The Clinical Utility of a Tiered Approach to Pediatric Glioma Molecular Characterization for Resource-Limited Settings

PURPOSE

Molecular characterization is key to optimally diagnose and manage cancer. The complexity and cost of routine genomic analysis have unfortunately limited its use and denied many patients access to precision medicine. A possible solution is to rationalize use-creating a tiered approach to testing which uses inexpensive techniques for most patients and limits expensive testing to patients with the highest needs. Here, we tested the utility of this approach to molecularly characterize pediatric glioma in a cost- and time-sensitive manner.

METHODS

We used a tiered testing pipeline of immunohistochemistry (IHC), customized fusion panels or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and targeted RNA sequencing in pediatric gliomas. Two distinct diagnostic algorithms were used for low- and high-grade gliomas (LGGs and HGGs). The percentage of driver alterations identified, associated testing costs, and turnaround time (TAT) are reported.

RESULTS

The tiered approach successfully characterized 96% (95 of 99) of gliomas. For 82 LGGs, IHC, targeted fusion panel or FISH, and targeted RNA sequencing solved 35% (29 of 82), 29% (24 of 82), and 30% (25 of 82) of cases, respectively. A total of 64% (53 of 82) of samples were characterized without targeted RNA sequencing. Of 17 HGG samples, 13 were characterized by IHC and four were characterized by targeted RNA sequencing. The average cost per sample was more affordable when using the tiered approach as compared with up-front targeted RNA sequencing in LGG ($405 US dollars [USD] v $745 USD) and HGGs ($282 USD v $745 USD). The average TAT per sample was also shorter using the tiered approach (10 days for LGG, 5 days for HGG v 14 days for targeted RNA sequencing).

CONCLUSION

Our tiered approach molecularly characterized 96% of samples in a cost- and time-sensitive manner. Such an approach may be feasible in neuro-oncology centers worldwide, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Outcomes After Meningioma Surgery

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the association between diabetes mellitus and incidence of adverse outcomes in patients who underwent meningioma surgery.

METHODS

The 2012-2014 National Inpatient Sample database was used. Prolonged length of stay was indicated by values greater than the 90th percentile of the sample. The Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used to compare demographics, hospital characteristics, comorbidity, and complications among race cohorts. Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent effect of diabetes on adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

After selecting for patients with primary diagnosis of meningioma who underwent a resection procedure, 7745 individuals were identified and divided into diabetic (n = 1518) and nondiabetic (n = 6227) cohorts. Demographics, hospital characteristics, and comorbidities were significantly different among the 2 cohorts. Average length of stay was longer in diabetic patients (8.15 vs. 6.04 days, P < 0.001), and total charges were higher in diabetic patients ($139,462.66 vs. $123,250.71, P < 0.001). Multivariate regression indicated diabetic patients have higher odds of experiencing a complication (odds ratio [OR] 1.442, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.255-1.656, P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (OR 1.672, 95% CI 1.034-2.705, P = 0.036) after meningioma surgery. Analysis of individual postoperative complications revealed that diabetic patients experienced increased odds of pulmonary (OR 1.501, 95% CI 1.209-1.864, P < 0.001), neurologic (OR 1.690, 95% CI 1.383-2.065, P < 0.001), and urinary/renal complications (OR 2.618, 95% CI 1.933-3.545, P < 0.001). In addition, diabetic patients were more likely to have a prolonged length of stay (OR 1.694, 95% CI 1.389-2.065, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes is an important factor associated with complications after meningioma surgery. Preventative measures must be taken to optimize postoperative outcomes in these patients.

Real-world impact of brain metastases on healthcare utilization and costs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-TKIs in the US

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) is difficult to treat and associated with poor survival. This study assessed the impact of BM on healthcare-related utilization and costs (HRUC) among patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults newly-diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC, initiating first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI treatment, with BM or no BM (NBM), were identified retrospectively from IBM MarketScan healthcare claims databases (2013-2017). HRUC were measured during the variable-length follow-up period. Generalized linear models assessed the impact of BM on total healthcare costs, standardized to 2017 US$.

RESULTS

Overall, 222 BM and 280 NBM patients were included, with a mean duration of follow-up of 14 months. Adjusted NSCLC-related and all-cause costs over average follow-up were 1.2 times higher among BM patients (Δ$5,640 and Δ$6,366, respectively; p <0.05); differences were driven primarily by radiation treatment and radiology. More than two times more BM than NBM patients received NSCLC-related radiation treatment, in both inpatient (15.3% vs 6.8%; p <0.05) and outpatient settings (87.8% vs 37.5%; p <0.05). Per-patient per-month (PPPM) radiation costs were also higher among BM patients, both inpatient ($796 vs $464, p =0.172) and outpatient ($2,443 vs $747, p <0.05). All-cause PPPM radiology visits (2.0 vs 1.3) and associated costs ($3,824 vs $1,621) were higher among BM patients (both p <0.05).

CONCLUSION

NSCLC-related HRUC, especially those attributable to radiation treatment, were higher among patients with BM. Future research should compare the potential for CNS-active EGFR-TKIs vs first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with radiotherapy to reduce HRUC.

The Association between Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios and Health Expenditures in Brain and Nervous System Cancers

Mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs) are alternative parameters used to evaluate the prognosis of a disease. In addition, MIRs are associated with the ranking of health care systems and expenditures for certain types of cancer. However, a lack of association between MIRs and pancreatic cancer has been noted. Given the poor prognosis of brain and nervous system cancers, similar to pancreatic cancer, the relation of MIRs and health care disparities is worth investigating. We used the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (CC) to analyze the correlation between the MIRs in brain and nervous system cancers and inter-country disparities, including expenditures on health and human development index. Interestingly, the MIRs in brain and nervous system cancers are associated with the human development index score (N = 157, CC = -0.394, p < 0.001), current health expenditure (CHE) per capita (N = 157, CC = -0.438, p < 0.001), and CHE as percentage of gross domestic product (N = 157, CC = -0.245, p = 0.002). In conclusion, the MIRs in the brain and nervous system cancer are significantly associated with health expenditures and human development index. However, their role as an indicator of health disparity warrants further investigation.

Cost-effectiveness of Intraoperative MRI for Treatment of High-Grade Gliomas

Background Intraoperative MRI has been shown to improve gross-total resection of high-grade glioma. However, to the knowledge of the authors, the cost-effectiveness of intraoperative MRI has not been established. Purpose To construct a clinical decision analysis model for assessing intraoperative MRI in the treatment of high-grade glioma. Materials and Methods An integrated five-state microsimulation model was constructed to follow patients with high-grade glioma. One-hundred-thousand patients treated with intraoperative MRI were compared with 100 000 patients who were treated without intraoperative MRI from initial resection and debulking until death (median age at initial resection, 55 years). After the operation and treatment of complications, patients existed in one of three health states: progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease, or dead. Patients with recurrence were offered up to two repeated resections. PFS, valuation of health states (utility values), probabilities, and costs were obtained from randomized controlled trials whenever possible. Otherwise, national databases, registries, and nonrandomized trials were used. Uncertainty in model inputs was assessed by using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A health care perspective was used for this analysis. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was used to determine cost efficacy. Results Intraoperative MRI yielded an incremental benefit of 0.18 QALYs (1.34 QALYs with intraoperative MRI vs 1.16 QALYs without) at an incremental cost of $13 447 ($176 460 with intraoperative MRI vs $163 013 without) in microsimulation modeling, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $76 442 per QALY. Because of parameter distributions, probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that intraoperative MRI had a 99.5% chance of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. Conclusion Intraoperative MRI is likely to be a cost-effective modality in the treatment of high-grade glioma. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bettmann in this issue.

Toward Value in Health Care: Perspectives, Priorities, and Policy

The goal of value-based care is simple: deliver care that improves the health of patients at the lowest possible cost. In recent years, concerns about health care value have led to the emergence of multiple value-based frameworks for decision-making. This commentary describes how the concept of value is defined for different stakeholders, discusses the impact of the value-based movement, and offers perspective on future directions for prioritization and policymaking.

Direct medical costs of treatment in newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma among commercially insured US patients

AIM

This analysis assessed the direct medical costs of newly-diagnosed, temozolomide (TMZ)-treated glioblastoma (GBM) from the perspective of a US commercial setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis included subjects identified from the IMS PharMetrics LifeLink Plus™ claims database from January 1, 2008 to August 31, 2014 who were ≥18 years of age, had ≥1 malignant brain cancer diagnosis, had brain surgery ≤90 days prior to TMZ initiation, had TMZ treatment, and were continuously enrolled for ≥12 months pre-diagnosis and ≥1 month post-diagnosis. Per-patient per-month (PPPM) and cumulative costs from 3 months pre-diagnosis to various post-diagnosis follow-up time points were calculated. Multivariable analyses were used to estimate adjusted mean cost and identify contributors of cost.

RESULTS

The study included 2,921 subjects (median age = 56 years; 60% male). After diagnosis, the median (interquartile range, IQR) number of inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient visits were 2 (1-4), 1 (1-3), and 19 (13-27); median (IQR) length of stay per hospitalization was 5 (3-9) days. Mean total cumulative costs per patient from 3 months pre-diagnosis to 12 months and to 5 years post-diagnosis were $201,749 (197,490-206,024) and $268,031 (262,877-274,416). Mean (SD) PPPM costs were $818 (1,128) and $7,394 (8,676) pre- and post-GBM diagnosis, respectively. The variables most predictive of cumulative costs included radiation therapy (+$81,732), ≥2 weeks of hospitalization (+$49,629), and ≥7 MRI scans (+$40,105).

CONCLUSIONS

The direct medical costs of newly-diagnosed, TMZ-treated GBM in commercially insured patients are substantial, with estimated total cumulative costs of $268,031.

Clinical and economic evaluation of modulated electrohyperthermia concurrent to dose-dense temozolomide 21/28 days regimen in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective analysis of a two-centre German cohort trial with systematic comparison and effect-to-treatment analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of modulated electrohyperthermia (mEHT) concurrent to dose-dense temozolomide (ddTMZ) 21/28 days regimen versus ddTMZ 21/28 days alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM).

DESIGN

A cohort of 54 patients with recurrent GBM treated with ddTMZ+mEHT in 2000-2005 was systematically retrospectively compared with five pooled ddTMZ 21/28 days cohorts (114 patients) enrolled in 2008-2013.

RESULTS

The ddTMZ+mEHT cohort had a not significantly improved mean survival time (mST) versus the comparator (p=0.531) after a significantly less mean number of cycles (1.56 vs 3.98, p<0.001). Effect-to-treatment analysis (ETA) suggests that mEHT significantly enhances the efficacy of the ddTMZ 21/28 days regimen (p=0.011), with significantly less toxicity (no grade III-IV toxicity vs 45%-92%, p<0.0001). An estimated maximal attainable median survival time is 10.10 months (9.10-11.10). Cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that, unlike ddTMZ 21/28 days alone, ddTMZ+mEHT is cost-effective versus the applicable cost-effectiveness thresholds €US$25 000-50 000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Budget impact analysis suggests a significant saving of €8 577 947/$11 201 761 with 29.1-38.5 QALY gained per 1000 patients per year. Cost-benefit analysis suggests that mEHT is profitable and will generate revenues between €3 124 574 and $6 458 400, with a total economic effect (saving+revenues) of €5 700 034 to $8 237 432 per mEHT device over an 8-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our ETA suggests that mEHT significantly improves survival of patients receiving the ddTMZ 21/28 days regimen. Economic evaluation suggests that ddTMZ+mEHT is cost-effective, budget-saving and profitable. After confirmation of the results, mEHT could be recommended for the treatment of recurrent GBM as a cost-effective enhancer of ddTMZ regimens, and, probably, of the regular 5/28 days regimen. mEHT is applicable also as a single treatment if chemotherapy is impossible, and as a salvage treatment after the failure of chemotherapy.

Brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients on epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: symptom and economic burden

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the symptom and economic burden associated with brain metastases (BM) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

METHODS

This retrospective study included adults with ≥2 medical claims, within 90 days, for lung cancer and ≥1 administration of EGFR-TKIs. Based on ICD-9 codes, patients were stratified into cohorts by type of metastases (BM, other metastases [OM], or no metastases [NM]), and by when the metastasis diagnosis occurred (synchronous or asynchronous).

RESULTS

The population (synchronous BM [SBM] = 24, synchronous OM [SOM] = 23, asynchronous BM [ASBM] = 15, asynchronous OM [ASOM] = 49, NM = 85) was mostly female (57%), average age 69 years (SD = 11). SBM patients experienced more fatigue and nausea/vomiting compared with SOM and NM patients and more headaches and loss of appetite than NM patients. ASBM was associated with more fatigue, nausea/vomiting, headaches, pain/numbness, altered mental status, and seizures than NM, and more headaches and pain/numbness than ASOM. SBM patients experienced a greater increase in per-member-per-month all-cause total healthcare costs after diagnosis ($20,301) vs SOM ($9,131, p = .001) and NM ($2,493, p = .001). ASBM's cost increase between baseline and follow-up ($7,867) did not differ from ASOM's ($4,947, p = .195); both were larger than NM ($2,493, p = .001 and p = .009, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

EGFR mutation status was inferred based on EGFR-TKI treatment, not by molecular testing. Patients were from US commercial insurance plans; results may not be generalizable to other populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with EGFR-TKI-treated NSCLC, patients with BM experienced more symptoms and, when diagnosed synchronously, had significant increases in total medical costs vs patients with OM and NM. Therapeutic options with central nervous system activity may offer advantages in symptomatology and costs in EGFR-mutated patients with BM.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of intraoperative imaging in high-grade glioma resection; a comparative review of intraoperative ALA, fluorescein, ultrasound and MRI

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of high-grade gliomas (HGG) is standard therapy because it imparts significant progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, HGG-tumor margins are indistinguishable from normal brain during surgery. Hence intraoperative technology such as fluorescence (ALA, fluorescein) and intraoperative ultrasound (IoUS) and MRI (IoMRI) has been deployed. This study compares the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these technologies.

METHODS

Critical literature review and meta-analyses, using MEDLINE/PubMed service. The list of references in each article was double-checked for any missing references. We included all studies that reported the use of ALA, fluorescein (FLCN), IoUS or IoMRI to guide HGG-surgery. The meta-analyses were conducted according to statistical heterogeneity between studies. If there was no heterogeneity, fixed effects model was used; otherwise, a random effects model was used. Statistical heterogeneity was explored by χ² and inconsistency (I²) statistics. To assess cost-effectiveness, we calculated the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).

RESULTS

Gross total resection (GTR) after ALA, FLCN, IoUS and IoMRI was 69.1%, 84.4%, 73.4% and 70% respectively. The differences were not statistically significant. All four techniques led to significant prolongation of PFS and tended to prolong OS. However none of these technologies led to significant prolongation of OS compared to controls. The cost/QALY was $16,218, $3181, $6049 and $32,954 for ALA, FLCN, IoUS and IoMRI respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ALA, FLCN, IoUS and IoMRI significantly improve GTR and PFS of HGG. Their incremental cost was below the threshold for cost-effectiveness of HGG-therapy, denoting that each intraoperative technology was cost-effective on its own.

Treatment of Brain Tumors in Thailand from 2005 to 2014: Data from the National Health Security Office

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the treatment of brain tumor in Thailand. Conclusion: The treatment of brain tumors in Thailand is developed throughout the country, with better outcomes, shorter lengths of stay. The health region 1, 7, 12 and 13 have a very high ability to treat brain tumors in their areas.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The data from the National Health Security Office (NHSO) concerning the principle diagnosis of brain tumors between 2005 and 2014 were retrieved and analyzed for their treatment.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2014, there were a total of 93,810 hospital admissions in Thailand for brain tumor treatment. The number of brain tumors had increased each year (from 6,056 in 2005 to 12,098 in 2014) but the length of stay (LOS) had been shorter (from 13.28 in 2005 to 9.94 days in 2014). The adjusted relative weight had increased from 2.946 to 4.383, respectively. The number of poor outcomes had also decreased from 23.7% in 2005 to 18.1% in 2014. Above 80% of total admissions, the treatment was performed within the health region, namely region 1, 7, 12 and 13 which had very high treatment rates within the region.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of brain tumors in Thailand is developed throughout the country, with better outcomes, shorter lengths of stay. The health region 1, 7, 12 and 13 have a very high ability to treat brain tumors in their areas.

Impact of image guidance during whole-brain radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Radiation oncologists are rapidly adopting image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), warranting further evaluation of its role and value. We analyzed the impact of IGRT for one of the most common radiation treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively identified patients who received whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with mask immobilization and who underwent routine IGRT with kilovoltage imaging. We calculated IGRT shifts by comparing couch positions before and after imaging. We determined the dosimetric impact of IGRT on lens maximum and dose received by 95% (D95%) of the brain and cribriform region. We calculated episode of care costs using the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients received 2392 image-guided fractions. The median absolute shift was 1 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm in the vertical, lateral, and longitudinal directions, respectively. Ninety-nine percent of shifts were ≤6 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm in the vertical, lateral, and longitudinal directions, respectively. For the 22 patients with the largest average shift per fraction, treating without IGRT would have changed D95% brain by a median 3 cGy (interquartile range, 2-9) and D95% cribriform region by a median 39 cGy (interquartile range, 7-116). Without IGRT, lens doses would have increased for 11/22 patients and decreased for 11/22. Using a 700 cGy lens threshold, there was no net change in the proportion of patients above and below the threshold regardless of IGRT use. For a 10-fraction course, daily IGRT accounted for 10% of the total episode of care cost.

CONCLUSIONS

IGRT results in small positional corrections during WBRT. Even among cases with the largest shifts, the dosimetric impact is minor for the brain and modest for the cribriform region and lenses. This study suggests mask immobilization alone is sufficient for routine cases, and it may help clinicians make evidence-based decisions about IGRT in this setting.

The economic burden of brain metastasis among lung cancer patients in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Brain metastases among lung cancer patients can impair cognitive and functional ability, complicate care, and reduce survival. This study focuses on the economic burden of brain metastasis in lung cancer-direct healthcare costs to payers and indirect costs to patients, payers, and employers-in the US.

METHODS

Retrospective study using claims data from over 60 self-insured Fortune 500 companies across all US census regions (January 1999-March 2013). Adult, non-elderly lung cancer patients with brain metastasis were evaluated over two study periods: (1) pre-diagnosis (≤30 days prior to first observed lung cancer diagnosis to ≤30 days prior to first-observed brain metastasis diagnosis) and (2) post-diagnosis (≤30 days prior to first observed brain metastasis diagnosis to end of continuous eligibility or observation).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Healthcare costs to payers and resource utilization, salary loss to patients, disability payouts for payers, and productivity loss to employers.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were followed for a median of 8.4 and 6.6 months in the pre- and post-diagnosis periods, respectively. At diagnosis of brain metastasis, 21.2% of patients were on leave of absence and 6.1% on long-term disability leave. Substantial differences were observed in the pre- vs post-diagnosis periods. Specifically, patients incurred much greater healthcare utilization in the post-diagnosis period, resulting in $25,579 higher medical costs per-patient-per-6-months (PPP6M). During this period, patients missed significantly more work days, generating an incremental burden of $2853 PPP6M in salary loss for patients, $2557 PPP6M in disability payments for payers, and $4570 PPP6M in productivity loss for employers.

LIMITATIONS

Type of primary lung cancer and extent of brain metastasis could not be assessed in the data. The analysis was also limited to patients with comprehensive disability coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of brain metastasis among lung cancer patients is associated with a substantial economic burden to payers, patients, and employers.

Brain metastases in patients with ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer: clinical symptoms, treatment patterns and economic burden

OBJECTIVE

Brain metastases (BM) are highly prevalent among anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; yet little is known about their real-world treatment patterns and clinical and economic burdens. This study aimed to describe these patients' treatment patterns, symptoms, and costs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective study pooling data from three large administrative databases in the US (08/2011-06/2013). ALK+ NSCLC patients with BM and continuous enrollment for ≥ 60 days before and ≥ 30 days after the first observed BM diagnosis were identified by pharmacy records for crizotinib among patients with lung cancer and BM diagnostic codes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Treatment patterns, symptoms, healthcare resource utilization, and costs, before and after BM diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 213 crizotinib patients with BM diagnoses meeting the selection criteria, 23.0% had BM prior to NSCLC diagnosis; 47.4% had BM prior to crizotinib initiation; 19.2% during crizotinib treatment; and 10.3% post-crizotinib treatment. For those diagnosed with BM after NSCLC diagnosis, the median time between the NSCLC and BM diagnoses was 88 days. Following the first observed BM diagnosis, 88.7% used chemotherapy, 63.4% had radiotherapy, and 31.9% had stereotactic radiosurgery. The prevalence of BM-related symptoms substantially increased post-BM-diagnosis: fatigue (from 15% to 39%), headaches (from 5% to 24%), and depression (from 5% to 15%). Monthly costs per patient averaged $5983 before the BM diagnosis and $22,645 after diagnosis. Patients' resource utilization increased significantly post-BM-diagnosis, with a 3-fold increase in OP visits and a 6-fold increase in IP stays. Post-BM-diagnosis costs were driven by pharmacy (42.0%), inpatient (29.6%), and outpatient costs (26.0%).

LIMITATIONS

The study sample was limited to crizotinib-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-BM-diagnosis, patients experience high symptom burden. Post-BM-diagnosis, treatment is highly variable and costly: average monthly costs per patient almost quadrupled post-BM-diagnosis.

The appropriate use of neuroimaging in the diagnostic work-up of dementia: an economic literature review and cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Structural brain imaging is often performed to establish the underlying causes of dementia. However, recommendations differ as to who should receive neuroimaging and whether computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be used.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness in Ontario of offering structural imaging to all patients with mild to moderate dementia compared with offering it selectively according to guidelines from the Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCC). We compared the cost-effectiveness of CT and MRI as first-line strategies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search (2000 to 2013) to identify cost-effectiveness studies of clinical prediction rules and structural imaging modalities. Studies were assessed for quality and applicability to Ontario. We also developed a model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of clinical guidelines (image all versus according to CCC) and modalities (CT versus MRI). Transition probabilities, utilities, and costs were obtained from published literature or expert opinion. Results were expressed in terms of costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs).

RESULTS

No relevant cost-effectiveness analyses were identified in the published literature. According to the base-case results of our model, the most effective and cost-effective strategy is to image patients who meet CCC criteria with CT and to follow-up with MRI for suspected cases of space-occupying lesions (SOL). However, the results were sensitive to the specificity of MRI for detecting vascular causes of dementia. At a specificity of 64%, the most cost-effective strategy is CCC followed by MRI.

LIMITATIONS

Studies used to estimate diagnostic accuracy were limited by a lack of a gold standard test for establishing the cause of dementia. The model does not include costs to patients and their families, nor does it account for patient preferences about diagnostic information.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the relative prevalence of vascular dementia and SOLs, and the improvement in QALYs associated with treatment, the strategy with the greatest combined sensitivity (CCC with CT followed by MRI for patients with SOLs) results in the greatest number of QALYs and is the least costly. Due to limitations in the clinical data and challenges in the interpretation of this evidence, the model should be considered a framework for assessing uncertainty in the evidence base rather than providing definitive answers to the research questions.

Glioblastoma: background, standard treatment paradigms, and supportive care considerations

Glioblastoma is a brain tumor condition marked by rapid neurological and clinical demise, resulting in disproportionate disability for those affected. Caring for this group of patients is complex, intense, multidisciplinary in nature, and fraught with the need for expensive treatments, surveillance imaging, physician follow-up, and rehabilitative, psychological, and social support interventions. Few of these patients return to the workforce for any meaningful time frame, and because of the enormity of the financial burden that patients, their caregivers, and society face, utilization reviews become the focus of ethical scrutiny.

Is it reasonable to deny older patients treatment for glioblastoma?

Is it ever fair to limit treatment for diseases like glioblastoma for which prognosis is poor? Because resources are finite and health care spending limits the other possible uses for those resources, limiting access to an intervention that does not generate benefits is ethically sound. Ignoring the balance of benefits and burdens associated with treatment ignores opportunity costs and leads us to treat some lives as more valuable than others. Although it is ethically sound to set limits on medical care, I argue that biological age is a poor criterion for allocating resources.

Burden of breast cancer with brain metastasis: a French national hospital database analysis

OBJECTIVE

Incidence of breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM) is increasing, especially among patients over-expressing HER2. Epidemiology on this sub-type of cancer is scarce, since cancer registries carry no information on the HER2 status. A retrospective database analysis was conducted to estimate the burden of BCBM, especially among HER2-positive patients in a secondary objective.

METHODS

Patients with a new diagnosis of BCBM carried out between January and December 2008 were identified from the national hospital database using the International Disease Classification. Patients receiving a targeted anti-HER2 therapy were identified from the national pharmacy database. Hospital and pharmacy claims were linked to estimate the burden of HER2-positive patients. Data on hospitalizations were extracted to describe treatment patterns and healthcare costs during a 1-year follow-up. Predictors of treatment cost were analyzed through multi-linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Two thousand and ninety-nine BCBM patients were identified (mean age (SD) = 57.8 (13.6)), of whom 12.2% received a targeted anti-HER2 therapy; 79% of patients had brain metastases associated with extracranial metastases, and the attrition rate reached 82%. Patients received mostly palliative care (47.4%), general medical care (40.6%), and chemotherapy (35.0%). The total annual hospital cost of treatment was 8,426,392€, representing a mean cost of 22,591€ (±14,726) per patient, mainly influenced by extracranial metastases, surgical acts, and HER2-overexpression (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The database linkage of hospital and pharmacy claims is a relevant approach to identify sub-type of cancer. Chemotherapy was widely used as a systemic treatment for breast cancer rather than for local treatment of brain metastases whose morbi-mortality remains high. The variability of treatment costs suggests clinical heterogeneity and, thus, extensive individualization of protocols.

Burden of disease and unmet needs in tuberous sclerosis complex with neurological manifestations: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a progressive genetic disorder characterized by pervasive benign tumor growth. We sought to assess the current understanding of burden of TSC-related neurological manifestations.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE- and EMBASE-indexed, English-language literature (5/2000-5/2010) and non-indexed materials.

RESULTS

In total, 119 articles were included, 115 on epidemiology and treatment. Recent prevalence estimates from Ireland and Taiwan report TSC in 1:14,000-25,000 individuals, below older estimates of 1:10,000. While neurological manifestations are common, treatment is largely unaddressed by guidelines and focuses on symptoms, with resection standard for subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs) and common practice for refractory epilepsy. Antiepileptic drugs and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors safely, effectively minimize the need for surgery for severe epilepsy and SEGAs.

CONCLUSION

Morbidity and treatment burden of prevalent neurological manifestations is significant, suggesting substantial economic and humanistic burden; however, these areas are poorly studied, indicating total disease burden is unknown. Future research should assess quality of life, caregiver burden, and costs.

[Study on medical economic evaluation methods for metastatic brain tumors therapy]

INTRODUCTION

Treatment design for metastatic brain tumors is required to firstly care about the life and function for which the patient hopes because it is terminal care. Therefore, to discuss the value of the therapy, a viewpoint of the QOL and the socioeconomic factors other than the survival rate is important. However, examination that applies these factors to the therapy needs to be carried out more thoroughly. With this in mind, we discuss cost effectiveness of therapy for metastatic brain tumor, through a pilot study on gamma knife therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We studied 18 patients (mean age 61.6 years old) undergoing therapy for metastatic brain tumors. The health rate QOL was assessed by the profile-type measure SF-36 (Short-Form 36-Item Ver1.2) and the preference-based measure EQ-5D (EuroQoL-5D), before and six months after gamma knife therapy. Cost-utility-analysis (yen/Qaly) was carried out from quality adjusted life years (Qalys) and medical fee claims. In addition, we made a correlation analysis of the irradiation procedure and the gains attained.

RESULTS

The observation by SF-36 for six months was useful for metastatic brain tumor. As a result, the QOL indicators showed increased mental health (MH: p=0.040) and role emotional (RE: p=0.029) with significant difference. In the measurement of EQ-5D, it was added only for one month based on the significant difference (p=0.022) from the pre-therapy QOL. The utilities that were analyzed became 0.052+/-0.175SD (score), and Qalys were 0.135. Because the cost was 721.4+/-5.2SD (thousand yen), the performance of cost-utility-analysis was estimated as 5, 330, 000 (yen/Qaly). In addition, positive correlation (r=0.845/p=0.034) was found between the EQ-5D utility score and the tumor irradiation energy (mJ), etc.

CONCLUSION

We established a new value over and above mere survival rate concerning metastatic brain tumor therapy. The socioeconomics and efficacy of therapy are more difficult to discuss in this disease than in other diseases. We did this by clarifying the measurement and analysis of QOL as compared with the cost factor. We found that quantitatively, the mental health rate involved in the QOL, had improved. We established that it is appropriate to cover this disease by public insurance, because cost-utility-analysis showed that it was under the threshold line. Our study also suggested that, when guessing the QOL of the prognosis, there should be grades of sensitivity according to the irradiation element involved in the therapy.

Cost of disorders of the brain in Italy

The aim of this study was to estimate the cost of "brain" disorders in Italy. Country-specific prevalence and health-economic data on addiction, affective, anxiety and psychotic disorders, tumours, dementia, epilepsy, migraine/other headaches, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, stroke and head trauma were reviewed. Direct medical/non-medical and indirect costs were computed. Population-based samples and national or regional registries were used. The Italian population expected with a brain disorder was 12.4 million in 2004. The highest cost per case was for tumours and multiple sclerosis; the lowest was for anxiety disorders and migraine. Dementia (8.6 billion euros), psychotic and affective disorders (18.7 billion euros), migraine (3.5 billion euros) and stroke (3.4 billion euros) represented the highest total costs. Direct medical costs were predominant for psychiatric and neurosurgical disorders, direct non-medical costs for dementia, and indirect costs for neurological disorders. The total cost of brain disorders in Italy was 40.8 billion euros, 3% of the gross national product, and 706 euros per Italian citizen/year. This figure is however likely to be underestimated as it is based on retrospective methodology and samples of brain disorders, and does not include intangible costs.

The economics of temozolomide in brain cancer

For 30 years, nitrosourea was the only adjuvant treatment available for aggressive glioma patients, despite its severe side effects; and, therefore, radiotherapy was often the therapy of choice. Survival prospect in these patients was, however, low with generally few patients surviving beyond 2 years. Recently, temozolomide was successfully tested in a number of randomised clinical trials and showed an increased survival. As many countries are considering reimbursement or have granted a market authorisation for temozolomide, a number of studies have been published in various countries in order to assess the cost-effectiveness of temozolomide for glioma patients in first- or second-line treatment. These studies show that in general, the incremental cost-effectiveness of temozolomide as adjuvant treatment, albeit at the higher end of commonly accepted thresholds, falls in line with other accepted cancer treatments.

I could lose everything: understanding the cost of a brain tumor

Although studies have quantified the costs of cancer treatment, few have evaluated the widespread impact of cancer costs on the family unit. Specifically, little is known regarding how cancer affects patients and their families financially, and how they cope with these costs. The purpose of this descriptive study was to explore the financial impact of cancer care in neuro-oncology. Content analysis was used to examine data from interviews with 20 adults receiving treatment for a primary malignant brain tumor. Participants were recruited from across the United States through an advertisement in a national support group newsletter. Four major themes were identified -"paying for medication/healthcare", "strategies to offset costs", "impact of cancer costs", and "fear/uncertainty". Within the major themes several sub-themes were also recognized. In the theme of paying for medication/healthcare, participants emphasized sub-themes such as frustrations over "not qualifying/red tape" and being "thankful" for what was covered. Some of the strategies used to offset cancer costs included "cashing in" and relying on "family/friends" for financial support. When describing the impact of cancer costs, participants mentioned sub-themes including the "cost to their family", the "cost of their disability", and the impact of a "change in income/job". Results elucidate the financial concerns and coping strategies of persons undergoing treatment for cancer. These data help target patients' support needs during treatment, such as providing for their family and navigating their insurance policies, and suggest more efficient implementation of financial interventions are needed to alleviate the emotional burden of cancer costs.

Epidemiology and economic burden of brain metastases among patients with primary breast cancer: results from a US claims data analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence, prevalence, and economic burden of secondary breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) among a US-based population of patients with primary breast cancer.

METHODS

Female patients diagnosed with secondary BCBM between 1/2002 and 12/2004 and with a brain or head diagnostic test within 30 days of the BCBM diagnosis were identified in a US commercial insurance claims database. A 12-month look-back period was used to identify patients with a breast cancer diagnosis and those with and without a history of BCBM. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled in their health plan for the duration of the study. Incident BCBM patients were matched to a control group of breast cancer patients with no evidence of BCBM. Patient characteristics at baseline, incidence and prevalence rates, and resource utilization and health care costs were determined.

RESULTS

From 2002 to 2004, 779 incident and 995 prevalent BCBM patients and 8,518 primary breast cancer patients were identified. The incidence of BCBM during this time period was 9.1% (95% CI=8.5%, 9.8%); the prevalence of BCBM was 11.7% (95% CI=11.0%, 12.4%), with rates increasing from 2002 to 2004. About 22% of incident patients died (based on a proxy measure) during the follow-up period, an average of 158 days (95% CI=131.1, 183.9) from the index BCBM diagnosis. A 1:1 match of incident BCBM patients to controls resulted in 775 patients in each group. At 6 months follow-up (N=398), incident BCBM patients had significantly more hospital stays (mean 1.1 vs. 0.5, P<0.001) and remained hospitalized for a longer period (mean 8.0 days vs. 2.5 days, P<0.001) compared to controls. Incident BCBM patients also averaged more physician office visits (32.8 vs. 24.3, P<0.001) as well as pharmacy claims (56.0 vs. 39.1, P<0.001). Similar differences were found at 12 months (N=230). Average total costs for incident BCBM patients at 6 months were $60,045 compared to $28,193 for controls (P<0.001); this difference was driven by higher mean inpatient ($17,462 vs. $5,362, P<0.001) and outpatient ($26,209 vs. $11,652, P<0.001) costs among incident BCBM patients. At 12 months, higher mean total costs persisted in incident BCBM patients ($99,899 vs. $47,719, P<0.001). After adjusting for key variables, mean costs for these patients were 123% higher than those for control group patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary BCBM is a common occurrence among breast cancer patients, with rates increasing over time. Breast cancer patients with secondary BCBM incurred significantly more health care resources following diagnosis compared to those with breast cancer but no BCBM. Mean total costs for BCBM patients were more than double those of patients without BCBM at 6 and 12 months. The increasing prevalence and economic burden associated with BCBM suggests an unmet need that could be filled with newer treatments that improve breast cancer outcomes, including the prevention or delay of BCBM.

Re-evaluation of the cost effectiveness of temozolomide for malignant gliomas in British Columbia

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To re-evaluate the cost effectiveness and median overall survival (OS) achieved in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas treated with temozolomide in British Columbia, as compared to previous lomustine use in the same patient population based on updated outcomes data. Results were also compared to temozolomide literature reports.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was performed to identify patients who received single agent temozolomide or lomustine during successive, prespecified time periods. Data were collected on survival, duration of therapy, drug cost, labour and supplies, and successive or prior chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients in the temozolomide group and 25 patients in the lomustine group were analysed. The median OS was 33.3 weeks (95% CI 28.4, 42.1 weeks) and 37.7 weeks (95% CI 25.0, 88.4 weeks) respectively (P = 0.783). Temozolomide patients received a mean of 5.1 cycles of drug treatment, with a mean cost per patient of 10746 dollars (CAD). In contrast, lomustine patients received a mean of 3.3 cycles of therapy, with a mean cost per patient of 129 dollars (CAD). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that temozolomide was generally not a cost-effective strategy and that lomustine was the dominant strategy. In the sensitivity analysis, in scenarios where median OS was prolonged with temozolomide as compared to lomustine, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for each life year gained ranged from 32,247 dollars to 162,186 dollars.

CONCLUSION

No difference in survival was observed between patients treated with single agent lomustine and temozolomide. Based on the higher cost and lack of additional clinical benefit of temozolomide, lomustine is a more cost-effective treatment strategy.

Utilization and cost of health care services associated with primary malignant brain tumors in the United States

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the economic burden of primary malignant brain tumors in a commercially insured population in the United States, and to identify the primary drivers of health care resource use and cost.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using a 1998-2000 database containing inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims for employees, their dependents, and early retirees of over 50 large US employers with wide geographic distribution. Patients were followed from first brain tumor diagnosis until death, termination of health benefits coverage, or study end. Controls without any cancer diagnosis were matched at a 3:1 ratio by demographic characteristics and length of follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients with malignant brain tumors (n = 653) had significantly greater health service utilization and costs for hospitalizations, emergency room visits, outpatient office visits, laboratory tests, radiology services, and pharmacy-dispensed drugs (all P < 0.05) than did controls (n = 1959). Regression-adjusted mean monthly costs were $6364 for brain tumor patients, compared with $277 for controls (P < 0.0001). The primary cost driver was inpatient care ($4502 per month). Total costs during the study period were $49,242 for those with brain tumors and $2790 for controls (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with malignant brain tumors accrued health care costs that were 20 times greater than demographically matched control subjects without cancer. The costs for inpatient services were the primary drivers of total health resource use. Despite their low incidence, primary malignant brain tumors produce a substantial burden on the US health care system. There is a marked need for improved and new approaches to treatment to reduce the resource use and to offset health care costs associated with this disease.

Insurance barriers for childhood survivors of pediatric brain tumors: the case for neurocognitive evaluations

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to provide empirical evidence of system-based barriers to psychological services for pediatric brain tumor patients when they are medically indicated.

METHOD

Insurance claims data covering 263,866 insured lives during the 1996 fiscal year were pooled from a cross-sectional national sample of adults and their families insured by private insurance companies or self-insured firms. Based on inclusion criteria, records for 209 pediatric brain tumor patients aged 18 and under were extracted and analyzed. Claims data including total amount of payments made on behalf of a member, total length of hospital stays, and total number of unique admissions were recorded for all patients, and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were analyzed to determine frequency of payment for routinely billed psychological procedures. Results were then compared to the frequency of payment for routinely billed psychological procedures for children with other medical conditions.

RESULTS

Results indicate that two of the CPT codes commonly associated with neurocognitive evaluations were reimbursed by these third-party payers for pediatric brain tumor patients during the 1996 fiscal year. Additionally, seven of the CPT codes commonly associated with psychological therapy were also reimbursed.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings provide empirical evidence of system-based obstacles (i.e., lack of third-party reimbursement) for medically indicated psychological services in pediatric brain tumor patients.

Cost of temozolomide therapy and global care for recurrent malignant gliomas followed until death

Effectiveness and costs of care and treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas are largely unknown. In this study, 49 patients (32 males, 17 females; mean age, 49; age range, 23-79) were treated with temozolomide (TMZ) for recurrent or progressive malignant gliomas after standard radiation therapy. Cost assessment (payer's perspective) singled out treatment for first recurrence and all costs of care until death. We computed personnel costs as wages; drugs, imaging, and laboratory tests as prices; and hospitalizations as day rates. Patients were administered a median of five TMZ cycles at recurrence. Drug acquisition costs amounted to euro 2206 per cycle (76% of total costs). Seven patients showed no second recurrence (two are still alive), 16 received no further chemotherapy and died after 3.9 months, and 26 received second-line chemotherapy. After the second progression, median survival was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval, 1.8-6.1). Overall monthly costs of care varied between euro 2450 and euro 3242 among the different groups, and median cost-effectiveness and cost utility ranged from euro 28,817 to euro 38,450 and from euro 41,167 to euro 53,369 per life of year and per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. We conclude that despite high TMZ drug acquisition costs, care of recurrent malignant gliomas is comparable to other accepted therapies.

Primary malignant brain tumor incidence and Medicaid enrollment

BACKGROUND

The relationship between socioeconomic status and health care disparities in the incidence of brain tumors is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the associations between age, sex, and Medicaid enrollment and the incidence of primary malignant brain tumors in Michigan in 1996 and 1997.

METHODS

Records were obtained from the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program on the 1,006 incident cases during this period and cross-checked with Medicaid enrollment files.

RESULTS

Persons enrolled in Medicaid were more likely than non-enrolled persons to develop a malignant brain tumor of any type, a glioblastoma multiforme, and an astrocytoma for certain subgroups. In addition, incidence rates for malignant brain tumors in persons enrolled in Medicaid peaked at a younger age.

CONCLUSION

Sociodemographic status may be associated with cerebral malignancy and should be considered when targeting treatment and educational interventions at persons at risk.

Combined 201Tl and 67Ga brain SPECT in patients with suspected central nervous system lymphoma or germinoma: clinical and economic value

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is costly and an unfavorable prognostic factor for primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma and germinoma patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic and economic impact of combined 201Tl and 67Ga brain SPECT on the management of patients suspected of having CNS lymphoma or germinoma.

METHODS

Sequential 201Tl and 67Ga brain SPECT was performed in 40 patients with cranial tumors to assess the diagnostic and economic impact of combined 201Tl and 67Ga SPECT on the management of patients suspected of having CNS lymphoma or germinoma. All intracranial masses were pathologically confirmed. The final diagnoses of a total of 47 foci were: 11 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in 10 patients, 3 germinomas in 2 patients, 10 glioblastomas in 9 patients, 10 cerebral metastases in 8 patients, 13 meningiomas in 11 patients. Decision-tree sensitivity analysis for pretest probability regarding expected cost saving was performed for introduction of the combined study.

RESULTS

All but one focus of CNS lymphomas or germinomas (92.9%, 13/14) exhibited more intense uptake of 67Ga than of 201Tl (p < 0.001). All foci of glioblastomas (10/10) and meningiomas (13/13), and 60% of metastatic foci (6/10) exhibited higher uptake of 201Tl than of 67Ga (p < 0.035). Expected cost saving in the 1% to 50% range of pretest probability of CNS lymphoma or germinoma would be from minus dollars 842US to plus dollars 2,047US per patient for introduction of the combined study, because of substitution of stereotactic biopsy for craniotomy. The pretest probability was the key factor for cost saving of the combined study.

CONCLUSIONS

A 67Ga-positive and 201Tl-positive pattern with more intense uptake of 67Ga than 201Tl probably suggests CNS lymphoma or germinoma. This combination study appears to be cost-effective only in patients highly suspected of having CNS lymphoma or germinoma.

Brain neoplasms: epidemiology, diagnosis, and prospects for cost-effective imaging

Currently, the literature lacks a solid body of research on decision and cost-effectiveness analysis of imaging strategies for adults and children suspected of having a brain neoplasm. This article describes the epidemiology and clinical presentation of brain neoplasms, reviews current diagnostic strategies, highlights gaps in the literature on decision and cost-effectiveness analysis, and suggests directions for future research.

Outcome and cost of craniotomy performed to treat tumors in regional academic referral centers

OBJECTIVE

Improved clinical and economic outcomes for high-risk surgical procedures have been previously cited in support of regionalization. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of regionalization by analyzing the cost and outcome of craniotomy for tumors and to compare the findings in academic medical centers versus community-based hospitals.

METHODS

Outcomes and charges were analyzed for all adult patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor in 33 nonfederal acute care hospitals in Maryland using the Maryland Health Service Cost Review Commission database for the years 1990 to 1996. A total of 4723 patients who underwent craniotomy for tumor were selected on the basis of Diagnostic Related Group 1 (craniotomy except for trauma, age 18 or older) and International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision diagnosis code for benign tumor, primary malignant neoplasm, or secondary malignant neoplasm (codes 191, 192, 194, 200, 225, 227, 228, 237, and 239). Hospitals were categorized as high-volume hospitals (>50 craniotomies/yr) or low-volume hospitals (<or=50 craniotomies/yr). In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and charges were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mortality rate was 2.5% at high-volume centers and 4.9% at low-volume hospitals with an adjusted relative risk of 1.4 (P < 0.05), assuming equivalence of disease severity. Adjusted average length of stay in high-volume centers was 6.8, as compared with 8.8 days in low-volume hospitals (P < 0.001). Adjusted average total charges were $15,867 at high-volume centers and $14,045 at low-volume centers (P < 0.001). If all patients in the state had been treated at centers with survival rates equal to those achieved by the high-volume centers, then 46 patients would not have died of operation; that is, 48.6% fewer patients would have died, at an additional adjusted cost of $76,395 dollars per patient saved.

CONCLUSION

High-volume regional medical centers are capable of providing services with improved mortality rates and fewer hospital days, although with adjusted costs slightly higher than those at low-volume hospitals.

Costs and benefits of intraoperative MR-guided brain tumor resection

We retrospectively compared the costs and benefits of brain tumor resection in the conventional operating room (cOR) with the interventional magnetic resonance (iMR) suite from 1993-1998. Comparisons were made for adults (diagnosis-related group (DRG) 001) and children (DRG 003) for length of stay (LOS), hospital charges and payments, hospital total direct and indirect costs, readmission rates, repeat resection (RR) interval, and net health outcome. Statistical analysis was with ANOVA, Dunnett's, and Bonferroni tests. For DRG 001, iMR LOS (3.7 days (d)) was 54.9% shorter than for cOR (8.2 d) for first resections (FR) (P < 0.001) and RR (6.0 vs. 8.7 d (31.0%), P < 0.05). IMR hospital charges were 12.2% lower ($4063) for FR and 4.1% lower ($922) for RR than for cOR. Total iMR hospital costs were 14.4% lower ($3415) than for cOR for FR and 3.3% lower ($723) than costs for RR. Cost-to-charge ratio (c/c) for FR was 69.6% (iMR) and 71.4% (cOR) and for RR 70.9% (iMR) and 71.1% (cOR). For DRG 003, iMR LOS (4.5 d) was shorter than for cOR (14.1 d, P < 0.001) for FR and for RR (8.0 vs. 13.3 d). IMR hospital charges were 43.8% lower than for cOR for FR (P < 0.05) and RR. The iMR costs were lower for FR (46.4%, P < 0.01) and RR (44.7%) than cOR. IMR c/c was 71.4% and 74.8% for cOR. For RR, the iMR c/c was 72.8% and 73.9% for cOR. No RR have followed iMR surgery. COR RR rate was 20% in adults and 30% in children. The mean time from iMR surgery was 11.3 months in adults and 18.0 in children. For the cOR, the mean time to RR was 9.3 months in adults and 13.3 in children. This data suggests that iMR surgery improves net health outcomes by reduced LOS, reduced RR, and reduced hospital charges and costs.

Direct costs of microsurgical management of radiosurgically amenable intracranial pathology in Germany: an analysis of meningiomas, acoustic neuromas, metastases and arteriovenous malformations of less than 3 cm in diameter

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the analysis was to appreciate and compare the effective direct costs of microsurgical treatment of intracranial pathology potentially amenable to radiosurgery as they arose in 1998-99.

METHOD

Treatment costs of 127 microsurgically treated patients harbouring an arteriovenous malformation (AVM), acoustic nEuroma, meningioma or brain metastasis potentially amenable to radiosurgery were reviewed. Costs for the surgical procedure, ICU care, medical and nursing care on the ward, interclinical bills (ICB) for services provided by other departments and the overhead for basic hotel service were added. For comparison Gamma Knife costs were calculated by dividing the global operating cost of the Gamma Knife centre by the number of patients treated in 1999.

FINDINGS

Average hospitalisation time for the entire microsurgical patients was 15,4+/-8,6 days. The patients spent an average of 1,2+/-2,8 days on ICU. Average operating time for all patients, including preparation, was 393+/-118 minutes. Average costs for the microsurgical therapy were Euro10.814+/-6.108. These consisted of Euro1417+/-426 for the surgical procedure, Euro1.188+/-2.658 for ICU care, Euro2.333+/-1.582 for medical and nursing care on the ward, Euro1.671+/-1.433 for interclinical bills and Euro 4.204+/-2.338 for basic hotel service (overhead, Euro273/day). 70% of the microsurgically treated patients needed ancillary inpatient rehabilitation or radiotherapy resulting in an average additional cost for all patients of Euro2.744. Furthermore 20% of the microsurgically treated patients required an unplanned readmission after discharge, resulting in an average additional costs for all patients of Euro1.684. Average overall costs per patient including ancillary therapy and unplanned readmissions amounted to Euro15.242. For comparison, Gamma Knife treatment costs per patient amounted to Euro7.920 in 1999.

INTERPRETATION

The current analysis showed that for established radiosurgical indications the primary costs of microsurgery exceeded the costs of radiosurgery. Differences with regard to additional expenses as a consequence of disability were not addressed in this study. Microsurgical management as well as Gamma Knife radiosurgery have potential for economic improvement.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: impact on brain tumor surgery

BACKGROUND

Refinements in the imaging of intracranial tumors assist neurosurgeons in maximizing resections in a safe manner. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) represents a recent addition to their therapeutic armamentaria.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the development of iMRI and describe their experience with iMRI-guided resection of intracranial tumors in 112 patients. The PoleStar N-10 iMRI system was used in this series.

RESULTS

Intraoperative imaging resulted in additional tumor removal in 40 (36%) of the patients. In another 35 (31%), imaging confirmed that the goals of surgery had been attained so potentially harmful dissection in and around the brain was avoided. For patients with lesions of the skull base, iMRI was possible in all but 2 patients who had a large body habitus. There was a decrease in length of hospital stay for patients who had surgery with iMRI. Lesion location did not play a role in this change. Brain tumor surgery was affected in 67% of patients. A potential for cost savings with iMRI was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative imaging with MRI is the latest evolution in the increasing precision of neurosurgery. The advantages of this technology will make it a ubiquitous feature in the neurosurgical operating room.

Children with headache suspected of having a brain tumor: a cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical and economic consequences of 3 diagnostic strategies-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography followed by MRI for positive results (CT-MRI), and no neuroimaging with close clinical follow-up-in the evaluation of children with headache suspected of having a brain tumor. Three risk groups based on clinical variables were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov model and cost-effectiveness analysis was performed incorporating the risk group prior probability, MRI and CT sensitivity and specificity, tumor survival, progression rates, and cost per strategy. Outcomes were based on quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and incremental cost per QALY gained.

RESULTS

For low-risk children with chronic nonmigraine headaches of >6 months' duration as the sole symptom (prior probability of brain tumor 0.01%), no neuroimaging with close clinical follow-up was less costly and more effective than the 2 neuroimaging strategies. For the intermediate-risk children with migraine headache and normal neurologic examination (prior probability of brain tumor 0.4%), CT-MRI was the most effective strategy but cost >$1 million per QALY gained compared with no neuroimaging. For high-risk children with headache of <6 months' duration and other clinical predictors of a brain tumor such as an abnormal neurologic examination (prior probability of brain tumor 4%), the most effective strategy was MRI, with cost-effectiveness ratio of $113 800 per QALY gained compared with no imaging.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that MRI maximizes QALY gained at a reasonable cost-effectiveness ratio in children with headache at high risk of having a brain tumor. Conversely, the strategy of no imaging with close clinical follow-up is cost saving in low-risk children. Although the CT-MRI strategy maximizes QALY gained in the intermediate-risk patients, its additional cost per QALY gained is high. In children with headache, appropriate selection of patients and diagnostic strategy may maximize quality-adjusted life expectancy and decrease costs of medical workup.

The case for radiosurgery

Brain metastases represent a significant health-care problem, with almost 200,000 patient in the Unite States annually suffering from symptomatic parenchymal lesions. Lung, breast, melanoma, renal, and gastrointestinal cancers contribute the majority of lesions that come to clinical attention. Although median survival once brain metastases are diagnosed is less than a year, timely therapy can restore neurological function and can often prevent further neurological complications of cancer for the duration of a patient's survival. Important prognostic features associated with improved survival include the absence of extracranial disease progression, young age, a high pretreatment neurological status, one to three versus more than three lesions, and a long interval from primary disease diagnosis to the development of brain metastases. The need to aggressively treat brain metastases effectively is becoming increasingly important, however, as advances in the treatment of systemic disease result in an increasing number of patients developing brain metastases in the setting of limited systemic disease. For many such patients, surgery provides the best therapy, but results are still not encouraging because even patients with the best prognostic indicators often die within 18 to 24 months. Until Superior treatment modalities are developed, the judicious use of available techniques for treatment of patients with limited systemic disease provides the best opportunities for palliation and extended survival. Perhaps the most significant development in the treatment of patients with brain metastases during the last decade is the increasing use of radiosurgery. For patients with a single lesion, local control and survival rates of radiosurgery compare well with those produced with surgical resection. Radiosurgery remains an important treatment modality and, when used promptly, can reverse neurological deficits, often for the remainder of a patients life. There is compelling evidence to suggest that aggressive local therapy (surgery or radiosurgery) for patients with a single brain metastasis produces superior survival and quality of life compared with treatment with whole brain radiotherapy alone. However, surgery should be restricted to the minority of patients for whom brain metastases represents the life-threatening site of their disease. For an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patient with a lesion smaller than 3 cm in diameter, radiosurgery is an excellent alternative to surgery. Although radiosurgery is a noninvasive procedure, the same selection criteria should be considered as for those patients undergoing surgical resection.