56 metastatic breast cancer patients (38 patients with OM and 18 patients with OP) were involved in this retrospective review. The median follow-up was 35.6 months (range 4.0-132.9 months). The estimated local control at 1 , 2 and 5 years were 90.9%, 88.7% and 88.7%, respectively. The estimated median PFS was 19.2 months (95%CI 10.3-28.1 months); the PFS at 1, 2 and 5 years were 63.3%, 44.4% and 33.2%. The estimated OS at 1, 2 and 5 years were 98.0%, 91.9% and 74.3%, respectively with the estimated median OS of 105.1 months (95%CI 51.5-158.7 months). The vast majority of patients tolerated the treatment well with the commonest acute side effects as grade 1 fatigue. There were no statistically significant factors found in OS regression analysis. The types of follow-up imaging, metastases status, oestrogen receptor status, and number of metastases for SABR were statistically significant factors (p < 0.05) in the multivariate Cox regression analysis on PFS.

CONCLUSION

There are limited studies published on the efficacy and post-treatment toxicities of metastatic breast cancer OM and OP SABR with adequate length of follow-up. This study confirmed that SABR was a safe, non-invasive treatment option for patients with extracranial OM and OP diseases originated from primary breast cancer in terms of the acceptable post-treatment toxicities.

Patient-reported outcomes in high-risk HR+ /HER2- early breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy with or without palbociclib within the randomized PENELOPEB study

BACKGROUND

The PENELOPEB trial investigating efficacy and safety of additional 1-year post-neoadjuvant palbociclib to standard endocrine therapy (ET) high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer patients failed to improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). This analysis compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between treatment groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received 13 cycles of palbociclib 125 mg/day (n = 631) or placebo (n = 619) orally for 3 out of 4 weeks + ET. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), its breast cancer (BR23) and fatigue (FA13) modules, mood questionnaire GAD7 and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) instruments were used for the assessment of quality of life (QoL). Repeated-measures mixed-effects models were used to evaluate differences in PRO, changes of PRO over time, and treatment-by-time interactions.

RESULTS

924 of 1250 patients (73.9%) completed baseline and at least one post-baseline questionnaire of all PRO instruments. General health status (GHS)/QoL based on EORTC QLQ-C30 was high in both arms (mean [SD]: palbociclib 70.1 [19.3], placebo 71.4 [18.8]) and was slightly higher in the placebo arm (LeastSquare mean difference: 0.82, p < 0.001). Higher fatigue was reported in the palbociclib arm (mean [SD]: 30.3 [23.8] vs. placebo 28.3 [22.7]; p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed among FA13 physical, cognitive, and emotional fatigue subscales.

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported global QoL and fatigue did not substantially change in both treatment arms. Slight differences in GHS, physical functioning, and fatigue favored the placebo arm statistically without achieving clinically meaningful thresholds.

Two-dimensional ultrasound results in underestimation of the ovarian follicle size compared to automated three-dimensional imaging in women undergoing IVF

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, for the assessment of follicle growth during IVF, two-dimensional (2D) transvaginal ultrasound (US) is used. In the past few years three-dimensional (3D) US has also been introduced.

OBJECTIVES

To compare follicular sizes between 2 and 3D ultrasound imaging on the final day of controlled ovarian stimulation.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study including 121 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) between January 2017 and July 2018. All women were assessed by transvaginal 2D and 3D ultrasonography to measure ovarian follicle dimensions on the final day of COS.

RESULTS

The mean difference in paired comparisons between the 3D and 2D US measurements in 25 women with monofollicular development was + 1.6 ± 2.5 mm for the x-dimension and + 1.7 ± 2.4 mm for the y-dimension; and in the total number of 1197 paired measurements of follicles the mean difference + 2.1 ± 3.3 mm and + 1.8 ± 3.9 mm for the x- and y-dimension respectively. In all cases the paired t-test showed that differences were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Further it was conjectured that the 2D underestimation results from the inherent difficulty to precisely place the US probe simultaneously on the perpendicular maximal of the x and y follicle diameters, leading to measurement errors that, by theory, are normally distributed. Running Monte-Carlo simulations based on these measurement errors it was found that both the mean difference and standard deviation are of the same magnitude as the ones found in real measurements, thus proving the conjecture.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilisation of 3D US results in different measurements of the follicular dimensions, and volumes, when compared to conventional 2D US. The differences in the x- and y-dimensions may affect the outcome of an IVF cycle as they are used to define the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, which is associated with the yield of mature oocytes and the probability of live birth.

Abstract OT3-32-01: OPTIMA, a prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer

Background: Multi-parameter tumor gene expression assays (MPAs) are used to estimate individual patient risk and guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The TAILORx trial supports MPA use in a node-negative population. Evidence for MPA use in postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer has been provided by the RxPONDER trial interim analysis but this relies on the absence of superiority in an analysis where &gt;50% of events were unrelated to breast cancer. There is much uncertainty about MPA use for premenopausal patients. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) (ISRCTN42400492) is a prospective international randomized controlled trial designed to validate MPAs as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population.

Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded study with an adaptive two-stage design. The trial recruits women and men age 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment using the Prosigna (PAM50) test. Those with a Prosigna tumor Score (ROR_PT) &gt;60 receive standard management whilst those with a low score (≤60) tumor are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal women includes ovarian suppression for all participants unless they experience a chemotherapy-induced menopause. Adjuvant abemaciclib is permitted. The trial will be analyzed for (1) non-inferiority of recurrence according to randomization and (2) cost-effectiveness. The key secondary outcome is non-inferiority of recurrence for patients with low ROR_PT score tumors. The efficacy analyses will be performed Per Protocol using Invasive Breast Cancer Free Survival (IBCFS) as the primary outcome measure to limit the risk of a false non-inferiority conclusion. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 8 years will permit demonstration of up to 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment with at least 83% power, assuming 5-year IBCFS is 87% with standard management. An integrated qualitative recruitment study addresses challenges to consent and recruitment, building on experience from the feasibility study which found that a multidisciplinary approach is important for recruitment success. OPTIMA is strongly supported by a patient group which has helped design all patient documents and which is represented on the TMG.

Results: The OPTIMA main trial opened in January 2017 and has continued to recruit throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall recruitment as of 1 July 2022 was 2814 (2593 from UK, 221 from Norway). Patient characteristics are well balanced between the trial arms. Currently 95% of randomized participants are eligible for inclusion in the PP analysis. 66% of the MPA-directed arm participants have been allocated to endocrine therapy only. The test failure rate is &lt; 1%.

Conclusion: OPTIMA will provide robust unbiased evidence on test-directed chemotherapy safety for both postmenopausal and premenopausal women with 1-3 involved nodes as well as for patients with 4-9 involved nodes and for patients treated with abemaciclib.

Funding: OPTIMA is funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501) and in Norway by KLINBEFORSK and the Norwegian Cancer Society. Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Trial Inquiries: OPTIMA@warwick.ac.uk

Abstract HER2-06: HER2-06 Outcome analysis of HER2-zero or HER2-low hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients - characterization of the molecular phenotype in combination with molecular subtyping

Background: Breast cancer with low HER2 expression (HER2-low) is of high clinical relevance because of new therapeutic options with antibody-drug conjugates. We have recently shown in a large cohort from neoadjuvant clinical trials that HER2-low breast cancer has different molecular characteristics as well as different clinical outcomes compared to HER2-zero. Considering the positive correlation between HER2-low expression and hormone receptor positivity observed consistently in many investigations, we have extended our analysis to HR+ tumors from the post-neoadjuvant PenelopeB trial. In PenelopeB, patients with HR+ breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) were randomized to post-neoadjuvant palbociclib versus placebo in addition to endocrine therapy. We evaluated the molecular phenotype and clinical outcomes of HER2-low compared to HER2-zero patients. Methods: A total of 1250 patients were randomized, HER2 status was available for 1151 tumors from pretherapeutic core biopsy, determined mainly by local pathology, and from 1213 tumors from the post-NACT sample, determined as part of central pathology. For 1119 patients a paired HER2-status was both available. HER2-zero was defined as IHC0 and HER2-low-positive was defined as IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-. Gene expression analysis of 2549 genes using the HTG oncology biomarker panel was performed in 620 pretherapeutic biopsies and 780 post-NACT residual tumor samples, with 539 paired gene expression samples. Breast cancer subtypes were determined using the AIMS approach. Results: In pretherapeutic biopsies, 695 tumors (60%) were HER2-low and 457 (40%) were HER2-zero. A HER2-low status in the biopsy was significantly linked to improved iDFS (HR 0.76 (0.60-0.96; p=0.02). In residual tumors, 632 tumors (60%) were HER2-low and 581 (40%) were HER2-zero, without any prognostic impact of HER2 low status. In addition, a shift of HER2-low-status comparing core biopsy and residual tumor was observed in 415 (37%) of 1119 tumors. 161 (14%) had a shift from HER2-zero to HER2-low and 254 (23%) shifted from HER2-low to HER2-zero. A shift from HER2-zero to HER2-low in the post-NACT samples was significantly linked to reduced iDFS (HR 1.43 [95%CI 1.01-2.01]), p=0.04), compared to HER2-low group, while a shift from HER2-low to HER2-zero was associated with better iDFS compared to HER2-zero group, although not statistically significant (p=0.17). We did not observe a significant correlation of HER2-low status and AIMS molecular subtypes. In particular, the HER2-enriched (HER2E) subtype was assigned to only 4.3% of HER2-zero and 3.1% of HER2-low tumors. Significant iDFS differences were observed for HER2-low-status in combination with AIMS subtypes (lumB/basal/HER2E vs. lumA/normL; overall p-value &lt; 0.0001) for both pretherapeutic biopsies and residual tumor. Patients with post-NACT HER2-low tumors had an improved survival in the subgroups of aggressive AIMS subtypes (lumB/basal/HER2E), but not in the less aggressive AIMs subtypes (lumA/normL), with a positive test for interaction (p=0.02). For the pre-NACT samples a similar, but non-significant trend was observed. We evaluated a total of 620 core biopsies for differences in gene expression comparing HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors. A total of 417 genes were statistically significantly different, but in a hierarchical clustering there was no clear separation of HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors. Conclusions: In the PenelopeB cohort of HR+ tumors, a HER2-low status in pretherapeutic core biopsies is related to improved disease-free survival, especially for those tumors that have a more aggressive intrinsic subtype. A shift of HER2-low status was observed before and after chemotherapy, indicating an adaptation of the pathway activity to therapy-induced stress, which might become relevant for future diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Citation Format: Carsten Denkert, Miguel Martín, Michael Untch, Hervé R. Bonnefoi, Erik S. Knudsen, Seock-Ah Im, Angela DeMichele, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Laura Van ’t Veer, Sung-Bae Kim, Harry D. Bear, Nicole McCarthy, Karen Gelmon, Frederik Marmé, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Nicholas Turner, Federico Rojo, Martin Filipits, Lesley-Ann Martin, Peter A. Fasching, Christian Schem, Catherine M. Kelly, Toralf Reimer, Masakazu Toi, Hope Rugo, Michael Gnant, Andreas Makris, Yuan Liu, Karsten Weber, Sivaramakrishna Rachakonda, Sibylle Loibl. HER2-06 Outcome analysis of HER2-zero or HER2-low hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients - characterization of the molecular phenotype in combination with molecular subtyping [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-06.

Abstract PD17-06: Immunohistochemical markers and determinants of clinical response in the Penelope-B trial

Background: The Penelope-B trial did not show improvement in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with the addition of palbociclib to endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Biomarkers may be able to identify subgroups of patients deriving benefit from Palbociclib and guide future studies. Estrogen-receptor (ER), progesterone-receptor (PgR) and Ki-67 might be helpful in identifying patients benefiting from palbociclib. Concordantly, tumors with elevated expression of Cyclin D1 and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (phospho-RB) may harbor more dependency on CDK4/6 and thus higher sensitivity to palbociclib. Methods: The percentage of positive ER and PgR cells and Ki-67 assessed in surgical specimens after NACT were combined to obtain the immunohistochemical score 3 (IHC3, Cuzick et al JCO 2011, low vs high based on the median IHC3 value). Cyclin D1 and phospho-RB Ser 807/811 immunoreactive (phospho-RB) scores were analyzed in residual tumors after NACT (range 0-12 each). Proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the predictive and prognostic value of IHC3 and treatment on iDFS. Subgroup analysis was performed according to BC intrinsic subtypes (luminal-A/normal-like, luminal-B/HER2-enriched/basal) and HER2-status (HER2 0, HER2 low). Cox/Fine-Gray regression was used to define the predictive and prognostic value of CyclinD1 (≤1, &gt;1), phospho-RB (≤2, &gt;2) as dichotomized and continuous variables on iDFS, distant DFS (DDFS), locoregional invasive recurrence-free interval (LRRFI) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analyses (MVA) were adjusted for age (≤50 vs &gt;50), Ki-67 (≤15 vs &gt;15), region (non-Asian vs Asian), ypN (ypN0-1 vs ypN2-3), risk status (CPS-EG=2 ypN+ vs ≥3), cT (cT1-2 vs cT3-4), ypT (ypT0-2 vs ypT3-4), and grade (G1-2 vs G3). The MVA for IHC3 includes all the covariates above except Ki-67. p&lt; 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Results: Data for ER, PgR, Ki-67, HER2, Cyclin D1 and phospho-RB were available for 1250 patients. Overall, 98.9% of the patients had ER+ tumors, 75.0% PgR+, 52.2% had HER2 low, 25.5% Ki-67&gt;15, 50% had IHC3 score higher than median, 93.9% had Cyclin D1 &gt;1, 57.8% had phospho-RB &gt;2. Patients with IHC3 score high had a worse iDFS compared to patients with IHC3 score low (MVA HR 2.28 95%CI (1.78-2.91), p&lt; 0.0001). Patients with luminal-A/normal-like tumors and IHC3 low had an improved iDFS with the addition of palbociclib to ET (MVA HR 0.35 95%CI (0.14-0.90), test for interaction p=0.01). No difference was observed according to HER2 status. Cyclin D1&gt;1 has no predictive value but is prognostic for better iDFS (MVA HR 0.62 95%CI (0.41-0.94), p=0.023), LRRFI (MVA HR 0.30 95%CI (0.15-0.63), p=0.001) and OS (MVA HR 0.50 95%CI (0.28-0.89), p=0.019). Similar results were obtained when Cyclin D1 was analysed as a continuous variable. Phospho-RB had neither predictive nor prognostic value. Phospho-RB highly correlates with Ki-67 (p&lt; 0.001, Spearman correlation 0.248). Conclusions: Patients with high Cyclin D1 expression had a favorable prognosis independent of treatment arm, but patients with luminal-A/normal-like tumors and IHC3 low after NACT had an improved outcome when receiving palbociclib in addition to adjuvant ET. Theses exploratory studies suggest specific signatures/phenotypes could predict benefit from Palbociclib in high-risk early breast cancer.

Citation Format: Erik S. Knudsen, Sivaramakrishna Rachakonda, Frederik Marmé, Miguel Martín, Michael Untch, Hervé R. Bonnefoi, Wolfgang D. Schmitt, Sung-Bae Kim, Harry D. Bear, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Seock-Ah Im, Angela DeMichele, Laura Van’t Veer, Nicole McCarthy, Bruno V. Sinn, Karen Gelmon, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Catherine M. Kelly, Toralf Reimer, Nicholas Turner, Federico Rojo, Martin Filipits, Peter A. Fasching, Christian Schem, Lesley-Ann Martin, Yuan Liu, Masakazu Toi, Hope Rugo, Michael Gnant, Andreas Makris, Jenny Furlanetto, Karsten Weber, Carsten Denkert, Sibylle Loibl. Immunohistochemical markers and determinants of clinical response in the Penelope-B trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD17-06.

Delivery outcomes as a result of snoring as determined by standard sleep surveys

Background

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), is an umbrella term that encompasses obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), central sleep apnea (CSA) and hypoventilation. is common but studies in the pregnant population are limited. Data suggests relationships between OSA and preeclampsia, but the relationship between snoring and pregnancy outcomes is unknown.

Methods

A prospective study of 2224 singleton pregnancies was undertaken. Women were questioned using the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ- 2 or more categories where the score is positive.) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS >10/24), the results compared with pregnancy outcomes with regard to hypertension in pregnancy.

Results

Women having symptoms raising the possibility of OSA defined by the BQ with a score >7 was 45.5%, and using ESS with a score >10, was 36%. The birth and neonatal outcomes for self-reported snoring and increased daytime sleepiness showed increased adverse outcomes notably increased caesarean section rates and low APGAR scores but not birth before 37 weeks of gestation.

Conclusion

Using questionnaires designed for the general population, the prevalence of possible undiagnosed OSA is high in the pregnant population. The increased adverse delivery and neonatal outcomes for self-reported snoring and increased daytime sleepiness with these tools indicated the need for further investigation of the links between snoring SDB and pregnancy outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness of palbociclib in early breast cancer patients with a high risk of relapse: Results from the PENELOPE-B trial

Background

Patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are at a high risk of relapse. PENELOPE-B was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial that investigated adding palbociclib (PAL) for thirteen 28-day cycles to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in these patients. Clinical results showed no significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival with PAL.

Methods

We performed a pre-planned cost-effectiveness analysis of PAL within PENELOPE-B from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. Health-related quality of life scores, collected in the trial using the EQ-5D-3L instrument, were converted to utilities based on the German valuation algorithm. Resource use was valued using German price weights. Outcomes were discounted at 3% and modeled with mixed-level linear models to adjust for attrition, repeated measurements, and residual baseline imbalances. Subgroup analyses were performed for key prognostic risk factors. Scenario analyses addressed data limitations and evaluated the robustness of the estimated cost-effectiveness of PAL to methodological choices.

Results

The effects of PAL on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were marginal during the active treatment phase, increasing thereafter to 0.088 (95% confidence interval: −0.001; 0.177) QALYs gained over the 4 years of follow-up. The incremental costs were dominated by PAL averaging EUR 33,000 per patient; costs were higher in the PAL arm but not significantly different after the second year. At an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 380,000 per QALY gained, PAL was not cost-effective compared to the standard-of-care ET. Analyses restricted to Germany and other subgroups were consistent with the main results. Findings were robust in the scenarios evaluated.

Conclusions

One year of PAL added to ET is not cost-effective in women with residual invasive disease after NACT in Germany.

P-706 Improved prediction of the number of oocytes retrieved using automated-3D ultrasound compared to manual-2D ultrasound on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation

Study question

Does the number of follicles ≥11mm differ when measured by manual-2D or automated-3D ultrasound and which method predicts the number of oocytes collected more accurately?

Summary answer

Manual-2D and automated-3D ultrasound find similar numbers of follicles ≥11mm. Automated-3D ultrasound has a higher predictive ability regarding the number of oocytes collected.

What is known already

Accurate assessment of the size and number of follicles during ovarian stimulation is important to determine the optimum day of triggering final oocyte maturation and subsequent oocyte retrieval, in order to achieve the maximum number of mature oocytes. Moreover, the number of follicles ≥11mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, has been used as a criterion to identify women at risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome.

Automated-3D ultrasound follicle size and count measurement has been proposed as a valid alternative to 2D ultrasound measurement, but its predictive ability regarding number of oocytes collected has not been compared.

Study design, size, duration

Prospective observational cohort study performed between 12/2020 and 07/2021 in a single ART center including 93 women undergoing COS. On the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, 3D-ultrasound (SonoAVC;GE Medical Systems) and traditional 2D-ultrasound were used to assess the number and size of follicles.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Patients underwent ovarian stimulation with recombinant-FSH and GnRH antagonists. Triggering of final oocyte maturation was performed when three follicles ≥17mm were present on 2D ultrasound.

The number of follicles ≥11mm assessed with manual-2D and automated-3D ultrasound on the day of triggering was compared. Linear regression analysis was performed with dependent variable the number oocytes retrieved and independent variables the number of follicles ≥11mm (2D-ultrasound) as well as the number of follicles ≥11mm (automated-3D ultrasound).

Main results and the role of chance

The median number of follicles ≥11mm counted via automated-3D [ 10 (IQR: 5.75 – 16)] and the median number of follicles ≥11mm found via manual-2D assessment [10 (IQR: 6.75 – 18)] was similar between the two groups. Τhe median number of oocytes retrieved was 12 (IQR: 6.75 – 18). A high correlation of R = 0.915 was observed between the number of follicles found to be ≥ 11mm via automated-3D and 2D.

However, regarding the number of oocytes collected, the predictive ability of automated-3D, was found to be, significantly higher (R2=0.837) than the predictive ability of 2d-ultrasound (R2=0.734) when all follicles ≥11mm were taken into account. These findings suggest that while the number of follicles measured to be ≥ 11mm was similar in both methods, automated 3D-ultrasound measurement offers a higher ability to predict the number of oocytes retrieved, compared to manual 2D-ultrasound measurements.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The present study compared manual 2D and automated 3D-ultrasound follicle measurements in the general IVF population. Future studies using a larger patient population will be useful to determine any potential differences between the two methods in patients stratified according to ovarian response.

Wider implications of the findings

Manual 2D and automated 3D-ultrasound assessment provide similar measurements of follicle number and size in patients undergoing IVF but automated-3D measurements offer greater predictive value regarding the number of oocytes collected and can be used effectively to monitor follicular development during ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Trial registration number

N/A

P-702 Prediction of oocyte maturity via automated volumetric follicle measurements on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. An observational cohort study

Study question

Can automated measurements of follicular volume by three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound predict the number of mature oocytes retrieved better than two-dimensional (2D) measurements of follicles?

Summary answer

Automated measurements of follicular volume by 3D ultrasound have similar predictive ability of the number of mature oocytes retrieved as manual 2D measurements of follicles.

What is known already

Accurate assessment of the size and number of follicles during ovarian stimulation is important to determine the day of triggering final oocyte maturation and subsequent oocyte retrieval, in order to achieve the optimal number of mature oocytes. Follicles with a diameter ≥11mm on the day of triggering are often considered to contribute the most towards the final number of mature oocytes. It has also been shown that 3D follicle volumes offer a more physiological measurement and may be a more objective than 2D follicle diameters. However, to date, the correlation between diameters and volumes has not been properly evaluated.

Study design, size, duration

Prospective observational cohort study of 75 women undergoing ICSI between 01/2021 and 09/2021 in a private ART centre. In each patient, two dimensional-2D and three dimensional-3D transvaginal ultrasound (SonoAVC; GE Medical Systems), was used to assess differences in the number and size of follicles on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. SonoAVC automatically calculates the volume of the follicle while manual-2D value is calculated as the mean of the maximal follicular dimensions x-y.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Patients underwent ovarian stimulation with recombinant-FSH and GnRH antagonists. Statistical analysis involved robust linear regression with dependent variable the number MIIs retrieved and independent variables the number of follicles ≥11mm (via 2D) and the number of follicles with volume ≥0.7ml (via SonoAVC). 0.7ml was used as it is a close approximation to the volume of a sphere with diameter 11mm. This was confirmed by identifying the actual volume of aspirated follicles 11mm (unpublished data).

Main results and the role of chance

A high correlation of R = 0.922 was observed between manual-2D and automated-3D assessment in the number of follicles with volume ≥0.7ml and those with mean diameter ≥11mm. In addition, no differences were found in the number of follicles with volume ≥0.7ml vs the number of follicles with diameter of ≥ 11mm (median 9.0, IQR: 5.0 – 14.5 vs. median 10.0, IQR: 6.75 – 18, respectively) on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. The median number of MIIs collected was 9.0 (IQR: 5.0 – 13.25).

The predictive capability of follicles with volume ≥0.7ml in regards to the number of MII collected was found to be R2=0.736, which is higher than the predictive capability of follicles ≥11mm (R2=0.629). These findings suggest that the number of follicles with a volume ≥0.7ml offers at least a similar predictive capability as the traditionally used number of follicles ≥11mm.

Limitations, reasons for caution

While the volume of 0.7ml was found to be closely correlated with the size of 11mm, the predictive capability of other follicular volumes needs to also be compared, since follicles are rarely spheres, especially in hyperstimulated ovaries and therefore even better prediction of oocyte maturation may arise from another volume.

Wider implications of the findings

Manual-2D ultrasound and automated-3D volumetric assessment of follicles provide similar predictive value of the number of mature oocytes retrieved. Therefore volumetric measurements can possibly be used during assessment of ovarian stimulation, instead of mean diameter. However, their clinical effectiveness needs to be tested in a robust clinical trial.

Trial registration number

N/A

Disparity between Ki67 measurements and tumor gene expression tests in patients with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer from the OPTIMA preliminary trial

567

Background: Tumor gene expression tests are increasingly used in breast cancer management. The Ki67 biomarker has been proposed as an inexpensive alternative for making chemotherapy decisions, has demonstrated utility for determination of endocrine therapy responsiveness and is included in the FDA license for adjuvant abemaciclib. We have compared Ki67 measurements with tumor gene expression test results for patients included in the OPTIMA prelim trial. Methods: We compared Ki67 %staining with the results of Oncotype DX, Prosigna and MammaPrint performed by the test vendor. Ki67 was determined in a single laboratory on triplicate tissue micro-arrays using quantitative image analysis including a 10% manual quality control check. We used kappa statistics to measure agreement between tests, divided into groups using the pre-defined test score boundaries for high vs. not high risk. Results: Data were available for 259 patients. Using ≥20% staining to define a high Ki67 score, kappa values (95% CI) for agreement with Prosigna were: 0.39 (0.28-0.49); Oncotype DX: 0.27 (0.18-0.36); and MammaPrint: 0.38 (0.27-0.49). Kappa values <0.2 are conventionally interpreted as showing slight agreement and 0.21-0.4 as fair agreement. A detailed breakdown of the comparisons of Ki67 with Prosigna and Oncotype DX is tabulated. Conclusions: Agreement between Ki67 and tumor gene expression tests is limited. Therefore, Ki67 values cannot accurately be used to reflect any of the molecular scores assessed here, all of which are well validated prognostic biomarkers. The use of Ki67 to determine suitability for adjuvant chemotherapy requires validation before it can replace the existing tests. Tumor gene expression tests may prove superior to Ki67 for the identification of patients likely to benefit from adjuvant abemaciclib. OPTIMA prelim is registered as ISRCTN42400492 and funded by the UK NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, award number 10/34/01. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN42400492. [Table: see text]

Abstract P5-13-36: Germline BRCA1/2 and other predisposition genes in high-risk early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) patients treated with endocrine therapy (ET) with or without palbociclib: A secondary analysis from the PENELOPE-B study

Background: In high-risk hormone-receptor (HR)+/HER2- BC patients germline (g) mutations can be found in approximately 14% in BRCA1/2 and in BRCA1/2 and other BC predisposition genes in 20% (Pohl-Rescigno E, et al. JAMA Oncol 2020). In metastatic BC CDK4/6 inhibitors may have greater activity in patients with a BRCA mutation detected in ctDNA (André F, et al. J Clin Oncol 2020). The PENELOPE-B trial did not to show an improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) by adding palbociclib to ET in high-risk HR+/HER2- BC (Loibl S, et al. J Clin Oncol 2021). Methods: Blood samples from 898 of 1250 PENELOPE-B patients were available. 445 patients were sampled following a case-cohort design (220 cases defined as patients with any event during follow-up and 225 randomly selected patients without any event [non-cases]) and analyzed for germline variants in BRCA1/2 and 16 non-BRCA1/2 cancer predisposition genes (ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, FANCM, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53, XRCC2) by targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). The primary definition of mutational status was the prevalence of a pathogenic mutation (mt) in one or more analyzed BC predisposition genes. Statistical analyses for time-to-event endpoints (iDFS, distant disease-free survival [DDFS], and overall survival [OS]) were based on inverse probability weighting: weighted Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used. Results: 442 of 445 patients (placebo arm: 104 cases and 105 non-cases; palbociclib arm: 114 cases and 119 non-cases) were successfully analyzed for mutational status. A total of 42 (9.5%) patients (placebo arm: 9.1%; palbociclib arm: 9.9%) carried any mutation. 15 (3.4%) patients had a gBRCA1/2 mt (one of whom carried a gATM mt and one a gCHEK2 mt in addition to gBRCA2 mt) and 29 (6.6%) had mutations in one of the other BC predisposition genes (n=8 CHEK2, n=7 PALB2, n=5 ATM, n=2 RAD50, n=1 for BARD1, FANCM, MRE11A, RAD51C, RAD51D, TP53 and n=1 both RAD51D and BRIP1). The mutational status with respect to all genes analyzed showed no significant correlation to clinical baseline variables. With regard to gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 genes only, the mutational status significantly correlated with age but not with other clinical variables: all 15 (100%) gBRCA mt carriers were younger than 50 years compared to 238 (56%) wildtype (wt) patients (p=0.002). The iDFS rate after 3 years was 80.9% in patients with any mutation and 79.5% in patients without. Mutational status (mt vs. wt) based on all genes analyzed was not prognostic (iDFS: hazard ratio 1.015, 95%CI 0.558-1.784; DDFS: 0.970, 95%CI 0.521-1.758; OS: 0.768, 95%CI 0.274-1.615). Neither the mutated patients had a benefit from palbociclib treatment (palbociclib vs placebo; iDFS: hazard ratio 0.766, 95%CI 0.263-3.022; DDFS: 0.897, 95%CI 0.275-3.489; OS: 0.666, 95%CI 0.063-5.671) nor the wt patients (iDFS: hazard ratio 0.918, 95%CI 0.650-1.303; DDFS: 0.966, 95%CI 0.679-1.393; OS: 0.901, 95%CI 0.573-1.433); interaction tests for treatment arm/mutational status for all time-to-event endpoints were not statistically significant. Analysis in the subgroups of patients by gBRCA1/2 showed similar results but had less statistical power. Conclusions: In this case-cohort analysis of 442 patients enrolled in the PENELOPE-B trial, the detection of BC predisposition genes was lower than expected with 10%. This is probably due to the low rate of gBRCA1/2 carriers (3.4%), which could be influenced by the selection criteria of the trial. Patients with gBRCA1/2 or other BC disposition genes had a comparable outcome to non-carriers in the PENELOPE-B trial.

Citation Format: Sibylle Loibl, Jan Hauke, Karen Gelmon, Frederik Marmé, Corinna Ernst, Miguel Martin, Michael Untch, Hervé Bonnefoi, Erik Knudsen, Seock-Ah Im, Angela DeMichele, Laura Van’t Veer, Sung-Bae Kim, Harry Bear, Nicole McCarthy, Nicholas Turner, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Federico Rojo, Peter A Fasching, José A García-Sáenz, Catherine M Kelly, Toralf Reimer, Masakazu Toi, Hope S Rugo, Carsten Denkert, Michael Gnant, Andreas Makris, Yuan Liu, Olga Valota, Bärbel Felder, Karsten Weber, Valentina Nekljudova, Eric Hahnen. Germline BRCA1/2 and other predisposition genes in high-risk early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) patients treated with endocrine therapy (ET) with or without palbociclib: A secondary analysis from the PENELOPE-B study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-36.

Abstract PD2-04: Molecular plasticity of luminal breast cancer and response to CDK 4/6 inhibition - The biomarker program of the PENELOPE-B trial investigating post-neoadjuvant palbociclib

Background: Molecular plasticity of breast cancer is crucial for the development of therapy-resistant disease. In this investigation, we studied changes in molecular signatures between pretherapeutic (pre-Tx) and post-therapeutic (post-NACT) tumor samples from patients included in the PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) trial. The phase III PENELOPE-B study did not show a significant benefit from palbociclib in women with centrally confirmed HR+, HER2- primary breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and at high-risk of relapse (CPS-EG score ≥3 or 2 and ypN+) (Loibl et al. JCO 2021). However, first translational investigations showed that a small number of patients with a luminal-B tumor subtype, based on absolute intrinsic molecular subtyping (AIMS, Paquet & Hallet, JNCI 2014) subtyping after NACT, had a numerical benefit from post-NACT palbociclib. We have therefore extended the analysis and included a cohort of paired pre-Tx and post-NACT samples. Methods: We investigated gene expression in pre-Tx (n=259) tumor tissue samples using the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel including 2549 genes (HTG Molecular Diagnostics Inc.); for the same patients the same panel on post-NACT residual tumor samples were available. The paired samples were selected based on a case-cohort approach. Based on 91 genes of this panel, the AIMS subtype was calculated. In addition, we performed exploratory biomarker analyses to identify genes and gene signatures with prognostic and predictive relevance. After completion of NACT, PENELOPE-B patients were randomized to palbociclib versus placebo in addition to standard endocrine therapy. Results: The prevalence of AIMS subtypes, in particular LumA vs LumB, changed in pre-Tx and post-NACT tumors. In the pre-Tx samples, 115 (44%) and 123 (47%) of tumors had LumA and LumB subtypes, respectively, as expected from a high-risk cohort. However, in the post-NACT samples, LumA tumors were predominant (n=183, 71%) over LumB (n=30; 12%). 78 (30%) and 6 (2%) tumors switched their subtype from LumB to LumA and LumA to LumB, respectively. For further analyses, we compared the groups of low proliferating (LumA and NormL) and high proliferating subtypes (LumB, BasalL and HER2E). In bivariable Cox regression analysis, the grouped pre-Tx and post-NACT AIMS subtypes were independent prognostic factors for iDFS: HR=1.85 (1.16-2.98, p=0.011) for pre-Tx LumB/BasalL/HER2E vs LumA/NormL and HR=2.18 (1.24-3.84, p=0.007) for post-NACT. Similar results were found when adjusted for prognostic clinical factors and for DDFS and OS endpoints although the pre-Tx subtype did not reach significance. These and further Cox models investigating interaction effects show that patients with tumors developing from high (pre-Tx) to low proliferation (post-NACT) had a higher iDFS risk compared to stable low proliferating tumors but a lower iDFS risk compared to stable high proliferating tumors. Neither in the pre-Tx LumB/BasalL/HER2E nor in the pre-Tx LumA/NormL subgroup a benefit from palbociclib was observed. Based on the results of the AIMS subtyping, we extended the exploratory analysis to identify genes that might be involved in the prognostic and predictive effects as well as genes driving the subtype switch. The analysis is ongoing and the relevant genes will be presented at the conference. Conclusions: Our findings show that the switch from high-risk molecular subtypes (in particular LumB) to low-risk subtypes (in particular LumA) is common in neoadjuvant therapy of luminal tumors. The adaptation of luminal high-risk tumors to therapy-induced stress is crucial for the clinical outcome and the results suggest that molecular defined tumor subtypes might not be as stable as originally thought.

Citation Format: Carsten Denkert, Frederik Marmé, Miguel Martin, Michael Untch, Hervé Bonnefoi, Sung-Bae Kim, Harry Bear, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Seock-Ah Im, Angela DeMichele, Laura Van’t Veer, Nicole McCarthy, Thorsten Stiewe, Karen A. Gelmon, José A. García-Sáenz, Catherine M. Kelly, Toralf Reimer, Erik Knudsen, Nicholas Turner, Federico Rojo, Peter A. Fasching, Julia Teply-Szymanski, Yuan Liu, Masakazu Toi, Hope S. Rugo, Michael Gnant, Andreas Makris, Bärbel Felder, Karsten Weber, Sibylle Loibl. Molecular plasticity of luminal breast cancer and response to CDK 4/6 inhibition - The biomarker program of the PENELOPE-B trial investigating post-neoadjuvant palbociclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-04.

Effect of Celecoxib vs Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy on Disease-Free Survival Among Patients With Breast Cancer: The REACT Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Patients with breast cancer remain at risk of relapse after adjuvant therapy. Celecoxib has shown antitumor effects in preclinical models of human breast cancer, but clinical evidence is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of celecoxib as an addition to conventional therapy for women with ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative primary breast cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Randomized European Celecoxib Trial (REACT) was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study conducted in 160 centers across the UK and Germany testing 2 years of adjuvant celecoxib vs placebo among 2639 patients recruited between January 19, 2007, and November 1, 2012, with follow-up 10 years after treatment completion. Eligible patients had completely resected breast cancer with local and systemic therapy according to local practice. Patients with ERBB2-positive or node-negative and T1, grade 1 tumors were not eligible. Randomization was in a 2:1 ratio between celecoxib or placebo. Statistical analysis was performed from May 5, 2019, to March 5, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received celecoxib, 400 mg, or placebo once daily for 2 years.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), analyzed in the intention-to-treat population using Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank analysis. Follow-up is complete.

RESULTS

A total of 2639 patients (median age, 55.2 years [range, 26.8-86.0 years]) were recruited; 1763 received celecoxib, and 876 received placebo. Most patients' tumors (1930 [73%]) were estrogen receptor positive or progesterone receptor positive and ERBB2 negative. A total of 1265 patients (48%) had node-positive disease, and 1111 (42%) had grade 3 tumors. At a median follow-up of 74.3 months (interquartile range, 61.4-93.6 years), DFS events had been reported for 487 patients (19%): 18% for those who received celecoxib (n = 323; 5-year DFS rate = 84%) vs 19% for those who received placebo (n = 164; 5-year DFS rate = 83%); the unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.80-1.17; log-rank P = .75). Rates of toxic effects were low across both treatment groups, with no evidence of a difference.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, patients showed no evidence of a DFS benefit for 2 years' treatment with celecoxib compared with placebo as adjuvant treatment of ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Longer-term treatment or use of a higher dose of celecoxib may lead to a DFS benefit, but further studies would be required to test this possibility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02429427 and isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN48254013.

Optima: Optimal personalised treatment of early breast cancer using multi-parameter analysis, an international randomized trial of tumor gene expression test-directed chemotherapy treatment in a largely node-positive population

TPS599

Background: Multi-parameter tumor gene expression assays (MPAs) are validated tools to assist adjuvant chemotherapy decisions for post-menopausal women with luminal-type node-negative breast cancer. Currently there is less certainty for women with 1-3 involved axillary lymph nodes and no information on MPA use for patients with higher level nodal involvement. Three RCTs with available data report chemotherapy benefit for premenopausal women; with limited use of ovarian function suppression (OFS) for non-chemotherapy treated participants, chemotherapy-induced menopause may explain these results. Methods: OPTIMA is an international academic, partially-blinded RCT of test-directed chemotherapy treatment with an adaptive design. Women and men aged 40 or older with resected luminal-type breast cancer may participate if they fulfil one of the following stage criteria: pN1-2; pN1mi with pT ≥20mm; pN0 with pT ≥30mm. Consenting patients are randomized between standard treatment with chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy or to undergo Prosigna testing; those with high-Prosigna Score ( > 60) tumors receive standard treatment whilst those with low-score tumors are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Patients are informed only of their treatment; test details, and randomization for chemotherapy-treated patients are masked. Clinical choice of chemotherapy is declared at randomization from a menu of standard regimens. Endocrine therapy must be for at least 5 years. Women postmenopausal at trial entry should receive an AI; men, tamoxifen; and premenopausal women, either an AI or tamoxifen, and OFS for 3 or more years; OFS initiation may be deferred because of post-chemotherapy amenorrhea. OPTIMA aims to randomize 2250 patients in each arm to demonstrate non-inferiority of test directed treatment, defined as not more than 3% below the estimated 85% 5-year IDFS for the control arm with a one sided 5% significance level. Power is 81% assuming recruitment over 96-months from January 2017 and 12 months minimum follow-up. OPTIMA also has at least 80% power to demonstrate 3.5% non-inferiority of IDFS for patients with low Prosigna Score tumors (estimated 65% of participants). Cox proportional hazards models will be used to explore important prognostic factors including menopausal status. Additional secondary endpoints include DRFI. A cost-effectiveness analysis of protocol specified MPA driven treatment against standard clinical practice will be conducted. At 31/01/2021, 2004 patients had been randomized. The DMC reviewed the trial in December 2020 with knowledge of related trial results and suggested that the trial continues as planned. OPTIMA is registered as ISRCTN42400492 and funded by the UK NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, award number 10/34/501. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN42400492.

Palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Subgroup analyses of premenopausal patients in PENELOPE-B

518

Background: PENELOPE-B assessed efficacy of the CDK4/6 inhibitor 1-year palbociclib versus placebo added to endocrine therapy (ET) as post-neoadjuvant treatment in a high-risk breast cancer population. Palbociclib did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo (3-year iDFS 81.3% vs 77.7%) (Loibl et al. J Clin Oncol 2021). Here we report results from the subpopulation of premenopausal women. Methods: Patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer without pathological complete response after taxane‐containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and at high risk of relapse (CPS‐EG score ≥3 or 2 and ypN+) were randomized (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib 125mg daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28d cycle in addition to standard endocrine treatment including tamoxifen (TAM) +/- gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH) and aromatase inhibitor (AI) +/- GnRH. Randomization was stratified by nodal status at surgery, age ( < 50 vs ≥50 years), Ki-67, region, and CPS-EG score. Results: 616/1250 patients were premenopausal at the time of enrollment, 185 of these patients (30.0%) were younger than 40 years of age. 95.2% had ypN+ after surgery; 42.8% had ypT2 and 46.8% a CPS-EG score of 3. 23.1% of the premenopausal women had a Ki67 of > 15% in residual disease. 66.1% started with TAM alone; 19.3% with TAM and ovarian function suppression (OFS); and 13.6% received an AI+OFS. There was no difference in iDFS between palbociclib and placebo in the premenopausal women HR 0.948 (0.693-1.30). The 3-year iDFS was 80.6% and 78.3%, respectively. Palbociclib vs placebo in subgroups by endocrine treatment: TAM alone HR 1.05 (0.715-1.53) p = 0.817; TAM+GnRH HR 0.52 (0.267-1.02) p = 0.057 and AI+GnRH HR 1.58 (0.548-4.56) p = 0.397; pinteraction0.124. Hematologic toxicity was significantly more common with palbociclib. Non-hematological toxicity any grade palbociclib vs placebo were: fatigue 67.4% vs 51.3%; hot flushes 52.2% vs 54.8%; bone pain 15.6% vs 16.6%; and vaginal dryness 11.0% vs 11.5%. When receiving palbociclib fewer patients in the AI+GnRH group vs the TAM +/- GnRH cohort experienced anemia (54.1% vs 80.5%) and thrombocytopenia (37.8% vs 65.1%). Fatigue (75.7% vs 66.3%) and nausea (40.5% vs 24.9%) were more common with AI+GnRH than TAM +/-GnRH when palbociclib was added. Thromboembolic events were low with overall 9 events (4 vs 5; AI+GnRH 2.4% vs 1.3% TAM+/-GnRH). Conclusions: The addition of palbociclib to endocrine therapy did not improve iDFS in premenopausal women. These are the first safety results from a phase III study for the combination tamoxifen +/-GnRH and palbociclib. The addition of palbociclib to tamoxifen +/-GnRH in premenopausal women did not increase side effects compared to AI+GnRH and seems to be an alternative to AI+GnRH. Clinical trial information: NCT01864746.

Palbociclib for Residual High-Risk Invasive HR-Positive and HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer-The Penelope-B Trial

PURPOSE

About one third of patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) will relapse. Thus, additional therapy is needed. Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor demonstrating efficacy in the metastatic setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane-containing NACT and at high risk of relapse (clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3 or 2 and ypN+). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib 125 mg once daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28-day cycle in addition to endocrine therapy (ET). Primary end point is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Final analysis was planned after 290 iDFS events with a two-sided efficacy boundary P < .0463 because of two interim analyses.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned. The median age was 49.0 years (range, 19-79), and the majority were ypN+ with Ki-67 ≤ 15%; 59.4% of patients had a clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3. 50.1% received aromatase inhibitor, and 33% of premenopausal women received a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog in addition to either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (92% complete), 308 events were confirmed. Palbociclib did not improve iDFS versus placebo added to ET-stratified hazard ratio, 0.93 (95% repeated CI, 0.74 to 1.17) and two-sided weighted log-rank test (Cui, Hung, and Wang) P = .525. There was no difference among the subgroups. Most common related serious adverse events were infections and vascular disorders in 113 (9.1%) patients with no difference between the treatment arms. Eight fatal serious adverse events (two palbociclib and six placebo) were reported.

CONCLUSION

Palbociclib for 1 year in addition to ET did not improve iDFS in women with residual invasive disease after NACT.

Comparison of standard versus ultrasound guidance in radial and femoral access: a subanalysis of the randomised SURF trial

Background

Ultrasound (US) guidance in facilitating arterial access may reduce vascular complications and possible bleeding. There are still limited trials assessing real-time US guidance for coronary angiography. The SURF (Standard versus ultrasound-guided radial and femoral access in coronary angiography and intervention) trial showed no difference in primary outcome when the combined radial and femoral ultrasound analysis compared with standard (SD) technique, but significantly improved access efficiency and success rate.

Purpose

This subanalysis compared clinical and procedural outcomes of the individual radial and femoral access with US guidance versus standard technique.

Methods

Patients (n=1388) undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention were randomised (1:1) into radial or femoral access, and (1:1) to SD or US guidance. The primary outcome was a composite of ACUITY (Acute Catheterisation and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) major bleeding, MACE (death, stroke, myocardial infarction or urgent target lesion revascularisation) and vascular complications at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were access time, number of attempts, venepuncture, difficult accesses and first-pass success.

Results

Compared to standard, US guidance produced no difference in composite endpoint for both radial (1.4% vs 1.2%, p=0.78) and femoral (3.1% vs 3.8%, p=0.65) accesses. ACUITY major bleeding (radial: 0.9% US vs 0.6% SD, p=0.69; femoral: 1.9% US vs 2.3% SD, p=0.69), vascular complications (radial: 0.3% US vs 0.3% SD, p=0.98; femoral: 1.3% US vs 0.9% SD, p=0.63) and MACE (radial: 0.6% US vs 0.3% SD, p=0.59; femoral: 0.9% US vs 1.2% SD, p=0.78) were similar in the US and SD approaches, respectively. However, US guidance resulted in improved procedural outcomes for both accesses. Femoral access derived the most benefit from US, with reduced mean access time (73 sec vs 97 sec, p=0.006), attempts (1.35 vs 1.84, p≤0.0001), difficult accesses (1.8% vs 6.2%, p=0.004), venepuncture (5.8% vs 12.6%, p=0.002) and improved first-pass success (77.2% vs 58.8%, p≤0.0001). For radial, US reduced attempts (1.59 vs 1.97, p=0.0007), difficult accesses (6.9% vs 12.3%, p=0.02), venepuncture (2.5% vs 5.6%, p=0.04) and improved first-pass success (69.2% vs 60.7%, p=0.02). There was no difference in radial mean access time (111 sec vs 126 sec, p=0.18).

Conclusions

US guidance in radial and femoral access did not reduce primary outcome compared to standard technique. The use of US significantly improved the efficiency and success rate of arterial cannulation, with femoral access derived the most benefit.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Comparison of Whole-Body MRI, CT, and Bone Scintigraphy for Response Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics in Metastatic Breast Cancer to Bone

Background CT and bone scintigraphy have limitations in evaluating systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) response in bone metastases from metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Purpose To evaluate whether whole-body MRI enables identification of progressive disease (PD) earlier than CT and bone scintigraphy in bone-only MBC. Materials and Methods This prospective study evaluated participants with bone-only MBC between May 2016 and January 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03266744). Participants were enrolled at initiation of first or subsequent SACT based on standard CT and bone scintigraphy imaging. Baseline whole-body MRI was performed within 2 weeks of entry; those with extraosseous disease were excluded. CT and whole-body MRI were performed every 12 weeks until definitive PD was evident with one or both modalities. In case of PD, bone scintigraphy was used to assess for bone disease progression. Radiologists independently interpreted images from CT, whole-body MRI, or bone scintigraphy and were blinded to results with the other modalities. Systematic differences in performance between modalities were analyzed by using the McNemar test. Results Forty-five participants (mean age, 60 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; all women) were evaluated. Median time on study was 36 weeks (range, 1-120 weeks). Two participants were excluded because of unequivocal evidence of liver metastases at baseline whole-body MRI, two participants were excluded because they had clinical progression before imaging showed PD, and one participant was lost to follow-up. Of the 33 participants with PD at imaging, 67% (22 participants) had PD evident at whole-body MRI only and 33% (11 participants) had PD at CT and whole-body MRI concurrently; none had PD at CT only (P < .001, McNemar test). There was only slight agreement between whole-body MRI and CT (Cohen κ, 0.15). PD at bone scintigraphy was reported in 50% of participants (13 of 26) with bone progression at CT and/or whole-body MRI (P < .001, McNemar test). Conclusion Whole-body MRI enabled identification of progressive disease before CT in most participants with bone-only metastatic breast cancer. Progressive disease at bone scintigraphy was evident in only half of participants with bone progression at whole-body MRI. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Strategies to Improve Recruitment to a De-escalation Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study of the OPTIMA Prelim Trial in Early Breast Cancer

AIMS

De-escalation trials are challenging and sometimes may fail due to poor recruitment. The OPTIMA Prelim randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN42400492) randomised patients with early stage breast cancer to chemotherapy versus 'test-directed' chemotherapy, with a possible outcome of no chemotherapy, which could confer less treatment relative to routine practice. Despite encountering challenges, OPTIMA Prelim reached its recruitment target ahead of schedule. This study reports the root causes of recruitment challenges and the strategies used to successfully overcome them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mixed-methods recruitment intervention (QuinteT Recruitment Intervention) was used to investigate the recruitment difficulties and feedback findings to inform interventions and optimise ongoing recruitment. Quantitative site-level recruitment data, audio-recorded recruitment appointments (n = 46), qualitative interviews (n = 22) with trialists/recruiting staff (oncologists/nurses) and patient-facing documentation were analysed using descriptive, thematic and conversation analyses. Findings were triangulated to inform a 'plan of action' to optimise recruitment.

RESULTS

Despite best intentions, oncologists' routine practices complicated recruitment. Discomfort about deviating from the usual practice of recommending chemotherapy according to tumour clinicopathological features meant that not all eligible patients were approached. Audio-recorded recruitment appointments revealed how routine practices undermined recruitment. A tendency to justify chemotherapy provision before presenting the randomised controlled trial and subtly indicating that chemotherapy would be more/less beneficial undermined equipoise and made it difficult for patients to engage with OPTIMA Prelim. To tackle these challenges, individual and group recruiter feedback focussed on communication issues and vignettes of eligible patients were discussed to address discomforts around approaching patients. 'Tips' documents concerning structuring discussions and conveying equipoise were disseminated across sites, together with revisions to the Patient Information Sheet.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study illuminating the tension between oncologists' routine practices and recruitment to de-escalation trials. Although time and resources are required, these challenges can be addressed through specific feedback and training as the trial is underway.

Abstract OT3-17-01: OPTIMA: A prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in mostly node-positive early breast cancer

Background: Multi-parameter tumour gene expression assays (MPAs) are widely used to estimate individual patient risk and to guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The TAILORx trial supports MPA use in a node-negative population. Evidence in node-positive breast cancer is limited. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) (ISRCTN42400492) is a prospective international randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to validate MPA’s as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population.

Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded study with an adaptive two-stage design. The main eligibility criteria are women and men age 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomisation is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment using the Prosigna (PAM50) test. Those with a Prosigna tumour Score (ROR_PT) &gt;60 receive standard management whilst those with a low score (≤60) are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal women includes ovarian suppression. Prosigna tests are currently performed only for participants randomised to MPA-directed treatment. More than 1 tumour may be tested if participants have multi-focal tumours with discordant features and/or are considered clinically significant. The co-primary outcomes are: (1) Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS) and (2) cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes include IDFS in patients with low-score tumours and quality of life. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 5 years will permit demonstration of 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment, assuming 5-year IDFS of 85% with standard management. An integrated qualitative recruitment study addresses challenges to consent and recruitment, building on experience from the feasibility study which found that a multidisciplinary approach is important for recruitment success.

Results: The OPTIMA main trial opened in January 2017. Overall recruitment as of 1 July 2019 was 1123 (1100 from UK, 13 from Norway); 91% had axillary node macro-metastases. Median time from consent to treatment allocation was 12 days (interquartile range 10-14 days). The withdrawal rate from trial treatment is 3%; 50% of these continue with follow up. Prosigna tests have been performed on 608 tumours for 549 participants; 59% were luminal A, 38% were luminal B and 3% non-luminal (6 patients with non-luminal tumours [1% overall] were ineligible on receptor retesting). Of the 53 (10%) participants with &gt;1 tumour tested, 3 (6%) had discordant scores only, 7 (13%) had discordant subtypes only and 8 (15%) had both discordant scores and subtypes. Two thirds of the MPA-directed arm participants have been allocated to endocrine therapy only. The test failure rate is &lt;1%.

Conclusion: OPTIMA is one of two large scale prospective trials validating the use of test-guided chemotherapy decisions in node-positive early breast cancer. It is expected to have a global impact on breast cancer treatment.

Funding: OPTIMA is funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501). Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Trial Inquiries: OPTIMA@warwick.ac.uk

Citation Format: Robert C Stein, Andrea Marshall, Andreas Makris, Luke Hughes-Davies, Iain R MacPherson, Carmel Conefrey, Leila Rooshenas, Sarah E Pinder, Abeer M Shaaban, Bjørn Naume, David A Cameron, Daniel W Rea, Helena M Earl, Christopher J Poole, Peter S Hall, Georgina Dotchin, Stuart A McIntosh, Victoria Harmer, Adrienne Morgan, Bethany Shinkins, Nigel Stallard, Christopher McCabe, Jenny L Donovan, John MS Bartlett, Janet A Dunn. OPTIMA: A prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in mostly node-positive early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-17-01.

Effect of Placental Growth Factor on Trophoblast-Endothelial Cell Interactions In Vitro

Placental growth factor (PlGF) is an important angiogenic factor which has an emerging role in the clinical management of suspected preeclampsia. The role of PlGF in normal placental development is not completely understood and it is uncertain whether PlGF influences trophoblast and endothelial cell interactions central to uterine spiral artery remodelling, especially in variable oxygen conditions. A two-cell model of endovascular invasion was used. Tissue culture plates were coated with Matrigel™, on which fluorescent-labelled uterine microvascular endothelial cells (1 × 10⁵/well) and HTR8/SVNeo cells were co-cultured (1 × 10⁵/well) for 20 h. Co-cultures were treated with recombinant human PlGF (rhPlGF) (10 or 100 ng/mL) and incubated at either 21% O₂ or 2% O₂. Images were captured by fluorescence microscopy and analysed using ImageJ (n = 7). Data was analysed using SPSSv24. Treatment with rhPlGF did not improve integration in co-cultures irrespective of oxygen conditions but increased proliferation in 2% O₂ of both trophoblast and endothelial cells. Expression of angiogenic factors VEGF, sFLT-1, PlGF and CXCL12 in both co-cultures and in isolated trophoblast cells was not altered by rhPlGF treatment. Expression of TLR-3 mRNA in co-cultures was increased by rhPlGF 100 ng/mL at 21% O₂ (p = 0.03). PlGF contributes to trophoblast and endothelial cell proliferation in the setting of physiological hypoxia but does not influence trophoblast and endothelial cell interactions in an in vitro model of spiral artery remodelling. Upregulation of TLR-3 expression in co-cultures may indicate a role for PlGF in the placental inflammatory response.

Fulvestrant Plus Vistusertib vs Fulvestrant Plus Everolimus vs Fulvestrant Alone for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: The MANTA Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Does the addition of vistusertib increase progression-free survival and other measures of antitumor activity of fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed after prior therapy with aromatase inhibitors?

Findings

This randomized clinical trial in 333 patients failed to demonstrate a benefit of vistusertib plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant alone. In addition, the outcomes in both vistusertib groups were inferior to those in the group treated with fulvestrant plus everolimus.

Meaning

The results suggest that dual mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition with vistusertib at the maximal tolerated doses is inferior to mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 inhibition with the rapamycin analogue everolimus.

Importance

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a substantial benefit of adding everolimus to endocrine therapy. Everolimus inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) complex but not mTORC2, which can set off an activating feedback loop via mTORC2. Vistusertib, a dual inhibitor of mTORC1 and mTORC2, has demonstrated broad activity in preclinical breast cancer models, showing superior activity to everolimus.

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vistusertib in combination with fulvestrant compared with fulvestrant alone or fulvestrant plus everolimus in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The MANTA trial is an open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial in which 333 patients with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer progressing after prior aromatase inhibitor treatment underwent randomization (2:3:3:2) between April 1, 2014, and October 24, 2016, at 88 sites in 9 countries: 67 patients were assigned to receive fulvestrant, 103 fulvestrant plus vistusertib daily, 98 fulvestrant plus vistusertib intermittently, and 65 fulvestrant plus everolimus. Treatment was continued until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Interventions

Fulvestrant alone or in combination with vistusertib (continuous or intermittent dosing schedules) or everolimus.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Among the 333 women in the study (median age, 63 years [range, 56-70 years]), median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.5-9.2 months) with fulvestrant, 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-9.4 months) with fulvestrant plus daily vistusertib, 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.6-9.9 months) with fulvestrant plus intermittent vistusertib, and 12.3 months (95% CI, 7.7-15.7 months) with fulvestrant plus everolimus. There was no significant difference in PFS between those receiving fulvestrant plus daily or intermittent vistusertib and fulvestrant alone (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.63-1.24]; P = .46; and hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.55-1.12]; P = .16).

Conclusions and Relevance

The combination of fulvestrant plus everolimus demonstrated significantly longer PFS compared with fulvestrant plus vistusertib or fulvestrant alone. The trial failed to demonstrate a benefit of adding the dual mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibitor vistusertib to fulvestrant.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02216786 and EudraCT number: 2013-002403-34

Assessment of the Spatial Heterogeneity of Breast Cancers: Associations Between Computed Tomography and Immunohistochemistry

BACKGROUND

Tumour heterogeneity is considered an important mechanism of treatment failure. Imaging-based assessment of tumour heterogeneity is showing promise but the relationship between these mathematically derived measures and accepted 'gold standards' of tumour biology such as immunohistochemical measures is not established.

METHODS

A total of 20 women with primary breast cancer underwent a research dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography prior to treatment with data being available for 15 of these. Texture analysis was performed of the primary tumours to extract 13 locoregional and global parameters. Immunohistochemical analysis associations were assessed by the Spearman rank correlation.

RESULTS

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α was correlated with first-order kurtosis (r = -0.533, P = .041) and higher order neighbourhood grey-tone difference matrix coarseness (r = 0.54, P = .038). Vascular maturity-related smooth muscle actin was correlated with higher order grey-level run-length long-run emphasis (r = -0.52, P = .047), fractal dimension (r = 0.613, P = .015), and lacunarity (r = -0.634, P = .011). Micro-vessel density, reflecting angiogenesis, was also associated with lacunarity (r = 0.547, P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

The associations suggest a biological basis for these image-based heterogeneity features and support the use of imaging, already part of standard care, for assessing intratumoural heterogeneity.

Abstract OT1-05-02: OPTIMA: A prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer

Background:Multi-parameter tumour gene expression assays (MPAs) are widely used to estimate individual patient residual risk and to guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The TAILORx trial supports MPA use in a node-negative population. Evidence for MPA use in node-positive breast cancer is limited. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) (ISRCTN42400492) aims to validate MPAs as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population where prospective RCT (Randomised Controlled Trial) evidence is lacking.

Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded multi-center RCT with an adaptive two-stage design. The main eligibility criteria are women and men age 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomisation is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment using the Prosigna (PAM50) test. Those with a Prosigna tumour score (ROR_PT) &gt;60 receive standard management whilst those with a low score (≤60) are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal women includes ovarian suppression. The co-primary outcomes are (1) Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS) and (2) cost-effectiveness of test-directed treatment. Secondary outcomes include IDFS in patients with low-score tumours and quality of life. An integrated qualitative recruitment study addresses challenges to consent and recruitment and will build on experience from the feasibility study that a multidisciplinary approach at sites is important for recruitment success. Tumour blocks will be banked to allow evaluation of additional MPA technologies. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 5 years will permit demonstration of 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment, assuming 5-year IDFS of 85% with standard management, equivalent to a HR of 1.22. Inclusion of patients from the feasibility study will increase the power to test for non-inferiority.

Results: The OPTIMA main trial opened in January 2017. Overall recruitment (including the feasibility study) will reach 1000 in August 2018. Recruitment in Norway will commence in July 2018. Characteristics of the OPTIMA main participants recruited to 31st May 2018 are shown in the table.

Main study patient characteristicsCharacteristic %Median age in years (range)57 (40-80) Menopause statusPre34 Post66 Male1Tumour size&lt;30mm58 &gt;=30mm42Node statuspN04 pN1mi(sn)7 pN1(sn)20 pN155 pN214Historic grade16 258 336

Conclusion: OPTIMA is one of two large scale prospective trials validating the use of test-guided chemotherapy decisions in node-positive early breast cancer. It is expected to have a global impact on breast cancer treatment. Experience from the preliminary study and close engagement with centres will aid trial success.

Funding: OPTIMA is funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501). Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the DoH.

Citation Format: Stein RC, Hughes-Davies L, Makris A, Macpherson IR, Conefrey C, Rooshenas L, Pinder SE, Thomas J, Hall PS, Cameron DA, Earl HM, Naume B, Poole CJ, Rea DW, MacIntosh SA, Harmer V, Morgan A, Hulme C, McCabe C, Stallard N, Higgins H, Donovan JL, Bartlett JM, Marshall A, Dunn JA. OPTIMA: A prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-05-02.

Abstract OT1-06-01: OPTIMA: A prospective randomized trial to validate the predictive utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer

Background: Multi-parameter gene expression assays (MPAs) are widely used to estimate individual patient residual risk in hormone-sensitive HER2-negative node-negative early breast cancer, allowing patients with low risk to safely avoid chemotherapy. Evidence for MPA use in node-positive breast cancer is limited. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) aims to validate MPA's as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population.

Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded multi-center, phase 3 randomized controlled trial with an adaptive two-stage design. The main eligibility criteria are women or men aged 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment. Those with a “high risk” tumor MPA score receive standard management whilst those at “low risk” are treated with endocrine therapy alone. The preliminary phase (OPTIMA prelim) evaluated the performance of several MPAs to select a test to be used in the main efficacy trial based on economic analysis, and assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a large UK trial. OPTIMA prelim used Oncotype DX as the primary discriminator; the main trial will use Prosigna (PAM50) with Prosigna Score ≤60 defined as “low-risk”. The co-primary outcomes are (1) Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS) and (2) cost-effectiveness of test-directed therapy. Secondary outcomes include IDFS in “low-risk” patients, quality of life and additional survival measures. An integrated qualitative recruitment study will identify and address challenges to recruitment and informed consent. Tumor blocks from all consenting participants will be banked allowing the performance of alternative MPA technologies to be evaluated. Recruitment of 4500 patients will permit demonstration of 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment, with 5% significance and 85% power, assuming 3 years follow-up and a control arm 5-year IDFS of at least 85%. The addition of patients from OPTIMA prelim will allow non-inferiority to be assessed with 2.5% significance.

Results: OPTIMA-prelim recruited 412 patients in 23 months from 35 sites with a 47% acceptance rate. The main study opened in January 2017. Early progress indicates that the recruitment target is achievable in the intended 46-month timescale through the participation of &gt;100 sites

Conclusion: OPTIMA, as one of two large scale prospective trials validating the use of test-guided chemotherapy decisions in node-positive early breast cancer, is expected to have a global impact on breast cancer treatment. Experience from OPTIMA prelim showed that patient advocate support and close engagement with sites will aid trial success.

Funding: The project is funded in the UK by the NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501). Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the DoH.

Citation Format: Stein RC, Makris A, Hughes-Davies L, Macpherson IR, Hall PS, Cameron DA, Earl HM, Pinder SE, Poole CJ, Rea DW, McIntosh S, Harmer V, Morgan A, Rooshenas L, Conefrey C, Donovan JL, Hulme C, McCabe C, Stallard N, Campbell A, Higgins H, Bartlett JMS, Marshall A, Dunn JA. OPTIMA: A prospective randomized trial to validate the predictive utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-06-01.

Abstract GS3-03: A phase III multicentre double blind randomised trial of celecoxib versus placebo in primary breast cancer patients (REACT – Randomised EuropeAn celecoxib trial)

Background

Inhibition of COX-2 has been shown to attenuate the metastatic process in pre-clinical models of human breast cancer (BC). The primary aim of this study was to assess the effect of 2 years adjuvant therapy with the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib compared with placebo in HER2-ve primary BC patients.

Patients & Methods

Patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive celecoxib 400mg once daily or placebo for 2 years. Patients had to have completely resected BC with prior local and systemic adjuvant treatment according to local practice. Concurrent radiotherapy was permitted and hormone receptor +ve patients received endocrine therapy according to local practice. Patients with HER2+ or node negative, T1 and grade 1 disease were excluded. Median age of patients was 55 years (IQR: 49-63). 50% of patients had tumours &gt;2cm; 42% were grade 3; 48% had node +ve disease. According to local assessment 73% were ER/PgR +ve. Primary endpoint was Disease Free Survival (DFS); defined as time from randomisation to date of first event, with events contributing to analysis defined as recurrence (distant/local), new primary BC (ipsilateral/contralateral) and death. Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), toxicity, cardiovascular mortality and incidence of second primaries. Subgroup analysis by hormone receptor status was pre-planned. Survival endpoints are analysed using Cox-proportional hazards and log-rank tests; restricted mean survival is used where proportional hazards do not hold.

Results

Between January 2007 and November 2012, 2639 patients were randomised (1763 celecoxib; 876 placebo) from 181 centres across the UK and Germany. At 13th April 2017, median follow up was 60 months (IQR: 48-72) with 428 DFS events reported. Unadjusted survival analysis results are presented below, with hazard ratio&lt;1 favouring celecoxib:

 5 year survival estimate (95% CI)Hazard ratio (95% CI)p-valueDFS (all patients)   Celecoxib83% (81, 85)1.02 (0.83 – 1.24)0.88Placebo83% (80, 86)1-    DFS within ER+   Celecoxib87% (85, 89)0.89 (0.69 – 1.16)0.40Placebo86% (83, 89)1-    DFS within ER-   Celecoxib72% (68, 76)1.17 (0.85 – 1.61)0.33Placebo75% (69, 80)1-    OS (all patients)   Celecoxib90% (88, 91)0.97 (0.75 – 1.25)0.81Placebo90% (88, 92)1-

The interaction between ER status and treatment was not significant; p=0.36.

In the celecoxib and placebo groups there were 17 and 8 deaths respectively in patients who had not relapsed. These were due to cardiac (n=3; 2) and other (n=14; 6) in the celecoxib and placebo groups respectively; none were GI related. In total 304 serious adverse events were observed in 265 patients (186/1763 celecoxib; 79/876 placebo). In the celecoxib and placebo groups respectively these were related to cardiac (n=12; 7), GI (n=9; 2) and other (n=193; 81). Work is ongoing to determine whether a subset of ER+ patients whose primary tumours show the characteristics of a COX-2 signature receive greater benefit from celecoxib.

Conclusions

There is no benefit of celecoxib in the ITT population. Further exploratory studies focussing on the ER+ subpopulation are ongoing. Celecoxib treatment is not associated with significant toxicity when compared to placebo in this population of BC patients.

Citation Format: Coombes RC, Tovey H, Kilburn L, Mansi J, Palmieri C, Bartlett J, Hicks J, Makris A, Evans A, Loibl S, Denkert C, Murray E, Grieve R, Coleman R, Schmidt M, Klare P, Rezai M, Rautenberg B, Klutinus N, Rhein U, Mousa K, Ricardo-Vitorino S, von Minckwitz G, Bliss J. A phase III multicentre double blind randomised trial of celecoxib versus placebo in primary breast cancer patients (REACT – Randomised EuropeAn celecoxib trial) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-03.

Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for early breast cancer can make breast-conserving surgery more feasible and might be more likely to eradicate micrometastatic disease than might the same chemotherapy given after surgery. We investigated the long-term benefits and risks of NACT and the influence of tumour characteristics on outcome with a collaborative meta-analysis of individual patient data from relevant randomised trials.

METHODS

We obtained information about prerandomisation tumour characteristics, clinical tumour response, surgery, recurrence, and mortality for 4756 women in ten randomised trials in early breast cancer that began before 2005 and compared NACT with the same chemotherapy given postoperatively. Primary outcomes were tumour response, extent of local therapy, local and distant recurrence, breast cancer death, and overall mortality. Analyses by intention-to-treat used standard regression (for response and frequency of breast-conserving therapy) and log-rank methods (for recurrence and mortality).

FINDINGS

Patients entered the trials from 1983 to 2002 and median follow-up was 9 years (IQR 5-14), with the last follow-up in 2013. Most chemotherapy was anthracycline based (3838 [81%] of 4756 women). More than two thirds (1349 [69%] of 1947) of women allocated NACT had a complete or partial clinical response. Patients allocated NACT had an increased frequency of breast-conserving therapy (1504 [65%] of 2320 treated with NACT vs 1135 [49%] of 2318 treated with adjuvant chemotherapy). NACT was associated with more frequent local recurrence than was adjuvant chemotherapy: the 15 year local recurrence was 21·4% for NACT versus 15·9% for adjuvant chemotherapy (5·5% increase [95% CI 2·4-8·6]; rate ratio 1·37 [95% CI 1·17-1·61]; p=0·0001). No significant difference between NACT and adjuvant chemotherapy was noted for distant recurrence (15 year risk 38·2% for NACT vs 38·0% for adjuvant chemotherapy; rate ratio 1·02 [95% CI 0·92-1·14]; p=0·66), breast cancer mortality (34·4% vs 33·7%; 1·06 [0·95-1·18]; p=0·31), or death from any cause (40·9% vs 41·2%; 1·04 [0·94-1·15]; p=0·45).

INTERPRETATION

Tumours downsized by NACT might have higher local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy than might tumours of the same dimensions in women who have not received NACT. Strategies to mitigate the increased local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy in tumours downsized by NACT should be considered-eg, careful tumour localisation, detailed pathological assessment, and appropriate radiotherapy.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and UK Department of Health.

Value of Information Analysis of Multiparameter Tests for Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: The OPTIMA Prelim Trial

BACKGROUND

Precision medicine is heralded as offering more effective treatments to smaller targeted patient populations. In breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy is standard for patients considered as high-risk after surgery. Molecular tests may identify patients who can safely avoid chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

To use economic analysis before a large-scale clinical trial of molecular testing to confirm the value of the trial and help prioritize between candidate tests as randomized comparators.

METHODS

Women with surgically treated breast cancer (estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-positive or tumor size ≥30 mm) were randomized to standard care (chemotherapy for all) or test-directed care using Oncotype DX™. Additional testing was undertaken using alternative tests: MammaPrint^TM, PAM-50 (Prosigna^TM), MammaTyper^TM, IHC4, and IHC4-AQUA™ (NexCourse Breast™). A probabilistic decision model assessed the cost-effectiveness of all tests from a UK perspective. Value of information analysis determined the most efficient publicly funded ongoing trial design in the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

There was an 86% probability of molecular testing being cost-effective, with most tests producing cost savings (range -£1892 to £195) and quality-adjusted life-year gains (range 0.17-0.20). There were only small differences in costs and quality-adjusted life-years between tests. Uncertainty was driven by long-term outcomes. Value of information demonstrated value of further research into all tests, with Prosigna currently being the highest priority for further research.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular tests are likely to be cost-effective, but an optimal test is yet to be identified. Health economics modeling to inform the design of a randomized controlled trial looking at diagnostic technology has been demonstrated to be feasible as a method for improving research efficiency.

Imaging the Nonlinear Plasmoemission Dynamics of Electrons from Strong Plasmonic Fields

We use subcycle time-resolved photoemission microscopy to unambiguously distinguish optically triggered electron emission (photoemission) from effects caused purely by the plasmonic field (termed "plasmoemission"). We find from time-resolved imaging that nonlinear plasmoemission is dominated by the transverse plasmon field component by utilizing a transient standing wave from two counter-propagating plasmon pulses of opposite transverse spin. From plasmonic foci on flat metal surfaces, we observe highly nonlinear plasmoemission up to the fifth power of intensity and quantized energy transfer, which reflects the quantum-mechanical nature of surface plasmons. Our work constitutes the basis for novel plasmonic devices such as nanometer-confined ultrafast electron sources as well as applications in time-resolved electron microscopy.

Splenic Enlargement and Bone Marrow Hyperplasia in Patients Receiving Trastuzumab-Emtansine for Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

An association between trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and splenic enlargement is reported in preclinical data, and has been noted anecdotally in patients receiving T-DM1 at our institution. Use of whole-body MRI examinations (WB-MRI) allows for detailed bone marrow assessment and semi-automated splenic volume calculations.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate changes in splenic volume versus evidence of bone marrow hyperplasia and/or changes in portal venous pressure in patients receiving T-DM1 for metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve metastatic breast cancer patients underwent 29 WB-MRIs before and during T-DM1 therapy. Splenic volume, portal vein diameter, bone marrow diffusion-weighted normalised signal intensity (nSI), quantitative water diffusivity (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC) and fat fraction (rF%) were measured and correlated.

RESULTS

Splenic volume increases were observed in 92% of patients. Mean splenic volume increased from 144 cm³ (95% CI 110-177 cm³) to 209 cm³ (95% CI 161-257 cm³) on T-DM1 therapy (p = 0.006). Splenic volume increases correlated with treatment duration (r² = 0.43). Bone marrow hyperplasia was evidenced by an increase in bone marrow nSI (3.5 to 4.8, p = 0.12), and decreases in rF% (64.3% to 57.3%, p = 0.12) and ADC (655 μm²/s to 543 μm²/s, p = 0.11). No changes to portal vein diameter were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously unreported increases in splenic volume and bone marrow hyperplasia are observed on WB-MRI in patients on T-DM1 therapy. Caution must be applied to avoid misinterpreting T-DM1-induced bone marrow hyperplasia as diffuse disease progression in bone.

Spatial heterogeneity of MRI response to first-line hormonal therapy to predict progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer

e12544

Background: Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) can positively identify response to systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) by the analysis of water diffusivity, cellularity and cell variability. We adapted a novel methodology that captures patient-level, spatial response heterogeneity using the METastasis Response Assessment Diagnostic System (MET-RADS) using WB-MRI. This study evaluated whether spatial heterogeneity seen at the first response assessment is predictive of duration of treatment (i.e. progression-free survival, PFS) in patients on first line hormonal therapy for MBC. Methods: Patients on first line hormonal therapy for MBC had baseline and on-treatment response assessment WB-MRI scans. All patients had a primary breast mass in situ. Patients showing unequivocal disease progression at their first response assessment scans were excluded from further analysis. Criteria for response assessment utilised the methodology described by MET-RADS. A Likert five-point response assessment category (RAC) score (1 = response highly likely, 5 = progression highly likely) was applied to 14 anatomic regions (7 bone & 7 soft tissue). Two scores reflecting the dominant and next most common response per region were recorded, capturing inter- and intra-region response heterogeneity. A novel Response Heterogeneity Index (RHI) summarised the response heterogeneity at the patient level. RHI and depth of response (mean RAC score for all involved regions) and therapy duration were analysed. Results: Twenty-one patients with primary breast mass in situ were analysed. Patients with higher levels of response heterogeneity (defined as RHI > 5; n = 11) had significantly shorter PFS than those with RHI ≤5 (n = 10; median PFS: 11 vs 27 months; log rank test p = 0.011). The depth of response and PFS were unrelated (mean RAC ≤2.5 vs mean RAC > 2.5; median PFS: 21 vs 18 months; log rank test p = 0.46). There were no correlations between RHI score and mean RAC (r2= 0.007). Conclusions: A low spatial heterogeneity of response is predictive of improved PFS in patients receiving first line hormonal therapy for MBC.