Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods

Outcomes of open carpal tunnel release at a minimum of ten years

BACKGROUND

There is little research on the long-term outcomes of open carpal tunnel release. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the functional and symptomatic outcomes of patients at a minimum of ten years postoperatively.

METHODS

Two hundred and eleven patients underwent open carpal tunnel release from 1996 to 2000 performed by the same hand fellowship-trained surgeon. Follow-up with validated self-administered questionnaire instruments was conducted an average of thirteen years after surgery. The principal outcomes included the Levine-Katz symptom and function scores, ranging from 1 point (best) to 5 points (worst), and satisfaction with the results of surgery. The patients self-reported current comorbidities.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of thirteen years (range, eleven to seventeen years), 92% (194) of 211 patients were located. They included 140 who were still living and fifty-four who had died. Seventy-two percent (113) of the 157 located, surviving patients responded to the questionnaire. The mean Levine-Katz symptom score (and standard deviation) was 1.3 ± 0.5 points, and 13% of patients had a poor symptom score (≥2 points). The mean Levine-Katz function score was 1.6 ± 0.8 points, and 26% had a poor function score (≥2 points). The most common symptom-related complaint was weakness in the hand, followed by diurnal pain, numbness, and tingling. The least common symptoms were nocturnal pain and tenderness at the incision. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were either completely satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery. Seventy-four percent reported their symptoms to be completely resolved. Thirty-three percent of men were classified as having poor function compared with 23% of women. Two (1.8%) of 113 patients underwent repeat surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

At an average of thirteen years after open carpal tunnel release, the majority of patients are satisfied and free of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Carpal tunnel syndrome with thenar atrophy: evaluation of the pinch and grip strength in patients undergoing surgical treatment

This aim of this study was to evaluate the progression of grip, tip pinch, key (lateral) pinch, and tripod pinch strengths in patients suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome with thenar atrophy following surgery. Between October 2008 and May 2010, 46 patients (49 hands) with carpal tunnel syndrome associated with thenar atrophy underwent surgery. Thenar atrophy was assessed by clinical inspection. Evaluations for grip strength and for tip, key, and tripod pinch strengths were made using a hydraulic hand dynamometer grip and a hydraulic pinch gauge, respectively. These measurements were taken before surgery and at 3 and 6 months after the procedure. When we compared the averages of all forces measured in the affected hand before the surgery with all forces measured at 3 months postoperative, we found no significant differences. However, after 6 months, we found significant differences for all four strength tests as compared with those measurements taken preoperatively and at the 3 month time point. Our results suggest that patients with thenar atrophy show increased grip strength and pinch strength by the sixth month after surgical treatment.

Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release using the manos CTR system

PURPOSE

Ultrasound (US) has been used in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome since the 1980s. The first report of US-guided carpal tunnel release (CTR) was published in 1997, with cadaver and clinical reports confirming the safe navigation of surgical tools with US for division of the transverse carpal ligament. The MANOS CTR device was recently reported as a minimally invasive tool for CTR, and may be well suited for use with US guidance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors report three cases of US-guided CTR using the MANOS CTR device. The MANOS device was inserted in a blunt configuration into the safe zone, and the cutting surface was deployed with a thumb-activated trigger that simultaneously ejected a sharp through the palm. The transverse carpal ligament was divided safely and confirmed with US.

RESULTS

US allowed for clear identification of the median nerve, safe zones, transverse carpal ligament, and the MANOS CTR device in relation to all pertinent structures of the carpal tunnel. Complete division of the transverse carpal ligament was confirmed in all three cases. There were no median nerve, vessel, tendon injuries, or chronic regional pain syndrome in any of the three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided CTR with the MANOS CTR device appears to be a safe technique and successful in confirming complete release.

Magnetic resonance imaging after endoscopic carpal tunnel release

PURPOSE

To determine with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the morphologic changes in the carpal tunnel and median nerve 3 months after endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR).

METHODS

We enrolled patients who had complete resolution of numbness and pain by 6 weeks after ECTR. Patients who met these inclusion criteria received an MRI at 3 months after surgery. Images were analyzed to determine whether median nerve morphology changes and discrete gap or separation of the flexor retinaculum could be appreciated on MRI.

RESULTS

There were 17 patients screened and 15 met the inclusion criteria. Three-month MRI in all patients demonstrated changes in the flexor retinaculum over the median nerve. In all 15 patients, a distinct gap or separation in the fibers of the flexor retinaculum overlying the median nerve could not be appreciated. Median nerve width-to-height ratios at the level of the pisiform and at the hook of the hamate were 2.4 and 2.1, respectively. Median nerve cross-sectional area was 14.1 at the pisiform and 13.3 at the hook of the hamate.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI of patients 3 months after successful ECTR does not demonstrate a discrete gap or separation in the flexor retinaculum overlying the median nerve but may be useful for evaluating median nerve morphology.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

Ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release: anatomic study of a new technique

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to measure a safe zone and a path for ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release with a 1-mm incision in healthy volunteers and then test the procedure in cadavers.

METHODS

First, a previously reported sonographic zone was defined as the space between the median nerve and the closest ulnar vascular structure. Axially, the safest theoretical cutting point for carpal tunnel release was set by bisecting this zone. Magnetic resonance imaging was used for axially determining the limits of the sectors (origin at the cutting point) that did not enclose structures at risk (arteries and nerves) and coronally for determining whether our release path could require directions that could potentially compromise safety (origin at the pisiform's proximal pole). Second, in cadavers, we performed ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release from an intracarpal position through a 1-mm antebrachial approach. Efficacy (deepest fibrous layer release rate), safety (absence of neurovascular or tendon injury), and damage to any anatomy superficial to transverse carpal ligament were assessed by dissection.

RESULTS

All 11 of our volunteers (22 wrists) had safe axial sectors located volar and radially of at least 80.4º (considered safe). Release path directions were theoretically safe (almost parallel to the longitudinal axis of the forearm). In 10 cadaver wrists, ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release was effective (100% release rate) and safe without signs of intrusion into the superficial anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release in a safe sonographic zone may be feasible The technique preserves the superficial anatomy and diminishes the damage of a surgical approach.

Evaluation and treatment of failed carpal tunnel release

Treatment failure and complications are encountered in 1% to 25% of all carpal tunnel releases. Besides hematoma, infection, skin necrosis, and intraoperative iatrogenic injuries, persistence and recurrence should be included in this discussion. Persistence is often related to incomplete release. Similar symptoms recurring after a symptom-free interval of 6 months are considered recurrent and may be caused by intraneural or perineural scarring. Adequate diagnosis and treatment of these failures can be challenging. Operative release is the main treatment consisting of complete decompression of the median nerve. In some circumstances, coverage of the median nerve may be necessary.

Long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release: a critical review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is widely accepted as an effective surgical treatment method for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. While the short-term literature is well substantiated, the "long-term" literature has rarely exceeded 2 years of follow-up, which may be inadequate for a chronic and potentially recurring disease such as carpal tunnel syndrome.

METHODS

An English language literature search for long-term outcomes research on carpal tunnel release was made. Long-term is defined as 2 years or more after surgery.

RESULTS

CTR is a highly effective procedure, but important aspects remain poorly understood, including recurrence and existing electromyographic data. Some study design issues exist with the current literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Further high-quality research is needed.

Anatomic variations in the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve among adults in Lagos, Nigeria

Dysesthesias due to palmar cutaneous branch of median nerve injuries infrequently follow carpal tunnel release surgeries.

Corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome: a 5-year survivorship analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study was to determine the rate of carpal tunnel decompression (CTD) following local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), as well as identifying predictors of requiring further intervention and eventual decompression.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with CTS in our unit over a 6-year period were prospectively assessed. Patients were diagnosed using a combination of clinical presentation and nerve conduction studies. Patients were managed with open carpal tunnel decompression or corticosteroid injection. There were 1,564 consecutive patients diagnosed with CTS over the study period, of whom 824 (53%) underwent a corticosteroid injection as their primary treatment. We performed a survivorship analysis of these patients and used Kaplan-Meier survivorship methodology to determine the 5-year rate of re-intervention. Risk factors for re-intervention were also determined.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year Kaplan-Meier rate of secondary CTD was 15% at 1 year and 33% at 5 years. The need for secondary CTD was independently associated with female gender, diabetes mellitus and positive nerve conduction studies at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid injection is an appropriate treatment in carefully selected patients. Those who are female, diabetic and have neurophysiological confirmation of diagnosis have the highest risk of relapse. These results may be used to guide initial treatment and counsel patients about the risk relapse.

CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE WITH A LIMITED PALMAR INCISION: CLINICAL RESULTS AND PILLAR PAIN AT 18 MONTHS FOLLOW-UP

Limited open carpal tunnel release was performed in 58 hands (44 patients) using a single 1.5 cm palmar incision according to the technique described by Lee and Strickland.1The patients were assessed at regular intervals after surgery for hand functions and subjective symptoms, in particular pillar pain. There was rapid wound recovery with minimal post-operative pain and scarring, and return to functional activities within four weeks. At an average follow-up of 18 months (range 14–24 months), 91% of patients had complete or significant resolution of hand paraesthesia. No patient required further surgery. However, pillar pain was found in 48% of hands at four weeks, 21% at 12 weeks, 12% at six months, 9% at 12 months and 7% at the last follow-up. The significance of the incidence of pillar pain is discussed.

Carpal tunnel release using the MANOS CTR system: preliminary results in 52 patients

PURPOSE

To describe a carpal tunnel release technique using the MANOS Carpal Tunnel Release device, with preliminary results in 52 patients.

METHODS

The MANOS Carpal Tunnel Release device is a blade that divides the transverse carpal ligament using wrist and palm skin punctures. The awake patient provides feedback as the surgeon navigates a 2.1-mm-diameter blunt probe across the undersurface of the ligament from a wrist incision with standard disposable nerve stimulator monitoring. The leading tip of the blunt probe is uninsulated and conducts 2 mA. The surgeon converts the blunt insulated probe into an uninsulated blade by advancing a 0.9-mm needle through the palm with a thumb-activated deployment feature. The surgeon saws the ligament through the 2 skin punctures. We used a validated outcome questionnaire to assess postoperative symptoms at 3 months.

RESULTS

Symptom severity and functional status scores compare favorably with literature controls for open and endoscopic surgery at 3 months. One patient required reoperation for incomplete release. There were no tendon or nerve injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results suggest the MANOS Carpal Tunnel Release device to be safe and effective.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Determinants of return to work after carpal tunnel release

PURPOSE

The determinants of time to return to work-a common measure of treatment effectiveness-are incompletely defined. Our primary hypothesis was that employment circumstances are the strongest determinant of earlier return to work. Our secondary hypothesis was that return to work in patients with desk-based jobs is predicted by patient expectations and other psychosocial factors.

METHODS

We enrolled 65 employed patients with limited incision open carpal tunnel release in a prospective cohort study. Patients completed validated measures of depression, coping strategies, pain anxiety, and job burnout. Heavy lifting was not allowed for 1 month after surgery. Return to modified and full work duty was recorded in days. Although not specifically an exclusion criterion, none of the patients had a workers' compensation claim or other source of secondary gain.

RESULTS

Patients returned to modified duty an average of 11.8 days and full duty at an average of 18.9 days after surgery. Predictors of earlier return to modified duty in multivariate analyses included desk-based work and both the number of days patients expected to take off and the numbers of days they wanted to take off for the entire cohort, with an additional influence from catastrophic thinking in desk-based workers. Predictors of earlier return to full duty in multivariate analyses included desk-based work and number of days patients expected to take off before for the entire cohort, fewer days off desired in non-desk-based workers, fewer days off desired and change in work role in desk-based workers, and lower pain anxiety in part-time workers.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important determinant of return to full duty work after limited incision open carpal tunnel release is job type, but psychological factors such as patient expectations, catastrophic thinking, and anxiety in response to pain also have a role.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Carpal tunnel surgery: patient preferences and predictors for satisfaction

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a debilitating disease of the upper extremity affecting patient function and quality of life. Surgical interventions have been developed that effectively treat this disease. However, there remains a subset of patients who are not fully satisfied with their outcome. Extensive investigation has been undertaken to analyze preoperative factors predictive of higher patient satisfaction. This review summarizes the role of unique patient characteristics and patient psychology, worker's compensation, patient demographics, certain clinical features, and patient preferences and expectations regarding patient satisfaction following carpal tunnel surgery. Understanding the complex nature of patient satisfaction will enable surgeons to indicate patients for surgical intervention better, provide appropriate preoperative counseling, and manage expectations postoperatively.

Surgical techniques and return to work following carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review was conducted to evaluate return to work (RTW) following minimally invasive carpal tunnel surgery versus open carpal tunnel release. This study also assesses how RTW as an outcome measure was examined in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The bibliographic databases Medline, AMED and CINAHL were systematically searched. We found 15 relevant RCTs. Meta-analysis was possible only for four studies.

RESULTS

The result indicates that minimally invasive surgery offers earlier return to work compared to open carpal tunnel release (mean difference -7.2 days; 95% CI -10 to -4.4 days). There were remarkable inconsistencies in how return to work as an outcome measure was examined in different RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Calculating standardised mean difference in future RCTs would allow future reviews to be more inclusive of the evidence. The authors suggest more consistent approach for evaluating work-related features in future studies. We recommend that new fit note categories introduced by UK Department of Work and Pension (unfit for all work/return to modified work or work adaptations/return to normal work) would be used to identify different levels of return to work.

A COMPARISON OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PATIENTS AND NONWORKERS' COMPENSATION PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPIC CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE

This study compares results of endoscopic carpal tunnel release using the two-portal technique in two groups of patients based on whether or not they were receiving workers' compensation. There were 50 patients in the worker's compensation group and 63 in the nonworker's compensation group. Mean follow-up was 40.8 months and 44.8 months, respectively. Duration of symptoms before surgery was statistically different in the two groups, 13.6 months in the worker's compensation groups compared to 26.2 months in the nonworker's compensation group. Worker's compensation patients tended to be younger, have shorter duration of symptoms before surgery, report lower postoperative activity levels, have more subsequent surgeries, and have mediocre results when compared to nonworker's compensation patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate or timing of return to work. Our series of 113 patients who had endoscopic carpal tunnel release indicates that careful patient selection is necessary to achieve satisfactory outcomes in worker's compensation patients.

Application of the CONSORT statement to randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release

BACKGROUND

The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement was developed by a group of clinical trialists, biostatisticians, epidemiologists and biomedical editors as a means to improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The purpose of the present study is to assess the reporting quality of published RCTs that compare endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) with open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) using the CONSORT statement.

METHODS

A computerized literature search was conducted to identify all RCTs published from January 1989 to November 2004 that compared ECTR with OCTR. Foreign language studies were also included, and translated versions of these studies were obtained. Two investigators independently reviewed each eligible article and determined whether the authors reported on each of the 22 items of the CONSORT statement. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The mean scores for studies published before the introduction of the CONSORT statement and those published afterward were compared. Similarly, a comparison was made between foreign language studies and those published in English.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs comparing ECTR with OCTR met the inclusion criteria. The total scores on the CONSORT checklist ranged from 3 to 20, with a mean score of 9.83+/-3.79 (the maximum possible score was 22). The six studies published in foreign language journals had a statistically significantly lower mean score than the studies published in English language journals (7.00+/-2.76 versus 11.25+/-3.49, respectively; P<0.05). The mean score was higher for studies published after 1996 than for those published in 1996 or earlier (12.14+/-3.80 versus 8.36+/-3.11, respectively; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of reporting improved over time, but no study met all 22 criteria of the CONSORT statement. The CONSORT scores were higher for studies published after 1996 and for studies published in English language journals. Despite the improvement after 1996, most of these RCTs only reported one-half of the items listed on the CONSORT statement. Future investigators of surgical RCTs should make an effort to comply with the CONSORT checklist.

A cost-utility analysis of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release

BACKGROUND

Open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) is the standard procedure for the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. With the advent of minimally invasive surgery, endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) was introduced.

OBJECTIVE

To use a decision analytical model to compare ECTR with OCTR in an economic evaluation.

METHODS

Direct medical costs were obtained from a Canadian university hospital. Utility values obtained from experts, presented with carpal tunnel syndrome outcome health states, were transformed into quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The probabilities of the health states associated with both techniques were obtained from the literature.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was $124,311.32/QALY gained, providing strong evidence to reject ECTR when ECTR is performed in the main operating room and OCTR is performed in the day surgery unit. A one-way sensitivity analysis in the present study demonstrated that when both OCTR and ECTR are performed in day surgery unit, the ICUR falls in the 'win-win' quadrant, making ECTR both more effective and less costly than OCTR. If the scar tenderness probability is decreased in the ECTR group in a second one-way sensitivity analysis, the ICUR decreases to $100,621.91/QALY gained, providing evidence to reject ECTR. If the reflex sympathetic dystrophy probability is increased in the ECTR group in a third one-way sensitivity analysis, the ICUR increases to $202,657.88/QALY gained, providing strong evidence to reject ECTR.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still uncertainty associated with the costs and effectiveness of ECTR and OCTR. To obtain a definitive answer as to whether the ECTR is more effective than the OCTR, it is necessary to perform a large, randomized, controlled trial in which the utilities and resource use are measured prospectively.

Clinical quality measures for intraoperative and perioperative management in carpal tunnel surgery

BACKGROUND

Previous research documents suboptimal preoperative or postoperative care for patients undergoing surgery. However, few existing quality measures directly address the fundamental element of surgical care: intra-operative care processes. This study sought to develop quality measures for intraoperative, preoperative, and postoperative care for carpal tunnel surgery, a common operation in the USA.

METHODS

We applied a variation of the well-established RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Adherence to measures developed using this method has been associated with improved patient outcomes in several studies. Hand surgeons and quality measurement experts developed draft measures using guidelines and literature. Subsequently, in a two-round modified-Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 11 national experts in carpal tunnel syndrome (including six surgeons) reviewed structured summaries of the evidence and rated the measures for validity (association with improved patient outcomes) and feasibility (ability to be assessed using medical records).

RESULTS

Of 25 draft measures, panelists judged 22 (88%) to be valid and feasible. Nine intraoperative measures addressed the location and extent of surgical dissection, release after wrist trauma, endoscopic release, and four procedures sometimes performed during carpal tunnel surgery. Eleven measures covered preoperative and postoperative evaluation and management.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed several measures that experts, including surgeons, believe to reflect the quality of care processes occurring during carpal tunnel surgery and be assessable using medical records. Although quality measures like these cannot assess a surgeon's skill in handling the instruments, they can assess many important aspects of intraoperative care. Intraoperative measures should be developed for other procedures.

Predictors of scar pain after open carpal tunnel release

PURPOSE

To identify the predictors of scar pain after open carpal tunnel release (CTR).

METHODS

We enrolled 83 patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome treated by open CTR. All patients completed the Brigham and Women's (Boston) carpal tunnel questionnaire (BCTQ) preoperatively. We assessed levels of depression preoperatively using the Center for the Epidemiological Study of Depression (CES-D) scale, and pain anxiety using the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale. At 3 months after surgery, patients were asked to self-assess treatment satisfaction and scar pain using a 10-point ordinal scale and to complete the BCTQ.

RESULTS

The mean BCTQ-symptom (BCTQ-S) score decreased significantly from 2.7 ± 1.1 preoperatively to 1.6 ± 1.0 at 3 months postoperatively, and mean BCTQ-function score decreased significantly from 2.4 ± 1.1 to 1.4 ± 1.0. Overall, scar pain intensity at 3 months postoperatively ranged from 0 to 8 (mean, 2.4 ± 2.2), and overall satisfaction ranged from 2 to 10 (mean, 7.6 ± 2.6). The intensity of the scar pain was significantly correlated with the CES-D scale and BCTQ-S. Multivariable regression analysis showed that depression, assessed using the CES-D scale, and postoperative symptoms, assessed using the BCTQ-S, predicted scar pain intensity, which accounted for 38% of scar pain intensity variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression score and postoperative symptoms predicted scar pain intensity after open CTR. However, the most important contributor to scar pain intensity variance remains unidentified.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic I.

Scope-assisted release of the cubital tunnel

We report on a technique of endoscopic release of the cubital tunnel, which is a modification of Bruno and Tsai's technique. This article covers the history, complications, indications, and postoperative management of ulnar nerve entrapments treated endoscopically, with a special focus on our technique. This minimally invasive alternative to transposition requires no mobilization of the ulnar nerve, which could potentially reduce iatrogenic trauma to the nerve and its vascularity.

Results of endoscopic carpal tunnel release relative to surgeon experience with the Agee technique

PURPOSE

To establish the rate of iatrogenic injury after endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) for a surgeon in the first 2 years of practice; to report the rate of conversion from ECTR to open carpal tunnel release (OCTR), the reason for conversion, and any increase in morbidity found in patients converted to OCTR; and to determine whether the conversion rate decreased with increasing surgeon experience.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing ECTR by a single surgeon in the first 2 years of practice. Data collected or calculated included symptom relief, rate of conversion to OCTR, reason for conversion, and neurovascular complications. For patients converted to OCTR, we assessed satisfaction and function using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. We compared these results for 1 to 6 months, 7 to 12 months, and 12 to 24 months to determine whether a learning curve was present.

RESULTS

A total of 278 patients (358 procedures) underwent ECTR. Of these, 12 patients required conversion to OCTR during the index procedure over a 2-year period. In the first 6 months of practice, 8 of 71 ECTRs were converted to OCTR compared to 1 of 72 in the second 6 months. This was a statistically significant decrease (p = .017). In year 2, 3 of 215 patients were converted to OCTR. Average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score for patients converted from ECTR to OCTR was 9. No patients required repeat surgery for recurrence of carpal tunnel symptoms. We observed no major neurovascular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A learning curve for ECTR was present. Rates of conversion significantly diminished with increased surgeon and anesthesia experience. Patients requiring conversion showed no variation in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores from established values after OCTR. Patients may be at a higher risk of conversion to OCTR during the learning curve time period; nevertheless, we found no increased morbidity.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic III.

[Pseudoaneurysm of the superficial palmar arch, following endoscopic carpal tunnel release. A case report]

Pseudo-aneurysm of the superficial palmar arch following carpal tunnel release is exceptional and thus poorly reported. We present one observation, recorded on more than 1300 hands treated by endoscopic release using the "Chow" technique by a single surgeon. Ultra-sonography could be used in an attempt to locate the superficial palmar arch and thus prevent vascular damage at surgery.

[Limited portal carpal tunnel release. An alternative to classic open release?]

The aim of this study was to determine the significance of limited portal carpal tunnel release compared to the classic open approach. We present a retrospective comparative clinical trial including 161 patients (105 open release and 56 limited portal release). Special interest was directed towards postoperative functionality, disorders and quality of life. Significant advantages could be demonstrated for the limited portal carpal tunnel release: rapid ability to return to work as well as to routine tasks of daily living and high patient satisfaction. In the hands of trained surgeons, limited portal carpal tunnel release represents a rewarding alternative to the classic open release.

Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part II: effectiveness of surgical treatments--a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To present an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of surgical and postsurgical interventions to treat carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro were searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select potential studies.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the methodologic quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results of the included studies. Two reviews and 25 RCTs were included. Moderate evidence was found in favor of surgical treatment compared with splinting or anti-inflammatory drugs plus hand therapy in the midterm and long term, and for the effectiveness of corticosteroid irrigation of the median nerve before skin closure as additive to carpal tunnel release in the short term. Limited evidence was found in favor of a double-incision technique compared with the standard incision technique. Also, limited evidence was found in favor of a mini-open technique assisted by a Knifelight instrument compared with a standard open release at 19 months of follow-up. However, in the short term and at 30 months of follow-up, no significant differences were found between the mini-open technique assisted by a Knifelight instrument compared with a standard open release. Many studies compared different surgical interventions, but no evidence was found in favor of any one of them. No RCTs explored the optimal timing strategy for surgery. No evidence was found for the efficacy of various presurgical or postsurgical treatment programs, including splinting.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment seems to be more effective than splinting or anti-inflammatory drugs plus hand therapy in the midterm and long term to treat CTS. However, there is no unequivocal evidence that suggests one surgical treatment is more effective than the other. More research is needed to study conservative to surgical treatment in which also should be taken into account the optimal timing of surgery. Future research should also concentrate on optimal presurgical and postsurgical treatment programs.

Does wrist immobilization following open carpal tunnel release improve functional outcome? A literature review

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a compressive neuropathy of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. It is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy. The surgical management includes dividing the flexor retinaculum to decompress the median nerve. Post-operative mobilization of the wrist is controversial. Some surgeons splint the wrist for 2-4 weeks whilst others encourage early mobilization. The literature has been inconclusive as to which method is most beneficial. The purpose of this study is to review the literature regarding the effectiveness of wrist immobilization following open carpal tunnel decompression. We reviewed all published clinical trials claiming to evaluate the mobility status following open carpal tunnel release. Studies not in the English language as well as those with small number of patients (n < 30) were excluded. There were five studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. We conclude that there is no beneficial effect from post-operative immobilization after open carpal tunnel decompression when compared to early mobilization.

Single portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: modification of Menon's technique and data from 65 cases

The purpose of our study is to make a follow-up evaluation of endoscopic carpal tunnel release under focal anesthesia using the Wolf single portal system. A total of 65 patients with a mean age of 50 years undergoing 79 procedures were retrospectively studied. Preoperative complaints, intraoperative findings, and postoperative results of all the patients were recorded. Follow-up was conducted at 1, 5, 12, and 24 weeks and at 1 year postoperatively. Wound pain, analysis of satisfaction, Levine functional status scales, and surgical complications were included. No patients sustained iatrogenic neurovascular injury or hematoma formation. The average Levine functional severity score decreased from 2.82 points preoperatively to 1.2 points at the most recent survey. One case recurred at 1 year after the surgery and subsequently underwent open release. Surgery using the Wolf single portal system under focal anesthesia is a safe and efficacious option for endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release

PURPOSE

This study compared endoscopic carpal tunnel release with the conventional open technique with respect to short- and long-term improvements in functional and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We assessed 72 outpatients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. Of these patients, 37 underwent the endoscopic method according to Chow and 35 were assigned to the open method. Improvement in symptoms, severity, and functionality were evaluated at 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 year postoperatively. Changes in clinical outcomes were evaluated at 1 year postoperatively. Complications were also assessed.

RESULTS

Both groups showed similar improvement in all but 1 outcome 1 year after the release; increase in grip strength was significantly higher in the endoscopic group. However, the endoscopic method showed a greater improvement in symptoms and functional status compared with the open method at 2 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks postoperatively. Separate analysis of the questions referring to pain showed that the delay in improvement in the open group was because of the persistence of pain for a longer period. Paresthesias and numbness decrease immediately after the operation with comparable rates for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release provides a faster recovery to operated patients for the first 2 weeks, with faster relief of pain and faster improvement in functional abilities. Paresthesia and numbness subside in an identical manner with the 2 techniques. At 1 year postoperatively, both open and endoscopic techniques seem to be equivalently efficient.

Applications of statistical tests in hand surgery

During the 19th century, with the emergence of public health as a goal to improve hygiene and conditions of the poor, statistics established itself as a distinct scientific field important for critically interpreting studies of public health concerns. During the 20th century, statistics began to evolve mathematically and methodologically with hypothesis testing and experimental design. Today, much of medical investigation centers around clinical trials and observational studies, and with the application of statistical formulas, the collected data are summarized, weighed, interpreted, and presented to direct both physicians and the public toward evidence-based medicine. Having a basic understanding of statistics is mandatory in evaluating the validity of published literature and applying it to patient care. In this review, we discuss basic statistical tests to assist the investigator in choosing the correct statistical test and present examples relevant to hand surgery research.

Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release

We prospectively compared the safety and effectiveness of mini-incision (group A) and a limited open technique (group B) for carpal tunnel release (CTR) in 185 consecutive patients operated between November 1999 and May 2001, with a 5-year minimum follow-up. Patients in Group A had a minimally invasive approach (<2 cm incision), performed using the KnifeLight (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan) instrument. Patients in Group B had a limited longitudinal incision (3-4 cm). Patient status was evaluated with an Italian modified version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel questionnaire, administered preoperatively and at 19, 30, and 60 postoperative months. Mini-incision CTR showed advantages over standard technique in early recovery, pillar pain, and recurrence rate. The recovery period after mini-incision is shorter than after standard procedure.

Double- versus single-incision technique for open carpal tunnel release

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed comparing the double incision technique to the conventional open method used in carpal tunnel decompression surgery, with pillar pain, scar sensitivity, and recovery of grip strength each assessed independently. Forty patients (40 hands) were operated on, 21 hands with the standard single-incision technique and 19 hands with the double-incision technique. Patients were assessed throughout 6 months of follow-up. The results showed that the double-incision technique caused less pillar pain and scar sensitivity compared to the single-incision technique. No difference in recovery of grip strength was noted between the 2 techniques. The limited open technique using the double incision in carpal tunnel decompression surgery is advantageous over the standard technique in tackling scar-related morbidities.

Mini open carpal tunnel release using Knifelight: evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of using a single wrist incision (cadaveric study)

This cadaveric study evaluates the margin of safety and technical efficacy of mini open carpal tunnel release performed using Knifelight (Stryker Instruments) through a transverse 1 cm wrist incision. A single investigator released 32 wrists in 17 cadavers. The wrists were then explored to assess the completeness of release and damage to vital structures including the superficial palmar arch, palmar cutaneous branch and recurrent branch of the median nerve. All the releases were complete and no injury to the median nerve and other structures were observed. The mean distance of the recurrent motor branch to the ligamentous divisions was 5.7 +/- 2.4 mm, superficial palmar arch was 8.7 +/- 3.1 mm and palmar cutaneous branch to the ligamentous division was 7.2 +/- 2.4 mm. The mean length of the transverse carpal ligament was 29.3 +/- 3.7 mm. Guyon's canal was preserved in all cases.

A survey regarding physician recommendations regarding return to work

PURPOSE

Returning patients to work may be influenced by subjective factors and physician bias. The purpose of this study was to determine whether factors such as complaints of pain and patient motivation influence physicians' recommendations regarding return to work or activity.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-five members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand completed an online survey describing a 25-year-old patient with surgically treated diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna. Physicians were asked whether the patient could be returned to work in 4 distinct scenarios varying with occupation, time since injury, radiographic union, patient motivation, and pain.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that all 5 predictor variables were highly significant predictors of return to work. Pain and diminished motivation were associated with a significantly lower probability of return to work.

CONCLUSIONS

Although in the scenario depicted, objective factors such as radiographic union and job demands are the major determinants of physician clearance to return to work, physicians are also influenced by patient motivation and complaints of pain.

Definition of a safe-zone in open carpal tunnel surgery: a cadaver study

Carpal tunnel decompression is one of the most common surgical procedures in hand surgery. Cutaneous innervation of the palm by median and ulnar nerves was evaluated to find a suitable incision preserving cutaneous nerves. A morphometric study was designed to define the safe-zone for mini-open carpal tunnel release. Sixteen fresh-frozen (8 right, 8 left) and 14 formalin-fixed (8 right, 6 left) cadaveric hands were dissected. Anatomy of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median and the ulnar nerve, motor branch of the median nerve, superficial palmar arch were evaluated relative to the surgical incision. We also identified the motor branch of the median nerve. Detailed measurements of the whole palmar region are reported in this study. The motor branch of the median nerve was extraligamentous as 60%, subligamentous as 34%, transligamentous as 6%. The palmar cutaneous branches of the median and the ulnar nerves in the palmar region were classified as Type A (34%), Type B (13%), Type C (13%), Type D (none), Type E (40%) according to forms of palmar cutaneous innervation originating from the ulnar and median nerves. Injury to the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (PCBMN) is the most common complication of the carpal tunnel surgery. Various techniques were described to decrease post-operative morbidity. Based on these anatomic findings mini incision between the superficial palmar arch and the most distal part of the PCBMN in the palmar region is the safe-zone for carpal tunnel surgery.

Selection of operative procedures for cubital tunnel syndrome

The purpose of this study was to investigate the primary operative procedures that are performed by hand surgeons for cubital tunnel syndrome and their reported satisfaction with these procedures. The survey consisted of 22 questions regarding primary operative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome and demographics and was sent by email to the 459 active members of the American Association for Hand Surgery. One hundred sixty-four surgeons completed the survey (36% response rate). The total sample included 154 hand surgeons (143 males, 11 females) who operated on cubital tunnel syndrome and the majority of surgeons were in private practice (n = 100) followed by academic practice (n = 50). The most prevalent factors that influence the decision to operate include evidence of muscle atrophy (84%), abnormal nerve conduction studies (51%), and failed non-operative treatment (49%). Most surgeons (n = 133) reported using more than one operative procedure for their patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. Factors that influenced the operative procedure selected included the degree of nerve compression (60%), medical comorbidities (30%), patient's occupation (28%), and obesity (22%). Following carpal tunnel surgery, 88% of the surgeons were "very satisfied" with their patient outcome and following surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome, only 44% were "very satisfied" with their patient outcome. Most surgeons use more than one operative procedure in their treatment of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome and the selection of the operative procedure is influenced by patient factors and surgeon preference.

LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF DUAL-PORTAL ENDOSCOPIC RELEASE OF THE TRANSVERSE LIGAMENT IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

OBJECTIVE

The long-term efficacy of dual-portal endoscopic release of the transverse ligament in carpal tunnel syndrome is still being debated. In this study, the authors present 94 endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery cases with long-term follow-up data.

METHODS

The study includes 72 patients aged 17 to 86 years (mean age, 53.4 years); bilateral surgery was performed in 22 of these patients. Seventy-two hands of female patients and 22 hands of male patients were included. All procedures were performed with a dual-portal set according to the Chow technique. All patients were examined 2 to 3 months after surgery. The long-term follow-up evaluation was based on telephone interviews 5 to 12 years (mean, 8.2 years) after surgery.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 214 cases that were treated surgically between 1995 and 2002, 94 cases (44%) could be evaluated for long-term follow-up. Four of these patients had to be excluded from long-term follow-up because of a switch to an open technique and early open revision (3–6 months after the first surgery), owing to persistent symptoms. A good to optimal postoperative outcome with improvement of neurological signs and subjective patient satisfaction was observed in 84 (93.3%) of the remaining 90 cases. There were no recurrences.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that dual-portal endoscopic release of the transverse ligament in carpal tunnel syndrome is a valuable technique that produces very good long-term results and high patient satisfaction and does not result in a significant recurrence rate.