Yield of laboratory testing to identify secondary contributors to osteoporosis in otherwise healthy women

Evaluation of patients with a recent clinical fracture and osteoporosis, a multidisciplinary approach

The aetiology of osteoporotic fractures is multifactorial, but little is known about the way to evaluate patients with a recent clinical fracture for the presence of secondary osteoporosis.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of contributors to secondary osteoporosis in patients presenting with a clinical vertebral or non-vertebral fracture. Identifying and correcting these contributors will enhance treatment effect aimed at reducing the risk of subsequent fractures.

In a multidisciplinary approach, including evaluation of bone and fall-related risk factors, 100 consecutive women (n = 73) and men (n = 27) older than 50 years presenting with a clinical vertebral or non-vertebral fracture and having osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5) were further evaluated clinically and by laboratory testing for the presence of contributors to secondary osteoporosis.

In 27 patients, 34 contributors were previously known, in 50 patients 52 new contributors were diagnosed (mainly vitamin D deficiency in 42) and 14 needed further exploration because of laboratory abnormalities (mainly abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone in 9). The 57 patients with contributors were older (71 vs. 64 yrs, p < 0.01), had more vertebral deformities (67% vs. 44%, p < 0.05) and a higher calculated absolute 10-year risk for major (16.5 vs. 9.9%, p < 0.01) and for hip fracture (6.9 vs. 2.4%, p < 0.01) than patients without contributors. The presence of contributors was similar between women and men and between patients with fractures associated with a low or high-energy trauma.

We conclude that more than one in two patients presenting with a clinical vertebral or non-vertebral fracture and BMD-osteoporosis have secondary contributors to osteoporosis, most of which were correctable. Identifying and correcting these associated disorders will enhance treatment effect aimed at reducing the risk of subsequent fractures in patients older than 50 years.

Intestinal hyperabsorption of calcium and low bone turnover in hypercalciuric postmenopausal osteoporosis

Hypercalciuria of intestinal origin has been linked with bone loss in calcium nephrolithiasis and idiopathic osteoporosis. This retrospective data analysis was performed to explore potential pathogenetic link between intestinal hyperabsorption of calcium and postmenopausal osteoporosis. Data were retrieved from postmenopausal women who were evaluated for osteoporosis or osteopenia at the Mineral Metabolism Clinic of UT Southwestern Medical Center. A total of 319 patients underwent the test of calciuric response to oral calcium load to obtain an indirect measure of intestinal calcium absorption. Serum and urinary biochemistry and L2-L4 bone mineral density (BMD) were compared between five quintiles of calciuric response. There was a statistically significant trend toward a rise in 24-h urinary calcium and a decrease in urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) and BMD, with increasing order of quintiles. The presentation of those in the 1st quintile was consistent with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency, with impaired calcium absorption, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and stimulated bone turnover (high normal urinary DPD). In contrast, patients in the 5th quintile displayed a picture of absorptive hypercalciuria of stone disease, with intestinal hyperabsorption of calcium, high or high normal urinary calcium and suppressed bone turnover (low or low normal urinary DPD). Thus, the assessment of intestinal calcium absorption in a seemingly homogeneous group of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia revealed a spectrum of calciuric response whose extremes may represent two physiologically distinct subtypes that have important diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Secondary contributors to bone loss in osteoporosis related hip fractures

Osteoporosis treatment of patients with hip fractures is necessary to prevent subsequent fractures. Secondary causes for bone loss are present in more than 80% of patients with hip fractures, and therefore, assessment of Vitamin D status, disorders in calcium absorption and excretion, monoclonal gammopathies, and renal function should be performed. Identifying and managing these disorders will improve detection and enhance treatment aimed at reducing the risk of recurrent fractures in older adults.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of disorders affecting bone and mineral metabolism in individuals with osteoporotic hip fractures.

METHODS

Community dwelling individuals with hip fractures (HFx) 50 years of age and older. Assessment for vitamin D, renal and parathyroid status, calcium absorption, and plasma cell disorders.

RESULTS

Of 157 HFx, mean age 70 +/- 10 years, HFx had higher creatinine (p = 0.002, 95% C.I. -0.09, 0.05); lower 25 OH vitamin D (p = 0.019, 95% C.I. 6.5, 2.7), albumin (p = 0.007, 95% C.I. 0.36, 0.009), and 24-h urine calcium (p = 0.024, 95% CI 51, 21) as compared to controls. More than 80% of HFx had at least one previously undiagnosed condition, with vitamin D insufficiency (61%), chronic kidney disease (16%) (CKD), monoclonal gammopathy (6%), and low calcium absorption (5%) being the most common. One case each of multiple myeloma and solitary plasmocytoma were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis treatment of HFx is necessary to prevent subsequent fractures. Secondary causes for bone loss are remarkably common in HFx; therefore, assessment of vitamin D status, disorders in calcium absorption and excretion, protein electrophoresis, and renal function should be performed. Identifying and correcting these disorders will improve detection and enhance treatment aimed at reducing the risk of recurrent fractures in older adults.

Healthy children with frequent fractures: how much evaluation is needed?

OBJECTIVE

We performed a case-control study to determine whether occult bone disease is associated with a history of frequent fractures in children.

METHODS

Healthy children with > or = 2 incidences of low-energy fractures were recruited (n = 68). Children with no history of fractures served as control subjects (n = 57). Food logs, activity surveys, physical examinations, laboratory tests, and dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry were used.

RESULTS

Bone mineral density z scores were significantly reduced in case subjects, compared with control subjects. Three case subjects (4.3%) and 1 control subject (1.8%) had bone mineral density z scores below the expected range. Of those 4 subjects, 2 had dairy avoidance and 2 had delayed puberty. An additional case subject had evidence of vitamin D deficiency. A significant number of subjects (20% of case subjects and 23% of control subjects) had idiopathic hypercalcuria, based on 24-hour urine collections. Among the case subjects, bone mineral density z scores were significantly lower for those with idiopathic hypercalcuria. Among the control subjects, the presence of idiopathic hypercalcuria did not affect bone mineral density. The case subjects with idiopathic hypercalcuria accounted for virtually all of the differences in bone mineral density between the case and control groups. Analysis of parathyroid hormone and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D levels showed that children with frequent fractures and hypercalcuria had renal hypercalcuria, whereas children with no fractures and hypercalcuria had absorptive hypercalcuria.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a significant association between a history of frequent fractures and hypercalcuria in children. We propose that the appropriate screening evaluation for children who present with a history of frequent fractures consists of a dietary history targeted at calcium and vitamin D intakes, a physical examination to assess for pubertal delay, and urinary calcium concentration/creatinine ratio determination to assess for hypercalcuria. Children with abnormalities in this screening should undergo dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and appropriate evaluation.

Drug Insight: choosing a drug treatment strategy for women with osteoporosis-an evidence--based clinical perspective

Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated drug treatment for women at high risk of fracture, with a reduction in fracture risk as their end point. There has also been progress in identifying women at the highest risk of fractures. The most important clinical determinant contributing to the clinical decision of initiating and choosing drug therapy for fracture prevention is a woman's fracture risk, which, in RCTs, was determined by menopausal state, age, bone mineral density, fracture history, fall risks and glucocorticoid use. Women with secondary osteoporosis were excluded, except in studies of glucocorticoid use. A second determinant of drug therapy is the evidence for fracture prevention in terms of spectrum (vertebral, nonvertebral and/or hip fractures), size and speed of effect. In the absence of head-to-head RCTs with fracture risk as the end point, however, the efficacy of antifracture drugs cannot be directly compared. Other determinants include the potential extraskeletal benefits and safety concerns of the drug, patient preferences and reimbursement issues.

Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium, August 3-4, 2007

The Eighth Annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium convened August 3-4, 2007, in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, immediately preceded by the Research Symposium in Metabolic Bone Disease and Osteoporosis Update for Endocrine Fellows, and followed by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) Bone Densitometry Course. The symposium faculty consists of internationally recognized experts in osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease who presented state-of-the-art research data and late-breaking developments in the fields of osteoporosis, metabolic bone disease, and assessment of skeletal health. The presentations and numerous interactive discussions that followed focused on applying what is known from clinical trials, knowledge of bone pathophysiology, and the mechanisms of action of therapeutic interventions, to making real-world patient management decisions. Topics included an update on reimbursement issues for bone density testing in the United States, a report on the 2007 ISCD Pediatric and Adult Position Development Conferences, present and future therapeutic concepts, new paradigms for fracture risk assessment and intervention thresholds, evaluation for secondary causes of osteoporosis, nonvertebral fracture risk reduction-medical evidence and clinical practice, epidemiological insights into the prevention of osteoporotic fractures, osteonecrosis of the jaw facts and fictions, and osteomalacia. Presented here are short essays based on the key clinical presentations of the 2007 Santa Fe Bone Symposium.

Approach to the prostate cancer patient with bone disease

Prostate cancer is the most common visceral malignancy in men. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly used in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer and is associated with significant bone loss and fractures. The greatest bone loss occurs during initiation of ADT. Men should have assessment of skeletal integrity with bone mineral density examination by dual x-ray absorptiometry of the hip and spine. Men with fragility fractures or osteoporosis by bone density should be considered for bisphosphonate therapy. Men with low bone mass may need antiresorptive therapy, depending on other risk factors. Men with a normal bone mineral density should be followed up closely with bone densitometry while on ADT. All men should receive preventive measures with calcium (1200 mg daily in divided doses), vitamin D (800-1000 IU/d), and weight-bearing exercise. Men should be evaluated for additional secondary causes of bone loss including vitamin D insufficiency. Guidelines are needed for androgen-induced bone loss screening and treatment.

Redefining osteoporosis treatment: Who to treat and how long to treat

Osteoporosis is a common disease that is associated with increased risk of fractures and serious clinical consequences. Bone mineral density (BMD) testing is used to diagnose osteoporosis, estimate the risk of fracture, and monitor changes in BMD over time. Combining clinical risk factors for fracture with BMD is a better predictor of fracture risk than BMD or clinical risk factors alone. Methodologies are being developed to use BMD and validated risk factors to estimate the 10-year probability of fracture, and then combine fracture probability with country-specific economic assumptions to determine cost-effective intervention thresholds. The decision to treat is based on factors that also include availability of therapy, patient preferences, and co-morbidities. All patients benefit from nonpharmacological lifestyle treatments such a weight-bearing exercise, adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, fall prevention, avoidance of cigarette smoking and bone-toxic drugs, and moderation of alcohol intake. Patients at high risk for fracture should be considered for pharmacological therapy, which can reduce fracture risk by about 50%.

Patient assessment in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis

Assessment of the patient with osteoporosis includes history and physical examination, laboratory testing, and imaging studies. Information gathered during this assessment assists clinicians in targeting strategies to prevent fractures. The medical history should contain items such as personal and family history of fractures, lifestyle, intake of substances such as vitamin D, calcium, corticosteroids, and other medications. The physical examination can reveal relevant information such as height loss and risk of falls. Bone mineral density (BMD), most commonly determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, best predicts fracture risk in patients without previous fracture. BMD testing is most efficient in women over 65 years old but is also helpful for men and women with risk factors. Serial BMD tests can identify individuals losing bone mass, but clinicians should be aware of what constitutes a significant change. Laboratory testing can detect other risk factors and can provide clues to etiology. Selection of laboratory tests should be individualized, as there is no consensus regarding which tests are optimal. Biochemical markers of bone turnover have a potential role in fracture risk assessment and in gauging response to therapy, but are not widely used at present. Clinicians should be aware of problems with vitamin D measurement, including seasonal variation, variability among laboratories, and the desirable therapeutic range. Careful assessment of the osteoporotic patient is essential in developing a comprehensive plan that reduces fracture risk and improves quality of life.

The need for increasing awareness of osteoporosis in men

Awareness of the need to evaluate men for osteoporosis is almost nonexistent among health care providers. Osteoporosis is a silent disorder in both men and women until fracture occurs. Yet, screening for osteoporosis is particularly important in men because fragility fractures are more likely to lead to fatal consequences than in women. Without a diagnosis of osteoporosis, treatment interventions that can prevent fractures in men are not initiated. Advancement of better health outcomes for men at risk for osteoporosis begins with a greater awareness of the need for osteoporosis screening and treatment whenever appropriate. The primary objective of this review article is to report on study findings that document the need for more clinical attention to osteoporosis in men. It is important to know how osteoporosis in men differs from osteoporosis in women, the classification into type 1 and type 2 primary osteoporosis and secondary osteoporosis, and how to measure bone mineral density in men. In addition, there is a great need to develop evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in men.

Secondary osteoporosis: a review of the recent evidence

OBJECTIVE

To review several causes of secondary osteoporosis as well as screening recommendations for underlying disorders.

METHODS

We conducted a review of the literature on many of the causes of osteoporosis that have been published during the past 15 years, focusing on those sources available from 2000 through the present. Indeed, more than two-thirds of the articles that we reviewed were printed during the past 6 years. These reports examined secondary osteoporosis in general, as well as many of the specific causes.

RESULTS

Secondary osteoporosis occurs in almost two-thirds of men, more than half of premenopausal and perimenopausal women, and about one-fifth of postmenopausal women. Its causes are vast, and they include hypogonadism, medications, hyperthyroidism, vitamin D deficiency, primary hyperparathyroidism, solid organ transplantation, gastrointestinal diseases, hematologic diseases, Cushing's syndrome, and idiopathic hypercalciuria. These causes have their own pathogenesis, epidemiologic features, and effect on the skeleton.

CONCLUSION

The causes of secondary osteoporosis are numerous, and an understanding of their characteristics with respect to bone density and potential fracture risk is essential in the management of osteoporosis. A heightened awareness of the possibility of their existence is necessary to provide optimal care.

Diagnostic de l’ostéoporose: quels examens biologiques faut-il faire ?

Malignant or metabolic causes of low bone mineral density must be sought after either a fragility fracture or the discovery of low bone density measurements. Laboratory tests for calcium and phosphate metabolism are normal in osteoporosis. Vitamin D deficiency is frequent and requires supplementation. Markers of bone remodeling can be useful in cases where the treatment decision is difficult.

Nouvelles définitions de l'insuffisance vitaminique D, retentissement sur les normes de PTH

SCOPE

Knowledge concerning vitamin D has greatly improved during the past few years. Vitamin D can no longer be considered only as a preventive therapy for rickets-osteomalacia. Indeed, beside its role in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in the elderly, many data suggest that it may be involved in the prevention of various diseases including cancers and auto-immune diseases.

CURRENT SITUATION AND SALIENT POINTS

Vitamin D status may be easily assessed by the measurement of 25OHD serum concentration. However, many specialists in the field regard most 25OHD reference values as being too low, and believe that the 25OHD threshold below which vitamin D status can be considered as insufficient is somewhere between 50 and 100 nmol/L (20 to 40 ng/mL). It then appears that usually recommended amounts of supplemental vitamin D may be too low to reach these 25OHD concentrations, and thus need to be revised. We have proposed that PTH reference values should be established in healthy subjects with a normal vitamin D status. This supposes that 25OHD is measured in the reference population beforehand, and that the subjects with vitamin D insufficiency are eliminated from the reference group.

PERSPECTIVES

Although more complicated than the usual way to establish normative data, we have shown that it decreases the upper limit of normal by 25-35%, enhancing thus the diagnostic sensitivity for hyperparathyroidism without a decrease in specificity.

Utility of biochemical screening in the context of evaluating patients with a presumptive diagnosis of osteoporosis

The ageing population is expected to increase the burden of osteoporosis on the health care system. Secondary causes of osteoporosis are found in a proportion of patients. There is much controversy regarding the best work-up for patients who have been diagnosed as having osteoporosis based on bone mineral density. It is difficult to decide where interventions should be targeted both from a patient's perspective and for cost effectiveness. We evaluated the utility of a standard panel (full blood count, plasma viscosity, plasma protein, electrophoresis, urine Bence Jones protein, thyroid function test, bone profile, fasting lipids and liver function test) of biochemical investigations in 327 consecutive patients (287 females, 40 males) referred to the new patient osteoporosis clinic from April 1999 to March 2000. Patients were characterised after measurement of spinal/femoral neck bone mineral density after a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. There were 88 patients with osteoporosis, 91 with osteopenia, 130 had normal bone mineral density and 20 who did not have a bone scan. No case of multiple myeloma was found in this cohort of patients. There was no difference in the mean plasma viscosity of patients with and without osteoporosis (P=0.182). There was no significant difference in the abnormal urine calcium/creatinine (Ca/Cr ratio) in patients with osteoporosis and those without osteoporosis (P=0.316). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hypothyroidism (P=0.213) or thyrotoxicosis (P=0.138) in patients with and without osteoporosis. There was no strong correlation between cholesterol concentrations and osteoporosis (r=0.069). We found no utility in performing a myeloma screen. A small proportion of patients had abnormalities of calcium homeostasis or thyroid disease. We recommend that a screening biochemical evaluation should be restricted to calcium/bone profile and thyroid function tests in patients with a presumptive diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Diagnosis, screening, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is the most common bone disease in humans and affects both men and women. The clinical and public health implications of the disease are substantial because of the mortality, morbidity, and cost of medical care associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis is diagnosed on the basis of a low-impact or fragility fracture or low bone mineral density, which was best assessed by central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Both nonpharmacological therapy (calcium and vitamin D supplementation, weight-bearing exercise, and fall prevention) and pharmacological treatments (antiresorptive and anabolic agents) may be helpful in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Therefore, clinicians need to be vigilant in instituting primary prevention measures for those at high risk for osteoporosis and in instituting treatment for patients diagnosed as having the disease either by screening or a history of fracture. This article provides an overview of the diagnosis, screening, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients with HIV: a review of current concepts

Since the advent of potent antiretroviral therapy in combination regimens, multiple epidemiologic studies have shown that osteopenia and osteoporosis are common among patients with HIV infection. However, there remain many areas of uncertainty about this potential complication, which can be confusing for the HIV clinician. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, suggested screening strategies, and management options of decreased bone mineral density in patients with HIV. Our aims are to review the available data, highlight controversial issues, and provide guidance for clinicians where supporting data are unavailable.

Practical considerations in PTH testing

New knowledge concerning PTH biology have accumulated during the past few years. The finding that the so-called "intact" PTH assays measure a "non-1-84" PTH fragment in addition to full-length PTH has led to the development of new assays. These new assays, which were initially thought to measure 1-84 PTH only, have been shown to recognize also another PTH species called "amino-PTH". As the various names given to the different assay methods are highly confusing, there is a need for a simplified nomenclature. A simple way would be to identify the older "intact" PTH assays as second-generation assays and the new assays (Whole, CAP, BioIntact) as third-generation assays. Although of considerable potential interest for the comprehension of PTH physiology, the third-generation PTH assays have not yet proved to be superior to the second-generation assays in clinical practice. There is thus currently no recommendation to switch from the second-generation to the third-generation assays in clinical practice, or to use a ratio derived from the concommitent measurement of PTH with both assay-generation. Because second- and third-generation PTH assays are usually highly correlated, significant differences in the clinical information provided by these methods are unlikely. However, our opinion is that more definitive bone biopsy studies in dialyzed patients selected according to their bone- and calcium-related treatment are still needed to reach a consensus. Finally, we have proposed that PTH reference values should be established in healthy subjects with a normal vitamin D status. This supposes that 25OHD is measured in the reference population beforehand, and that the subjects with vitamin D insufficiency are eliminated from the reference group. Although more complicated than the usual way to establish normative data, we have shown that it decreases the upper limit of normal by 25-35%, enhancing thus the diagnostic sensitivity for hyperparathyroidism without a decrease in specificity.

The Importance of Parathyroid Hormone and Vitamin D Status in the Treatment of Osteoporosis and Renal Insufficiency

Suboptimal vitamin D status is common in sick, elderly patients and is associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism, increased bone turnover, and accelerated bone loss. Nutritional supplementation of elderly patients with vitamin D and calcium has been associated with a reduction in fractures and falls. Recently, the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) recommended screening parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in those with glomerular filtration rates (GFR) less than 60 mL/min. The PTH target range increases as renal failure progresses because of skeletal resistance. When PTH levels are above the target range, measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) is recommended. If the 25-OH-D level is less than 30 ng/mL, supplementation with vitamin D is recommended. Practitioners should consider supplementing most residents with vitamin D and calcium or follow NKF guidelines.

Rôle de la parathormone dans l’ostéoporose

Continuous parathyroid hormone secretion caused by primary hyperparathyroidism contributes to osteoporosis. Laboratory tests, in particular the intact PTH assay, make the diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism certain. In hyperparathyroidism, the bone damage primarily affects the cortical bone, especially the proximal one-third of the radius and to a lesser degree the upper femur; the lumbar spine is affected more rarely. Intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone stimulates bone formation and is useful in treating osteoporosis. Subcutaneous injections once daily administration of PTH stimulates bone formation on the surface of trabecular and cortical bone, by preferential stimulation of osteoblastic more than osteoclastic activity.

The management of secondary osteoporosis

Secondary osteoporosis is common among patients being evaluated for osteoporosis. All men and premenopausal women with unexplained bone loss or a history of a fragility fracture should undergo a work-up for secondary osteoporosis. Also, postmenopausal women with risk factors for secondary osteoporosis should be carefully evaluated. The evaluation should include a thorough history, physical examination, bone mineral density testing, and laboratory testing. While there is no consensus for a cost-effective laboratory evaluation, some recommendations include: 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum and urine calcium, phosphate, creatinine, liver function tests, a complete blood count, testosterone in men, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. After a thorough review of the evaluation for secondary osteoporosis, this chapter reviews the pathophysiology and treatment of secondary osteoporotic disorders, including vitamin D insufficiency, osteomalacia, the osteoporosis of erosive inflammatory arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and osteoporosis related to anti-androgenic therapy for prostate cancer and aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer. Physicians have a significant responsibility to evaluate and treat the underlying medical problem that is the cause of secondary osteoporosis and to optimize bone health in the individual patient.

Osteoporosis in otherwise healthy perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women: physical and biochemical characteristics

Population studies have shown that about 3-5% of perimenopausal women already have osteoporosis according to the WHO definition of osteoporosis for postmenopausal women ( t -score<or=-2.5). In general, this bone loss arises from well-characterized diseases or conditions that affect acquisition of peak bone mass and/or the rate of bone loss after peak bone mass has been attained. However, there often remains a subset of these women, with no identifiable cause of bone loss. This group has so far been little studied. We prospectively evaluated a group of 60 perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women (mean age 52.2+/-2.5 years) who were found to have apparently unexplained low bone mass, and we compared them to 120 controls matched for age and menopausal status. These women were extensively investigated, including by detailed questionnaire and laboratory testing. Of the 60 women with osteoporosis, only three were found to have previously undiagnosed disorders (two with subclinical hyperthyroidism and one with elevated serum PTH levels) that might have contributed to their low bone mass. On the other hand, osteoporotic patients were characterized by a significantly lower body weight, higher prevalence of personal and parental histories of fractures and a higher level of bone turnover as assessed by increased serum osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase levels and urinary type I collagen C-telopeptide (CTX) excretion, as compared to controls. These findings support theories of a genetic contribution to osteoporosis and underline the predictive value of a previous history of personal and familial fracture in the identification of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women.

Incidence of primary hyperparathyroidism in Rochester, Minnesota, 1993-2001: an update on the changing epidemiology of the disease

We updated the incidence of primary hyperparathyroidism in Rochester, Minnesota. The lower rates previously noted persisted, whereas parathyroidectomies at our institution remained high. These data suggest an etiologic factor may be responsible for the peak incidence in the 1970s.

INTRODUCTION

Automated serum calcium measurements were associated with a dramatic rise in primary hyperparathyroidism in the early 1970s, but a progressive decline in the incidence thereafter was unexpected and suggested a fundamental change in the epidemiology of the disease. Our objective was to evaluate trends in the incidence of primary hyperparathyroidism since 1992.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this population-based descriptive study, Rochester, MN, residents who met defined diagnostic criteria for primary hyperparathyroidism from January 1993 through December 2001 were identified through the medical record linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project and the Mayo Clinic Laboratory Information System. Changes in incidence were evaluated by Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Altogether, 136 Rochester residents (94 women and 42 men) were newly identified with primary hyperparathyroidism in 1993-2001. Their mean age was 56 years, and 93% had definite disease. The overall age- and sex-adjusted (to 2000 U.S. whites) rate during this period was 21.6 per 100,000 person-years, which was less than the annual rate of 29.1 per 100,000 observed in 1983-1992 and 82.5 per 100,000 in July 1974-1982. Although community incidence declined, the number of parathyroidectomies performed at our institution increased during the same period. Serum calcium was deleted from the automated chemistry panel in June 1996, but most subjects remained asymptomatic at diagnosis (95%) with mild hypercalcemia. The majority of subjects were observed without parathyroid surgery (75%), and there was minimal impact on patient management from the 1990 NIH consensus conference on asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower incidence of primary hyperparathyroidism noted through 1992 has persisted in our community through 2001, whereas parathyroidectomies at our institution remained high. These data suggest that some underlying etiologic factor, in addition to the introduction of automated serum calcium testing, may have been responsible for the peak incidence in the 1970s.

Secondary osteoporosis

Secondary osteoporosis occurs as a consequence of various lifestyle factors (eg, eating disorders, smoking, alcoholism), disease processes (eg, endocrinopathies, gastrointestinal tract disease, hepatobiliary disease), and treatment regimens that comprise corticosteroids or chemotherapeutic agents. Some of the disease entities underlying secondary osteoporosis may be clinically silent and identified only during evaluation for documented osteoporosis. The pathogenesis of osteoporosis in these settings is typically multifactorial. The loss of bone may be direct or indirect but ultimately is related to altered osteoblast or osteoclast function. Causes of secondary osteoporosis should especially be investigated in men at all ages and in premenopausal women with atraumatic fractures. In addition, patients with known risk factors should be evaluated. Early recognition and intervention are essential to prevent further loss of bone mass and to prevent fragility fractures.

Bone disease in primary hypercalciuria

Primary hypercalciuria (PH) is very often accompanied by some degree of bone demineralization. The most frequent clinical condition in which this association has been observed is calcium nephrolithiasis. In patients affected by this disorder, bone density is very frequently low, and increased susceptibility to fragility fractures is reported. The very poor definition of this bone disease from a histomorphometric point of view is a crucial aspect. At present, the most common finding seems to be a low bone turnover condition. Many factors are involved in the complex relationships between bone loss and PH. Since bone loss was mainly reported in patients with fasting hypercalciuria, a primary alteration in bone metabolism was proposed as a cause of both hypercalciuria and bone demineralization. This hypothesis was strengthened by the observation that some bone resorbing-cytokines, such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor nechrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), are high in hypercalciuric patients. An excessive response to the acid load induced by dietary protein intake seems to be an additional factor explaining a primitive alteration of bone. The intestine plays a major role in the clinical course of bone disease in PH. Patients with absorptive hypercalciuria less frequently show bone disease, and a reduction in dietary calcium greatly increases the probability of bone loss in PH subjects. It has recently been reported that greater bone loss is associated with a larger increase in intestinal calcium absorption in PH patients. Considering the absence of parathyroid hormone (PTH) alterations, it was proposed that this is not a compensatory phenomenon, but probably the marker of disturbed cell calcium transport, involving both intestinal and bone tissues. While renal hypercalciuria is rather uncommon, the kidney still seems to play a role in the pathogenesis of bone loss in PH patients, possibly via the effect of mild-to-moderate urinary phosphate loss with secondary hypophosphatemia. In conclusion, bone loss is very common in PH patients. Even if most of the factors involved in this process have been identified, many aspects of this intriguing clinical condition remain to be elucidated.

Urinary calcium excretion in primary hyperparathyroidism: relationship to 25-hydroxyvitamin d status

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and evaluate the relationship between urinary calcium excretion and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) levels in patients with PHPT.

METHODS

We present a case report and a review of the medical records of patients with PHPT. Of 75 patients with PHPT substantiated by hypercalcemia and increased levels of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), 35 were identified with laboratory evaluation of vitamin D levels and 24-hour urinary calcium excretion. These study subjects were stratified as 25-OH-D deficient, insufficient, or replete (on the basis of serum values of <15, 15 to 25, or >25 ng/mL, respectively). Total 24-hour urinary calcium excretion and the fractional excretion of calcium (FECa) were analyzed as a function of 25-OH-D status.

RESULTS

Of the 35 study subjects, 14 (40%) and 13 (37%) had 25-OH-D deficiency or insufficiency, respectively. Those patients with a 25-OH-D level <15 ng/mL had higher serum iPTH concentrations as well as lower urinary calcium excretion and FECa. No significant correlations were found, however, between 25-OH-D status and iPTH concentrations (r = -0.21; P = 0.23), total 24-hour urinary calcium excretion (r = 0.07; P = 0.7), or FECa (r = 0.04; P = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D deficiency (25-OH-D levels <15 ng/mL) was common in our population of patients with PHPT. Urinary calcium excretion was not significantly altered by 25-OH-D deficiency in patients with newly recognized PHPT. Measurements of total urinary calcium excretion and FECa can be reliably used to rule out familial benign hypocalciuric hypercalcemia in the initial evaluation of PHPT, regardless of 25-OH-D status. Determining 25-OH-D concentrations best assesses the vitamin D status.

Effects of lifestyle and risk factors on bone mineral density in a cohort of Italian women: suggestion for a new decision rule

In this study the authors analyzed the role of risk factors in postmenopausal osteoporosis in a cohort of Italian women and evaluated predictive values of decision rules for early identification of osteoporotic women. Furthermore, the authors investigated the prevalence of secondary osteoporosis in this population. Women who underwent bone densitometry were asked to answer a questionnaire about the common risk factors for osteoporosis. Patients were classified as nonosteoporotic, nonosteopenic, and osteoporotic. Risk factors were compared among the groups by use of analysis of variance (ANOVA). National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) recommendation, Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instruments (ORAIs), Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tools (OST) score, and weight criterion were applied to this population. The authors proposed a new decision rule based on a new score. A total of 525 women received the questionnaire: 47.4% women were osteoporotic, 32.2% were osteopenic, and 20.4% nonosteoporotic. Risk factors that differed significantly between these groups were: age, age at menarche, postmenopausal period, and body mass index (BMI); the aforementioned risk factors appear to be significant predictors of bone density (BMD) in linear regression model. The incidence of secondary osteoporosis was 13%. In conclusion, the authors (1) confirmed the role played by nonmodifiable risk factors in determining BMD; (2) showed that the use of NOF guidelines, ORAI, OST score, and weight criterion is not satisfactory in our cohort; (3) suggested a new score, based upon the features that were significantly different between patients and controls; and (4) demonstrated the relatively high prevalence of secondary osteoporosis and suggest a primary screening for secondary osteoporosis in all patients with low BMD.

Redesigning the care of fragility fracture patients to improve osteoporosis management: a health care improvement project

OBJECTIVE

To develop new processes that assure more reliable, population-based care of fragility fracture patients.

METHODS

A 4-year clinical improvement project was performed in a multispecialty, community practice health system using evidence-based guidelines and rapid cycle process improvement methods (plan-do-study-act cycles).

RESULTS

Prior to this project, appropriate osteoporosis care was provided to only 5% of our 1999 hip fracture patients. In 2001, primary physicians were provided prompts about appropriate care (cycle 1), which resulted in improved care for only 20% of patients. A process improvement pilot in 2002 (cycle 2) and full program implementation in 2003 (cycle 3) have assured osteoporosis care for all willing and able patients with any fragility fracture. Altogether, 58% of 2003 fragility fracture patients, including 46% of those with hip fracture, have had a bone measurement, have been assigned to osteoporosis care with their primary physician or a consultant, and are being monitored regularly. Only 19% refused osteoporosis care. Key process improvements have included using orthopedic billings to identify patients, referring patients directly from orthopedics to an osteoporosis care program, organizing care with a nurse manager and process management computer software, assigning patients to primary or consultative physician care based on disease severity, and monitoring adherence to therapy by telephone.

CONCLUSION

Reliable osteoporosis care is achievable by redesigning clinical processes. Performance data motivate physicians to reconsider traditional approaches. Improving the care of osteoporosis and other chronic diseases requires coordinated care across specialty boundaries and health system support.

Clinical utility of laboratory testing in women with osteoporosis

Clinicians regularly order laboratory tests in women with osteoporosis to assess if an underlying medical condition is contributing to bone loss. To determine which laboratory tests are associated with osteoporosis we conducted a secondary analyses of data collected as part of the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT), which included 15,316 postmenopausal women. Women had tests of liver and kidney function, mineral metabolism, electrolytes and complete blood count, femoral neck and total body BMD and spinal radiographs. The prevalence of abnormal tests in women with osteoporosis compared to women without was not different, except for low TSH (<0.5 IU/ml). Among women with and without osteoporosis at the femoral neck the prevalence of low TSH was 4.9% (95% CI: 4.4-5.5) and 3.7% (95% CI: 3.3-4.1), respectively, yielding a positive likelihood ratio of 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1-1.3). We observed similar results for women with vertebral fractures compared to women without vertebral fractures; positive likelihood ratio of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3-1.6). Our data suggests that when assessing healthy women with osteoporosis ordering a routine panel of laboratory tests is not useful but measuring TSH may be informative.

Marcadores bioquímicos de remodelado en el estudio de la masa ósea en la mujer con menopausia reciente sin osteoporosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To date, there have not been performed enough studies in Spain to analyze the usefulness of biochemical bone markers in postmenopausal and non-osteoporotic women.

POPULATION AND METHOD

We studied several groups of women, ages between 17 and 30 years, 30-45 years, premenopausal and recently postmenopausal in order to know the reference values of some biochemical bone markers along 2 years in premenopausal and postmenopausal women (postmenopausal divided in 2 groups: those under treatment with ordinary hormonal replacement therapy [HRT], and those without it).

RESULTS

Values of biochemical bone markers were higher in postmenopausal and in 17-30 years group than in premenopausal and 30-45 years group (p < 0.05). Absolute values and the change in bone markers (%) were higher in postmenopausal and non-osteoporotic women under HRT than in those without HRT (% change: OC, 35,72 vs 4.45 [p < 0.01]; ALPo, 13,13 vs 27.06 [p < 0.01]; NTx, 42.74 vs 10.93 [p < 0.01]; fDPD, 21.07 vs 28.49 [p < 0.05]; betaCrossLaps, 50,17 vs 23.04 [p < 0.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

We have defined reference values in our region and have proved that biochemical bone markers (absolute values and their change from the basal value) represent a useful tool in monitoring hormonal replacement therapy in recently postmenopausal and non-osteoporotic women.

Lebanese guidelines for osteoporosis assessment and treatment: who to test? What measures to use? When to treat?

With the demographic explosion of the population worldwide, the human, social, and economic costs of osteoporosis will continue to rise. It is estimated that the magnitude of the problem might be even larger in developing countries, including those in the Middle East. Although several organizations and countries have developed or adapted guidelines to their local needs, as of today there are no guidelines for osteoporosis assessment in the Middle East. In April 2002, a panel of osteoporosis experts met and discussed practice guidelines for osteoporosis assessment and treatment in Lebanon. The process, which involved an overview of international guidelines as well as local data on osteoporosis, resulted in a draft for Lebanese guidelines that addressed three main questions: "Who to test?" "What measures to use?" and "When to treat?". Representatives from five major Lebanese societies (Endocrinology, Rheumatology, Orthopedics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Radiology) subsequently reviewed, discussed, and officially endorsed the guidelines after revisions. The Lebanese guidelines were also endorsed by the Eastern Mediterranean branch of the World Health Organization.

Hyperparathyroïdie et ostéoporose

INTRODUCTION

In patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, a definite diagnosis is the first step in the management strategy and relies on appropriately selected and carefully interpreted laboratory tests. Parathyroid hormone assays are being increasingly performed as part of the routine evaluation of osteoporosis.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

In this setting, laboratory tests are often consistent with primary hyperparathyroidism but should be interpreted with caution.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Bone mineral density measurements are useful for assessing the impact of primary hyperparathyroidism. The recommended bone mineral density cutoffs for selecting patients requiring parathyroidectomy were lowered in 2003, and the number of surgically treated patients has increased as a result. Parathyroidectomy remains the treatment of choice given the low mortality associated with this procedure and the absence of pharmacological alternatives suitable for long-term use.

Primary hyperparathyroidism and osteoporosis in 2004

In patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, a definite diagnosis is the first step in the management strategy and relies on appropriately selected and carefully interpreted laboratory tests. Parathyroid hormone assays are being increasingly performed as part of the routine evaluation of osteoporosis. In this setting, laboratory tests are often consistent with primary hyperparathyroidism but should be interpreted with caution. Bone mineral density measurements are useful for assessing the impact of primary hyperparathyroidism. The recommended bone mineral density cutoffs for selecting patients requiring parathyroidectomy were lowered in 2003, and the number of surgically treated patients has increased as a result. Parathyroidectomy remains the treatment of choice given the low mortality associated with this procedure and the absence of pharmacological alternatives suitable for long-term use.

The use of biochemical markers in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease in which there is a loss of, or de-crease in, bone mass with a deterioration of the microarchitecture of bone tissue. The disease is progressive, taking place over a period of years, and involves derangements in the processes of bone turnover. These derangements can be classified as those in which osteoclast activity (resorption) is stimulated so that more bone is re-moved than formed or in which osteoblast activity (formation) is hindered such that refilling of the resorption cavity is incomplete. Regardless of the process, a key pathologic development is the net loss of bone mass. This article reviews the use of biochemical markers in osteoporosis.

Evaluation and measurement of bone mass

Patients taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have an increased risk for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) is the best predictor of fracture risk. Measurement of BMD allows the identification of patients at risk before they suffer a fracture. The current "gold standard" for the measurement of BMD and diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clinicians should be familiar with the ways in which bone mass measurements are reported and should understand how to use BMD measurements in making treatment decisions and monitoring treatment. They should also be aware of current controversies, including the role of peripheral versus central BMD measurements and the use of different reference databases for different patient groups. Laboratory assessment to identify secondary causes of osteoporosis, such as low vitamin D status in patients taking AEDs, is useful, but the role of markers of bone turnover in clinical practice has not been well defined.

Vignettes in osteoporosis: a road map to successful therapeutics

The diagnosis and management of osteoporosis have become increasingly more complex as new drugs enter the marketplace and meta-analyses of randomized trials with "other" agents become more prolific. We describe five common clinical scenarios encountered in the practice of osteoporosis medicine and various road maps that could lead to successful therapy.

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis have changed dramatically in the last decade. Advances in diagnostic technologies and a range of newer treatment options have provided the clinician with a wide array of choices for treating this chronic disease. Despite the issuance of several "guidelines" and practice recommendations, there still remains confusion among clinicians about basic approaches to the management of osteoporosis. This paper should be used as a case-based approach to define optimal therapeutic choices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five representative cases were selected from two very large clinical practices (Bangor, ME; Pittsburgh, PA). Diagnostic modalities and treatment options used in these cases were selected on an evidence-based analysis of respective clinical trials. Subsequent to narrative choices by two metabolic bone disease specialists (SG and CR), calculation of future fracture risk and selection of potential alternative therapeutic regimens were reviewed and critiqued by an epidemiologist (DB).

RESULTS

A narrative about each case and possible management choices for each of the five cases are presented with references to justify selection of the various therapeutic options. Alternatives are considered and discussed based on literature and references through July 2003. The disposition of the individual patient is noted at the end of each case.

CONCLUSIONS

A case-based approach to the management of osteoporosis provides a useful interface between guidelines, evidence-based meta-analyses, and clinical practice dilemmas.

Management of vitamin d depletion in postmenopausal women

In the United States, the impact regarding the routine fortification of milk and other dairy products has been less than satisfactory in preventing vitamin D depletion in adults. As more individuals are being evaluated and treated for osteoporosis, it has become necessary to exclude vitamin D depletion as a cause, because of the likelihood that differences in vitamin D and calcium nutrition may modify the individual response to therapy. Increased prevalence of subclinical vitamin D depletion among vertebral and hip fracture patients and the beneficial effect of vitamin D therapy and calcium supplementation in preventing such fractures lend credence to this assumption. The prevalence of vitamin D depletion is increasing again, especially among older adults, precisely the group at greatest risk for osteoporotic fractures.

Evaluation of vertebral fractures on lateral chest radiographs of inner-city postmenopausal women

We assessed the prevalence of vertebral fractures as a marker for osteoporosis on lateral chest radiographs in inner-city, minority, postmenopausal women. We reviewed outpatient lateral chest radiographs on all women 55 years and older at an inner-city hospital during two randomly selected months, August 2000 and April 2002. There were 106 women with a mean age of 65 (range 55-89) years, 45 were Hispanic, 42 Black, 9 White, 10 of other ethnicity. Deformity was graded on a 0-3 scale with Grades 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe) deformities considered fractures. Interval lateral chest radiographs within 1-2 years were evaluated. Of the group 25% (26/106) had vertebral fractures. The fracture prevalence increased with age: 13% (17/54) of women under 65 years and 37% (19/52) of women 65 years and older had fractures ( P < 0.05). The fracture was described as part of the radiographic report in only 15% (4/26) of the women. Of the group 15% (16/106) had interval lateral chest radiographs. Among those with interval lateral chest radiographs, 19% (3/16) developed new fractures. In this series 29% (31/106) of women were scheduled for bone density studies, but the studies were only completed in 6% (6/106). Lateral chest radiographs showed that vertebral fractures occurred commonly, increased with age, and progressed on follow-up. In a population of underserved minority women, the lateral chest radiograph provides an opportunity to identify women with osteoporosis for possible treatment.