101
|
Demby TC, Rodriguez O, McCarthy CW, Lee YC, Albanese C, Mandelblatt J, Rebeck GW. A mouse model of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairments integrating the risk factors of aging and APOE4 genotype. Behav Brain Res 2020; 384:112534. [PMID: 32027870 PMCID: PMC7082850 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Some cancer survivors experience marked cognitive impairment, referred to as cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). CRCI has been linked to the genetic factor APOE4, the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). We used APOE knock-in mice to test whether the relationship between APOE4 and CRCI can be demonstrated in a mouse model, to identify associations of chemotherapy with behavioural and structural correlates of cognition, and to test whether chemotherapy affects markers of AD. Twelve-month old C57BL/6 J female APOE3 (n = 30) and APOE4 (n = 31) knock-in mice were randomized to treatment with either doxorubicin (10 mg/kg) or saline. Behavioural assays at 2-21 weeks-post exposure included open field maze, elevated zero maze, pre-pulse inhibition, Barnes maze, and fear conditioning. Ex-vivo magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine regional volume differences at 31-35 weeks-post exposure, and tissue sections were analyzed for markers of AD pathogenesis. Minimal toxicities were observed in the aged mice after doxorubicin exposure. In the Barnes maze assay, APOE3 mice did not exhibit impairment in spatial learning after doxorubicin treatment, but APOE4 mice demonstrated significant impairments in both the initial identification of the escape hole and the latency to full escape at 6 weeks post-exposure. Both APOE3 and APOE4 mice treated with doxorubicin showed impairment of spatial memory. Grey matter volume in the frontal cortex decreased in APOE4 mice treated with doxorubicin vs. APOE3 mice. This study demonstrates cognitive impairments in aged APOE4 knock-in mice after doxorubicin treatment and establishes this system as a novel and powerful model of CRCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar C Demby
- Tumor Biology Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC United States
| | - Olga Rodriguez
- Department of Oncology, Molecular Oncology Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC United States; Center for Translational Imaging, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, United States
| | - Camryn W McCarthy
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC United States
| | - Yi-Chien Lee
- Department of Oncology, Molecular Oncology Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC United States; Center for Translational Imaging, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, United States
| | - Christopher Albanese
- Department of Oncology, Molecular Oncology Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC United States; Center for Translational Imaging, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, United States
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, United States
| | - G William Rebeck
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC United States.
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Clinical impact of melatonin on breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy; effects on cognition, sleep and depressive symptoms: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0231379. [PMID: 32302347 PMCID: PMC7164654 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial tested the hypothesis that 20mg of melatonin before and during the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer (ACBC) reduced the side effects associated with cognitive impairment. We evaluated the effects of melatonin on cognition, depressive symptoms and sleep quality, and whether these effects were related to serum levels of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) and its receptor, tropomyosin kinase B (TrkB). Thirty-six women were randomly assigned to receive melatonin or placebo for 10 days. To evaluate cognitive performance, we used the Trail-Making-Test Parts A and B (A-B), Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) and an inhibitory task type Go / No-Go. Our results revealed that melatonin improved executive function on TMT scores, enhanced episodic memory (immediate and delayed) and recognition on RAVLT, and increased verbal fluency in the orthographic COWAT. The TMT-A-B(A-B) were negatively correlated with baseline levels of TrkB and BDNF, respectively. At the end of treatment, changes in TrkB and BDNF were inversely associated with depressive symptoms and sleep quality, but not with the TMT scores. These results suggest a neuroprotective effect of melatonin to counteract the adverse effects of ACBC on cognitive function, sleep quality and depressive symptoms.
Collapse
|
103
|
Wagner LI, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Whelan TJ, Garcia SF, Yanez B, Tevaarwerk AJ, Carlos RC, Albain KS, Olson JA, Goetz MP, Pritchard KI, Hayes DF, Geyer CE, Dees EC, McCaskill-Stevens WJ, Minasian LM, Sledge GW, Cella D. Patient-Reported Cognitive Impairment Among Women With Early Breast Cancer Randomly Assigned to Endocrine Therapy Alone Versus Chemoendocrine Therapy: Results From TAILORx. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:1875-1886. [PMID: 32271671 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is common during adjuvant chemotherapy and may persist. TAILORx provided a novel opportunity to prospectively assess patient-reported cognitive impairment among women with early breast cancer who were randomly assigned to chemoendocrine therapy (CT+E) versus endocrine therapy alone (E), allowing us to quantify the unique contribution of chemotherapy to CRCI. METHODS Women with a 21-gene recurrence score of 11 to 25 enrolled in TAILORX were randomly assigned to CT+E or E. Cognitive impairment was assessed among a subgroup of 552 evaluable women using the 37-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) questionnaire, administered at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. The FACT-Cog included the 20-item Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) scale, our primary end point. Clinically meaningful changes were defined a priori and linear regression was used to model PCI scores on baseline PCI, treatment, and other factors. RESULTS FACT-Cog PCI scores were significantly lower, indicating more impairment, at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months compared with baseline for both groups. The magnitude of PCI change scores was greater for CT+E than E at 3 months, the prespecified primary trial end point, and at 6 months, but not at 12, 24, and 36 months. Tests of an interaction between menopausal status and treatment were nonsignificant. CONCLUSION Adjuvant CT+E is associated with significantly greater CRCI compared with E at 3 and 6 months. These differences abated over time, with no significant differences observed at 12 months and beyond. These findings indicate that chemotherapy produces early, but not sustained, cognitive impairment relative to E, providing reassurance to patients and clinicians in whom adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated to reduce recurrence risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert J Gray
- ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Timothy J Whelan
- McMaster University, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Betina Yanez
- Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Ruth C Carlos
- The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kathy S Albain
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - John A Olson
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Kathleen I Pritchard
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Charles E Geyer
- Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center Minority/Underserved National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Richmond, VA
| | | | | | | | | | - David Cella
- Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Pergolotti M, Battisti NML, Padgett L, Sleight AG, Abdallah M, Newman R, Van Dyk K, Covington KR, Williams GR, van den Bos F, Pollock Y, Salerno EA, Magnuson A, Gattás-Vernaglia IF, Ahles TA. Embracing the complexity: Older adults with cancer-related cognitive decline-A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology position paper. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:237-243. [PMID: 31619372 PMCID: PMC7054166 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD) may have particularly significant consequences for older adults, impacting their functional and physical abilities, level of independence, ability to make decisions, treatment adherence, overall quality of life, and ultimately survival. In honor of Dr. Hurria's work we explore and examine multiple types of screening, assessment and non-pharmacologic treatments for CRCD. We then suggest future research and clinical practice questions to holistically appreciate the complexity of older adults with cancer's experiences and fully integrate the team-based approach to best serve this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzi Pergolotti
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, 4174 Gettysburg Rd, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055, USA; Department of Occupational Therapy - College of Health and Human Sciences, Colorado State University, 200 Occupational Therapy Building, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1573, USA.
| | - Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
- Department of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
| | - Lynne Padgett
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alix G Sleight
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, USA.
| | - Maya Abdallah
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate Medical Center, 759 Chestnut St., Springfield, MA, 01199, USA.
| | - Robin Newman
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Boston University Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 635 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| | - Kelley R Covington
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, 4174 Gettysburg Rd, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055, USA; Department of Occupational Therapy - College of Health and Human Sciences, Colorado State University, 200 Occupational Therapy Building, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1573, USA.
| | - Grant R Williams
- Divisions of Hematology/Oncology & Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Departement of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - YaoYao Pollock
- Geriatric Oncology Fellowship Program, University of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
| | - Elizabeth A Salerno
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
| | - Allison Magnuson
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
| | - Isabella F Gattás-Vernaglia
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of São Paulo Medical School, Hospital Sírio-Libanês- Geriatric Oncology Team, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 155, 8° Andar, Bloco 3, São Paulo, SP CEP 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, New York, NY 10022, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practical brief measures are needed for clinicians and researchers to identify and effectively manage cognitive impairment in cancer patients. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the reliability (ie, internal consistency reliability) and validity (ie, construct, convergent, concurrent, and known-group validity) of the Brief Perceived Cognitive Impairment Scale-Korean (BPCIS-K). METHODS From a university hospital, 249 cancer patients participated. The BPCIS-K was constructed with 6 items evaluating key aspects of cognitive impairment in cancer patients. For internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's α and item-total correlations were evaluated. For construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis was performed. For convergent validity, Pearson correlations were tested with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function. For concurrent validity, Pearson correlations were tested with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue. For known-group validity, t tests were performed. RESULTS The BPCIS-K showed high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = .92; item-total correlations ranged from 0.76 to 0.81). Factor analysis confirmed the scale is unidimensional. It is highly associated with another validated cognitive impairment measure (r = -0.91, P < .001) and moderately correlated with a fatigue measure (r = -0.52, P < .001). In known-group validity, female and patients undergoing treatment experienced more severe impairment than did male patients and patient awaiting treatment (P = .05, P = .08, respectively). CONCLUSION The BPCIS-K is valid and reliable for assessing cancer patients' perceived cognitive impairment, particularly in concentration, memory, and executive functions. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE This study introduces a practical brief measure to clinicians and researchers.
Collapse
|
106
|
Kjaer TK, Andersen EAW, Winther JF, Bidstrup PE, Borre M, Møller H, Larsen SB, Johansen C, Dalton SO. Long-term Somatic Disease Risk in Adult Danish Cancer Survivors. JAMA Oncol 2020; 5:537-545. [PMID: 30844031 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Long-term health effects of cancer in adult survivors are a major concern; however, it is difficult to differentiate between the consequences of cancer and cancer treatment and those of normal aging or comorbidity. Objectives To provide an overview and investigate the temporal pattern of hospitalizations for medically verified incident somatic disease in adult survivors compared with cancer-free comparison people, taking into consideration pretreatment comorbidity and the socioeconomic position of the participants. Design, Setting, and Participants In this nationwide, population-based cohort-cohort study, 458 646 survivors of the 12 most frequent first primary cancers listed in the Danish Cancer Registry between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2014, and 2 121 567 matched cancer-free comparison people were identified from the Danish Central Population Registry. Hospitalizations for somatic diseases after cancer diagnosis or study entry were identified from the National Patient Register and stratified according to the 11 main diagnostic groups in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. A cohort of cancer survivors was formed for each combination of cancer type and diagnostic group, with a corresponding group of cancer-free people, resulting in 132 unique cohorts. Data analysis was performed from September 1, 2017, to January 15, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Risk of hospitalization and the temporal pattern of incidence were analyzed in Cox proportional hazards regression models. Cumulative incidence proportions were calculated by the pseudo-observation method. Results A total of 2 580 213 people were investigated, of whom 458 646 were cancer survivors (mean [SD] age, 69 [11.6] years; 230 793 [50.3%] male and 227 853 [49.7%] female) and 2 121 567 were comparison people (mean [SD] age, 69 [11.5] years; 1 054 465 [49.7%] male and 1 067 102 [50.3%] female). More cancer survivors vs comparison people had comorbid conditions at the time of cancer diagnosis or study entry (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥1: 19% vs 13%). Overall, the risk of hospitalizations for somatic diseases was significantly higher for cancer survivors in almost all diagnostic groups (eg, diseases in the nervous system among breast cancer survivors: hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.17-1.22; diseases in the respiratory system in lung cancer survivors: hazard ratio, 5.85; 95% CI, 5.63-6.07; and diseases in blood and blood-forming organs in prostate cancer survivors: hazard ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.50-2.71). Conclusions and Relevance The findings suggest that adult survivors of the 12 most common cancers are at significantly higher risk for a broad range of somatic diseases that require hospitalization compared with matched cancer-free comparison people. The results of this study suggest the importance of close, targeted monitoring for new somatic disease during follow-up care of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeanette Falck Winther
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Michael Borre
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henrik Møller
- Cancer Epidemiology & Population Health, King's College London, London, England.,The Danish Clinical Registries, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Signe Benzon Larsen
- Survivorship Unit, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
- Survivorship Unit, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Oncology & Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Kim HJ, Jung SO, Kim H, Abraham I. Systematic review of longitudinal studies on chemotherapy-associated subjective cognitive impairment in cancer patients. Psychooncology 2020; 29:617-631. [PMID: 32017297 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review of longitudinal studies, assessing subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) reported by adult cancer patients, aimed to summarize evidence on the impact of chemotherapy on SCI, identify moderators of SCI, and evaluate methodological issues. METHODS Data accrued from Pubmed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and the Cochrane library. Inclusion criteria were original studies, an exclusively adult sample, valid and reliable subjective cognitive measures, and at least one baseline data point prior to and another after the initiation of chemotherapy. Data were collected on the sample composition, data-collection time points, outcome measures, statistical analysis, and major findings (ie, longitudinal changes in prevalence, severity, and associated factors). RESULTS Forty articles published between 2004 and 2019 were retained: 21 examined chemotherapy-treated patients only, and 19 employed control groups. Findings were mixed, with slightly more studies supporting the impact of chemotherapy on SCI. SCI tended to be more prevalent and severe after initiating chemotherapy, compared with patients' own baseline and controls not treated with chemotherapy. Impact appeared to be acute and more likely limited to subsamples. Most studies examining non-breast-cancer samples reported the lack or limited impact of chemotherapy on SCI. The most consistent moderators were depression and fatigue. Methodological issues regarding sampling design, measurement, and statistical analysis were discussed. CONCLUSION More rigorously designed longitudinal studies would clarify direct and indirect effects of chemotherapy on SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee-Ju Kim
- College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sun-Ok Jung
- College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyang Kim
- College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ivo Abraham
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy; Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine; Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Soliman H, Shah V, Srkalovic G, Mahtani R, Levine E, Mavromatis B, Srinivasiah J, Kassar M, Gabordi R, Qamar R, Untch S, Kling HM, Treece T, Audeh W. MammaPrint guides treatment decisions in breast Cancer: results of the IMPACt trial. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:81. [PMID: 32005181 PMCID: PMC6995096 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6534-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Increased usage of genomic risk assessment assays suggests increased reliance on data provided by these assays to guide therapy decisions. The current study aimed to assess the change in treatment decision and physician confidence based on the 70-gene risk of recurrence signature (70-GS, MammaPrint) and the 80-gene molecular subtype signature (80-GS, BluePrint) in early stage breast cancer patients. Methods IMPACt, a prospective, case-only study, enrolled 452 patients between November 2015 and August 2017. The primary objective population included 358 patients with stage I-II, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. The recommended treatment plan and physician confidence were captured before and after receiving results for 70-GS and 80-GS. Treatment was started after obtaining results. The distribution of 70-GS High Risk (HR) and Low Risk (LR) patients was evaluated, in addition to the distribution of 80-GS compared to IHC status. Results The 70-GS classified 62.5% (n = 224/358) of patients as LR and 37.5% (n = 134/358) as HR. Treatment decisions were changed for 24.0% (n = 86/358) of patients after receiving 70-GS and 80-GS results. Of the LR patients initially prescribed CT, 71.0% (44/62) had CT removed from their treatment recommendation. Of the HR patients not initially prescribed CT, 65.1% (41/63) had CT added. After receiving 70-GS results, CT was included in 83.6% (n = 112/134) of 70-GS HR patient treatment plans, and 91.5% (n = 205/224) of 70-GS LR patient treatment plans did not include CT. For patients who disagreed with the treatment recommended by their physicians, most (94.1%, n = 16/17) elected not to receive CT when it was recommended. For patients whose physician-recommended treatment plan was discordant with 70-GS results, discordance was significantly associated with age and lymph node status. Conclusions The IMPACt trial showed that treatment plans were 88.5% (n = 317/358) in agreement with 70-GS results, indicating that physicians make treatment decisions in clinical practice based on the 70-GS result. In clinically high risk, 70-GS Low Risk patients, there was a 60.0% reduction in treatment recommendations that include CT. Additionally, physicians reported having greater confidence in treatment decisions for their patients in 72% (n = 258/358) of cases after receiving 70-GS results. Trial registration “Measuring the Impact of MammaPrint on Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Registry” (NCT02670577) retrospectively registered on Jan 27, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Varsha Shah
- Ascension Columbia St. Mary's Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Gordan Srkalovic
- Herbert-Herman Cancer Center, Sparrow Hospital, Lansing, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
109
|
La Carpia D, Liperoti R, Guglielmo M, Di Capua B, Devizzi LF, Matteucci P, Farina L, Fusco D, Colloca G, Di Pede P, Ferrara ML, Hohaus S, Bernabei R, Ripamonti CI. Cognitive decline in older long-term survivors from Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: a multicenter cross-sectional study. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:790-795. [PMID: 32008957 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare cognition in a group of older long-term survivors from Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and in a corresponding group of non-cancer controls of the same age. Functional status, polypharmacy and multimorbidity were also evaluated. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed in a population of 63 outpatient long-term survivors from NHL, aged 65 or more and 61 non-cancer controls. Socio-demographic, clinical and functional data were collected. Cognitive function was assessed through neuropsychological tests. RESULTS NHL survivors showed a slightly worse functional status than controls, they were affected by more chronic conditions (3.4 vs 2.3; p = .003) and were taking a higher number of medications (3.4 vs 2.3; p = .03). The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) was not significantly different between the groups. NHL survivors performed worse than controls in executive functioning (Trail Making Test B-A 47.9 vs 32.1 p = .04, OR for Stroop test time over 75th percentile in survivors: 2.66; CI 95% 1.04-6.61; OR for Multiple Features Target Cancellation time over 75th percentile in survivors: 2.84; CI 95% 1.10-7.31). A small, statistically significant difference was also observed in verbal memory scores between the two groups. . CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that, compared with non-cancer controls, older survivors from NHL may have a lower cognitive performance, especially in the executive functioning and attention domains, regardless of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Further evidence from larger samples is needed to confirm such findings and better characterize cognitive decline in NHL survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rosa Liperoti
- Department of Geriatrics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Guglielmo
- Oncology-Supportive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Beatrice Di Capua
- Department of Geriatrics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paola Matteucci
- Haematology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucia Farina
- Haematology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Fusco
- Department of Geriatrics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Colloca
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Patricia Di Pede
- Oncology-Supportive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stephan Hohaus
- Haematology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Bernabei
- Department of Geriatrics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Carla Ida Ripamonti
- Oncology-Supportive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Abstract
Abstract
The American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) asserts that occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants, through the use of occupations and activities, facilitate clients’ cognitive functioning to enhance occupational performance, self-efficacy, participation, and perceived quality of life. Cognitive processes are integral to effective performance across the broad range of daily occupations such as work, educational pursuits, home management, and play and leisure. Cognition plays an integral role in human development and in the ability to learn, retain, and use new information to enable occupational performance across the lifespan.
This statement defines the role of occupational therapy in evaluating and addressing cognitive functioning to help clients maintain and improve occupational performance. The intended primary audience is practitioners1 within the profession of occupational therapy. The statement also may be used to inform recipients of occupational therapy services, practitioners in other disciplines, and the wider community regarding occupational therapy theory and methods and to articulate the expertise of occupational therapy practitioners in addressing cognition and challenges in adapting to cognitive dysfunction.
Collapse
|
111
|
Jalali R, Dutta D. Impact of systemic therapies on cognition in patients with primary brain tumors. CANCER RESEARCH, STATISTICS, AND TREATMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_263_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
112
|
Dumas A, Vaz Luis I, Bovagnet T, El Mouhebb M, Di Meglio A, Pinto S, Charles C, Dauchy S, Delaloge S, Arveux P, Coutant C, Cottu P, Lesur A, Lerebours F, Tredan O, Vanlemmens L, Levy C, Lemonnier J, Mesleard C, Andre F, Menvielle G. Impact of Breast Cancer Treatment on Employment: Results of a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (CANTO). J Clin Oncol 2019; 38:734-743. [PMID: 31834818 PMCID: PMC7048162 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adverse effects of breast cancer treatment can negatively affect survivors’ work ability. Previous reports lacked detailed clinical data or health-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and did not prospectively assess the combined impact of treatment and related sequelae on employment. METHODS We used a French prospective clinical cohort of patients with stage I-III breast cancer including 1,874 women who were working and ≥ 5 years younger than legal retirement age (≤ 57 years) at breast cancer diagnosis. Our outcome was nonreturn to work (non-RTW) 2 years after diagnosis. Independent variables included treatment characteristics as well as toxicities (Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events [CTCAE] v4) and PROs (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of life Questionnaires, Breast cancer module [QLQ-BR23] and Fatigue module [QLQ-FA12], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) collected 1 year after diagnosis. Logistic regression models assessed correlates of non-RTW, adjusting for age, stage, comorbidities, and socioeconomic covariates. RESULTS Two years after diagnosis, 21% of patients had not returned to work. Odds of non-RTW were significantly increased among patients treated with combinations of chemotherapy and trastuzumab (odds ratio [OR] v chemotherapy-hormonotherapy: for chemotherapy-trastuzumab, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.18 to 3.44; for chemotherapy-trastuzumab-hormonotherapy, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.41). Other significant associations with non-RTW included grade ≥ 3 CTCAE toxicities (OR v no, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.18), arm morbidity (OR v no, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.13), anxiety (OR v no, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.11), and depression (OR v no, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.91). CONCLUSION Receipt of systemic therapy combinations including trastuzumab was associated with increased odds of non-RTW. Likelihood of unemployment was also higher among patients who reported severe physical and psychological symptoms. This comprehensive study identifies potentially vulnerable patients and warrants supportive interventional strategies to facilitate their RTW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnes Dumas
- Université de Paris, ECEVE UMR 1123, INSERM (National Institute for Health and Medical Research), Paris, France.,Clinical Research Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ines Vaz Luis
- Breast Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM Unit U 981, Villejuif, France
| | - Thomas Bovagnet
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Mayssam El Mouhebb
- Clinical Research Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM Unit U 981, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Sandrine Pinto
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Cecile Charles
- Department of Supportive Care, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé (EA 4057), Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Dauchy
- Department of Supportive Care, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Breast Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Patrick Arveux
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.,INSERM U1018, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Anne Lesur
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fabrice Andre
- Breast Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM Unit U 981, Villejuif, France
| | - Gwenn Menvielle
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Partnered, adapted argentine tango dance for cancer survivors: A feasibility study and pilot study of efficacy. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2019; 70:257-264. [PMID: 31751861 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurotoxic cancer treatments can cause chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and postural control deficits that cancer survivors report as a concern. Exercise-based sensorimotor training has emerged as a promising treatment for symptoms including balance deficits, however, more study is needed to optimize engagement and participation. We evaluated feasibility, satisfaction, and preliminary efficacy of a novel balance training program for cancer survivors: partnered, Adapted Argentine Tango dance (Tango). METHODS Twenty-two individuals participated (n = 22). Tango classes (1 h) were offered twice/week. At baseline, midpoint (8 classes), and conclusion of the training (15 or 16 classes), we assessed postural control by measuring center-of-pressure (CoP) measures during quiet standing with eyes closed. We also documented attendance, barriers to attendance, and satisfaction (7 point scale; 1 high). At conclusion, we analyzed whether 1) attendance and satisfaction met feasibility criteria; 2) postural control improved among participants who were outside of normal range at baseline; and 3) co-enrolling with a companion increased attendance. FINDINGS Feasibility criteria were met: more than half of participants attended more than half the classes offered with a mean satisfaction rate of 1.2 (SD 0.4). Those who enrolled with a companion (n = 9) attended more sessions than those who did not (n = 13) (Mann-Whitney U value = 20; p = 0.012). Participants with demonstrated deficits (n = 9) improved in 3 CoP measures at midpoint (i.e., medial-lateral sway, ellipse area, medial-lateral velocity), retaining improvement in 2 CoP measures at endpoint (i.e., medial-lateral sway, ellipse area). INTERPRETATION Partnered, Adapted Argentine Tango is feasible for cancer survivors and may improve postural control. Enrolling with a companion improved attendance.
Collapse
|
114
|
Xu Z, Luo F, Wang Y, Zou BS, Man Y, Liu JS, Li H, Arshad B, Li H, Li S, Wei YX, Li HY, Wu KN, Kong LQ. Cognitive impairments in breast cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy: a study based on event-related potentials. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2019; 85:61-67. [PMID: 31745592 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03994-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairments in breast cancer patients were usually reported through cognitive questionnaires or scales which may be subjective and insensitive. This study is to assess the effect of chemotherapy on cognitive function in breast cancer patients stratified by age using objective electrophysiological measure, the P300 component of event-related potentials (ERPs) with a large sample size. METHODS Totally, 529 primary breast cancer patients, including 178 cases at initial diagnosis stage and before chemotherapy (Group1), 167 cases during chemotherapy (Group2), and 184 cases post chemotherapy and during follow-up period (Group3), were examined with ERPs (P300 component) to assess the effect of chemotherapy on their cognitive function. RESULTS There were significant differences of P300 latency in Group2 (364.74 ± 15.73 ms) and Group3 (364.02 ± 17.12 ms, mean follow-up period of 2.42 years) compared with Group1 (355.13 ± 19.47 ms, P < 0.001), respectively. With further age stratification: in patients of < 50 years, P300 latency was significantly prolonged in Group2 and Group3 compared with Group1 (P < 0.001), respectively; in patients of 50-59 years, P300 latency was significantly prolonged in Group2 compared with Group1 (P < 0.05), but without difference in Group1 and Group3 (P>0.05); In patients of ≥ 60 years, there were no differences of P300 latency among three the groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS It is first suggested by our objective detection data that the side effect of chemotherapy on cognitive functions in breast cancer patients may decrease with age. Electrophysiological cognitive impairments mainly occur in younger breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and would last for years after chemotherapy, which highlights the importance of early intervention for those patients, especially in younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhou Xu
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Feng Luo
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Outpatient Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Bao-Shan Zou
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Yuan Man
- Electromyogram Room of Neurology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Jia-Shuo Liu
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Hao Li
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Bilal Arshad
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Shu Li
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Yu-Xian Wei
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Hong-Yuan Li
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Kai-Nan Wu
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Ling-Quan Kong
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 You Yi Rd., Chongqing, 400016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Ongnok B, Chattipakorn N, Chattipakorn SC. Doxorubicin and cisplatin induced cognitive impairment: The possible mechanisms and interventions. Exp Neurol 2019; 324:113118. [PMID: 31756316 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy has significantly increased the number of cancer survivors. However, chemotherapy itself carries various adverse effects that limit the efficacy of treatment and quality of life of the cancer patients. Most patients who have received chemotherapy report some cognitive deficit characterized by dysfunction in memory, learning, concentration, and reasoning. The phenomenon of cognitive decline developed from chemotherapy treatment is referred to as chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI) or chemobrain. The two most common cancers occurring worldwide are lung and breast cancer. The predominant chemotherapeutic drugs used to treat lung and breast cancer are doxorubicin and cisplatin. There is evidence to suggest that both drugs potentially induce chemobrain. The evidence around the proposed pathogenesis of chemobrain caused by these two drugs is inconsistent. Understanding the underlying mechanisms involved in the development of chemobrain would aid in the prevention or treatment of the adverse effects of chemotherapy on brain. This review will summarize and discuss controversial findings and possible mechanisms involved in the development of chemobrain and the interventions which could limit it from in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Ongnok
- Neuroelectrophysiology Unit, Cardiac Electrophysiology Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand; Center of Excellence in Cardiac Electrophysiology Research, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand; Cardiac Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Physiology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
| | - Nipon Chattipakorn
- Neuroelectrophysiology Unit, Cardiac Electrophysiology Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand; Center of Excellence in Cardiac Electrophysiology Research, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand; Cardiac Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Physiology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
| | - Siriporn C Chattipakorn
- Neuroelectrophysiology Unit, Cardiac Electrophysiology Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand; Center of Excellence in Cardiac Electrophysiology Research, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand; Department of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Huehnchen P, van Kampen A, Boehmerle W, Endres M. Cognitive impairment after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Neurooncol Pract 2019; 7:11-21. [PMID: 32257280 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neurotoxicity is a frequent side effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy and affects a large number of patients. Despite the high medical need, few research efforts have addressed the impact of cytotoxic agents on cognition (ie, postchemotherapy cognitive impairment; PCCI). One unsolved question is whether individual cytotoxic drugs have differential effects on cognition. We thus examine the current state of research regarding PCCI. Neurological symptoms after targeted therapies and immunotherapies are not part of this review. Methods A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database, and 1215 articles were reviewed for predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty articles were included in the systematic review. Results Twenty-five of the included studies report significant cognitive impairment. Of these, 21 studies investigated patients with breast cancer. Patients mainly received combinations of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and taxanes (FEC/FEC-T). Five studies found no significant cognitive impairment in chemotherapy patients. Of these, 2 studies investigated patients with colon cancer receiving 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). Independent risk factors for PCCI were patient age, mood alterations, cognitive reserve, and the presence of apolipoprotein E e4 alleles. Conclusions There is evidence that certain chemotherapy regimens cause PCCI more frequently than others as evidenced by 21 out of 23 studies in breast cancer patients (mainly FEC-T), whereas 2 out of 3 studies with colon cancer patients (FOLFOX) did not observe significant changes. Further studies are needed defining patient cohorts by treatment protocol in addition to cancer type to elucidate the effects of individual cytotoxic drugs on cognitive functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Huehnchen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Cluster of Excellence NeuroCure, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - Antonia van Kampen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Boehmerle
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Cluster of Excellence NeuroCure, Germany
| | - Matthias Endres
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Cluster of Excellence NeuroCure, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
The impact of chemotherapy on cognitive function: a multicentre prospective cohort study in testicular cancer. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:3081-3091. [PMID: 31642990 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05095-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The causal link between chemotherapy and cognitive impairment is unclear. We studied testicular cancer patients' objective and subjective cognitive function longitudinally, comparing a surgery group with a surgery + chemotherapy group, addressing prior methodological issues using a computerized test to limit assessment issues, and controlling for confounding variables. METHODS Prospectively, of 145 patients from 16 centres with sufficient data, n = 61 receiving surgery + chemotherapy (etoposide and cisplatin ± bleomycin, BEP/EP; or single agent carboplatin) were compared to n = 41 receiving surgery alone. CogHealth assessed six objective cognitive tasks. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire assessed self-perceived cognitive dysfunction. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale assessed psychological influences. Linear mixed models compared changes from baseline (< 6 months post-surgery/pre-chemotherapy) to follow-up (12-18 months post-baseline), controlling covariates. RESULTS There were no significant interaction effects for five objective cognitive function tasks suggesting that changes over time were not due to group membership. However, psychomotor function (controlling for age) and physical well-being were significantly worse for the chemotherapy versus the surgery group at baseline, with groups converging by follow-up. Groups showed no differences in subjective cognitive dysfunction. The chemotherapy group showed higher anxiety, poorer functional well-being and worse fatigue compared to the surgery-only group at baseline, but not by follow-up. For both groups, emotional well-being, functional well-being and anxiety significantly improved over time. CONCLUSION No substantive differences in objective or subjective cognitive dysfunction in either group persisted 12-18 months post-baseline. Patients undergoing chemotherapy for testicular cancer differ from findings in breast cancer populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ACTRN12609000545268.
Collapse
|
118
|
Yang Y, Rushton S, Woodward A, Hendrix C. Understanding on the association between informal caregiver characteristics and cognitive function of adults with cancer: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031842. [PMID: 31537575 PMCID: PMC6756403 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adults with cancer frequently report symptoms such as decline in cognitive function throughout the trajectory of illness. Patients with cognitive deficits need support and assistance from their informal caregivers and often rely on them to manage their symptoms based on their degree of deficits. Patients spend a significant amount of time with their informal caregivers and become interdependent with each other. In spite of their interdependence, it is unclear whether patients' cognitive outcomes (ie, cognitive function) are associated with their informal caregivers. Therefore, the body of literature related to the association between caregiver characteristics and cognitive function of adults with cancer needs to be fully mapped with assessment for knowledge gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Methods for this scoping review was informed by the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. Seven electronic databases will be searched: (1) PubMed (MEDLINE), (2) CINAHL, (3) Embase, (4) PsycINFO, (5) Scopus, (6) Sociological Abstracts and (7) ProQuest dissertation abstracts. In addition, the search for grey literature will include the conference abstracts available through Embase, Scopus and Sociological abstracts as well as dissertations available in ProQuest dissertations. All retrieved citations will be independently screened by two authors and eligibility will be determined based on inclusion and exclusion criteria at title and abstract level. Studies meeting inclusion criteria, will be screened at full text level by two reviewers followed by abstraction of included studies. Eligible studies will be collated, summarised and reported using the data charting form that research team developed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This scoping review does not require ethics approval. Results of this scoping review will be disseminated via conference presentation and/or publication in a scientific journal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yesol Yang
- Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sharron Rushton
- Division of Health Systems and Analytics, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amanda Woodward
- Duke University Medical Center Library, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cristina Hendrix
- Division of Health Systems and Analytics, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- GRECC, Durham Veteran Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Small BJ, Jim HSL, Eisel SL, Jacobsen PB, Scott SB. Cognitive performance of breast cancer survivors in daily life: Role of fatigue and depressed mood. Psychooncology 2019; 28:2174-2180. [PMID: 31418499 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer and its treatment are associated with long-term cognitive deficits. However, most studies of cancer patients have used traditional, office-based cognitive evaluations instead of assessing patients in their daily lives. Recent research in cognitive aging suggests that variability in performance may be a sensitive indicator of cognitive decline. Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), we examined cognitive variability among breast cancer survivors and evaluated whether ratings of fatigue and depressed mood were associated with cognition. METHODS Participants were 47 women (M age = 53.3 years) who completed treatment for early stage breast cancer 6 to 36 months previously. Smartphones were preloaded with cognitive tests measuring processing speed, executive functioning, and memory, as well as rating scales for fatigue and depressed mood. Participants were prompted five times per day over a 14-day period to complete EMA cognitive tasks and fatigue and depressed mood ratings. RESULTS Cognitive variability was observed across all three EMA cognitive tasks. Processing speed responses were slower at times that women rated themselves as more fatigued than their average (P < .001). Ratings of depressed mood were not associated with cognition. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to report cognitive variability in the daily lives of women treated for breast cancer. Performance was worse on a measure of processing speed at times when a woman rated her fatigue as greater than her own average. The ability to identify moments when cognition is most vulnerable may allow for personalized interventions to be applied at times when they are most needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Florida.,Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sarah L Eisel
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Florida.,Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Stacey B Scott
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Syarif H, Waluyo AH, Afiyanti Y, Mansyur M. Verbal Learning and Memory Function and the Influencing Factors on Breast Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study. Asian Pac Isl Nurs J 2019; 4:77-83. [PMID: 31259233 PMCID: PMC6571914 DOI: 10.31372/20190402.1036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Impairment of cognitive function is a common complaint by post-chemotherapy breast cancer survivors, specifically impairment of verbal learning and memory. The objective of this study was to identify the association between age, duration of education, chemotherapy type, hormone therapy usage, menopausal status, sleep quality, fatigue, stress, and hemoglobin (Hb) levels to memory and verbal learning function. This cross-sectional study consisted of 82 post-chemotherapy breast cancer survivors, 81 non-chemotherapy survivors, and 80 non-cancer female patients in two hospitals. The data were collected using the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test in Indonesian, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, 10-item Perceived Stress Scale, and the Piper Fatigue Scale-12. All instruments were already adopted into Indonesian. Characteristic data were obtained from hospital reports. The mean age of the respondents was 43.06 (8.18) years, 197 (81.1%) had been educated for ≤12 years, 82 (33.7%) were post-chemotherapy survivors, 46 (18.9%) were using hormonal therapy, and 125 (51.4%) had gone through menopause. Among the remaining respondents, 91 (37.4%) were anemic, 124 (51.0%) had poor sleep quality, and 115 (47.3%) experienced moderate fatigue. Twenty-one (25.6%) of post-chemotherapy survivors had a high possibility of having dementia. The significant variables associated with memory and verbal learning function included age, stress, survivor type, chemotherapy category, sleep quality, and fatigue. The insignificant variables included the length of education, hormone therapy usage, menopausal status, and hemoglobin levels. A logistic regression analysis showed that stress was the most influential variable with an odds ratio of 1.159. It is recommended that nurses consider the significant variables when providing services to post-chemotherapy breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilman Syarif
- Doctoral Student in the Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.,Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
| | - Agung Hilman Waluyo
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
| | - Yati Afiyanti
- Department of Maternity Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
| | | |
Collapse
|
121
|
Hartman SJ, Nelson SH, Marinac CR, Natarajan L, Parker BA, Patterson RE. The effects of weight loss and metformin on cognition among breast cancer survivors: Evidence from the Reach for Health study. Psychooncology 2019; 28:1640-1646. [PMID: 31140202 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Breast cancer survivors experience problems with cognition that interfere with daily life and can last for years. In the general population, obesity and diabetes are risk factors for cognitive decline, and weight loss can improve cognition; however, the impact of intentional weight loss on cancer survivors' cognition has not been tested. We investigated the impact of weight loss and metformin on changes in cognitive function in a sample of breast cancer survivors. METHODS Overweight/obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors (n = 333) were randomized to a weight loss intervention versus control and metformin versus placebo in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Outcomes were changes in five cognitive domains from baseline to 6 months measured by objective neurocognitive tests. RESULTS There were no statistically significant intervention effects for the metformin or weight loss interventions in five neurocognitive domains. Baseline body mass index (BMI) was a significant effect modifier of the changes in verbal functioning for the weight loss (P = 0.009) and metformin interventions (P = 0.0125). These effect modifications were independent of percent weight loss achieved during the 6-month study period. CONCLUSIONS This randomized controlled trial of weight loss and metformin interventions that examined changes to cognition among breast cancer survivors suggests that these interventions may not improve cognitive functioning among breast cancer survivors in general. However, weight loss may improve verbal functioning among individuals with a higher BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheri J Hartman
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California.,UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Sandahl H Nelson
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California.,UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Catherine R Marinac
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Loki Natarajan
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California.,UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Barbara A Parker
- UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Department of Medicine, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Ruth E Patterson
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California.,UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Cohen RA, Gullett JM, Woods AJ, Porges EC, Starkweather A, Jackson-Cook CK, Lynch-Kelly DL, Lyon DE. Cytokine-associated fatigue prior to, during, and post-chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Neuroimmunol 2019; 334:577001. [PMID: 31260949 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2019.577001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- R A Cohen
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Department of Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32605-0165, USA.
| | - J M Gullett
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Department of Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32605-0165, USA.
| | - A J Woods
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Department of Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32605-0165, USA.
| | - E C Porges
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Department of Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32605-0165, USA.
| | - A Starkweather
- Center for Advancement in Managing Pain, University of Connecticut, School of Nursing, United States.
| | - C K Jackson-Cook
- Cytogenetic Diagnostics Laboratory, Virginia Commonwealth University, Colleen, United States.
| | - D L Lynch-Kelly
- College of Nursing, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100197, Gainesville, FL 32610-0197, USA
| | - D E Lyon
- College of Nursing, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100197, Gainesville, FL 32610-0197, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Monfort SM, Pan X, Loprinzi CL, Lustberg MB, Chaudhari AMW. Exploring the Roles of Central and Peripheral Nervous System Function in Gait Stability: Preliminary Insights from Cancer Survivors. Gait Posture 2019; 71:62-68. [PMID: 31009918 PMCID: PMC6594171 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2018] [Revised: 03/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impairments in central and/or peripheral nervous systems are known to be associated with altered gait; however, the interplay between cognitive function, peripheral sensation, and orbital gait stability remains largely unclear. Elucidating these relationships is expected to provide a clearer understanding of potential fall risk factors across various populations and targets for novel interventions. Many patients diagnosed with cancer are treated with chemotherapy agents known to be neurotoxic to the central and/or peripheral nervous systems that can contribute to movement deficiencies, making this population a novel model to investigate these relationships. RESEARCH QUESTION The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate how central and peripheral nervous system impairments associate with orbital stability during single- and dual-task gait. METHODS Twenty cancer survivors were enrolled and separated into three groups: no prior chemotherapy exposure (CON, n = 6), and prior treatment with chemotherapy and having no/mild chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) symptoms (-CIPN, n = 8) or moderate/severe CIPN symptoms (+CIPN, n = 6). Testing included single- and dual-task (i.e., serial sevens) treadmill walking as well as a computerized test of executive function. Maximum Floquet multipliers were calculated to assess orbital stability during gait. RESULTS Worse executive function was associated with decreased orbital stability during the dual-task condition in the +CIPN group (Spearman's ρ = 0.94, P = 0.017). Additionally, decreased orbital stability during dual-task gait was observed for the -CIPN group compared to the CON group (ES = 1.96, P = 0.019). SIGNIFICANCE Executive dysfunction was associated with decreased gait stability during challenging dual-task gait in survivors with sensory symptoms of CIPN. The association between combined central and peripheral nervous system impairments and decreased gait stability in cancer survivors provides a novel demonstration of potential compensatory strategies that accompany deficiencies in these functions. Future work is needed to confirm these relationships and whether they hold in other populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott M Monfort
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Xueliang Pan
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Maryam B Lustberg
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ajit M W Chaudhari
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Huang Z, Zhao J, Ding K, Lv Y, Zhang C, Chao HH, Li CS, Cheng H. Depression involved in self-reported prospective memory problems in survivors of breast cancer who have received chemotherapy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e15301. [PMID: 31008981 PMCID: PMC6494378 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the relationship between depression and the self-reported prospective memory (SPM) problems in breast cancer survivors who have received chemotherapy.Sixty-three breast cancer patients were administered with self-rating depression scale (SDS) and the prospective memory questionnaire as part of extensive neuropsychological assessments before and after chemotherapy. The performance of SDS and SPM were compared, with the level of significance set at P < .05.Compared with the group before chemotherapy, there is a significant difference on the SPM score (t = 6.069, P = .000) in breast cancer patients after chemotherapy. Further, there is also a significant difference on the SPM score (t = -4.348, P = .000) between the patients with and without depression group after chemotherapy.The present result indicated that the depression in breast cancer survivors after chemotherapy may be involved in their chemotherapy-induced SPM impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhonglian Huang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
| | - Jingjing Zhao
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
| | - Ke Ding
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
| | - Yue Lv
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
| | - Congjun Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui
| | - Herta H. Chao
- Cancer Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine
| | - Chiang-Shan Li
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Huaidong Cheng
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Vergani L, Marton G, Pizzoli SFM, Monzani D, Mazzocco K, Pravettoni G. Training Cognitive Functions Using Mobile Apps in Breast Cancer Patients: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e10855. [PMID: 30888326 PMCID: PMC6444278 DOI: 10.2196/10855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is an invalidating disease and its treatment can bring serious side effects that have a physical and psychological impact. Specifically, cancer treatment generally has a strong impact on cognitive function. In recent years, new technologies and eHealth have had a growing influence on health care and innovative mobile apps can be useful tools to deliver cognitive exercise in the patient’s home. Objective This systematic review gives an overview of the state-of-the-art mobile apps aimed at training cognitive functions to better understand whether these apps could be useful tools to counteract cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients. Methods We searched in a systematic way all the full-text articles from the PubMed and Embase databases. Results We found eleven studies using mobile apps to deliver cognitive training. They included a total of 819 participants. App and study characteristics are presented and discussed, including cognitive domains trained (attention, problem solving, memory, cognitive control, executive function, visuospatial function, and language). None of the apps were specifically developed for breast cancer patients. They were generally developed for a specific clinical population. Only 2 apps deal with more than 1 cognitive domain, and only 3 studies focus on the efficacy of the app training intervention. Conclusions These results highlight the lack of empirical evidence on the efficacy of currently available apps to train cognitive function. Cognitive domains are not well defined across studies. It is noteworthy that no apps are specifically developed for cancer patients, and their applicability to breast cancer should not be taken for granted. Future studies should test the feasibility, usability, and effectiveness of available cognitive training apps in women with breast cancer. Due to the complexity and multidimensionality of cognitive difficulties in this cancer population, it may be useful to design, develop, and implement an ad hoc app targeting cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Vergani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marton
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Monzani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Cognitive Function of Patients With Early-stage Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 18:19-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Revised: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
127
|
Lycke M, Lefebvre T, Pottel L, Pottel H, Ketelaars L, Stellamans K, Van Eygen K, Vergauwe P, Werbrouck P, Cool L, Boterberg T, Liefhooghe N, Schofield P, Debruyne PR. Subjective, but not objective, cognitive complaints impact long-term quality of life in cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol 2019; 37:427-440. [DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1504154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Lycke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tessa Lefebvre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lies Pottel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Hans Pottel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care @ Kulak, Catholic University Leuven Kulak, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Lore Ketelaars
- Department of Neuropsychology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Karin Stellamans
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Eygen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
- Department of Haematology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Philippe Vergauwe
- Department of Gastro-Enterology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Patrick Werbrouck
- Department of Urology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Lieselot Cool
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nick Liefhooghe
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Patricia Schofield
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Philip R. Debruyne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Pharmacologic management of cognitive impairment induced by cancer therapy. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:e92-e102. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30938-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
129
|
Association of functional dorsal attention network alterations with breast cancer and chemotherapy. Sci Rep 2019; 9:104. [PMID: 30643203 PMCID: PMC6331552 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36380-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Adjuvant chemotherapy has significantly reduced mortality but increased cognitive impairments, including attention function, making quality of life issues a crucial concern. This study enrolled nineteen breast cancer patients who were treated with standard chemotherapy within 6 months and 20 sex-matched healthy controls to investigate the brain effects of chemotherapy. All participants underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) with mean fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (mfALFF) analysis and were correlated with neuropsychological tests, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R), and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), to explore the possible underlying mechanism of cognitive alternations. We found increased mfALFF over the frontoparietal lobe and decreased mfALFF over the occipital lobe in the cancer patients compared with the healthy controls; the altered brain regions may be associated with the dorsal attention network (DAN) and may be explained by a compensatory mechanism. Both MMSE and CAMS-R scores showed a positive correlation with mfALFF in the occipital lobe but a negative correlation in the frontoparietal lobe. By contrast, IES-R scores showed a positive correlation with mfALFF in the frontoparietal lobe but a negative correlation in the occipital lobe. These alterations are potentially related to the effects of both chemotherapy and psychological distress. Future research involving a larger sample size of patients with breast cancer is recommended.
Collapse
|
130
|
Carreira H, Williams R, Müller M, Harewood R, Stanway S, Bhaskaran K. Associations Between Breast Cancer Survivorship and Adverse Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110:1311-1327. [PMID: 30403799 PMCID: PMC6292797 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to systematically review the evidence on adverse mental health outcomes in breast cancer survivors (≥1 year) compared with women with no history of cancer. Methods Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Social Sciences Citation Index, and through backward citation tracking. Two researchers selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Results Sixty studies were included. Of 38 studies of depression, 33 observed more depression in breast cancer survivors; this was statistically significant in 19 studies overall, including six of seven where depression was ascertained clinically, three of four studies of antidepressants, and 13 of 31 that quantified depressive symptoms. Of 21 studies of anxiety, 17 observed more anxiety in breast cancer survivors, statistically significant in 11 studies overall, including two of four with clinical/prescription-based outcomes, and in eight of 17 of anxiety symptoms. Breast cancer survivors also had statistically significantly increased symptoms/frequency of neurocognitive dysfunction (18 of 24 studies), sexual dysfunctions (5 of 6 studies), sleep disturbance (5 of 5 studies), stress-related disorders/PTSD (2 of 3 studies), suicide (2 of 2 studies), somatisation (2 of 2 studies), and bipolar and obsessive-compulsive disorders (1 of 1 study each). Studies were heterogeneous in terms of participants' characteristics, time since diagnosis, ascertainment of outcomes, and measures reported. Approximately one-half of the studies were at high risk of selection bias and confounding by socio-economic status. Conclusions There is compelling evidence of an increased risk of anxiety, depression and suicide, and neurocognitive and sexual dysfunctions in breast cancer survivors compared with women with no prior cancer. This information can be used to support evidence-based prevention and management strategies. Further population-based and longitudinal research would help to better characterize these associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Carreira
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rachael Williams
- Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Martin Müller
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rhea Harewood
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Susannah Stanway
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, UK
| | - Krishnan Bhaskaran
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Gokal K, Munir F, Ahmed S, Kancherla K, Wallis D. Does walking protect against decline in cognitive functioning among breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy? Results from a small randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0206874. [PMID: 30485297 PMCID: PMC6261560 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer related cognitive impairments have been subjectively reported and objectively detected in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and are known to have a profound negative impact on productivity, psychosocial well-being and overall quality of life. Moderate levels of walking are known to be of benefit to the psychosocial well-being of those affected by breast cancer and for managing cognitive impairment in healthy adults, children, and the elderly. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of a home-based, self-managed, moderate intensity walking intervention on subjective and objective cognitive functioning in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS A home-based, self-managed intervention that consisted of moderate levels of walking was compared to usual care among breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy in a randomised controlled trial. Outcome measures included changes in subjective (CFQ) and objectively detected cognitive functioning (Stroop, SART and two subscales from the WAIS- Digit Span and Block Design). Fifty participants were randomised to either the intervention group (n = 25), who completed 12 weeks of moderate intensity walking, or to the control group (n = 25) mid-way through chemotherapy. RESULTS Compared with the control group, the self-managed walking intervention had positive effects on perceived cognitive function but not on sustained attention, executive function, memory or visual spatial skills when assessed objectively using neuropsychological measures. CONCLUSION This home-based, self-managed intervention is beneficial for protecting against perceived cognitive decline in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. There is a need for further research to objectively assess cognitive decline within this population with larger sample sizes of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50709297.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kajal Gokal
- School of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
- National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| | - Fehmidah Munir
- School of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
- National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| | - Samreen Ahmed
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| | - Kiran Kancherla
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Wallis
- School of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
- National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Carroll JE, Van Dyk K, Bower JE, Scuric Z, Petersen L, Schiestl R, Irwin MR, Ganz PA. Cognitive performance in survivors of breast cancer and markers of biological aging. Cancer 2018; 125:298-306. [PMID: 30474160 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biological aging pathways accelerated by cancer treatments may be a mechanism for cognitive impairment in cancer survivors. The goal of the current study was to examine whether indicators of biological aging, namely elevated levels of DNA damage, reduced telomerase enzymatic activity, and shorter peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) telomere length (TL) would be related to cognitive function in a cohort of survivors of breast cancer. METHODS The authors evaluated a cross-sectional sample of 94 women aged 36 to 69 years who were treated for early-stage breast cancer 3 to 6 years previously. Leukocyte DNA damage, PBMC telomerase enzymatic activity, PBMC TL, and the inflammatory marker soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II (sTNF-RII) were determined from blood samples. Cognitive function was assessed using a neuropsychological test battery and self-report. Linear regression models examined the relationship between biological aging predictors and cognitive outcomes. RESULTS Both higher DNA damage and lower telomerase were found to be statistically significantly related to lower executive function scores adjusting for age, body mass index, race, years from treatment, and intelligence score (standardized coefficients [B], -0.23 and 0.30; all P values <.05). In addition, lower telomerase activity was associated with worse attention and motor speed scores (B values, 0.30 and 0.24; P <.05). sTNF-RII and TL were found to be unrelated to any of the neurocognitive domains. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study suggest a significant association between measures of biological aging and objective measures of cognitive performance in survivors of breast cancer. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm a causal role of biological aging as a driver of declines in cognitive function after cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith E Carroll
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Julienne E Bower
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Zorica Scuric
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Pathology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Environmental Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,University of California at Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California
| | - Laura Petersen
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Robert Schiestl
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Pathology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Environmental Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,University of California at Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael R Irwin
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Mandelblatt JS, Small BJ, Luta G, Hurria A, Jim H, McDonald BC, Graham D, Zhou X, Clapp J, Zhai W, Breen E, Carroll JE, Denduluri N, Dilawari A, Extermann M, Isaacs C, Jacobsen PB, Kobayashi LC, Holohan Nudelman K, Root J, Stern RA, Tometich D, Turner R, VanMeter JW, Saykin AJ, Ahles T. Cancer-Related Cognitive Outcomes Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors in the Thinking and Living With Cancer Study. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:JCO1800140. [PMID: 30281396 PMCID: PMC7237199 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine treatment and aging-related effects on longitudinal cognitive function in older breast cancer survivors. METHODS Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 344) and matched controls without cancer (n = 347) 60 years of age and older without dementia or neurologic disease were recruited between August 2010 and December 2015. Data collection occurred during presystemic treatment/control enrollment and at 12 and 24 months through biospecimens; surveys; self-reported Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function; and neuropsychological tests that measured attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE) and learning and memory (LM). Linear mixed-effects models tested two-way interactions of treatment group (control, chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy, and hormonal therapy) and time and explored three-way interactions of ApoE (ε4+ v not) by group by time; covariates included baseline age, frailty, race, and cognitive reserve. RESULTS Survivors and controls were 60 to 98 years of age, were well educated, and had similar baseline cognitive scores. Treatment was related to longitudinal cognition scores, with survivors who received chemotherapy having increasingly worse APE scores ( P = .05) and those initiating hormonal therapy having lower LM scores at 12 months ( P = .03) than other groups. These group-by-time differences varied by ApoE genotype, where only ε4+ survivors receiving hormone therapy had short-term decreases in adjusted LM scores (three-way interaction P = .03). For APE, the three-way interaction was not significant ( P = .14), but scores were significantly lower for ε4+ survivors exposed to chemotherapy (-0.40; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.01) at 24 months than ε4+ controls (0.01; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.18; P < .05). Increasing age was associated with lower baseline scores on all cognitive measures ( P < .001); frailty was associated with baseline APE and self-reported decline ( P < .001). CONCLUSION Breast cancer systemic treatment and aging-related phenotypes and genotypes are associated with longitudinal decreases in cognitive function scores in older survivors. These data could inform treatment decision making and survivorship care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Brent J. Small
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Gheorghe Luta
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Arti Hurria
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Heather Jim
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Brenna C. McDonald
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Deena Graham
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan Clapp
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth Breen
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Judith E. Carroll
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Neelima Denduluri
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Asma Dilawari
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Martine Extermann
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Paul B. Jacobsen
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Lindsay C. Kobayashi
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Kelly Holohan Nudelman
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - James Root
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Robert A. Stern
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Danielle Tometich
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Raymond Turner
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - John W. VanMeter
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Tim Ahles
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Baussard L, Carayol M, Porro B, Baguet F, Cousson-Gelie F. Fatigue in cancer patients: Development and validation of a short form of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-10). Eur J Oncol Nurs 2018; 36:62-67. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
135
|
Janelsins MC, Heckler CE, Peppone LJ, Ahles TA, Mohile SG, Mustian KM, Palesh O, O’Mara AM, Minasian LM, Williams AM, Magnuson A, Geer J, Dakhil SR, Hopkins JO, Morrow GR. Longitudinal Trajectory and Characterization of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in a Nationwide Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:JCO2018786624. [PMID: 30240328 PMCID: PMC6225503 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.78.6624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is an important clinical problem in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. Nationwide longitudinal studies are needed to understand the trajectory and severity of CRCI in specific cognitive domains. PATIENTS AND METHODS The overall objective of this nationwide, prospective, observational study conducted within the National Cancer Institute Community Clinical Oncology Research Program was to assess trajectories in specific cognitive domains in patients with breast cancer (stage I-IIIC) receiving chemotherapy, from pre- (A1) to postchemotherapy (A2) and from prechemotherapy to 6 months postchemotherapy (A3); controls were assessed at the same time-equivalent points. The primary aim assessed visual memory using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery Delayed Match to Sample test by longitudinal mixed models including A1, A2, and A3 and adjusting for age, education, race, cognitive reserve score, and baseline anxiety and depressive symptoms. We also assessed trajectories of CRCI in other aspects of memory as well as in attention and executive function with computerized, paper-based, and telephone-based cognitive tests. RESULTS In total, 580 patients with breast cancer (mean age, 53.4 years) and 363 controls (mean age, 52.6 years) were assessed. On the Delayed Match to Sample test, the longitudinal mixed model results revealed a significant group-by-time effect ( P < .005); patients declined over time from prechemotherapy (A1) to 6 months postchemotherapy (A3; P = .005), but controls did not change ( P = .426). The group difference between patients and controls was also significant, revealing declines in patients but not controls ( P = .017). Several other models of computerized, standard, and telephone tests indicated significantly worse performance by patients compared with controls from pre- to postchemotherapy and from prechemotherapy to 6 months postchemotherapy. CONCLUSION This nationwide study showed CRCI in patients with breast cancer affects multiple cognitive domains for at least 6 months postchemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C. Janelsins
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Charles E. Heckler
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Luke J. Peppone
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Tim A. Ahles
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Supriya G. Mohile
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Karen M. Mustian
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Oxana Palesh
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Ann M. O’Mara
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Lori M. Minasian
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Annalynn M. Williams
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Allison Magnuson
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Jodi Geer
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Shaker R. Dakhil
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Judith O. Hopkins
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Gary R. Morrow
- Michelle C. Janelsins, Charles E. Heckler, Luke J. Peppone, Supriya G. Mohile, Karen M. Mustian, Annalynn M. Williams, Allison Magnuson, and Gary R. Morrow, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Tim A. Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oxana Palesh, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA; Ann M. O’Mara and Lori M. Minasian, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD; Jodi Geer, Metro Minnesota NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Saint Louis Park, MN; Shaker R. Dakhil, Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS; and Judith O. Hopkins, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Diminished gray matter density mediates chemotherapy dosage-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients. Sci Rep 2018; 8:13801. [PMID: 30218006 PMCID: PMC6138678 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32257-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate chemotherapy dosage-related cognitive impairment and its neural mechanisms in breast cancer (BC) patients. Twenty-eight breast cancer patients after each chemotherapy cycle and matched 29 healthy control subjects underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging. Voxel-based morphometry analysis was performed to compare group differences in the gray matter for the whole brain. Furthermore, mediation analysis was conducted to explore the role of brain structures in chemotherapy dosage-related cognitive impairment. Voxel-based morphometry analysis was performed in gray matter for the whole brain of BC patients after chemotherapy. The results revealed that the gray matter density in the left inferior frontal gyrus, right middle frontal gyrus, right fusiform area, and bilateral cerebellum was decreased in the BC patients compared to controls. The number of chemotherapy cycles was negatively associated with general cognitive capacity, verbal fluency and digit span performance in the BC patients. In addition, decreased gray matter density in the right middle frontal gyrus could mediate the chemotherapy dosage effects on verbal fluency performance. These findings indicate that the dose-response relationship between chemotherapy and cognitive impairment may depend on the decreases in gray matter density of the frontal cortical structures.
Collapse
|
137
|
Zuniga KE, Moran NE. Low Serum Carotenoids Are Associated with Self-Reported Cognitive Dysfunction and Inflammatory Markers in Breast Cancer Survivors. Nutrients 2018; 10:E1111. [PMID: 30126098 PMCID: PMC6116006 DOI: 10.3390/nu10081111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Dietary carotenoids may exert anti-inflammatory activities to reduce inflammation-driven cognitive impairments during cancer and cancer treatment. Our objective was to explore if cognitive function in breast cancer survivors (BCS) differs by serum carotenoid concentrations, and if blood carotenoids concentrations are associated with reduced systemic inflammation. Methods: Objective cognitive function and perceived cognitive impairment of 29 BCS and 38 controls were assessed cross-sectionally with the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery and The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function Questionnaire, respectively. Serum carotenoid and inflammatory marker (sTNF-RII, IL-6, IL-1ra, CRP) concentrations were measured. Results: Low-carotenoid BCS had more cognitive complaints compared to the low-carotenoid controls (Mdiff = -43.0, p < 0.001) and high-carotenoid controls (Mdiff = -44.5, p < 0.001). However, the cognitive complaints of high-carotenoid BCS were intermediate to and not different than the low-carotenoid BCS, or low- or high-carotenoid controls. BCS performed similarly to controls on all objective cognitive measures. Multiple linear regression, controlling for age and body mass index (BMI), demonstrated an inverse association between serum carotenoid concentrations and pro-inflammatory sTNFR-II (β = 0.404, p = 0.005) and IL-6 concentrations (β = -0.35, p = 0.001), but not IL-1ra or CRP. Conclusions: Higher serum carotenoid concentrations may convey cognitive and anti-inflammatory benefits in BCS. Future research should identify dietary components and patterns that support cognitive health in cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystle E Zuniga
- Nutrition and Foods, Family and Consumer Sciences, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.
| | - Nancy E Moran
- United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Lee SH, Lee KH, Chang SJ. Do health literacy and self-care behaviours affect quality of life in older persons with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy? Int J Nurs Pract 2018; 24:e12691. [PMID: 30101486 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed at identifying the factors associated with health literacy, self-care behaviours, and quality of life among older persons with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy. METHODS This was a descriptive study. A total of 80 older persons with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy participated in this study. Data were collected from July 21 to November 3, 2016 in Korea. The Short Form of the Korean Functional Health Literacy Test, the Self-Care Behaviours Scale, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale-Lung were used to measure functional health literacy, self-care behaviours, and quality of life, respectively. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were conducted to analyse the data. RESULTS In the each regression model for the general and disease-related quality of life, performance status, self-care behaviours, and prior lines of treatment were identified as a predictor. However, functional health literacy was found to be a predictor only of disease-related quality of life. Among these predictors, self-care behaviours had the greatest impact. CONCLUSION Health care providers should be aware of the effects of health literacy and self-care behaviours on health-related quality of life and consider the factors associated with quality of life when they take care of older persons with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Hee Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea
| | - Ki Hyeong Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea
| | - Sun Ju Chang
- College of Nursing and Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Myers JS, Kahya M, Mitchell M, Dai J, He J, Moon S, Hamilton K, Valla M, O'Dea A, Klemp J, Kurylo M, Akinwuntan A, Devos H. Pupillary response: cognitive effort for breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2018; 27:1121-1128. [PMID: 30097791 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4401-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this cross-sectional comparative pilot study was to evaluate cognitive effort, indexed by pupillary response (PR), for breast cancer survivors (BCS) with complaints of cognitive dysfunction following chemotherapy. STUDY AIMS Compare the cognitive effort employed by BCS to healthy controls (HC) during neuropsychological tests (NPT) for memory, sustained attention, verbal fluency, visuospatial ability, processing speed and executive function; and Investigate the relationship between PR-indexed cognitive effort and participants' self-report of cognitive function. METHODS Self-report of cognitive function was collected from 23 BCS and 23 HC. PR was measured during NPT. Independent two-sample t tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare group scores. Between-group effect size (Cohen's d) was calculated for each outcome. Correlation between mean self-report scores and PR values, as well as 95% confidence intervals, was calculated. RESULTS No group differences were demonstrated for NPT performance. BCS reported more issues with cognitive function than HC (p < .0001). A group effect for BCS was seen with PR-indexed cognitive effort for components of most NPT (p < .05). PR was correlated with most self-report measures of cognitive function (r = 0.33-0.45). CONCLUSIONS PR sensitivity to cognitive effort across a variety of NPT and correlation with self-report of cognitive function was demonstrated. The portability, affordability, and "real-time" aspects of PR are attractive for potential use in the clinic setting to assess cognitive function. A larger study is needed to confirm these results. Prospective investigation of PR in BCS is needed to demonstrate sensitivity to cognitive function changes over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie S Myers
- Office of Grants and Research, University of Kansas School of Nursing, MS 4043, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
| | - Melike Kahya
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Melissa Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Junqiang Dai
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Jianghua He
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Sanghee Moon
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Kevin Hamilton
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Mary Valla
- North Kansas City Hospital, 2750 Clay Edwards Drive, North Kansas City, MO, 64116, USA
| | - Anne O'Dea
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Jennifer Klemp
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, 2650 Shawnee Mission Pkwy, Westwood, KS, 66205, USA
| | - Monica Kurylo
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Abiodun Akinwuntan
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Hannes Devos
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Levkovich I, Cohen M, Alon S, Kuchuk I, Nissenbaum B, Evron E, Pollack S, Fried G. Symptom cluster of emotional distress, fatigue and cognitive difficulties among young and older breast cancer survivors: The mediating role of subjective stress. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:469-475. [PMID: 29759914 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Revised: 03/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the nature of the symptom cluster of emotional distress, fatigue, and cognitive difficulties in young and older breast cancer survivors (BCS); To assess the mediating role of subjective stress and coping strategies (emotional control and meaning-focused coping) in the association between age and symptom cluster. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants were 170 BCS, stages I-III, 1-12 months post-chemotherapy, filled-out the Fatigue, Emotional Control, Meaning-focused Coping, Emotional Distress and the Cognitive Difficulties Questionnaires. Statistical analyses included tests for difference between-groups Pearson correlations and Structural Equation Modeling for the assessment of the study model. RESULTS Older BCS (aged 60-82) reported lower levels of emotional distress (M = 0.87, SD = 0.87), fatigue (M = 3.85, SD = 2.38), and cognitive difficulties (M = 1.17, SD = 1.07) compared to the younger BCS (aged 24-59) (emotional distress M = 1.17, SD = 0.85, fatigue M = 5.02, SD = 2.32, and cognitive difficulties M = 1.66, SD = 1.23, p < .01-,05). The older survivors reported lower levels of subjective stress and used more emotional control strategies compared to the younger BCS. The empirical model had good fit indices (χ2 = 27.60, p = 0.20, χ2/df = 1.26; CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.98; NFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.04 (90% CI = 0.00, 10) and showed that subjective stress, but not coping strategies, mediated the effect of age on symptom cluster severity. CONCLUSIONS Lower levels of subjective stress, but not coping strategies, mediated the association of age with the symptom cluster of emotional distress, fatigue and cognitive difficulties. Further research is needed to explore differences in subjective stress by age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inbar Levkovich
- The Division of Family Medicine, The Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Miri Cohen
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel.
| | - Shirly Alon
- Oncology Department, Meir Medical Center, Israel.
| | - Iryna Kuchuk
- Oncology Department, Meir Medical Center, Israel.
| | | | - Ella Evron
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to Tel Aviv University, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Israel.
| | | | - Georgeta Fried
- Oncology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Chang L, Weiner LS, Hartman SJ, Horvath S, Jeste D, Mischel PS, Kado DM. Breast cancer treatment and its effects on aging. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 10:346-355. [PMID: 30078714 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer of women in the United States. It is also proving to be one of the most treatable. Early detection, surgical intervention, therapeutic radiation, cytotoxic chemotherapies and molecularly targeted agents are transforming the lives of patients with breast cancer, markedly improving their survival. Although current breast cancer treatments are largely successful in producing cancer remission and extending lifespan, there is concern that these treatments may have long lasting detrimental effects on cancer survivors, in part, through their impact on non-tumor cells. Presently, the impact of breast cancer treatment on normal cells, its impact on cellular function and its effect on the overall function of the individual are incompletely understood. In particular, it is unclear whether breast cancer and/or its treatments are associated with an accelerated aging phenotype. In this review, we consider breast cancer survivorship from the perspective of accelerated aging, and discuss the evidence suggesting that women treated for breast cancer may suffer from an increased rate of physical and cognitive decline that likely corresponds with underlying vulnerabilities of genome instability, epigenetic changes, and cellular senescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Chang
- Departments of Family Medicine & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine University of California, San Diego, United States
| | - Lauren S Weiner
- Departments of Family Medicine & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, United States; University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Sheri J Hartman
- Departments of Family Medicine & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, United States; University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Steve Horvath
- Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, United States; Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Dilip Jeste
- Departments of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, United States; Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging, United States
| | - Paul S Mischel
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, United States; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, United States
| | - Deborah M Kado
- Departments of Family Medicine & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine University of California, San Diego, United States; Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Jazzar U, Yong S, Klaassen Z, Huo J, Hughes BD, Esparza E, Mehta HB, Kim SP, Tyler DS, Freedland SJ, Kamat AM, Wolf DV, Williams SB. Impact of psychiatric illness on decreased survival in elderly patients with bladder cancer in the United States. Cancer 2018; 124:3127-3135. [PMID: 29660813 PMCID: PMC6097900 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2017] [Revised: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatments for muscle-invasive bladder cancer are multimodal, complex, and often carry significant risks of physical and psychological morbidity. The objectives of this study were to define the incidence and types of psychiatric illnesses diagnosed after treatment and to determine their impact on survival outcomes. METHODS In total, 3709 patients who were diagnosed with clinical stage T2 through T4a bladder cancer from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2011, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare were analyzed. Multivariable analysis and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to determine the predictors associated with psychiatric diagnosis and impact on survival outcomes. RESULTS Of 3709 patients, 1870 (50.4%) were diagnosed with posttreatment psychiatric disorders. Patients who underwent radical cystectomy were identified as being at significantly greater risk of having a posttreatment psychiatric illness compared with those who received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.31; P = .001). In adjusted analyses, diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder resulted in significantly worse overall survival (HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.47-3.17; P < .001) and cancer-specific survival (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.05-2.78; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS One-half of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who underwent treatment were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder, which resulted in worse survival outcomes compared with patients who did not have a posttreatment psychiatric diagnosis. This information can be used to inform interventions to educate patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer regarding the impact of different treatments on mental health. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usama Jazzar
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Shan Yong
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Jinhai Huo
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Byron D. Hughes
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Edgar Esparza
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Hemalkumar B. Mehta
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Simon P. Kim
- Urology Institute, Center for Health Care Quality and Outcomes, University Hospitals Case Western Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
- Cancer Outcomes and Public Policy Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Douglas S. Tyler
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | | | - Ashish M. Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dwight V. Wolf
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Stephen B. Williams
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Jordan KR, Loman BR, Bailey MT, Pyter LM. Gut microbiota-immune-brain interactions in chemotherapy-associated behavioral comorbidities. Cancer 2018; 124:3990-3999. [PMID: 29975400 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Increasing scientific attention is focused on the gut-brain axis, including the ability of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to modulate central nervous system function. Changes in the intestinal microbiome can influence affective-like behavior, cognitive performance, fatigue, and sleep in rodents and humans. Patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy experience similar negative behavioral changes and concurrent GI symptoms. These chemotherapy comorbidities can be long-lasting and may reduce patients' quality of life and motivation to comply with treatment. This review summarizes the clinical and preclinical evidence supporting a role for the intestinal microbiome in mediating behavioral comorbidities through peripheral immune activation in patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy. In addition, evidence suggesting that targeted modification of the intestinal microbiome during cancer treatment could ameliorate associated behavioral comorbidities is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelley R Jordan
- The Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Brett R Loman
- Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Michael T Bailey
- The Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Leah M Pyter
- The Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Lambert M, Ouimet LA, Wan C, Stewart A, Collins B, Vitoroulis I, Bielajew C. Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis. Oncol Rev 2018; 12:371. [PMID: 30294410 PMCID: PMC6170883 DOI: 10.4081/oncol.2018.371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a great deal of variability in the composition of neuropsychological test batteries used in the assessment of cancerrelated cognitive impairment (CRCI). Not only the development of a gold standard approach for CRCI assessment would allow for easier identification of women suffering from CRCI but it would also promote optimal care for survivors. As a first step towards the development of a valid and reliable unified test battery, the objective of this study was to verify whether the theoretical domains commonly used in CRCI assessment are statistically supported, before and after breast cancer treatment. Principal component analyses (PCA) were performed on the results from 23 neuropsychological tests grouped into eight conceptual domains. For baseline data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .82 and Bartlett's X2(253, N=95) = 949.48, P<0.001. A five-component solution explained 60.94% of the common variance. For the post-treatment data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .83 and Bartlett's X2(253, N=95) = 1007.21, P<0.001 and a five component solution explained 62.03% of the common variance. Although a visual comparison of the theoretical model with those determined via PCA indicated important overlap between conceptual domains and statistical components, significant dissimilarities were also observed.
Collapse
|
145
|
Grégoire C, Nicolas H, Bragard I, Delevallez F, Merckaert I, Razavi D, Waltregny D, Faymonville ME, Vanhaudenhuyse A. Efficacy of a hypnosis-based intervention to improve well-being during cancer: a comparison between prostate and breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:677. [PMID: 29929493 PMCID: PMC6013950 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4607-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate and breast cancer can have a lot of negative consequences such as fatigue, sleep difficulties and emotional distress, which decrease quality of life. Group interventions showed benefits to emotional distress and fatigue, but most of these studies focus on breast cancer patients. However, it is important to test if an effective intervention for breast cancer patients could also have benefits for prostate cancer patients. METHODS Our controlled study aimed to compare the efficacy of a self-hypnosis/self-care group intervention to improve emotional distress, sleep difficulties, fatigue and quality of life of breast and prostate cancer patients. 25 men with prostate cancer and 68 women with breast cancer participated and were evaluated before (T0) and after (T1) the intervention. RESULTS After the intervention, the breast cancer group showed positive effects for anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep difficulties, and global health status, whereas there was no effect in the prostate cancer group. We showed that women suffered from higher difficulties prior to the intervention and that their oncological treatments were different in comparison to men. CONCLUSION The differences in the efficacy of the intervention could be explained by the baseline differences. As men in our sample reported few distress, fatigue or sleep problems, it is likely that they did not improve on these dimensions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02569294 and NCT03423927 ). Retrospectively registered in October 2015 and February 2018 respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Grégoire
- Public Health Department and Sensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - H. Nicolas
- Urology Department, CHR Citadelle, Liège, Belgium
| | - I. Bragard
- Public Health Department and Sensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - F. Delevallez
- Psychology Department, University, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - I. Merckaert
- Psychology Department, University, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - D. Razavi
- Psychology Department, University, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - D. Waltregny
- Urology Department, University Hospital of Liège, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - M.-E. Faymonville
- Algology-Palliative Care Department, University Hospital of Liège, Sensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - A. Vanhaudenhuyse
- Algology-Palliative Care Department, University Hospital of Liège, Sensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Hardy SJ, Krull KR, Wefel JS, Janelsins M. Cognitive Changes in Cancer Survivors. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38:795-806. [PMID: 30231372 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_201179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Advances in cancer treatments have led to substantially improved survival for patients with cancer. However, many patients experience changes in cognition as a side effect of both cancer and cancer treatment. This occurs with both central nervous system (CNS) tumors and non-CNS tumors and in both children and adults. Studies of patients with non-CNS cancer have shown that cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), which can include changes in memory, executive function, attention, and processing speed, occurs in up to 30% of patients prior to any treatment and in up to 75% of patients during treatment. A subset of patients with non-CNS and CNS cancer appear to be at higher risk for CRCI, so much research has gone into identifying who is vulnerable. Risk factors for CRCI in adults include cognitive reserve, age, genetic factors, and ethnicity; risk factors for children include genetic factors, female sex, younger age at diagnosis, chemotherapy dose, and both dose and field size for radiation. Although the field has made substantial strides in understanding and treating CRCI, more research is still needed to improve outcomes for both pediatric and adult cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara J Hardy
- From the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kevin R Krull
- From the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- From the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michelle Janelsins
- From the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Kim HJ, Barsevick AM, Chan A, Chae JW. Chemotherapy-associated cognitive impairments in Korean cancer patients: Risk factors and functional outcome. Psychooncology 2018; 27:1995-2001. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2018] [Revised: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hee-Ju Kim
- College of Nursing; Catholic University of Korea; Seoul South Korea
| | | | - Alexandre Chan
- Department of Pharmacy; National University of Singapore; Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School; Singapore
| | - Jung-woo Chae
- College of Pharmacy; Chungnam National University; Daejeon South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Systematic review of self-reported cognitive function in cancer patients following chemotherapy treatment. J Cancer Surviv 2018; 12:537-559. [DOI: 10.1007/s11764-018-0692-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
149
|
Nomura SJO, Hwang YT, Gomez SL, Fung TT, Yeh SL, Dash C, Allen L, Philips S, Hilakivi-Clarke L, Zheng YL, Wang JHY. Dietary intake of soy and cruciferous vegetables and treatment-related symptoms in Chinese-American and non-Hispanic White breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 168:467-479. [PMID: 29230660 PMCID: PMC5928523 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4578-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This project was undertaken to examine the association between dietary intake of soy or cruciferous vegetables and breast cancer treatment-related symptoms among Chinese-American (CA) and Non-Hispanic White (NHW) breast cancer survivors. METHODS This cross-sectional study included 192 CA and 173 NHW female breast cancer survivors (stages 0-III, diagnosed between 2006 and 2012) recruited from two California cancer registries, who had completed primary treatment. Patient-reported data on treatment-related symptoms and potential covariates were collected via telephone interviews. Dietary data were ascertained by mailed questionnaires. The outcomes evaluated were menopausal symptoms (hot flashes, night sweats, vaginal dryness, vaginal discharge), joint problems, fatigue, hair thinning/loss, and memory problems. Associations between soy and cruciferous vegetables and symptoms were assessed using logistic regression. Analyses were further stratified by race/ethnicity and endocrine therapy usage (non-user, tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors). RESULTS Soy food and cruciferous vegetable intake ranged from no intake to 431 and 865 g/day, respectively, and was higher in CA survivors. Higher soy food intake was associated with lower odds of menopausal symptoms (≥ 24.0 vs. 0 g/day, OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.25, 1.03), and fatigue (≥ 24.0 vs. 0 g/day, OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22, 0.84). However, when stratified by race/ethnicity, associations were statistically significant in NHW survivors only. Compared with low intake, higher cruciferous vegetable intake was associated with lower odds of experiencing menopausal symptoms (≥ 70.8 vs. < 33.0 g/day, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25, 0.97) in the overall population. CONCLUSIONS In this population of breast cancer survivors, higher soy and cruciferous vegetable intake was associated with less treatment-related menopausal symptoms and fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J O Nomura
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, D.C., 20057, USA
| | - Yi-Ting Hwang
- Department of Statistics, National Taipei University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Teresa T Fung
- Department of Nutrition, Simmons College, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shu-Lan Yeh
- Department of Nutrition, Chang Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chiranjeev Dash
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, D.C., 20057, USA
| | - Laura Allen
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA, USA
| | - Serena Philips
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., 20052, USA
| | - Leena Hilakivi-Clarke
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, D.C., 20057, USA
| | - Yun-Ling Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, D.C., 20057, USA
| | - Judy Huei-Yu Wang
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, D.C., 20057, USA.
- , 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, D.C., 20007, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Pendergrass JC, Targum SD, Harrison JE. Cognitive Impairment Associated with Cancer: A Brief Review. INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 2018; 15:36-44. [PMID: 29497579 PMCID: PMC5819720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
This brief review explores the areas of cognitive impairment that have been observed in cancer patients and survivors, the cognitive assessment tools used, and the management of the observed cognitive changes. Cognitive changes and impairment observed in patients with cancer and those in remission can be related to the direct effects of cancer itself, nonspecific factors or comorbid conditions that are independent of the actual disease, and/or the treatments or combination of treatments administered. Attention, memory, and executive functioning are the most frequently identified cognitive domains impacted by cancer. However, the prevalence and extent of impairment remains largely unknown due to marked differences in methodology, definitions of cognitive impairment, and the assessment measures used. Assessment of cognitive functioning is an important and necessary part of a comprehensive oncological care plan. Research is needed to establish a better understanding of cognitive changes and impairments associated with cancer so that optimal patient outcomes can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Cara Pendergrass
- Drs. Pendergrass and Targum are with Bracket Global and Clintara LLC, A Bracket Company, in Boston, Massachusetts
- Dr. Harrison is with the Alzheimer's Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam, Netherlands; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, United Kingdom; and Metis Cognition Ltd, Park House, Kilmington Common in Wiltshire, United Kingdom
| | - Steven D Targum
- Drs. Pendergrass and Targum are with Bracket Global and Clintara LLC, A Bracket Company, in Boston, Massachusetts
- Dr. Harrison is with the Alzheimer's Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam, Netherlands; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, United Kingdom; and Metis Cognition Ltd, Park House, Kilmington Common in Wiltshire, United Kingdom
| | - John E Harrison
- Drs. Pendergrass and Targum are with Bracket Global and Clintara LLC, A Bracket Company, in Boston, Massachusetts
- Dr. Harrison is with the Alzheimer's Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam, Netherlands; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, United Kingdom; and Metis Cognition Ltd, Park House, Kilmington Common in Wiltshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|