Medication-induced hyperprolactinemia

Incidentally discovered pituitary masses: pituitary incidentalomas

With the widespread use of computed tomography and MRI, the incidental discovery of pituitary incidentalomas is increasing in frequency. The most common cause of a pituitary mass is a pituitary adenoma (90% of all pituitary masses); however, the differential diagnosis remains extensive. The challenge is to distinguish those that can or will cause morbidity/mortality from those that will not. Opinions on approaching management of these lesions vary. This article will review current data regarding the prevalence, natural history and potential morbidity associated with this entity and describe an epidemiological approach based on four questions: does an incidental mass put the patient at increased risk for an adverse outcome? Can individuals with treatable syndromes be accurately diagnosed? Is the treatment of these syndromes more effective in presymptomatic patients? And do the beneficial effects of presymptomatic detection and treatment of these patients justify the costs incurred? We recommend the following approach: recognizing that one size does not fit all and that the approach should be tailored to the needs of the particular case. If the mass was discovered on a computed tomography, an enhanced MRI is recommended. Detailed history and physical examination should be carried out to look for signs of functional or 'subclinically' functional tumor. Size and structure should be assessed, especially proximity to the optic chiasm. Laboratory evaluation with a serum prolactin for small tumors is cost effective, other lab testing is indicated if metabolic problems are present. Care should be taken to assess for hypopituitarism, clinically and biochemically, if the mass is large, that is, more than 1 cm, visual field testing is also recommended. Note that the vast majority of patients with pituitary incidentalomas that are microadenomas die with them, not from them.

Adverse endocrine and metabolic effects of psychotropic drugs: selective clinical review

The article critically reviews selected, clinically significant, adverse endocrine and metabolic effects associated with psychotropic drug treatments, including hyperprolactinaemia, hyponatraemia, diabetes insipidus, hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, sexual dysfunction and virilization, weight loss, weight gain and metabolic syndrome (type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and hypertension). Such effects are prevalent and complex, but can be managed clinically when recognized. They encourage continued critical assessment of benefits versus risks of psychotropic drugs and underscore the importance of close coordination of psychiatric and general medical care to improve long-term health of psychiatric patients. Options for management of hyperprolactinaemia include lowering doses, switching to agents such as aripiprazole, clozapine or quetiapine, managing associated osteoporosis, carefully considering the use of dopamine receptor agonists and ruling out stress, oral contraceptive use and hypothyroidism as contributing factors. Disorders of water homeostasis may include syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH), managed by water restriction or slow replacement by hypertonic saline along with drug discontinuation. Safe management of diabetes insipidus, commonly associated with lithium, involves switching mood stabilizer and consideration of potassium-sparing diuretics. Clinical hypothyroidism may be a more useful marker than absolute cut-offs of hormone values, and may be associated with quetiapine, antidepressant and lithium use, and managed by thyroxine replacement. Hyper-parathyroidism requires comprehensive medical evaluation for occult tumours. Hypocalcaemia, along with multiple other psychiatric and medical causes, may result in decreased bone density and require evaluation and management. Strategies for reducing sexual dysfunction with psychotropics remain largely unsatisfactory. Finally, management strategies for obesity and metabolic syndrome are reviewed in light of the recent expert guidelines, including risk assessment and treatments, such as monoamine transport inhibitors, anticonvulsants and cannabinoid receptor antagonists, as well as lifestyle changes.

Hyperprolactinemia and possibly related development of prolactinoma during amisulpride treatment; three cases

Schizophrenia is a chronic and debilitating psychotic mental disorder that affects about 1% of the world's population. Antipsychotic drugs are the mainstay of treatment in schizophrenia. Hyperprolactinemia, which is a common side effect of typical antipsychotics, is also associated with the use of some of the newer atypical agents. Antipsychotics may enhance prolactinoma growth as manifested by an increase in serum prolactin concentration. Prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas possibly related with antipsychotics have been described in the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first series of cases showing a possible relation between pituitary adenomas and amisulpride treatment in patients with schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic medication in children and adolescents: a descriptive review of the effects on prolactin level and associated side effects

OBJECTIVE

This review reports the incidence of hyperprolactinemia, its relationship with genotype, and prolactin-related side effects in children and adolescents treated with antipsychotics.

METHOD

Data on prolactin levels were available for haloperidol, pimozide, risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, and quetiapine. Twenty-nine studies were selected after a literature search in the English Medline/Embase/Psychinfo/EBM databases (1965 to August, 2008).

RESULTS

All antipsychotics, except clozapine, ziprasidone, and quetiapine, increase the mean prolactin level from baseline values of 8.0 ng/mL to 25-28 ng/mL after 4 weeks of treatment (reference range 0-15 ng/mL). The most and best data are available for risperidone. Five risperidone studies (n = 577) show an increase of prolactin level from 7.8 ng/mL to 17.7 ng/mL after 1 year of treatment, and two risperidone studies (n = 60) show an increase from 7.4 ng/mL to 24.9 ng/mL after 2 years of treatment. Aggregated over all antipsychotics, prolactin-related side effects, such as gynecomastia, galactorrhea, irregular menses, and sexual dysfunction, were reported by 4.8% of the children and adolescents. No data are available on bone mineral density in relation to antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in children and adolescents. Prolactin levels may be influenced by the genetic differences that influence prolactin metabolism and D2 dopamine receptor density.

CONCLUSION

Persistent elevation of prolactin for periods up to 2 years has been documented in maintenance treatment with risperidone. Very limited long-term data of pimozide, olanzapine, and quetiapine prohibit drawing conclusions for these antipsychotics. Systematic long-term observational studies, including specific questionnaires as well as physical examination, are needed to investigate prolactin-related side effects of antipsychotic treatment in children and adolescents.

Melperone, an aytpical antipsychotic drug with clozapine-like effect on plasma prolactin: contrast with typical neuroleptics

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of melperone, a butyrophenone with atypical antipsychotic properties, on plasma prolactin (PRL) concentrations compared with clozapine and typical neuroleptics.

METHODS

Analysis of pre- and post-treatment PRL levels collected prospectively per protocol in a non-randomized study of 26 melperone-, 76 clozapine-, and 66 neuroleptic-treated patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Cross-sectional analysis of a larger sample of patients with PRL data was also performed.

RESULTS

For males, post-treatment PRL levels were significantly higher in the typical neuroleptic group compared with the melperone (p = 0.0001) and clozapine (p = 0.0001) groups, with no significant difference between clozapine and melperone. For females, post-treatment PRL levels were significantly higher in the melperone group as compared to the clozapine group (p = 0.004). There were too few typical neuroleptic-treated females to permit analysis of this sample. However, the cross-sectional analysis of PRL data confirmed the results for melperone- and clozapine-treated females, and showed higher PRL levels in typical neuroleptic-treated females as compared with those who received melperone and clozapine.

CONCLUSION

Melperone did not significantly increase PRL levels in male patients. However, melperone and typical neuroleptics caused increase in PRL levels in females. Further study of melperone's effects on PRL concentration is warranted.

Hyperprolactinemia-related adverse events associated with antipsychotic treatment in children and adolescents

PURPOSE

To characterize factors related to the development of hyperprolactinemia and the ensuing reproductive/sexual adverse events in children and adolescents treated with antipsychotic and other psychotropic agents, and the additional risk posed for those with comorbid obesity, metabolic, or endocrine disorders.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort design evaluating medical and pharmacy claims from South Carolina's Medicaid program was used to compare incidence rates for sexual/reproductive adverse events in 4140 children and adolescents who were newly prescribed one of six atypical or two conventional antipsychotic medications, and a random sample of 4500 children not treated with psychotropic medications, January 1998 to December 2005. Logistic and Cox Proportional Hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The treated cohort was not significantly more likely to evince hyperprolactinemia-related disorders than the control sample, but females and adolescents 13 and older were. Incident reproductive/sexual conditions were more likely for females (odds ratio [OR] = 9.52; confidence interval [CI] = 7.63-11.90), adolescents (OR = 3.91; CI = 3.25-4.70), those also taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (OR = 2.04; CI = 1.56-2.37) or valproic acid derivatives (OR = 1.29; CI = 1.03-1.64), and those with comorbid obesity/weight gain (OR = 1.92; CI = 1.56-2.37), metabolic (OR = 1.41; CI = 1.12-1.78), or endocrine disorders (OR = 2.76; CI = 1.98-3.84).

CONCLUSION

In this treated cohort, female adolescents exposed to SSRIs or valproic acid derivatives and those with comorbid obesity, metabolic, or endocrine disorders while taking antipsychotics were at higher risk of developing hyperprolactinemia and ensuing sexual/reproductive adverse events.

Diagnosis and treatment of prolactinomas

Prolactinomas account for approximately 40% of all pituitary adenomas. Hyperprolactinemia causes hypogonadism, infertility and galactorrhea. Macroprolactinomas may cause signs of local expansion, such as headache, visual field defects and paresis of oculomotor nerves during suprasellar and parasellar extensions. Compression of healthy pituitary tissue together with the blockade of the flow of hypothalamic released hormones to the pituitary by macroprolactinomas results in the development of hypopituitarism. The aim of treatment is restoration of hypogonadism and fertility in the microprolactinoma patients, as well as tumor shrinkage in macroprolactinoma patients. Primary therapy for prolactinomas is pharmacological treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs). However, surgical or radiation treatment is recommended for prolactinoma patients resistant or intolerant to DAs. In patients with long-term normoprolactinemia and significant tumor shrinkage, a trial of tapering and discontinuation of medical therapy is possible. After discontinuation of DAs, a long-term follow-up is necessary. In cases of recurrence displaying hyperprolactinemia and tumor enlargement, treatment must be resumed.

Use of common medications and breast cancer risk

Prescription and over-the-counter medications are widely used in the United States and many western countries. More than two-thirds of women ages >45 years, who are at greatest risk for breast cancer, take prescription medication. In light of the ubiquitous nature of medication use and the fact that breast cancer remains the most common cancer in women, research on the role of medication use in breast cancer etiology is warranted. We summarize the epidemiologic evidence on the association between breast cancer risk and use of common medications, including antibiotics, antidepressants, statins, antihypertensives, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Overall, there is little evidence that would implicate the use of antibiotics, antidepressants, statins, and antihypertensives in the etiology of breast cancer. Although several prospective studies and a randomized low-dose aspirin chemoprevention trial have not shown lower risk of breast cancer among aspirin users, most studies that have examined the potential chemoprotective effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have shown significant risk reductions for regular and prolonged use of these drugs. The existing literature on the role of medication use in breast carcinogenesis is complicated. Interpretation of the evidence is hampered due to major methodologic differences across studies, including exposure assessment, exposure classification, and adjustment for potential confounding variables. These differences largely stem from the fact that the majority of articles on this topic represent secondary data analyses from studies with inadequate information on exposure or confounders. Thus, future epidemiologic studies specifically designed to study these ubiquitous and biologically plausible exposures are warranted.

Estrogen and comprehension of metaphoric speech in women suffering from schizophrenia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The effects of estrogen on comprehension of metaphoric speech, word fluency, and verbal ability were investigated in women suffering from schizophrenia. The issue of estrogen-dependent neuropsychological performance could be highly relevant because women with schizophrenia frequently suffer from hypoestrogenism.

METHOD

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study using 17beta-estradiol for replacement therapy and as an adjunct to a naturalistic maintenance antipsychotic treatment was carried out over a period of 8 months. Nineteen women (mean age = 38.0 years, SD = 9.9 years) with schizophrenia were included in the study. Comprehension of metaphoric speech was measured by a lexical decision paradigm, word fluency, and verbal ability by a paper-and-pencil test.

RESULTS

Significant improvement was seen for the activation of metaphoric meaning during estrogen treatment (P = .013); in contrast, no difference was found for the activation of concrete meaning under this condition. Verbal ability and word fluency did not improve under estrogen replacement therapy either.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the very first study based on estrogen intervention instead of the physiological hormone changes to examine the estrogen effects on neuropsychological performance in women with schizophrenia. In addition, it is the first time that the effect of estrogen on metaphoric speech comprehension was investigated in this context. While in a previous study estrogen therapy as adjunct to a naturalistic maintenance treatment with antipsychotics did not show an effect on psychopathology measured by a rating scale, a significant effect of estrogen on the comprehension of metaphoric speech and/or concretism, a main feature of schizophrenic thought and language disturbance, was found in the present study. Because the improvement of formal thought disorders and language disturbances is crucial for social integration of patients with schizophrenia, the results may have implications for the treatment of these individuals.

Antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: likelihood to be helped or harmed, understanding proximal and distal benefits and risks

Benefit-risk decisions are the central part of the philosophy of evidence-based medicine. Although number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) can quantify differences between two antipsychotics in terms of benefits and risks for the treatment of schizophrenia, these benefits and risks can take on greatly differing degrees of importance or relevance depending on the subjective point of view of the patient and clinician, baseline risks, severity of the underlying illness, as well as the time horizon when these effects emerge. The metric of likelihood to be helped or harmed, the ratio NNH to NNT, can be helpful in quantifying the benefit:risk ratio, provided that the outcomes are carefully matched in terms of both importance to the clinician and the patient and whether they are proximal or distal. The examples provided are extensions to the initially published NNT and NNH analyses conducted by the first author.

Hyperprolactinaemia due to hypothalamic-pituitary disease or drug-induced in patients with erectile dysfunction

One hundred and sixty-five patients with erectile dysfunction were assessed at the Athens Medical Sex Institute: 60 men (36.4%) considered their condition as organic, 52 (31.5%) rated it as mostly psychogenic, 45 (27.2%) thought it could be of mixed aetiology and 8 (4.8%) could not comment at all as to the aetiology. Initial psychologic evaluation rated the condition in the majority of cases as psychogenic (130 patients, 84.8%). No psychologist considered the erectile dysfunction as purely (100%) organic. After the urological and endocrine evaluation, vascular disorder was considered in 30 patients (18.2%), endocrine dysfunction in 16 patients (9.7%) and psychogenic in 109 patients (66.1%). Sixteen of the above patients had definite hyperprolactinaemia, two had large-sized prolactinomas as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pituitary function tests. Four had nonfunctioning pituitary tumours, which was also based on MRI and pituitary tests. Four had small prolactin (PRL) adenomas. Drug-induced hyperprolactinaemia was suspected in six patients who used medications affecting PRL secretion and had no evidence of tumour on radiological evaluation. In conclusion, hyperprolactinaemia in men with erectile dysfunction needs to be evaluated before considering any other treatment.

Diagnosis and management of hyperprolactinemia: results of a Brazilian multicenter study with 1234 patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical and laboratorial features of 1234 patients with different etiologies of hyperprolactinemia, as well as the response of 388 patients with prolactinomas to dopamine agonists.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

A total of 1234 hyperprolactinemic patients from 10 Brazilian endocrine centers were enrolled in this retrospective study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

PRL measurement, thyroid function tests, and screening for macroprolactin were conducted.

RESULTS

Patients were subdivided as follows: 56.2% had prolactinomas, 14.5% drug-induced hyperprolactinemia, 9.3% macroprolactinemia, 6.6% non-functioning pituitary adenomas, 6.3% primary hypothyroidism, 3.6% idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and 3.2% acromegaly. Clinical manifestations were similar irrespective of the etiology of the hyperprolactinemia. The highest PRL levels were observed in patients with prolactinomas but there was a great overlap in PRL values between all groups. However, PRL>500 ng/ml allowed a clear distinction between prolactinomas and the other etiologies. Cabergoline (CAB) was more effective than bromocriptine (BCR) in normalizing PRL levels (81.9% vs 67.1%, p<0.0001) and in inducing significant tumor shrinkage and complete disappearance of tumor mass. Drug resistance was observed in 10% of patients treated with CAB and in 18.4% of those that used BCR (p=0.0006). Side-effects and intolerance were also more common in BCR treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Prolactinomas, drug induced hyperprolactinemia, and macroprolactinemia were the 3 most common causes of hyperprolactinemia. Although PRL levels could not reliably define the etiology of hyperprolactinemia, PRL values >500 ng/ml were exclusively seen in patients with prolactinomas. CAB was significantly more effective than BCR in terms of prolactin normalization, tumor shrinkage, and tolerability.

Hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas

Any process interfering with dopamine synthesis, its transport to the pituitary gland, or its action at the level of lactotroph dopamine receptors can cause hyperprolactinemia. As described in this article, considering the complexity of prolactin regulation, many factors could cause hyperprolactinemia, and hyperprolactinemia can have clinical effects not only on the reproductive axis. Once any drug effects are excluded, prolactinomas are the most common cause of hyperprolactinemia. The most frequent symptom is hypogonadism in both genders. Medical and surgical therapies generally have excellent results, and most prolactinomas are well controlled or even cured in some cases.

What can we learn from rodents about prolactin in humans?

Prolactin (PRL) is a 23-kDa protein hormone that binds to a single-span membrane receptor, a member of the cytokine receptor superfamily, and exerts its action via several interacting signaling pathways. PRL is a multifunctional hormone that affects multiple reproductive and metabolic functions and is also involved in tumorigenicity. In addition to being a classical pituitary hormone, PRL in humans is produced by many tissues throughout the body where it acts as a cytokine. The objective of this review is to compare and contrast multiple aspects of PRL, from structure to regulation, and from physiology to pathology in rats, mice, and humans. At each juncture, questions are raised whether, or to what extent, data from rodents are relevant to PRL homeostasis in humans. Most current knowledge on PRL has been obtained from studies with rats and, more recently, from the use of transgenic mice. Although this information is indispensable for understanding PRL in human health and disease, there is sufficient disparity in the control of the production, distribution, and physiological functions of PRL among these species to warrant careful and judicial extrapolation to humans.

Hyperprolactinemia

In several respects prolactin is unique among anterior pituitary hormones. The primary regulation of prolactin secretion is mediated through hypothalamic inhibition, and the diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia can be established without the use of stimulation or suppression tests. Documenting the presence of hyperprolactinemia is not difficult-the challenge is in identifying the cause of the hormone hypersecretion. With immunoradiometric assays falsely low levels of prolactin are occasionally seen in patients with macroadenomas and very high serum prolactin (the hook effect). Macroprolactin should be suspected when a patient with hyperprolactinemia does not present with typical clinical symptoms, and all hyperprolactinemic sera should be screened for macroprolactin. With prolactinomas, prolactin levels generally parallel tumor size. Prolactin secreting macroadenomas are typically associated with levels that exceed 250 microg/l and may exceed 1,000 microg/l. Large non-functioning adenomas also lead to hyperprolactinemia but levels virtually never exceed 94 microg/l. Acquired and isolated prolactin deficiency is rare.

Weight gain and metabolic issues of medicines used for bipolar disorder

Patients with bipolar disorder are at high risk of gaining weight and developing metabolic illnesses, and pharmacologic treatment for the disorder may significantly increase this risk. This paper reviews the literature on the metabolic consequences of the medications used in bipolar disorder and describes the possible strategies to prevent, monitor, and treat the common metabolic illnesses that patients with bipolar disorder may develop during treatment.

Clinical implications of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in patients with schizophrenia spectrum or bipolar spectrum disorders: recent developments and current perspectives

Hyperprolactinemia is increasingly studied as a frequent and potentially important consequence of antipsychotic medication treatment. Some individuals presenting with hyperprolactinemia remain asymptomatic, but others may exhibit a wide range of clinical symptoms resulting from either the direct effects of prolactin on body tissues (galactorrhea, gynecomastia) or endocrine-related secondary effects (sexual and reproductive dysfunction in the short term, and possibly the risk of tumorigenesis and osteoporosis in the longer term). Short-term side effects may negatively impact medication compliance, and long-term effects have the potential for serious health consequences. Antipsychotic medications have differing propensities to cause prolactin elevation. The first-generation antipsychotics, as well as the second-generation antipsychotic risperidone and its active metabolite paliperidone, have been shown to cause marked and sustained elevations in prolactin levels, whereas others of the second-generation antipsychotics appear to have little or no effect on prolactin levels or may decrease prolactin. A comprehensive overview of antipsychotics and hyperprolactinemia is presented together with a review of emerging evidence about the short- and long-term health risks of hyperprolactinemia.

Aripiprazole in the Treatment??of Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is generally a chronic and disabling mental illness. Pharmacological therapy, which is used for relief of acute psychotic episodes and prevention of subsequent relapse, is essential for the effective management of schizophrenia. In order to alleviate the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, all antipsychotic agents act on the dopaminergic system. However, strong, high-affinity dopamine D(2)-receptor blockade may also be responsible for debilitating extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and hyperprolactinaemia. Unlike conventional antipsychotic agents, atypical antipsychotics also exert activity at other receptors, and it is generally acknowledged that, compared with conventional antipsychotics, atypical agents are associated with a broader spectrum of clinical efficacy and are better tolerated. However, other adverse effects such as weight gain and metabolic changes are cause for concern with some atypical antipsychotics. The novel atypical antipsychotic agent aripiprazole is a partial agonist at D(2) receptors that has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating both the positive and the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and to be well tolerated, with a low propensity for EPS and no clinically significant weight gain, hyperprolactinaemia or corrected QT-interval prolongation. Aripiprazole thus provides clinicians with another treatment option, and in October 2005, schizophrenia experts participated in an expert consensus meeting that aimed to agree on a set of guidelines for best-practice use of aripiprazole in the acute and long-term management of schizophrenia in Italy. This report describes the outcome of the meeting. Our recommendations for dosage and administration of aripiprazole are in agreement with the manufacturer's prescribing information. Ideally, optimal dosing should be evaluated on an individual basis, taking into account patients' characteristics such as the presence or absence of agitation. Overall, in our experience, aripiprazole is generally a well accepted, well tolerated, safe and broadly effective first-line antipsychotic agent. Switching to aripiprazole from maintenance therapy with another antipsychotic also works well, provided the change is made gradually, involving tapering of the original medication.

Increase in clusterin-containing follicles in the adenohypophysis of drug abusers

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system in drug abusers may be affected due to disorders of the hypothalamic dopaminergic system. The present study investigated alterations in the adenohypophysis of middle-aged drug abusers (40-60 years of age), using clusterin-containing mixed cell-follicles as the indicator, in which clusterin (apolipoprotein J) is a multifunctional glycoprotein related to neurodegeneration. The paraffin-embedded adenohypophyses of methamphetamine and psychotropic drug abusers (n = 76) were compared with those of non-abusers (n = 82). The number of follicles was larger in drug abusers independent of the immediate cause of death, although the size was not significantly different. When cell types forming the follicles were immunohistochemically examined, drug abusers showed an increase of prolactin (PRL) cells and gonadotroph cells and a reciprocal decrease of growth hormone cells, suggesting hypofunction of dopaminergic neurons in the hypothalamus, while there was no change in the adrenocorticotropic hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone cells. These increases of the clusterin-containing follicles and PRL cells in the follicles may be related to the dysfunction of dopaminergic neurons in the hypothalamus of chronic drug abusers and may be useful for investigating drug abuse in forensic casework.

Drug Insight: prolactin-receptor antagonists, a novel approach to treatment of unresolved systemic and local hyperprolactinemia?

Prolactin is a polypeptide hormone whose major biological actions are related to normal lactation and reproduction. Abnormally high prolactin levels, referred to as hyperprolactinemia, can result in various reproductive disorders. Currently, therapeutic management of hyperprolactinemia relies on dopamine agonists, since dopamine is the primary physiological suppressor of pituitary prolactin production. Epidemiologic studies have shown that prolactin levels in the high-normal range, as well as medications that interfere with dopamine action (e.g. certain antipsychotic drugs), might correlate with increased breast cancer risk. In addition to circulating prolactin, it is now well established that prolactin is also produced locally within various tissues, including breast and prostate. Increasing evidence, mainly from animal studies at present, suggests that excess locally produced prolactin may promote the growth of breast and prostate tumors via an autocrine or paracrine mechanism. These findings have renewed the interest in finding alternative strategies to suppress prolactin actions when dopamine agonists are ineffective. Our studies of the relationship between prolactin structure and function have resulted in the development of pure prolactin-receptor antagonists. These molecules prevent endogenous prolactin from exerting its actions via a competitive mechanism for receptor binding. In this review, we discuss the possible future therapeutic utility of this novel class of compounds.

Review of the epidemiological literature on antidepressant use and breast cancer risk

Based on evidence that antidepressants increase levels of prolactin and may promote the growth of mammary tumor cells, there has been concern that the use of these drugs may increase the risk of breast cancer. This article reviews the epidemiological evidence on the relationship between breast cancer risk and the use of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the tricyclic antidepressants and other antidepressants. Overall, the evidence does not support the hypothesis that the use of antidepressants increases the risk of breast cancer. There is a dearth of data on long-term selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use. Since these drugs are commonly used, it is prudent public health policy to monitor breast cancer incidence among women using this class of drug for long durations.

Evaluation and management of pituitary incidentalomas--revisiting an acquaintance

Incidentalomas of the pituitary gland have been described with increasing frequency, paralleling the advances in diagnostic imaging modalities. Several approaches have been proposed in order to appropriately evaluate their impact on patients, some recommending extensive investigations, while others advocate a more focused and potentially more cost-effective approach. The first part of this article will review current data about the prevalence, natural history and potential morbidity associated with these tumors. The second part will focus on imaging and hormonal evaluation of the incidental mass and suggest an updated management algorithm.

Guidelines of the Pituitary Society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas

In June 2005, an ad hoc Expert Committee formed by the Pituitary Society convened during the 9th International Pituitary Congress in San Diego, California. Members of this committee consisted of invited international experts in the field, and included endocrinologists and neurosurgeons with recognized expertise in the management of prolactinomas. Discussions were held that included all interested participants to the Congress and resulted in formulation of these guidelines, which represent the current recommendations on the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas based upon comprehensive analysis and synthesis of all available data.

Effects of Raloxifene on Circulating Prolactin and Estradiol Levels in Premenopausal Women at High Risk for Developing Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Prolactin is a peptide hormone necessary for normal breast development that may contribute to breast tumorigenesis. Estrogen is a significant positive regulator of prolactin synthesis; therefore, raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator under study as a breast cancer prevention agent, may modulate both estradiol and prolactin levels by inhibiting estradiol from binding to its receptor.

METHODS

Premenopausal women at increased risk for invasive breast cancer participated in a pilot chemoprevention trial and were given 60 mg raloxifene daily for 24 months. Fasting serum samples collected at baseline and after 12 months on drug were used to measure circulating prolactin, estradiol, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels.

RESULTS

Of the 27 subjects who completed 12 months of raloxifene, 23 had paired prolactin samples, and 20 had paired estradiol and SHBG samples. Prolactin levels did not significantly change with raloxifene treatment, but SHBG levels increased (mean change = 7.3 nmol/L; P = 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-10.7). Estradiol (mean change = 42 pg/mL; P = 0.048; 95% confidence interval, 1-84 pg/mL) levels were elevated when comparing 15 of the 20 women with paired estradiol measurements who also had both of these samples taken during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

This report is the first to examine the long-term effects of raloxifene on prolactin, estradiol, and SHBG levels in premenopausal women who are also at increased risk for developing invasive breast cancer. Raloxifene had no significant effect on prolactin levels but did increase estradiol and SHBG measurements.