Warfarin withdrawal. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations

Antithrombotic effects and bleeding time of thrombin inhibitors and warfarin in the rat

Warfarin limits the synthesis of y-glutamyl carboxylated forms of coagulation factors, factor II, factor VII, factor IX, and factor X, protein C, and protein S and as a result impairs the function of these proteins. In contrast, direct inhibitors of thrombin only affect one enzyme in the coagulation cascade. The aim of this study was to investigate the antithrombotic effect and the slope of the dose-response curves of the multifactorial coagulation inhibitor warfarin in comparison with the single factor low-molecular-weight thrombin inhibitors melagatran and inogatran. An arterial thrombosis model in rats was used, and vessel damage was induced by topical application of ferric chloride to the carotid artery. The slopes of the dose-response curves were 3.6, 1.8, 1.1, and 1.2, for warfarin, heparin, inogatran, and melagatran, respectively. For warfarin the antithrombotic effect increased from 23% to 81% when the dose was doubled. In contrast, 10-fold increases in the doses of inogatran and melagatran were necessary to obtain a similar increase in antithrombotic effect. The doses needed to obtain 80% antithrombotic effect for heparin, warfarin, and melagatran were investigated in a tail transection bleeding model. For heparin, this dose significantly prolonged the bleeding time and the blood loss; for warfarin, only the total bleeding time was increased while for melagatran there was no increase in bleeding. We conclude that, thrombin inhibitors affecting only one enzyme in the coagulation cascade seem preferable to inhibitors affecting multiple enzymes, such as warfarin, due to shallower dose-response curves and a wider therapeutic interval.

Anticoagulant therapy, anti-platelet agents and gastrointestinal endoscopy

BACKGROUND

The increasing use of anticoagulant therapy and anti-platelet agents in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and venous thromboembolic disease has increased the need for guidelines for managing these agents prior to gastrointestinal endoscopy, particularly if therapeutic manoeuvres are required. The continuation of anticoagulant therapy increases the risk of haemorrhagic complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Temporary suspension of anticoagulant therapy exposes the patient to the risk of thromboembolism associated with the underlying condition requiring anticoagulant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This article reviews the literature and proposes guidelines for the management of patients taking anticoagulant and anti-platelet agents who require gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of fluindione in patients

OBJECTIVE

Fluindione is a vitamin K antagonist with a long half-life. This study was designed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of multiple doses of fluindione in patients.

METHODS

In a learning group of 49 patients who began fluindione treatment, blood samples were taken 12, 18, or 24 hours after one, three, and five doses. Concentration of fluindione, activity of clotting factors II, VII, IX and X, prothrombin complex activity (PCA), and international normalized ratio (INR) were measured. An indirect-response pharmacodynamic model was used for each effect. A comprehensive analysis was performed with a nonparametric population approach. The model was evaluated in 24 other patients: blood samples were taken 24 hours after two, three, four, and six doses; and PCA and INR were observed.

RESULTS

Analysis of concentrations and clotting factor activities showed notably that (1) fluindione has a long half-life (median, 69 hours), and (2) concentration that inhibits the synthesis of the clotting factors by 50% varied for each factor, with a median ranging from 0.25 to 2.05 mg.L-1 for factors VII and II, respectively. The results obtained for INR and PCA were validated in the 24 subsequent patients.

CONCLUSION

The population approach allowed the comparison of several pharmacodynamic submodels. This first application of the indirect-response model to multiple oral anticoagulant doses in patients confirmed that both the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of fluindione show substantial interindividual variability.

Pharmacological importance of stereochemical resolution of enantiomeric drugs

Drug enantiomers have identical properties in an achiral environment, but should be considered as different chemical compounds. This is because they often differ considerably in potency, pharmacological activity and pharmacokinetic profile, since the modules with which they interact in biological systems are also optically active. Within biological systems, the metabolism of one isomer may be via a different pathway or occur at a different rate from that of the other isomer. Preferential binding of one isomer to plasma proteins may cause differences in circulating free drug and hence alter concentrations at active sites. Interactions of both isomers may differ at the active sites through which pharmacological action is mediated. Actions and levels of activity of the stereoisomers in vivo may also differ. All the pharmacological activity may reside in a single enantiomer, whereas several possibilities exist for the other enantiomer-- it may be inactive, have a qualitatively different effect, an antagonistic effect or produce greater toxicity. Two isomers may have nearly identical qualitative pharmacological activity, qualitatively similar pharmacological activity but quantitatively different potency, or qualitatively different pharmacological activity. To avoid adverse effects and optimise the therapeutic value of enantiomeric drugs, it is necessary that methods for the resolution of racemates be evolved and devolved to determine isomeric purity, establish the effectiveness of isomers of the drug, and detect the presence of an enantiomer with lower therapeutic activity and undesirable adverse effects. Even if a drug is given as a pure enantiomer, methods to discriminate between enantiomers are required because racemisation can occur both in vitro and in vivo. Methods developed for resolution of drug enantiomers should facilitate routine testing of single isomers and their metabolites, studies of pharmacological, toxicological and clinical effectiveness, routine analysis of racemates, pure enantiomers or intermediates in manufacturing processes, and investigation of the potential for inversion of an enantiopure drug substance during the early stages of drug development and therapeutic drug monitoring.