101
|
Tanabe Y, Shimizu C, Hamada A, Hashimoto K, Ikeda K, Nishizawa D, Hasegawa J, Shimomura A, Ozaki Y, Tamura N, Yamamoto H, Yunokawa M, Yonemori K, Takano T, Kawabata H, Tamura K, Fujiwara Y. Paclitaxel-induced sensory peripheral neuropathy is associated with an ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphism and older age in Japanese. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2017; 79:1179-1186. [DOI: 10.1007/s00280-017-3314-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
102
|
Wang J, Chen S, Xu B, Yuan P, Ma F, Li Q, Zhang P, Cai R, Fan Y, Luo Y, Li Q. Timing of paclitaxel treatment in pre-operative or post-operative does not affect survival in breast cancer patients. Thorac Cancer 2017; 8:246-250. [PMID: 28402606 PMCID: PMC5415454 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2016] [Revised: 02/12/2017] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two epirubicin and paclitaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were compared in breast cancer patients. METHODS We enrolled 309 breast cancer patients who received two types of regimens: cyclophosphamide + epirubicin dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by sequential postoperative paclitaxel single-drug medication, and paclitaxel + epirubicin standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by two cycles of the same chemotherapy after surgery. The primary endpoint was a pathological complete response (pCR) and the secondary endpoints were disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 65 months. The overall pCRs for pathological efficacy and efficacy of primary lesions were 14.4% and 29.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). The pCR of the paclitaxel + epirubicin group was significantly higher than in the cyclophosphamide + epirubicin group (17.3% vs. 9.2%; P = 0.0345), but the five-year disease-free survival rates in both groups were not significantly different (82.9% vs. 75.3%; P = 0.916). CONCLUSIONS The results of our study indicated that the timing of paclitaxel therapy, either preoperative or postoperative, does not affect survival times in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Pin Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ruigang Cai
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Fan
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qiao Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Ballinger TJ, Kassem N, Shen F, Jiang G, Smith ML, Railey E, Howell J, White CB, Schneider BP. Discerning the clinical relevance of biomarkers in early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 164:89-97. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4238-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
104
|
Blum JL, Flynn PJ, Yothers G, Asmar L, Geyer CE, Jacobs SA, Robert NJ, Hopkins JO, O'Shaughnessy JA, Dang CT, Gómez HL, Fehrenbacher L, Vukelja SJ, Lyss AP, Paul D, Brufsky AM, Jeong JH, Colangelo LH, Swain SM, Mamounas EP, Jones SE, Wolmark N. Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: The ABC Trials-USOR 06-090, NSABP B-46-I/USOR 07132, and NSABP B-49 (NRG Oncology). J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2647-2655. [PMID: 28398846 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.71.4147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) was superior to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in a trial in early breast cancer. However, activity of TC relative to AC regimens with a taxane (TaxAC) is unknown. Methods In a series of three adjuvant trials, women were randomly assigned to TC for six cycles (TC6) or to a standard TaxAC regimen. US Oncology Research (USOR) 06-090 compared TC6 with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC6). National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-46-I/USOR 07132 compared TC6, TAC6, or TC6 plus bevacizumab. NSABP B-49 compared TC6 with several standard AC and taxane combination regimens. Before any analysis of individual trials, a joint efficacy analysis of TC versus the TaxAC regimens was planned, with invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) as the primary end point. Patients who received TC6 plus bevacizumab on NSABP B-46-I/USOR 07132 were not included. A hazard ratio (HR) from a stratified Cox model that exceeded 1.18 for TC6 versus TaxAC was predefined as inferiority for TC6. The prespecified interim monitoring plan was to report for futility if the HR was > 1.18 when 334 IDFS events were observed (50% of 668 events required for definitive analysis). Results A total of 2,125 patients were randomly assigned to receive TC6 regimens and 2,117 patients were randomly assigned to receive TaxAC regimens. The median follow-up time was 3.3 years. There were 334 IDFS events, and the HR for TC6 versus TaxAC was 1.202 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.49), which triggered early reporting for futility. The 4-year IDFS was 88.2% for TC6 and was 90.7% for TaxAC ( P = .04). Tests for treatment interaction by protocol, hormone receptor status, and nodal status were negative. Conclusion The TaxAC regimens improved IDFS in patients with high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer compared with the TC6 regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne L Blum
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Patrick J Flynn
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Greg Yothers
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Lina Asmar
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Charles E Geyer
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Samuel A Jacobs
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Nicholas J Robert
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Judith O Hopkins
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Joyce A O'Shaughnessy
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Chau T Dang
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Henry Leonidas Gómez
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Louis Fehrenbacher
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Svetislava J Vukelja
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Alan P Lyss
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Devchand Paul
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Adam M Brufsky
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Jong-Hyeon Jeong
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Linda H Colangelo
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Sandra M Swain
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Eleftherios P Mamounas
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Stephen E Jones
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Norman Wolmark
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Garrido-Castro AC, Winer EP. Genomic Profiling in Node-Positive ER-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Can Tumor Biology Guide Locoregional Therapy? J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:3067833. [PMID: 28376163 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C Garrido-Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Natori A, Ethier JL, Amir E, Cescon DW. Capecitabine in early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer 2017; 77:40-47. [PMID: 28355581 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Revised: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Capecitabine is an effective therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Its role in early breast cancer is uncertain due to conflicting data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS PubMed and major conference proceedings were searched to identify RCTs comparing standard chemotherapy with or without capecitabine in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. Hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as odds ratios (ORs) for toxicities were extracted or calculated and pooled in a meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis compared triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to non-TNBC and whether capecitabine was given in addition to or in place of standard chemotherapy. Meta-regression was used to explore the influence of TNBC on OS. RESULTS Eight studies comprising 9302 patients were included. In unselected patients, capecitabine did not influence DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, p = 0.93) or OS (HR 0.90, p = 0.36). There was a significant difference in DFS when capecitabine was given in addition to standard treatment compared with in place of standard treatment (HR 0.92 versus 1.62, interaction p = 0.002). Addition of capecitabine to standard chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved DFS in TNBC versus non-TNBC (HR 0.72 versus 1.01, interaction p = 0.02). Meta-regression showed that adding capecitabine to standard chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in studies with higher proportions of patients with TNBC (R = -0.967, p = 0.007). Capecitabine increased grade 3/4 diarrhoea (odds ratio [OR] 2.33, p < 0.001) and hand-foot syndrome (OR 8.08, p < 0.001), and resulted in more frequent treatment discontinuation (OR 3.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Adding capecitabine to standard chemotherapy appears to improve DFS and OS in TNBC, but increases adverse events in keeping with its known toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akina Natori
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Suite RFE3-805, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada.
| | - Josee-Lyne Ethier
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Suite RFE3-805, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada.
| | - Eitan Amir
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Suite RFE3-805, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada.
| | - David W Cescon
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Suite RFE3-805, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Tan QW, Luo T, Zheng H, Tian TL, He P, Chen J, Zeng HL, Lv Q. Weekly taxane-anthracycline combination regimen versus tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER 2017; 36:27. [PMID: 28270181 PMCID: PMC5340016 DOI: 10.1186/s40880-017-0196-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 12/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Extensive studies have confirmed the efficacy of taxanes in combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy on breast cancer. However, few studies have assessed the efficacy of weekly taxane–anthracycline regimens on locally advanced breast cancer. This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a weekly taxane–anthracycline regimen with those of tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Methods Patients with locally advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive 4–6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tri-weekly 5-fluorouracil–epirubicin–cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen or weekly paclitaxel–epirubicin (PE) regimen. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Other endpoints included the clinical tumor response, breast-conserving surgery rate, and adverse events. Results Between March 2010 and September 2013, 293 patients were randomized to the FEC (n = 151) and PE (n = 142) arms. The overall clinical response rate was significantly higher in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (76.06% vs. 59.95%, P = 0.001). Consistently, the post-chemotherapy pathologic T and N stages were significantly lower in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (P < 0.001). However, the pCR rate was similar in the two arms (10.61% vs. 12.31%, P = 0.665). Overall, 36 (27.27%) patients in the FEC arm and 6 (35.28%) in the PE arm were qualified for breast-conserving surgery. Most adverse events were comparable in both arms, with more severe neutropenia in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (11.97% vs. 5.96%, P = 0.031). Conclusions In patients with locally advanced breast cancer, weekly PE was not superior to FEC in terms of pCR. However, weekly PE has a higher response rate and superior down-staging effects. On this account, the PE regimen may be considered an alternative option for locally advanced breast cancer. Long-term follow-up data are needed to confirm the efficacy of this regimen on locally advanced breast cancer. Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR-TRC-10001043, September 21, 2014
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiu-Wen Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Ting Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Hong Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Ting-Lun Tian
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Ping He
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - He-Lin Zeng
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Qing Lv
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Overexpression of ANLN contributed to poor prognosis of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2017; 79:535-543. [PMID: 28243684 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-017-3248-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the associations of ANLN expression with prognosis of breast cancer and clinical outcome of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. METHODS This study enrolled 308 breast cancer patients in which 264 of them received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect ANLN expression level of the patients. Clinical characteristics of the patients were collected, and associations of ANLN expression with prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS Our results showed that ANLN expression was associated with survival of breast cancer patients, and it was also related to clinical outcome of patients received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Breast cancer patients with high expression of ANLN would have poor prognosis and poor clinical outcome to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION ANLN could be an independent prognosis predictor for breast cancer, and its expression might be used to predict the anthracycline-based chemotherapy clinical outcome in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
109
|
Watanabe T, Kuranami M, Inoue K, Masuda N, Aogi K, Ohno S, Iwata H, Mukai H, Uemura Y, Ohashi Y. Comparison of an AC-taxane versus AC-free regimen and paclitaxel versus docetaxel in patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer: Final results of the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer 02 trial, a randomized comparative phase 3 study. Cancer 2017; 123:759-768. [PMID: 28081304 PMCID: PMC6668007 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Revised: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In postoperative patients with breast cancer, the combination of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by a taxane is a standard regimen. In the current study, the authors examined whether AC could be safely omitted, and compared the effectiveness of paclitaxel versus docetaxel. METHODS Female postoperative patients with axillary lymph node‐positive breast cancer were eligible for enrollment in this phase 3, open‐label, randomized controlled trial at 84 centers in Japan. Patients were randomized to 4 cycles of doxorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at a dose of 600 mg/m2 (AC) followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 (ACpT) or AC followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 (ACdT), or 8 cycles of paclitaxel (PTx) or docetaxel (DTx) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease‐free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival adverse events. The authors adopted a 2 × 2 factorial design to examine the AC containing‐regimens (ACpT and ACdT) versus the AC free‐regimens (PTx and DTx), and the paclitaxel‐containing regimens (ACpT and PTx) versus the docetaxel‐containing regimens (ACdT and DTx). RESULTS Of 1060 patients, 1049 were treated and included in the intention‐to‐treat population. The DFS results did not demonstrate noninferiority between the AC‐containing and the AC‐free regimens (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.982‐1.448 [Pnoninferiority = .30]). Better outcomes were noted in patients treated with the docetaxel‐containing regimens compared with the paclitaxel‐containing regimens with respect to DFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.589‐0.875 [P = .0008]) and overall survival (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.574‐0.980 [P = .035]). Neutropenia, nausea, and vomiting were found to occur more often in the AC‐containing arms, whereas the incidence of edema was greater in the docetaxel‐containing treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS Noninferiority in DFS was not demonstrated between the AC‐containing and AC‐free regimens. Compared with a similar regimen of paclitaxel, docetaxel appeared to increase the DFS. Cancer 2017;123:759–68. © 2016 American Cancer Society. In postoperative patients with breast cancer, the combination of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane is a standard regimen. The results of the current phase 3 study demonstrate that noninferiority in disease‐free survival is not shown between regimens containing the combination of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide and those that do not, and that compared with a similar regimen of paclitaxel, docetaxel increased disease‐free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Watanabe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hamamatsu Oncology Center, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Masaru Kuranami
- Department of Surgery, Yamato Municipal Hospital, Yamato, Japan
| | - Kenichi Inoue
- Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi, Japan
| | - Norikazu Masuda
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Aogi
- Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Shinji Ohno
- Breast Oncology Center, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation of Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroji Iwata
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Mukai
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Yukari Uemura
- Clinical Research Support Center (CresCent), The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuo Ohashi
- Department of Integrated Science and Engineering for Sustainable Society, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Grover S, Martei YM, Puri P, Prabhakar P, Mutebi M, Balogun OD, Price AJ, Freeman AH, Narasimhamurthy M, Rodin D, Rayne S, Zetola NM. Breast Cancer and HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Complex Relationship. J Glob Oncol 2017; 4:1-11. [PMID: 30241185 PMCID: PMC6180795 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.2016.006585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The number and lifespan of individuals living with HIV have increased
significantly with the scale-up of antiretroviral therapy. Furthermore, the
incidence of breast cancer in women with HIV is growing, especially in
sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, the association between HIV infection and
breast cancer is not well understood. Methods A literature search was performed to identify articles published in journals
pertaining to breast cancer and HIV, with an emphasis on SSA. Selected
US-based studies were also identified for comparison. Results Among the 56 studies reviewed, the largest study examined 314 patients with
breast cancer and HIV in the United States. There is no consensus on whether
HIV infection acts as a pro-oncogenic or antioncogenic factor in breast
cancer, and it may have no relation to breast cancer. A higher incidence of
breast cancer is reported in high-income countries than in SSA, although
breast cancer in SSA presents at a younger age and at a more advanced stage.
Some studies show that patients with breast cancer and HIV experience worse
chemotherapy toxicity than do patients without HIV. Data on treatment
outcomes are limited. The largest study showed worse treatment outcomes in
patients with HIV, compared with their counterparts without HIV. Conclusion HIV infection has not been associated with different clinical presentation of
breast cancer. However, some evidence suggests that concurrent diagnosis of
HIV with breast cancer is associated with increased therapy-related toxicity
and worse outcomes. Systematic prospective studies are needed to establish
whether there is a specific association between breast cancer and HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Grover
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Yehoda M Martei
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Priya Puri
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Pooja Prabhakar
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Miriam Mutebi
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Onyinye D Balogun
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Aryeh J Price
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Alexandra H Freeman
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Mohan Narasimhamurthy
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Danielle Rodin
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Sarah Rayne
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Nicola M Zetola
- Surbhi Grover, Yehoda M. Martei, Priya Puri, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Surbhi Grover, Mohan Narasimhamurthy, and Nicola M. Zetola, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; Pooja Prabhakar, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Miriam Mutebi, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; Onyinye D. Balogun, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Aryeh J. Price, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; Alexandra H. Freeman, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Danielle Rodin, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Sarah Rayne, Helen Joseph Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Kim H, Park W, Yu JI, Choi DH, Huh SJ, Kim YJ, Lee ES, Lee KS, Kang HS, Park IH, Shin KH, Wee CW, Kim K, Park KR, Kim YB, Ahn SJ, Lee JH, Kim JH, Chun M, Lee HS, Kim JS, Cha J. Prognostic Impact of Elective Supraclavicular Nodal Irradiation for Patients with N1 Breast Cancer after Lumpectomy and Anthracycline Plus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy (KROG 1418): A Multicenter Case-Controlled Study. Cancer Res Treat 2017; 49:970-980. [PMID: 28052649 PMCID: PMC5654147 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2016.382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of supraclavicular lymph node radiotherapy (SCNRT) on N1 breast cancer patients receiving post-lumpectomy whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and anthracycline plus taxane-based (AT) chemotherapy. Materials and Methods We performed a case-control analysis to compare the outcomes of WBI and WBI plus SCNRT (WBI+SCNRT). Among 1,147 patients with N1 breast cancer who received post-lumpectomy radiotherapy and AT-based chemotherapy in 12 hospitals, 542 were selected after propensity score matching. Patterns of failure, disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and treatment-related toxicity were compared between groups. Results A total of 41 patients (7.6%) were found to have recurrence. Supraclavicular lymph node (SCN) failure was detected in three patients, two in WBI and one in WBI+SCNRT. All SCN failures were found simultaneously with distant metastasis. There was no significant difference in patterns of failure or survival between groups. The 5-year DFS and DMFS for patients with WBI and WBI+SCNRT were 94.4% versus 92.6% (p=0.50) and 95.1% versus 94.5% (p=0.99), respectively. The rates of lymphedema and radiation pneumonitis were significantly higher in the WBI+SCNRT than in the WBI. Conclusion We did not find a benefit of SCNRT for N1 breast cancer patients receiving AT-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haeyoung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Doo Ho Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Jae Huh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeon-Joo Kim
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eun Sook Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Keun Seok Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Han-Sung Kang
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - In Hae Park
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Woo Wee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Ran Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Ja Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Mison Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hyung-Sik Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jung Soo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Jihye Cha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Fraser Symmans W. Pathology After Neoadjuvant Treatments. Breast Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48848-6_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
113
|
Phase 2 study of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, capecitabine, and cisplatin in patients with curatively resected stage IIIB-IV gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20:182-189. [PMID: 26661592 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-015-0580-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin is a standard treatment for resectable gastric cancer (GC). However, survival outcomes of stage IIIB-IV (M0) GC cases are still poor. We investigated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel, capecitabine, and cisplatin (DXP) in patients with stage IIIB-IV GC. METHODS This was a single-arm phase 2 study that included patients with stage IIIB-IV GC who underwent D2 gastrectomy. Patients received six cycles of docetaxel [60 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1)], capecitabine (1,875 mg/m2/day on D1-14), and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on D1) every 3 weeks. The primary end-point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS A total of 46 GC patients between January 2007 and August 2008 were included. After a median follow-up of 56.1 months (range 52.2-64.1), the median RFS and overall survival (OS) were 26.9 months (95 % CI 7.5-46.4) and 43.9 months (95 % CI 29.2-58.7), respectively. The 5-year RFS and OS rates were 39.1 and 41.3 %, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (40 %), anorexia (22 %), and febrile neutropenia (15 %). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant DXP is feasible and effective for patients with stage IIIB-IV GC. A phase 3 study comparing triplet and doublet regimens for these patients is ongoing.
Collapse
|
114
|
Bromelain-Functionalized Multiple-Wall Lipid-Core Nanocapsules: Formulation, Chemical Structure and Antiproliferative Effect Against Human Breast Cancer Cells (MCF-7). Pharm Res 2016; 34:438-452. [PMID: 27981451 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-2074-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was conducted a promising approach to surface functionalization developed for lipid-core nanocapsules and the merit to pursue new strategies to treat solid tumors. METHODS Bromelain-functionalized multiple-wall lipid-core nanocapsules (Bro-MLNC-Zn) were produced by self-assembling following three steps of interfacial reactions. Physicochemical and structural characteristics, in vitro proteolytic activity (casein substrate) and antiproliferative activity (breast cancer cells, MCF-7) were determined. RESULTS Bro-MLNC-Zn had z-average diameter of 135 nm and zeta potential of +23 mV. The complex is formed by a Zn-N chemical bond and a chelate with hydroxyl and carboxyl groups. Bromelain complexed at the nanocapsule surface maintained its proteolytic activity and showed anti-proliferative effect against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) (72.6 ± 1.2% at 1.250 μg mL-1 and 65.5 ± 5.5% at 0.625 μg mL-1). Comparing Bro-MLNC-Zn and bromelain solution, the former needed a dose 160-folds lower than the latter for a similar effect. Tripan blue dye assay corroborated the results. CONCLUSIONS The surface functionalization approach produced an innovative formulation having a much higher anti-proliferative effect than the bromelain solution, even though both in vitro proteolytic activity were similar, opening up a great opportunity for further studies in nanomedicine.
Collapse
|
115
|
Oudin MJ, Barbier L, Schäfer C, Kosciuk T, Miller MA, Han S, Jonas O, Lauffenburger DA, Gertler FB. MENA Confers Resistance to Paclitaxel in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2016; 16:143-155. [PMID: 27811011 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2016] [Revised: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Taxane therapy remains the standard of care for triple-negative breast cancer. However, high frequencies of recurrence and progression in treated patients indicate that metastatic breast cancer cells can acquire resistance to this drug. The actin regulatory protein MENA and particularly its invasive isoform, MENAINV, are established drivers of metastasis. MENAINV expression is significantly correlated with metastasis and poor outcome in human patients with breast cancer. We investigated whether MENA isoforms might play a role in driving resistance to chemotherapeutics. We find that both MENA and MENAINV confer resistance to the taxane paclitaxel, but not to the widely used DNA-damaging agents doxorubicin or cisplatin. Furthermore, paclitaxel treatment does not attenuate growth of MENAINV-driven metastatic lesions. Mechanistically, MENA isoform expression alters the ratio of dynamic and stable microtubule populations in paclitaxel-treated cells. MENA expression also increases MAPK signaling in response to paclitaxel treatment. Decreasing ERK phosphorylation by co-treatment with MEK inhibitor restored paclitaxel sensitivity by driving microtubule stabilization in MENA isoform-expressing cells. Our results reveal a novel mechanism of taxane resistance in highly metastatic breast cancer cells and identify a combination therapy to overcome such resistance. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(1); 143-55. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine J Oudin
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Lucie Barbier
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,ENS-Cachan, Cachan, France
| | - Claudia Schäfer
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Tatsiana Kosciuk
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Miles A Miller
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sangyoon Han
- Lydia Hill Department for Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Oliver Jonas
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas A Lauffenburger
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Frank B Gertler
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. .,Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Wu L, Yao L, Zhang H, Ouyang T, Li J, Wang T, Fan Z, Fan T, Lin B, Yin CC, Xie Y. A genome-wide association study identifies WT1 variant with better response to 5-fluorouracil, pirarubicin and cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 2016; 7:5042-52. [PMID: 26573232 PMCID: PMC4826264 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is believed to result from the interplay of genetic and non-genetic risk factors, and individual genetic variation may influence the efficacy of chemotherapy. Here we conducted a genome-wide association study to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with response to anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. In the discovery stage, we divided 92 patients who received anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy into 2 groups according to pathologic response and performed a genome-wide study using Affymetrix SNP6.0 genechip. Of 389,795 SNPs associated with pathologic complete response (pCR), we identified 2 SNPs, rs6044100 and rs1799937, that were significantly associated with pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the validation stage, genotype analysis of samples from an independent cohort of 401 patients who received anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimens and 467 patients who received taxane-based regimens was performed using sequencing analysis. We found that only SNP rs1799937, located in the WT1 gene, was associated with pCR after anthracycline-based neoadjuvant therapy (AA vs GG; odds ratio [OR], 2.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-6.98; P < 0.05) but not after taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy (AA vs GG; OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.36-2.04; P = 0.72). These results suggest that WT1 may be a potential target of anthracycline-based neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Wu
- Central Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Lu Yao
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Central Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Tao Ouyang
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jinfeng Li
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Tianfeng Wang
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Zhaoqing Fan
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Tie Fan
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Benyao Lin
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - C Cameron Yin
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yuntao Xie
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Zhang T, Wang R, Liu Y, Huang J, Yang Z. Efficacy and safety of doublet versus single agent as salvage treatment for metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2016; 32:1883-1889. [PMID: 27489049 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1219707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy and safety of doublet versus single agent as salvage treatment for pretreated metastatic breast cancer. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All clinical studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted and analyzed using Comprehensive MetaAnalysis software (Version 2.0). RESULTS Thirteen RCTs involving 4878 pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients were ultimately identified. The pooled results demonstrated that doublet combination therapy significantly improved ORR (RR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.27, p < .001) and PFS (hazard ration [HR] 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96, p = .011), but not OS (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.86-1.01, p = .065). Similar results were observed in sub-group analysis according to treatment regimens. Additionally, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression toxicities nausea and fatigue were observed in doublet combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS In comparison with a single agent alone, doublet combination therapy as salvage treatment for pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients significantly improves ORR and PFS, but not OS. Further studies are recommended to identify patients who will most likely benefit from the appropriate doublet combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tengteng Zhang
- a The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu , Shangqiu , Henan Province , China
| | - Ruoming Wang
- a The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu , Shangqiu , Henan Province , China
| | - Yunbin Liu
- a The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu , Shangqiu , Henan Province , China
| | - Jisheng Huang
- a The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu , Shangqiu , Henan Province , China
| | - Zhen Yang
- b The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University , Zhengzhou , Henan Province , China
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Abstract
Paclitaxel, a chemotherapeutic drug isolated from the Pacific yew, was approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in 1994 and remains one of the most important agents in the treatment of patients with this disease. It is currently approved for the adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer, administered sequentially after a standard doxorubicin-containing regimen, and for metastatic disease after failure of combination chemotherapy or relapse within 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. In this article, data on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety of paclitaxel for the treatment of breast cancer will be reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Patt
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd-10, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michelle Gauthier
- ACB Building, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1220 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sharon Giordano
- The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301439, Unit 1354, Houston, TX 77230, USA, Tel.: +1 713 792 2817; Fax: +1 713 794 4385
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Briest S, Stearns V. Advances in the Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer. WOMENS HEALTH 2016; 3:325-39. [DOI: 10.2217/17455057.3.3.325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Several advances in the adjuvant systemic therapy of primary breast cancer have occurred in the last decade and contributed to a decline in disease-related mortality. These include the introduction of aromatase inhibitors, new chemotherapy agents, and the novel antibody trastuzumab. New supportive treatments, such as growth factors, have contributed to the optimization of chemotherapy dose and schedule, and have improved the efficacy and safety of the treatment. In this review we will outline some of the recent advances in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. We will also discuss ongoing and proposed clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Briest
- University of Leipzig, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leipzig Germany
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans Street, CRB I, Room 186, Baltimore, MD 21231-1000, USA, Tel.: +1 410 502 3472; Fax: +1 410 614 9421
| | - Vered Stearns
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans Street, CRB I, Room 1M-53 Baltimore, MD 21231-1000, USA, Tel.: +1 443 287 6489; Fax: +1 410 955 0125
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Kim JY, Jung HH, Ahn S, Bae S, Lee SK, Kim SW, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Ahn JS, Im YH, Park YH. The relationship between nuclear factor (NF)-κB family gene expression and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients receiving adjuvant doxorubicin treatment. Sci Rep 2016; 6:31804. [PMID: 27545642 PMCID: PMC4992884 DOI: 10.1038/srep31804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Accepted: 07/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated gene expression profiles of the NF-κB pathway in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) receiving adjuvant chemotherapy to determine the prognostic value of NF-κB pathway genes according to chemotherapeutic regimen. We used the nCounter expression assay to measure expression of 11 genes (NFKB1, NFKB2, RELA, RELB, REL, TP53, FOXC1, TBP, SP1, STAT3 and IRF1 genes) belonging to the NF-κB pathway using mRNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from 203 patients diagnosed with TNBC. Of the 203 patients, 116 were treated with a chemotherapeutic regimen containing doxorubicin. As revealed by the expression profiles of the 11 genes, increased expression of SP1 was associated with poor prognosis in TNBC patients treated with adjuvant doxorubicin chemotherapy (5-year distant recurrence-free survival [5Y DRFS], low vs. high expression [cut-off: median]: 92.3% vs. 71.6%, P = 0.001). In a multivariate Cox regression model, SP1 expression was a useful marker for predicting long-term prognosis in TNBC patients receiving doxorubicin treatment, and we thus suggest that SP1 expression could serve as a prognostic marker in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Yeon Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Hae Hyun Jung
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Soomin Ahn
- Innovative Cancer Medicine Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - SooYoun Bae
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Se Kyung Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Seok Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Jeong Eon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Seok Jin Nam
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Jin Seok Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Young-Hyuck Im
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University Seoul 06351, Korea
- Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University Seoul 06351, Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea
- Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Aalders K, van Bommel A, van Dalen T, Sonke G, van Diest P, Boersma L, van der Heiden- van der Loo M. Contemporary risks of local and regional recurrence and contralateral breast cancer in patients treated for primary breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2016; 63:118-26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2015] [Revised: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
122
|
Ricciardi GRR, Franchina T, Russo A, Schifano S, Ferraro G, Adamo V. Nab-paclitaxel and trastuzumab combination: a promising approach for neoadjuvant treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2016; 9:4351-5. [PMID: 27499629 PMCID: PMC4959577 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s107930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy is a well-established approach for the treatment of locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer (BC) and has been increasingly used in recent years not only as a management strategy but also as a research tool. Recently, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel)/trastuzumab combinations have been associated with promising activity in different clinical settings. In the present case, we report a complete pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment with the trastuzumab/nab-paclitaxel combination in a locally advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive BC patient, with a good toxicity profile. This combination may represent a valid therapeutic option in the neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive locally advanced BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tindara Franchina
- Human Pathology University Department & Medical Oncology Unit AO Papardo, Messina, Italy
| | - Alessandro Russo
- Human Pathology University Department & Medical Oncology Unit AO Papardo, Messina, Italy
| | - Silvia Schifano
- Human Pathology University Department & Medical Oncology Unit AO Papardo, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppa Ferraro
- Human Pathology University Department & Medical Oncology Unit AO Papardo, Messina, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Adamo
- Human Pathology University Department & Medical Oncology Unit AO Papardo, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Plichta JK, Rai U, Tang R, Coopey SB, Buckley JM, Gadd MA, Specht MC, Hughes KS, Taghian AG, Smith BL. Factors Associated with Recurrence Rates and Long-Term Survival in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer Ages 40 and Younger. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3212-20. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5404-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
124
|
Kuerer HM, van la Parra RFD. Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: Past Half Century Moving Forward Advancing Patient Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3145-52. [PMID: 27364503 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5326-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trials in breast cancer have contributed immensely to the advancements of modern multimodal breast cancer treatment. Due to improved screening methods and more effective biologic-based tailored systemic therapies, the extent of surgery necessary for local and systemic control of disease is decreasing. Sequential trials for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have changed the management of this disease and are culminating in randomized active surveillance studies in an effort potentially to prevent overtreatment of low- and intermediate-grade disease. For patients with initial node-positive disease, clipping and marking of the biopsy-proven nodal metastases before the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy can allow for selective node dissection based on the axillary response. With the current advances in primary systemic therapy, feasibility trials are beginning to investigate the potential of nonoperative therapy for invasive cancers with percutaneously documented pathologic complete response. This article presents a review and update on landmark clinical trials related to DCIS, the extent of axillary surgery in node-positive disease, and the integration of systemic therapy with local therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry M Kuerer
- Division of Surgery, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Raquel F D van la Parra
- Division of Surgery, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Orbaugh K, Ryan JC, Pfeuffer L. Palbociclib Plus Letrozole for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Illustrative Case Scenario. J Adv Pract Oncol 2016; 7:550-561. [PMID: 29282430 PMCID: PMC5737402 DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2016.7.5.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
CASE STUDY Betty, a 66-year-old white female, was diagnosed with stage IIB, T2N1M0, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in 2007. It was detected on screening mammography when she was age 59, and she was confirmed to be postmenopausal at the time. She has no family history of breast cancer. Betty has never smoked but enjoys drinking alcohol, normally with dinner and typically limited to 1 drink of hard liquor per day. Her medical history includes type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension, which are adequately controlled with metformin and lisinopril. Betty is married and a retired teacher. She has four healthy adult children and five grandchildren. She noted that although she was always thin as a child, she was never able to lose the weight she gained during her pregnancies. Currently, her body mass index (BMI) is around 29 kg/m2. She enjoys ballroom dancing with her husband, gardening, and walking her dog and she is an active member at her church. Betty and her family were shocked to hear about her diagnosis. After a discussion with her oncologist, a treatment plan was devised. Her Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at diagnosis was 0. Initial treatment consisted of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) × 4 cycles followed by weekly paclitaxel × 12 cycles. Betty tolerated treatment relatively well. However, she was hospitalized once after cycle 3 of AC for neutropenic fever. Her subsequent cycle was followed with pegfilgrastim. Repeat imaging after AC treatment revealed a good overall response. Other adverse effects from treatment included fatigue and nausea for a few days after each cycle. Residual grade 1 neuropathy secondary to her treatment with paclitaxel, with a potential contribution from her history of diabetes, was a long-term complication. Following completion of her neoadjuvant therapy, she had a lumpectomy and then radiation therapy. Adjuvant endocrine therapy with the aromatase inhibitor (AI) anastrozole was given for 5 years, which she completed in late 2012. Bone health was monitored with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry screening. Mild osteopenia was noted during AI therapy, and she was given twice-daily calcium plus vitamin D supplementation. Annual surveillance diagnostic breast mammography along with biannual history and physical examinations showed no signs of disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristi Orbaugh
- 1Community Hospital Oncology Physicians, Zionsville, Indiana; 2Pfizer Inc, New York, New York; 3Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Joanne C Ryan
- 1Community Hospital Oncology Physicians, Zionsville, Indiana; 2Pfizer Inc, New York, New York; 3Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Lynn Pfeuffer
- 1Community Hospital Oncology Physicians, Zionsville, Indiana; 2Pfizer Inc, New York, New York; 3Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Chiu N, Chiu L, Chow R, Lam H, Verma S, Pasetka M, Chow E, DeAngelis C. Taxane-induced arthralgia and myalgia: A literature review. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2016; 23:56-67. [DOI: 10.1177/1078155215627502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Arthralgia and myalgia following taxane chemotherapy has been documented in the literature. However, these two toxicities associated with taxane treatment have not been closely examined in the literature, and data remain inconsistent in terms of the reported incidences of these toxicities. The purpose of this literature review was to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the incidence of taxane-induced arthralgia and myalgia, as well as to document the risk factors and preventative and therapeutic treatments that have been investigated. Methods A literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline, OldMedline, Embase, Embase Classic, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using relevant subject headings and keywords such as: “arthralgia,” “myalgia,” “muscle pain,” “joint pain,” “taxane,” “chemotherapy,” “docetaxel,” “paclitaxel.” Results The reported incidences of arthralgia and myalgia were variable. Taxane chemotherapy was found to be associated with greater incidences of arthralgia and myalgia than non-taxane forms of chemotherapy. Moreover, docetaxel and nab-paclitaxel seem to be associated with lower incidences of arthralgia and myalgia than paclitaxel. Finally, the literature on prevention and therapeutic treatment of taxane-induced arthralgia and myalgia is scarce. Conclusion More studies should be done in order to more conclusively identify optimal therapeutic and preventative treatments as well as different risk factors. We recommend that a prospective study be done in order to better understand the true incidence of arthralgia and myalgia in patients being treated with the paclitaxel, docetaxel, and nab-paclitaxel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Chiu
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leonard Chiu
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ronald Chow
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Henry Lam
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sunil Verma
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Pasetka
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Edward Chow
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carlo DeAngelis
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Raman R, Mott SL, Schroeder MC, Phadke S, El Masri J, Thomas A. Effect of Body Mass Index- and Actual Weight-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Doses on Pathologic Complete Response in Operable Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2016; 16:480-486. [PMID: 27431461 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 06/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effect of body mass index (BMI) and chemotherapy dose reduction on pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locoregional breast cancer remains unclear. Contemporary studies have reported largely on trial populations and used dose-capping. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patient registries at the University of Iowa were queried to identify patients with operable breast cancer who received NAC. Dose reductions were calculated for taxanes (T), anthracyclines (A) and non-A-T chemotherapy. Clinical-pathologic characteristics, chemotherapy dose reductions, and adverse events were compared between normal (BMI <25) and overweight/obese patients (BMI ≥25). Additionally, the synergistic effect of BMI and chemotherapy dose reduction on pCR was assessed. RESULTS Of 171 eligible patients, 112 were overweight/obese. Chemotherapy dosing was capped in 2 patients; all others initiated full weight-based treatment. Overweight/obese patients required more frequent taxane (44.6% vs. 25.4%; P = .01) and any chemotherapy dose reductions (50.9% vs. 33.9%; P = .03). pCR was attained in 29.2% of patients. In a multivariable model, the interaction term for BMI as a continuous variable and any chemotherapy dose reduction was significant independent of the clinical stage and tumor receptor status (P = .04). For obese patients, any chemotherapy dose reduction was significantly associated with increased odds of not attaining pCR. CONCLUSION During NAC, overweight/obese patients more often have chemotherapy dose reductions. Chemotherapy dose reduction in obese patients was a powerful predictor of not attaining pCR. This was not seen for normal or overweight patients. Opportunities might exist to improve pCR rates in this higher-risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachna Raman
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Sarah L Mott
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Mary C Schroeder
- Division of Health Services Research, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Sneha Phadke
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Jad El Masri
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Alexandra Thomas
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Regional Nodal Irradiation: Examining the Clinical Implications of Randomized Trials. Am J Clin Oncol 2016; 39:90-1. [PMID: 26600011 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
129
|
Wolmark N, Mamounas EP, Baehner FL, Butler SM, Tang G, Jamshidian F, Sing AP, Shak S, Paik S. Prognostic Impact of the Combination of Recurrence Score and Quantitative Estrogen Receptor Expression (ESR1) on Predicting Late Distant Recurrence Risk in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer After 5 Years of Tamoxifen: Results From NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-28 and B-14. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2350-8. [PMID: 27217450 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.6630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We determined the utility of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score (RS) in predicting late (> 5 years) distant recurrence (LDR) in stage I and II breast cancer within high and low-ESR1-expressing groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS RS was assessed in chemotherapy/tamoxifen-treated, estrogen receptor (ER) -positive, node-positive National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-28 patients and tamoxifen-treated, ER-positive, node-negative B-14 patients. The association of the RS with risk of distant recurrence (DR) 0 to 5 years and those at risk > 5 years was assessed. An ESR1 expression cut point was optimized in B-28 and tested in B-14. RESULTS Median follow-up was 11.2 years for B-28 and 13.9 years for B-14. Of 1,065 B-28 patients, 36% had low (< 18), 34% intermediate (18 to 30), and 30% high (≥ 31) RS. Of 668 B-14 patients, 51% had low, 22% intermediate, and 27% high RS. Median ESR1 expression by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was: B-28, 9.7 normalized expression cycle threshold units (CT) and B-14, 10.7 CT. In B-28, RS was associated with DR 0 to 5 years (log-rank P < .001) and > 5 to 10 years (log-rank P = .02) regardless of ESR1 expression. An ESR1 expression cut point of 9.1 CT was identified in B-28. It was validated in B-14 patients for whom the RS was associated with DR in years 5 to 15: 6.8% (95% CI, 4.4% to 10.6%) versus 11.2% (95% CI, 6.2% to 19.9%) versus 16.4% (95% CI, 10.2% to 25.7%) for RS < 18, RS 18 to 30, and RS ≥ 31, respectively (log-rank P = .01). CONCLUSION For LDR, RS is strongly prognostic in patients with higher quantitative ESR1. Risk of LDR is relatively low for patients with low RS. These results suggest the value of extended tamoxifen therapy merits evaluation in patients with intermediate and high RS with higher ESR1 expression at initial diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norman Wolmark
- Norman Wolmark, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Gong Tang, University of Pittsburgh; and Gong Tang, NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Frederick L. Baehner, Steven M. Butler, Farid Jamshidian, Amy P. Sing, and Steven Shak, Genomic Health, Redwood City, and Frederick L. Baehner, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA; and Soonmyung Paik, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eleftherios P Mamounas
- Norman Wolmark, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Gong Tang, University of Pittsburgh; and Gong Tang, NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Frederick L. Baehner, Steven M. Butler, Farid Jamshidian, Amy P. Sing, and Steven Shak, Genomic Health, Redwood City, and Frederick L. Baehner, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA; and Soonmyung Paik, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Frederick L Baehner
- Norman Wolmark, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Gong Tang, University of Pittsburgh; and Gong Tang, NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Frederick L. Baehner, Steven M. Butler, Farid Jamshidian, Amy P. Sing, and Steven Shak, Genomic Health, Redwood City, and Frederick L. Baehner, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA; and Soonmyung Paik, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Steven M Butler
- Norman Wolmark, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Gong Tang, University of Pittsburgh; and Gong Tang, NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Frederick L. Baehner, Steven M. Butler, Farid Jamshidian, Amy P. Sing, and Steven Shak, Genomic Health, Redwood City, and Frederick L. Baehner, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA; and Soonmyung Paik, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gong Tang
- Norman Wolmark, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Gong Tang, University of Pittsburgh; and Gong Tang, NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Frederick L. Baehner, Steven M. Butler, Farid Jamshidian, Amy P. Sing, and Steven Shak, Genomic Health, Redwood City, and Frederick L. Baehner, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA; and Soonmyung Paik, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Farid Jamshidian
- Norman Wolmark, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Gong Tang, University of Pittsburgh; and Gong Tang, NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Frederick L. Baehner, Steven M. Butler, Farid Jamshidian, Amy P. Sing, and Steven Shak, Genomic Health, Redwood City, and Frederick L. Baehner, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA; and Soonmyung Paik, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Amy P Sing
- Norman Wolmark, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Gong Tang, University of Pittsburgh; and Gong Tang, NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Frederick L. Baehner, Steven M. Butler, Farid Jamshidian, Amy P. Sing, and Steven Shak, Genomic Health, Redwood City, and Frederick L. Baehner, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA; and Soonmyung Paik, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Steven Shak
- Norman Wolmark, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Gong Tang, University of Pittsburgh; and Gong Tang, NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Frederick L. Baehner, Steven M. Butler, Farid Jamshidian, Amy P. Sing, and Steven Shak, Genomic Health, Redwood City, and Frederick L. Baehner, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA; and Soonmyung Paik, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soonmyung Paik
- Norman Wolmark, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Gong Tang, University of Pittsburgh; and Gong Tang, NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA; Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Frederick L. Baehner, Steven M. Butler, Farid Jamshidian, Amy P. Sing, and Steven Shak, Genomic Health, Redwood City, and Frederick L. Baehner, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA; and Soonmyung Paik, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) in patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy for breast cancer—a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24:3633-50. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3256-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
131
|
Schröder L, Rack B, Sommer H, Koch JG, Weissenbacher T, Janni W, Schneeweiss A, Rezai M, Lorenz R, Jäger B, Schramm A, Häberle L, Fasching PA, Friedl TWP, Beckmann MW, Scholz C. Toxicity Assessment of a Phase III Study Evaluating FEC-Doc and FEC-Doc Combined with Gemcitabine as an Adjuvant Treatment for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: the SUCCESS-A Trial. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76:542-550. [PMID: 27239063 PMCID: PMC4873296 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Revised: 04/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: This paper aims to evaluate the toxicity profile of additive gemcitabine to adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Methods: Patients enrolled in this open-label randomized controlled Phase III study were treated with 3 cycles of epirubicin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel with those receiving 3 cycles of FEC followed by 3 cycles of gemcitabine-docetaxel (FEC-DG). 3690 patients were evaluated according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) toxicity criteria (CTCAE). The study medications were assessed by the occurrence of grade 3-4 adverse events, dose reductions, postponements of treatment cycles and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Results: No differences in neutropenia or febrile neutropenia were demonstrated. However, thrombocytopenia was significantly increased with FEC-DG treatment (2.0 vs. 0.5 %, p < 0.001), as was leukopenia (64.1 vs. 58.5 %, p < 0.001). With FEC-DG significantly more G-CSF support in cycles 4 to 6 (FEC-DG: 57.8 %, FEC-D: 36.3 %, p < 0.001) was provided. Transaminase elevation was significantly more common with FEC-DG (SGPT: 6.3 %, SGOT: 2 %), whereas neuropathy (1.2 %), arthralgia (1.6 %) and bone pain (2.6 %) were more common using FEC-D. Dose reductions > 20 % (4 vs. 2.4 %) and postponement of treatment cycles (0.9 vs. 0.4 %) were significantly more frequent in the FEC-DG arm. Eight deaths occurred during treatment in the FEC-DG arm and four in the FEC-D arm. Conclusion: The addition of gemcitabine increased hematological toxicity and was associated with more dose reductions and postponements of treatment cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Schröder
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
| | - B Rack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
| | - H Sommer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
| | - J G Koch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
| | - T Weissenbacher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
| | - W Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm
| | - A Schneeweiss
- Head of Division Gynecologic Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - M Rezai
- Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
| | - R Lorenz
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. R. Lorenz/N. Hecker, Braunschweig
| | - B Jäger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
| | - A Schramm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm
| | - L Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - T W P Friedl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
| | - C Scholz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Kiba T, Morii N, Takahashi H, Ozaki S, Atsumi M, Masumoto F, Yamashiro H. Pathological complete response rate in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant FEC, followed by weekly paclitaxel administration: A retrospective study and review of the literature. Oncol Lett 2016; 11:3064-3070. [PMID: 27123064 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2015] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
While tumor size, the presence of inflammatory carcinoma and lymph node involvement are the main prognostic factors of women with locally advanced breast cancer, the prognostic value of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status has not been fully clarified. The present study examined the therapeutic efficacy of a neoadjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide regimen (FEC), followed by weekly paclitaxel and/or trastuzumab administration, in the treatment of hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Between April 2012 and February 2014, 14 patients with hormone receptor-negative local breast cancer (triple-negative type, 9 patients; HER2 type, 5 patients) were included in the study. In all cases, the histological type of the primary cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma. Among the 14 women who received the regimen, 5 presented with stage I cancer (35.7%), 3 with stage IIA (21.4%), 3 with stage IIB (21.4%), 1 with stage IIIB (7.1%) and 2 with stage IIIC (14.3%), according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. With regard to the tumor-node-metastasis classification, 5 patients were T1N0M0 (35.7%), 3 were T2N0M0 (21.4%), 3 were T2N1M0 (21.4%), 2 were T3N3M0 (14.3%) and 1 was T4N1M0 (7.1%). The pathological response was evaluated using resected tissue following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, according to the criteria established by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Patients were classified into pathological responders (grades 2 and 3, 71.4% of all patients) and non-responders (grade 1, 28.6% of all patients). A pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 50.0% of all cases (7/14); 44.4% of triple-negative-type cases (4/9) and 60.0% of HER2-type cases (3/5). Hematological and non-hematological toxicity was reversible and manageable. No patients withdrew from treatment, and favorable compliance was achieved. The present study demonstrated that neoadjuvant FEC followed by weekly administration of paclitaxel and/or trastuzumab induces a high pathological response and a high pCR rate in patients with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Due to the high clinical benefit rate and acceptable safety profile, this regimen should be considered an acceptable neoadjuvant treatment option for hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayoshi Kiba
- Division of Modern Medical Technology, Institute for Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan; Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi 983-8512, Japan
| | - Nao Morii
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Takahashi
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan
| | - Shinji Ozaki
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan
| | - Misao Atsumi
- Clinical Trial Management Office, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan
| | - Fumi Masumoto
- Clinical Trial Management Office, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Yamashiro
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan; Department of Breast Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara 632-8552, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Fujii T, Le Du F, Xiao L, Kogawa T, Barcenas CH, Alvarez RH, Valero V, Shen Y, Ueno NT. Effectiveness of an Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2016; 1:1311-8. [PMID: 26402167 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are available for early-stage breast cancer. Because conventional meta-analysis does not allow comparing all regimens, we performed a network meta-analysis to identify the most effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. OBJECTIVE To find the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer. DATA SOURCES We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published before June 2015; the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting abstracts from January 1983 through December 2014; and the American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting abstracts from January 1916 through December 2014. Additionally, we manually searched bibliographies for related references. STUDY SELECTION We included randomized clinical trials of adjuvant treatments for early-stage breast cancer that compared 2 or more of the following: no adjuvant chemotherapy; sequential anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (AC-T); concurrent anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (ACT); anthracycline-cyclophosphamide without taxane (AC); docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC); cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF); and platinum-containing regimens. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently selected the articles and extracted information. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with another author. Quality was assessed by Cochrane risk-of-bias method. Data were pooled using random-effects models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We used network meta-analysis to test the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen in terms of overall survival (OS) by comparing regimens listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and platinum-containing regimens. RESULTS We identified 24 trials. The TC and platinum-containing regimens had OS benefit similar to that of sequential AC-T (TC hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62-1.40; and platinum HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31). Patients treated with CMF or AC had significantly worse OS than those treated with sequential AC-T (CMF HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.32-1.85; and AC HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37). Platinum-containing regimens tended to be more toxic than sequential AC-T. The toxicity of TC was similar to or less than that of sequential AC-T. Meta-regression analysis showed that hormone receptor status did not impact the HRs for OS for any regimen. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Sequential AC-T is likely to be the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer regardless of hormone receptor status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeo Fujii
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston2The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston
| | - Fanny Le Du
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Lianchun Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Takahiro Kogawa
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Carlos H Barcenas
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ricardo H Alvarez
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Vicente Valero
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Yu Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Naoto T Ueno
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Janni W, Harbeck N, Rack B, Augustin D, Jueckstock J, Wischnik A, Annecke K, Scholz C, Huober J, Zwingers T, Friedl TWP, Kiechle M. Randomised phase III trial of FEC120 vs EC-docetaxel in patients with high-risk node-positive primary breast cancer: final survival analysis of the ADEBAR study. Br J Cancer 2016; 114:863-71. [PMID: 27031854 PMCID: PMC4984804 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.82] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Revised: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 03/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Taxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy has been established as standard treatment in node-positive breast cancer. This study compared efficacy and tolerability of epirubicin (E)/cyclophosphamide (C) followed by docetaxel (Doc) with a dose-dense 5-fluorouracil (F)+E+ C regimen. METHODS The ADEBAR study was a randomised phase III trial for women with primary invasive breast cancer and ⩾4 metastatic axillary lymph nodes (n=1364). Treatment consisted of four 21-day cycles of E plus C, followed by four 21-day cycles of Doc (EC-Doc), or six 28-day cycles of E plus F plus C (FEC120). RESULTS Disease-free survival (DFS) was similar in the two treatment arms as shown by multivariate Cox regression adjusted for other prognostic factors (EC-Doc vs FEC120, hazard ratio (HR): 1.087; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.878-1.346, P=0.444). In addition, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups (HR: 0.974; 95% CI: 0.750-1.264, P=0.841). Haematologic toxicity was more common in FEC120 recipients; non-haematologic toxicities occurred more frequently in the EC-Doc arm. The serious adverse event rate was significantly higher in the FEC120 group (29.7% vs 22.5%). CONCLUSIONS EC-Doc provides a feasible and effective alternative therapy option to FEC120 with a different safety profile in this high-risk breast cancer cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - N Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 München, Germany
| | - B Rack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Maistraße 11, 80337 München, Germany
| | - D Augustin
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Deggendorf, Perlasberger Strasse 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany
| | - J Jueckstock
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Maistraße 11, 80337 München, Germany
| | - A Wischnik
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - K Annecke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University Clinics Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 München, Germany
| | - C Scholz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - J Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - T Zwingers
- Estimate GmbH, Konrad-Adenauer-Allee 1, 86150 Augsburg, Germany
| | - T W P Friedl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - M Kiechle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University Clinics Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Prognosis after mastectomy versus repeat lumpectomy in patients with ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: A propensity score analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:474-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Revised: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
136
|
Yang SX, Polley E, Lipkowitz S. New insights on PI3K/AKT pathway alterations and clinical outcomes in breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 45:87-96. [PMID: 26995633 PMCID: PMC7436195 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2016] [Revised: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PI3K/AKT signaling pathway plays an important role in tumorigenesis and regulates critical cellular functions including survival, proliferation and metabolism. PIK3CA mutations and AKT activation by phosphorylation (pAKT) are often detected in many cancers and especially at high frequencies in breast cancer. Mounting data suggest that PIK3CA mutations or pAKT are mostly associated with better or insignificant outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early stage breast cancer and tend to be with worse prognosis in ER- disease. pAKT expression has been identified to predict paclitaxel chemotherapy benefit in node-positive breast cancer. Preclinical and neoadjuvant trial data suggest that PIK3CA alterations confer resistance to HER2-targeted therapy and are associated with lower pathological complete response (pCR) rate in HER2-positive breast cancer. However, recent results from randomized clinical trials of adjuvant and metastatic settings show that patients with mutant and wildtype PIK3CA tumors derived similar benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. This article, with our new insights, aims to decipher the mixed data and discusses the influence of the potential confounding factors in the assessments. We also share our views for validation of PI3K/AKT alterations in relation to clinical outcome in the context of specific breast cancer subtypes and treatment modalities towards further advance of the precision medicine for breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry X Yang
- National Clinical Target Validation Laboratory, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Eric Polley
- Biometrics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stanley Lipkowitz
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Economic issues involved in integrating genomic testing into clinical care: the case of genomic testing to guide decision-making about chemotherapy for breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 129:401-9. [PMID: 21061059 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1242-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The use of taxanes to treat node-positive (N+) breast cancer patients is associated with heterogeneous benefits as well as with morbidity and financial costs. This study aimed to assess the economic impact of using gene expression profiling to guide decision-making about chemotherapy, and to discuss the coverage/reimbursement issues involved. Retrospective data on 246 patients included in a randomised trial (PACS01) were analyzed. Tumours were genotyped using DNA microarrays (189-gene signature), and patients were classified depending on whether or not they were likely to benefit from chemotherapy regimens without taxanes. Standard anthracyclines plus taxane chemotherapy (strategy AT) was compared with the innovative strategy based on genomic testing (GEN). Statistical analyses involved bootstrap methods and sensitivity analyses. The AT and GEN strategies yielded similar 5-year metastasis-free survival rates. In comparison with AT, GEN was cost-effective when genomic testing costs were less than 2,090€. With genomic testing costs higher than 2,919€, AT was cost-effective. Considering a 30% decrease in the price of docetaxel (the patent rights being about to expire), GEN was cost-effective if the cost of genomic testing was in the 0€-1,139€, range; whereas AT was cost-effective if genomic testing costs were higher than 1,891€. The use of gene expression profiling to guide decision-making about chemotherapy for N+ breast cancer patients is potentially cost-effective. Since genomic testing and the drugs targeted in these tests yield greater well-being than the sum of those resulting from separate use, questions arise about how to deal with extra well-being in decision-making about coverage/reimbursement.
Collapse
|
138
|
Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (GeparSepto—GBG 69): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:345-356. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00542-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 246] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2015] [Revised: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
139
|
Sharma M, Tuaine J, McLaren B, Waters DL, Black K, Jones LM, McCormick SPA. Chemotherapy Agents Alter Plasma Lipids in Breast Cancer Patients and Show Differential Effects on Lipid Metabolism Genes in Liver Cells. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0148049. [PMID: 26807857 PMCID: PMC4726544 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular complications have emerged as a major concern for cancer patients. Many chemotherapy agents are cardiotoxic and some appear to also alter lipid profiles, although the mechanism for this is unknown. We studied plasma lipid levels in 12 breast cancer patients throughout their chemotherapy. Patients received either four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel or three cycles of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5’-fluorouracil followed by three cycles of docetaxel. Patients demonstrated a significant reduction (0.32 mmol/L) in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) levels (0.18 g/L) and an elevation in apolipoprotein B (apoB) levels (0.15 g/L) after treatment. Investigation of the individual chemotherapy agents for their effect on genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism in liver cells showed that doxorubicin decreased ATP binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) via a downregulation of the peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and liver X receptor α (LXRα) transcription factors. In contrast, ABCA1 levels were not affected by cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel. Likewise, apoA1 levels were reduced by doxorubicin and remained unaffected by cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel both increased apoB protein levels and paclitaxel also decreased low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) protein levels. These findings correlate with the observed reduction in HDL-C and apoA1 and increase in apoB levels seen in these patients. The unfavourable lipid profiles produced by some chemotherapy agents may be detrimental in the longer term to cancer patients, especially those already at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This knowledge may be useful in tailoring effective follow-up care plans for cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Sharma
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Jo Tuaine
- Southern Blood and Cancer Service, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Blair McLaren
- Southern Blood and Cancer Service, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Debra L. Waters
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Katherine Black
- Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Lynnette M. Jones
- School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
140
|
Yao L, Zhang J, Liu Y, Ouyang T, Li J, Wang T, Fan Z, Fan T, Lin B, Xie Y. Association between HER2 status and response to neoadjuvant anthracycline followed by paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy without trastuzumab in breast cancer. Chin J Cancer Res 2016; 27:553-61. [PMID: 26752929 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.12.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We recently showed HER2-positive breast cancers are less likely to respond to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy. Here, we investigated whether HER2-positive breast cancers responded to sequential neoadjuvant anthracycline followed by paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimen in the absence of trastuzumab. METHODS Women (n=372) with operable primary breast cancer initially received two cycles of neoadjuvant anthracyclines, the clinical tumor response was assessed, then patients were received four cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimen. All the patients did not received trastuzumab treatment in the neoadjuvant setting. HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and/or by fluorescence in situ hybridization in core-biopsy breast cancer tissue obtained before the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Eighteen percent (67/372) of patients achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) in their breast. HER2-positive tumors had a significant higher pCR rate than HER2-negative tumors (33.0% versus 13.5%, P<0.001) in this cohort of 372 patients, and positive HER2 status remained an independent favorable predictor of pCR in a multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR), 2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18 to 4.36, P=0.015]. Furthermore, patients who responded to initial anthracycline regimens were more likely to respond to paclitaxel plus carboplatin than patients who did not (pCR, 27.2% versus 14.6%, P=0.005). Patients with HER2-positive tumors exhibited a significant higher pCR rate than did patients with HER2-negative tumors in both anthracycline response group (40.5% versus 20.0%, P=0.025) and anthracycline non-response group (28.3% versus 11.3%, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS Under the circumstance of no trastuzumab treatment, women with HER2-positive cancers derive a large benefit from paclitaxel-carboplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Yao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Juan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yiqiang Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Tao Ouyang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Jinfeng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Tianfeng Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Zhaoqing Fan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Tie Fan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Benyao Lin
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yuntao Xie
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Breast Center, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Shah C, Vicini FA. Regional Nodal Irradiation: Moving Beyond Overall Survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 94:208-209. [PMID: 26700715 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Frank A Vicini
- 21st Century Oncology/Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Farmington Hills, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
5-Fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide versus epirubicin and paclitaxel in node-positive early breast cancer: a phase-III randomized GONO-MIG5 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 155:117-26. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3655-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
143
|
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer in young women (<50 years) has been associated with an increased risk of recurrence and decreased survival compared with patients older than 50. The objective of this analysis was to determine, from a large database of patients with early-stage breast cancer, if the Recurrence Score® result (Oncotype DX®, Genomic Health, Inc, Redwood City, CA, USA) provided clinically meaningful differences in predicted risk of recurrence in younger—compared with older—patients. Methods Tumor samples from patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers that were successfully processed in the Genomic Health central lab between June 2004 and December 2013 for Recurrence Score and quantitative gene expression of ER, progesterone receptor (PR), and Her/2neu, were included. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the distribution of scores by age group: <40, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and ≥70 years, nodal status, and histologic subtype. Results Specimens from 394,031 patients [3.3% (n = 13,029) aged <40 years; 15.6% (n = 61,643) aged ≥70 years] were included; 81.6% of patients had invasive ductal carcinoma. Nodal status was specified for 362,001 patients (87.0% negative). Median Recurrence Score results were similar across risk groups. Low (<18)- and high (≥31)- risk Recurrence Score results were seen in 58.5% and 8.5% of patients, respectively. A greater proportion of patients aged <40 (14.1%) than ≥70 (8.8%) years had a high-risk score. ER expression increased as a function of age and PR single-gene and invasion gene group expression were similar across age groups. Conclusion These data indicate that in patients with ER-positive breast cancer, age alone does not reflect the underlying individual tumor biology, suggesting that the Recurrence Score result may add potentially useful information for personalized treatment decisions. Funding Genomic Health, Inc. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0268-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
144
|
Shajahan J, Pillai PS, Jayakumar KNL. A Prospective Comparative Study of the Toxicity Profile of 5-Flurouracil, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide Regime VS Adriamycin, Paclitaxel Regime in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9:FC01-6. [PMID: 26870703 DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/15939.6864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Accepted: 10/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A 5-flurouracil, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide (FAC) and Adriamycin, Paclitaxel (AT) are two popular chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment of breast carcinoma. The most time tested and popular regimen is FAC. It is extensively studied for efficacy and toxicity. But data regarding toxicity profile and efficacy of AT regimen is sparse. AIM To study the toxicity profile, severity of toxicities and clinical response rate of FAC and AT regimens in patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective observational study with 50 patients in each treatment arm. Study duration was 12 months from November 2012 to October 2013. Consecutive patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma receiving treatment with either FAC or AT regimen, satisfying inclusion criteria were enrolled into the study after getting informed written consent. Prior to initiation of treatment detailed medical history was taken from all patients. General clinical examination, examination of organ systems and local examination of breast lump were done. After each cycle of chemotherapy and after completion of treatment patients were interviewed and examined for clinical response and toxicities. Toxicities were graded with WHO toxicity grading criteria. All data were entered in a structured proforma. At least 50% reduction in tumour size was taken as adequate clinical response. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Data was analysed using Chi-square test with help of Excel 2007 and SPSS-16 statistical software. RESULTS Different pattern of toxicities were seen with FAC and AT regimens. Anaemia, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, hyperpigmentation, photosensitivity and diarrhoea were more common with patients receiving FAC regimen. Leucopenia, peripheral neuropathy, myalgia, arthralgia, vomiting and injection site reactions were more common in AT regimen. Both FAC and AT regimens gave 100% clinical response. CONCLUSION FAC and AT regimens are equally efficacious but have different toxicity profiles. Patient's predisposition to toxicities may govern the selection of a particular regime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihana Shajahan
- Senior Resident, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College , Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Pradeep Sadasivan Pillai
- Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College , Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
145
|
Jatoi I, Bandos H, Jeong JH, Anderson WF, Romond EH, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Time-Varying Effects of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Systemic Therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 108:djv304. [PMID: 26518884 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Accepted: 09/25/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of breast cancer adjuvant systemic treatments are generally assumed to be proportional (or constant) over time, but limited data suggest that some treatment effects may vary with time. We therefore systematically assessed the proportional hazards assumption across all 19 breast cancer adjuvant systemic therapy trials in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) database. METHODS The NSABP breast cancer trials were tested for the proportionality of hazard rates between randomized treatment groups for five endpoints: overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence, local-regional recurrence, or distant recurrence as first events. When the proportional hazards assumption did not hold, a "change point for the relative risk" technique was used to identify the temporal breakdown of the treatment effect. RESULTS Time-varying treatment effects were observed in nearly half of the trials (nine of 19). In six (B-05, B-11, B-12, B-14, B-16, and B-20), novel treatment benefits diminished statistically significantly at specific time points following surgery. In B-09 and B-31, novel treatment benefits were delayed and emerged more than one year after surgery (1.57 and 1.32 years correspondingly), but the benefit in B-09 reversed after the third year of follow-up. In one trial (B-23), the initial advantage and subsequent disadvantage of one of the regimens was evident. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer adjuvant systemic therapy can have statistically significant time-varying effects, which should be considered in the design, analysis, reporting, and translation of clinical trials. These time-dependent effects will have greater relevance as the number of long-term breast cancer survivors increases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Jatoi
- NRG Oncology/ National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (IJ, EHR, EPM, NW); Department of Surgery University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX (IJ); NRG Oncology Statistics & Data Management Center, and the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (HB, JHJ); NIH/NCI/Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD (WFA); Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (EHR); UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL (EPM); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW).
| | - Hanna Bandos
- NRG Oncology/ National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (IJ, EHR, EPM, NW); Department of Surgery University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX (IJ); NRG Oncology Statistics & Data Management Center, and the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (HB, JHJ); NIH/NCI/Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD (WFA); Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (EHR); UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL (EPM); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Jong-Hyeon Jeong
- NRG Oncology/ National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (IJ, EHR, EPM, NW); Department of Surgery University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX (IJ); NRG Oncology Statistics & Data Management Center, and the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (HB, JHJ); NIH/NCI/Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD (WFA); Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (EHR); UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL (EPM); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - William F Anderson
- NRG Oncology/ National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (IJ, EHR, EPM, NW); Department of Surgery University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX (IJ); NRG Oncology Statistics & Data Management Center, and the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (HB, JHJ); NIH/NCI/Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD (WFA); Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (EHR); UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL (EPM); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Edward H Romond
- NRG Oncology/ National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (IJ, EHR, EPM, NW); Department of Surgery University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX (IJ); NRG Oncology Statistics & Data Management Center, and the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (HB, JHJ); NIH/NCI/Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD (WFA); Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (EHR); UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL (EPM); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Eleftherios P Mamounas
- NRG Oncology/ National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (IJ, EHR, EPM, NW); Department of Surgery University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX (IJ); NRG Oncology Statistics & Data Management Center, and the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (HB, JHJ); NIH/NCI/Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD (WFA); Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (EHR); UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL (EPM); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Norman Wolmark
- NRG Oncology/ National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (IJ, EHR, EPM, NW); Department of Surgery University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX (IJ); NRG Oncology Statistics & Data Management Center, and the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (HB, JHJ); NIH/NCI/Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD (WFA); Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (EHR); UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL (EPM); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
A Pilot Study of Dose-Dense Paclitaxel With Trastuzumab and Lapatinib for Node-negative HER2-Overexpressed Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2015; 16:87-94. [PMID: 26454612 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Revised: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dual anti-HER2 therapy is effective for HER2-amplified breast cancer. Weekly paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and full-dose lapatinib (PTL) is not feasible because of grade 3 diarrhea. We conducted a phase II feasibility study of dose-dense (DD; every other week) PTL (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01827163). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had HER2-positive breast cancer, tumor size ≤ 3 cm, and negative nodes. Treatment included paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) × 4, every 2 weeks with pegfilgrastim), trastuzumab (4 mg/kg load and then 2 mg/kg weekly), and lapatinib (1000 mg daily). After paclitaxel × 4, trastuzumab (6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus lapatinib were continued for 1 year. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as (1) > 80% of patients completing PTL without a dose delay or reduction, (2) grade 3 diarrhea rate < 20%, and (3) cardiac event rate < 4%. RESULTS From May 2013 to November 2013, we enrolled 20 of 55 planned patients. The median age was 49 years (range, 34-74 years). One patient had immediate paclitaxel hypersensitivity and was deemed inevaluable. Only 13 of 19 evaluable patients (68%) completed PTL without a dose delay or reduction or unacceptable toxicities. Only 3 of 19 (16%) had grade 3 diarrhea. Rash was frequent, with all grades in 18 of 19 (95%) and grade 3 in 2 of 19 (11%). The study was stopped early because of excess toxicity. CONCLUSION The discontinuation rate during DD PTL was high, owing, in part, to an unexpectedly high incidence of rash. The trial was halted, because the initial discontinuation rate from overall toxicity made it unlikely that full accrual would demonstrate feasibility.
Collapse
|
147
|
Azim HA, Abdal-Kader YSED, Mousa MM, Malek RA, Abdalmassih MK, Ibrahim NY. Taxane-based regimens as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer: a retrospective study in egyptian cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16:65-9. [PMID: 25640392 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.1.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the impact of adding taxanes to anthracycline-based regimens in the adjuvant setting in localized young female breast cancer patients on the overall survival (OS) and the disease free survival (DFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included all female breast cancer patients who were candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy presenting to Kasr Al Ainy centre of clinical oncology and Cairo oncology centre (Cairo Cure) in the period from January 2005 till December 2010. RESULTS Our study included 865 patients, 732 of whom received anthracycline based regimens and 133 taxane based regimens. The mean age of patients was 39 years. After a median follow up of 50 months the median DFS was 48.4 months. Survival analysis indicated that the tumor size (>5cm vs. <5cm) p=0.001), nodal involvement (Yes vs. No) p=0.0001) and pathology (invasive lobular vs. ductal) p=0.048) affected DFS. As regards hormonal status, ER, PR and HER 2neu positive patients had longer DFS (p=0.001, 0.003, 0.106). On multivariate analysis DFS was affected by tumor size and lymph node involvement (p=0.014, 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed improvement in arms treated with taxanes in terms of DFS with positive Her2neu, ER and PR, but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Adding adjuvant taxanes to anthracyclines is beneficial for treatment of localized breast cancer among all subgroups, especially higher risk groups .The type of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and tumor characteristics have direct effects on DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamdy Abdel Azim
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy Center of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
148
|
Treatment of taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) in cancer patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy—a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2015; 24:1583-94. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2941-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2015] [Accepted: 09/03/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
149
|
Bear HD, Tang G, Rastogi P, Geyer CE, Liu Q, Robidoux A, Baez-Diaz L, Brufsky AM, Mehta RS, Fehrenbacher L, Young JA, Senecal FM, Gaur R, Margolese RG, Adams PT, Gross HM, Costantino JP, Paik S, Swain SM, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant bevacizumab in early breast cancer (NSABP B-40 [NRG Oncology]): secondary outcomes of a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16:1037-1048. [PMID: 26272770 PMCID: PMC4624323 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00041-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2015] [Revised: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 06/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND NSABP B-40 was a 3 × 2 factorial trial testing whether adding capecitabine or gemcitabine to docetaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy would improve outcomes in women with operable, HER2-negative breast cancer and whether adding neoadjuvant plus adjuvant bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens would also improve outcomes. As reported previously, addition of neoadjuvant bevacizumab increased the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response, which was the primary endpoint. We present secondary patient outcomes, including disease-free survival, a specified endpoint by protocol, and data for distant recurrence-free interval, and overall survival, which were not prespecified endpoints but were collected prospectively. METHODS In this randomised controlled trial (NSABP B-40), we enrolled women aged 18 years or older, with operable, HER2-non-amplified invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast, 2 cm or greater in diameter by palpation, clinical stage T1c-3, cN0, cN1, or cN2a, without metastatic disease and diagnosed by core needle biopsy. Patients received one of three docetaxel-based neoadjuvant regimens for four cycles: docetaxel alone (100 mg/m(2)) with addition of capecitabine (825 mg/m(2) oral twice daily days 1-14, 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel) or with addition of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 intravenously, 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel), all followed by neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/m(2) and 600 mg/m(2) intravenously) every 3 weeks for four cycles. Those randomly assigned to bevacizumab groups were to receive bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3 weeks for six cycles) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postoperatively for ten doses. Randomisation was done (1:1:1:1:1:1) via a biased-coin minimisation procedure to balance the characteristics with respect to clinical nodal status, clinical tumour size, hormone receptor status, and age. Intent-to-treat analyses were done for disease-free survival and overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00408408. FINDINGS Between Jan 5, 2007, and June 30, 2010, 1206 patients were enrolled in the study. Follow-up data were collected from Oct 31, 2007 to March 27, 2014, and were available for overall survival in 1186 patients, disease-free survival in 1184, and distant recurrence-free interval in 1181. Neither capecitabine nor gemcitabine increased disease-free survival or overall survival. Median follow-up was 4·7 years (IQR 4·0-5·2). The addition of bevacizumab significantly increased overall survival (hazard ratio 0·65 [95% CI 0·49-0·88]; p=0·004) but did not significantly increase disease-free survival (0·80 [0·63-1·01]; p=0·06). Four deaths occurred on treatment due to vascular disorder (docetaxel plus capecitabine followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide group), sudden death (docetaxel plus capecitabine followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide group), infective endocarditis (docetaxel plus bevacizumab followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab group), and visceral arterial ischaemia (docetaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide group). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the bevacizumab group were neutropenia (grade 3, 99 [17%]; grade 4, 37 [6%]), hand-foot syndrome (grade 3, 63 [11%]), and hypertension (grade 3, 60 [10%]; grade 4, two [<1%]) and in the non-bevacizumab group were neutropenia (grade 3, 98 [16%]; grade 4, 36 [6%]), fatigue (grade 3, 53 [9%]), and hand-foot syndrome (grade 3, 43 [7%]). INTERPRETATION The addition of gemcitabine or capecitabine to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide does not seem to provide any benefit to patients with operable breast cancer, and should not change clinical practice in the short term. The improved overall survival with bevacizumab contradicts the findings of other studies of bevacizumab in breast cancer and may indicate the need for additional investigation of this agent. FUNDING National Institutes of Health, Genentech, Roche Laboratories, Lilly Research Laboratories, and Precision Therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry D Bear
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Gong Tang
- NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Priya Rastogi
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Charles E Geyer
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Qing Liu
- NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - André Robidoux
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Luis Baez-Diaz
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Minority-Based CCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Adam M Brufsky
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rita S Mehta
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of California at Irvine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Louis Fehrenbacher
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials, Northern California, Vallejo, CA, USA
| | - James A Young
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Colorado Cancer Research Program, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
| | - Francis M Senecal
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Northwest Medical Specialties, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Rakesh Gaur
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; CCOP, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Richard G Margolese
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul T Adams
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Genesys Regional Medical Center, Grand Blanc, MI, USA
| | - Howard M Gross
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; CCOP, Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA
| | | | - Soonmyung Paik
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Severance Biomedical Science Institute and Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sandra M Swain
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Eleftherios P Mamounas
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Norman Wolmark
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP/NRG Oncology), Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Hart CD, Sanna G, Siclari O, Biganzoli L, Di Leo A. Defining optimal duration and predicting benefit from chemotherapy in patients with luminal-like subtypes. Breast 2015; 24 Suppl 2:S136-42. [PMID: 26320761 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The molecular subtypes of breast cancer have individual patterns of behaviour, prognosis and sensitivity to treatment, with subsequent implications for the choice of, or indeed role for adjuvant therapy. The luminal A and B subtypes make up the majority of breast cancers, but despite sharing expression of the oestrogen receptor (ER), they are molecularly distinct. It follows then that they would have different sensitivities to chemotherapy. Clinically, luminal A disease has a better prognosis than luminal B, and may not derive significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However no prospective trials have specifically investigated the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in each subtype, nor do we know if certain agents are more or less effective. This paper will briefly summarise the role of molecular profiles in assessing the need for chemotherapy and predicting its effectiveness, followed by an assessment of the relative value of newer anthracycline- or taxane-containing regimes in the luminal-like subtypes, providing a review of retrospective analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D Hart
- "Sandro Pitigliani" Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Sanna
- "Sandro Pitigliani" Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - Olimpia Siclari
- "Sandro Pitigliani" Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - Laura Biganzoli
- "Sandro Pitigliani" Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - Angelo Di Leo
- "Sandro Pitigliani" Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|