A mobile high-field magnetic resonance system for neurosurgery

Intraoperative diffusion-tensor MR imaging: shifting of white matter tracts during neurosurgical procedures--initial experience

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the location of white matter tracts with diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) during neurosurgical procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical committee approval and signed informed consent were obtained. A 1.5-T magnetic resonance imager with an adapted rotating surgical table that is placed in a radiofrequency-shielded operating theater was used for pre- and intraoperative imaging. DTI was performed by applying an echo-planar imaging sequence with six diffusion directions in 38 patients (20 female patients, 18 male patients; age range, 7-77 years; mean age, 45.6 years) who were undergoing surgery (35 craniotomy and three burr hole procedures). Color-encoded maps of fractional anisotropy were generated by depicting white matter tracts. A rigid registration algorithm was used to compare pre- and intraoperative images.

RESULTS

Intraoperative DTI was technically feasible in all patients, and no major image distortions occurred in the areas of interest. Pre- and intraoperative color-encoded maps of fractional anisotropy could be registered; these maps depicted marked and highly variable shifting of white matter tracts during neurosurgical procedures. In the 27 patients who underwent brain tumor resection, white matter tract shifting ranged from an inward shift of 8 mm to an outward shift of 15 mm (mean shift +/- standard deviation, outward shift of 2.5 mm +/- 5.8). In 16 (59%) of 27 patients, outward shifting was detected; in eight (30%), inward shifting was detected. In eight patients who underwent temporal lobe resections for drug-resistant epilepsy, shifting was only inward and ranged from 2 to 14 mm (9 mm +/- 3.3). In two of the three patients who underwent burr hole procedures, outward shifting occurred.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative DTI can depict shifting of major white matter tracts that is caused by surgical intervention.

Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience

The concept of interventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is based on the integration of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, favored by the combination of the excellent morphological and functional imaging characteristics of MRI. The spectrum of MRI-assisted interventions ranges from biopsies and intraoperative guidance to thermal ablation modalities and vascular interventions. The most relevant recently published experimental and clinical results are discussed. In the future, interventional MRI is expected to play an important role in interventional radiology, minimal invasive therapy and guidance of surgical procedures. However, the associated high costs require a careful evaluation of its potentials in order to ensure cost-effective medical care.

Robotics in neurosurgery

Technological developments in imaging guidance, intraoperative imaging, and microscopy have pushed neurosurgeons to the limits of their dexterity and stamina. The introduction of robotically assisted surgery has provided surgeons with improved ergonomics and enhanced visualization, dexterity, and haptic capabilities. This article provides a historical perspective on neurosurgical robots, including image-guided stereotactic and microsurgery systems. The future of robot-assisted neurosurgery, including the use of surgical simulation tools and methods to evaluate surgeon performance, is discussed.

Volumetric assessment of glioma removal by intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the contribution of high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) for further reduction of tumor volume in glioma surgery.

METHODS

From April 2002 to June 2003, 182 neurosurgical procedures were performed with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance system. Among patients who underwent these procedures, 47 patients with gliomas (14 with World Health Organization Grade I or II glioma, and 33 with World Health Organization Grade III or IV glioma) who underwent craniotomy were investigated retrospectively. Completeness of tumor resection and volumetric analysis were assessed with intraoperative imaging data.

RESULTS

Surgical procedures were influenced by iMRI in 36.2% of operations, and surgery was continued to remove residual tumor. Additional further resection significantly reduced the percentage of final tumor volume compared with first iMRI scan (6.9% +/- 10.3% versus 21.4% +/- 13.8%; P < 0.001). Percentages of final tumor volume also were significantly reduced in both low-grade (10.3% +/- 11.5% versus 25.8% +/- 16.3%; P < 0.05) and high-grade gliomas (5.4% +/- 9.9% versus 19.5% +/- 13.0%; P < 0.001). Complete resection was achieved finally in 36.2% of all patients (low-grade, 57.1%; high-grade, 27.3%). Among the 17 patients in whom complete tumor resection was achieved, 7 complete resections (41.2%) were attributable to further tumor removal after iMRI. We did not encounter unexpected events attributable to high-field iMRI, and standard neurosurgical equipment could be used safely.

CONCLUSION

Despite extended resections, introduction of high-field iMRI in conjunction with functional navigation did not translate into an increased risk of postoperative deficits. The use of high-field iMRI increased radicality in glioma surgery without additional morbidity.

Remote computing environment compensating for brain shift

OBJECTIVE

Anatomical and functional image data become invalid during an operation due to brain shift. Compensation is achieved by using intraoperative imaging to update anatomical information. To accelerate the registration and visualization of pre- and intraoperative image data, the presented work focuses on remote computing capabilities. The underlying framework efficiently combines local desktop computers and remote high-end graphics workstations exploiting expensive hardware.

METHODS

By performing all computations on the remote computer, the MR volumes are rigidly aligned via voxel-based registration. Using graphics hardware for acceleration, all interpolation operations are performed with 3D texture-mapping hardware. A new approach then transforms functional markers from preoperative measurements to the intraoperative situation using an automatic tracking algorithm to identify corresponding sulci. Communicating Java viewers are suggested for analyzing the results interactively on a local computer, with all calculations being performed exclusively on the remote computer.

RESULTS

The suggested approach was successfully applied in 5 cases using MR data containing functional markers of MEG and fMRI measurements identifying eloquent brain areas. Remote large-scale graphics hardware was thereby efficiently made available for fast registration and interactive direct volume rendering in neurosurgery.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the presented framework demonstrates efficient access of expensive high-end hardware remotely controlled by thin clients, and further emphasizes the need to compensate for brain shift in functional neuronavigation.

Intraoperative high-field-strength MR imaging: implementation and experience in 200 patients

PURPOSE

To review the initial clinical experience with intraoperative high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of brain lesions in 200 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred patients (mean age, 46.1 years; range, 7-84 years), most of whom had glioma or pituitary adenoma, were examined with a 1.5-T MR imager equipped with a rotating operating table and located in a radiofrequency-shielded operating theater. A navigation microscope placed inside the 0.5-mT zone and used in combination with a ceiling-mounted navigation system enabled integrated microscope-based neuronavigation. The extent of resection depicted at intraoperative imaging, the surgical consequences of intraoperative imaging, and the clinical practicability of the operating room setup were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven resections with a transsphenoidal approach, 100 craniotomies, and 23 burr-hole procedures were performed. In 55 (27.5%) of 200 patients, intraoperative MR imaging had immediate surgical consequences (eg, extension of resection in 39% of patients with pituitary adenoma or glioma). In 108 patients the navigation system was used, and for 37 of those patients, functional imaging data were integrated into the navigation system. There was nearly no difference in quality between pre- and intraoperative images. Intraoperative workflow with intraoperative patient transport for imaging was straightforward, and imaging in most cases began less than 2 minutes after sterile covering of the surgical site. No complications resulted from high-field-strength MR imaging.

CONCLUSION

The high-field-strength MR imager was successfully adapted for intraoperative use with the integrated neuronavigation system. Intraoperative MR imaging provided valuable information that allowed intraoperative modification of the surgical strategy.

Intracranial neuronavigation with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This is an invited review regarding the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the neurosurgical setting. The medical literature evaluating the intraoperative use of magnetic resonance imaging for neurosurgery has increased steadily since the implementation of this technique 10 years ago. The present review discusses recent findings and the current use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery with special emphasis on the quality of available evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intraoperative use of magnetic resonance imaging is a safe technique that enables the neurosurgeon to update data sets for navigational systems, to evaluate the extent of tumor resection and modify surgery if necessary, to guide instruments to the site of the lesion, and to evaluate the presence of intraoperative complications at the end of surgery. Although recent findings support the safety and efficacy of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for the above-mentioned purposes, there is no convincing evidence regarding its prognostic significance in the neurosurgical setting.

SUMMARY

Although the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery has increased significantly within the last 10 years, currently there are less than two dozen dedicated intraoperative units in the United States. The popularization of this technique depends on both economic justification and high-quality scientific evidence supporting its prognostic importance regarding patient outcome.

Surgical Robotics: A Review and Neurosurgical Prototype Development

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to update the neurosurgical community on the expanding field of surgical robotics and to present the design of a novel neurosurgical prototype. It is intended to mimic standard technique and deploy conventional microsurgical tools. The intention is to ease its integration into the "nervous system" of both the traditional operating room and surgeon.

CONCEPT

To permit benefit from updated intraoperative imaging, magnetic resonance imaging-compatible materials were incorporated into the design. Advanced haptics, optics, and auditory communication with the surgical site recreate the sight, sound, and feel of neurosurgery.

RATIONALE

Magnification and advanced imaging have pushed surgeons to the limit of their dexterity and stamina. Robots, in contrast, are indefatigable and have superior spatial resolution and geometric accuracy. The use of tremor filters and motion scalers permits procedures requiring superior dexterity.

DISCUSSION

Breadboard testing of the prototype components has shown spatial resolution of 30 microm, greatly exceeding our expectations. Neurosurgeons will not only be able to perform current procedures with a higher margin of safety but also must speculate on techniques that have hitherto not even been contemplated. This includes coupling the robot to intelligent tools that interrogate tissue before its manipulation and the potential of molecular imaging to transform neurosurgical research into surgical exploration of the cell, not the organ.

Preliminary experience in glioma surgery with intraoperative high-field MRI

OBJECTIVE

To apply a new setup, combining the benefits of high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with microscope-based neuronavigation, providing anatomical and functional guidance, in glioma surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MR imaging was performed using a 1.5 T scanner, located in a radiofrequency-shielded operating theatre. The patient is lying on a rotating operating table, which is locked at the 160 degree position for surgery at the 5 G zone and turned into the scanner for imaging. The microscope, placed in the 5 G zone, in combination with a ceiling mounted navigation system enables microscope-based neuronavigation; integrated data from magnetoencephalography and functional MRI provide functional guidance.

RESULTS

126 patients were investigated with intraoperative high-field MRI, among them were 37 patients with gliomas. In the biopsy/catheter group (n = 8) MRI reliably depicted the needle position or the location of catheter placement. In the group with glioma resection (n = 29) intraoperative MRI revealed that the surgical objective was not achieved in 28%, leading to further tumour removal. We did not observe complications attributable to intraoperative high-field MRI. Image quality was not diminished by the operating room equipment, so that there was nearly no noticeable difference between pre- and intraoperative image quality. Neuronavigational guidance was applied in 31 patients: the integrated use of functional data prevented an increased morbidity despite extended resections.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative high-field MRI allows a reliable delineation of the extent of resection in glioma surgery. If the surgical objective was not met, a modification of the surgical strategy during the same operation is possible, thus leading to more radical resections. Furthermore, high-field MRI offers increased image quality and a much broader spectrum of different imaging modalities, compared to previous intraoperative low-field systems.

Frameless Stereotactic Surgery Using Intraoperative High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging

This study evaluated the clinical validity of frameless stereotaxy using high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance (iMR) imaging combined with an in-room neuronavigation system. A 1.5 Tesla MR scanner in conjunction with a ceiling-mounted neuronavigation system was used during 32 frameless stereotaxy procedures consisting of 19 brain biopsies and 13 catheter placements between April 2002 and mid-October 2003. Evaluation of the procedure was based on either the rate of histological diagnostic yield or the ability to accurately position the catheter in the target region. This technique allowed successful registration with a mean error of 1.2 +/- 0.8 mm and resulted in successful placement of the instrument within the target tissue. Intraoperatively, frozen section analysis showed all biopsy samples contained pathological tissue and locations of sampling points were confirmed by iMR imaging. Specific final diagnosis was made in all 19 brain biopsies. The tip of the catheter was successfully placed into the target in all 13 patients confirmed by iMR imaging. The catheter was repositioned based on iMR imaging in four of 13 patients, increasing the rate of successful placement. There were no procedure-related neurological deficits or mortality, but we encountered two cases of wound infection, one needing surgical revision. Total additional procedure time related to the induction of iMR imaging was 76.7 +/- 23.3 minutes. This initial experience of the combination of conventional frameless stereotaxy and high-field iMR imaging improved the quality of frameless stereotaxy with low morbidity and mortality, but did not translate into a significant reduction of procedure-related time.

Functional neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI

Our concept of computer assisted surgery is based on the combination of intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with microscope-based neuronavigation, providing anatomical and functional guidance simultaneously. Intraoperative imaging evaluates the extent of a resection, while the additional use of functional neuronavigation, which displays the position of eloquent brain areas in the operative field, prevents increasing neurological deficits, which would otherwise result from extended resections. Up to mid 2001 we performed intraoperative MR imaging using a low-field 0.2 Tesla scanner in 330 patients. The main indications were the evaluation of the extent of resection in gliomas, pituitary tumours, and in epilepsy surgery. Intraoperative MR imaging proved to serve as intraoperative quality control with the possibility of an immediate modification of the surgical strategy, i.e. extension of the resection. Integrated use of functional neuronavigation prevented increased neurological deficits. Compared to routine pre- or postoperative imaging being performed with high-Tesla machines, intraoperative image quality and sequence spectrum could not compete. This led to the development of the concept to adapt a high-field MR scanner to the operating environment, preserving the benefits of using standard microsurgical equipment and microscope-based neuronavigational guidance with integrated functional data, which was successfully implemented by April 2002. Up to the end of 2002, 95 patients were investigated with the new setup. Improved image quality, intraoperative workflow, as well as enhanced sophisticated intraoperative imaging possibilities are the major benefits of the high-field setup.

Intraoperative imaging--MRI

Neuronavigation has become a standard technique in many neurosurgical procedures where its use allow better positioning of the craniotomy flap, precise targeting of lesions, and better anatomical orientation. However, the imaging used in such procedures is acquired preoperatively and thus, cannot project the dynamic changes that occur during surgery and result in many cases in significant brain shift and decreased accuracy. Recent technological developments have yielded a variety of MRI machines that can be used intraoperatively and provide the surgeon with updated images, integrated navigation capabilities, full compensation for brain shifts, and the ability to assess the extent of resection of the lesion. The concepts behind such technologies vary from one manufacture to another resulting in systems that vary in complexity, ease of use, spatial demands, and cost. In this chapter we review our experience with two intraoperative MRI systems used in a variety of neurosurgical procedures: the GE Signa SP System and the Odin PoleStar System.

PoleStar N-10 Low-field Compact Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging System with Mobile Radiofrequency Shielding

The PoleStar N-10 intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging system is manufactured by Odin Medical Technologies, Yokneam, Israel, and is marketed by Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies, 826 Coal Creek Circle, Coal Creek Corporate Center One, Louisville, CO 80027; telephone: 720/890-3200. The cost of the PoleStar N-10 ranges from $900,000 to $1,050,000, depending on options. The price of the mobile radiofrequency shielding option is $80,000.

Limited benefit of intraoperative low-field magnetic resonance imaging in craniopharyngioma surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the benefit of intraoperative low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in craniopharyngioma surgery.

METHODS

We used a 0.2-T Magnetom Open scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) that was located in a radiofrequency-shielded operating theater for intraoperative MRI. The head of the patient was placed in the fringe field of the scanner, so that standard microinstruments could be used. In transsphenoidal surgery, T1-weighted coronal and sagittal images were acquired. In transcranial surgery, a three-dimensional, gradient echo, T1-weighted, fast low-angle shot sequence was measured, thus allowing multiplanar reformatting.

RESULTS

A total of 21 surgical procedures in craniopharyngioma patients were investigated. In 10 patients, a bifrontal-translaminar approach was used; in 6 patients, the craniopharyngioma was removed via a transsphenoidal approach; and in 5 patients, intraoperative MRI was used to monitor cyst puncture and aspiration. In the craniotomy group, intraoperative imaging depicted a clear tumor remnant in one patient, which was subsequently removed. In another patient, an area of contrast enhancement was interpreted as artifact; however, postoperative follow-up at 3 months was suspicious for a minor remnant. Two of the eight patients with complete removal developed a recurrence during the follow-up period. In the group of patients who underwent primary transsphenoidal surgery (n = 4), complete removal was estimated by the surgeon in three cases. Intraoperative imaging depicted a remaining tumor in one case, leading to further tumor removal; however, follow-up revealed recurrent cysts.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative low-field MRI allows an ultraearly evaluation of the extent of tumor removal in craniopharyngioma surgery in most cases. Imaging showing an incomplete resection offers the chance for further tumor removal during the same operation. However, intraoperative low-field MRI depicting a complete resection does not exclude craniopharyngioma recurrence.

Glioma surgery evaluated by intraoperative low-field magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

To give an overview on intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in glioma surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MR imaging was performed using a 0.2T scanner, located in a radiofrequency-shielded operating theatre. Two setups were used: surgery either in a neighbouring operating theatre, or directly at the 5G line. Additionally, in gliomas adjacent to eloquent brain areas microscope- or pointer-based neuronavigation with integrated functional data was applied. 106 gliomas were among the 330 patients investigated in the last 5 years.

RESULTS

We did not observe complications attributable to intraoperative MR imaging. Image quality was sufficient to evaluate the extent of the tumour resection in the majority of cases. Intraoperative imaging revealed remaining tumour in 63%. In a total of 26% patients further tumour could be removed due to the results of intraoperative imaging, increasing the rate of complete tumour removal especially in the low-grade tumours. The additional use of functional neuronavigation prevented an increased morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative MR imaging offers the possibility of further tumour removal during the same surgical procedure in case of tumour remnants, increasing the rate of complete tumour removal. The effects of brain shift can be compensated for using intraoperative image data for updating.

Clinical results in MR-guided therapy for malignant gliomas

The prognostic impact of the extent of tumour resection in surgery of malignant glioma patients remains controversial. We report the results of cumulative survival of malignant glioma patients operated with MR-guidance. Patients with complete tumour removal were compared with a population of patients with incomplete tumour removal. A 0.5 T scanner was used to criticize the extent of resection during surgery. In total no significant difference could be found, however there is a tendency that complete tumour removal seems to be associated with a slightly increased median survival time.

Costs and benefits of intraoperative MR-guided brain tumor resection

We retrospectively compared the costs and benefits of brain tumor resection in the conventional operating room (cOR) with the interventional magnetic resonance (iMR) suite from 1993-1998. Comparisons were made for adults (diagnosis-related group (DRG) 001) and children (DRG 003) for length of stay (LOS), hospital charges and payments, hospital total direct and indirect costs, readmission rates, repeat resection (RR) interval, and net health outcome. Statistical analysis was with ANOVA, Dunnett's, and Bonferroni tests. For DRG 001, iMR LOS (3.7 days (d)) was 54.9% shorter than for cOR (8.2 d) for first resections (FR) (P < 0.001) and RR (6.0 vs. 8.7 d (31.0%), P < 0.05). IMR hospital charges were 12.2% lower ($4063) for FR and 4.1% lower ($922) for RR than for cOR. Total iMR hospital costs were 14.4% lower ($3415) than for cOR for FR and 3.3% lower ($723) than costs for RR. Cost-to-charge ratio (c/c) for FR was 69.6% (iMR) and 71.4% (cOR) and for RR 70.9% (iMR) and 71.1% (cOR). For DRG 003, iMR LOS (4.5 d) was shorter than for cOR (14.1 d, P < 0.001) for FR and for RR (8.0 vs. 13.3 d). IMR hospital charges were 43.8% lower than for cOR for FR (P < 0.05) and RR. The iMR costs were lower for FR (46.4%, P < 0.01) and RR (44.7%) than cOR. IMR c/c was 71.4% and 74.8% for cOR. For RR, the iMR c/c was 72.8% and 73.9% for cOR. No RR have followed iMR surgery. COR RR rate was 20% in adults and 30% in children. The mean time from iMR surgery was 11.3 months in adults and 18.0 in children. For the cOR, the mean time to RR was 9.3 months in adults and 13.3 in children. This data suggests that iMR surgery improves net health outcomes by reduced LOS, reduced RR, and reduced hospital charges and costs.

Intraoperative computerized tomography for improved accuracy of spinal navigation in pedicle screw placement of the thoracic spine

We report on our experiences with the use of intraoperative CT imaging in surgery of the thoracic spine and on our results of pedicle screw insertion using spinal navigation and implantable fiducial markers. For our operations we used the Tomoscan M-EG and the EasyGuideSpine (Philips Medical Systems). During the operation the patient was positioned on the mobile CT table. Following dorsal preparation, small titanium screws were implanted in the vertebrae so as to serve as fiducial markers. Image data were obtained by performing a spiral CT scan. Ventilation was suspended for the duration of the CT scan. Screw insertion as well as vertebral biopsies were performed using spinal navigation. Intraoperative CT scans were obtained to confirm the position of the implants and to assess the amount of bony decompression as well as the realignment. Since 1998, 112 patients with various disorders of the thoracic spine have been operated on using the described technique. 365 screws were inserted in the area of T1 to T12. There were 23 (6.3%) misplacements of pedicle screws. In 42 cases (11.5%) we observed a minimal lateral perforation (<2 mm) of the pedicle wall. No neurological, cardiovascular, or pulmonary injury occurred. Intraoperative CT imaging influenced surgical decisions as well as the final result of surgery. Despite the use of intraoperative imaging and accurate spinal navigation, pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine remains extremely challenging.

Influence of 1.5-Tesla intraoperative MR imaging on surgical decision making

To determine the frequency that high-field magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences influenced surgical decision making during intraoperative MR-guided surgery. From January 1997 to February 2001, 346 MR-guided procedures were performed using a 1.5-Tesla MR system (NT-ACS, Philips Medical Systems). This system can perform functional MR imaging (fMRI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS), MR angiography (MRA), and MR venography (MRV) in addition to T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and turbo FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) imaging. FMRI was used to determine areas of brain activation for language, motor function, and memory. DWI was utilized after tumor resection to exclude cerebral ischemia or infarction. MRS was obtained to identify areas of elevated choline that were suspected to correlate with tumor presence. MRA and MRV localized vascular structures adjacent to tumors prior to resection. The intraoperative procedures performed included 140 brain biopsies of which 82 utilized a trajectory guide and prospective stereotaxy. MRS was used in 42 biopsies (30%), of which 29 had turbo spectroscopic imaging (TSI) and 21 had single voxel spectroscopy (SVS). In all biopsy cases, diagnostic tissue was obtained. There were 103 tumor resections of which 18 (17%) had MRS. Functional MRI was used in 17 cases; 3 biopsies (2%) and 14 planned resections (14%). Speech function was localized in 3 cases, memory function in 3, and motor function in 11. In one case where the motor function of the tongue was intimately involved with a low-grade glioma, resection was not attempted. DWI was used in less than 10% of tumor resections. MRA and MRV were performed in 3 (3%) and 2 (2%) of tumor resections, respectively. The imaging capabilities (i.e., fMRI, DWI, MRA, MRV) associated with high-field intraoperative MR influenced surgical decision making primarily for tumor resections. MRS influenced target selection during brain biopsy.

Intraoperative MRI for pediatric tumor management

The emergence of intraoperative MRI has opened new doors for the surgical treatment of pediatric disorders. This technology will hopefully not only improve the surgeon's ability to obtain complete tumor resections with minimal damage to surrounding structures, but also allows surgeons to perform various procedures via less invasive measures. We performed a total of 38 procedures in 36 children in our intraoperative MRI system (GE Signa SP, open configuration). All procedures were performed within the magnet bore, which allows for either continuous real-time or periodic imaging. Procedures included craniotomy for tumor resection, open biopsy, stereotactic biopsy or catheter placement into a tumor-related cyst. There were no infectious, hemorrhagic or neurological complications. Intraoperative MRI is an useful tool for the management of pediatric neurosurgical disorders. Intraoperative imaging not only helps surgeons navigate through eloquent areas of the brain, but also ensures the maximal possible tumor resection or confirms adequate catheter placement prior to skin closure. The impact of this technology on long term survival is yet to be determined.

Intraoperative MR at 1.5 Tesla--experience and future directions

The objective of this report is to present and contrast the development of the different intraoperative MR systems that are currently in use. The manuscript focuses on the design and clinical experience of a 1.5 Tesla MR system, based on a movable magnet. This configuration is similar to the operating microscope and other surgical adjuncts, with MR technology moved to and from the patient as needed. The system has been used to monitor 294 neurosurgical procedures. including CNS neoplasia. epilepsy, cervical spine disorders, arteriovenous malformations, cavernomas and aneurysms. In many cases the surgical procedure was significantly altered by intraoperatively acquired MRI. Future developments include the construction of a 3 Tesla intraoperative MR system and an ambidextrous MR-compatible robot. This seamless integration of robotic technology into an intraoperative MR environment may well revolutionize neurosurgery.

Optimizing outcomes with maximal surgical resection of malignant gliomas

BACKGROUND

Aggressive surgical resection of malignant gliomas is a controversial issue in neurosurgery. Studies with rigorous methodology that fully address this issue have only recently become available.

METHODS

The controversy regarding the role of maximal surgical resection of malignant gliomas is reviewed. The authors discuss surgical techniques and adjunctive technologies that can be utilized to assist in resection of these lesions.

RESULTS

Using current microneurosurgical techniques, it is possible to resect malignant gliomas in gross total fashion. An aggressive approach in which 98% or more of the tumor mass is resected results in a statistically significant survival advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

An aggressive surgical procedure for malignant gliomas can result in increased survival duration for selected groups of patients.

Intraoperative imaging in glioblastoma resection

The use of intraoperative imaging (IOI) in neurosurgical practice is proving to be yet another important advance in the evolution of brain tumor resection, particularly for the most common adult primary brain tumor--glioblastoma (GBM). The number of surgeons using IOI continues to increase, and the experience to date affords an opportunity to assess the value of the various techniques used for IOI.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: impact on brain tumor surgery

BACKGROUND

Refinements in the imaging of intracranial tumors assist neurosurgeons in maximizing resections in a safe manner. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) represents a recent addition to their therapeutic armamentaria.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the development of iMRI and describe their experience with iMRI-guided resection of intracranial tumors in 112 patients. The PoleStar N-10 iMRI system was used in this series.

RESULTS

Intraoperative imaging resulted in additional tumor removal in 40 (36%) of the patients. In another 35 (31%), imaging confirmed that the goals of surgery had been attained so potentially harmful dissection in and around the brain was avoided. For patients with lesions of the skull base, iMRI was possible in all but 2 patients who had a large body habitus. There was a decrease in length of hospital stay for patients who had surgery with iMRI. Lesion location did not play a role in this change. Brain tumor surgery was affected in 67% of patients. A potential for cost savings with iMRI was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative imaging with MRI is the latest evolution in the increasing precision of neurosurgery. The advantages of this technology will make it a ubiquitous feature in the neurosurgical operating room.

Current surgical management of glioblastoma

Surgical resection is a critical aspect of the management of a patient with a glioblastoma (GBM). An intimate knowledge of the anatomy of a GBM, as well as familiarity with particular surgical techniques and adjunctive technologies is required for safe surgical resection. The goals of resection include diagnosis, relief of mass effect, and cytoreduction. A recent study showed that resection of 98% or more of the tumor mass can result in a statistically significant survival advantage. Even in functionally critical areas, "gross total" resections are possible if proper techniques are employed. It is recommended that a "gross total" resection of the enhancing portion of a GBM be performed whenever possible. With this philosophy, the mortality rate is 3% and the rate of major neurologic morbidity is less than 10%.

Primeros pasos en neuronavegación

INTRODUCTION

We try to evaluate the introduction of a neuronavigation system widely used in a neurosurgical department.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyze the surgical procedures performed since the introduction of a neuronavigator in our hospital, the advantages and the problems related with its use.

RESULTS

From 21/12/00 to 31/12/01, 64 cranial and 5 spinal procedures were performed in our centre with the aid of the BrainLAB neuronavigation system. They were 19.37% of the elective surgeries: 45.7% of cranial and 2.8% of spinal procedures. The accuracy of registration was 1.6 mm; the number of trials for registration was 2.8 on average, although in 3 cases it was not possible; there were disarrangements during 9 surgical procedures (two of them after the lesions were reached). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used in 54 instances, computerized tomography (CT) in 5, fluoroscopy (Rx) in 1, CT plus MRI in 8, CT plus Rx in 1. Since Z-Touch localization system and software was available, it was used exclusively, disregarding the use of external fiducials.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, neuronavigation needs extra time, but it helps in the election of the best position for the surgical approach, reduces the time required for scalp incision and craniotomy planning, and is useful for the opening of the dura and the corticectomy. As the operation proceeds, we found it less truhstworthy and necessary. The Z-touch system frees the imaging from the surgery. Its use in spinal operation is scarce and with limited results in our practice. We found the neuronavigation useful, and we employ it on a regular basis in every cranial procedure whenever it is possible.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-guided therapy for brain tumors

Since their introduction into surgical practice in the mid 1990s, intraoperative MRI systems have evolved into essential, routinely used tools for the surgical treatment of brain tumors in many centers. Clear delineation of the lesion, "under-the-surface" vision, and the possibility of obtaining real-time feedback on the extent of resection and the position of residual tumor tissue (which may change during surgery due to "brain-shift") are the main strengths of this method. High-performance computing has further extended the capabilities of intraoperative MRI systems, opening the way for using multimodal information and 3D anatomical reconstructions, which can be updated in "near real time." MRI sensitivity to thermal changes has also opened the way for innovative, minimally invasive (LASER ablations) as well as noninvasive therapeutic approaches for brain tumors (focused ultrasound). Although we have not used intraoperative MRI in clinical applications sufficiently long to assess long-term outcomes, this method clearly enhances the ability of the neurosurgeon to navigate the surgical field with greater accuracy, to avoid critical anatomic structures with greater efficacy, and to reduce the overall invasiveness of the surgery itself.

Use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in tailored temporal lobe surgeries for epilepsy

PURPOSE

We investigated whether intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was able to assess immediately the extent of a tailored temporal lobe resection for epilepsy in comparison to delayed postoperative MRI. The recently proposed concept of an individually tailored procedure, preserving tissue not involved in seizures, leads to a variety of differently shaped resections.

METHODS

For intraoperative imaging we used a Magnetom Open 0.2 Tesla scanner. Fifty-eight patients undergoing temporal lobe resections for pharmacoresistant epilepsy were investigated. Half of these were nonlesional. All patients had delayed postoperative follow-up scans, which were compared with the intraoperative, postresection images.

RESULTS

In 49 (84%) of 58 cases, intraoperative MRI depicted the resection cavity identical to delayed postoperative studies. Complete resection of the visible lesion was primarily proved in 23 of the 29 cases. In two patients with lesions and in one nonlesional case, the resection was extended after intraoperative imaging, thus increasing the rate of total resections in gliomas from 73 to 87%. In four patients, an extension into eloquent areas did not allow complete removal. In the nonlesional cases (n = 29), the extent of tailored temporal resections also could be exactly documented intraoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative MRI allowed a reliable evaluation of the localization and extent of resection in epilepsy surgery within the operative procedure. Furthermore, it provided the possibility of an image-based correction of an initially incomplete resection, particularly in lesional cases. In the majority of patients, the intraoperative images would have been able to replace delayed postoperative MRI. However, in 16%, there were postoperative changes in the resection volume.

Intraoperative mobile magnetic resonance imaging for craniotomy lengthens the procedure but does not increase morbidity

PURPOSE

To evaluate anesthetic aspects of care provided for craniotomy using mobile intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI).

METHODS

Anesthetic factors were studied using a retrospective case-control design. The primary outcome measures were the duration of the surgical intervention; the recovery score and body temperature on arrival; and length of stay in the post-anesthetic care unit. Secondary outcome measures were estimated blood loss, perioperative transfusion requirements, and fluids administered.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients undergoing craniotomy in the MRI theatre were compared with a case-matched control group of patients who underwent neurosurgical interventions in the conventional operating room during the same time period. The only outcome measure that differed between the two groups of patients was the duration of surgery: the mean duration of procedures for patients who underwent imaging was 407 +/- 143 min compared to 285 +/- 122 min in the conventional operating theatre (P < 0.000). Actual time spent imaging accounted for approximately 100 min (83%) of the increased duration.

CONCLUSION

Our results do not support concerns that the iMRI suite is a "hostile" environment for the delivery of anesthesia for craniotomy. With the exception of an increased duration of the procedure, patients undergoing anesthesia with iMRI showed no differences from those operated in the conventional operating theatres.

Intraoperative assessment of aneurysm clipping using magnetic resonance angiography and diffusion-weighted imaging: technical case report

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

To use intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging, including magnetic resonance angiography and diffusion-weighted imaging, to monitor the surgical treatment of a patient with an intracranial aneurysm.

TECHNIQUE

Intraoperative imaging was performed with a ceiling-mounted, mobile, 1.5-T magnet (developed in collaboration with Innovative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems, Inc., Winnipeg, MB, Canada) that included high-performance 20-mT/m gradients. Pre- and postclipping, intraoperative, T1-weighted, angiographic and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images were obtained from a patient with an incidental, 8-mm, anterior communicating artery aneurysm.

RESULTS

T1-weighted images demonstrated brain anatomic features, with visible shifts induced by surgery. Magnetic resonance angiography demonstrated the aneurysm and indicated that, after clipping, the A1 and A2 anterior cerebral artery branches were patent. Diffusion-weighted studies demonstrated no evidence of brain ischemia.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging has been used to monitor the surgical treatment of a patient with an intracranial aneurysm.

Standardization of amygdalohippocampectomy with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience

PURPOSE

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IMRI) is an extremely useful neurosurgical tool in surgeries in which the extent of resection is known to have a significant impact on outcome. Residual hippocampus is the most common cause of recurrent seizures after temporal lobectomy for medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Although the risk/benefit ratio of a policy of universal radical hippocampal resection is not known, we hypothesized that IMRI would aid in the intraoperative assessment of the extent of hippocampal resection and assist in accomplishing a complete hippocampectomy.

METHODS

Five consecutive patients with medically intractable medial temporal lobe epilepsy underwent a radical amygdalohippocampectomy as part of the their surgery for epilepsy. IMRI was used before surgery and after an initial resection. The quality of images was assessed. Postoperative MR images were evaluated by a radiologist to determine the extent of resection of the amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative infections. After a mean follow-up of 10 months, all patients are seizure free. T(1)-weighted coronal intraoperative images were judged adequate at visualizing the medial structures in all patients. T(2) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images did not provide useful information. Postoperative MR images indicated that a complete hippocampectomy had been achieved in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IMRI is a useful adjunct in the surgical treatment of medial temporal lobe epilepsy and perhaps the most reliable method of standardizing a complete hippocampectomy. T(1)-weighted coronal images are the most helpful sequence.

Intraoperative compensation for brain shift

BACKGROUND

Tumor removal, brain swelling, the use of brain retractors, and cerebrospinal-fluid drainage all result in an intraoperative brain deformation that is known as brain shift. Thus, neuronavigation systems relying on preoperative image data have a decreasing accuracy during the surgical procedure. Intraoperative image data represent the correct anatomic situation, so their use may compensate for the effects of brain shift.

METHODS

In a series of 16 brain tumor patients, we used intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to obtain 3-D data, which were then transferred to the microscope-based neuronavigation system. With the help of bone fiducial markers these images were registered intraoperatively, updating the neuronavigation system.

RESULTS

In all patients the updating of the neuronavigation system with the intraoperative MR data was successful. It led to reliable neuronavigation with high accuracy; the mean registration error of the update procedure in all patients was 1.1 mm. The updating procedure added about 15 minutes to the operation time. In all patients the area suggestive of remaining tumor was reached and the additional tumor could be resected, resulting in a complete tumor removal in 14 patients. In the remaining patients extension of the tumor into eloquent brain areas prevented a complete excision.

CONCLUSIONS

The update of a neuronavigation system with intraoperative MR images reliably compensates for the effects of brain shift. This method allows completion of tumor removal in some difficult brain tumors.

Functional activity within brain tumors: a magnetic source imaging study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether low-grade gliomas contain functional cortical activity more often than high-grade gliomas within radiologically defined abnormal tissue.

METHODS

Patients with intra-axial cerebral lesions located in the vicinity of eloquent brain cortex preoperatively underwent magnetic source imaging. A dual 37-channel biomagnetometer was used to perform the imaging. Evoked magnetic fields were analyzed using the single-equivalent dipole representation to ascertain the neuronal source. Stimuli included painless tactile somatosensory stimulation of fingers, toes, and lips and auditory presentation of pure sinusoidal tones.

RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of 106 nonconsecutively treated patients, who had undergone preoperative magnetic source imaging between February 1996 and December 1999, revealed that 24.5% of the patients had been at risk for neurological deficits, because functionally active tissue was located within or at the border of the tumor. Functional activity was found within the radiologically defined lesion in 18% of Grade 2 tumors, in 17% of Grade 3 tumors, and in 8% of Grade 4 tumors.

CONCLUSION

The results confirm that, regardless of tumor grade, intra-axial brain tumors may involve or directly border on functional cortex. The degree of involvement of functionally viable cortex appeared greater for low-grade tumors than for high-grade lesions. On the other hand, high-grade lesions were more likely to be associated with functional cortex at their margins or within peritumoral edema. To safely maximize tumor resection, preoperative functional imaging and intraoperative electrophysiological mapping of the cerebral cortex and the white matter tracts are deemed necessary.