Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial

A phase II study of pazopanib in patients with recurrent or metastatic invasive breast carcinoma: a trial of the Princess Margaret Hospital phase II consortium

PURPOSE

Angiogenesis is an important hallmark of breast cancer growth and progression. Pazopanib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and KIT, has activity across a range of solid tumors. We evaluated the activity of single-agent pazopanib in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with recurrent breast cancer or MBC, treated with up to two prior lines of chemotherapy, were eligible to receive pazopanib, 800 mg daily until progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included time to progression, the stable disease rate, and toxicity. Using a two-stage design, confirmed response in three of 18 patients was required to proceed to stage 2.

RESULTS

Twenty evaluable patients were treated, with a median age of 56 years; 70% were estrogen receptor positive, all were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative. The majority had one or two prior lines of chemotherapy. One patient (5%) had a partial response, 11 (55%) had stable disease (SD) [four (20%) with SD > or = 6 months], and seven (35%) had progressive disease as their best response. One (5%) was not evaluable. The median time to progression was 5.3 months. Pazopanib did not cause significant severe toxicity aside from grade 3-4 transaminitis, hypertension, and neutropenia in three patients each (14% each) and grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage in one patient (5%).

CONCLUSION

Pazopanib provides disease stability in advanced breast cancer. The activity seen is comparable with that of other antiangiogenic agents in this setting. Pazopanib may be of interest for future studies in breast cancer, including in combination with other systemic agents.

Molecular targeted therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives

Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis, is the first drug found to prolong survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This advance has shifted the paradigm of systemic treatment for HCC toward molecular targeted therapy (MTT). However, the disease-stabilizing effect of VEGF signaling-targeted MTT normally lasts only for a few months, suggesting a rapid emergence of resistance in the majority of patients. To overcome the resistance to VEGF signaling-targeted MTT, strategies incorporating inhibition of either compensatory pro-angiogenic pathways or recruitment of bone marrow-derived circulating endothelial progenitors, as well as suppression of other oncogenic pathways, are currently being investigated. The combination of multiple molecular targeted agents or the use of multi-target agents may enhance the efficacy at the expense of increased toxicities. To facilitate the development of MTT for HCC, current methodologies for pharmacodynamic assessment, patient selection and target identification need to be improved. Patient selection according to the individual molecular signature of the tumor and correlative biomarker studies are encouraged while planning a clinical trial of novel MTT.

Long-term safety of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: follow-up of patients from phase III TARGET

BACKGROUND

The phase III Treatment Approaches in Renal cancer Global Evaluation Trial (TARGET) indicated that sorafenib is effective and well tolerated in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients. However, few data have been published on the safety of long-term sorafenib treatment. A retrospective subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in TARGET who received treatment for >1 year.

METHODS

The present subgroup analysis (based on the September 2006 database with updated safety analysis) evaluated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in all patients in the sorafenib arm of TARGET who were treated for >1 year. The assessments included the overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The patients remained on therapy post-progression at the discretion of the investigator.

RESULTS

In TARGET, 169 patients received treatment with sorafenib for >1 year. The median PFS of patients in this subpopulation was 10.9 months from the date of randomisation, with a DCR of 92%. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events of any grade were diarrhoea (74%), rash/desquamation (51%), hand-foot skin reaction (49%), alopecia (39%), and fatigue (38%). Adverse events were mild to moderate, and presented early in the course of the treatment; there were no unexpected toxicities associated with the long-term administration of sorafenib.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in TARGET who received treatment for >1 year indicate that long-term treatment with sorafenib is associated with continued efficacy and a well-tolerated safety profile.

Emerging molecular classification in renal cell carcinoma: implications for drug development

In the past decade, progress has been made in the development of targeted therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, as multiple therapeutic choices become available to clinicians, we currently lack effective indicators that allow physicians to choose the best treatment option for specific patients. For approved targeted therapies, potential molecules that could indicate drug effectiveness in a specific tumor follow naturally from both the therapeutic mechanism and the previously elucidated tumor biology. However, in advanced RCC, the use of these molecules as biomarkers for treatment selection has shown equivocal results and requires further investigation. In addition to looking at specific molecular targets, subclassification of tumors based on their molecular characteristics may also allow stratification of patients based on therapeutic benefits, providing information for treatment selection. Furthermore, the continued development of such tumor classification schemes will hopefully uncover other molecular targets that warrant development as future RCC therapies. The use of molecular classification of patients' tumors for treatment selection will provide the opportunity to increase the effectiveness of currently available therapies for advanced RCC and to judiciously pursue promising options for future RCC therapies.

Targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma: understanding their impact on survival

Within the past 5 years, the United States Food and Drug Administration have approved six targeted agents for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). While this offers great potential to patients afflicted with this disease, oncologists are faced with the challenge of applying each agent in the appropriate clinical setting. Doing so requires an intricate understanding of the pivotal trials evaluating these agents. Herein, we have provided a detailed analysis of the study design employed in these trials. Use of appropriate comparator arms for targeted therapies (i.e., interferon-alpha or placebo) is addressed. Furthermore, we discuss the relative merits of using progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) as a primary endpoint-importantly, the two endpoints may not be precisely correlated. Strategies to appropriately interpret OS in the context of post-study therapies and crossover designs are described. Ultimately, head-to-head trials comparing targeted therapies are necessary to resolve clinical equipoise. Several ongoing efforts juxtaposing the approved agents for mRCC are discussed.

Targeted therapies in renal cell cancer: recent developments in imaging

Targeted therapy has significantly improved the perspectives of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Frequently, these new molecules cause disease stabilization rather than substantial tumor regression. As treatment options expand with the growing number of targeted agents, there is an increasing need for surrogate markers to early assess tumor response. Here, we review the currently available imaging techniques and response evaluation criteria for the assessment of tumor response in mRCC patients. For computed tomography (CT), different criteria are discussed including the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the Choi criteria, the modified Choi criteria, and the size and attenuation CT (SACT) criteria. Functional imaging modalities are discussed, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US), and positron emission tomography (PET).

(Pre-)clinical pharmacology and activity of pazopanib, a novel multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor

Pazopanib is a recently approved, novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically designed to impair angiogenesis by abrogating vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) to exert its function. Pazopanib inhibits VEGF-induced endothelial cell proliferation in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo and demonstrates antitumor activity in mouse models. Furthermore, the pazopanib concentration resulting in maximal inhibition of VEGFR-2 phosphorylation in vivo was in line with the steady-state concentration required to inhibit growth of tumor xenografts, suggesting that pazopanib's mechanism of action is indeed through VEGFR-2 inhibition. In a phase I trial, a generally well-tolerated dose was identified at which the majority of patients achieved pazopanib plasma concentrations above the concentration required for maximal in vivo inhibition of VEGFR-2 phosphorylation in preclinical models. Administered as monotherapy, evidence of antitumor activity was observed in phase II studies in several tumor types, including soft tissue sarcoma, renal cell cancer (RCC), ovarian cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval for treatment with pazopanib in patients with RCC based on the longer progression-free survival time observed with this agent in a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. This review summarizes the preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pazopanib, as well as data on clinical activity, that ultimately resulted in its recent approval.

Defining risk status in the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Targeted agents, such as sunitinib, have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and are now well-established treatment options for these patients. Several pre-treatment clinical features have been associated with shorter survival, and identification of these prognostic factors has led to the development of risk models, such as the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) model. These risk models can be used to stratify patients according to their risk status. The risk status of patients can have important implications for their response to different treatment strategies; therefore, risk models enable treatment to be tailored for individual patients. In the MSKCC model, patients are stratified into one of three groups according to defined risk factors: favourable, intermediate or poor risk. The MSKCC model is well established and has been used to stratify patients in many clinical studies with targeted agents. However, some studies have used modified criteria which can make it difficult to make direct comparisons between studies. This can have important implications when selecting the most appropriate treatment for individual patients. In this review the rationale for establishing risk status is discussed and the practical application of risk models to aid the selection of appropriate first-line treatments is examined. Additionally, the evidence supporting the use of targeted agents in patients with mRCC according to their risk status is reviewed.

Pazopanib-induced hyperbilirubinemia is associated with Gilbert's syndrome UGT1A1 polymorphism

BACKGROUND

Pazopanib has shown clinical activity against multiple tumour types and is generally well tolerated. However, isolated elevations in transaminases and bilirubin have been observed. This study examined polymorphisms in molecules involved in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of pazopanib and their association with hepatic dysfunction.

METHODS

Twenty-eight polymorphisms in 11 genes were evaluated in pazopanib-treated renal cell carcinoma patients. An exploratory analysis was conducted in 116 patients from a phase II study; a replication study was conducted in 130 patients from a phase III study.

RESULTS

No polymorphisms were associated with alanine aminotransferase elevation. The Gilbert's uridine-diphosphoglucuronate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) TA-repeat polymorphism was significantly associated with pazopanib-induced hyperbilirubinemia in the phase II study. This association was replicated in the phase III study (P<0.01). Patients with TA6/TA6, TA6/TA7, and TA7/TA7 genotypes experienced median bilirubin increases of 0.31, 0.37, and 0.71 x upper limit of the normal range (ULN), respectively. Of the 38 patients with hyperbilirubinemia (> or = 1.5 x ULN), 32 (84%) were either TA7 homozygotes (n=18) or TA7 heterozygotes (n=14). For TA7 homozygotes, the odds ratio (95% CI) for developing hyperbilirubinemia was 13.1 (5.3-32.2) compared with other genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

The UGT1A1 polymorphism is frequently associated with pazopanib-induced hyperbilirubinemia. These data suggest that some instances of isolated hyperbilirubinemia in pazopanib-treated patients are benign manifestations of Gilbert's syndrome, thus supporting continuation of pazopanib monotherapy in this setting.

Plasma cytokine and angiogenic factor profiling identifies markers associated with tumor shrinkage in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with pazopanib

There is an unmet need for pharmacodynamic and predictive biomarkers for antiangiogenic agents. Recent studies have shown that soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (sVEGFR2), VEGF, and several other soluble factors may be modulated by VEGF pathway inhibitors. We conducted a broad profiling of cytokine and angiogenic factors (CAF) to investigate the relationship between baseline CAF levels, CAF changes during treatment, and tumor shrinkage in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with pazopanib, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting VEGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-kit. Plasma samples were collected before treatment and on the last day of therapy from 33 patients with early-stage NSCLC participating in a single-arm phase II trial. Levels of 31 CAFs were measured by suspension bead multiplex assays or ELISA and correlated with change in tumor volume. Pazopanib therapy was associated with significant changes of eight CAFs; sVEGFR2 showed the largest decrease, whereas placental growth factor underwent the largest increase. Increases were also observed in stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha, IP-10, cutaneous T-cell-attracting chemokine, monokine induced by IFN-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, and IFN-alpha. Posttreatment changes in plasma sVEGFR2 and interleukin (IL)-4 significantly correlated with tumor shrinkage. Baseline levels of 11 CAFs significantly correlated with tumor shrinkage, with IL-12 showing the strongest association. Using multivariate classification, a baseline CAF signature consisting of hepatocyte growth factor and IL-12 was associated with tumor response to pazopanib and identified responding patients with 81% accuracy. These data suggest that CAF profiling may be useful for identifying patients likely to benefit from pazopanib, and merit further investigation in clinical trials.

Relation between microRNA expression and progression and prognosis of gastric cancer: a microRNA expression analysis

BACKGROUND

Analyses of microRNA expression profiles have shown that many microRNAs are expressed aberrantly and correlate with tumorigenesis, progression, and prognosis of various haematological and solid tumours. We aimed to assess the relation between microRNA expression and progression and prognosis of gastric cancer.

METHODS

353 gastric samples from two independent subsets of patients from Japan were analysed by microRNA microarray. MicroRNA expression patterns were compared between non-tumour mucosa and cancer samples, graded by diffuse and intestinal histological types and by progression-related factors (eg, depth of invasion, metastasis, and stage). Disease outcome was calculated by multivariable regression analysis to establish whether microRNAs are independent prognostic factors.

FINDINGS

In 160 paired samples of non-tumour mucosa and cancer, 22 microRNAs were upregulated and 13 were downregulated in gastric cancer; 292 (83%) samples were distinguished correctly by this signature. The two histological subtypes of gastric cancer showed different microRNA signatures: eight microRNAs were upregulated in diffuse-type and four in intestinal-type cancer. In the progression-related signature, miR-125b, miR-199a, and miR-100 were the most important microRNAs involved. Low expression of let-7g (hazard ratio 2.6 [95% CI 1.3-4.9]) and miR-433 (2.1 [1.1-3.9]) and high expression of miR-214 (2.4 [1.2-4.5]) were associated with unfavourable outcome in overall survival independent of clinical covariates, including depth of invasion, lymph-node metastasis, and stage.

INTERPRETATION

MicroRNAs are expressed differentially in gastric cancers, and histological subtypes are characterised by specific microRNA signatures. Unique microRNAs are associated with progression and prognosis of gastric cancer.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute.

Targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Advanced renal cell carcinoma has been resistant to drug therapy of different types and new types of drug therapy are needed. Targeted agents inhibit known molecular pathways involved in cellular proliferation and neoangiogenesis, the induction by the tumour of host microvascular networks. Angiogenesis is of special interest in the clear cell histologic subtype of renal cancer because of its vascularity and constitutively activated hypoxia-inducible path in the majority of tumours.

OBJECTIVES

1) To provide a systematic review of studies testing targeted agents.2) To identify the type and degree of clinical benefit, if any, of targeted agents over the prior standard of care, particularly any impact on overall survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

1) Electronic search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.2) Hand search of international cancer meeting abstract and other sources specified in the protocol.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled studies of targeted agents in patients with advanced renal cell cancer reporting major remission rate or overall survival by allocation. Progression-free survival (PFS) was adopted as an additional outcome because PFS was a commonly chosen primary outcome, and because several pivotal studies allowed crossover from the control to the investigational arm after closure to accrual thereby making overall survival a problematic endpoint.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Nineteen fully eligible studies tested ten different targeted agents (Table 04). One additional study was excluded because no outcome data by allocation have been reported (Hutson 2007). For purposes of comparison, the studies were divided into three groups: Group 1 studies compared different doses of the same agents; Group 2 studies examined the impact of targeted agents in patients who had received prior cytokine or other systemic therapy; and Group 3 studies tested targeted agents in systemically naive patients, either against standard interferon-alfa or against another control therapy. Meta-analysis was not utilized because there were very few situations where the same agents had been tested in the same group in more than one study.

MAIN RESULTS

In systemically untreated patients in studies using subcutaneous interferon-alfa as control therapy, the major findings were: 1) An improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated only with the use of weekly intravenous temsirolimus in patients with unselected renal cancer histology and adverse prognostic features (median survival 10.9 months versus 7.3 months for temsirolimus or interferon-alfa respectively, HR 0.73, P = 0.008 log rank, Hudes 2007). However, the chance of major remission was low and not improved with temsirolimus. 2) In patients with mostly good or intermediate prognostic risk with clear cell renal cancer, oral sunitinib improves the chance of major remission, the probability of symptomatic improvement, and freedom from disease progression (Motzer 2007); in a similar setting, the addition of biweekly intravenous bevacizumab to interferon-alfa also improved the chance of major remission and prolonged progression-free survival (Escudier 2007b); overall survival had not changed at the time of interim reporting of either study. In patients with clear cell renal cancers who had failed prior cytokine therapy, oral sorafenib gives a better quality of life than placebo as well as improved chance of being free of disease progression; overall survival may have improved but is hard to evaluate because of crossover of placebo-assigned patients after the study closed to accrual (Escudier 2007a).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on less than a decade of experience, some targeted agents with specified molecular targets have demonstrated clinically useful benefits over the previous standard of care for patients with advanced renal cancer. Much more research is required to fully establish the role of targeted agents in this condition.