Dose adjustment in patients with liver disease

High inter-individual variability of vardenafil pharmacokinetics in patients with pulmonary hypertension

PURPOSE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of a single oral dose of vardenafil in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).

METHODS

Sixteen patients with PH received vardenafil in single oral doses (20, 10 or 5 mg), and repeated blood sampling for up to 9 h was performed. Vardenafil plasma concentration was determined using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using model-independent analysis.

RESULTS

The plasma vardenafil concentration increased rapidly and exhibited a median time to maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) of 1 h and a mean elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of 3.4 h. The geometric mean and standard deviation of (1) the peak plasma concentration (C(max)) was 21.4 ± 1.7 μg/L, (2) the normalized C(max) (C(max, norm)) 79.1 ± 1.6 g/L, (3) the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) 71.5 ± 1.6 μg · h/L and (4) the normalized AUC (AUC(norm)) 261.6 ± 1.7 g · h/L. Patients co-medicated with bosentan reached t(max) later and had a 90% reduction of C(max), C(max, norm), AUC and AUC(norm).

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetic profile of vardenafil overall revealed considerable inter-individual variability in patients with PH. Co-medication with bosentan resulted in a pharmacokinetic drug interaction, leading to significantly decreased plasma concentrations of vardenafil. Therapeutic drug monitoring for individual dose optimization may be warranted.

Introduction to drug pharmacokinetics in the critically ill patient

Despite regular use of drugs for critically ill patients, overall data are limited regarding the impact of critical illness on pharmacokinetics (PK). Designing safe and effective drug regimens for patients with critical illness requires an understanding of PK. This article reviews general principles of PK, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination, and how critical illness can influence these parameters. In the area of drug absorption, we discuss the impact of vasopressor use, delayed gastric emptying and feeding tubes, and nutrient interactions. On the topic of drug distribution, we review fluid resuscitation, alterations in plasma protein binding, and tissue perfusion. With drug metabolism, we discuss hepatic enzyme activity, protein binding, and hepatic blood flow. Finally, we review drug elimination in the critically ill patient and discuss the impact of augmented renal clearance and acute kidney injury on drug therapies. In each section, we highlight select literature reviewing the PK impact of these conditions on a drug PK profile and, where appropriate, provide general suggestions for clinicians on how to modify drug regimens to manage PK challenges.

Use of hepatotoxic drugs in chronic liver disease

Cirrhosis and chronic liver disease are common illnesses that cause high mortality and require treatment. Medication use in these patients may be challenging because of idiosyncratic or dose-dependent drug toxicity. Therefore, drug choice and drug dose adaptations play an important role. The objective of this clinical review is to discuss the literature about and challenges in drug use in patients with chronic liver disease. To make good decisions regarding drug choice and dose adjustments in these patients, well-defined clinical information about diagnoses and laboratory results (creatinine, international normalized ratio, bilirubin, and serologies) as well as in some instances, pathological findings like liver biopsies are needed. In a second step, these data should be organized in electronically supported clinical decision systems, which can then assist providers in making choices about medication selection and dosage. In summary, although substantial research has been done in the field of drug use in patients with liver dysfunction, a great deal also remains to be learned. Although many of these patients can now be identified, it is still very difficult to assess their individual level of hepatic function. The degree of risk associated with drug use and how best to use medications in these patients represents an important area for further study. In the future, pharmacogenomics and electronic linking of clinical data may well prove helpful for making decisions about optimal drug choices in this complex group of patients.

Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management

Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant originally used for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder. Methylphenidate inhibits neuronal neurotransmitter transporters involved in the uptake of dopamine and norepinephrine at the level of the synapse. Inhibition of these transmitter transporters leads to increased concentrations of dopamine and norepinephrine in the synapse, which results in increasing alertness. The stimulant effect of methylphenidate has been used for the treatment of major depression, poststroke depression, cognitive enhancement in patients with brain tumors, neurodegenerative disorders, HIV disease, fatigue, and as a treatment for delirium and sedation associated with opioid use. Other areas where methylphenidate has been evaluated include gait disorders in the elderly individuals and the treatment of apathy in dementia. Analgesic effects have been demonstrated in preclinical models but true analgesic effects remain to be proven in humans. This article reviews the current use of methylphenidate for symptom management with a critical look at the evidence base for its efficacy in the conditions described.

Drug-induced QT prolongation in cirrhotic patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

GOALS AND BACKGROUND

Nearly 40% of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) activity is located in the small intestine. An earlier study has shown that cirrhotics with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have diminished intestinal CYP3A activity. We hypothesized that oral CYP3A substrates known to prolong QT interval may cause further prolongation of the QT interval in cirrhotic patients with TIPS.

STUDY

A total of 23 patients (9 healthy controls, 6 cirrhotics without and 8 cirrhotics with TIPS) participated in a study that tested this hypothesis using erythromycin as the probe drug. Participants with cirrhosis with and without TIPS were matched for age, sex, race, BMI and etiology of liver disease. Serial electrocardiograms were obtained at baseline, after single dose of erythromycin 500 milligrams, and after 7 days of erythromycin (500 milligrams orally twice daily). QT intervals were measured in 3 consecutive beats in 3 leads and corrected QT intervals (QTc) were obtained using various correction formulae. The maximal QTc change (ΔQTc Max) after single and multiple dose administration was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

At baseline, the QTc intervals (mean±S.E) in cirrhotics with TIPS (418±6 msec) and cirrhosis (431±6 msec) were significantly higher compared with controls (388±9 msec, P=0.021). After a single dose of erythromycin, there was no significant difference among the 3 groups in ΔQTc Max (P=0.7). However, after a 7 day course, cirrhotics with TIPS developed significantly greater ΔQTc Max (179.5±67.8 msec) compared with cirrhotics (31.2±9.5 msec) and healthy controls (38.3±3.3 msec) (P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that patients with TIPS are potentially at increased risk for abnormal QT prolongation when exposed to oral CYP 3A substrates with QT prolonging effect.

Prescribing medications in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis

Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis have various serious complications which require multiple drugs for therapeutic or prophylactic use. Majority of the drugs are primarily metabolized and excreted by hepatobiliary system; hence, liver cell necrosis contributes to impaired drug handling in liver failure while portosystemic shunt can alter drug action in cirrhosis. Hence, in order to decide drug dosing in liver failure, 3 important factors need to be considered (1) pharmacokinetic alterations of drugs, (2) pharmacodynamic alteration of drugs, and (3) increased susceptibility of patients to adverse events particularly hepatotoxicity. Though there is no predictable test which can be used to determine drug dosage in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, drugs with first pass metabolism require reduction in oral dosages, for high clearance drugs both loading and maintenance dosages need adjustment, for low clearance drugs maintenance dose needs adjustment, whenever possible measuring drug level in the blood and monitoring of adverse events frequently should be done. No evidence-based guidelines exist for the use of medication in patients' with liver cirrhosis. There are hardly any prospective studies on the safety of drugs in cirrhotic patients. According to the experts opinion, most of the drugs can be used safely in patients with cirrhosis, but drug-induced hepatotoxicity may be poorly tolerated by patients with cirrhosis; hence, potential hepatotoxins should be avoided in patients with liver cirrhosis. Potentially hepatotoxic drugs may be used in patients with liver cirrhosis based on the clinical needs and when there are no alternatives available. Caveat for the prescribing medications in patients with cirrhosis the drug dosing should be individualized depending on a number of factors like nutritional status, renal function, adherence, and drug interaction. Monitoring of the liver function at frequent intervals is highly recommended.

Sub-clinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients is not aggravated by sedation with propofol compared to midazolam: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The risk of exacerbating sub-clinical hepatic encephalopathy (HE) by propofol has not been established. The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of propofol, for upper endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis, precipitates sub-clinical HE.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with compensated HCV and HBV cirrhosis (CP score 5-6) were randomly selected and divided into two groups (intent-to-treat population) matched for age, gender, and BMI. The first group received a single propofol sedation (N = 31, age 57 ± 12, dose range 70-100 mg/procedure) and the second group (N = 30, age 56 ± 12, dose 3-6 mg/procedure) received a single midazolam sedation, all done by an anesthesiologist. All patients completed number connection test (NCT), cognitive function score, time to recovery, time to discharge sheets, and hemodynamic parameters before sedation, and at discharge from the endoscopy unit, 1h post-procedure. Thirty control subjects without cirrhosis were matched to the cirrhotic patients who received sedation with regard to age, gender, BMI, and education level.

RESULTS

A total of 58/61 cirrhotic patients (95%) had sub-clinical encephalopathy before the endoscopy (mean NCT 84.7 ± 77 s, normal < 30 s). No patient developed overt HE after sedation. There were no differences between groups in the incidence of adverse effects, cognitive function, MELD score, CP score, oxygen saturation, or respiratory and heart rates before and after sedation. Propofol did not exacerbate minimal HE when compared to midazolam (NCT changed from 87.5 ± 62 s prior to sedation to 74.2 ± 58 s after sedation in the propofol group versus 72.8 ± 62 s before to 85.6 ± 72 s after sedation in the midazolam group; p < 0.01). Time to recovery (4.1 ± 1.9 min vs. 11.5 ± 5.0 min, p < 0.001), and time to discharge (38.0 ± 9 min vs. 110 ± 42 min, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter with propofol than midazolam. Pre- and post-procedure NCT (from 25 ± 20 s to 24 ± 20 s), cognitive function score (from 25 to 26), time to recovery (3.5 ± 1.0 min), and time to discharge (35 ± 10 min) did not change in the healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Sedation with propofol has a shorter time recovery and a shorter time to discharge than midazolam and does not exacerbate sub-clinical hepatic encephalopathy in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.

Drug dosing considerations for the critically ill patient with liver disease

Hepatic dysfunction in the critically ill patient presents a unique challenge to clinicians when designing pharmacotherapeutic treatment plans. Overall, the literature regarding drug dosing in critically ill patients with hepatic dysfunction is incomplete and current tools available to bedside clinicians have limitations. Despite these challenges, rational drug regimens can be implemented by critical care nurses who consider the potential impact of hepatic dysfunction on drug pharmacokinetics. This information can be applied clinically and careful monitoring plans can be implemented to assess a drug for efficacy and safety. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic changes that can occur in hepatic failure, identifies practical ways to quantify the severity of dysfunction, and discusses general drug dosing strategies in this patient population.

How to manage medications in the setting of liver disease with the application of six questions

OBJECTIVE

Reviewing the current literature to guide clinicians managing medications in the setting of liver disease.

LITERATURE SOURCES

Using the terms liver disease, medication management, and therapeutic monitoring, a literature review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles in MEDLINE (1966-April 2009). Reference citations were reviewed as an additional resource. Published English-language literatures, articles and trials were reviewed. Emphasis was placed on prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

QUESTION SYNTHESIS

An informed decision on how to manage medications in the setting of liver disease should account for changes that transpire in a medication's first-pass metabolism, protein binding, volume of distribution, clearance and pharmacodynamic interactions. To incorporate these issues within one's thought process, clinicians can utilise the following six questions to evaluate a medication use: (i) Is the patient experiencing acute or chronic liver failure? (ii) Does the drug have high hepatic first-pass metabolism? (iii) Is the medication highly protein-bound? (iv) Is there a change in the volume of distribution for the medication? (v) Is the clearance of the medication significantly altered? and (vi) Is there a pharmacodynamic interaction with the medication?

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction and use of six clinically relevant questions in the setting of liver disease can serve as a guide to clinicians who manage patients with liver disease.

Effect of dimethylnitrosamine-induced liver dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil after administration of S-1, an antitumour drug, to rats

OBJECTIVES

The anti-tumour agent S-1 comprises tegafur (a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil; 5-FU), gimeracil (2-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP); a competitive inhibitor of 5-FU metabolism) and oteracil potassium. The effect of hepatic dysfunction induced by dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) on the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU after administration of S-1 to rats was investigated.

METHODS

S-1 (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously and orally to rats with DMN-induced liver dysfunction. Plasma concentrations of S-1 components and 5-FU were measured by HPLC and LC/MS-MS. Blood tests and in-vitro enzymatic investigations were also conducted.

KEY FINDINGS

DMN treatment induced hepatic dysfunction and decreased the conversion of tegafur to 5-FU in the liver without altering renal function or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity. Following intravenous administration of S-1, the blood concentration-time profiles of CDHP were similar between control rats and rats with hepatic dysfunction, but the half-life of tegafur was significantly prolonged. The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of 5-FU was significantly reduced and the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) was reduced by 22%. Following oral administration, the C(max) of tegafur, 5-FU and CDHP were significantly decreased and half-lives significantly increased. Hepatic dysfunction had a less pronounced effect on the AUC of 5-FU (13.6% reduction).

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic profiles of tegafur, 5-FU and CDHP were altered by changes in the elimination rate of tegafur induced by a decrease in the conversion of tegafur to 5-FU. However, hepatic dysfunction had less of an effect on the AUC of 5-FU, which correlates with anti-tumour effect, after the oral administration of S-1.

Pain management in the cirrhotic patient: the clinical challenge

Pain management in patients with cirrhosis is a difficult clinical challenge for health care professionals, and few prospective studies have offered an evidence-based approach. In patients with end-stage liver disease, adverse events from analgesics are frequent, potentially fatal, and often avoidable. Severe complications from analgesia in these patients include hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, and gastrointestinal bleeding, which can result in substantial morbidity and even death. In general, acetaminophen at reduced dosing is a safe option. In patients with cirrhosis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be avoided to avert renal failure, and opiates should be avoided or used sparingly, with low and infrequent dosing, to prevent encephalopathy. For this review, we searched the available literature using PubMed and MEDLINE with no limits.

Biochemical mechanisms in drug-induced liver injury: Certainties and doubts

Drug-induced liver injury is a significant and still unresolved clinical problem. Limitations to knowledge about the mechanisms of toxicity render incomplete the detection of hepatotoxic potential during preclinical development. Several xenobiotics are lipophilic substances and their transformation into hydrophilic compounds by the cytochrome P-450 system results in production of toxic metabolites. Aging, preexisting liver disease, enzyme induction or inhibition, genetic variances, local O₂ supply and, above all, the intrinsic molecular properties of the drug may affect this process. Necrotic death follows antioxidant consumption and oxidation of intracellular proteins, which determine increased permeability of mitochondrial membranes, loss of potential, decreased ATP synthesis, inhibition of Ca²⁺-dependent ATPase, reduced capability to sequester Ca²⁺ within mitochondria, and membrane bleb formation. Conversely, activation of nucleases and energetic participation of mitochondria are the main intracellular mechanisms that lead to apoptosis. Non-parenchymal hepatic cells are inducers of hepatocellular injury and targets for damage. Activation of the immune system promotes idiosyncratic reactions that result in hepatic necrosis or cholestasis, in which different HLA genotypes might play a major role. This review focuses on current knowledge of the mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury and recent advances on newly discovered mechanisms of liver damage. Future perspectives including new frontiers for research are discussed.

Preoperative risk assessment for patients with liver disease

Patients with underlying liver disease often present for non-liver-related surgery and are at risk for postoperative decompensation. Several predictive models exist to determine the risk of morbidity and mortality after surgery in such patients, but the risk depends on the severity of liver disease and also the type and urgency of the surgery. Clinicians should be cognizant of the various risk assessment tools and incorporate them into their practice when encountering patients with liver disease undergoing surgery.

Rationale for faster oral delivery to overcome the pathophysiology associated with dental pain--biopharmaceutic and pharmacokinetic challenges

Recent published evidences on ibuprofen and meloxicam confirm the need of faster oral drug absorption to overcome the pathophysiological conditions associated with dental pain (due to excessive vagal nerve suppression) in order to provide relief in acute pain management. While the communication provides relevant case studies to support the hypothesis in both dental pain and migraine attacks, it also provides biopharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic challenges of developing such a strategy for faster oral drug absorption. It is envisaged that the unmet need in this area, to overcome the pathophsiological barriers, should provide impetus for further research exploration in formulation strategies and biopharmaceutical/pharmacokinetic integration.

Drug-Induced Liver Disease and Drug Use Considerations in Liver Disease

Chronic liver disease encompasses a large number of hepatic disorders. One of the most important etiologies of liver disease is drug-induced liver disease, which is the leading cause of liver failure in patients referred for liver transplantation in the United States. Drug-induced liver disease can present in all forms of acute and chronic liver disease with highly variable clinical presentations. There is no effective treatment for most drug-induced liver disease and the recognition and prevention of drug-induced liver disease remain the most important management strategy. Drug dosing in patients with liver disease represents an even more challenging task to clinicians, as there is only scant information on biomarkers that can be used to predict the pharmacokinetic changes of drugs in patients with underlying liver disease. Several factors contribute to alterations in drugs metabolism and clearance in cirrhotic patients, including the severity of the liver disease and the metabolic pathways of each individual drug. Only general guidelines on dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic impairment are available. When drugs with extensive hepatic metabolism are required in patients with preexisting liver disease, benefit of therapeutic effect must be evaluated against the risk of toxicity, and the drugs must be initiated with extreme caution with appropriate dosage reduction.

Clinical review: Drug metabolism and nonrenal clearance in acute kidney injury

Decreased renal drug clearance is an obvious consequence of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, there is growing evidence to suggest that nonrenal drug clearance is also affected. Data derived from human and animal studies suggest that hepatic drug metabolism and transporter function are components of nonrenal clearance affected by AKI. Acute kidney injury may also impair the clearance of formed metabolites. The fact that AKI does not solely influence kidney function may have important implications for drug dosing, not only of renally eliminated drugs but also of those that are hepatically cleared. A review of the literature addressing the topic of drug metabolism and clearance alterations in AKI reveals that changes in nonrenal clearance are highly complicated and poorly studied, but they may be quite common. At present, our understanding of how AKI affects drug metabolism and nonrenal clearance is limited. However, based on the available evidence, clinicians should be cognizant that even hepatically eliminated drugs and formed drug metabolites may accumulate during AKI, and renal replacement therapy may affect nonrenal clearance as well as drug metabolite clearance.

Review article: The use of potentially hepatotoxic drugs in patients with liver disease

BACKGROUND

Misconceptions surround the use of hepatotoxic drugs in chronic liver disease. While many prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) agents can be used safely, this often runs counter to labelled warnings/contraindications, especially for the statins and other commonly used agents.

AIM

To evaluate published data on the use of hepatotoxic drugs in chronic liver disease including pharmacokinetic changes in cirrhosis and drug interactions, where available, to formulate recommendations on their use.

METHODS

Using a combination of PubMed searches, review texts, the Physicians' Desk Reference and expert opinion, drugs considered at higher risk of hepatotoxicity in chronic liver disease were evaluated.

RESULTS

Most drugs and OTC products including herbals have not been formally studied in chronic liver disease, but available data suggest that several of the most commonly used agents, especially the statins, can be used safely. While there is an increased risk of drug-induced liver injury for drugs used in the treatment of tuberculosis and HIV patients with hepatitis B or C, recommendations for their safe use are emerging.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many clinicians remain hesitant to use hepatotoxic drugs in chronic liver disease, the database supporting this view is limited to just a few agents. Most medications can be used safely in patients with chronic liver disease with appropriate monitoring.

Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction

The liver plays a central role in the pharmacokinetics of the majority of drugs. Liver dysfunction may not only reduce the blood/plasma clearance of drugs eliminated by hepatic metabolism or biliary excretion, it can also affect plasma protein binding, which in turn could influence the processes of distribution and elimination. Portal-systemic shunting, which is common in advanced liver cirrhosis, may substantially decrease the presystemic elimination (i.e., first-pass effect) of high extraction drugs following their oral administration, thus leading to a significant increase in the extent of absorption. Chronic liver diseases are associated with variable and non-uniform reductions in drug-metabolizing activities. For example, the activity of the various CYP450 enzymes seems to be differentially affected in patients with cirrhosis. Glucuronidation is often considered to be affected to a lesser extent than CYP450-mediated reactions in mild to moderate cirrhosis but can also be substantially impaired in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Patients with advanced cirrhosis often have impaired renal function and dose adjustment may, therefore, also be necessary for drugs eliminated by renal exctretion. In addition, patients with liver cirrhosis are more sensitive to the central adverse effects of opioid analgesics and the renal adverse effects of NSAIDs. In contrast, a decreased therapeutic effect has been noted in cirrhotic patients with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and certain diuretics. Unfortunately, there is no simple endogenous marker to predict hepatic function with respect to the elimination capacity of specific drugs. Several quantitative liver tests that measure the elimination of marker substrates such as galactose, sorbitol, antipyrine, caffeine, erythromycin, and midazolam, have been developed and evaluated, but no single test has gained widespread clinical use to adjust dosage regimens for drugs in patients with hepatic dysfunction. The semi-quantitative Child-Pugh score is frequently used to assess the severity of liver function impairment, but only offers the clinician rough guidance for dosage adjustment because it lacks the sensitivity to quantitate the specific ability of the liver to metabolize individual drugs. The recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) to study the effect of liver disease on the pharmacokinetics of drugs under development is clearly aimed at generating, if possible, specific dosage recommendations for patients with hepatic dysfunction. However, the limitations of the Child-Pugh score are acknowledged, and further research is needed to develop more sensitive liver function tests to guide drug dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction

The liver plays a central role in the pharmacokinetics of the majority of drugs. Liver dysfunction may not only reduce the blood/plasma clearance of drugs eliminated by hepatic metabolism or biliary excretion, it can also affect plasma protein binding, which in turn could influence the processes of distribution and elimination. Portal-systemic shunting, which is common in advanced liver cirrhosis, may substantially decrease the presystemic elimination (i.e., first-pass effect) of high extraction drugs following their oral administration, thus leading to a significant increase in the extent of absorption. Chronic liver diseases are associated with variable and non-uniform reductions in drug-metabolizing activities. For example, the activity of the various CYP450 enzymes seems to be differentially affected in patients with cirrhosis. Glucuronidation is often considered to be affected to a lesser extent than CYP450-mediated reactions in mild to moderate cirrhosis but can also be substantially impaired in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Patients with advanced cirrhosis often have impaired renal function and dose adjustment may, therefore, also be necessary for drugs eliminated by renal exctretion. In addition, patients with liver cirrhosis are more sensitive to the central adverse effects of opioid analgesics and the renal adverse effects of NSAIDs. In contrast, a decreased therapeutic effect has been noted in cirrhotic patients with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and certain diuretics. Unfortunately, there is no simple endogenous marker to predict hepatic function with respect to the elimination capacity of specific drugs. Several quantitative liver tests that measure the elimination of marker substrates such as galactose, sorbitol, antipyrine, caffeine, erythromycin, and midazolam, have been developed and evaluated, but no single test has gained widespread clinical use to adjust dosage regimens for drugs in patients with hepatic dysfunction. The semi-quantitative Child-Pugh score is frequently used to assess the severity of liver function impairment, but only offers the clinician rough guidance for dosage adjustment because it lacks the sensitivity to quantitate the specific ability of the liver to metabolize individual drugs. The recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) to study the effect of liver disease on the pharmacokinetics of drugs under development is clearly aimed at generating, if possible, specific dosage recommendations for patients with hepatic dysfunction. However, the limitations of the Child-Pugh score are acknowledged, and further research is needed to develop more sensitive liver function tests to guide drug dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Interpretation of drug concentrations in an alternative matrix: the case of meprobamate in bile

Investigating toxicological causes of death may require alternative matrices when the usual ones are lacking. Whereas forensic toxicology uses bile almost only for xenobiotic screening, a diagnostic test interpreting postmortem bile concentrations of meprobamate is reported. Based on 128 sets of autopsy data, its intrinsic qualities were good, with 0.95 sensitivity and 0.93 specificity. In a French forensic population, the positive and negative predictive factors were 0.90 and 0.97, respectively. It is a useful means of revealing overdoses where blood samples are not available or of confirming blood tests when postmortem redistribution is suspected.

Pharmacokinetics of midazolam and metabolites in a patient with refractory status epilepticus treated with extraordinary doses of midazolam

The authors present a patient with refractory epilepsy who was treated with very high doses (up to 4 mg/min) of intravenous midazolam, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and other antiepileptics. Because it was known from the literature that the half-life of midazolam can increase at high dosage, the kinetics of midazolam (MDZ), 1'-hydroxymidazolam, and 4-hydroxymidazolam were assessed at steady state (dosage 1 mg/min) and after stopping treatment. Total body clearance of MDZ (33 L/kg) and intrinsic hepatic clearance (19 mL/min/kg) at steady state were both five to 10 times higher than after normal therapeutic doses, demonstrating hepatic cytochrome (CYP) 3A induction. Despite the high body clearance, the half-life of MDZ was in the range of 24 hours, approximately 10 times higher than after normal therapeutic doses. The volume of distribution at steady state was 33 L/kg, approximately 50 times higher than after normal therapeutic doses. The free fraction of MDZ was 58% at steady state, much higher than the 3% to 6% at normal therapeutic doses. The kinetics of intravenous MDZ is strongly dependent on its dose and on hepatic CYP3A activity. Even in patients with hepatic CYP3A induction, the half-life of MDZ increases with high doses as a result of a rise in its volume of distribution, which is a consequence of an increase in the free fraction of MDZ.

Pharmacokinetics of diclofenac in rats intoxicated with CCL4, and in the regenerating liver

The pharmacokinetics of an intravenous and oral diclofenac dose of 3.2 mg/kg was studied in male Wistar rats under control conditions, 1 and 3 days after liver damage and regeneration induced by an oral injection of CCl(4). One day after CCl(4) administration, indicators of necrosis (alanine aminotransferase), cholestasis (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase) and regeneration (alpha-fetoprotein) were significantly increased; these effects were reversed after 3 days. In nonintoxicated rats, t(1/2) was 43.83 +/- 4.95 min, V(d) was 0.37 +/- 0.04 l/kg, Cl was 129.21 +/- 9.20 ml/min kg, AUC(i.v.) was 25.62 +/- 1.45 microg/min ml, and AUC(p.o.) was 20.21 +/- 1.03. One day after intoxication, when the liver was damaged and regenerating, the metabolism was decreased: diclofenac t(1/2) was increased to 258.21 +/- 30.80 min but V(d) did not change significantly, therefore Cl was reduced to 32.81 +/- 3.38 ml/min kg. By day 3 after intoxication, liver function, regeneration and pharmacokinetics returned to normal. The results show that liver damage and regeneration increases the bioavailability by decreasing elimination. The present observations suggest that reduction of the pharmacokinetic parameters may lead to drug accumulation in the regenerating-damaged liver with an attendant possible increase in toxic effects. The results in rats, also suggest that once hepatic injury is finished and regeneration is complete, diclofenac can be administered normally.

Hepatobiliary excretion of silibinin in normal and liver cirrhotic rats

Silibinin is the main biologically active flavonolignan extracted from the seeds and fruits of milk thistle and has potential efficacy in the treatment of liver disease. The aim of the present study was to examine the hepatobiliary excretion of silibinin and its effect on dimethylnitrosamine (DMN)-induced liver cirrhosis. The experiments were divided into five groups: 10, 30, and 50 mg/kg silibinin alone, 30 mg/kg silibinin coadministered with cyclosporin A (CsA), and 50 mg/kg silibinin with liver cirrhosis induced by DMN. The data indicated that silibinin had dose-related pharmacokinetics in the dose ranges of 10 to 50 mg/kg. All of the unconjugated or total (unconjugated + conjugated) silibinin concentrations in the bile were significantly higher than those in plasma at the sampling time points at each dose, suggesting active hepatobiliary excretion. When coadministered with CsA, the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) in bile was significantly decreased. This result suggested that the active silibinin efflux might be partially inhibited by P-glycoprotein. In the DMN-induced liver cirrhotic rats, the AUC of plasma unconjugated silibinin was reduced by 53%; however, total silibinin was increased by 182%. These results together suggest that the phase II conjugative reaction of silibinin was blocked by treatment with DNM.

Cancer chemotherapy II: atypical hepatic injuries

Although chemotherapy generally is accompanied by regular testing for liver enzyme abnormalities, atypical reactions may occur that escape ordinary detection, because hepatocyte injury is not the primary event. The presence of fatty liver, mitochondrial changes, and even biliary abnormalities can be associated with normal or nearly normal liver enzyme levels. This article discusses unique aspects of liver damage associated with cancer chemotherapy. These unique reactions merit special attention and a special vigilance from clinicians.

Preoperative evaluation of patients with liver disease

Patients with end-stage liver disease often undergo surgery for indications other than liver transplantation. These patients have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality that is related to their underlying liver disease. Assessments of surgical risk provide a basis for discussion of risks and benefits, treatment decision making, and for optimal management of patients for whom surgery is planned. The most useful indicators of surgical risk are indices that predict advanced disease, such as the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, or those that predict prognosis, such as the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score. Careful preoperative risk assessment, patient selection, and management of various manifestations of advanced disease might decrease morbidity and mortality from nontransplant surgery in patients with liver disease.

Dose adaptation of antineoplastic drugs in patients with liver disease

Dose adaptation for liver disease is important in patients treated with antineoplastic drugs because of the high prevalence of impaired liver function in this population and the dose-dependent, frequently serious adverse effects of these drugs. We classified the antineoplastic drugs marketed in Switzerland at the end of 2004 according to their bioavailability and/or hepatic extraction to predict their kinetic behaviour in patients with decreased liver function. This prediction was compared with kinetic studies carried out with these drugs in patients with liver disease. The studies were identified by a structured, computer-based literature search. Of the 69 drugs identified, 52 had a predominant extrarenal (in most cases hepatic) metabolism and/or excretion. For 49 drugs, hepatic extraction could be calculated and/or bioavailability data were available, allowing classification according to hepatic extraction. For 18 drugs, kinetic studies have been reported in patients with impaired liver function, with the findings generally resulting in quantitative recommendations for adaptation of the dosage. In particular, recommendations are precise for 16 drugs excreted by the bile (e.g. doxorubicin and derivatives and vinca alkaloids). Validation studies comparing such recommendations with kinetics and/or dynamics of antineoplastic drugs in patients with decreased liver function have not been published. We conclude that there are currently not enough data for safe use of cyctostatics in patients with liver disease. Pharmaceutical companies should be urged to provide kinetic data (especially hepatic extraction data) for the classification of such drugs and to conduct kinetic studies for drugs with primarily hepatic metabolism in patients with impaired liver function to allow quantitative advice to be given for dose adaptation.