Treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavarin in HCV infection with genotype 2 or 3 for 14 weeks: a pilot study

Individualized treatment duration for hepatitis C genotype 1 patients: A randomized controlled trial

It was hypothesized that in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 patients, variable treatment duration individualized by first undetectable HCV RNA is as effective as standard 48-week treatment. Patients (n = 696) received peginterferon alfa-2a, 180 mg/week, or peginterferon alfa-2b, 1.5 mg/kg/week, plus ribavirin, 1000-1200 mg/day, for 48 weeks (standard, n = 237) or for 24, 48, or 72 weeks if HCV-RNA-negative at weeks 4, 8, or 12, respectively (variable, n = 459). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 45.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 38.8-51.4] of the patients in the standard group and in 48.8% (CI 44.2-53.3) of the patients in the variable group (P = 0.37). The percentages of patients who first achieved undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 4, 8, or 12 were 26.7%, 27.8%, and 11.3%, respectively. In the standard treatment group, 87.1%, 70.3%, and 38.1% of patients who first achieved undetectable HCV RNA at 4, 8, or 12 weeks attained SVRs, respectively. In the variable group, corresponding SVR rates were 77.2%, 71.9%, and 63.5%. Low viremia levels and young age were independent predictors of response at week 4 [rapid virologic response (RVR)]. RVR patients with baseline viremia >or=400,000 IU/mL achieved higher SVR rates when treated for 48 weeks rather than 24 weeks (86.8% versus 73.1%, P = 0.14). The only predictive factor of SVR in RVR patients was advanced fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Variable treatment duration ensures SVR rates similar to those of standard treatment duration, sparing unnecessary side effects and costs.

Pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin for 14 versus 24 weeks in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3 and rapid virological response

A recent nonrandomized pilot trial showed that hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients with genotype 2/3 and rapid virological response (RVR) had a 90% sustained virological response (SVR) rate after 14 weeks of treatment. We aimed to assess this concept in a randomized controlled trial. In the trial, 428 treatment-naïve HCV RNA-positive patients with genotype 2 or 3 were enrolled. Patients with RVR were randomized to 14 (group A) or 24 (group B) weeks of treatment. Patients were treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg) subcutaneously weekly and ribavirin (800-1400 mg) orally daily. The noninferiority margin was set to be 10% between the two groups with a one-sided 2.5% significance level. RVR was obtained in 302 of 428 (71%), and 298 of these were randomized to group A (n = 148) or group B (n = 150). In the intention-to-treat analysis, SVR rates were 120 of 148 (81.1%) in group A and 136 of 150 (90.7%) in group B (difference, 9.6%; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-17.7). Among patients with an HCV RNA test 24 weeks after the end of treatment, 120 of 139 (86.3%) patients in group A achieved SVR compared with 136 of 146 (93.2%) in group B (difference, 6.9%; 95% confidence interval, -0.1 to +13.9).

CONCLUSION

We cannot formally claim that 14 weeks of treatment is noninferior to 24 weeks of treatment. However, the SVR rate after 14 weeks of treatment is high, and although longer treatment may give slightly better SVR, we believe economical savings and fewer side effects make it rational to treat patients with genotype 2 or 3 and RVR for only 14 weeks.

Cost minimisation analysis of 12 or 24 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2b + ribavirin for hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin are at present the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients.

OBJECTIVE

The present economic evaluation compared 12 vs. 24 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2b + ribavirin treatments for HCV genotypes 2 or 3. Shortening the period of antiviral therapy is important in terms of adverse events and costs.

METHODS

Clinical evidence was based on the results of a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial (RCCT) conducted in Italy, which found that the shorter course of therapy was as effective as the 24-week course for patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 responding to treatment at 4 weeks. A cost minimisation analysis was performed. The analysis took the Italian National Health Service (INHS) point of view, thus only healthcare costs (drugs, medical consultations, diagnostic tests, hospital admissions) were considered. Healthcare activities were estimated by the RCCT principal investigators and were priced by applying the INHS tariffs and prices.

RESULTS

The total mean cost per patient was estimated at euro9,785 for the standard group and euro7,508 for the variable-duration group. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the baseline results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the variable-duration regimen can be recommended as an efficient use of resources for patients from the INHS perspective.

A non-invasive fibrosis score predicts treatment outcome in chronic hepatitis C virus infection

OBJECTIVE

The results of a previous study suggest that an index calculated according to the formula (normalized ASAT x PK-INR) x 100/thrombocyte count (x 10(9)/L; GUCI) may reflect liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aims of the present study were (i) to validate the association between the Göteborg University Cirrhosis Index (GUCI) score and liver fibrosis and (ii) to evaluate the utility of this index in predicting the outcome of antiviral treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 269 patients with chronic HCV infection, stratified according to HCV genotype (1/4 versus 2/3) participated in a phase III trial using pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin (DITTO study). Retrospective analyses of the baseline GUCI scores and assessments of pretreatment liver biopsies using the Ishak protocol were performed. Cut-off GUCI scores were calculated to distinguish patients with a high or low probability of sustained viral response (SVR).

RESULTS

Striking associations between GUCI and Ishak fibrosis stages (stages 0-2 versus stages 3-4, p = 0.0002, stages 3-4 versus stages 5-6, p = 0.002) were observed. In patients with genotype 1 or 4, a GUCI score below 0.33 was associated with a rapid viral response to antiviral treatment and an SVR rate of 80%. Ninety-two percent of patients (92/101) with a SVR had a pretreatment GUCI score below 1.11.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the GUCI score appropriately reflects the stage of liver fibrosis in HCV-infected patients, and predicts initial viral kinetics as well as treatment outcome in patients infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4.

Suitable treatment period in patients with virological response during combination therapy of peginterferon and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the suitable treatment period in patients who achieve virological response during combination therapy of peginterferon and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were HCV-genotype 1b, serum HCV RNA level of > or =100 KIU/ml before treatment, and negativity of serum HCV RNA during treatment. The 366 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified into four groups according to difference of response: rapid-virological response (RVR) at week 4 after the initiation of treatment (n=37), early-virological response (EVR) at week 5-12 (n=161), late-virological response (LVR) at week 13-24 (n=131), and superlate-virological response (SLVR) at week 25-48 (n=37). A non-relapse in patients with undetectable HCV RNA during therapy was defined as clearance of HCV RNA 6 month after the cessation of therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 366 patients, 241 had non-relapse and the non-relapse rate in each group was 89% (33/37) in RVR, 79% (127/161) in EVR, 54% (71/131) in LVR, and 27% (10/37) in SLVR. In RVR, 26 of 27 patients with continuance of negative HCV RNA of > or =30 weeks during treatment had non-relapse. In EVR, patients with period of negative HCV RNA of > or =40 weeks had non-relapse rate of 90% (71/79). In LVR and SLVR, all nine patients with continuance of negative HCV RNA of > or =60 weeks had non-relapse.

CONCLUSION

A suitable treatment period of combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C should be determined based on the time of attainment of negative HCV RNA.

Pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in patients with genotype 4 chronic hepatitis C: The role of rapid and early virologic response

In patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4, the optimum duration of therapy and the predictors of sustained virologic response (SVR) have not been adequately determined. In this study, 358 patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 were randomly assigned to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha-2b (1.5 mug/kg/week) plus oral ribavirin (10.6 mg/kg/day) for a fixed duration of 48 weeks (control group, n = 50) or for a variable duration (n = 318). In the variable-duration group, patients with undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 were treated for 24 weeks (group A, n = 69), patients with undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 were treated for 36 weeks (group B, n = 79), and the rest of the patients were treated for 48 weeks (group C, n = 160). The primary endpoint was SVR (undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment cessation). Groups A-C and the control group had SVR rates of 86%, 76%, 56%, and 58%, respectively. After the study was controlled for predictors, a low baseline histologic grade and stage were associated with SVR (P < 0.029) in all groups. In addition, among patients in group C, older age (P = 0.04), a higher baseline body mass index (P = 0.013), and low baseline HCV RNA (P < 0.001) were also associated with SVR attainment. The incidence of adverse events and the rate of discontinuation were higher in patients in the variable-duration and fixed-duration groups treated for 48 weeks.

CONCLUSION

In patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 and undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 4 and 12, treatment with PEG-IFN alpha-2b and ribavirin for 24 weeks and 36 weeks, respectively, is sufficient.

Hepatitis C viral kinetics during treatment of hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfected patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies of hepatitis C virus and HIV kinetics during treatment have been instrumental in elucidating the viral lifecycle and mechanisms of action of antiviral therapies. We sought to review data on hepatitis C virus kinetics in hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfected patients and to illustrate how viral kinetics might direct therapeutic decisions in these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Few studies have so far analysed the dynamic changes in hepatitis C virus RNA after treatment initiation in hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfected patients. These studies applied mathematical models previously developed in hepatitis C virus mono-infected patients, and the results obtained did not reveal major differences in viral kinetics between the two patient groups. Similar to mono-infected patients, early measurements of hepatitis C virus RNA levels after treatment initiation have been shown to have utility in predicting treatment response in coinfected patients.

SUMMARY

Confirmatory studies are required to determine definitively whether differences exist between hepatitis C virus kinetics in mono compared with coinfected patients. With additional data, these methods have the potential to direct decisions in hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfection.

Practical use of hepatitis C virus kinetics monitoring in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C

Prevention of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection complications can be achieved by antiviral therapy based on the use of a combination of pegylated interferon (IFN)-alpha and ribavirin. The steady-state kinetics of HCV infection represents the treatment target. The goal is cure, which is achieved when all infected cells have been cleared from the body. Because of their intrinsic properties, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods are rapidly replacing other technologies for routine quantification of HCV-RNA during antiviral therapy. The virological response at week 12 of therapy is currently used to tailor treatment duration in HCV genotype 1 infection only. Recent reports suggest that the virological response at week 4 could be used to tailor treatment duration, whatever the HCV genotype.

Antiviral therapy: chronic hepatitis C

The combination of pegylated interferon (IFN) with ribavirin is the standard of care for chronic hepatitis C. Response rates range from 50 to 90% for genotype 1 and 2/3 which also differ in the duration of treatment (48 vs 24 weeks, respectively). Therapy if given with weight-based dosing may be shortened from 24 to 12, 14 or 16 weeks (genotypes 2 and 3), and from 48 to 24 weeks (genotype 1) in case of hepatitis C virus (HCV) clearance at week 4, without reducing sustained virologic response (SVR). Conversely, prolonging treatment for 72 weeks in those with only a decrease of viral load at week 4, i.e. "slow responders" increases SVR rates by preventing relapse. In spite of such progress, over half of patients are relapsers or nonresponders. If the previous treatment was suboptimal, retreatment with higher doses or longer duration may be beneficial unless an individual was a 'null responder' previously. New promising anti-HCV molecules (antiproteases and antipolymerases), some with potent antiviral activity, are in phase II trials but appear to require the addition of IFN and ribavirin to maintain viral suppression. Other immunomodulatory agents such as new IFN or therapeutic vaccines and alternatives to ribavirin are also under development. Future regimens should improve efficacy and provide shorter and better-tolerated combination therapy.

Personalized therapy for chronic viral hepatitis C in the naive patient: How can we optimize treatment duration as a function of viral genotype?

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC). It yields sustained virological response (SVR) rates of 42-52% for genotype 1, 66-72% for genotype 4, and 76-80% for genotypes 2 and 3. Hence, the patient's genotype appears to be a determining predictive factor for the SVR. We have reviewed the literature in order to determine whether a genotype-specific treatment duration should be envisaged. The largest study to date of patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 confirmed the value of the standard treatment duration of 24 weeks. Shorter treatments exposed the patients to a greater risk of relapse. For genotype 1, it was possible to offer a shorter, 24-week course of treatment to the 35% of patients with an initial viral load below 600,000 IU/mL and an early virological response (EVR) at week 4 (negative PCR), resulting in an SVR of 89%. For the remaining two-thirds of genotype 1 patients with a high viral load, the treatment duration should remain at 48 weeks. A subgroup of patients - the "slow virological responders" (positive PCR at week 12 but with less than 6000 IU/mL; negative PCR at week 24) - benefited from the extension of the treatment to 72 weeks, with an SVR of 88%. For patients infected with genotype 4 virus, combination therapy should feature a ribavirin dose of more than 1000 mg/day for an optimal duration of 48 weeks.

Interferon-based therapy of hepatitis C

In 2007, the world celebrated the 50th anniversary of the discovery of interferon (IFN). The first clinical trial of recombinant IFN-alpha in patients with chronic hepatitis C was published in 1986. This article reviews the classification of IFNs, IFN production during viral infections, IFN signaling pathways and the mechanisms of their antiviral and immunomodulatory properties. Hepatitis C virus infection treatment is currently based on the combination of pegylated IFN-alpha and ribavirin. The pegylated IFN-alpha molecules are described, as well as the putative mechanisms of action of ribavirin. Current treatment guidelines are discussed and new results suggesting that the treatment schedule should be tailored to the early virological response during therapy are presented. Finally, insights into new hepatitis C drug developments are given.

Peginterferon alfa-2b and weight-based or flat-dose ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients: a randomized trial

This prospective, multicenter, community-based and academic-based, open-label, investigator-initiated, U.S. study evaluated efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa-2b plus a flat or weight-based dose of ribavirin (RBV) in adults with chronic hepatitis C. Patients (n = 5027) were randomly assigned to receive PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.5 microg/kg/week plus flat-dose (800 mg/day) or weight-based (800-1400 mg/day) RBV for 48 weeks (patients with genotype 1, 4, 5, or 6) and for 24 or 48 weeks (genotype 2/3 patients). Primary end point was sustained virologic response (undetectable [<125 IU/mL] serum hepatitis C virus RNA at 24-week follow-up). Sustained virologic response, but not end-of-treatment, rates were significantly higher with weight-based than with flat-dose RBV (44.2% versus 40.5%; P = 0.008). Sustained virologic response rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 34.0% and 28.9%, respectively, in genotype 1 patients (P = 0.005) and 31.2% and 26.7%, respectively, in genotype 1 patients with high baseline viral load (P = 0.056). In genotype 2/3 patients, rates were not significantly different (61.8% and 59.5%, respectively) regardless of treatment duration. Besides greater hemoglobin reductions with weight-based RBV, safety profiles were similar across RBV dosing groups, including the 1400-mg/day group.

CONCLUSION

PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus weight-based RBV is more effective than flat-dose RBV, particularly in genotype 1 patients, providing equivalent efficacy across all weight groups. RBV 1400 mg/day is appropriate for patients 105 to 125 kg. For genotype 2/3 patients, 24 weeks of treatment with flat-dose RBV is adequate; no evidence of additional benefit of extending treatment to 48 weeks was demonstrated.

Prognostic significance of hepatitis C virus RNA detection by transcription-mediated amplification with negative polymerase chain reaction during therapy with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin

The lower limit of detection of most polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is 50 IU/ml, compared to 5 IU/ml for the transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) method. We retrospectively reviewed 57 patients to assess the predictive value of a positive TMA in the setting of a negative PCR during antiviral therapy. Patients were divided into (1) PCR-/TMA+ (discordant; n=21) and (2) PCR-/TMA-(concordant; n=36). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was decreased in the discordant group (48% vs. 75%; P=0.04). In discordant patients, SVR was more frequent in patients who had one positive TMA than in those who had two or more positive TMAs or one positive TMA and recurrent HCV RNA detectability by PCR during treatment (78% vs. 25%; P=0.03). Breakthrough occurred more frequently in discordant patients (24% vs. 3%; P=0.02). A positive TMA on two or more occasions in patients who have become PCR-negative on therapy indicates a high likelihood of treatment failure.

Which patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C can benefit from prolonged treatment with the 'accordion' regimen?

The on-treatment virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy is a useful tool in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The time at which hepatitis C virus RNA becomes undetectable by a sensitive PCR assay has a huge impact on the probability of achieving a sustained virological response, particularly in genotype 1 patients, and may be useful in selecting patients for prolonged therapy. Indiscriminate extension of treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 is not beneficial. However, there is a subgroup of patients - the so-called 'slow responders' - who benefit from extending treatment from 48 to 72 weeks and can be readily identified after 4-12 weeks of combination therapy. Thus, it is important to distinguish slow responders from null responders. In the TeraVIC-4 study virological relapse rates were significantly lower, and sustained virological response rates were significantly higher, in those treated for 72 weeks with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin (45% vs. 32% with 48 weeks, P=0.014). Patients are best served by quantitative determination of the hepatitis C virus RNA level at weeks 4, 12 and 24. The results of these determinations can then be used to tailor the length of therapy.

Peg-interferon alone or combined with ribavirin in HCV cirrhosis with portal hypertension: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Risks and benefits of antiviral therapy in HCV cirrhosis with portal hypertension are poorly known.

METHODS

We performed a randomized controlled trial in 102 HCV patients with compensated cirrhosis and portal hypertension: 51 received 1 microg/kg/week of Pegylated-interferon alpha-2b and 51 Pegylated-interferon plus 800 mg/day of ribavirin up to 52 weeks.

RESULTS

By intention-to-treat analysis, five patients on monotherapy and eleven on combination therapy achieved a sustained virological response (9.8% vs. 21.6%, p=0.06). The response was more frequent for genotypes 2 or 3 than genotype 1 (66.6% vs. 11.3%, p=0.001). Genotype 1, who had low viral load at start of therapy, were HCV-RNA negative at 4 weeks, and were adherent to the scheduled therapy had a higher probability of sustained virological response. Patients with sustained virological response had less disease events compared to nonresponders (6.2% vs. 38.3%, p=0.03 by log rank test) during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In HCV cirrhosis with portal hypertension Peg-interferon plus ribavirin is a feasible treatment. Although the rate of viral eradication is modest, tailoring by genotype and early viral response allows to keep patients on treatment who are more likely to have viral eradication. Patients with viral eradication have fewer disease complications during follow-up.

Lack of Rapid Virological Response Predicts Interferon-α2b/Ribavirin Therapy failure in HCV Genotype 2 Patients: A Single-Centre Study

Background

A minority of patients with HCV-2 chronic hepatitis does not attain a sustained virological response to interferon-based therapies. Registration trials have failed to identify the real proportion of HCV-2 non-responders, and predictors of non-response. The analysis of ‘real-life’ HCV-2 patients might help define the effectiveness of anti-HCV therapy and the role of response moderators.

Methods

A re-analysis of all treatment-naive HCV-2 patients who consecutively received weight-dosed ribavirin with either 3 MU three times a week standard interferon-α2b or 1.5 μg/kg/week pegylated interferon-α2b.

Results

The 94 interferon-treated patients and the 136 pegylated-interferon-treated patients were comparable for demography, prevalence of cirrhosis (25%) and adherence to therapy (74%). By intention-to-treat analysis, the overall sustained virological response rate was 80% (82% interferon versus 78% pegylated interferon). Overall, sustained virological rates were 83% for the 182 patients who cleared HCV RNA at week 4 (rapid virological response) and 52% for the 48 who did not ( P<0.001). The corresponding week 12 figures of HCV RNA clearance were 90% and 32%, respectively ( P<0.001). Sustained response was independent of gender, age, body mass index, modality of infection, duration and severity of liver disease, adherence to therapy and interferon type. After stratification for interferon type, the only treatment failure predictor was persistence of HCV RNA at week 4 and 12.

Conclusions

Despite the prevalence of moderators of treatment outcome, HCV-2 patients showed as high sustained virological response rates as those reported in registration trials for HCV-2 and HCV-3 pooled patients; pegylated interferon therapy failure was predicted by lack of rapid virological response.

Evaluating the cost of sustained virologic response in naïve chronic hepatitis C patients treated à la carte

BACKGROUND

There is a tendency to individualize treatment in chronic hepatitis C patients depending on viral load and rapid clearance of HCV-RNA.

AIM

To evaluate the cost (euro, 2006) per sustained virologic response in naïve patients with therapy à la carte compared with standard combination therapy.

METHODS

A decision analysis model was used to compare standard therapy with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin for 24 weeks for genotype (G) 2/3, and 48 weeks for G1 and therapy à la carte with the same drugs but different durations: G1 high viral load for 48 weeks, G1 low viral load with rapid virologic response for 24 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 48 weeks, and G2/3 with rapid virologic response for 12 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Sustained virologic response was similar in both strategies. The cost per successfully treated patient for standard therapy is 17,812 euros and for therapy à la carte 12,313 euros. Assuming that 13,309 patients with standard therapy and 14,450 patients with therapy à la carte achieve sustained virologic response, therapy à la carte has an overall cost-saving of 59.13 million euros.

CONCLUSION

Therapy à la carte is a cost-saving strategy for chronic hepatitis C infection compared to standard therapy, with lower investment requirement per patient to achieve sustained virologic response.

The cost-effectiveness of the new protocol reflecting rapid virologic response to peginterferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have reported the effectiveness of shorter courses of treatment with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C, who achieved a rapid virologic response (RVR), defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV-) RNA at week 4. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the new protocol for treatment, from the perspective of RVR.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis based on the rate of sustained virologic response was performed. A Markov cohort model of hepatitis C was constructed to demonstrate the clinical states on the basis of the assigned transition probabilities over 30 years. The treatment strategies were classified into five subgroups taking into consideration the viral genotypes, viral load, and RVR. The lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared between the new and standard protocols for treatment.

RESULTS

Genotype 1-infected patients in the new protocol for treatment compared with the standard one could prolong QALYs by 0.33 and reduce lifetime cost by euro 5993. Genotype 2 or 3-infected patients in the new protocol for treatment compared with the standard one could prolong QALYs by 0.02 and reduce lifetime cost by euro2851.

CONCLUSION

Treatment strategies that consider viral load and RVR for patients with a low viral load infected with genotype 1 and those infected with genotype 2 or 3 are more cost-effective compared with the standard protocol for treatment.

Current and Future Hepatitis C Therapies

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients has evolved significantly in the past 15 years. With a better knowledge of viral kinetics and molecular virology of the hepatitis C virus, we have gone from a low chance of viral eradication to a chance as high as 50%. Despite this, current therapies are not ideal and are associated with side effects, complications, and poor patient tolerability. Therefore, an urgent need to look for better strategies to treat this disease is imperative. Thanks to the current knowledge and ongoing research, we know the way we treat hepatitis C today will change dramatically in the next 5-10 years. This review will focus on current therapies for hepatitis C and the most recent advances in the search for new therapies.

Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 16 or 24 weeks in HCV genotype 2 or 3

BACKGROUND

Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 or 3 have sustained virologic response rates of approximately 80% after receiving treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin for 24 weeks. We conducted a large, randomized, multinational, noninferiority trial to determine whether similar efficacy could be achieved with only 16 weeks of treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 1469 patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 to receive 180 mug of peginterferon alfa-2a weekly, plus 800 mg of ribavirin daily, for either 16 or 24 weeks. A sustained virologic response was defined as an undetectable serum HCV RNA level (<50 IU per milliliter) 24 weeks after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

The study failed to demonstrate that the 16-week regimen was noninferior to the 24-week regimen. The sustained virologic response rate was significantly lower in patients treated for 16 weeks than in patients treated for 24 weeks (62% vs. 70%; odds ratio for 16 weeks vs. 24 weeks, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.84; P<0.001). In addition, the rate of relapse (a detectable HCV RNA level during follow-up in patients who had undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment) was significantly greater in the 16-week group (31%, vs. 18% in the 24-week group; P<0.001). The sustained virologic response rates in patients with a pretreatment serum HCV RNA level of 400,000 IU per milliliter or less was 82% with the 16-week regimen and 81% with the 24-week regimen. Among patients with a rapid virologic response (an undetectable HCV RNA level by week 4), sustained virologic response rates were 79% in the 16-week group and 85% in the 24-week group (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin for 16 weeks in patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 results in a lower overall sustained virologic response rate than treatment with the standard 24-week regimen. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00077636 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Productivity improvements in hepatitis C treatment: impact on efficacy, cost, cost-effectiveness and quality of life

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C has advanced considerably during the past 15 years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different key developments from a health-economic perspective.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Costs and health-related quality-of-life data from a follow-up of Swedish patients treated for hepatitis C in clinical practice were used together with clinical trial data and natural history data in order to create a mathematical model that could be used to evaluate the advancement in hepatitis C therapy. The efficacy of treatment, costs and cost-effectiveness were evaluated for both current as well as proposed treatment strategies. A sensitivity analysis was used to assess how results were affected when key variables changed.

RESULTS

Current genotype-guided pegylated interferon and ribavirin is a cost-effective treatment strategy. A proposed treatment strategy involving a reduction in the length of treatment for certain patient subgroups with genotypes 1, 2 and 3, as well as an increase in the length of treatment for patients with genotype 1 and slow virological response was estimated to be a cost-effective future treatment alternative. These results were insensitive to changes in costs and risks associated with chronic hepatitis.

CONCLUSION

Although the costs for treatment of hepatitis C have increased significantly over the past decade, the improvements have provided the health-care system with cost-effective options in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

The effect of age on response to therapy with peginterferon alpha plus ribavirin in a cohort of patients with chronic HCV hepatitis including subjects older than 65 yr

OBJECTIVES

In many industrialized countries HCV infection is characterized by an increasing prevalence during ageing; however, data on the efficacy of treatment among older patients are scarce. This study was set up to evaluate the effect of age on the treatment of chronic HCV hepatitis with peginterferon alpha plus ribavirin.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 153 adult patients with chronic HCV hepatitis treated with combination therapy; 30 of them (19.6%) were 65 years of age or older.

RESULTS

In multivariable analysis, age groups >/=40 years had similar odds of achieving sustained virologic response (P= 0.71) and significantly lower odds of sustained response compared with younger patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.59, P= 0.006; OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.49, P= 0.002; OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.91, P= 0.037 for patients aged 40-49 years, 50-64 years, and older than 64 years, respectively). The effect of age was present in the 74 patients infected with genotype 1 or 4 (P= 0.04), while among the 79 patients with genotype 2 or 3 sustained virologic response rates were relatively uniform, with no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of good response to combination treatment with peginterferon alpha plus ribavirin is decreased for patients aged more than 40 years infected with genotype 1 or 4, but patients aged more than 65 had a similar rate of response to those aged 40-64 years. Combination treatment may be safely extended to elderly patients with no major contraindications.

Hepatitis C virus: Virology, diagnosis and management of antiviral therapy

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects approximately 170 million individuals worldwide. Prevention of HCV infection complications is based on antiviral therapy with the combination of pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin. The use of serological and virological tests has become essential in the management of HCV infection in order to diagnose infection, guide treatment decisions and assess the virological response to antiviral therapy. Anti-HCV antibody testing and HCV RNA testing are used to diagnose acute and chronic hepatitis C. The HCV genotype should be systematically determined before treatment, as it determines the indication, the duration of treatment, the dose of ribavirin and the virological monitoring procedure. HCV RNA monitoring during therapy is used to tailor treatment duration in HCV genotype 1 infection, and molecular assays are used to assess the end-of-treatment and, most importantly the sustained virological response, i.e. the endpoint of therapy.

Treatment uptake and outcomes among current and former injection drug users receiving directly observed therapy within a multidisciplinary group model for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection

Injection drug use accounts for the majority of incident and prevalent cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, very few injection drug users (IDUs) have received treatment for this condition given issues of medical or psychiatric co-morbidity, ongoing substance abuse and a widely held belief that such individuals will not be able to adhere to the requirements of therapy, including regular medical follow-up. With this in mind, we sought to evaluate HCV treatment uptake and outcomes among current and former IDUs attending a weekly peer support group and receiving directly observed HCV therapy. Utilizing the existing infrastructure for the management of addictive disease, we have developed a model of "one-stop shopping" whereby the treatment of addiction, HCV and other medical conditions are fully integrated, with the collaboration of nurses, counsellors, addiction specialists, infectious disease specialists, primary care physicians and researchers. Subjects interested in receiving treatment for HCV infection were referred to a weekly peer-support group and evaluated for treatment. Patients received therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha2a or -alpha2b, both in combination with ribavirin. All injections were directly observed. Overall, we observed a high uptake of HCV treatment among attendees, with 51 percent either receiving or about to receive therapy. To date, 18 patients have initiated treatment for HCV infection and 12 have completed therapy. Overall, 8/12 (67 percent) subjects achieved an end of treatment response (genotype 1, 67 percent; genotypes 2/3, 67 percent), despite ongoing drug use in 75 percent of patients during treatment. These data demonstrate that with the appropriate programs in place, a high uptake of HCV treatment can be achieved among IDUs referred to a peer-support group. Moreover, the treatment of HCV in current and former IDUs within a multidisciplinary DOT program can be successfully undertaken, resulting in ETRs similar to those reported in randomized controlled trials.

Current therapy for hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION

Pegylated interferon alfa in combination with ribavirin has been established as standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with sustained virologic response rates of 54-63%. The duration of therapy depends on the HCV genotype with currently 48 weeks for genotype 1 and 24 weeks for genotypes 2 and 3.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The probability of sustained virologic response is very low (<1-2%) in genotype-1-infected patients without a 2-log decline of HCV RNA concentration after 12 weeks of therapy, and treatment can therefore be discontinued early.

CONCLUSION

Efficient treatment of the multiple side-effects of interferon-based antiviral therapy is essential in order to improve compliance, prevent dose reduction or early discontinuation and therefore enhance the probability of sustained response. Future developments of interferon-based therapy aim at the individualisation of the duration of therapy according to the kinetics of viral reduction. Furthermore, direct antiviral drugs, which are currently under investigation in phase I/II clinical trials, will fundamentally expand the treatment options of HCV infection in the next few years.

Short-duration therapy for hepatitis C: suitable for all?

Peginterferon alpha (PegIFN alpha) plus ribavirin achieves sustained virological response (SVR) in more than 50% of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although in the trials which led to the registration of this combination therapy, only a 48-week period of treatment had been evaluated, current international guidelines state that 48 or 24 weeks of treatment should be recommended in accordance with genotype; i.e. 48 weeks for genotypes 1 and 4, and 24 weeks for 2 and 3. However, side effects and the high cost of antiviral therapy forced investigators to evaluate further reductions in the treatment duration. Based on the new evidence that fast and persistent viral clearance is highly predictive of SVR, a week 4 negative HCV RNA by a sensitive molecular assay was recently utilized as a criterion for halving the duration of treatment to 12-16 weeks for genotypes 2 and 3, and 24 weeks for genotype 1 patients. However, some issues on this topic, are still open. In this review, existing evidence is discussed, and both the relevance and limitations of published studies are considered.

A randomised study of peginterferon and ribavirin for 16 versus 24 weeks in patients with genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The recommended treatment for patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 (HCV2) is pegylated interferon (peginterferon) and ribavirin for 24 weeks.

AIM

To assess whether a shorter 16-week treatment is as effective as a standard 24-week treatment.

METHODS

Patients with HCV2 infection were randomised in a 1:2 ratio to either 16 weeks (n = 50) or 24 weeks (n = 100) of treatment with peginterferon alpha-2a (180 mug/week) and weight-based ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day, with a 24-week follow-up period. A rapid virological response (RVR) was defined as seronegative for HCV RNA at 4 weeks of treatment, and the primary end point, sustained virological response (SVR), as seronegative for HCV RNA at the 24-week follow-up.

RESULTS

The rate of RVR and SVR was 86% (43/50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 76% to 96%) and 94% (47/50, CI 87% to 100%), respectively, in the 16-week group, which was comparable to 87% (87/100, CI 80% to 94%) and 95% (95/100, CI 91% to 99%) in the 24-week group. Patients with RVR had a significantly higher SVR rate than patients without RVR in both 16-week (100% vs 57%, p = 0.015) and 24-week groups (98% vs 77%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that RVR and age were independent factors associated with SVR. Both treatment arms were equally well tolerated. The incidence of alopecia was significantly higher in the 24-week group (49%) than in the 16-week group (20%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

16 weeks and 24 weeks of peginterferon treatment with weight-based ribavirin at a dose of 1000-1200 mg/day provided equal efficacy in patients with HCV2 who achieved RVR at 4 weeks.

Induction versus noninduction antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus in patients with congenital coagulation disorders: a Canadian multicentre trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with congenital coagulation disorders and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have multiple risk factors (ie, infection predominantly with genotype-1 HCV, long duration of the disease, HIV coinfection and male sex) for poor response to antiviral therapy. The present study compared induction therapy with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha)-2b with standard IFN-alpha2b therapy. Pegylated IFN was not available at the time that the study was initiated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized study was performed comparing the efficacy of traditional IFN-alpha2b therapy (group A -- three million units, three times weekly for 24 to 48 weeks) and daily ribavirin (1.0 g to 1.2 g according to weight for 24 to 48 weeks), with induction IFN-alpha2b therapy (group B -- three million units, daily for eight weeks followed by the same dose administered three times a week for a further 16 to 40 weeks) and daily ribavirin (same dose as above) in IFN-naive patients with congenital coagulation disorders and chronic HCV infection.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2003, 54 HIV-negative patients were recruited and randomly assigned to group A or B (n=27 each). Both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, baseline HCV RNA titre, viral genotype, liver fibrosis stage and type of coagulation disorder. Induction therapy did not significantly alter sustained virological response rates (group A 50%, group B 50%; P=1.0). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that induction therapy did not benefit individuals with difficult-to-treat infection (ie, those infected with genotypes 1 and 4, or those with high baseline viral loads).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no benefit with induction antiviral therapy for HCV infection in individuals with congenital coagulation disorders.

Changing treatment paradigms: hepatitis C virus in HIV-infected patients

The evaluation of hepatic histology and treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-coinfected patients is rapidly changing. HCV has become an important cause of mortality in HIV-infected patients. Consequently, assessment of liver histology in all coinfected patients is particularly important. The evaluation of hepatic histology is shifting from reliance on the liver biopsy toward noninvasive modalities. Additionally, the importance of HCV-associated morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients has prompted increasing numbers of these patients to be HCV treatment candidates. Prospective trials in coinfected patients have reported lower sustained virologic responses compared to HCV-monoinfected patients. Consequently, the numbers of coinfected nonresponders to pegylated interferon/ribavirin continues to increase. Because none of the presently available treatment modalities for pegylated interferon/ribavirin nonresponders are clearly efficacious, management decisions must be individualized. The options include, HCV-specific medications, maintenance therapy, the use of alternative interferon formulations, and observation. HCV-specific agents, particularly protease and polymerase inhibitors, show early promise in HCV-monoinfected individuals. Their use in coinfected patients, however, is likely to be delayed for several years, and they are likely to be used in combination with interferon. Low-dose pegylated interferon, administered in an attempt to slow fibrosis progression (maintenance therapy), is being evaluated in several large prospective trials in monoinfected and coinfected patients. Observation may be best for nonresponders with relatively mild hepatic histology. In summary, HCV treatment will likely follow the example forged by HIV. In the near future, combinations of different drugs will likely be used simultaneously to result in durable viral suppression.

Utility of week-4 viral response to tailor treatment duration in hepatitis C virus genotype 3/HIV co-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utility of a week-4 virological response for sustained response prediction in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3/HIV-co-infected patients treated with interferon and ribavirin for 24 weeks.

METHODS

Using a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based quantitative assay (COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS-TaqMan 48; Roche Diagnostics) we retrospectively analysed samples obtained at baseline and weeks 4 and 12 from a subset of 35 HCV genotype 3-HIV co-infected patients enrolled in a randomized comparative trial of peginterferon alpha-2b versus interferon alpha-2b both in combination with ribavirin.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis, 78% of patients treated with peginterferon and 53% of those receiving standard interferon achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) Overall, at 4 weeks, 49% of patients had HCV RNA < 50 IU/ml and 63% had < 600 IU/ml. Of these rapid responders 88 and 86% achieved a SVR, respectively, with only one patient relapsing among end-of-treatment responders. In contrast, only 44 and 31% of patients with a week-4 HCV RNA >or= 50 or >or= 600 IU/ml achieved an SVR, respectively, with relapse rates of 33 and 50%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis a serum HCV RNA level below 600 IU/ml at week 4 was the strongest independent predictor of SVR (odds ratio, 11.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 75.0; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Monitoring early viral response may be useful to tailor the duration of treatment among patients with HCV genotype 3/HIV-co-infection. Patients whose HCV RNA falls below 600 IU/ml at 4 weeks are at low risk of relapse after 24 weeks of combination therapy.

A short course of pegylated interferon-alpha in acute HCV hepatitis

Acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection evolves to chronicity in 50-84% cases. Treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) was repeatedly found to provide sustained cure rates higher than that in chronic HCV infection, but the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been defined. In a multicentre open-label study, we investigated the therapeutic performance of a short course of pegylated (peg) IFN-alpha in patients with acute HCV hepatitis. Peg IFN-alpha2b, 1.0-1.5 micro g/kg weekly, was administered for 12 weeks. Forty-six patients were enrolled; 26 of them were intravenous drug users. Eleven patients had jaundice. Treatment was started within 1-90 days from the peak alanine aminotransferase. Treatment was well tolerated with a single dropout (2%). Thirty-three of 46 patients (72%) had a sustained virological response (SVR) after a 6 months post-treatment follow-up, 8 (17%) relapsed after treatment and 4 were nonresponders (9%). A lower peak viraemia, receiving at least 1.2 micro g/kg of peg IFN-alpha, and a negative HCV-RNA at week 4 and week 12 were predictors of SVR. Thus, in patients with early (week 4) viral response, a short course of peg IFN-alpha at a weekly dose >1.2 micro g/kg, may be a valuable option for the treatment of acute HCV hepatitis.

Short-term therapy for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3 infection

In the past 10 years, progress has been made in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C. A sustained virological response (SVR) is achieved in 80-85% of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 or 3 after 24 weeks of treatment with peginterferon-alpha and ribavirin. Treatment durations <24 weeks have been investigated to determine whether shorter-term therapy reduces adverse effects and costs compared with longer-term therapy without compromising efficacy. Three studies involving only patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3, with different baseline patient characteristics have shown that 12-16 weeks of treatment can be as effective as 24 weeks of treatment. In all three trials, undetectable HCV RNA 4 weeks after the start of treatment was defined as rapid virological response (RVR), and only patients with RVR stopped treatment early. In the first trial, 75% of patients treated with peginterferon-alpha-2b and ribavirin achieved RVR; these rapid responders achieved an SVR rate of 90% after 14 weeks of treatment. In the second trial, 63% of patients achieved RVR after 4 weeks of treatment with peginterferon-alpha-2b and ribavirin, and 85% of patients with RVR achieved SVR after 12 weeks of treatment. In comparison, 91% of patients with RVR treated for 24 weeks had SVR. In the third study, 93% of the total study population achieved RVR and were randomly assigned to 16 or 24 weeks of treatment with peginterferon-alpha-2a and ribavirin. Among patients with RVR, 85% in the group treated for 16 weeks and 80% in the group treated for 24 weeks achieved SVR. Among patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3, achieving an RVR to interferon-based treatment is common and a criterion to reduce the duration of treatment. In patients with genotype 2 and RVR, 12 weeks of therapy with peginterferon-alpha and ribavirin is recommended. For patients with genotype 3, a univocal recommendation on treatment duration cannot be made. However, ongoing trials will probably clarify this aspect.

Present and future therapy for hepatitis C virus

The treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has developed enormously over recent years. Early treatment of acute HCV infection with interferon-alpha can prevent chronicity and a significant proportion of patients with chronic HCV can be cured with the current standard therapy consisting of pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin. However, the improvement of current treatment regimens and the development of new antiviral drugs will be essential within the next few years. This review focuses on the present and future concepts for treating HCV infection, including prevention of infection, antiviral therapy of acute and chronic HCV and the management of patients after liver transplantation.

Hepatitis C treatment of opioid dependants receiving maintenance treatment: results of a Norwegian pilot study

BACKGROUND

Many physicians are still skeptic to treat opioid dependants, with or without maintenance treatment, for hepatitis C (HCV) because of concerns about psychiatric comorbidity, stability and adherence. In Norway, there are about 3,500 patients participating in the restrictive medication-assisted rehabilitation (LAR) programs in which all patients are given methadone or buprenorphine maintenance therapy. This study was undertaken to determine whether HCV combination therapy with pegylated interferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin is feasible, efficient and safe in this patient group.

METHOD

Seventeen patients with HCV genotype 3a were treated for 24 weeks. To optimize compliance, the treatment was given from a department of infectious diseases in cooperation with an LAR center. All injections were given in the LAR center and the patients were given psychosocial support.

RESULTS

The compliance was 100%. All responded to the therapy and 16 (94%) were sustained responders.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This study indicates that compliance and treatment outcome of opioid dependants on methadone or buprenorphine maintenance after 24 weeks of HCV treatment corresponds to that for non-dependants if extra support is given. The treatment should be undertaken in collaboration with specialists in addiction medicine, hepatology and infectious diseases.

Customizing treatment to patient populations

Combination treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is the most effective therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV); however, responses are less than optimal in some subpopulations of patients. Emerging insights are suggesting that viral kinetics can be used to predict response. The rapidity of response has been shown to be a more important predictor of sustained virologic response than the duration of therapy. In patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3, shorter durations of treatment might be sufficient in rapid responders and could minimize the risk of toxic effects. Weight-based dosing of ribavirin has emerged as another important consideration. This strategy seems to be most important for difficult-to-treat patients with HCV genotype 1 or advanced fibrosis, and for African-Americans, and is possibly important for patients who have genotype 3 and a high viral load. Re-treatment of nonresponders with interferon-based therapy has been associated with low rates of sustained virologic response. Consensus interferon might offer a new option for patients who do not achieve an early treatment response to standard or pegylated interferon plus ribavirin.

Hepatic histologic response (HR) to combination therapy among HCV/HIV-coinfected individuals: interferon induces HR independent of sustained virologic response (SVR)

Most HIV/HCV-coinfected patients fail to achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) to peginterferon-ribavirin therapy. We examined the hepatic histologic response (HR), defined as an improvement in hepatic inflammation scores of two points or more, to combination therapy among HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects. An open label prospective trial treated 32 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with peginterferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for 48 weeks. Liver biopsies, scored by a single pathologist using the Histology Activity Index (HAI, range 0-18) and Ishak fibrosis scores (range 0-6), were performed before and after treatment. Gene expression profiles of PBMCs were performed using Affymetrix U133A gene chips. A total of 87% of SVR subjects and 88% of nonresponders (NR) had an HR, but no significant change in the liver fibrosis scores was observed (p > 0.05). For genotype 1 patients, a baseline fibrosis score </=2 was related to a higher likelihood of SVR than those with a score >2 (p = 0.012). Combination therapy for HCV among HIV-coinfected subjects resulted in a modest SVR rate. Persons with mild liver disease had a better SVR rate, suggesting early treatment may be beneficial. Combination therapy resulted in an HR for most of the patients, however, further follow-up of these patients will determine the durability of such an HR.

Outcome of Chronic Hepatitis C Patients who Required Early Termination of Pegylated Interferon-α plus Ribavirin Combination Therapy

Background

Pegylated interferon/ribavirin (peg-IFN/RBV) combination therapy is effective for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) but frequently causes adverse events, leading to early termination. Little is known about the outcome of CHC patients who required early termination.

Methods

Of 617 treatment-naive CHC patients prescribed a 24-week protocol of peg-IFN/RBV, 29 (4.7%) patients who terminated treatment early at <20 weeks were recruited to evaluate the rate of and the factors associated with sustained virological response (SVR), defined as seronegativity of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA throughout the 24-week off-treatment follow-up period.

Results

The reasons for early termination were flu-like symptoms/signs ( n=9, 31.0%), irritability ( n=1, 3.4%), severe urticaria ( n=1, 3.4%), insomnia ( n=2, 6.9%), pulmonary tuberculosis ( n=1, 3.4%), suicide idea ( n=2, 6.9%), poor response ( n=2, 6.9%), depression ( n=2, 6.9%), unwilling to continue ( n=1, 3.4%), mortality ( n=1, 3.4%), gastrointestinal upset ( n=1, 3.4%), pancytopenia complicated with cellulitis ( n=1, 3.4%), anaemia ( n=3, 10.3%), overseas work ( n=1, 3.4%) and an unknown cause ( n=1, 3.4%). Five (17.2%) patients achieved an SVR, comprising none of 16 HCV genotype-1 and five of the 13 (38.5%) genotype-2 patients ( P=0.001). All sustained responders were HCV RNA seronegative at week 4 of treatment. The SVR rate among HCV-2 patients was 0% (0/1), 0% (0/2), 25% (1/4), 33% (1/3) and 100% (3/3) in those who received peg-IFN/RBV for 1–3, 4–7, 8–11, 12–15 and 16–19 weeks, respectively ( P=0.019, χ2 with linear trend).

Conclusions

Based on this limited study, we observed that an SVR might be achieved in patients who required early termination of a 24-week regimen of peg-IFN/RBV, especially for HCV-2 patients with HCV RNA seronegativity at week 4.

Optimizing treatment regimens in hepatitis C

Scientists and clinicians have made tremendous advances in understanding the pathogenesis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and have developed impressive strategies for treating this hepatotropic virus in the short time since its discovery in 1989. This article goes beyond the current guidelines for the treatment of HCV infection to examine the use of multiple pretreatment factors to predict response; the use of viral kinetics to guide length of treatment; higher dose ribavirin in genotype 1 infection; retreatment of non responders and relapsers; and improving adherence to therapy.

Management and treatment of hepatitis C viral infection: recommendations from the Department of Veterans Affairs Hepatitis C Resource Center program and the National Hepatitis C Program office

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects approximately 1.3% of the general U.S. population and 5-10% of veterans who use Department of Veterans Affairs medical services. Chronic HCV is clearly linked to the development of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation. The consequences of HCV infection constitute a significant disease burden and demonstrate the need for effective medical care. Treatment of chronic HCV is aimed at slowing disease progression, preventing complications of cirrhosis, reducing the risk of HCC, and treating extrahepatic complications of the virus. As part of a comprehensive approach to HCV management, antiviral therapy with peginterferon alfa combined with ribavirin is the current standard of care. Antiviral therapy should be provided to those individuals who meet criteria for treatment and who are at greatest risk for progressive liver disease. Many of these patients may have comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions, which may worsen while on antiviral therapy. Current antiviral regimens are associated with significant adverse effects that can lead to noncompliance, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation. To overcome these barriers and to address these issues, it has become crucial to facilitate a multidisciplinary team who can respond to and provide HCV-specific care and treatment. Screening for HCV, preventing transmission, delaying disease progression, ensuring appropriate antiviral therapy, and managing treatment-related adverse effects can improve patient quality of life, treatment adherence, and ultimately, improve patient outcomes.

Short-term treatment duration for HCV-2 and HCV-3 infected patients

BACKGROUND

We have shown that 12-14 weeks treatment is effective in HCV-2 or -3 patients with undetectable HCV-RNA after 4 weeks of therapy (rapid virologic response).

PATIENTS

To identify predictors of sustained virologic response, rapid virologic response and relapse following short treatment, we pooled data from the original Italian and Norwegian studies. Four hundreds and three patients were treated with PegIFN alpha-2b (1.0, n=281 or 1.5 microg/kg, n=122) and ribavirin (800-1200 mg) for 12-14 or 24 weeks, depending on negative or positive HCV-RNA at week 4.

RESULTS

Sustained virologic response differed between cases with and without rapid virologic response (85% versus 62%, P<0.0001), mild and severe fibrosis (83% versus 67%, P=0.004), and HCV-2 and -3 (81% versus 73%, P=0.05). In a regression model, RVR (odds ratio 3.49, confidence interval 1.73-5.36) and mild fibrosis (odds ratio 2.91, confidence interval 1.57-5.38) independently predicted sustained virologic response. Rapid virologic response was obtained in 274 (68%) patients, 163/242 (67%) HCV-2, and 111/161 (69%) HCV-3. Patients with RVR had more frequently mild fibrosis (70% versus 54%, P=0.03), and high PegIFN dose (78% versus 64%, P=0.005). In a regression model, mild fibrosis independently predicted rapid virologic response (odds ratio 1.87, confidence interval 1.10-3.16). In rapid virologic response patients, sustained virologic response was achieved in 85% of both HCV-2 and -3. Virologic relapse was observed in 10.6% rapid virologic response patients and was more frequent among those with low ALT (14% versus 2%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

In HCV-2 or -3, the HCV-RNA status after 4 weeks of therapy may guide treatment duration. HCV-2 and HCV-3 patients with severe fibrosis are less likely to experience both rapid virologic response and sustained virologic response, and more frequently relapse after a 12 or 14 weeks duration of antiviral therapy.

Clinical virology of hepatitis C virus

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects approximately 170 million individuals worldwide. Prevention of HCV-infection complications is based on antiviral therapy with the combination of pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin. The use of serological and virological tests has become essential in the management of HCV infection. These tests diagnose infection, guide treatment decisions and assess the virological response to antiviral therapy. Anti-HCV antibody testing and HCV-RNA testing are used to diagnose acute and chronic hepatitis C. The HCV genotype should be systematically determined before treatment, as it determines the indication, duration of treatment, dose of ribavirin and virological monitoring procedure. HCV-RNA monitoring during therapy is used to tailor treatment duration in HCV genotype 1 infection, and molecular assays are used to assess the end-of-treatment and, most importantly, the sustained virological response, for example the end point of therapy.