Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial

Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes with and without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Large Ischemic Cores Identified with CT or MRI

Background Whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) provides additional benefits in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and a large infarct core (LIC) remains unclear. Purpose To examine whether treatment with IVT before EVT is beneficial in patients with LIC identified with CT or MRI (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score 0-5). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients diagnosed with AIS due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) and LIC treated with EVT who were enrolled in the ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) Registry in France between January 2015 and January 2022. The primary outcome measure was a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-3) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (mRS score 0-2) at 90 days, improvement in degree of disability (ordinal shift in mRS score toward a better outcome) at 90 days, early neurologic improvement at 24 hours, and successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or higher). Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 24 hours and mortality at 90 days. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted analysis was used to assess the treatment effect of IVT adjusted for baseline variables. Results Of 1408 patients (mean age, 68.3 years ± 15.4 [SD]; 789 men), 654 (46.4%) were treated with IVT prior to EVT. In the IPTW-adjusted data set, IVT plus EVT was associated with a higher rate of favorable outcome at 90 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.24 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.46]; P = .01), functional independence at 90 days (OR, 1.47 [95% CI: 1.22, 1.77]; P < .001), improvement in degree of disability at 90 days (common OR, 1.30 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.49]; P < .001), early neurologic improvement (OR, 1.26 [95% CI: 1.07, 1.49]; P = .005), and successful reperfusion (OR, 1.43 [95% CI: 1.14, 1.79]; P = .002) than EVT alone. Rates of brain hemorrhage within 24 hours and mortality at 90 days were similar between groups. Conclusion In patients with AIS due to LVO with LIC identified with CT or MRI, treatment with IVT before EVT appeared to provide a clinical benefit over EVT alone. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03776877 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kallmes and Rabinstein in this issue.

Intracranial hemorrhage in large vessel occlusion patients receiving endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous alteplase: a secondary analysis of the DIRECT-MT trial

BACKGROUND

Alteplase before thrombectomy for patients with large vessel occlusion stroke raises concerns regarding an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), but the details of this relationship are not well understood.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of the DIRECT-MT trial. ICH and its subtypes were independently reviewed and classified according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. The effects of alteplase before thrombectomy on ICH and ICH subtypes occurrence were evaluated using logistic regression. Clinical and imaging characteristics that may modify these effects were exploratorily tested.

RESULTS

Among 591 patients, any ICH occurred in 254 (43.0%), including hemorrhagic infarction type 1 in 12 (2.1%), hemorrhagic infarction type 2 in 127 (21.7%), parenchymal hematoma type 1 in 34 (5.8%), parenchymal hematoma type 2 in 50 (8.6%), and other hemorrhage types (3a-3c) in 24 (4.1%). Similar ICH frequencies were observed with combined alteplase and thrombectomy versus thrombectomy only (134/292 (45.9%) vs 120/299 (40.1%); OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.75, P=0.16), but patients treated with alteplase had a higher parenchymal hematoma rate (51/287 (17.8%) vs 33/297 (11.1%); OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.85, P=0.024). In the adjusted model, difference in parenchymal hematoma occurrence between groups remained significant (adjusted OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.92, P=0.049). Patients with history of diabetes (Pinteraction=0.048), hypertension (Pinteraction=0.02), antiplatelet therapy (Pinteraction=0.02), anticoagulation therapy (Pinteraction=0.04), and statin administration (Pinteraction=0.02) harbored a higher ICH rate when they received combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that in the DIRECT-MT trial, alteplase did not increase overall ICH for large vessel occlusion patients treated with thrombectomy, but it increased the parenchymal hematoma rate.

Value of intravenous thrombolysis in endovascular treatment for large-vessel anterior circulation stroke: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis is recommended before endovascular treatment, but its value has been questioned in patients who are admitted directly to centres capable of endovascular treatment. Existing randomised controlled trials have indicated non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone or have been statistically inconclusive. We formed the Improving Reperfusion Strategies in Acute Ischaemic Stroke collaboration to assess non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone versus intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to establish non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone versus intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment. We searched PubMed and MEDLINE with the terms "stroke", "endovascular treatment", "intravenous thrombolysis", and synonyms for articles published from database inception to March 9, 2023. We included randomised controlled trials on the topic of interest, without language restrictions. Authors of the identified trials agreed to take part, and individual participant data were provided by the principal investigators of the respective trials and collated centrally by the collaborators. Our primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone was assessed using a lower boundary of 0·82 for the 95% CI around the adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) for shift towards improved outcome (analogous to 5% absolute difference in functional independence) with ordinal regression. We used mixed-effects models for all analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023411986.

FINDINGS

We identified 1081 studies, and six studies (n=2313; 1153 participants randomly assigned to receive endovascular treatment alone and 1160 randomly assigned to receive intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment) were eligible for analysis. The risk of bias of the included studies was low to moderate. Variability between studies was small, and mainly related to the choice and dose of the thrombolytic drug and country of execution. The median mRS score at 90 days was 3 (IQR 1-5) for participants who received endovascular treatment alone and 2 (1-4) for participants who received intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment (acOR 0·89, 95% CI 0·76-1·04). Any intracranial haemorrhage (0·82, 0·68-0·99) occurred less frequently with endovascular treatment alone than with intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and mortality rates did not differ significantly.

INTERPRETATION

We did not establish non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment in patients presenting directly at endovascular treatment centres. Further research could focus on cost-effectiveness analysis and on individualised decisions when patient characteristics, medication shortages, or delays are expected to offset a potential benefit of administering intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular treatment.

FUNDING

Stryker and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam.

Admission blood pressure and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase and endovascular treatment versus endovascular treatment alone: A MR CLEAN-NO IV substudy

INTRODUCTION

High systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with poor functional outcome. We analysed whether the association of SBP with outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT) is modified by prior intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a post-hoc analysis of MR CLEAN-NO IV, a randomised trial of IVT with alteplase followed by EVT versus EVT alone, within 4.5 h from stroke onset. SBP was recorded on hospital admission. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and secondary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) and successful reperfusion (eTICI 2b-3), analysed with (ordinal) logistic regression. Estimates were calculated per 10 mmHg change in SBP. We assessed whether IVT modified the associations of SBP with these outcomes using multiplicative interaction terms.

RESULTS

Of 539 randomised patients, 266 received IVT. The association of SBP with mRS score was J-shaped, with an inflection point at 150 mmHg. Using 150 mmHg as a reference point, SBPs higher than 150 mmHg were associated with poor functional outcome (acOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09-1.38), but lower SBPs were not (acOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.99-1.30). Higher SBP was not associated with the risk of sICH (aOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.93-1.27) nor with the probability of successful reperfusion (aOR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91-1.10). Our main result was that we found no effect modification by IVT (p-values for interaction, mRS = 0.94; sICH = 0.26; successful reperfusion = 0.58).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

There was no effect modification of IVT with SBP for any of the clinical outcomes. Therefore, the level of SBP (if ⩽185/110 mmHg) should not guide IVT decisions in patients otherwise eligible for both IVT and EVT within the 4.5-h time window.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN80619088, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN80619088.

Clinical evidence comparing bridging and direct endovascular thrombectomy: progress and controversies

Clinical evidence comparing bridging endovascular thrombectomy (bEVT) with intravenous thrombolysis and direct endovascular thrombectomy (dEVT) without thrombolysis for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) presented directly to an EVT-capable center is overwhelming but inconsistent. This study aimed to analyze the progress and controversies in clinical evidence based on current meta-analyses. Three databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched. Relevant data were extracted and reviewed from the pooled studies. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review (AMSTAR-2) was used for quality assessment. Twenty-five meta-analyses were finally included. There were 56% (14/25) from Asian countries, 20% (5/25) from North America, and 24% (6/25) from Europe. The majority (72%, 18/25) of evidence arose in a short period from 2020 to 2022 with the serial publication of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among the 25 meta-analyses, 11 pooled at least three RCTs but there is substantial overlap among seven (five recruited the same four RCTs solely and two recruited the same three RCTs solely). Meanwhile, quality rating based on AMSTAR-2 showed 16 'high' rated studies (64%). For functional independence, 40% (10/25) of studies favored bEVT and 60% showed neutral results. For symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, most studies (82.6%, 19/23) showed no significant difference. Non-RCT studies contributed to evidence favoring bEVT. Current RCTs provide an update of clinical evidence comparing bEVT and dEVT. However, they simultaneously contribute to an unnecessary overlap among studies. Contemporary observational studies demonstrated different but possibly confounded evidence. Thus, this issue still requires more clinical evidence under standard procedures.

Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in patients with tandem lesion in the anterior circulation: analysis from the METRICS study

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior circulation tandem lesion (TL) remains a technical and clinical challenge for endovascular treatment (EVT). Conflicting results from observational studies and missing evidence from the randomized trials led us to report a recent real-world multicenter clinical experience and evaluate possible predictors of good outcome after EVT.

METHODS

We analyzed all AIS patients with TL enrolled in the prospective national study METRICS (Mechanical Thrombectomy Quality Indicators Study in Czech Stroke Centers). A good 3-month clinical outcome was scored as 0-2 points in modified Rankin Scale (mRS), achieved recanalization using the Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) according to the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) criteria.

RESULTS

Of 1178 patients enrolled in METRICS, 194 (19.2%) (59.8% males, mean age 68.7±11.5 years) were treated for TL. They did not differ in mRS 0-2 (48.7% vs 46.7%; p=0.616), mortality (17.3% vs 22.7%; p=0.103) and sICH (4.7% vs 5.1%; p=0.809) from those with single occlusion (SO). More TL patients with prior intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) reached TICI 3 (70.3% vs 50.8%; p=0.012) and mRS 0-2 (55.4% vs 34.4%; p=0.007) than those without IVT. No difference was found in the rate of sICH (6.2% vs 1.6%; p=0.276). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed prior IVT as a predictor of mRS 0-2 after adjustment for potential confounders (OR 3.818, 95% CI 1.614 to 9.030, p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with TL did not differ from those with SO in outcomes after EVT. TL patients with prior IVT had more complete recanalization and mRS 0-2 and IVT was found to be a predictor of good outcome after EVT.

Time to treatment with bridging intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment:subanalysis of the randomized controlled SWIFT-DIRECT trial

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that treatment delays might be an effect modifier regarding risks and benefits of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

METHODS

We used the dataset of the SWIFT-DIRECT trial, which randomized 408 patients to IVT+MT or MT alone. Potential interactions between assignment to IVT+MT and expected time from onset-to-needle (OTN) as well as expected time from door-to-needle (DTN) were included in regression models. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included mRS shift, mortality, recanalization rates, and (symptomatic) intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours.

RESULTS

We included 408 patients (IVT+MT 207, MT 201, median age 72 years (IQR 64-81), 209 (51.2%) female). The expected median OTN and DTN were 142 min and 54 min in the IVT+MT group and 129 min and 51 min in the MT alone group. Overall, there was no significant interaction between OTN and bridging IVT assignment regarding either the functional (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.30) and safety outcomes or the recanalization rates. Analysis of in-hospital delays showed no significant interaction between DTN and bridging IVT assignment regarding the dichotomized functional outcome (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.62), but the shift and mortality analyses suggested a greater benefit of IVT when in-hospital delays were short.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that the effect of bridging IVT on functional independence is modified by overall or in-hospital treatment delays. Considering its low power, this subgroup analysis could have missed a clinically important effect, and exploratory analysis of secondary clinical outcomes indicated a potentially favorable effect of IVT with shorter in-hospital delays. Heterogeneity of the IVT effect size before MT should be further analyzed in individual patient meta-analysis of comparable trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03192332.

Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Thrombolytics in Basilar Artery Occlusion

OBJECTIVE

Two randomized trials demonstrated the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients suffering from a stroke due to a basilar artery occlusion (BAO). However, intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) use before EVT was low in these trials, questioning the added value of this treatment in this setting. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of EVT alone compared to IVT + EVT in stroke patients with a BAO.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry, a prospective, observational, multicenter study of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT in 21 centers in France between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. We included patients with BAO and/or intracranial vertebral artery occlusion and compared patients treated with EVT alone versus IVT + EVT after propensity score (PS) matching. Variables selected for the PS were pre-stroke mRS, dyslipidemia, diabetes, anticoagulation, admission mode, baseline NIHSS and ASPECTS, type of anesthesia, and time from symptom onset to puncture. Efficacy outcomes were good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3) and functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages and all-cause mortality at 90 days.

RESULTS

Among 385 patients, 243 (134 EVT alone and 109 IVT + EVT) were included after PS matching. There was no difference between EVT alone and IVT + EVT regarding good functional outcome (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] labeling = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-2.37, p = 0.45) and functional independence (aOR = 1.50, 95% CI, 0.79-2.85, p = 0.21). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause mortality were also similar between the two groups (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.10-1.79, p = 0.24 and aOR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.29-1.10, p = 0.09, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

In this PS matching analysis, EVT alone seemed to lead to similar neurological recovery than IVT + EVT, with comparable safety profile. However, given our sample size and the observational nature of this study, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:596-604.

Influence of time metrics on the treatment effect of intravenous alteplase prior to endovascular treatment in MR CLEAN-NO IV

BACKGROUND

We assessed whether the treatment effect of intravenous alteplase (IVT) prior to endovascular treatment (EVT) on functional outcome is modified by time metrics.

METHODS

We used data from all patients included in MR CLEAN-NO IV, a randomized trial of IVT followed by EVT versus EVT alone in patients who presented directly to EVT-capable hospitals. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. We used ordinal regression with a multiplicative interaction term to assess if the effect of IVT is modified by onset-to-randomization (OTR), onset-to-IV-needle (OTN), door-to-groin (DTG) or needle-to-groin (NTG) times. Secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction Scale 2b-3) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

In 539 included patients (266 allocated to IVT+EVT and 273 to EVT alone), median workflow times were OTR: 93 (IQR 71-145) min; OTN: 98 (IQR 75-156) min; DTG: 64 (IQR 51-78) min; and NTG: 28 (IQR 20-41) min. There was a significant association between worse outcomes and longer time intervals for all metrics except NTG. We found no interaction between any of the time metrics and IVT for the effect on functional outcome (p values for interaction: OTR=0.40, OTN=0.39, DTG=0.61, NTG=0.56). We also did not observe any significant interaction for successful reperfusion or sICH.

CONCLUSION

In MR CLEAN-NO IV, the effect of IVT prior to EVT was not modified by OTR, OTN, DTG or NTG times. Our results do not support the use of these metrics to guide IVT treatment decisions prior to EVT in comprehensive stroke centres.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN80619088.

Differences in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke on weekdays versus nights/ weekends in a Japanese primary stroke core center

OBJECTIVE

The term "weekend effect" refers to an increase in the mortality rate for hospitalizations occurring on weekends versus weekdays. In this study, we investigated whether such an effect exists in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (currently the standard treatment for this condition) at a single center in Japan.

METHODS

We surveyed 151 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (75 and 76 patients were treated during daytime and nighttime, respectively) from January 2019 to June 2021. The items evaluated in this analysis were the rate of modified Rankin Scale ≤2 or prestroke scale, mortality, and procedural treatment time.

RESULTS

The rates of modified Rankin Scale ≤2 or prestroke scale and mortality at 90 days after treatment did not differ significantly between daytime and nighttime (41.3% vs. 29.0%, p=0.11; 14.7% vs. 11.8%, p=0.61, respectively). The door-to-groin time tended to be shorter during daytime versus nighttime (57 [IQR: 42.5-70] min vs. 70 [IQR: 55-82]) min, p=0.0507).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not reveal differences in treatment outcome between daytime and nighttime in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Therefore, the "weekend effect" was not observed in our institution.

Endovascular Thrombectomy versus Endovascular Thrombectomy Preceded by Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials comparing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus EVT preceded by intravenous thrombolysis (EVT + IVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion remain controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis seek to compare these 2 modalities.

METHODS

Online Protocol is available at PROSPERO (york.ac.uk) (registration# CRD42022357506). MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase were searched. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS ≤1, 90-day mean mRS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 1-3 and 3-7 days, 90-day Barthel Index, 90-day EQ-5D-5L (EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level), the volume of infarction (mL), successful reperfusion, complete reperfusion, recanalization, 90-day mortality, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, embolization in new territory, new infarction, puncture site complications, vessel dissection, and contrast extravasation. The certainty in the evidence was determined by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials yielding 2332 patients were included, of which 1163 and 1169 underwent EVT and EVT + IVT, respectively. The relative risk (RR) of 90-day mRS ≤2 was similar between the groups (RR = 0.96[0.88, 1.04]; P = 0.28). EVT was non-inferior to EVT + IVT because the lower bond of 95% confidence interval of the risk difference (RD = -0.02 [-0.06, 0.02]; P = 0.36) exceeded the -0.1 non-inferiority margin. The certainty in the evidence was high. The RR of successful reperfusion (RR = 0.96 [0.93, 0.99]; P = 0.006), any ICH (RR = 0.87 [0.77, 0.98]; P = 0.02), and puncture site complications (RR = 0.47 [0.25, 0.88]; P = 0.02) were lower with EVT. For EVT + IVT, the number needed to treat for successful reperfusion was 25, and the number needed to harm for any ICH was 20. The 2 groups were similar in other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

EVT is non-inferior to EVT + IVT. In centers capable of both EVT and IVT, if timely EVT is feasible, it is reasonable to skip bridging IVT and keep rescue thrombolysis at the discretion of the interventionist for patients presenting within 4.5 hours of anterior ischemic stroke.

Decline of thrombolysis rates before endovascular therapy in patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: A multicenter analysis from the German Stroke Registry

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the role of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) has been discussed intensively. Whether the discussion was accompanied by changing rates of bridging IVT is unknown.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the prospectively maintained German Stroke Registry, including patients treated with EVT at one of 28 stroke centers in Germany between 2016 and 2021. Primary outcome parameters were the rate of bridging IVT (a) in the entire registry cohort and (b) in patients without formal contraindications to IVT (i.e. recent oral anticoagulants, time window ⩾4.5 h, extensive early ischemic changes) adjusted for demographic and clinical confounders.

RESULTS

10,162 patients (52.8% women, median age 77 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 14) were analyzed. In the entire cohort, the rate of bridging IVT decreased from 63.8% in 2016 to 43.6% in 2021 (average absolute annual decrease 3.1%, 95% CI 2.4%-3.8%), while the proportion of patients with at least one formal contraindication increased by only 1.2% annually (95% CI 0.6%-1.9%). Among 5460 patients without record of formal contraindications, the rate of bridging IVT decreased from 75.5% in 2016 to 63.2% in 2021 and was significantly associated with admission date in a multivariable model (average absolute annual decrease 1.4%, 95% CI 0.6%-2.2%). Clinical factors associated with lower odds of bridging IVT included diabetes mellitus, carotid-T-occlusion, dual antiplatelet therapy, and direct admission to a thrombectomy center.

CONCLUSION

We observed a substantial decline in bridging IVT rates independent of demographic confounders and not explained by an increase in contraindications. This observation deserves further exploration in independent populations.

A review of acute ischemic stroke caused by distal, medium vessel occlusions

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) is increasingly recognized as the next frontier for mechanical thrombectomy. Distal, medium vessel occlusions are typically defined as an occlusion in the following arteries: anterior cerebral artery, M2-M4 segments of the middle cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery, posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, and superior cerebellar artery. It is estimated that 25-40% of all AIS is due to DMVO. Because of the large burden of DMVO, the frequency of literature published regarding these occlusions has greatly increased in recent years. Furthermore, treatment modalities have been created specifically for DMVOs. Due to the rapidly evolving literature on this topic, remaining up to date on DMVO definitions, anatomy, management, imaging, and clinical course is difficult. In this review article, we synthesized existing literature regarding the aforementioned topics and discussed future directions.

Atrial Fibrillation and Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Patients: Prevalence and Outcomes-A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly contributes to acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), yet its precise influence on clinical outcomes post-intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and post-endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has remained elusive. Furthermore, the overall prevalence of AF in AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapy has not been clearly determined. Employing random-effects meta-analyses, this research aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of AF among AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapy, while also examining the association between AF and clinical outcomes such as functional outcomes, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Studies comparing AF and non-AF patient groups undergoing reperfusion therapy were identified and included following an extensive database search. Forty-nine studies (n = 66,887) were included. Among IVT patients, the prevalence of AF was 31% (Effect Size [ES] 0.31 [95%CI 0.28-0.35], p < 0.01), while in EVT patients, it reached 42% (ES 0.42 [95%CI 0.38-0.46], p < 0.01), and in bridging therapy (BT) patients, it stood at 36% (ES 0.36 [95%CI 0.28-0.43], p < 0.01). AF was associated with significantly lower odds of favourable 90-day functional outcomes post IVT (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.512 [95%CI 0.376-0.696], p < 0.001), but not post EVT (OR 0.826 [95%CI 0.651-1.049], p = 0.117). Our comprehensive meta-analysis highlights the varying prevalence of AF among different reperfusion therapies and its differential impact on patient outcomes. The highest pooled prevalence of AF was observed in EVT patients, followed by BT and IVT patients. Interestingly, our analysis revealed that AF was significantly associated with poorer clinical outcomes following IVT. Such an association was not observed following EVT.

Effect of Time Window on Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results from DIRECT-MT

INTRODUCTION

Whether time window affects the intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) effect before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the effect of different time windows (0-3 h and >3-4.5 h from stroke onset to randomization) on clinical outcomes of EVT with or without IVT in a subgroup analysis of DIRECT-MT.

METHODS

The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) according to time window. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the effect of different treatments (EVT with or without IVT) on outcomes within 0-3 h or >3-4.5 h.

RESULTS

Among 656 patients who were included in the analysis, 282 (43.0%) were randomized within >3-4.5 h after stroke onset (125 without IVT and 157 with IVT), and 374 (57.0%) were randomized within 0-3 h (202 without IVT and 172 with IVT). We noted no significant difference in the thrombectomy-alone effect between the time window subgroups according to 90-day ordinal mRS (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR] in patients within 0-3 h: 1.06 [95% CI: 0.73-1.52], acOR in patients within >3-4.5 h: 1.19 [95% CI: 0.78-1.82]) and 90-day functional independence. Thrombectomy alone resulted in an increased proportion of patients with 90-day mRS 0-3 treated within >3-4.5 h (62.90 vs. 48.72%) but not within 0-3 h (65.84 vs. 63.95%). However, there was no interaction effect regarding all outcomes after the Bonferroni correction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results did not support thrombectomy-alone administration within 3-4.5 h in patients with acute ischemic stroke from large-vessel occlusion in the subgroup analysis of DIRECT-MT.

Advances in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke

Mechanical thrombectomy is a ground breaking treatment for acute ischaemic stroke caused by occlusion of a large vessel. Its efficacy over intravenous thrombolysis has been proven in multiple trials with a lower number needed to treat than percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. However, access to this key treatment modality remains limited with a considerable postcode lottery across the UK and many parts of the world. The evidence base for mechanical thrombectomy dates back to 2015. Since then, there have been important advances in establishing and widening the criteria for treatment. This narrative review aims to summarise the current evidence base and latest advances for physicians and academics with an interest in recanalisation treatments for acute ischaemic stroke.

Effect of Needle-To-Puncture Time on Reperfusion Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of time interval between start of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to start of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) on stroke outcomes.

METHODS

Data from the Quality Improvement and Clinical Research (QuICR) provincial stroke registry from Alberta, Canada, were used to identify stroke patients who received IVT and EVT from January 2015 to December 2019. We assessed the impact of the time interval between IVT bolus to EVT puncture (needle-to-puncture times [NPT]) on outcomes. Radiological outcomes included successful initial recanalization (revised Arterial Occlusive Lesion 2b-3), successful initial and final reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3). Clinical outcomes were 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 680 patients, 233 patients (median age: 73, 41% females) received IVT + EVT. Median NPT was 38 min (IQR, 24-60). Arrival during working hours was independently associated with shorter NPT (p < 0.001). Successful initial recanalization and initial and final reperfusion were observed in 12%, 10%, and 83% of patients, respectively. NPT was not associated with initial successful recanalization (OR 0.97 for every 10-min increase of NPT, 95% CI: 0.91-1.04), initial successful reperfusion (OR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96-1.07), or final successful reperfusion (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97-1.08). Every 10-min delay in NPT was associated with lower odds of functional independence at 90 days (mRS ≤2; OR: 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97). Patients with shorter NPT (≤38 min) had lower 90-day mRS scores (median 1 vs. 3; OR: 0.54 [0.31-0.91]) and had lower mortality (6.1% vs. 21.2%; OR, 0.23 [0.10-0.57]) than the longer NPT group.

CONCLUSION

Shorter NPT did not impact reperfusion outcomes but was associated with better clinical outcome.

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage after Ischemic Stroke Treated with Bridging Revascularization Therapy

(1) Background: bridging revascularization therapy is now the standard of care in patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. This study aimed to determine the frequency of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) related to this treatment, and to assess contributing factors and patients' outcomes. (2) Methods: consecutive ischemic stroke patients treated with bridging therapy were prospectively enrolled. sICH (intracranial hemorrhage with an increase in NIHSS score of ≥4 points) was assessed on imaging at 24 h. The functional status of patients was measured at 6 months using the mRS score; (3) Results: 176 patients were included (mean age 68.7 ± 1.2 years, 52.3% women), among whom 15 (8.5%) had sICH. Patients with sICH had more frequent alcohol abuse (30.1% versus 9.7%, p = 0.023), prestroke use of dual antiplatelet therapy (14.3% versus 1.3%, p = 0.002), higher NIHSS scores at admission (median score 20.5 versus 15, p = 0.01), greater systolic blood pressure upon admission, more frequent vascular intracranial calcifications (p = 0.004), leukoaraiosis (p = 0.001), and intracranial atheroma (p = 0.02), and higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (p = 0.02) and neutrophil-to-platelet ratios (p = 0.04). At 6-month follow-up, 9 (60%) patients with sICH died, versus 18% of patients without sICH (p < 0.001). Only 1 (7%) patient with sICH had a good functional outcome, defined as an mRS score of 0 to 2, versus 51% of patients without sICH. (4) Conclusions: one in twelve ischemic stroke patients treated with bridging therapy suffered sICH. Given the observed poor outcomes after sICH, further studies are required to better identify patients at risk to help clinicians in guiding therapeutic strategies.

Predictors of favorable outcome and mortality after endovascular thrombectomy in young Chinese patients with large vascular occlusions

Background

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has evolved into the standard treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, little information is available on the management of EVT in young patients with AIS-LVO in China. The purpose of this study was to assess the favorable outcomes and mortality rates after 90 days of EVT in young Chinese patients with AIS-LVO and their predictors.

Methods

This retrospective study included young Chinese patients aged 18-50 years with AIS-LVO. The primary efficacy endpoint was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at day 90, and the primary safety endpoint was mortality within 90 days. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, the associations between clinical, imaging, and procedure variables and favorable (mRS 0-2) outcomes or mortality at 90 days were analyzed.

Results

A total of 113 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 43.1 ± 6.3 years. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) occurred in 8 (7.1%) patients. Favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) were recovered in 42.5% of patients at 3 months. After 90 days, the mortality rate was 32.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed that the increase in admission NIHSS score was associated with a lower probability of functional independence (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15, p = 0.01 and aOR 1.01, 95% CI 1-1.01, p = 0.008, respectively) and a higher probability of death at 90 days (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.03-1.18, p = 0.007 and aOR 1.00, 95% CI 1-1.01, p = 0.021, respectively).

Conclusion

This study demonstrate that EVT provides higher rates of arterial recanalization, rather than better favorable outcomes and lower risk of death at 3 months in young Chinese patients with AIS-LVO. Increased NIHSS scores on admission may be associated with poor patient prognosis.

Shorter Door-to-Needle Times Are Associated With Better Outcomes After Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy and Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Existing data and clinical trials could not determine whether faster intravenous thrombolytic therapy (IVT) translates into better long-term functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke among those treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Patient-level national data can provide the required large population to study the associations between earlier IVT, versus later, with longitudinal functional outcomes and mortality in patients receiving IVT+EVT combined treatment.

METHODS

This cohort study included older US patients (age ≥65 years) who received IVT within 4.5 hours or EVT within 7 hours after acute ischemic stroke using the linked 2015 to 2018 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke and Medicare database (38 913 treated with IVT only and 3946 with IVT+EVT). Primary outcome was home time, a patient-prioritized functional outcome. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality in 1 year. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between door-to-needle (DTN) times and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among patients treated with IVT+EVT, after adjusting for patient and hospital factors, including onset-to-EVT times, each 15-minute increase in DTN times for IVT was associated with significantly higher odds of zero home time in a year (never discharged to home) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.19]), less home time among those discharged to home (adjusted odds ratio, 0.93 per 1% of 365 days [95% CI, 0.89-0.98]), and higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.11]). These associations were also statistically significant among patients treated with IVT but at a modest degree (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04 for zero home time, 0.96 per 1% home time for those discharged to home, and adjusted hazard ratio 1.03 for mortality). In the secondary analysis where the IVT+EVT group was compared with 3704 patients treated with EVT only, shorter DTN times (≤60, 45, and 30 minutes) achieved incrementally more home time in a year, and more modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2 at discharge (22.3%, 23.4%, and 25.0%, respectively) versus EVT only (16.4%, P<0.001 for each). The benefit dissipated with DTN>60 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older patients with stroke treated with either IVT only or IVT+EVT, shorter DTN times are associated with better long-term functional outcomes and lower mortality. These findings support further efforts to accelerate thrombolytic administration in all eligible patients, including EVT candidates.

Ligustrazine Nanoparticle Hitchhiking on Neutrophils for Enhanced Therapy of Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Ischemic stroke is a refractory disease that endangers human health and safety owing to cerebral ischemia. Brain ischemia induces a series of inflammatory reactions. Neutrophils migrate from the circulatory system to the site of cerebral ischemia and accumulate in large numbers at the site of inflammation across the blood-brain barrier. Therefore, hitchhiking on neutrophils to deliver drugs to ischemic brain sites could be an optimal strategy. Since the surface of neutrophils has a formyl peptide receptor (FPR), this work modifies a nanoplatform surface by the peptide cinnamyl-F-(D)L-F-(D)L-F (CFLFLF), which can specifically bind to the FPR receptor. After intravenous injection, the fabricated nanoparticles effectively adhered to the surface of neutrophils in peripheral blood mediated by FPR, thereby hitchhiking with neutrophils to achieve higher accumulation at the inflammatory site of cerebral ischemia. In addition, the nanoparticle shell is composed of a polymer with reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive bond breaking and is encased in ligustrazine, a natural product with neuroprotective properties. In conclusion, the strategy of hitching the delivered drugs to neutrophils in this study could improve drug enrichment in the brain, thereby providing a general delivery platform for ischemic stroke or other inflammation-related diseases.

Advances in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment: Current Status and Future Directions

The management of acute ischemic stroke has undergone a paradigm shift in the past decade. This has been spearheaded by the emergence of endovascular thrombectomy, along with advances in medical therapy, imaging, and other facets of stroke care. Herein, we present an updated review of the various stroke trials that have impacted and continue to transform stroke management. It is critical for the radiologist to stay abreast of the ongoing developments to provide meaningful input and remain a useful part of the stroke team.

Safety and Efficacy of Direct Thrombectomy Versus Bridging Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Eligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis of reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of direct thrombectomy (DT) and bridging therapy (BT) for patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to July 11, 2022 was performed. RCTs comparing DT and BT were included. The relative risk or rate difference and their 95% confidence intervals in a Mantel-Haenszel fixed effects model were used as the effect index of each outcome. The noninferior margin was specified as 80% for the relative risk or -10% for the rate difference. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 or a return to baseline at 90 days. Additional efficacy and safety outcomes included successful recanalization at the end of thrombectomy, excellent clinical outcomes (defined as an mRS score of 0-1), death within 90 ± 14 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, any type of intracerebral hemorrhage, and clot migration.

RESULTS

Six RCTs with 2334 patients were pooled for the meta-analysis. The results showed the noninferiority of DT for favorable functional outcomes, higher successful recanalization rates, and any intracerebral hemorrhage in the BT group, with no statistically significant differences for other outcomes. The risk of bias for all RCTs in our analysis was low.

CONCLUSIONS

DT achieved noninferiority to BT for favorable functional outcomes. Patient-level pooled analysis and subgroup analysis are needed to provide more information to distinguish which patients will benefit more from which therapy.

Endovascular thrombectomy with or without thrombolysis bridging in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis of randomised trials and cost-effectiveness analysis

INTRODUCTION

Current published guidelines and meta-analyses comparing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone versus EVT with bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) suggest that EVT alone is non-inferior to EVT with bridging thrombolysis in achieving favourable functional outcome. Because of this controversy, we aimed to systematically update the evidence and meta-analyse data from randomised trials comparing EVT alone versus EVT with bridging thrombolysis, and performed an economic evaluation comparing both strategies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing EVT with or without bridging thrombolysis in patients presenting with large vessel occlusions. We will identify eligible studies by systematically searching the following databases from inception without any language restrictions: MEDLINE (through Ovid), Embase and the Cochrane Library. The following criteria will be used to assess eligibility for inclusion: (1) adult patients ≥18 years old; (2) randomised patients to EVT alone or to EVT with IVT; and (3) measured outcomes, including functional outcomes, at least 90 days after randomisation. Pairs of reviewers will independently screen the identified articles, extract information and assess the risk of bias of eligible studies. We will use the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool to evaluate risk of bias. We will also use the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty in evidence for each outcome. We will then perform an economic evaluation based on the extracted data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review will not require a research ethics approval because no confidential patient data will be used. We will disseminate our findings by publishing the results in a peer-reviewed journal and via presentation at conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022315608.

Benefit from successful recanalization in an Italian cohort of stroke patients receiving endovascular treatments according to the DIRECT-MT trial criteria

INTRODUCTION

To identify predictors of 3-month mRS score and to estimate the benefit from successful recanalization across baseline subgroups of Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS) cohort of stroke patients receiving endovascular treatments according to the DIRECT-MT criteria.

METHODS

Using a model of propensity score matching, we retrospectively identified an IRETAS cohort of 137 patients receiving bridging who were matched with 137 patients receiving MT alone according to the DIRECT-MT criteria.

RESULTS

Differences were found between DIRECT-MT and IRETAS cohorts for 3-month mRS score 0 to 1 (23.5% vs. 33.1%) and 0 to 2 (36.7% vs. 47.1%), successful (82% vs. 76.7%) and complete recanalization (32.3% vs. 58.8%). Among unfavorable predictors for 3-month mRS shift, diabetes mellitus (18.9% vs. 13.9%) and asymptomatic intracerebral hemorhage (ICH) (34.8% vs. 25.5%) were more frequent in the DIRECT-MT, whereas age ≥80 years (23.7% vs. 15.3%) and pre-stroke mRS score >0 (16.1% vs. 7.8%) were more frequent in the IRETAS.The direction of effect on the 3-month mRS shift (6 to 0) favored successful recanalization across all strata. Greatest benefit from successful recanalization was observed in patients with most severe strokes (NIHSS ≥20, OR:4.002; 16-19, OR:3.292; 2-5, OR:2.470) and most proximal occlusion site (intra-cranial ICA, OR:4.092; M1-MCA, OR:3.705; M2-MCA, OR:2.001), in younger patients (18-59 years, OR:3.677; 60-79, OR:3.267; ≥80, OR:1.993), and in patients who started the treatment earlier (onset-to-groin time ≤205 min, OR:4.361; onset-to-groin time >205, OR:2.326).

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit from successful recanalization for 3-month mRS shift in the direction of favorable outcome was different across baseline subgroups.

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: An Evolution of Trials

The last decade's progress in demonstrating the clinical benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke has transformed the paradigm of care for these patients. This review presents the milestones in implementing EVT as standard of care, demonstrates the current state of evidence, provides guidance for identifying the candidate patient for EVT, and highlights unsolved and controversial issues. Ongoing trials investigate broadening of EVT indications for patients who present with large core infarction, adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis, medium vessel occlusion, low NIHSS, and tandem occlusion.

Femoral Access-Site Complications with Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large-Vessel-Occlusion Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

IV thrombolysis with alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy for emergent large-vessel-occlusion stroke is associated with access-site bleeding complications. However, the incidence of femoral access-site complications with tenecteplase before mechanical thrombectomy requires exploration. Here, femoral access-site complications with tenecteplase versus alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel-occlusion stroke were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients receiving IV thrombolytics before mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel-occlusion stroke who presented from January 2020 to August 2022 were reviewed. In May 2021, our health care system switched from alteplase to tenecteplase as the primary thrombolytic for all patients with stroke, facilitating the comparison of alteplase-versus-tenecteplase femoral access-site complication rates. Major (requiring surgery) and minor (managed conservatively) access-site complications were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine patients underwent transfemoral mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel-occlusion stroke, of whom 46/139 (33.1%) received tenecteplase and 93/139 (66.9%) received alteplase. In all cases (n = 139), an 8F sheath was inserted without sonographic guidance, and vascular closure was obtained with an Angio-Seal. Baseline demographics, concomitant antithrombotic medications, and periprocedural coagulation lab findings were similar between groups. The incidence of conservatively managed groin hematomas (2.2% versus 4.3%), delayed access-site oozing requiring manual compression (6.5% versus 2.2%), and arterial occlusion requiring surgery (2.2% versus 1.1%) was similar between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups, respectively (P = not significant). No dissection, arteriovenous fistula, or retroperitoneal hematoma was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Tenecteplase compared with alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel-occlusion stroke is not associated with an alteration in femoral access-site complication rates.

In a hub-and-spoke network, spoke-administered thrombolysis reduces mechanical thrombectomy procedure time and number of passes

BACKGROUND

The utility of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO) is controversial. Some data suggest IVT increases MT technical difficulty. Within our hub-and-spoke telestroke network, we examined how spoke-administered IVT affected hub MT procedure time and pass number.

METHODS

Patients presenting to 25 spoke hospitals who were transferred to the hub and underwent MT from 2018 to 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. MT procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and pass number were obtained from operative reports.

RESULTS

Of 107 patients, 48 received IVT at spokes. Baseline characteristics and NIHSS were similar. The last known well (LKW)-to-puncture time was shorter among IVT patients (4.3 ± 1.9 h vs. 10.5 ± 6.5 h, p < 0.0001). In patients that received IVT, mean MT procedure time was decreased by 18.8 min (50.5 ± 29.4 vs. 69.3 ± 46.7 min, p = 0.02) and mean fluoroscopy time was decreased by 11.3 min (21.7 ± 15.8 vs. 33.0 ± 30.9 min, p = 0.03). Furthermore, IVT-treated patients required fewer MT passes (median 1 pass [IQR 1.0, 1.80] vs. 2 passes [1.0, 2.3], p = 0.0002) and were more likely to achieve reperfusion in ≤2 passes (81.3% vs. 59.3%, p = 0.01). An increased proportion of IVT-treated patients achieved TICI 2b-3 reperfusion after MT (93.9% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.045). There were no associations between MT procedural characteristics and LKW-to-puncture time.

CONCLUSION

Within our network, hub MT following spoke-administered IVT was faster, required fewer passes, and achieved improved reperfusion. This suggests spoke-administered IVT does not impair MT, but instead may enhance it.

Sex differences in outcomes after endovascular treatment of patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusion

BACKGROUND

Current studies on the role of sex in the prognosis of acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) are limited. We aimed to explore whether there are sex differences on outcomes in patients treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) for VBAO.

METHODS

Patients from December 2015 to December 2018 with acute VBAO within 24 h of the estimated occlusion time in 21 stroke centers in China were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline data between sexes were compared in the total population cohort and propensity score (PS)-matched cohort. Multivariate logistic regression and ordinal regression were used to analyze the association of sex with outcomes. Mixed-effects regression model was performed for changes in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores in men and women from 90 days to 1 year after discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 577 patients (28.4% women) were finally included. Multivariate logistic regression showed that women had a lower probability of favorable outcome (mRS score 0-3 at 90 days; OR 0.544; 95% CI 0.329-0.899) and functional independence (mRS score 0-2 at 90 days; OR 0.391; 95% CI 0.228-0.670) as well as a higher possibility of shifting to worse mRS (OR 1.484; 95% CI 1.020-2.158) than men. After PS matching, 391 patients (39.4% women) were analyzed, confirming the same results regarding favorable outcome (OR 0.580; 95% CI 0.344-0.977), functional independence (OR 0.394; 95% CI 0.218-0.712), and shift mRS (OR 1.504; 95% CI 1.023-2.210). However, the results of repeated ANOVA showed that men and women had a comparable functional recovery from 90 days to 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke due to VBAO treated with EVT is associated with worse outcomes in women than in men. However, men and women showed similar long-term improvement trends.

[Intravenous thrombolysis of ischemic stroke-Current status]

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) treatment with alteplase (rtPA) is an essential part of the routine treatment of patients with ischemic stroke since its introduction in the late 1990s. Rapid treatment is of essential importance. For patients with an unclear time window, various mismatch concepts have been established to identify salvageable brain tissue prior to IVT. Numerous official contraindications for rtPA are not evidence-based; for example, current data from observational studies show that systemic thrombolytic treatment is possible even in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment. Tenecteplase (TNK) is an alternative thrombolytic agent with some pharmacologic advantages. The most recent guidelines indicate that TNK is particularly advantageous over rtPA in patients treated in combination with endovascular stroke therapy (EST). The combination of IVT and EST should primarily be performed in the 4.5‑h time window in patients without contraindications; in the later time window EST alone is conceivable if it can be performed without delay.

Mechanical thrombectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analyses

To assess the clinical value of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) combined with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by comparing it with the MT alone. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of both observational and randomized controlled studies (RCTs) to investigate various outcomes. Our search for relevant studies was conducted between January 2011 and June 2022 in four major databases: PubMed, Embase, WOS, and Cochrane Library. We collected data on several outcomes, including functional independence (FI; defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2), excellent outcomes (mRS 0-1), successful recanalization (SR), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), any intracerebral hemorrhage (aICH), and mortality at three months or discharge. The primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome were FI and sICH, respectively, whereas excellent outcomes and SR were considered secondary efficacy outcomes. Additionally, mortality and aICH were analyzed as secondary safety outcomes. We employed the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model for RCTs when I² < 50%, otherwise the random-effects model was utilized. For observational studies and subgroup analyses, we used the random-effects model to minimize potential bias. A total of 55 eligible studies (nine RCTs and 46 observational studies) were included. For RCTs, the MT + IVT group was superior in FI (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11-1.46), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.43), SR (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05-1.45), mortality (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97) in crude analyses. In adjusted analyses, the MT + IVT group reduced the risk of mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.88). However, the difference in FI between the MT + IVT group and the MT alone group was not significant (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.99-1.38, Fig. 3a). For observational studies, the results of FI (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16-1.33), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.54), SR (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05-1.44), mortality (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64-0.77) in the MT + IVT group were better. Additionally, the MT + IVT group increased the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) including sICH (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11-1.21) and aICH (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05-1.46) in crude analyses. In adjusted analyses, significant better outcomes were seen in the MT + IVT group on FI (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.21-1.52), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.26-1.75), and mortality (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.94). The MT + IVT therapy did improve the prognosis for AIS patients and did not increase the risk of HT compared with MT alone therapy.

Bridging Thrombolysis Before Endovascular Therapy in Stroke Patients With Faster Core Growth

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is still uncertain that going direct to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) leads to equivalent outcomes as bridging IV thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic patients. This study aimed to explore whether the rate of ischemic core growth influenced the patient outcomes after bridging IVT vs direct EVT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study based on the International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry (INSPIRE). It selected acute ischemic stroke patients receiving perfusion CT within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. Patients who went direct to EVT were compared with those who received bridging treatment of IVT before EVT. Ischemic core growth rate was estimated by the acute ischemic core volume on perfusion CT divided by the time from stroke onset to perfusion CT, based on the assumption of a linear growth pattern of ischemic core. Core growth rate was stratified into fast (>15 mL/h) and slow (≤15 mL/h), based on its interaction with bridging IVT in predicting the primary outcome. The primary outcome was modified Rankin scale of 0-2 at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included successful thrombectomy reperfusion defined by modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3 and time from groin puncture to reperfusion.

RESULTS

Of the 1,221 EVT patients in the INSPIRE, 323 patients were selected, of which 82 patients received direct EVT and 241 patients received bridging IVT. Bridging IVT was associated with a higher rate of good clinical outcome among patients with fast core growth (39% vs 7% for direct EVT, odds ratio [OR] 8.75 [1.96-39.1], p = 0.005), but the difference was not notable for patients with slow core growth (55% vs 55% for direct EVT, OR 1.00 [0.53-1.87], p = 0.989). In patients with fast core growth, the bridging and direct EVT patients showed no difference in the reperfusion rate (80% vs 76%, p = 0.616). However, patients who received bridging IVT were more likely to achieve reperfusion earlier (the median groin to reperfusion time of 63.0 vs 94.0 minutes, p = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

Patients with fast core growth were more likely to benefit from bridging IVT. This is likely because prior IVT facilitates clot removal and thus reduces time to reperfusion.

Association of Tirofiban With Functional Outcomes After Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of IV infusion of tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy for patients with large vessel occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease. The secondary objective was to identify potential mediators for the clinical effect of tirofiban.

METHODS

Post hoc exploratory analysis of the Endovascular Treatment With versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke (RESCUE BT) trial, which was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial at 55 centers in China from October 2018 to October 2021. Patients with occlusion of the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery due to intracranial atherosclerosis were included. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients achieving functional independence (defined as modified Rankin scale 0-2) at 90 days. Binary logistic regression and causal mediation analyses were used to estimate the treatment effect of tirofiban and the potential mediators.

RESULTS

This study included 435 patients, of whom 71.5% were men. The median age was 65 (interquartile range [IQR] 56-72) years, with a median NIH Stroke Scale of 14 (IQR 10-19). Patients in the tirofiban group had higher rates of functional independence at 90 days than patients in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio 1.68; 95% CI 1.11-2.56, p = 0.02) without an increased risk of mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Tirofiban was associated with fewer thrombectomy passes (median [IQR] 1 [1-2] vs 1 [1-2], p = 0.004), which was an independent predictor of functional independence. Mediation analysis showed tirofiban-reduced thrombectomy passes explained 20.0% (95% CI 4.1%-76.0%) of the effect of tirofiban on functional independence.

DISCUSSION

In this post hoc analysis of the RESCUE BT trial, tirofiban was an effective and well-tolerated adjuvant medication of endovascular thrombectomy for patients with large vessel occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerosis. These findings need to be confirmed in future trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

The RESCUE BT trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that tirofiban plus endovascular therapy improves 90-day outcome for patients with large vessel occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerosis.

Association Between Intravenous Thrombolysis and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Unsuccessful Mechanical Reperfusion

Importance

Clinical evidence of the potential treatment benefit of intravenous thrombolysis preceding unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is scarce.

Objective

To determine whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to unsuccessful MT improves functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study from the prospective, observational, multicenter German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment between May 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. This study compared IVT plus MT vs MT alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion in whom mechanical reperfusion was unsuccessful. Unsuccessful mechanical reperfusion was defined as failed (final modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade of 0 or 1) or partial (grade 2a). Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were matched by treatment group using 1:1 propensity score matching.

Interventions

Mechanical thrombectomy with or without IVT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2. Safety outcomes were the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death.

Results

After matching, 746 patients were compared by treatment arms (median age, 78 [IQR, 68-84] years; 438 women [58.7%]). The proportion of patients who were functionally independent at 90 days was 68 of 373 (18.2%) in the IVT plus MT and 42 of 373 (11.3%) in the MT alone group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.63 [95% CI, 1.41-5.11]; P = .003). There was a shift toward better functional outcomes on the modified Rankin Scale favoring IVT plus MT (adjusted common OR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.35-2.92]; P < .001). The treatment benefit of IVT was greater in patients with partial reperfusion compared with failed reperfusion. There was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages between treatment groups (AOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.29-1.81]; P = .45), while the death rate was lower after IVT plus MT (AOR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.34-0.86]; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that prior IVT was safe and improved functional outcomes at 90 days. Partial reperfusion was associated with a greater treatment benefit of IVT, indicating a positive interaction between IVT and MT. These results support current guidelines that all eligible patients with stroke should receive IVT before MT and add a new perspective to the debate on noninferiority of combined stroke treatment.

Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy with alteplase versus endovascular thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Recent randomized trials have suggested that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone may provide similar functional outcomes as the current standard of care, EVT combined with intravenous alteplase treatment, for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. We conducted an economic evaluation of these 2 therapeutic options.

METHODS

We constructed a decision analytic model with a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients to assess the cost-effectiveness of EVT with intravenous alteplase treatment versus EVT alone for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion from both the societal and public health care payer perspectives. We used studies and data published in 2009-2021 for model inputs, and acquired cost data for Canada and China, representing high- and middle-income countries, respectively. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using a lifetime horizon and accounted for uncertainty using 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. All costs are reported in 2021 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

In Canada, the difference in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained between EVT with alteplase and EVT alone was 0.10 from both the societal and health care payer perspectives. The difference in cost was $2847 from a societal perspective and $2767 from the payer perspective. In China, the difference in QALYs gained was 0.07 from both perspectives, and the difference in cost was $1550 from the societal perspective and $1607 from the payer perspective. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the distributions of modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days after stroke were the most influential factor on ICERs. For Canada, compared to EVT alone, the probability that EVT with alteplase would be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY gained was 58.7% from a societal perspective and 58.4% from a payer perspective. The corresponding values for at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $47 185 (3 times the Chinese gross domestic product per capita in 2021) were 65.2% and 67.4%.

INTERPRETATION

For patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion eligible for immediate treatment with both EVT alone and EVT with intravenous alteplase treatment, it is uncertain whether EVT with alteplase is cost-effective compared to EVT alone in Canada and China.

Endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in large-vessel ischemic stroke: A non-inferiority meta-analysis of 6 randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether thrombectomy alone is non-inferior to thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion.

PURPOSE

To perform a comprehensive, trial-level data, non-inferiority meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing endovascular thrombectomy with and without intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion of anterior circulation.

METHODS

The prespecified primary efficacy outcome was functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS)score of 0 to 2 at 90 days. The two prespecified non-inferiority margins were risk differences of -10% and - 5%. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022361110) and conducted according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Six trials were included in this analysis (DIRECT-MT, DEVT, SKIP, MR CLEAN-NO IV, DIRECT-SAFE and SWIFT DIRECT) comprising a total of 2334 patients. Functional independence at 90 days was achieved by 570 (49·0%) of 1164 patients in the thrombectomy alone group and 595 (50·9%) of 1170 patients in the thrombectomy with thrombolysis group (pooled risk difference - 0·02, [95% CI -0·06-0·02]). Combined thrombectomy and thrombolysis were associated with significantly higher rates of successful reperfusion (pooled risk ratio 0·96 [95% CI, 0·93-0·99], p = 0·006) but at the expense of a significantly increased risk of overall - but not symptomatic - intracranial haemorrhage (pooled risk ratio 0·87 [95% CI, 0·77-0·98], p = 0·02).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with a combined treatment approach, thrombectomy alone was non-inferior at -10% non-inferiority margin, but not at a - 5% inferiority margin for functional independence. Current evidence cannot exclude clinically important differences between the two treatment approaches.

Infarct Evolution in Patients with Anterior Circulation Large-Vessel Occlusion Randomized to IV Alteplase and Endovascular Treatment versus Endovascular Treatment Alone

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Infarct evolution after endovascular treatment varies widely among patients with stroke and may be affected by baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes. Moreover, IV alteplase and endovascular treatment may influence the relationship of these factors to infarct evolution. We aimed to assess whether the infarct evolution between baseline and follow-up imaging was different for patients who received IVT and EVT versus EVT alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included patients from the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN)-NO IV trial with baseline CTP and follow-up imaging. Follow-up infarct volume was segmented on 24-hour or 1-week follow-up DWI or NCCT. Infarct evolution was defined as the follow-up lesion volume: CTP core volume. Substantial infarct growth was defined as an increase in follow-up infarct volume of >10 mL. We assessed whether infarct evolution was different for patients with IV alteplase and endovascular treatment versus endovascular treatment alone and evaluated the association of baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes with infarct evolution using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

From 228 patients with CTP results available, 145 patients had follow-up imaging and were included in our analysis. For patients with IV alteplase and endovascular treatment versus endovascular treatment alone, the baseline median CTP core volume was 17 (interquartile range = 4-35) mL versus 11 (interquartile range = 6-24) mL. The median follow-up infarct volume was 13 (interquartile range, 4-48) mL versus 17 (interquartile range = 4-50) mL. Collateral status and occlusion location were negatively associated with substantial infarct growth in patients with and without IV alteplase before endovascular treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant difference in infarct evolution was found in directly admitted patients who received IV alteplase and endovascular treatment within 4.5 hours of symptom onset versus patients who underwent endovascular treatment alone. Collateral status and occlusion location may be useful predictors of infarct evolution prognosis in patients eligible for IV alteplase who underwent endovascular treatment.

Endovascular Thrombectomy With or Without Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

We performed this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare the outcomes in patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy who receive prior intravenous thrombolysis with those who do not receive such treatment. Recently, one randomized trial reported outcomes to address this issue, so timely update of meta-analysis is needed to determine the value of administering intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four randomized clinical trials are included in our meta-analysis. We calculated pooled odds ratios and 95% CIs using random-effects models. The primary efficacy endpoint was a favorable outcome defined by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 (no symptoms), 1 (no significant disability), or 2 (slight disability) at 90 days post-randomization. Secondary endpoints analyzed were any intracerebral hemorrhage, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 1633 patients randomized, the proportion of patients who achieved a favorable outcome was similar between endovascular thrombectomy alone and combined approach with intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy (1631 patients analyzed; odds ratio 1.02; CI 0.84-1.25; p = 0.83). Risk of any intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly lower among those randomized to endovascular thrombectomy alone (1633 patients analyzed; odds ratio 0.75; CI 0.57-0.99; p = 0.04). Rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (p = 0.36) and mortality (p = 0.62) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with endovascular thrombectomy preceded by intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy resulted in similar rates of favorable outcome with a lower rate of intracerebral hemorrhage. A large phase 3 trial is required to conclusively demonstrate equivalency of both approaches to guide future practice.

Evolving Stroke Systems of Care: Stroke Diagnosis and Treatment in the Post-Thrombectomy Era

Thrombectomy became the gold-standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusions (LVO) in 2015 after five clinical trials published that year demonstrated significantly improved patient outcomes. In subsequent years, advances in stroke systems of care have centered around improving access to and expanding patient eligibility for thrombectomy. The prehospital and acute stroke treatment settings have had the greatest emphasis. Numerous prehospital stroke scales now provide emergency medical services with focused physical exams to identify LVOs, and many devices to non-invasively detect LVO are undergoing clinical testing. Mobile stroke units deployed throughout Western Europe and the USA also show promising results by bringing elements of acute stroke care directly to the patient. Numerous clinical trials since 2015 have aimed to increase candidates for thrombectomy by expanding indications and the eligibility time window. Further optimizations of thrombectomy treatment have focused on the role of thrombolytics and other adjunctive therapies that may promote neuroprotection and neurorecovery. While many of these approaches require further clinical investigation, the next decade shows significant potential for further advances in stroke care.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the history of IV thrombolysis, its current indications and implementation, the duality of the "time is brain" versus "tissue clock" approaches, the impact of endovascular thrombectomy on IV thrombolysis, the emergence of tenecteplase, and future research directions.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The growing use of factor Xa inhibitors has increasingly caused patients with stroke to be excluded from treatment with IV thrombolysis. Important geographic, socioeconomic, sex, race, and ethnic disparities have been identified in the implementation of IV thrombolysis and need to be overcome. IV thrombolysis substantially improves outcomes when provided within the first golden hour after stroke onset in patients treated in mobile stroke units, supporting the "time is brain" concept and encouraging the possible value of more widespread implementation of the mobile stroke unit approach. At the same time, other studies have shown that IV thrombolysis can be successful in patients whose "tissue clock" is still ticking up to 9 hours after stroke onset or in patients who awaken with their stroke, as demonstrated by favorable imaging profiles. These considerations, along with the emergence of endovascular thrombectomy, have fostered examination of our care systems, including the "drip and ship" versus direct to comprehensive or endovascular thrombectomy stroke center approaches, as well as the possibility of skipping IV thrombolysis in certain patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy. Data suggesting that tenecteplase is at least noninferior to alteplase, as well as its more convenient dosing, has led to its increased use. Ongoing studies are evaluating newer thrombolytics and adding antithrombotic therapy to IV thrombolysis.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

IV thrombolysis remains the most common acute stroke treatment. Advances in acting faster to treat stroke have increased its efficacy, and advances in imaging have expanded its use. However, implementing these advances and overcoming disparities in IV thrombolysis use remain major challenges.

Treatment of Acute Stroke: Current Practices and Future Horizons

PURPOSE

This review will discuss revascularization of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), discussing the concept of the ischemic penumbra and how thrombolysis and thrombectomy take advantage of it.

SUMMARY

The goal of AIS revascularization is to rescue the ischemic penumbra and the approach to has gone from a time-based to tissue-based approach. Patients must be carefully selected for thrombolysis, which traditionally was limited to those whose last known normal time (LKNT) was known and within 4.5 h. However, newer imaging techniques involving MRI and CT perfusion (CTP) can select patients for thrombolysis whose LKNT is unknown. Alteplase, or tPA, is still the agent of choice for thrombolysis in patients with AIS but tenecteplase (TNK) may be just as effective and more efficient to use. Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has shown considerable efficacy for treating large-vessel occlusions and using CTP, patients can be selected for hours after symptom-onset if viable tissue remains. Further research is underway to determine if EVT can be used for medium vessel occlusions and for basilar artery thromboses as well as to determine whether an "EVT-alone" strategy is superior to "tPA + EVT" strategy.

Current advances in endovascular treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the most beneficial reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Currently, much effort is done to promote trials examining EVT efficacy and safety in various conditions not included in the main randomized controlled trials established the superiority of EVT. This review summarizes the current advances of EVT patients' selection and periprocedural management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence points to beneficial effect of EVT among patients with relatively large ischemic core, premorbid independent nonagenarians and basilar artery occlusion, and suggest that intravenous thrombolysis bridging treatment is associated with better reperfusion rates. Ongoing trials currently examine EVT efficacy and safety in distal vessel occlusions and in large vessel occlusion with low NIHSS. Current evidence also support use of general anaesthesia and avoid postprocedural extremely low or high blood pressure as well as haemodynamic instability.

SUMMARY

The field of EVT is rapidly evolving. The results of recent trials have dramatically increased the indications for EVT, with many ongoing trials examining further indications.

Endovascular treatment over 24 hours after ischemic stroke onset: a single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel obstruction or stenosis (AIS-LVO/S) over 24 h after first AIS symptom recognition (FAISSR).

METHODS

A total of 33 AIS-LVO/S cases with EVT over 24 h after FAISSR during the period from January 2019 to February 2022 in our hospital were divided into the 90d mRS ≤ 2 group [favorable outcome (FO) group] and 90d mRS > 2 group [unfavorable outcome (UFO) group] and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The reperfusion was successfully established with EVT in 97% (32/33) of cases, and most (63.6%, 21/33) had 90d mRS ≤ 2 and only 36.4% (12/33) had 90d mRS > 2. Preoperative DWI-ASPECT and ASITN/SIR scores were significantly higher and NIHSS scores were significantly lower in the FO group than those in the UFO group (P < 0.05). In addition, the FAISSR to exacerbation time, FAISSR to groin puncture time, and FAISSR to reperfusion time were significantly longer, and the groin puncture to reperfusion time was significantly shorter in the FO group than those in the UFO group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the stroke exacerbation to groin puncture time (P > 0.05). The patients with cerebral infarction due to artery dissection had more favorable EVT outcomes, but the patients with posterior cerebral circulation infarction had very poor EVT outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The FAISSR to groin puncture time over 24 h may not be a taboo for EVT and it may be safe and effective for AIS-LVO/S in anterior cerebral circulation, especially with lower preoperative NIHSS scores.

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular stroke therapy has greatly improved the ability to treat the deadliest and most disabling form of acute ischemic stroke. This article summarizes some of the recent innovations in this field and discusses likely future developments.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

At present, there is robust activity to improve all facets of care for patients with large vessel occlusion stroke, including better prehospital routing, more efficient in-hospital screening, expanding indications for thrombectomy eligibility, innovating novel thrombectomy devices, and improving the effects of recanalization on clinical outcomes. In addition, the integration of endovascular stroke therapy (EVT)-an emergent and frequently off-hours procedure that requires a specialized team of nurses, technologists, and physicians-into acute stroke care has transformed referral patterns, hospital accreditation pathways, and physician practices. The eligibility for the procedure will potentially continue to grow to include patients screened without advanced imaging, larger core infarcts, and more distal occlusions.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

In this review, we discuss the current state of EVT and its implications for practice, and present three cases that highlight some of the directions in which the field is moving.

Development of sertraline analogues as potential anti-ischemic stroke agents

Ischemic stroke (IS) is harmful to human health and social development, and there is no medicine available at present. To find the hit compound for treating ischemic stroke, we screened 28 FDA approved nervous system drugs by using an in vitro OGD-induced stroke model. Notably, our in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that low-dose sertraline had good neuroprotective activities, while high-dose sertraline showed significant toxicity. Interestingly, the same high-dose sertraline in the control group did not exhibit any obvious toxic effect. Therefore, it is important to modify the structure of sertraline to improve the activity and reduce the toxicity. Stereoisomers of sertraline were first investigated to analyze the influence of stereochemistry on the neuroprotective activities, which showed no obvious difference. Then we evaluated the activity of our previously reported sertraline analogues and found that introducing amide or alkane groups to the amino moiety might be beneficial to enhance the activity and reduce the toxicity. Thus, 10 new analogues were designed, synthesized, and evaluated. Among them, compound OY-201 showed the best safety and neuroprotective activity in both in vitro and in vivo models. Moreover, it exhibited good blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, indicating its potential for the development of anti-ischemic stroke drugs.

Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: current status and future perspectives

Alteplase is currently the only approved thrombolytic agent for treatment of acute ischaemic stroke, but interest is burgeoning in the development of new thrombolytic agents for systemic reperfusion with an improved safety profile, increased efficacy, and convenient delivery. Tenecteplase has emerged as a potential alternative thrombolytic agent that might be preferred over alteplase because of its ease of administration and reported efficacy in patients with large vessel occlusion. Ongoing research efforts are also looking at potential improvements in recanalisation with the use of adjunct therapies to intravenous thrombolysis. New treatment strategies are also emerging that aim to reduce the risk of vessel reocclusion after intravenous thrombolysis administration. Other research endeavors are looking at the use of intra-arterial thrombolysis after mechanical thrombectomy to induce tissue reperfusion. The growing implementation of mobile stroke units and advanced neuroimaging could boost the number of patients who can receive intravenous thrombolysis by shortening onset-to-treatment times and identifying patients with salvageable penumbra. Continued improvements in this area will be essential to facilitate the ongoing research endeavors and to improve delivery of new interventions.

Association between computed tomography perfusion and the effect of intravenous alteplase prior to endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke

PURPOSE

Intravenous alteplase (IVT) prior to endovascular treatment (EVT) is neither superior nor noninferior to EVT alone in acute ischemic stroke patients. We aim to assess whether the effect of IVT prior to EVT differs according to CT perfusion (CTP)-based imaging parameters.

METHODS

In this retrospective post hoc analysis, we included patients from the MR CLEAN-NO IV with available CTP data. CTP data were processed using syngo.via (version VB40). We performed multivariable logistic regression to obtain the effect size estimates (adjusted common odds ratio a[c]OR) on 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) and functional independence (mRS 0-2) for CTP parameters with two-way multiplicative interaction terms between IVT administration and the studied parameters.

RESULTS

In 227 patients, median CTP-estimated core volume was 13 (IQR 5-35) mL. The treatment effect of IVT prior to EVT on outcome was not altered by CTP-estimated ischemic core volume, penumbral volume, mismatch ratio, and presence of a target mismatch profile. None of the CTP parameters was significantly associated with functional outcome after adjusting for confounders.

CONCLUSION

In directly admitted patients with limited CTP-estimated ischemic core volumes who presented within 4.5 h after symptom onset, CTP parameters did not statistically significantly alter the treatment effect of IVT prior to EVT. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in patients with larger core volumes and more unfavorable baseline perfusion profiles on CTP imaging.